ML24190A108: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Obser vation Public Meeting
{{#Wiki_filter:Obser vation Public Meeting


Discuss SNCs previous License Amendment Request to Revise Joseph M.
Discuss SNCs previous License Amendment Request to Revise Joseph M.
Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Actions and Completion Times in TS 3.6.5, Containment Air       Temperature,       using     RIPE
Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Actions and Completion Times in TS 3.6.5, Containment Air Temperature, using RIPE


Date: July 11, 2024
Date: July 11, 2024


1                                                 1 Purpose
1 1 Purpose
* Provide a brief background related to SNC's LAR to modify Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, TS 3.6.5, "Containment Air Temperature" under RIPE
* Provide a brief background related to SNC's LAR to modify Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, TS 3.6.5, "Containment Air Temperature" under RIPE
* Ensure a common understanding of SNC's previous LAR dated April 19, 2024, as supplemented
* Ensure a common understanding of SNC's previous LAR dated April 19, 2024, as supplemented
* Identify informational needs for any future LARs related to modifying TS 3.6.5 for RIPE and/or traditional reviews
* Identify informational needs for any future LARs related to modifying TS 3.6.5 for RIPE and/or traditional reviews


2                                                                                               2 Key messages
2 2 Key messages
* SNC's April 2024 Farley submittal (under RIPE) was a request for a permanent change similar to an emergent, time-limited                                 LAR which was granted for 16 days to preclude a plant shutdown. Permanent changes require a more complete justification and review than one-time, time                                           -limited requests.
* SNC's April 2024 Farley submittal (under RIPE) was a request for a permanent change similar to an emergent, time-limited LAR which was granted for 16 days to preclude a plant shutdown. Permanent changes require a more complete justification and review than one-time, time -limited requests.
* NRC understands the likely seasonal need for a containment temperature licensing modification.                                 NRC is committed to an expedited review whether resubmitted as a RIPE or non-RIPE licensing request.
* NRC understands the likely seasonal need for a containment temperature licensing modification. NRC is committed to an expedited review whether resubmitted as a RIPE or non-RIPE licensing request.


3 Background -                                                                                         August 2023 Emergency Amendment
3 Background - August 2023 Emergency Amendment
* Emergency Amendment -                                                                                                                                                                       August 24, 2023 (ML23235A296)
* Emergency Amendment - August 24, 2023 (ML23235A296)
          -                                                       Amendment expired on September 9, 2024 (16 days)
- Amendment expired on September 9, 2024 (16 days)


4                                                                                                                                                                                           4 Background -                                                                                         RIPE LAR Pre-submittal meeting
4 4 Background - RIPE LAR Pre-submittal meeting
* P re-submittal meeting was held on April 3, 2024
* P re-submittal meeting was held on April 3, 2024
          -                                                       SNC slides (ML24088A166)
- SNC slides (ML24088A166)
          -                                                       Meeting summary -                                                                                                                                                                                           April 12, 2023 (ML24096A183)
- Meeting summary - April 12, 2023 (ML24096A183)


5                                                                                                                                                                                                       5 Background-                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             SNC       s RIPE LAR Submittal
5 5 Background-SNC s RIPE LAR Submittal


            -                                                       SNC submittal April 19, 2024                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   (ML24110A126)
- SNC submittal April 19, 2024 (ML24110A126)
            -                                                       NRC Request for Supplemental Information May 28, 2024 (ML24143A041)
- NRC Request for Supplemental Information May 28, 2024 (ML24143A041)
            -                                                       SNC Supplement June 14, 2024 (ML24166A290)
- SNC Supplement June 14, 2024 (ML24166A290)
            -                                                       NRC Nonacceptance Letter July 1, 2024 (ML24178A376)
- NRC Nonacceptance Letter July 1, 2024 (ML24178A376)


6                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             6 Farley RIPE LAR
6 6 Farley RIPE LAR
* SNC submitted Farley RIPE LAR on April 19, 2024 (ML24110A126)
* SNC submitted Farley RIPE LAR on April 19, 2024 (ML24110A126)
* TS 3.6.5 Actions, upon exceeding the containment average air temperature limit, are proposed to be revised to allow continued operation for up to 30 cumulative days provided:
* TS 3.6.5 Actions, upon exceeding the containment average air temperature limit, are proposed to be revised to allow continued operation for up to 30 cumulative days provided:
the containment average air temperature remains less than or equal to 122oF (verified within 8 hours and once per 8 hours thereafter);
the containment average air temperature remains less than or equal to 122oF (verified within 8 hours and once per 8 hours thereafter);
the containment average air temperature has not exceeded the 120oF limit for more than 720 cumulative hours during the current calendar year (verified within 8 hours and once per 8 hours thereafter); and the refueling water storage tank temperature remains less than or equal to 100oF (verified within 8 hours and once per 8 hours
the containment average air temperature has not exceeded the 120oF limit for more than 720 cumulative hours during the current calendar year (verified within 8 hours and once per 8 hours thereafter); and the refueling water storage tank temperature remains less than or equal to 100oF (verified within 8 hours and once per 8 hours


7 8
7 8
Technical Discussion
Technical Discussion


In the original application, as supplemented, there were areas where additional information would be needed or expanded on to accept the licensees submittal:
In the original application, as supplemented, there were areas where additional information would be needed or expanded on to accept the licensees submittal:
* PCT
* PCT
        -                                                                         NRC staff seeks to understand the methodology SNC used to determine increase in PCT as an effect of increased Containment Average Air Temperature
- NRC staff seeks to understand the methodology SNC used to determine increase in PCT as an effect of increased Containment Average Air Temperature
* NPSH
* NPSH
        -                                                                       NRC staff seeks to clarify the version and inputs/assumptions of SNC's GOTHIC model on LOCA sump temperature response
- NRC staff seeks to clarify the version and inputs/assumptions of SNC's GOTHIC model on LOCA sump temperature response
* TS
* TS
        -                                                                           NRC staff seeks to understand how the proposed change in TS 3.6.5 is derived from analysis and evaluation included in the Safety Analysis Report
- NRC staff seeks to understand how the proposed change in TS 3.6.5 is derived from analysis and evaluation included in the Safety Analysis Report


9                                                                                                                                                                   9 Technical Discussion -                                                                                                                                                                                           PCT
9 9 Technical Discussion - PCT
* Plant-specific Methodology -                                                                       The application did not provide                               sufficient information                                 to assess the analytical methods and results concerning the plant-                                                 specific effects of increasing PCT would have on a large break LOCA, explicit to Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2.
* Plant-specific Methodology - The application did not provide sufficient information to assess the analytical methods and results concerning the plant-specific effects of increasing PCT would have on a large break LOCA, explicit to Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2.
* 10 CFR 50 App B Design Control -                                                                         The application did not discuss how the remaining PCT margin would be tracked or documented for future reviews.
* 10 CFR 50 App B Design Control - The application did not discuss how the remaining PCT margin would be tracked or documented for future reviews.
        -                                                               10 CFR 50.46(b)(1) requires PCT not exceed 2200°F
- 10 CFR 50.46(b)(1) requires PCT not exceed 2200°F


10                                                                                                                                                       10 Technical Discussion -                                                                                                                                                                                           NPSH
10 10 Technical Discussion - NPSH
* GOTHIC Code - The application did not describe the version of the GOTHIC code used.                                   More information is needed on uncertainties and on inputs that impact LOCA sump temperature response.
* GOTHIC Code - The application did not describe the version of the GOTHIC code used. More information is needed on uncertainties and on inputs that impact LOCA sump temperature response.
* NPSH Margin -                                                                                 The application did not describe the NPSH margin for containment spray pumps during the LOCA recirculation phase.
* NPSH Margin - The application did not describe the NPSH margin for containment spray pumps during the LOCA recirculation phase.


11                                                                                                                                     11 Technical Discussion -                                                                                                                                                                                           TS
11 11 Technical Discussion - TS
* Should the application be resubmitted, technical issues may drive the structure of an appropriate TS for the change IAW 10 CFR 50.36.
* Should the application be resubmitted, technical issues may drive the structure of an appropriate TS for the change IAW 10 CFR 50.36.
* Remedial Action vs LCO-                                                                                                   The application did not provide a justification for why the proposed change would not be considered an LCO rather than a remedial action.
* Remedial Action vs LCO-The application did not provide a justification for why the proposed change would not be considered an LCO rather than a remedial action.
        -                                                                   10 CFR 50.36(c)(2) defines LCO as the lowest functional capability or performance levels of equipment required for safe operation of the facility.
- 10 CFR 50.36(c)(2) defines LCO as the lowest functional capability or performance levels of equipment required for safe operation of the facility.


12                                                                                                                                               12 Path For ward
12 12 Path For ward
* The NRC staff is committed to an expeditious review of this LAR,                               if resubmitted, whether under RIPE or non-RIPE.
* The NRC staff is committed to an expeditious review of this LAR, if resubmitted, whether under RIPE or non-RIPE.
* The NRC would expect this submittal to inform future reviews and the                               RIPE process.
* The NRC would expect this submittal to inform future reviews and the RIPE process.


13 Acronyms
13 Acronyms


CFR -                                                                         Code of Federal Regulations LAR -                                                                         License Amendment Request LCO -                                                                       Limiting Conditions for Operation LOCA -                                                                         Loss of Coolant Accident NPSH -                                                                         Net Positive Suction Head PCT -                                                                         Peak Cladding Temperature RIPE -                                                                         Risk-                                                                                                                                                         Informed Process for Evaluation SNC -                                                                         Southern Nuclear Company TS -                                                                     Technical Specification
CFR - Code of Federal Regulations LAR - License Amendment Request LCO - Limiting Conditions for Operation LOCA - Loss of Coolant Accident NPSH - Net Positive Suction Head PCT - Peak Cladding Temperature RIPE - Risk-Informed Process for Evaluation SNC - Southern Nuclear Company TS - Technical Specification


14                                                                                                                                                                                                                             14 Questions?
14 14 Questions?


15}}
15}}

Latest revision as of 11:36, 4 October 2024

NRC Slides-07/11/2024 Mtg to Exchange Technical Information Regarding Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 & 2, Proposed License Amendment Request to Increase TS 3.6.5 Containment Temperature Limit Completion Using Risk-Informed Process
ML24190A108
Person / Time
Site: Farley  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 07/08/2024
From: Turner Z
Plant Licensing Branch II
To:
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
Turner, Zachary
References
TS 3.6.5
Download: ML24190A108 (1)


Text

Obser vation Public Meeting

Discuss SNCs previous License Amendment Request to Revise Joseph M.

Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Actions and Completion Times in TS 3.6.5, Containment Air Temperature, using RIPE

Date: July 11, 2024

1 1 Purpose

  • Provide a brief background related to SNC's LAR to modify Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, TS 3.6.5, "Containment Air Temperature" under RIPE
  • Ensure a common understanding of SNC's previous LAR dated April 19, 2024, as supplemented
  • Identify informational needs for any future LARs related to modifying TS 3.6.5 for RIPE and/or traditional reviews

2 2 Key messages

  • SNC's April 2024 Farley submittal (under RIPE) was a request for a permanent change similar to an emergent, time-limited LAR which was granted for 16 days to preclude a plant shutdown. Permanent changes require a more complete justification and review than one-time, time -limited requests.
  • NRC understands the likely seasonal need for a containment temperature licensing modification. NRC is committed to an expedited review whether resubmitted as a RIPE or non-RIPE licensing request.

3 Background - August 2023 Emergency Amendment

- Amendment expired on September 9, 2024 (16 days)

4 4 Background - RIPE LAR Pre-submittal meeting

  • P re-submittal meeting was held on April 3, 2024

- SNC slides (ML24088A166)

- Meeting summary - April 12, 2023 (ML24096A183)

5 5 Background-SNC s RIPE LAR Submittal

- SNC submittal April 19, 2024 (ML24110A126)

- NRC Request for Supplemental Information May 28, 2024 (ML24143A041)

- SNC Supplement June 14, 2024 (ML24166A290)

- NRC Nonacceptance Letter July 1, 2024 (ML24178A376)

6 6 Farley RIPE LAR

  • TS 3.6.5 Actions, upon exceeding the containment average air temperature limit, are proposed to be revised to allow continued operation for up to 30 cumulative days provided:

the containment average air temperature remains less than or equal to 122oF (verified within 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> and once per 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> thereafter);

the containment average air temperature has not exceeded the 120oF limit for more than 720 cumulative hours during the current calendar year (verified within 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> and once per 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> thereafter); and the refueling water storage tank temperature remains less than or equal to 100oF (verified within 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> and once per 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br />

7 8

Technical Discussion

In the original application, as supplemented, there were areas where additional information would be needed or expanded on to accept the licensees submittal:

- NRC staff seeks to understand the methodology SNC used to determine increase in PCT as an effect of increased Containment Average Air Temperature

- NRC staff seeks to clarify the version and inputs/assumptions of SNC's GOTHIC model on LOCA sump temperature response

  • TS

- NRC staff seeks to understand how the proposed change in TS 3.6.5 is derived from analysis and evaluation included in the Safety Analysis Report

9 9 Technical Discussion - PCT

  • Plant-specific Methodology - The application did not provide sufficient information to assess the analytical methods and results concerning the plant-specific effects of increasing PCT would have on a large break LOCA, explicit to Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2.
  • 10 CFR 50 App B Design Control - The application did not discuss how the remaining PCT margin would be tracked or documented for future reviews.

- 10 CFR 50.46(b)(1) requires PCT not exceed 2200°F

10 10 Technical Discussion - NPSH

  • GOTHIC Code - The application did not describe the version of the GOTHIC code used. More information is needed on uncertainties and on inputs that impact LOCA sump temperature response.

11 11 Technical Discussion - TS

  • Should the application be resubmitted, technical issues may drive the structure of an appropriate TS for the change IAW 10 CFR 50.36.
  • Remedial Action vs LCO-The application did not provide a justification for why the proposed change would not be considered an LCO rather than a remedial action.

- 10 CFR 50.36(c)(2) defines LCO as the lowest functional capability or performance levels of equipment required for safe operation of the facility.

12 12 Path For ward

  • The NRC staff is committed to an expeditious review of this LAR, if resubmitted, whether under RIPE or non-RIPE.
  • The NRC would expect this submittal to inform future reviews and the RIPE process.

13 Acronyms

CFR - Code of Federal Regulations LAR - License Amendment Request LCO - Limiting Conditions for Operation LOCA - Loss of Coolant Accident NPSH - Net Positive Suction Head PCT - Peak Cladding Temperature RIPE - Risk-Informed Process for Evaluation SNC - Southern Nuclear Company TS - Technical Specification

14 14 Questions?

15