ML15061A335: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 28: Line 28:
==Dear Mr. Batson:==
==Dear Mr. Batson:==


The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Region II staff will conduct a Problem Identification and Resolution (PI&R) inspection at your Oconee Nuclear Station during the weeks of April 13-17, 2015, and April 27-May 1, 2015. The inspection team will be led by Ms. Jannette Worosilo, a Senior Project Engineer from the NRC's Region II office. This inspection will be conducted in accordance with the baseline inspection procedure, Procedure 71152, Problem Identification and Resolution, effective date January 1,  
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Region II staff will conduct a Problem Identification and Resolution (PI&R) inspection at your Oconee Nuclear Station during the weeks of April 13-17, 2015, and April 27-May 1, 2015. The inspection team will be led by Ms. Jannette Worosilo, a Senior Project Engineer from the NRC's Region II office. This inspection will be conducted in accordance with the baseline inspection procedure, Procedure 71152, Problem Identification and Resolution, effective date January 1, 2015. The biennial PI&R inspection and assessment of the licensee's Corrective Action Program (CAP) complements and expands upon the resident baseline inspections of routine daily screening of all corrective action program issues, quarterly focused issue reviews, and semiannual trend PI&R reviews.
 
2015. The biennial PI&R inspection and assessment of the licensee's Corrective Action Program (CAP) complements and expands upon the resident baseline inspections of routine daily screening of all corrective action program issues, quarterly focused issue reviews, and semiannual trend PI&R reviews.
On March 2, 2015, Ms. Worosilo confirmed with Ms. Judy Smith, of your staff, arrangements for the two-week onsite inspection.  
On March 2, 2015, Ms. Worosilo confirmed with Ms. Judy Smith, of your staff, arrangements for the two-week onsite inspection.  


Line 46: Line 44:


Sincerely,  
Sincerely,  
       /Steven Rose RA for/
       /Steven Rose RA for/
Anthony D. Masters, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 7 Division of Reactor Projects  
Anthony D. Masters, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 7 Division of Reactor Projects  
Line 87: Line 84:
* Responsible plant department
* Responsible plant department
* PIP completion status If possible, provide this list in a format compatible with spreadsheet software (example shown below).
* PIP completion status If possible, provide this list in a format compatible with spreadsheet software (example shown below).
PIP # Problem PrioritySystemComponent Org Status PIP-O-2008-01 "A" RHR Pump failed flow criteria per SR 5.0.5.4 2 RHR 2-RHR-PMP-A ENG Open 2    4. List of outstanding corrective actions including the following information for each action:
PIP # Problem Priority System Component Org Status PIP-O-2008-01 "A" RHR Pump failed flow criteria per SR 5.0.5.4 2 RHR 2-RHR-PMP-A ENG Open 2    4. List of outstanding corrective actions including the following information for each action:
* Corrective action number
* Corrective action number
* Corrective action type (e.g., corrective action to prevent recurrence, enhancement, maintenance rule evaluation, etc)
* Corrective action type (e.g., corrective action to prevent recurrence, enhancement, maintenance rule evaluation, etc)
Line 96: Line 93:
* Corrective action due date
* Corrective action due date
* Completion status If possible, provide this list in a format compatible with spreadsheet software (example shown below).
* Completion status If possible, provide this list in a format compatible with spreadsheet software (example shown below).
Corrective Action #
Corrective Action # Type Description PIP Initiation Date Extensions Due Date Status AI2008000 001 CAPR Revise Procedure  
Type Description PIP Initiation Date Extensions Due Date Status AI2008000
 
001 CAPR Revise Procedure  


NGK-003-4585 PIP-O-2008-01 01/05/08 2 06/15/08Awaiting CARB Review  5. List of control room deficiencies with a brief description and corresponding PIP and/or work order (WO) number  
NGK-003-4585 PIP-O-2008-01 01/05/08 2 06/15/08Awaiting CARB Review  5. List of control room deficiencies with a brief description and corresponding PIP and/or work order (WO) number  

Revision as of 07:31, 9 July 2018

Oconee Nuclear Station - Notification of Inspection and Request for Information for NRC Problem Identification and Resolution Inspection
ML15061A335
Person / Time
Site: Oconee  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 03/02/2015
From: Masters A D
Reactor Projects Branch 7
To: Batson S
Duke Energy Corp
References
Download: ML15061A335 (2)


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION II 245 PEACHTREE CENTER AVENUE NE, SUITE 1200 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-1257 March 2, 2015

Mr. Scott Batson Site Vice President

Duke Energy Corporation Oconee Nuclear Station 7800 Rochester Highway

Seneca, SC 29672-0752

SUBJECT:

OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION - NOTIFICATION OF INSPECTION AND REQUEST FOR INFORMATION FOR NRC PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION AND RESOLUTION INSPECTION

Dear Mr. Batson:

The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Region II staff will conduct a Problem Identification and Resolution (PI&R) inspection at your Oconee Nuclear Station during the weeks of April 13-17, 2015, and April 27-May 1, 2015. The inspection team will be led by Ms. Jannette Worosilo, a Senior Project Engineer from the NRC's Region II office. This inspection will be conducted in accordance with the baseline inspection procedure, Procedure 71152, Problem Identification and Resolution, effective date January 1, 2015. The biennial PI&R inspection and assessment of the licensee's Corrective Action Program (CAP) complements and expands upon the resident baseline inspections of routine daily screening of all corrective action program issues, quarterly focused issue reviews, and semiannual trend PI&R reviews.

On March 2, 2015, Ms. Worosilo confirmed with Ms. Judy Smith, of your staff, arrangements for the two-week onsite inspection.

The enclosure lists documents that will be needed prior to the inspection. Please have the referenced information available no later than March 30, 2015. Contact Ms. Worosilo with any questions concerning the requested information. The inspectors will try to minimize your administrative burden by specifically identifying only those documents required for inspection preparation.

If additional documents are needed, they will be requested when identified. Prior to the onsite inspection, Ms. Worosilo will discuss with your staff the following inspection support administrative details: availability of knowledgeable plant engineering and licensing personnel to serve as points of contact during the inspection; method of tracking inspector requests during the inspection; access to licensee computers; working space; arrangements for site access; and

other applicable information.

S. Batson 2

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions regarding the information requested or the inspection, please contact Ms. Worosilo at (404) 997-4485.

Sincerely,

/Steven Rose RA for/

Anthony D. Masters, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 7 Division of Reactor Projects

Docket Nos.: 50-269, 50-270, 50-287 License Nos.: DPR-38, DPR-47, DPR-55

Enclosure:

Information Request for Oconee Nuclear Station Problem Identification And Resolution Inspection Distribution via ListServ

ML15061A335 SUNSI REVIEW COMPLETE FORM 665 ATTACHED OFFICE RII:DRP RII:DRP SIGNATURE JGW1 SDR2 for ADM2 NAME J. Worosilo A. Masters DATE 03/02/2015 03/02/2015 E-MAIL COPY? YES NO YES NO S. Batson 3 Letter to Scott Batson from Anthony D. Masters dated March 2, 2015.

SUBJECT:

OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION - NOTIFICATION OF INSPECTION AND REQUEST FOR INFORMATION FOR NRC PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION AND RESOLUTION INSPECTION

DISTRIBUTION:

L. Douglas, RII OE Mail RIDSNRRDIRS

PUBLIC RidsNrrPMOconee Resource

Enclosure INFORMATION REQUEST FOR OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION AND RESOLUTION INSPECTION (APRIL 13-17, 2015 AND APRIL 27-May 1, 2015)

Note: Unless otherwise noted, the information requested below corresponds to documents generated since April 2013. Please provide the requested documents in electronic format. If the information is not available in electronic format, please contact the inspection team leader to coordinate other available methods to provide the information.

1. Copies of the corporate and site level procedures and sub-tier procedures associated with the corrective action program. This should include procedures related to:
  • Corrective action process
  • Cause evaluation
  • Operating experience program
  • Employee concerns program
  • Self-assessment program
  • Degraded/non-conforming condition process (e.g., RIS 2005-20)
  • System health process or equivalent equipment reliability improvement programs
  • Preventive maintenance deferral process If any of the procedures requested above were revised after April 2013, please provide (or have available) copies of all revisions during the onsite inspection.
2. List of top ten risk significant systems, top ten risk significant components for each one of the top ten risk significant systems, and top ten risk significant operator manual actions
3. List of all Problem Investigation Program reports (PIPs) initiated including the following information for each PIP:
  • Brief, but complete problem description
  • Priority or level
  • Affected system
  • Affected component
  • Responsible plant department
  • PIP completion status If possible, provide this list in a format compatible with spreadsheet software (example shown below).

PIP # Problem Priority System Component Org Status PIP-O-2008-01 "A" RHR Pump failed flow criteria per SR 5.0.5.4 2 RHR 2-RHR-PMP-A ENG Open 2 4. List of outstanding corrective actions including the following information for each action:

  • Corrective action number
  • Corrective action type (e.g., corrective action to prevent recurrence, enhancement, maintenance rule evaluation, etc)
  • Brief, but complete corrective action description
  • Associated PIP number
  • Corrective action initiation date
  • Number of extensions
  • Corrective action due date
  • Completion status If possible, provide this list in a format compatible with spreadsheet software (example shown below).

Corrective Action # Type Description PIP Initiation Date Extensions Due Date Status AI2008000 001 CAPR Revise Procedure

NGK-003-4585 PIP-O-2008-01 01/05/08 2 06/15/08Awaiting CARB Review 5. List of control room deficiencies with a brief description and corresponding PIP and/or work order (WO) number

6. List of operator workarounds and operator burdens with a brief description and corresponding PIP number
7. List of all currently extended or overdue PIPs, sorted by initiation date, with the following information:
  • Priority or Significance
  • PIP title and short description
8. List of all PIPs that have been voided, cancelled, or deleted. Please provide the following information for each PIP:
  • Brief, but complete problem description
  • Reason voided, cancelled, or deleted
9. List of all structures, systems, and components (SSCs) which were classified as (a)(1) in accordance with the Maintenance Rule since April 2013. Please include the following information for each system in (a)(1):

3

  • Date of classification in (a)(1)
  • Reason for being placed in (a)(1)
  • Planned actions and their status
10. List of Maintenance Preventable Functional Failures (MPFF) of risk-significant systems. Please include actions completed and current status.
11. List of corrective maintenance work orders. Please include the following information for each work order:
  • Brief, but complete work description
  • Affected system and components
  • Date of initiation
  • Date of completion (if completed)

If possible, provide this list in a format compatible with spreadsheet software (example shown below).

Work Order # Description System Component Initiation Date Due Date StatusWO01345 Replace breaker 2A-BKR-08-BB4 for 2A SI Pump. SI 2A-SI-PMP, BKR-08-BB4 01/05/08 03/15/09 Closed

12. Corrective action closeout packages, including PIPs with description of corrective actions, for all NRC findings and Licensee identif ied violations (LIVs). Please include a cross-reference linking NRC Finding numbers and LIVs to appropriate PIP numbers.
13. Corrective action closeout packages, including PIPs with description of corrective actions, for all licensee event reports (LERs) issued. Please include a cross-reference linking LER number to appropriate PIP number.
14. List of all NRC generic communications (e.g., Information Notices, Generic Letters, etc.) and industry operating experience (OE) documents (e.g., Part 21 reports, vendor information letters, information from other sites, etc.) evaluated by the site for applicability to the station, regardless of the determination of applicability. Please include the reference number (e.g., PIP number) for the documents that evaluated the aforementioned OE information.
15. Copies of all quality assurance audits and/or assessments issued, including the last two audits/assessments of the corrective action program
16. Copies of all department self-assessments.

4 17. Copy of the most recent integrated plant trend report, departmental trend report(s), and corrective action trend report, including any human performance and equipment reliability trends.

18. Copy of the latest Corrective Action Program statistics (if exists) such as the number of PIPs initiated by department, human performance errors by department, and others as may be available.
19. Copies of any minutes of meetings by the offsite safety review boards/groups. In addition, please provide a list of routine meetings involving the CAP to be held while

team is onsite.

20. List of PIPs related to equipment aging issues in the top ten risk significant systems since April 2010 (e.g., system erosion and/or corrosion problems; electronic component aging or obsolescence of circuit boards, power supplies, relays, etc.; environmental qualification). Please provide the following information for each PIP:
  • Priority
  • PIP problem description
21. If performed, please provide any recent self-assessment of the site safety culture.
22. Copies of corrective action program documents related to cross-cutting issues (human performance, problem identification and resolution, and safety conscious work environment) identified via trending, self-assessments, safety review committee or other

oversight methods

23. List of all root cause evaluations with a brief description.
24. Copy of Probabilistic Risk Assessment importance measures report, if available.
25. System Health Reports, system design basis documents, and system description information for the top ten risk significant systems.