ML14071A063

Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 107 of 217 Through Attachment 8 Through End

ML14071A063
Person / Time
Site:	Farley
Issue date:	02/20/2014
From:	Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-14-0249
Download: ML14071A063 (34)

Text

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 FI-- -107 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet i of 6 Status: YO N[D U0 Equipment ID No. .SH21L503B Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description SERVICE WATER 8 TRAIN BA1TERY ROOM HVAC LCS Location:

Bldg. SWIS Floor El. 1,88 Room, Area 72C Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage i. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YO NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Anchorage verified SAT on 9/11/12 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YZ NO U- N/AQ YC@ NO U[3 NIAO Anchorage verified SAT on 9/11/12 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y[ NO UO N/An Anchorage verified SAT on 9/11/12 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Anchorage verified SAT on 9/11/12 YO NO UO N/A0 YO NO UR' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 194 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 6 Status: YZ NEI U0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0SH21L5038 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Descriplion YICEBYE WA TER, B OWTRN BAIT Y ROOM 1HVAC LO Interaction Efrects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YO NO Ur N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NEI Ur N/A-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NO Ur N/AO YO NO UO Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

The cabinet internals were inspected and no missing fasteners were observed.

All internal connections and routed cables have been determined to be adequate and pose no adverse seismic condition.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWC completed originally on 9/11/12.Final walkdown performed on 2/6/13 to Inspect cabinet internals.

No adverse seismic conditions noted.Evaluated by: Ryan Harlos Tnylor Vnun hh,,., V (J(j Date: Tal,11jr Younphitmul Page 195 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 6 Page 196 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 6 Page 197 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 5 of 6 Page 198 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 6 of 6 Page 199 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 fl-let Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0SH22L0502 Equip. Class'Equipment Description DIESEL LOCAL RELAY PANEL Sheet 1 of 3 Status: YS NE UO 1-2A, Location:

Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 155' Room, Area 6t Manufacturer.

Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO]of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YO Nn UO N/AO YO NO UO N/AQ 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YJM Nr3 U[D N/ArO 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage configuration verified on 8/3CY12 per SEWS package dated&24194.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO NO UO N/All YO NO UO I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 200 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. OSH22L0502 Equip. Class, Equipment Description DIESEL LOCAL RELAY PANEL Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YO NEI U0 1-2A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YO NO UO1 N/AQ 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NO Ur NIAQ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NO UO NIAO YO NO UO Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

All cables had adequate flex. All mounting hardware and anchorage Is Intact and appears In good condition.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Original walkdown performed on /30/12 verifled anchorage and IPEEE resolution.

Walkdown on 9125/13 pedormed to Inspect cabinet internals.

Evaluated by: Brian Nelson Nikol Arrant Date: q Z-11 Page 201 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-108 Sheet 3 of 3 I Page 202 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: Yo N[-] U[-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0SR42BO516A Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description Unit I Servke Water Battery Fuse Box Train A Location:

Bldg. SWIS$ Floor El. 1.8 Room. Area 74 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraze I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Panel anchorage was venfied in walkdowns dated 8/29/12.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?The anchorage in the panel is free from potentially adverse seismic conditions.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage In the panel was verified on 8/29/12 and Is consistent with SEWS package dated 417/94.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO NEI YO NOI UI N/AO YO NO U- N/AQ Y0 NEI Ur N/AI YO NO UO N/A-YO NO U[-3 IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 203 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YU N[3 Ur'Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0SR42BO516A Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description Unit I Service Water Batten Fuse Box Train A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YO NO U' N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yo NEI Ur N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?NO UO N/AlO YO NO UQ Other Adverse Conditions i1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y19 NOI UQ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

All equipment Inside the panel was adequately restrained with no loose connections and no missing bolts.Conments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWC originally completed on 8/29/12. Final walkdown performed to inspect panel internals and complete anchorage verification.

Area walk-by was completed 8/29/2012.

Evaluated by: L Tern, Alan MguL~x $~I~iA.a a- ý -Date: \KJ, -z ci Page 204 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 4 Page 205 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 4 Page 206 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1 -%%o Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. OSR42B520B Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description SW BATTERY NO. 3 OR 4 DETECTION CABINET Sheet i ofg3 Status: YO N[r] Ur-Location:

Bldg. SWIS Floor El. 188 Room, Area .7_3 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorase 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO- No of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Anchorage verified SAT on 9/12/12 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Anchorage venrfied SAT on 9/12/12 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Anchorage verified SAT on 9/12/12 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Anchorage verified SAT on 9/12/12 YO NO UD N/Al YO ND UD N/AQ YO NO UO N/AO YO NO UO N/As YO NO UD' Enter the equipment class name rrom Appendix B: Classes of Equipment Page 207 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 03 */,, Status: YO NO U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QSR42B520B Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description SW BA7TERY NO.3 OR 4 DETECTION CABAINET Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YO NEI U" N/AQ 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NO UF N/An and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO Nr UO N/A[Q YO NEI UO Other Adverse Conditions II. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

The internals of tMe cabinet were inspected and no missing hardware or fasteners was observed The cables Inside the cabinet had adequate flex. No other adverse seismic conditons were present.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWC completed oniginally on 9/12/12.-C Evaluated by: Ryan HarJos Date:.i III r I i, r Tavlar Vnunphlrund

&lfY 1.f 6 )ýýo (/'U Page 208 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 I Page 209 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet z of 4 Status: Yo NE ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0SR4280525A Equip.Equipment Description SW Buildin A Train Battel vSol Sw Location:

Bldg. SWIS Floor El. 1L8 Room, Area 74 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorsu I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Panel anchorage was verffed in walkdowns dated 8/29/12.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?The anchorage in the panel is free from potentially adverse seismic condutis.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage in the panel was verified on 8/29/12 and is consistent with SEWS package dated 417194.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YCM N3 YO NO UE] NIAQ YO NC3 U[I NIAQ YO NC3 U[3 NIAC3 YO NI- UO NIAC YO NO UO' Ener the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 210 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 Of 4 Status: Y[ NE] UQ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0SR4260525A Equip.Equipment Description SIN Building A Train Batte, V Sel Sw Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YM NE UQ N/AO 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yo NO UO N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NOI UO N/AD YO NO Ur Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

All equipment inside the panel was adequately restrained with no loose connections and no missing bolts.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWC originally completed on 8/29/12. Final walkdown performed to inspect panel internals and complete anchorage verification.

Area walk-by was completed 8/29/2012.

Evaluated by: Laura Maclay TJ ZSQelLA Terry Alan MYUlen" 44, 4/JAD Date: 2-1 -3:;Ili vlýj I U Page 211 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 4 Page 212 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 4 Page 213 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS SeI-s 15 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: Yo Nn ul-I Equipment ID No. QSR42BO526B Equip. Class, 16 Equipment Description SERVICE-WATER BLDG BATTERY CHARGER NO. 2 (STANDBYJ Location:

Bldg. SWIS Floor El. 188 ....... Room, Area 72D Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorafze I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Anchorage verified on 8/30/12.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Anchorage venfled on 8/30112.YONO YN NO UO N/AO YO NO UO N/AO Y0R NO UO N/AQ YM3 NO UO N/AO YO NO UO= Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 214 of 217*Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment, Page 214 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YO NO UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0SR42B0526B Equip. Class' 16 Equipment Description SERVICE WATER BLDG BATTERY CHARGER NQO 2 (STANDBY)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YO NO UF N/Arl 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NOl U[3 N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?All Internal cables have adequate flex and do not represent an adverse seismic condition.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NO UO N/AI-U[3 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

All cables have adequate flex and all mounting hardware is intact and appears to be in good condition.

All sensitive equipment Inside the cabinet (I.e. circuit boards) are mounted adequately and pose no seismic concern.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

External inspection peoformed 8/30/12.Second walkdown perfonned to Inspect Intemals found no adverse seismic conditions.

IPEEE outliers, restrain cart and ladder In area, have been resolved.

No unrestrained items are located in this area.Walkdown end SWC originally completed 10/16/13 has been retyped for clarity.Evaluated by: Brian Nelson _ i ? Date: Nikole ArrantuR'k-I&

xsi On4h yL Page 215 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Fl-113 (QSR4280526B)

Shieet 3of 4 Page 216 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 FI-113 (05R42130526R)

Sheet 4of 4 Page 217 of 217 ATTACHMENT 8: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 8 UNIT 1 -AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS (AWCs) (Version 2.0)NO. SNCF164-RPT-01 A total of 2 Area Walk-bys have been completed.

The Checklists are provided within this Attachment.

Page 1 of 10 ATTACHMENT 8: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: Y[D ND UD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. CTMT Floor El. 105" Room, Area' CTMT 105' Inside Bloshleld Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

YN NO UO N/Al: 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Y0 NE UO N/AO degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

All overhead equioment appeared to be mounted adequately and In good condition.

YO NO Ur N/AD YO NOI UD N/AD' Ifthe room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g.. Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.Page 2 of 10 ATTACHMENT 8: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YO NEI UQ]A r i- y h i W Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. CTMT Floor El. 105' Room, Area, CTMT 105' Iside Bloshleld 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Temporary cables were In the vicinity of the valve, but do not pose an adverse seismic condition.

All scaffold and other material staged for outage activities was propedy stored and Wll1 be removed near the end of the outage.YO NO UO N/AD YZ NO UO N/AO YO NOI UO N/An 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Brian Nelson Date: 9/10/13 Nikole Arrant 9/30/13 Page 3 of 10 ATTACHMENT 8: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS F1-008 (AWC) CTMT 105' El.NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 4 Page 4 of 10 ATTACHMENT 8: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS F1-OO8 (AWC) CTMT 105' El.NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 4 Page 5 of 10 ATTACHMENT 8: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Sheet I of.5 Status: YN NEI uO Location:

Bldg. CTMT Floor El. 129' Room, Area' CTMT 129' nearpenetrations Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.I. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

YO NO UD N/AD 2, Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YO NO UD N/AD degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?Cable trays and other overhead equipment are adequately supported and appear In good condition.

This valve Is also located directly below grating which would protect It from Interaction with the overhead equipment.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

YO ND U- N/AO YO NO UD N/Al'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.Page 6 of 10 ATTACHMENT 8: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 5~Status: Y~Ni] uQ~Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)Location:

Bldg. CTMT Floor El. 129' Room, Area' CTMT 1291'near oenetratlons

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

This area is not being used for material storage. Workers In the area were practicing good houskeeping.

No scaffold or temporary installations were present.YO NOI UO NIAD YO NO UD NIAO YO NO UQ N/AQ 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NOl Ui adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Waikdown and A WC completed onginally on 9/30/13 has been retyped for clarity.Evaluated by: Brian Nel&on Date: _ $/1 _ _Nikole A rrant C{kok~ds..'

~1 Page 7 of 10 ATTACHMENT 8: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS F1-063 (AWC) CTMIT 129' El.NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 5 Page 8 of 10 ATTACHMENT 8: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS F1-063 (AWC) CTMT 129' El.NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of S Page 9 of 10 ATTACHMENT 8: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS F1-063 (AWC) C"MT 129' El.NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 5 of 5 Page 10 of 10