ML13241A038: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
First Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051) | First Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051) | ||
==References:== | ==References:== | ||
: 1. NRC Order Number EA-12-051 | : 1. NRC Order Number EA-12-051 , " Issuance of Order to Modify Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation | ||
, " Issuance of Order to Modify Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation | ," dated March 12, 2012 2. NRC Interim Staff Guidance JLD-ISG-2012-03, "Compliance with Order EA-12-051 , Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation," Revision 0, dated August 29, 2012 3. NEI12-02, Industry Guidance for Compliance with NRC Order EA-12-051, "To Modify Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation," Revision 1, dated August 2012 4. Exelon Generation Company, LLC's Initial Status Report in Response to March 12,2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051), dated October 25,2012 5. Exelon Generation Company, LLC Overall Integrated Plan in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051), dated February 28,2013 (RS-13-033) | ||
," dated March 12, 2012 2. NRC Interim Staff Guidance JLD-ISG-2012-03, "Compliance with Order EA-12-051 | |||
, Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation, | |||
" Revision 0, dated August 29, 2012 3. NEI12-02, Industry Guidance for Compliance with NRC Order EA-12-051, "To Modify Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation," | |||
Revision 1, dated August 2012 4. Exelon Generation | |||
dated October 25,2012 5. Exelon Generation | |||
dated February 28,2013 (RS-13-033) | |||
On March 12, 2012, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission | On March 12, 2012, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission | ||
("NRC" or "Commission") | ("NRC" or "Commission") | ||
issued an order (Reference | issued an order (Reference | ||
: 1) to Exelon Generation | : 1) to Exelon Generation Company, LLC (EGG). Reference 1 was immediately effective and directs EGC to install reliable spent fuel pool level instrumentation. Specific requirements are outlined in Attachment 2 of Reference | ||
. Specific requirements are outlined in Attachment 2 of Reference | |||
: 1. Reference 1 required submission of an initial status report 60 days following issuance of the final interim staff guidance (Reference | : 1. Reference 1 required submission of an initial status report 60 days following issuance of the final interim staff guidance (Reference | ||
: 2) and an overall integrated plan pursuant to Section IV, Condition C. Reference 2 endorses industry guidance document NEI 12-02, Revision 1 (Reference | : 2) and an overall integrated plan pursuant to Section IV , Condition C. Reference 2 endorses industry guidance document NEI 12-02, Revision 1 (Reference | ||
: 3) with clarifications and exceptions identified in Reference | : 3) with clarifications and exceptions identified in Reference | ||
: 2. Reference 4 provided U.S. Nuclear, Regulatory Commission Integrated Plan Report to EA-12-051 August 28,2013 Page 2 the EGC initial status report regarding reliable spent fuel pool instrumentation. | : 2. Reference 4 provided U.S. Nuclear , Regulatory Commission Integrated Plan Report to EA-12-051 August 28,2013 Page 2 the EGC initial status report regarding reliable spent fuel pool instrumentation. | ||
Reference 5 provided the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station overall integrated plan. Reference 1 requires submission of a status report at six-month intervals following submittal of the overall integrated plan. Reference 3 provides direction regarding the content of the status reports. | Reference 5 provided the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station overall integrated plan. Reference 1 requires submission of a status report at six-month intervals following submittal of the overall integrated plan. Reference 3 provides direction regarding the content of the status reports. The purpose of this letter is to provide the first six-month status report pursuant to Section IV, Condition C.2, of Reference 1, that delineates progress made in implementing the requirements of Reference | ||
The purpose of this letter is to provide the first six-month status report pursuant to Section IV, Condition C.2, of Reference 1, that delineates progress made in implementing the requirements of Reference | |||
: 1. The enclosed report provides an update of milestone accomplishments since the last status report, including any changes to the compliance method, schedule, or need for relief and the basis, if any. This letter contains no new regulatory commitments. | : 1. The enclosed report provides an update of milestone accomplishments since the last status report, including any changes to the compliance method, schedule, or need for relief and the basis, if any. This letter contains no new regulatory commitments. | ||
If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact David P. Helker at 610-765-5525. | If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact David P. Helker at 610-765-5525. | ||
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. | I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on the 28 th day of August 2013. Respectfully submitted, Director -Licensing | ||
Executed on the | & Regulatory Affairs Exelon Generation Company, LLC | ||
-Licensing | |||
& Regulatory Affairs Exelon Generation | |||
==Enclosure:== | ==Enclosure:== | ||
: 1. Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station First Six-Month Status Report for the Implementation of Order EA-12-051 | : 1. Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station First Six-Month Status Report for the Implementation of Order EA-12-051 , Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation cc: Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation NRC Regional Administrator | ||
, Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation cc: Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation NRC Regional Administrator | |||
-Region I NRC Senior Resident Inspector | -Region I NRC Senior Resident Inspector | ||
-Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station NRC Project Manager, NRR -Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Ms. Jessica A. Kratchman, NRR/JLD/PMB, NRC Mr. Robert J. Fretz, Jr, NRR/JLD/PMB, NRC Mr. Robert L. Dennig, NRR/DSS/SCVB, NRC Manager, Bureau of Nuclear Engineering | -Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station NRC Project Manager, NRR -Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Ms. Jessica A. Kratchman, NRR/JLD/PMB, NRC Mr. Robert J. Fretz, Jr, NRR/JLD/PMB, NRC Mr. Robert L. Dennig, NRR/DSS/SCVB, NRC Manager, Bureau of Nuclear Engineering | ||
-New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Mayor of Lacey Township, Forked River, NJ U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Integrated Plan Report to EA-12-0S1 August 28, 2013 Page 3 bcc: Site Vice President | -New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Mayor of Lacey Township, Forked River, NJ U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Integrated Plan Report to EA-12-0S1 August 28, 2013 Page 3 bcc: Site Vice President | ||
-Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Vice President Operations Support Plant Manager, Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Site Engineering Director | -Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Vice President Operations Support Plant Manager, Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Site Engineering Director -Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Regulatory Affairs Manager Regulatory Assurance Manager -Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Severe Accident Management Director Site Operations Director -Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Corporate Licensing Manager -East Corporate licensing Director -East Exelon Records Management Vi nod Aggarwal Roger Schiavoni Sailaja Mokkapati Mohamed Dicko Enclosure Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station First Six-Month Status Report for the Implementation of Order EA-12-0S1, Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (5 pages) | ||
-Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Regulatory Affairs Manager Regulatory Assurance Manager -Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Severe Accident Management Director Site Operations Director | Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station First Six-Month Status Report for the Implementation of Order EA-12-0S1, Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation 1 Introduction Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station developed an Overall Integrated Plan (Reference 1 in Section 8), documenting the requirements to install reliable Spent Fuel Pool Level Instrumentation (SFPLI), in response to Reference | ||
-Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Corporate Licensing Manager -East Corporate licensing Director | |||
-East Exelon Records Management Vi nod Aggarwal Roger Schiavoni Sailaja Mokkapati Mohamed Dicko Enclosure Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station First Six-Month Status Report for the Implementation of Order EA-12-0S1, Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (5 pages) | |||
Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station First Six-Month Status Report for the Implementation of Order EA-12-0S1, Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation 1 Introduction Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station developed an Overall Integrated Plan (Reference 1 in Section 8), documenting the requirements to install reliable Spent Fuel Pool Level Instrumentation (SFPLI), | |||
in response to Reference | |||
: 2. This enclosure provides an update of milestone accomplishments since submittal of the Overall Integrated Plan including any changes to the compliance method, schedule, or need for relief/relaxation and the basis, if any. 2 Milestone Accomplishments The following milestone has been completed since the development of the Overall Integrated Plan (Reference 1), and is current as of August 19, 2013. | : 2. This enclosure provides an update of milestone accomplishments since submittal of the Overall Integrated Plan including any changes to the compliance method, schedule, or need for relief/relaxation and the basis, if any. 2 Milestone Accomplishments The following milestone has been completed since the development of the Overall Integrated Plan (Reference 1), and is current as of August 19, 2013. | ||
* Issued Exelon Fleet contract to procure Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (SFPI) on June 18, 2013 3 Milestone Schedule Status The following provides an update to the milestone schedule to support the Overall Integrated Plan. This section provides the activity status of each item, and the expected completion date noting any change. The dates are planning dates subject to change as design and implementation details are developed. | * Issued Exelon Fleet contract to procure Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (SFPI) on June 18, 2013 3 Milestone Schedule Status The following provides an update to the milestone schedule to support the Overall Integrated Plan. This section provides the activity status of each item, and the expected completion date noting any change. The dates are planning dates subject to change as design and implementation details are developed. | ||
Revised Milestone Target Completion Activity Target Date Status Completion Date Submit 60 Day Status Report October 25, 2012 Complete Submit Overall Integrated Plan February 28, 2013 Complete Submit 6 Month Updates: | Revised Milestone Target Completion Activity Target Date Status Completion Date Submit 60 Day Status Report October 25, 2012 Complete Submit Overall Integrated Plan February 28, 2013 Complete Submit 6 Month Updates: Update 1 August 28, 2013 Complete with this submittal Update 2 February 28, 2014 Not Started Update 3 August 28, 2014 Not Started Update 4 February 28, 2015 Not Started Update 5 August 28, 2015 Not Started Page 1 of 5 Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station First Six-Month Status Report for the Implementation of SFP LI August28,2013 Milestone Target Completion Activity Date Status Update 6 February 28, 2016 Not Started Update 7 August 28, 2016 Not Started Modifications: | ||
Update 1 August 28, 2013 Complete with this submittal Update 2 February 28, 2014 Not Started Update 3 August 28, 2014 Not Started Update 4 February 28, 2015 Not Started Update 5 August 28, 2015 Not Started Page 1 of 5 Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station First Six-Month Status Report for the Implementation of SFP LI August28,2013 Milestone Target Completion Activity Date Status Update 6 February 28, 2016 Not Started Update 7 August 28, 2016 Not Started Modifications: | Conceptual Design 302012 Complete Issue Exelon Fleet contract to 202013 Complete procure SFPI Equipment Begin Detailed Design 402014 Not Started Engineering Complete and Issue SFPI 202015 Not Started Modification Package Begin Installation 2Q2016 Not Started Complete SFPI Installation and 402016 Not Started Put Into Service 4 Changes to Compliance Method Revised Target Completion Date There are no changes to the compliance method as documented in the Overall Integrated Plan (Reference 1). 5 Need for Relief/Relaxation and Basis for the Relief/Relaxation Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station expects to comply with the order implementation date and no relief/relaxation is required at this time. 6 Open Items from Overall Integrated Plan and Draft Safety Evaluation The following tables provide a summary of the open items documented in the Overall Integrated Plan or the Draft Safety Evaluation (SE) and the status of each item. Overall Integrated Plan Open Items 01# Description Status 1 Instruments Complete. (Ref.1 ) Continuous level indication will be The Westinghouse Spent Fuel Pool provided by a guided wave radar Level Indication instrumentation was Page 2 of 5 Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station First Six-Month Status Report for the Implementation of SFP LI August 28, 2013 system, submersible pressure selected consistent with the guidelines of transducer, or other appropriate level NRC JLD-ISG-2012-03 and NEI 12-02. sensing technology that will be The instrument is a guided wave radar determined during the detailed system. It provides the capability to engineering phase of the project. reliably monitor the spent fuel pool water level under normal and anticipated adverse environmental conditions. | ||
Conceptual Design 302012 Complete Issue Exelon Fleet contract to 202013 Complete procure SFPI Equipment Begin Detailed Design 402014 Not Started Engineering Complete and Issue SFPI 202015 Not Started Modification Package Begin Installation 2Q2016 Not Started Complete SFPI Installation and 402016 Not Started Put Into Service 4 Changes to Compliance Method Revised Target Completion Date There are no changes to the compliance method as documented in the Overall Integrated Plan (Reference 1). 5 Need for Relief/Relaxation and Basis for the Relief/Relaxation Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station expects to comply with the order implementation date and no relief/relaxation is required at this time. 6 Open Items from Overall Integrated Plan and Draft Safety Evaluation The following tables provide a summary of the open items documented in the Overall Integrated Plan or the Draft Safety Evaluation (SE) and the status of each item. Overall Integrated Plan Open Items 01# Description Status 1 Instruments Complete. | The sensor input to the system is a guided wave radar probe. Using the principle of time domain reflectometry (TDR) to detect the SFP water level, microwave signals are pulsed down the cable probe and reflected back from the water surface. This is used to determine the level of the water in the pool. Each water level measurement channel includes a flexible stainless-steel sensor cable probe suspended in the spent fuel pool from a seismic Category 1 bracket attached to the operating deck or to a raised curb at the side of the pool. The cable probe extends to just above the top of the spent fuel racks. The sensor electronics are mounted in seismic and missile protected areas outside of the building housing the SFP to minimize exposure to elevated radiation and environmental conditions which could result from a postulated loss of water inventory in the pool. There is an interconnecting cable between the sensor cable probe and sensor electronics. | ||
(Ref.1 ) Continuous level indication will be The Westinghouse Spent Fuel Pool provided by a guided wave radar Level Indication instrumentation was Page 2 of 5 Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station First Six-Month Status Report for the Implementation of SFP LI August 28, 2013 system, submersible pressure selected consistent with the guidelines of transducer, or other appropriate level NRC JLD-ISG-2012-03 and NEI 12-02. sensing technology that will be The instrument is a guided wave radar determined during the detailed system. It provides the capability to engineering phase of the project. | |||
reliably monitor the spent fuel pool water level under normal and anticipated adverse environmental conditions. | |||
The sensor input to the system is a guided wave radar probe. Using the principle of time domain reflectometry (TDR) to detect the SFP water level, microwave signals are pulsed down the cable probe and reflected back from the water surface. | |||
This is used to determine the level of the water in the pool. Each water level measurement channel includes a flexible stainless-steel sensor cable probe suspended in the spent fuel pool from a seismic Category 1 bracket attached to the operating deck or to a raised curb at the side of the pool. The cable probe extends to just above the top of the spent fuel racks. The sensor electronics are mounted in seismic and missile protected areas outside of the building housing the SFP to minimize exposure to elevated radiation and environmental conditions which could result from a postulated loss of water inventory in the pool. There is an interconnecting cable between the sensor cable probe and sensor electronics. | |||
The sensor electronics provide an instrument standard analog signal to a remote enclosure that will be installed in an accessible location. | The sensor electronics provide an instrument standard analog signal to a remote enclosure that will be installed in an accessible location. | ||
This enclosure contains the Uninterruptable Power Supply (UPS), backup battery, and water level display. | This enclosure contains the Uninterruptable Power Supply (UPS), backup battery, and water level display. The enclosure also includes the capability to connect an emergency or temporary external power Page 3 of 5 01# Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station First Six-Month Status Report for the Implementation of SFP LI August 28,2013 source as part of the FLEX mitigating strategies. | ||
The enclosure also includes the capability to connect an emergency or temporary external power Page 3 of 5 01# Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station First Six-Month Status Report for the Implementation of SFP LI August 28,2013 source as part of the FLEX mitigating strategies. | Attachment 1 shows the components and arrangement of the guided wave radar system spent fuel pool level sensor and electronics enclosure for one channel. Draft Safety Evaluation Open Items Description Status None at this time. 7 Potential Draft Safety Evaluation Impacts There are no potential impacts to the Draft Safety Evaluation identified at this time. 8 References The following references support the updates to the Overall Integrated Plan described in this enclosure. | ||
Attachment 1 shows the components and arrangement of the guided wave radar system spent fuel pool level sensor and electronics enclosure for one channel. | : 1. Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station, "Overall Integrated Plan in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-0S1)," dated February 28,2013 (RS-13-033) 2. NRC Order Number EA-12-0S1, "Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation," dated March 12, 2012. Page 4 of 5 Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station First Six-Month Status Report for the Implementation of SFP LI August28,2013 Attachment 1 Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation System Sensor Electronics Remote Enclosure containing I [1[QJ I sensor UPS Interconnecting Cable Spent Fuel Pool 1201240 VAC Power 20-30' (typical) measurement span to just above top of , fuel racks 6 mm SST Cable Probe with Anchor Weight Page 5 of 5 Output to optional alternate display ... *11 40.0 II}} | ||
Draft Safety Evaluation Open Items Description Status None at this time. 7 Potential Draft Safety Evaluation Impacts There are no potential impacts to the Draft Safety Evaluation identified at this time. 8 References The following references support the updates to the Overall Integrated Plan described in this enclosure. | |||
: 1. Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating | |||
dated February 28,2013 (RS-13-033) 2. NRC Order Number EA-12-0S1, "Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation," | |||
dated March 12, 2012. Page 4 of 5 Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station First Six-Month Status Report for the Implementation of SFP LI August28,2013 Attachment 1 Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation System Sensor Electronics Remote Enclosure containing I [1[QJ I sensor UPS Interconnecting Cable Spent Fuel Pool 1201240 VAC Power 20-30' (typical) measurement span to just above top of , fuel racks 6 mm SST Cable Probe with Anchor Weight Page 5 of 5 Output to optional alternate display ... *11 40.0 II}} |
Revision as of 00:37, 14 July 2018
ML13241A038 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Oyster Creek |
Issue date: | 08/28/2013 |
From: | Jim Barstow Exelon Generation Co |
To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Document Control Desk |
References | |
EA-12-051, RA-13-050, RS-13-124 | |
Download: ML13241A038 (9) | |
Text
1 Exelon Generation Order No. EA-12-051 RS-13-124 RA-13-050 August 28, 2013 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-16 NRC Docket No. 50-219
Subject:
First Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051)
References:
- 1. NRC Order Number EA-12-051 , " Issuance of Order to Modify Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation
," dated March 12, 2012 2. NRC Interim Staff Guidance JLD-ISG-2012-03, "Compliance with Order EA-12-051 , Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation," Revision 0, dated August 29, 2012 3. NEI12-02, Industry Guidance for Compliance with NRC Order EA-12-051, "To Modify Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation," Revision 1, dated August 2012 4. Exelon Generation Company, LLC's Initial Status Report in Response to March 12,2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051), dated October 25,2012 5. Exelon Generation Company, LLC Overall Integrated Plan in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051), dated February 28,2013 (RS-13-033)
On March 12, 2012, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
("NRC" or "Commission")
issued an order (Reference
- 1) to Exelon Generation Company, LLC (EGG). Reference 1 was immediately effective and directs EGC to install reliable spent fuel pool level instrumentation. Specific requirements are outlined in Attachment 2 of Reference
- 1. Reference 1 required submission of an initial status report 60 days following issuance of the final interim staff guidance (Reference
- 2) and an overall integrated plan pursuant to Section IV , Condition C. Reference 2 endorses industry guidance document NEI 12-02, Revision 1 (Reference
- 3) with clarifications and exceptions identified in Reference
- 2. Reference 4 provided U.S. Nuclear , Regulatory Commission Integrated Plan Report to EA-12-051 August 28,2013 Page 2 the EGC initial status report regarding reliable spent fuel pool instrumentation.
Reference 5 provided the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station overall integrated plan. Reference 1 requires submission of a status report at six-month intervals following submittal of the overall integrated plan. Reference 3 provides direction regarding the content of the status reports. The purpose of this letter is to provide the first six-month status report pursuant to Section IV, Condition C.2, of Reference 1, that delineates progress made in implementing the requirements of Reference
- 1. The enclosed report provides an update of milestone accomplishments since the last status report, including any changes to the compliance method, schedule, or need for relief and the basis, if any. This letter contains no new regulatory commitments.
If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact David P. Helker at 610-765-5525.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on the 28 th day of August 2013. Respectfully submitted, Director -Licensing
& Regulatory Affairs Exelon Generation Company, LLC
Enclosure:
- 1. Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station First Six-Month Status Report for the Implementation of Order EA-12-051 , Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation cc: Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation NRC Regional Administrator
-Region I NRC Senior Resident Inspector
-Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station NRC Project Manager, NRR -Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Ms. Jessica A. Kratchman, NRR/JLD/PMB, NRC Mr. Robert J. Fretz, Jr, NRR/JLD/PMB, NRC Mr. Robert L. Dennig, NRR/DSS/SCVB, NRC Manager, Bureau of Nuclear Engineering
-New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Mayor of Lacey Township, Forked River, NJ U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Integrated Plan Report to EA-12-0S1 August 28, 2013 Page 3 bcc: Site Vice President
-Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Vice President Operations Support Plant Manager, Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Site Engineering Director -Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Regulatory Affairs Manager Regulatory Assurance Manager -Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Severe Accident Management Director Site Operations Director -Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Corporate Licensing Manager -East Corporate licensing Director -East Exelon Records Management Vi nod Aggarwal Roger Schiavoni Sailaja Mokkapati Mohamed Dicko Enclosure Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station First Six-Month Status Report for the Implementation of Order EA-12-0S1, Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (5 pages)
Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station First Six-Month Status Report for the Implementation of Order EA-12-0S1, Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation 1 Introduction Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station developed an Overall Integrated Plan (Reference 1 in Section 8), documenting the requirements to install reliable Spent Fuel Pool Level Instrumentation (SFPLI), in response to Reference
- 2. This enclosure provides an update of milestone accomplishments since submittal of the Overall Integrated Plan including any changes to the compliance method, schedule, or need for relief/relaxation and the basis, if any. 2 Milestone Accomplishments The following milestone has been completed since the development of the Overall Integrated Plan (Reference 1), and is current as of August 19, 2013.
- Issued Exelon Fleet contract to procure Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (SFPI) on June 18, 2013 3 Milestone Schedule Status The following provides an update to the milestone schedule to support the Overall Integrated Plan. This section provides the activity status of each item, and the expected completion date noting any change. The dates are planning dates subject to change as design and implementation details are developed.
Revised Milestone Target Completion Activity Target Date Status Completion Date Submit 60 Day Status Report October 25, 2012 Complete Submit Overall Integrated Plan February 28, 2013 Complete Submit 6 Month Updates: Update 1 August 28, 2013 Complete with this submittal Update 2 February 28, 2014 Not Started Update 3 August 28, 2014 Not Started Update 4 February 28, 2015 Not Started Update 5 August 28, 2015 Not Started Page 1 of 5 Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station First Six-Month Status Report for the Implementation of SFP LI August28,2013 Milestone Target Completion Activity Date Status Update 6 February 28, 2016 Not Started Update 7 August 28, 2016 Not Started Modifications:
Conceptual Design 302012 Complete Issue Exelon Fleet contract to 202013 Complete procure SFPI Equipment Begin Detailed Design 402014 Not Started Engineering Complete and Issue SFPI 202015 Not Started Modification Package Begin Installation 2Q2016 Not Started Complete SFPI Installation and 402016 Not Started Put Into Service 4 Changes to Compliance Method Revised Target Completion Date There are no changes to the compliance method as documented in the Overall Integrated Plan (Reference 1). 5 Need for Relief/Relaxation and Basis for the Relief/Relaxation Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station expects to comply with the order implementation date and no relief/relaxation is required at this time. 6 Open Items from Overall Integrated Plan and Draft Safety Evaluation The following tables provide a summary of the open items documented in the Overall Integrated Plan or the Draft Safety Evaluation (SE) and the status of each item. Overall Integrated Plan Open Items 01# Description Status 1 Instruments Complete. (Ref.1 ) Continuous level indication will be The Westinghouse Spent Fuel Pool provided by a guided wave radar Level Indication instrumentation was Page 2 of 5 Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station First Six-Month Status Report for the Implementation of SFP LI August 28, 2013 system, submersible pressure selected consistent with the guidelines of transducer, or other appropriate level NRC JLD-ISG-2012-03 and NEI 12-02. sensing technology that will be The instrument is a guided wave radar determined during the detailed system. It provides the capability to engineering phase of the project. reliably monitor the spent fuel pool water level under normal and anticipated adverse environmental conditions.
The sensor input to the system is a guided wave radar probe. Using the principle of time domain reflectometry (TDR) to detect the SFP water level, microwave signals are pulsed down the cable probe and reflected back from the water surface. This is used to determine the level of the water in the pool. Each water level measurement channel includes a flexible stainless-steel sensor cable probe suspended in the spent fuel pool from a seismic Category 1 bracket attached to the operating deck or to a raised curb at the side of the pool. The cable probe extends to just above the top of the spent fuel racks. The sensor electronics are mounted in seismic and missile protected areas outside of the building housing the SFP to minimize exposure to elevated radiation and environmental conditions which could result from a postulated loss of water inventory in the pool. There is an interconnecting cable between the sensor cable probe and sensor electronics.
The sensor electronics provide an instrument standard analog signal to a remote enclosure that will be installed in an accessible location.
This enclosure contains the Uninterruptable Power Supply (UPS), backup battery, and water level display. The enclosure also includes the capability to connect an emergency or temporary external power Page 3 of 5 01# Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station First Six-Month Status Report for the Implementation of SFP LI August 28,2013 source as part of the FLEX mitigating strategies.
Attachment 1 shows the components and arrangement of the guided wave radar system spent fuel pool level sensor and electronics enclosure for one channel. Draft Safety Evaluation Open Items Description Status None at this time. 7 Potential Draft Safety Evaluation Impacts There are no potential impacts to the Draft Safety Evaluation identified at this time. 8 References The following references support the updates to the Overall Integrated Plan described in this enclosure.
- 1. Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station, "Overall Integrated Plan in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-0S1)," dated February 28,2013 (RS-13-033) 2. NRC Order Number EA-12-0S1, "Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation," dated March 12, 2012. Page 4 of 5 Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station First Six-Month Status Report for the Implementation of SFP LI August28,2013 Attachment 1 Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation System Sensor Electronics Remote Enclosure containing I [1[QJ I sensor UPS Interconnecting Cable Spent Fuel Pool 1201240 VAC Power 20-30' (typical) measurement span to just above top of , fuel racks 6 mm SST Cable Probe with Anchor Weight Page 5 of 5 Output to optional alternate display ... *11 40.0 II