ML062720210: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 10/30/2006
| issue date = 10/30/2006
| title = G20060809/LTR-06-0482 - Rep. Jim Saxton, Rep. Christopher H. Smith, Rep. Robert E. Andrews, Rep. Rush Holt, Rep. Frank Pallone, Jr., and Rep. Bill Pascrell, Jr. Ltr Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Facility
| title = G20060809/LTR-06-0482 - Rep. Jim Saxton, Rep. Christopher H. Smith, Rep. Robert E. Andrews, Rep. Rush Holt, Rep. Frank Pallone, Jr., and Rep. Bill Pascrell, Jr. Ltr Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Facility
| author name = Reyes L A
| author name = Reyes L
| author affiliation = NRC/EDO
| author affiliation = NRC/EDO
| addressee name = Andrews R, Holt R, Pallone F, Pascrell B, Saxton J, Smith C H
| addressee name = Andrews R, Holt R, Pallone F, Pascrell B, Saxton J, Smith C
| addressee affiliation = US HR  (House of Representatives)
| addressee affiliation = US HR  (House of Representatives)
| docket = 05000219
| docket = 05000219

Revision as of 12:15, 13 July 2019

G20060809/LTR-06-0482 - Rep. Jim Saxton, Rep. Christopher H. Smith, Rep. Robert E. Andrews, Rep. Rush Holt, Rep. Frank Pallone, Jr., and Rep. Bill Pascrell, Jr. Ltr Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Facility
ML062720210
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 10/30/2006
From: Reyes L
NRC/EDO
To: Andrews R, Holt R, Pallone F, Pascrell B, Saxton J, Casey Smith
US HR (House of Representatives)
Dudley N, NRR/DLR/RLRA, 415-1154
Shared Package
ML062720203 List:
References
G20060809, LTR-06-0482
Download: ML062720210 (13)


Text

October 30, 2006The Honorable Jim SaxtonUnited States House of Representatives Washington, DC 20515-3003

Dear Congressman Saxton:

I am responding to your letter to Chairman Klein dated September 26, 2006, in which youidentify concerns related to the safe operation of the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station (Oyster Creek). The NRC continues to implement our Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) at Oyster Creek to ensure active components and systems function as designed. In addition, the NRC is currently reviewing Oyster Creek's license renewal application to ensure that passive long-lived components and structures will be adequately managed for an additional 20 years.With regard to the specific concerns identified in your letter, GPU Nuclear Corporation (GPU),the former owner of Oyster Creek, identified water leakage into the drywell sand bed region during refueling outages in the mid-1980s. GPU's corrective actions included removing sand from the sand bed region and identifying drywell shell corrosion by visual inspections and approximately 1000 ultrasonic testing (UT) measurements. Further corrective actions in the early 1990s included modeling the thickness of the drywell shell to establish criteria for shell thickness, repeating UT measurement of the most corroded areas every two years, coating the drywell shell in the sand bed region to prevent further corrosion, and implementing inspection programs. In 1996, GPU determined that the corrosion rate had been arrested and decided that UT measurements would be performed in another 10 years. The NRC reviewed and approved GPU's decision.Amergen Energy Company, LLC (the licensee), the current owner of Oyster Creek, plans toperform UT measurements on the drywell shell in the sand bed area during the refueling outage they entered on October 15, 2006. The NRC will inspect the UT measurements and the related analysis as part of the ROP for operating reactors and take regulatory action if appropriate. For license renewal, the drywell shell is one of the passive long-lived structures that requires anaging program. The staff focused substantial technical effort in evaluating the current condition of the drywell as well as the licensee's plans for monitoring the integrity of the containment structure into the future. The drywell integrity issue has been raised before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB) in the license renewal proceeding.

During the NRC staff review of the license renewal application, the licensee provided eleven commitments which form an integrated aging management program to identify, evaluate, and resolve issues associated with different parts of the drywell shell. The NRC's review results and the licensee's commitments are contained in the Safety Evaluation Report (SER) with Open Items that was issued on August 18, 2006.

J. Saxton In addition, the NRC staff has independently developed a model of the degraded drywell usingUT measurements taken on the drywell shell. The staff analyzed the pressure boundary and structural support integrity of the drywell under different accident conditions. Preliminary results of the pressure boundary analysis indicate that the stresses in the degraded drywell shell are within the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel code service level requirements.The NRC staff believes that corrosion in the embedded region, if any, will be less severe thanany corrosion in the sand bed area, since the alkalinity in the environment reduces the potential for corrosion. On the basis of analysis results from the staff model, staff has determined that even if the embedded area is corroded the pressure retention capability of the drywell shell will be maintained. The NRC staff met with the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) LicenseRenewal Subcommittee on October 3, 2006, concerning the Oyster Creek SER with Open Items in general and the drywell integrity issue specifically. Members of the public had the opportunity to address the ACRS. Staff will meet again with the ACRS to discuss the results of the licensee's additional UT measurements on the NRC staff's analysis.I appreciate your interest in the safety of the Oyster Creek plant. If you have additionalquestions, the NRC staff would be happy to meet with you or your staff to discuss the NRC's license renewal process. Please contact me if I can be of further assistance.Sincerely,/RA William F. Kane Acting for/Luis A. ReyesExecutive Director for Operations October 30, 2006The Honorable Christopher SmithUnited States House of Representatives Washington, DC 20515-3003

Dear Congressman Smith:

I am responding to your letter to Chairman Klein dated September 26, 2006, in which youidentify concerns related to the safe operation of the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station (Oyster Creek). The NRC continues to implement our Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) at Oyster Creek to ensure active components and systems function as designed. In addition, the NRC is currently reviewing Oyster Creek's license renewal application to ensure that passive long-lived components and structures will be adequately managed for an additional 20 years.With regard to the specific concerns identified in your letter, GPU Nuclear Corporation (GPU),the former owner of Oyster Creek, identified water leakage into the drywell sand bed region during refueling outages in the mid-1980s. GPU's corrective actions included removing sand from the sand bed region and identifying drywell shell corrosion by visual inspections and approximately 1000 ultrasonic testing (UT) measurements. Further corrective actions in the early 1990s included modeling the thickness of the drywell shell to establish criteria for shell thickness, repeating UT measurement of the most corroded areas every two years, coating the drywell shell in the sand bed region to prevent further corrosion, and implementing inspection programs. In 1996, GPU determined that the corrosion rate had been arrested and decided that UT measurements would be performed in another 10 years. The NRC reviewed and approved GPU's decision.Amergen Energy Company, LLC (the licensee), the current owner of Oyster Creek, plans toperform UT measurements on the drywell shell in the sand bed area during the refueling outage they entered on October 15, 2006. The NRC will inspect the UT measurements and the related analysis as part of the ROP for operating reactors and take regulatory action if appropriate. For license renewal, the drywell shell is one of the passive long-lived structures that requires anaging program. The staff focused substantial technical effort in evaluating the current condition of the drywell as well as the licensee's plans for monitoring the integrity of the containment structure into the future. The drywell integrity issue has been raised before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB) in the license renewal proceeding.

During the NRC staff review of the license renewal application, the licensee provided eleven commitments which form an integrated aging management program to identify, evaluate, and resolve issues associated with different parts of the drywell shell. The NRC's review results and the licensee's commitments are contained in the Safety Evaluation Report (SER) with Open Items that was issued on August 18, 2006.

C. Smith In addition, the NRC staff has independently developed a model of the degraded drywell usingUT measurements taken on the drywell shell. The staff analyzed the pressure boundary and structural support integrity of the drywell under different accident conditions. Preliminary results of the pressure boundary analysis indicate that the stresses in the degraded drywell shell are within the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel code service level requirements.The NRC staff believes that corrosion in the embedded region, if any, will be less severe thanany corrosion in the sand bed area, since the alkalinity in the environment reduces the potential for corrosion. On the basis of analysis results from the staff model, staff has determined that even if the embedded area is corroded the pressure retention capability of the drywell shell will be maintained. The NRC staff met with the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) LicenseRenewal Subcommittee on October 3, 2006, concerning the Oyster Creek SER with Open Items in general and the drywell integrity issue specifically. Members of the public had the opportunity to address the ACRS. Staff will meet again with the ACRS to discuss the results of the licensee's additional UT measurements on the NRC staff's analysis.I appreciate your interest in the safety of the Oyster Creek plant. If you have additionalquestions, the NRC staff would be happy to meet with you or your staff to discuss the NRC's license renewal process. Please contact me if I can be of further assistance.Sincerely, /RA William F. Kane Acting for/Luis A. ReyesExecutive Director for Operations October 30, 2006The Honorable Robert AndrewsUnited States House of Representatives Washington, DC 20515-3003

Dear Congressman Andrews:

I am responding to your letter to Chairman Klein dated September 26, 2006, in which youidentify concerns related to the safe operation of the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station (Oyster Creek). The NRC continues to implement our Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) at Oyster Creek to ensure active components and systems function as designed. In addition, the NRC is currently reviewing Oyster Creek's license renewal application to ensure that passive long-lived components and structures will be adequately managed for an additional 20 years.With regard to the specific concerns identified in your letter, GPU Nuclear Corporation (GPU),the former owner of Oyster Creek, identified water leakage into the drywell sand bed region during refueling outages in the mid-1980s. GPU's corrective actions included removing sand from the sand bed region and identifying drywell shell corrosion by visual inspections and approximately 1000 ultrasonic testing (UT) measurements. Further corrective actions in the early 1990s included modeling the thickness of the drywell shell to establish criteria for shell thickness, repeating UT measurement of the most corroded areas every two years, coating the drywell shell in the sand bed region to prevent further corrosion, and implementing inspection programs. In 1996, GPU determined that the corrosion rate had been arrested and decided that UT measurements would be performed in another 10 years. The NRC reviewed and approved GPU's decision.Amergen Energy Company, LLC (the licensee), the current owner of Oyster Creek, plans toperform UT measurements on the drywell shell in the sand bed area during the refueling outage they entered on October 15, 2006. The NRC will inspect the UT measurements and the related analysis as part of the ROP for operating reactors and take regulatory action if appropriate. For license renewal, the drywell shell is one of the passive long-lived structures that requires anaging program. The staff focused substantial technical effort in evaluating the current condition of the drywell as well as the licensee's plans for monitoring the integrity of the containment structure into the future. The drywell integrity issue has been raised before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB) in the license renewal proceeding.

During the NRC staff review of the license renewal application, the licensee provided eleven commitments which form an integrated aging management program to identify, evaluate, and resolve issues associated with different parts of the drywell shell. The NRC's review results and the licensee's commitments are contained in the Safety Evaluation Report (SER) with Open Items that was issued on August 18, 2006.

R. Andrews In addition, the NRC staff has independently developed a model of the degraded drywell usingUT measurements taken on the drywell shell. The staff analyzed the pressure boundary and structural support integrity of the drywell under different accident conditions. Preliminary results of the pressure boundary analysis indicate that the stresses in the degraded drywell shell are within the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel code service level requirements.The NRC staff believes that corrosion in the embedded region, if any, will be less severe thanany corrosion in the sand bed area, since the alkalinity in the environment reduces the potential for corrosion. On the basis of analysis results from the staff model, staff has determined that even if the embedded area is corroded the pressure retention capability of the drywell shell will be maintained. The NRC staff met with the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) LicenseRenewal Subcommittee on October 3, 2006, concerning the Oyster Creek SER with Open Items in general and the drywell integrity issue specifically. Members of the public had the opportunity to address the ACRS. Staff will meet again with the ACRS to discuss the results of the licensee's additional UT measurements on the NRC staff's analysis.I appreciate your interest in the safety of the Oyster Creek plant. If you have additionalquestions, the NRC staff would be happy to meet with you or your staff to discuss the NRC's license renewal process. Please contact me if I can be of further assistance.Sincerely, /RA William F. Kane Acting for/Luis A. ReyesExecutive Director for Operations October 30, 2006The Honorable Rush HoltUnited States House of Representatives Washington, DC 20515-3003

Dear Congressman Holt:

I am responding to your letter to Chairman Klein dated September 26, 2006, in which youidentify concerns related to the safe operation of the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station (Oyster Creek). The NRC continues to implement our Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) at Oyster Creek to ensure active components and systems function as designed. In addition, the NRC is currently reviewing Oyster Creek's license renewal application to ensure that passive long-lived components and structures will be adequately managed for an additional 20 years.With regard to the specific concerns identified in your letter, GPU Nuclear Corporation (GPU),the former owner of Oyster Creek, identified water leakage into the drywell sand bed region during refueling outages in the mid-1980s. GPU's corrective actions included removing sand from the sand bed region and identifying drywell shell corrosion by visual inspections and approximately 1000 ultrasonic testing (UT) measurements. Further corrective actions in the early 1990s included modeling the thickness of the drywell shell to establish criteria for shell thickness, repeating UT measurement of the most corroded areas every two years, coating the drywell shell in the sand bed region to prevent further corrosion, and implementing inspection programs. In 1996, GPU determined that the corrosion rate had been arrested and decided that UT measurements would be performed in another 10 years. The NRC reviewed and approved GPU's decision.Amergen Energy Company, LLC (the licensee), the current owner of Oyster Creek, plans toperform UT measurements on the drywell shell in the sand bed area during the refueling outage they entered on October 15, 2006. The NRC will inspect the UT measurements and the related analysis as part of the ROP for operating reactors and take regulatory action if appropriate. For license renewal, the drywell shell is one of the passive long-lived structures that requires anaging program. The staff focused substantial technical effort in evaluating the current condition of the drywell as well as the licensee's plans for monitoring the integrity of the containment structure into the future. The drywell integrity issue has been raised before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB) in the license renewal proceeding.

During the NRC staff review of the license renewal application, the licensee provided eleven commitments which form an integrated aging management program to identify, evaluate, and resolve issues associated with different parts of the drywell shell. The NRC's review results and the licensee's commitments are contained in the Safety Evaluation Report (SER) with Open Items that was issued on August 18, 2006.

R. Holt In addition, the NRC staff has independently developed a model of the degraded drywell usingUT measurements taken on the drywell shell. The staff analyzed the pressure boundary and structural support integrity of the drywell under different accident conditions. Preliminary results of the pressure boundary analysis indicate that the stresses in the degraded drywell shell are within the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel code service level requirements.The NRC staff believes that corrosion in the embedded region, if any, will be less severe thanany corrosion in the sand bed area, since the alkalinity in the environment reduces the potential for corrosion. On the basis of analysis results from the staff model, staff has determined that even if the embedded area is corroded the pressure retention capability of the drywell shell will be maintained. The NRC staff met with the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) LicenseRenewal Subcommittee on October 3, 2006, concerning the Oyster Creek SER with Open Items in general and the drywell integrity issue specifically. Members of the public had the opportunity to address the ACRS. Staff will meet again with the ACRS to discuss the results of the licensee's additional UT measurements on the NRC staff's analysis.I appreciate your interest in the safety of the Oyster Creek plant. If you have additionalquestions, the NRC staff would be happy to meet with you or your staff to discuss the NRC's license renewal process. Please contact me if I can be of further assistance.Sincerely,/RA William F. Kane Acting for/Luis A. ReyesExecutive Director for Operations October 30, 2006The Honorable Frank Pallone, Jr.United States House of Representatives Washington, DC 20515-3003

Dear Congressman Pallone:

I am responding to your letter to Chairman Klein dated September 26, 2006, in which youidentify concerns related to the safe operation of the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station (Oyster Creek). The NRC continues to implement our Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) at Oyster Creek to ensure active components and systems function as designed. In addition, the NRC is currently reviewing Oyster Creek's license renewal application to ensure that passive long-lived components and structures will be adequately managed for an additional 20 years.With regard to the specific concerns identified in your letter, GPU Nuclear Corporation (GPU),the former owner of Oyster Creek, identified water leakage into the drywell sand bed region during refueling outages in the mid-1980s. GPU's corrective actions included removing sand from the sand bed region and identifying drywell shell corrosion by visual inspections and approximately 1000 ultrasonic testing (UT) measurements. Further corrective actions in the early 1990s included modeling the thickness of the drywell shell to establish criteria for shell thickness, repeating UT measurement of the most corroded areas every two years, coating the drywell shell in the sand bed region to prevent further corrosion, and implementing inspection programs. In 1996, GPU determined that the corrosion rate had been arrested and decided that UT measurements would be performed in another 10 years. The NRC reviewed and approved GPU's decision.Amergen Energy Company, LLC (the licensee), the current owner of Oyster Creek, plans toperform UT measurements on the drywell shell in the sand bed area during the refueling outage they entered on October 15, 2006. The NRC will inspect the UT measurements and the related analysis as part of the ROP for operating reactors and take regulatory action if appropriate. For license renewal, the drywell shell is one of the passive long-lived structures that requires anaging program. The staff focused substantial technical effort in evaluating the current condition of the drywell as well as the licensee's plans for monitoring the integrity of the containment structure into the future. The drywell integrity issue has been raised before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB) in the license renewal proceeding.

During the NRC staff review of the license renewal application, the licensee provided eleven commitments which form an integrated aging management program to identify, evaluate, and resolve issues associated with different parts of the drywell shell. The NRC's review results and the licensee's commitments are contained in the Safety Evaluation Report (SER) with Open Items that was issued on August 18, 2006.

F. Pallone In addition, the NRC staff has independently developed a model of the degraded drywell usingUT measurements taken on the drywell shell. The staff analyzed the pressure boundary and structural support integrity of the drywell under different accident conditions. Preliminary results of the pressure boundary analysis indicate that the stresses in the degraded drywell shell are within the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel code service level requirements.The NRC staff believes that corrosion in the embedded region, if any, will be less severe thanany corrosion in the sand bed area, since the alkalinity in the environment reduces the potential for corrosion. On the basis of analysis results from the staff model, staff has determined that even if the embedded area is corroded the pressure retention capability of the drywell shell will be maintained. The NRC staff met with the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) LicenseRenewal Subcommittee on October 3, 2006, concerning the Oyster Creek SER with Open Items in general and the drywell integrity issue specifically. Members of the public had the opportunity to address the ACRS. Staff will meet again with the ACRS to discuss the results of the licensee's additional UT measurements on the NRC staff's analysis.I appreciate your interest in the safety of the Oyster Creek plant. If you have additionalquestions, the NRC staff would be happy to meet with you or your staff to discuss the NRC's license renewal process. Please contact me if I can be of further assistance.Sincerely,/RA William F. Kane Acting for/Luis A. ReyesExecutive Director for Operations October 30, 2006The Honorable Bill Pascrell, Jr.United States House of Representatives Washington, DC 20515-3003

Dear Congressman Pascrell:

I am responding to your letter to Chairman Klein dated September 26, 2006, in which youidentify concerns related to the safe operation of the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station (Oyster Creek). The NRC continues to implement our Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) at Oyster Creek to ensure active components and systems function as designed. In addition, the NRC is currently reviewing Oyster Creek's license renewal application to ensure that passive long-lived components and structures will be adequately managed for an additional 20 years.With regard to the specific concerns identified in your letter, GPU Nuclear Corporation (GPU),the former owner of Oyster Creek, identified water leakage into the drywell sand bed region during refueling outages in the mid-1980s. GPU's corrective actions included removing sand from the sand bed region and identifying drywell shell corrosion by visual inspections and approximately 1000 ultrasonic testing (UT) measurements. Further corrective actions in the early 1990s included modeling the thickness of the drywell shell to establish criteria for shell thickness, repeating UT measurement of the most corroded areas every two years, coating the drywell shell in the sand bed region to prevent further corrosion, and implementing inspection programs. In 1996, GPU determined that the corrosion rate had been arrested and decided that UT measurements would be performed in another 10 years. The NRC reviewed and approved GPU's decision.Amergen Energy Company, LLC (the licensee), the current owner of Oyster Creek, plans toperform UT measurements on the drywell shell in the sand bed area during the refueling outage they entered on October 15, 2006. The NRC will inspect the UT measurements and the related analysis as part of the ROP for operating reactors and take regulatory action if appropriate. For license renewal, the drywell shell is one of the passive long-lived structures that requires anaging program. The staff focused substantial technical effort in evaluating the current condition of the drywell as well as the licensee's plans for monitoring the integrity of the containment structure into the future. The drywell integrity issue has been raised before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB) in the license renewal proceeding.

During the NRC staff review of the license renewal application, the licensee provided eleven commitments which form an integrated aging management program to identify, evaluate, and resolve issues associated with different parts of the drywell shell. The NRC's review results and the licensee's commitments are contained in the Safety Evaluation Report (SER) with Open Items that was issued on August 18, 2006.

B. Pascrell In addition, the NRC staff has independently developed a model of the degraded drywell usingUT measurements taken on the drywell shell. The staff analyzed the pressure boundary and structural support integrity of the drywell under different accident conditions. Preliminary results of the pressure boundary analysis indicate that the stresses in the degraded drywell shell are within the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel code service level requirements.The NRC staff believes that corrosion in the embedded region, if any, will be less severe thanany corrosion in the sand bed area, since the alkalinity in the environment reduces the potential for corrosion. On the basis of analysis results from the staff model, staff has determined that even if the embedded area is corroded the pressure retention capability of the drywell shell will be maintained. The NRC staff met with the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) LicenseRenewal Subcommittee on October 3, 2006, concerning the Oyster Creek SER with Open Items in general and the drywell integrity issue specifically. Members of the public had the opportunity to address the ACRS. Staff will meet again with the ACRS to discuss the results of the licensee's additional UT measurements on the NRC staff's analysis.I appreciate your interest in the safety of the Oyster Creek plant. If you have additionalquestions, the NRC staff would be happy to meet with you or your staff to discuss the NRC's license renewal process. Please contact me if I can be of further assistance.

Sincerely,/RA William F. Kane Acting for/Luis A. ReyesExecutive Director for Operations

Pkg: ML062720203; Incoming: ML062720018; Response: ML062720210 OFFICEPM:RLRA:DLRLA:RLRA:DLRTech EditorOGCBC:RLRA:DLRNAMENDudleyYEdmondsCBladey (by e-mail)MYoungLLundDATE10/05/0610/05/0610/04/0610/06/0610/06/06 OFFICED:DLRD:NRROCAEDO NAMEFGillespieJDyer (MWeber for w/ rev.)LReyes (WFKane for)DATE10/06/0610/06/0610/30/0610/30/06