ML17261A904

Rev 15 to QA Program for Station Operation.

ML17261A904
Person / Time
Site:	Ginna
Issue date:	12/31/1989
From:	ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP.
To:
Shared Package
ML17261A905	List: ML17261A904 ML17309A435
References
NUDOCS 9001050038
Download: ML17261A904 (118)

Text

ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION R.E. GINNA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Revision 15 to:

Quality Assurance Program for Station Operation DOCKET NO. 50-244 December, 1989 t'

~

900i050038. 89'l228 PDR .ADOCK 05000244 jp PDC

II I, % f 't 'i~ ~

~ Jl K 1

TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Pacae QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM FOR STATION OPERATION Quality Assurance Program 2 ~ Organization 3 ~ Design Control 4 ~ Procurement Document Control 12 5 ~ Instructions, Procedures and Drawings 13

6. Document Control 15 7 ~ Control of Purchased Material, Equipment 17 and Services

8. Identification and Control of Materials, 21 Parts and Components 9 ~ Control of Special Processes =

22 10 Inspection 23

'2 Test Control 24 Control of Measuring and Test Equipment 25 Handling, Storage and Shipping

'3.

26

14. Inspection, Test and Operating Status 27

15. Nonconforming Materials, Parts and Components 28

16. Corrective Action 29

17. Quality Assurance Records 31

18. Audits 32 Revision 15 December 1989

C P

~ ( P) (, V

LIST OF TABLES Table Number Title Pacae Quality Assurance Program 34 Procedures Subject Listing 4-1 Procurement Document Requirements 47 18-1 Audit List 48 LIST OF FIGURES

-, ',-Fi re Number Title Pacae 2-1 Management Organization 51 2-2 Quality Performance Organization 52 2-3 Ginna Station Organization 53 2-4 Electric Transmission and Distribution 54 Organization 2-5 Engineering Division Organization 55 2-6 Ginna Station Review and Audits 56 Functions Revision 15 December 1989

U I

>S,,e S g ~ >4

'v.~w0 y1

+ s 4-

UALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM FOR STATION OPERATION ualit Assurance Pro ram The Quality Assurance Program.,has been developed by the Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation to assure safe and reliable operation of the R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant.

This program applies to all activities affecting the safety related functions of the structures, systems, and components that prevent or mitigate the consequences of postulated accid'ents that could cause undue risk to the health and safety of the public; These quality'affecting activities include operation, maintenance, repair, inservice inspection, refueling, modification, test and inspecti'on.

In addition, the Quality Assurance Program applies to the activities associated with the packaging of licensed radioactive materials to be shipped in accordance with 10 CFR Part 71.

The basic, Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation quality assurance policy is established by the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer through the President. This policy is implemented under the overall direction of the Senior Vice President, Production and Engineering, through the Department Manager, Quality Performance; General Manager, Nuclear Production; the Plant Manager, Ginna Station; Chief Engineer and heads of other supporting departments.

The program is governed by a Ginna Station Quality Assurance Manual which contains the requirements and assignment of responsibilities for~implementation of the program. The manual is prepared; -reviewed, and maintained by Quality Performance and approved by the Senior Vice President,

, Production and Engineering.

The program is implemented through Quality Assurance/Quality Control, Ginna Station, Engineering, General Maintenance, Materials Engineering and Inspection Services, Electric Transmission and Distribution, and Purchasing procedures.

These procedures are'repared'and approved by the responsible organization and reviewed and concurred with by Quality Performance.'.; The procedures are contained in separate manuals maintained by the responsible organization.

All these procedures're reviewed for adequacy't least once every two years by the responsible organization. Table provides a listing of the subjects and a short description l-l of the "subject matter which is contained in the procedures.

I Revision 15 December 1989

'I J

t-I st%>w

~ W ~ "t

~ t gtg p J

1 t

0

Organizational interfaces are defined and controlled by sections of the Quality Assurance Manual. Organizational responsibilities are described in Section 2.

I The Quality Assurance Program covers all existing. Seismic Category I and Class 1E structures, systems, and components, including their foundations and supports. Activities affecting the quality of these structures, systems, and components are controlled to an extent consistent .with their to safety significance. A detailed listing of the structures, systems, and components covered by the Quality Assurance Program, based on Section 3.2. of the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, is contained in the Quality Assurance Manual.

Details of the system boundaries and the quality classi-fication of water-and-steam-containing components are con-tained on system flow drawings. The listing of structures, systems, and components covered by the Quality Assurance Program and the system flow drawings are prepared and main-

-, tained by Engineering and reviewed and concurred with by Quality Performance.

Modifications or additions to.existing structures, systems, and components are designated',the same seismic classifica-tion as the existing, system. New structures, systems, and components are designated a seismic classification in accordance with the"guidelines in USNRC Regulatory Guide 1.29, Revision 3. I Supervisory personnel are indoctrinated in quality assurance policies, manuals, and procedures 'to assure they und a these are mandatory requirements which must be imple-t d mented and enforced.

activities affecting'uality are responsible Personnel for performing trained and indoctrinated in the requirements, purpose, scope, and implementation of quality related manuals and procedures. Refresher sessions are held periodically and retraining is required whenever a new procedure is issued or a major revision is made to an existing procedure. Training of personnel not in the Quality Performance organization is the responsibilit 0 f ach department performing an activity affecting quality.

eac Quality Performance assists in establishing train'n re quirements and assures that personnel are trained by auditing training.

In addition to training in quality assurance eaac h d epar-ment conducts trainxng, including on-the-job training t 0

~ ~

t-the e xtent necessary to assure that personnel are qualified for their primary work assignments.

Revision 15 December 1989

'I ~y g t The General Manager, Nuclear Production is responsible for the formal training, 'qualification, licensing, and re-qualification of operators, as necessary. Where necessary, personnel are trained in radiation protection,- plant safety and security. II r

The Nuclear Safety Audit and Review Board is required to review the status and adequacy of the Quality Assurance Program at least once every two years to assure that meaningful and is effectively complying with corporate it is policy and 10CFR50, Appendix B. This review consists of audits or a review equivalent to an audit performed by company personnel or outside organizations.

The Quality Assurance Program is designed to meet the requirements of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 50, Appendix B, "Quality'Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants." The program conforms to the following NRC Regulatory Guides aqd ANSI Standards:

a. NRC Regulatory Guide 1.8, Revision 1, "Personnel Selec-tion and Training."

b. NRC Regulatory Guide 1.28, Revision 2, <<Quality Assur-ance Program Requirements (Design and Construction) ."

c ~ AEC Regulatory Guide 1.30, Revision 0, "Quality Assurance Requirements for the Installation, Inspection, and Testing of Instrumentation and Electric Equipment."

d 0 AEC Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 0, "Quality Assurance Program Requirements (Operation)," and regulatory staff comments and supplementary guidance contained in the document entitled "Guidance on Quality Assurance Requirements During the Operations Phase of Nuclear Power Plants," Revision 0 dated October 1973 (Orange Book -< Revision 0)

e. AEC Regulatory Guide 1.37, Revision 0, "Quality Assurance Requirements for Cleaning of Fluid Systems and Associated Components of Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants." 'l NRC Regulatory Guide 1.38, Revision 2, "Quality Assurance Requirements for Packaging, Shipping, Receiving, Storage, and Handling of Items for Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants."

g, NRC Regulatory Guide 1.39, Revision 2, >>Housekeeping Requirements for Water-Cobled Nuclear Power Plants."

'evision 15 December 1989

I k+

J~

~

I Il " IV"

'h s w V

Ae

h. NRC Regulatory Guide 1.58; Revision 1, "Qualification of Nuclear Power Plant Inspection, Examination and Testing Personnel."

NRC. Regulatory Guide 1.64, Revision 1, "Quality Assurance Requirements for the Design of Nuclear Power Plants."

NRC Regulatory Guide 1.74, Revision 0, "Quality Assur-ance Terms and Definitions."

k. NRC Regulatory Guide 1.88, Revision 2, "Collection, Storage and Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plant Records."

Note: When record storage facilities are not designed in accordance with the requirements of Regulatory Guide 1.88, duplicate records are kept in two separate storage locations in separate buildings which are physically isolated from each other.

NRC Regulatory Guide 1.116, Revision O-R, "Quality Assurance Requirements for Installation, Inspection, and Testing of, Mechanical Equipment and Systems."

m. NRC Regulatory Guide 1.123, Revision 1, "Quality Assurance Requirements for Control of Procurement of Items and Services for Nuclear Power Plants."

n. ANSI N45.2.12, D3, R4, 2/74 "Requirements for Auditing of Quality Assurance Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.>>

o. NRC Regulatory Guide 1.146, Revision 0, "Qualification of Quality Assurance Program Audit Personnel for Nuclear Power Plants."

Or anization The major organizations participating in the Quality Assur-ance Program are Purchasing, Engineering, Ginna Station, General Maintenance, Electric Transmission and Distribution, Quality Performance,~'the Plant Operations Review Committee, and the Nuclear Safety Audit and Review Board. Figure 2-1 is an organizational chart showing these organizations and their relationship to the corporate

(

organization.

Revision 15 December 1989

C h

C1 I P.

P

~ '

t$

Positions responsible for the principal elements of the quality'ssurance program are:

Chairman of the Board and Chief. Executive Officer

'resident Senior Vice President, Production and Engineering-Chief Engineer Director, Nuclear Engineering Services Department Manger, Quality Performance Manager, Divisional Services Manager, Quality Assurance Purchasing Agent General Manager, Nuclear Production Plant Manager, Ginna Station Superintendent, Ginna Support Services Superintendent, Ginna Production Division Training Manager Nuclear Assurance Manager Superintendent, Electric Substations Superintendent, General Maintenance Quality Services Coordinator Manager, Materials Engineering and Inspection Services In addition to the above individuals, two advisory groups are utilized to review and audit plant operations. These groups are the Plant Operations Review Committee and the Nuclear Safety Audit and Review Board. The Plant Operations Review Committee acts in an advisory capacity to the Plant Manager, Ginna Station and the Nuclear Safety Audit and Review Board advises the Senior Vice President, Production and Engineering. The qualifications of members and the responsibilities of these organizations are described in Section 6.0, Technical Specifications, Appendix A to Provisional Operating License No. DPR-18.

The Chairman of the ~Board of the Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation directed the establishment of the Quality Assur-ance Program and issued the governing policy statement. He has established the Nuclear Safety Audit and Review Board to review and audit plant operations. The Chairman of the Nuclear Safety Audit and Review Board is responsible to the President on all activities of the Nuclear Safety Audit and Review Board.

The Senior Vice President, Production and Engineering reports to the President and has corporate responsibility for operation of Ginna Station in accordance with applicable regulatory requirements. In addition, he has overall responsibility and authority for directing the Quality Assurance Program and shall be responsible for the approval

,of the Quality Assurance Manual. He is responsible for Revision 15 December 1989

Qf 1g t <

e a<~%'L 1 A .~r " ~l ."i~ y The Plant Manager, Ginna Station is responsible to the General Manager, Nuclear Production for the overall on-site safe operation of Ginna Station. He is responsible for the performance of all Ginna Station quality affecting activities in accordance with the requirements of the quality assurance program. He is responsible for providing qualified personnel to perform these activities in accordance with approved drawings, specifications, and procedures. He is also responsible for those items delineated in Section 6.0, Technical Specifications. The Superintendent, Ginna Support Services reports to the Plant Manager. Ginnajstation and is Primarily responsible for the performance of modification, support maintenance, and fire protection activities in accordance with the requirements of the Quality Assurance Program. The Superintendent Ginna Production reports to the Plant Manager, Ginna Station, and is responsible for operations, health physics and chemistry, refueling, results and tests, technical-engineering,,surveillance testing and operational assessment in accordance with the requirements of the quality assurance program. The Plant Manager, G~i.nna Station and Superintendents are assisted by other depignated staff members, Figure 2-3, in the implementation og certain'uality Assurance Program requirements at the f>lant. These staff members are assigned responsibility for testing, storage of material and equipment, operation',(and test status control, calibration and control of measuring and test equipment, maintenance of material handling equipment, and control of all activities involving operation,: maintenance, repair, refueling and modification. The Division Training Manager is responsible to the General Manager, Nuclear Production for maintaining and implementing an INPO accredited training program. The Nuclear Assurance Manager reports to the Department Manager, Quality Performance and is responsible for assuring that station activities affecting quality are prescribed and carried out. in accordance with approved drawings, specifica-tions, and procedureg. He is a member of the Plant Operations Review Cokmittee and delegates the day to day quality assuring pla; ning and work monitoring responsibilities to is staff'f Quality Control Engineers, a staff QA Engineer nd QC Inspectors. The Quality Control Engineers and the staff QA Engineer are responsible for the review of design and~ installation documents and for the review of plant procedures which involve maintenance, repair, refueling, modification, and testing. The Quality Revision 15 December 1989 r %PA@ lA Wc 9':~ ), II l l'< 4P g 'b A )~ 'll 1 tp Control Foreman is responsible for the coordination of inspection activities and the assurance that inspection requirements are included in approved procedures at Ginna Station and shop work travelers at General Maintenance. This includes the receipt inspection of incoming materials, parts and components and the processing of nonconformance reports at Ginna Station and the General Maintenance shops. The Nuclear Assurance Quality Control Inspectors also perform compliance oriented surveillance of nuclear related activities. The Superintendent, General Maintenance, is responsible for supervising and directing a staff, Figure 2-5, which super-vises the performance of safety related maintenance, repair and modification activities performed at the General Maintenance facility! He is also 'responsible for providing trained and qualified welders, riggers and crane operators for the support of Ginna activities. The Quality Services Coordinator is responsible for the preparation of Quality Maintenance and Quality Engineering procedures and for the training of the corresponding personnel in the implementation of these procedures. He also coordinates the processing of, replies to audit reports for both departments. The Superintendent Electric Substations Department is responsible for directing a staff, Figure 2-4 which is responsible for providing relay engineering, maintenance and testing services. He is also, responsible for design, modification and construction, activities at Station 13A and for supporting the Engineerinp department's design and construction activities at Ginna. He is also responsible for coordinating and'or providing support documentation for any design modifications initiated within the Electric Transmission and Distribution Division. Desi n Control Design activities are performed Rochester Electric Corporation',personnel. orby are subcontractedand to Gas organizations providing services to Rochester Gas and Electric. Engineering is responsible for the design and control of design activities (including design interfaces) for major modifications of structures, systems or components. Augmenting this effort is the, design and technical support provided by the Electric Substations Department for those activities for which) Electric Transmission and Distribution <<9 Revision 1 15 December 1989 k

tg l Aj P

k ~r 'pE'~ 'lg W'I II is responsible. In this regard they support Engineering for design of safety related modifications. Ginna Station is responsible for the design and control of design activities for Minor modifications of structures, systems, or components. Ginna Station is also responsible for classifying station originated modifications as either Major or Minor. Engineering reviews and concurs with modi-fications being classified as Minor. Minor modifications typically involve (1) component changes which involve vendor design and are limited to the extent that the change does not impact existing performance requirements, (2) additions within Seismic Category I buildings which perform no safety functions and which neither interface with Seismic Category I or Class 1E items nor whose failure could reduce the functioning of any safety related component required for safe shutdown of the, plant to an unacceptable level, (3) changes to a safety related system determined not to be major (i.e., vents, drains, alarms, indicating lights, etc.). II Design control is implemented by means of procedures which include: design considerations, design review requirements; internal and external interface control considerations; design document review, approval, distribution, control, and revision requirements; and corrective action. Design con-siderations include, (as appropriate: physics, stress, materials, thermal, hydraulic, radiation and accident analysis; appropriate design bases, codes, standards and regulations; acceptability for operation, maintenance and repair; acceptance and rejection criteria; and quality standards and other quality assurance requirements. Design verification utilizes various methods such as formal design reviews, alternate calculations, or tests, as appropriate, to assure the adequacy of the'esign. The design of plant modifications is verified by an engineer other than the one who performed the original design. For Major modification design, this may be done by Engineering department design engineers or consulting engineers as re-quested. For Minor modification station design, this may be done by Ginna Station, Engineering department design engineers or. consulting engineers,. as appropriate. IA Spare or replacement" parts must at least meet the original equipment's technical and qual'ity requirements. For plant modifications, standard, "off-the-shelf", commercial or pre-viously approved materials, parts, and equipment are selected and reviewed for suitability of application by the design engineer. Revision 15 December 1989 vi~ ~4 l

adverse to quality. = Quality Assurance is'esponsible for assuring that design control procedures,"whether the work is done by Rochester Gas and Electric or by other organizations, are prepared and implemented and incorporate appropriate design control practices, checks, and reviews. Design control procedures are reviewed to assu're that an independent verification is performed. 'I Engineering and Ginna Station':are responsible for establishing measures for the;proper control of design documents and revisions there-'to, to assure that distribution is to responsible individuals and in a timely manner to prevent inadvertent use of superseded design information. The measures include the use of document revision levels, document transmittals, release stamps, field change request'-forms and distribution lists. Design documents are collected, stored, and maintained in accordance with Section 6 and'7, as appropriate. Design documents include design criteria, analyses, specifications, drawings, design review- records, and changes thereto. I Quality Performance, through preparation assistance and/or review, assure the proper inclusion of quality standards in the design of major and minor. modifications. Quality Performance is also responsible for assuring that adequate inspection requirements. are included in specifications. The Manager, Quality 'Assurance retriews and approves any deviations from.qual'.ty standards'when they occur. -ll-Revision 15 December 1989 q+'>> ti J 0, ~ ' ~ y Plant modifications are controlled by means of applicable Ginna Station, Engineering, Electric Transmission and Distribution, and Quality'ssurance procedures. These procedures provide for the preparation, review, and approval of design documents, safety analyses., and plant modification procedures. Plant modifications are reviewed by the Plant-Operations Review Committee and Nuclear Safety Audit and Review Board as required by Section 6.0, Technical Specifications. 4 ~ Procurement. Document Control Procurement document control applies to the control of procurement documents for materials, parts, components, and services required to perform quality affecting activities. Such documents may be prepared by Rochester Gas and Electric or by a contractor and include purchase requisitions, purchase orders, service agreements, contracts, specifications, and drawings. Procurement of materials, parts, components, and services is initiated by department staff personnel. Procurement proce-dures require that organizations preparing procurement documents consider and include, as appropriate, the items listed in Table 4-1. Procurement documents, including those requesting spare or replacement parts, initiated at Ginna Station are reviewed by Quality Performance and approved by the designated Ginna Station supervision. Procurement documents initiated in Engineering, Materials Engineering and Inspection Services, Electric Transmission and Distribution, General Maintenance and Quality Assurance are reviewed by Quality Performance and approved by designated departmental supervision. Evidence of review and approval of procurement documents is recorded on the documents and identifies to Purchasing a procurement method which will ensure that the selected supplier is capable of providing the item or service in accordance with the requirements of the procurement documents. Considerations used in selecting a supplier and for determining the corresponding procurement method are described in Section 7. After purchase requisitions, service agreements, contractsg specifications, and drawings have received the required re-views and approvals, a purchase order is issued by Purchasing to the selected supplier and -=controlled as described in Section 7. These documents are maintained by Revision 15 December 1989 'I >rQ 't P', Rift <<4g 'C)~~ h I ~ / Ik 1 "\ P~ iW 0 Purchasing, by the originating department, and/or by the receiving locations, as appropriate, until procurement is completed. ,,Under,no circumstances are, purchasing requirements altered (except for quantity or pricing) during order placement unless review and concurrence is obtained from those who were required to review, concur with, and approve the original documents as described above. Changes or revisions to procurement documents are subject to the same review and approval requirements as the original documents. Originating department technical review of procurement documents includes verification of applicable regulatory, code and design requirements. Quality Performance review of the above includes checks to verify proper inclusion of the quality standards, quality assurance program requirements, method of procurement and, the applicable acceptance criteria. Ginna Station Procurement, Materials and Budget organization reviews procurement documents for spare or ',replacement parts to,determine similarity, compatibility, and acceptance criteria of the original design. Quality Performance also reviews procurement documents for spare or replacement parts for adequacy of the quality requirements. Instructions Procedures and Drawin s Each Rochester Gas and Electric company organization, involved in quality related activities, is responsible for developing, reviewing, approving, and implementing procedures as required to implement the Quality Assurance Program. These procedures, cover activities such as document control, training of personnel, and responsibilities and duties of personnel. Quality Performance reviews and concurs with these procedures. Table l-l provides a summary of the subject matter contained in the procedures which are used to implement the quality assurance program. Procurement documents require suppliers and contractors to have appropriate instructions, procedures, specifications, and drawings. Ginna Station is responsible for providing and implementing instructions and procedures associated with operation, maintenance, repair, in-service inspection, refueling, modification and testing. This includes instructions and procedures listed in USAEC Regulatory Guide 1.33 for administrative control; general plant operation; startup, operation,- and shutdown of safety related systems; correction of abnormal, off normal, or alarm conditions, response to emergencies and other significant events; radioactivity control; control of measuring and test Revision 15 December 1989 g 4t SQ 4>

• " O'Ar' 4'

PC ,.5 equipment; chemical and radiochemical control; and fuel handling and refueling. Ginna Station is responsible for appropriate changes to such documents upon receipt of regulatory directives, instructions from Rochester Gas and Electric management, or;the completion of plant modifications. Ginna Station is also responsible for and issuance of those minor modification design the'reparation documents not provided~ by Engineering or the equipment supplier. General Maintenance is'esponsible for providing and for implementing procedures associated with shop work required 'to support Ginna Station maintenance, repair and modifica-tion activities. Electric Transmission 'and Distrj.bution is responsible for the preparation and implementation of relay inspection and testing procedures as required to direct detailed inspec-tions and testing activities for which they are responsible. Electric Transmission,and Distribution also assists in the "<< preparation .of routine relay maintenance and testing procedures used by their personnel in the annual Ginna Station protective relay surveill'ance program. Engineering is responsible for <providing approved specifi-cations, and drawings .associated with major modifications and when minor modifications necessitate drawings or speci-fications. These documents require those performing the work to obtain, understand, and, comply with appropriate procedures, specifications and drawings. Engineering has established procedures for revi'sing drawings and specifica-tions. These procedures cover 'updating of as-built drawings after plant modifications and the revision, approval,-dis-. tribution, and control of all.drawings and specifications.'uality Performance is responsible for the preparation and implementation of inspection procedures utilized for detailed inspection activities at Ginna Station and General Maintenance. This organization is responsible for providing and for impl'ementing 'procedures for audit and surveillance related activities. In addition, responsible for providing and for implementing instructions it is and procedures associated with "special processes, routine maintenance and inspection of cranes and handling equipment as well as materials testing and inservice inspection. Persons preparing and:,approving documents are responsible . for assuring that specifications, instructions, procedures, and drawings include appropriate quantitative or qualitative acceptance criteria for determi'ning that important activities have-been satisfactorily accomplished and assuring that the documents are kept current. Ii 'evision December 1989 15 I~ ~~ r t w* Li4 p I f4 ga 1 u Indoctrination and tr'aining of personnel is provided by the responsible organizations to ensure that quality affecting .activities are conducted in aqcordance with established documents. In addition, Quality Performance department surveiilance and audit as described in Section 10 and Section 18 are used to verify that quality affecting activities 'are being,performed"'in accordance with approved instructions, procedures and )rawings. Document Control Procedures are established to"control the issuance of pro-cedures, instructions, drawings, and specifications. Standard document control requirement's are contained in the Quality Assurance Manual. The Plant Manager, Ginna Station is responsible for the control of all documents issued at Ginna Station. Electric Transmission and Distribution is responsible for the control of documents issued by their organization. Engineering controls the distribution of controlled manuals issued for Engineering, General Maintenance, Materials Engineering and Inspection Services, Quality Assurance/Quality Control, Purchasing and Electric Transmission and Distribution. Each organization control-ling documents has alseparate.procedure to control documents in accordance with the requirements of the Quality Assurance Manual. The Quality Assurance Manual designates responsibilities and defines requirements for the preparation, review and approval of documents. Each department responsible for an activity is responsible for providing the necessary review and approval of insCructions,:procedures or drawings to assure that they are adequate,'nd include appropriate qualitative.and quantitative requirements. Nuclear Assurance Quality Control representatives, assigned to support departmental maintenance, repair, refueling and modification activities, review governing procedures, prior to use, to assure quality assurance requirements are included. The Plant 'Operations Review Committee has the responsibility for reviewing Ginna Station procedures prior to their approval as required bg Section 6.0, Technical Specifications. 'Dethiled inspection, test and examination procedures used by qualified personnel require the review and concurrence of the responsible technical person associated with that yctivity. Ginna Station, General Maintenance, Engineering, Material Engineering and Inspection Services,iPurchasing; and Electric Transmission and Distribution quality assurance implementing procedures require the review and concurrence "of 'Quality Performance arid the approval of;,the appropriate', department supervisor. I 'Rev,ision 15 December 1989 0 ) P 'n. ' a I" * * <<.-t% "M 4 AV 1,, ~ t 44 atew II cy 7 rgb 0 III I Quality Assurance/Quality Control procedures are approved by the Department Manager, Quality Performance. ,The Quality Assurance, Manual requires that documents. be controlled as appropriate, considering the type, of,.document involved, its importance to safety, and the intended use of the document. It specifies the types of documents which must be controlled; identifies the difference between con-trolled and uncontrolled copie4 of the same document; includes. the method for identifying holders of controlled copies; requires that only controlled copies of a document be used for official'purposes; requires that lists of effective revisions be issued~periodically; requires lists of document holders,to be maintained by the distributors; and requires that distributors transmit controlled documents using approved forms internally and externally. Types of documents which are controlled include Technical Speci.fications, UFSAR, Quality Assurance Manual, procedures (such as engineering', purchasing, repair, maintenance, test, calibration, fuel handling, modification, and administrative), specifications and drawings. Suppliers of materials, equipment, and services are required in procure-ment documents to provide for'control of documents, including manufactur'ing, inspection and testing instructions. r The Quality Assurance Manual further requires that each g organization provide Xn its procedures for measures: to assure that document's are available when required; to pro-perly review and approve documents such as procedures, instructions, specifications,j and drawings; to provide the same reviews and approvals for changes to documents as was required of the original document; to that organiza-tions which review and approve documentsrequire have access to pertinent information and adequate knowledge of the original document intent; to assure that approved changes are prompt1y transmitted'or incorporation into documents; and to assure that obsol'ete or superseded documents are eliminated from. the system and'ot used. Quality Performance is responsible for review and concurrence of procurement documents for all procuring organizations and, therefore, procurement document control requirements. Quality Performance is respons'ible for review, inspection, surveillance, and audit, as appropriate, of document control systems to assure adequate systems are implemented. ',r II I r Revision 15 December 1989 1 I' V I I I If I Control of Purchased Material E i ment and Services supplier selection, planning for item 1 Procurement documents, or service acceptance,'ontrol of supplier performance and acceptance of items and services are five major means used in controlling purchased material, equipment and services. All procurement is conducted in accordance with procurement documents as stated;in Section 4. All reviews, inspections, surveillances, and audits are'conducted by personnel who are competent in establishing whether or not a supplier is capable of providing, acceptable, quality products. Procurement planning is utilized by the procuring organiza-tions for determining the methods.to be used for acceptance of the item or service as well as requirements for the control of the supplier performance. Source inspection (surveillance), certificate of conformance, receipt inspec-tion and post installation test are methods which are considered for item acceptance with receipt inspection utilized in the acceptance of all items. In lieu of these methods, acceptance of services is based on either or a combination of: (1)'surveillance of the activity and (2) review of objective evidence Nor conformance to the procure-ment document requirements (i e. certifications, stress reports etc.). The extent of!the acceptance methods and as-sociated verification activities will vary and be a function of the relative importance and complexity of the purchased item or service and the suppliers past performance. Consideration for the control~of supplier performance includes the necessity for document submittals or surveillance, and under what situation the supplier is to report nonconformances. Results of the planning are incorporated in the procurement documents. I Selection of a supplier is based on the evaluation of its capability to provide the item or services in accordance with the requirements of the procurement documents. The evaluation which is abcomplished during the procurement planning, determines<>the necessity for the supplier selection to be'rom> the approved suppliers list maintained by Purchasing. Purchasing utilizes the approved suppliers list as the selection source for those suppliers found to have a satisfactory quality assurance program. The evaluation guidelines for source selection considers the item complexity, method(s) of acceptance and for a replacement item, if>> the source is to be restricted to the original supplier. For engineered and off-the-shelf items procured from suppliers required to have a quality assurance program, supplier selection is from the approved t t Revision 15 December 1989 4w Q ~ 4 4 4> "I 0 44 suppliers lists or one who is in the process of being added to a list, after havi'ng its capability evaluated to purchaser satisfaction. Xtems or services which meet industry standards and are typically utilized in applications other than nuclear may be purchased from suppliers not listed on the approved suppliers list provided that item acceptance, can be based on acceptance of standard commercial quality which is supplemented, as necessary, with source surveillance, pre- or post-installation tests, receipt tests, commercial supplier test reports, commercial supplier certificates, or receipt inspection. Xtems or services which have nuclear quality requirements which normally require the 'e,,uppllerIto implement a quality assurance program but for which no such supplier can be practicably utilized"',may also"be purchased from suppliers not listed on the approved suppliers list provided that verification of nuclear quality can be accomplished by methods such as source surveillance, pre- or post-installation tests, receipt tests, supplier test reports, supplier certificates, or receipt inspection as approved by Quality Assurance. Departmental procedures establish guidelines for source selection evaluations and for documenting the results through indication of the corresponding procurement method. The purchase requisition will also identify the source~when replacement parts are to be procured from the original equipment supplier. Addition of a supplier to the approved suppliers list is based on satisfactory evaluation of the supplier's capability by Qualitp Assurance, Purchasing and other departments, as appropriate. For engineered items, Engineering is responsible for evalu-ating the overall design or manufacturing capability of the supplier including hb.s particular technical ability to produce the design, service, item, or component delineated in the procurement documents." As part of this review, the supplier's design capabilities, machinery capabilities, handling capabilities, testing facilities, service capabili-ties, and experience",are reviewed. Quality Assurance is, responsible for evaluating the supplier's overall quality assurance organization and program in accordance with applicable codes, standards, applicable parts of 10CFR50 Appendix B, and Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation requirements. The review includes consideration of: company organization, quality assurance personnel qualifications, review and control of design documents, manufacturing procedures, quality assurance procedures, calibration practices, acceptance criteria, required quality assurance records and their retention, and quality assurance requirements and controls imposed by the N+ 4 Revision 15 December 1989 k OQ, / + u supplier on his subcontractors. Supplier evaluation is conducted by means of procedures or checklists which identify applicable regulatory or code quality assurance requirements. Ginna Station, Quality Performance and Electric Transmission and Distribution evaluate the. suppliers of inspection, test, and calibration services whicQ they intend to use. ft The departments responsible for performing supplier evalu-ations shall document, their results in reports which discuss areas investigated, findings,'and conclusions. As applicable, concurrence of Purchasing, Engineering, Quality Performance, Ginna Station, General Maintenance, and Electric Transmission and Distribution is required to place a supplier on the qualified suppliers'ist. One organization can remove a supplier from the list without concurrence of the others. Measures are established by Engineering and Quality Assurance to control supplier:performance for engineered items. These measures typically include the processing of change information, surveillance of supplier activities and the control of documents exchanged with the supplier. Xn addition, each department procuring off-the-shelf items or services establishes)similar measures for the control of supplier performance.~ With the exception of processing change information, the need for and applicable extent of purchaser controls of the supplier are determined during procurement planning". Quality Assurance isiresponsible for determining and documenting the degree of supplier surveillance (including review, inspection, or audit): required during design, fabrication, inspection, testing, and shipping, and for providing the requir'ed surveillance. The objective of supplier surveillanc'e is to provide a sampling review of the supplier's quality assurance program implementation and of product conformance with respect to the purchase order requirements. For complex engineered items, Quality Assurance and Engineering are'esponsible for joint development of surve'illance plans in advance of surveillance trips to identify areas to be'eviewed. j The results of the surveillanbe trip are documented by means of inspection she'ets," or trip reports which are distributed to the Manager, Quality Assurance, and the department which initiated the procurement. When a deviation from purchase order requirements is noted, the Quality Assurance represen-tative has the authority to inform the vendor that a particular item is unacceptable, to issue a nonconformance report, or to stop work, if necessary. t ( It Revision 15 December 1989 W l~ I h pk 4 ) II" ~ l Quality Performance is responsible for surveillance of Ginna Station site contractors to assure that they meet all technical and quality, requirements. The reporting and documenting of contractor surveillance is managed in a manner similar to supplier surveillance. l" The verification methods for the acceptance of items and are specified on the;,.attached procurement control 'ervices form during procurement planning and the purchase requisition preparation.! I'l 'f Department supervision is responsible for receiving and storing items pending their acceptance. Upon receipt, the department stockkeeper logs the item, places a "hold" tag on the item, and noti.fies Quality Performance that the item has arrived. Quality Performance is responsible for receipt inspection at N Ginna Station and General Maintenance upon delivery of items and associated services for maintenance, repair, modification, and refueling. IThis inspection includes the use of written procedures or checklists to verify that the items and services conform to the procurement documents (if this, has not been performed by source inspections) and that documentary evidence, of conformance is available at the plant prior to installation or use. Documentary evidence sufficient to identify the codes, standards or specifications met by the purchased material, equipment, and services is retained". In the) event a final source inspection for the acceptance" is conducted prior to receipt by RGSE, Quality Performance performs an inspection for shipping damage or lost parts'nd a document check to assure that the required documentation has been reviewed and is complete. A receiving inspection checkl-ist is completed for all items received to document the extent of the inspection performed, including:.the documents checked, and the inspection results. N If N l the item and documentation are adequate, Quality Performance labels the item as "Accepted", files the documentation and receipt inspection results, and releases the item for storage or use. 'If the item is nonconforming or the documentation'is unsatisfactory, Quality Performance initiates a nonconformance reph ort which is controlled in accordance with Section 15. I N 'h All items issued must bear anIacceptance tag and have dccu-mentation to support~the acceptability of the item. In the event the traceability is lost or the documentation review is unsatis factory, the item bhcomes nonconf orming and may not be released for'use. N Revision 15 December 1989 il l4 I l i. Identification and Control of <<Materials Parts and The identification and control of-materials, parts, and components is accomplished in ~accordance with written requirements and applies to material, parts, or components in any stage of fabrication, storage, or installation. Identification and control requirements are established by either an existing procedure or requirements documents which are prepared during the planning stages of a pro)ect. The identification. and control requirements cover items such as: traceability to assojiated documents such as drawings, specifications, purchase orders, manufacturing test data and inspection documents,'nd physical and chemical mill test reports; specification of thejdegree of identification to preclude a degradation of the item's functional capability or quality; and the proper identification of materials, parts, and components prior to;release for manufacturing, shipping, construction, and installation. Engineering and Quality Performance are responsible for assuring that drawings and specifications contain appropriate requirements for the identification and control of materials, parts,d'or components, as appropriate. Suppliers are required to assure that all required documentation for an' item is properly identified and related to the item. Each item is required to be physically identified, either by marking; on the item or by tags. Physical identificat~ion by purchase order number is used to the maximum extent possible for relating an item at any time to applicable documentation. )Identification is either on the item or records traceable'o the item. Where physical identification is impractical~, physical separation, procedural control, or other appropriate means -are employed. II The Plant Manager, G'irma Station is responsible for main-taining identification and cohtrol of materials, parts, or components received,;<stored, installed, and used at the plant. Procedures covering the identification and control of materials, parts,f'and components at the plant are approved by the Plant Manager~,. Ginna Station. The responsible supervish.on of other departments which receive material which is to<'be stored away, from the plant are responsible for establishing procedures for identification area g, and control and for maintaining identification and control of material, parts, or components< stored or used in their of responsibili'ty. i t In the event that traceability'is lost for a specific item, it is handled as nonbonforming material and deviations and waivers, are controlled, and documented in accordance with Section 15. ~ Revision l5 December l989 ~~9'~ E 43 ~p lg Control of S ecial Pr'ocesses Written procedures are. established to control special pro-cesses, such as welding, heat treating, and .nondestructive examination to assure compliance with applicable codes, standards, and design specifications. Qualification of personnel and special process, procedures complies with the requirements of applicable codes and standards. When special process qualification requirements are not included in existing codes and standards, they are described in procedures which give details. of the special process, the personnel qualification requirements, the equipment necessary, and the special process qualification requirements. Initiators of procurement activities are responsible for requiring suppliers,,',in procurement documents, to control special processes in~ accordance with the above requirements. Quality Performance personnel are responsible for reviewing procurement documents to ensure that requirements for control of special processes are included. Rochester Gas and, Electric procedures for special processes are prepared, reviewed, and approved by Materials Engineering and Inspection Services. Special process procedures submitted. by suppliers and contractors are reviewed and concurred with by Materials Engineering and Inspection Services.~ The Manager, Nuclear"Assurance and, Ginna Station Maintenance Manager are responsible for assuring that personnel per-forming special processes under their cognizance are quali-fied and are using qualified procedures in accordance with applicable codes, specifications,.and standards. Within the Quality Performance Department, the Manager, Materials Engineering and Insp'ection Services is responsible for the qualification of NDE>'personnel and procedures. The Manager, Materials Engineering and Inspection Services is responsible for the qualification of welding procedures and the training and qualification of'elders.'ecords for personnel and procedures to demonstrate that required qualifications have been obtained and kept current are maintained by Engineering at Ginna Station. Performance 'perform surveil'lance, inspections, and i'uality audits of special processes performed by Rochester Gas and Electric or contractors to assure effective compliance with procedures.. I Revision 15 December 1989 C p ~ . 10 'rocedures prepared for the control of activities include. inspection requiremen'ts and hold points as required by drawings, instructions, requirements documents, specifi-cations, codes, standards, or'regulatory requirements. For clarification and to'distinguish from preventive mainte-nance inspections, the following controls are associated with the quality assurance function inspections and referred to as verification inspections. Instructions for conducting detailed verification inspections,,are contained in inspection procedures. These>inspection procedures and all supporting specifications and:drawings are provided to inspection personnel, for use prior to performing the inspection. Inspection requirements and hold points are utilized to verify conformance of activities to the documented instructions, specifications, and drawings for accomplishing the activity. Inspection procedures include the identification of quality, characteristics to be inspected, a description of the method of inspection to be used, the identification of the group responsible for per-forming the inspecti6n, the acceptance and rejection criteria, the requirements for the recording of inspection results, and the requirements for providing evidence of completion and certification of the inspection activity. Verification inspections are performed by qualified inspec-tion personnel who are independent of the personnel performing the work.,i Outside'ontractors are required by procurement documents to have; and 'follow similar procedures and to use independent inspectors; Inspectors are sufficiently trained"to adequately evaluate the activity they are inspecting.~ M Quality Performance personnel're responsible for performing verification inspections, as required, during plant operation, maintenance, repair, in-service inspection, refueling, modification, and testing when the work is performed by Rochester Gas and'lectric personnel. When the work is performed by". outside contractors, Quality Performance. is respohsible for surveillance of the subcontractor's insp'ection activities. Inspection . equipment is calibrated and controlled in accordance with Section 12. Calibration status is verified by inspection personnel prior to performing an inspection operation. In the event an inspection of, processed material or products is impossible or impractical,. indirect control by monitoring processing methods, equipment", and personnel is provided. Both inspection and process mbnitoring are required when control is inadequat'e without'oth. j, Revision 15 December 1989 J~ %o, 14 'E g ~ ( )f4 0 Quality Performance is responsible for the adequate inclusion of inspection requirements in specifications. The Manager, Nuclear Assurance is'responsible 'for-assuring that adequate inspection requirements and hold points are included in maintenance, repair, refueling, modification and testing procedures. He is also responsible for the assign-ment of qualified personnel required for the performance of verification inspections and quality control surveillances of quality affecting activities. The Manager, Nuclear Assurance is also responsible for assuring that adequate inspection requirements are included in procedures, instructions and/or checklists controlling maintenance, modification and'repair activities and related fabrication processes at the General Maintenance facility. With the exception of that which pertains to Pump and Valve Testing, the Manager, Materials Engineering and Inspection Services is responsible for establishing the requirements- --:.'or the .Inse'rvice Inspection Program. Engineering is responsible for establishing the requi.rements for the Inservice Pump and Valve Testing Program. The program for inservice inspection of the reactor coolant system and other safety related systems is contained in Section 4.2, Technical Specifications. Test Control Whenever testing is required to demonstrate that a material, part, component, or system will perform satisfactorily in service, a test program is instituted employing written and approved procedures which are in accordance with basic .requirements .established in Technical, Specifications, draw-ings, instructions, procurement documents, specifications, codes, standards, and regulatory requirements. The test program requires the identification, control, and documen-tation of all tests, and the preparation of wri.tten proce-dures required for satisfactory accomplishment of the testing. Written test procedures and checklists include: necessary test equipment and calibration requirements; material requirements; test personnel requirements; prerequisite plant and equipment conditions; limiting condi-tions; detailed performance instructions for, the testing method and test equipment instrumentation; acceptance and rejection criteria; instructions for disposition of deviations; data collection requirements; and test result approval. The Plant Manager, Ginna Station is responsible for the station test program,'hich includes the surveillance test Revision 15 December 1989 A (,y V* A4 )s-, 1 ~ <<.< l E program required by. Section 4.,0', Technical Specifications - and testingassociated with modifications. I ,Test procedures, are prepared by .the plant staff,.reviewed by . the Plant Operations Review Committee and Quality Performance, and approved by the Plant Manager, Ginna Station. The Plant Manager, Ginna Station is responsible for the correct and timely performance of the required tests utilizing written and approved procedures. When con-tractors are employed for tests, the contractor is required to perform testing in accordance with its quality assurance program requirements. All test results are required to be documented, reviewed, and approved by those responsible for performing the test. When requested by Ginna Station, Electric Transmission and Distribution performs test activities to determine the cause of protective relay malfunctions. These test activities are performed in accordance with approved procedures by qualified personnel. Engineering and Quality Performance are responsible for assuring that required tests for major modifications are included in specifications. Engineering and Electric Transmission and Distribution"assistance in the preparation of modification-related test procedures may be provided to the Ginna Station staff. The Ginna Station Technical Manager is responsible for the adequate inclusion of test requirements in minor modification design documents and for reviewing modification-related test results for acceptability to design requirements. Reviews of minor modification design by Quality, Performance verifies adequate inclusion of test requirements'.

12. Control of Measurin and Test E i ment "The'calibration and control system for measuring and test equipment includes calibration procedures, establishment of calibration frequencies, and maintenance and control requirements of measuring and" test'nstruments, tools, gauges, shop standards, and nondestructive test equipment which are to be used in the measurement, inspection, and

..-. monitoring of components, systems, and structures. Calibra- ., tion procedures include step-by-step methods for calibration and requirements for instrument accuracy. Calibration frequency is based on required accuracy, degree of usage, stability characteristics, manufacturer's recommendations, experience, and other conditions affecting measurement capability. Control of measuring'and test'quipment requires: a recall system assuring timely calibration of equipment; a system Revision 15 December 1989 ~E: t+VÃ sA; 4 I - tt ~ II' g)~ W J, 4I' providing unique identification of equipment, traceability to calibration test data, and identification of the next calibration date on the .equipment; a system providing -trace- " ability of shop standards to. nationally recognized .standards (where national standards do not exist, procedures contain instructions to,document the basis for calibration) and periodic revalidation of shop standards; a system providing for records to be maintained which indicate the complete status of all items under the calibration system including the maintenance, calibration results, abnormalities, and last and future calibration dates; and a system controlling the purchase requirements of new equipment to be entered into the calibration and control system including require-ments for accuracy, stability, and repeatability under normal use conditions. In the event a measuring instrument (i.e. shop or field standard) is found out of calibration, an investigation is conducted to determine the validity of previous measurements. The Plant Manager, Ginna Station is responsible for the procedures. and- program required to= assure control and cali-bration of measuring and test equipment at Ginna Station in accordance with the above requirements. Instruments specified in Section 4.1, Technical Specifications, are included in the program. Tools, gauges, and instruments necessary for maintenance, inspection, and test are cali-brated and controlled in accordance with station procedures. Measuring, test or inspection equipment used by Nuclear Assurance Quality Control is included in the program. The Manager, Materials Engineering and Inspection Services and Superintendent, Electric Meter and Laboratory, are responsible for establishing a program and the preparation ... of procedures for. the control'-and calibration--of measuring.. and test equipment used by their respective organizations.

13. Handlin Stora e and Shi in Ginna Station Supervision is responsible for developing and implementing procedures for the handling, storage, shipping, preservation, and cleaning of material and equipment delivered to or located at Ginna Station. General Maintenance, Electric,Transmission'and Distribution, and, Materials Engineering and Insp'ection Services are responsible for preparing and implementing procedures for the handling, storage, shipping, preservation, and cleaning of material and equipment delivered to or located in their work areas. In addition, the Manager, Materials Engineering and Inspection Services is .responsible for preparing and implementing procedures for the, routine maintenance and inspection of lifting and handling equipment. Under normal circumstances, manufacturer s specific written instructions Revision 15 December 1989

V ~ IQ li I I V 4p l and recommendations and purchase specification requirements are invoked for cleanliness, preservation, special handlingg ,and storage with, respect to environmental requirements., In .the absence of, or in addition to, specific manufacturer . requirements, the department superintendent may invoke additional requirements in accordance with department procedures. II is responsible for specifying in procure-I The Chief Engineer ment documents and in engineering specifications that written procedures be used, as appropriate, for the handling, shipping, storage, cleaning, and preservation of materials and, equipment procured for major modifications. These procedures are prepared by contractors, by the station staff, or by staff members of General Maintenance or Electric Transmission and Distribution as appropriate. Rochester Gas and Electric procedures are reviewed and approved as described in Section 6. In the preparation of procurement documents, department " procedures, and contractor procedures, consideration of handling, shipping, storage, cleanliness, and preservation is given to all material and equipment throughout various stages of manufacturing and installation prior to operational acceptan'ce. t Quality Performance is responsible for review of Engineering specifications to assure that)proper handling, storing, and shipping requirements have been specified. Quality Performance is responsible for examination of handling, storage, and shipping activities by suppliers, Rochester Gas and Electric personnel, and contractors.

14. Ins ection Test and 0 eratin Status Equipment or systems not ready for normal service are clearly identified by use of tags I control logs nd th suitabl a e means to indicate the status in a positive manner.

The identification is sufficient to positively indicate the status of the particular equipment or system being isolated. The Plant Manager, Ginna Station is responsible for indicating the status of. operating. equipment or systems to. be removed from service for maintenance, repair, or modifi-cation in accordance'with the approved Electric System Operating Rules. The Plant Manager designates personnel who have station holding"authority. Personnel who have station holding authority are responsible for directing the status change of equipment and systems in accordance with the approved station holding procedures. Revision 15 December 1989 C 7h ~ $ pj4. p< I 4 C ) rhea t. ~4>e,lI vi ,\

• 4 ~

I r li t N ~~e 4 4 8t V +ca Pp g gl 'I 1a rr 1I ~ gl ic System status is indicated through the use of hold tags, block tags and corresponding control logs. Equipment or system, inspection. and.test status are. indicated by use of test tags, labels, or work inspection and test status sheets. Written procedures control the use of hold tags, test, tags, and labels. The procedures require the recording of the name of the person placing and removing the tag. Systems, components, and equipment which are found to be unacceptable during or after testing are clearly identified. Fuel handling operations involving fuel assemblies or other radioactive sources are identified and controlled by the use of tags, stamps, or other suitable means. Maintenance, repair, or modification of components, systems, or structures utilizes procedures, travelers, data sheets or checklists to indicate status of the work, inspections or tests and corresponding acceptance or rejection for a particular component, system, or structure. These job control forms are prepared jointly by the job supervisor and Nuclear Assurance Quality Control personnel and maintained at a designated control location to indicate the status and the completion of required inspections and tests. I Quality Performance nonitors the status change of Ginna Station activities for their implementation of approved procedures and assures that inspection results are properly documented. Materia% Engineering and Inspection Services establishes the procedures for implementing the inspection status sheets utilized during~inservice inspection.

15. Nonconformin Materials Parts and Com onents Procedures are established for the control, evaluation and l

disposition of deficient material, parts, and components. Materials, parts, or components which do not conform to the drawing or specification requirements are identified with a tag and reported on a nonconformance report. Nuclear Assurance is responsible for issuing nonconformance reports, initiating repair or rework, and inspecting and approving ,repaired or reworked items. Prior to installation or use, nonconforming items generally remain in a receiving inspection hold area until approved disposition has been received. Nonconforning items which are released for installation to meet! critical fabrication schedules are controlled by Quality Control',to prevent inadvertent use prior to clearance of the nonconformance. After installa-tion or- use, nonconforming items are identified and con-trolled until approved disposition has been implemented. ,I Revision 15 December 1989 I 4 4 4 4 44 t f ~ r 4 V Nonconformances iden ified at,a supplier's facility and reported to RG&E, whi~ch have supplier recommended depositions of use-as-is, or repair, are normally processed by the department originating~the procurement. Organizations which specify the requirement being dispositioned are responsible, for reviewing.and approving-the supplier recommended disposition. This also applies to nonconformances discovered after receipt inspection, during handling or after installation or use. Items are repaired and'reworked only in accordance with li approved procedures and current drawings. Nuclear Assurance assures that approved procedures and/or drawings are avail-able for use all repaired prior to the repair or rework and reinspects or reworked items. The repair or rework must be verified as acceptable by an inspection of the affected item which is at least equal to the original inspection method. Items which are accepted "use-.as-is" are fully documented upwith the. drawing or specification requirement and technical justification for acceptance.! All such items are approved prior to use by the cognizant, organization having responsi-bility for the requirement. In addition, those "use-as-is" nonconformances which also deviate from a Design Criteria requirement shall require additional approval of the Vice President, Production and Engineering. s Nuclear Assurance provides nonconformance status information monthly. Quality Performance'. analyzes nonconformance report data for adverse trends and processes periodic reports to management. Adverse trends form a basis for supplier re-evaluation or for.'other corrective action. Corrective Action Quality Assurance establishes the requirements for identi-fication, review and<correction of significant conditions adverse to quality. !Significant conditions adverse to quality such as faildres, malfunctions, deficiencies, de-viations, defective material and equipment, and nonconfor-are reported on a ificant conditions adversecorrective action report. Sign- . mances to quality include conditions affecting safety, conditions which could result in plant shutdown, high maintenance ithms, and operating procedure deficiencies. The correctiveIaction report identifies the condition, the cause of the condition, and the corrective action taken. Corrective Action Reports mayIbe initiated by Quality Performance, Engineering, Ginna Station, General Maintenance, Electric: Transmission and Distribution or Pur-Revision 15 December 1989 P <4) "J I A 4r 'I chasing staff personnel. Corrective Action Reports initiated at Ginna Station are submitted to the Ginna .,Station..Corrective, Action .Cooidinator for.review prior..to- . further processing..."Corrective..Action. Reports initiated by departments other than at Ginna Station are reviewed and processed by Quality Performance. T When a significant condition adverse to quality at Ginna Station is identified, Quality Performance evaluates the affect of continuingIthe activity. If continuing the activity would obscur'e or preclude identification and correction of the deficiency,"continuing the activity would increase the extent of the deficiency or lead to an unsafe condition, stop work action is'taken. Quality Performance Supervision has authority to stop work on maintenance, repair, inservice inspection, refueling, modification, testing or inspection deficiencies, at Ginna Station. Quality Performance may recommend stop work action to the Plant Manager, Ginna Station on operating deficiencies. f The Manager,. Quality Assurance has the authority to stop work for conditions identified in Purchasing, Engineering, General Maintenance,IMaterials Engineering ans Inspection Services, Electric Transmission and Distribution or cognizant supplier aksociations. The Plant OperationsI~Review Committee reviews all corrective action reports initiqted at Ga.nna Station and recommends interim corrective action if the action does not represent a change in configurat'ion of the deficient item. The Committee recommendsffpermanent corrective action for all conditions adverse to quality which involve operating procedures. Significant conditions adverse to quality identified at General Maintenance are submitted to the Quality Services Coordinator for review. Quality Control Supervision has the authority to stop or limit work activities within General Maintenance. 4 Conditions adverse t9 quality-'hich involve design defi-ciencies or a recommended corrective action which involves a design change are reviewed by Ginna Station or Engineering as applicable. The cognizantorganization determines the cause of the condition and recommends corrective action to preclude repetition. Quality Assurance reviews all corrective action reports to assure that the cause of the condition has been determined and that corrective action has been taken to preclude repe-tition ~ f i, J s -3 0-" Revision 15 December 1989 S I~ ~ Ch P 'PKJ 'h h%+I QI ~ S <<4, I~ S I SP I Sh 'h Corrective action summary reports are submitted to departmental supervision to keep them aware of significant conditions adverse to quality,'. related causes and corrective action .being taken.- .Senior Management is advised of- the-. causes and actions of the more significant Corrective. Action Reports. ualit Assurance Records Quality Assurance is responsible for establishing the basic requirements for qua3.'ity assurance record retention and maintenance. Engineering, as directed by the Chief Engineer, is responsible for the retention and maintenance of Engineering and Ginna Station records. Quality Performance, Purchasing, Research and Science, General Maintenance and Electric Transmission and Distribution departments are responsible for assuring the maintenance and retention of records,.'which they originate. This may be accomplished either by retaining the records in their department or by forwarding them to the Ginna Station or Engineering record retention locations as appropriate. Each organization retaining records is responsible for preparation, review, approval,'nd implementation of specific quality assurance record procedures for their areas of responsibility in accordance with these requirements. The records which fall within> quality assurance record requirements include those records required by Section 6.10 of the Technical Specifications and the Quality Assurance Program. All 'records associated with the operation, main-tenance, repair, inservice inspection, refueling, modifica-tion, inspection and)testing of structures, systems, and components covered by the quality. assurance program are included. i Ginna Station records include~ operating logs; the results of inspections, tests, jnd the monitoring of plant activities; drawings, procurement documents and material analyses; calibration procedures and reports; and Nonconformance and Corrective Action Reports. Records of the qualification of personnel, procedures, and equipment for special processes and the results of reviews are maintained at Engineering or Ginna Station as appropriate.) Inspection and test records contain a description of the type of test or inspection activity, evidence of completion of the activity, results, the; name of the inspector or data recorder, the acceptance or rejection of the activity, and a record of any nonconformances'. The requirements and responsibilities for record accessibility and tr nsmittal're 'described in the Quality Assurance Manual sec ions as appropriate. Requirements and Revision 15 December 1989 ~r '/ r,l ~ ~ I r, r ,gc fr,Q o ,o I 1 II 1i responsibilities for"'preparation, inspection, ~ .. identification, review, .-storage, retrieval, maintenance, and ~ ~ ~ ~ the, retention of., quality .assur'ance.records, rerecord are in accordance ...,;- with applicable quality assurance procedures, codes, , standards,. and,.procurement documents.. Records are available ~ to authorized personnel. Removal of records from storage is documented on sign-out cards and accountability is maintained by the responsible record control activity.'l Records are either skored in record storage facilities which are designed to prevent destruction of records due to fire, flooding, theft, andjdeterioration by temperature or humidity conditions; or, duplicate records are kept in two separate storage locations inIseparate buildings which are physically isolated from each/other. IJ keeping procedures provide i'ecord for receiving, classifying, indexing, labeling, and preparing records for -" --.storage..The. procedures establish retention requirements, accessibility, control of obsolete record destruction, and control for issuance and return of all records. Engineering is respo> sible for maintaining plant operating records as required n Section 6.10, Technical Specifications. Engineering is also responsible for maintainin off-site I prepared design records, such',as specifications,g drawings, design review reports, and design control documentation; quality assurance re'cords, such as audit reports and surveillance reports; purchasing records, such as supplier qualifications, bid evaluations, and purchase, orders.-

18. Audits e

Compliance with, all aspects of the Quality Assurance Program a and the effectiveness of the program is determined by audits and surveillances of all organizations performing quality affecting activities. Qualitg Assurance is responsible for conducting audits of, each organization involved in the quality assurance pro gram on a planned, periodic basis. Audit intervals are ased on the status and safety importance of activi: ies being performed. Audits of Ginna Stath. on, Engineerin g , Qualit y Performance, General Maintenance,) Electric) Transmission and Distribution, and Puychasing organizations are performed annually. Table 18-g. is a list of the activities to be examined by audit or] surveillknce in each of the organizations. Frequencies are based on the level of Revision 15 December 1989 I( K V %4 A

• I activity in each area. Audit schedules are established to assure that each of the activities are audited at the frequency specified in Section 6 Technical Specifications which includes annually for those activities required to meet the criteria of. Appendix,'B, 10CPR Part 50. Additional audits or surveillances are conducted as required by special conditions or circumstances.

t ) Each audit'equires 4he development of an audit plan to provide information about theIaudit, such as the functional areas to be audited,;;the names and assignments of those who will perform the audit, the scheduling arrangements, and the method of reporting 'findings and recommendations. The audits are performed'n accordance with written procedures or checklists by appropriately trained personnel not having direct responsibilities in the areas being audited. Audit results are documented and r'eported to the supervisor and division head having responsibility in the area audited and the Nuclear Safety Audit and Review Board. Within a specified, period of time, the person having supervisory responsibility in the area audited is required to review the audit results, take necessary action to correct the deficiencies identif'ied by the audit, and document and report the corrective, action.; Quality Assurance isresponsible for developing audit plans and audit checklists< designating and training audit personnel, and conducting audits. Audits may be conducted by Quality Assurance engineers or other qualified personnel, such as technical specialists from other company departments and outside consultants. Audits of major contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers are conducted during>'the early stages of design and procure-ment, as required, to evaluate their quality assurance program for complian'ce with all aspects of the procurement documents. Audits are conducted, as required, to assure that major contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers are auditing their suppliers'uality assurance programs in accordance with procurement documents. During the project, additional audits are performed, as required, to assure all quality assurance program requirements are properly imple-mented in accordance,'..'with procurement documents. Quality Assurance performs regular analyses of audit and Quality Assurance surveillance results to evaluate quality trends. Results of these analyses are provided to management for their~regular review. I 1 I Revision 15 December 1989 AE ~ ~ Table l-l Quality Assurance Program Procedures Subject Listing Appendix B ualit Assurance ualit Control Procedures Criteria Indoctrination of Quality Assurance/Quality Control and Supervisory Personnel Training of Quality Assurance Personnel Management Review of the Quality Assurance Program Periodic Review of Quality Assurance/Quality Control Procedures Quality Assurance/Quality Control Group Organization and Responsibilities Quality Assurance Review bf Rochester Gas and. Electric Design Criteria P 'i e Quality Assurance Review'of Rochester Gas and Electric Engineering Specifications Quality Assurance Review of Architect/Engineer's Design Documents 'l Requisitioning Quality As'surance/Quality Control Services I Quality Review of Rochester Gas and IV Electric Procurement Documents Preparation, Review and Approval of, Rochester Gas and IV Electric Q.A. Specifications Preparation, Review and Approval of Ginna Station N Quality Assurance Manual ". Preparation, Review and Approval of Quality Assurance/Quality Control,'rocedures Review of Departmental Procedures VI Preparation, Review and Approval of Procedure VI Deviation Requests by Quality Assurance/Quality Control I Evaluation of Suppliers by Quality Assurance VII Revision 15 December 1989 ~ PP ,I+ 4 J S A' I C k Jp ti l Table l-l (cont,'d) Appendix B ualit Assurance ualit Control Procedures Criteria Supplier Surveillance Control of Supplier Performance VII Quality Assurance Evaluati.on of Bids VIZ Inspection and Surveillance Activities X Qualification of Surveillance and Inspection Personnel X Preparation of Inservice Pump and Valve Testing Program XI Quality Assurance Review of Nonconformance Reports Preparation, Review and Processing'of Corrective XVI Action Reports by Quality"Assurance

• 4 Qualification of Auditing Personnel XVZII Audit Scheduling and Planning XVIIZ Performance of Quality Assurance Audits XVIII Reporting and Follow-Up of Audit Findings XVIII Conduct of Quality Assurance During and in XVIII Follow-Up of USNRC and Management Audits Response to Audits and Surveillances XVZII 6

Qualifications of Surveillance Personnel s< l XVIII Quality Performance Surveillance Program XVZII Revision 15 December 1989 +~g< 1 Table l-l (cont'd) Appendix B Materials En ineerin Ins ection Services Criteria c Indoctrination and Training j Materials Engineering and;,Inspection Services Organization and Responsibilities Preparation, Review and Approval of Purchase IV Requisitions and Related Procurement Documents Quality Materials Engineering and Inspection Services Procedures Quality Materials Engineering and Inspection Services Procedure Deviation Request Preparation, Review and Approval of Material ~Handling Equipment Instructions Control and Distribution f.Documents Regulating VI Safety Related Activities[~ ll / Receipt and Acceptance of.,Purchased Materials ~ VII Preparation, Review and Approval of Supplier VII Evaluation Welding Procedure Preparation Review and Approval IX Welding Procedure Qualification IX Heat Treating Procedures IX 1 Welder Qualification and Currency IX Nondestructive Examination Procedures IX Nondestructive Examinationj Procedures Manual IX ';1 Nondestructive Examination Personnel Qualification IX Inservice Inspection Program and Plans X Incorporating Ginna Modifications into Inservice X Inspection Program Test Control XI Revision 15 December 1989 l f~ f ~ i~ ~ fv't4.bk I II j;I 4 Ta le 1-1 (cont'd) Appendix B ... Materials En ineerin and Ins ection Services Criteria Test Personnel Qualifications XI I Calibration and Control of Nondestructive XII Examination Instruments Inspection and Maintenanc of Material Handling XIII Equipment Overhead and Gantr Crane XIII Inspection and Maintenanc  ! of Portable Lifting XIII and Handling Equipment Underhung .Cranes, Jib Cran es and Monorail Systems XIII Sl'ngs and Related Apparatus XIII Classification and Training of Material Handling XIII Equipment Personnel Mobile Hydraulic Cranes I Inspection and Maintenance of Jacks XIII Forklift Loading Forks XIII Training and Qualificaticji of- Crane Operators XIII Lifting Devices in the Cog tainment'essel XIII Control and D is p ositi on of Nonconformin g Material Parts and Components II Corrective Action at Materials Engineering and Inspection Services Quality Materials Engineering and Inspection Services Records Materials Engineering and,Inspection Services XVIII Response to Internal Audits Revision 15 December 1989 ,f rp I 4' s I Table 1-1 (cont'd) Appendix B Ginna Procedures Criteria Ginna Quality Assurance Program Implementation Training of Ginna Personnel Ginna Administrative and Engineering Staff Responsibilities Ginna Modification Project Organization Plant Operations Review Committee Operating Procedure Control of Station Modification Station Modification Installation Acceptance and Completion Preparation, Review and Approval of Design Documents Preparation, Review and Approval of Minor Modification Safety Analysis Control of Procurement Documents for Purchased Materials, Parts, Components and Services IV Requisition Services from General Maintenance IV Plant Procedures 1 Plant Procedure Control and Distribution VI Control of Engineering Documents VI Vendor Manual Control VI Receipt and Acceptance of Purchased Materials VII II Supplier Qualification Technical Evaluation VII Control of Purchased Services VII Control of Accepted Material, Parts and Components ,~ 'I VIII Identification and Markin'g of Material VIII Revision 15 December 1989 '1 rw < pS Table l-l (cont'd) I Appendix B Ginna Procedures Criteria Control of Welding, Heat Treating and IX Nondestructive Examination Welding Equipment Performance Verification IX Nondestructive Examination IX Preventive Maintenance Programs for Electrical, X Mechanical and Valves Inservice Inspection X, XIV II Environmentally Qualified Equipment Maintenance X Program k Performance of Tests XI Qualification of Test Personnel XI Calibration and Control of Measuring and Test Equipment XII Installed Plant Instruments and Equipment Maintenance and Inspection of Material Handling XIII Equipment Control of Material Handling and Handling Equipment XIII Storage and Preservation of Materials XIII Control of Heavy Loads at Ginna XIII Electric System Operating Rules XIV Test Status Control XIV Bypass of Safety Function or Jumper Control XIV Control of Temporary Modifications', XIV Control and Disposition of Nonconforming Materials 4 Issue of Nonconformance Reports Corrective Action at Ginna Station Table l-l (cont'd) 4 Revision 15 December 1989 Appendix B Ginna Procedures Criteria Ginna Records XVII Record Storage Facility and Equipment XVII Maintenance and History Program XVII Ginna Station Response to Internal Audits XVIII Revision 15 December 1989 l I 4 P~< C I I p 4e C Table 1-1 (cont'd) Appendix B En ineerin Procedures Criteria Indoctrination and Training Engineering Department, Organization and Responsibilities I Preparation, Review and Approval IIX of Design Input Documents Review and Approval of Design Analyses .'reparation, Preparation, Review and Approval of Engineering Drawings IXX Preparation, Review and Approval of Specifications IIX Design- Verification IIX Preparation, Review and Approval of Safety Analyses IIX Review and Approval of Architect Engineer or IIX Consultant Design Documents Preparation, Review and Approval of Field Change Requests Purchase Requisition IV Engineering Procedures l ~ Engineering Procedure Deviation Request 'I I Distribution and Control of Documents by the Control Number Method" of Documents by the I'ontrol List of VI Current Revisions Method AH Distribution of Documents by the List of Correspondence Procedures; VI Receipt, Control and Distribution of Drawings and. Aperture Cards fg I VI Supplier Evaluation VII Revision 15 December 1989 C e 41K Table l-l (cont'd) Appendix B En ineerin Procedures Criteria Preparation, Review and Approval of Bid Requests, VII Bid Evaluations and Recommendations for Award Engineering Review of Nonconforming Materials, Parts VX or Components Initiating and Responding 'to Corrective Action Reports Records XVII Engineering Response to Audits XVIII Revision l5 December l989 'E V C~ "r l "Table 1-1 (cont'd) Appendix B Purchasin Procedures Criteria Periodic Review of Purchasing Procedures Indoctrination and Training of Purchasing Personnel Purchasing Department Organization and Responsibilities Preparation, Review, Approval and Issuance of IV Purchase Orders and Changes to Purchase Orders Requests for Bids and Bid Evaluation IV Purchasing Procedures Purchasing Procedure Deviation Request Supplier Evaluation VII Establishment and Maintenance of Qualified VII Suppliers List p Supplier Nonconformance Report Processing Purchasing Department Response to Corrective Action Reports and Corrective Action Reporting Purchasing Records XVII Purchasing Response to Audits XVIII -4 3-. Revision 15 December 1989 .~il r< w 'I k 4 I~ Table l-l (cont)d) Appendix B II 4 .General Maintenance Procedures Criteria Indoctrination I and Training General Maintenance Organization and Responsibilities Documentation .and Control,:.of Modification/ Fabrication Activities Preparation, Review and Approval of Purchase IV Requisitions and Related Procurement Documents Quality Maintenance Procedures Quality Maintenance Procedure Deviation Requests Preparation, Review and Approval of General Maintenance Fabrication R'oute Cards I Control and Distribution of Documents Regulating VI Safety Related Activities",'eceipt and Acceptance of Purchased Materials VII Control of Accepted Material, Parts and Components VIII Traceability of Material . VIII Issue, Control and Storag'e of Weld'onsumables ) VIII Control of Welding IX Conduct of Crane operators XIII Control and Disposition of Nonconforming Material, XV Parts and Components Corrective Action at General Maintenance Quality Maintenance Records XVII General Maintenance Response to Internal Audits XVIII Revision 15 December 1989 'a gpss t p ~, c ~ g ~ ~g .~, '~4-'gm (oh ~ y f Table l-l (cont'd) Electric Transmission Procedures and Distribution Appendix B Procedures Criteria Quality Assurance Program Implementation for Electric Transmission and~.Distribution Department, Training of Electric Transmission and Distribution Personnel Electric Transmission and Distribution Organization Design/Modification Activities Control Control of Procurement Documents for Purchased IV Parts, Components and Services Preparation, Review, and Approval of Electric Transmission and Distribution and Laboratory Procedures Control of Electric Transmission and Distribution VI Procedures, Schedules and'Test Form Books 1 Supplier Qualification Technical Evaluation VII 'I Receipt and Acceptance of Instrumentation and VII Standards Ecpxipment h Control of Purchased Services for Electric Meter and Lab VZI Identification and Control of Materials, Parts and VIII Components Performance of Tests at Gonna Station (4 XZ Performance of Tests at the Electrical Laboratory XZ gt Qualification of Test Personnel XI Calibration and Control of test Instruments XII Handling, Storage and Shipping XIII Inspection and Test Status at Electric Meter and XZV Laboratory Control and Disposition of Nonconforming Parts and Components 'evision 15 December 1989 0 Table 1-1 (cont'd) .Transmission and Distribution f'lectric Appendix B Procedures Criteria Initiating and Processing~of Corrective Action Rep'orts Control of Quality Assurance Records XVII Response to Audits XVIII A' S; Re'vision 15 December 1989 V TABLE 4-1 Procurement Document Re uirements Items to be considered for inclusion in procurement documents include:

1. Sco e of Work Detailed statement of the work to be performed.

• 2. Technical Re uirements by reference to specific drawings, specifications,'odes, regulations, procedures or instructions, including revisions, that describe the items or services to be furnished. Also identified shall be test, inspection and acceptance requirements, and any special requirements for such activities as designing, identification, fabrication, cleaning, erecting, packaging, handling, shipping and extended storage.

• 3 ualit Assurance Pro ram Re uirements - which require the supplier to have a documented quality assurance program that.

implements portions or all of 10CFR50 Appendix B as well as applicable quality assurance program requirements of other nationally recognized codes and standards. Also included shall be the requirement that the supplier incorporate appropriate quality assurance program requirements in subtier procurement documents.

• Ri ht of Access to include the facilities and records of i the supplier for source inspection and audit by the Purchaser or parties designated by'he purchaser. Also included shall be provisions for the identification of witness and hold points and the minimum time of advance notice.

• 5. Documentation Re uirements Submittal approval and. retention requirements for documents such as quality assurance manuals, special process and test procedures, materials records, calculations and analyses.

• 6. Nonconformance Requirements for reporting and disposition of nonconformance to procurement requirements.

• Included in the review by Quality Assurance or Quality Control.

Revision 15 December 1989 I' Table 18-1 Audit List Functional Or anization Activities Audited Engineering Indoctrination and Training Design Control Procurement Document Control Document Control Records Procurement Control Purchasing Indoctrination and Training Procurement Document Control Records and Document Control Procurement Control Ginna Station QA Indoctrination and Training Ginna Staff Training, Retaining-Qualification and Performance Modification Maintenance and Repair Procurement Control Document Control and Records Inservice Inspection Surveillance Testing Handling, Storage and Shipping Facility Operation Conformance to all provisions contained in Technical Specifications and applicable license conditions Refueling Calibration and Control of Measuring and Test Equipment Health Physics & Chemistry Security Plan and Procedures Emergency Plan and Procedures

• Fire Protection Program and Implementing Procedures Corrective Action associated with deficiencies occurring in fac'ility equipment, structures, Revision 15 December 1989

TABLE 18-1 (cont'd) Audit List Functional Or anization Activities Audited systems or methods of operation Transportation of Radioactive Waste Fire Protection and Loss Prevention Program Inspection and Audit

• • • Fire Protection and Loss Prevention Program Independent Inspections and Audits Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program and Results Thereof

• Offsite Dose Calculation Manual and Implementing Procedures

• Process Control Program and.

Implementing Procedures

• Biennially

• • • Triennial General Maintenance Indoctrination and Training Maintenance and Repair Procurement Control Document Control and Records Shop Fabrication and Repairs Control of Measuring Equipment Special Processes Handling, Storage and Shipping Inspection and Surveillance Electric Transmission and Indoctrination and Training Distribution Design/Modification Control Procurement Control Document Control and Records Handling and Shipping Control of Measuring and Test Equipment Test Control Revision 15 December 1989

TABLE 18-1 (cont'd) Audit List Functional Or anization Activities Audited Quality Performance Indoctrination and Training Handling, Storage, and Shipping Procurement Control Welding and NDE Inservice Inspection Document Control Control of Measuring and Test Equipment Test Control Records Inspection and Surveillance Revision 15 December 1989 cQIRM DF THE RDARD R. E. GINNA NUCLEAR POKIER PLANT MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATfON CHART SfllIOR LINKS OF SUPERVISIOH AND ADNJNISTRATION PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT 4 CONTROLLER LINES OF CIIIIICATION OR SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRE VIII3'll ADNIN SE RVJCES QF4% DIS1RI DIJON PRODUCIION 4 EX6INEERIN6 . AND CORPORATE PLAIIH6 MA6ER VICE PRESIDENT RISJ QIERJMS ELECTRIC QXACENENT QNACEXEHI TRAHSXISS ION 4 DISIR14UTION DEPARTXENT QXA6ER CHIEF EN6TXEER 6ENERAL QNACER DIRECIOR OF OUALIIT NUCLM PRODUCTION ~PORC SECURITY PERFORMCE DIRECTOR CORPORATE MA6ER PROD RADJATIOX PROJECTION STSTEI5 AND SERVICES tURCHASIN6 SUPT SUPT MASER MA6ER MA6ER DIRECTOR SUPT DEPARTXEHT QQ6ER DIVISION PLANT SUPERVISOR A6ENT* ELE CTRIC ELECTRIC OUALJJT NUCLEAR NATER IAI.S NUCLEAR 6EXERAL QNA6ER DIVISIOQL JRAININ6 QNA6ER NUCLEAR HETER 4 SUJSTAT TONS ASSURANCE ASSURANCE EXOIXEERIN6 EN6IXEBIND NAIHIEXANCE RESEARCH SBVICES QNADER 6IIOIA SECURITY LAD DIVISIOX 4 ll5PECTION SERVICES 4 SCIENCE STATION SERVICES t ROCURXENT HETER DE SICH, DUMIIY OUMIJY NATERIALS DE SICH, FIELD 4 SHOP BVIROHHEXJM RECORI5 4 TRAINIH6 SIATIOH SECURITY SERVICES CMIRRATION TECH SUPPORTI ASSURANCE CONTROL AND EXDTNEERTX6, CONSTRUCTION, FAIRICATION SCIENCE 4 DOCUXEXT SERVICES OPERATIONS SERVICES 4 NAIHTENANCE ROTATIX6 PROCUREXEXT, DUALIll XDE, L IC05IX6y SERVICES LA!ORATORY CONTROL XAIHTEXARCH, AND ELfCTRIC EOUIPP80 AUDIT 4 ENDIXEERIX6 ISI 4 FUEL CHENJS1RT SBYICES ~ Nt 4 LAR SERVICES QINTEQHCE SURVEII.LANCE SERVICES IOIE INSP MA6ENENT 4 SERVICES, OUM IIV CHENISTRY RELAY TEST k SERV CES SERVICES TECHNICAL RESEARCH 4 SERVICES CONTROL CO5JRUCTIOX SUPPOR'I DEYELOPXEXT TECHHICll SERVICES SERVICES SUPPORTs IESTIH6 QJERIAC CONTROL 4 L JASON EX61HE ERIN6o FIRE tROTECTIDN 4 SAFETY, DPBAIIORAL ASSESSlSIT pigure 2-1 I QUAL TY PERFOR19kNCE ORGANXZATION DEPhRXMENT MANAGER QUAX XTY HKFORMANCE MANhGER NUCLEAR MANAGER QUALITY PERFORMANCE QUALITY ASSURANCE MATERIALS EHQINEERINQ hNALYSES hND ASSURANCE MANhGBR 8c INSPECTION SERVICES HRGRAM SUPPORT QUALITY QUALITY QUALITY MATERIAL a ASSURANCE CONTROL CONTROL MATERIAL HANDLINQ ENGIMHUtS ENGINEERS FOREMAN ENGINEERS Cc FOREMEN TECHNICIANS STAFF Figure 2-2 al R g R GINNA STATION ORGANIZATION 6EHERAL MASER NUCLEAR PRODUCTION PLANT QHAGER STOA STATIOH SUPERIHTEXDEHT SUPERINTENDENT DIVISIOH TRAIXING 6INHA PRODUCTION 6IHXA SUPPORT SERVICES MA6ER TECHNICAL HEALTH PHYSICS OPERATIOXS QIHTEHAMCE NAIHTEHAMCE 61NA TRAINIH6 MA6ER AND/@Md)TRY MA6ER (SRO) MA6ER PLAHHIQQ)PgDULIHG FIRj P fgOjPIOH MASER OPERATIONS REACTOR HEALTH SUPERVISOR (SRO) SUPERVISOR ENGINEER(s) PHYSICISTS NECH NAINT PN AMALTSTS LICENSE TRAIMIM6 SUPERVISOR NECH, ELEC, STEAN GEHERATOR SHIFT SUPERVISDR ISC E HVAC COORDIHATOR RADIATIOX I/SHIFT (SRO) RESULTS! lEST PROTECTIOH SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR FOREM SECTION FORENAM SIlfULAIOR TRAIHIN6 COHTROL RNN PIPE, IHSUL, MELD DISCIPLIHE PLAOERS NODIFICATIOH FOREQN (SRO)+ Iec, ELEG }KcH> SflPPORT l RADIATIOX PROTECIIOX AMD PIPE COORDIQTOR Vf RESULTS 4 TEsl TECHNICIAHS I/SMIFT H.P. 4 CHEN FOREM HEAD CONTROL PIPEFITTER FOREM TRAIHINS COORD I OPERATOR 4 FITTERS I/SHIFT (RO) NAINT STATION TECHXICIAHS 4 RADIOCHENISl EH6IHEER(S) PERFORQHCE COHFI6. TESTERS CONTROL OPERATOR MECHANIC FOREQX MA6ENENT CHEMISTRY l/SHIFT (RO) 4 NECHAHICS CORRECTIVE COORDIMATOR TECHNICIANS DIRECTOR ACTION NAINT SYSTENS COORDIQIOR AUXILARY EIISINEER7$ $ OPERATORS SECTION FOREQH STAFF ASSIST. CHENISl(S) 2/SHIFT SUPPT SRVCS GENERAL EMPLOYEE IHPO/HPRDS SAFETY IRAINING ANALYST COORDINATOR ax SHIFT TEC}NICAL ADVISOR I/SHIFT< CHENISlRY TEC}NICIAHS OPERATIONAL ASSESSMENT SllE SERVICES COORDINATOR QIHT TRN6 0 < fD l. COORDINATOR SPECM PROJECTS DIRECTOR OUTAGE QMAGER PLAHHIN6 FOREM 4 TRNG COORD O 0 MAMDYQH a INSTRUCTORS rr LO C7 Ul

• WHEN KS AVKQGE TEMPERRKRE >200 F NAINT SHOP IKC SUPERVISOR Ql'L, MGER PROCUR.

- AND eUDGET TRNS SYSIENS LD DLDS SERVICES Iec AHD ELEclRIc .MASER FOREQH FORENEH STORES BUDGET 6 PROCUREMENT TECH TRM6 TECMHICIAHS SUPPORT SkCS, S/6 FORE}fEH REPAIR}fEX E ANALYSIS 4 ELECTRICIA}5 EVALUATIONS Figure 2-3 DES16H 6 DEVELOPMENT ZX.SaXRXC XmerSMrSSXOX ~O OXSXRXauX XOX OXVXSXOW VICE PRESIDENT BLECTRIC TIUlNSMISSION Sc DISTRIBUTION SUPERINTENDENT SUPERINHN DENT ELECTRIC METER h ELBCTRIC SUBSTATIONS LABORATORY DEPhRXMQG'ABORATORY MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER SBRVICBS FIELD SERVICES ENGINBERINQ ADMINISTRATIVE AND SHOPS CONSTRUCTION NOTE: Chart is abbreviated to show only RELAY TEST key positions involved in implementing Qh program and therfore, does not show MAINTENANCB all positions in the division. AND TEST QUALITY SERVICES TRAVBLING OPERATORS Figure 2-4 w ~ l 4 ENGINEERING DIVISION ORGANIZATION CHIEF EK6IKEER DIRECTOR SUPT DEPARTHEMT NAHA6ER DIRECTOR NUCLEAR 6EHERAL NAKAGER DIVISIOKAL GEKERAL EM6IHEERIKG NAIHTEKAHCE RESEARCH 4 SERVICES , EH6IKEERIMG SERVICES SCIEHCE SERVICES Hanager Nanager Hanager Cost and Fossil Structural and Shop Operations Environaental Schedule Engineering Construction Science Engineering Manager Docuaent Hydro Field Service Nanager Preparation A Engineering Manager Operations Cheaistry Secretarial Electrical and Project Services Services Facility Engineering Planning Engineering Supervisor Docuaent Hanager Hanager. Environaental Control Real Estate Mechanical Adainistrative Laboratory Nanageaent Engineering Services Ginna Central Senior Records Manager Nanyger Environaental Nuclear Inspect>on/Land Analyst Quality Safety and Survey and Research 4 Services Licensing Building Developaent Services Prograa Technical Inforaation Center Figure 2-5 oC ah 6 XNNA S TATXON RE V XEN A3%3 AVDX T FUNC T XONS NSARB QUALITY PERFORMANCE MATERIALS ELECTRIC ENGINEERING TRANSMISSION PURCHASING GENERAL ENGINEERING GINNA STATION AND INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES DISTRIBUTION REVIEW ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ AUDITS %p ~'