ML22193A314

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
2021 Quad-Cities Ile ES-201-2 Outline Quality Checklist
ML22193A314
Person / Time
Site: Quad Cities  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 04/07/2021
From: Randy Baker
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:
Exelon Generation Co
Baker R
Shared Package
ML20139A013 List:
References
Download: ML22193A314 (1)


Text

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality CheckRat Fonn ES-201-2

Date of Examination:

llem Tak Deaafpllon

1. a. Verify lhat lhe outline(*) tl(t) the eppropriatlt model fn accordance with ES-401 or ES-401N.

w b. Asseu whether the outline Wll.ayltematlcally tnd. randomly prepared In accordance wllh R Section D.1 of ES-401 ar ES-401N and whether au KIA C8l8g0ries are approplllt8ly sampled.

I T c. Assea whether the oulllne overemphasizes a ny svstams, evolutlons, or generic topics.

T e d. Assea whether the justllCationa for delelected or rejected KIA ltaternenta ara appropriate.

N

2. a. Ullng Fonn Es-301-6, verify that Ille pfOPOl8d scenario sets cover the ntqUl,ed number of normal evolutlana, lnstnlrnent and component failures, technlcal speclftcationt. and major s I tnmllents.

M b. Assets whether thent arw enough acenario NII (and spares) to tat the prqected number and u mix of appllcanll In acc:ordance with the expect8d cnw compolltlon and rotation tdledule L wfthout compromlslfls exam lntegrfty, and ensure that each IPJ)llClnt can be tNtad ustng It A Intl one new or llignlftcantly modlflad scenario, that no l0IMrioa me dupllcatlld from the T appllclnts' audit tat(s), and that scanarlol wtll nat be ntpeated on IUbNQuent days.

0 c. To the extent possible,..... whether the oulllna(a) conforms with the quallallve and R quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and delcribed In Appendix D lfld In Section D.5, -Specific lnstruc:llona for the 'Simulator Operating Teal,"' of Es-301 (including overlap).

3. a. Verify that lhe systems walcthn,ugh outline meell the crltlnl 1pecfflad on Fann ES-301-2:

(1) The oulllne(a) canlalna the reqUIAld number of control room anG in-pant talks diltrl>Uted w A (2) TIiie repalllton among the safety functions as specified on the fonn.

I. (3) No tam are dllpllcated fram the last two NRC examinations is wlhln the llmlls ll)ICillld on the form.

from the appllclnl't eudltt81t(a). 0,- ~

K (4) The runblrof new ot mocllled talks ffl8III orexcaedlthe mintmrnlapecllad on the form.

T (5) The number of altemlte-path, low-power, emeivency, and radlolaglcally conttolled am H taka meets the crfterll on the form.

R b. Verify that the adminlltrltlve OUlllne meets the criteria 0 ( 1) The ta ka ara dlltrlbUled among the topics aa specified on the roan. apeclled on Fonn ES-301*1:

u (2) M leut one 111k II new or algnlllcantly modified.

C (3) No more thin ane lak Is reoeated from the last two NRC icensina H examinations.

c. DelBnnlne am>lca nts and 8ll9UJII that no il8l11a whether there are enough different outllne9 to tat the projected number and na of are dUOllca19d on subYO uent davs.
4. a. AIN8' whether plant-tpeClfic priorltlea (lndUdlng pnlbablllallc risk.....-nent and lndlvldual olant exanlnallon lntlghll) an, coverad In the te exam aec:Uons.

G b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41, 55.43, and 55.45 sampling is aDOrODrlate.

E N c. EnsuAJ that KIA tmportance ratings (except for plant-9l)t!Clflc prioritie$) are at least 2.5.

E R d. Check for duDllcation and ovarla D a mona e,cam sections and the last two NRC exams.

A L e. Check the entile exam for balance of cove rage.

f. Anna whether the exam fits the -
  • lob leveHRO or SRO>.

~ Printed Name/Signature Date

a. Author ""~~..,._J..,,, no~v r-(-,._,,<k-=:>"'-<-_> __________ _ l-?f<>_ Zvl.r
b. Facility Reviewer C, - 4aJ4 M/4 ~ / J.I.IV.:,(-ll~('~"f.,J :J*-a:~ 1
c. NRC ChiefExaminer(t) : ~~,.,:!Q~~ /J-A~ t?,,Jh-1 l,;cg;e l:{17/:Jc@J
d. NRC Supervisor Patricia J. Pelke g:,:,z;~;._~."l'i~,.~~" '
  • Not appllcable for NR(;prepanKI examination outlines.
  1. The Independent NRC reviewer Initials Items In column "c"; the chief exarniler's concurrence Is required.