ML17308A469

1988 Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept. W/890421 Ltr

ML17308A469
Person / Time
Site:	Saint Lucie
Issue date:	12/31/1988
From:	Conway W FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
L-89-137, NUDOCS 8904270305
Download: ML17308A469 (173)

Text

kC CELEBRATED Dl ~BUTJON DEMO%ST)flOY SY~gg REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

DOCKET FACIL:50-335 St. Lucie Plant, Unit 1, Florida Power 6 Light Co. 05000335 50-.389 St. Lucie Plant, Unit 2, Florida Power 6 Light Co. 05000389 AUTH. NAME . AUTHOR AFFILIATION

• Florida Power 6 Light Co.

CONWAY,W.F. Florida Power 6 Light Co.

RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION

SUBJECT:

"1988 Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept." /890421 ltr. 7 D

DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE25D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE:

TITLE: Environmental Monitoring Rept (per Tech Specs)

NOTES:

/.

RECIPIENT -,> COPIES RECIPIENT ~

COPIES h ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL LA

'-'D2-2 4 PD2-2 PD 1 1 NORRIS,'J 1 1 INTERNAL: ACRS 1 1 AEOD/DS P/TPAB 1 1 IRM TECH ADV 1 1 NRR ROTHMAN,R 1 1 NRR/DEST/ADE 8H NUDOCS-ABSTRACT RGN2'RSS/RPB 1

1 2

1 1

2 RGN2 LTr~

R~RB~RBB FILE 02 1

2 1

1 2

1 1

EXTERNAL EGGG' IMPSON g F 2 2 LPDR 1 1 NRC,.PDR 1 1 R

I h

NOTE 'IO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENIS:

PIZASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE! CONZACI'IHE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT. 20079) KO EIJZGKLTB YOUR NME FRED DISTRZKKIGN LISTS H)R DOCUMEMI'S YOU DGNiT NEZD!

TOTAL NUMBER -OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 22 ENCL 22

P.O. Box14000,Juno Beach, FL 33408-0420 APRIL 2 1 1989 L-89-137 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555 Gentlemen:

Re: St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nris. 50-335 and 50-389 1988 Annual Radiological Environmental 0 eratin Re ort This letter transmits the subject report in accordance with Technical Sper ification 6.9.1.8 for St. Lucie Units 1 and 2.

Should there be any questions on this information, please contact us ~

Very truly yours, W. . Con y Senior V' President Nuclear WFC/RG/gp Enclosure cc: Stewart D. Ebneter, Regional Administrator, Region Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC, St. Lucie Plant II, USNRC an FPL Group company

0 t

890g270305 1988 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 License Nos. DPR-67, NPF-16 Docket Nos. 50-335, 50-389 Data Submitted By:Florida DHRS Report Prepared: /l ESP Report Reviewed:

S5'04270305 SS1231 PDR ADOCK 05000335 R PDC

'I J

E i,y 1

i~,)A

1988 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT UNITS NOS. 1 AND 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE INTRODUCTION RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM DISCUSSION AND INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS ENVIRONMENTAL RADXOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

TABLE 1 DEVIATIONS/MISSING DATA TABLE 1A ANALYSES WITH LLDs ABOVE TABLE 4.12-1 DETECTION CAPABILITXES TABLE 1B LAND USE CENSUS TABLE 2 EY TO SAMPLE LOCATIONS ATTACHMENT A DIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY'S ST. LUCIE SITE ATTACHMENT B FIRST QUARTER, 1988 SECOND QUARTERi 1988 THXRD QUARTER, 1988 FOURTH QUARTER, 1988 RESULTS FROM THE INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM, 1988 ATTACHMENT C HP3: 1

'I I

1988 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT UNITS NOS. 1 AND 2 I. INTRODUCTION This report is submitted pursuant to Specification 6.9 of St. Lucie Unit No. 1 and St. Lucie Unit No. 2 Technical Specifications. The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report provides information, summaries and analytical results pertaining to the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program for the calendar year indicated. This report covers surveillance activities meeting the requirements of Unit No. 1 and Unit No. 2. Technical Specifications.

II. RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM A. ~Pur ose: The purpose of the radiological environmental monitoring program is to provide representative measurements of radiation and of radioactive materials in those exposure pathways and for those radionuclides which lead to the highest potential radiation exposures of members of the public resulting from station operation. The radiological environmental monitoring program also supplements the radiological effluent monitoring program by verifying that the measurable concentrations of radioactive materials and levels of radiation are not, higher than expected on the basis of the effluent measurements and the modeling of the environmental exposure pathways.

B. Pro ram Descri tion: The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program for the St'. Lucie Plant is conducted pursuant to Technical Specifications 3/4e12 of St. Lucie Unit No. 1 and St. Lucie Unit No. 2 Technical Specifications.

1~ Sam le Locations T es and Fre uencies:

a ~ Direct radiation gamma exposure rate is monitored continuously at 27 locations by thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD's). TLD's are collected and analyzed quarterly.

b. Airborne radioiodine and particulate samplers are operated continuously at five locations. Samples are collected and analyzed weekly. Analyses include Iodine-131, gross beta, and gamma isotopic measurements.

c ~ Surface water samples are collected from two locations. Samples are collected and analyzed weekly and monthly respectively. Analyses include gamma isotopic and tritium measurements.

HP3: 1

/~

lg J

I[

4

1988 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. 'LUCIE PLANT UNITS NOS. 1 AND 2

d. Shoreline sediment samples are collected from two locations coinciding with the locations for surface water samples. Samples are collected and analyzed semi-annually. Sediment samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements.

e. Fish and invertebrate samples are collected from two locations. Samples are collected and analyzed semi-annually. Fish and invertebrate samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements.

Broad leaf vegetation samples are collected from three locations. Samples are collected and analyzed monthly. Broad leaf vegetation samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements.

Attachment A provides specific information pertaining to sample locations, types and frequencies.

2. Anal tical Res onsibilit Radiological environmental monitoring for the St. Lucie Plant is conducted by the State of Florida, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (HRS). Samples are collected and analyzed by HRS personnel. Samples are analyzed at the HRS Environmental Radiation Control Laboratory in Orlando, Florida.

C. Anal tical Results: Table 1, Environmental Radiolo ical Monitorin Pro ram Annual ~Summar provides a summary for all specified samples collected during the referenced surveillance period. Deviations from the sample schedule, missing data and/or samples not meeting the specified "A PRIORI" LLD, if any, are noted and explained in Tables lA and 1B respectively.

Analysis data for all specified samples analyzed during the surveillance period is provided in Attachment B.

D. Land Use Census: A land use census out to a distance of 5 miles radius from the St. Lucie Plant is conducted annually to determine the location of the nearest milk animal, residence, and garden producing broad leaf vegetation in each of the sixteen meteorological sectors. A summary of the land use census for the surveillance year is provided in Table 2, Land Use Census ~Summar No locations yielding a calculated dose or dose commitment greater than the values currently being calculated were identified by the land use census.

HP3: 1 (2)

C

'h II

1988 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT UNITS NOS. 1 AND 2 No locations yielding a calculated dose or dose commitment (via the same exposure pathway) 20 % greater than locations currently being sampled in the radiological environmental monitoring program were identified by the land use census.

E. Interlaborator Com arison Pro ram: The State of Florida HRS Environmental Radiation Control Laboratory participates in the Environmental Radioactivity Laboratory Intercomparison Studies Program conducted by the Environmental Protection Agency. Results from the Interlaboratory Comparison Program are provided in Attachment C.

III. DISCUSSION AND INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS A. Re ortin of Results: The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report contains the summaries, interpretations and information required by the St. Lucie Plant, Unit Nos. 1 & 2 Technical Specifications. Table 1 provides a summary of the measurements made for the nuclides required by Technical Specifications, Table 4.12-1, for all samples specified by Table 3.12-1. In addition, summaries are provided for other nuclides identified in the specified samples, including those not related to station operation. These include nuclides such as K-40, Th-232, Ra-226, Ra-228, Be-7, U-238, and Pb-210 which are common in the Florida environment.

B. Inter retation of Results Direct Radiation: The results for direct radiation monitoring are consistent with past measurements for the specified locations. The exposure rate data shows no indication of any trends attributed to effluents from the plant. The measured exposure rates are consistent with exposure rates that were observed during the preoperational surveillance program. Direct radiation monitoring results are summarized in Table 1.

2. Air Particulates Radioiodine: The results for radioactive air particulate and radioiodine monitoring are consistent with past measurements and indicate no trends attributed to plant effluents. All samples for radioiodine yielded no detectable I-131. Gamma isotopic measurements yielded no indication of any nuclides attributed to station operation. The results for air particulate/radioiodine samples are consistent with measurements which were made during the preoperational surveillance program. Air particulate and radioiodine monitoring results are summarized in Table 1.

HP3: 1 (3)

1988 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT UNITS NOS. 1 AND 2

3. Surface Water: The results for radioactivity measurements in surface water samples are consistent with past, measurements. Tritium was reported as present in two of the weekly surface water samples collected from Site H15. Subsequent samples indicate there has been no increase nor adverse trend for tritium in surface water samples at H15. The highest measured tritium was less than 24 of the reporting level specified by plant technical specifications, Table 3.12-2. No other nuclides attributed to station operation were detected.

Results for surface water samples are summarized in Table 1.

Waterborne Sediment and Food Products: The results for radioactivity measurements in waterborne sediment, fish and crustacea samples are consistent with past measurements and with measurements made during the preoperational surveillance program. There were no indications of any radionuclides attributed to plant effluents. Results for the waterborne sediment, fish and crustacea samples are summarized in Table 1.

5. Broad Leaf Ve etation: The results for radioactivity measurements in broad leaf vegetation are consistent with past measurements and with measurements made during the preoperational surveillance program. There were no indications of any nuclides attributed to plant effluents. Results for the broad leaf vegetation samples are summarized in Table 1.

C. Conclusions The data obtained through the St. Lucie Plant Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program verifies that the levels of radiation and concentrations of radioactive materials in environmental samples, representing the highest potential exposure pathways to member's of the public, are not being increased. The measurements verify that the dose or dose commitment to members of the public, due to operation of St.

Lucie Unit Nos. 1 6 2, during the surveillance year, are well within "as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA)" criteria established by 10 CFR 50, Appendix I.

HP3: 1

0 E 1 Page 1 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL TORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility St. Lucie Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Docket No.(s) 50-335 and 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie Florida Reporting Period Januar 1 December 31 1988 (County, State)

PATHWAY DIRECT RADIATION SAMPLES COLLECTED: TLD UNITS: MICRO R/hr Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Highest Control Locations Total Number of Analyses Performed of a Detection (LLD)

Locations Mean (f)

Range Name'ean Distance Annual Mean

& Range f

Mean (f)

Range Direction Exposure 5.1 (107/107) NW-10 6. 6 (4/4) 5.9 (4/4)

Rate, 107 4.5 6.6 10 miles, NW 6.5 6. 6 5.7 6.1 Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements = 0

E 1 Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL TORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility St. Lucie Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Docket No.(s) 50-335 and 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie Florida Reporting Period Janua 1 - December 31 1988 (County, State)

PATHWAY: AIRBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED: RADIOIODINE AND PARTICULATES UNITS: PICO Ci/M Type and Total Number of Analyses Performed Lower of Limit a

Detection (LLD)

All Indicator Locations Mean (f)

Range Name'ontrol Location with Highest Distance Annual Mean Mean Range f

Mean Locations Range (f)

Direction

'"I 260 0.024 < MDA < MDA Gross Beta, 260 0.0025 0.011 (260/260) H-08 0.013 (52/52) O.OH. (52/52) 0.004 0.028 6 miles, WNW 0.004 0.028 0.005 0.017 Composite Gamma Isotopic, 2 Be 0.0052 0. 127 (20/20) H-34 0. 134 (4/4) 0.126 (4/4) 0.087 0.157 0.5 miles, N 0.095 0.157 0.104 0. 144 4'Z 0.012 MDA MDA

'"C 0.00069 MDA < MDA 137C 0.00066 < MDA MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements = 0

Page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL TORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility St. Lucie Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Docket No.(s) 50-335 and 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie Florida Reporting Period Janua 1 - December 31 1988 (County, State)

PATHWAY: WATERBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED: SURFACE WATER UNITS: PICO Ci/LITER Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Highest Control Locations Total Number of a Locations Annual Mean Mean (f) of Analyses Detection Mean (f) Name Mean f Range Performed (LLD) Range Distance & Range Direction Tritium, 64 230 270 (2/64) H-15 270 (2152) MDA 150 390 < 1 mi, ENE/E/ESE 150-390 Gamma Isotopic, 64 40K 60 304 (64/64) H-15 305 (52/52) 298 (12/12) 220 370 < 1 mi, ENE/E/ESE 220 370 260 350

'4Mn < MDA < MDA 59F < MDA MDA 58CO MDA < MDA 60C MDA MDA Zn < MDA MDA 95Zr-Nb MDA < MDA 131I < MDA MDA 134CS MDA < MDA 137C MDA MDA Ba-La MDA MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements = 0

E 1 Page 4 8 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL TORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility St. Lucie Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Docket No.(s) 50-335 and 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie Florida Reporting Period Janua 1 December 31 1988 (County, State)

PATHWAY: WATERBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED: SHORELINE SEDIMENT UNITS: PICO Ci/Kg, DRY Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Highest Control Locations Total Number of Analyses Performed of a Detection (LLD)

Locations Mean (f)

Range Name'ean Distance Annual Mean 6 Range f

Mean (f)

Range Direction Gamma Isotopic, 4 40K 140 300 (4/4) H-59 340 (2/2) 340 (2/2) 210 370 10-20 mi, S/SSE 310 370 310 370 226Ra 49 196 (4/4) H-59 197 (2/2) 197 (2/2) 174 220 10-20 mi, S/SSE 174 220 174 220 Th 52 70 (2/4) H-59 80 (1/2) 80 ( 1/2) 60 80 10-20 mi, S/SSE 23SU 34 (1/4) H-15 34 (1/2) MDA

< 1 mi, ENE/E/ESE 238U 200 (1/4) H-15 200 (1/4) < MDA

< 1 mi, ENE/E/ESE Be 100 MDA < MDA 58CO < MDA MDA Co MDA MDA 134C 14 MDA MDA 4

137CS 12 MDA MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements = 0

Page 5 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL TORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility St. Lucie Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Docket No.(s) 50-335 and 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie Florida Reporting Period Janua 1 December 31 1988 (County, State)

PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED: CRUSTACEA UNITS: PICO Ci/Eg, WET Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Highest Control Zocations Total Number of a Locations Annual Mean Mean (f) of Analyses Detection Mean (f) Name Mean f Range Performed (LLD) Range Distance & Range Direction Gamma Isotopic, 4 40K 130 1570 (3/4) H-59 2000 (2/2) 2000 (3/3) 710 2100 10-20 mi, S/SSE 1900 2100 1900 2100 14 (1/4) H-59 14 ( 1/2) 14 (1/2) 10-20 mi, S/SSE 226R 20 106 (2/2) H-15 113 (1/2) 100 (1/2) 100 113 < 1 mi, ENE/E/ESE 228R 190 (4/4) H-15 235 (2/2) 145 (2/2) 140 280 < 1 mi, ENE/E/ESE 190 280 140 150 238U 770 (1/4) H-15 770 (1/2) MDA

< 1 mi, ENE/E/ESE

'4Mn MDA MDA 59F 16 MDA MDA Co MDA MDA 60C 19 MDA < MDA Zn 17 MDA MDA 134C MDA MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements = 0

'A E 1 Page 6 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL TORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility St. Lucie Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Docket No.(s) 50-335 and 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie Florida Reporting Period Januar 1 December 31 1988 (County, State)

PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED: FISH UNITS: PICO Ci/Kg, WET Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Highest Control Locations Total Number of Analyses Performed of a Detection (LLD)

Locations Mean (f)

Range Name'ean Distance Annual Mean 6 Range f

Mean (f)

Range Direction Gamma Isotopic, 4 40K 130 2820 (4/4) H-59 3100 (2/2) 3 100 (2/2) 2400 3500 10-20 mi, S/SSE 2700 3500 2700 3500

'4Mn MDA MDA 59F 16 MDA MDA 58CO MDA MDA 6OC 10 MDA MDA Zn 17 MDA MDA 134C < MDA MDA 137CS MDA MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements = 0

E 1 Page 7 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL TORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility St. Lucie Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Docket No.(s) 50-335 and 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie Florida Reporting Period Janua 1 December 31 1988 (County, State)

PATHWAY INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED: BROAD LEAF VEGETATION UNITS: PICO Ci/Kg, WET Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Highest Control Locations Total Number of Analyses Performed of a Detection (LLD)

Locations Mean (f)

Range Name'ean Distance Annual Mean

& Range f

Mean (f)

Range Direction Gamma Isotopic, 36 Be 71 500 (36/36) H-52 540 (12/12) 480 (12/12) 280 710 1 mi, S/SSE 417 710 280 620 40K 100 2730 (36/36) H-52 2920 (12/12) 2850 (12/12) 900 5300 1 mi, S/SSE 2400 3400 1640 4900 131I MDA MDA 134CS MDA < MDA 137C MDA MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements = 0

TABLE 1 Page 8 of 8 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility St. Lucie Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Docket No.(s) 50-335 and 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie Florida (County, State)

Reporting Period Januar 1 December 31 1988 NOTES a~ The LLD is an "a priori" lower limit of detection which establishes the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count above system background that will be detected with 95~ probability with only 54 probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a real signal.

LLD's in this column are at time of measurement. The MDAs reported in Attachment B for the individual samples have been corrected to the time of sample collection.

b.~ Mean and range based upon detectable measurements only.

Fraction of detectable measurements at specified locations is

~

indicated in parentheses (f).

~ ~ ~

c ~ Specific identifying information for each sample location is provided in Attachment A.

d. Results are based upon the average net response of two TLDs.

(Thermoluminescent dosimeters).

MDA refers to minimum detectable activity.

1988 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT, UNIT NOS. 1 6 2 TABLE 1A DEVIATIONS MISSING DATA A) Pathway: Direct Radiation Location: WSW-5, 5,miles WSW Date: 3/30/88 to 6/16/88 Deviation: Failure to continuously provide exposure monitoring at this location for the second quarter of 1988 Description of Problem: The dosimeters for this site were missing when collection was attempted.

Corrective Action: Replaced TLDs upon discovery of situation.

Pathway: Airborne Location: H-30, 2 miles W Date: 8/9/88 to 8/16/88 Deviation: Failure to continuously provide air sampling at. this location for the third week of August 1988.

Description of Problem: The sample has a low collected volume. It is believed due to a power interruption during the sample period. There was evidence of construction work at the sampling site. It is estimated that sampling occurred during 113 of the 168 hour0.00194 days <br />0.0467 hours <br />2.777778e-4 weeks <br />6.3924e-5 months <br /> period.

Corrective Action: The sampling equipment was inspected and verified as operating properly.

1988 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT UNIT NOS. 1 & 2 TABLE 1B ANALYSES WITH LLDs ABOVE TABLE 4.12-1 DETECTION CAPABILITIES 1 1 88 12 31 88 The values specified in Table 4.12 1g Detection Capabilities, were achieved for all samples.

1988 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATXNG REPORT ST. LUCXE PLANT UNXTS NOS. 1 AND 2 TABLE 2 LAND USE CENSUS DISTANCE TO NEAREST (a, b) 6/88 Milk (c) 6/88 6/88 Sector Animal Residence Garden (d) 0 (e)

NNE 0 NE ENE

'SE 1. 5/14 1 L (<) 3.5/152 (g) 4.3/182 3.2/191 SSW L 2.2/213 4.0/208 SW 1.9/236 1.9/234 WSW 4.2/254 1.9/245 (11) 1.9/258 4.5/266 1 '/260 2.1/275 WNW 3.8/289 2.3/281 3.8/288 NW 4.9/306 3.5/304 3.7/306 NNW L L (g) L

1988 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT UNITS NOS. 1 AND 2 TABLE 2 NOTES LAND USE CENSUS (a) All categories surveyed out to 5 miles radius from the St. Lucie Plant (b) The following format is used to denote the location:

distance (miles)/bearing (degrees)

For example, a residence located in the southeast sector at a distance of 1.5 miles bearing 141 degrees is recorded as 1.5/141.

(c) Potential milk animal locations. All locations specified have been verified to be not producing milk for human consumption.

(d) Gardens with an estimated growing area of 500 square feet or more.

0 denotes that the sector area is predominantly an ocean area.

L denotes that, the sector area is predominantly a land area unoccupied by the category type.

(g) Non-residential occupied buildings in this sector include the following:

SSE Fire Station, 1.8/149 SSE Country Club, 3.4/153 NNW Lifeguard station at beach 4.6/342 (h) Several residences in this sector are located approximately 1.9 miles from the St. Lucie Plant.

'j 1988 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT UNITS NOS. 1 AND 2 ATTACHMENT A KEY TO SAMPLE LOCATIONS

4*

"I

1988 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST ~ LUCIE PLANT UNZT NOS ~ 1 6 2 Key to Sample Locations ATHWAY: DIRECT RADIATION 0 PLES COLLECTED: TLD AMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: QUARTERLY Approximate Location Direction Distance Name Sector miles Descri tion N-1 N A1A, North of Blind Creek NNW-5 NNW South of Pete Stone Creek NNW-10 NNW Coast Guard Station NW-5 NW Indian River Dr., at Rio Vista Dr.

NW-10 NW 10 S.R. 68 at S.R. 607 WNW-2 WNW 3 Cemetery South of 7107 Indian River Dr.

WNW-5 WNW 5 U.S. 1 at S.R. 712 WNW-10 WNW 10 S.R. 70, West of Turnpike W-2 W 2 7609 Indian River Drive W-5 W 5 Oleander and Sager Street W-10 W 9 Interstate 95 at S.R. 709 WSW-2 WSW 2 8503 Indian River Dr.

WSW-5 WSW 5 Prima Vista at Yacht Club WSW-10 WSW 10 Del Rio at Davis Street W-2 SW 2 9207 Indian River Drive

-5 SW 5 U.S. 1 at Village Green Dr.

-10 SW 10 Port St. Lucie Blvd at Cairo Rd.

SSW-2 SSW 3 10307 Indian River Drive SSW-5 SSW 6 U.S. 1 at Port St. Lucie Blvd.

SSW-10 SSW 8 Pine Valley at Westmoreland Rd.

S-5 S 5 13179 Indian River Drive S-10 S 10 U.S. 1 at S.R. 714 S/SSE-10 SSE 10 Indian River Dr. at Quail Run Lane SSE-5 SSE 5 Entrance to Nettles Island SSE-10 SSE 10 Elliot Museum SE-1 SE 1 South of Cooling Canal H-32 NNW 19 University of Florida IFAS Vero Beach

1988 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT UNIT NOS 1 & 2 Key to Sample Locations THWAY: AIRBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED: RADIOIODINE AND PARTICULATES SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: WEEKLY Approximate Location Direction Distance Name Sector miles Descri tion H-08 WNW FPL Substation, Weatherby Rd.

H-14 SE On-Site, Near South Property Lane H-30 Power Line, 7609 Indian River Drive H-34 N 0.5 On-Site at Meteorology Tower Control:

H-12 12 FPL Substation, SR-76 Stuart

q ~

1988 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST ~ LUCIE PLANT UNIT NOS ~ 1 & 2 Key to Sample Locations THWAY WATERBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED: SURFACE WATER (OCEAN)

SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: H-15 WEEKLY H-59 MONTHLY Approximate Location Direction Distance Name Sector miles Descri tion H-15 ENE/E/SSE Atlantic Ocean, Public Beaches East Side A1A Control:

H-59 S/SSE 10-20 South End, Hutchinson Island SAMPLES COLLECTED: SHORELINE SEDIMENT SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: SEMI-ANNUALLY Approximate Location Direction Distance arne Sector miles Descri tion

-15 ENE/E/ESE Atlantic Ocean, Public Beaches East Side A1A Control:

H-59 S/SSE 10-20 South End, Hutchinson Island

1988 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST ~ LUCIE PLANT UNIT NOS ~ 1 & 2 Key to Sample Locations THWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED: CRUSTACEA AND FISH SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY! SEMI-ANNUALLY Approximate Location Direction Distance Name Sector miles Descri tion H-15 ENE/E/ESE Ocean Side, Vicinity of St.

Lucie Plant Control:

H-59 S/SSE 10-20 South End, Hutchinson Island SAMPLES COLLECTED BROAD LEAF VEGETATION SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: MONTHLY Approximate Location Direction Distance Name Sector miles Descri tion N/NNW Off-Site Near North Property Line H-52 S/SSE Off-Site Near South Property Line Control:

H-59 S/SSE 10-20 South End, Hutchinson Island

I i

t t O M o

I FPSL s I Q O~

O 00 PROPERTY4 N-1 I,. ~O

< a' I

LI N E 4'

~ H51I Q8LIHD I D 0 O.

O O gl R

CV II.

O ri l

i II I

I Py MN-2 Inset Detail t,~

'h~,

Ot rh4 io Ir n

'V'34 +E'EK eC

+0 I

pl yC r I H15 I

H3O 'XCLUSION AREA (0.9') UNIT I ANO LOW POPULATION ZONE (I mi) UNIT 2 I

0

'<<+ ~~KH~SE-1

~ r f res J f

g,l FPSL s PROP E RT Y I LINE ,lH14 i'~4

~ i

'H52 WSH-2 t~ i O>>0

~

4

'I

~ 4 4V coO 44 P. O

\ ~

O FLORiDA POWER 8 LIGHT COMPANY ST. LUCIE PLANT 0 I/2 4

SCALE IN MILES SIT E AR EA MAP FIGURE 5.1. i

y L J t V(

CI pl

~ HP tltl

<<t>>tl O'I'0 pphyp r"

0

'I p ~

v'Li' I~

~4

~ .p p IPPH.S H

> (il 0

~ +

l5?

t H-1 I

plV,'II)II?I ~

Q pppp.2

", NP0

<

> Hll 'I 0 IP J~ 40II~ p, .0- PI 4 4 H C~ ? P? M/0 IP" ~ v 4 LQV.?0 . 0 tt'PH PI, tI ~ Ig0 gt' P ' ' t I~ 0 ~$ $ K.N? gg 4 ~ ~ ~I p? Ile I I4>>4 IPP tt P4 I<<t>>>>41 1988 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT UNITS NOS. 1 AND 2 ATTACHMENT B RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY'S ST. LUCIE SITE 1988 First Quarter, 1988 Second Quarter, 1988 Third Quarter, 1988 Fourth Quarter, 1988 RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY'S ST. LUCIE SITE First Quarter, 1988 Office of Radiation Control Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services Wp 4 ST. LUCIE SITE Technical Specifications Sampling Fir'st Quarter, 1988 Collection Locations Number of Sam le T e Fre uenc

1. Direct 'Radiation Quarterly 27

2. Airborne 2.a Air Iodines Weekly 65 69*

2.b Air Particulates Weekly

3. Waterborne 3.a Surface Water Weekly 13 Monthly 3 3.b Shoreline sediment Semiannually 3*

4. Ingestion 4.a Fish and Invertebrates 4.a.1 Crustacea Semiannually 4.a.2 Fish Semian'nually 4.b Food Products =

4.b.l Broadleaf Monthly Vegetation ~ Total: 219

• Includes DOE split'amples.

NOTE ~ Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background .of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term. Measurement results that are not significantly above background are reported as '"non-detectable" (ND) or as less than a Lower Limit of Detection (<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 95% confidence) for the true activity in- the sample. ST. LUCIE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS SAMPLING First Quarter, 1988 DIRECT RADIATION TLDs (micro-R/hour) Each result is the average net response of two dosimeters. Sample Deployment 12-16-87 Site Collection 03-30-88 N-1 5.1 + 0.3 NNW-5 5.1 + 0.3 NNW-10 5.0 + 0.3 NW-5 5.1 + 0.3 NW-10 6.6 + 0.3 WNW-2 5.2 + 0.3 WNW-5 5.0 + 0.3 WNW-10 5.1 + 0.3 W-2 5.2 + 0.3 W-5 5.3 + 0.3 W-10 5.1 + 0.3 WSW-2 5.3 + 0.3 WSW-5 5.1 + 0.3 WSW-10 4.7 + 0.2 SW-2 4.7 + 0.2 SW-5 4.8 + 0.3 SW-10 5.0 + 0.3 SSW-2 4 ~ 8+ 0.3 SSW-5 4.9 + 0.3 SSW-10 5.2 + 0.3 S-5 5.0 + 0.3 S-10 5.0 + 0.3 S/SSE-10 4.9 + 0.3 SSE-5 5.5 + 0.3 SSE-10 5.3 + 0.3 SE-1 5.2 + 0.3 H-32 5.7 + 0.3 Notes: (A) These results have been determined with the assumption that fading is negligible, although detailed testing to confirm this has not been completed. (B) Testing to confirm compliance with NRC Reg. Guide 4.13 arid ANSI N545-1975 performance standards has not been completed. IODINE-131 IN WEEKLY AIR FILTERS ( Ci/m3 ) Sam le Site Collection Date H08 H12 H14 H30 H34 01-OS-88 <0.03 <0. 03 <0. 03 <0.02 <0. 03 01-12-88 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 01-20-88 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 01-26-88 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 02-02-88 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.04 02-09-88 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <o.o4 <0.04 02-16-88 <0.02 <0. 02 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 02-23-88 <0.02 <0. 02 <0.03 <0.02 <0.02 03-01-88 <0.03 <0. 02 <0. 03 <0. 03 <0.03 03-08-88 <<= <0.02 <0. 02 <0. 02 <0. 02 <0.02 03-15-88 <0. 02 <0. 02 <0. 02 <0. 02 <0.02 03-22-88 <0. 03 <0. 03 <0. 03 <0. 03 <0.03 03-29-88 <0. 02 <0. 02 <0. 02 <0. 02 <0.02 I~ ~ Qf 2.b AIR PARTICULATES GROSS BETA ( Ci/m ) Collection Sam le Site Date H08 H12 H14 H30 H34 01-05-88 0.011 + 0.002 0. 007 + 0.002 0.005 + 0.002 0. 007 + 0.001 0.010 + 0.002 01-12-88 0.012 + 0.002 0. 013 + 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 0.012 + 0.002 01-20-88 0.010 + 0.002 0. 010 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 0.007 + 0.002 0.009 + 0.002 01-26-88 0.008 + 0.002 0. 006 + 0.002 0.008 + 0.002 0.007 + 0.002 0.009 + 0.002 02-02-88 0.007 + 0.002 0.009 + 0.002 *0.008 + 0.002 0.006 + 0.002 0.008 + 0.002 02-09-88 0.007 + 0.002 0.006 + 0.002 *0.008 + 0.002 0.005 + 0.001 0.008 + 0.002 02-16-88 0.011 + 0.002 0.008 + 0.002 *0.013 + 0.002 0.014 + 0.002 0.013 + 0.002 02-23-88 0.012 + 0.002 0.008 + 0.002 *0.011 + 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 0.009 + 0.002 03-01-88 0.023 + 0;002 0.015 + 0.002 0.016 + 0.002 0.014 + 0.002 0.016 + 0.002 03-08-88 0.011 + 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 0.008 + 0.002 03-15-88 0.011 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 0.015 + 0.002 0.013 + 0.002 0.013 + 0.002 03-22-88 0.009 + 0.002 0.009 + 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 0.012 + 0.002 0.009 + 0.002 03-29-88 . 0.008 + 0.002 0.012 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 0.007 + 0.002 0.013 + 0.002 Means: 0.011 + 0.001 0.010 + 0.001 0.011 + 0.001 0.010 + 0.001 0.011 + 0.001

• DOE split samples.

2.b AIR PARTICULATES GAMMA SCANS OF QUARTERLY COMPOSITES ( Ci/m3 ) First Quarter, 1988 Sample Site Be-7 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 H08 0. 138 + 0. 010 <0. 027 <0.0010 <0.0008 H12 0.144 + 0. 010 <0. 028 <0.0009 <0.0009 H14 0.150 + 0.011 <0.019 <0.0008 <0.0008 H30 0.145 + 0.010 <0.017 <0.0012 <0.0008 H34 0.157 + 0.010 <0.018 <0.0010 <0.0008 3.a SURFACE WATER ( Ci/1) Sample Collection Zr-95 Ba-140 Site Date H-3 K-40 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 La-140 (A) (B) H15 01-05-88 <190 330 + 40 <5 <9 <4 <5 <9 <7 <7 <5 <4 <7 01-12-88 <190 350 + 50 <5 <10 <5 <4 <10 <6 <9 <5 <4 <6 01-20-88 01-26-88 02-09-88 '2-02-88 <190 <190 <180 <180 320 360 280 310 + + + + 50 50 50 50 <4 <5 <4 <5 <8 <10 <10 <10 <3 <4 <4 <5 <5 <5 <4 <5 <10 <9 <10 <12 <8 <8 <8 <7 '8 <7 <7 <8 <5 <5 <5 <5 <4 <4 <3 <4 <6 <7 <7 <4 02-16-88 <180 290 + 50 <4 <10 <5 <3 <9 <9 <7 <6 <5 =- <5 02-23-88 <180 260 + 50 <4 <11 <4 <5 <10 <8 <7 <4 <4 <5 03-01-88 ~ <180 320 + 50 <5 <10 <6 <5 <10 <7 <10 <4 <4 <9 03-08-88 <190 250 + 40 <5 <10 <5 <4 <10 <8 <7 <4 <4 <4 03-15-88 <180 320 + 50 <4 <12 <5 <4 <10 <6 <8 <5 <4 <5 03-22-88 <180 350 + 50 <4 <11 <5 <5 <9 <7 <5 <5 <4 <10 03-29-88 <180 370 + 50 <4 <8 <4 <5 <10 <7 <7 <4 <5 <6 H59 01-06-88 <190 310 + 50 <5 <8 <4 <5 <8 <8 <7 <5 <5 <7 02-03-88 <180 340 +'50 <5 <10 <5 <5 <10 <7 <8 <4 <4 <5 03-02-88 <180 310 + 50 <5 <9 <5 <4 <9 <8 <10 <4 <5 <7 (A) These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs. (B) These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct, measurement. of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample. 3.b SEDIMENT ( Ci/k dr wei ht) Sample Collection Site Date Be-7 K-40 Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Th-232 U-235 U-238 H15* 02-10-88 <60 210 + 40 <6 <9 <8 <8 180 + 10 60 + 20 34 + 6 200 + 50 H59 02-10-88 <90 310 + 50 <10 <7 <10 <8 220 + 10 <23 <120 <280

• DOE split sample.

4.a.1 CRUSTACEA Blue Crab ( Ci/k wet wei ht) Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Ra-228 H15 This sample was not collected despite several attempts. Attempts will continue. H59 02-10-88 2100 + 100 <15 <32 <13 <14 <26 <16 14 + 6 <39 150 + 20 4.a.2 FISH Mixed S ecies ( Ci/k , wet wei ht) Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Ce-134 Ca-137 Ra-226 Ra-228 H15 03-16-88 2700 + 100 <10 <28 <13 <10 <27 <12 <13 <27 <47 H59 02-11-88 3500 + 200 <13 <29 <13 <13 <30 <12 <14 <25 <60 4.b.l BROADLEAF VEGETATION Man rove ( Ci/k wet wei ht) Sample Collection Cs-137 Site Date Be-7 K-40 1-131 Cs-134 H51 01-06-88 540 + 40 2200 + 100 <7 <7 <6 02-03-88 590 + 40 1310 + 80 <ll <8 <6 03-02-88 590 + 50 1800 + 100 <15 <8 <8 H52 01-06-88 620 + 40 2600 + 100 <8 <8 <7 02-03-88 640 + 40 2700 + 100 <10 <8 <7 03-02-88 550 + 50 2400 + 100 <14 <8 <8 H59 01-06-88 520 + 40 2200 + 100 <8 <8 <7 02-03-88 560 + 50 2600 + 100 <13 <10 <8 03-02-88 460 + 40 2100 + 100 <14 <9 <8 RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT CONPANYsS ST. LUCIE SITE Second Quarter, 1988 Office of Radiation Control Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services 'la ST. LUCIE SITE Technical Specifications Sampling Second Quarter, 1988 Collection Locations Number of Sam le T e Fre uenc

1. Direct Radiation Quarterly 27 52

2. Airborne 2.a Air Iodines Weekly 65 2.b Air Particulates Weekly 69*

3. Waterborne 3.a Surface Water Weekly 13 Monthly 3 3.b Shoreline sediment Semiannually 0

4. Ingestion

~ 4.a Fish and Invertebrates ~ 4.a.l Crustacea Semiannually 4.a.2 Fish~ Semiannually 4.b Food Products 4.b.l Broadleaf Monthly Vegetation Total: 212

• Includes DOE split samples.

NOTE: Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term.. Measurement results that are not significantly above background are reported as "non-detectable" (ND) or as less than a Lower Limit of Detection (<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 95% confidence) for the true activity in the sample. 0 ST. LUCIE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS SAMPLING Second Quarter, 1988 DIRECT RADIATION TLDs (micro-R/hour) Each result is the average net response of two dosimeters. Sample Deployment 03-30-88 Site . Collection 06-16-88 N-1 5.1 + 0.3 NNW-5 4.9 + 0.3 NNW-10 5.2 + 0.3 NW-5 5.3 + 0.3 NW-10 6.6 + 0.3 WNW-2 5.3 + 0.3 WNW-5 5.2 + 0.3 WNW-10 5.1 + 0.3 W-2 5.3 + 0.3 W-5 5.3 + 0.3 W-10 5.2 + 0.3 WSW-2 5.0 + 0.3 WSW-5 (C) WSW-10 4.5 + 0.2 SW-2 5.0 + 0.3 SW-5 4.8 + 0.3 SW-10 5.2 + 0.3 SSW-2 4.9 + 0.3 SSW-5 5.2 + 0.3 SSW-10 5.2 + 0.3 S-5 5.0 + 0.3 S-10 5.0 + 0.3 S/SSE-10 4.8 + 0.3 SSE-5 5.5 + 0.3 SSE-10 5.3 + 0.3 SE-1 4.9 + 0.3 H-32 6.1 + 0.3 (A) These results have been determined with the assumption that fading is negligible, although detailed testing to confirm this has not been completed. Testing to confirm compliance with NRC Reg. Guide 4.13 and ANSI N545-1975 performance standards has not been completed. (C) The dosimeters for site WSW-5 were missing when collection was attempted. 2 , IODINE-131 IN WEEKLY AIR FILTERS ( Ci/m 3 ) Sam le Site Collection Date H08 H12 H14 H30 H34 04-05-88 '0.02 <0.03 <0. 02 <0.02 <0.02 04-12-88 <0.03 <0.03 <0. 03 <0.03 <0.03 04-19-88 <0.02 <0.02 <0. 02 <0.02 <0.02'0.02 04-26-88 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.03 05-03-88 <0. 02. <0.03 <0.02 <0.03 <0.03 05-11-88 ,<0. 02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 05-17-88 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 05-'24-88 <0.02 <0.03 <0.02 <0.03 <0.02 05-31-88 < 0.'03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 06-07-88 <0.03 <0.03 <0.04 <0.03 <0.04 06-15-88 <0.02 <0.02 <0.03 <0.03 <0.02 06-21-88 <0.02 <0.02 <0.03 <0.02 <0.03 06-28-88 <0. 03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0. 03 jr t @~ i~ 2.b AIR PARTICULATES GROSS BETA ( Ci/m ) Collection Sam le Site Date H08 H12 H14 H30 H34 04-05-88 0.014 + 0.002 0. 009 + 0.002 0. 012 + 0.002 0.012 + 0.002 0. 013 + 0. 002 04-12-88 0.014 + 0.002 0. 012 +'.002 0. 010 + 0.002 0.018 + 0.002 0.008 + 0.002 04-19-88 0.010 + 0.002 0. 013 + 0.002 0. 010 + 0.002 0.013 + 0.002 0.014 + 0.002 04-26-88 0.014 + 0.002 0. 011 + 0.002 0.016 + 0.002 0.017 + 0.002 0.018 + 0.002 05-03-88 0.016 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 *0.010 + 0.002 0.013 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 05-11-88 0.016 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 *0.013 + 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 0.015 + 0.002 05-17-88 0.015 + 0.002 0.014 + 0.002 *0.012 + 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 05-24-88 0.006 + 0.002 0.008 + 0.002 *0.007 + 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 05-31-88 0.009 + 0.002 0.005 + 0.001 0.007 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 06-07-88 0.015 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 0.012 + 0.002 0.012 + 0.002 06-15-88 0.010 + 0.002 0.012 + 0.002 0.007 + 0.002 0.009 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 06-21-88 0.014 + 0.002 0.015 + 0.002 0.004 + 0.002 0.019 + 0.002 0.008 + 0.002 06-28-88 0.012 + 0.002 0.012 + 0.002 0.009 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 Means: 0.013 + 0.001 0.011 + 0.001 0.010 + 0.001 0.013 + 0.001 0.011 + 0.001

• DOE split samples.

2.b AIR PARTICULATES GAMMA SCANS OF QUARTERLY COMPOSITES ( Ci/m3 ) Second Quarter, 1988 Sample Site Be-7 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 H08 0.114 + 0.009 <0.026 <0.0008 <0.0007 H12 0.121 + 0.010 <0.026 <0.0008 <0.0008 H14 0.137 + 0.010 <0.016 <0.0009 <0.0009 H30 0.144 + 0.011 <0.026 <0.0009 <0.0007 H34 0.152 + 0.011 <0.026 <0.0009 <0.0009 3.a SURFACE WATER ( Ci/l) Sample Collection Zr-95 Ba-140 Site Date H-3 K-40 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 La-140 (A) (B) H15 04-05-88 <180 340 + 50 <5 = <9 <5 <6 <10 <7 <5 <6 <4 <6 04-12-88 <180 350 + 50 <3 <10 <5 <4 <12 <7 <8 <5 <4 <5 04-19-88 <180 220 + 50 <5 <8 <3 <5 <6 <7 <6 <6 <5 <7 04-27-88 05-03-88 <180 330 + 50 <4 <8 <4 <5 <9 <9,<8 <5 <5 <8 <180 310 + 50 <4 <11 <5 <5 <10, <7 <8 <5 <4 <5 05-11-88 <180 360 + 50 <4 <6 <4 <5 <11 <8 <6 <5 <5 <8 05-18-88 <180 300 + 50 <5 <8 <5 <5 <12 <7 <5 <5 <5 <4 05-24-88 <180 330 + 50 <4 <11 <4 <5 <10 <7 <6 <5 <4 <6 05-31-88 <180 330 + 50 <5 <9 <5 <4 <12 <6 <5 <5 <4 <5 06-07-88 <190 300 + 50 <4 <11 <4 <4 <10 <9 <8 <5 <5 <5 06-15-88 390 + 60 330 + 50 <5 <ll <5 <4 <12 <7 <8 <5 <4 <6 06-21-88 <180 310 + 50 <5 <9 <5 <5 <8 <7 <6 <5 <5 <6 06-29-88 <180 360 + 50 <5 <7 <5 <3 <10 <8 <9 <5 <4 <7 H59 04-06-88 <180 330 + 60 <5 <10 <5 <4 <10 <7 <7 <5 <5 <5 05-04-88 <180 270 + 60 <4 <9 <5 <5 <10 <7 <7 <6 <5 <6 06-01-88 <180 330 + 50 <5 <10 <4 <5 , <10 <7 <7 <6 <5 <3 (A) These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs. (B) These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample. CRUSTACEA Blue Crab ( Ci/k wet wei ht) Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Ra-228 H15 05-17-88 '10 + 80 <11 <22 <10 <12 <24 <15 <11 113 + 9 280 + 40 4.b. 1 BROADLEAF VEGETATION Man rove ( Ci/k wet wei ht) Sample Collection Site Date Be-7 K-4 0 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 H51 04-06-88 570 + 50 1950 + 120 <9 <9 <8 05-04-88 620 + 40 2340 + 110 <9 <8 <8 06-01-88 .430 + 40 900 + 90 <8 <7 <7 H52 04-06-88 " 540 + 50- 2560 + 130 <10 <9 <8 05-04-88 630 + 50 3350 + 140 <10 <9 06-01-88 450 + 40 3260 + 140 <8 <8 <8 H59 04-06-88 280 + 40 1640 + 90 <8 <7 <6 05-04-88 480 + 50 2200 + 120 <10 <8 <8 06-01-88 490 + 50 3300 + 130 <9 <8 <8 RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY'S ST. LUCIE SITE Third Quarter, 1988 Office of Radiation Control Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services ST. LUCIE SITE Technical Specifications Sampling Third Quarter, 1988 Collection Locations Number of Sam le T e Fre uenc Sam led Sam les

1. Direct Radiation

2. Airborne

'uarterly 27 54 2.a Air Iodines Weekly 65 2.b Air Particulates Weekly 69*

3. Waterborne 3.a Surface Water Weekly 13 Monthly 3 3.b Shoreline sediment Semiannually 3*

4.~ Ingestion 4.a ~ Fish and Invertebrates 4.a.l Crustacea Semiannually -4.a.2 Fish Semiannually 4.b Food Products 4.b.l Broadleaf Monthly Vegetation Total: 219

• - Includes DOE split samples.

NOTE: Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term. Measurement results that are not significantly above background are reported as "non-detectable" (ND) or as less than a'Lower Limit of Detection (<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 95% confidence) for the true activity in the sample. ST. LUCIE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS SAMPLING Third Quarter, 1988 DIRECT RADIATION - TLDs (micro-R/hour) Each result is the average net response of two dosimeters. Sample Deployment 06-16-88 Site Collection 09-13-88 N-1 5.2 + 0.3 0.3'.3 NNW-5 + NNW-10 5' + 0.3 NW-5 5.2 + 0.3 NW-10 6.6 + 0.3 WNW-2 5.3 + 0.3 WNW-5 4.9 + 0.3 WNW-10 4 ' + 0' W-2 5.4 + 0.3 W-5 5.1 + 0.3 W-10 4' + 0.3 WSW-2 5.1 + 0.3 WSW-5 5.0 + 0.3 WSW-10 4.6 + 0.2 SW-2 4.6 + 0.2 SW-5 4.5 + 0.2 SW<<10 4.8 + 0.3 SSW-2 4 ' + 0' SSW-5 4.9 + 0.3 SSW-10, 5.2 + 0.3 S-5 5.0 + 0' S-10 4.9 + 0.3 S/SSE-10 4.8 + 0' SSE-5 5.3 + 0.3 SSE-10 5.0 + 0.3 SE-1 4.9 + 0.3 H-32 5.7 + 0.3 Notes: (A) These results have been determined with the assumption that fading is negligible, although detailed testing to confirm this has not been completed. Testing to confirm compliance with NRC Reg. Guide 4.13 and ANSI N545-1975 performance standards has not been completed. \4 0 ll , ~ 0 2 ' IODINE-131 IN WEEKLY AIR FILTERS - ( Ci/m 3 ) Sam le Site Collection Date H08 H12 H14 H30 H34 07-05-88 <0. 03 <0. 03 <0.03 <0. 03 <0. 03 07-12-88 <0 ~ 02 <0.02 <0.03 <0. 02 <0. 02 07-19-88 <0 02 <0 '2 <0.02 <0.02 <0. 02 07-27-88 <0. 03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0. 03 08-02-88 <0. 04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0 ~ 04 08-09>>88 <0. 03 <0.03 <0.03 <0 '2 <0. 03 08-16-88 <0. 03 <0.02 <0. 02 <0.04(A) <0.02 08-23-88 <0 '2 <0.02 <0. 03 <0. 02 <0.03 08-30-88 <0.02 <0 '2 <0 ~ 02 <0. 02 <0. 02 09-06-88 <0.02 <0.02 <0. 02 <0.02 <0.02 09-13-88 <0.02 <0. 02 <0 ~ 02 <0.02 <0.02 09-20-88 <0 '2 <0 '2 <0.03 <0.03 <0.02 09-27-88 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0 '2 <0.02 A - This sample had a low collected volume. This is believed to be due to a power outage during work on power lines at this site. The equipment is estimated to have run for 113 hours0.00131 days <br />0.0314 hours <br />1.868386e-4 weeks <br />4.29965e-5 months <br /> out of the 168 total hours .for this sampling interval. I'i W.p 4 k' 2.b AIR PARTICULATES GROSS BETA ( Ci/m ) Collection Sam le Site Date H08 H12 H14 H30 H34 07-05-88 0.009 + 0. 002 0. 010 + 0.002 0. 010 + 0.002 0. 011 + 0.002 0-009 + 0.002 07-12-88 0.010 + 0. 002 0. 010 + 0.002 0.009 + 0.002 0.008 + 0.002 0.007 + 0.002 07-19-88 0.007 + 0. 002 0. 007 + 0.002 0.007 + 0.002 0.009 + 0.002 0.007 + 0.002 07-27-88 0.010 + 0. 002 0. 007 + 0.001 0.008 + 0.002 0.007 + 0.001 0.005 + 0.001 08-02-88 0.015 + 0. 002 0. 012 + 0.002 *0.014 + 0.002 0.013 + 0.002 0.013 + 0.002 08-09-88 0.011 + 0. 002 0. 012 + 0.002 *0.013 + 0.002 0.012 + 0.002 0.013 + 0.002 08-16-88 0.009 + 0. 002 0.009 + 0.002 *0.008 + 0.002 (A0.007 + 0.002 0.007 + 0.002 08-23-88 0.010 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 *0.008 + 0.002 0.014 + 0.002 0.009 + 0.002 08-30-88 0.008 + 0.002 0.007 + 0.002 0.014 + 0.002 0. 01,4 + 0.002 0.006 + 0.002 09-06-88 0.011 + 0.002 0 F 011 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 0. 011 + 0.002 0.006 + 0.002 09-13-88 0.016 + 0.002 0.016 + 0.002 0.016 + 0.002 0. 013 + 0.002 0.015 + 0.002 09-20-88 0.013 + 0.002 0.007 + 0.002 0.008 + 0.002 0. 007 + 0.002 0.006 + 0.002 09-27-88 0.014 + 0.002 0.013 + 0.002 0.009 + 0.002 0. 008 + 0.002 0.008 + 0.002 Means: 0.011 + 0.001 0.010 + 0.001 0.010 + 0.001 0.010 + 0.001 0.009 + 0.001

• DOE split samples.

A This sample had a low collected volume. This is believed to be due to a power outage during work on power lines at this site. The equipment is estimated to have run for 113 hours0.00131 days <br />0.0314 hours <br />1.868386e-4 weeks <br />4.29965e-5 months <br /> out of the 168 total hours for this sampling interval. 2.b AIR PARTICULATES GAMMA SCANS OF QUARTERLY COMPOSITES - ( Ci/m ) Third Quarter, 1988 Sample Site Be-7 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 H08 0. 098 + 0. 009 <0. 024 <0. 0010 <0.0007 H12 0.104 + 0.008 <0.016 <0. 0009 <0.0008 'H14 0.100 + 0.009 <0.015 <0. 0009 <0.0007 H30 0.087 + 0.008 <0.012 <0.0008 <0.0007 H34 0.095 + 0.008 <0.015 <0.0009 <0.0009 f't pr 3.a SURFACE WATER ( Ci/1) Sample Collection 7 Zr-95 Ba-140 Site Date H-3 K-40 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 La-140 (A) (B) H15 07-05-88 <180 340 + 40 <4 <10 <5 <4 <9 <8 <8 <6 <3 <7 07-12-88 <180 310 + 50 <5 <10 <4 <4 <10 <7 <8 <5 <4 <8 07-19-88 <180 360 + 50 <5 <9 <4 <5 <9 <7 '<7 <5 <5 <7 07-27-88 <180 340 + 50 <4 <10 <4 <5 <10 <8 <13 <5 <5 <6 08-03-88 <180 290 + 50 <5 <9 <3 <4 <9 <6 <11 <5 <4 . <7 08-09-88 08-17-88 08-24-88 08-30-88 09-06-88 <170 <170 <170 <170 320 330 280 310 + + + + 50 50 50 50 <4 <5 <5 <4 <9 <8. <8 <10 <5 <5 <5 <4 <4 <5 <5 <5 <9 <10 <10 <13 <9 <8 <10 <6 <8 <7 <8 <8 '5 <5 <5 <6 <4 <5 <4 <4 <5 <7 <6 <5 <170 260 + 40 <5 <9 <5 <4 <9 <8 <5 <4 <4 <8 09-13-88 <170 290 + 40 <5 <9 <5 <4 <8 <8 <5 <5 <3 <9 09-20-88 <170 290 + 40 <4 <9 <5 <5 <10 <6 <6 <5 <4 <7 09-27-88 <170 250 + 40 <5 <7 <4 <5 <10 <7 <5 <5 <4 <10 H59 07-06-88 <180 350 + 50 <5 <10 <5 <5 <9 <8 <7 <5 <5 <8 08-03-88 <170 270 + 40 <4 <9 <4 <5 <11 <7 <10 <5 <5 <5 09-06-88 <170 270 + 50 <3 <8 <4 <5 <8 <8 <7 <3 <5 <7 (A) These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs. (B) These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample. 3.b SEDIMENT ( Ci/k dr wei ht) Sample Collection Site Date Be-7 K-40 Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 .Cs-137 Ra-226 Th-232 H15* 08-03-88 <90 310 + 70 " <8 <7 . <9 '9 210 + 20 <60 H59 08-03-88 <90 370 + 50 <8 <8 <9 <8 174 + 8 80 + 10

• DOE split sample.

4.a.l CRUSTACEA - Blue Crab ( Ci/k wet wei ht) Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Ra-228 H15 Attempts to collect this sample were not successful. Additional attempts will be made. H59 08-05-88 1900 + 100 <11 <31 <12 <9 <30 <13 <10 100 + 10 140 + 60 4.a.2 FISH Mixed S ecies ( Ci/k wet wei ht) Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Ra-228 H15 09-20-88 2400 + 200 <16 <30 <17 <14 <32 <14 <13 <33 <70 H59 08-17-88 2700 + 100 <11 <26 <10 <14 <22 <13 <13 <31 <60 4.b.l BROADLEAF VEGETATION Man rove - ( Ci/k wet wei ht) Sample Collection Site Date Be-7 K-40 I>>131 Cs-134 Cs<<137 H51 07-06-88 , 380 + 40 2700 + 100 <13 <10 <8 08>>03<<88 470 + 40 2400 + 100 <10 <8 <7 09-06-88 390 + 40 2800 + 100 <11 <9 <7 H52 07-06-88 410 + 40 3000 + 100 <12 <8 <8 08-03-88 710 + 50 3300 + 100 <12 <10 <8-09-06-88 500 + 50 2500 + 100 <14 <10 <10 H59 07<<06-88 420 + 40 3000 + 100 <12 <9 <9 08-03-88 450 + 40 2500 + 100 <12 <6 <7 09-06-88 620 + 60 3600 + 200 <18 <12 <10 RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY'S ST. LUCIE SITE Fourth Quarter, 1988 Office of Radiation Control Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services ST. LUCIE SITE Technical Specifications Sampling Fourth Quarter, 1988 Collection Locations Number of Sam le T e Fre uenc

1. Direct Radiation Quarterly 27 54

2. Airborne 2.a Air Iodines Weekly 65 2.b Air Particulates Weekly 69*

3. Waterborne 3.a Surface Water Weekly 13 Monthly 3 3.b Shoreline sediment Semiannually 0 4.

~ Ingestion, ~ 4.a Fish and Invertebrates ~ 4.a.l Crustacea ~ Semiannually 4.a.2 Fish Semiannually 4.b Food Products 4.b.l Broadleaf Monthly Vegetation Total: 214

• Includes DOE split samples.

NOTE: Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term. Measurement results that are not significantly above background are reported as "non-detectable" (ND) or as less than a Lower Limit of Detection (<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 95%, confidence) for the true activity in the sample. ST. LUCIE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS SAMPLING Fourth Quarter, 1988 DIRECT RADIATION - TLDs (micro-R/hour) Each result is the average net response of two dosimeters. Sample Deployment 09-13-88 Site Collection 12-14-88 N-1 5.1 + 0.3 NNW-5 5.0 + 0.3 NNW-10 5.2 + 0.3 NW-5 5.2 + 0.3 NW-10 6.5 + 0.3 WNW-2 5.1 + 0.3 WNW-5 4.8 + 0.3 WNW-10 5.4 + 0.3 W-2 5.0 + 0.3 W-5 4.9 + 0.3 W-10 4.9 + 0.3 WSW-2 5.0 + 0.3 WSW-5 5.1 + 0.3 WSW-10 4.6 + 0.2 SW-2 5.0 + 0.3 SW-5 5.0 + 0.3 SW-10 5.0 + 0.3 SSW-2 5.0 + 0.3 SSW<<5 5.1 + 0.3 SSW-10 5.3 + 0.3 S-5 5.0 + 0.3 S-10 5.1 + 0.3 S/SSE-10 4.7 + 0.2 SSE-5 5.3 + 0.3 SSE-10 5.0 + 0.3 SE-1 4.5 + 0.2 H-32 6.0 + 0.3 Notes: (A) These results have been determined with the assumption that fading is negligible, although detailed testing to confirm this has not been completed. Testing to confirm compliance with NRC Reg. Guide 4.13 and ANSI N545-1975 performance standards has not been completed. 2.a IODINE-131 XN MEEKLY AIR FILTERS ( Ci/m ) Sam le Site Collection Date H08 H12 H14 H30 H34 10-04-88 <0. 02 <0. 02 <0. 02 <0.02 <0.02 10-11-88 <0. 02 <0. 02 <0. 03 <0.02 <0.03 10-18-88 <0. 03 <0. 03 <0. 03 <0.03 <0.03 10-25-88 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 11-01-88 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 11-08-88 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 11-15-88 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0. 02 11-22-88 <0.04 <0.03 <0.04 <0.04 <0.03 11-29-88 <0.04 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 12-06-88 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 12-13-88 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 12-20-88 <0. 02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 12-27-88 <0. 02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 2.b AIR PARTICULATES GROSS BETA ( Ci/m ) Collection Sam le Site Date H08 H12 H14 H30 H34 10-04-88 0.009 + 0.002 0. Oll + 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 0.009 + 0.002 0.008 + 0.002 10-11-88 0.018 + 0.002 0. 013 + 0.002 0.014 + 0.002 0.018 + 0.002 0.017 + 0.002 10-18-88 0.014 + 0.002 0. 012 + 0.002 0.015 + 0.002 0.015 + 0.002 0.017 + 0.002 10-25-88 0.028 + 0.003 0. 015 + 0.002 0.015 + 0.002 0.020 + 0.002 0.016 + 0.002 11-01-88 0.014 + 0.002 0. 017 + 0.002 0.016 + 0.002 0.017 + 0.002 0.017 + 0.002 11-08-88 0.020 + 0.002 0. 011 + 0.002 *0.013 + 0.002 0.015 + 0.002 0.014 + 0.002 11-15-88 0.019 + 0.002 0. 012 + 0.002 *0.016 + 0.002 0.013 + 0.002 0.016 + 0.002 11-22-88 0.004 + 0.002 0. 006 + 0.002 *0.006 + 0.002 0.007 + 0.002 0.005 + 0.002 11-29-88 0.012 + 0.002 0. 011 + 0.002 *0.013 + 0.002 0.013 + 0.002 0.009 + 0.002 12-06-88 0.014 + 0.002 0. Oll + 0.002 0.015 + 0.002 0.014 + 0.002 0.015 + 0.002 12-13-88 0.011 + 0.002 0. 008 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 12-20-88 0.019 + 0.002 0. 013 + 0.002 0.017 + 0.002 0.013 + 0.002 0.017 + 0.002 12-27-88 0.013 + 0.002 0. 010 + 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 0.008 + 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 Means: 0.015 + 0.001 0.012 + 0.001 0.013 + 0.001 0.013 + 0.001 0.013 + 0.001 DOE split samples. 2.b AIR PARTICULATES GAMMA SCANS OF QUARTERLY COMPOSITES ( Ci/m ) Fourth Quarter, 1988 Sample Site Be-7 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 H08 0.133 + 0.010 <0.014 <0.0008 <0.0008 H12 0.133 + 0.009 <0.013 <0.0008 <0.0006 H14 0.146 + 0.009 <0.015 <0.0008 <0.0007 H30 0.110 + 0.008 <0.013 <0.0009 <0.0008 H34 0.131 + 0.009 <0.016 <0.0010 <0.0008 3.a SURFACE WATER ( Ci/1) Sample Collection Zr-95 Ba-140 Site Date H-3 K-40 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 La-140 (A) (B) H15 10-04-88 <180 300 + 50 <5 <9 <5 <4 <11 <10 <7 <5 <5 10-11-88 <180 260 + 50 <4 <10 <4 <5 <11 <7 <9 <6 10-18-88 <180 230 + 50 <5 <9 <5 <5 <9 <9 <7 <4 <7 10-25-88 <180 310 + 50 <3 <10 <4 <5 <10 <8 <6 <4 <4 11-01-88 <180 260 + 50 <4 <11 <4 <6 <8 <8 <7 <5 <6 11-08-88 <180 250 + 40 <4 <9 <4 <4 <11 <9 <10 <4 <7 11-15-88 <180 240 + 50 <5 <10 <3 <5 <8 <7 <5 <4 <6 11-22-88 <180 290 + 50 <5 <10 <5 <4 <8 <6 <7 <4 <5 11-29-88 150 + 50 300 + 50 <5 <7 <4 <5 <10 <7 <7 <5 <5 12-06-88 <160 290 + 50 <4 <10 <4 <5 <9 <7 <5 <3 <7 12-13-88 <160 230 + 50 <4 <9 <4 <5 <10 <9 <8 <4 <6 12-21-88 <160 360 + 50 <3 <10 <4 <4 <8 <8 <7 <4 <4 12-27-88 <160 280 + 50 <4 <7 <4 <5 <9 <8 <5 <4 <10 H59 10-05-88 <180 260 + 40 <4 <9 <4 <4 <7 <6 <7 <6 <4 <4 11-02-88 <180 280 + 50 <4 <9 <4 <5 <9 <8 <6 <5 <3 <5 12-07-88 <160 260 + 50 <4 <8 <4 <4 <10 <7 <6 <5 <4 <9 (A) These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs. (B) These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample. 4.a. 1 CRUSTACEA Blue Crab ( Ci/k , wet wei ht) Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 H15 11-11-88 <350 <23 <49 <24 <26 <47 <24 Cs-137 Ra-226 Ra-228 U-238 <22 <440 190 + 30 770 + 80 4.b.1 ~ ~ BROADLEAF VEGETATXON - Man rove ( Ci/k wet wei ht) Sample Collection Site Date Be-7 K-40 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 H51 10-05-88 580 + 40 5300 + 200 <14 <9 11-02-88 390 + 50 3400 + 200 <17 <12 <10 12-07-88 440 + 40 1900 + 100 <8 <9 <8 H52 10-05-88 520 + 50 3400 + 200 <14 <12 <9 11-02-88 450 + 60 2600 + 100 <17 <10 <10 12-07-88 440 + 40 3400 + 100 <9 <9 <8 H59 10-05-88 540 + 50 4900 + 200 <15 <15 <10 11-02-88 440 + 50 3000 + 100 <17 <10 12-07-88 460 + 50 3200 + 200 <12 <9 1 1988 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT UNITS NOS. 1 AND 2 ATTACHMENT C RESULTS FROM THE INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM 1988 If I E. FLORIDA DEPT OF HRS EPA INTERLABORATORY CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM DATA January through June, 1988 Media Nuclide Collection EPA Units Normal. Mean of N.D.K. Action Mon Day Yr Known Range Analyses Level FILTER Alpha

• 03 25 88 20 pCi/F , 0.118 23.33 1 ~ 15 FILTER Beta 03 25 88 50 pci/F 0.000 50 00 F 0. 00 FILTER Cs<<137 03 25 88 16 pCi/F 0.237 18.33 0. 81 FILTER Sr-90 03 25 88 17 pci/F 0.395 14.67 -2. 69 FOOD FOOD I-131 Cs-137 01 01 29 29 88 88 102 pCi/Kg 91 pCi/Kg 0.058 0.355 99 '3 92.00

-0. 45

0. 35 FOOD K 01 29 88 1230 mg/Kg 0. 578 1176.67 -1.50 FOOD Sr-89 01 29 88 46 pCi/Kg 0 237 36.00 -3.46 FOOD MILK Sr-90 I-131 01 06 29 24 88 88 55 pCi/Kg pCi/L

~

0. 215 48.33 -4 '0NA MILK Cs-137 06 24 88 pCi/L NA MILK K 06 24 88 mg/L NA MILK Sr-89 06 24 88 pci/L NA MILK Sr-99 06 24 88 pCi/L NA WATER Alpha 01 22 88 4 pCi/L 0. 000 3. 00 -0. 35 WATER Alpha 03 18 88 6 pCi/L 0.118 5.33 -0. 23 WATER Alpha 05 20 88 11 pCi/L 0.118 7.33 -l. 27 WATER Beta 01 22 88 8 pCi/L 0.118 8. 67 ,0. 23 WATER Beta 03 18 88 13 pCi/L 0.118 14.33 0. 46 WATER WATER Beta Cr-51 05 06 20 03 88 88 ll pCi/L pCi/L 0.118 12.67 0. 58 NA ATER Co-60 02 05 88 69 pCi/L 0.355 70. 67 0. 58 WATER Co-60 06 03 88 pCi/L NA WATER Zn-65 02 05 88 94 pCi/L 0.252 98. 00 0.74 WATER Zn-65 06 03 88 pCi/L NA WATER Ru-106 02 05 88 105 pCi/L 0.451 102.33 -0. 44 WATER Ru-106 06 03 88 pCi/L NA WATER Cs-134 02 05 88 64 pCi/L 0. 000 60.00 -1.39 WATER Cs-134 06 03 88 pCi/L NA WATER Cs>>137 02 05 88 94 pCi/L. 0. 118 91.67 -0.81 WATER Cs-137 06 03 88 pCi/L NA WATER WATER H-3 H-3 02 06 12 10 88 88 3327 pCi/L pCi/L

0. 082 3313.33 -0 '7NA WATER Sr-89 01 08 88 30 pCi/L 0. 118 27.67 -0.81 WATER Sr-89 05 06 88 pCi/L NA WATER Sr-90 Ol 08 88 15 pCi/L 0.000 14.00 -1. 15 WATER Sr-90 05 06 88 pCi/L NA

~ I 'k 4 C ' NOTES: mal.: Normalized range. As defined in "Environmental Radioactivity Lab- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ nge oratory Intercomparison Studies Program Fiscal Year 1981 1982", ~ Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, ~ ~ ~ U. S.~ Environmental ~ Protection Agency, P. 0. Box 15027, Las Vegas, Nevada, ~ ~ ~ 89114. EPA-600/4-81-004, February, 1981. N.D.K.: Normalized deviation- of the mean from the known value. As defined in EPA-600/4-81-004. NDP: No data provided. No data was provided to EPA for inclusion in their report. NA: Not available. Report containing this data has not yet been re-ceived from EPA, Las Vegas. Action Level: (1) Cause: Erroneously over estimated chemical recovery of strontium carrier. Corrective action: Try to improve purity of isolated strontium carrier. (2) Cause: Erroneously over estimated chemical recovery of strontium carrier. Corrective action: Try to improve purity of isolated strontium carrier. II I FLORIDA DBPT OF HRS BPA ZNTBRLABORATORY CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM DATA July through December, 1988 Media Nuclide Collection EPA Units Normal. Mean of N.D.K. Action Mon Day Yr Known Range Analyses Level FILTER Alpha 08 26 88 8 pCi/F 0.000 9. 00 0. 35 FILTER Beta 08 26 88 29 pCi/F 0.237 27. 00 -0.69 FILTER Cs-137 08 26 88 12 pCi/F 0.000 13. 00 0.35 FILTER Sr-90 08 26 88 8 pCi/F 0.790 6. 00 2 ~ 31 FOOD I-131 07 29 88 107 pCi/Kg 0.108 109.00 0. 31 FOOD Cs-137 07 29 88 49 pCi/Kg 0.355 49.33 0.12 FOOD K 07 29 88 1240 mg/Kg

• 0.669 1186.67 -1.49' FOOD Sr-89 07 29 88 33 pCi/Kg 0.237 25.00 ~ 77 FOOD Sr-90 07 29 88 34 pCi/Kg 0.296 28.67 -4. 62 MILK I-131 06 24 88 94 pCi/L 0.132 95.00 0. 19 MILK I-131 10 28 88 91 pCi/L 0.197 90.33 -0. 13 MILK Cs-137 06 24 88 51 pCi/L 0.118 50.67 -0. 12 MILK Cs-137 10 28 88 50 pCi/L 0.355 47.33 -0. 92 MILK K 06 24 88 1600 mg/L 0.148 1593.33 -0. 14 MILK K 10 28 88 1600 mg/L 0.296 1520.00 -l. 73 MILK Sr-89 06 24 88 40 pCi/L ,0.237 36.00 -1. 39 MILK Sr-89 10 28 88 40 pCi/L 0.237 33.00 -2.42 MILK Sr-90 06 24 88 60 pCi/L 0.592 55.67 -2.50 MILK Sr-90 10 28 88 60 pCi/L 0.592 52.33 -4.43 WATER Alpha 07 22 88 15 pCi/L 0.237 10. 67 -1.50 ATER Alpha 09 23 88 8 pCi/L 0.000 6. 00 -0.69 WATER WATER Alpha Beta ll 07 25 22 88 88 9 pCi/L 4 pCi/L 0.237 0.000 9 ~ 33

6. 00 0.12 0.69 WATER Beta 09 23 88 10 pCi/L 0.000 12. 00 0.69 WATER Beta 11 25 88 9 pCi/L 0.000 11. 00 0.69 WATER Cr-51 06 03 88 302 pCi/L 0.178 294. 33 -0.44 WATER Cr-51 10 07 88 251 pCi/L 0.237 250.33 -0.05 WATER Co-60 06 03 88 15 pCi/L . 0.118 16.33 0.46 WATER Co-60 10 07 88 25 pCi/L 0.118 26.33 0.46 WATER Zn-65 06 03 88 101 pCi/L 0.415 99.67 -0.23 WATER Zn-65 10 07 88 151 pCi/L 0.237 151.67 0.08 WATER Ru-106 06 03 88 195 pCi/L 0. 237 189.33 -0.49 WATER Ru-106 10 07 88 152 pCi/L 0. 434 142.33 1 ~ 21 WATER Cs-134 06 03 88 20 pCi/L 0. 000 19.00 -0.35

, WATER Cs-134 10 07 88 25 pCi/L 0. 237 23.33 -0.58 WATER Cs-137 06 03 88 25 pCi/L 0. 118 25.67 0.23 WATER Cs-137 10 07 88 15 pCi/L 0. 237 15.33 0.12 WATER H-3 06 10 88 5565 pCi/L 0. 064 5620.00 0.17 WATER H-3 10 14 88 2316 pCi/L 0.152 2336.67 0.10 WATER I-131 08 05 88 76 pCi/L 0.074 75.67 -0.07 WATER I-131 12 09 88 115 pCi/L 0.049 116.33 0.19 WATER Sr-89 05 06 88 20 pCi/L 0.000 18 F 00 -0.69 WATER Sr-90 05 -06 88 20 pCi/L 0.395 18. 67 -1.54 M 9 I', 4 r NOTES: rmal.: Normalized range. As defined in "Environmental Radioactivity Lab-ange oratory Intercomparison Studies Program Fiscal Year 1981 1982", Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, P. O. Box 15027, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89114. EPA-600/4-81-004, February, 1981. N.D.K.: Normalized deviation of the mean from the known value. As defined in EPA-600/4-81-004. NDP: No data provided. No data was provided to EPA for inclusion in their report. NA: Not available. Report containing this data has not yet been re-ceived from EPA, Las Vegas. ACTION LEVEL: Cause: Erroneously over estimated chemical recovery of strontium carrier. Corrective action: Try to improve purity of isolated strontium carrier. Cause: Erroneously over estimated chemical recovery of strontium carrier. Corrective action: Try to improve purity of isolated strontium carrier. gpp424p361 1989 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 License Nos. DPR-67, NPF-16 I Docket Nos. 50-335, 50-389 Data Submitted By:Flo ida DHRS Report Prepared: o 9'/' <l 9O Report Reviewed: 2/arel A +/PWfd HP3:1 RADEHVOP.PSL 0 1989 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT UNITS NOS. 1 AND 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE INTRODUCTION RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM DISCUSSION AND INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

TABLE 1 DEVIATIONS/MISSING DATA TABLE 1A ANALYSES WITH LLDs ABOVE TABLE 4.12-1 DETECTION CAPABILITIES TABLE 1B LAND USE CENSUS TABLE 2 EY TO SAMPLE LOCATIONS ATTACHMENT A DIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY'S ST. LUCIE SITE ATTACHMENT B FIRST QUARTER, 1989 SECOND QUARTER, 1989 THIRD QUARTER, 1989 FOURTH QUARTER, 1989 RESULTS FROM THE INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM, 1989 ATTACHMENT C HP3:1 RADENVOP.PSL

1989 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT UNITS NOS. 1 AND 2 I. INTRODUCTION This report is submitted pursuant to Specification 6.9 of St. Lucie Unit No. 1 and St. Lucie Unit No. 2 Technical Specifications. The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report provides information, summaries and analytical results pertaining to the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program for the calendar year indicated. This report covers surveillance activities meeting the requirements of Unit No. 1 and Unit No. 2. Technical Specifications.

II. RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM A. ~Pur ose: The purpose of the radiological environmental monitoring program is to provide representative measurements of radiation and of radioactive materials in those exposure pathways and for those radionuclides which lead to the highest potential radiation exposures of members of the public resulting from station operation. The radiological environmental monitoring program also supplements the radiological effluent monitoring program by verifying that the measurable concentrations of radioactive materials and levels of radiation are not higher than expected on the basis of the effluent measurements and the modeling of the environmental exposure pathways.

B. Pro ram Descri tion: The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program for the St. Lucie Plant is conducted pursuant to Technical Specifications 3/4e12 of St. Lucie Unit No. 1 and St. Lucie Unit No. 2 Technical Specifications.

Sam le Locations T es and Fre encies:

a ~ Direct radiation gamma exposure rate is monitored continuously at 27 locations by thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD's). TLD's are collected and analyzed quarterly.

b. Airborne radioiodine and particulate samplers are operated continuously at five locations. Samples are collected and analyzed weekly. Analyses include Iodine-131, gross beta, and gamma isotopic measurements.

c ~ Surface water samples are collected from two locations. Samples are collected and analyzed weekly and monthly respectively. Analyses include gamma isotopic and tritium measurements.

HP3:1 RADEHVOP.PSL

1989 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT UNITS NOS. 1 AND 2

d. Shoreline sediment samples are collected from two locations coinciding with the locations for surface water samples. Samples are collected and analyzed semi-annually. Sediment samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements.

e. Fish and invertebrate samples are collected from two locations. Samples are collected and analyzed semi-annually. Fish and invertebrate samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements.

f. Broad leaf vegetation samples are collected from three locations. Samples are collected and analyzed monthly. Broad leaf vegetation samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements.

E Attachment A provides specific information pertaining to sample locations, types and frequencies.

2. Anal tical Res onsibilit Radiological environmental monitoring for the St. Lucie Plant is conducted by the State of Florida, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (HRS). Samples are collected and analyzed by HRS personnel. Samples are analyzed at the HRS Environmental Radiation Control Laboratory in Orlando, Florida.

C. Anal tical Results: Table 1, Environmental Radiolo ical Monitorin Pro ram Annual ~Summar provides a summary for all specified samples collected during the referenced surveillance period. Deviations from the sample schedule, missing data and/or samples not meeting the specified "A PRIORI" LLD, if any, are noted and explained in Tables 1A and 1B respectively.

Analysis data for all specified samples analyzed during the surveillance period is provided in Attachment B.

D. Land Use Census: A land use census out to a distance of 5 miles radius from the St. Lucie Plant is conducted annually to determine the location of the nearest milk animal, residence, and garden producing broad leaf vegetation in each of the sixteen meteorological sectors. A summary of the land use census for the surveillance year is provided in Table 2, Land Use Census ~Summa No locations yielding a calculated dose or dose commitment greater than the values currently being calculated were identified by the land use census.

HP3:1 RADEHVOP.PSL (2)

1989 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT UNITS NOS. 1 AND 2 No locations yielding a calculated dose or dose commitment (via the same exposure pathway) 20 4 greater than locations currently being sampled in the radiological environmental monitoring program were identified by the land use census.

E. Interlaborator Com arison Pro ra : The State of Florida HRS Environmental Radiation Control Laboratory participates in the Environmental Radioactivity Laboratory Intercomparison Studies Program conducted by the Environmental Protection Agency. Results from the Interlaboratory Comparison Program are provided in Attachment C.

III. DISCUSSION AND INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS A. Re ortin of Results: The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report contains the summaries, interpretations and information required by the St. Lucie Plant, Unit Nos. 1 & 2 Technical Specifications. Table 1 provides a summary of the measurements made for the nuclides required by Technical Specifications, Table 4.12-1, for all samples specified by Table 3.12-1. In addition, summaries are provided for other nuclides identified in the specified samples, including those not related to station operation. These include nuclides such as K-40, Th-232, Ra-226, Ra-228, and Be-7 which are common in the Florida environment.

B. Inter retation of Results Direct Radiation: The results for direct radiation monitoring are consistent with past measurements for the specified locations. The exposure rate data shows no indication of any trends attributed to effluents from the plant. The measured exposure rates are consistent with exposure rates that were observed during the preoperational surveillance program. Direct radiation monitoring results are summarized in Table 1.

2 ~ Air Particulates Radioiodine: The results for radioactive air particulate and radioiodine monitoring are consistent with past measurements and indicate no trends attributed to plant effluents. All samples for radioiodine yielded no detectable I-131. Gamma isotopic measurements yielded no indication of any nuclides attributed to station operation. The results for air particulate/radioiodine samples are consistent with measurements which were made during the preoperational surveillance program. Air particulate and radioiodine monitoring results are summarized in Table 1.

HP3:1 RAOEHVOP.PSL (3)

l e 1989 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT UNITS NOS. 1 AND 2 3 ~ Surface Water: The results for radioactivity measurements in surface water samples are consistent with past measurements. Tritium was reported as present in four of the weekly surface water samples collected from Site H-15 and one of the monthly surface water samples at site H-59. Subsequent samples indicate there has been no increase nor adverse trend for tritium in surface water samples at H-15. The highest measured tritium was at site H-59 and was less than 14 of the reporting level specified by plant technical specifications, Table 3.12-2. No other nuclides attributed to station operation were detected. Results for surface water samples are summarized in Table 1.

4 ~ Waterborne Sediment and Food Products: The results for radioactivity measurements in waterborne sediment, fish and crustacea samples are consistent with past measurements and with measurements made during the preoperational surveillance program. There were no indications of any radionuclides attributed to plant effluents. Results for the waterborne sediment, fish and crustacea samples are summarized in Table 1.

5. Broad Leaf Ve etation: The results for radioactivity measurements in broad leaf vegetation are consistent with past measurements and with measurements made during the preoperational surveillance program. There were no indications of any nuclides attributed to plant effluents. Results for the broad leaf vegetation samples are summarized in Table 1.

C. Conclusions The data obtained through the St. Lucie Plant Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program verifies that the levels of radiation and concentrations of radioactive materials in environmental samples, representing the highest potential exposure pathways to members of the public, are not being increased. The measurements verify that the dose or dose commitment to members of the public, due to operation of St.

Lucie Unit Nos. 1 6 2, during the surveillance year, are well within "as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA)" criteria established by 10 CFR 50, Appendix I.

IIP3:1 RADENVOP.PSL (4)

Page 1 of 8

~r ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MON ORING PROGRAM ANNUAL StBQGLRY Name of Facility St. Lucie Unit Nos 1 and 2 Docket No.(s) 50-335 and 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie Florida Reporting Period Zanua 1 December 31 1989 (County, State)

PATHWAY DIRECT RADIATION SAMPLES COLLECTED: TLD UNITS: MICRO R/hr Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Highest Control Locations Total Number of Locations Annual Mean Mean (f) of Analyses Detection Mean (f) Name Mean f Range Performed (LLD) Range Distance & Range Direction Exposur e 5.3 (108/108) NW-10 6. 5 (4/4) 6. 1 (4/4)

Rate, 108 d 4.5 6.7 10 miles, NW 6.4 6.7 6.0 6.2 Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements = 0

T 1 Page 2 of 8 e ~-

ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MON ORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility St. Lucie Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Docket No.(s) 50-335 and 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie Florida Reporting Period, Janua 1 December 31 1989 (County, State)

PATHWAY: AIRBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED: RADIOIODINE AND PARTICULATES UNITS PICO Ci/M Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Highest Control Zacatjons Total Number of Locations Annual Mean Mean (f) of Analyses Detection Mean (f) Name Mean f Range Performed (LLD) Range Distance & Range Direction 131? 260 0. 024 < MDA < MDA Gross Beta, 260 0.0025 0.011 (260/260) H-08 0.013 (52/52) 0.011 (52/52) 0.003 0.024 6 miles, WNW 0.003 0.024 0.003 0.020 Composite Gamma Isotopic, 20 Be 0.0052 0. 099 (20/20) H-34 0. 105 (4/4) 0.095 (4/4)

0. 066 0. 126 0.5 miles, N 0.075 0.123 0.066 0. 118 40~ 0. 012 < MDA MDA 134C 0.00069 < MDA < MDA 137C 0.00066 MDA < MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements = 0

T 1 Page 3 of 8 r

ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MON ORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility St. Lucie Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Docket No.(s) 50-335 and 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie Florida Reporting Period Janua 1 December 31 1989 (County, State)

PATHWAY: WATERBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED: SURFACE WATER UNITS: PICO Ci/LITER Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Highest Control Locations Total Number of Locations Annual Mean Mean (f) of Analyses Detection Mean (f) Name Mean f Range Performed (LLD) Range Distance & Range Direction Tritium, 64 230 102 (5/64) H-59 130 (1/12) 130 (1/12) 90 130 10-20 mi, S/SSE Gamma Isotopic, 64 40K 60 325 (64/64) H-15 329 (52/52) 310 (12/12) 220 420 < 1 mi, ENE/E/ESE 220 420 240 400

'4Mn < MDA < MDA 5'Fe MDA MDA 58Co MDA MDA 60Co < MDA MDA Zn < MDA MDA Zr-Nb < MDA MDA 131I < MDA MDA 134C MDA MDA 137C MDA MDA 140B MDA MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements = 0

T 1 Page 4 of 8 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MO ORING PROGRAM ANNUAL SUMMA Name of Facility St. Lucie Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Docket No.(s) 50-335 and 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie Florida Reporting Period Zanua 1 December 31 1989 (County, State)

PATHWAY: WATERBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED: SHORELINE SEDIMENT UNITS: PICO Ci/Kg, DRY Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Highest Control Locations Total Number of Locations 'nnual Mean Mean (f) of Analyses Detection Mean (f) Name Mean f Range Performed (LLD) Range Distance & Range Direction Gamma Isotopic, 4 40K 140 525 (4/4) H-15 680 (2/2) 370 (2/2) 270 740 < 1 mi. ENE/E/ESE 620 740 270 470 226R 49 253 (4/4) H-59 254 (2/2) 254 (2/2) 197 311 10-20 mi, S/SSE 197 311 197 311 232T 52 108 (2/4) H-59 119 (1/2) 119 (1/2) 96 119 10-20 mi, S/SSE Be 100 < MDA < MDA 58Co MDA MDA 60Co 12 MDA < MDA 134C 14 MDA MDA 137C 12 MDA < MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements = 0

Page 5 of 8 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MON ORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility St. Lucie Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Docket No.(s) 50-335 and 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie Florida Reporting Period Januar 1 - December 31 1989 (County, State)

PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED: CRUSTACEA UNITS: PICO Ci/Kg, WET Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Highest Control Locations Total Numb'er of Locations Annual Mean Mean (f) of Analyses Detection Mean (f) Name Mean f Range Performed (LLD) Range Distance & Range Direction Gamma Isotopic, 4 4'K 130 1298 (4/4) H-59 1965 (2/2) 1965 (2/2) 490 2060 10-20 mi, S/SSE 1870 2060 1870 2060 226R 20 180 (4/4) H-15 250 (2/2) 110 (2/2) 86 370 < 1 mi, ENE/E/ESE 129 370 86 135 228 294 (2/4) H-15 294 (2/2) MDA 177 410 < 1 mi, ENE/E/ESE 177 410 54Mn < MDA MDA 59F 16 < MDA MDA 58Co < MDA MDA 60co 19 < MDA < MDA Zn 17 MDA MDA 134C < MDA MDA 137C < MDA MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements = 0

T 1 Page 6 of 8 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MON RING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility St. Lucie Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Docket No.(s)

~ ~ ~ ~

50-335 and 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie Florida Reporting Period Zanua 1 December 31 1989 (County, State)

PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED: FISH UNITS: PICO Ci/Kg, WET Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Highest Control Locations Total Number of Locations Annual Mean Mean (f) of Analyses Detection Mean (f) Name Mean f Range Performed (LLD) Range Distance & Range Direction Gamma Isotopic, 4 40K 130 3200 (4/4) H-15 3445 (2/2) 2955 (2/2) 2710 4180 < 1 mi, ENE/E/ESE 2710 4180 2910 3000 226R 20 78 (1/4) H-59 78 (1/4) 78 (1/4) 10-20 mi, S/SSE 228 H-59 93 (1/4) 93 (1/4) 93 (1/4) 10-20 mi, S/SSE 54Mn < MDA MDA 59Fe 16 < MDA MDA 5'Co < MDA MDA 60Co 10 MDA MDA 65~ 17 MDA < MDA 134C MDA MDA 137C MDA MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements = 0

TP 1 Page 7 of 8 0

ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility St. Lucie Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Docket No.(s) 50-335 and 50-389 Location of Facility -

St. Lucie Florida Reporting Period Zanuar 1 December 31 1989 (County, State)

PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED: BROAD LEAF VEGETATION UNITS: PICO Ci/Kg, WET Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Highest Control Locations Total Number of Locations Annual Mean Mean (f) of Analyses Detection Mean (f) Name Mean f Range Performed (LLD) Range Distance & Range Direction Gamma Isotopic, 36 Be 71 416 (36/36) H-52 461 (12/12) 425 (12/12) 280 830 1 mi, S/SSE 300 740 310 830 40K 100 2930 (36/36) H-52 3500 (12/12) 2820 (12/12) 810 4480 1 mi, S/SSE 2200 4480 1970 4200 226 H-59 26 29 (1/36) 29 (1/12) 29 (1/12) 10-20 mi, S/SSE 131I MDA < MDA 134C < MDA MDA 137C < MDA MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements = 0

TABLE 1 Page 8 of 8 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility St. Lucie Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Docket No.(s) 50-335 and 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie Florida (County, State)

Reporting Period Januar 1 December 31 1989 NOTES a ~ The LLD is an "a priori" lower limit of detection which establishes the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count above system background that will be detected with 954 probability with only 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation, represents a real signal.

LLD's in this column are at time of measurement. The MDAs reported in Attachment B for the individual samples have been corrected to the time of sample collection.

b.~ Mean and range based upon detectable measurements only.

Fraction of detectable measurements at specified locations is

~

indicated in parentheses (f).

~ ~ ~

C~ Specific identifying information for each sample location is provided in Attachment A.

d. Results are based upon the average net response of two TLDs.

(Thermoluminescent dosimeters).

MDA refers to minimum detectable activity.

C 1989 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT, UNIT NOS. 1 & 2 TABLE 1A DEVIATIONS MISSING DATA A) Pathway: Airborne Location: H-08, 6 miles WNW Date: 02/21/89 to 02/28/89 Deviation: Failure to continuously provide air sampling at this location for the fourth week of February 1989.

Description of Problem: The sample had a low collected volume with a normal as found flow rate. A power interruption is suspected. Estimated sampling duration of 111 hours0.00128 days <br />0.0308 hours <br />1.835317e-4 weeks <br />4.22355e-5 months <br /> out of the 169 hour0.00196 days <br />0.0469 hours <br />2.794312e-4 weeks <br />6.43045e-5 months <br /> period.

Corrective Action: The sampling equipment was inspected and verified as operating properly.

B) Pathway: Airborne Location: H-08, 6 miles WNW Date: 03/07/89 to 03/14/89 Deviation: Failure to continuously provide air sampling at this location for the second week of March 1989.

Description of Problem: Air sample pump found running backwards, due to internal motor failure. Estimated duration of failure is 9 hours1.041667e-4 days <br />0.0025 hours <br />1.488095e-5 weeks <br />3.4245e-6 months <br />.

Corrective Action: 1) Reviewed prior sample data to verify unaffected sampling period, especially Feb. 21-28, 1989 period.

2) Replace sampling pump-motor combination.

C) Pathway: Airborne Location: H-30, 2 miles W Date: 07/11/89 to 07/18/89 Deviation: Failure to continuously provide air sampling at this location.

Description of Problem: Electrical circuit breaker found tripped at end of sample period. Lightning suspected cause.

Corrective Action: Reset breaker, inspected sampling equipment and verified as operating properly.

1989 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT UNIT NOS. 1 & 2 TABLE 1B ANALYSES WITH LLDs ABOVE TABLE 4.12-1 DETECTION CAPABILITIES 1 1 89 12 31 89 The values specified in Table 4.12-1,'etection Capabilities, were achieved for all samples.

1989 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT UNITS NOS. 1 AND 2 TABLE 2 LAND USE CENSUS DISTANCE TO NEAREST (a, b) 6/89 Milk (c) 6/89 6/89 Sector Animal Residence Garden (d) 0 (e) 0, NNE 0 NE ENE 0

1.5/141 (g)

SSE L (f) 3.5/152 (g) 4.3/182 3.2/191 SSW L 2.2/213 3.8/202 SW L 1.9/236 1.9/234 WSW 4.2/254 1.9/245 (11) 1.9/258 4.5/266 1.9/260 2.1/275 L 2.3/281 3.2/283 4.9/306 3.5/304 3.7/306 NNW L L (g) L

1989 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 TABLE 2 NOTES LAND USE CENSUS (a) All categories surveyed out to 5 miles radius from the St. Lucie Plant (b) The following format is used to denote the location:

distance (miles)/bearing (degrees)

For example, a residence located in the southeast sector at a distance of 1.5 miles bearing 141 degrees is recorded as 1.5/141.

(c) Potential milk animal locations. All locations specified have been verified to be not producing milk for human consumption.

(d) Gardens with an estimated growing area of 500 square feet or more.

0 denotes that the sector area is predominantly an 'ocean area.

, L denotes that the sector area is predominantly a land area unoccupied by the category type.

(g) Non-residential occupied buildings in this sector include the following:

SSE Fire Station, 1.8/149 SSE Country Club, 3.4/153 NNW Lifeguard station at beach, 4.6/342 SE Lifeguard station at beach, 1.1/132 (h) Several residences in this sector are located approximately 1.9 miles from the St. Lucie Plant.

I 1989 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT UNITS NOS. 1 AND 2 ATTACHMENT A KEY TO SAMPLE LOCATIONS

1989 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT UNIT NOS. 1 & 2 Key to Sample Locations PATHWAY: DIRECT RADIATION SAMPLES COLLECTED: TLD SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: QUARTERLY Approximate Location Direction Distance Name Sector miles Descri tion N-1 N A1A, North of Blind Creek NNW-5 NNW South of Pete Stone Creek NNW-10 NNW Coast Guard Station NW-5 NW Indian River Dr., at Rio Vista Dr.

NW-10 10 S.R. 68 at S.R. 607 WNW-2 3 Cemetery South of 7107 Indian River Dr.

WNW-5 WNW 5 U.S. 1 at S.R. 712 WNW-10 WNW 10 S.R. 70, West of Turnpike W-2 W 2 7609 Indian River Drive W-5 W 5 Oleander and Sager Street

-10 W 9 Interstate 95 at S.R. 709 SW-2 WSW 2 8503 Indian River Dr.

SW-5 WSW 5 Prima Vista at Yacht Club WSW-10 WSW 10 Del Rio at Davis Street SW-2 SW 2 9207 Indian River Drive SW-5 SW 5 U.S. 1 at Village Green Dr.

SW-10 SW 10 Port St. Lucie Blvd. at Cairo Rd.

SSW-2 SSW 3 10307 Indian River Drive SSW-5 SSW 6 U.S. 1 at Port St. Lucie Blvd.

SSW-10 SSW 8 Pine Valley at Westmoreland Rd.

S-5 S 5 13179 Indian River Drive S-10 S 10 U.S. 1 at S.R. 714 S/SSE-10 SSE 10 Indian River Dr. at Quail Run Lane SSE-5 SSE 5 Entrance to Nettles Island SSE-10 SSE 10 Elliot Museum SE-1 SE 1 South of Cooling Canal Control:

H-32 NNW 19 University of Florida IFAS Vero Beach

I 4 8

1989 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT UNIT NOS. 1 & 2 p>>

Key to Sample Locations PATHWAY: AIRBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED: RADIOIODINE AND PARTICULATES SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: WEEKLY Approximate Location Direction Distance Name Sector miles Descri tion H-08 . FPL Substation, Weatherby Rd.

H-14 SE On-Site, Near South Property Lane H-30 Power Line, 7609 Indian River Drive H-34 N 0.5 On-Site at Meteorology Tower Control:

H-12 12 FPL Substation, SR-76 Stuart

1989 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT UNIT NOS. 1 & 2 Key to Sample Locations PATHWAY: WATERBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED: SURFACE WATER (OCEAN)

SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: H-15 WEEKLY, H-59 MONTHLY Approximate Location Direction Distance Name Sector miles Descri tion H-15 ENE/E/SSE Atlantic Ocean, Public Beaches East Side A1A Control::

H-59 S/SSE 10-20 South End, Hutchinson Island SAMPLES COLLECTED: SHORELINE SEDIMENT SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: SEMI-ANNUALLY Approximate ocation Direction Distance Name Sector Descri tion H-15 ENE/E/ESE Atlantic Ocean, Public Beaches East Side A1A Control:

H-59 S/SSE 10-20 South Endg Hutchinson Island

I 1989 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT UNIT NOS. 1 & 2 Key to Sample Locations PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED: CRUSTACEA AND FISH SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: SEMI-ANNUALLY Approximate Location Direction Distance Name Sector miles Descri tion H-15 ENE/E/ESE Ocean Side, Vicinity of St.

Lucie Plant Control:

H-59 S/SSE 10-20 South End, Hutchinson Island SAMPLES COLLECTED: BROAD LEAF VEGETATION SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: MONTHLY Approximate Location Direction Distance Name Sector Descri tion H-51 N/NNW Off-site Near North Property Line H-52 S/SSE Off-Site Near South Property Line Control:

H-59 S/SSE 10-20 South End, Hutchinson Island

CZL1

~. ~ ~..w 4+~~- .

l ~

~~

~ ~ s ~~ r 0 >tta ) )'

~ ~

I

~ ~ I III

.c\~, ' 6 l l hl

'D cn / Ng/A N A / VEh OO ~plant Vents 202 7n el>

Vl Iv IO O g I

m O m

9 3

~

~/ - - Fuel Bldg Vents 109.5 l l elv f P Xl

>O r

W

~8 I

p r ~~

>O mm~

~ Q 2.

mr r~

C p EA

>"r o

h g C p po Ul rn l I

2 I l <r'-

~

Vl p gUl gV tQ ~

(p X ~

~ ~

jp. 'A)H'I.+- i ZI ao gge D 0 ~ ~ hg ~ i i ~~o 5 8

~

Public Access to Beach ) Public Access lo Aeach 0

I

~ *

~,

('

'I'.'

~

v I ~ ~ ~ IOI Cla 5 gI5

/ ~~

(

'~t

• r

~ s ~  !

I <<

t

~

~ ~ I

~ ~

. ~, 4 ~ ~

I'l ~ (

( e ~

~ ~

5 XS ~

I. " Al OII W~ ~%

J

~ ~

)

(~

\

V 0

'I g

/

lit oi5 5O

<<( ( [if IO ill I V

~ L

~ ~

( ~

~

4'I I

~o )t. ~ ~

I( ~

~ a I ~

>>4 ~

05M

! ~

~ I

~ ~

1989 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT UNITS NOS. 1 AND 2 ATTACHMENT B RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY'S ST. LUCIE SITE 1989 First Quarter, 1989 Second Quarter, 1989 Third Quarter, 1989 Fourth Quarter, 1989

RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POMER AND I IGHT COMPANY'S ST. LUCIE SITE First Quarter, 1989 Office of Radiation Control Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services

ST. LUCIE SITE Technical Specifications Sampling First Quarter, 1989 Collection Locations Number of Sam le T e Fre uenc

1. Direct Radiation Quarterly 27 54

2. Airborne

2. a Air Iodines Weekly 65 2.b Air Particulates Meekly 69*

3. Waterborne 3.a Surface Mater Weekly 13 Nonthly 3 3.b Shoreline sediment Semiannually 3*

4. Ingestion 4.a Fish and Invertebrates

~

4.a.l Crustacea Semiannually 4.a.2 Fish

~ ~ Semiannually 4.b Food Products 4.b.l Broadleaf Honthly Vegetation Total: 220

• - Includes DOE split samples.

NOTE: Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term.

Measurement results that are not significantly above background are reported as "non-detectable" (ND) or as less than a Lower Limit of Detection (<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 95K confidence) for the true activity in the 0 sample.

ST. LUCIE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS SANPLING First Quarter, 1989 DIRECT RADIATION TLDs - (micro-R/hour)

Each result is the average net response of two dosimeters.

Sample Deployment 12-14"88 Site Collection 03-22-89 N-1 5.1 + 0 '

NNW-5 5.4 x 0.3 NNW-10 5.6 a 0.3 NW"5 5.2 4 0.3 NW-10 6' + 0' WNW-2 5.2 a 0.3 WNW-5 5.4 + 0.3 WNW"10 F 7 + 0' W"2 5.4 ~ 0.3 W-5 5.2 + 0.3 W-10 5.2 ~ 0.3 WSW-2 4' ~ 0' WSW-5 5' + 0.3 WSW-10 ~

4' + 0' SW-2 5.0 ~ 0.3 SW-5 4.6 a 0.2 SW"10 5.0

• 0.3 SSW-2 5.1 + 0.3 SSW"5 5' + 0' SSW-10 5' 4 0 '

S-5 5.2 x 0.3 S"10 4.9 + 0.3 S/SSE-10 5' + 0.3 SSE-5 5' ~ 0.3 SSE-10 5.1 + 0 '

SE"1 4.9 + 0.3 H-32 F 1 + 0' Notes:

(A) These results have been determined with the assumption that fading is negligible, although detailed testing to confirm this has not been completed.

(B) Testing to confirm compliance with NRC Reg. Guide 4.13 and ANSI N545-1975 performance standards has not been completed.

2 ' IODINE-131 IN WEEKLY AIR FILTERS ( Ci/m3)

Sam le Site Collection Date H08 H12 H14 H30 H34 01-03-89 <0,02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 01-11-89 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 01-18-89 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0 '2 <0.02 01"25-89 <0.02 <0.02 <0.03 <0.02 <0.03 01-31"89 <0.02 <0.03 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 02-08-89 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 02-14-89 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 02-21-89 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 02-28-89 <0.04(A) <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0 '2 03-07-89 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.03 03-14-89 <0.02(B) <0.02 <0'02 <0.02 <0.02 03-21-89 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 03-28-89 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 (A) - This sample had a low collected volume with a normal flowrate.

A power outage is suspected. The equipment is estimated to have run for 111 hours out of the 169 total hours for this sampling interval.

(B) Upon collection of this sample, the air pump was found to be running backwards due to an internal failure. The air pump is estimated to have run backwards for 9 hours1.041667e-4 days <br />0.0025 hours <br />1.488095e-5 weeks <br />3.4245e-6 months <br /> out ef the 168 total hours for this sampling interval. After this malfunction, the particulate filter collected from this site on 02-28-89 was re" examined, but there was no sign that the pump had run backwards during the collection of that sample.

2.b AIR PARTICULATES GROSS BETA ( Ci/m3)

Collection Sam le Site Date H08 H12 H14 H30 H34 01-03-89 0.010 0.002 0.005 0.002 0.007 + 0.002 0 '08 + 0.002 0.008 0.002 01-11-89 0.016 0.002 0.008 0.002 0.010 0.002 0.008 0.002 0.009 0.002 01-18-89 0.012 0.002 0.006 + 0.002 0.008 0.002 0.010 ~ 0.002 0.006 0.002 01-25-89 0.010 + 0.002 0.015 0.002 0.009 + 0.002 0.010 0.002 0.009 0.002 01-31-89 0.008 0.002 0.010 0. 002, 0.008 0.002 0.008 0.002 0.007 0.002 02-08-89 0.005 0.001 0.005 + 0.001 *0.004 0.001 0.007 a 0.002 0.007 0.002 02-14-89 0.015 0.002 0.017 0.002 *0.017 0.002 0.013 0.002 0.017 + 0.002 02-21-89 0.010 0.002 0.007 0.002 *0.010 0.002 0.008 0.002 0.006 0.002 02-28-89 (A0.009 + 0.002 0.014 0.002 *0.014 0.002 0.013 0.002 0.016 0.002 03-07-89 0.003 a 0.001 0.008 + 0.002 0.006 0.002 0.006 ~ 0.002 <0 .005 03-14-89 (B0.012 0.002 0.012 0.002 0.011 + 0.002 0.012 + 0.002 0.012 0.002 03-21-89 0.016 0.002 0.010 0.002 0.012 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 0.014 0.002 03-28-89 0.008 0.002 0.008 0.002 0.004 0.002 0.008 0.002 0.005 0.002 Neans: 0. 010 w 0; 001 0.010 +'.001 0.009 ~ 0.001 0.009 i 0.001 0.010 + 0.001

• - DOE split samples.

A This sample had a low collected volume with a normal flowrate. A power outage is sus-pected. The eguipment is estimated to have run for 111 hours0.00128 days <br />0.0308 hours <br />1.835317e-4 weeks <br />4.22355e-5 months <br /> out of the 169 total hours for this sampling interval.

B The air pump is estimated to have run backwards for 9 hours1.041667e-4 days <br />0.0025 hours <br />1.488095e-5 weeks <br />3.4245e-6 months <br /> out of the 168 total hours for this sampling interval. After this malfunction, the filter collected from this site on 02-28-89 was re-examined, but there was no sign that a similar malfunction occurred then.

2.b AIR PARTICULATES GANNA SCANS OF QUARTERLY CONPOSITES ( Ci/m )

First Quarter, 1989 Sample Site Be-7 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 H08 0.104 0.008 <0.015 <0.0009 <0.0006 H12 0.118 0.008 <0.013 <0.0008'0.0009

<0.0007 H14 0.126 ~ 0.009 <0.016 <0.0007 H30 0.111 0.008 <0.015 <0.0006 <0.0006 H34 0.121 0.009 <0.025 <0.0007 <0.0007

3.a SURFACE WATER ( Ci'/1)

Sample Collection Zr-95 Ba-140 Site Date H-3 K-40 Nn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 La-140 (A) (B)

H15 01-03-89 <150 310 x 50 <4 <7 <4 <4 <10 <7 <6 <3 <5 01"11-89 110 R 50 280 k 50 <5 <9 <4 <5 <10 <8 <6 <5 <7 01-18-89 <170 290 N 50 <4 <12 <4 <5 <8 <8 <7 <3 <9 01"25-89 <150 310 50 <9 <5 <4 <9 <7 <6 <5 <4 <9 02-01-89 <130 350 a 50 <4 <6 <4 <5 <10 <9 <7 <5 <4 <6 02-08-89 <130 230 ~ 50 <4 <8 <3 <4 <11 <7 <6 <4 <5 <6 02"14-89 <130 290 + 50 <3 <10 <4 <4 <9 <7 <9 <5 <4 <6 02-21-89 90 ~ 40 320 4 50 <5 <9 <4 <5 <9 <8 <7 <4 <8 02-28-89 <130 390 + 50 <4 <9 <3 <5 <10 <7 <5 <5 <4 <8 03-08-89 <130 270 a 50 <3 <8 <4 <5 <11 <7 <6 <4 <6 03-'15-89 03-21-89

<130 280 i 50 <4 <10 <4 <7 <5 <8

<7

<5

<4

<4 <6

<6

<140 300 + 50 <8 <3 <7 <7 03-28-89 <130 310 50 <4 <10 <5 <5 <9 <9 <6 <5 <4 <4 H59 01-04-89 <150 260 + 40 <4 <9 <4 <5 <9 <7 <6 <5 <5 <7 02"01-89 <130 280 R 50 <5 <8 <5 <4 <10 <9 <7 <5 <4 <4 03-01-89 <130 240 + 40 <4 <10 <5 <4 <12 <5 <7 <6 <6 <6 (A) These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs,.

(B) These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.

3.b EDINENT ( Ci/k dr wei ht)

Sample Collection Site Date Be-7 K-40 Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Th-232 H15* 02-01-89 <80 620 70 <5 <9 <9 221 ~ 9 96 + 13 H59 02-01-89 <80 470 4. 60 <8 <6 <10 <8 311 ~ 12 119 + 23

• DOE split sample.

4.a.l CRUSTACEA Blue Crab ( Ci/k wet wei ht)

Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Rn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Ce-134 Ce-137 Ra-226 H15 01 "03-89 This sample A new sample was accidentally thrown out before will be collected.

it was analyzed.

H59 02-15-89. 2060 R 1'70 <16 <36 <19 <19 <41 <17 <18 135 ~ 17 4.a.2 FISH Nixed S ecies ( Ci/k wet wei ht)

Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Nn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 H15 03-15-89 2710 + 160 <12 <26 <9 <12 <25 <11 <12 <29 H59 03-01-89 3000 160 <12 <27 <13 <14 <26 <13 <13 <35

4.b.1 BROADLEAF VEGETATION - Man rove ( Ci/k wet wei ht)

Sample Collection Site Date Be-7 K-40 I-131 Ca-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 H51 01-04"89 370 R 40 2460 + 120 <7 <7 <8 <20 02-01-89 410 + 40 2470 ~ 120 <7 <9 <8 <20 03"01-89 280 i 40 810 + 100 <9 <10 <10 <22 H52 01-04-89 430 + 40 2730 i 110 <8 <7 <7 <42 02-01-89 410 + 40 2840 R 120 <7 <9 <7 <18 03-01-89 430 i 60 3120 A 170 <13 <15 <11 <34 H59 01-04"89 390 + 30 2010 S 100 <8 <8 <6 <35 02-01-89 310 R 50 1970 ~ 120 <8 <10 <9 29 + 7 03-01-89 310 + 50 2170 R 140 <12 <10 <10 <28 7

RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER AND I IGHT COMPANY'S ST. LUCIE SITE Second Quarter, 1989 Office of Radiation Control Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services

ST. LUCIE SITE Technical Specifications Sampling Second Quarter, 1989 Collection Locations Number of Sam le T e Fre uenc

1. Direct Radiation Quarterly 27

2. Airborne 2.a Air Iodines Weekly 65 2.b Air Particulates Weekly 69*

3. Waterborne 3.a Surface Water Weekly 13 Monthly 3 3.b Shoreline sediment Semiannually 0

4. Ingestion 4.a Fish and Invertebrates 4.a.1 Crustacea Semiannually 4.a.2 Fish Semiannually 4.b Food Products 4.b.l Broadleaf Monthly Vegetation Total: 214

• Includes NRC split samples.

NOTE: Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term.

Neasurement results that are not significantly above background are reported as "non-detectable" (ND) or as less than a Lower Limit of Detection (<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 95K confidence) for the true activity in the sample.

ST. IUCIE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS SAMPLING Second Quarter, 1989 DIRECT RADIATION - TLDs - (micro-R/hour)

Each result is the average net response of two dosimeters.

Sample Deployment 03-22-89 Site Collection 06-14-89 N-1 5.3 + 0.3 NNW-5 4.9 0.3 NNW" 10 S.3 + 0.3 NW-5 5.4 + 0.3 NW-10 6.4 + 0.3 WNW-2 5.1 + 0.3 WNW"5 S.l 0.3 WNW"10 5.6 0.3 W"2 5' + 0.3 W-5 5 7 + 0.3 W-10 5.3 + 0.3 WSW-2 5 ' + 0.3.,

WSW-5 5.2 + 0.3 WSW-10 4.5 + 0.2 SW-2 5.1 + 0.3 SW"5 5.0 + 0.3 SW-10 S.O ~ 0.3 SSW-2 5.1 + 0.3 SSW-5 S.O + 0.3 SSW"10 5.3 ~ 0.3 S"5 4.7 ~ 0.2 S-10 4.8 + 0.3 S/SSE-10 4.7 a 0.2 SSE-5 5 ' + 0.3 SSE-10 S.l 0.3 SE-1 4.9 +

.'.3 H-32 6.2 + 0 '

Notes:

(A) These results have been determined with the assumption that fading is negligible, although detailed testing to confirm this has not been completed.

(8) Testing to confirm compliance with NRC Reg. Guide 4.13 and ANSI N545-1975 performance standards has not been completed.

" IODINE-131 IN WEEKLY AIR FILTERS - ( Ci/m )

Sam le Site Collection Date HOB H12 H14 H30 H34 04-05"89 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 04-11-89 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 04-18"89 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 04-25-89 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 05-02-89 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 05-09-89 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 05-16-89 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 05-23-89 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 05-31-89 <0.03 <0.03 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 06-06-89 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 06-13-89 <0.02 <Oo02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 06-20-89 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 06-27-89 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02

2.b AIR PARTICULATES GROSS BETA ( Ci/m )

Collection Sam le Site Date H08 H12 H14 H30 H34 04-05-89 0.011 0.002 0.009 0.001 0.008 0.001 0.009 0.001 0.010 0.002 04-11-89 0.010 0.002 0.013 0.002 0.011 0.002 0.009 + 0.002 0.010 0.002 04-18-89 0.005 0.002 0-. 003 0.001 0.005 + 0.001 0.007 4 0.002 0.006 0.002 04-25-89 0.019 0.002 0.015 0.002 0.012 0.002 0.017 0.002 0.016 0.002 05-02-89 0.016 + 0.002 0.016 + 0.002 *0.016 + 0.002 0.018 0.002 0.016 0.002 05-09-89 0.014 0.002 0.017 0.002 *0.014 + 0.002 0.018 + 0.002 0.016 0.002 05-16-89 0.021 a 0.002 0.014 + 0.002 *0.015 + 0.002 0.018 0.002 0.015 + 0.002 05-23-89 0.009 0.002 0.012 0.002 *0.012 0.002 0.009 0.002 0.012 0.002 05-31-89 0.015 + 0.002 0.016 + 0.002 0.016 + 0.002 0.014 0.002 0.016 0.002 06-06-89 0.013 0.002 0.011 0.002 0.010 0.002 0.013 + 0.002 0.010 0.002 06-13-89,. 0.018 0.002 0.013 0.002 0.012 0.002 0.015 + 0.002 0.014 0.002 06-20-89 0.021 + 0.002 0.015 0.002 0.013 + 0.002 0.020 0.002 0.015 0.002 06-27-89 0.011 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 0.008 0.002 0.012 0.002 0.011 0.002 Means: 0.014 + 0.001 0.013 + 0.001 0.012 ~ 0.001 0.014 w 0.001 0.013 w 0.001

• NRC split samples.

2.b AIR PARTICULATES GAMMA SCANS OF QUARTERLY COMPOSITES ( Ci/m )

Second Quarter, 1989 Sample Site Be-7 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 H08 H12 H14

'.1080.113 0.110

+

0.008 0.009 0.009

<0.014

<0.014

<0.016

<0.0009

<0.0007

<0.0009

<0.0007

<0.0007

<0.0007 H30 0.109 0.010 <0.016 <0.0008 <0.0006 H34 0.123 0.009 <0.014 <0.0006 <0.0009

3.a SURFACE WATER ( Ci/1)

Sample Collection Zr-95 .Ba-140 Site Date H-3 K-40 Nn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 La-140 (A) (B)

H15 04-06-89 <140 300 + 50 <5 <9 <4 <5 <9 <7 <6 <5 <5 <7 04-11-89 <140 310 + 50 <3 <11 <4 <5 <9 <7 <8 <4 <7 04-18-89 <140 360 w 50 <4 <7 <5 <5 <10 <7 <6 <5 <5 <6 04-25-89 <140 310 i 50 <4 <8 <4 <4 <10 <8 <7 <5 <5

<3

<6

<6 05-03-89 <120 320 a 30 <3 <7 <3 <6 <5 <4 <3 05"09-89 <130 270 + 30 <3 <7 <3 <4 <7 ~ <5 <5 <3 <3 <4 05-16-89 <130 300 + 40 <10 <4 <5 <ll <7 <8 <3 <4 <7 05-23-89 90 a 40 290 + 30 <3 <6 <3 <3 <7 <5 <4 <3 <5 05-31-89 <130 320 a 50 <5 <11 <5 <8 <8 <7 <4 <7 06-06-89 <130 320 + 40 <3 <11 <4 <5 <11 <5 <7 <5 <4 <5 06-13-89 90 a 40 260 + 40 <4 <9 <4 <11 <7 <9 <5 <4 <6 06-20-89 . <130 220 + 40 <Q <4 <4 <12 <6 <7 <6 <4 <4 06-27-89 <130 340 a 40 <3 <10 <5 <5 <10 <6 <9 <3 <4 <7 H59 04-06-89 <140 250 E 50 <5 <8 <4 <5 <11 <7 <5 <5 <5 K3 05-03-89 <120 310 e 30 <3 <6 <3 <3 <7 <4 <5 <3 <3 06-01-89 <130 300 + 40 <3 <9 <4 <6 <8 <6 <7 <6 (A) These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs.

(B) These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct mea-urement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.

4.a.1

~ ~ CRUSTACEA Blue Crab ( Ci/k wet wei ht)

Sample Collection Site Date K-40 H15 04-17-89 770 5 260 <51 <82 <48 <54 <85 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Ra-228

<50 <45 370 + 80 410 + 70 4.b.l BROADLEAF VEGETATION - Man rove ( Ci/k wet wei ht)

Sample Collection Site Date Be-7 K-40 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 H51 . 04"06-89 350 s 40 1650 N 100 <8 <7 <8 05-03"89 560 60 4040 170 <10 06-01-89 320 + 30 1530 L 80 <8 <6 <6 H52 04-06"89 740 4 60 2670 + 150 <12 05-03-89 650 + 50 4480 4. 170 <10 <10 <9 06-01"89 300 k 40 2200 + 110 <9 <8 <8 H59 04-06-89 390 I 50 2400 i 140 <9 <10 <9 05-03-89 520 + 40 2430 ~ 130 <10 <8 <9 06"01-89 380 + 40 2120 N 100 <9 <7 <7 6

RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POMER AND LIGHT CONPANY'S ST. LUCIE SITE Third Quarter, 1989 Office of Radiation Control Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services

C ST. LUCIE SITE Technical Specifications Sampling Third Quarter, 1989 Collection Locations Number of Sam le T e Fre uenc

1. Direct Radiation Quarterly 27 54

2. Airborne 2.a Air Iodines Weekly 65 2.b Air Particulates Weekly 69*

3. Waterborne 3.a Surface Water Weekly 13 Honthly 3 3.b Shoreline Sediment Semiannually 3*

4. Ingestion

~

4.a Fish and Invertebrates

~

4.a.1 Crustacea Semiannually 4.a.2 Fish Semiannually 4.b Food Products 4.b.l Broadleaf Honthly Vegetation Total: 219

• - Includes NRC split samples.

NOTE: Heasurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term.

Heasurement results that are not significantly above background are reported as "non-detectable" (ND) or as less than a Lower Limit of Detection (<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 95K confidence) for the true activity in the sample.

ST. LVCIE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS SAMPLING Third Qrarter, 1989 DIRECT RADIATION - TLDs (micro-R/hour)

Each result is the average net response of two dosimeters.

Sample Deployment 06-14-89 Site Collection 09-14-89 N-1 5 ' + 0.3 NNW"5 5.3 ~ 0.3 NNW-10 F 6 + 0.3 NW-5 5.3 0.3 NW-10 6.5 c 0.3 WNW"2 5.2 + 0.3 WNW-5 5.5 + 0.3 WNW-10 6.0 4 0.3 W"2 5.6 a 0.3 W-5 5.5 a 0.3 W-10 5' + 0.3 WSW-2 5' i 0.3 WSW-5 5.4 a 0.3 WSW-10 4' s 0.3 SW-2 5.4 x 0.3 SW-5 4.9 ~ 0.3 SW-10 5.3 0.3 SSW-2 5.3 + 0.3 SSW-5 5.2 N 0.3 SSW-10 S "5 5.1 i 0.3 5.0 a 0.3 S-10 5.0 a 0.3 S/SSE-10 4.9 a 0.3 SSE-5 5.4 a 0.3 SSE-10 5' 0.3 SE"1 5.0 a 0.3 H-32 6.2 a 0.3 Notes:

(A) These results have been determined with the assumption that fading is negligible, although detailed testing to confirm this has not been completed.

(B) Testing to confirm compliance with NRC Reg. Guide 4.13 and ANSI N545-1975 performance standards has not been completed.

2

0 IODINE"131 IN WEEKLY AIR FILTERS ( Ci/m )

Sam le Site Collection Date H08 H12 H14 H30 H34 07-05-89 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0. <0.02 02'0.03 07-11-89 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 07-18-89 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02(A) <0.02 07-25-89 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 08-01-89 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 08-08-89 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 08-15-89 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 08"23-89 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 08-29-89 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 09-05-89 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 09-13-89 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 09-19-89 <0.03 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 09-26-89 <0.02 <0 '2 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 (A) Electrical power was off at the end of this sample due to a tripped circuit breaker. Lightning is suspected to be the cause. The equipment is estimated to have run for 132 hours0.00153 days <br />0.0367 hours <br />2.18254e-4 weeks <br />5.0226e-5 months <br /> out of the 171 total hours for this sampling interval.

3

8 2.b AIR PARTICULATES GROSS BETA ( Ci/m3)

Collection Sam le Site Date H08 H12 H14 H30 H34 07-05-89 0.007 0.001 0.006 + 0.001 0.005 0 .001 0.009 0.001 0.009 0.002 07-11-89 0.015 0.002 0.018 0.002 0.016 0 .002 0.015 0.002 0.012 0.002 07-18-89 0.014 0.002 0.009 0.002 0.007 + 0 .002 (A0.009 0.002 0.008 0.002 07"25"89 0.006 0.002 0.005 0.002 <0 .005 0.004 ~ 0.002 0.003 0.002 08-01-89 0.011 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 *0.010 + 0 .002 0.007 0.002 0.013 0.002 08-08-89 0.016 0.002 0.012 0.002 *0.013 + 0 .002 0.014 ~ 0.002 0.013 0.002 08-15-89 0.005 + 0.002 <0 .005 *0.006 ~ 0 .002 0.008 0.002 0.006 0.002 08-23-89 0.013 0.002 0.010 0.002 *0.008 0 .002 0.009 0.002 0.010 0.002 08"29-89 0.010 0.002 0.011 0.002 0.011 + 0 .002 0.011 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 09-05-89 0.008 0.002 0.005 0.002 0.010 + 0 .002 0.006 0.002 0.005 0.002 09-13-89 0.014 0.002 0.013 + 0.002 0.012 + 0 .002 0.013 0.002 0.008 0.001 09-19"89 0.006 0.002 0.005 0.002 0.007 0 .002 0.006 + 0.002 0.006 0.002 09-26"89 0.005 + 0.002 0.007 + 0.002 0.004 a 0 .001 0.009 0.002 0.009 0.002 Means: 0.010 0.001 0.009 ~ 0.001 0.009 ~ 0.001 0.009 ~ 0.001 0.009 ~ 0.001

• - NRC split samples.

(A) Electrical power was off at the end of this sample due to a tripped circuit breaker.

Lightning is suspected to be the cause. The equipment is estimated to have run for 132 hours0.00153 days <br />0.0367 hours <br />2.18254e-4 weeks <br />5.0226e-5 months <br /> out of the 171 total hours for this sampling interval.

2.b AIR PARTICULATES GAMMA SCANS OF QUARTERLY COMPOSITES ( Ci/m3)

Third Quarter, 1989 Sample Site Be-7 K"40 Cs-134 Cs-137 H08 0.080 0.007 <0.015 <0.0009 <0.0008 H12 0.066 0.006 <0.013 <0.0009 <0.0006 H14 0.094 0.008 <0.017 <0.0005 <0.0008 H30 0.068 0.008 <0.014 <0.0007 <0.0007 H34 0.075 0.007 <0.012 <0.0008 <0.0005

3.a SURFACE WATER ( Ci/1)

Sample Collection Zr-95 Ba-140~,

Site Date H-3 K-40 Hn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 La-140 (A) (B)

H15 07-06-89 <130 390 + 50 <4 <9 <3 <4 <9 <8 <6 <4 <4 <5 07-11-89 <130 420 + 40 <4 <8 <4 <6 <9 <7 <7 <4 <8 07-18-89 <130 380 40 <4 <12 <4 <4 <10 <7 <5 <4 <4 <3 07-25-89 <130 350 40 <4 <8 <4 <3 <6 <6 <6 <4 <4 <4 08-01-89 <130 350 + 40 <4 <8 <4 <5 <10 <5 <6 <5 <5 <7 08-08;89 <130 380 40 <4 <9 <3 <5 <9 <7 <4 <5 <4 <6 08-16-89 <130 370 + 40 <4 <8 <3 <4 <10 <7 <5 <5 <4 <7 08-23-89 <130 380 40 <4 <11 <4 <5 <9 <7 <6 <5 <7 08-29-89 <130 370 40 <4 <10 <4 <5 <10 <7 <6 <5 <4 <4 09-06-89 <140 340 40 <3 <10 <4 <8 <7 <6 <4 <4 <7 09.-13-89 <140 340 ~ 40 <3 <10 <3 <4 <10 <5 <7 <4 <3 09"19-89 <140 370 + 40 <4 <11 <4 <5 <8 <5 <6 <4 <5 <5 09-26-89 <140 350 + 40 <4 <ll <4 <4 <9 <8 <5 <3 <4 <6 H59 07-06-89 <130 270 ~ 40 <4 <6 <3 <5 <9 <7 <7 <6 <5 <3 08-01-89 <130 340 + 40 <4 <8 <4 <4 <11 <8 <6 <5 <3 <5 09-06-89 <140 400 ~ 40 <4 <10 <4 <4 <8 <6 <5 <3 <4 <6 (A) These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs.

(B) These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.

l 3.b SEDIMENT - ( Ci/k dr wei ht)

Sample Collection Site Date Be-7 K-40 Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Th-232 H15* 08-02-89 <70 740 i 60 <9 <9 <10 <8 283 + 21 <63 H59 08-02-89 <70 270 ~ 50 <6 <9 <7 <8 197 + 12 <45

• - HRC split sample.'.a.l CRUSTACEA - Blue Crab ( Ci/k wet wei ht)

Sample Collection Site . Date K-40 Nn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Ra-228 H15 08-04-89 490 + 80 <13 <25 <10 <13 <27 <14 <12 129 + ll 177 + 35 H59 08-05"89 1870 4 190 <20 <51 <19 <16 <39 <22 <18 86 4 13 <120 4.a.2 FISH Mixed S ecies ( Ci/k wet wei ht)

Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Hn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Ra-228 H15 Attempts to collect this sample were unsuccessful. Additional attempts will be made.

H59 08-08-89 2910 + 150 <13 <28 <9 <12 <28 <12 <13 78 + 10 93 + 19

4.b.l BROADLEAF VEGETATION - Nan rove ( Ci/k wet wei ht)

Sample Collection Sita Data Be-7 K-40 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 H51 07-06-89 330 + 50 3800 + 160 <14 <13 <10 08-01-89 340 + 40 3520 + 160 <9 <9 09-06-89 380 + 40 2910 + 130 <8 <8 <8 H52 07-06-89 460 + 50 4280 + 150 <12 <9 08-01-89 350 + 50 4360 + 160 <9 <9 <9 09-06-89 510 + 50 3660 + 150 <8 <8 <8 H59 07-06"89 420 4 50 3130 + 150 <12 <12 <10 08-01-89 830 + 50 4200 + 170 <9 09-06-89 420 + 50 4200 s 160 <9 <12 <9

RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POMER AND LIGHT COMPANY'S ST. LUCIE SITE Fourth Quarter, 1989 Office of Radiation Control Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services

ST. I.UCIE SITE Technical Specifications Sampling Fourth Quarter, 1989 Collection Locations Number of Sam le T e Fre uenc ~Sam led ~Sam les

1. Direct Radiation Quarterly 27 54

2. Airborne 2.a Air Iodines Weekly es 2.b Air Particulates Weekly 69*

3. Waterborne 3.a Surface Water Weekly 13 Monthly 3 3; b Shoreline Sediment Semiannually 0

4. Ingestion 4.a Fish and Invertebrates 4.a.l Crustacea Semiannually 4.a.2 Fish Semiannually 4.b Food Products 4.b.l Broadleaf Monthly Vegetation Total: 214

• - Includes NRC split samples.

NOTE: Measurement results having maqnitudes that are sianificantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term.

measurement results that are not significantly above background are reported as "non-detectable" (ND) or as less than a Lower Limit of Detection (<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 95K confidence) for the true'activity in the sample.

ST. LUCIE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS SAMPLING Fourth Qrarter, 1989 DIRECT RADIATION - TLDs (micro-R/hour)

Each result is the average net response of two dosimeters.

Sample Deployment 09-14"89 Site Collection 12-13-89 N-1 5.3 a 0.3 NNW-5 4.9 i 0.3 NNW-10 5.4 a 0.3 NW-5 5.5 x 0.3 NW-10 6.5 a 0.3 WNW-2 5.1 i 0.3 WNW"5 5.1 i 0.3 WNW" 10 5.5 i 0.3 W-2 5.3 0.3 W"5 5.5

• 0.3 W-10 5.2 i 0.3 WSW-2 5.4 a 0.3 WSW-5 5.2 x 0.3 WSW"10 4.7 a 0.2 SW-2 5' a 0.3 SW-5 5.1 x 0.3 SW-10 5' a 0.3 SSW"2 5.3 0.3 SSW"5 5' 0.3 SSW-10 5.5 x 0.3 S-5 5.1 x 0.3 S-10 F 1 a 0.3

/SSE-10 4.8 a 0.3 SSE-5 5.5 0.3 SSE-10 5.2 a 0.3 SE-1 4.9

• 0.3 H"32 6.0 a 0.3 Notes:

('A) These results have been determined with the assumption that fading is negligible, although detailed testing to confirm this has not been completed.

(B) Testing to confirm compliance with NRC Reg. Guide 4.13 and ANSI N545-1975 performance standards has not been completed.

l 0

2.a IODINE-131 IN MEEKLY AIR FILTERS - ( Ci/m3)

Sam le Site Collection Date H08 H12 H14 H30 H34 10-03"89 <0.02 <0.02 <0 02

~ <0.02 <0.02 10-10-89 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03

(

10-17-89 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 10-25-89 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 11-01-89 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 11-07-89 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 11-14-89 <0.02 <0 '2 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 11-21-89 <0.03 <0.02 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 11"29"89 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 12-05"89 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 12-12-89 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 12-19-89 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 12-27-89 <0.01 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02

2.b AIR PARTICULATES - GROSS BETA ( Ci/m )

Collection Sam le Site Date H08 H12 H14 H30 H34 10-03-89 0.012 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 0.011 0.002 0.009 0. 002 0.011 0.002 10"10-89 0.012 0.002 0.010 0.002 0.011 0.002 0.009 0.002 0.009 0.002 10-17-89 o.ooe 0.002 0.004 0.001 0.007 0.002 0.005 0.002 0.008 0.002 10-25-89 0.019 ~ 0.002 0.015 0.002 0.012 0.002 0.013 0.002 0.011 0.002

'11-01-89 0.010 0.002 0.004 0.001 *0.006 0.002 0.008 0.002 0.007 0.002 11-07-89 0.024 + 0.003 0.012 0.002 *0.009 + 0.002 0.010 + 0.002 (A0.013 0.002 11-14-89 0.014 0.002 0.013 + 0.002 *0.012 0.002 0.009 0.002 (A0.013 + 0.002 11-21-89 0.019 + 0.002 0.017 + 0.002 *0.015 0.002 0.016 0.002 0.019 0.002 11-29-89 0.016 0.002 0.014 0.002 0.014 + 0.002 0.021 + 0.002 0.017 0.002 12-05"89 0.016 0.002 0.015 0.002 0.014 0.002 0.013 0.002 0.013 0.002 12-12-89 0.014 0.002 0.009 0.002 0.012 + 0.002 0.012 0.002 0.012 0.002 12"19-89 0.015 + 0.002 0.011 0.002 0.011 0.002 0.015 0.002 0.010 0.002 12-27-89 0.014 0.002 0.020 0.002 0.016 + 0.002 0.014 0.002 0.018 + 0.002 Neans: 0.015 0.001 0.012 i 0.001 0.012 ~ 0.001 0.012 w 0.001 0.012 ~ 0.001

• - NRC split samples.

(A) - Due to a procedural error, the changing date for the particulate filter at H34 was 11-09-89. The charcoal filter cartridge was changed on 11-07-89. Although the changing dates were different, there was no gap in the continuous monitoring by these filters.

2.b AIR PARTICULATES GANNA SCANS OF QUARTERLY CONPOSITES - ( Ci/m3)

Fourth Quarter, 1989 Sample Site Be-7 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 H08 0.084 o.noe <0.014 <0.0008 <U.OOO8 H12 0.082 0.007 <0.015 <0.0007 <0.0007 H14 o.n90 0.008 <0.013 <0.0005 <0.0007 H30 0.089 0.007 <0.013 <0.0009 <0.0006 H34 0.102 0.008 <0.013 <0.0006 <n.oooe

3.a SURFACE MATER - ( Ci/1)

Sample Collection Zr-95 Ba-146 Site Date H-3 K-40 Hn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 La-140 (A) (B)

H15 10-04-89 <130 380 + 40 <4 <9 <4 <5 <10 <7 <6 <4 <4 <7 10-10-89 <130 370 + 40 <5 <8 <4 <5 <12 <7 <6 <4 <4 <7 10-17-89 <130 270 40 <3 <11 <5 <5 <8 <8 <6 <4 <3 <8 10-25-89 <130 360 40 <4 <11 <4 <9 <6 <12 <4 <4 <6 11-02-89 <130 300 + 30 <2 <7 <3 <3 <6 <5 <5 <3 <3 <4 11-08-89 <130 330 40 <4 <9 <4 <4 <9 <7 <6 <3 <4 <3 11-15-89 <130 370 40 <4 <10 <5 <4 <8 <8 <7 <5 <4 <6 11"22-89 11-28-89

<130 300 -4.

40 <3 <10 <3 <5 <ll <6 <5 <6

<130 400 + 40 <4 <10 <4 <5 <11 <6 <6 <4 <5 <5 12-06-89 <130 350 40 <3 <10 <3 <4 <6 <9 <7 <4 <7 12-12-89 <130 380 + 40 <4 <5 <5 <10 <6 <7 <4 <4 <5 12-19"89 <130 250 + 40 <4 <ll <4 <10 <8 <8 <5 <4 <7 12-27-89 <130 350 + 40 <4 <8 <4 <6 <10 <5 <7 <5 <5 <5 H59 10-04-89 130 + 40 370 + 40 <3 <10 <4 <4 <9 <7 <5 <4 <7 11"08-89 <130 380 4 40 <3 <7 <4 <2 <7 <7 <6 <4 <6 12-06-89 <130 320 ~ 40 <5 <10 <3 <5 <9 <6 <6 <4 <4 <7 (A) These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs.

(B) These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.

4.a.2

~ ~ FISH - Mixed S ecies - ( Ci/k wet weight)

Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Mn-54 Fe-59 (:o-58 r.'o-bO Zn-65 H15 10-04-89 4180 + 240 <13 <44 <15 <17 <40 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Ra-228

<20 <22 <36 <68 4.B.I BROADLEAF VEGETATION Mao rove ( Ci/R wet weI ht)

Sample Collection Site Date Be-'7 K-40 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 H51 10-04"89 300 4 50 2500 + 140 <10 <10 11-08-89 400 R 40 1990 4 110 <7 <9 <8 12-06-89 300 50 2060 120 <9 <12 <9 H52 10-04-89 400 + 50 4400 i 170 <9 <9 <10 11-08-89 550 + 50 3180 + 130 <9 <9 <8 12-06-89 310 R 40 4090 + 170 <8 <12 <10 H59 10-04-89 420 4 50 3840 + 150 <12 <9 <10 11-08-89 370 + 30 2770 R 120 <8 <7 <10 12-06-89 340 + 40 2650 4.

140 <8 <10 <10

h 1989 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT UNITS NOS. 1 AND 2 ATTACHMENT C RESULTS FROM THE INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM 1989

i PLORIDA DEPT OP HRS EPA IHTERLABORATORY CROSS-CHECR PROGRAM DATA January through June, 1989 Media Nuclide Collection EPA Units Normal. Mean of N.D.K. Action Mon Day Yr Known Range Analyses Level FILTER Alpha 03 31 89 21 pCi/F 0. 118 23.67 0.92 FILTER Beta 03 31 89 62 pCi/F 0. 237 59.00 -1.04 FILTER Cs-137 03 31 89 20 pCi/F 0.118 22.33 0. 81 FILTER Sr-90 03 31 89 20 pCi/F 0.790 17.00 -3. 46 MILK Cs-137 04 28 89 50 pCi/L 0.237 50.00 0. 00 MILK K 04 28 89 1600 mg/L 0.074 1613.33 0. 29 MILK Sr-89 04 28 89 39 pCi/L 0.000 33.00 -2.08 MILK Sr-90 04 28 89 55 pCi/L 0 '95 48.00 -4.04 WATER Alpha 01 20 89 8 pCi/L 0.000 7.00 -0.35 WATER Alpha 05 12 89 30 pCi/L 0.222 26.67 -0.72 WATER Beta 01 20 89 4 pCi/L 0.118 5.33 0.46 WATER Beta 05 12 89 50 pCi/L 0.711 49.67 -0.12 WATER Cr-51 02 10 89 235 pCi/L 0.025 236.33 0.10 WATER Co-60 02 10 89 10 pCi/L 0.118 10.67 0.23 WATER Co-60 06 09 89 31 pCi/L 0.237 31.67 0.23 WATER Zn-65 02 10 89 159 pCi/L 0.111 167.33 0. 90 WATER Zn-65 06 09 89 165 pCi/L 0.070 176.00 1.12 WATER RQ-106 02 10 89 178 pCi/L 0.165 173.00 -0.48 WATER Ru-106 06 09 89 128 pCi/L 0.775 127.00 -0.13 WATER Ba-133 06 09 89 49 pCi/L 0.000 48.00 -0.35 WATER Cs-134 02 10 89 10 pCi/L 0.000 10.00 0.00 WATER Cs-134 06 09 89 39 pCi/L 0.000 38.00 -0.35 WATER Cs-137 02 10 89 10 pci/L 0.118 10.33 0.12 WATER Cs-137 06 09 89 20 pCi/L 0.000 21.00 0.35 WATER H-3 02 24 89 2754 pci/L 0.000 2960.00 1.00 WATER H-3 06 23 89 4503 pCi/L 0.039 4736.67 0.90 WATER I-131 02 17 89 106 pCi/L 0.162 106.00 0.00 WATER Sr-89 01 06 89 40 pCi/L 0.474 35.00 1 ~ 73 WATER Sr-89 05 05 89 6 pCi/L 0.237 5.00 <<0. 35 WATER Sr-90 01 06 89 25 pCi/L 0.395 22.67 -2. 69 WATER Sr-90 05 05 89 6 pCi/L 0.395 4.67 -1. 54

Ky r

NOTES:

Normal.: Normalized range. As defined in "Environmental Radioactivity Range Laboratory Intercomparison Studies Program Fiscal Year 1981 1982", Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, U. S.

Environmental Protection Agency, P. O. Box 93478, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89193-3478. EPA-600/4-81-004, February, 1981.

N.D.K.: Normalized deviation of the mean from the known value, as defined in EPA-600/4-81-004.

NDP: No data provided. No data was provided to EPA for inclusion in their report. ~

NA: Not available. Report containing this data has not yet been received from EPA, Las Vegas.

ACTION LEVEL:

Cause: Erroneously over estimated chemical recovery of stron-tium carrier. Corrective action: Try to improve purity of isolated strontium carrier.

(~) Cause: Erroneously over estimated chemical recovery of stron-tium carrier. Corrective action: Try to improve purity of isolated strontium carrier.

FLORIDA DEPT OF HRS EPA INTERLABORATORY CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM DATA July through December, 1989 Media Nuclide Collection EPA Units Normal. Mean of N.D.K. Action Mon Day Yr Known Range Analyses Level FILTER Alpha 08 25 89 6 pCi/F 0.118 6.33 0.12 FILTER Beta 08 25 89 pCi/F NA FILTER Cs-137 08 25 89 10 pCi/F 0. 118 10. 67 0 ~ 23 FILTER I-131 08 25 89 pCi/F NA WATER Alpha 09 22 89 4 pCi/L 0. 118 4. 67 0. 23 WATER Beta 09 22 89 6 pCi/L 0.000 12. 00 2. 08 WATER Co-60 10 06 89 30 pCi/L F 118 32.33 0.81 WATER Zn-65 10 06 89 129 pCi/L 0.273 132.67 0.49 WATER Ru-106 10 06 89 161 pCi/L 0.370 163.00 0.22 WATER Ba-133 10 06 89 59 pci/I, 0.197 58.00 -0.29 WATER Cs-134 10 06 89 29 pCi/L 0.237 28.67 -0.12 WATER Cs-137 10 06 89 59 pCi/L 0 '37 63.33 1.50 WATER H-3 10 20 89 3496 pCi/L 0.212 3563.33 0.32 WATER I-131 08 04 89 83 pCi/L 0.222 83.67 0.14 NOTES:

Normal.: Normalized range. As defined in "Environmental Radioactivity Range Laboratory Intercomparison Studies Program Fiscal Year 1981 1982", Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, U. S.

Environmental Protection Agency, P. O. Box 93478, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89193-3478. EPA-600/4-81-004, February, 1981.

N.D.K.: Normalized deviation of the mean from the known value, as defined in EPA-600/4-81-004.

NDP: No data provided. No data was provided to EPA for inclusion in their report.

NA: Not available. Due to problems in preparing cross-check sample. Please see attachments.

/

~

'MSL-LV AIR FILTER INTERCOMPARISON STUDY August 25, 1989 Beta Due to problems with the Iodine-131 in the Air Filter Intercomparison Study of August 25, 1989, the Beta results are invalid.

Study: 8908 AF Isotope: Beta Collection Date: Au ust 25 1989 Supervisory Check Date

V V

EMSL"LV AIR FILTER INTERCOMPARISON STUDY August 25, 1989 Iodine-131 Due to problems with the Iodine-131 in the Air Filter Intercomparison Study of August 25, 1989, the Iodine-131 results are invalid.

Study: 8908 AF Isotope: Iodine-131 Collection Date: Au ust 25 1989 Supervisory Check Date

)t e.

/

la 't t

, II 4

C