ML20070R544: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 68: Line 68:
==Dear Congressman Hendon:==
==Dear Congressman Hendon:==


Thank you for your July 7,1982 letter requesting information on a constituent's behalf concerning NRC's environmental assessment of the Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant.
Thank you for your {{letter dated|date=July 7, 1982|text=July 7,1982 letter}} requesting information on a constituent's behalf concerning NRC's environmental assessment of the Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant.
There have been a number of changes pertinent to this assessment that have occurred since the Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant Environmental Statement (HUREG-0139) was issued in February 1977.        We have been assessing these changes and their environmental significance'from the i
There have been a number of changes pertinent to this assessment that have occurred since the Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant Environmental Statement (HUREG-0139) was issued in February 1977.        We have been assessing these changes and their environmental significance'from the i
time licensing activities for the Clinch River Plant were resumed in the fall of 1981. The results of that assessment will be documented in a report which is scheduled to be issued soon.                            ~
time licensing activities for the Clinch River Plant were resumed in the fall of 1981. The results of that assessment will be documented in a report which is scheduled to be issued soon.                            ~

Latest revision as of 07:17, 31 May 2023

Urges Rejection of DOE Licensing Exemption Request for Crbr. Approval Would Damage Credibility & Set Bad Precedence
ML20070R544
Person / Time
Site: Clinch River
Issue date: 07/28/1982
From: Vento B
HOUSE OF REP.
To: Palladino N
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
Shared Package
ML20069D029 List:
References
FOIA-82-516 NUDOCS 8302030072
Download: ML20070R544 (1)


Text

- - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Houst coMMirTsc ON BRUCE F. VENTO , h cauxina, riuance ano unsan m Ains

.1,. o.ri cr. u r.

4[. " f"33

no cT omes ==m'.e M W '~*o "."'I"* ".,k
    • ~sT "L'*"' Congressof tfjeflinitebsbtate#

Houscsct cycouwerrer oismer omen %Cust of Etprtstntatibtg on sanna Rooes150 Masfjfttgtott,D.C. 20515 G "g* ",',"",,7,,

3aperr w M westseva 53101

^" # "" July 28, 1982 Nunzio Palladino, Chairman U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1717 H Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20555

Dear Chairman Palladino:

It is my understanding that in the near future the NRC will act on the latest application by the Department of Energy to bypass the normal i nuclear licensing procedures for the Clinch River Breeder project.

Serving on the Energy and Environment Subcommittee of the House Interior Committee has allowed me the opportunity to study in-depth many nuclear policy issues. One such issue is the development of breeder technology, ,

especially as it relates to the Clinch River demonstration project.

In reviewing the Clinch River project, both from a technological and a fiscal standpoint, I have come to the conclusion that the Clinch River project is unnecessary from an energy policyEvidently,, standpointmany and of further my is '*

an imprudent expenditure of taxpayer money.

Colleagues agree with my assessment; witness the vote by 186. members last year to delete funding for the Clinch River project.

Despite the Congressional concerns as expressed by the House vote, we are now witnessing an attempt by DOE to bypass normal licensing procedures in an effort to speed up the project's construction, which after 10 years, has yet to begin in earnest. I have seen no compelling reason for the Commission to agree to this request, especially in view of the fact that the Commission has twice previously turned down similar DOE licensing exemption applications. As you are probably aware, efforts <

are being undertaken in the NRC Authorization legislation to provide for reforms . i.n the nuclear.. licensing process. Approval of the exemption would fly in the face of these efforts to enact credible reforms.

Given the repeated attempts at licensing speed-up by DOE, I believe the Commission's acceptance at this time would set a poor precedent by which to judge the future exemption requests of other parties.

(

I urge the Commission to reject the Department of EnerEy's licensing cxemption request.

irm regards. -

Si,n r y,

)

f -

t

Sruce F. Vento o
pemberofCongress 8302030072 821229 Yr, -

f PDR FOIA Y t

WEISS82-516 PDR rJ wsdT-T(m Upp3F] MCE3 WITH RECYCLED FISEMS --_________ ___- ______ _

-H ss ^TDLr

- 2

.~.- G #cm k':y -

~s?

E ~

% xr}-

4 E V

.. 7

ECRETARIAT RECORD Cb JUL 21 1982 -

Y W i

i The Honorable Bill Hendon United States House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Congressman Hendon:

Thank you for your July 7,1982 letter requesting information on a constituent's behalf concerning NRC's environmental assessment of the Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant.

There have been a number of changes pertinent to this assessment that have occurred since the Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant Environmental Statement (HUREG-0139) was issued in February 1977. We have been assessing these changes and their environmental significance'from the i

time licensing activities for the Clinch River Plant were resumed in the fall of 1981. The results of that assessment will be documented in a report which is scheduled to be issued soon. ~

Sincerely, (signed) T. A.Br.hm William J. Dircks -

  • i Executive Director for Operations _

O 8

ll pM

'3 BILL HENQON' EMM W.M l

~E

' '~

{ (hwAmewofoN omca:

p 212 CANNON Houst OmCE tutoeNG d

~ . M CA'ioWNA g {g, ' WASH 0NGTON. D.C. 20515  ;

=n25. i

-.h.w py. -

2..x.._#w m

. T cv oec,,

,,uc, ee- u __ \'

^""= " "" c" ""^ 2*"

- -a N - -

Houseo Ase cmsumas emusts Cottgregg of tfje Ettitch diptateg 704/290 9437

%* JPouge of Representatibts TtxTna EEasWngtet.B.C. 20515 7em L*; Fontst CnY, Noam CAmouMA 20043

' ^ " " " " " rodna2m July 7, 1982 Mr. Joseph M. Hendrie Chairman Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1717 H Street, N.W.

Washington, D. C. 20555

Dear Mr. Hendrie:

Enclosed you will find a copy of a request that I recently received from my constituent, Rubin Falk.

In order to respond to my constituent, I would appreciate any information that you could furnish to my Washington staff.

.Your prompt attention in this matter is deeply appreciated and I, sincerely, thank you for your efforts.

Best regards.

Sincerely,

\N )hN -

BILL HENDON Member of Congress from Western North Carolina f BH/cl Enclosure

{

l

\

t c

'7I D'f El m i

iiMLW . _ .

/, JUN 10iSF 2

, - ..- o pv Q OFFICE CASE SilEET

. e4 9UBJECT' jw,.h h,. nym,gv %cmv ATTENTION Chmk ItECElhEDBY Gail LOCATION ID DATE 6-7-82

'7ELEPHONE CALL X OFFICE VISIT OFFICE HOURS

!!AME Mr. Rubin Falk ADDRESS 60 A Webb Cove Road, Asheville, N.C. 28804 l' HONE: HOME 258-0214 w0Rn orngg tis # C#

'OLD CASE NEW CASE a A _i S .

IF ANOTHER PERSON MAME RELATIONSHIP CV l.DDRESS l' HONE: HOME WORK OTilER NSO CG

_ Mr. Falk is with the Carolinians for Safe Energy group and he wuld like for --

, Mr. Hendon to contact Mr. Nunzio Palladino, Chairem'of NRC regarding Clinch River Breeder Reactor. He wants NRC to issue a draft supplement to the final i environmental imoact statement so he can circulate it.

\.

t

  • p r1e O

1 -

l -

t h

u

MpT 7'ENWICK , m. g

( -

Sves Desvencf. New Jamsay 1130 h w h m.. _

)4 ' W % DwC. 20515 T- = > .mo 8-

~

"^'

==3%'2* 'N L GIangress of ilje guitch plaics Al Nosme man.as Statr7 CC.ECT COMM3YTEC ON AGING fio**ENwatLE. New Jumorv 90876 COMMISSION ON

'== ^"a,ocool=^="

,, JUnsynsinn, PE. 2n515 iu

, o,,,

MessessTouse. New Juststy 97900 TELE,sesser. (30s ) 538-7287 July 16, 1982 Mr. Nunzio Palladino Chairman ..

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washingtone D.C. . 20,555

Dear Mr. Palladino:

I understand that the Department of Energy has applied to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to conduct site preparations for the Clinch River Breeder Reactor. It is my contention that this project is unnedded, outmoded and unjustifiable.

As you may know, I was among the ninety-one House Members who signed a letter to President Reagan requesting that federal funding be withdrawn

~~

for the Clinch River Breeder Reactor. I have little doubt that support for this project in the House is as scant as the tenable arguments in favor -

of this project. The assumptions that launched the plan to construct a demonstration breeder reactor have proven inaccurate. Consequently, I see no reason to pursue this unworthy pork barrel project. It is my hope that the NRC will reject the Department of Energy request and . . .

help our-taxpayers save two and one half billion dollars.

Thank you very much for your consideration.

i With all good wishes, ,

t

..u Yours sincerely, i

t k4hv l

l ,~ MILLICENT FENWICK Member of Congress MF:mn t

5 g .', ,

/

<)[

/$^ -

e ck

_hPRf NTED ON PAPER..MADE_WITH RECYCLED _ElBERS

&