ML17262A283

Rev 16 to QA Program for Station Operation.

ML17262A283
Person / Time
Site:	Ginna
Issue date:	12/31/1990
From:	ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP.
To:
Shared Package
ML17262A282	List: ML17262A281 ML17262A283
References
NUDOCS 9101100235
Download: ML17262A283 (126)

Text

ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION R.E. GINNA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Revision 16 to:

Quality Assurance Program for Station Operation DOCKET NO. 50-244 December, 1990 910ii00235 90i22i PDR ADOCK 05000244 P PDR

~

'f \

W E

( I

'/

~ .

TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Pa<ac QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM FOR STATION OPERATION Quality Assurance Program

2. Organization

3. Design Control 10

4. Procurement Document Control 12

5. Instructions, Procedures and. Drawings 14 6 ~ Document Control 16

7. Control of Purchased Material, Equipment 18 and Services

8. Identification and Control of Materials, 22 Parts and Components

9. Control of Special Processes 23

10. Inspection 24 Test Control 26

12. Control of Measuring and Test Equipment 27

13. Handling, Storage and Shipping 28

14. Inspection, Test and Operating Status 29

15. Nonconforming Materials, Parts and. Components 31

16. Corrective Action 32

17. Quality Assurance Records 33

18. Audits 35 Revision 16 December, 1990

I 1

J Vi

LIST OF TABLES Table Number Title Pa<ac Quality Assurance Program 37 Procedures Subject Listing Procurement Document Requirements 50 18-1 Audit List 51 LIST OF FIGURES Fi ure Number Title Pacae 2-1 Management Organization 55 2-2 Quality Performance Organization 56 Ginna Station Organization 57 2-4 Electric Transmission and Distribution 58 Organization 1 2-5 Engineering Division Organization 59 2-6 Ginna Station Review and Audits 60 Functions Revision 16 December, 1990

1 I

UALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM FOR STATION OPERATION 1.

~ ualit

~

Assura nc e P ro ram The Quality Assurance Program has been developed by the Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation to assure safe and reliable operation of the R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant.

This program applies to all activities affecting the safety related functions of the structures, systems, and components that prevent or mitigate the consequences of postulated accidents that could cause undue risk to the health and safety of the public. These quality affecting activities include operation, maintenance, repair, inservice inspection, refueling, modification, test and inspection.

In addition, the Quality Assurance Program applies to the activities associated with the packaging of licensed radioactive materials to be shipped in accordance with 10 CFR Part 71.

The basic Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation quality assurance policy is established by the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer through the President. This policy is implemented under the overall direction of the Senior Vice President, Production and Engineering, through the Department Manager, Quality Performance; Vice President-Ginna Nuclear Production; the Plant Manager-Ginna Station, Division Manager and Chief Engineer, and heads of other supporting departments.

The program is governed by a Ginna Station Quality Assurance Manual which contains the requirements and assignment of responsibilities for implementation of the program. The manual is prepared, reviewed, and maintained by Quality Performance and approved by the Senior Vice President, Production and Engineering.

The program is implemented through Quality Assurance/Quality Control, Ginna Station, Engineering, General Maintenance, Materials Engineering and Inspection Services, Electric Transmission and Distribution, and Purchasing procedures. These procedures are prepared and approved by the responsible organization and reviewed and concurred with by Quality Performance. The procedures are contained in separate manuals maintained by the responsible organization. All these procedures are reviewed for adequacy at least once every two years by the responsible organization. Table l-l provides a listing of the subjects and a short description of the subject matter which is contained in the procedures.

Revision 16 December 1990

l Organizational interfaces are defined and. controlled by sections of the Quality Assurance Manual. Organizational responsibilities are described in Section 2.

The Quality Assurance Program. covers all existing Seismic Category. X and Class lE structures, systems; and components.,

including their foundations and supports. Activities affecting the quality of these structures, systems, and components are controlled to an extent consistent with their safety significance. A detailed listing of the structures, systems, and components covered by the Quality Assurance.

program and based on Section 3.2. of the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, is contained in the Quality Assur-ance Manual.

Details of the system boundaries and. the quality classi-fication of water-and-steam-containing components are con-tained. on system flow drawings.. The listing of structures, systems-,'nd components. covered by the Quality Assurance Program. are prepared and. maintained by Nuclear Engineerinp Services and. reviewed and. concurred with by- Quality Performance.

Modifications or additions to existing structures, systems, and components: are designated the same seismic classifica=

tion as the existing system. New structures, systems, and components are designated a seismic classification in accordance with the guidelines in USNRC Regulatory Guide 1.29, Revision 3.

Supervisory personnel are indoctrinated in quality assurance policies, manuals, and. procedures. to assure they understand.

that these are mandatory requirements which- must be imple-mented and enforced. Personnel responsible for performing activities affecting quality are, trained. and. indoctrinated in the requirements, purpose, scope, and implementation of.

quality related manuals and procedures. Refresher sessions are held periodically and retraining is required. whenever a new procedure is issued or a major revision is made ta an existing procedure. Training of personnel not in the Quality Performance. organization is the responsibility of.

each department performing an activity affecting quality.

Quality Performance assists in establishing training requirements and. assures that. personnel are trained. by auditing training.

Revision 16 December 1990

I II

In addition to training in quality assurance, each depart-ment conducts training, including on-the-job training, to the extent necessary to assure that personnel are qualified-for their primary work assignments.

The Vice-president, Ginna Nuclear. Production is responsible for the formal training, qualification, licensing, and re-qualification of operators, as necessary. Where necessary, personnel are trained in. radiation protection, plant. safety and security.

The Nuclear Safety Audit and Review Board is required to review the status and adequacy of the Quality Assurance Program at leash once every two years ta assure that it is meaningful and is effectively complying with corporate policy and 10CFR50, Appendix B. This. review consists.by.of audits or a review equivalent to an audit performed company personnel or outside organizations.

The Quality Assurance Program is designed. to meet the.

requirements of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 50, Appendix B, "Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants." The program conforms, to the following- NRC Regulatory Guides and ANSI Standards:

a ~ NRC Regulatory. Guide 1.8, Revision 1, "Personnel Selec-tion and Training."

b. NRC Regulatory Guide 1.28, Revision 2, "Quality Assur-ance Program Requirements (Design and Construction)."

c AEC Regulatory Guide 1.30, Revision 0, "Quality Assurance Requirements far the Installation, Inspection, and Testing of Instrumentation and Electric Equipment."

AEC Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 0, Program Requirements (Operation)," and "Quality'ssurance regulatory staff comments. and supplementary guidance contained in the document entitled "Guidance on Quality Assurance Requirements During the Operations Phase of Nuclear. Power Plants.," Revision 0 dated. October l973 (Orange Book Revision 0)

e. AEC Regulatory Guide 1.37, Revision 0, "Quality Assurance Requirements fox Cleaning of Fluid, Systems.

and Associated Components of Water-Cooled Nuclear Power plants."

Revision 16 December 1990

I I

NRC Regulatory Guide l.38, Revision 2, "Quality Assurance Requirements for Packaging, Shipping, Receiving, Storage, and Handling of Items for Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants."

go NRC Regulatory Guide 1.39, Revision 2, "Housekeeping Requirements for Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants."

h. NRC Regulatory Guide 1.58, Revision 1, "Qualification of Nuclear Power Plant Inspection, Examination and Testin'g Personnel."

NRC Regulatory Guide l.64, Revision 1, "Quality Assurance Requirements for the Design of Nuclear Power Plants." I NRC Regulatory Guide 1.74, Revision 0, "Quality Assurance Terms and Definitions".

k. NRC Regulatory Guide 1.88, Revision 2, "Collection, Storage and Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plant Records."

Note: When record storage facilities are not designed in accordance with the requirements of Regulatory Guide 1.88, duplicate records are kept in two separate storage locations in separate buildings which are physically isolated from each other.

l. NRC Regulatory Guide 1.116, Revision O-R, "Quality Assurance Requirements for Installation, Inspection, and Testing of Mechanical Equipment and Systems."

m. NRC Regulatory Guide l.123, Revision 1, "Quality Assurance Requirements for Control of Procurement of Items and Services for Nuclear Power Plants."

n. ANSI N45.2.12, D3, R4, 2/74 "Requirements for Auditing of Quality Assurance Programs for Nuclear Power Plants."

o. NRC Regulatory Guide 1.146, Revision 0, "Qualification of Quality Assurance Program Audit Personnel for Nuclear Power Plants."

Or anization The major organizations participating in the Quality Assur-ance Program are Purchasing, Engineering, Ginna Nuclear Production, Electric Transmission and Distribution, Quality Revision 16 December 1990

'I l 1

l

Performance, the Plant Operations Review Committee, and the Nuclear Safety Audit and Review Board. Figure 2-1 is an organizational chart showing these organizations and their relationship to the corporate organization.

Positions responsible for the principal elements of the quality assurance program are:

Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer President Senior Vice President, Production and Engineering Vice President, Ginna Nuclear Production Division Manager and Chief Engineer Department Manager, Nuclear Engineering Services Department Manger, Quality Performance, Manager, Quality Assurance Department Manager and Purchasing Agent, Materials Management Plant Manager, Ginna Station Superintendent, Ginna Support Services Superintendent, Ginna Production Department Manager, Production Division Training Manager, Nuclear Assurance Department Superintendent, Electric Substations Department Department Superintendent, General Maintenance Manager, Materials Engineering and Inspection Services Zn addition to the above individuals, two advisory groups are utilized to review and audit plant operations. These groups are the Plant Operations Review Committee and the Nuclear Safety Audit and Review Board. The Plant Operations Review Committee acts in an advisory capacity to the Plant Manager, Ginna Station and the Nuclear Safety Audit and Review Board advises the, Senior Vice President, Production and Engineering. The qualifications of members and the responsibilities of these organizations are described in Section 6.0, Technical Specifications, Appendix A to Provisional Operating License No. DPR-l8.

The Chairman of the Board of the Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation directed the establishment of the Quality Assur-ance Program and issued the governing policy statement. He has established the Nuclear Safety Audit and Review Board to review and audit plant operations. The Chairman of the Nuclear Safety Audit and Review Board is responsible to the President on all activities of the Nuclear Safety Audit and Review Board.

Revision 16 December 1990

'I 1

1 I

The Senior Vice President, Production and Engineering reports to the President and has corporate responsibility for operation of Ginna Station in accordance with applicable regulatory requirements. In addition, he has overall responsibility and authority for directing the Quality Assurance Program and shall be responsible for the approval of the Quality Assurance Manual. He is responsible for establishing the policies and requirements necessary to assure safe and reliable operation of Ginna Station. He is also responsible for those items delineated in Section 6.0, Technical Specifications.

The Vice President, Ginna Nuclear Production is responsible to the Senior Vice President, Production and Engineering for directing Ginna nuclear production activities and those support activities associated with Nuclear Engineering Services, Production Systems and Services, Production Division Training, and Corporate Radiation Protection.

The Division Manager and Chief Engineer is responsible for supervising the Engineering Division which is responsible for safety related maintenance, repair and modifications performed at the General Maintenance facility and for support of these activities at Ginna Station. He maintains Divisional Services which is responsible for providing records maintenance, document control, schedule and administrative support services to the Engineering Division and other organizations as appropriate. Divisional Services also includes the preparation of General Maintenance and Engineering procedures (Table l-l) for the training of the of the corresponding personnel in the implementation of these procedures. Divisional Services is also responsible for coordinating the processing of replies to audit reports for the departments using these procedures.

The Department Manager, Nuclear Engineering Services is responsible to the Vice President, Ginna Nuclear Production for designing and constructing major modifications in accordance with applicable design bases, regulatory requirements, codes and standard and for nuclear fuel management. ,As requested by Ginna Station, he is also responsible for reviewing unique maintenance and repair procedures for major equipment.

Revision 16 December 1990

1 l I l 1

J

The Department Manager, Quality Performance is responsible for establishing the overall Quality Assurance Program. He is r'esponsible for assuring that all planned and systematic actions necessary to provide adequate confidence that Ginna Station will operate safely and reliably are established and followed. He provides management with objective information concerning quality, independent of the individual or group directly responsible for performing the specific activity.

He has the authority and organizational freedom to assure all necessary quality activities are performed. In addition, he is responsible for special processes and the inservice inspection program. He is responsible for maintaining a staff, Figure 2-2, for the conduct of staff training and for directing its activities. The staff assists in the preparation and maintenance of the Quality Assurance/Quality Control Procedures Manual.

The Manager, Quality Assurance reports to the Department Manager, Quality Performance. He and the Quality Assurance Staff are responsible for formulating corporate quality assurance policy and for assuring its implementation. This includes writing Quality Assurance policies, assuring that the program satisfies the requirements of 10CFR50, Appendix B, and for maintaining the total program up to date. The Manager, Quality Assurance is also responsible for establishing and implementing a comprehensive audit and surveillance program, as well as, reviewing administrative procedures of the organizations participating in the Quality Assurance Program. The staff is also responsible for auditing and surveillance of aspects of the Quality Assurance Program and for ensuring significant conditions adverse to quality are corrected. They are responsible for assuring that proper codes, standards, and quality requirements are specified in design, procurement. and installation documents. They are responsible for assuring that the suppliers of safety-related material, equipment and services are properly qualified, and they are responsible for conducting audits and surveillances at these supplier's facilities. In addition, the staff assists the Manager, Quality Assurance, in the preparation of the audit, schedule, audit status reports and applicable corrective action report summaries.

The Manager, Quality Assurance is a graduate engineer with at least six years of responsible experience, of which two years are in quality assurance and three years in the design or operation of nuclear power plants.

Revision 16 December 1990

1 The Manager, Materials Engineering and Inspection Services is responsible for supervi ing and directing a staff. which is responsible for the development. and qualification of procedures utilized for special processes. He is responsible for providing functional guidance and direction for those methods:. He is responsible for establishing. the lnservice inspection Program and for coordinating changes thereto. He is also responsible for the routine maintenance of lifting and handling equipment and. foz the testing and.

evaluation of Ginna Station materials.

The Department. Manager and Purcha ing Agent, Materials Management. is responsible for. the. procuzement of matezials, services, and components, from qualified suppliers, in accordance with applicable: commercial, technical, and quality requizements.. He maintains a. listing. of qualifieL suppliers determined through an evaluation made by Purchasing, Engineering, Quality Assurance and the other involved departments. as appropriate..

The Plant Manager, Ginna Station is responsible to the Vice President, Ginna Nuclear Production for the overall on-site safe operation of Ginna. Station. He is responsible for the performance of all Ginna Station quality affecting activities in accordance with the requirements of the quality assurance program. He is responsible for pzoviding qualified personnel to perform these activities in accordance with approved drawings, specifications, and procedures. He is also responsible foz those items delineated in Section 6.0, Technical Specifications.

The Superintendent, Ginna Support Services reports ta the Plant Manager, Ginna Station and is primarily responsible for the performance of modification, support maintenance, and fire protection activities in accordance with the requirements. of. the QualMy Assurance Program.

The Superintendent Ginna Production reports to the Plant Manager, Ginna Station, and is responsible for operations.,

health physics and. chemistry, refueling., results. and tests technical engineering, surveillance testing and operational assessment in accordance with the requirements of the quality assurance. program.

The Plant Manager, Ginna Station and Superintendents. are assisted by other designated staff members, Figure 2-3, in the implementation. of certain Quality Assuzance Program requirements at the plant. These staff members are assigned.

Revision 16 December 1990

l l I

responsibility for testing, storage of'aterial and equipment,-. operation and. test status control,, calibration and control of measurin'g and test equipment, maintenance of material handling equipment, and control of all activities involving operation, maintenance, repair, refueling and.

modi ficati on.

The Department Manager, Production Division Traizzing is responsible to the Vice. President, Ginna Nuclear Production for maintaining and implementing azz INPO accredited training program+

The Manager, Nuclear Assurance reports ta the Department Manager, Quality Performance and is respozzsible for. assuring that station activities affecting quality are prescribed and.

carried out in accordance. with approved drawings, specifica.

tions, and procedures. He is a member of the Plant Operations Review Committee and delegates- the day to day quality assurance. and control planning and work monitoring responsibilities to his staff of Quality Control Engineers; a staff QA Engineer and QC Inspectors. The Quality Control Engineers and the staff QA Engineer are responsible for: the review of desigzz and installation documezzts and for the review of plant procedures- which involve maintezzance, repair, refueling, modification, and. testing. The. Quality Control Foreman is responsible for the coordizzation of inspection activities and the assurance that inspection requirements are included. in approved. procedures at Ginna Station and shop work travelers at General Maintenance.

This includes the receipt inspection of incoming materials, parts and components and the processing of nonconformance.

reports at Ginna Station and the General Naintezzance shops..

The Nuclear Assurance Quality Control Inspectors also perform compliance. oriented surveillance of nuclear. related.

activities.

The Department Superintendent, General Maintezzance, is responsible for supervising and directing. a staff, Figure. 2-5, which supervises the performazzce of safety'elated maintenance, repair and modificatiozz activities performed at the General. Maintenance. facility. He is also responsible for providing trained and qualified. welders, riggers and crane operators for the support of Ginna activities.

The Department Superintendent. Electric Substations.

Departmezzt is responsible for directing a staff, Figure 2-4 which is responsible for providing relay engineering, maintenance. and testing services.. He is also. responsible.

Revision X6 December 1990

I I II i I IR

for design, modification and construction activities at Station 13A and for supporting the Nuclear Engineering Services design and construction activities at Ginna. He is also responsible for coordinating and for providing support documentation for any design modifications initiated within the Electric Transmission. and. Distribution Division.

3 ~ Desi n Control Design activities are performed by Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation personnel. or are subcontracted to organizations providing services ta Rochester Gas and Electric.

Nuclear Engineering. Services is responsible for the design and control of design activities (including design.

interfaces) for major modifications of. structures, systems or components.

Augmenting this effort is the design and technical support provided by the Electric Substations. Department for those activities for which Electric Transmission and. Distribution is responsible. Xn this regard they support. Nuclear Engineering Services for design of safety related modifications. J Ginna Station is responsible for the design and control of design activities for Minor modifications of structures, systems, or components. Ginna. Station is also responsible.

for classifying station originated modifications. as either Major or Minor. Nuclear Engineering Services reviews and concurs with modifications being classified. as Minor. Minor modifications typically involve (1) component changes which involve vendor design and are limited tc the extent that the change does not impact existing- per+ormanca requirements.,

(2) additions within Seismic Category. I buildings. which perform no safety'unctions and. which neither interface with Seismic Category I or Class 1E items nor whose failure. could.

reduce the functioning of any. safety related component required for safe shutdown of the plant to an unacceptable.

level, (3) changes to a safety related system determined not to be major (i.e., vents, drains, alarms, indicating lights.,

etc.).

Design control is implemented- by means of procedures which include: design considerations, design review requirements; internal and external interface control considerations; design document. review, approval, distribution., control, and Revision 16 Decemb..r 1990

I I

revision requirements; and corrective action. Design con-siderations include,. as appropriate: physics, stress, materials, thermal, hydraulic, radiation, and accident analysis; appropriate design bases, codes, standards and regulations; acceptability for operation, maintenance and.

repair; acceptance and rejection criteria.; and. quality standards and other quality assurance requirements. Design verification utilizes various methods such- as formal design-reviews, alternate. calculations, or tests, as appropriate, to assure the adequacy of the design.

The design of plant modifications is verified. by an engineer.

other than the one who performed. the origina design. Por Major modification design, this may; be done by Nuclear Engineering Services design engineers or- consulting engineers as requested. For Minor modification. station design, this may be done by Ginna Station, Nuclear Engineering Services'esign engineers or consulting engineers, as appropriate Spare or replacement parts must at least meet the original.

equipment's technical and quality requirements-. For plant modifications, standard, "off-the-shelf", commercial. or pre-viously approved materials, parts, and equipment. are selected and reviewed for suitability of application by a design engineer.

Changes to a modification design are normally reviewed and.

approved in accordance with the same procedures as the original modification design. Supplemental procedures are; established for the review and approval of field changes.

In general, design changes. including field changes; are reviewed and. approved by the organizations or individuals that. performed, reviewed and approved: the original design.

Where this is not practical, other responsible design organizations or individuals are designated, provided they have access to pertinent background information and are com-petent, in the specific design area.

Design verification and field. change systems are methods.

utilized. to detect, document. and correct.. design process errors and deficiencies. In addition, the corrective action system, described. in Section X6, is utilized.to control and document corrective action to preclude- recurrence. of thorn design process errors and deficiencies which are considered to be a significant, condition.. adverse; to quality.,

Revision 16 December 199Q

I 4

I Quality Assurance is responsible for assuring that design control. procedures, whether the work .is done by Rochester Gas and Electric or by other organizations, are prepared and implemented and incorporate appropriate design control practices, checks, and reviews. Design control procedures are reviewed to assure that an independent verification is performed.

Engineering and Ginna Station are responsible for establishing measures for the proper control of design documents and revisions there-to, to assure that distribution is to responsible individuals and in a timely manner to prevent inadvertent use of superseded design information. The measures include the use of document revision levels, document transmittals, release stamps, field change request forms and distribution lists.

Design documents are collected, stored, and maintained in accordance with Section, 6 and 17, as appropriate. Design documents include design criteria, analyses, specifications, drawings, design review records, and changes thereto.

Quality Performance, through preparation assistance and/or review, assure the proper inclusion of quality standards in the design of major and minor modifications. Quality Performance is also responsible for assuring that adequate test, examination and inspection requirements are included in specifications.. The Manager, Quality Assurance reviews and approves any deviations from quality standards when they occur ~

Plant modifications are controlled by means of applicable Ginna Station, Engineering, Electric Transmission and Distribution, and Quality Assurance/Quality Control proce-dures. These procedures provide for the preparation, review, and approval of design documents, safety analyses, and plant modification procedures. Plant modifications are reviewed by the Plant Operations Review Committee and Nuclear Safety Audit and Review Board as required by Section 6.0, Technical Specifications.

Procurement Document Control Procurement document control applies to the control of procurement documents for materials, parts, components, and services required to perform quality affecting activities.

Such documents may be prepared by Rochester Gas and Electric.

or by a contractor and include purchase requisitions, Revision 16 December 1990

I purchase orders, service agreements, contracts, specifications, and drawings.

Procurement of materials, parts, components, and. services is initiated by department staff personnel. Procurement proce-dures require that organizations preparing procurement documents consider. and. include., as. appropriate, the items listed in Table 4-1.

Procurement documents, including. those. requesting. spare or replacement parts, initiated. at Ginna. Station. are; reviewed.

by Quality Performance and approved by. the designated Ginna.

Station supervision. Procurement documents'nitiated in Nuclear Engineering. Services., Materials. Engineering and.

Inspection Services, Electric Transmission and Distribution.,

General Maintenance and; Quality Assurance are reviewed by Quality Performance and. approved by designated. departmental.

supervision.

Evidence of review and apprcxval of procurement documents is recorded on the documents. and. identifies. to Purchasing a.

procurement method which will ensure that the selected supplier is capable of providing the item or service in accordance with the requirements of the procurement documents. Considerations used in se3ecting a supplier and for determining the corresponding procurement method are described in Section 7.

After purchase reqUisitions, service agreements, contracts, specifications, and drawings have received the required re-views and approvals, a purchase order isissued by, Purchasing to the selected supplier and contro?led as described in Section 7. These documents. are maintained by Purchasing, by the originating department; and/or by. the receiving locations, as appropriate, until procurement is completed.

Under no circumstances are purchasing requirements altered (except for quantity" or pricing) during order. placement.

unless review and concurrence is obtained from those: who were required to review, concur with, and. approve the original documents as described above. Changes or revisions to procurement documents. are subject to the same review and approval requirements as the original. documents.

Revision 16 December 1990

C originating department technical review of procurement documents includes verification of applicable regulatory, code and design requirements. Quality Performance review of the above includes checks to verify proper inclusion. of the quality standards, quality assurance program requirements, method, of. procurement and the applicable acceptance criteria. Ginna Station Procurement, Materials and Budget organization reviews procurement documents for spare or replacement parts to determine. similarity, compatibility,.

and acceptance criteria of the original design. Quality Performance also reviews procurement documents for spare or replacement parts for adequacy of the quality requirements.

Instructions Procedures and Drawin s.

Each Rochester. Gas and Electric company organization, involved in quality related'ctivities., is responsible for developing, reviewing, approving', and. implementing procedures as required to implement. the Quality Assurance Program. These procedures cover activities, such. as document control, training of personnel, and responsibilities and duties of personnel. Quality Performance reviews and concurs with these procedures. Table 1-1 provides a summary.

of the subject matter contained in the procedures which are used to implement the quality assurance program.

Procurement. documents. require. suppliers and. contractors to have appropriate instructions, procedures, specifications.,

and drawings.

Ginna Station is, responsible for providing and implementing instructions. and procedures associated with operation, maintenance, repair, in-service- inspection, refueling, modification, and. testing. This includes instructions and.

procedures listed in USAEC Regulatory Guide 1.33 for administrative control; general plant operation; startup, operation, and shutdown of safety related. systems; correction of'bnormal, off normal, or alarm conditions, response to emergencies and other significant events; radioactivity control; control of measuring and test.

equipment; chemical and radiochemiczl control; and and refueling. Ginna Station is responsible for fuel'andling appropriate changes. to such documents. upon. receipt of regulatory directives, instructions from Rochester Gas and.

Electric management, or the completion of plant:

Revision 16 December 1990

I I

I

>iodifications. Ginna Station is also responsible for. the preparation and'ssuance of those minor modification design documents not provided by Nuclear Engineering Services or the equipment supplier.

General Maintenance is responsible for providing and for implementing procedures associated with shop work required to support Ginna Station maintenance, repair and. modifica-tion activities'.

Electric Transmission and Distribution is responsible for the preparation and. implementation. of relay inspection anc1 testing procedures as required to direct detailed inspec-tions and testing activities for which they are responsible.

Electric Transmission and:. Distribution. also. assists in the preparation of routine relay maintenance and testing procedures used by their personnel in the annual Ginna Station protective. relay surveillance. program.

Nuclear Engineering Services is responsible for providing approved specifications,,and drawings associated with major modifications. and when minor modifications. necessitate drawings or specifications. These documents require those performing. the work to obtain, understand, and: comply with appropriate. procedures, specifications,and. drawings.

Engineering has established procedures for revising drawings and specifications. These procedures cover updating of as-built drawings'fter plant modifications. and. the. revision,.

approval, distribution, and. control of all drawings and specifications.',

Quality Performance is responsible for the preparation auX implementation of inspection procedures utilized for detailed inspection activities at Ginna Station and; General.

Maintenance. This organization is responsible for providing and for implementing procedures for audit and surveillance related activities. ln addition, it is responsible for providing ancL for implementing instructions and. procedures.

associated with special processes, routine maintenance and inspection of cranes and handling equipment. as well as materials. testing and. inservice. inspection..

Persons preparing and. approving documents are responsible for assuring that specifications, instructions, procedures, and. drawings. include appropriate. quantitative. or qualitative acceptance criteria for determining. that'mportant activities have been satisfactorily accomplished and assuring that the. documents are, kep< current.

Revision 16 December 1990

J k

Indoctrination and training of personnel is provided by the responsible organizations to ensure that quality affecting activities are conducted in accordance. with, established documents. In addition, Quality Performazzce department surveillance and audit as described in Section 10 and Section 18 are used to verify that quality, affecting.

activities are being performed in accordance'ith approved instructions, procedures and, drawings.

Document Control.

Procedures are established to contm3. the is uazzce of pro-cedures, instructions, drawings, and specifications.

Standard document. control requirements are contained. in. the.

Quality Assurance Manual. The Plant Manager, Ginna Statiozz is responsible for the control of all documents. issued. at Ginna Station. Electric Transmission. and. Distribution. is responsible for the control of documents issued by their organization. Divisional Services, controls the distribution of contralled manuals issued. for Engineering, General Maintenance, Materials. Engineering and Inspection Services, Quality Assurance/Quality Control, Purchasing azzd. Electric Transmission and. Distribution (Table 1-1). Each organization controlling documents. has a separate procedure to control documents in accordance with the requirements of the Quality Assurance Manual.

The Quality Assurance Manual designates responsibilities and defines requirements for the preparatiozz, review and approval of documents. Each department. responsible. for an activity is responsible for. providing the necessary review and approval of instructions, procedures or drawings to assure that they are. adequate, and. include appropriate.

qualitative and quantitative requirements. Nuclear Assurance Quality Control representatives, assigned to support departmental. maintenance, repair, refueling. and.

modification activities, review governing procedures, prior to use, to assure quality assurance requirements are included. The Plant Operations Review Committee. has. the.

responsibility for reviewing Ginna Statiozz procedures prior to their approval as required by Section 6.0, Technical Specifications. Detailed, inspection, test and. examination.

procedures used by qualified personnel require. the review and concurrence of the responsible technical person associated with that activity. Ginna. Station, General Maintenance, Engineering, Material Engineering and.

Inspection Services, Purchasing, and Electric Transmission and Distribution quality assurance implementing. procedures.

Revision 16 D cember 1990

4' (Table 1-1) require the review and concurrence of Quality

.Performance and the approval of the appropriate department supervisor ~

Quality Assurance /Quality Control procedures are approved. by the Department Manager, Quality'erformance or designee.

The Quality Assurance Manual requires. that documents be controlled as appropriate, considering the type of document.

involved, its importance to safety, and the intended. use. of the document. It specifies the types, of. documents which.

must be controlled; identifies the difference between con-trolled and uncontrolled copies of the same document.',<<

includes the method. for identifying holders. of controlled.

copies; requires that only controlled copies of a document.

be used for official purposes; requires: that lists of effective revisions be issued periodically; requires lists.

of document holders to be maintained by the distributors; and requires that distributors transmit controlled documents using approved forms internally and. externally.

Types of documents which are controlled include Technical Specifications, UFSAR, Quality Assurance, Manual, procedures (such as engineering, purchasing, repair., maintenance, test, calibration, fuel handling; modification, and administrative), specifications and drawings. Suppliers of materials, equipment, and services are required, in. procure-ment documents to provide for control of documents, including manufacturing, inspection and testing instructions.

The Quality Assurance Manual further requires that each organization provide in its procedures for measures: to assure that documents. are available when required; to pro-perly review and approve docunrents such as procedures, instructions, specifications., and drawings; to provide the same reviews and. approvals for changes to documents. as. was required'f the original document; ter require that orgaxzi,za-tions which review and approve documents have access to pertinent information and. adequate. knowledge. of the. original.

document intent; to assure that approved changes are promptly transmitted for incorporation into documents- and to assure that obsolete or superseded.,djocuments are eliminated from the system and not. used.

Quality Performance is responsible for review and concurrence of procurement. documents for a31. procuring organizations and, therefore, procurement document control Revision. 16 December 1990

7 I f

requirements.

Quality Performance is responsible for review, inspection surveillance, and audit, as appropriate, of document control systems to assure adequate-systems are implemented.

Control oK Purchased. Material E i nt and. Services, Procurement documents, supplier selection., planning for item or service acceptance, control of supplier performance and acceptance of items and. services. are five major means used in controlling purchased material, equipment aad services.

All procurement is conducted in accordance with procurement documents as stated in Section 4. All reviews, inspections, surveillances, and audits are conducted by" personnel who are competent in establishing whether or not a supplier is capable of. providing acceptable, quality products.

Procurement planning is utilized by the procuring organiza-tions for determining the methods to be used for acceptance of the item or sezvice as wel3, as requirements for the control of the supplier performance. Source iaspectzon (surveillance), certificate of conformance, receipt inspec-tion and post installation test are methods, which are considered for item. acceptance with receipt inspection utilized in the acceptance of all items. In lieu"of these methods, acceptance of services is based on either or a combination of: (1) surveillance of the activity and. (2) review of objective evidence for conformance to the procure-ment document requirements (i.e. certifications, stress.

reports etc.). The extent of the acceptance methods- and. as-sociated verificatioa activities will vary and be a function of the relative importaace and complexity. of the. purchased item or service and the suppliers past per&>rmance.

Consideration for the control of supplier. performance.

includes. the, necessity for document. submittals or surveillance, and under what situation the supplier is to report nonconformances.

Results of the. planniag aze incorporated. in the procurement documents.

Selection of a supplier is based on the evaluation of its capability to provide the item or services in accordance with the requirements of the'rocurement documents. The.

evaluation which is accomplished during. the procurement Revision 16 December 1990

I I

planning, determines the necessity for the supplier selection to.be from the approved suppliers list maintained by Purchasing. Purchasing utilizes the approved suppliers list as the selection. source for those suppliers found. to have a satisfactory quality assurance progranr. The evaluation guidelines for source selection. considers the item complexity, method(s) of acceptance and for a replacement item., if the source is to be restricted to the original supplier. For engineered and off-the-shelf items procured. from suppliers required to have a quality assurance program, supplier selection is from the approved suppliers lists or one who is in the process of being added to a list, after having its capability evaluated to purchaser satisfaction. Xtems or services which meet industry.

standards and are typically utilized in applications other than nuclear may be purchased.. from suppliers not listed. on.

the approved suppliers list provided that item acceptance can be based on acceptance of standard commercial quality which. is supplemented, as necessary, with source.

surveillance, pre- or post-installation tests, receipt tests, commercial supplier test reports commercial supplier certificates, or receipt inspection. Xtems or services which have nuclear quality requirements which normally require the supplier to implement a quality assurance program but'or which no such supplier can be practicably utilized may also be purchased from suppliers not listed on the approved suppliers list provided that verification of nuclear quality can. be accomplished. by methods such as source surveillance, pre- or post-installation.

tests, supplier test reports, supplier certificates, tests,'eceipt or receipt inspection as approved: by Quality Assurance.

Departmental procedures establish guidelines for evaluations and for documenting the. results sour'election through. indication of the corresponding procurement. method The purchase requisition will also identify the source when replacement parts are to be procured from. the original equipment. supplier..

Addition of a supplier to the approved suppliers list is based on satisfactory. evaluation of the supplier's capability by Quality Assurance, Purchasing- and. other departments, as appropriate.

For engineered items., Nuclear Engineering Services is responsible for evaluating the. overall design or capability of the supplier including his ability to produce. the design, service,

'anufacturing particular technical item, or component; delineated in the: procurement documents..

Revision 16 December 1990

I

\

~

!f

As part of this review, the supplier s design. capabilities, machinery capabilities, handling capabilities, testing facilities, service capabilities, and experience are reviewed.

Quality Assurance is responsible for evaluating the supplier.'s overall quality assurance organization and program in accordance with applicable codes, standards, applicable parts of lQCPR50 Appendix B, and Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation requirements.. The review includes consideration of: company organization, quality assurance personnel qualifications, review and control of design documents,, manufacturing procedures, quality assurance procedures, calibration practices, acceptance criteria, required quality assurance records and, their retention, and quality assurance requirements and controls, imposed by the.

supplier on his subcontractors; Supplier evaluation is conducted by means of procedures or checklists which identify applicable regulatory or code quality assurance requirements".

Ginna Station, Quality Performance and Electric, Transmission.

and. Distribution. evaluate the suppliers of: inspection. test, and calibration services which they intend to use.

The departments responsible for performing supplier evalu-ations shall document their results in reports.. which. discuss areas investigated, findings, and: conclusions. As applicable, concurrence of'urchasing, Nuclear Engineering Services, Quality Perf orarance, Ginna. Station., General.

Maintenance, and Electric Transmission and Distribution is required to place a supplier on the qualified.

One organization can. remove a supplier from the U.st suppliers'ist.

without concurrence of the others.

Measures are established by. Nuclear Engineering Services and Quality Assurance. to control supplier. performance. for engineered items. These measures typically include the processing of change information, surveillance of supplier activities and the control, of documents exchanged. with the supplier. En addition, each department procuring off-thee-shelf items or services establishes- similar measures, for. the control of supplier. performance. With the exception..of processing change information, the need for and applicable extent of. purchaser controls of the. supplier aze. determined during procurement planning.

Revision 16 December 1990

I 4

0

Quality Assurance is responsible for determining and documenting the degree of supplier surveillance .(including review, inspection, or, audi t) required during design, fabrication, inspection, testing, and shipping, and for providing the required: surveillance. The objective of supplier surveillance is to provide a sampling review ofof- the supplier's quality assurance program implenentation. and product conformance with respect to the purchase:- order requirements. For complex engineered. items, Quality Assurance and Nuclear Engineering Services are responsible for joint development of surveillance. plans in advance of surveillance trips to identify areas. to be reviewed.

The results of the surveillance trip are documented by. means of inspection sheets or trip reports which are distributed to the Manager, Quality Assurance, and. the; depaxtmenC which.

initiated the procurement. Shen a deviation from purchase order requirements. is noted, the Quality Assurance represen-tative has the authority to inform the vendor that a particular item is unacceptable, to issue a nonconformance report, or to stop work, if necessary.

Quality Performance. is responsible for surveillance of Ginna.

Station site contractors to assure that they meet. all technical and quality requirements. The reporting and documenting- of contractor surveillance- is managed in a manner similar to supplier surveillance.

The verification methods for the acceptance of items and services axe specified. on the attached, procurement. contxol.

form during procurement planning ance the purchase requisition preparation..

Department. supervision is responsible for receiving and.

storing items pending their acceptance. Upon receipt, the department stockkeeper logs the item, places a "hold" tag on the item, and notifies Quality Performance that the item has arrived.

Quality Performance is responsible for receipt inspection at Ginna. Station and General Maintenance. upon; delivexy of items and associated services for maintenance, repair, modification, and refueling. This inspection includes the use of written procedures or checklists. to verify. that the items and services conform to the procurement documents (if this has not been performed by source inspections) and that documentary evidence of conformance- is available at the plant prior to installation or use. Documentary. evidence sufficient to identify the codes,. standards- or, Revision 16 December 1990

l J

~~

I'

specifications met. by the purchased material, .equipment, and.

services is retained. In the event a final source inspection for the acceptance is conducted prior to receipt by RG&E, Quality Performance performs an inspection for .

shipping damage or lost parts. and a document check to assure that the required documentation has been reviewed and is complete. A receiving inspection. checklist is completed. far all items received ta document the extent of the inspection performed, including the documents checked, and, the inspection results..

If the item and documentation are adequate, Qua1ity Performance, labels the item as "Accepted", files the documentation and receipt inspection results., and releases the item for. storage or use. If the item. is nonconforming or the documentation is unsatisfactory; Quality Performance initiates controls. on. the item in: accordance with Section.

l5.

All it:ems issued must. bear an acceptance'ag and have. docu-mentatian. to support: the acceptahi1ity of the item. In the event the traceability is lost or the documentation review is unsatisfactory, the item. becomes nonconforming and may not be released. for use.

Identification and Control of Materials Parts. and WE The identification. and contra1 of materials, parts, and components is accomplished in accordance with written requirements and applies to material, parts, or components in any stage of fabrication., storage, oz installation..

Identification and control requirements are established by either an existing procedure or requirements documents: which are prepared during the planning stages of a project. The identification and control requirements cover items such as:

traceability to associated documents such as drawings, specifications, purchase orders., manufacturing test data,. and.

inspection documents, and physical and chemical mill test reports; specification of the degree of. identification to preclude a degradation of the item's functional. capability or quality; and the proper identification of materials, parts, and components prior to release for manufacturing, shipping, construction, and. installation.

Revision 16 December 1990

Nuclear Engineering Services and Quality Performance are responsible for assuring that drawings and. specifications .

contain. appropriate requirements. for the identification and.

contro3. of materia3.s, parts, or components, as appropriate.

Suppliers are required to assure that. all required documentation, for an. item.'is properly identified and,related to the item. Each item is required to be physically identified, either by marking on the item or by tags.

Physical identification. hy purchase.. order number is. used to the maximum extent. possible for relating an item at any time-to applicable. documentation. Identification is either on the item or records traceable. to the; item. Where= physical identification is impractical, physical separation, procedural contzo3., or other appropriate means are employed.

The Plant Manager, Ginna. Station is. responsible. for main-taining identification and. contrcrl of materials', parts., or components received, stored, installed,, and used at the plant. Procedures. covering the. identification. and. control of materials, parts, and components at the p3.ant are approved by the Plant Manager., Ginna, Station. The responsib3e supezvision. of. other. departments which, receive material which is to be stored away from the plant are responsible for establishing procedures for identification and control and for maintaining identification. and. contzol of material, parts, or components, stored. or used in their area. of responsibility.

In the event: that traceability is lost. for a specific. item, it is handled as nonconfarming materia3. and deviations and waivers are controlled and documented in accordance with Section 15.

Control of S ial Processes-Written procedures are established. to contro3. special pra-cesses, such as welding, heat treating, and nondestructive examination to assure compliance with applicable codes, standards, and design specifications. Qualification of personnel and special. process procedures compliea with the requirements of applicable codes .and standards. When pecial process qualification requirements are not included in existing codes and standards, they are described in.

procedures which give details of the- special process, the personnel qualification requirements, the equipment.

necessazy, and the special process. qualification.

requirements.

Revision 16 December 1990

Initiators of procurement activities are responsible for requiring suppliers, in procurement documents; to control special processes in accordance with the above requirenzezzts; Quality Performance personnel are responsible for. reviewing procurement documents to ensure that. requirements. for control of special processes are included.

Rochester Gas and Electric procedures for special processes are prepared, reviewed, and approved by Materials.

Engineering and Inspectiorz Services; Special, process.

procedures submitted by suppXiers: and contractors are reviewed and concurred. with by Materials. Engineexing and.

Inspection Services.

The Manager, Nuclear Assurance and Ginna Station Maintenance Managers are responsible. for assuring that personnel per-forming special processes under their cognizance are qua3.i-fied and are using qualified procedures in accordance with applicable codes, specifications, and. standards.. Within the Quality Performance Department, the Mazzager, Materials Engineering and Inspection, Services is responsible: for the qualification of NDE personnel and. procedures. The Managez, Materials Engineering and Inspection Services is responsible for the qualification of welding procedures and the training and qualification of welders. Records for persmmel and procedures to demonstrate that; required qualifications have been obtained and kept current are maintained by Divisional Services at Ginna Station.

Quality Performance performs surveillance, inspections, and audits of special processes performed by Rochester Gas and Electric or contractors to assure effective compliance. with procedures.

Ins ection Procedures prepared. for the control of activities include.

inspection requirements and hold points. as required by drawings, instructions, requirements documents; specifi-cations, codes, standards., or regulatory requirements Pox clarification and. to distizzguish. from prevezrtive maintenance inspections, the following cozztrols are associated with the quality assurance. function. inspections. and. referred to as.

verification inspections. Instrzzctions for conducting detailed verification inspections are contained, in inspection procedures. These inspection. procedures. and. all supporting- specifications ant drawings are provided to inspection personnel for use prior to performing',the Revision 16 December 1990

n inspection. Inspection requirements and hold points. are.

utilized to verify conformance of activities to the for documented instructions, specifications, and drawings accomplishing. the activity. Inspection procedures. includa the identification of quality characteristics to be inspected, a description of the method of inspection to be used, the identification. of the group responsible for per-forming the inspection, the acceptance and rejection criteria, the requirements for the recording evidence of inspection results, and. the requirements for providing, of, completion and certification of the inspection'activity.

Verification inspections are performed by qualified inspec-tion personnel. who are independent of the pezsonne3 performing'he work. Outside contractors are required by procurement documents to have and follow similar procedures and to use independent inspectors. Inspectors. aze sufficiently trained to adequately evaluate the activity they are inspecting.

Quality Performance. personnel are responsible for performing verification inspections, as required, during plant operation, maintenance, repair, in-service inspection, refueling, modification, and.. testing when. the work is performed by Rochester Gas and Electric personnel. When the work is performed. by outside contractors, Quality Performance is responsible for surveillance of the subcontractor's inspection activities. Inspection. equipment is calibrated and controlled in accordance with Section 12.

Calibration status. is verified by inspection personnel. prior to performing an inspection operation..

In the event an inspection of processed material or products is impossible or impzactical, indirect contza3.. by monitoring processing methods, equipment, and personnel is provided.

Both inspection and process monitoring are required. when control is inadequate without. both.,

Quality Performance is responsible for the adequate inclusion of inspection requirements

/

in specifications.

The Manager, Nuclear Assurance is responsible for assuzing that adequate inspection requirements and hoXd points are included in maintenance., repair, refueling, modification and:

testing instzuctions. and procedures. He is. also responsible.

for the assignment of qualified personnelandrequired for the performance of verification. inspections quality control suzveillances of quality affecting activities Revision 16 December. 1990

~

'I

The Manager, Nuclear Assurance is also responsible for assuring that adequate inspection requirements-are included in procedures, instructions and/or checklists controlling maintenance, modification and. repair activities. and related fabrication processes at the General Maintenance facility.

With the exception of that which pertains to Pump and Valve Testing, the Manager, Materials Engineering and Inspection Services is responsible for establishing the requirements.

for the. Insezvice Inspection, Program. Pngineering. is responsible for establishing the requirements for the Inservice Pump and Valve Testing Program. The program for insexvice inspection of,the reactor coolant system and. other safety related systems is contained in Section 4.2, Technical Specifications.

Test Control Checks or testing performed to verify the adequacy of-corrective or preventive maintenance- shall be performed to approved instructions, praceduzes., or drawings.

Whenever testing is required to demonstrate that a material, part, component, or system will perform- satisfactorily in service, a test program is instituted employing written and.

approved procedures which are in accordance with basic requirements established in Technical Specifications, draw-ings, instructions, procuzement documents:, specifications.,

codes, standards, and regulatory requirements. The test program requires the identification, contr>6, and documen-tation of all, tests, and the. preparation of. written proce-dures required for satisfactory. accomplishment of the testing. Written test procedures. and. checklists. include:

necessary test. equipment and. calibration requirements.;

material requirements.; test personnel requirerrexxts; prerequisite- plant. and equipment conditions; limiting condi-tions; detailed performance instzuctions fo'z the.. testing method and test equipment instrumentation; acceptance and; rejection criteria; instructions for disposition. of deviations; data. collection requirements.; and. test result.

approval.

The Plant Manager, Ginna Station is responsible. for the station. test program., which includes. the; surveillance tea<

program required by Section 4.0, Technical Specifications and testing associated with modifications.,

Revision 16 December 1990

Test procedures are prepared. by the plant staff, reviewed by the Plant Operations Review Committee and Quality Performance, and approved by the Plant Manager, Ginna Station. The Plant Manager., Ginna. Station is responsible for the correct and timely performance of the required tests utilizing written and approved procedures. When contractors are employed for tests., the contractor is required to perform testing'n accordance with its quality assurance program requirements. All test results are required ta be documented, reviewed, and approved by those responsible for performing the test.

When requested by Ginna Station, Electric Transmission and Distribution performs test activities to determine- the cause of protective relay malfunctions. These test activities are performed in accordance with approved procedures by

<<jualified personnel.

Nuclear Engineering Services and Quality Performance: are responsible for assuring. that required tests for major modifications axe included. in specifications. Nuclear Engineering Services and Electric Transmissi'on and Distribution assistance in. the preparation of modification-related test procedures may be provided to the Ginna. Station staff. The Ginna Station Technical Manager is responsible for the adequate inclusion of test requirements'n minor modification design documents. and for reviewing.

modification-related test results for acceptability. to design requirements. Reviews of minor modification design by Quality Performance verifies adequate inclusion. of test requirements.

Control of Measurin and Test E i nt The calibration and control. system for measuring and. test equipment includes calibration procedures, establishment of calibration frequencies, and maintenance- and. control requirements, of measuring, and. test instruments, tools, gauges, shop standards, and. nondestructive test equipment which are to be used in the measurement, inspection, and monitoring of components, systems,, and. structures. Calibra-tion procedures include step-by-step methods for calibration and requirements for instrument accuracy. Calibration frequency is hased on required accuracy, degree of usage, stability charact:eristics, manufacturer's recommendations, experience, and other conditions affecting measurement capability.

Revision 16 December 1990

Control of measuring and test equipment requires: a recall system -assuring timely calibration of equipment; a system providing unique identification of equipment, traceability to calibration test data, and identification of the next calibration date on the. equipment; a system providing trace-ability of shop standards to nationally recognized. standards.

(where national standards do not exist, procedures contain instructions to document the basis for calibration) and periodic, revalidation of shop standards; a system providing for records to be maintained which indicate the complete status of all items under the calibration system including the maintenance, calibration. results., abnormalities, and.

last and future calibration dates.; and. a system controlling the purchase requirements of new equipment ta be entered into the calibration and. control system including require-ments for accuracy; stability, and repeatability under normal use conditions. In the event a measuring instrument (i.e. shop or field., standard) is found. out. of calibratioa,an investigation is conducted to determine the validity'f previous measurements..

The Plant Manager, Gism Station. is responsible for the procedures and program require to assure control and cali-bration of measuring and test equipment at Ginna Station in accordance with. the above; requirements. Instruments specified in Section 4.1, Technical Specifications, are included in the program. Tools, gauges., and instruments necessary for maintenance, inspection., and. test are cali-brated and controlled in accordance with station procedures.

Measuring, test or inspection equipment used by Nuclear Assurance Quality Control is included. in the program.

The Department Superintendent, General Maintenance, Manager, Materials Engineering and Inspection Services and Super-intendent, Electric Meter and, Laboratory, are responsible; for establishing a program and the preparation of procedures.

for the control and calibration of measuring and test equipment used by their respective organizations.

Handlin Stora e and. Shi in Ginna Station Supervision is responsible for developing and implementing procedures for the handling, storage, shipping, preservation, and cleaning of material and equipment.

delivered to or located at Ginna Station. General Maintenance, Electric Transmission and Distribution, and Materials Engineering'nd. Inspection Services are responsible for preparing and implementing procedures for Revision X6 December 1990

r the handling, storage, shipping, preservation, and cleaning of material and eguipment delivered to or located in their work areas. In addition, the Manager, Materials Engineering and Inspection Services. is responsible for- preparing and.

implementing procedures for the routine maintenance and inspection of lifting and handling equipment. Under normal circumstances, manufactuzez.'s specific written. instructions and recommendations and purchase specification requirements are invoked for cleanliness, preservation, special handling, and storage with respect to environmental'equirements. In the absence of, or in addition to-, specific manufacturer requirements, the management may invoke additional require-ments. in. accordance. with department procedures..

The Department Manager, Nuclear Engineering. Services is responsible for specifying in procurement. documents- and in engineering. specifications. that; written procedures. be used, as appropriate, for the handling; shipping, storage, clean-ing, and pzesezvation of materials and equipment procured:

for major modifications. These- procedures are. prepared. hy contractors, by the station staff, or by staff members of General Maintenance or Electric Transmission and Distribution as appropriate. Rochester Gas. and Electric procedures are reviewed and approved as described in Section 6.

In the preparation of procurement. documents, department procedures, and contractor procedures, consideration of handling, shipping-, storage, cleanliness, and preservation.

is given to all material. and equipment throughout. various.

stages of manufacturing and installation prior ta operational acceptance.

Quality Performance. is. responsible for review of Engineering, specifications to assure that proper handling, storing, and.

shipping requirements have been specified,. Quality Performance is responsible for. examination of handling, storage, and shipping activities by suppliers, Rochester Gas and Electric personnel, and, contractors.

Ins ctiorx. Test and ratin Status.

Eguipment or systems not ready for normal service are clearly identified by use of tags, control logs, and other suitable means to indicate the. status. in a positive manner.

The identification i's sufficient. to positively indicate the status of the particular equipment or system being isolated Revi ion 16 Decembei 1990

1 V

The Plant Manager, Ginna Station is responsible for indicat-ing the status of operating equipment or systems to be removed from service for maintenance, repair, or modifica-tion in accordance with the approved Electric System Operating Rules. The Plant Manager designates personnel who have station holding authority.

Personnel who have station holding authority are responsible for directing the status change of equipment and systems in accordance with the approved station holding procedures.

System status is indicated through the use of hold tags, block tags and corresponding control logs.

Equipment or system inspection and test status are indicated by use of test tags, labels, or work inspection and test status sheets. Written procedures control the use of hold tags, test tags, and labels. The procedures require the recording of the name of the person placing and removing the tag.

Systems, components, and equipment which are found to be unacceptable during or after testing are clearly identified.

Fuel handling operations involving fuel assemblies or other radioactive sources are identified and controlled by the use of tags, stamps, or other suitable means.

Maintenance, repair, or modification of components, systems, or structures utilizes procedures, travelers, data sheets, instructions or checklists to indicate status of the work, inspections or tests and corresponding acceptance or rejec-tion for a particular component, system, or structure.

These job control forms are prepared by the job supervisor and reviewed by Nuclear Assurance Quality Control personnel and maintained. at a designated control location to indicate the status and the completion of required inspections and tests.

Quality Performance monitors the status change of Ginna Station activities for their implementation of approved procedures and assures that inspection results are properly documented. Material Engineering and Inspection Services establishes the procedures for implementing the inspection status sheets utilized during inservice inspection.

Revision 16 December 1990

15. Nonconformin Materials Parts and Com onents Procedures are established for the control, evaluation and disposition of deficient material, parts, and components..

Materials, parts, or components which do not conform to the drawing or specification requirements are identified and reported. RG&E personnel are responsible for initiating nonconformance reports and initiating dispositions. Nuclear Assurance Quality Control personnel are responsible for inspecting and approving closeout of nonconformance reports.

Prior to installation or use, nonconforming items generally remain in a hold area until an approved disposition has been implemented. Nonconforming items may be released for installation to meet critical fabrication schedules provided controls are established to prevent inadvertent use prior to implementing the nonconformance disposition.. After installation or use, nonconforming items are identified and controlled until approved disposition has been implemented.

Nonconformances identified at a supplier's facility and reported to RGGE, which have supplier recommended depositions of use-as-is, or repair, are normally processed by the department originating the procurement.

Organizations which specify the requirement being dispositioned are responsible for reviewing and approving the supplier recommended disposition.

Items are repaired and reworked in accordance with approved procedures and current drawings. The repair or rework must be verified as acceptable by an inspection of the affected item or process which is at least equal to the original inspection method.

Items which are accepted "use-as-is" are fully documented with the drawing or specification requirement and technical justification for acceptance. All such items are approved prior to use by the cognizant organization having responsi-bility for the requirement. In addition, those "use-as-is" nonconformances which also deviate from a Design Cr'iteria requirement shall require additional approval of the Senior Vice President, Production and Engineering.

Nuclear Assurance Quality Control personnel provide nonconformance status information periodically. Quality Performance and other organizations analyze nonconformance report data for adverse trends and processes periodic reports to management. Adverse trends form a basis for supplier re-evaluation or for other corrective action.

Revision 16 December 1990

Corrective Action Significant conditions adverse to quality such as failures, malfunctions, deficiencies, deviations, defective material and equipment, and. nonconformances are reporteK on a corrective action report; Significant conditions adverse to quality include conditions affecting safety; conditions which coulL result in plant shutdown, high maintenance:

items, and operating procedure deficiencies. The corrective action report identifies the condition,. the cause of the. condition, and. the corrective action taken.

Significant conditions adverse to quality may be identified by anyone noting the condition. and reported to Quality Assurance or the Ginna. Station Corrective Action Coordinator for review and, if appropriate, the initiation of a corrective action report.

When a significant condition adverse to quality at Ginna Station is identified, Quality Performance evaluates the affect of continuing the activity. If continuing the activity would obscure or preclude identification and correction of the deficiency, continuing the activity would increase the extent of the, deficiency or leaL to an, unsafe condition, stop work'ction is taken. Quality Performance Supervision has. authority to stop work on maintenance, repair, insezvice inspection, refueling., modification, testing or inspection deficiencies at Ginna. Station, as well as, maintenance activities at General Maintenance. Quality Performance may recommend. stop work action to the. Plant Manager, Ginna Station on operating deficiencies.

The Manager, Quality Assurance has the authority to stop work for conditions identified..in. Purchasing, Engineering, Materials Engineering and Inspection Services, Electric Transmission and Distribution or cognizant supplier associations.

The Plant Operations Review Committee reviews. all corrective action reports initiated, at Ginna. Station and: recommends" interim corrective. action.-if. the: action. does not represent a.

change in configuration of the deficient item. The Committee recommends permanent corrective- action for all.

conditions. adverse to quality which involve operating procedures.

Revision 16 December 1990

r Conditions adverse to quality which involve design defi-ciencies or a recommended corrective action which involves a design change are reviewed by Ginna Station or Engineering as applicable. The cognizant organization determines the cause of the condition and recommends corrective action to preclude repetition.

Quality Assurance reviews all corrective action reports to assure that the cause of the condition has been determined and that corrective action has been taken to preclude repe-tition.

Corrective action summary reports are submitted to departmental supervision to keep them aware of significant conditions adverse to quality, related causes and corrective action being taken. Senior Management is advised of the causes and actions of the more significant Corrective Action Reports.

ualit Assurance Records

'uality Assurance is responsible for establishing the basic requirements for quality assurance record retention and maintenance. Divisional Services, as directed by the Division Manager and Chief Engineer, is responsible for the retention and maintenance of Engineering and Ginna Station records. Quality Performance, Purchasing, Research and Science, General Maintenance and Electric Transmission and Distribution departments are responsible for assuring the maintenance and retention of records which they originate.

This may be accomplished either by retaining the records in their department or by forwarding them to the appropriate Divisional Services record retention locations. Each organization. retaining records is responsible for preparation, review, approval, and implementation of specific quality assurance record procedures for their areas of responsibility in accordance with these requirements.

The records which fall within quality assurance record requirements include those records required by Section 6.10 of the Technical Specifications and the Quality Assurance Program. All records associated with the operation, main-tenance, repair, inservice inspection, refueling, modifica-tion, inspection and testing of structures, systems, and components covered by the quality assurance program are included.

Revision 16 December 1990

~ t P

0 1'

Records initiated at Ginna Station include operating logs; the .results of inspections, tests, and the monitoring of plant activities; drawings, procurement documents and.

material analyses; calibration procedures and reports; and Nonconformance and Corrective Action Reports.. Records of.

the qualification of personnel., procedures, and equipment, for special processes and the results of reviews are maintained at the appropriate Divisional Services record retention location..

Xnspection and test records contain a description of the type of test or inspection activity, evidence of- completion of the activity, results., the. name of the inspector. or data.

recorder, the acceptance or rejection. of the activity, and a record of any nonconformances.

The requirements. and. responsibilities. for record:

accessibility and transmittal are described in the Quality Assurance Manual sections as appropriate. Requirements- and responsibilities for preparation, inspection, identification, review, storage, retrieval, maintenance, and the retention of quality assurance records are in accordance with applicable quality assurance, record. procedures, codes.,

standards, and procurement documents. Records are available to authorized personnel.

Removal of records, from storage. is documented. and accountability is maintained by- the responsible record control activity.

Records are either stored. in record storage facilities which.

are designed to prevent. destruction of records due to fire, flooding, theft, and deterioration by temperature or humidity conditions.; or, duplicate records. are kept. in two separate storage locations in separate buildings which are physically isolated from. each other.

Record keeping procedures. provide. for. receiving, classifying, indexing, labeling and preparing. records for storage.. The procedures: establish retention requirements, accessibility, contxol of obsolete., record.destruction:, and.

control for issuance and. return of all records.

Divisional Services is responsible. for maintaining plant operating records..as required. in. Section. 6.10,. Technical.

Specifications.

Revision 16 December 1990

Divisional Services is also responsible for maintaining off-site prepared design records, such as specifications, drawings, design review'eports, and design control documentation; quality assurance records, such as audit reports and surveillance reports; purchasing records, such as supplier qualifications, bid evaluations, and purchase orders.

Audits Compliance with all aspects of the Quality Assurance Program and the effectiveness of the program is determined by audits and surveillances of all organizations performing quality affecting activities. Quality Assurance is responsible for conducting audits of those organizations and activities involved in the quality assurance program on a planned, periodic basis. Audit intervals are based on the status and safety importance of activities being performed, as well as, group performance and related management concerns.

Table 18-1 is a list of the activities to be examined by audit in each of the audits. Frequencies are based on the level of activity in each area. Audit schedules are estab-lished to assure that each of the activities are audited at the frequency specified in Section 6.0 Technical Speci-fications. Additional audits or surveillances are conducted as required by special conditions, circumstances or to address management concerns.

Each audit requires the development of an audit plan to provide information about the audit, such as the functional areas to be audited, the names of those who will perform the audit, the scheduling arrangements, and the method of reporting findings and recommendations. Audit planning and performance utilize performance based techniques that will facilitate effectiveness assessments as well as compliance verification. The audits are performed in accordance with written procedures or checklists by appropriately trained personnel not having direct responsibilities in the areas being audited.

Audit results are documented and reported to the supervisor and division head having responsibility in the area audited and the Nuclear Safety Audit and Review Board. Within a specified period of time, the person having supervisory responsibility in the area audited is required to review the Revision 16 December 1990

I 0

audit results, take necessary'ction to correct the deficiencies identified by the audit, and document and report the corrective action.

Quality Assurance is responsible for developing audit plans and audit checklists, designating and training audit personnel, and conducting audits..

Audits may be conducted by Quality Assurance engineers or other qualified personnel, such as. technical. specialists from other company departments and, outside consultants.

Audits of major contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers are conducted during the early stages of design and. procure-ment, as zequized., to evaluate. their quality assurance:

pxogram for compliance with all aspects of the procurement documents. Audits are conducted, as required, to assure.

that major contractors, subcontractors., and. suppliezs are auditing their suppliers'uality assurance programs in, accordance with procurement documents.. During the project, additional audits are pezformed, as requized, to assure a3.1.

quality assurance program requirements are'roperly imple-mented in accordance with procurement documents..

Quality Performance performs. regular analyses of audit and.

Quality Assurance surveillance resu1ts to evaluate quality trends. Results of these analysea are provided to management for their regular review.

Revision 16 December 1990

Table 1-1 Quality Assurance Program Procedures Subject Listing Appendix B alit Assurance uali Control Procedures Control Criteria Indoctrination of Quality Assurance/Quality and Supervisory Personnel Training of Quality Assurance/Quality Control Personnel Management Review of the Quality Assurance Program Periodic Review of Quality Assurance/Quality Contra?

Procedures Quality Assurance/Quality Contrcrl Group Organization and Responsibilities Quality Assurance Review of Rochester Gas and Electric Design Criteria.

Quality Assurance Review of Rochester Gas and Electric Engineering Specifications Quality Assurance Review: of Architect/Engineer's Design Documents Requisitioning Quality Assurance/Quality Control IV Services Quality Review of Rochester Gas and IV Electric Procurement. Documents.

Preparation, Review. and Approval of Rochester Gas and IV Electric Q.A. Specifications Preparation, Review and. Approval of Ginna Station Quality Assurance Nanual, Preparation, Review and Approval of Quality Assurance/Quality Control Procedures Review of, Departmental. Procedures. VI Preparation, Review and Approval of Procedure Deviation Requests by Quality Assurance/Quality Control Evaluation of Suppliers by Quality Assurance. VII Revision 16 December 1990

I 4 Table 1-1 (cont'd)

E Appendix B ualit Assurance alit Control Procedures. Criteria Supplier Surveillance IEI Control of Supplier Performance VII Quality Assurance Evaluation of Bids VIE Inspection and Surveillance Activities.

Qualification of Surveillance and Inspection Personnel X Preparation of Inservice Pump and Valve Testing Program Quality Assurance Review of Nonconformance Reports Preparation, Review and. Processing of Corrective Action Reports by Quality Assurance.

Qualification of Auditing Personnel XVIII'VIII Audit Scheduling and Planning Performance of Quality-Assurance Audits XVIII.

Reporting and Follow-Up of Audit Findings. XVIII Conduct of Quality Assurance During'nd in XVIII Follow-Up of USHRC and. Management. Audits Response to Audits and Surveillances XVIII Qualifications of Surveillance Personnel XVIII Quality Performance Surveillance Program: XVIII.

Revision 16 D cember 1990

t' Table 1-1 (cont'd)

Appendix B I Materials En ineerin Ins etion Services Criteria.

Indoctrination and Training Materials Engineering and Inspection Services Organization and Responsibilities Preparation, Review and. Approval of Purchase IV Requisitions and Related Procurement Documents Quality Materials Engineering and Inspection Services Procedures Quality Materials Engineering and Inspection Services Procedure Deviation Request Preparation; Review'nd Approval of Material V Handling Equipment Instructions Control and Distribution of Documents Regulating: VI Saf ety Related Activities Receipt and Acceptance of Purchased Materials, VII Preparation, Review and. Approval of Supplier VII Evaluation Welding Procedure Preparation Review and Approval IX Welding Procedure. Qualification IX Heat Treating Procedures IX Welder Qualification and Currency Nondestructive Examination Procedures. IX Nondestructive Examination Procedures Manual IX Nondestructive Examination Personnel Qualification IX Inservice Inspection, Program, and Plans Incorporating Ginna Modifications into Inservice Inspection Program Test Control XI 0 Revision 16 December 1990

Table 1-" (cont'd)

Appendix B Materials En ineerin and. Xns ction Services Criteria Test Personnel Qualifications XI Calibration and Control of Nondestructive XII Examination Instruments; Inspection and Maintenance of. Material Handling XIXI Equipment Overhead and. Gantry Cranes. XIII.

Inspection and Maintenance of'Portable Lifting XIXI and Handling Equipment, Underhung Cranes., Jib Cranes. and. Monorail Systems XIII Slings and Related Apparatus XXII Classification and Training of Material Handling, XIII Equipment Personnel.

Mobile Hydraulic Cranes XXII Inspection and Maintenance. of Jacks XIII Forklift Loading Forks XIII Training and Qualification of Crane Operators. XIII Lifting Devices in the Containment Vessel XIII Control and. Disposition. of Nonconforming Material Parts and Components.

Corrective Action at Materials Engineering.and XVX Inspection Services Quality Materials Engineering and Inspects.ozr Services Records.

Materials Engineering and. Inspection Services XVIII r Response to Internal Audits Revision 16 December 1990

Table l-l (cont'd) Appendix B Ginna Procedures Criteria Ginna Quality Assurance Program Implementation Training of Ginna Personnel.

Ginna Administrative and Engineering Staff. IX Responsibilities Ginna Modification. Pxoject Organization.

Plant Operations Review Committee Operating Procedure Control of Station Modification Station Modification, Installation Acceptance and. IIX Completion Preparation, Review and Approval of Design Documents Preparation, Review and. Approval of Minor Modification Safety Analysis Control of Procurement Documents for'urchased Materials, Parts, Components. and Services Requisition Services from General Maintenance IV Plant Procedures Plant Procedure Control. and Distribution. VI Control of Engineering Documents VI Vendor Manual Control VX Receipt. and. Acceptance of Purchased, Naterials-. VXX Supplier Qualification Technical Evaluation VII Control of Purchased Services VII Control of Accepted Material, Parts and Components. VIXX Identification and Marking of Material. VIII Revision 16 December 1990

I Table 1-'3..(cont d)

Appendix B Ginna Procedures .Criteria Control of Welding, Heat Treating and IX Nondestructive Examination Welding Equipment Performance Verification Nondestructive Examination IX Preventive Maintenance Programs for Electrical, X Mechanical and Valves Inservice Inspection X, XIV Environmentally Qualified. Equipment Maintenance. X Program Performance of Tests Qualification of Test Personnel XI Calibration and Control of Measuring and Test Equipment XII Installed Plant Instruments and Equipment:

Maintenance and Inspection of Material Handling XIII Equipment Control of Material Handling and Handling Equipment XIII Storage and. Preservation of Materials.

Control of Heavy Loads at Ginna XIII Electric Syst: em Operating Rules XIV Test Status Control XIV Bypass of Safety'unction or Jumper Control XIV Control of Temporary Modifications XIV Control. and Disposition of Nonconfcuxdag Materials Issue of Nonconformance Reports Revision 16 December 1990

Table 1-1 (cont'd)

Appendix B Ginna Procedures Criteria Ginna Records XVII Record Storage Facility and Equipment XVII Maintenance and History Program. XVII Ginna Station Response to Internal Audits XVIII Revision 16 December 1990

I 1

T

Table 1-1 (cont'd)

Appendix B En ineerin Procedures Criteria Indoctrination and Training Engineering Department Organization and Res ponsihi liti es Preparation, Review and Approval.

of Design Input Documents Preparation, Review and Approval of Design Analyses IEI Preparation, Review and. Approval. of Engineering Drawings. IIE, Preparation, Review and Approval of, Specifications Design Verification IEI Preparation, Review and Approval of Safety Analyses Review and Approval of Architect. Engineer or Consultant Design Documents Preparation., Review and. Approval. of Field Change Requests IEI Purchase Requisition IV Engineering Procedures Engineering'rocedure Deviation Request.

Distribution and Control of Documents hy the Control Number Method Control of Documents hy the List of VE Current Revisions Method Distribution of. Documents. by the List of Correspondence Procedures VI Receipt, Control and Distribution of Drawings and Aperture Cards VE Supplier Evaluation VEE Revision 16 Decemhe" 1990

Table 1-1 (cont'd)

Appendix B En ineerin Procedures Criteria Preparation, Review and Approval of Bid Requests, VII Bid Evaluations and Recommendations. for Award.

Engineering Review of Nonccazforming Material,s., Parts or Components Initiating and Responding to Corrective Action Reports.

Records XVI I Engineering Response to Audits. XVIII Revision 16 December 1990

Table 1-1 (cont'd)

Appendix B Purchasin Procedures Criteria Periodic Review of Purchasing Procedures, Indoctrination and Training of Purchasing Personnel Purchasing Department Organization and Re~nsibilities.

Preparation, Review, Approval and Issuance. of IV Purchase Orders and Changes to Purchase Orders.

Requests for Bids and Bid Evaluation IV Purchasing Procedures Purchasing Procedure Deviation Request Supplier Evaluation VII Establishment and Maintenance. of Quali&.ed VII Suppliers List Supplier Nonconformance Report Processing; Purchasing Department Response. to Corrective-Action Reports and Corrective Action Reporting Purchasing Records. XVII Purchasing Response to Audits. XVIII Revision 16 December 1990

Table 1-1 (cont'd)

Appendix 3 General Maintenance Procedures". Criteria Indoctrination and Training General Maintenance Organization and:

Responsibilities Documentation and Control of Modification/

Fabrication Activities Preparation,. Review and Approval. of Purchase IV Requisitions and Related Procurement Documents Quality Maintenance Procedures Quality Maintenance Procedure Deviation Requests Preparation, Review and Approval, of General V Maintenance Fabrication Route Cards Control and Distribution of Documents Recrating UI Safety Related Activities Receipt and Acceptance of Purchased Materials VII Control of Accepted. Material., Parts and. Components VIII Traceability of Material VIII Issue, Control and Storage of Meld Consumables UIII Control of We3ding. IX Conduct of Crane operators XIII Control and Disposition of Nonconforming Material.,

Parts and Components Corrective Action at General Maintenance XVI Quality Maintenance. Records. XVII General Maintenance Response to Internal Audits. XVIII Revision 16 December 1990

Table 1-1 (cont'd)

Electric Transmission Procedures and Distribution Appendix B Procedures Criteria.

Quality Assurance Program Implementation for Electric Transmission and Distribution Department Training of Electric. Transmission and. Distribution Personnel Electric Transmission. and Distribution Organization XI Design/Modification Activities Control.

I Control of Procurement Documents. for Purchased.

Parts, Components and Services Preparation, Review, and Approval. of Electric V Transmission and Distribution and Laboratory Procedures Control of Electric Transmission and. Distribution Procedures, Schedules and. Test Form Books Supplier Qualification Technical Evaluation VIX Receipt and Acceptance of Instrumentation and VIX Standards Equipment Control of Purchased Services for Electric Meter and Lab VXX Identification and, Control of Materials Parts and VIXI Components Performance of Tests- at Ginna Station XI Performance of Tests, at the Electrical Laboratory XI Qualification of Test Personnel.

Calibration and Control of, test Instruments XIX Handling, Storage. and Shipping XIII Inspection and Test: Status at Electric. Meter and XIV Laboratory Revision 16 December 1990

P Table 1-1 (cont'd)

Flectric Transmission and Distribution Appendix. 3 Procedures Criteria Control and Disposition of Nonconforming Parts and Components Initiating and Processing of Corrective Action Reports. XVX Control of Quality Assurance Records XVX I Response to Audits XVXXX Revision 16 December 1990

I TABLE 4-1 Procurement Document Re uirements Items to be considered for inclusion in procurement documents include:

1. Sco e of Work Detailed statement of the work to be performed.

2. Technical Re uirements by reference to specific drawings, specifications, codes, regulations, procedures or instructions, including revisions, that describe the items or services to be furnished. Also identified shall be test, inspection and acceptance requirements, and any special requirements for such activities as designing, identification, fabrication, cleaning, erecting, packaging, handling, shipping and extended storage.

• 3 ualit Assurance Pro ram Re uirements which require the supplier to have a documented quality assurance program that implements portions or,all of 10CFR50 Appendix B as well as applicable quality assurance program requirements of other nationally recognized codes and standards. Also included shall be the requirement that the supplier incorporate appropriate quality assurance program requirements in subtier procurement documents.

Ri ht of Access to include the facilities and records of the supplier for source inspection and audit by the Purchaser or parties designated by the purchaser. Also included shall be provisions for the identification of witness and hold points and the minimum time of advance notice.

• 5. Documentation Re uirements Submittal approval and retention requirements for documents such as quality assurance manuals, special process and test procedures, materials records, calculations and analyses.

• 6. Nonconformance - Requirements for reporting and disposition of nonconformance to procurement requirements.

7. -Shelf Life Information Requirements .for reporting the date an item's shelf life started and the length of shelf life available for the item.

• Items reviewed by Quality Assurance or Quality Control.

Revision 16 December 1990

Table 18-1 Audit List Audit Title Audit To ic Areas Corrective Action Corrective Action associated with deficiencies occurring in facility, equipment, structures, systems or methods of operation.

Operational Assessment Nonconformance Control

~Outage Activities Refueling and Special Nuclear Material ISI Implementation IST Program and Implementation Surveillance Test and LCOs Maintenance Modification Installation Safety Security Radiation Protection and ALARA

• Health Physics, Chemistry and Radwaste Shipping and Process Radwaste Control Program and implementing procedures Radioactive Effluents and Offsite Dose Calcultion Manual and implementing procedures Radiation Protection and ALARA HP/Chemistry Measuring and Text Equipment Chemistry Program Hazardous Material Control Program Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Fire and Safety Fire Protection Program and implementing procedures-Fire Protection and Loss Prevention Program Revision 16 December 1990

P' Table 18-1 (con't)

Audit List Audit Title Audit To ic Areas Independent Inspections and Audits Fire Systems Fire Surveillance Fire Brigade Training, Fire Brigade Equipment Safety Program Housekeeping Instructions, Procedures, Drawing Control and Document Control Vendor Manual Control Procedure Control Records Control Security Security Plan and Implementating procedures Guard Training and Qualification "Operations 'Limiting Conditions for.

Operation Surveillance Testing Operator Performance Operations Administration PORC Activities NSARB Activities 4

Materials Engineering and ISI Program Inspection Services VDE Qualifications Welding Qualifications MHE Program Miscellaneous QA Controls

• Maintenance and Testing Preventive Maintenance Program Planning and Scheduling Work Order Implementation Post-Maintenance Testing Work Order Closeout; and, Equipment History Control of Measuring and Test Equipment Revision 16 December 1990

Table 18-1 (con't)

Audit List Audit Title Audit To ic Areas Technical Specification Surveillance Fitness for Duty Fitness for Duty Program Software Quality Assurance SQA Program and Implementation Nuclear Emergency Response Plan Nuclear Emergency Response Plan and Procedures Offsite Agency Interface Response Personnel Training Emergency Information Plan Training/performance and Licensed Operator qualifications of the Auxiliary Operator operating and technical staff Chemistry Technician Maintenance Radiation Protection Technician Results and Test Technician QC Inspector Shift Technical Advisor Technical Staff and Managers Engineering Department Training General Employee Training Procurement Procurement Evaluations Procurement Document. Control Control of Purchased Items and Services Handling, Storage, and Shipping Configuration Control Major Modification Design Minor Modification Design Installation Planning Control of As-Built Configuration Licensing Activities Temporary Modifications'53-Revision 16 December 1990

Table 18-1 (con't)

Audit List Audit Title Audit To ic Areas General Maintenance General Maintenance Activities Electric Transmission Electric Mater and Laboratory and Distribution Electric Substations

• Noted audits vill also address relevant activities to verify conformance of facility operation to all provisions contained in Technical Specifications and applicable license conditions.

Revision 16 December 1990

I R. E. GINNA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION CHART LINKS Of QPGWISION NO AOIINISTRATION PRESIDENT LINKS OF CONRSII CAT I ON SENIOR SENIOR SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT PRODUCTION 4 ENCIIEERING VICE PRESIDENT VICC PRESIDGIT 4 CONTROLLER CAS 4 ELCCTRIC DISTRIBUTION AND CORPORATK PLANING VICC PRKSIOCNT VICE PRKSIOKNTe CINNA SECRKTARV AND VICE PRCSIDENT VICC PRESIDENT DEPARTMENT TRKASURKR WCIEAR PRODUCTION DPLOYKE CLKCTRIC RELATIONS, TRANSHISSION PUBLIC AFFAIRS 4 DISTRIBUTION AND HATERIALS HANACOENT IWIAGKR PRODUCTS RISK OEPARTIENT MANAGER DIVISION IMNAGER lNNACOENT OMLITY ANO DKPAROENT PKRfORHANCK OIIEf GCINEER HNMCKR NO PURCHASING OIRKC'IOR OF CIIWA HANAGKR AGKNT SEONIITY SPECIAL PRODUCTION SYSTEHS HATER IALS AIC SGWICCS HNMCOENT DKPARDENT DEPAR7lCNT MANAGER DEPARTMENT DEPAR TIGHT DIVISIONAL DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT lIATERIALS SUPERINTENDENT HANACCR SERVICES H ANAGOGE MANAGER SUPER INTGCENT QPER INTKNDENT ELECTRIC ELECTRIC GCI NEER INC CBQAL RESEARCH MKLEAR PRODUCTION 4 INSPECTION HAINTENANCK 4 SCIENCE GCINKCRIIC DIVISION ICIER 4 QSSTATIONS TRAINING DIVISION SERVICES SERVICES LAB KNVIROIKNTAL DIVISION DESIGN. TRAINING STATION QPERVISOR PROCUR DENT i@TER DESICN, DUALITY HATCRIALS FIELD 4 SHOP I'ASR ICA'l SCIGCC 4 BUDGET, CONSTRUCTION, SOW ICES OPERATIONS, WCLEAR SERVICES CALIBRATION TCCH SUPPORT, ASSUR NCC ENGI NECR INC, ION SKRVICCS LABORATORY PROJCCT L I CCNS INC. IlAINTENNCK, SKCURITY 4 HAINTCNNICC ROTATIIC PROCIBIDENT, NOE, HP 4 ANO ELCCTRIC KDUIPWIT AICIT 4 ISI 4 CHOIISTRV HANACOCNT TUEL LAB SERVICES HAINTENANCE. SURVK ILLANCE ISIE INSP SERVICES, SKR VICES HANACOCNT 4 CIN34ISTRY RESEARCH 4 (SCHESR.INC) TCCHNICAL DIRECTOR CONTROL, RELAY TEST 4 SGWICCS SERVICCS ~

DEVELOPlENT NUCLEAR QPPORT CORPORATE ICOSI ICAL CONSTRICTION QPPORT ~ SECNITV SKRVICCS RECORDS, SERVICES RADIATION DPLOYKK RELATIONS fOSS ILAAQRO PROTKC'II ON T EST INC.

HATER IAL SERVICES RKC ORBS, DUALITY CONTROL 4 SKRVICCS CORPORATE LIASON HEALTH CNGINKER INC, PHYSICS Ale fPROTECTION IRE NUCLKAR DENCE NCY 4 SAFETY.

PLANNING OPERAT I ONAL OMLITY ASSESSMENT CONTROL ANO DUAL I'IY CICI NEER INC SERVICES Figure 2-1

IL QUALITY PERFORMANCE ORGANZZATZON DEPARTHENT HANAGER QUALITY PERFORMANCE HANAGER HANAGER HAXAGER QUALITY PERFORHANCE QUALITY NUCLEAR HATERIALS ENGINEERING ANALYSES AND ASSURANCE ASSURANCE 4 INSPECTION SERVICES PROGRAH SUPPORT QUALITY QUALITY QUALITY HATERIAL R ASSURANCE CONTROL CONTROL HATERIAL HANDLING ENGINEERS ENGINEERS FOREHAN ENGINEERS 4 FOREHEN STAFF TECHNICIANS STAFF 4 INSPECTORS ex tD GJ I

o 4 g M OD 0

Figure 2-2 C)

II GINNA NUCLEAR PRODUCTION ORGANISATION VICE PRESIDENT GINHA NUCLEAR PRODUCTION PLAMT MANAGER GINHA STATION DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT MANAGER KAHAGER SUPERINTENDEHT CORRECTIVE SUPERIHTEHDEHT PRODUCTION NUCLEAR GIHHA PRCOUCTIOH ACTION GINNA SUPPORT SERVICES DI VISION TRAI NING EHGI NEER ING SERVICES SAFETY HEALTH PHTSICS OPERATIONS OUTAGE KECHANICAL F I RE IHITIAL LICEHSED DESIGN, AND CHEMISTRY PLANNIHG MAINTENANCE PROTECTION OPERATOR, CONSTRUCTION, OPERATOR REOUAL ~ LICEHSIHG, HATER I ALS KOOI F I CAT ION AUX OPERATOR, FUEL KANAGEHENT PROCUREMENT SUPPORT SHIFT TECHNICAL AMD TECHNICAI.

AND BUDGET ADVISOR IN!T IAL, SUPPORT SERVICES STA REOUAL, TECHNICAL OP ERAT I OHAL ELECTRICAL CHEMISTRY ENGINEERING ASSESSKEHT AND IKC TECHHICIAH~

MAINTENANCE RAD IAT ION PROTECT IOH TECHNICIAN, CONTRACT RADIATION TECH ~

MAINTENANCE ELECTRICAL PLANHING 8 KAINTEMAMCE, SCHEDULIHG KECHANICAL KAIHTENANCE, ISC TECHHICIAM, RKT TECHNICIAN AND TECH STAFF AMD KANAGERS Figure 2-3 TRAINING COURSES

<A

~.

ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION DIVISION VICE PRESIDENT ELECTRIC TRANSHISSIOH B 0 I STR I BUT ION DEPARTNENT DEPARTNEHT SUPERINTENDENT SUPERINTENDENT ELECTRIC HETER BI ELECTRIC SUBSTATIOHS LABORATORY DEPARTNEHT LABORATORY HETER NANAGER NAXAGER KANAGER SERVICES NAINTEHAHCE FIELD SERVICES ENGI NEER IKG ADNINI STRAT IVE AND SHOPS EHGIHEERIKG CONSTRUCTION NOTE: Chart is abbreviated to shoM only RELAY TEST key positions involved in iaplementing OA program and therfore, does not shoM KAINTEKAKCE all positions in the, division. AHD TEST QUALITY SERVICES TRAVELING OPERATORS Figure 2-4

( ~

A, I

ENGZNEERING DIVISION ORGANIZATION DIVISION NANAGER AND CHIEF ENGINEER GINNA SPECIAL PROJECTS DEPARTKENT DEPARTHENT D I VI S IONAL DEPARTNENT HANAGER SUPERINTENDENT NANAGER SERVICES GENERAL GENERAL RESEARCH 8 ENGINEERING NAINTENANCE SCIEHCE SERVICES Nanager Hanager Budget and Cost Fossil Shop Operations Enviromental Engineering Science Project Nanager Nanagement Hydro Field Service kanager Services Engineering Operations Chemistry Services Docuoent Facility Nanager Preparation S Engineering Adalnistrative Supervisor Secretarial Services Enviroanental Services Real Estate and Project Laboratory Nanagement Planning Docuaent Senior Control Nanager Enviroanental Inspection/Land Analyst Ginna Central Survey and Research S Records Building Development Services Program Quality Services Technical Informat i on Center Figure 2-5

e'l 0

GXNNA STATXON REVXE% AND AUDXT PUNCTXONS KSARB QUALITY PERFONAKCE MATERIALS ELECTRIC ENGINEERING TRANSHI SS ION PURCHASING GENERAL ENGINEERING GINNA STATION AND INSPECTION AND IQINTEKANCE SERVICES DISTRIBUTION REVIEW

~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 AUDITS P X CURE 2 -5

r't

/'

<<4 + e