ML17352A640: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 5: Line 5:
| author name = Lenning E
| author name = Lenning E
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DLP/PLPB
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DLP/PLPB
| addressee name = Morey D C
| addressee name = Morey D
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR/DLP/PLPB
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR/DLP/PLPB
| docket = 99902038, PROJ0700
| docket = 99902038, PROJ0700

Revision as of 08:55, 18 June 2019

Summary of Closed Audit for the Westinghouse Electric Company Topical Report WCAP-18032-P, Revision 0 and Wcap-18032-NP, Revision 0, Calculation of Mixed Core Safety Limit Minimum Critical Power Ratio.
ML17352A640
Person / Time
Site: Westinghouse, PROJ0700
Issue date: 01/10/2018
From: Ekaterina Lenning
NRC/NRR/DLP/PLPB
To: Dennis Morey
NRC/NRR/DLP/PLPB
Lenning E
References
TAC MF9017
Download: ML17352A640 (5)


Text

January 10, 2018

MEMORANDUM TO: Dennis C. Morey, Chief Licensing Processes Branch Division of Licensing Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

FROM: Ekaterina Lenning, Project Manager

/RA/ Licensing Processes Branch Division of Licensing Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF CLOSED AUDIT FOR THE WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY TOPICAL REPORT WCAP-18032-P, REVISION 0 AND WCAP-18032-NP, REVISION 0, "CALCULATION OF

MIXED CORE SAFETY LIMIT MINIMUM CRITICAL POWER RATIO" (TAC NO. MF9017)

On October 17-18, 2017, a closed audit was conducted by U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff at the Westinghouse Electric Company (Westinghouse) in Cranberry

Township, PA, to review and discuss proprietary information related to the review of the

WCAP-18032-P, Revision 0 and WCAP-18032-NP, Revision 0, "Calculation of Mixed Core

Safety Limit Minimum Critical Power Ratio," topical report (TR). As a result of the audit draft

requests for additional information (RAI) questions were sent to Westinghouse via encrypted

email on November 2, 2017, to give opportunity to Westinghouse review and provide proprietary markings before the NRC staff issued final RAI questions.

Docket No. 99902038

CONTACT: Ekaterina Lenning, NRR/PLPB 301-415-3151

Ekaterina.Lenning@nrc.gov

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF CLOSED AUDIT FOR THE WESTINGHOUSE

ML17352A640; *concurrence via e-mail NRC-001 OFFIC E DLP/PLPB/PM DLP/PLPB/LA* DSS/SNPB/BC* DLP/PLPB/BC* DLP/PLPB/PM NAME ELenning DHarrison RLukes DMorey ELenning DATE 12/18/2017 12/28/2017 1/4/2018 1/5/2018 1/10/2018

Enclosure U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

SUMMARY

OF CLOSED AUDIT FOR THE WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY TOPICAL REPORT WCAP-18032-P, REVISION 0 AND WCAP-18032-NP, REVISION 0, "CALCULATION OF MIXED CORE SAFETY LIMIT MINIMUM CRITICAL POWER RATIO"

1.0 INTRODUCTION

By letter dated December 12, 2016, Westinghouse Electric Company (Westinghouse) submitted WCAP-18032-P, Revision 0, and WCAP-18032-NP, Revision 0, "Calculation of Mixed Core

Safety Limit Minimum Critical Power Ratio," topi cal report (TR) for the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) review and approval. In September 2017, the NRC staff informed

Westinghouse of its intent to conduct a regulatory audit. The main purpose of the audit was for

the NRC technical reviewer to better understand the TR and to have an opportunity to ask

Westinghouse representatives clarifying questions regarding the information contained within

the submittal. After a detailed review of the TR, the NRC staff developed 202 comprehension

questions that required clarification before request for additional information (RAI) questions

could be drafted. Therefore, the NRC staff conducted a closed audit of understanding for the

WCAP-18032-P, Revision 0, and WCAP-18032-NP, Revision 0, TR review, between October 17

and 18, 2017, at the Westinghouse facilities in Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania.

2.0 AUDIT TEAM

Joshua Kaizer (NRC)

Kevin Heller (NRC)

3.0 AUDIT RESULTS

Discussion of Topical Report

The audit consisted of a detailed walkthrough of WCAP-18032-P, Revision 0, and

WCAP-18032-NP, Revision 0. The NRC staff used this opportunity to resolve

202 comprehension questions which were developed from an earlier extensive study of TR.

Westinghouse provided explanations for the comprehension questions, enabling the NRC staff

to identify nine specific areas of concern that would allow them to draft RAI questions.

Generation of RAI Questions

Westinghouse was able to clarify information contained in TR during the audit. However, the

NRC staff believes that most of the pertinent information presented during the audit was not

reflected in the submittal. Therefore, the NRC staff proposed to have two rounds of RAI

questions. The first round of RAI questions focuses specifically on the proprietary information

discussed during the audit that is essential for the NRC staff's review and is not contained within

the submittal. The draft RAI questions were provided to Westinghouse for review and

proprietary determination on November 2, 2017, via encrypted email. After responses to formal

RAI questions are submitted, the NRC staff will review them and make a decision if a second

round of RAI questions is needed in order to complete NRC draft safety evaluation.

Westinghouse agreed with this course of action. 4.0 PARTICIPANTS NAME ORGANIZATION Joshua Kaizer NRC Kevin Heller NRC Eric Frantz Westinghouse Bradley Maurer Westinghouse Anghel Enica Westinghouse Uffe Bergman Westinghouse Jean-Marie Le Corre Westinghouse Kaj Thorselius Westinghouse Patricia Quaglia Westinghouse Scott Vrtiska Westinghouse