ML14071A072

Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 351 of 562 Through 391 of 562

ML14071A072
Person / Time
Site:	Farley
Issue date:	02/20/2014
From:	Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-14-0249
Download: ML14071A072 (41)

Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of/ 5 1 Jvp Status: YO NEI UFI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q1R17BO02 Equip. Class' I Equipment Description MCC 10 Location:

Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area 72 O Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[2/N]of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

~~~&E ~ r fA.T, A e 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YECN/NO U- N/AO Y[2'/N0 UO N/AO Y4 ND U] N/AO YI[ NO U[ N/AQ Y[d NO U'-Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 351 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F -F7 Sheet 2 of 2I¢' -10 Status: Yo N[O U[-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentiDNo.

QIREf7fe2 Equip. i Equipment Description MCC 18 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8, Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yd ND UD N/AD Y[2fANO U- N/AO Yr/ND UD N/AD Y4ND UO Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

0 mnL~dtoa ae may be added as necessary) r L/ I 4v Q~*Jt~ ML~,(T~.Yu'AO Date: 7/to ,~Evaluated by:.Date: 1/1,P11 v iv)I (K~)11/t01tV z Page 352 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of:;3 , tkolt 90 Status: Yj'NL-] UF'I]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIR178002 Equip.Equipment Description MCC 1B Photographs I 97 To ppVE=P E-W JAOVe MjMtA t~E:10 TfH.E M~cC LQC-ATACI)0k AFth MrC C~)~ ~T C~Note:~ ~/ jn, T* dP WF~C 00J THE2ýT~ W~4--TI I iEAOT A~J AT Mep- 1 Note: Note: Note: Page 353 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 354 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 355 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 356 of 562 NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 357 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 1\-,J r-'% esm Page 358 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 359 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0-'3-J Page 360 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS"T--I -V.n NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 361 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0-3-'t- N -. , Page 362 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 363 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 TI..,-x ýZ-'Page 364 of 562 nki 11 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. lalNG io4-mr I-U0, vr'ru..' 'Page 365 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ,%X she of Status: Y9 NEI U[0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. OIR178507-A Equip. ClassýEquipment Description MCC IN Location:

Bldg. DIESEl Floor El. 155 Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL, The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Auchorase 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?NUI" 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y9'Nr1 UlI N/AD YjN3UQ N/ADJ YE'ND U-] N/AID YO ND UD N/Alf Y& NO Ul Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment Page 366 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 rC ~Status: uE%ýINJ U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0IR17B507-A Equip. Class, Equipment Description MCC 1N Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yd"NQ U N/AC 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, UI] N/AC]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Y[2/NE3 UC] N/AC]10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could UC adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Plwc-~-, -z-t [I Evaluated'

-1161- Iq a" M frw"014v.Page 367 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0.4 Page 368 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 r-I I i .-- , I I Page 369 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 1 ofsfx'Staturs Y~dNI U1'N]u Equipment ID No. QIR18B029 Equip. Class'-2 Equipment Description POWER DISCONNECT SWITCH Location:

Bldg. AUIY U1ARY Floor E. ,/j4.. Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL, The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Auchorae 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO N§1"1 of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YNF'<0 U1) N/AD Ye"NO Ul- N/AQ Y&NO UID N/Ar YO NO U- N/AID " Yrb/NO 1)0 IEnter the equipment clan name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 370 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIR18B029 Equip. Class, 2 Equipment Description POWER DISCONNECT SWITCH CAL Sheeat of Status: YE N[-] U[']Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YIV<DOUEJ N/ACJ 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[tNF[] U--1 N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yb/ND U0- N/AQ 1;C'e t-T& r*i V-V POT~ or'4Q -JjC A I r a-XC Z t10.-'Baed on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free UD C of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

YE4<cD UM Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

AJVDVf Evaluated by: .... k " * " ( Y~yk~( x~1a <Z/Date: X -zo'Z-Page 371 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 372 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 373 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Seismic Walkcdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q1R168031 Equip. Class, NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet of Status: UEJ o .Equipment Description CIRCUIT BREAKER BOX Location:

Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139 Room, Area 332 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anehoraee 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[C NEý 'of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?U['U N/AD*/N- U" N/AO Y&<CJ UEJ N/AQ YO1 Nil UC NI5", Y1140$F UQ]I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 374 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 She~t 2 ofV" 1 Status: Yt NEI UL]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. OIR18B031 Equip. Class 2 Equipment Description CIRCUIT BREAKER BOX Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y3, 4 1( UD N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[frlND UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y .-'ND- UD N/AD COt,roo T A 00 5-5 / v,ý ,.-.fs,-w, ,.,,,Jj' t- k.,,W .t.. IT-s ,,'C.-40,, W_ -T- O's- hct ....5N1C tktkVC 1& -i5j --ýCL,-0. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y&ýN[]UD]Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

/V 6 A.>;Evaluated by: G1 -1 04 1 DX-ýfUAýý Date: V.z /.r. u4¶i4 A_________

Page 375 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 376 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 377 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F~I- r14 Sheet I of 3 Status: YEý N[] Ur"I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIR18B035 Equip. Class' 14 Equipment Description CIRCUIT BREAKER BOX Location:

Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139 Room, Area -3/Z Ai)Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

I , Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y8-N" of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

sewv ALdd.. 3 -Z-o-q 5 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Y[tA ur- N/A-1 U0 N/A]ýýNO U!] N/AE Yt< NO UI] N/AD-5& po-- &e p rd" , A,4cA d-- ýt --r Av c, e 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y N0"] U!]potentially adverse seismic conditions?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 378 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 Of 3 Status: 71NO] U0[Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. O1R18B035 Equip. Class, 14 Equipment Description CIRCUIT BREAKER BOX Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YA6NO- U["3 N/AD3 16N/NH UEJ N/AD YS.-N)D UD] N/AD" ~U0 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yý NQ UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 4 .02 Evaluated by: 7 7 L.JA .Hg," Date: 9,/o. 2_0/12 ci. tOL'Page 379 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 380 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 S Sheet 1 of-dýStatus: YMN-3 U-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q1R21BOO1A Equip. Class, 14 Equipment Description VITAL AC BREAKER BOX Location:

Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 155' Room, Area 416 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraze I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO N of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yid NOI Ur N/AQ Y,0 NO UO N/AQ Yy"NO UO N/AO YO NO UO N/APf Y)1No UQ IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 381 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of Status: NI- UI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 01R21BOO1A Equip. Class, Equipment Description VITAL AC BREAKER Box Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y)1NO UO N/AQ Y) NO UI N/AO Y NEI U= N/AO Yf ND UI Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y -NO U-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

CommentS (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

2. ZAP Evaluated by Evaluated byDae clý L-1 LLD (Y Date: Page 382 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO, SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 383 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS

&NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 384 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 385 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of " t L ', Status: Y[: f NO uf1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIR21EOO9C Equip. Class' 14 Equipment Description INVERTER IC ,,W.., ..Location:

Bldg, AUXILIARY Floor El. # /it/ Room, Area ! p/ t Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraee 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YM NU 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?/YE/INC UO N/AC Y[WN" U- N/AC/U NO UC N/AC 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? NC UC (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Vel~ie'l~b

£!OIIIOLVAANWOO t c *QHA2CtoMe FC7z5WS TOP-Q2IR2 w 9C " C,,IIZZI eO9A7 'PAT&V 'W/24/-9* (N07)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y60t"No UC potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/AC IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 386 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 r, 1 1 6? ý)ý-fl Sheet 2 off ;jrP1 Status: YiA' N[] UrI] J11dF7 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIR21EO09C Equip. Class, 14 Equipment Description INVERTER IC Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free firom impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YIN" UEJ N/AC Y[V/NO U"I N/Al Y[VN-I UCI N/ACl Y[4/N'- UCI Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS(ND Ull adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

MOVE Evaluated by:.RWPMKl5 fi &J/ L/ 'I Date: __ __ __ __9 ,//Ox-I. 70AI/- 1 1 -I Page 387 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 388 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 389 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 390 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 a I I~1 Page 391 of 562