IR 05000298/2014006: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
-Nuclear and Chief Nuclear Officer Nebraska Public Power District Cooper Nuclear Station 72676 648A Avenue | -Nuclear and Chief Nuclear Officer Nebraska Public Power District Cooper Nuclear Station 72676 648A Avenue | ||
Brownville, NE 68321 | Brownville, NE 68321 SUBJECT: MID-CYCLE ASSESSMENT LETTER FOR COOPER NUCLEAR STATION (REPORT 05000298/2014006 | ||
SUBJECT: MID-CYCLE ASSESSMENT LETTER FOR COOPER NUCLEAR STATION (REPORT 05000298/2014006 | |||
) Dear Mr. Limpias | ) Dear Mr. Limpias | ||
: On August 14, 2014, the NRC completed its mid-cycle performance review of the Cooper Nuclear Statio The NRC reviewed the most recent quarterly performance indicators (PIs) in addition to inspection results and enforcement actions from July 1, 2013 through June 30, 201 This letter informs you of the NRC's assessment of the Cooper Nuclear Station during this period and its plans for future inspections at your facilit The NRC determined that overall, the Cooper Nuclear Station was operated in a manner that preserved public health and safety and met all cornerstone objective The NRC determined the performance at the Cooper Nuclear Station during the most recent quarter was within the Licensee Response Column of the NRC's Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) Action Matrix because all inspection findings had very low (i.e., Green) safety significance, and all PIs indicated that your performance was within the nominal, expected range (i.e., Green). Therefore, the NRC plans to conduct ROP baseline inspections at your facilit As a result of the Safety Culture Common Language Initiative, the terminology and coding of cross-cutting aspects were revise All cross | : On August 14, 2014, the NRC completed its mid-cycle performance review of the Cooper Nuclear Statio The NRC reviewed the most recent quarterly performance indicators (PIs) in addition to inspection results and enforcement actions from July 1, 2013 through June 30, 201 This letter informs you of the NRC's assessment of the Cooper Nuclear Station during this period and its plans for future inspections at your facilit The NRC determined that overall, the Cooper Nuclear Station was operated in a manner that preserved public health and safety and met all cornerstone objective The NRC determined the performance at the Cooper Nuclear Station during the most recent quarter was within the Licensee Response Column of the NRC's Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) Action Matrix because all inspection findings had very low (i.e., Green) safety significance, and all PIs indicated that your performance was within the nominal, expected range (i.e., Green). Therefore, the NRC plans to conduct ROP baseline inspections at your facilit As a result of the Safety Culture Common Language Initiative, the terminology and coding of cross-cutting aspects were revise All cross | ||
| Line 34: | Line 32: | ||
-cutting issues in accordance with IMC 0305, "Operating Reactor Assessment Program," dated October 18, 201 The NRC identified a cross | -cutting issues in accordance with IMC 0305, "Operating Reactor Assessment Program," dated October 18, 201 The NRC identified a cross | ||
-cutting theme in the human performance area associated with Procedural Adherenc Specifically, the theme consists of four inspection findings in the mitigating systems cornerstone related to individuals follow processes, procedures and work instructions [H.8/WP.4]. The NRC determined that a substantive cross | -cutting theme in the human performance area associated with Procedural Adherenc Specifically, the theme consists of four inspection findings in the mitigating systems cornerstone related to individuals follow processes, procedures and work instructions [H.8/WP.4]. The NRC determined that a substantive cross | ||
-cutting issue does not O. Limpias exist because, while there were four inspection findings with this theme, this represented a recent performance tren Once identified, your staff placed this issue into the corrective action program and is presently developing plans to address this issu The NRC will continue to monitor your staff's efforts and progress in addressing the theme until the theme criteria are no longer me The NRC identified a cross | -cutting issue does not O. Limpias | ||
- 2 - exist because, while there were four inspection findings with this theme, this represented a recent performance tren Once identified, your staff placed this issue into the corrective action program and is presently developing plans to address this issu The NRC will continue to monitor your staff's efforts and progress in addressing the theme until the theme criteria are no longer me The NRC identified a cross | |||
-cutting theme in the human performance area associated with Conservative Bia Specifically, the theme consists of four inspection findings in the mitigating systems cornerstone related to individuals' use of decision | -cutting theme in the human performance area associated with Conservative Bia Specifically, the theme consists of four inspection findings in the mitigating systems cornerstone related to individuals' use of decision | ||
-making practices that emphasize prudent choices over those that are simply allowabl A proposed action is determined to be safe in order to proceed, rather than unsafe in order to stop [H.14/ DM.2]. The NRC determined that a substantive cross | -making practices that emphasize prudent choices over those that are simply allowabl A proposed action is determined to be safe in order to proceed, rather than unsafe in order to stop [H.14/ DM.2]. The NRC determined that a substantive cross | ||
| Line 49: | Line 48: | ||
-design-basis external even The NRC is conducting audits of licensee efforts towards compliance with these Order This audit includes an onsite component in order for the NRC to evaluate licensee plans for complying with the Orders, as described in site | -design-basis external even The NRC is conducting audits of licensee efforts towards compliance with these Order This audit includes an onsite component in order for the NRC to evaluate licensee plans for complying with the Orders, as described in site | ||
-specific submittals, and to receive and review information relative to associated open items. This onsite activity will occur in the months prior to a declaration of compliance for each site, and will aid staff in development of an ultimate Safety Evaluation for the site. The date for the onsite component at your site is being coordinated with your staff. A site | -specific submittals, and to receive and review information relative to associated open items. This onsite activity will occur in the months prior to a declaration of compliance for each site, and will aid staff in development of an ultimate Safety Evaluation for the site. The date for the onsite component at your site is being coordinated with your staff. A site | ||
-specific audit plan for the visit will be provided in advance to allow sufficient time for preparation O. Limpias In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading | -specific audit plan for the visit will be provided in advance to allow sufficient time for preparation O. Limpias | ||
- 3 - In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading | |||
-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). | -rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). | ||
| Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
Cooper Nuclear Station Inspection/Activity Plan | Cooper Nuclear Station Inspection/Activity Plan | ||
SUNSI Review By: DAllen ADAMS Yes No Publicly Available Non-Publicly Available Non-Sensitive Sensitive OFFICE RIV/DRP/BC RIV/DRS/D RIV/DRP/D NAME DAllen/dll AVegel TPruett SIGNATURE /RA/ /RA/VGaddy for /RA/ DATE 8/22/14 8/25/14 8/22/14 Letter to Oscar A. Limpias from Donald B. Allen dated September 2, 2014 | SUNSI Review By: DAllen ADAMS Yes No Publicly Available Non-Publicly Available Non-Sensitive Sensitive OFFICE RIV/DRP/BC RIV/DRS/D RIV/DRP/D NAME DAllen/dll AVegel TPruett SIGNATURE /RA/ /RA/VGaddy for /RA/ DATE 8/22/14 8/25/14 8/22/14 Letter to Oscar A. Limpias from Donald B. Allen dated September 2, 2014 SUBJECT: MID-CYCLE ASSESSMENT LETTER FOR COOPER NUCLEAR STATION (REPORT 05000298/2014006 | ||
SUBJECT: MID-CYCLE ASSESSMENT LETTER FOR COOPER NUCLEAR STATION (REPORT 05000298/2014006 | |||
) DISTRIBUTION | ) DISTRIBUTION | ||
: Regional Administrator (Marc.Dapas@nrc.gov) Deputy Regional Administrator (Kriss.Kennedy@nrc.gov) Acting DRP Director (Troy.Pruett@nrc.gov) Acting DRP Deputy Director (Michael. Hay@nrc.gov) DRS Director (Anton.Vegel@nrc.gov) DRS Deputy Director (Jeff.Clark@nrc.gov) Senior Resident Inspector (Jeffrey.Josey@nrc.gov) Resident Inspector (Christopher.Henderson@nrc.gov | : Regional Administrator (Marc.Dapas@nrc.gov) Deputy Regional Administrator (Kriss.Kennedy@nrc.gov) Acting DRP Director (Troy.Pruett@nrc.gov) Acting DRP Deputy Director (Michael. Hay@nrc.gov) DRS Director (Anton.Vegel@nrc.gov) DRS Deputy Director (Jeff.Clark@nrc.gov) Senior Resident Inspector (Jeffrey.Josey@nrc.gov) Resident Inspector (Christopher.Henderson@nrc.gov | ||
Revision as of 07:38, 18 May 2019
| ML14239A405 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cooper  |
| Issue date: | 09/02/2014 |
| From: | Allen D B NRC/RGN-IV/DRP/RPB-C |
| To: | Limpias O A Nebraska Public Power District (NPPD) |
| Allen D | |
| References | |
| IR-14-006 | |
| Download: ML14239A405 (7) | |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION IV 1600 E LAMAR BLVD ARLINGTON, TX 76011
-4511 September 2, 2014 Mr. Oscar A. Limpias, Vice President
-Nuclear and Chief Nuclear Officer Nebraska Public Power District Cooper Nuclear Station 72676 648A Avenue
Brownville, NE 68321 SUBJECT: MID-CYCLE ASSESSMENT LETTER FOR COOPER NUCLEAR STATION (REPORT 05000298/2014006
) Dear Mr. Limpias
- On August 14, 2014, the NRC completed its mid-cycle performance review of the Cooper Nuclear Statio The NRC reviewed the most recent quarterly performance indicators (PIs) in addition to inspection results and enforcement actions from July 1, 2013 through June 30, 201 This letter informs you of the NRC's assessment of the Cooper Nuclear Station during this period and its plans for future inspections at your facilit The NRC determined that overall, the Cooper Nuclear Station was operated in a manner that preserved public health and safety and met all cornerstone objective The NRC determined the performance at the Cooper Nuclear Station during the most recent quarter was within the Licensee Response Column of the NRC's Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) Action Matrix because all inspection findings had very low (i.e., Green) safety significance, and all PIs indicated that your performance was within the nominal, expected range (i.e., Green). Therefore, the NRC plans to conduct ROP baseline inspections at your facilit As a result of the Safety Culture Common Language Initiative, the terminology and coding of cross-cutting aspects were revise All cross
-cutting aspects identified during inspections conducted in calendar year 2014 reflect this revision to Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 0310 , "Aspects Within The Cross
-Cutting Areas," dated December 19, 201 Cross-cutting aspects identified in 2013 using the 2013 terminology were converted to the latest revision in accordance with the cross
-reference in IMC 0310 during the mid
-cycle assessment review and evaluated for cross
-cutting themes and potential substantive cross
-cutting issues in accordance with IMC 0305, "Operating Reactor Assessment Program," dated October 18, 201 The NRC identified a cross
-cutting theme in the human performance area associated with Procedural Adherenc Specifically, the theme consists of four inspection findings in the mitigating systems cornerstone related to individuals follow processes, procedures and work instructions [H.8/WP.4]. The NRC determined that a substantive cross
-cutting issue does not O. Limpias
- 2 - exist because, while there were four inspection findings with this theme, this represented a recent performance tren Once identified, your staff placed this issue into the corrective action program and is presently developing plans to address this issu The NRC will continue to monitor your staff's efforts and progress in addressing the theme until the theme criteria are no longer me The NRC identified a cross
-cutting theme in the human performance area associated with Conservative Bia Specifically, the theme consists of four inspection findings in the mitigating systems cornerstone related to individuals' use of decision
-making practices that emphasize prudent choices over those that are simply allowabl A proposed action is determined to be safe in order to proceed, rather than unsafe in order to stop [H.14/ DM.2]. The NRC determined that a substantive cross
-cutting issue does not exist because, while there were four inspection findings with this theme, this represented a continuing reduction in the number of findings with this cross
-cutting aspec The NRC will continue to monitor your staff's efforts and progress in addressing the theme until the theme criteria are no longer me We expect your staff to frequently review or monitor the effectiveness of the corrective actions for these cross
-cutting themes, using appropriate indications of performance, and implement additional actions if the desired performance is not observe The enclosed inspection plan lists the inspections scheduled through December 31, 201 Routine inspections performed by resident inspectors are not included in the inspection pla The inspections listed during the last nine months of the inspection plan are tentative and may be revised at the end
-of-cycle performance revie The NRC provides the inspection plan to allow for the resolution of any scheduling conflicts and personnel availability issue The NRC will contact you as soon as possible to discuss changes to the inspection plan should circumstances warrant any change This inspection plan does not include security
-related inspections, which will be sent via separate, non
-publicly available correspondenc In response to the accident at Fukushima, the Commission issued Order EA
-12-049, "Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond
-Design-Basis External Events," which requires licensees to develop, implement, and maintain guidance and strategies to maintain or restore core cooling, containment, and spent fuel pool cooling capabilities following a beyond
-design-basis external even Additionally, the Commission issued Order EA
-12-051, "Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation," which requires licensees to have a reliable means of remotely monitoring wide-range Spent Fuel Pool levels to support effective prioritization of event mitigation and recovery actions in the event of a beyond
-design-basis external even The NRC is conducting audits of licensee efforts towards compliance with these Order This audit includes an onsite component in order for the NRC to evaluate licensee plans for complying with the Orders, as described in site
-specific submittals, and to receive and review information relative to associated open items. This onsite activity will occur in the months prior to a declaration of compliance for each site, and will aid staff in development of an ultimate Safety Evaluation for the site. The date for the onsite component at your site is being coordinated with your staff. A site
-specific audit plan for the visit will be provided in advance to allow sufficient time for preparation O. Limpias
- 3 - In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading
-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Please contact me at (817) 200-1144 with any questions you have regarding this lette
Sincerely,
/RA/ Donald B. Allen, Chief Project Branch C Division of Reactor Projects Docket No.: 50-298 License No.
- DRP-46 Enclosure:
Cooper Nuclear Station Inspection/Activity Plan
SUNSI Review By: DAllen ADAMS Yes No Publicly Available Non-Publicly Available Non-Sensitive Sensitive OFFICE RIV/DRP/BC RIV/DRS/D RIV/DRP/D NAME DAllen/dll AVegel TPruett SIGNATURE /RA/ /RA/VGaddy for /RA/ DATE 8/22/14 8/25/14 8/22/14 Letter to Oscar A. Limpias from Donald B. Allen dated September 2, 2014 SUBJECT: MID-CYCLE ASSESSMENT LETTER FOR COOPER NUCLEAR STATION (REPORT 05000298/2014006
) DISTRIBUTION
- Regional Administrator (Marc.Dapas@nrc.gov) Deputy Regional Administrator (Kriss.Kennedy@nrc.gov) Acting DRP Director (Troy.Pruett@nrc.gov) Acting DRP Deputy Director (Michael. Hay@nrc.gov) DRS Director (Anton.Vegel@nrc.gov) DRS Deputy Director (Jeff.Clark@nrc.gov) Senior Resident Inspector (Jeffrey.Josey@nrc.gov) Resident Inspector (Christopher.Henderson@nrc.gov
) Administrative Assistant (Amy.Elam@nrc.gov)
Branch Chief (Don.Allen@nrc.gov) Senior Project Engineer (Ray.Azua@nrc.gov) Project Engineer (Paul.Nizov@nrc.gov
) Project Engineer (Michael.Langelier@nrc.gov)
Public Affairs Officer (Victor.Dricks@nrc.gov)
Public Affairs Officer (Lara.Uselding@nrc.gov
) RIV State Liaison Officer (Bill.Maier@nrc.gov)
Project Manager (Andrea.George@nrc.gov) Branch Chief, DRS/TSB (Geoffrey.Miller@nrc.gov) R4DRPBC@nrc.gov R4DRSBC@nrc.gov Director, DIRS, NRR (Scott.Morris@nrc.gov)
Deputy Director, DIRS, NRR (Allen.Howe@nrc.gov)
Acting Director, DORL, NRR (Louise.Lund@nrc.gov)
Acting Deputy Director, DORL (Michael.Markley@nrc.gov)
Director, NSIR/DPR (Rob.Lewis@nrc.gov)
Chief, PLB IV, DORL, NRR (Eric.Oesterle@nrc.gov) Regional Counsel (Karla.Fuller@nrc.gov)
RITS Coordinator (Marisa.Herrera@nrc.gov)
Technical Support Assistant (Loretta.Williams@nrc.gov)
Congressional Affairs Officer (Jenny.Weil@nrc.gov)
RIV/ETA: OEDO (Anthony.Bowers@nrc.gov)
ROPassessment Resource@nrc.go v ROPreports@nrc.gov OEMail Resource@nrc.gov
Distribution via Listserv for Cooper Nuclear Station
Page 1 of 2 08/22/2014 13:59:29 Report 22 Unit NumberPlanned Dates Start EndInspection ActivityTitle No. of Staff on Site CooperInspection / Activity Plan 09/01/2014
-12/31/2015EXAM-INITIAL OPERATOR EXAM 3 1 INITIAL EXAM CNS (12/2015)
X02547 10/19/2015 10/23/2015 1 INITIAL EXAM CNS (12/2015)
X02547 10/26/2015 10/30/201571111.08-INSERVICE INSPECTION 2 1 IP Inservice Inspection Activities - BWR7111108G 10/06/2014 10/10/2014 RS 13 PI-RADIATION SAFETY 2 1 IP Radiological Hazard Assessment and Exposure Controls71124.01 10/06/2014 10/10/2014 1 IP In-Plant Airborne Radioactivity Control and Mitigation71124.03 10/06/2014 10/10/2014 1 IP71151-OR01 10/06/2014 10/10/2014 1 IP71151-PR01 10/06/2014 10/10/2014 EB1-07T-CNS TRIENNIAL HEAT SINK PERFORMANCE 1 1 IP Heat Sink Performance7111107T 02/23/2015 02/27/2015 EB1-21T-CNS COMPONENT DESIGN BASIS INSPECTION 7 1 IP Component Design Bases Inspection7111121 04/06/2015 05/08/2015 RS 12 PI-RADIATION SAFETY 2 1 IP Radiological Hazard Assessment and Exposure Controls71124.01 05/18/2015 05/22/2015 1 IP Occupational ALARA Planning and Controls71124.02 05/18/2015 05/22/2015 1 IP71151-OR01 05/18/2015 05/22/2015 1 IP71151-PR01 05/18/2015 05/22/2015TSB 52B-BIENNIAL PI&R INSPECTION 4 1 IP Problem Identification and Resolution71152B 06/08/2015 06/12/2015 1 IP Problem Identification and Resolution71152B 06/22/2015 06/26/2015 BRQ-BIENNIAL REQUAL INSPECTION 3 1 IP Licensed Operator Requalification Program7111111B 08/10/2015 08/14/2015 RS 5678-RADIATION SAFETY - TEAM 4 1 IP Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation71124.05 08/24/2015 08/28/2015 1 IP Radioactive Gaseous and Liquid Effluent Treatment71124.06 08/24/2015 08/28/2015 1 IP Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program71124.07 08/24/2015 08/28/2015 1 IP Radioactive Solid Waste Processing and Radioactive Material Handling, Storage, and Transportation71124.08 08/24/2015 08/28/2015 EP-1-BIENNIAL EP PROGRAM INSPECTION 1 1 IP A lert and Notification System Testing711140211/02/201511/06/2015 1 IP Emergency Preparedness Organization Staffing and Augmentation System711140311/02/201511/06/2015 1 IP Emergency Action Level and Emergency Plan Changes711140411/02/201511/06/2015 1 IP Correction of Emergency Preparedness Weaknesses and Deficiencies711140511/02/201511/06/2015 This report does not include INPO and OUTAGE activities. This report shows only on-site and announced inspection procedure Page 2 of 2 08/22/2014 13:59:29 Report 22 Unit NumberPlanned Dates Start EndInspection ActivityTitle No. of Staff on Site CooperInspection / Activity Plan 09/01/2014
-12/31/2015 EP-2-EP PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 1 1 IP71151-EP0111/02/201511/06/2015 1 IP71151-EP0211/02/201511/06/2015 1 IP71151-EP0311/02/201511/06/2015 This report does not include INPO and OUTAGE activities. This report shows only on-site and announced inspection procedures.