ML12054A137: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:/33 Dennia. Robert From: Sent: To: Cc:  
{{#Wiki_filter:Dennia. Robert
                                                                                                  / 33 From:                       Bedli, Gurjendra  I Sent:                       Monday, September 19, 2011 10:36 AM To:                         Martin, Robert Cc:                         Khanna, Meena; Karwoski, Kenneth; Howe, Allen; Dennig, Robert; Rahn, David; Mathew, Roy; McMurtray, Anthony; Lupold, Timothy; Tsao, John; Murphy, Martin; Murphy, Emmett; Mitchell, Matthew; Auluck, Rajender; Harrison, Donnie; Bedi, Gurjendra


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Attachments:
RE: CPTB input to NA RESTART - 2nd set of RAIs Attachments:                CPTB updated North Anna RAI second .docx Hi Bob Attached is the CPTB input/update to the North Anna 1 & 2 Restart - 2nd set of RAIs.
Bedli, Gurjendra I Monday, September 19, 2011 10:36 AM Martin, Robert Khanna, Meena; Karwoski, Kenneth; Howe, Allen; Dennig, Robert; Rahn, David; Mathew, Roy;McMurtray, Anthony; Lupold, Timothy; Tsao, John; Murphy, Martin; Murphy, Emmett; Mitchell, Matthew; Auluck, Rajender; Harrison, Donnie; Bedi, Gurjendra RE: CPTB input to NA RESTART -2nd set of RAIs CPTB updated North Anna RAI second .docx Hi Bob Attached is the CPTB input/update to the North Anna 1 & 2 Restart -2nd set of RAIs.If you need any additional information please let me know.Thank you Gurjendra S. Bedi Mechanical Engineer NRC/NRR/DCI/CPTB 301-415-1393 guriendra.bedi@nrc.gov From: Martin, RobertW-Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2011 2:14 PM To: McMurtray, Anthony; Bedi, Gurjendra; Lupold, Timothy; Tsao, John; Murphy, Martin; Murphy, Emmett; Mitchell, Matthew; Dennig, Robert; Rahn, David; Mathew, Roy; Auluck, Rajender; Harrison, Donnie Cc: Khanna, Meena; Karwoski, Kenneth; Howe, Allen  
If you need any additional information please let me know.
Thank you Gurjendra S. Bedi Mechanical Engineer NRC/NRR/DCI/CPTB 301-415-1393 guriendra.bedi@nrc.gov From: Martin, RobertW-Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2011 2:14 PM To: McMurtray, Anthony; Bedi, Gurjendra; Lupold, Timothy; Tsao, John; Murphy, Martin; Murphy, Emmett; Mitchell, Matthew; Dennig, Robert; Rahn, David; Mathew, Roy; Auluck, Rajender; Harrison, Donnie Cc: Khanna, Meena; Karwoski, Kenneth; Howe, Allen


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
NA RESTART -2nd set of RAIs Attached is the second set of RAIs that you provided in response to our request from last week. Hope I didn't miss anyone.Please provide the requested acronymns and document titles where noted in the RAIs.Also, please review the attached report from VEPCO and determine whether you still wish to send these RAIs out. If there is doubt or if it will take awhile to determine this, we should probably go ahead and send them out. If the questions aren't completely answered in the VEPCO report, the value of VEPCO having them asap is considerable.
NA RESTART - 2nd set of RAIs Attached is the second set of RAIs that you provided in response to our request from last week. Hope I didn't miss anyone.
If its an issue where they clearly provide the answer in their Sept 17 report, then so indicate and we can remove the question.We expect that the review of the VEPCO report to support our safety evaluation will necessitate further requests for information.
Please provide the requested acronymns and document titles where noted in the RAIs.
Also, please review the attached report from VEPCO and determine whether you still wish to send these RAIs out. If there is doubt or if it will take awhile to determine this, we should probably go ahead and send them out. If the questions aren't completely answered in the VEPCO report, the value of VEPCO having them asap is considerable. If its an issue where they clearly provide the answer in their Sept 17 report, then so indicate and we can remove the question.
We expect that the review of the VEPCO report to support our safety evaluation will necessitate further requests for information.
61}}
61}}

Latest revision as of 08:53, 12 November 2019

Email from G. Bedi, NRR to R. Martin, NRR Cptb Input to Na Restart - 2nd Set of RAIs
ML12054A137
Person / Time
Site: North Anna  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 09/19/2011
From: Gurjendra Bedi
Component Performance and Testing Branch
To: Martin R
Plant Licensing Branch II
References
FOIA/PA-2011-0357
Download: ML12054A137 (1)


Text

Dennia. Robert

/ 33 From: Bedli, Gurjendra I Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 10:36 AM To: Martin, Robert Cc: Khanna, Meena; Karwoski, Kenneth; Howe, Allen; Dennig, Robert; Rahn, David; Mathew, Roy; McMurtray, Anthony; Lupold, Timothy; Tsao, John; Murphy, Martin; Murphy, Emmett; Mitchell, Matthew; Auluck, Rajender; Harrison, Donnie; Bedi, Gurjendra

Subject:

RE: CPTB input to NA RESTART - 2nd set of RAIs Attachments: CPTB updated North Anna RAI second .docx Hi Bob Attached is the CPTB input/update to the North Anna 1 & 2 Restart - 2nd set of RAIs.

If you need any additional information please let me know.

Thank you Gurjendra S. Bedi Mechanical Engineer NRC/NRR/DCI/CPTB 301-415-1393 guriendra.bedi@nrc.gov From: Martin, RobertW-Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2011 2:14 PM To: McMurtray, Anthony; Bedi, Gurjendra; Lupold, Timothy; Tsao, John; Murphy, Martin; Murphy, Emmett; Mitchell, Matthew; Dennig, Robert; Rahn, David; Mathew, Roy; Auluck, Rajender; Harrison, Donnie Cc: Khanna, Meena; Karwoski, Kenneth; Howe, Allen

Subject:

NA RESTART - 2nd set of RAIs Attached is the second set of RAIs that you provided in response to our request from last week. Hope I didn't miss anyone.

Please provide the requested acronymns and document titles where noted in the RAIs.

Also, please review the attached report from VEPCO and determine whether you still wish to send these RAIs out. If there is doubt or if it will take awhile to determine this, we should probably go ahead and send them out. If the questions aren't completely answered in the VEPCO report, the value of VEPCO having them asap is considerable. If its an issue where they clearly provide the answer in their Sept 17 report, then so indicate and we can remove the question.

We expect that the review of the VEPCO report to support our safety evaluation will necessitate further requests for information.

61