IR 05000269/2014301: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION II 245 PEACHTREE CENTER AVENUE NE, SUITE 1200 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-1257 August 14, 2014 Mr. Scott Site Vice President | ||
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Oconee Nuclear Station | |||
7800 Rochester Highway Seneca, SC 29672 | |||
SUBJECT: OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION - NRC EXAMINATION REPORT 05000269/2014301, 05000270/2014301 AND 05000287/2014301 | SUBJECT: OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION - NRC EXAMINATION REPORT 05000269/2014301, 05000270/2014301 AND 05000287/2014301 | ||
==Dear Mr. Batson:== | ==Dear Mr. Batson:== | ||
During the period June 9 - 12, 2014, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) administered operating tests to employees of your company who had applied for licenses to operate the Oconee Nuclear Station. At the conclusion of the tests, the examiners discussed preliminary findings related to the operating tests and the written examination submittal with those members of your staff identified in the enclosed report. The written examination was administered by your staff on June 18, 2014. Two Reactor Operator (RO) and five Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) applicants passed both the operating test and written examination. There were no post-administration comments. Seven applicants were issued licenses commensurate with the level of examination administered. A Simulator Fidelity Report is included in this report as Enclosure 2. The initial examination operating test submittal was within the range of acceptability expected for a proposed examination. All | During the period June 9 - 12, 2014, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) administered operating tests to employees of your company who had applied for licenses to operate the Oconee Nuclear Station. At the conclusion of the tests, the examiners discussed preliminary findings related to the operating tests and the written examination submittal with those members of your staff identified in the enclosed report. The written examination was administered by your staff on June 18, 2014. | ||
Two Reactor Operator (RO) and five Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) applicants passed both the operating test and written examination. There were no post-administration comments. | |||
Seven applicants were issued licenses commensurate with the level of examination administered. A Simulator Fidelity Report is included in this report as Enclosure 2. | |||
The initial examination operating test submittal was within the range of acceptability expected for a proposed examination. All examinat ion changes agreed upon between the NRC and your staff were made according to NUREG-1021, Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors, Revision 9, Supplement 1. | |||
Sincerely,/RA/ | In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its | ||
Eugene F. Guthrie, Chief Operations Branch 2 Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos.: 50-269, 50-270, 50-287 License Nos.: DPR-38, DPR-47, DPR-55 | |||
enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). If you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact me at (404) 997-4662. | |||
Sincerely,/RA/ | |||
Eugene F. Guthrie, Chief Operations Branch 2 Division of Reactor Safety | |||
Docket Nos.: 50-269, 50-270, 50-287 License Nos.: DPR-38, DPR-47, DPR-55 | |||
===Enclosures:=== | ===Enclosures:=== | ||
1. Report Details 2. Simulator Fidelity Report | 1. Report Details | ||
2. Simulator Fidelity Report | |||
cc: Distribution via Listserv | cc: Distribution via Listserv | ||
__ML14227A249___________ SUNSI REVIEW COMPLETE FORM 665 ATTACHED OFFICE RII:DRS RII:DRS RII:DRS SIGNATURE EFG FOR DRL2 VIA EMAIL EFG NAME RBALDWIN DLANYI EGUTHRIE DATE 8/14/2014 8/ 13 /2014 8/14/2014 E-MAIL COPY? YES NO YES NO YES NO YES YES NO YES NO YES NO Letter to Scott from Eugene F. Guthrie dated August 14, 2014 | __ML14227A249___________ SUNSI REVIEW COMPLETE FORM 665 ATTACHED OFFICE RII:DRS RII:DRS RII:DRS SIGNATURE EFG FOR DRL2 VIA EMAIL EFG NAME RBALDWIN DLANYI EGUTHRIE DATE 8/14/2014 8/ 13 /2014 8/14/2014 E-MAIL COPY? | ||
YES NO YES NO YES NO YES YES NO YES NO YES NO Letter to Scott from Eugene F. Guthrie dated August 14, 2014 | |||
SUBJECT: OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION - NRC EXAMINATION REPORT 05000269/2014301, 05000270/2014301 AND 05000287/2014301 DISTRIBUTION: S. Law, RII EICS L. Douglas, RII EICS RIDSNRRDIRS PUBLIC RidsNrrPMOconee Resource | SUBJECT: OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION - NRC EXAMINATION REPORT 05000269/2014301, 05000270/2014301 AND 05000287/2014301 DISTRIBUTION | ||
: S. Law, RII EICS L. Douglas, RII EICS RIDSNRRDIRS PUBLIC RidsNrrPMOconee Resource | |||
Enclosure 1 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION II Docket Nos.: 05000269, 05000270, 05000287 | Enclosure 1 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION II Docket Nos.: 05000269, 05000270, 05000287 | ||
License Nos.: DPR-38, DPR-47 and DPR-55 Report No.: 05000269/2014301, 05000270/2014301 and 05000287/2014301 | License Nos.: DPR-38, DPR-47 and DPR-55 | ||
Report No.: 05000269/2014301, 05000270/2014301 and 05000287/2014301 | |||
Licensee: Duke Energy Carolinas LLC. | Licensee: Duke Energy Carolinas LLC. | ||
| Line 48: | Line 68: | ||
Facility: Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 | Facility: Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 | ||
Location: Seneca, SC Dates: Operating Tests - June 9 - 12, 2014 Written Examination - June 18, 2014 | Location: Seneca, SC | ||
Dates: Operating Tests - June 9 - 12, 2014 Written Examination - June 18, 2014 | |||
Examiners: R. Baldwin, Chief, Senior Operations Examiner G. Laska, Senior Examiner D. Lanyi, Operations Engineer | Examiners: R. Baldwin, Chief, Senior Operations Examiner G. Laska, Senior Examiner D. Lanyi, Operations Engineer | ||
| Line 62: | Line 84: | ||
The NRC administered the operating tests during the period of June 9 - 12, 2014. Members of the Oconee Nuclear Station training staff administered the written examination June 18, 2014. | The NRC administered the operating tests during the period of June 9 - 12, 2014. Members of the Oconee Nuclear Station training staff administered the written examination June 18, 2014. | ||
Two Reactor Operator (RO) and five Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) applicants passed both the written examination and operating test. Seven applicants were issued licenses commensurate with the level of examination administered. | Two Reactor Operator (RO) and five Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) applicants passed both the written examination and operating test. Seven applicants were issued licenses | ||
commensurate with the level of examination administered. | |||
There were no post-examination comments. | There were no post-examination comments. | ||
| Line 68: | Line 92: | ||
No findings were identified. | No findings were identified. | ||
Report Details 4. OTHER ACTIVITIES 4OA5 Operator Licensing Initial Examinations a. Inspection Scope Members of the Oconee Nuclear Station staff developed both the operating tests and the written examination. All examination material was developed in accordance with the guidelines contained in Revision 9, Supplement 1, of NUREG-1021, "Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors." The NRC examination team reviewed the proposed examination. Examination changes agreed upon between the NRC and the licensee were made per NUREG-1021, and incorporated into the final version of the examination materials. | Report Details 4. OTHER ACTIVITIES | ||
4OA5 Operator Licensing Initial Examinations | |||
a. Inspection Scope Members of the Oconee Nuclear Station staff developed both the operating tests and the written examination. All examination material was developed in accordance with the guidelines contained in Revision 9, Supplement 1, of NUREG-1021, "Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors." The NRC examination team reviewed the proposed examination. Examination changes agreed upon between the NRC and the licensee were made per NUREG-1021, and incorporated into the final version of the examination materials. | |||
The examiners reviewed the licensee's examination security measures while preparing and administering the examinations to | The examiners reviewed the licensee's examination security measures while preparing and administering the examinations to ens ure examination security and integrity complied with 10 CFR 55.49, "Integrity of Examinations and Tests." | ||
The NRC examiners evaluated two Reactor Operator (RO) and five Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) applicants using the guidelines contained in NUREG-1021. The examiners administered the operating tests during the period of June 9 - 12, 2014. | The NRC examiners evaluated two Reactor Operator (RO) and five Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) applicants using the guidelines contained in NUREG-1021. The examiners administered the operating tests during the period of June 9 - 12, 2014. | ||
Members of the Oconee Nuclear Station training staff administered the written examination on June 18, 2014. Evaluations of applicants and reviews of associated documentation were performed to determine if the applicants, who applied for licenses to operate the Oconee Nuclear Station, met the requirements specified in 10 CFR Part 55, | Members of the Oconee Nuclear Station training staff administered the written examination on June 18, 2014. Evaluations of applicants and reviews of associated documentation were performed to determine if the applicants, who applied for licenses to operate the Oconee Nuclear Station, met the requirements specified in 10 CFR Part 55, | ||
"Operators' Licenses." b. Findings No findings were identified. The NRC determined that, using NUREG-1021, the licensee's initial operating test examination submittal was within the range of acceptability expected for a proposed examination. | |||
"Operators' Licenses." | |||
b. Findings No findings were identified. The NRC determined that, using NUREG-1021, the licensee's initial operating test examination submittal was within the range of acceptability expected for a proposed examination. | |||
Two RO and five SRO applicants passed both the operating test and written examination. Seven licenses were issued commensurate with the level of examination administered. | Two RO and five SRO applicants passed both the operating test and written examination. Seven licenses were issued commensurate with the level of examination administered. | ||
Copies of all individual examination reports were sent to the facility Training Manager for evaluation of weaknesses and determination of appropriate remedial training. The licensee did not submit any post-examination comments. A copy of the final RO and SRO written examinations and answer key's may be accessed not earlier than June 18, 2016, in the ADAMS system (ADAMS Accession Number ML14174A885 and ML14174A904). | Copies of all individual examination reports were sent to the facility Training Manager for evaluation of weaknesses and determination of appropriate remedial training. | ||
The licensee did not submit any post-examination comments. A copy of the final RO and SRO written examinations and answer key's may be accessed not earlier than June 18, 2016, in the ADAMS system (ADAMS Accession Number ML14174A885 and ML14174A904). | |||
4 4OA6 Meetings Exit Meeting Summary On June 12, 2014, the NRC examination team discussed generic issues associated with the operating test with Mr. Batson, Oconee Nuclear Station Vice President, and members of his staff. The examiners asked the licensee if any of the examination material was proprietary. No proprietary information was identified. | 4 4OA6 Meetings Exit Meeting Summary On June 12, 2014, the NRC examination team discussed generic issues associated with the operating test with Mr. Batson, Oconee Nuclear Station Vice President, and members of his staff. The examiners asked the licensee if any of the examination material was proprietary. No proprietary information was identified. | ||
PARTIAL LIST OF PERSONS CONTACTED Licensee personnel T. Doss, ILT Supervisor P. Fisk, Operations Manager L. Nowell, Supervisor Nuclear OPS Training T. Ray, Oconee Plant Manager C. Rop, Operations Training Manager J. Smith, Licensing Administrator J. Steely, Nuclear Training Manager G. Washburn, Nuclear Station Instructor - Operations K. Welchel, Simulator Supervisor C. Witherspoon, Sr. Operations Specialist NRC personnel N/A | PARTIAL LIST OF PERSONS CONTACTED | ||
Licensee personnel T. Doss, ILT Supervisor P. Fisk, Operations Manager L. Nowell, Supervisor Nuclear OPS Training T. Ray, Oconee Plant Manager C. Rop, Operations Training Manager J. Smith, Licensing Administrator J. Steely, Nuclear Training Manager G. Washburn, Nuclear Station Instructor - Operations K. Welchel, Simulator Supervisor C. Witherspoon, Sr. Operations Specialist | |||
NRC personnel | |||
N/A | |||
Enclosure 2 SIMULATOR FIDELITY REPORT Facility Licensee: Oconee Nuclear Station | |||
Facility Docket No.: 05000269, 05000270, AND 05000287 | |||
Operating Test Administered: June 9 - 12, 2013 | |||
This form is to be used only to report observations. These observations do not constitute audit or inspection findings and, without further verification and review in accordance with Inspection Procedure 71111.11, are not indicative of noncompliance with 10 CFR 55.46. No licensee action is required in response to these observations. | |||
No simulator fidelity or configuration issues were identified. | No simulator fidelity or configuration issues were identified. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 11:02, 1 July 2018
| ML14227A249 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 08/14/2014 |
| From: | Guthrie E F Division of Reactor Safety II |
| To: | Batson S L Duke Energy Carolinas |
| References | |
| IR-14-301 | |
| Download: ML14227A249 (9) | |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION II 245 PEACHTREE CENTER AVENUE NE, SUITE 1200 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-1257 August 14, 2014 Mr. Scott Site Vice President
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Oconee Nuclear Station
7800 Rochester Highway Seneca, SC 29672
SUBJECT: OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION - NRC EXAMINATION REPORT 05000269/2014301, 05000270/2014301 AND 05000287/2014301
Dear Mr. Batson:
During the period June 9 - 12, 2014, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) administered operating tests to employees of your company who had applied for licenses to operate the Oconee Nuclear Station. At the conclusion of the tests, the examiners discussed preliminary findings related to the operating tests and the written examination submittal with those members of your staff identified in the enclosed report. The written examination was administered by your staff on June 18, 2014.
Two Reactor Operator (RO) and five Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) applicants passed both the operating test and written examination. There were no post-administration comments.
Seven applicants were issued licenses commensurate with the level of examination administered. A Simulator Fidelity Report is included in this report as Enclosure 2.
The initial examination operating test submittal was within the range of acceptability expected for a proposed examination. All examinat ion changes agreed upon between the NRC and your staff were made according to NUREG-1021, Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors, Revision 9, Supplement 1.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its
enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). If you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact me at (404) 997-4662.
Sincerely,/RA/
Eugene F. Guthrie, Chief Operations Branch 2 Division of Reactor Safety
Docket Nos.: 50-269, 50-270, 50-287 License Nos.: DPR-38, DPR-47, DPR-55
Enclosures:
1. Report Details
2. Simulator Fidelity Report
cc: Distribution via Listserv
__ML14227A249___________ SUNSI REVIEW COMPLETE FORM 665 ATTACHED OFFICE RII:DRS RII:DRS RII:DRS SIGNATURE EFG FOR DRL2 VIA EMAIL EFG NAME RBALDWIN DLANYI EGUTHRIE DATE 8/14/2014 8/ 13 /2014 8/14/2014 E-MAIL COPY?
YES NO YES NO YES NO YES YES NO YES NO YES NO Letter to Scott from Eugene F. Guthrie dated August 14, 2014
SUBJECT: OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION - NRC EXAMINATION REPORT 05000269/2014301, 05000270/2014301 AND 05000287/2014301 DISTRIBUTION
- S. Law, RII EICS L. Douglas, RII EICS RIDSNRRDIRS PUBLIC RidsNrrPMOconee Resource
Enclosure 1 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION II Docket Nos.: 05000269, 05000270, 05000287
License Nos.: DPR-38, DPR-47 and DPR-55
Report No.: 05000269/2014301, 05000270/2014301 and 05000287/2014301
Licensee: Duke Energy Carolinas LLC.
Facility: Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3
Location: Seneca, SC
Dates: Operating Tests - June 9 - 12, 2014 Written Examination - June 18, 2014
Examiners: R. Baldwin, Chief, Senior Operations Examiner G. Laska, Senior Examiner D. Lanyi, Operations Engineer
Approved by: Eugene F. Guthrie, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ER 05000269/2014301, 05000270/2014301 and 05000287/2014301; operating test June 9 - 12, 2014 & written exam June 18, 2014; Oconee Nuclear Station, Units 1, 2, and 3; Operator License Examinations.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) examiners conducted an initial examination in accordance with the guidelines in Revision 9, Supplement 1, of NUREG-1021, "Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors." This examination implemented the operator licensing requirements identified in 10 CFR §55.41, §55.43, and §55.45 as applicable.
Members of the Oconee Nuclear Station staff developed the operating tests and the written examination. The NRC developed the written examination outlines.
The NRC administered the operating tests during the period of June 9 - 12, 2014. Members of the Oconee Nuclear Station training staff administered the written examination June 18, 2014.
Two Reactor Operator (RO) and five Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) applicants passed both the written examination and operating test. Seven applicants were issued licenses
commensurate with the level of examination administered.
There were no post-examination comments.
No findings were identified.
Report Details 4. OTHER ACTIVITIES
4OA5 Operator Licensing Initial Examinations
a. Inspection Scope Members of the Oconee Nuclear Station staff developed both the operating tests and the written examination. All examination material was developed in accordance with the guidelines contained in Revision 9, Supplement 1, of NUREG-1021, "Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors." The NRC examination team reviewed the proposed examination. Examination changes agreed upon between the NRC and the licensee were made per NUREG-1021, and incorporated into the final version of the examination materials.
The examiners reviewed the licensee's examination security measures while preparing and administering the examinations to ens ure examination security and integrity complied with 10 CFR 55.49, "Integrity of Examinations and Tests."
The NRC examiners evaluated two Reactor Operator (RO) and five Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) applicants using the guidelines contained in NUREG-1021. The examiners administered the operating tests during the period of June 9 - 12, 2014.
Members of the Oconee Nuclear Station training staff administered the written examination on June 18, 2014. Evaluations of applicants and reviews of associated documentation were performed to determine if the applicants, who applied for licenses to operate the Oconee Nuclear Station, met the requirements specified in 10 CFR Part 55,
"Operators' Licenses."
b. Findings No findings were identified. The NRC determined that, using NUREG-1021, the licensee's initial operating test examination submittal was within the range of acceptability expected for a proposed examination.
Two RO and five SRO applicants passed both the operating test and written examination. Seven licenses were issued commensurate with the level of examination administered.
Copies of all individual examination reports were sent to the facility Training Manager for evaluation of weaknesses and determination of appropriate remedial training.
The licensee did not submit any post-examination comments. A copy of the final RO and SRO written examinations and answer key's may be accessed not earlier than June 18, 2016, in the ADAMS system (ADAMS Accession Number ML14174A885 and ML14174A904).
4 4OA6 Meetings Exit Meeting Summary On June 12, 2014, the NRC examination team discussed generic issues associated with the operating test with Mr. Batson, Oconee Nuclear Station Vice President, and members of his staff. The examiners asked the licensee if any of the examination material was proprietary. No proprietary information was identified.
PARTIAL LIST OF PERSONS CONTACTED
Licensee personnel T. Doss, ILT Supervisor P. Fisk, Operations Manager L. Nowell, Supervisor Nuclear OPS Training T. Ray, Oconee Plant Manager C. Rop, Operations Training Manager J. Smith, Licensing Administrator J. Steely, Nuclear Training Manager G. Washburn, Nuclear Station Instructor - Operations K. Welchel, Simulator Supervisor C. Witherspoon, Sr. Operations Specialist
NRC personnel
N/A
Enclosure 2 SIMULATOR FIDELITY REPORT Facility Licensee: Oconee Nuclear Station
Facility Docket No.: 05000269, 05000270, AND 05000287
Operating Test Administered: June 9 - 12, 2013
This form is to be used only to report observations. These observations do not constitute audit or inspection findings and, without further verification and review in accordance with Inspection Procedure 71111.11, are not indicative of noncompliance with 10 CFR 55.46. No licensee action is required in response to these observations.
No simulator fidelity or configuration issues were identified.