ML15140A381: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1NRR-PMDAPEm ResourceFrom:Sreenivas, VSent:Wednesday, May 20, 2015 9:05 AMTo:david.heacock@dom.comCc:'Gary D Miller'; Pascarelli, Robert; Craig D Sly (Generation - 6) (craig.d.sly@dom.com); 'david.sommers@dom.com' (david.sommers@dom.com); szymanski.tom@dom.com
{{#Wiki_filter:1NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:Sreenivas, V Sent:Wednesday, May 20, 2015 9:05 AM To:david.heacock@dom.com Cc:'Gary D Miller'; Pascarelli, Robert; Craig D Sl y (Generation - 6) (craig.d.sly@dom.com);  
'david.sommers@dom.com' (david.somme rs@dom.com); szymanski.tom@dom.com


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Acceptance Review: Revise the Emergency Action Levels (EALs) North Anna Power StationBy letter dated May 4, 2015, Virginia Electric and Power Company (Licensee) submitted a license amendment request (LAR) to revise the Emergency Action Levels (EALs) North Anna Power Station. The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this LAR. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.  
Acceptance Review: Revise the Emergency Acti on Levels (EALs) North Anna Power StationBy letter dated May 4, 2015, Virginia Electric and Power Company (Licensee) submitted a license amendment request (LAR) to revise the Emergency Action Levels (EALs) North Anna Power Station. The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this LAR. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.  


The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.  
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.  
Line 25: Line 26:
__________________________
__________________________
V. Sreenivas, PH.D., C.P.M.,
V. Sreenivas, PH.D., C.P.M.,
Dominion Fleet/North Anna Power Station Project Manager, LPL2-1, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Hearing Identifier:  NRR_PMDA Email Number:  2091  Mail Envelope Properties  (V.Sreenivas@nrc.gov20150520090500)  
Dominion Fleet/North Anna Power Station Project Manager, LPL2-1, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation  
 
Hearing Identifier:  NRR_PMDA Email Number:  2091  Mail Envelope Properties  (V.Sreenivas@nrc.gov20150520090500)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Acceptance Review: Revise the Emergency Action Levels (EALs) North Anna Power Station  Sent Date:  5/20/2015 9:05:19 AM  Received Date:  5/20/2015 9:05:00 AM From:    Sreenivas, V Created By:  V.Sreenivas@nrc.gov Recipients:    "'Gary D Miller'" <gary.d.miller@dom.com>  Tracking Status: None "Pascarelli, Robert" <Robert.Pascarelli@nrc.gov>  Tracking Status: None  "Craig D Sly (Generation - 6) (craig.d.sly@dom.com)" <craig.d.sly@dom.com>  Tracking Status: None  "'david.sommers@dom.com' (david.sommers@dom.com)" <david.sommers@dom.com>  Tracking Status: None "szymanski.tom@dom.com" <szymanski.tom@dom.com>  Tracking Status: None  "david.heacock@dom.com" <david.heacock@dom.com>  Tracking Status: None Post Office:      Files    Size      Date & Time MESSAGE    1760      5/20/2015 9:05:00 AM Options  Priority:    Standard  Return Notification:    No  Reply Requested:    No  Sensitivity:    Normal  Expiration Date:      Recipients Received:}}
Acceptance Review: Revise the Emergency Action Levels (EALs) North Anna Power Station  Sent Date:  5/20/2015 9:05:19 AM  Received Date:  5/20/2015 9:05:00 AM From:    Sreenivas, V Created By:  V.Sreenivas@nrc.gov Recipients:    "'Gary D Miller'" <gary.d.miller@dom.com>  Tracking Status: None "Pascarelli, Robert" <Robert.Pascarelli@nrc.gov>  Tracking Status: None  "Craig D Sly (Generation - 6) (craig.d.sly@dom.com)" <craig.d.sly@dom.com>  Tracking Status: None  "'david.sommers@dom.com' (david.sommers@dom.com)" <david.sommers@dom.com>  Tracking Status: None "szymanski.tom@dom.com" <szymanski.tom@dom.com>  Tracking Status: None  "david.heacock@dom.com" <david.heacock@dom.com>  Tracking Status: None Post Office:      Files    Size      Date & Time MESSAGE    1760      5/20/2015 9:05:00 AM
 
Options  Priority:    Standard  Return Notification:    No  Reply Requested:    No  Sensitivity:    Normal  Expiration Date:      Recipients Received:}}

Revision as of 00:58, 1 July 2018

2015/05/20 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review: Revise the Emergency Action Levels (Eals) North Anna Power Station
ML15140A381
Person / Time
Site: North Anna  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 05/20/2015
From: V Sreenivas
Plant Licensing Branch II
To: Heacock D A
Dominion Energy Co
References
Download: ML15140A381 (2)
v • d • e


Text

1NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:Sreenivas, V Sent:Wednesday, May 20, 2015 9:05 AM To:david.heacock@dom.com Cc:'Gary D Miller'; Pascarelli, Robert; Craig D Sl y (Generation - 6) (craig.d.sly@dom.com);

'david.sommers@dom.com' (david.somme rs@dom.com); szymanski.tom@dom.com

Subject:

Acceptance Review: Revise the Emergency Acti on Levels (EALs) North Anna Power StationBy letter dated May 4, 2015, Virginia Electric and Power Company (Licensee) submitted a license amendment request (LAR) to revise the Emergency Action Levels (EALs) North Anna Power Station. The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this LAR. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact me at 301-415-2597.

__________________________

V. Sreenivas, PH.D., C.P.M.,

Dominion Fleet/North Anna Power Station Project Manager, LPL2-1, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 2091 Mail Envelope Properties (V.Sreenivas@nrc.gov20150520090500)

Subject:

Acceptance Review: Revise the Emergency Action Levels (EALs) North Anna Power Station Sent Date: 5/20/2015 9:05:19 AM Received Date: 5/20/2015 9:05:00 AM From: Sreenivas, V Created By: V.Sreenivas@nrc.gov Recipients: "'Gary D Miller'" <gary.d.miller@dom.com> Tracking Status: None "Pascarelli, Robert" <Robert.Pascarelli@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "Craig D Sly (Generation - 6) (craig.d.sly@dom.com)" <craig.d.sly@dom.com> Tracking Status: None "'david.sommers@dom.com' (david.sommers@dom.com)" <david.sommers@dom.com> Tracking Status: None "szymanski.tom@dom.com" <szymanski.tom@dom.com> Tracking Status: None "david.heacock@dom.com" <david.heacock@dom.com> Tracking Status: None Post Office: Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1760 5/20/2015 9:05:00 AM

Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML15140A381&oldid=778178"