ML20070U141: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:<
PutSC $PfVke ll6ctne arid GM Compaay Thomas M, Crimmins, Jr. Pub 5C Service Electoc and Gas Compe.ay P.O Box 23E Hancom Bodyt NJ 08038 609-339 4700 s ce %oet N a g ne y MAR 2 8 1991 NLR-N91042 i    S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Do ument Control Desk Washington, DC        20555 Gentlemen:
WIDE RANGE NEUTRON FLUX MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 On April 23, 1990, Public Service Electric and Gas Company (PSE&G) submitted a commitment to the NRC to provide a detailed schedule for installation of a Regulatory Guide 1.97 qualified Wide Range Neutron Monitoring System (WRNMS).                              This commitment, which was made following the NRC's rejection of a BWR Owners Group (BWROG) appeal on this issue, became due within 180 days of the NRC's October 3, 1990 approval of the General Electric WRNMS design.
Since that time, PSE&G has followed the progress of a subsequent BWROG appeal of the WRNMS requirement and strongly endorses the bases of that appeal. The WRNMS design, while providing a number of attractive features, as described in the LWROG arguments, does not provide increased safety benefit commensurate with its' attendant costs.        PSE&G believes that the resources necessary to purchace and install the WRNMS could be better expended on more safety-significant plant improvements. Therefore, pending NRC's resolution of the BWROG appeal, we have delayed a final decision regarding a WRNMS installation-schedule.
Should you have ar./ questions regarding this letter, we will be pleased to discus        them with you.
Sincerely,
                                                        ~~      j      .
t (e      I    Ib      f, i \
bh l /1 }
96 910408o17e 92032e                                                O fDR    ADOCK 05000354                                                  \\%
,                                PDR                                                      \
l
 
  -+
Document Control Desk                                MAR 2 8 199; NLR-N91042 C    Mr. T. Martin, Administrator Region I Mr. S. Dembek Licensing Project Manager Mr. T. Johnsen Senior Resident Inspector Mr. Kent Tosch, Chief New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Nuclear Engineering l
I l
l                                                                                \
1}}

Latest revision as of 21:26, 23 May 2020

Notifies of Delay of Final Decision Re Wide Range Neutron Flux Monitoring Instrumentation Installation Schedule
ML20070U141
Person / Time
Site: Hope Creek PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 03/28/1991
From: Crimmins T
Public Service Enterprise Group
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
NLR-N91042, NUDOCS 9104080178
Download: ML20070U141 (2)


Text

<

PutSC $PfVke ll6ctne arid GM Compaay Thomas M, Crimmins, Jr. Pub 5C Service Electoc and Gas Compe.ay P.O Box 23E Hancom Bodyt NJ 08038 609-339 4700 s ce %oet N a g ne y MAR 2 8 1991 NLR-N91042 i S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Do ument Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Gentlemen:

WIDE RANGE NEUTRON FLUX MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 On April 23, 1990, Public Service Electric and Gas Company (PSE&G) submitted a commitment to the NRC to provide a detailed schedule for installation of a Regulatory Guide 1.97 qualified Wide Range Neutron Monitoring System (WRNMS). This commitment, which was made following the NRC's rejection of a BWR Owners Group (BWROG) appeal on this issue, became due within 180 days of the NRC's October 3, 1990 approval of the General Electric WRNMS design.

Since that time, PSE&G has followed the progress of a subsequent BWROG appeal of the WRNMS requirement and strongly endorses the bases of that appeal. The WRNMS design, while providing a number of attractive features, as described in the LWROG arguments, does not provide increased safety benefit commensurate with its' attendant costs. PSE&G believes that the resources necessary to purchace and install the WRNMS could be better expended on more safety-significant plant improvements. Therefore, pending NRC's resolution of the BWROG appeal, we have delayed a final decision regarding a WRNMS installation-schedule.

Should you have ar./ questions regarding this letter, we will be pleased to discus them with you.

Sincerely,

~~ j .

t (e I Ib f, i \

bh l /1 }

96 910408o17e 92032e O fDR ADOCK 05000354 \\%

, PDR \

l

-+

Document Control Desk MAR 2 8 199; NLR-N91042 C Mr. T. Martin, Administrator Region I Mr. S. Dembek Licensing Project Manager Mr. T. Johnsen Senior Resident Inspector Mr. Kent Tosch, Chief New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Nuclear Engineering l

I l

l \

1