ML24190A108
| ML24190A108 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley |
| Issue date: | 07/08/2024 |
| From: | Turner Z Plant Licensing Branch II |
| To: | Southern Nuclear Operating Co |
| Turner, Zachary | |
| References | |
| TS 3.6.5 | |
| Download: ML24190A108 (1) | |
Text
1 Discuss SNCs previous License Amendment Request to Revise Joseph M.
Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Actions and Completion Times in TS 3.6.5, Containment Air Temperature, using RIPE Date: July 11, 2024 1
Observation Public Meeting
2 Purpose
- Provide a brief background related to SNC's LAR to modify Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, TS 3.6.5, "Containment Air Temperature" under RIPE
- Identify informational needs for any future LARs related to modifying TS 3.6.5 for RIPE and/or traditional reviews 2
3 Key messages
- SNC's April 2024 Farley submittal (under RIPE) was a request for a permanent change similar to an emergent, time-limited LAR which was granted for 16 days to preclude a plant shutdown. Permanent changes require a more complete justification and review than one-time, time-limited requests.
- NRC understands the likely seasonal need for a containment temperature licensing modification. NRC is committed to an expedited review whether resubmitted as a RIPE or non-RIPE licensing request.
4 Background - August 2023 Emergency Amendment
- Emergency Amendment - August 24, 2023 (ML23235A296)
-Amendment expired on September 9, 2024 (16 days) 4
5 Background - RIPE LAR Pre-submittal meeting
- Pre-submittal meeting was held on April 3, 2024
-SNC slides (ML24088A166)
-Meeting summary - April 12, 2023 (ML24096A183) 5
6 Background-SNCs RIPE LAR Submittal
-SNC submittal April 19, 2024 (ML24110A126)
-NRC Request for Supplemental Information May 28, 2024 (ML24143A041)
-SNC Supplement June 14, 2024 (ML24166A290)
-NRC Nonacceptance Letter July 1, 2024 (ML24178A376) 6
- SNC submitted Farley RIPE LAR on April 19, 2024 (ML24110A126)
- TS 3.6.5 Actions, upon exceeding the containment average air temperature limit, are proposed to be revised to allow continued operation for up to 30 cumulative days provided:
the containment average air temperature remains less than or equal to 122oF (verified within 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> and once per 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> thereafter);
the containment average air temperature has not exceeded the 120oF limit for more than 720 cumulative hours during the current calendar year (verified within 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> and once per 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> thereafter); and the refueling water storage tank temperature remains less than or equal to 100oF (verified within 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> and once per 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br />
8
9 Technical Discussion In the original application, as supplemented, there were areas where additional information would be needed or expanded on to accept the licensees submittal:
- NRC staff seeks to understand the methodology SNC used to determine increase in PCT as an effect of increased Containment Average Air Temperature
- NRC staff seeks to clarify the version and inputs/assumptions of SNC's GOTHIC model on LOCA sump temperature response
- TS
- NRC staff seeks to understand how the proposed change in TS 3.6.5 is derived from analysis and evaluation included in the Safety Analysis Report 9
10 Technical Discussion - PCT
- Plant-specific Methodology - The application did not provide sufficient information to assess the analytical methods and results concerning the plant-specific effects of increasing PCT would have on a large break LOCA, explicit to Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2.
- 10 CFR 50 App B Design Control - The application did not discuss how the remaining PCT margin would be tracked or documented for future reviews.
- 10 CFR 50.46(b)(1) requires PCT not exceed 2200°F 10
11 Technical Discussion - NPSH
- GOTHIC Code - The application did not describe the version of the GOTHIC code used. More information is needed on uncertainties and on inputs that impact LOCA sump temperature response.
- NPSH Margin - The application did not describe the NPSH margin for containment spray pumps during the LOCA recirculation phase.
11
12 Technical Discussion - TS
- Should the application be resubmitted, technical issues may drive the structure of an appropriate TS for the change IAW 10 CFR 50.36.
- Remedial Action vs LCO-The application did not provide a justification for why the proposed change would not be considered an LCO rather than a remedial action.
- 10 CFR 50.36(c)(2) defines LCO as the lowest functional capability or performance levels of equipment required for safe operation of the facility.
12
13 Path Forward
- The NRC staff is committed to an expeditious review of this LAR, if resubmitted, whether under RIPE or non-RIPE.
- The NRC would expect this submittal to inform future reviews and the RIPE process.
14 Acronyms CFR - Code of Federal Regulations LAR - License Amendment Request LCO - Limiting Conditions for Operation LOCA - Loss of Coolant Accident NPSH - Net Positive Suction Head PCT - Peak Cladding Temperature RIPE - Risk-Informed Process for Evaluation SNC - Southern Nuclear Company TS - Technical Specification 14
15 Questions?