ML19208A979: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:-_h-%Omaha Public Power District 1623 MARNEY t OMAHA, NEBRASKA 68102 TELEPHONE 536 4000 AREA CODE 402 September 12, 1979 Ms. Reba M. Diggs Facilities Program Coordinator License Fee Management 3 ranch Office of Administration U. S. :iuclear Regulatory Co==ission Washington D. C.20555  
{{#Wiki_filter:-
_
-%
Omaha Public Power District 1623 MARNEY   t OMAHA, NEBRASKA 68102     TELEPHONE 536 4000 AREA CODE 402 September 12, 1979 Ms. Reba M. Diggs Facilities Program Coordinator License Fee Management 3 ranch Office of Administration U. S. :iuclear Regulatory Co==ission Washington D. C. 20555


==Dear Ms. Jiggs:==
==Dear Ms. Jiggs:==


C=aha Public Pcwer District filed an " Application for Atendment of Operating License", dated May h,1979, with the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Cc==issica requesting deletion of non-radiological monitor-ing requirements from Appendix 3 of the Technical Specifications for Fort Calhoun Unit No. 1 License No. DPR-k0.
C=aha Public Pcwer District filed an " Application for Atendment of Operating License", dated May h,1979, with the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Cc==issica requesting deletion of non-radiological monitor-ing requirements from Appendix 3 of the Technical Specifications for Fort Calhoun Unit No. 1 License No. DPR-k0.         Si:.ce the Application involved caly an ad=inistrative correction by the Cc==ission in res-pense to the decision in Yellcw Creek, the Applicatien was deemed not to have any safety or environ = ental significance. Accordingly, a fee of $1,200 was enclesed. On August 1,1979, in respcase to a request frc= the Staff of the Cc==ission, the District sent a discussien of the environmental aspects of the proposed Amendment to the Co==ission, although the District continued to maintain its position that the A=endment requested relied upon a deter =ined issue of lav not in-volving environ = ental review considerations.
Si:.ce the Application involved caly an ad=inistrative correction by the Cc==ission in res-pense to the decision in Yellcw Creek, the Applicatien was deemed not to have any safety or environ = ental significance. Accordingly, a fee of $1,200 was enclesed. On August 1,1979, in respcase to a request frc= the Staff of the Cc==ission, the District sent a discussien of the environmental aspects of the proposed Amendment to the Co==ission, although the District continued to maintain its position that the A=endment requested relied upon a deter =ined issue of lav not in-volving environ = ental review considerations.
In a letter to the District, dated August ik,1979, you re-quested a further pay =ent of $2,800 since the Amendment was being reclassified as a Class III Amend =ent pursuant to 10 C.F.R. 5 170.22 since it involves " consideration of an environmental issue".           To avoid further delay in review of the Application, the District is submitting a check for $2,800 under protest. The District continues to assert that this Amendment is a Class Il A=end=ent which does not involve environ = ental, safety or other 19 sues for Cc==ission review.
In a letter to the District, dated August ik,1979, you re-quested a further pay =ent of $2,800 since the Amendment was being reclassified as a Class III Amend =ent pursuant to 10 C.F.R. 5 170.22 since it involves " consideration of an environmental issue".
It seeks merely to i=plement the Yello''. gt decision by deleting provisions based on an invalid asser' a . of N==ission jurisdicticn.
To avoid further delay in review of the Application, the District is submitting a check for $2,800 under protest. The District continues to assert that this Amendment is a Class Il A=end=ent which does not involve environ = ental, safety or other 1 sues for Cc==ission review.
                                          *'  rely.
9 It seeks merely to i=plement the Yello''. gt decision by deleting provisions based on an invalid asser' a . of N==ission jurisdicticn.
W. C. Jones Division Manager Production Operations WCJ/KJM/3JH:J==
rely.*'W.C. Jones Division Manager Production Operations WCJ/KJM/3JH:J==
F.nclos ure gg
gg F.nclos ure
                                                                                \
\cc: 23ceuf, Lamb, Leiby & MacRae ND1.o [J'Q Q s..L b$1333 New Ha=pshire Avenue , N. W.
s..
[*Washingtcn , D. C.
cc:   23ceuf, Lamb, Leiby & MacRae                                 ND1.oL[J'Q   b $
20036 7909180M5h
Q 1333 New Ha=pshire Avenue , N. W.
+}}
Washingtcn , D. C.       20036
[
* 7909180M5h
                                                                            +}}

Revision as of 15:22, 19 October 2019

Submits Addl Fee for Class III Application for Amend of License DPR-40 Under Protest.Amend Is Class II & Does Not Involve Environ Review Considerations
ML19208A979
Person / Time
Site: Fort Calhoun Omaha Public Power District icon.png
Issue date: 09/12/1979
From: William Jones
OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
To: Diggs R
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
References
NUDOCS 7909180378
Download: ML19208A979 (1)


Text

-

_

h -%

Omaha Public Power District 1623 MARNEY t OMAHA, NEBRASKA 68102 TELEPHONE 536 4000 AREA CODE 402 September 12, 1979 Ms. Reba M. Diggs Facilities Program Coordinator License Fee Management 3 ranch Office of Administration U. S. :iuclear Regulatory Co==ission Washington D. C. 20555

Dear Ms. Jiggs:

C=aha Public Pcwer District filed an " Application for Atendment of Operating License", dated May h,1979, with the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Cc==issica requesting deletion of non-radiological monitor-ing requirements from Appendix 3 of the Technical Specifications for Fort Calhoun Unit No. 1 License No. DPR-k0. Si:.ce the Application involved caly an ad=inistrative correction by the Cc==ission in res-pense to the decision in Yellcw Creek, the Applicatien was deemed not to have any safety or environ = ental significance. Accordingly, a fee of $1,200 was enclesed. On August 1,1979, in respcase to a request frc= the Staff of the Cc==ission, the District sent a discussien of the environmental aspects of the proposed Amendment to the Co==ission, although the District continued to maintain its position that the A=endment requested relied upon a deter =ined issue of lav not in-volving environ = ental review considerations.

In a letter to the District, dated August ik,1979, you re-quested a further pay =ent of $2,800 since the Amendment was being reclassified as a Class III Amend =ent pursuant to 10 C.F.R. 5 170.22 since it involves " consideration of an environmental issue". To avoid further delay in review of the Application, the District is submitting a check for $2,800 under protest. The District continues to assert that this Amendment is a Class Il A=end=ent which does not involve environ = ental, safety or other 19 sues for Cc==ission review.

It seeks merely to i=plement the Yello. gt decision by deleting provisions based on an invalid asser' a . of N==ission jurisdicticn.

  • ' rely.

W. C. Jones Division Manager Production Operations WCJ/KJM/3JH:J==

F.nclos ure gg

\

s..

cc: 23ceuf, Lamb, Leiby & MacRae ND1.oL[J'Q b $

Q 1333 New Ha=pshire Avenue , N. W.

Washingtcn , D. C. 20036

[

  • 7909180M5h

+