ML17339A090: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, O.C. 20555-0001 December 19, 2017 Mr. Joseph W. Shea Vice President, Nuclear Regulatory Affairs and Support Services Tennessee Valley Authority 1101 Market Street, LP 3R-C Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801  
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, O.C. 20555-0001 December 19, 2017 Mr. Joseph W. Shea Vice President, Nuclear Regulatory Affairs and Support Services Tennessee Valley Authority 1101 Market Street, LP 3R-C Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
WATIS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 2-
WATIS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 2-  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF OCTOBER 27, 2017, CONFERENCE CALL WITH TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY RE: FALL 2017 STEAM GENERATOR INSPECTIONS (EPID L-2017-LR0-0050)  
OF OCTOBER 27, 2017, CONFERENCE CALL WITH TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY RE: FALL 2017 STEAM GENERATOR INSPECTIONS (EPID L-2017-LR0-0050)


==Dear Mr. Shea:==
==Dear Mr. Shea:==
On November 13, 2017, the U.S Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff participated in a conference call with representatives of the Tennessee Valley Authority (the licensee) regarding the ongoing steam generator inspection activities at the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2. A list of participants is provided as Enclosure
 
: 1. A summary of the conference call is provided as Enclosure 2, which includes a list of questions and the licensee's draft responses discussed during the call. If you have any questions regarding this matter, I may be reached at (301) 415-6020 or Robert.Schaaf@nrc.gov.
On November 13, 2017, the U.S Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff participated in a conference call with representatives of the Tennessee Valley Authority (the licensee) regarding the ongoing steam generator inspection activities at the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2. A list of participants is provided as Enclosure 1. A summary of the conference call is provided as , which includes a list of questions and the licensee's draft responses discussed during the call.
Docket No. 50-391  
If you have any questions regarding this matter, I may be reached at (301) 415-6020 or Robert.Schaaf@nrc.gov.
Sincerely,
                                                  ~Rgj_!
Robert G. Schaaf, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-391


==Enclosures:==
==Enclosures:==
: 1. List of Participants
: 1. List of Participants
: 2. Conference Call Summary cc: Distribution via Listserv Sincerely, ~Rgj_! Robert G. Schaaf, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation LIST OF PARTICIPANTS NOVEMBER 13, 2017, CONFERENCE CALL WITH TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 2 FALL 2017 STEAM GENERATOR INSPECTIONS U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Farideh Saba Alan Huynh Paul Klein Andrew Johnson Alexander Butcavage Tennessee Valley Authority Kim Hulvey Russell Wells Jeremy Mayo Dan Folsom Jesse Baron Enclosure 1
: 2. Conference Call Summary cc: Distribution via Listserv
 
LIST OF PARTICIPANTS NOVEMBER 13, 2017, CONFERENCE CALL WITH TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 2 FALL 2017 STEAM GENERATOR INSPECTIONS U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Farideh Saba Alan Huynh Paul Klein Andrew Johnson Alexander Butcavage Tennessee Valley Authority Kim Hulvey Russell Wells Jeremy Mayo Dan Folsom Jesse Baron Enclosure 1


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF NOVEMBER 13, 2017, CONFERENCE CALL WITH TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 2 FALL 2017 STEAM GENERATOR TUBE INSPECTIONS DOCKET NO. 50-391 On November 13, 2017, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff participated in a conference call with Tennessee Valley Authority (the licensee), regarding the ongoing steam generator (SG) tube inspection activities at Watts Bar Nuclear Plant (Watts Bar), Unit 2. Several topics regarding the ongoing inspections were discussed during the conference call. A summary of the discussion follows.
OF NOVEMBER 13, 2017, CONFERENCE CALL WITH TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 2 FALL 2017 STEAM GENERATOR TUBE INSPECTIONS DOCKET NO. 50-391 On November 13, 2017, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff participated in a conference call with Tennessee Valley Authority (the licensee), regarding the ongoing steam generator (SG) tube inspection activities at Watts Bar Nuclear Plant (Watts Bar), Unit 2.
Several topics regarding the ongoing inspections were discussed during the conference call. A summary of the discussion follows.
* This was the first refueling outage for the Watts Bar, Unit 2, SGs following the recently completed operating cycle of 0.74 effective full power years. At the time of the call, the licensee was almost finished with eddy current exams but still had some additional SG inspections (e.g., SG 4 foreign object search and retrieval) to complete.
* This was the first refueling outage for the Watts Bar, Unit 2, SGs following the recently completed operating cycle of 0.74 effective full power years. At the time of the call, the licensee was almost finished with eddy current exams but still had some additional SG inspections (e.g., SG 4 foreign object search and retrieval) to complete.
* The licensee provided an overview of the design of its SGs during the call. The Watts Bar, Unit 2, Westinghouse Model D3 SGs were fabricated in the early 1970s. Each SG has 4,674 mill-annealed Alloy 600 tubes that have a nominal outer diameter of 0.75 inches and nominal wall thickness of 0.043 inches. The tubes are supported by drilled carbon steel tube support plates (TSPs) and were hard roll expanded for the full depth of the tubesheet.
* The licensee provided an overview of the design of its SGs during the call. The Watts Bar, Unit 2, Westinghouse Model D3 SGs were fabricated in the early 1970s. Each SG has 4,674 mill-annealed Alloy 600 tubes that have a nominal outer diameter of 0.75 inches and nominal wall thickness of 0.043 inches. The tubes are supported by drilled carbon steel tube support plates (TSPs) and were hard roll expanded for the full depth of the tubesheet. The licensee stated that some tubes were pulled prior to operation to aid loose parts retrieval efforts.
The licensee stated that some tubes were pulled prior to operation to aid loose parts retrieval efforts.
* The licensee stated that there was no primary-to-secondary leakage observed during the recently completed operating cycle, no secondary side pressure tests were performed, and no in-situ pressure tests or tube pulls were planned.
* The licensee stated that there was no primary-to-secondary leakage observed during the recently completed operating cycle, no secondary side pressure tests were performed, and no in-situ pressure tests or tube pulls were planned.
* The licensee stated that there were two deviations taken to the industry guidelines.
* The licensee stated that there were two deviations taken to the industry guidelines. One was related to the Water Chemistry guidelines for high ionic impurities at startup, due to the long shutdown during the operating cycle. This deviation was closed at the time of the call. The other deviation was due to the performance of preservice inspections prior to hydrostatic tests instead of after the hydrostatic tests. This deviation was to be closed after the outage.
One was related to the Water Chemistry guidelines for high ionic impurities at startup, due to the long shutdown during the operating cycle. This deviation was closed at the time of the call. The other deviation was due to the performance of preservice inspections prior to hydrostatic tests instead of after the hydrostatic tests. This deviation was to be closed after the outage.
* The licensee provided the scope of its inspections, which included:
* The licensee provided the scope of its inspections, which included:
o 100 percent full-length bobbin o +PointŽ inspections of U-bends in rows 1-4 o Special interest inspections for non-resolved bobbin indications o 100 percent hot leg (HL) top of tubesheet o 50 percent X-probe up to the sixth TSP Gust above the preheater inlet) on cold leg (CL) sid~ for loose parts o +PointŽ or X-probe of dents/dings 5 volts (HL to top CL TSP) Enclosure 2  o 20 percent +PointŽ or X-probe of dents/dings 2 volts o Channel head inspections o Foreign object search and retrieval (FOSAR) o Sludge lancing o Steam drum inspections
o 100 percent full-length bobbin o +Point' inspections of U-bends in rows 1-4 o Special interest inspections for non-resolved bobbin indications o 100 percent hot leg (HL) top of tubesheet o 50 percent X-probe up to the sixth TSP Gust above the preheater inlet) on cold leg (CL) sid~ for loose parts o +Point' or X-probe of dents/dings ~ 5 volts (HL to top CL TSP)
* The licensee stated that tube wear from anti-vibration bars was the only form of degradation detected.
Enclosure 2
The maximum depth was 15 percent through-wall for all indications.
 
o   20 percent +Point' or X-probe of dents/dings ~ 2 volts o   Channel head inspections o   Foreign object search and retrieval (FOSAR) o   Sludge lancing o   Steam drum inspections
* The licensee stated that tube wear from anti-vibration bars was the only form of degradation detected. The maximum depth was 15 percent through-wall for all indications.
* The licensee stated that in-situ pressure tests and tube pulls were not performed.
* The licensee stated that in-situ pressure tests and tube pulls were not performed.
* Regarding loose parts, the licensee stated that X-probe inspections, FOSAR, and sludge lancing were performed.
* Regarding loose parts, the licensee stated that X-probe inspections, FOSAR, and sludge lancing were performed. The licensee stated that one loose part was not removed from the SGs and tubes surrounding it would be plugged. There were no wear indications associated with loose parts. The licensee also stated that while sludge lancing is typically performed prior to FOSAR, it performed some FOSAR prior to sludge lancing.
The licensee stated that one loose part was not removed from the SGs and tubes surrounding it would be plugged. There were no wear indications associated with loose parts. The licensee also stated that while sludge lancing is typically performed prior to FOSAR, it performed some FOSAR prior to sludge lancing. The licensee removed 24.5, 22.5, 27.5, and 35 pounds of sludge from SGs 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively.
The licensee removed 24.5, 22.5, 27.5, and 35 pounds of sludge from SGs 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively.
The NRC staff did not identify any issues that required followup action at this time; however, the NRC staff asked to be notified in the event that any unusual conditions were detected during the remainder of the outage.
The NRC staff did not identify any issues that required followup action at this time; however, the NRC staff asked to be notified in the event that any unusual conditions were detected during the remainder of the outage.


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
WADS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 2 -
WADS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 2 -  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF OCTOBER 27, 2017, CONFERENCE CALL WITH TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY RE: FALL 2017 STEAM GENERATOR INSPECTIONS (EPID L-2017-LR0-0050)
OF OCTOBER 27, 2017, CONFERENCE CALL WITH TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY RE: FALL 2017 STEAM GENERATOR INSPECTIONS (EPID L-2017-LR0-0050)
DATED DECEMBER 19, 2017 DISTRIBUTION:
DATED DECEMBER 19, 2017 DISTRIBUTION:
PUBLIC RidsACRS_MailCTR Resource RidsNrrDorlLpl2-2 Resource RidsNrrDmlrMccb Resource AHuynh, NRR AJohnson, NRR AButcavage, R-11 ADAMS A ccess1on N ML17339A090 o.: OFFICE D0RULPL2-2/PM D0RULPL2-2/LA NAME RSchaaf BClayton (LRonewicz for) DATE 12/11/2017 12/08/2017 RidsRgn2Mai1Center Resource RidsNrrDssStsb Resource RidsNrrLABClayton Resource RidsNrrPMWattsBar Resource PKlein, NRR SWalkery, R-11 JNadel, R-11 *b d >Y memoran um DMLR/MCCB/BC*
PUBLIC                                   RidsRgn2Mai1Center Resource RidsACRS_MailCTR Resource                RidsNrrDssStsb Resource RidsNrrDorlLpl2-2 Resource              RidsNrrLABClayton Resource RidsNrrDmlrMccb Resource                RidsNrrPMWattsBar Resource AHuynh, NRR                              PKlein, NRR AJohnson, NRR                           SWalkery, R-11 AButcavage, R-11                        JNadel, R-11 ADAMS A ccess1on N o.: ML17339A090                          *b>Y memoran d um OFFICE D0RULPL2-2/PM   D0RULPL2-2/LA   DMLR/MCCB/BC* D0RULPL2-2/BC   D0RULPL2-2/PM BClayton NAME    RSchaaf                          SBloom         UShoop           RSchaaf (LRonewicz for)
D0RULPL2-2/BC D0RULPL2-2/PM SBloom UShoop RSchaaf 11/27/2017 12/19/2017 12/19/2017 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY}}
DATE    12/11/2017      12/08/2017      11/27/2017     12/19/2017       12/19/2017 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY}}

Latest revision as of 10:31, 22 October 2019

Summary of October 27, 2017, Conference Call with Tennessee Valley Authority Fall 2017 Steam Generator Inspections
ML17339A090
Person / Time
Site: Watts Bar Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 12/19/2017
From: Robert Schaaf
Plant Licensing Branch II
To: James Shea
Tennessee Valley Authority
Schaaf, Robert, NRR/DORL/LPLII-2
References
EPID L-2017-LRO-0050
Download: ML17339A090 (5)


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, O.C. 20555-0001 December 19, 2017 Mr. Joseph W. Shea Vice President, Nuclear Regulatory Affairs and Support Services Tennessee Valley Authority 1101 Market Street, LP 3R-C Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801

SUBJECT:

WATIS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 2-

SUMMARY

OF OCTOBER 27, 2017, CONFERENCE CALL WITH TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY RE: FALL 2017 STEAM GENERATOR INSPECTIONS (EPID L-2017-LR0-0050)

Dear Mr. Shea:

On November 13, 2017, the U.S Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff participated in a conference call with representatives of the Tennessee Valley Authority (the licensee) regarding the ongoing steam generator inspection activities at the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2. A list of participants is provided as Enclosure 1. A summary of the conference call is provided as , which includes a list of questions and the licensee's draft responses discussed during the call.

If you have any questions regarding this matter, I may be reached at (301) 415-6020 or Robert.Schaaf@nrc.gov.

Sincerely,

~Rgj_!

Robert G. Schaaf, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-391

Enclosures:

1. List of Participants
2. Conference Call Summary cc: Distribution via Listserv

LIST OF PARTICIPANTS NOVEMBER 13, 2017, CONFERENCE CALL WITH TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 2 FALL 2017 STEAM GENERATOR INSPECTIONS U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Farideh Saba Alan Huynh Paul Klein Andrew Johnson Alexander Butcavage Tennessee Valley Authority Kim Hulvey Russell Wells Jeremy Mayo Dan Folsom Jesse Baron Enclosure 1

SUMMARY

OF NOVEMBER 13, 2017, CONFERENCE CALL WITH TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 2 FALL 2017 STEAM GENERATOR TUBE INSPECTIONS DOCKET NO. 50-391 On November 13, 2017, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff participated in a conference call with Tennessee Valley Authority (the licensee), regarding the ongoing steam generator (SG) tube inspection activities at Watts Bar Nuclear Plant (Watts Bar), Unit 2.

Several topics regarding the ongoing inspections were discussed during the conference call. A summary of the discussion follows.

  • This was the first refueling outage for the Watts Bar, Unit 2, SGs following the recently completed operating cycle of 0.74 effective full power years. At the time of the call, the licensee was almost finished with eddy current exams but still had some additional SG inspections (e.g., SG 4 foreign object search and retrieval) to complete.
  • The licensee provided an overview of the design of its SGs during the call. The Watts Bar, Unit 2, Westinghouse Model D3 SGs were fabricated in the early 1970s. Each SG has 4,674 mill-annealed Alloy 600 tubes that have a nominal outer diameter of 0.75 inches and nominal wall thickness of 0.043 inches. The tubes are supported by drilled carbon steel tube support plates (TSPs) and were hard roll expanded for the full depth of the tubesheet. The licensee stated that some tubes were pulled prior to operation to aid loose parts retrieval efforts.
  • The licensee stated that there was no primary-to-secondary leakage observed during the recently completed operating cycle, no secondary side pressure tests were performed, and no in-situ pressure tests or tube pulls were planned.
  • The licensee stated that there were two deviations taken to the industry guidelines. One was related to the Water Chemistry guidelines for high ionic impurities at startup, due to the long shutdown during the operating cycle. This deviation was closed at the time of the call. The other deviation was due to the performance of preservice inspections prior to hydrostatic tests instead of after the hydrostatic tests. This deviation was to be closed after the outage.
  • The licensee provided the scope of its inspections, which included:

o 100 percent full-length bobbin o +Point' inspections of U-bends in rows 1-4 o Special interest inspections for non-resolved bobbin indications o 100 percent hot leg (HL) top of tubesheet o 50 percent X-probe up to the sixth TSP Gust above the preheater inlet) on cold leg (CL) sid~ for loose parts o +Point' or X-probe of dents/dings ~ 5 volts (HL to top CL TSP)

Enclosure 2

o 20 percent +Point' or X-probe of dents/dings ~ 2 volts o Channel head inspections o Foreign object search and retrieval (FOSAR) o Sludge lancing o Steam drum inspections

  • The licensee stated that tube wear from anti-vibration bars was the only form of degradation detected. The maximum depth was 15 percent through-wall for all indications.
  • The licensee stated that in-situ pressure tests and tube pulls were not performed.
  • Regarding loose parts, the licensee stated that X-probe inspections, FOSAR, and sludge lancing were performed. The licensee stated that one loose part was not removed from the SGs and tubes surrounding it would be plugged. There were no wear indications associated with loose parts. The licensee also stated that while sludge lancing is typically performed prior to FOSAR, it performed some FOSAR prior to sludge lancing.

The licensee removed 24.5, 22.5, 27.5, and 35 pounds of sludge from SGs 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively.

The NRC staff did not identify any issues that required followup action at this time; however, the NRC staff asked to be notified in the event that any unusual conditions were detected during the remainder of the outage.

SUBJECT:

WADS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 2 -

SUMMARY

OF OCTOBER 27, 2017, CONFERENCE CALL WITH TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY RE: FALL 2017 STEAM GENERATOR INSPECTIONS (EPID L-2017-LR0-0050)

DATED DECEMBER 19, 2017 DISTRIBUTION:

PUBLIC RidsRgn2Mai1Center Resource RidsACRS_MailCTR Resource RidsNrrDssStsb Resource RidsNrrDorlLpl2-2 Resource RidsNrrLABClayton Resource RidsNrrDmlrMccb Resource RidsNrrPMWattsBar Resource AHuynh, NRR PKlein, NRR AJohnson, NRR SWalkery, R-11 AButcavage, R-11 JNadel, R-11 ADAMS A ccess1on N o.: ML17339A090 *b>Y memoran d um OFFICE D0RULPL2-2/PM D0RULPL2-2/LA DMLR/MCCB/BC* D0RULPL2-2/BC D0RULPL2-2/PM BClayton NAME RSchaaf SBloom UShoop RSchaaf (LRonewicz for)

DATE 12/11/2017 12/08/2017 11/27/2017 12/19/2017 12/19/2017 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY