Revision as of 14:27, 18 May 2018

Text

Proposed Tech Specs Increasing Storage Capacity of Spent Fuel Pool Storage Racks
	ML17255A744
Person / Time
Site:	Ginna
Issue date:	04/02/1984
From:	; ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP.
To:	;
Shared Package
ML17255A742	List: ML17255A741; ML17255A743; ML17255A744;
References
	NUDOCS 8404100124
	Download: ML17255A744 (145)
	v • d • e

'ttachmentAReplacepage5.4-1withattached5.4-1through5.4-5.8404i001Z4840402PDRADOCK05000244PPDR II1'-iiI'V.

FuelStoraeSecificationThenewandspentfuelpit.structuresaredesignedtowithstandtheanticipatedearthquakeloadingsasClassIstructures.Thespentfuelpit,hasastainlesssteellinertoensureagainstlossofwater.ThespentfuelstorageracksaredividedintotworegionsasdepictedonFigure5.4-1.InRegion1itisimpossibletoinsertfuelassembliesinotherthanthe.prescribedlocations.ThefuelisstoredverticallyinanarraywithsufficientcentertocenterdistancebetweenassembliestoassureKeff<0.95for(1)unirradiatedfuelassembliesdeliveredpriortoJanuary1,1984(Region1-15)containingnomorethan39.0gmsU-235peraxialcm,and(2)unirradiatedfuelassembliesdeliveredafterJanuary1,1984containingnomorethan41.9gmsU-235peraxialcm.InRegion2ofthespentfuelstorageracks,fuelisstoredinaclosepackedarrayutilizingfixedneutronpoisonsineachofthestoredlocations.FordischargedfuelassembliestobestoredinRegion2,(1)60daysmusthaveelapsedsincethecorereachedhotshutdownpriortodischargeand(2)thecombinationofassemblyaverageburnupandinitialU-235enrichmentmustbesuchthatthepointidentifiedbythesetwoparameterson'igure5.4-2isabovethelineapplicabletotheparticularfuelassembly.design,thereforeassuringthatKeff<0.95.AmendmentNo.Proposed 5.4.4~~ThespentfuelstoragepitisfilledwithboratedwaterataconcentrationtomatchthatusedinthereactorBasiscavityandrefuelingcanalduringrefuelingoperationswheneverthereisfuelinthepit.ThecentertocenterspacingofRegion1insuresthatKeff<.0.95fortheenrichmentlimitationsspecifiedin5.4.2,andforapostulatedmissileimpacttheresultingdoseattheEABwouldbewithintheguidelinesof10CFR100~.InRegion2,Keff<0.95isinsuredbytheadditionoffixedneutronpoison(boraflex)ineachoftheRegion2storagelocations,andaminimumburnuprequirementasafunctionofinitialenrichmentforeachfuelassemblydesign.The60daycoolingtimerequirementinsuresthatforapostulatedmissileimpacttheresultingdoseattheEABwouldbewithintheguidelinesof10CFR100.ThetwocurvesofFigure5.4-2dividethefuelassemblydesignsintotwogroups.ThefirstgroupisallfueldeliveredpriortoJanuary1,1984.ThisincorporatesallExxonandWestinghouseHIPARdesignsusedatGinna4ThesecondcurveisfortheWestinghouseOptimizedFuelAssemblydesigndeliveredtoGinnabeginninginFebruary19843TheassemblyaverageburnupiscalculatedusingINCOREgeneratedpowersharingdataandtheactualplantoperatinghistory.Thecalculatedassemblyaverageburnupshouldbereducedby10%toaccountforuncertainties.Anuncertaintyof4%isassociatedwiththemeasurementofpowersharing.Theadditional6%providesadditionalmargintoboundtheburnupuncertainty5.4-2Proposed associatedwiththetimebetweenmeasurementsandupdatesofcoreburnup.ThecurvesofFigure5.4-2incorporatetheuncertaintiesofthecalculationofassemblyreactivity.~References1.Letter,J.E.MaiertoH.R.Denton,January18,1984.2.LetterJ.E.MaiertoH.R.Denton,January18,1984.3.CriticalityAnalysisofRegion2oftheGinnaMDRSpentFuelStorageRack,Pickard,LoweandGarrick,Inc.March8,1984.4.Letter,T.R.Robbins,Pickard,LoweandGarrick,Inc.toJ.D.Cook,RG&EMarch15,1984.5.4-3~Proposed f(5>ER>EQ)35L'RRRRRRRXRSRSiSRRRRRRRRRWiRiSili3S)iAf~R(~RSIIRSSSISSRSIHSRll5%%5515511eire~ae~ae~aaraaaaaaraaaaaaaaaraaaaaaaraaa5)<5135)ii)<5%%iiSS5%%iSSiSRiRRSiRHRSSRSRI<Sf<1)3AIJSRRISRISIRROIIRIRRRRSRRRIIIIHIQCRKI5353555iiSSi%15SSli%iSiSiSSSRSkiSSe~ac~aeiac~aaaaraaaraaaaaraaarrraaarrrxaaaRt(RC{RAS>i$%%%%5555%5%5SR%5%iSi%555%5HReireiavai~arraaaaaaaaaraaaaaxaarrarraaaaaRCiiilQKER>3%5i%55%55%5%55%%5%%%5%%%855%5%RES)iS)3iCOSRSSSRSSHRSXSEiRiiSRRiSRRRRRRSf<5)ti>EO(iiiRSH%5Qi%%55%%HRQ%%%)Si%i)<5)3i>EQ)3SRRRiRRSRSRiRRRiRiRSSSiiiSSRRRRif~5j)R)<RKiRIIRB1QQRHIRRRQIRQ11SRQIit(RKESf(if(51<SK<if<5)35%<5>(SRiiRRRRRRRRSESRRRRSRRRRRRRRRRRf<R>~IXf<5555i)X<%>~lit~<5]~(L~(5i~<5%iSS55555%55SSSS>%555iRSS55%if(5>3S)ER)35@4)35)35>3ifiR]iSSSRiSgRRiRSOQRiiiRRRSRMRiERii)3RK~S)ESKER)35>(R>350<5>tif<5)~55iSSQS555%5555%5iRSSSSi555i%5Xi3%f~SK(R>3%35i3A35)3RC<R)3SRRRiSRRRRRRRRRRRRiRiRRRiSRRR55f~RKERf<if<R>l5>li>31)35131)3535XISISRRRRSSRRRR>IRSQSSISRSRSI5)3564fliKER)3E>354f(5>3i)3SRRiRESRiRRRRiRiRRRRiSRRRSRRSiRCiOKIQKIRK~SK<53535)3S)ISfi5)iIi%5'5555iXSiQSiRiSiiiRSSSRiSRRC~RKERC<SC<5)EQ)35vS)<5>Eifli55iRRNRRiRRiRRESRRRRiiRRRRRRRae~reii=~ae~auaaaaaaaaaaaaaaraaaraaaaxaaaaaa)<5><5)35>iR>3555ERSgiRIRRRSRSRiRi555i%%5%5ik)35)35>3A3i555515SHSRiRSSSSARiSSSRi5555%Ki5~35)~<5>~~i~<155%155RESIIRRIRRIRSSSRIRRRRl5A(<1()l(il(IQSSSSIQWISILIRSS/SISSQSS51SS 2'20TCtTHEINCH~IjaIuItClll&HECKEUFFEE&ESSEIICO.salasususA461242FIGURE.-230f2010~*!",ar44I~1-3"i4~~ffIl"~~~i'l~a~I3I-*fII'~~'~'IIIte1st~I4Iil'I:;-;I-~rr~~~~ite~'l~'~i'f:fi::!-4's~+'I*-1~4~11t~~"41'II~*I4sa,1I~41~4~I~Iatt~it:lli4,it'I4I~~~I1"'II1e~4fsi.yea4+I'.'f!I4~~I*1I!lil.'lei~II..3f'~it.tli11'~4f~4~1~F-1~~4~Il4'1~r~ACCEPTABLEFOsits1~,f)11~-1',"N2~4~'I'IO~)e'ill~I1141RE,i)a,iei14t1I~1~14~~";1'4I1tl~~IT4l~1444~4I*~leI~,~~tt~t,~4i'ijI~'I1It'~~~I,4I~*3-1It44'!'~II~'~~fI114rj.!r'I~14II~fti~~)1'~(4-lt~i."~3'.~1st1st14Ifta11~rsaI~-,~r~4~~i'FUELDELIVEREDPRIOR~!i'ANUARYI'la'te"111~1,1984IllII~i'L!1st'1:.)':ii,;It~TQLr!is~,4tl4lll:1~I'i~~I1'.lI1stI4~I~IIl~1\tf'l!IsfI~4~i1Z~~lt'.~I~~iII:'ll14rjS."34Il,44~II,~IasaI~It,~fff3.'ilIF~tifl'f~i)s'Ii'~III~~jfai(i!i~I114f)T:~...I-,~(itI~1III'~'I~~III~~~*f,i~li~tiaI4'I1~~~})fl~~~1ir,ill~~i~l;-1'N4~~4*-i~1'4~-,~~~-4tIII7fl;-.I~esastlt~4'liti)i~~I~f~1reIteia)i~tla3~)I.i~l(sfileif!ii);itti~~is1~II~fI~iI(3~lifill(li3TIf;I)1REGIONSOFACCEPTABILITYAl4DUNACCEPTABILITYFORSTORAGEOFSPENTFUELINREGION21I~ail~\1TII~~)flasI,itrlil1eli~;iifrlI'~it~I~i~;l)f$!issl~I\i~I~~)er~t~ae',f1~~I'I~1jf~I~~~~t{sff,i',141slitIt4~'I~flsf','it~IIt4lI~I~1~1't~~)~3:3-',4~i4)PIj~11I~',)i))3CCi4~i11EPTABLEI~l\~~fIfte1irI~4(:;..':.~~~~I~Iiit~~illfaiaft.'}il'fff~fsi'iAi~II~4ilttltl410atif3)TTFUELDELIVERED7~TTlT14I~Ii~l'I~'-I~4i)lal'I~lt~~T,r16~~lfl;if'I~3.~e-I'fill!3')'s-~I41g~14~~~II~I-lieI~4'I4~41;}i-';ile.~aiif<<~'iit.f)4'I)~~IIi')3!if~~l~il')flet~471'3'I-'t.i~tI)ia,i)it~~~~~~i)ll)~~~4~I,IIte)il~it7ff,af,ffFORI~i4s~is11~I11'tl~~I114TTIEGIONt~~~il~ii~,ii",1~*I,fa,fi'I~II'~~~~air1'"~I-lan1.it;!..if),':')IIt)lsis'T-'~'FTERJANUARY1,1984'444at;il')'-'IItI~I~~11it~I~Li~I~Ifetr~a~rte'Ii'144t*II'I'~')!a!i:I:3a~~4~I+441'11;~i3'14*4'IeaaaI~!3ii"Iil3'I1.50I2.003.00INITIALENRICHMENT,N/04.00.4.25 BackroundTheoriginalspentfuelstorageracksprovidedcapacityforthestorageof210fuelassemblies.In1976RG&Erequested,andtheNRCapproved,thereplacementoftheoriginalrackswithhigherdensityracksprovidedbyWachterandAssociates.~,~Thisexpandedthestoragecapabilityfrom210to595fuelassemblies.In1980,RG&Erequested3andthe'RCapproved4modificationstothespentfuelcoolingsystemtoprovideheatremovalcapacityof16x10BTU/HR.Thismodificationprovidessufficientheat6removalcapabilityforallpredictedfueldischargesinadditiontoafullcoredischargeatleasttotheyear2010.RecentlyRGSEhassubmittedchangestotheTechnicalSpecificationtoestablishnewlimitationsonunirradiatedfuelenrichmen't(whichhasbeenapproved)andtodeletearestrictiononthespacing.ofrecentlydischargedfuelGeneralTheproposedmodificationtothespentfuelstoragerackswillinvolveonlythesixwest-mostrackmodules(Figure1-1).Theserackswillberemovedfrompoolandmodifiedsothatfuelassembliescanbestoredinwhatwerethewaterboxlocations.Theremainingthreerackmoduleswillnotbemodified.Themodificationswillprovideanadditional420storagelocationsresultinginatotalcapacityof1016*.ThesixmodifiedrackswillbedesignatedRegion2andwillbeusedforfuelthatsatisfiescertainburnupcriteriaandhascooledforatleast60days.The*Amechanicalplugpreviouslyinstalledinastoragecellwillberemoved.

remainingthreerackswillbedesignatedRegion1andwillbeusedforlowburnupand/orrecentlydischargedfuel.TheenclosedanalysisconformstotheNRCguidanceofApril14,1978.Thisreliesonpastanalyses(References1thru6)forthosecomponentswhicharenotmodifiedorarenotimpactedbythemodification.Theanalysisisseparatedinto7sections.1.DescriptionoftheModification2.Nuclear3.Thermal-Hydraulic4.Mechanical,MaterialandStructural5.Cost/BenefitAssessment6.RadiologicalEvaluation7.AccidentEvaluationRochesterGas6ElectricutilizedU.S.ToolSDieasacontractortoperformthemechanical,structuralandmaterialanalyses.U.S.Tool8DiepreviouslymergedwithWachterandAssociates,thesuppliersofthecurrentstorageracks.ThenuclearanalysiswasperformedbyPickard,LoweandGarrick,Inc.ThedescriptionofthemodificationnotesanexceptiontotheTechnicalSpecifications(Section3.11.3)thatwillberequiredtoremovethewestmostracksinthepool.Whilethetrolleyoftheauxiliarybuildingcraneoritstransportedrackwillnottraveloveranyspentfuel,thetrolleywillpassover2-3emptyrowsofarackcontainingspentfuel.Thedistancebetweentheareaunderneaththetransportedrackandthestoredspentfuelwillbemaximizedtoinsurethefuelwouldnotbedamagediftheloadwasdropped.

e1.DescritionoftheModificationAdescriptionofthecurrentspentfuelstorageracksarecontainedinreference1andsubsequentresponsestoNRCstaffquestionsbyRG&E.AgenerallayoutoftheracksinthepoolisatFigurel-l.Theracksascurrentlyconfiguredarecomposedofthreemajorcomponents.a0b.c~Therackmodules,whicharerectangulararraysofcellsofwhichoneoutoftwoarestoragecells.Theothersarewaterboxes.Thesupportbases,onwhichtherackmodulesrest,arearectangularconstructionofIbeams.Figure1-2givesagenerallayoutofthesupportbasesinthepoolandFigure4-2providesasketchoftherackandsupportbase.Ateachcornerofthebaseajackscrewprovidesalevelingmechanismandliftsthebaseaminimumof2inchesoffthepoolfloor.Tofacilitatecoolingwaterflow,holesarecutintothesupportbaseIbeams.Thejackscrewsbottomhemispherical.headrestsonsteelplateswhichrestonthepoolfloor.Seismicsupportsbetweenthebasesandthepoolwallsprovideameanstotransmithorizontalloadsfromtherackstothewalls(seefigure1-2).TaskDescritionofModification1.Shufflespentfueltotheeastmostpositioninthepooltoallowaccesstothetwowestmostracks.

z.Diversloosenthefourmountingboltsfasteningtheracktothebaseinthetwowestmostracks.Comment:Asaresultofstep1,atleast8emptyrowsoffuelcellswillbebetweenthediversandanyspentfuel(Figure1-1).3.Installtheliftingrigintherackandusingtheauxiliarybuildingcraneremoveitfromthepool.Astheracksclearthepoolsurfacedecontaminatewithhighpressurewater.Moverackoverthedecontaminationpitdirectlytothesouthofthespent.fuelpoolandplaceonJskid.Performadditionaldecontaminationasrequired.Comment:Boththespentfuelpoolandthedecontaminationpitsitonbedrock,therefore,thesafetysignificanceofarackdropduringtransferisminimized(SeeFigure1-3).Forthemodification,atemporaryplatformwillbebuiltoverthedecontaminationpitonwhichtheworkwillbeperformed.TheGinnaTechnicalSpecificationsprohibitsthetrolleyoftheAuxiliaryBuildingcranefrommovingoverrackscontainingspentfuel(Section3.11.3).Forthefirsttwowestmostracksthiswillbeviolated.However,thetrolleyorthetransportedrackwillnotpassoveranyspentfuel,but2to3emptyrowsofarackcontainingspentfuel.Shouldaloaddropoccurthedistancebetweentheserowsandcellscontainingspentfuelwillpreventfueldamage.Duringthedecontaminationprocessoverthepool,thepoolboronconcentrationwillbecheckedfrequently.

4.Usingaspecialcuttingmachineremove70guidefunnelsand~~28guideanglesoverthewaterboxes.5.6.7.8.Remove4lifterassembliesandinstallmodifiedbottom'plateswithliftingslots.Enlargethe,flowholesinthebottomplates,andinstalladditional1/2"bottomplatestotheformerwaterboxes.Installtheright-angledpoisonassembliesineachcelloftherack.Diversinstallshimsatthecornersofthesupportbaseandretractjackscrews.Baseandrackloadswillrestontheshims.9.Setracksinpoolonsupportbaseswithoutthemounting~~bolts.10.Repeattheabovestepsuntilthesixwestmostracksinthepoolhavebeenmodified.11.Removeall(bothRegion2andRegion1)seismicsupportsbetweentherackbasesandthewalls.Inordertoremovethetwowestmostracksthespentfuelpoolcoolingsystemdischargepipewillhavetoberemovedwhereitdescendsthewest,wallofthespentfuelpool.Thedecayheatloadduringthetime'periodofthemodificationwillbesmall(<2MBTU/HR)becausetheprojectedstarttimeforthemodificationofOctober1984willbeatleastsixmonthsafterthedischargeofthelastreloadbatch.Theheatcapacityofthepoolissuchthataheatuprateassumingnoheatlossesduetoevaporationorothermechanismsislessthan1'Fperhour.Atemporaryfittingandhosewillbeusedtoreturncoolingwatertothepool.

Shouldcoolantflowbelost,theslowheatuprateandthetypicallylowinitialtemperatureofthepoolwillensureadequatetimeisavailableforthenormalbackup(skidmountedpumpandheatexchanger)emergencycoolingsystemtobeputintooperation.Assoonaspossibleafterthetwowestmostracksarere-installed,thenormalcoolingpathwillberestored.

~SEA~C~ESSSSSSSSS~~ESSSESESSESIK(SEERESS~~ERERSRS~EEEEEEEEEESSI')5a><gf<Sftgfi5I>E%KIRK(RK(kftQKESSEE~~ERR~SRRSRESSSSSSSSSSSSSSESK%4SK~RRSRWSWASEESEESRSXIPM5$LLLR~EuaaeKIESSSESESSN~-){555%%6KERRSSSSSSRRRSSM555555SSMQ%5OK(%5%)(%hi%5'5%3RMMK%6WK~%5%%~%%45W$355%K(RKiXK(RORti%RRK%555K(RE<K(ROk~Ha5555%8K45RRSSI>INNSR5i~rrrraxraa5>SQRRARRK(05SN1S-->A(i<5-.55SRSR)(>(R~SManrraarri~t4NiNNS51%NSQSRidN5958OK~MQM885K<SRX5555MRQMRWRNSlMRi'%$%2%555$K~RFiRK%-I II~v~vSII'L'Pg%.LPI)~(ISO.io)I(1/AI)s'.l/sr)"O.&l)s(aea')s((ta4.uO)a4)',s~!(5()T.44"IG.(()(0em~4)hg(()144JI'/b(Io.cc')(La.w+4)I(.~/sa(4X4C)(IA.447s(0aca~ptdi)0g.y)+50IIIIIIgo~(v%VEAUSs~~4)s4vWg~vI:c";Iss~~ia-~~ls11~I~I'I~~A~.s.s')'ZtI~~sv1Saon)s4Vv+++~s041440(sl'->Pl.I~~v>.&1,/s0I(Ivz.)I;II4f4'rV$gofg~IgiI~oarereyeoio;+(I'Io%4ooaa4-I+CggLsvvIs~01~(I20JI~~Ig(v4L4~v0~~v1v4IoI11%.bl)s(r44)a+4O.Isola4)(4144I V)<}I=~vI)~~'~~~II)J~~/VhlEWSL'EL6"EVA7ogLIF>ivfKi~CH.I2wI~gznv~d/gga//(NEctZ-~I'5la=Fuaa.%t~wi.tpl..'SSI<ti~v)):D-C)I<t-Oa7)-'VIIR)ITCtt)CJPAV)8.i(C,wesT)FVVKLClhJVV'O)VVI)V))l}4)IL)V,~'ihtEL.l-SO.0V~C~t.T&~lhl<b),TlO&.vP)T~Fl.eaR.ELEV749i~.lI~IilJIII.+&8t)LtJPO2-I-<7))l)!cvARC6+O'L+~~~A"'E'l'R7Q'-4FPS'-/o"~6-/OFIGURE1-3~~AUXILIARYBUILDINGSPENTFUELPOOLAREA~4VV~)gtl)PV'~~~)~~-~4JExya~dwA~<;>woeV'I4iI~HEOJ.PLKLORAGKAREASEEDl<A4JlN(q,O-oA.-00'7.,I))p~~=xnan,:sAx.,~<~"rz1mcl~~~~$47~8//CIIz4'-r'0 2.NuclearAnalsisAttachedisanuclearanalysisofRegion2rackconfigurationperformedbyPickard,LoweandGarrick.ThisanalysisestablishestheminimumburnupsasafunctionofinitialenrichmentrequiredinorderforafuelassemblytobestoredinRegion2.ThisanalysiswasperformedfortheWestinghouseOptimizedFuelAssembly.Reference23addedtheExxonzircaloyguidetubedesign(Regions13-15).TheExxonRegions13-15differfromtheearlierExxonRegions10-12onlyinthatthelaterregionsincorporatezircaloyguidetubeswhiletheearlierregionshadstainlesssteelguidetubes.ThelaterExxonregionoffuelwillbemorereactivethantheearlierregionatanyburnupbecauseofthisdesignchange.Therefore,theminimumburnupcriteriaforRegion2generatedforExxonRegions13-15willbebounding.TheotherfueldesignusedatGinnawastheWestinghouseHIPARdesignwhichincorporatedinconelgridsandstainlesssteelguidetubes.Table2-1showsacomparisonofdesignparametersforthosefuelassembliesusedatGinna.Reference23documentedthattheWestinghouseHIPARdesignislessreactivethantheExxonRegions13-15designatanyburnup,thereforetheminimumburnupcriteriageneratedfortheExxondesignwillbeboundingfortheWestinghouseHIPAR.Inordertodeterminetheburnupofanindividualassemblyfollowingdischarge,RGKwilluseitsNuclearFuelAccountabilityCode(NFAC)whichwasestablishedintheearly1970'storecordtheisotopiccontentofthefuelandotherspecificparameterssuchasburnupforuseinfuturefuelreprocessing.NFACusesasinputtheburnupratedata(Mw-hrsper1000coreMw-hrs)generated byINCOREresultsfromfluxmeasurements.EveryassemblyirradiatedatGinnaisfollowedwithNFACbeginningwithinsertionandproceedingthroughcorelifetodischarge.TheseburnupsgeneratedbyINCORE-NFACwillbereducedby.afactorof10%toconservativelyboundmeasurementuncertainties.Thisreducedburnupwillbecomparedtothecurve(Figure5.4-2ofproposedTechnicalSpecification)todetermineifafuelassemblyisacceptableforstorageinRegion2.Asdescribed,inSection1,everycellofthemodifiedrackswillhaveBoraflexneutronpoisoninsertsinstalled.SpecificqualitycontrolprocedureswillbeusedtoinsurethepresenceoftheBoraflexineverycell.ProperdocumentationfromthemanufacturersofBoraflexwillbeobtainedtoassuretheminimumBdensity.AdiscussionofmechanicalstabilityofBoraflexisatSection5,MechanicalAnalysis.ReferringtoFigure4-4,PoisonAssemblyInstallation,thelengthofthepoisonmaterialinthecellis132inches.This.comparestoamaximumfuelassemblyactivefuellengthof142inches.Theendsoftheactivefuelregionwillbeataburnuplowerthantheassemblyaverage.However,thispositivereactivityeffectwillbeoffsetbytheincreasedneutronleakageattheendsofthefuelregion.Additionalcalculationsarebeingperformedtoquantifythenetreactivityeffectofthepoisonconfiguration.Theresultsofthesecalculationswillbeforwardedwhenavailableandthepoisonmaterialregionextendedifrequired.

Table2-1ComparisonofDesignParametersRodArrayRodsperAssembly"WestinghouseHIPARREGIONS1-914x14179ExxonREGIONS10-1214x14179179179WestinghouseOFA13-15REGION1614x1414x14RodPitch,In.AssemblyPitch\ActiveFuelHeight,In.CladO.D.,In.CladThickness,In.CladMaterialPelletDiameter,In.ametralGap,In.PelletDensity,%GuideTubeO.D.,In.I.D.,In.GTMaterialInstrumentTubeO.D.,In.I.D.,In.ITMaterialIGridsGridMaterial.5567.803141.4-142.0.422.0243SS-304.3659.007594.5375.5075SS-304.422.3455SS-304INCONEL.5567.803142.0.424.030ZRC.3565.007594.540.510SS-304.424.346SS-304ZRCwINCONELSPRINGS.5567.803142.0.424.030ZRC.3565.0075'94.541.'507ZRC.424.346ZRCwINCONELSPRINGS.5567.803141.4.400.243ZRC.3444.007095.5280.4825ZRC.4015.3499ZRC,7-ZRC2-INCONEL"TheseareRegion8parameters.Therewereminorvariationsinsomeoftheseparametersovertheregions.

3.ThermalHdraulicReference4containstheNRCsafetyevaluationofproposedspentfuelpoolcoolingsystemmodificationsandapprovalthatthesewouldprovidesufficientcoolingcapacityforprojecteddischargesthroughyear2009withafullcoredischargeinyearI2010(1360fuelassembliestotal).Thiscoolingcapacityexceedsthemaximumthatwouldberequired=undertheproposedmodifications(1016fuelassembliestotal).Thecurrentprojectedrefuelingcyclesareconsistentwiththeassumptionsofthissafetyanalysis.Itisanticipatedthatthismodificationwillbecompletedduring1986.Thecurrentspentfuelpoolcoolingsystemcapacityis9.3x10BTU/HR.-Thisisfarinexcessofwhatwillberequiredundernormalconditionspriorto1986(dischargeofonlyoneregionoffuelat.endofeachcycle).Ifafullcoredischargeisrequiredpriortothenewspentfuelpoolcoolingsystembeinginoperation,thein-reactordecaytimewillbeextendedinordertoensurethepooltemperaturelimitationsintheTechnicalSpecificationsaresatsfied.InresponsetoNRCquestionsconcerningthepreviousstoragerackmodification,RG6Ecalculatedthemaximumcladdingtemperatureforthehottestfuelassemblyofarecentlydischargedba'tch,dischargedinconjunctionwithafullcore.Thiscalculationkshowedamarginofover80'Ftothesaturationtemperature.Thisassumedarecentlydischargedbatchgroupedtogetheratastoragelocationfarthestfromthecoolingsystemcoldwaterinlet.ThisanalysisisstillvalidforRegion1where,inaccordancewiththeproposedTechnicalSpecification(Section5.4.4),recently dischargedfuelwouldbestoredforaperiodofatleast60daysafterreactorshutdown.After60daysofcoolingtimethefuelcouldbemovedtoRegion2'shigherdensitystorage.Aspartofthemodification,theflowholeatthebottomoftheformerwaterboxeswouldbeenlargedtoequalthatoftheotherstoragelocations.Asindicatedintheanalysis,adequateflowwillbeavailabletothehotterthanaverageassembliesandthereisnolimitingthermalrequirementwhichwouldpreventthegroupingoftheseassemblies~10 4.StructuralMechanicalMaterialAnalsesA.SeismicAnalysisTheobjectivesofthisseismicanalysisaretodeterminethefollowing'duringOBEandSSEseismicevents:1.Themaximumloadsimposedonthefuelstorageracks.2.Themaximumdistancetherackswillslideand/orliftoff.Theresultsofthisanalysiswillbeusedinthemechanicalanalysistoevaluatethestructuralintegrityoftherackswhensubjectedtotheseloadsandmovements.~ScoeTheloadingsconsideredinthisreportforthemodifiedracksusingbothstandardfuelassembliesandconsolidatedfuelwitha2:1compactionratioare:1.Deadweightofthefuelstorageracksandthefuelassemblies.2.Submergedweightsofthefuelstorageracksandthefuelassemblies.3.Seismicloading,bothOBEandSSE,asprovidedbytheaccelerationtimehistoryatthepoolfloor.Horizontalresponsestotheseismicaccelerationsoftheracksareobtainedbyevaluatingtheloadingsfortwodifferentboundaryconditions.1.Thehorizontalmotionisrestrainedbyahorizontalforceequalto0.2timesthenormalforce.Thisistheminimumanticipatedfrictionfactorbetweentherack andthesupportstand,(Ref.13).Theseresultsgivethemaximumdistancetherackswillmoveduringaseismicevent.2.Differentialmotionbetweentherackandthesupportstandisprevented.Thisismodeledinthefiniteelementrepresentationbyplacingahorizontalspring,representingtherackflexibility,betweentherackandafixedpoint.MethodsofAnalsisTheverticalseismicanalysiswasperformedusingtheequivalentstaticresponsespectramethod.Thisconsistsofdeterminingtheverticalnaturalfrequencytobegreaterthan33HZ,thenusingaccelerationsof0.23gforOBEandSSEtakenfromtheresponsespectracurves~4.Thesevalueswereappliedtothedeadweighttoobtainthetotalverticalforces.TheverticalreactionloadswerecombinedwiththehorizontalseismicloadsusingthesquarerootsumofthesquaresmethodasspecifiedinRef.8.Horizontalseismicanalysiswasperformedusingthetimehistorymethodofanalysisinconjunctionwithtimehistorydata.TheOBEtimehistorydatawasobtainedbydividingtheSSEtimehistorydatabytwo.Thisaccountsforthenon-linearitiesinherentinthespentfuelstoragerackswhichinclude:1.Fuel-to-rackwallimpacts2.Racksliding3.Verticalimpactduetoracktipping.Thetimehistoryanalysiswasperformedusingaspecialpurposecomputerprogram"RACKOE"*.Thisprogramwasdeveloped*RACKOEisanacronymforrackanalysisconsideringkineticsofearthquakes,anonlinearfiniteelementprogramdevelopedbyProf.W.F.StokeyofCarnegie-MellonUniversity,Pittsburgh.12

specificallytoanalyzefuelstoragerackbehaviorresultingfromseismicdisturbance.ThisprogramsolvestheequationsofmotionexplicitlyusingEuler'sExtrapolationFormula.Thefuelrestsinthecellbase.Itisassumedtoactasapinnedbeam,centeredinthecell,withagap,betweenthecellandthefuelalongitslength.Thegapsbetweenthefuelandthecellwallscanclosecausingimpacttothewalls.Thespacebetweenthefuelandthewallisfilledwithwater.Asthefuelandthewallmoverelativetoeachother,hydrodynamicforcesaresetupduetotheaccelerationofthewater.Theseforcesareexertedonthefuelandrackstructure,tendingtomitigateIimpactforces.Hydrodynamicforcesaregeneratedbetweentheracksandthepoolwalls.MethodsdescribedbyFritz(Ref.9),Dong(Ref.10)andStokey(Ref.11)areusedtoquantifythesehydrodynamicforces.DampingvaluesusedforthisanalysisaretakenfromRegulatoryGuide1.61,(Ref.12).Therackboxesareweldedtogether.Whentheweldsarestressedtherewillbesomelocalizeddeformation.Thedampingvaluesarebetweenthoseforweldedsteelandboltedsteelstructures.Intheinterestofconservatismthelowervaluesforweldedsteelstructuresareused.Friction,betweentherackandthepoolsupportstand,ishandledbyaspecialfrictionelementofthemodel.Thenormalforceonthiselementistheforceintheverticalsupportswhich,duetoracktipping,canbegreaterthanthedeadweightoftherack.13 EimentDescritionandMaterialProertiesEquipmentDescriptionSection1providesadescriptionofthemodification.AsshowninFigure4-1,thewestsixrackswillbemodifiedtoallowhstorageofspentfuelinwhatarecurrentlywaterboxlocations.TheserackswillbedesignatedRegion2andwillincorporateneutronabsorbingmateiialineachlocation.ShimsareaddedundertherackbasesinRegion2toprovideanincreasedloadtransferarea.SlidingisaccomodatedintheRegion2racksbetweentherackandthebase.supportbyremovaloftheboltsbetweenthetwo(Fig.4-2).TheRegion1racksareunmodifiedandtheirstoragedensityandloadsremainthesame.Inthiscaseslidingwouldoccurbetweenthejackscrewsateachcornerofthesupportbasesandthe11"x11"plateswhichrestonthespentfuelpoolfloor.Inaddition,alltheseismicsupports(bothinRegion1andRegion2)betweenthesupportbasesandthespentfuelpoolwallswillberemoved,thereforenoloadswillbetransmittedtothewallsbyeitherregionofracksasindicatedbytheresultsbelow.Theamountofslidingisinsignificantcomparedtothe(racktowallclearanceorthedimensionsoftheplatesonwhichtheRegion1supportbasejackscrewsrest.Alsotheracksrespondin-phasetoseismicevents,thustherewillbenoaddedimpactloadsattheRegion1-Region2interface.Theanalysisisperformedforthe140cellsizerackwhichiscommonforallsixinRegion2.Thecellcross-sectionisshownonFigure4-3andthelongitudinalsectiononFigure4-4.-14

/Twostoragearrangementsareanalyzed.Oneisreferredtoas"standard"whereinonefuelassembly(179fuelrods)isstoredineachcell.Theotherisreferredtoas"consolidated"whereinthefuelrodsfromtwoassemblies(358fuelrods)containedinastoragecanisterarestoredineachcell.Figure4.5showsthearrangementofthefuelrodsinthecanister.MaterialProertiesApplicablefrom70to200degreesF.Thespentfuelracksarefabricatedfromtype304stainlesssteel.The304SSrackmaterialpropertiesusedintheseismicanalysisare:(Ref.14)DensityYoung'sModulus501.0PCF27.8E06PSIShearModulus10.7E06PSIThefuelassembliescontaincladconstructedofZircaloywhosepropertiesare:(Ref.15):DensityYoung'sModulusShearModulus409.0PCF13.0E06PSI5.0E06PSIOtherdensitiesusedintheanalysisare:.Water62.4PCFUO2643.0PCF

ResultsAfiniteelementrepresentationofarackwithfuelassembliesisshownonFigure4-6where:RackatBase(Horizontal)2-6Rack(Horizontal)7-11FuelAssy.(Horizontal)12RotaryInertia13Rack6FuelAssy's(Vertical)RepresentsFlexibleElements1-5Rack6-10FuelAssy.11HorizontalSupport12,13VerticalSupportsRepresentsGapElementsMHrw=HydrodynamicMass(RacktoWall)MHrf=HydrodynamicMass(RacktoFuel)Theresultsaresummarizedfor:a.StandardRack-140FuelAssy's-179FuelRodsPerAssy.b.ConsolidatedRack-140FuelCanisters-358FuelRodsPerCanister.Thetabulatedresultsaregroupedandidentifiedby"sets"numbered1thru5.Thevaluesineachsetareexplainedbelow.SETgl-MaximumForces(KIPS).SETC2-LoadsonIndividualF/A's(LBS)andSupport(KIPS).Themaximumcontactforcesaretheforcesofset51divided-bythenumberoffuelassembliesintherack.Thesupportforcesaretheforcesofset1dividedbytwo.Twosupportstakethegivenreaction.16 SET53-MaximumForces(LBS)attheRackSupport.TheFvertValues,NS,EW,VT,arethevaluesofset1minusthesubmergedweight.(Ex.271,700-208,190=63,510)TheFhorizValues,NSandEW,aretakenfromset1.TheVerticalForces,VT,aredeterminedbyusing:OBE=0.23gSSE=0.23gFromtheresponsespectracurvecorrespondingto33HZ~4.VT(OBE)=(1.23DWT-BUOYANTFORCE)-SUBMERGEDWT.VT(SSE)=(1.23DWT-BUOYANTFORCE)-SUBMERGEDWT.TheRMSValuesarecalculatedusing:RMS=SUBMERGEDWEIGHT+Fns.+Few+FvtSET54-MaximumForces(LBS)onEachSupport.ThesevaluesarethevaluesofSet83dividedby2.SET05-HorizontalandVerticalMovement.oftheRack(Inches)ELASTIC-Theamounttherackwilldeformasaresultoftheinternalflexibilityoftherackwhenrestrainedfromhorizontalmotion.SLIDING-Theamounttherackwillmovewhentherackisconsideredrigidanda0.2frictionfactorisusedtorestrainmovementinthehorizontaldirection.LIFTOFF-Themaximumvaluestherackwillmoveverticallyoffofthebase,ortip,duringtheseismicevent.TheValuesDWT,BWTandSWTareDeadweight,BuoyantWeight,andSubmergedWeightrespectively.17 Thefrictionforcesarethemaximumhorizontalforcesdevelopedatthebaseofrackusingaminimumfrictionfactorof0.2.18 PROJECT8369SUMMARYOfRESULTSFOR140CELLRACK.ISET¹1-MAX.FORCESATGAPELEMENTSDIR,EVT12345STANDARD.FILERGSUM.1(KIPS).SUPPORTFvtFhxEWOBENSSSE0.055.672.473.273.28.962.098.377.'797.6NSOBE31.453.253.364.483.5271.7170.0393.3156.2404.7231.5EWSSE16.666.5115.883.9.103.3381.6164.2-----SET¹2NSOBELOADSONINDIVIDUALFIA'(LBS)ANDSUPPORTS(KIPS)---224.380.381.460.596.135.985.0EWOBE0.397.517.523.523NSSSE64.443.702.555.697.196.778.1202.4115.8EWSSE119.475.827.599.738190.882.1-SET¹3-MAX.FORCESATSUPPORT(LBS)FvertFhorixNSOBE63,510.170,000.-SET¹5-MOVEMENTATBASE(INS)ELASTICSLIDINGLIFTOFF0.0190.0800.009EWOBE185,110.VTOBE5.3,728.RMS411,133.NSSSE196,510.EWSSE173,410.VTSSE53,728.RMS475,723.156,200.00,000.230,865.231,500.164,300.00,000.283,878.0.0460.088-0.0260.308'.0480.5130.0480.0500.067-SET¹4-MAX.FORCESONSUPPORT(LBS)--NSOBE.31,755.85,000.VTOBE26,864RMS205,567NSSSEEWSSEVTSSE98,25586,705.26,864.EWOBE92,55578,10000,00015432115,750.82,150."00,000.DWTBWTSWTF,RICT80.2NSOBEEWOBENSSSEEWSSEZ33,600.LBS.25,410.LBS.208,190.LBS.IONFORCESFACTOR(LBS)41,640.'2,210.59,760.101,600.RMS237,86"141,939 PROJECT8369SUMMARYOFRESULTSFOR140CELLRACK-SET¹1-MAX.FORCESATGAPELEMENT¹DIREVT123R5NSOBE0.00.0100.098.4159.3EWOBE0.053.&178.3176.0180.1l~NSSSE14.8214.9225.6217.5250.7'A1lEWSSE0.0118.0249.3223.2235.0---'--SET¹2-LOADSONINDIVIDUALF/A'NSOBE00.00.714.703.1138.EWOBE00.383.1270.1257.1286.NSSSE106.1535.1611.1554.1791.EWSSE00.1060.1781.1594.1679.CONSOLIDATED.FILERGSUM.2(KIPS)SUPPORTFvtFhz312.4160.2405.2153.0455.7239.3512.1184.7(LBS)ANDSUPPORTS(KIPS)----156.280.1202.6.76.5227.9119.7256.192.4-SET¹3-MAX.FORCESATSUPPORT(LBS)FvertFhorixNSOBE00.160,200.-SET¹5-MOVEMENTSATBASE(INSELASTICSLIDINGLIFTOFF-0.0180.0280.000EW.OBE64,140.VTOBE89,470.RMS451,146.NSSSE114,640.EWSSE171,040.VTSSE89g470.RMS565,564.153,000.00,000.221,524.239,300.180,700.00,000.302,'289.0.0270.0940.0540.1280.0170.0720.0050.0240.015-SET¹4-MAX.FORCESONSUPPORT(LBS)--NSOBE00.80,100.!-eVTOBERMSNSSSEEWSSEVTSSE44,735.225,573.57,320.85,520.04,735RliS282p782EWOBE32,07076,50000,000.110,762.119,650.92,350.00,000.151,144.DWTBWTSl/T389,000.LBS.47,940.LBS.341,060.I.BS.FRICTIONFORCES80.2FACTOR(LBS)NSOBE=49,640.EWOBE=51,630.NSSSE=68,210.EWSSE=68,210.BECAUSEOFHOLIFTOFF.

B.MechanicalAnalysisIntroductionThespentfuelstorageracksareclassifiedascategory1perNRCRegulatoryGuide1.29.Theirprimaryfunctionistomaintainstoredfuelassembliesinasubcriticalarraywhileprotectingthemfrommechanicaldamageduringallcrediblestorageconditions.Themechanicalanalysispresents.analyticalproofofstructuralintegrity.TheanalysisfollowsNRCguidanceasdelineatedinthepositionpaper"ReviewandAcceptanceofSpentFuelStorageandHandlingApplications",datedApril14,1978andmodifiedJanuary18,1979.ThedesigncalculationsarebasedonsubsectionNFofASMEBoilerandPressureVesselCode,SectionIIIandAppendixDoftheStandardReviewPlan(SRP)3.8.4.ThepermissibleweldstressesaretakenfromTableNF-3324.5(a)-1,1983edition.ThisisthesameasTableNF-3292-1,1977edition,referredtointhepositionpaperandinNF-3321.Thistablenolongerexistsinthe1983edition.TheloadcombinationsusedinthisanalysisareonlysubmergeddeadweightplusSRSScombinationsofOBEandSSEloads.TheseloadcombinationsaretheRMSvaluestakendirectlyfromtheseismicanalysis(Section4A).Theracksarenotsubjectedtoliveloadsnortothermalloads.Thustheloadcombinations,D+L+To(orTa)+EandD+L+Ta+E'ecomeD+EandD+E'.19 Analysesareperformedfortwostoragearrangements,onereferredtoas"standard"whereinonefuelassembly(179fuelrods)isstoredineachcellinRegion2,theotherreferredtoas"consolidated"whereinthefuelrodsfromtwoassemblies(358fuelrods)inacanisterarestoredineach'cellinRegion2.Theinterfacebetweentheracksandbasesisthecruciformbottomplateattherackcornerswhichspanthreeboxesineachdirection.Thustheplaneatthethirdrowlocation,asshownonFigures4-7and4-8,andthethree-boxcornersquarearetheweldplanesanalyzed.FloorloadsforRegion2aretransferredthroughthebasetothell"x11"floorplates.BecauseoftheincreasedstorageinRegion2,shimsareinstalledbetweenthebasecornerandeachfloorplatetoprovidegreaterloadtransferareathanthepresentjackscrews(Fig.4-9).InRegion1,however,sincenochangein,storageisbeingmadethereisnochangeinbasetofloorplates,i.e.Thejackscrewsremain.Theregion1racksarenotbeingmovedfromtheirpresentlocations,andwith.thejackscrewscenteredonthe11"x11"floorplatesthereisenoughdistancetotheedgetotakecareofanysliding.Therearenocalculationsforwallloadsbecause,asfreestandingracksandbases,duetoremovalofthewallseismicrestraints,therearerelativelylargedimensionsbetweentheracksandwallsandconsequentlysmallhydrodynamicforces.TheseapproximatedimensionsareindicatedonFigure4-1andarelargecomparedto,themaximumslidingdistanceof.5inches.20 References1and2providedanevaluationoffuelhandlingaccidentsandconcludedthattherackstructureprotectsstoredfuelfromtheimpactofadroppedfuelassembly.Apostulateddropaccidentofafuelassemblystraightdownintoastoragecellisincludedinthereportbecauseitwasnotpreviouslyaddressed.EimentDescritionSixoftheninepresentlyinstalledrackswillbemodifiedfor100%storagedensity,anddesignatedasRegion2forstorageofdepletedfuel.Theremainingthreeracks,unmodified,areCdesignatedRegion1forstorageofunirradiatedorfreshlydischargedfuelat50%storagedensity.AllsixracksinRegion2arethesamesize,140storagecells.Themodificationconsistsofremovingthepresentboltconnectionsbetweenracksandbasesandthewallseismicrestraints,resultinginafree-standingarray.ThewallseismicrestraintsarealsoremovedfromRegion1.Additionally,afull-lengthrightanglepoisoninsertisweldedineachRegion2cell,asshownonFigure4-3andFigure4-4oftheseismicanalysis(Section4A).Asketchofrack,base,shims,andfloorplatesisrepresentedinFigure4-9.Theshimsareaddedbetweenthebaseandfloorplatesin"ordertoprovidemoreloadcarryingareathanthepresentjackscrews.LoadsfromtheSeismicAnalsisTabulationofloadsfromtheseismicanalysisareinSection4A.TheloadcombinationsofD+E(OBE)andD+E'SSE)aretheRMS21 valueslistedatSet43.Maximumverticalloadsarethoseoccuringon2ofthe4rackcornersatreturnimpactfollowinglift-off.Set54ishalfofset53ortheloadonasinglecorner.ThestressesaresummarizedinTable4-1for:a.Shearinweldsno.1,2,S3shownonFigures4-7and4-8.b.Shearoutofthecorner9boxes(shadedarea,Fig.4-7).c.Bucklingoftheboxwallsd.Floorloadsunderthell"x11"baseplateThestressesinweldsno.1,2,63aredeterminedbycalculatingtheRMSvaluesoftheshearload,verticalandhorizontal,togettheNS,EW,VTandSWTloads.Theforceintheweldiscalculatedby:S2+2SubmeredWeiFSWTFnFewFvt(SWTzsgght)Theshearoutofthecorner,thebucklingloadontheplateandthefloorloadaredeterminedbyusingtheRMSvaluesfortheindividualsupportsgiveninSection4A.Themaximumstressesinwelds1,2,83are:STD.Rack,E-WPlane,OBE,19,970psi,Weld52STD.Rack,N-SPlane,SSE,21,700psi,Weld02CON.Rack,E-WPlane,OBE,16,940psi,Weld52CON.Rack,E-WPlane,SSE,23,340psi,Weld01Themaximumshearoutstressesinthecornersare:STD.Rack,OBE,11,940psiSTD.Rack,SSE,13,800psiCON.Rack,OBE,13,110psiCON.Rack,SSE,16,430psi22 Themaximumfloorloadsinthell"x11"baseplateare:STD.OBE,1700psiSTD.SSE,1965psiCON.OBE,1860psiCON.SSE,2340psiTheallowableweldOBEshearstressis24,000psi.(Ref.14),Sect.NF3000,TableNF-32921-1)TheallowableweldSSEshearstressis38,400psi(1.6OBE(USNRC,SRP3.8.4.5(b))Thecriticalbucklingstressis19,140psi(Ref.21pg.2.12)FloorLoadsThesixmodifiedracksareinRegion02.Usingthesubmergedweightfortherackandcontainedfuelassembliesthetotalfloorloadsare:StandardRackConsolidatedRackI1,249,000LBS.2,046,360LBS.THEBEARINGSTRESSONTHECONCRETEUNDERTHElliiXll>>X3/4~iSUPPORTPLATESAREBEARINGSTRESS(PSI)17001965STANDARDRACKOBESSEFLOORLOAD(lbs)205,567237,862CONSOLIDATERACKOBESSE225,573282,78218642337Theallowableconcretebearingstressis3570psi(Ref.22).23 TABLE4-1SUMMARYOFSTRESSESSTRESS(PSI)NORTH-SOUTHPLANESTANDARDCONSOLIDATEDSTRESS(PSI)EAST-WESTPLANESTANDARDCONSOLIDATEDOBESSEOBESSEOBESSEOBESSEWELD//1WELD//2WELDg3CORNER>'cSHEAROUTBOX"BUCKLINGSTRESS1168016200798017330184801866014260212601480021700112802210019970202701694023340113501770012170172001888019320167202243011,95013p80013yll016p430.ll)95013p82013pl0016p4308,80010,2009,67012,1208,80010,2009,67012,120MAX.~FLOORIOADS1,7001,9651,8602,3401,7002,0001,8602,340*Thesevaluesarecommontobothplanes.24 StraihtDroofaFuelAssemblThrouhanIndividualCellAnanalyseswasperformedtodetermine.theaffectofafuelassemblybeingdroppedontoorintoaspentfuelrack.Theconsequencesofadropontoarack,inwhichtheassemblyimpactsthetopofthefuelboxes,haspreviouslybeenaddressedandfoundacceptable(Ref.1,2).Itwasshownthatafuelassemblyisnotdamagedbythisdrop.Anassessmentisprovidedbelowofafuelassemblybeingdroppeddirectlyintoafuelbox.Sincetheclearancebetweenafuelassemblyandafuelbox,eveninthemaximumboxsizeconsideringtolerances,isontheorderof.2inches,itisunlikelythatthiswouldoccur.Itismostlikelythatthefuelbundlewillstrikethetopofthefuelboxandbedeflectedsothattheenergyisdissipatedindeformationoftheboxorfuelbundleitself.Thispostulateddropaccidentwouldcausethefuelassemblytoimpactthebottomplateinthecell.Theclearancebetweenfueldimensionsandboxdimensionsarequiteclose;thusthefuelassemblywouldactasaleakypistonandthefuelboxwouldactasaleakycylinder.Thehydraulicforcesgeneratedwhenthefuelassemblyinitiallyentersthefuelboxwouldbequitelargeandwouldservetoretardthefuelassemblyduringthenext13.25feetofitsdescent.The0.090"weldswhichattachthebottomplatetothecellwouldbeplasticallydeformedtofailureifloadedhighenough.Thisfailureloadestimateisbasedon25

'I30,000psiultimateshearstrengthandatypicalplasticdeformationof20%.Theareainshearis0.090"x4(8.25")=2.97in.Energy=30,000psix(20%x0.090")x2.97in.=1604in-lbs.Comparingthisvaluetotheenergyavailablefrom.thestraightdropontherack,whichis43,500in-lbwhenthefuelassemblyisconsideredasarigidbodyfora30"drop,thebottomplateweldswouldfail.Sinceeachbottomplateofafuellocationisindividuallyweldedtoitsfuelbox,failureof'onebottomplatewouldnotaffectanyotherfuellocationofstoredfuel.Thus,thepostulatedfueldropwouldonlyresultinonestoragelocationbeingrenderedunuseable.Inaddition,theconsequencesfromaradiologicalstandpointareunchangedsinceonlyoneassemblywouldbeaffected.Also,sincethephysical.configurationofthespentfuelstoragecellswillnotbechanged,thesub-criticalarrayoftherackismaintained';NeutronAbsorbinMaterialTheneutronmaterial,Boraflex,tobeusedintheGinnamodifiedspentfuelrackconstructionwillbemanufacturedbyBrandIndustrialServices,Inc.,andfabricatedtosafetyrelatedbinuclearcriteriaoflOCFR50,AppendixB.Boraflexisasiliconebasedpolymercontainingfineparticlesofboroncarbideinahomogeneous,stablematrix.BoraflexcontainsaminimumBdensityof0.2gm/cm~.Boraflexhasundergoneextensivetestingtostudytheeffectsofgammairradiationinvariousenvironments,*andtoverifyits26 structuralintegrityandsuitabilityasaneutronabsorbing,material.TestswereperformedattheUniversityofMichiganexposingBoraflexto1.03x10"radsgammaradiationwithasubstantialconcurrentneutronfluxinboratedwater.ThesetestsindicatethatBoraflexmaintainsitsneutronattenuationcapabilitiesbeforeandafterbeingsubjectedtoanenvironmentofboratedwaterand1.03x10"radsgammaradiation.Longtermboratedwatersoaktestsathightemperatureswerealsoconducted.Itwasshownthat,Boraflexwithstandsaboratedwaterimmersionof240'Ffor260dayswithoutvisibledistortionorsoftening.Boraflexmaintainsitsfunctionalperformancecharacteristicsandshowsnoevidenceofswellingorlossofabilitytomaintainauniformdistributionofboroncarbide.Duringirradiationacertainamountofgasmaybegenerated.However,theabsorberwillnotbesealedwithinthestoragecellandventpathswillbeavailabletothepool.Thiswillpreventgasinducedswellingoftheinsertsandinterferencewiththefuelassembly.TheactualtestsverifythatBoraflexmaintainslong-termmaterialstabilityandmechanicalintegrity,andcanbesafelyutilizedasapoisonmaterialforneutronabsorptioninspentfuelstorageracks.Beyondtheextensivetestingconducted,BoraflexisbroadlyusedinhighdensityspentfuelstorageracksintheUnitedStatesandinEurope.ItwasfirstinstalledatPointBeachUnit27 1in1979.ApartiallistofoperatingpowerreactorusersofBoraflexfollows:PointBeachUnits1&2NineMilePointUnit1OconeeUnits1&2PrairieIslandUnits1&2TheextensivetestingandthebroadindustryexperiencewithCalvertCliffsIIQuadCitiesUnits1&2H.B.RobinsonUnit2theuseofBoraflexobviatestheneedforaGinnaspecificsurveillanceprogramoftheneutronabsorber.AnypotentiallongtermproblemswilldevelopatotherplantsbeforeitwouldbeevidentatGinna.28 USTRDOESIGhlBERVICEG,INCYDATESUBJECTKD.BYDATE~4FC.SECT.SHEET~OFFEOJ.HO.8369q9cDQ0.

FXGURE4-2RACE-BASESUPPORT WOW~Elch'usts~.1C~ss-sacr/oYY'pvw.s/zs)FIGURE4-3U6f5,DD1:-0I0N6L.F4Vt4:Lf),IP4AeBY/+~rt.DATEei~/e."I!OJECICHKD.BY~~~'ATEM4-..-++..~t..~.mata.Dle,tee,Pf!O.l.tt~]..PyrEzo/gg~yg%F2~~z%F.(dAPjAo1lA.ILT~(OFTw4&//~/=cex)Poiso//.(062/VyJIJI.)/NSER7BALL.o/gg,ZC'aWo6o8BO~DdS/C~PE)Vo/MAZEÃ.02g FIGURE4-4POISONASSEMBLYINSTALLATIONIIlJIICVFlg0lA~Q0C4I~I((III)li~~lIIl,8VcoC4r8 UBTG0QCUIQNBf:AVI(t.L',lf.'i.~W,w//,FIGURE4-5Dy~~~DA'rc14',+/3:.uoilciGill(D.BYg';D*tEi~/!<g'e>/PIOOCOHSOLIDA77&rv'R'SS-DEC7CPA~FULLY-SiZEDJ6,tlat:oF96'BgPQ~DMAILc".{z382llo~~(@ZZZZe,g~<PWax~'~~+(o7ellorn)fI/X)r~.SF'7PFueLRes,((Of'ZAai)Oy~)o.5F:!()'(-(((iITS'FUELRos3.QQ3.8ffhi'All.)~8044U7.846(7:8268/dA)

PROJECT.8369DlRECTICNCF.LOADloIO83IMHrf4M~Hrn7//12II12)~-Fhoriz2'/Fvcrt~FhorizFvtrtFIGURE4-6FINITEELEMENTREPRESENTATION FlGURE4-7RACKWELDSEAST-LIESTPLANE, UQTLDDCGIGNsERVICEG)INcFIGURE4-8RACENELDSNORTH-SOUTHPLANEp/Pic4Du/Sredg~c7rdpr FIGURE4-9RACK-BASESUPPORT 5.CostBenefitAssessment~~~Thecapacityofthespentfuelstorageracksintheircurrentconfigurationis595fuelassemblies.AtthecompletionoftheSpring,1984refuelingoutage332fuelassemblieswillbestoredinthepool.Assumingfutureaveragereloadsizesof28fuelassembliesfullcoredischargecapabilitywouldbelostaftertheSpring1990refuelingoutage.RochesterGasandElectricalsohas81fuelassembliesstoredatwhatwasformerlytheNuclearFuelServicesfacilityatWestValley,NewYork.RG&EisrequiredbythestateofNewYorktohavethisfuelremovedfromWest,ValleybySeptember,1985.TheadditionofthisfueltothestoragepoolwouldcausealossoffullcoredischargecapabilityafterrefuelingintheSpring1987.Withtheproposedmodification,420storagelocationswouldbeadded.Attheprojectedaverageof28fuelassembliesdischargedattheendofanannualcycleintheSpringofeachyear,thelossoffullcoredischargecapabilitywouldoccuraftertheSpring,2002refuelingoutage.ItistheintentofRG&Ethatthismodificationextendthecapabilitytostorespent.fuelattheGinnasiteuntilafinalrepositoryisavailableinaccordancewiththeinterimstorageprovisionsoftheNuclearWastePolicyActof1982.Itisexpectedthatadisposalfacilitywillbeavailableandshipmentswillbeginby.themidtolate1990's.RG&E'ssolecontracturalarrangementforthestorageofspentfueliswiththeNewYorkStateEnergyResearchandDevelopmentAuthority(NYSERDA)coveringthe81fuelassembliesatWest29

Valley,NewYork.NYSERDAhasdemandedthefuelberemovedand~~~inaccordancewiththeContract,RG6Emustcomply.TheattachedTable5-1and5-2,providesinformationonscheduleofprojectedfueldischargesandcorecomponentsstoredintheSFP.Adiscriptiono'fthemodificationisatSection1ofthisattachment.Preliminaryestimatesofthecostsofthemodificationareoutlinedbelow.EngineeringConstructionMaterialInstallationAFDCContingencyTotal125,000500,000825,00050,000400,000$1,900,000Thisisequivalenttoabout$4500perstoragelocation(or$13perkgU).Theseestimatesarepreliminaryandwillbeupdateduponrequest.Thealternativestoincreasingthecapacityofthespentfuelpoolarefew.Thereisnofuelreprocessingfacilityavailablenowandnoindicationthatonewouldbeavailableduringthisdecade.Therearenogovernmentoperatedaway-from-reactorstoragefacilities.IndependentspentfuelstorageexistsonlyintheGeneralElectric,Morris,Illinoisfacility.Thisisnotgenerallyavailabletonon-G.E.customersnorisitcurrentlyavailabletonewcustomers.Costsfortransportofonefuelassemblyalone,assumingathreedayturnaroundtimeanda600/miletriponeway,wouldbeontheorderof$10,500perfuel30 assemblyor$30/KgU.Theannualchargetostoreth'efuelandlaborandmaterialcostsforloadingandunloadingwouldbeadditional.Anotheralternative,thatofshippingtoanother.reactorsiteisnotavailabletoRG&EbecausethecompanyoperatesonlytheGinnaNuclearPlant.ShuttingdownthereactorasanalternativetoincreasingspentfuelstoragecapacitywouldimposeafinancialhardshiponthecustomersofRG&E.TheGinnaPlantsuppliesapproximately45percentofRG&E'selectricgeneration.Thereplacementpowercostswoulddependonwhethercompanycoalfiredgenerationwasavailabletopickuptheload.Estimatesrangefrom$23perMWHto$45/MWHforincrementalcostsofreplacementpower.Thisisequivalenttoabout$280,000to$540,000perday.Intermsofthematerialresourcesrequiredtocompletethemodification,theamountneededislowrelativetothatrequiredtoeitherreplacethestorageracksentirelywithallnewhighdensityracks,orusedrystoragecasktechnology.AsdiscussedinSection1,themodificationconsistsofremovingthelead-insandguidefunnelsfromthewaterboxes,addingbottomplatestotheformerwaterboxes,andrightangledboraflexpoisoninsertswithSS-304fillerplatesandliners.Table5-3liststhematerialrequirementforthemodification.InReferences3and4,theadditionalheatloadsthatwouldbeanticipatedassumingnormaldischargesuptoanendofplantlifein2009werecalculated.Thisanalysis(Reference4)assumednormalannualdischargesof36fuelassemblies100hoursafter31 reactorshutdown.Theresultingheatloadsfornormaldischarges6werecalculatedtoincreaseincrementallyfrom7.07x10BTU/HRxn1981to9.96x10BTU/HRintheyear2010.Byincreasingthecoolingtimeto14daysinthecaseofafullcoredischageinyear2010thedecayheatloadonthespentfuelpoolcoolingsystemwillremainbelow16x10BTU/HR.Atthismaximumheatload,theanalysisconcludedthat,assuming80'Fservicewaterwithaflowrateof1600gpm,themaximumpooltemperaturewouldbe150'Fandtheincreaseinservicewatertemperaturewouldbewithintheenvironmentalguidelinesof20'F.Thepotentialforanincreaseintheheatreleasedtotheenvironmentduetothemodificationistheincrementfrom7.07x10BTU/HRto9.96x1066BTU/HRorabout3xlOBTU/HR.Duringtheassumednormaloperation6ofcoolingsystem(80'FservicewaterI1000gpm)thisincrement'Irepresentsabouta6'Fincreaseinservicewatertemperaturethroughtheheatexchanger.Asstatedaboveevengiventhemaximumheatloadforafullcoredischagethe20'Fenvironmentalguidelinefortotalplantdischargewouldbemet.32 Table5-1ScheduleofAnticipatedFuelDischargesMonthearCapacityRemaining~Existin~ProosedMarch1984March1985*Sept1985March1986March1987March1988March1989March1990March1991March1992March1993March1994March1995March1996March1997March1998March1999March2000March2001March20022828812828282828282828282828282828282828332360441469497525553581609637665693721749777805833861889917263235154126**98704214683655574546518490462434406378350322294266238210182154126**98*81fuelassembliesfromWestValley**Lossoffullcoredischargecapability33 Table5-2Non-FuelComponentsStoredinSFP*ControlRodAssembliesBurnablePoisonRodsThimblePluggingDevicesPrimary/SecondarySources19*After1984refuelingComonentTable5-3MaterialVolumeWeicehtBottomPlates(420)NeutronPoisonSS-304Boraflex.020gm/cc12,259in310126,819in~3minB3555lbs7990lbsLinerPlates(840)SS-304FillerPlates(,3360)SS-30424,619in135,804in7140lbs39,383lbs 6.RadioloicalEvaluationTheSFPpurificationsystemconsistsofademineralizerandfilter.Asurfaceskimmersystemconsistingofapumpandfilterisalsousedtomaintainwaterclarity.Presentlythedemineralizergenerates28cubicfeetofsolidwasteannuallyfromtworesinbedchanges.TheSFPfilterandskimmerfilterarechangedannuallygenerating7cubicfeetofwaste.Thisrepresentsapproximately0.3%oftheaveragesolidradioactivewastevolumegenerated,eachyear.SincethepreviousSFPrackmodificationwascompletedin1977,thenumberofspentfuelassembliesstoredhasincreasedfrom92to302asof1983foranaverageincreaseof30peryear.From1977through1983,thewastevolumegeneratedbytheSFPhasremainedthesame,whilethenumberofstoredspentfuelassembliesincreasedafactorof3.28.Evenifthegeneratedsolidradioactivewasteincreaseslinearly,whichithasnot,withthenumberofspentfuelassembliesintheSFP,thesolidwastewouldincreasebyafactorof.2.96with894assembliesintheSFP(tomaintainfullcoredischargecapabilityonly1015-121=894fuelassembliescanbestoredintheSFP).ThesolidwastegeneratedbytheSFPwouldthenbelessthan1%ofthetotalyearlygeneratedsolidradioactivewaste.Thefuel.storageareaventilationiscombinedwiththeauxiliaryandintermediatebuildingventilation.TheKr-85measuredinthissystemwas9.9curiesin1982and15.7curiesin1983.Allofthekr-85measuredcouldbeattributedtothereleaseofdecayedwastegastanks.35 Thetablebelowprovidestheresultsofarecentgammaisotopicanalysis(Nov.22,1983)oftheGinnaSFPwater,andidentifiesprincipalradionuclidesandtheirrespectiveconcen-trations.Valuesobtainedfromtheanalysisarerepresentativebothintermsoftypicalgrossradioactivity,andtherelativeconcentrationsofmajorradionuclidespresentinthepoolwater.~IsoteConcentrationCiccPercentContribution.ToTotalWaterActivitCs-137Cs-134Co-60Co-587.7E-52.9E-52.1E-35.8E-531933SincethepreviousSFPrackmodificationin1977,doseequivalentratesaboveandatthesidesofthepoolhaveremainedthesame,between1and2mrem/hour.ThedoseequivalentrateabovetheSFPcanalsobedeterminedfromthefollowingmodel.TheradiationdoseratefromtheSFPatapointabovethepoolsurfacewascalculatedfromtheeffectivewatersurfaceactivity,allowingforself-absorptionbythewatermediuminwhichtheisotopeswereassumedtobeuniformlymixed.DosemodelsusedwerethosebyCember(1969)*.Thebasicgeometryappliedinthecalculationsconsistsofamodifiedplanesourcecl&asshownbelow.P(h*Cember,H.,IntroductiontoHealthPhsics,Chapter10,PergamonPress(1969).36 TheequationforthedoserateDatpointPlfromaplanarsourcesimilartotheaboveis:RD..IixCaix211rdr=IIxIixCaixr+h1nR~+~hwhere:D.=doserate(rem/hr)oftheiisotope3.Ii=gammasourcestrengthofiisotope.th(rem/hrat1m/Ci)C~=effectivesu@aceactivity(Ci/m)ofiisotopeR=radiusofsource(m)h=distanceabovesourcealongcentralaxis(m)Inthefuelpooldosecalculations,thepoolsurfacewasconservativelyassumedtohaveadiscconfigurationwhoseradiusequaledonehalfthelongestactualpooldimension.Sincethepoolcontainingmixedradioactivitymorecloselyresemblesalargeslabsource,Equation1wasmodifiedtoaccountforthepooldepth(t),-themixedradionuclideconcentrationC(Ci/m),andtheattenuationcoefficientofthepoolwater-1p(m).Thepoolsurfaceactivityduetoradioactivityinthelayerdxatadepthofxis:d(C.)=C'x'"IntegratingEquation(2)overthetotal-thicknesstgivestheeffectivesurfaceactivity:(2)tCaiCrixe"dx=Cri(1-e")0V(3)37 BysubstitutingEquation3intoEquation1,thefollowingrelationshipisobtainedforcalculatingdoserate:D(rem/hr)=ZDi=ZnliCri(1-e")VR2+h2~hThisequationgivesthedoseratesatthecenterofthepoolwherepersonnelwouldexperiencethehighestradiationlevelsfromthewater.Thedoseratescalculatedforthenuclideslistedonthetablebelowarelessthan5mrem/hr.Doseratesattheedgeofthepoolwouldbeslightlylessthanthedoseratesat.thecenterofthepoolbecauseofthesmallerradiationcontributionsfromoneside.Routineradiationsurveysperformedinthespentfuelpoolareahaveconfirmedthatdoselevelsatthepooledgearenotinexcessofthoseatthecenter.Thetablebelowgivestheresultsofanalysesperformedin1983todeterminetheprincipalairborneradionuclidesandtheirrespectiveconcentrationsinthespentfuelpoolarea.~jsotoeI-131I-133H-3Cs-134Cs-137Co-58Co-60~cicc<1E-12<1E-125.0E-07<1E-13<1E-13<1E-13<1E-13Theannualradiationdosetoaspecifiedorganfrominhalationofradioactivematerialiscalculatedusingthefollowingrelationship:38 Dose=365(C(Rb(DCF)where:Dose=annualdose(mrem/yr)365=unitsconversionconstantC.=airborneconcentrationofisotopei(pCi/cc)Rb,=assumedbreathingrate(cc/d)DCF.=doseconversionfactorrelatingorgandosetointakeofanisotopebyinhalation(mrem/pC.).lValuesforDCF.arebaseduponICRPrecommendations1(ICRPPublicationII,1959)andarecalculatedinthefollowingmanner:iDCFiwhere:ref(Cf)(2.0E+7)(365)Df=ICRPrecommendedmaximumpermissibledosetoaspecifiedorganofanadultoccupationallyexposedtoradiation(mrem/yr)Cf=ICRPrecommendedconcentrationofanisotopeinairwhich,ifbreathedbyanadultattherateof2.0E+7cc/dayfor50years,willresultina50th-yeardoseofDmremtothespecifiedorgan(pCi/cc)2.0.E+7=adult.breathingrateassumedinICRPcalculations(cc/day)365=unitsconversionconstant(days/yr)WhereICRPIIgivesnovaluesofCfforcertainreforgans,thelowestvalueofCflistedforotherorgansistakenrefasthevalueofCffortheunlistedones.Foraddedconservatism,refthoseisotopeswhoseconcentrationswerereportedas"lessthan"values,wereassumedtobepresentatdetectionlimitlevels.39 Sinceindividualswillspendonlyaportionoftheirtimeinthespentfuelpoolarea,dosesareexpectedtobeconsiderablylessthanifcontinuousexposureisassumed.Ifa100-hourannualoccupancytimeisassumedforamaximallyexposedworkerinthespentfuelpoolarea,theresultingtotalbodyandorgandosesarelessthan10mremperyear.Thespentfuelpoolmodificationwillresultinlongertermstorageofwellcooledfuel.Thepresentpooltemperaturelimitationswillstillapply.Theoperationofthepoolpurifi-1cationsystemandthebuildingventilationequipmentwillnot,change.Therefore,thepresent,airborneisotopicconcentrationsarenotexpectedtochangesignificantlyafterthemodification.Thus,resultingpotentialdoseincreasesbothinthespentfuelpoolareaandanyoffsitelocationswillbequitesmall.Thepotentialincreaseinannualman-remfrommorefrequentresinand'filterchangeswasestimatedbyscalingpresentpersonnelexposurevalueslinearlywiththenumberoffutureaddedspentfuelassembliesinthepool.Spentfuelpoolfiltercartridgeanddemineralizerresinchangesassociatedwiththeexisting302storedfuelassembliescontributelessthan0.1percentofGinna'stotalannualman-remburden.Iffilterandresinchangefrequenciesareconservativelyassumedtoincreaselinearlywithincreasednumbersofassembliesinthepool,resultantpersonnelexposurescouldberaisedbyafactorof2.96,ortolessthan0.3percentofGinna'stotalannualman-rem.Thus,increasesinoccupationaldosesfromtheserelatedoperations,whencomparedtotheplant'stotalyearlyexposureburden,willbenegligible.40 RoutineradiationsurveysoftheGinna.spentfuelpoolhaveshowndoseratestypicallylessthan5mR/hralongthepooledges.Notrendisapparentinpastandcurrentsurveydatawhichwouldreflectdoserateincreasesfromcrudbuildup.Further,nofutureincreasesinradiationlevelsfromcrudinthepoolareanticipatedasaresultofadditionalfuel.Shouldaccumulationalongthepoolwallsbegintoproducehigherexposuresofanysignificance,thesewillbeindicatedbyroutineradiationsurveys.Atthattimemethodswillbedevelopedtoreduceradiationlevelsatthepooledgetoaslowasisreasonablyachievable.Baseduponaveragepersonneloccupancytimesinthefuelpoolarea,theannualman-remresultingfromallrelatedoperationsisestimatedtobelessthanonepercentofthetotalplantman-rem.FuturetotaloccupationalexposureatGinnaisnotexpectedtobesignificantlyaffectedbyeithera)morefrequentchangingofdemineralizerresinandfilters,orb)crudbuildupalongthesidesofthepool,asaresultoftheproposedspent.fuelpoolmodification.Radiationdoseratesabovethepoolresultingfromsubmergedspentfuelassembliesplacedinanyconfigurationwillbenegligiblewhencomparedtobackground.Thecontributionfromthissourcetototalannualpersonnelexposureisthereforenegligible.TheradiationprotectionprogramwillutilizeroutinesurveyinformationtodeterminechangesinSFParearadiationlevelsandairborneradioactivematerialconcentrationstomain-tainpersonnelexposureALARA.

AsstatedinSection1,themodificationofthestoragerackswillincluderemovaloftheleadinguidesoverthewaterboxesandtheseismicsupportsbetweenthesupportbasesandthepoolwalls.ThesetwocomponentsarefabricatedfromSS-304andrepresentthewastematerialthatwillbeproducedbythemodifi-cation.Thetotalweightofthismaterialisapproximately8000lbs.Thismaterialwillbedisposedofaseitherlowlevelradioactivewasteordecontaminatedanddisposedofasnormal(non-radioactive)waste.

~~7.AccidentEvaluationCurrentlyGinnaTechnicalSpecificationsprohibitthemovementofaspentfuelcaskwiththeauxiliarybuildingcrane.RG&Ehassubmittedanapplicationtodeletethisrestrictionbaseduponaproposedmodificationtothecranetomeetthesingle-failure-proofrequirementsofNUREG-0554~~.Modifyingthecranetobesingle-failure-proofwouldobviatetheneedtoanalyzethecaskdrop.Forthoseloadsthatcannotbemovedinasinglefailureproofmode,RG&EwillcontinuetosatisfytherequirementsofNUREG-0612bysomecombinationofloaddropanalysis,loadheightrestrictionandsafeloadpath.Ineithercase,theGinnaTechnicalSpecificationprohibitsthetrolleyoftheauxiliarybuildingcranetobestationedaboveorpassoveraspentfuelstoragerackcontainingspentfuel.Thisrequirementalongwithinstalledinterlockspreventsthemovementofloadsoverspentfuelbytheauxiliarybuildingcrane.Theoverheadhoistattachedtospentfuelpoolbridgeisusedtotransferspentfuelwithinthepoolarea.Useofthishoistislimitedtosinglefuelassembliesandtheirhandlingtools.Therackstructureprotectsstoredfuelfromtheimpactofadroppedfuelassembly~.Aweightlimitationonthehoist(2000lbs),thephysicalpositionoftheoverheadhoist,andanup-stoplimitswitchpreventsthepotentialimpactenergyofaloadfromsubstantiallyexceedingthatofadroppedspentfuelassembly.~

Referencesl.ApplicationforAmendmenttoOperatingLicense,January30,1976.2.Letter,ASchwencertoL.D.White,November15,1976.3.Zetter,L.D.WhitetoD.L.Ziemann,February13,1980.4.Zetter,D.M.CrutchfieldtoZ.D.White,November3,1981.5.ApplicationforAmendmenttoOperatingLicense,February23,1982.6.ApplicationforAmendmenttoOperatingZicense,January18,1984.7.Letter,J.E.MaiertoD.M.Crutchfield,June9,1981.8.9U.S.NuclearRegulatoryCommission,StandardReviewPlan3.7.2"SeismicSystemAnalysis,"Revision1,July,1981.Fritz,R.J.,"TheEffectsofLiquidsontheDynamicMotionsofImmersedSolids,"ASMEFebruary,1972.10.Dong,R.G.;"EffectiveMassandDampingofSubmergedStructures",UCRL-52342,L.L.L.,April,1978.ll.Stokey,W.J.,Scavuzzo,R.J.andRadke,E.E.,"DynamicFluidStructureCouplingofRectangularModulesinRectangularPools,"ASMESpecialPublicationPVP-39,1979.12.RegulatoryGuide1.61,"DampingValuesforSeismicDesignofNuclearPowerPlant",October,1973.13.Rabinowicz,E.,"FrictionCoefficientsofWater-ZubricatedStainlessSteelsforaSpentFuelRackFacility",StudyperformedforBostonEdison,Co.November,1976.14.ASMEBoilerandPressureVessels,NUCZEARVESSELS,SectionIII,1980ed.15.G.E.TechnicalPaper22A5866,Rev.Dec.26,1979.AppendixII,FUELASSEMBZYSTRUCTURALCHARACTERISTICS.16.R.D.Blevins,Ph.D,FORMULAS,FORNATURALFREQUENCYANDMODESHAPE,VanNostrandReinholdCo.,N.Y.,N.Y.,1979.17.,R.J.Roark,W.C.Young,FORMULASFORSTRESSANDSTRAIN,MCRAW-HILZBOOKCO.,N.Y.5thEd.,1975.

18.J.S.Anderson,"BoraflexNeutronShieldingMaterial-ProductPerformanceData,"BrandIndustries,Inc.,Report748-30-1,(August,1979).19.J.S.Anderson,"IrradiationStudyofBoraflexNeutronShielding,Material,"BrandIndustries,Inc.,Report748-10-1,(July,1979).20.J.R.Anderson,"AFinalReportontheEffectsofHighTemperatureBoratedWaterExposureonBISCOBoraflexNeutronAbsorbingMaterial,"BrandIndustries,Inc.,Report748-21-1,(August,1978).21.O.W.Blodgett,DesignofWeldedStructures,J.F.LincolnArcWeldingFoundation,Cleveland,Ohio,7thPrinting1975.22.AmericanConcreteInstitute,ManualofConcretePractice,329-32,Detroit,Michigan.23.LetterT.R.RobbinstoJ.D.Cook,March15,1984.24.GilbertAssociates,Inc.,GinnaStationSeismicUpgradingProgram-AuxiliaryStructuresSeismicAnalysis,May15,1980.25.ApplicationforAmendmenttoOperatingLicense,January18,1984.

~~ForU.S.Tool4Die,?nc.CriticalityAnalysisofRegion2oftheGinnat<DRSpentFuelStorageRackFinalReportbyPickar4,Lowe4Garrick,Inc.Mashington,D.C.~~

TABLEOFCONTENTS1.0THEMAXIMUMDENSITYRACK(MDR)DESIGNCONCEPT1.1Introduction2.0CRITICALITYANALYSISOFREGION2(ASSUMESIRRADIATEDFUEL)2.1AnalyticalTechnique2.2CalculationalApproach2.3ManufacturingandThermalConsiderations2.4DesignConservatisms2.5AccidentAnalysis2.6RequiredExposureasaFunctionofInitialEnrichmentforRegion2SpentFuel~Pae3891011REFERENCES137047U012784 TABLEOFCONTENTS(continued)ListofTablesTable10TitleRegion2DesignCriteriaFuelAssemblyTechnicalInformationforGinnaNuclearPlantSummaryofLeopardResultsforMeasuredCriticalsWestinghouseUO2Zr-4CladCylindricalCoreCriticalExperimentsBattelleFixedNeutronPoisonCriticalsSaxtonPu02-U02CriticalExperimentsESADAPu02-U02CriticalExperimentsSummaryofPredictionsforkeffinCriticalityExperimentsSummaryofReactivityBiasesandUncertaintiesforGinnaRegion2MDRComputedInfiniteMultiplicationFactorsforGinnaMDR7047U012784

TABLEOFCONTENTS(continued)ListofFiures~Ffere101213TitleGinnaMDRSpentFuelRackDesignNetDestructionofU-235VersusBurnupin,theYankeeAsymptotict/eutronSpectrumSpecificProductionofU-236VersusBurnupinYankeeAsymptoticNeutronSpectrumNetDestructionofU-238VersusBurnupintheYankeeAsymptoticNeutronSpectrumSpecificProductionofPu-239VersusBurnupinYankeeAsymptoticNeutronSpectrumSpecificProductionofPu-240VersusBurnupinYankeeAsymptoticNeutronSpectrumSpecificProductionofPu-241VersusBurnupinYankeeAsymptoticNeutronSpectrumSpecificProductionofPu-242VersusBurnupinYankeeAsyhptoticNeutronSpectrumSpecificProductionofTotalPuandFissilePuVersusBurnupinYankeeAsymptoticNeutronSpectrumAtomPercentofTotalUVersusExposurePu-239/U-238AtomRatioVersusExposureAtomPercentofTotalPuVersusExposureFissionProductAbsorptionCross-SectionsasaFunctionofTimeAfterShutdown141516One-QuarterRackCellModelforGinnaMDRFour-QuarterRackCellModelforGinnaMDRVariationofkwithAssemblyPitchforGinnaMDR17VariationofkwithSteelThicknessforGinnaMDR7047U012784 TABLEOFCONTENTS(continued)ListofFiures~Fiure18TitleVariationofkwithPelletDiameterforGinnaMDR19.VariationofkwithPelletDensityforGinnaMDR20212223VariationofkwithWaterDensityforGinnaMDRVariationofkwithTemperatureforGinnaMDR.ConfigurationUsedtoDeterminetheEffectsoftheRegion1-Region2InterfaceRegionsofAcceptabilityandUnacceptabilityforRegion2SpentFuel7047U012784 1.0THEMAXIMUMDENSITYRACK(MDR)DESIGNCONCEPT1.1IntroductionHistorically,spentfuelrackdesignshavebeenbasedonconservativeassumptionsthatcouldbeeasilyaccommodatedsinceitwasnotplannedtostorelargenumbersofhighexposurespentfuelassemblieson-site.Previouslyitwasanticipatedthatonly.small.amountsofhighexposurefuelassemblies(1/4to1/2ofafullcoreload)wouldnormallybestoredinthespentfuelpoolatanyonetime.Additionally,itwasanticipatedthat,occasionally(e.g.,forinserviceinspectionofthereactorvesselinternals)theentirecorewouldbeunloadedandtemporarilystoredinthespentfuelpool.Therefore,thespentfuelstoragerackdesignwasbasedontheconservativeassumptionthatallfuelrackstoragepositionswouldbeoccupiedbyfreshunirradiatedfuelassembliesofthehighestinitialenrichmentthatwasforeseenasbeinguseableinthatfacility.Thepenaltyinachievable.spentfuelstoragedensityassociatedwiththisconservativedesignassumptionwasrelativelysmallunderthecircumstancesanticipatedandeasilyaccommodatedbyaconservativespentfuelrackdesign.Thepotentialpenaltyassociatedwiththisconservativedesignbasisisnolongersmallwhenlong,termon-sitestorageofspentfuelisanecessity.Itisnotconceivablethatmorethanonefullcoreloadoffreshunirradiatedfuelassembliescouldbestoredinthespentfuelstoragepool.Therefore,itisunnecessaryandwastefultobasetheentirespentfuelstoragerackdesignontheassumptionoffreshunirradiatedfuelofthehighestinitialenrichment.IntheMDRdesignconcept,thespentfuelpoolisdividedintotwoseparateanddistinctregionswhichforthepurposeofcriticallyconsiderationsmaybeconsideredasseparatepools.SuitabilityofthisdesignassumptionregardingpoolseparatabilityisassuredthroughappropriatedesignrestrictionsattheboundariesbetweenRegion1andRegion2.Thesmallerregion,Region1,ofthepoolisdesignedonthe7043U012784 basisofcurrentlyacceptedconservativecriteriawhichallowforthesafestorageofanumberoffreshunirradiatedfuelassemblies(includingafullcoreunloadingifthatshouldprovenecessary).Thelargerregionofthepool,Region2,is'esignedtosafelystoreirradiatedfuel.assemblieswhichwillbedischargedfromthereactorinlargequantities.ThecriteriaforRegion2ofthepoolarespecificallylistedinTableTheonlychangeincriteriaistherecognitionofactualfuelandfissionproductinventoryaccompaniedbyasystemforcheckingfuelpriortomovinganyfuelassemblyfromRegion1toRegion2.Duringanormalrefuelingoperation,eachfuelassemblyisfirstmovedfromthecoretoRegionl.AftertherefuelingoperationiscompleteandthesuitabilityofeachspentfuelassemblyformovementintoRegion2isverified,thisfuelwillbemovedintoRegion2.Region2isdesignedtostorefuelwhichdoesnotexceedpre-establishedreactivitycriteria.Consequently,thelimitonacceptableinitialenrichmentvarieswiththeexposureatthetimeofstorage.Forinstance,4.25w/ofuelisacceptableforstorageonlyafterapredeterminedminimumexposurehasbeenreached.Asomewhatlowerminimumexposurewouldbeacceptableforfuelwithalowerinitialenrichment.Thisresultingcurveofinitialfuelassemblyenrichmentversusminimumacceptableexposuredefinesacurveofconstantspentfuelrackreactivity'.Themajorpurposeofthisstudyisthedeterminationofthiscurve.2.0CRITICALITYANALYSISOFREGIO)$2(ASSUMESIRRADIATEDFUEL)ThefuelassembliesusedinthisanalysisarecharacterizedinTable2.TheGinnaasbuiltspentfuelrackcellisshowninFigure1.Thefollowingdiscussionsummarizesthedesignofthespentfuelrackswithrespecttothecriticalitydesign.Theanalyticaltechniquesdescribedherearesimilartothoseusedtosuccessfullylicensespentfuelracksforseveralotherplants.7043U012784 2.1AnalticalTechniueTheLEOPARDcomputerprogramwasusedtogeneratemacroscopiccrosssectionsforinputtofourenergygroupdiffusiontheorycalculationswhichareperformedwiththePDg-7program.LEOPARDcalculatesthe(2)neutronenergyspectrumovertheentireenergyrangefromthermalupto10Mevanddeterminesaveragedcrosssectionsoverappropriateenergygroups.ThefundamentalmethodsusedintheLEOPARDprogramarethose-usedintheNUFTandSOFOCATEprogramswhichweredeveloped(3)(4)undertheNavalReactorProgramandthusarewellfoundedandextensivelytestedtechniques.Inaddition,WestinghouseElectricCorporation,thedevelopersoftheoriginalLEOPARDprogram,demonstratedtheaccuracyofthesemethodsbyextensiveanalysisofmeasuredcriticalassembliesconsistingofslightlyenrichedUOfuelrods.(5)Inaddition,Pickard,LoweandGarrick,Inc.(PLG)hasmadeanumberofinprovementstotheLEOPARDprogramtoincreaseitsaccuracyforthecalculationofreactivitiesinsystemswhichcontainsignificantamountsof.plutoniummixedwithU02.PLGhastestedtheaccuracyofthesemodificationsbyanalyzingaseriesofUOandPu02-UOcriticalexperiments.ThesebenchmarkinganalysesnotonlydemonstratetheimprovementsobtainedfortheanalysisofPu02-U02systemsbutalsodemonstratethatthesemodificationshavenot'adverselyaffectedtheaccuracyofthePLG-modifiedLEOPARDprogramforcalculationsofslightlyenrichedU02systems.TheU02criticalexperimentschosenforbenchmarkingincludevariationsinH20/U02volumeratios,U-235enrichments,,pelletdiametersandcladdingmaterials.AlthoughtheLEOPARDmodelalsoaccuratelycalculates'hereactivityeffectsofsolubleboron,theseexperimentshavenotbeenincludedintheLEOPARDbenchmarkingcriticalssincethespentfuelpoolcalculationsdonotinvolvesolubleboron.NeutronleakagewasrepresentedbyusingmeasuredbucklinginputtoinfinitelatticeLEOPARDcalculationstorepresentthecriticalassembly.AsummaryoftheresultsisshowninTable3forthe27measuredcriticalschosenasbeingdirectlyapplicableforbenchmarking7043U012784 theLEOPARDmodelforgeneratinggroupaveragecrosssectionsforspentfuelrackcriticalitycalculations.Theaveragecalculatedkeffis0.9979andthestandarddeviationfromthisaverageis0.0080hk.Reference5raisedquestionsconcerningtheaccuracyofthemeasuredbucklingreportedfortheexperimentsnumber12through19.Ifthesedataareexcluded,theaveragecalculatedkefffortheremaining19experimentsis1.0006withastandarddeviationfromthisvalueof0.0063hk.Inalloftheseexperiments;therearesignificantuncertain-tiesinthemeasuredbucklingswhicharenecessaryinputstotheLEOPARDanalysis.TheseuncertaintiesarethesameorderofmagnitudeastheindicatederrorsintheLEOPARDresults,andthereforeamoredefinitivesetofexperimentaldataisusedtoestablishtheaccuracyofthecombinedLEOPARD/PDg-7modelusedforthecriticalityanalysisofth'spentfuelracks.ThePDgseriesofprogramshavebeenextensivelydevelopedandtestedoveraperiodof20yearsandthecurrentversion,PDg-7,isanaccurateandreliablemodelforcalculatingthesubcriticalmarginoftheproposedspentfuelrackarrangement.ThiscodeoramathematicallyequivalentmethodisusedbyalltheU.S.suppliersoflightwaterreactorcoresandreloadfuel.Inaddition,thiscodehasreceivedextensiveutilizationintheU.S.NavalReactorProgram.Asaspecificdemonstrationoftheaccuracyofthe'calculationalmodelusedforthespentfuelrackcalculations,thecombinedLEOPARD/PDg-7modelhasbeenusedtocalculatefourteenmeasuredjustcriticalassemblies.ThecriticalsarehighneutronleakagesystemswithalargevariationinU/H0volumeratioandincludeparametersinthesame2rangeasthoseapplicabletotheproposedfuelrackdesign.ExperimentsincludingsolubleboronareincludedinthisdemonstrationsincetheabilityofPDg-7tocalculateneutronleakageeffectsisofprimaryinterest.Theuseofsolubleboronallowschangesintheneutronleakageoftheassemblywhilemaintainingauniformlatticeandthusallowsabettertestoftheaccuracyofthemodel.Furthermore,iteliminatestheerrorassociatedwiththemeasuredbucklingswhichisinherentintheLEOPARDbenchmarks,thuspermittingdeterminationsoftheactualcalcu-

lationaluncertaintywhichmustbeaccountedforinthespentfuelrackcriticalityanalysis.ThesecombinationLEOPARD/PDg-7calculationsresultinacalculatedaveragekffof0.9928withastandarddeviationaboutthisvalueofeff0.0012hk.Theseresults,asshowninTable4demonstratethattheproposedLEOPARD/PDg-7calculationalmodelcancalculatethereactivityoftheproposedspentfuelrackarrangementswithanaccuracyofbetterthan0.010Lkatthe95percentconfidencelevel.'IThecrosssectionsfortheBoraflexneutronabsorbingmaterialwhichisanintegralpartofthedesignarecalculatedusingfundamentaltechniquesthathavebeensuccessfullyappliedinthepasttothinheavilyabsorbingmediumssuchascontrolrods.Thisprocedureisstraightforwardandiscomprisedofseveralwelldefinedsteps:1.TheBfromthethinBoraflexsheetsishomogenizedinanappropriateamountofwater,andLEOPARDisusedtoobtainunshieldedmacroscopicBcrosssections.2.IntegraltransporttheoryisappliedinslabgeometryusingThey'smethodforcalculatingfluxdepressionsandshieldingfactorstodetermineanappropriateBnumberdensity.Thisapproachis10similartothatofAmouyalandBenoist.3.TheBnumberdensitycalculatedinStep2ishomogenizedinwater,andLEOPARDisusedtoobtaincorrectedmicroscopicBcrosssections.4.BlacknesstheoryisappliedtoobtainmacroscopiccrosssectionswhichwillproducetherequiredboundaryconditionsatthesurfaceoftheBoraflexsheets.7043U012784 InadditiontothefourteencriticalassembliesinTable4,theLEOPARD/PDgmodelwasusedtocalculatethekefffortwelveadditionalcriticalassemblies,sevenofwhichincorporatedthin,heavily-absorbingmaterialsforwhichtheprocedurejustdescribedwasusedtodeterminethemacroscopiccrosssections.ThesetwelvecriticalswereperformedbyBattellePacificNorthwestLaboratoriesspecificallyforthepurposeofprovidingbenchmarkcriticalexperimentsinsupportoFspentfuelcriticalityanalysis.TheyaredescribedindetailinReference18.TheresultsofthesecriticalexperimentsaresummarizedinTable5.Thefirstsevenofthesetwelveexperimentsincludefixedneutronpoisonabsorberplates,andtheaveragekffcalculatedforthesejustcriticalassemblieswas0.9935,withaeffstandarddeviationaroundthisvalueof0.0007b,k.Theotherfivecriticalexperimentsinthisseriesdonotincludeabsorberplatesandtheaveragekffcalculatedforthesejustcriticalassemblieswaseff0.9944,withastandarddeviationaroundthisvalueof0.0007Lk.Theoverallaveragekffcalculatedforthesetwelvejustcriticaleffassemblieswas0.9939,withastandarddeviationaroundthisvalueof0.0008~k.-ThisextensiveseriesofV02criticalexperimentsfurthersupportstheapplicabilityofthemethodsdescribedaboveforuseincalculatingthesubcriticalmarginofthesefuelstoragerackdesigns,anddemonstratesthattheaccuracyofbetterthan0.010hkatthe95percentconfidencelevelestablishedfortheLEOPARD/PDg-7modelappliesequallywelltodesignsincorporatingfixedneutronabsorbersforwhichblacknesstheoryisusedtocalculatethemacroscopiccrosssectionsandalsotoassembliescontainingplutonium.Asaresultofthisapproachtoseparatelybenchmarkboththecrosssectionsandthediffusiontheorycalculationsagainstapplicablecriticalassemblies,the"transporttheorycorrectionfactor"isimplicitlyincludedinthederivedcalculationaluncertaintyfactor.7043U012784 TheanalyticalmethodsusedforRegion2mustalsoaccountforthedepletionofU-235andbuildupofvariousplutoniumisotopesandfissionproducts.Theisotopiccompositioniscalculatedasafunctionofirradiationtime,assemblyaverageexposure,andsubsequentdecayusingtheLEOPARD(-andCINDERcomputeprograms.Oncetheisotopic(6)compositionsofthefuelassembliesareknown,thesubsequentcriticalitycalculationsforthespentfuelracksinRegion2areperformedinthemannergivenabove.TheaccuracyoftheexposuredependentisotopicconcentrationscalculatedwiththeLEOPARDprogramisdemonstratedinFigure2throughFigure12.Figures2through9showcomparisonsofLEOPARDcalculateddatawithmeasureddatafromaU02fuelassemblyirradiatedintheYankee-RowereactorwhileFigures10through12showcorrespondingdataforamixedoxide(Pu02-UO)fuelassemblyirradiatedintheSAXTOWreactor.ExceptforthedatalabeledPLGcalculation,thedataandcurvesonFigures2through9andFigures10through12aretakendirectlyfromReferences7and8,respectively.Inallcases,theaccuracyofthecalculationslabeledPLGiswithintheuncertaintyinthemeasureddata.Theaccuracyofreactivitycalculationsforirradiatedfuelcanbedemonstratedinpartbytheanalysisofcriticalarraysofmixedoxidefuelrodswhichcontainhighconcentrationsoftheplutoniumisotopes.Tables6and7showresultsofcriticalityanalysesfortheSAXTON(9)andESADAsetsofexperimentswhichcoverawiderangeofwater-to-oxidevolumeratios.AsummaryofthesedataisshowninTable8Forthemixedoxidecriticalsthecalculatedmeankeffis09969withastandarddeviationaboutthisvalueof0.0066'hk.Usingthe95%probabilityat95%confidencelevelcriterion(one-sided)with11datapoints,thisimpliesapossibleerrorof2.82=0.0186hkwithanoffsetof+.0031Lk.7043U012784 TheanalyticalmethodsusedforRegion2mustalsoaccountforthedepletionofU-235andbuildupofvariousplutoniumisotopesandfissionproducts.Theisotopiccompositioniscalculatedasafunctionofirradiationtime,assemblyaverageexposure,andsubsequentdecayusingtheLEOPARDandCINDERcomputerprograms.Oncethe,isotopic(6)compositionsofthefuelassembliesareknown,thesubsequentcriticalitycalculationsforthespentfuelracksinRegion2areperformedinthemannergivenabove.TheaccuracyoftheexposuredependentisotopicconcentrationscalculatedwiththeLEOPARDprogramisdemonstratedinFigure2throughFigure12.Figures2through9showcomparisonsofLEOPARDcalculateddatawithmeasureddatafromaU02fuelassemblyirradiatedintheYankee-RowereactorwhileFigures10through12showcorrespondingdataforamixed-oxide(Pu02-UO)fuelassemblyirradiatedintheSAXTONreactor.ExceptforthedatalabeledPLGcalculation,thedataandcurvesonFigures2through9andFigures10through12aretakendirectlyfromReferences7and8,respectively.Inallcases,theaccuracyofthecalculationslabeledPLGiswithintheuncertaintyinthemeasureddata.Theaccuracyofreactivitycalculationsforirradiatedfuelcanbedemonstratedinpartbytheanalysisofcriticalarraysofmixedoxidefuelrodswhichcontainhighconcentrationsoftheplutoniumisotopes.Tables6and7showresultsofcriticalityanalysesfortheSAXTONandESADAsetsofexperimentswhichcoverawiderangeof(10)water-to-oxidevolumeratios.AsummaryofthesedataisshowninTable8.Forthemixedoxidecriticals,thecalculatedmeankffis0.9969effwithastandarddeviationaboutthisvalueof0.0066Ak.Usingthe95%probabilityat95%confidencelevelcriterion(one-sided)with11datapoints,thisimpliesapossibleerrorof2.82=0.0186Dkwithanoffsetof+.0031~k.7043U012784

TheothermajoruncertaintyinthecalculationsforRegion2isassociatedwiththecalculatedreductioninfuelassemblyreactivityassociatedwiththedepletionoftheheavymetalsandtheaccumulationoffissionproductsasafunctionoffuelassemblyexposure.Asanexample,considera4.25w/o(initialenrichment)Ginnafuelassemblyat30,000HND/HT.Thetotalreactivitylossfromthefreshunirradiatedcaseis0.225hk/k,ofwhichapproximately50'Xcanbeattributedtothebuild-upoffissionproducts.Calculationsofreactorreactivitylifetimesusingthesameanalyticalmethodsasusedinthisanalysisdemonstrateanaccuracyofbetterthan+5%.Therefore,theresultinguncertaintyinthecalculatedfuelassemblykassociatedwithfueldepletionwouldbeconservativelyestimatedat0.01126k/k(=.05x.235hk/k).The,correspondinguncertaintyinthecalculatedRegion2multiplicationfactoris0.0102hkonabasecaseRegion2kof0.9072.Inordertoprovidefurtherassuranceoftheconservativenatureofthesecalculations,thedecayofa>>fissionproductsfollowingdischargeofthefuelassemblywastakenintoaccount.ThiswasaccomplishedwiththeaidoftheCIHDERcodewhichtreatsatotalof186nuclidesin84linearchains.Thefissionproductinventoryforeachfuelassemblywasdecayedforthirtyyearsfollowingitsremovalfromthereactorcore,andthetimepointofminimumfissionproductabsorptionwithinthatthirtyyearperiodwasusedatthebasisforde'terminingthefissionproducemacroscopicabsorptioncrosssectionsforthatparticularfuelassemblyatthatspecificexposure.Thatminimumoccursatapproximately100daysintothedecayandfrom,thenoncontinuestoincreaseasi>>ustratedinFiure13.Reductioninthefissionproductinventoryduetoleakageorgure(>>)escapetotheplenumhasbeenfoundtobenegligible.2.2CalculationalAroachThePOQ-7programisusedinthefinalpredictionsofthereactivityofthespentfuelstoppageracks.Thecalculationsareperformedinfourenergygroupsandtakeintoaccounta>>thesignificantgeometricdetailsofthefuelassemblies,fuelboxes,andmajorstructuralcomponents.The70430012784

geometryusedformostofthecalculationsisabasiccellrepresentingone-quarteroftheareaofarepeatingarrayofstainless-steelboxes.ThespecificgeometryofthisbasiccellisshowninFigure14.Thecalculationalapproachistousethebasiccelltocalculatethereactivityofaninfinitearrayofuniformspentfuelracksandtoaccountforanydeviationsofth'eactualspentfuelrackarrayfromthisassumedinfinitearrayasperturbationsonthecalculatedreactivityofthebasiccell.Theeffectsofmanufacturingtolerances,aswellasthermaluncertainties,includingfuelandwatertemperatureanddensityvariations,arealsotreatedasperturbationsonthecalculatedreactivityofthebasiccell.TheAdequacyofthecalculationalmeshselectedforthistypeofcel'icalculationhasbeenverifiedbycomparisonwiththeresultsofanidenticalgeometrywhichusedafinercalculationalmesh(twotimesthenumberofmeshintervalsineachdirection).Thefinercalculationalmeshresultedinlittlechangeinthevalueofkwithanobservedincreaseof+0.0002Dk.Afurthercheckonthecalculationalmodeluseddivastheuseofamoreaccuratespatialmodelencompassingthecornersoffouradjacentrackcellsas'howninFigure15.Theuseofthismodelhadtheeffectofincreasingkby0.0005~k.2.3ManufacturinandThermalConsiderationsSeveralperturbationsofthebasiccellwereperformedtodeterminetheeffectsofchangesinthephysicalcellandcomponentdimensions,duetomanufacturingtolerances,changesinwaterdensity,andchangesintemperature.Allcaseswereperformedon4.25w/ofuelatanexposureof30,000MWD/tonne.7043U012784 Thefollowingchangesinspecificationsduetomanufacturingtoleranceswereconsidered:Reducingassemblypitchby.060"leavingotherdimensionsconstant(watergapreduced);reducingsteelwallthicknessofbothbox(by.009")andboraflexretaining-device(by.003")(increasedwatergap);reducingpelletdiameter.0010",andincreasingpelletdensityby1.5%ofthetheoreticalvalue.Thesevariationsrepresentthefullrangeofpossiblevariationsinthemechanicaldesignofthefuelrackandfuel.Thereductioninpitchresultsinanincreaseinkof0.0019dk.Thereductioninsteelthicknessresultsinadecreaseofk~of0.0002hk.Thereductioninpelletdiameterresultsinadecreaseinkof0.0005hk,'hiletheincreaseinpelletdensityincreaseskby0.0015Dk.TheseeffectsareshowninFigures16-19.TheresultsofdecreasesinwaterdensityandincreasesintemperatureEareshowninFigures20and21.Inbothcases,itisclearthatthebasecase(68'F,wateratfulldensity)representsthemaximumreactivity.TheeffectoftheinterfacebetweenRegion1andRegion2wasevaluatedassumingfresh4.25w/ofuelinRegion1and4.25w/ofuelatanexposureof30,000NWD/MTinRegion2.Thisresultedinacomputedkof0.9195,orachangeof+0.'0123Lkoverthecomputedkbasisrack.cellusedtorepresentRegion2.ThemodelusedisshowninFigure22.AsummaryofthebiasesanduncertaintiesinthecomputedvalvesofkisgiveninTable9.Theuncertaintieshavebeencombinedstatistically.Theseresultsshowthatabasiccellcomputedkoflessthan0.9108willassureanactualkbelow0.95with95%probabilityatthe95%confidencelevel.2.4DesinConservatismsMhilethetlDRconceptreducessomeofthedesignconservatismsinherentintheearlierspentfuelstorageconcepts(e.g.,assumptionoffreshunirradiatedfuel),thedesignandanalysesfortheHDRasimplementedinRegion2arestillveryconservativeinnature.7043U01278410 Theuseofassemblyaverageexposuresisoneexampleofthisconservativeapproach;Axially,morethan80%ofthefuelassemblywillnormallyhavereachedexposuresgreaterthantheaverageandthiswilloccuralongthecentral,higherworthregionoftheassembly.Thelowerexposureregionswouldnormallyaccountforlessthan20%ofthefuelassemblylengthdistributedattheendsofthefuelassemblyactivelengthwhicharelowerworthregions.Theresultisaneutronicallyhigherexposureassemblythanrepresentedbythesimpleassemblyaverageexposure.Theuseofthesimpleassemblyaverageexposurecanresultinanover-estimateofthefuelassemblykffby+.015hk/k.2.5AccidentAnalsisTheRegion2fuelracksaredesignedtopreventadroppedfuelbundlefrompenetratingandoccupyingapositionotherthananormalfuelstoragelocation.Theonlypositivereactivityeffectofsuchabundleonthemultiplicationfactoroftherackwouldbebyvirtueofareductioninaxialneutronleakagefromtherack.Sincethecalculationsreportedheretakenocreditforaxialneutronleakage,theeffectofadroppedfuelassemblycouldnotbeexpectedtoexceedthereportedmaximumpossiblereactivityofthespentfuelstoragerack.Thisisbecausethereportedmaximumpossiblereactivityoftherackisbasedoninfinitearraycalculations(bothlaterallyandvertically).2.6ReuiredExosureasaFunctionofInitialEnrichmentforReion2SentFuelAsshownabove,acomputedkof0.9108willassurethattheactualkisbelow0.95withaprobabilityof0.95atthe95%confidencelevel.Thesecomputationswereperformedfor4.25w/ofuelwithanexposureof30,000tlWD/NT.Fotlowerenrichmentswiththesamecomputedvalueofk,theamountofexposurewillbereduced,reducingthereactivityuncertaintiesduetodepletionoffuelandbuildupoffissionproducts,andthusreducingthetotaluncertainty.Thusthecomputedkvalueof0.9108shouldbeconservativeforallenrichmentsnotexceeding4.25w/o.In7043U012784 ordertoallowforpossibleinterpolationerrors,however,atargetvalueof0.9050forkwillbeusedforotherenrichments.TheresultsshowninTable-l0maybeinterpolatedtoestimatetherequiredexposuretoreachacomputedkvalueof0.9050.For4.25w/ofueltherequiredexposureis30,000HMT/MT,for3.00w/ofuelitis15,960HMD/MT.For1.75w/ofuel,evenfreshfuelhasacomputedkoflessthan0.9050.Theresultingcurve,showninFigure23,givestherequiredexposureasafunctionofenrichmenttoassurethatthevalueofkinthespentfuelhasaprobabilityof95%ofnotexceeding0.95>>atthe95'Xconfidencelevel.rBecauseofthewell-founded,conservativetechniqueusedfordeterminationoftheinfinitemultiplicationfactor,thereisassurancethatthisspentfuelrackdesignwill*notcauseunduerisktothepublichealthandsafetyresultingfromcriticalityconsiderations.7043U01278412 REFERENCES1.R.F.:Barry,"LEOPARD-ASpectrumDependentNon-SpatialDepletionCodefortheIBM-7094,"MCAP-3269,September1963.2.M.R.Caldwell,"PDg-7ReferenceManual,"WAPO-TM-678,January1967.3.H.Bohl,E.GelbardandG.Ryan,"MUFT-4-FastNeutronSpectrumCodefortheIBM-740,"WAOP-TM-72,July1957.4.H.AmsterandR.Suarez,"TheCalculationofThermalConstantsAveragedOveraWigner-WilkinsFluxSpectrum:DescriptionoftheSOFOCATECode,"MAPO-TM-39,January1957.5.L.E.StrawbridgeandR.F.Barry,"CriticalityCalculationsforUniformMater-ModeratedLattices,"NuclearScienceandEngineering,23,58,1965.6.ElectricPowerResearchInstitute,"FissionProductDataforThermalReactors,Part1andPart2:DataSetforEPRI-CINDERandUsersManualforEPRI-CINDERCodeandData,"EPRIHP-356,FinalReport'1976).7.R.J.Ndvik,"EvaluationofMassSpectometricandRadiochemicalAnalysesofYankeeCoreIandCoreIISpentFuel,"MCAP-6068(1965).8.R.J..Nodvik,"SaxtonCoreIIFuelPerformanceEvaluationofMassSpectometricandRadiochemicalAnalysesofIrradiatedSaxtonPlutoniumFuel,"WCAP-3385-56PartII{1970).9.M.L.Orr,H.I.Sternberg,P.Oeramaix,R.H.Chastain,L.BinderandA.J.Impink,"SaxtonPlutoniumProgram,NuclearDesignoftheSaxtonPartialPlutoniumCore,"MCAP-3385-51,December1965.(AlsoEURAEC-1490).10.R.D.Learner,W.L.Orr,R.L.Stover,E.G.Taylor,J.P.TobinandA.Bukmir,"Pu02-U02FueledCriticalExperiments,"MCAP-3726-1,July1967.ll.R.A.Lorenz,etal.,"FissionProductReleasefromHighlyIrradiatedLWRFuel,"NUREG/CR-0722,February1980.12.P.M.Davison,etal.,"YankeeCriticalExperimentsMeasurementsonLatticesofStainlessSteelCladSlightlyEnrichedUraniumDioxideFuelRodsinLightWater,"YAEC-94,MestinghouseAtomicPowerDivision{1959).13.V.E.GrobandP.W.Oavison,etal.,"Multi-RegionReactorLatticeStudies-ResultsofCriticalExperimentsinLooseLatticesofUORods1nM20,0MCAP-1412,Mest1nghooseAtomicPower01v141on(1960).7044U012784'3 REFERENCES(continued)14.W.J;EichandW.P.Kovacik,"ReactivityandNeutronFluxStudiesinMultiregionLoadedCores,"WCAP-1433,WestinghouseAtomicPower,Division(1961).15.'.J.Eich,PersonalCommunication(1963).16.T.C.Engelder,etal.,"MeasurementandAnalysisofUniformLatticesofSlightlyEnrichedU02ModeratedbyDp0-H20Mixtures,"BAW-1273,theBabcock&WilcoxCompanytl963).17.A.L.MacKinneyandR.M.Ball,"ReactivityMeasurementsonUnperturbed,SlightlyEnrichedUraniumDioxideLattices,"BAW-1199,theBabcock4WilcoxCompany(1960).18.BattellePacificNorthwestLabbratories,"CriticalSeparativeBetweenSubcriticalClustersof2.35WtX235-UEnrichedU02RodsinWaterWithFixedNeutronPoisons,"PNL-2438.7044U012784 TABLE1REGION2OESIGNCRITERIA1.Actualirradiatedfuelandfissionproductinventoryisassumed.2.keff(0.953.Creditmaybetakenforpresenceofboratedwaterforabnormal(accident)conditions.4.MultiplechecksrequiredforeachfuelassemblypriortotransferfromRegion1toRegion2.7044U012784 TABLE2FUELASSEMBLYTECHNICALINFORMATIONFORGINNANUCLEARPLANTRodArrayRodsPerAssemblyRodPitch,In.OverallDimensions,In.14x14gf1790.5567.784ActiveFuelHeight,'n.CladThickness,In.141.4.0243FuelRodO.D.,In.PelletDiameter,In.DiametralGap,In.PelletDensity(Xtheoretical).400.3444.007095ControlRodGuideTubesOuterDiameter,In.Znrszcv4rP.t'<,lrl<0.52800.4900InstrumentTubeOuterDiameter,In.gn&885gaPz.-.4zZu'.40150.34997044U012784 TABLE3'CARYOFLEOPARDRESULTS,FORHEASUREDCRlTiCALSCase~NumherReferenceXllmkccEnrichment(atom%)H20/UVoluneFuelPelletCladDensityDiameterDiameterCladThickness(cm)Lattice,Pitch(cm(CriticalBucklingm2Calculated~kl2345678910ll1213141516(81920212223242526271212121313131414141415,161617l7171717179999101010102.73427342.7342.734.2.7342.7342.7342.7343.7453.7453.7454.0994.0994.0994.0694.0694,0693.0373.0370.7'I4*0.714>>0714>>0.714*0.729*0.729*0.729*0.729*2.182.933.807.028.4910.132.504.512.504.514.512.552.142.593.538.029.902.648.101.682.174.7010.761.113.493.491.5410.1810.1810.1810.1810.1810.1810.1&I0.1810.3710.3710.379.469.469.459.459.459.459.289.289.529.529.529.529.359.359.359.350.76200.76200.76200.76200.76200.76200.76200.76200.75440.75440.75441.12781.12781.12681.12681.12681.12681.12681~12680.85700.85700.85700,85701.28271.28271.2827l.28270.85940.85940.85940.85940.85940.85940.85940.85940.86000.86000.86001.20901.20901.27011.27011.27011.27011.27011.27010.99310.99310.993'I0.99311.44271.44271.44271.44270.040850.040850.040850.040850.040850.040850.040&50.040850.04060.04060.04060.04060.04060.071630.071630.071630.071630.071630.071630.05920.05920.05920.05920.08000.08000.0&000.0&001.02871.10491.19381.45541.56211.68911.06171.25221.06171.25221.25221.51131.4501.5551.6842.1982.3&11.5552.198l.32081.42241.86692.64161.75262.47852.47851.905040.7553.2363.2865.6460.0752.9247.568.8.68.395.195.6888.079.069.2585.5292.8491.7950.7568.81108.8121.5159.6128.489.1104.7279.590.01.00151.00521.00431.00981.0118lm00721.00080.99871.00101.00251.00090.98890.98300.99990.99581.00400.98720.994&0.98090.99121.00290.99441.00080.99021.00550.99480.9878*ThesearePu02inNaturalU02.>>>>Cases1through19arewithstainlesssteelclad,Cases20through27arezfrcaloy.'045U012784 0

TABLE4WESTINGHOUSEUOZr-4CLADCYLINDRICALCORECRITICALEXPERIMENTS(6,7)2Exeriment12345678910ll121314NotesPitch1o0.6000.6900.8480.9760.6000.6000.6000.6000.6000.6000.6000.6000.8480.848BoronConcentration(m)0000306.536.4727.7104.218.330.446.657.1104.218.MaterialBuckling(forLEOPARD-CH-2.008793.009725.008637.006458.007177.006244.005572.008165.007599.007106.006661.005809.007320.006073CriticalNo.ofPins489.4317.0.251.6293.0659.9807.2950.2546.3607.1669.5735.3895.3321.0420.5RadiusofFuelRegion(cm)19.02117.60519.27623.93522.08824.42926.50420.09721.18622.24823.31525.72721.77224.919keff(LEOPARD/PD-7)0.99120.99410.99270.99350.99270.99370.99400.'99190.99170.99160.99090.99440.99380.99250.9928Mean0.0012Std~t'11IlEnrichmentFuelDensityPelletRadiusCladIRCladOR2.719w/oU-23510.41g/cm30.20in0.2027in0.23415in(b)Thicknessofwaterreflectoristhatrequiredtoattaintotalradiusof50cmformodel.(c)B=.000527cm2Z "TABLE5BATTELLEFIXEDNEUTRONPOISONCRITICALSLengthTimesCaseMidth>>Ho.ofAssembliesInArrayAbsorberType,ThicknessDistanceCriticalToFuelSeparationkffClusterofClustersLEOPARD/PO002020x1701722.21x16x00220x18.88+02820x16027'0x163Boral3Boral1BoralS.S.S.S..713cm.713.713.485cm.302.645cm.6452.732.645cm,6456.34cm5.226.88cm7.430.99320.99440.99250.99460.993503220x1703820x173S.S.1.1w/o8.298aa3S.S.1.6w/o8.298.645cm.6457.56cm7.360.99330.9931002801501302202120x18.07520x1720x1620x1520x16NoneHone.HoneHoneHone11.92cm8.396.394.460.99560.99420.99450.99330.9946StatisticalSugary:Seriesmember~meank.BoralS.S.S.S.(Borated)~x~osoenTotalNon-PoisonTotal'UWera70.99340.99410.99320.99350.9944mm0.00080.00060.00010.00070.0007K3HJUE>>Thisisinunitsofpitch(Pitch>>2.032cm)xCenterassemblywas20xl6andtheoutertwowereelongatedat22.21x16.+20xl8.88wasoneassemblywithaboralsheetontwosides.Fuelregiondata:Enrichment~2.35w/o,Pelletradius~0.5588cm,CladOR~.635cm,Mallthickness>>.0762cm,Pitch>>2.032cm7045U012784

~~'ABLE6SAXTONPu02-U02CRITICALEXPERIMENTS(Reference9)~Ext.BoronH0/UOTpPpm'ume)3371.682.172.174.7010.76.520.560.560.7351.040.99121.00291.0084.99441.0008-.0088+.0029+.0084-.0056+.000870440012784'~~

TABLE7ESAOAPu02-U02CRITICALEXPERIMENTS(Reference10)~Ext.BoronPu-240H0/U~ppmTEToume~k~108085268248'26~81.54.750.6901.11.6903.49.97583.49.97583.49'9758.99021.0055.9949.9948.9878.9945-.0098+.0055-.0051-.0052-.0122-.00557044U012784 TABLE8SUMMARYOFPREDICTIONSFORkffeff'INCRITICALITYEXPERIMENTSExerimentSaxtonPu02-U02ESADAPu02-U02AllPu02U2Cases'.9995+.00680.9946+.00610.9969+.00667044U012784 TABLE9SUMMARYOFREACTIYITYBIASESANDUNCERTAINTIESFORGINNAREGION2MDRDescrition~ftftRffBasicrackcellat20C,4.25H/oU-235030,000HWD/HT8.430inchpitch(seeFigure1)Usingone-quartercellmodelCalculationBiasesLeopard/PDt)modelbiasModelingEffectMeshSpacingEffectMostReactiveTemperature~overoperatingrangeMostReactiveWaterDensityRegion1-Region2InterfaceEffectTotalBiasBasiccellincludingBiasesTolerances.andUncertainties(95/95)DepletedfuelassemblyreactivityuncertaintiesMaximumerrorduetopitchtoleranceMaximumerrorduetoSSthicknesstoleranceMaximumerrorduetopelletdensitytolerance(+.015)Maximumerrorduetopelletdiametertolerance(+.001")CalculationalUncertainty(2.82a)TotalUncertainty(statistical)MaximumreactivitychangefrombiasesanduncertaintiesMaximumk,includingbiasesanduncertainties+0.0031+0.0005+0.0002+0.0000+0.0000+0.0123+0.01610.01310.00190.00020.00150.00050.01860.02290.03900.90720.92230.94627044U012784 TABLE10COMPUTEDINFINITEMULTIPLICATIONFACTORSFORGINNAMDREnrichmentw/o1.751.751.751.753.003.003.003.004.254.254.254.254.254.25ExposureMHD/MT010,00012,50015,00010,00020,00025,00030,000025,00030,00035,00040,00045,000Computedkm0.89730.79010.76490.74420.96090.86550.82150.77881.17010.94630.90720.86800.82880.79037044U012784 p~j+f]IIj)jk~%trrl~rprerrrr~]))/rrIrI~.tjjjj),laPrrr]~(JIjj\lgt))jjf~q'L0++JgZ~1I'-~)~

FIGURE2NETDESTRUCTIONOFU-235VERSUSBURNUPINTHEYANKEEASYMPTOTICNEUTRONSPECTRUM20II<<~~II<<<<4~~~~'IIII;I!!I~<<~iII,i~I~<<~~II~~k<<jilIi!!.<<~P')'I'tl':.r.tiIII..IliI:lI::..l'~'jr:~~~It.II~lj1<<lIII<<I~~<<~Ijl~[<<<<1I~~~i~~Il~gi,'pi)ai~~<<I'II'12810rfe8'7.rqI~i.'.3II'1it)liIjII~~.~I]1,II<<;~,~II<<iL"'i<<IK~e~InferredfromisotopicdataFreehandfitofdataPreviousLEOPARDunitcellcalc.~NPLGLEOPARDunitcellcalc.00121620IIIIrIIIIII(jjirj)/lCVx103)28 K

FIGURE3SPECIFICPRODUCTIONOFU-236VERSUSBURNUPINTHEYANKEEASYMPTOTICNEUTRONSPECTRUM4.0II3.5<<t<<'3.0<<(~(.1~~..s..(~0*I'Pt:'Jf\~+~~~I.(('+'Rtt~t4~<<i,g4<<i~(lI~~~Iio(,<<lP2.5gO2.0U40C41.5Rl.0~~i8(~J'(I.L~~.Ll.~~4.i+~~'(\L'L4.K~eInferredfromisotopicdataj,FreehandfitofdataPreviousLEOPARDunitcellcalc.,PLQLEOPARDunitcellcalc.0.5001216-20Sunup(WD/HIMx103)28 FIGURE4NETDESTRUCTIONOFU-238VERSUSBURNUPXNTHEYANKEEASYMPTOTICNEUTRONSPECTRUM128VpWsiaesK~e-~InferredfromisotopicdataFreehandfitofdata-Previous'LEOPARDunitcellcalc.~PLGLEOPARDunitcellcalc.

FIGURE5SPECZFZCPRODUCTIONOFPU-239VERSUSBURNUPEgTHEYANKEEASYMPTOTICNEUTRONSPECTRUM~g~pig.'L.R~~1~Iv-jItL-',+M:/jib~i0t~fI~)~~i~!I)I~!.I,~+Isir!-.-K~e~InferredfromisotopicdataFreehandfitofdataPreviousLEOPARDunitcellcalc.~PLGLEOPARDunitcellcalc.u'6aoBuzmup(le/AUx103)28

FIGURE6SPECIFICPRODUCTIONOFPu-240VERSUSBURNUPZNTHEYANKEEASYMPTOTICNEUTRONSPECTRUM2PO~~~~~IL~~II',ItX~PPI\1:FIJ.~I~~4II..'IsfsslI~Ii!.t).t~IIj!IsfL8<<gilsIi.~TPlI'si,:~~%sf!'s<<I~I>sI!isI);~~!II!ILt:ssH,'st;I-hJ'gIf~Is1.6~~!'j's:ssi~I'PTPI!!:iI.~~I,~~~I'i'~.'pIIfs1.4~~,~Iss;wl~-:~IIII'!i~Is'I~II"1sissI~~.I~~"'isiIIII~I~ss1.0'sg'J.gJ'"s~~(II~i!<fjf~"'scsPs0.8~r'rpp+0,6K~e~Inferredfron1isotopicdataFreehandfitofdataPreviousLEOPARDunitcellcalc.pLgLEOPARDunitcellcalc.00121620Bufffup(IBID/ICQx103)24 FIGURE7SPECIFICPRODUCTIONOFPu-241VERSUSBURNUPINTHEYANKEEASYMPTOTIC'EUTRONSPECTRUMLLK~eInferredfromisotopicdata-.FreehandfitofdataPreviousLEOPARDunitcellcalc.PLGLEOPARDunitcellcalc.1.21.0go8C0*oe6PcesO.4It41220Burnup(HMD/HEQx103)28 FIGURE8SPECIFICPRODUCTIONOFPQ-242VERSUSBURNUPINTHEYANKEEASYMPTOTICNEUTRONSPECTRUM0.28L24II~'i'K~eIInferredfromisotopicdataFreehandfitofdataPreviousLEOPARDunitcellcalc.',PLGLEOPARDunitcellcalc.limniili20)H.iIf(.i;~IlIT(aiIlf:.l6CO0.12'o0'0.08C4C4IaPc00~JVI48l620BurnIIP(WD/KiiJxlO3)24

FIGURE9SPECIFICPRODUCTIONOFTOTALPuANDFISSILEPuVERSUSBURNUPINTHEYANKEEASYMPTOTICNEUTRONSPECTRUMNetProduction(Kg/MTU)1020~KeTotalPu(Pu-239+Pu-240+Pu-241+Pu-242)FissilePu(Pu-239+Pu-241)FreehandFitofDataPreviousLEOPARDunitcellcalc.PLGLEOPARDunitcellcalc.otaltu~~eWe'"J~Srt~etiotu~~a~~~410101\~1614101110araay(WD/kNa101)

ATOMPERCENTOFTOTALUI~+iI'Ii1~~~~~~I~~iI'II~I'I>'lf~~-rIg]ImaIf~I~II'l:I~I'l,'fir-I.I.I~H0WOa00td>IIl.~g~I1 FIGUREllPu-239/U-238ATOMRATIOVERSUSEXPOSURE.QvI~li~)II'IIIjj:~:JI!Il~ilf!I:.!I.'.I',,!!il.I))J)!i!:jl:jjl.'Iiiji")'ii!i!'ill!I)JI"Jll.,!111'I'I!'.:It)iIII.'.;IfJjjilllil)jjItl:';;r:.I)~SaxtonData-'I)~"):llI'J'I--I-'-)Calculation~Q6.Q5jj'.'l!I)Ill)I;I1tliItl:I!IIIIIIg:I'.IIi!i:i!i!:i:i'i!II~'1'I1I),".iiu},1)ll'la::Ii!I".'j.!Li'i,11'ill"-I:".!)i:i!:~F.11'~I.~~I~pgi'!~I'l).i.1)lllljiIi'i!)~i!'ii)jfIll!.'i.'ti!1'ii'!ill1Itill11)l.I':~l.',jlf)'II'!'I:liiII)i!illi.l::iIi".I&I.~I~1'I681012141618,20MND/KgM PCCIATOMPERCENTOFTOTALPuCl~)~iLi~~C10tJ0I0t3OlP

190150vIv1Iv'I!"iflf.rIhltv~,IIIfII4Ir4)'I,Jvf4&4,agvl4rfI4ivllv4v'>>4!)IlvargI"II4IvIvtlv'+'lvIvrfvf'I'71Iv,aaJXvtfI~I'~IfvIf."II:ClaLiavllvvaI!l~)vl<</lhIIIIvvilvvv,IvailIAif1l41l.f<<llIyllvg>>-vgII!Iill,I"iIaIrahflvIaa,I$JvIvv'I1100av!!...,IFvtiv>>IIvvIIlvv.fIgvtIgIvaVlt44,~..'I~,julvfvfl',IIkaaaFLI4"vvlIvI500.001Figure13.0.1YearsafterShutdownFissionProductAbsorptionCross-Sectionsas1.10aFunctionofTimeAfterShutdown50 12GridElementsMATERIALIDENTIFICATION1620241.PinCells2.GuideTubeCells3.InstrumentTubeCells4.StainlessSteel5.Water6.BoraflexFigure14.One-(}uarterRackCellModelforGinnaMDR gg~ioI~~~g~

0.910~~p~~~Ik~)I4~0.906~~~I~0.908g;~$4y~<<t0~\tl~~f~~4~~<<~J~~~~'~~~SI~<I~'V'~~o~1ep0~~~~~~4~<<o~<<~~~~a4t~'t~<<et~0~~~~~<<I~<<aP<<~~~~Wt<<~t~fItt+to<<IQ0.9048.3008.4008500AssemblyPitch,inches8.600Figure16.VariationofkwithAssemblyPitchforGinnaMDR(4.25w/o830,000MWD/MT,20'C) 0.9100.908i,,liHE>fw'rIp<<i.I~)~ipre~II~II~~(t~I~tsarKlLf.I.'if:0.906pV'iL'l~I)II)~~yI$/)Ij4i)i~+~~~~~tt~'I~I~~)clif0.904)~gi~I1~i~~~<<~)li)iItjI)'.~<<!lj;6~Ir~~I~\~~~Ot~~I~iE!jg)IjnI0.1300.1100.120NormalizedSteelThickness,inches(Boxthickness+O.SxBoraflexretainerthickness)Figure17.VariationofkwithSteelThicknessforGinnaNOR(4.25w/o930,000MAD/NT,20'C) 0.9100.908~~t,~~tW4~~~-'..I.j!i.i~I,~Ti[~~~qH7~4~~'jt0.906'~l4~4+14btt~~o~t~>>4sapw~~4l%~V~~I~~~Ii~fi+i.~~I~~0.9050.1715"0.1720"0.1725"01730"PelletDiameter,inchesFigure18.VariationofkwithPelletDiameterforGinnaHDR(4.25wio830,000MWD/MT,20'C) 0.910~~~g+'~~~I~f5Li~IW~~1~f04/~~bOf4$jl4~~Ii+~CHILI~$~~0.908ot~;i,:II.".'k;~It$sW~Lb~4f~p'Itt~~~~!~J~4~~~'~$~fiy~IIq.!lre~0.906~~~rg.,P..1I~~ilit~sy~f4~~~~'fg~aa.~\Qo~4~1+~yeo~i+08~fI0.9040.9300.9400.9500.9600.970PelletDensity,FractionofTheoreticalFigure19.VariationofkwithPelletDensityforGinnaMOR(4.25w/o9'30,000MWD/MT,20'C,ReferenceDimensions) 1.0>>ouiccv.vaib'av<V<>OTseawaieruenslr.ytorViennaMOR(4.25w/o930,000MWD/MT,C,ReferenceDimensions)0.8l,l~~plr~I~~~~0.60.4Ilifii/,l~~~~i.'II~II~~fl1nII~~~~0.00.20.4pH20,g/cm30.60.8 0.910!~~~t~ft~t!0.908~>>~t~t~~t~~tt.!!t~t!ttt!~~~ft~~t0.906~fP~t>>'PEfgd!Pf)hatt~tt~tI>>>>I>>f!~~!~!~-'0~t+~~~~~~>>I>>~t~t~~~~t~t~~~I~~>>I>>4'T~~I~>>>t~ltl'~ut~pt~~~~~~.904608090100110Temperature,'F70fQt+!at![Q%>>!4!pgfIHg)!jt!!!!ft(f.~L!l"!~~t~Figure21.VariationofkwithTemperatureforGinnaMDR"(4.25w/o830,000MWD/MT,ReferenceDimensions)

~~I~~I.~~I~I~~~~~

~~B~I'.~~~~~'~~~~~~I~~~-~~~~

AttachmentCInaccordancewith10CFR50.91thesechangestotheTechnicalSpecificationshavebeenevaluatedagainstthreecriteriatodetermineiftheoperationofthefacilityinaccordancewiththeproposedamendmentwould:l.involveasignificantincreaseintheprobabilityorconsequencesofanaccidentpreviouslyevaluated;or2.createthepossibilityofanewordifferentkindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviouslyevaluated;or3.involveasignificantreductioninamarginofsafety.TheproposedmodificationwouldincreasethespentfuelstoragecapacityatGinnafrom595fuelassembliesto1016.ThesafetyanalysishasshownthatthemodifiedrackssatisfyNRCStaffacceptedcriteriafornuclear,structuralandthermalhydraulicdesign.Thediscussionbelowexamineseachofthethreecriteriastatedaboveandsupportsthefindingthattheproposedmodificationisoutsidethestandardsof10CFR50.91.Therefore,ano'ignificanthazardsfindingiswarranted.1.Theproposedmodificationdoesnotinvolveasignificantincreaseintheprobabilityortheconsequencesofanaccidentpreviouslyevaluated.Fourpotentialaccidentscenarioshavebeenidentified:1)spentfuelcaskdrop;2)lossofspentfuelpoolforcedcoolingwater;3)seismicevent;4)spentfuelassemblydrop.Theprobabilityoftheseeventswillnotbeaffectedbytheamountoffuelstoredinthepool.

Theconsequencesofaspentfuelcaskdropaccidentareunchangedbythemodification.ThecurrentTechnicalSpecificationsprohibitthemovementofacaskintheauxiliarybuilding.AnApplicationforAmendmenttotheOperatingLicensehasbeensubmittedtotheNRCtodeletethisrestrictionbymodifyingthecranetobesinglefailureproofinaccordancewiththerequirementsofNUREG-0554.Thiswouldobviatetheneedtoevaluatetheconsequencesofacaskdropaccident.Thelossofspentfuelpoolforcedcoolingwaterhasbeenpreviouslyevaluatedforboththecurrentpoolcoolingsystem,~'~andthesystemtobeinstalledin1986.~'~Thedecayheat.loadsassumedintheseanalysesboundthosethatwillbeexperiencedduetotheincreasedstoragecapacity.Thereforetheconsequencesofthisaccidentareunchangedfromthosepreviouslyevaluated.ThestructuralresponseoffullyloadedstorageracksduringaseismiceventwasevaluatedinSection4ofAttachmentBtothisAppli;cation.TheresultsofthisevaluationsatisfiedNRCStaffaccepteddesigncriteria.Therefore.theconsequencesofaseismiceventareunchanged.Theconsequencesofasinglefuelassemblydrophasbeenevaluatedinreference2andinSections2and4ofAttachment,BtothisApplication.TheevaluationindicatesthatKeffremainsbelow.95.Sincetheproposedmodificationonlyaffectsstorageofwellcooledfuel,themaximumradiologicalreleaseswouldoccurfromthedropofanassemblyinRegion1whichisunchanged.Thereforetheconsequencesofafuelassemblydropareunchanged.

2.'Createthepossibilityofanewordifferentkindofaccidentfromany-accidentpreviouslyevaluated.RG&EhasevaluatedtheproposedrackmodificationinaccordancewiththeNRCApril14,1978letter"NRCPositionforReviewandAcceptanceofSpentFuelStorageandHandlingApplication"andappropriateNRCandindustryguides,codesandstandards.Initsevaluation,RGB'asfoundnoindicationthatanewordifferentkindofaccidentiscreated.3.,Theproposedmodificationdoesnotinvolveasignificantreductioninthemarginofsafety.Undernormaloperationandaccidentconditions,theproposedmodifiedstoragerackdesignmust,satisfycertaincriteriainthreeareas:1.NuclearCriticality2.ThermalHydraulic3.StructuralMechanicalIntheareaofnuclearcriticality,thecriteriaestablishedisthatKeffmust,belessthan.95.Section2ofAttachmentBofthisApplicationindicatesthatthiscriteriaissatisfiedandtheresultsarenotsignificantlydifferentthanpreviousanalyses.5Thecriteriaitselfisunchangedfromprevioussubmittals,thereforethemarginofsafetyhasnotbeenreduced.Section3ofAttachmentBoftheApplicationandpreviousanalysesvaluatethethermalhydraulicconsiderationsofthemodification.Thisevaluationshowsthatthedecayheatloadsofpreviousanalysesboundthosethatcouldresultfromthe1proposedmodification.Thereforethemarginofsafetyhasnotbeenreduced.3 Thestructuralconsiderationsdealprimarilywiththeresponseoffullyloadedracksduringaseismicevent.Section4ofAttachmentBtotheApplicationpresentsthestructuralmechanicalevaluationoftheracksandindicatesthat,theappropriatecriteriaestablishedbyNRCguidanceandindustrypracticehasbeensatisfied.Inaddition,theseanalysesestablishtheacceptabilityofpoolfloorloadsunderworstcaseconditions.Withtheappropriatecriteriasatisfied,thereisnosignificantreductioninthemarginofsafety.

~~r'4~~~

@@ Line 79: / Line 79: @@
 .'Createthepossibilityofanewordifferentkindofaccidentfromany-accidentpreviouslyevaluated.RG&EhasevaluatedtheproposedrackmodificationinaccordancewiththeNRCApril14,1978letter"NRCPositionforReviewandAcceptanceofSpentFuelStorageandHandlingApplication"andappropriateNRCandindustryguides,codesandstandards.Initsevaluation,RGB'asfoundnoindicationthatanewordifferentkindofaccidentiscreated.3.,Theproposedmodificationdoesnotinvolveasignificantreductioninthemarginofsafety.Undernormaloperationandaccidentconditions,theproposedmodifiedstoragerackdesignmust,satisfycertaincriteriainthreeareas:1.NuclearCriticality2.ThermalHydraulic3.StructuralMechanicalIntheareaofnuclearcriticality,thecriteriaestablishedisthatKeffmust,belessthan.95.Section2ofAttachmentBofthisApplicationindicatesthatthiscriteriaissatisfiedandtheresultsarenotsignificantlydifferentthanpreviousanalyses.5Thecriteriaitselfisunchangedfromprevioussubmittals,thereforethemarginofsafetyhasnotbeenreduced.Section3ofAttachmentBoftheApplicationandpreviousanalyses''valuatethethermalhydraulicconsiderationsofthemodification.Thisevaluationshowsthatthedecayheatloadsofpreviousanalysesboundthosethatcouldresultfromthe1proposedmodification.Thereforethemarginofsafetyhasnotbeenreduced.3 Thestructuralconsiderationsdealprimarilywiththeresponseoffullyloadedracksduringaseismicevent.Section4ofAttachmentBtotheApplicationpresentsthestructuralmechanicalevaluationoftheracksandindicatesthat,theappropriatecriteriaestablishedbyNRCguidanceandindustrypracticehasbeensatisfied.Inaddition,theseanalysesestablishtheacceptabilityofpoolfloorloadsunderworstcaseconditions.Withtheappropriatecriteriasatisfied,thereisnosignificantreductioninthemarginofsafety.
-r'4~
+r'4~}}
-}}

ML17255A744: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 14:27, 18 May 2018

Text

Navigation menu

ML17255A744: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 14:27, 18 May 2018

Text

Navigation menu

Search