ML20073D501: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:^ | {{#Wiki_filter:^ | ||
^ | |||
e Northern States Power Company Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant 1717 Wakonade Dr East Welch, Minnesota 55089 September 15, 1994 10 CFR Part 50 Appendix J U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATINC PIANT Docket Nos. 50-282 License Nos. DPR-42 50-306 DPR-60 Reactor Containment Building Intenrated Leak Rate Test Report Attached, for the information of the NRC staff, is a summary technical report describing the integrated containment leakage test conducted on Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Unit 1 at the conclusion of the last refueling outage. | |||
e Northern States Power Company Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant 1717 Wakonade Dr East Welch, Minnesota 55089 September 15, 1994 | |||
This report is being submitted to meet the requirements of Appendix J to 10 CFR Part 50. | This report is being submitted to meet the requirements of Appendix J to 10 CFR Part 50. | ||
Please contact us if you have any questions related to the attached report. | Please contact us if you have any questions related to the attached report. | ||
CY Roger 0 Andtrson U Director Licensing and Management Issues c: | CY Roger 0 Andtrson U | ||
Attachment | Director Licensing and Management Issues c: | ||
9409270254 940920 | Regional Administrator - Region III, NRC Senior Resident Inspector, NRC NRR Project Manager, NRC MPCA Attn: Kris Sanda J E Silberg cm, oL6) | ||
Attachment a-6 0\\ | |||
POR ADOCK 05000282 P | 9409270254 940920 I | ||
) | |||
POR ADOCK 05000282 P | |||
PDR | |||
j PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT Red Wing, Minriesota l | |||
UNITS 1 AND 2 i | |||
l | l | ||
\\ | |||
MINNEAPouse | MINNEAPouse ST. PAUL | ||
_=_', | _=_', | ||
UNIT 1 | UNIT 1 i | ||
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA | REACTOR CONTAINMENT BUILDING INTEGRATE: | ||
~AK RATE TEST JUNE 1994 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA | |||
1 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT UNIT 1 m | |||
h REACTOR CONTAINMENT BUILDING INTEGRATED LEAK RATE TEST | h REACTOR CONTAINMENT BUILDING INTEGRATED LEAK RATE TEST JUNE,1994 PREPARED BY: M. E. GRUBER PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT DATE: AUGUST 20,1994 A | ||
JUNE,1994 PREPARED BY: M. E. GRUBER PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT DATE: AUGUST 20,1994 A | pingp/ misc /gruber/ilrt l | ||
l | |||
ILRT Unit 1 Page 2 of 45 1.0 | ILRT Unit 1 Page 2 of 45 1.0 | ||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
The periodic Integrated Leak Rate Test (ILRT) of Prairie Island Unit 1 Containment was completed June 24,1994. This leakage rate test was performed in accordance with Prairie Island Technical Specification 4.4.A,10CFR50 Appendix J, and ANSl N45.4-1972. In addition, ANSI 56.8-1981 Mass Point calculation technique was used to analyze the data. | The periodic Integrated Leak Rate Test (ILRT) of Prairie Island Unit 1 Containment was completed June 24,1994. This leakage rate test was performed in accordance with Prairie Island Technical Specification 4.4.A,10CFR50 Appendix J, and ANSl N45.4-1972. In addition, ANSI 56.8-1981 Mass Point calculation technique was used to analyze the data. | ||
The test was performed at reduced pressure, | The test was performed at reduced pressure, P, of 23 psig. Containment was pressurized t | ||
and allowed to stabilize for 4.5 hours. An acceptable leakage rate was measured 24 hours later using the mass point method. The verification test was begun immediately. Four hours into the verification test, the containment leakage rate decreased. As a result of the deceased leakage rate, the verification test was declared unacceptable eleven hours after it was begun. The verification leakage rate went below the minimum acceptanca limit of -25%. | |||
A second ILRT was initiated immediately after securing the induced leak of the first verification test. The containment leakage rate was measured over the next six hours using the reduced test duration method as described by the Bechtel Topical Report, BN-TOP-1. | A second ILRT was initiated immediately after securing the induced leak of the first verification test. The containment leakage rate was measured over the next six hours using the reduced test duration method as described by the Bechtel Topical Report, BN-TOP-1. | ||
The leakage rate was also calculated with the mass point method. Again, a verification test was begun. After five hours, the verification leakage rate was stable and within the acceptance band of | The leakage rate was also calculated with the mass point method. Again, a verification test was begun. After five hours, the verification leakage rate was stable and within the acceptance band of 25%. This was true using both calculation methods, BN-TOP-1 and the mass point method. | ||
The first leakage rate measured is the leakage rate being reported for Unit 1 containment. | The first leakage rate measured is the leakage rate being reported for Unit 1 containment. | ||
Because the leakage rate changed (decreased) it was necessary to measure the containment leakage rate a second time in order to demonstrate that the leakage rate could be measured accurately. That is to say, the second ILRT was used as a new base line for | Because the leakage rate changed (decreased) it was necessary to measure the containment leakage rate a second time in order to demonstrate that the leakage rate could be measured accurately. That is to say, the second ILRT was used as a new base line for | ||
"'e verification test. | |||
The personnel airlock is believed to be the cause of the anomaly. Pressure was found in the airlock at the conclusion of testing. The decrease in the leakage rate occurred once the l | The personnel airlock is believed to be the cause of the anomaly. Pressure was found in the airlock at the conclusion of testing. The decrease in the leakage rate occurred once the l | ||
l For a reduced pressure test,0.75 | airlock had reached equilibrium with Containment. | ||
0.0685 wt%/ day. A valve lineup penalty of D 00074 wt%/ day must be added to L | l For a reduced pressure test,0.75 L as determined during preoperational testing,is t | ||
The final"AS LEFT" leakage rate at UCL including all penalties is 0.0772 wt%/ day while the l | 0.11569 wt%/ day. The 1994 ILRT on Unit 1 containment yielded a least squares curve fit Lm of 0.659 wt%/ day and a corresponding 96 percent upper confidence level L m of d | ||
t t | |||
I pingp/ misc /gruber/ilrt | 0.0685 wt%/ day. A valve lineup penalty of D 00074 wt%/ day must be added to L m 95% UCL. | ||
t The final"AS LEFT" leakage rate at UCL including all penalties is 0.0772 wt%/ day while the l | |||
"AS FOUND" leakage rate is 0.0998 wt%/ day (reference Appendix C). | |||
I pingp/ misc /gruber/ilrt | |||
= | |||
L | L | ||
ILRT Unit 1 Page 3 of 45 2.0 DESIGN INFORMATION 2.1 Containment Vessel Design The design parameters of the Unit 1 containment vessel have previously been described in references 6.1 and 6.2. | ILRT Unit 1 Page 3 of 45 2.0 DESIGN INFORMATION 2.1 Containment Vessel Design The design parameters of the Unit 1 containment vessel have previously been described in references 6.1 and 6.2. | ||
2.2 ILRT Instrumentation System The Integrated Leakage Rate Test Instrumentation System is designed to monitor containment parameters and calculate a leakage rate using the absolute method. Data read from the transducers is entered directly into a Hewlett Packard Model 1000 | 2.2 ILRT Instrumentation System The Integrated Leakage Rate Test Instrumentation System is designed to monitor containment parameters and calculate a leakage rate using the absolute method. Data read from the transducers is entered directly into a Hewlett Packard Model 1000 computer for reduction and analysis. Details of the test system are described in | ||
computer for reduction and analysis. Details of the test system are described in reference 6.5. For the leakage rate test twenty-six resistance temperature detectors (RTD), ten humiters, one precision pressure gauge and one flow meter were used. | ~ | ||
2.3 ILRT Pressurization System The containment was pressurized using Atlas Copco air compressors, after coolers and air dryers connected to Prairie Island's pressurization line. All air released from containment for the leakage rate test was vented to the Auxiliary Building and hence monitored by the Auxiliary Building ventilation radiation monitoring system. In addition, continuous air monitors (CAM) were positioned at the localized release path. | ~ | ||
reference 6.5. For the leakage rate test twenty-six resistance temperature detectors (RTD), ten humiters, one precision pressure gauge and one flow meter were used. | |||
2.3 ILRT Pressurization System The containment was pressurized using Atlas Copco air compressors, after coolers and air dryers connected to Prairie Island's pressurization line. All air released from containment for the leakage rate test was vented to the Auxiliary Building and hence monitored by the Auxiliary Building ventilation radiation monitoring system. In addition, continuous air monitors (CAM) were positioned at the localized release path. | |||
3.0 PRE-TEST CONSIDERATIONS 3.1 ILRT Instrumentation All instrumentation utilized during the ILRT was calibrated by vendors whose Quality Assurance Programs were verified by Northern States Power Company. | 3.0 PRE-TEST CONSIDERATIONS 3.1 ILRT Instrumentation All instrumentation utilized during the ILRT was calibrated by vendors whose Quality Assurance Programs were verified by Northern States Power Company. | ||
These instruments, all calibrated within six months of the test date, have calibration certification traceable to the NationalInstitute of Standards and Technology. Sensor calibration correction factors were then derived from the calibration curves. | These instruments, all calibrated within six months of the test date, have calibration certification traceable to the NationalInstitute of Standards and Technology. Sensor calibration correction factors were then derived from the calibration curves. | ||
Though not required by Technical Specifications, the containment fire detection system was temporarily modified by installing 12 photoelectric fire detectors in place of the existing ionization type. This was performed to avoid spurious fire alarms during periods when the containment was pressurized. No fire alarms were received during the duration of the test. | Though not required by Technical Specifications, the containment fire detection system was temporarily modified by installing 12 photoelectric fire detectors in place of the existing ionization type. This was performed to avoid spurious fire alarms during periods when the containment was pressurized. No fire alarms were received during the duration of the test. | ||
During the ILRT containment pressure was monitored by Control Room personnel via the containment wide range pressure channels. The six safeguards containment pressure channels were defeated by opening the test jack switches in the analog | |||
( | ( | ||
protection racks. | |||
pingp/ misc /gruber/itrt | pingp/ misc /gruber/itrt | ||
ILRT Unit 1 Page 4 of 45 3.2 Venting and Draining Criteria The following criteria was used to determine the ILRT valve lineup: | ILRT Unit 1 Page 4 of 45 3.2 Venting and Draining Criteria The following criteria was used to determine the ILRT valve lineup: | ||
A. From 10CFR50 Appendix J: | A. | ||
From 10CFR50 Appendix J: | |||
the containment SHALL be opened or vented to the containment atmosphere prior to and during the test." | 1. | ||
"Those portions of the fluid systems that are part of the reactor coolant pressure boundary and are open directly to the containment atmosphere under post-accident conditions and become an extension of the boundary of the containment SHALL be opened or vented to the containment atmosphere prior to and during the test." | |||
2. | |||
" Portions of closed systems inside containment that penetrate containment and rupture as a result of a loss of coolant accident SHALL be vented to the containment atmosphere." | |||
3. | |||
B. Other Criteria: | "All vented systems SHALL be drained of water or other fluids to the extent necessary to assure exposure of the system containment isolation valves to containment air test pressure and to assure they will be subjected to the post-accident differential pressure." | ||
4. | |||
" Systems that are required to maintain the plant in safe condition during the test SHALL be operable in their normal mode, and need not be vented." | |||
5. | |||
" Systems that are normally filled with water and operating under post-accident conditions, such as the containment heat removal system, need not be vented." | |||
B. | |||
Other Criteria: | |||
1. | |||
Allisolation valves which shut automatically on a safeguards signal, which are shut manually as a part of the post-accident safeguards sequence, or which are normally shut during power operation (except venting lineups) | |||
SHALL be shut during the ILRT. | SHALL be shut during the ILRT. | ||
2. | |||
Lines penetrating containment are to be vented to the outside atmosphere if, they are normally or potentially vented during power operation or if they could be vented after some phase of the safeguards sequence. Normally closed systems outside of the containment SHALL also be vented unless they are Seismic Class 1. | |||
pingp/ misc /gruber/ilrt | pingp/ misc /gruber/ilrt | ||
ILRT Unit 1 Page 5 of 45 C. Pressure vessels inside containment vented to containment atmosphere during the ILRT: | ILRT Unit 1 Page 5 of 45 C. | ||
Pressure vessels inside containment vented to containment atmosphere during the ILRT: | |||
1. | |||
RCS via Pressurizer Vent 2. | |||
Reactor Coolant Drain Tank 3. | |||
Pressurizer Relief Tank 4. | |||
Power Operated Relief Valve Accumulators (2 trains) 5. | |||
No.11 a 12 SI Accumulators 6. | |||
E. Water levelin the following equipment is recorded before and after the ILRT: | No.11 & 12 Steam Generator Snubber Accumulators Containment H Monitor Calibration Gas Bottles 7. | ||
2 D. | |||
Electrical penetration venting The electrical penetrCons were depressurized to 10 5 psig prior to the ILRT. Any penetration indicating greater than 15 psig would require investigation. During the ILRT, no electrical penetrations were observed to be greater than 15 psig. The nitregen supply to the electrical penetrations and the airlock electrical penetrations were isolated and vented to atmosphere. | |||
E. | |||
Water levelin the following equipment is recorded before and after the ILRT: | |||
1. | |||
Reactor Coolant Drain Tank 2. | |||
the final leak rate reported. | Pressurizer Relief Tank 3. | ||
3.3 Local Leak Rate Testing Program The local leak rate test program was performed during each refueling outage as required by 10CFR50, Appendix J and Prairie Island Technical Specification 4.4.A. | Containment Sump A 4. | ||
Containment Sump B 5. | |||
11 & 12 Steam Generator 6. | |||
Pressurizer During performance of the June ILRT the levelin Sump A increased 5 inches. The pressurizer level increased 1.2%, and the Pressurizer Relief Tank Level decreased 1.2%. This change in volume (0.00131 'wt%) will be included as an added penalty in the final leak rate reported. | |||
i 3.3 Local Leak Rate Testing Program The local leak rate test program was performed during each refueling outage as required by 10CFR50, Appendix J and Prairie Island Technical Specification 4.4.A. | |||
A summary of Type B and C test results, obtained since the last ILRT report was submitted, are in Appendices A, arid B. The 1994 final results reflect the as-left conditions of containment a?.sr the 1994 Unit 1 Type A test. Local leak rate valve repairs are summarized in Appendix C. | A summary of Type B and C test results, obtained since the last ILRT report was submitted, are in Appendices A, arid B. The 1994 final results reflect the as-left conditions of containment a?.sr the 1994 Unit 1 Type A test. Local leak rate valve repairs are summarized in Appendix C. | ||
The acceptance criteria for type B & C test are as follows: | The acceptance criteria for type B & C test are as follows: | ||
A. If the totalleakage of alllocalleakage testing exceeds 60% of La, repairs and | A. | ||
If the totalleakage of alllocalleakage testing exceeds 60% of La, repairs and | |||
( | ( | ||
retests SHALL be performed to reduce leakage below that value. | |||
I pingp/ misc /gruber/ilrt | I pingp/ misc /gruber/ilrt | ||
ILRT Unit 1 Page 6 of 45 | ILRT l | ||
B. Total leakage past isolation valves in systems in the Auxiliary Building Special Ventilation Zone (ABSVZ) SHALL be less than 0.1 wt%/ day at Pa-C. Totalleakage past isolation valves in systems exterior to both the ABSVZ and the Shield Building SHALL be less than 0.01 wt%/ day at Pa. | Unit 1 Page 6 of 45 B. Total leakage past isolation valves in systems in the Auxiliary Building Special Ventilation Zone (ABSVZ) SHALL be less than 0.1 wt%/ day at Pa-C. Totalleakage past isolation valves in systems exterior to both the ABSVZ and the Shield Building SHALL be less than 0.01 wt%/ day at Pa. | ||
D. | D. | ||
Airlock leakage SHALL be less than 1% of the La at 10 psig for the door inner gasket tests and less than 5% of the La at 46 psig for overall airlock tests. | |||
3.4 Containment inspection A generalinspection of the accessible interior and exterior surfaces of the containment and related components was performed prior to the ILRT as required by 10CFR50, Appendix J, Section V. There was no evidence of structural degradation. The inspection revealed no pressurized containers, fire hazards or containment wall growth interferences. In general, the containment was very clean. The annulus area was also inspected for wall growth interferences; none were found. | 3.4 Containment inspection A generalinspection of the accessible interior and exterior surfaces of the containment and related components was performed prior to the ILRT as required by 10CFR50, Appendix J, Section V. There was no evidence of structural degradation. The inspection revealed no pressurized containers, fire hazards or containment wall growth interferences. In general, the containment was very clean. The annulus area was also inspected for wall growth interferences; none were found. | ||
4.0 GQEDUCT OF ILRT 4.1 Acceptance Criteria of Type A Test The leakage rate, Lt at reduced pressure | 4.0 GQEDUCT OF ILRT 4.1 Acceptance Criteria of Type A Test The leakage rate, Lt at reduced pressure P,is calculated as follows: | ||
t L m. | |||
s 0.7 Lm if L = 0.25 t | |||
t i | |||
Lam Lam L = 0.25 P | |||
1/2 if Ltm s | |||
0.7 t | |||
t Pa Lam For acceptable ILRT, the measured leak rate,L m SHALL be less than 0.75L - | |||
t t | |||
Based upon preoperational test data (reference 6.2): | |||
0.0087 wt%/ day Lm | |||
= | |||
t 0.0141 wt%/ day Lam | |||
= | |||
0.0087 | |||
= 0.6170 Therefore, Ltm | |||
= | |||
Lam 0.0141 Since 0.6170 < 0.7, Lt | |||
= 0.25 wt%/ day L m t | |||
G-t or L | |||
= 0.25 wt%/ day (0.6170) = 0.15426 wt%/ day i | |||
-t s Then L m SHALL be less than 0.75 (0.15426) = 0.11569 v4%/ day t | |||
pingp/ misc /gruber/ilrt I | |||
Unit 1 Page 7 of 45 4.2 Iype A Test and Verification Test Results and Conclusions The Unit 1 Type A test was performed using the Mass Point Calculational Technique. | Unit 1 Page 7 of 45 4.2 Iype A Test and Verification Test Results and Conclusions The Unit 1 Type A test was performed using the Mass Point Calculational Technique. | ||
The test data displayed acceptable results after five hours of testing using the Mass Point Technique. The least squares leakage rate, L | The test data displayed acceptable results after five hours of testing using the Mass Point Technique. The least squares leakage rate, L m, at the final data point after t | ||
Upon completion of the Type A test, a supplemental test was performed to verify the validity of the Type A test. For the verification test, a leak of 1.20 | 24 hours of data collection was 0.0659 wt%/ day with a corresponding L m at the t | ||
95 percent upper confidence level equal to 0.0685 wt%/ day. | |||
Upon completion of the Type A test, a supplemental test was performed to verify the validity of the Type A test. For the verification test, a leak of 1.20 L was introduced t | |||
through a calibrated flow meter. Four hours into the verification test, the leakage rate began decreasing. This continued until the measured leakage rate went below the minimum acceptance criteria. After 11 hours, the verification test failed when the measured leakage rate went below 75% of the calculated leak (see Figures 5 - 8 and Table 2). | |||
',a immediately after the induced leak of the first verification test was isolated, a second Type A test was initiated. The second Type A test was a short duration test using the method described in BN-TOP-1. The leakage rate was also measured using the Mass Point method as a check on the BN-TOP-1 method. After six hours, a stable leakage rate was measured: 0.0056 wt%/ day (95% Upper Confidence Level), see Figures 9 - | |||
13 and Tables 3 and 4. | 13 and Tables 3 and 4. | ||
At the conclusion of the second Type A test, a second verification test was initiated. To verify that the flow meter used to measure the induced leak was accurate, a second calibrated flow meter was installed in series with the first meter. Because this second meter did not have the range of the first, the induced leak was chosen at 0.86 | At the conclusion of the second Type A test, a second verification test was initiated. To verify that the flow meter used to measure the induced leak was accurate, a second calibrated flow meter was installed in series with the first meter. Because this second meter did not have the range of the first, the induced leak was chosen at 0.86 L. Both t | ||
flow meters displayed the same flow. After five hours the composite leakage rate exhibited very good correlation to the acceptance band (see Figures 14 - 18 and Tab!cs 5 and 6): | |||
0.0896 wt%/ day 5 Le s 0.1547 wt%/ day | 0.0896 wt%/ day 5 Le s 0.1547 wt%/ day Once the second verification test was over, depressurization of the containment was begun. At this time, the two airlocks were vented. A significant amount of pressure was found in the personnel airlock. It is believed that the higher than usual leakage rate measured by the first Type A test was caused by the personnel airlock slowly pressurizing. The airlock finally reached equilibrium with containment at four hours into the first verification test. Once the airlock was at equilibrium the containment leakage rate decreased. This caused the failure of the first verification test. | ||
Once the second verification test was over, depressurization of the containment was begun. At this time, the two airlocks were vented. A significant amount of pressure was found in the personnel airlock. It is believed that the higher than usual leakage rate measured by the first Type A test was caused by the personnel airlock slowly pressurizing. The airlock finally reached equilibrium with containment at four hours into the first verification test. Once the airlock was at equilibrium the containment leakage rate decreased. This caused the failure of the first verification test. | With the exception of the failure of the first verification test, as explained above, review of the test data shows smooth and stable trends. No instruments failed. Ambient weather conditions were favorable. It was a successful Type A test. | ||
With the exception of the failure of the first verification test, as explained above, review of the test data shows smooth and stable trends. No instruments failed. Ambient weather conditions were favorable. It was a successful Type A test. | |||
pingp/ misc /gruber/ilr1 | pingp/ misc /gruber/ilr1 | ||
ILRT | ILRT Unit 1 Page 8 of 45 | ||
Unit 1 Page 8 of 45 | [ | ||
5.0 SPECIAL TESTING 5.1 Shield Building Testing Section IV, paragraph B of 10CFR50, Appendix J,"Special Testing Requirements" and Technical Specification 4.4.A.6 require testing of multiple barrier containments. Unit 1 Shield Building is functionally tested at monthly intervals according to NSP Surveillance Procedure SP 1073. The Shield Building is functionally tested when each redundant train of the special ventilation system is tested to determine if it meets drawdown performance computed for the test condition with 75% of the Shie:d Building inleakage specified in Technical Specification Figure TS 4.4.1. None of these monthly tests on | 5.0 SPECIAL TESTING 5.1 Shield Building Testing Section IV, paragraph B of 10CFR50, Appendix J,"Special Testing Requirements" and Technical Specification 4.4.A.6 require testing of multiple barrier containments. Unit 1 Shield Building is functionally tested at monthly intervals according to NSP Surveillance Procedure SP 1073. The Shield Building is functionally tested when each redundant train of the special ventilation system is tested to determine if it meets drawdown performance computed for the test condition with 75% of the Shie:d Building inleakage specified in Technical Specification Figure TS 4.4.1. None of these monthly tests on Unit 1 Shield Building have failed to meet the acceptance criteria due to Shield Building degradation. | ||
Unit 1 Shield Building have failed to meet the acceptance criteria due to Shield Building degradation. | |||
5.2 Auxiliary Building Testing Technical Specification 4.4.A.6 requires retesting of the Auxiliary Building Special Ventilation Zone (ABSVZ). Leak tightness of the ABSVZ is verified at quarterly intervals when each redundant train is run to determine if it can produce an acceptable negative pressure in the zona within six minutes with an opening in the bcindary of at least ten square feet. None of these quarterly tests have failed to meet the asceptance criteria. | 5.2 Auxiliary Building Testing Technical Specification 4.4.A.6 requires retesting of the Auxiliary Building Special Ventilation Zone (ABSVZ). Leak tightness of the ABSVZ is verified at quarterly intervals when each redundant train is run to determine if it can produce an acceptable negative pressure in the zona within six minutes with an opening in the bcindary of at least ten square feet. None of these quarterly tests have failed to meet the asceptance criteria. | ||
==6.0 REFERENCES== | ==6.0 REFERENCES== | ||
6.1 Unit 1 Reactor Containment Buildina Intearated Leak Rate Test. | 6.1 Unit 1 Reactor Containment Buildina Intearated Leak Rate Test. | ||
July.1973 Transmitted by {{letter dated|date=October 4, 1973|text=letter dated October 4,1973}}, from Mr. L.O. Mayer, NSP, to Mr. J.F. O' Leary, Directorate of Licensing, USAEC. | July.1973 Transmitted by {{letter dated|date=October 4, 1973|text=letter dated October 4,1973}}, from Mr. L.O. Mayer, NSP, to Mr. J.F. O' Leary, Directorate of Licensing, USAEC. | ||
6.2 Supplement No.1 to Unit 1 Reactor Containment Building Integrated Leak Rate Test. July 1973 Transmitted by {{letter dated|date=June 6, 1974|text=letter dated June 6,1974}}, from Mr. L.O. Mayer, NSP, to Mr. J.F. O' Leary, Directorate of Licensing, USAEC | 6.2 Supplement No.1 to Unit 1 Reactor Containment Building Integrated Leak Rate Test. July 1973 Transmitted by {{letter dated|date=June 6, 1974|text=letter dated June 6,1974}}, from Mr. L.O. Mayer, NSP, to Mr. J.F. O' Leary, Directorate of Licensing, USAEC. | ||
l | l 6.3 Unit 1 Reactor Containment Buildina Integrated Leak Rate Test. | ||
Qctober.1980 Transmitted by {{letter dated|date=December 22, 1981|text=letter dated December 22,1981}}, from Mr. L.O. Mayer, NSP, to Director, NRR. | Qctober.1980 Transmitted by {{letter dated|date=December 22, 1981|text=letter dated December 22,1981}}, from Mr. L.O. Mayer, NSP, to Director, NRR. | ||
l l | l l | ||
pingp/ misc /gruber/ilrt | pingp/ misc /gruber/ilrt | ||
ILRT Unit 1 Page 9 of 45 6.4 Unit 1 Reactor Containment Building Integrated Leak Rate Test February 1985 Transmitted by {{letter dated|date=June 11, 1985|text=letter dated June 11,1985}}, from Mr. D. Musolf, NSP, to Director, NRR. | ILRT Unit 1 Page 9 of 45 6.4 Unit 1 Reactor Containment Building Integrated Leak Rate Test February 1985 Transmitted by {{letter dated|date=June 11, 1985|text=letter dated June 11,1985}}, from Mr. D. Musolf, NSP, to Director, NRR. | ||
6.5 Unit 1 Reactor Containment Building Integrated Leak Rate Test. | 6.5 Unit 1 Reactor Containment Building Integrated Leak Rate Test. | ||
Seotember 1988 Transmitied by letter dated December 1988 from Mr. D. Musolf, NSP, to Director, NRR. | |||
( | ( | ||
F r | F r | ||
pingp/ misc /gruber/ilrt | pingp/ misc /gruber/ilrt | ||
ILRT Unit 1 Page 10 of 45 APPENDIX A -TYPE B AND C TEST RESULTS -1992 REFUELING OUTAGE Each penetration listed below is tested according to Surveillance Procedure 1072. The combined leakage for all components subject to Type B and C tests SHALL be less than 0.60 wt% / day. The combined leakage for components in the ABSVZ SHALL be less than 0.10 wt% / day. The combined leakage for components designated EXTERIOR SHALL be less than 0.01 wt% / day. The values listed are as left leakage rates in SCCM. Values in brackets indicate as found leakage rates in SCCM prior to maintenance. See Appendix C for repair Summary. | ILRT Unit 1 Page 10 of 45 APPENDIX A -TYPE B AND C TEST RESULTS -1992 REFUELING OUTAGE Each penetration listed below is tested according to Surveillance Procedure 1072. The combined leakage for all components subject to Type B and C tests SHALL be less than 0.60 wt% / day. The combined leakage for components in the ABSVZ SHALL be less than 0.10 wt% / day. The combined leakage for components designated EXTERIOR SHALL be less than 0.01 wt% / day. The values listed are as left leakage rates in SCCM. Values in brackets indicate as found leakage rates in SCCM prior to maintenance. See Appendix C for repair Summary. | ||
p.... | |||
1, | |||
FABSVZ PENETRATIONSs | : v..s | ||
[PonL | . c.m m :.. | ||
[ Nob | cm? | ||
c.m y s y v, | |||
n | |||
1 | ? ? | ||
13A | > wye:.( | ||
y-+m; | |||
~~ | |||
] | |||
FABSVZ PENETRATIONSs | |||
[PonL x | |||
[Outsids)> | |||
TMad - | |||
[ Type? | |||
ilInsidol | |||
[ Nob | |||
[Phnetisiorn '.. _ | |||
i m&.u., | |||
a-- | |||
c:w,. | |||
. w.a wts a | |||
. usua. | |||
s. | |||
1 Pressurizer Relief Tank Sample to C | |||
3 1 | |||
3 GA 4 | |||
Pnmary Vent Header C | |||
2 7 | |||
7 5 | |||
Reactor Coolant Drain Tank Pump C | |||
0 0 | |||
0 Discharge 11 Letdown Line C | |||
3400 0 | |||
3400 12 Charging Line C | |||
57 115[18] | |||
57[115] | |||
13A No.11 RCP Seal Water Supply C | |||
55[225,000] | |||
380 380[225,000) 13B No.12 RCP Seal Water Supply C | |||
4 12 12 14 RCP Seal Water Retum C | |||
245 95 245 15 Pressurizer Stm Sample C | |||
11 0 110 11 0 16 Pressurizer Liquid Smpi C | |||
3 8 | |||
8 17 Loop B Hot leg Sample C | |||
0 0 | |||
0 18 FuelTransicr Tube B | |||
30 30 19 Service Air B | |||
10 9 | |||
10 21 Reactor Coolant Drain Tank Gas to C | |||
30 0 | |||
30 GA 22 Cntmt Air Sample in C | |||
3 8 | |||
8 23 Cntmt Air Sample Out C | |||
3 5 | |||
5 25A Cntmt Purge Exhaust B | |||
1 1 | |||
25B Cntmt Purge Supply B | |||
1 1 | |||
26 Cntmt Sump *A' Disch C | |||
0 12 12 pingp/ misc /gruber/itrt | |||
ILRT Unit 1 Page 11 of 45 | ILRT Unit 1 Page 11 of 45 | ||
: n. , . . . . .. | , --ram n | ||
IA_BSVZ PENETRATIONS / | |||
~m | |||
: n.,...... | |||
(No? | . ~..... ~ | ||
!PSn3 y ' | |||
+...., | |||
27B | (No? | ||
29B | ::Penetrationi fTypes finsidel R O ntsidst l M A n w;m | ||
. ~a | |||
= | |||
>a wwa. " a a: m aamu;=u auia awkw. | |||
;.a, 27B Fire Protection B | |||
10 3 | |||
10 27 ILRT Pressure B | |||
21 21 C-1 Instrument 27 ILRT Pressure B | |||
1 1 | |||
C-1 Instrument 29A Internal Containment Spray C | |||
12,000 140 12,000 29B Internal Containment Spray C | |||
2 | 1,000 400 1,000 30A Containment Sump B C | ||
4,800 4.800 Suction Line 30B Containment Sump B Suction Line C | |||
565 565 42C Containment Heating Steam B | |||
2 2 | |||
2 42F Containment Heating Condensate B | |||
8 0 | |||
8 42F Containment Heating Condensate B | |||
1 1 | |||
1 44 ILRT Pressurization B | |||
0 95 95 45 Reactor Make Up to Pressurizer C | |||
310 2 | |||
310 Relief Tank 49B Demin Water B | |||
0 2 | |||
2 IEEYERIDdkNN5YR E6N53 " " | |||
7 ~~~^,~~~ | |||
\\ | |||
~~" | |||
/ | |||
X.YF; 4 | |||
y | |||
! Pen) x.. | |||
.* ~~.:r v-r: -eis | |||
-...c..~- | |||
x | |||
'. = -..., | |||
,. d0tside3 iMax;yts:.~ | |||
3 | |||
. Typei T1nside,t, | |||
; Non.. | |||
m Pe<netratio....nt | |||
~ ~.sa; m.n...a n.u w | |||
a,w. :aa - | |||
a mam.uzxa. na :wau..x:<un, m 2 | |||
Pressurizer Relief Tank N Supply C | |||
5 10 10 2 | |||
20 instrument Air C | |||
55 11 55 N to Accumulator C | |||
205 205 31 2 | |||
42A Post LOCA HYD Control Air Supply C | |||
8 4 | |||
8 50 Post LOCA HYD Control Air Supply C | |||
4 0 | |||
4 pingp/ misc /gruber/ilrt | |||
ILRT Unit 1 Page 12 of 45 p m ,,,mn,-n - wan n mpgw m emem:mn,,m m m me,e m amem e nnem^; | ILRT Unit 1 Page 12 of 45 p m,,,mn,-n - wan n mpgw m emem:mn,,m m m me,e m amem e nnem w m m nem w! | ||
^;,; | |||
m; E;f@ffy*. | |||
rANNULUS. PENETRATIONS | rANNULUS. PENETRATIONS | ||
* | * to w | ||
to | em | ||
/ ;;n e - | |||
m.m ?n - | |||
as' | |||
, 0 | |||
^-;',*a, | |||
..,. /. | |||
t | t | ||
* N; ., b "?' | * N;., b "?' | ||
p.jQ. /x,:i- | 2 | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
~ | |||
ys;6:, | |||
sx | |||
: s. m m . . .. | ^.:..x... | ||
p.jQ. /x,:i- > | |||
@P. men..,;.1nW N:s.,M m=s. T'. | |||
' fi M $ m:llnSide ^' | |||
* M 5 Q, ?. | |||
B,l M | |||
snmna@msentagahamaramannaasawnand. pg&)![. :.r. | |||
,,98 | |||
.-.m.xwp 1 | |||
~m.,53%y mssg | |||
:.s. | |||
m.. | |||
3 3x. | |||
d oni | |||
,"ynM 'f | |||
: s. m m.... | |||
lhli p | |||
A mmuaMmWaimaidawman.P., | |||
h bsa$A & | |||
x. | |||
ssi 4mna@h.ussa 34 Electrical Penetrations B | |||
1130 1130 j | |||
l 41A Containment Vacuum Breaker C | |||
8 320 320 41B Containment Vacuum Breaker C | |||
2 1 | |||
2 42A-1 Post LOCA Hydrogen Air Vent C | |||
35 45 45 l | |||
42A-2 Post LOCA Hydrogen Air Vent C | |||
8 10 10 j | |||
42B In Service Purge Supply C | |||
6 6 | |||
43A in Service Purge Exhaust B | |||
8 8 | |||
50-1 Post LOCA Hydrogen Air Vent C | |||
55 60 60 50-2 Post LOCA Hydrogen Air Vent C | |||
4 6 | |||
6 6A 11 Steam Line Bellows B | |||
10 10 10 6B 12 Steam Line Bellows B | |||
1 1 | |||
1 7A 11 Feedwater Line Bellows B | |||
2 1 | |||
2 7B 12 Feedwater Line Bellows B | |||
2 1 | |||
2 8A 11 Steam Generator Blowdown B | |||
1 15 15 Bellows 8B 12 Steam Generator Blowdown B | |||
1 2 | |||
2 Bellows 9 | |||
Residual Heat Out Bellows B | |||
2 2 | |||
2 1 | |||
10 Residual Heat in Bellows B | |||
1 3 | |||
3 | 3 | ||
{ | { | ||
I 11 Letdown Line Bellows B | |||
1 100 100 t | |||
Maintenance Airlock | 18 FuelTransfer Tube Bellows B | ||
1 4 | |||
4 Equipment Hatch B | |||
7 7 | |||
Personnel Airlock B | |||
1900[2775] | |||
1900[2775] | |||
Maintenance Airlock B | |||
1762[9688] | |||
1762[9688] | |||
pingp/ misc /gruber/ilrt i | pingp/ misc /gruber/ilrt i | ||
s ILRT Unit 1 Page 13 of 45 | s ILRT Unit 1 Page 13 of 45 APPENDIX B -TYPE B AND C TEST RESULTS - 1994 REFUELING OUTAGE Each penetration listed below is tested according to Surveillance Procedure 1072. The values listed are as left leakage rates in SCCM. Values in brackets indicate as found leakage rates in SCCM prior to maintenance. See Appendix C for repair Summary. | ||
APPENDIX B -TYPE B AND C TEST RESULTS - 1994 REFUELING OUTAGE Each penetration listed below is tested according to Surveillance Procedure 1072. The values listed are as left leakage rates in SCCM. Values in brackets indicate as found leakage rates in SCCM prior to maintenance. See Appendix C for repair Summary. | ~ | ||
~ | |||
p | p | ||
mnw nnswngsac | -, n-n n.,, | ||
m,, | |||
n,, | |||
,,,,w mnw nnswngsac tABSVZ PENETRATIONS) | |||
~ ' ' | |||
~ ~ ' | |||
(R. | (R. | ||
EPen? | ~ | ||
[Ndh | EPen? | ||
1 | , Min | ||
Sample to GA 4 | [Ndh | ||
23 psig | [PsiissstIstn Type inside Outside Max Pathway Penalty w | ||
5 | ~ uww au. <. | ||
11 | -,-,a, | ||
13B | ~.~ | ||
Water Supply 14 | 1 Pressurizer Relief Tank C | ||
15 | 3 3 | ||
16 | 3 3 | ||
18 | 0 Sample to GA 4 | ||
21 | Primary Vent Header C | ||
Tank Gas to GA 22 | 0 (1) 3 [2] | ||
3 [2] | |||
0 (1) 2* | |||
23 psig 2 [5] | |||
2 [1] | |||
2 [5] | |||
2 [1] | |||
5 Reactor Coolant Drn Tnk C | |||
2 [1] | |||
0[0] | |||
2 [1] | |||
0[0] | |||
0 t | |||
Pump Discharge 23 psig 0[0] | |||
O[1] | |||
0[1] | |||
0[0] | |||
11 Letdown Line C | |||
5200 0 | |||
5200 0 | |||
0 12 Charging Line C | |||
25 720 720 25 0 | |||
13A No.11 RCP Seal C | |||
30 3[13.000] | |||
30 3 | |||
7500 i | |||
Water Supply 23 psig 0 [7,500] | |||
0[7500] | |||
0[7500] | |||
13B No.12 RCP Seal C | |||
60 100 100 60 0 | |||
Water Supply 14 RCP Seal Water C | |||
250[9] | |||
125[26] | |||
250 [26] | |||
125 [9] | |||
42 Return 23 psig 8[50] | |||
26[170] | |||
26[170] | |||
8 [50] | |||
15 Pressurizer Stm C | |||
0[10] | |||
2(16] | |||
2[16] | |||
O[10] | |||
0 Sample 23 psig 1 [0] | |||
O[0] | |||
1 [1] | |||
O [0] | |||
16 Pressurizer Liquid Smpi C | |||
2 (2) 2 [0] | |||
2 [2] | |||
2 [0] | |||
O 23 psig 1 [0] | |||
1 [1] | |||
1 [1] | |||
1 [0] | |||
g 17 Loop B Hot Leg C | |||
70[2] | |||
175[3] | |||
175 [3] | |||
70[2] | |||
O Sample 23 psig 7 [1] | |||
150[1] | |||
150[1] | |||
7 [1] | |||
18 Fuel Transfer Tube B | |||
13 13 13 0 | |||
19 Service Air B | |||
2 0 | |||
2 0 | |||
0 21 Reactor Coolant Drn C | |||
25 0 | |||
25 0 | |||
0 Tank Gas to GA 22 Cntmt Air Sample in C | |||
8 2 | |||
8 2 | |||
0 23 Cntmt Air Sample Out C | |||
5 1 | |||
5 1 | |||
0 1 | |||
25A Cntmt Purge Exhaust B | |||
5 5 | |||
5 0 | |||
25B Cntmt Purge Supply B | |||
0 0 | |||
0 0 | |||
pingp/ misc /gruber/iln m | |||
Unit 1 Page 14 of 45 | Unit 1 Page 14 of 45 | ||
..:w ns;, | |||
n - | |||
m==w | |||
,,.-,.~.- :n | |||
~ ~; | |||
O | #ABSVZ.PENETRKrlONS1.: | ||
O | |||
[Noi | ...........m. | ||
27B | ?hside? | ||
C-1 | Outside! | ||
C-1 | Max | ||
Spray | [Noi | ||
29B | ! Peneti......ationh m awaaww =ua[=aa w m aawa Path.wayfliPenalW iTypeli ua:asawa | ||
Spray | ,t | ||
30A | |||
30B | ==aw men a - | ||
2950[140] | ~ am 26 Cntmt Sump "A" Disch C | ||
42A | 0[0] | ||
42C | O O [0] | ||
Steam 42F-1 | 0[0] | ||
Condensate 42F-2 | 0 23 psig 0[0] | ||
Condensate 44 | O[0] | ||
23 psig | O[0] | ||
Pressurizer Relief Tnk 49B | 27B Fire Protection B | ||
t pingp/ misc /gruber/ilrt | 0 0 | ||
i.ie | 0 0 | ||
0 27 ILRT Pressure B | |||
0 0 | |||
0 0 | |||
C-1 Instrument 23 psig 0 | |||
0 0 | |||
27 ILRT Pressure B | |||
20 20 20 0 | |||
C-1 Instrument 23 psig 0 | |||
0 0 | |||
29A Internal Containment C | |||
3100 65 [1] | |||
3100 65[1] | |||
65* | |||
Spray 23 psig 65 [0] | |||
65[0] | |||
65[0] | |||
29B Internal Containment C | |||
1300[1900] | |||
1050[0] | |||
1300[1900] | |||
1050[0] | |||
125* | |||
Spray 23 psig 0[1700] | |||
125[0] | |||
125[1700] | |||
O[0] | |||
30A Containment Sump B C | |||
150[3] | |||
150[3] | |||
150[3] | |||
20 Suction Line 23 psig 15 [35] | |||
15 [35] | |||
15 [35] | |||
30B Containment Sump B C | |||
2950[140] | |||
2950[140] | |||
2950[140] | |||
0 Suction Line 23 psig 900[15] | |||
900[15] | |||
900[15] | |||
42A Post LOCA H Control C | |||
1[30] | |||
0[0] | |||
1 [30] | |||
0[0] | |||
2 3 | |||
23 psig 1 [2] | |||
1 [2] | |||
1 [2] | |||
42C Containment Heating B | |||
10 2 | |||
10 2 | |||
0 Steam 42F-1 Containment Heating B | |||
0 0 | |||
0 0 | |||
0 Condensate 42F-2 Containment Heating B | |||
0 0 | |||
0 0 | |||
0 Condensate 44 ILRT Pressurization B | |||
0 220 220 0 | |||
0 23 psig 0 | |||
76 76 0 | |||
45 Reactor Make Up to C | |||
300 4 | |||
300 4 | |||
0 Pressurizer Relief Tnk 49B Demin Water B | |||
1 1 | |||
1 1 | |||
0 50 Post LOCA H Control C | |||
8 [0] | |||
O[0] | |||
8 [0] | |||
0[0] | |||
2 2 | |||
23 psig 0[2] | |||
O[2] | |||
O[2] | |||
t pingp/ misc /gruber/ilrt i.ie | |||
ILRT Unit 1 Page 15 of 45 | ILRT Unit 1 Page 15 of 45 | ||
_.--n-- | _.--n-- | ||
.m.m, ng | |||
,g,, | |||
,,,,,,,,,n nrn,y n,, | |||
, EXTERIOR PENETRATIONS,5 | |||
~ | |||
e i | |||
x | |||
IN6h | ' ^ ~ | ||
2, JP:na | |||
42A | ^ | ||
Control Air Supply | ? Min?^ | ||
50 | N IN6h (Psnettstion) | ||
.. Myps? | |||
fN~UO}hENNTNAiidU5I' | finsI,S$$ | ||
{dstsidA) | |||
Y~ | [Miki ~ [Psihnapj !NhAltyi a | ||
I,P. e. nn.. | _ wms eu a usaan msa amammaiusaams zaimeamawawam:u:sa; wi m 2 | ||
Pressurizer Relief Tank C | |||
7 1 | |||
7 1 | |||
0 N Supply 2 | |||
20 Instrument Air C | |||
360 30 360 30 0 | |||
N to Accumulator C | |||
100[115] | |||
100[115] | |||
100[115] | |||
31 2 | |||
25 23 psig 0 [25] | |||
O[25] | |||
0 [25] | |||
42A Post LOCA HYD C | |||
1[30] | |||
0 [0] | |||
1[30] | |||
O[0] | |||
) | |||
Control Air Supply 23 psig 1 [2] | |||
1 [2] | |||
1 [2] | |||
50 Post LOCA HYD C | |||
8 [0] | |||
0 [0] | |||
8 [0] | |||
0[0] | |||
2 Control Air Supply 23 psig 0[2] | |||
O[2] | |||
0 [2] | |||
"~ | |||
~ | |||
~ ~~ | |||
fN~UO}hENNTNAiidU5I' Y~ | |||
I,P. e. nn.. | |||
2Typej 4 Insides i(Outsid6,] | |||
(Max 5 Pathway Penalty' | |||
[, | [, | ||
Min | |||
...m | |||
...., m. | |||
{No.v iPenetratio.n) | {No.v iPenetratio.n) manum. na o | ||
,m me em, | |||
m om, | |||
Air Vent 42A-2 | _~ | ||
Air Vent | _,-.s | ||
42B | .e t. | ||
Air Vent 50-2 | wa4 x, | ||
6A | 34 Electrical Penetrations B | ||
Bellows 78 | 552 552 552 0 | ||
Bellows BA | 41 A Containment Vacuum C | ||
Blowdown Bellows pingp/ misc /gruber/ilrt | 6 335 335 6 | ||
0 Breaker l | |||
41B Containment Vacuum C | |||
0 210 210 0 | |||
0 Breaker 42A-1 Post LOCA Hydrogen C | |||
50 60 60 50 0 | |||
Air Vent 42A-2 Post LOCA Hydrogen C | |||
1[30] | |||
2 2[30] | |||
1 [2] | |||
Air Vent 23 psig 1 [2] | |||
1 [2] | |||
1 [2] | |||
42B in Service Purge Supply B | |||
3 3 | |||
3 0 | |||
43A in Service Purge Exhaust B | |||
0 0 | |||
0 0 | |||
50-1 Post LOCA Hydrogen C | |||
165 145 165 145 0 | |||
Air Vent 50-2 Post LOCA Hydrogen C | |||
8 [0] | |||
2[4200] | |||
8[4200] | |||
2 [0] | |||
2 Air Vent 23 psig 0[2] | |||
0[2] | |||
O[2] | |||
6A 11 Steam Line Bellows B | |||
0 0 | |||
0 0 | |||
0 6B 12 Steam Line Bellows B | |||
1 1 | |||
1 1 | |||
0 7A 11 Feedwater Line B | |||
0 0 | |||
0 0 | |||
0 Bellows 78 12 Feedwater Line B | |||
0 0 | |||
0 0 | |||
0 Bellows BA 11 Steam Generator B | |||
1 18 18 1 | |||
0 Blowdown Bellows pingp/ misc /gruber/ilrt | |||
ILRT, Rev.1 Unit 1 Page 16 of 42 | ILRT, Rev.1 Unit 1 Page 16 of 42 | ||
""~ | |||
~' | |||
~^ | |||
'~ | |||
IANNU[ INsN5TiiAiiU}45[ | IANNU[ INsN5TiiAiiU}45[ | ||
., i. | |||
..[M!@ | |||
ilnsidej^ !Outsidei | [ Perk. | ||
BTypes ilnsidej^ !Outsidei f.Maxj!,, sPathways ? Penalty] | |||
(Noi iPenetrationf | |||
Blowdown Bellows 9 | +.a a | ||
tows | ~n~ | ||
Residual Heat in Bellows | u.a - | ||
lows Equipment Hatch | . a =u ars | ||
Maintenance Airlock | : m. was s wh n aum | ||
.m:. nua w u aw 8B 12 Steam Generator B | |||
0 1 | |||
1 0 | |||
0 Blowdown Bellows 9 | |||
Residual Heat Out Bel-B 1 | |||
2 2 | |||
1 0 | |||
tows 10 Residual Heat in Bellows B | |||
2 0 | |||
2 0 | |||
0 11 Letdown Line Bellows B | |||
0 170 170 0 | |||
0 18 Fuel Transfer Tube Bel-B 0 | |||
0 0 | |||
0 0 | |||
lows Equipment Hatch B | |||
8 8 | |||
8 0 | |||
Personnel Airlock B | |||
9050[2265] | |||
9050[2265] 9050[2265] | |||
0 23 psig 3025[1275] | |||
3025[1275] 3025[1275] | |||
Maintenance Airlock B | |||
1725[5300] | |||
1725[5300] | |||
1725[5300] | |||
O 23 psig 3385 [725] | |||
3385[725] | |||
3385[725] | |||
* B + C Total Penalty = 192 SCCM @ 23 psig Total Repair Penalty = 7596 SCCM @ 23 psig B + C Penalty Calculations: | * B + C Total Penalty = 192 SCCM @ 23 psig Total Repair Penalty = 7596 SCCM @ 23 psig B + C Penalty Calculations: | ||
192 c.c X 1Ft3 X .10lLvd', X 60 min X 24 fir = 0.00074 6 @ 23 psig min 28317cc 1.32X106 ft3 Hr | 192 c.c X 1Ft3 X.10lLvd', X 60 min X 24 fir = 0.00074 6 @ 23 psig min 28317cc 1.32X106 ft3 Hr day day Total Repair Penalty Calculations: | ||
X.60 min X 2411r = 0.0293 6 @ 23 psig 7596 cc X 1 Ft3 X 100wt% | |||
4 min 28317cc 1.32X106 ft3 Hr day day Pressuiizer and Sump A Level increase Penalty = 0.00131 wt%/ day Using the above penalties the 1994 as found type A UCL leakage rate = | |||
(0.0685 + 0.00074 + 0.0293 + 0.00131) wt%/ day = 0.0998 wt%/ day < 0.11569 wt%/ day = 0.75 Lt @ Pt pingp/ misc /gruber/ilrt M | (0.0685 + 0.00074 + 0.0293 + 0.00131) wt%/ day = 0.0998 wt%/ day < 0.11569 wt%/ day = 0.75 Lt @ Pt pingp/ misc /gruber/ilrt M | ||
Line 331: | Line 804: | ||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
i:REFUELINGT PEN' f OUTAG E.. | |||
i:REFUELINGT | ; NOA iPENETR'ATION; J | ||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
1 x | 1 x | ||
1992 | 1992 12 Charging Line Perform corrective maintenance on air operated valves. | ||
1992 | 1992 13A No.11 RCP Seal Water Supply Replace check valve. | ||
1994 | 1994 4 | ||
valves. | Primary Vent Header Perform preventative maintenance on air operated valves. | ||
1994 | 1994 5 | ||
1994 | Reactor Coolant Drain Tank Pump Perform corrective Discharge maintenance on air operated valves. | ||
1994 | 1994 13A No.11 RCP Seal Water Supply Replace outside Containment isolation valve | ||
1994 | + | ||
1994 | 1994 14 RCP Seal Water Return Performed preventative maintenance on the motor actuators. | ||
1994 | 1994 15 Pressurizer Stm Sample Performed preventative maintenance on the motor actuators. | ||
1994 | 1994 16 Pressurizer Liquid Smpi Performed preventative maintenance on the motor actuators. | ||
1994 | 1994 17 Loop B Hot Leg Sample Performed preventative maintenance on the motor actuators. | ||
1994 | 1994 26 Containment Sump A Discharge Perform corrective maintenance on inside air operated valve. | ||
1994 29A Internal Containment Spray Perform preventative maintenance on the motor actuator. | |||
1994 29B Internal Containment Spray Perform preventative maintenance on the check valve and on the motor actuator. | |||
pingp/ misc /gruber/ilrt | pingp/ misc /gruber/ilrt | ||
ILRT Unit 1 Page 18 of 45 7wn,,w me n av mmme -am.:,w ~~ mee w m;r- | ILRT Unit 1 Page 18 of 45 7wn,,w me n av mmme -am.:,w ~~ mee w m;r-wmemmr.mr= nm- ~ -ve - | ||
i 7 P.. E. N...d. | |||
~..'... | |||
REFU.ELING.8 | REFU.ELING.8 | ||
, OUTAGE ll 6NOf ?PENETRATIONf s | |||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
8 | 8 | ||
% akwaeaumwu ;au waanmuumawwan,au ;axamw maaaaaam aasa 1994 30A Containment Sump B Suction Line Performed preventative maintenance on the motor I | |||
actuator. | actuator. | ||
1994 | 1994 30B Containment Sump B Suction Line Performed preventative maintenance on the motor actuator. | ||
1994 | 1994 42A Post LOCA HYD Control Air Supply Performed preventative maintenance on the motor actuator. | ||
1994 | 1994 50 Post LOCA HYD Control Air Supply Performed preventative maintenance on the motor actuator. | ||
pingp/ misc /gruber/ilrt | pingp/ misc /gruber/ilrt | ||
Graph Legend NSP PINGP Unit-1, | Graph Legend NSP PINGP Unit-1, ILRT 1994 Lam %/ day 95% EL Data FreRuencY 900 seconds 75% La ANS 56.8 Data Plot 24 H | ||
20 g | |||
H | m j | ||
^ | |||
16 g | |||
T. | |||
x H | |||
Q | o Q | ||
e | 12 g | ||
4 | g e | ||
4 7 | |||
0 08 g | |||
~ | |||
Es | |||
-~ | |||
_y. | e | ||
Q R5 | _y. | ||
_r | oc_ | ||
Q R5 | |||
$i m a o | |||
_r 04 Oj 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 Delta Time Hours start Time: | |||
1:45: 00 Date: | |||
1731994 End Time: | |||
1: 45: 00 Date: | |||
1741994 e | |||
e | e | ||
t NSP PINGP Unit-1, | t NSP PINGP Unit-1, ILRT 1994 Data Frequency 900 seconds l | ||
1 260820. | Raw Transducer Data Plot 260860. | ||
260780. | 1 260820. | ||
= | |||
260780. | |||
3 s | 3 s | ||
260740. | 260740. | ||
3 m | |||
g Ln | 260700. | ||
g Ln c-a$5 s | |||
Q | h260660. | ||
Q | |||
: 0. 80 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 Delta Time Hours Start Time: | |||
1: 45: 00 Date: | |||
1731994 End Time: | |||
1: 45: 00 Date: | |||
1741994 | |||
NSP PINGP Unit-1 ILRT 1994 Data Freciuency 900 seconds Raw Transducer Data Plot 39.48 | NSP PINGP Unit-1 ILRT 1994 Data Freciuency 900 seconds Raw Transducer Data Plot 39.48 H | ||
39.47 1 | |||
39.46 w | |||
H 39.45 | H 39.45 s | ||
~ | |||
o | o 39.44 s | ||
x S | |||
x | 15 m5 w | ||
S | 39.43 S | ||
0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 Delta Time Hours Start Time: | |||
1: 45: 00 Date: | |||
1731994 End Time: | |||
1: 45: 00 Date: | |||
1741994 | |||
NSP PINGP Unit-1, | NSP PINGP Unit-1, ILRT 1994 Data Frequency 900 seconds Raw Transducer Data Plot 80.00 s | ||
79.80 3 | |||
79.40 | 79.60 g | ||
79.20 | s 79.40 3 | ||
n C | u 79.20 g | ||
H | n C | ||
OC_ | |||
IE H | |||
m-5 g | |||
79.80 i | |||
g 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.80 25.00 Delta Time Hours Start Time: | |||
1: 45: 00 Date: | |||
1731994 End Time: | |||
1: 45: 00 Date: | |||
1741994 i | |||
Graph Legend NSP PINGP Unit-1 | Graph Legend NSP PINGP Unit-1 ILRT 1994 Lam %/ day | ||
._upp r Limit Data Fre9uenc7 900 seconds | |||
___ Lower Limit ANS 56.8 Data Plot | |||
.30 | |||
l, | ~ | ||
l, | |||
~ | |||
.28 g | |||
Q | 1 | ||
+ | |||
0 | .26 l | ||
X H | |||
l 0 | |||
Q | |||
.24 l | |||
g M | |||
e H | |||
s) o j | |||
.22 | |||
{ | |||
3 0 | |||
0m F | |||
__ N_. | __ N_. | ||
o | E{.F o | ||
g,3 | |||
.x | |||
.20 | |||
..\\ | |||
Oj 0.00 4.00 8.00 12.00 16.00 20.00 Delta Time Hours start Time 2:30:00 Date: | |||
1741994 End T i me: | |||
13: 15: 00 Date: | |||
1741994 1 | |||
NSP PINGP Unit-1 ILRT 1994 Data Frequency 900 seconds Raw Transducer Data Plot 260675. | NSP PINGP Unit-1 ILRT 1994 Data Frequency 900 seconds Raw Transducer Data Plot 260675. | ||
s 260625. | s 260625. | ||
g'I 3 | |||
260575. g s | h | ||
260525. | + | ||
a 260575. | |||
3 | g s | ||
260525. | |||
+ | |||
Q | m 260475. | ||
i 3 | |||
m 8[5 i= | |||
260425. | |||
Q 0.00 4.00 | |||
: 8. 00 12.00 16.00 | |||
: 20. 00 Delta Time Hours Start Time: | |||
2: 30: 00 Date: | |||
1741994 l | |||
End Time: | |||
13: 15: 00 Date: | |||
1741994 i | |||
NSP PINGP Unit-1. ILRT 1994 Data Frequency 900 seconds Raw Transducer Data Plot 39.46 | NSP PINGP Unit-1. | ||
ILRT 1994 Data Frequency 900 seconds Raw Transducer Data Plot 39.46 | |||
s 39.46 | \\ | ||
s 39.46 3 | |||
y | 3 5 | ||
39.45 g | |||
y s | |||
39.45 g | |||
39.45 g | |||
g e | |||
asr 9 | |||
&55 | |||
_Jg 39.44 p | |||
0.00 | |||
: 4. 00 8.00 12.00 16.00 | |||
: 20. 00 Delta Time Hours Start Time: | |||
2: 30: 00 Date: | |||
1741994 End Time: | |||
13: 15: 00 Date: | |||
1741994 i | |||
a | |||
i NSP PINGP Unit-1. ILRT 1994 Data Frequency 900 seconds Raw Transducer Data Plot 80.10 | i NSP PINGP Unit-1. | ||
ILRT 1994 Data Frequency 900 seconds Raw Transducer Data Plot 80.10 s | |||
80.00 s | |||
79.80 | 79.90 I | ||
79.70 | H 79.80 s | ||
S | T 79.70 g | ||
3 R E i= | |||
: 8. 00 12.00 16.00 20.OP Delta Time Hours | S s | ||
&53 | |||
) | |||
79.60 0.00 4.00 | |||
: 8. 00 12.00 16.00 20.OP Delta Time Hours Start Time: | |||
2: 30: 00 Date: | |||
1741994 End Time: | |||
13: 15: 00 Date: | |||
1741994 l | |||
r Graph Legend NSP PINGP Unit-1, | r Graph Legend NSP PINGP Unit-1, ILRT 1994 LSF Look 95% UCL Data Fre9uencY 900 seconds | ||
___75% La Total Time (Double UCL) | |||
Plot | |||
.18 | |||
.14 3 | |||
X | 4 | ||
.10 g | |||
g e | |||
o | X F | ||
N"N - | .06 s | ||
'\\ | |||
o 02 03 N"N - | |||
m | F cr | ||
%(,i= | |||
o 4 | |||
m F | |||
oj | |||
. 02 j | |||
0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 Delta Time Hours start Time 13: 3e: 0e Date: | |||
1741994 End Time 19: 30: 00 Date: | |||
1741994 | |||
1 Graph Legend NSP PINGP Unit-1. ILRT 1994 | 1 Graph Legend NSP PINGP Unit-1. | ||
75X La ANS 56.8 Data Plot | ILRT 1994 Lam x/ day 95% UCL Data Frequency 900 seconds 75X La ANS 56.8 Data Plot | ||
.18 H | |||
H | .14 g | ||
H l | |||
.10 g | |||
I g | |||
A H | |||
U | |||
.06 3 | |||
b j | |||
j | |||
.02 | |||
= | |||
g x. | |||
a c._ | |||
~ | |||
${j tn gx | |||
.ea Oj 0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 Delta Time Hours start T i me: | |||
13: 30: 00 Date: | |||
1741994 End Times 19: 30: 00 Date: | |||
1741994 d- | |||
NSP PINGP Unit-1, | NSP PINGP Unit-1, ILRT 1994 Data Freciuency 900 seconds Raw Transducer Data Plot 260438. | ||
Raw Transducer Data Plot 260438. | ~ | ||
1 260436. | |||
1 | ~ | ||
s 260434. | |||
s 260434. | |||
a 1 | a 1 | ||
l' l | l' l | ||
d i | d i | ||
260432. | 260432. | ||
s | s v | ||
260430. | |||
en | B en C | ||
O$g (f) | |||
H a | |||
Q | h260428. | ||
l Q | |||
0.00 | |||
: 2. 00 | |||
: 4. 00 6.00 8.00 10.00 Delta. Time Houre Start Time: | |||
13: 30: 00 Date: | |||
1741994 End Time: | |||
19: 30: 00 Date: | |||
1741994 W | |||
n | |||
NSP PINGP Unit-1. ILRT 1994 Data Frequency 900 seconds Raw Transducer Data Plot 39.45 | NSP PINGP Unit-1. | ||
ILRT 1994 Data Frequency 900 seconds Raw Transducer Data Plot 39.45 D | |||
39.45 | s 39.45 g | ||
emb l | emb" l | ||
39.45 | 39.45 g | ||
s 39.45 3 | |||
u 39.44 g | |||
3 e | |||
ac_ | |||
S | S | ||
&$5 | |||
.sy 39.44 S | |||
0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 Delta Time Hours Start Time: | |||
13: 30: 00 Date: | |||
1741994 End Time: | |||
19 30: 00 Date: | |||
1741994 l., | |||
NSP PINGP Unit-1. ILRT 1994 Data Freciuency 900 seconds Raw Transducer Data Plot 80.03 | NSP PINGP Unit-1. | ||
ILRT 1994 Data Freciuency 900 seconds Raw Transducer Data Plot 80.03 s | |||
80.01 s | |||
I O | |||
79.99 s | |||
79.97 s | |||
l | ? | ||
^ | |||
ii! | |||
l 79.95 g | |||
s r | |||
R $ i= | |||
a | |||
&E 79.93 Q | |||
0.20 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 l | |||
Delta Time Hours St. art Time: | |||
13: 30: 00 Date: | |||
1741994 End Time: | |||
19: 30: 00 Date: | |||
1741994 h | |||
Graph Legend NSP PINGP Unit-1. ILRT 1994 | Graph Legend NSP PINGP Unit-1. | ||
ILRT 1994 LSF Leck Upper Limit Data Fre uenc 900 seconds Total Time (Double UCL) | |||
Plot | |||
H | ___ Lower Limit | ||
.28 H | |||
5 | .24 3 | ||
1 5 | |||
1 | 1 | ||
~ | |||
s A | .20 g | ||
,s A | |||
F 0( | |||
.16 g | |||
.x N. | |||
e | |||
+ | |||
_r | ~ | ||
m Y | |||
O 12 H | |||
g EC F e | |||
Adm m | |||
m aa O | |||
_r | |||
,08 Oj | |||
.50 1.50 2.50 | |||
: 3. 50 4.50 5.50 Delta Time Hours Start Time: | |||
19: 45: 00 Date: | |||
1741994 End Times 0:45: 00 Date: | |||
1751994 | |||
') | |||
~ | |||
Graph Legend NSP PINGP Unit-1, ILRT 1994 | Graph Legend NSP PINGP Unit-1, ILRT 1994 Lam %/ day Data Fre uenc 900 seconds Upper Limit | ||
-__ Lower Limit ANS 56.8 Data Plot | |||
.28 i | |||
F | |||
. 24 g | |||
H | |||
.20 m | |||
3 a | |||
G | / | ||
x G | |||
1 Q | |||
.16 x | |||
19 i= l g w" m | g g | ||
m | 4)j | ||
a l D | .12 g | ||
_r .08 | 3 19 i= l D | ||
g w" m m | |||
a l l | |||
D | |||
_r | |||
.08 Oj | |||
.50 1.50 2.50 3.50 4.50 5.50 Delta Time Hours Start T i me: | |||
19:45:00 Date: | |||
1741994 End Time: | |||
0: 45: 00 Date: | |||
1751994 1 | |||
~ | |||
l NSP PINGP Unit-1. ILRT 1994 Data Frequency 900 seconds Raw Transducer Data Plot 39.46 | l NSP PINGP Unit-1. | ||
ILRT 1994 Data Frequency 900 seconds Raw Transducer Data Plot 39.46 P | |||
39.45 | s 39.45 g | ||
+ | |||
39.45 | 39.45 g | ||
39.45 | s 39.45 g | ||
+ | |||
8 G | |||
W 39.44 T | |||
9 E i= 1 | |||
& " El q | |||
3 | |||
_Jj 39.44 S | |||
: 0. 00 | |||
: 2. 00 4.00 | |||
: 6. 00 8.00 10.00 Delta Time Hours Start Time: | |||
19: 45: 00 Date: | |||
1741994 End Time: | |||
0: 45: 00 Date: | |||
1751994 I | |||
C 1 | |||
i lNSP'PINGPUnit-1, ILRT 1994 Data Frequency 900 seconds Raw Transducer Data Plot 80.07 | i lNSP'PINGPUnit-1, ILRT 1994 Data Frequency 900 seconds Raw Transducer Data Plot 80.07 3 | ||
80.06 s | |||
s s | 80.05 s | ||
80.04 | .s s | ||
80.04 3 | |||
l e? | |||
80.03 | ~ | ||
i- | 80.03 g | ||
: 80. 02 | s E ' i= | ||
A a | |||
i-a | |||
: 80. 02 Q | |||
0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.20 Delta Time Hours Start Time: | |||
19: 45: 00 Date: | |||
1741994 End Time: | |||
0: 45: 00 Date: | |||
1751994 s | |||
o | o | ||
F NSP PINGP Unit-1 ILRT 1994 Data Frec;uency 900 seconds Raw Transducer Data Plot 260440. | F NSP PINGP Unit-1 ILRT 1994 Data Frec;uency 900 seconds Raw Transducer Data Plot 260440. | ||
260420. 3 260400. | 260420. | ||
3 1 | |||
260400. | |||
260380. | m m | ||
H 260380. | |||
260360. s en | o8 260360. | ||
s 8 | |||
b'!h 260340 | en | ||
~ | |||
b'!h 260340. | |||
Q | |||
: 0. 00 | |||
: 2. 00 4.00 6.00 | |||
: 8. 00 | |||
: 10. 00 | |||
~ | |||
Delta Time Hours Start Time: | |||
19: 45: 00 Date: | |||
1741994 End Time: | |||
0: 45: 00 Date: | |||
1751994 O | |||
b | b | ||
TABLE 1 ANS 56.8 | TABLE 1 ANS 56.8 Page 1 | ||
NSP PINGP Unti-1, TLRT 1994 Date Analysis Window Start Tine: | RT Integrated Leakage Rete Calculations UNt1 File: June. set Pagg 37 of 45 NSP PINGP Unti-1, TLRT 1994 Date Analysis Window Start Tine: | ||
1:45: 0 Date: 1731994 End Time: | |||
1:45: 0 Date: 1741994 Data Analysis Frequency 900 seconds DELTA TIME FRESSURE TEMP LSF UCL OMEGA 0.0000 39.4707 79.4644 0.0000 0.0000 260843.0000 | |||
.2500 39.4675 79.4287 0.0000 0.0000 260639.0000 | |||
.5000 39.4644 79.3990 | |||
.1840 | |||
.3558 260833.0000 | |||
.7500 39.4619 79.3681 | |||
.1435 | |||
.2173 260832.0000 1.0000 39.4591 79.3441 | |||
.1583 | |||
.1980 250825.0000 1.2500 39.4573 79.3155 | |||
.1253 | |||
.1720 260827.0000 1.5000 39.4549 79.2882 | |||
.1170 | |||
.1489 260824.0000 1.7500 39.4532 79.2588 | |||
.1082 | |||
.1332 260822.0000 2.0000 39.4516 79.2450 | |||
.0920 | |||
.1179 260824.0000 2.2500 39.450B 79.2305 | |||
.0797 | |||
.1035 260824.0000 2.5000 39.4488 79.2110 | |||
.0729 | |||
.0938 250821.0000 2.7500 39.4481 7S,1959 | |||
.0825 | |||
.0829 260824.0000 3.0000 39.4467 79.1848 | |||
.0590 | |||
.0764 260820.0000 3.2500 39.4457 79.1732 | |||
.0582 | |||
.0713 260S19.0000 3.5000 39.4444 79.1611 | |||
.0557 | |||
.0687 2G0816.0000 3.7500 39.4438 79.1490 | |||
.0526 | |||
.0643 250818.0000 4.0000 39.4431 79.1409 | |||
.0501 | |||
.0507 260817.0000 4.2500 39.4418 79.1297 | |||
.0494 | |||
.0588 260814.0000 4.5000 39.4403 79.1229 | |||
.0516 | |||
.0603 260808.0000 4.7500 39.4403 79.1196 | |||
.0519 | |||
.3597 260809.0000 5.0000 39.4392 79.1104 | |||
.0525 | |||
.0595 260807.0000 5.2500 39.4384 79.1092 | |||
.0544 | |||
.0511 260802.0000 5.5000 39.4372 79.1052 | |||
.0578 | |||
.0647 2E0796.0000 5.7500 39.4379 79.0979 | |||
.0558 | |||
.0632 250804.0000 S.0000 39.4367 79.09S7 | |||
.0582 | |||
.0E43 260795.0000 8.2500 39.4366 79.0927 | |||
.0582 | |||
.0538 250798.0000 6.5000 39.4358 79.0883 | |||
.0589 | |||
.0641 250794.0000 6.7500 39.4357 79.0896 | |||
.0593 | |||
.0541 260793.0000 7.0000 39.4349 79.0856 | |||
.0500 | |||
.0645 260790.0000 7.2500 39.4347 79.0852 | |||
.0504 | |||
.0546 260789.0000 7.5000 39.4345 79.0855 | |||
.0608 | |||
.0648 260787.0000 7.7500 39.4337 79.0862 | |||
.0518 | |||
.0657 260782.00Ps 8.0000 39.4337 79.0850 | |||
.0624 | |||
.0660 260782.0000 8.2500 39.4334 79.0865 | |||
.0629 | |||
.0553 250780.0000 8.5000 39.4336 79.0890 | |||
.0630 | |||
.0663 2G0780.0000 8.7500 39.4336 79.0920 | |||
.0531 | |||
.0662 260778.0000 9.0000 39.4334 79.0949 | |||
.0633 | |||
.0652 250776.0000 9.2500 39.4328 79.0982 | |||
.0G41 | |||
.0570 280770.0000 9.5000 39.4325 79.1017 | |||
.0649 | |||
.0572 260767.0000 9.7500 39.4331 79.1014 | |||
.0649 | |||
.0676 260771.0000 l | |||
TN1 ANS 55.8 | TN1 ANS 55.8 Page 2 ILRT Integrated Leskage Rate Calculations Urit 1 NO FAle: june. set NSP PINSP Unit-1, ILRT 1994 Data Analysis Window Start Time: | ||
17.7500 | 1:451 0 Date: 1731994 End Time: | ||
1:45: 0 Date: 1741994 Data Analysis Frecuency 900 seconde DELTA 7IME FRESSURE TEMP LSF UCL OMEGA 10.0000 39.4334 79.1094 | |||
.0649 | |||
.0674 260759.0000 10.2500 39.4337 79.1148 | |||
.0648 | |||
.0572 2B0768.0000 10.5000 39.4333 79.1212 | |||
.0552 | |||
.0675 250762.0000 10.7500 39.4339 79.1228 | |||
.0649 | |||
.0571 260756.0000 11.0000 39.4340 73.1285 | |||
.0646 | |||
.0558 260764.0000 11.2500 39.4339 79.1353 | |||
.0548 | |||
.0569 250759.0000 11.5000 39.4341 79.1405 | |||
.0648 | |||
.0558 260758.0000 11.7500 39.4340 79.1468 | |||
.0650 | |||
.0570 250754.0000 12.0000 39.4332 79.1543 | |||
.0658 | |||
.0578 260748.0000 12.2500 39.4335 79.1584 | |||
.0564 | |||
.0585 250745.0000 12.5000 39.4346 79.1685 | |||
.0555 | |||
.0685 250748.0000 12.7500 39.4342 79.1777 | |||
.0671 | |||
.0591 260741.0000 13.0000 39.4347 79.1828 | |||
.0574 | |||
.0693 260742.0000 13.2500 39.4352 79.1928 | |||
.0577 | |||
.0595 250740.0000 13.5000 39.4355 79.2012 | |||
.0678 | |||
.0896 260739.0000 13.7500 39.4361 79.2058 | |||
.0679 | |||
.0896 250739.0000 14.0000 39.4362 79.2174 | |||
.0580 | |||
.0697 260735.0000 14.2500 39.4370 79.2258 | |||
.0580 | |||
.06S6 26073B.0000 14.5000 39.4372 79.2352 | |||
.0B80 | |||
.0595 260733.0000 14.7500 39.4376 79.2442 | |||
.0681 | |||
.0695 260731.0000 15.0090 39.4381 79.2502 | |||
.0600 | |||
.0695 250731.0000 15.2500 39.4379 79.2599 | |||
.0681 | |||
.0695 260726.0000 15.5000 39.4376 79.2706 | |||
.0685 | |||
.0700 260718.0000 15.7500 39.4381 79.2795 | |||
.0689 | |||
.0703 260717.0000 16.0000 39.4386 79.2890 | |||
.0692 | |||
.0706 260716.0000 l | |||
15.2500 39.4383 79.2973 | |||
.0557 | |||
.0711 260710.0000 i | |||
16.5000 39.4381 79.307i | |||
.0703 | |||
.0718 250704.0000 l | |||
16.7500 39.4382 79.3173 | |||
.0710 | |||
.0726 260700.0000 17.0000 39.4386 79.3283 | |||
.0716 | |||
.0733 260697.0000 17.2500 39.4388 79.3393 | |||
.0723 | |||
.0741 2B0693.0000 17.5000 39.4388 79.3505 | |||
.0731 | |||
.0749 250688.0000 17.7500 39.4394 79.3609 | |||
.0738 | |||
.0757 260686.0000 18.0000 39.4402 79.3695 | |||
.0743 | |||
.0782 260688.0000 18.2500 39.4405 79.3792 | |||
.0747 | |||
.0787 260586.0000 18.5000 39.4413 79.3908 | |||
.0751 | |||
.0770 280585.0000 18.7500 39.4416 79.4014 | |||
.0755 | |||
.07'i4 260681.0000 19.0000 39.4420 79.4090 | |||
.0759 | |||
.0777 260680.0000 19.2500 39.4426 79.4185 | |||
.07B1 | |||
.0780 250580.0000 19.5000 39.4432 79.4292 | |||
.0763 | |||
.0781 260679.0000 19.7500 39 4436 79.4405 | |||
.0755 | |||
.0783 260675.0000 lc. | |||
ILRT TABLE 1 ANS 56.8 | ILRT TABLE 1 ANS 56.8 Page 3 Unit 1 Integrated Leakage Rate Calculations Page 39 of 45 File: June. set NSP PINGP Unit-1 ILRT 1994 Data Analysis Window Start Tine: | ||
Integrated Leakage Rate Calculations Page 39 of 45 File: June. set NSP PINGP Unit-1 | 1:45: 0 Date: 1731994 End Time: | ||
Start Tine: | 1:45: 0 Date: 1741994 Data Analysis Frequency 900 seconds DELTA TIME PRESSURE TEMP' LSF UCL OMEGA 20.0000 39.4453 79.4501 | ||
.0784 | |||
.0792 260682.0000 20.2500 39.4465 79.4595 | |||
.0762 | |||
.0779 250696.0000 20.5000 39.4479 79.4671 | |||
.0757 | |||
.0774 2G0692.0000 20.7500 39.4492 79.47B3 | |||
.0750 | |||
.0768 2E0696.0000 2f.0000 39.4498 79.4813 | |||
.0743 | |||
.0762 260E97.0000 21.2500 39.4507 79.4907 | |||
.0725 | |||
.0755 260598.0000 21.5000 35.4514 79.4953 | |||
.0728 | |||
.0749 2E0699.0000 21.7500 39.4521 79.5104 | |||
.0720 | |||
.0742 260698.0000 22.0000 39.4529 79.5146 | |||
.0712 | |||
.0734 2G0701.0000 22.2500 39.4531 79.5268 | |||
.0705 | |||
.0728 2GOS97.0000 22.5000 39.4540 79.5366 | |||
.0697 | |||
.0721 260698.0000 22.7500 39.4543 79.5473 | |||
.0690 | |||
.0714 260695.0000 23.0000 39.4551 79.5593 | |||
.0684 | |||
.0708 250694.0000 23.2500 39.4555 79.5680 | |||
.0577 | |||
.0702 260593.0000 23.5000 39.4561 79.5800 | |||
.0671 | |||
.0696 2S0691.0000 23.7500 39.4563 79.5875 | |||
.0666 | |||
.0690 260589.0000 24.0000 39.4572 79.5957 | |||
.0659 | |||
.0665 260691.0000 l | |||
i | i | ||
TABLE 2 ANS 56.8 | TABLE 2 ANS 56.8 Pege 1 Unh1 InteDrated Leskoge Rote Calculetions Page 40 of 45 File: june. set NSP PIN 6P Unit-1, ILRT 1994 Data Analysis Window Start Tine: | ||
Start Tine: | 2:30: 0 Date: 1741994 End Tine: | ||
13: 15: | |||
Date: 1741994 Date Analysie Frequency 900 seconds DELTA TIME PRESSURE TEMP LSF UCL OMEGA 0.0000 39.4565 79.6185 0.0000 0.0000 260675.0000 | |||
.2500 39.4560 79.6268 0.0000 0.0000 260669.0000 | |||
.5000 39.4557 79.6376 | |||
.2578 | |||
.2578 260661.0000 | |||
.7500 39.4550 79.6472 | |||
.2909 | |||
.3472 260651.0000 1.0000 39.4552 79.6580 | |||
.2688 | |||
.3086 260647.0000 1.2500 39.4548 79.6597 | |||
.2662 | |||
.2900 260639.0000 1.5000 39.4545 79.6772 | |||
.2565 | |||
.2760 260634.0000 1.7500 39.4544 79.6870 | |||
.2495 | |||
.2655 260628.0000 2.0000 39.4543 79.6949 | |||
.2394 | |||
.2558 250624.0000 2.2500 39.4546 79.7047 | |||
.2272 | |||
.2455 260621.0000 2.5000 39.4537 79.7109 | |||
.2253 | |||
.2402 260612.0000 2.7500 39.4531 79.7240 | |||
.2297 | |||
.2428 260602.0000 3.0000 39.4525 79.7309 | |||
.2333 | |||
.2449 260595.0000 I | |||
3.2500 39.4520 79.7415 | |||
.2384 | |||
.2495 260586.0000 3.5000 39.4513 79.7512 | |||
.2449 | |||
.2566 260576.0000 3.7500 39.4505 79.7622 | |||
.2520 | |||
.2645 260566.0000 4.0000 39.4501 79.7707 | |||
.2570 | |||
.2690 260559.0000 4.2500 39.4500 79.7781 | |||
.2586 | |||
.2693 260555.0000 4.5000 39.4497 79.7873 | |||
.2597 | |||
.2693 260548.0000 4.7500 39.4501 79.7922 | |||
.2562 | |||
.2656 260549.0000 5.0000 39,4495 79.7996 | |||
.2528 | |||
.2619 260544.0000 5.25B0 39.4500 78.B055 | |||
.2480 | |||
.2575 260542.0000 5.5000 39.4492 79.8126 | |||
.2453 | |||
.2544 260533.0000 5.7500 39.4492 79.8162 | |||
.2416 | |||
.2506 260531.0000 6.0000 39.4486 79.8249 | |||
.2391 | |||
.2478 260523.0000 6.2500 39.4483 70.8328 | |||
.2367 | |||
.-2450 260518.0000 | |||
{ | |||
6.5000 39.4479 79.8389 | |||
.2347 | |||
.2426 260512.0000 6.7500 39.4478 79.8434 | |||
.2321 | |||
.2399 260509.0000 7.0000 39.4474 79.8495 | |||
.2300 | |||
.2375 260503.0000 7.2500 39.4473 79.8526 | |||
.2272 | |||
.2348 260501.0000 7.5000 39.4473 79.8622 | |||
.2245 | |||
.2321 260497.0000 7.7500 39.4467 79.8669 | |||
.2225 | |||
.2298 260490.0000 8.0000 39.4465 79.8710 | |||
.2202 | |||
.2274 200487.0000 8.2500 39.4461 79.8735 | |||
.2179 | |||
.2250 260483.0000 8,5000 39.4459 79.8783 | |||
.2154 | |||
.2226 260480.0000 8.7500 39.4454 79.8855 | |||
.2136 | |||
.2206 260473.0000 9.0000 39.4450 79.8896 | |||
.2119 | |||
.2187 260468.0000 l | |||
9.2500 39.4449 79.8948 | |||
.2100 | |||
.2167 260465.0000 9.5000 39.4444 79.9009 | |||
.2085 | |||
.2150 260459.0000 9,7500 39.4440 79.9069 | |||
.2072 | |||
.2135 260453.0000 l | |||
TABLE 2 ANS 56.8 | TABLE 2 ANS 56.8 Page 2 ILRT Integrated Leskage Rate Calculations Unit 1 File: june. set NSP PItJGP Unit-1, ILRT 1994 Data Analysis Window Start Time: | ||
2:30: 0 Date: 1741994 End Time: | |||
13:15: 0 Date: 1741994 Data Analysis Frequency 900 seconds DELTA TIME PRESSURE TEMP LSF UCL OMEGA 10.0000 39.4440 79.9076 | |||
.2054 | |||
.2117 250453.0000 10.2500 39.4436 79.9139 | |||
.2039 | |||
.2100 260447.0000 10.5000 39.4438 79.9191 | |||
.2020 | |||
.2082 260446.0000 10.7500 39.4430 79.9232 | |||
.2006 | |||
.2056 260439.0000 1 | |||
l l | l l | ||
l | l | ||
~ | |||
TABLE 3 Total Tine XDouble Uct > | ILRT TABLE 3 Total Tine XDouble Uct > | ||
File: june. set | Page 1 integrated Leakage Rate Calculations LNIIT 1 Page 42 of 45 _ | ||
File: june. set i | |||
NSP PINGP Unit-1. ILRT 1994 Data Analysis Window Start Time: | |||
13:30: 0 Date: 1741994 End Tine: | |||
4.2500 | 19:30: 0 Date: 1741994 Data Analysis Frequency 900 seconds DELTA TIME PRES 5URE TEMP LSF UCL OME6A | ||
4.5000 | .2500 39.4432 79.9393 0.0000 0.0000 | ||
\. | .03E9 | ||
.5000 39.4434 79.9438 0.0000 0.0000 | |||
.0359 | |||
.7500 39.4433 79.9473 | |||
.0471 | |||
.0957 | |||
.0491 l | |||
1.0000 39.4436 79.9526 | |||
.0482 | |||
.0708 | |||
.0481 l | |||
1.2500 39.4441 79.9594 | |||
.0385 | |||
.0738 | |||
.0295 1.5000 39.4444 79.9531 | |||
.0342 | |||
.0520 | |||
.0307 1.7500 39.4450 79.9691 | |||
.0248 | |||
.0532 | |||
.0158 2.0000 39.4458 79.9754 | |||
.0144 | |||
.0431 | |||
.0046 2.2500 39.4456 79.9778 | |||
.0122 | |||
.0381 | |||
.0154 2.5000 39.4460 79.9819 | |||
.0089 | |||
.0325 | |||
.0111 2.7500 39.4483 79.9835 | |||
.0054 | |||
.0270 | |||
. 0 D67 3.0000 39.4465 79.9902 | |||
.0035 | |||
.0244 | |||
.0092 3.2500 39.4468 79.9937 | |||
.0022 | |||
.0224 | |||
.0085 3.5000 39.4474 79.9972 | |||
.0003 | |||
.0189 | |||
.0026 3.7500 39.4479 80.0023 | |||
.0028 | |||
.0155 0.0000 4.0000 39.4480 80.0030 | |||
.0047 | |||
.0130 0.0000 4.2500 39.4482 80.0058 | |||
.0061 | |||
.0113 0.0000 | |||
( | |||
4.5000 39.448S 80.0085 | |||
.0081 | |||
.0088 | |||
.0041 4.7500 39.4409 80.0114 | |||
.0096 | |||
.0070 | |||
.0039 5.0B00 39.4488 80.0139 | |||
.0101 | |||
.0070 0.0000 5.2500 39.4493 80,0180 | |||
.0108 | |||
.0066 | |||
.0018 5.5000 39.4434 80.0191 | |||
.0116 | |||
.0058 | |||
.0034 5.7500 39.4498 80.0224 | |||
.0125 | |||
.0049 | |||
.0048 6.0000 39.4496 80.0249 | |||
.0124 | |||
.0056 0.0000 | |||
\\. | |||
TABLE 4 | TABLE 4 393 gg,3 p.g, j | ||
5 tert Tine: | IntoDrafed Leakage Rate Calculations Page 43 of 45 File: June. set NSP PINGP Unit-1, ILRT 1994 Data Analysis Window 5 tert Tine: | ||
End | 13:30: 0 Date: 1741994 End Time: | ||
19 30: 0 Date: 1741994 Date Analysis Frequency 900 seconds DELTA TIME PRESSURE TEMP L5F UCL OMEGA 0.0000 39.4427 79.9313 0.0000 0.0000 260433.0000 | |||
.2500 39.4432 79.9393 0.0000 0.0000 250432.0000 | |||
.5000 39.4434 79.9438 | |||
.0369 | |||
.0369 250431.0000 | |||
.7500 39.4433 79.9473 | |||
.0479 | |||
.0567 260429.0000 1.0000 39.4435 79.9526 | |||
.0479 | |||
.0555 2B0428.0000 1.2500 39.4441 79.9594 | |||
.0358 | |||
.0516 250429.0000 1.5000 39.4444 79.9631 | |||
.0316 | |||
.0432 260428.0000 1.7500 39.4450 79.9591 | |||
.0211 | |||
.0355 260430.0000 2.0000 39.4458 79.9754 | |||
.0098 ~ | |||
.0263 250432.0000 2.2500 39.4455 79.9778 | |||
.0095 | |||
.0225 2B0429.0000 2.5000 39.4460 79.9819 | |||
.0074 | |||
.0180 2G0430.0000 2.7500 3S.4453 79.9835 | |||
.0044 | |||
.0137 | |||
.260431.0000 3.0000 39.4465 79.9902 | |||
.0036 | |||
.0115 2SO430.0000 3.2500 39.4468 79.9937 | |||
.0031 | |||
.0097 2SO430.0000 3.5000 39.4474 79.9972 | |||
.0008 | |||
.0070 2G0432.0000 3.7500 39.4479 80.0023 | |||
.0016 | |||
.0043 260433.0000 4.0000 39.4480 80.0030 | |||
.0032 | |||
.0023 250433.0000 4.2500 30.4482 80.0058 | |||
.0042 | |||
.0007 260433.0000 4.5000 39.4486 80.0086 | |||
.0061 | |||
.0013 260435.0000 4.7500 39,4489 60s0114 | |||
.0073 | |||
.0029 250435.0000 5.0000 39.4488 80.0139 | |||
.0072 | |||
.0032 2B0433.0000 5.2500 39.4493 80.0180 | |||
.0075 | |||
.0038 260434.0000 5.5000 39,4494 80.0191 | |||
.0080 | |||
.004G 280435.0000 5.7500 39.4498 80.0224 | |||
.0087 | |||
.0055 280436.0000 5.0000 39.4496 80.0249 | |||
.0081 | |||
.0052 260433.0000 l | |||
l 1 | l 1 | ||
l | l | ||
~ | |||
TABLES | IL TABLES Total Time < Double uct ) | ||
Page 1 Integrated Leakege Rate Calculations lhlit 1 File: June. set NSP PINSP Unit-1, ILRT 1994 Date Analysis Window Start Time: | |||
19:45: 0 Date: 1741994 End Time: | |||
0: 45: 0 Date: 1751994 Data Analysis Frequen:y 900 seconds DELTA TIME FRESSURE TEMP LSF UCL OMEGA | |||
1.5000 | .2500 39.4485 60.0261 0.0000 0.0000 | ||
2.5000 | .2212 | ||
.5000 39.4480 80.0278 0.0000 0.0000 | |||
.1843 | |||
.7500 39.4472 80.0321 | |||
.1986 4416 | |||
.2089 1.0000 39.4463 80.0340 | |||
.2126 | |||
.3177 | |||
.2212 t.2500 39.4462 80.0339 | |||
.1965 | |||
.2758 | |||
.1843 1.5000 39.4458 80.0353 | |||
.1820 | |||
.2464 | |||
.1720 1.7500 39.4454 80.0358 | |||
.1897 | |||
.2238 | |||
.1532 2.0000 39.4449 80.0381 | |||
.1615 | |||
.2079 | |||
.1613 2.2500 39.4442 80,0389 | |||
.1574 | |||
.1993 | |||
.1638 2.5000 39.4439 80.0427 | |||
.1543 | |||
.1932 | |||
.1622 2.7500 39.4435 80.0433 | |||
.1508 | |||
.1871 | |||
.1575 3.0000 39,4432 80.0444 | |||
.1453 | |||
.1802 | |||
.1505 3.2500 39.4429 80.0453 | |||
.1423 | |||
.1743 | |||
.1474 3.5000 39.4423 80.0505 | |||
.1407 | |||
.1724 | |||
.1527 3.7500 39.4420 80.0510 | |||
.1383 | |||
.1691 | |||
.1474 4.0000 39.4414 80.0512 | |||
.1366 | |||
.1559 | |||
.1474 4.2500 39.4409 80.0517 | |||
.1352 | |||
.1654 | |||
.1474 4.5000 39.4399 80.0522 | |||
.1355 | |||
.1668 | |||
.1536 4.7500 39.4398 80.0546 | |||
.1350 | |||
.1654 | |||
.1494 5.0000 39.4391 80.0574 | |||
.1354 | |||
.1674 | |||
.1530 | |||
.-._--4 | |||
TABLE 6 | |||
~ | |||
File: june. set | ANS 55.B Page 1 ILRT Integrated Leakage Rate Calculations | ||
() git i ON File: june. set NSP PIN 6P Unit-1, ILRT 1994 Data Analysis Window Start Tine: | |||
19: 45: 0 Date: 1741994 End Time: | |||
0: 45: 0 Date: 1751994 Data Analysis Frequency 900 seconds DELTA TIME PRESSURE TEMP LSF UCL OMEGA 0.0000 39.4492 BO 0247 0.0000 0.0000 260431.0000 | |||
1.2500 | .2500 39.4485 80.0261 0.0000 0.0000 260425.0000 | ||
2.7500 | .5000 39.4480 80.0278 | ||
.1843 | |||
.3564 260421.0000 | |||
.7500 39.4472 80.0321 | |||
.2027 | |||
.2447 260414.0000 1.0000 39.4463 80.0340 | |||
.2175 | |||
.2454 200407.0000 1.2500 39.4462 80.0339 | |||
.1959 | |||
.2272 2SO408.0000 1.5000 39.4458 80.0353 | |||
.1790 | |||
.2077 2S0403.0000 1.7500 39.4454 80.0358 | |||
.1653 | |||
.1914 250400.0000 2.0000 39.4449 80.0381 | |||
.1591 | |||
.t796 260395.0000 2.2500 39.4442 80.0389 | |||
.1568 | |||
.1731 260391.0000 2.5000 39.4439 80.0427 | |||
.1552 | |||
.1693 250387.0000 2.7500 39.4435 80.0433 | |||
.1525 | |||
.1537 250384.0000 3.0000 39.4432 80.0444 | |||
.1483 | |||
.1586 250382.0000 3.2500 39.4429 80.0453 | |||
.1445 | |||
.3541 280379.0000 3.5000 39.4423 80.0506 | |||
.1440 | |||
.1523 280373.0000 3.7500 39.4420 80.0510 | |||
.1421 | |||
.1495 260371.0000 4.0000 39.4414 80.0512 | |||
.1409 | |||
.1476 260367.0000 4.2500 39.4409 60.0517 | |||
.1402 | |||
.1482 260363.0000 a | |||
4.5000 39.4399 80.0522 | |||
.1416 | |||
.1470 2503S6.0000 4.7500 39.4399 80.0546 | |||
.1415 | |||
.1455 260354.0000 5.0000 39.4393 80.0574 | |||
.1426 | |||
.1471 250348.0000 | |||
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _}} |
Latest revision as of 03:58, 15 December 2024
ML20073D501 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Prairie Island |
Issue date: | 08/20/1994 |
From: | Richard Anderson, Gruber M NORTHERN STATES POWER CO. |
To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
References | |
NUDOCS 9409270254 | |
Download: ML20073D501 (48) | |
Text
^
^
e Northern States Power Company Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant 1717 Wakonade Dr East Welch, Minnesota 55089 September 15, 1994 10 CFR Part 50 Appendix J U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATINC PIANT Docket Nos. 50-282 License Nos. DPR-42 50-306 DPR-60 Reactor Containment Building Intenrated Leak Rate Test Report Attached, for the information of the NRC staff, is a summary technical report describing the integrated containment leakage test conducted on Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Unit 1 at the conclusion of the last refueling outage.
This report is being submitted to meet the requirements of Appendix J to 10 CFR Part 50.
Please contact us if you have any questions related to the attached report.
CY Roger 0 Andtrson U
Director Licensing and Management Issues c:
Regional Administrator - Region III, NRC Senior Resident Inspector, NRC NRR Project Manager, NRC MPCA Attn: Kris Sanda J E Silberg cm, oL6)
Attachment a-6 0\\
9409270254 940920 I
)
POR ADOCK 05000282 P
j PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT Red Wing, Minriesota l
UNITS 1 AND 2 i
l
\\
MINNEAPouse ST. PAUL
_=_',
UNIT 1 i
REACTOR CONTAINMENT BUILDING INTEGRATE:
~AK RATE TEST JUNE 1994 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA
1 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT UNIT 1 m
h REACTOR CONTAINMENT BUILDING INTEGRATED LEAK RATE TEST JUNE,1994 PREPARED BY: M. E. GRUBER PRAIRIE ISLAND NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT DATE: AUGUST 20,1994 A
pingp/ misc /gruber/ilrt l
l
ILRT Unit 1 Page 2 of 45 1.0
SUMMARY
The periodic Integrated Leak Rate Test (ILRT) of Prairie Island Unit 1 Containment was completed June 24,1994. This leakage rate test was performed in accordance with Prairie Island Technical Specification 4.4.A,10CFR50 Appendix J, and ANSl N45.4-1972. In addition, ANSI 56.8-1981 Mass Point calculation technique was used to analyze the data.
The test was performed at reduced pressure, P, of 23 psig. Containment was pressurized t
and allowed to stabilize for 4.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br />. An acceptable leakage rate was measured 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> later using the mass point method. The verification test was begun immediately. Four hours into the verification test, the containment leakage rate decreased. As a result of the deceased leakage rate, the verification test was declared unacceptable eleven hours after it was begun. The verification leakage rate went below the minimum acceptanca limit of -25%.
A second ILRT was initiated immediately after securing the induced leak of the first verification test. The containment leakage rate was measured over the next six hours using the reduced test duration method as described by the Bechtel Topical Report, BN-TOP-1.
The leakage rate was also calculated with the mass point method. Again, a verification test was begun. After five hours, the verification leakage rate was stable and within the acceptance band of 25%. This was true using both calculation methods, BN-TOP-1 and the mass point method.
The first leakage rate measured is the leakage rate being reported for Unit 1 containment.
Because the leakage rate changed (decreased) it was necessary to measure the containment leakage rate a second time in order to demonstrate that the leakage rate could be measured accurately. That is to say, the second ILRT was used as a new base line for
"'e verification test.
The personnel airlock is believed to be the cause of the anomaly. Pressure was found in the airlock at the conclusion of testing. The decrease in the leakage rate occurred once the l
airlock had reached equilibrium with Containment.
l For a reduced pressure test,0.75 L as determined during preoperational testing,is t
0.11569 wt%/ day. The 1994 ILRT on Unit 1 containment yielded a least squares curve fit Lm of 0.659 wt%/ day and a corresponding 96 percent upper confidence level L m of d
t t
0.0685 wt%/ day. A valve lineup penalty of D 00074 wt%/ day must be added to L m 95% UCL.
t The final"AS LEFT" leakage rate at UCL including all penalties is 0.0772 wt%/ day while the l
"AS FOUND" leakage rate is 0.0998 wt%/ day (reference Appendix C).
I pingp/ misc /gruber/ilrt
=
L
ILRT Unit 1 Page 3 of 45 2.0 DESIGN INFORMATION 2.1 Containment Vessel Design The design parameters of the Unit 1 containment vessel have previously been described in references 6.1 and 6.2.
2.2 ILRT Instrumentation System The Integrated Leakage Rate Test Instrumentation System is designed to monitor containment parameters and calculate a leakage rate using the absolute method. Data read from the transducers is entered directly into a Hewlett Packard Model 1000 computer for reduction and analysis. Details of the test system are described in
~
~
reference 6.5. For the leakage rate test twenty-six resistance temperature detectors (RTD), ten humiters, one precision pressure gauge and one flow meter were used.
2.3 ILRT Pressurization System The containment was pressurized using Atlas Copco air compressors, after coolers and air dryers connected to Prairie Island's pressurization line. All air released from containment for the leakage rate test was vented to the Auxiliary Building and hence monitored by the Auxiliary Building ventilation radiation monitoring system. In addition, continuous air monitors (CAM) were positioned at the localized release path.
3.0 PRE-TEST CONSIDERATIONS 3.1 ILRT Instrumentation All instrumentation utilized during the ILRT was calibrated by vendors whose Quality Assurance Programs were verified by Northern States Power Company.
These instruments, all calibrated within six months of the test date, have calibration certification traceable to the NationalInstitute of Standards and Technology. Sensor calibration correction factors were then derived from the calibration curves.
Though not required by Technical Specifications, the containment fire detection system was temporarily modified by installing 12 photoelectric fire detectors in place of the existing ionization type. This was performed to avoid spurious fire alarms during periods when the containment was pressurized. No fire alarms were received during the duration of the test.
During the ILRT containment pressure was monitored by Control Room personnel via the containment wide range pressure channels. The six safeguards containment pressure channels were defeated by opening the test jack switches in the analog
(
protection racks.
pingp/ misc /gruber/itrt
ILRT Unit 1 Page 4 of 45 3.2 Venting and Draining Criteria The following criteria was used to determine the ILRT valve lineup:
A.
From 10CFR50 Appendix J:
1.
"Those portions of the fluid systems that are part of the reactor coolant pressure boundary and are open directly to the containment atmosphere under post-accident conditions and become an extension of the boundary of the containment SHALL be opened or vented to the containment atmosphere prior to and during the test."
2.
" Portions of closed systems inside containment that penetrate containment and rupture as a result of a loss of coolant accident SHALL be vented to the containment atmosphere."
3.
"All vented systems SHALL be drained of water or other fluids to the extent necessary to assure exposure of the system containment isolation valves to containment air test pressure and to assure they will be subjected to the post-accident differential pressure."
4.
" Systems that are required to maintain the plant in safe condition during the test SHALL be operable in their normal mode, and need not be vented."
5.
" Systems that are normally filled with water and operating under post-accident conditions, such as the containment heat removal system, need not be vented."
B.
Other Criteria:
1.
Allisolation valves which shut automatically on a safeguards signal, which are shut manually as a part of the post-accident safeguards sequence, or which are normally shut during power operation (except venting lineups)
SHALL be shut during the ILRT.
2.
Lines penetrating containment are to be vented to the outside atmosphere if, they are normally or potentially vented during power operation or if they could be vented after some phase of the safeguards sequence. Normally closed systems outside of the containment SHALL also be vented unless they are Seismic Class 1.
pingp/ misc /gruber/ilrt
ILRT Unit 1 Page 5 of 45 C.
Pressure vessels inside containment vented to containment atmosphere during the ILRT:
1.
RCS via Pressurizer Vent 2.
Reactor Coolant Drain Tank 3.
Pressurizer Relief Tank 4.
Power Operated Relief Valve Accumulators (2 trains) 5.
No.11 a 12 SI Accumulators 6.
No.11 & 12 Steam Generator Snubber Accumulators Containment H Monitor Calibration Gas Bottles 7.
2 D.
Electrical penetration venting The electrical penetrCons were depressurized to 10 5 psig prior to the ILRT. Any penetration indicating greater than 15 psig would require investigation. During the ILRT, no electrical penetrations were observed to be greater than 15 psig. The nitregen supply to the electrical penetrations and the airlock electrical penetrations were isolated and vented to atmosphere.
E.
Water levelin the following equipment is recorded before and after the ILRT:
1.
Reactor Coolant Drain Tank 2.
Pressurizer Relief Tank 3.
Containment Sump A 4.
Containment Sump B 5.
11 & 12 Steam Generator 6.
Pressurizer During performance of the June ILRT the levelin Sump A increased 5 inches. The pressurizer level increased 1.2%, and the Pressurizer Relief Tank Level decreased 1.2%. This change in volume (0.00131 'wt%) will be included as an added penalty in the final leak rate reported.
i 3.3 Local Leak Rate Testing Program The local leak rate test program was performed during each refueling outage as required by 10CFR50, Appendix J and Prairie Island Technical Specification 4.4.A.
A summary of Type B and C test results, obtained since the last ILRT report was submitted, are in Appendices A, arid B. The 1994 final results reflect the as-left conditions of containment a?.sr the 1994 Unit 1 Type A test. Local leak rate valve repairs are summarized in Appendix C.
The acceptance criteria for type B & C test are as follows:
A.
If the totalleakage of alllocalleakage testing exceeds 60% of La, repairs and
(
retests SHALL be performed to reduce leakage below that value.
I pingp/ misc /gruber/ilrt
ILRT l
Unit 1 Page 6 of 45 B. Total leakage past isolation valves in systems in the Auxiliary Building Special Ventilation Zone (ABSVZ) SHALL be less than 0.1 wt%/ day at Pa-C. Totalleakage past isolation valves in systems exterior to both the ABSVZ and the Shield Building SHALL be less than 0.01 wt%/ day at Pa.
D.
Airlock leakage SHALL be less than 1% of the La at 10 psig for the door inner gasket tests and less than 5% of the La at 46 psig for overall airlock tests.
3.4 Containment inspection A generalinspection of the accessible interior and exterior surfaces of the containment and related components was performed prior to the ILRT as required by 10CFR50, Appendix J, Section V. There was no evidence of structural degradation. The inspection revealed no pressurized containers, fire hazards or containment wall growth interferences. In general, the containment was very clean. The annulus area was also inspected for wall growth interferences; none were found.
4.0 GQEDUCT OF ILRT 4.1 Acceptance Criteria of Type A Test The leakage rate, Lt at reduced pressure P,is calculated as follows:
t L m.
s 0.7 Lm if L = 0.25 t
t i
Lam Lam L = 0.25 P
1/2 if Ltm s
0.7 t
t Pa Lam For acceptable ILRT, the measured leak rate,L m SHALL be less than 0.75L -
t t
Based upon preoperational test data (reference 6.2):
0.0087 wt%/ day Lm
=
t 0.0141 wt%/ day Lam
=
0.0087
= 0.6170 Therefore, Ltm
=
Lam 0.0141 Since 0.6170 < 0.7, Lt
= 0.25 wt%/ day L m t
G-t or L
= 0.25 wt%/ day (0.6170) = 0.15426 wt%/ day i
-t s Then L m SHALL be less than 0.75 (0.15426) = 0.11569 v4%/ day t
pingp/ misc /gruber/ilrt I
Unit 1 Page 7 of 45 4.2 Iype A Test and Verification Test Results and Conclusions The Unit 1 Type A test was performed using the Mass Point Calculational Technique.
The test data displayed acceptable results after five hours of testing using the Mass Point Technique. The least squares leakage rate, L m, at the final data point after t
24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> of data collection was 0.0659 wt%/ day with a corresponding L m at the t
95 percent upper confidence level equal to 0.0685 wt%/ day.
Upon completion of the Type A test, a supplemental test was performed to verify the validity of the Type A test. For the verification test, a leak of 1.20 L was introduced t
through a calibrated flow meter. Four hours into the verification test, the leakage rate began decreasing. This continued until the measured leakage rate went below the minimum acceptance criteria. After 11 hours1.273148e-4 days <br />0.00306 hours <br />1.818783e-5 weeks <br />4.1855e-6 months <br />, the verification test failed when the measured leakage rate went below 75% of the calculated leak (see Figures 5 - 8 and Table 2).
',a immediately after the induced leak of the first verification test was isolated, a second Type A test was initiated. The second Type A test was a short duration test using the method described in BN-TOP-1. The leakage rate was also measured using the Mass Point method as a check on the BN-TOP-1 method. After six hours, a stable leakage rate was measured: 0.0056 wt%/ day (95% Upper Confidence Level), see Figures 9 -
13 and Tables 3 and 4.
At the conclusion of the second Type A test, a second verification test was initiated. To verify that the flow meter used to measure the induced leak was accurate, a second calibrated flow meter was installed in series with the first meter. Because this second meter did not have the range of the first, the induced leak was chosen at 0.86 L. Both t
flow meters displayed the same flow. After five hours the composite leakage rate exhibited very good correlation to the acceptance band (see Figures 14 - 18 and Tab!cs 5 and 6):
0.0896 wt%/ day 5 Le s 0.1547 wt%/ day Once the second verification test was over, depressurization of the containment was begun. At this time, the two airlocks were vented. A significant amount of pressure was found in the personnel airlock. It is believed that the higher than usual leakage rate measured by the first Type A test was caused by the personnel airlock slowly pressurizing. The airlock finally reached equilibrium with containment at four hours into the first verification test. Once the airlock was at equilibrium the containment leakage rate decreased. This caused the failure of the first verification test.
With the exception of the failure of the first verification test, as explained above, review of the test data shows smooth and stable trends. No instruments failed. Ambient weather conditions were favorable. It was a successful Type A test.
pingp/ misc /gruber/ilr1
ILRT Unit 1 Page 8 of 45
[
5.0 SPECIAL TESTING 5.1 Shield Building Testing Section IV, paragraph B of 10CFR50, Appendix J,"Special Testing Requirements" and Technical Specification 4.4.A.6 require testing of multiple barrier containments. Unit 1 Shield Building is functionally tested at monthly intervals according to NSP Surveillance Procedure SP 1073. The Shield Building is functionally tested when each redundant train of the special ventilation system is tested to determine if it meets drawdown performance computed for the test condition with 75% of the Shie:d Building inleakage specified in Technical Specification Figure TS 4.4.1. None of these monthly tests on Unit 1 Shield Building have failed to meet the acceptance criteria due to Shield Building degradation.
5.2 Auxiliary Building Testing Technical Specification 4.4.A.6 requires retesting of the Auxiliary Building Special Ventilation Zone (ABSVZ). Leak tightness of the ABSVZ is verified at quarterly intervals when each redundant train is run to determine if it can produce an acceptable negative pressure in the zona within six minutes with an opening in the bcindary of at least ten square feet. None of these quarterly tests have failed to meet the asceptance criteria.
6.0 REFERENCES
6.1 Unit 1 Reactor Containment Buildina Intearated Leak Rate Test.
July.1973 Transmitted by letter dated October 4,1973, from Mr. L.O. Mayer, NSP, to Mr. J.F. O' Leary, Directorate of Licensing, USAEC.
6.2 Supplement No.1 to Unit 1 Reactor Containment Building Integrated Leak Rate Test. July 1973 Transmitted by letter dated June 6,1974, from Mr. L.O. Mayer, NSP, to Mr. J.F. O' Leary, Directorate of Licensing, USAEC.
l 6.3 Unit 1 Reactor Containment Buildina Integrated Leak Rate Test.
Qctober.1980 Transmitted by letter dated December 22,1981, from Mr. L.O. Mayer, NSP, to Director, NRR.
l l
pingp/ misc /gruber/ilrt
ILRT Unit 1 Page 9 of 45 6.4 Unit 1 Reactor Containment Building Integrated Leak Rate Test February 1985 Transmitted by letter dated June 11,1985, from Mr. D. Musolf, NSP, to Director, NRR.
6.5 Unit 1 Reactor Containment Building Integrated Leak Rate Test.
Seotember 1988 Transmitied by letter dated December 1988 from Mr. D. Musolf, NSP, to Director, NRR.
(
F r
pingp/ misc /gruber/ilrt
ILRT Unit 1 Page 10 of 45 APPENDIX A -TYPE B AND C TEST RESULTS -1992 REFUELING OUTAGE Each penetration listed below is tested according to Surveillance Procedure 1072. The combined leakage for all components subject to Type B and C tests SHALL be less than 0.60 wt% / day. The combined leakage for components in the ABSVZ SHALL be less than 0.10 wt% / day. The combined leakage for components designated EXTERIOR SHALL be less than 0.01 wt% / day. The values listed are as left leakage rates in SCCM. Values in brackets indicate as found leakage rates in SCCM prior to maintenance. See Appendix C for repair Summary.
p....
1,
- v..s
. c.m m :..
cm?
c.m y s y v,
n
? ?
> wye:.(
y-+m;
~~
]
FABSVZ PENETRATIONSs
[PonL x
[Outsids)>
TMad -
[ Type?
ilInsidol
[ Nob
[Phnetisiorn '.. _
i m&.u.,
a--
c:w,.
. w.a wts a
. usua.
s.
1 Pressurizer Relief Tank Sample to C
3 1
3 GA 4
Pnmary Vent Header C
2 7
7 5
Reactor Coolant Drain Tank Pump C
0 0
0 Discharge 11 Letdown Line C
3400 0
3400 12 Charging Line C
57 115[18]
57[115]
13A No.11 RCP Seal Water Supply C
55[225,000]
380 380[225,000) 13B No.12 RCP Seal Water Supply C
4 12 12 14 RCP Seal Water Retum C
245 95 245 15 Pressurizer Stm Sample C
11 0 110 11 0 16 Pressurizer Liquid Smpi C
3 8
8 17 Loop B Hot leg Sample C
0 0
0 18 FuelTransicr Tube B
30 30 19 Service Air B
10 9
10 21 Reactor Coolant Drain Tank Gas to C
30 0
30 GA 22 Cntmt Air Sample in C
3 8
8 23 Cntmt Air Sample Out C
3 5
5 25A Cntmt Purge Exhaust B
1 1
25B Cntmt Purge Supply B
1 1
26 Cntmt Sump *A' Disch C
0 12 12 pingp/ misc /gruber/itrt
ILRT Unit 1 Page 11 of 45
, --ram n
IA_BSVZ PENETRATIONS /
~m
- n.,......
. ~..... ~
!PSn3 y '
+....,
(No?
- Penetrationi fTypes finsidel R O ntsidst l M A n w;m
. ~a
=
>a wwa. " a a: m aamu;=u auia awkw.
- .a, 27B Fire Protection B
10 3
10 27 ILRT Pressure B
21 21 C-1 Instrument 27 ILRT Pressure B
1 1
C-1 Instrument 29A Internal Containment Spray C
12,000 140 12,000 29B Internal Containment Spray C
1,000 400 1,000 30A Containment Sump B C
4,800 4.800 Suction Line 30B Containment Sump B Suction Line C
565 565 42C Containment Heating Steam B
2 2
2 42F Containment Heating Condensate B
8 0
8 42F Containment Heating Condensate B
1 1
1 44 ILRT Pressurization B
0 95 95 45 Reactor Make Up to Pressurizer C
310 2
310 Relief Tank 49B Demin Water B
0 2
2 IEEYERIDdkNN5YR E6N53 " "
7 ~~~^,~~~
\\
~~"
/
X.YF; 4
y
! Pen) x..
.* ~~.:r v-r: -eis
-...c..~-
x
'. = -...,
,. d0tside3 iMax;yts:.~
3
. Typei T1nside,t,
- Non..
m Pe<netratio....nt
~ ~.sa; m.n...a n.u w
a,w. :aa -
a mam.uzxa. na :wau..x:<un, m 2
Pressurizer Relief Tank N Supply C
5 10 10 2
20 instrument Air C
55 11 55 N to Accumulator C
205 205 31 2
42A Post LOCA HYD Control Air Supply C
8 4
8 50 Post LOCA HYD Control Air Supply C
4 0
4 pingp/ misc /gruber/ilrt
ILRT Unit 1 Page 12 of 45 p m,,,mn,-n - wan n mpgw m emem:mn,,m m m me,e m amem e nnem w m m nem w!
^;,;
m; E;f@ffy*.
rANNULUS. PENETRATIONS
- to w
em
/ ;;n e -
m.m ?n -
as'
, 0
^-;',*a,
..,. /.
t
- N;., b "?'
2
+
+
~
ys;6:,
sx
^.:..x...
p.jQ. /x,:i- >
@P. men..,;.1nW N:s.,M m=s. T'.
' fi M $ m:llnSide ^'
- M 5 Q, ?.
B,l M
snmna@msentagahamaramannaasawnand. pg&)![. :.r.
,,98
.-.m.xwp 1
~m.,53%y mssg
- .s.
m..
3 3x.
d oni
,"ynM 'f
- s. m m....
lhli p
A mmuaMmWaimaidawman.P.,
h bsa$A &
x.
ssi 4mna@h.ussa 34 Electrical Penetrations B
1130 1130 j
l 41A Containment Vacuum Breaker C
8 320 320 41B Containment Vacuum Breaker C
2 1
2 42A-1 Post LOCA Hydrogen Air Vent C
35 45 45 l
42A-2 Post LOCA Hydrogen Air Vent C
8 10 10 j
42B In Service Purge Supply C
6 6
43A in Service Purge Exhaust B
8 8
50-1 Post LOCA Hydrogen Air Vent C
55 60 60 50-2 Post LOCA Hydrogen Air Vent C
4 6
6 6A 11 Steam Line Bellows B
10 10 10 6B 12 Steam Line Bellows B
1 1
1 7A 11 Feedwater Line Bellows B
2 1
2 7B 12 Feedwater Line Bellows B
2 1
2 8A 11 Steam Generator Blowdown B
1 15 15 Bellows 8B 12 Steam Generator Blowdown B
1 2
2 Bellows 9
Residual Heat Out Bellows B
2 2
2 1
10 Residual Heat in Bellows B
1 3
3
{
I 11 Letdown Line Bellows B
1 100 100 t
18 FuelTransfer Tube Bellows B
1 4
4 Equipment Hatch B
7 7
Personnel Airlock B
1900[2775]
1900[2775]
Maintenance Airlock B
1762[9688]
1762[9688]
pingp/ misc /gruber/ilrt i
s ILRT Unit 1 Page 13 of 45 APPENDIX B -TYPE B AND C TEST RESULTS - 1994 REFUELING OUTAGE Each penetration listed below is tested according to Surveillance Procedure 1072. The values listed are as left leakage rates in SCCM. Values in brackets indicate as found leakage rates in SCCM prior to maintenance. See Appendix C for repair Summary.
~
~
p
-, n-n n.,,
m,,
n,,
,,,,w mnw nnswngsac tABSVZ PENETRATIONS)
~ ' '
~ ~ '
(R.
~
EPen?
, Min
[Ndh
[PsiissstIstn Type inside Outside Max Pathway Penalty w
~ uww au. <.
-,-,a,
~.~
1 Pressurizer Relief Tank C
3 3
3 3
0 Sample to GA 4
Primary Vent Header C
0 (1) 3 [2]
3 [2]
0 (1) 2*
23 psig 2 [5]
2 [1]
2 [5]
2 [1]
5 Reactor Coolant Drn Tnk C
2 [1]
0[0]
2 [1]
0[0]
0 t
Pump Discharge 23 psig 0[0]
O[1]
0[1]
0[0]
11 Letdown Line C
5200 0
5200 0
0 12 Charging Line C
25 720 720 25 0
13A No.11 RCP Seal C
30 3[13.000]
30 3
7500 i
Water Supply 23 psig 0 [7,500]
0[7500]
0[7500]
13B No.12 RCP Seal C
60 100 100 60 0
Water Supply 14 RCP Seal Water C
250[9]
125[26]
250 [26]
125 [9]
42 Return 23 psig 8[50]
26[170]
26[170]
8 [50]
15 Pressurizer Stm C
0[10]
2(16]
2[16]
O[10]
0 Sample 23 psig 1 [0]
O[0]
1 [1]
O [0]
16 Pressurizer Liquid Smpi C
2 (2) 2 [0]
2 [2]
2 [0]
O 23 psig 1 [0]
1 [1]
1 [1]
1 [0]
g 17 Loop B Hot Leg C
70[2]
175[3]
175 [3]
70[2]
O Sample 23 psig 7 [1]
150[1]
150[1]
7 [1]
18 Fuel Transfer Tube B
13 13 13 0
19 Service Air B
2 0
2 0
0 21 Reactor Coolant Drn C
25 0
25 0
0 Tank Gas to GA 22 Cntmt Air Sample in C
8 2
8 2
0 23 Cntmt Air Sample Out C
5 1
5 1
0 1
25A Cntmt Purge Exhaust B
5 5
5 0
25B Cntmt Purge Supply B
0 0
0 0
pingp/ misc /gruber/iln m
Unit 1 Page 14 of 45
..:w ns;,
n -
m==w
,,.-,.~.- :n
~ ~;
- ABSVZ.PENETRKrlONS1.:
O
...........m.
?hside?
Outside!
Max
[Noi
! Peneti......ationh m awaaww =ua[=aa w m aawa Path.wayfliPenalW iTypeli ua:asawa
,t
==aw men a -
~ am 26 Cntmt Sump "A" Disch C
0[0]
O O [0]
0[0]
0 23 psig 0[0]
O[0]
O[0]
27B Fire Protection B
0 0
0 0
0 27 ILRT Pressure B
0 0
0 0
C-1 Instrument 23 psig 0
0 0
27 ILRT Pressure B
20 20 20 0
C-1 Instrument 23 psig 0
0 0
29A Internal Containment C
3100 65 [1]
3100 65[1]
65*
Spray 23 psig 65 [0]
65[0]
65[0]
29B Internal Containment C
1300[1900]
1050[0]
1300[1900]
1050[0]
125*
Spray 23 psig 0[1700]
125[0]
125[1700]
O[0]
30A Containment Sump B C
150[3]
150[3]
150[3]
20 Suction Line 23 psig 15 [35]
15 [35]
15 [35]
30B Containment Sump B C
2950[140]
2950[140]
2950[140]
0 Suction Line 23 psig 900[15]
900[15]
900[15]
42A Post LOCA H Control C
1[30]
0[0]
1 [30]
0[0]
2 3
23 psig 1 [2]
1 [2]
1 [2]
42C Containment Heating B
10 2
10 2
0 Steam 42F-1 Containment Heating B
0 0
0 0
0 Condensate 42F-2 Containment Heating B
0 0
0 0
0 Condensate 44 ILRT Pressurization B
0 220 220 0
0 23 psig 0
76 76 0
45 Reactor Make Up to C
300 4
300 4
0 Pressurizer Relief Tnk 49B Demin Water B
1 1
1 1
0 50 Post LOCA H Control C
8 [0]
O[0]
8 [0]
0[0]
2 2
23 psig 0[2]
O[2]
O[2]
t pingp/ misc /gruber/ilrt i.ie
ILRT Unit 1 Page 15 of 45
_.--n--
.m.m, ng
,g,,
,,,,,,,,,n nrn,y n,,
, EXTERIOR PENETRATIONS,5
~
e i
x
' ^ ~
2, JP:na
^
? Min?^
N IN6h (Psnettstion)
.. Myps?
finsI,S$$
{dstsidA)
[Miki ~ [Psihnapj !NhAltyi a
_ wms eu a usaan msa amammaiusaams zaimeamawawam:u:sa; wi m 2
Pressurizer Relief Tank C
7 1
7 1
0 N Supply 2
20 Instrument Air C
360 30 360 30 0
N to Accumulator C
100[115]
100[115]
100[115]
31 2
25 23 psig 0 [25]
O[25]
0 [25]
42A Post LOCA HYD C
1[30]
0 [0]
1[30]
O[0]
)
Control Air Supply 23 psig 1 [2]
1 [2]
1 [2]
50 Post LOCA HYD C
8 [0]
0 [0]
8 [0]
0[0]
2 Control Air Supply 23 psig 0[2]
O[2]
0 [2]
"~
~
~ ~~
fN~UO}hENNTNAiidU5I' Y~
I,P. e. nn..
2Typej 4 Insides i(Outsid6,]
(Max 5 Pathway Penalty'
[,
Min
...m
...., m.
{No.v iPenetratio.n) manum. na o
,m me em,
m om,
_~
_,-.s
.e t.
wa4 x,
34 Electrical Penetrations B
552 552 552 0
41 A Containment Vacuum C
6 335 335 6
0 Breaker l
41B Containment Vacuum C
0 210 210 0
0 Breaker 42A-1 Post LOCA Hydrogen C
50 60 60 50 0
Air Vent 42A-2 Post LOCA Hydrogen C
1[30]
2 2[30]
1 [2]
Air Vent 23 psig 1 [2]
1 [2]
1 [2]
42B in Service Purge Supply B
3 3
3 0
43A in Service Purge Exhaust B
0 0
0 0
165 145 165 145 0
Air Vent 50-2 Post LOCA Hydrogen C
8 [0]
2[4200]
8[4200]
2 [0]
2 Air Vent 23 psig 0[2]
0[2]
O[2]
6A 11 Steam Line Bellows B
0 0
0 0
0 6B 12 Steam Line Bellows B
1 1
1 1
0 7A 11 Feedwater Line B
0 0
0 0
0 Bellows 78 12 Feedwater Line B
0 0
0 0
0 Bellows BA 11 Steam Generator B
1 18 18 1
0 Blowdown Bellows pingp/ misc /gruber/ilrt
ILRT, Rev.1 Unit 1 Page 16 of 42
""~
~'
~^
'~
IANNU[ INsN5TiiAiiU}45[
., i.
..[M!@
[ Perk.
BTypes ilnsidej^ !Outsidei f.Maxj!,, sPathways ? Penalty]
(Noi iPenetrationf
+.a a
~n~
u.a -
. a =u ars
- m. was s wh n aum
.m:. nua w u aw 8B 12 Steam Generator B
0 1
1 0
0 Blowdown Bellows 9
Residual Heat Out Bel-B 1
2 2
1 0
tows 10 Residual Heat in Bellows B
2 0
2 0
0 11 Letdown Line Bellows B
0 170 170 0
0 18 Fuel Transfer Tube Bel-B 0
0 0
0 0
lows Equipment Hatch B
8 8
8 0
Personnel Airlock B
9050[2265]
9050[2265] 9050[2265]
0 23 psig 3025[1275]
3025[1275] 3025[1275]
Maintenance Airlock B
1725[5300]
1725[5300]
1725[5300]
O 23 psig 3385 [725]
3385[725]
3385[725]
- B + C Total Penalty = 192 SCCM @ 23 psig Total Repair Penalty = 7596 SCCM @ 23 psig B + C Penalty Calculations:
192 c.c X 1Ft3 X.10lLvd', X 60 min X 24 fir = 0.00074 6 @ 23 psig min 28317cc 1.32X106 ft3 Hr day day Total Repair Penalty Calculations:
X.60 min X 2411r = 0.0293 6 @ 23 psig 7596 cc X 1 Ft3 X 100wt%
4 min 28317cc 1.32X106 ft3 Hr day day Pressuiizer and Sump A Level increase Penalty = 0.00131 wt%/ day Using the above penalties the 1994 as found type A UCL leakage rate =
(0.0685 + 0.00074 + 0.0293 + 0.00131) wt%/ day = 0.0998 wt%/ day < 0.11569 wt%/ day = 0.75 Lt @ Pt pingp/ misc /gruber/ilrt M
ILRT, Rev.1 Unit 1 Page 17 of 42 APPENDIX C -TYPE B AND C TEST
SUMMARY
i:REFUELINGT PEN' f OUTAG E..
- NOA iPENETR'ATION; J
SUMMARY
1 x
1992 12 Charging Line Perform corrective maintenance on air operated valves.
1992 13A No.11 RCP Seal Water Supply Replace check valve.
1994 4
Primary Vent Header Perform preventative maintenance on air operated valves.
1994 5
Reactor Coolant Drain Tank Pump Perform corrective Discharge maintenance on air operated valves.
1994 13A No.11 RCP Seal Water Supply Replace outside Containment isolation valve
+
1994 14 RCP Seal Water Return Performed preventative maintenance on the motor actuators.
1994 15 Pressurizer Stm Sample Performed preventative maintenance on the motor actuators.
1994 16 Pressurizer Liquid Smpi Performed preventative maintenance on the motor actuators.
1994 17 Loop B Hot Leg Sample Performed preventative maintenance on the motor actuators.
1994 26 Containment Sump A Discharge Perform corrective maintenance on inside air operated valve.
1994 29A Internal Containment Spray Perform preventative maintenance on the motor actuator.
1994 29B Internal Containment Spray Perform preventative maintenance on the check valve and on the motor actuator.
pingp/ misc /gruber/ilrt
ILRT Unit 1 Page 18 of 45 7wn,,w me n av mmme -am.:,w ~~ mee w m;r-wmemmr.mr= nm- ~ -ve -
i 7 P.. E. N...d.
~..'...
REFU.ELING.8
, OUTAGE ll 6NOf ?PENETRATIONf s
SUMMARY
8
% akwaeaumwu ;au waanmuumawwan,au ;axamw maaaaaam aasa 1994 30A Containment Sump B Suction Line Performed preventative maintenance on the motor I
actuator.
1994 30B Containment Sump B Suction Line Performed preventative maintenance on the motor actuator.
1994 42A Post LOCA HYD Control Air Supply Performed preventative maintenance on the motor actuator.
1994 50 Post LOCA HYD Control Air Supply Performed preventative maintenance on the motor actuator.
pingp/ misc /gruber/ilrt
Graph Legend NSP PINGP Unit-1, ILRT 1994 Lam %/ day 95% EL Data FreRuencY 900 seconds 75% La ANS 56.8 Data Plot 24 H
20 g
m j
^
16 g
T.
x H
o Q
12 g
g e
4 7
0 08 g
~
Es
-~
e
_y.
oc_
Q R5
$i m a o
_r 04 Oj 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 Delta Time Hours start Time:
1:45: 00 Date:
1731994 End Time:
1: 45: 00 Date:
1741994 e
e
t NSP PINGP Unit-1, ILRT 1994 Data Frequency 900 seconds l
Raw Transducer Data Plot 260860.
1 260820.
=
260780.
3 s
260740.
3 m
260700.
g Ln c-a$5 s
h260660.
Q
- 0. 80 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 Delta Time Hours Start Time:
1: 45: 00 Date:
1731994 End Time:
1: 45: 00 Date:
1741994
NSP PINGP Unit-1 ILRT 1994 Data Freciuency 900 seconds Raw Transducer Data Plot 39.48 H
39.47 1
39.46 w
H 39.45 s
~
o 39.44 s
x S
15 m5 w
39.43 S
0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 Delta Time Hours Start Time:
1: 45: 00 Date:
1731994 End Time:
1: 45: 00 Date:
1741994
NSP PINGP Unit-1, ILRT 1994 Data Frequency 900 seconds Raw Transducer Data Plot 80.00 s
79.80 3
79.60 g
s 79.40 3
u 79.20 g
n C
OC_
IE H
m-5 g
79.80 i
g 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.80 25.00 Delta Time Hours Start Time:
1: 45: 00 Date:
1731994 End Time:
1: 45: 00 Date:
1741994 i
Graph Legend NSP PINGP Unit-1 ILRT 1994 Lam %/ day
._upp r Limit Data Fre9uenc7 900 seconds
___ Lower Limit ANS 56.8 Data Plot
.30
~
l,
~
.28 g
1
+
.26 l
X H
l 0
Q
.24 l
g M
e H
s) o j
.22
{
3 0
0m F
__ N_.
E{.F o
g,3
.x
.20
..\\
Oj 0.00 4.00 8.00 12.00 16.00 20.00 Delta Time Hours start Time 2:30:00 Date:
1741994 End T i me:
13: 15: 00 Date:
1741994 1
NSP PINGP Unit-1 ILRT 1994 Data Frequency 900 seconds Raw Transducer Data Plot 260675.
s 260625.
g'I 3
h
+
a 260575.
g s
260525.
+
m 260475.
i 3
m 8[5 i=
260425.
Q 0.00 4.00
- 8. 00 12.00 16.00
- 20. 00 Delta Time Hours Start Time:
2: 30: 00 Date:
1741994 l
End Time:
13: 15: 00 Date:
1741994 i
ILRT 1994 Data Frequency 900 seconds Raw Transducer Data Plot 39.46
\\
s 39.46 3
3 5
39.45 g
y s
39.45 g
39.45 g
g e
asr 9
&55
_Jg 39.44 p
0.00
- 4. 00 8.00 12.00 16.00
- 20. 00 Delta Time Hours Start Time:
2: 30: 00 Date:
1741994 End Time:
13: 15: 00 Date:
1741994 i
a
ILRT 1994 Data Frequency 900 seconds Raw Transducer Data Plot 80.10 s
80.00 s
79.90 I
H 79.80 s
T 79.70 g
3 R E i=
S s
&53
)
79.60 0.00 4.00
- 8. 00 12.00 16.00 20.OP Delta Time Hours Start Time:
2: 30: 00 Date:
1741994 End Time:
13: 15: 00 Date:
1741994 l
r Graph Legend NSP PINGP Unit-1, ILRT 1994 LSF Look 95% UCL Data Fre9uencY 900 seconds
___75% La Total Time (Double UCL)
Plot
.18
.14 3
4
.10 g
g e
X F
.06 s
'\\
o 02 03 N"N -
F cr
%(,i=
o 4
m F
oj
. 02 j
0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 Delta Time Hours start Time 13: 3e: 0e Date:
1741994 End Time 19: 30: 00 Date:
1741994
1 Graph Legend NSP PINGP Unit-1.
ILRT 1994 Lam x/ day 95% UCL Data Frequency 900 seconds 75X La ANS 56.8 Data Plot
.18 H
.14 g
H l
.10 g
I g
A H
U
.06 3
b j
j
.02
=
g x.
a c._
~
${j tn gx
.ea Oj 0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 Delta Time Hours start T i me:
13: 30: 00 Date:
1741994 End Times 19: 30: 00 Date:
1741994 d-
NSP PINGP Unit-1, ILRT 1994 Data Freciuency 900 seconds Raw Transducer Data Plot 260438.
~
1 260436.
~
s 260434.
a 1
l' l
d i
260432.
s v
260430.
B en C
O$g (f)
H a
h260428.
l Q
0.00
- 2. 00
- 4. 00 6.00 8.00 10.00 Delta. Time Houre Start Time:
13: 30: 00 Date:
1741994 End Time:
19: 30: 00 Date:
1741994 W
n
ILRT 1994 Data Frequency 900 seconds Raw Transducer Data Plot 39.45 D
s 39.45 g
emb" l
39.45 g
s 39.45 3
u 39.44 g
3 e
ac_
S
&$5
.sy 39.44 S
0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 Delta Time Hours Start Time:
13: 30: 00 Date:
1741994 End Time:
19 30: 00 Date:
1741994 l.,
ILRT 1994 Data Freciuency 900 seconds Raw Transducer Data Plot 80.03 s
80.01 s
I O
79.99 s
79.97 s
?
^
ii!
l 79.95 g
s r
R $ i=
a
&E 79.93 Q
0.20 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 l
Delta Time Hours St. art Time:
13: 30: 00 Date:
1741994 End Time:
19: 30: 00 Date:
1741994 h
Graph Legend NSP PINGP Unit-1.
ILRT 1994 LSF Leck Upper Limit Data Fre uenc 900 seconds Total Time (Double UCL)
Plot
___ Lower Limit
.28 H
.24 3
1 5
1
~
.20 g
,s A
F 0(
.16 g
.x N.
e
+
~
m Y
O 12 H
g EC F e
Adm m
m aa O
_r
,08 Oj
.50 1.50 2.50
- 3. 50 4.50 5.50 Delta Time Hours Start Time:
19: 45: 00 Date:
1741994 End Times 0:45: 00 Date:
1751994
')
~
Graph Legend NSP PINGP Unit-1, ILRT 1994 Lam %/ day Data Fre uenc 900 seconds Upper Limit
-__ Lower Limit ANS 56.8 Data Plot
.28 i
F
. 24 g
H
.20 m
3 a
/
x G
1 Q
.16 x
g g
4)j
.12 g
3 19 i= l D
g w" m m
a l l
D
_r
.08 Oj
.50 1.50 2.50 3.50 4.50 5.50 Delta Time Hours Start T i me:
19:45:00 Date:
1741994 End Time:
0: 45: 00 Date:
1751994 1
~
ILRT 1994 Data Frequency 900 seconds Raw Transducer Data Plot 39.46 P
s 39.45 g
+
39.45 g
s 39.45 g
+
8 G
W 39.44 T
9 E i= 1
& " El q
3
_Jj 39.44 S
- 0. 00
- 2. 00 4.00
- 6. 00 8.00 10.00 Delta Time Hours Start Time:
19: 45: 00 Date:
1741994 End Time:
0: 45: 00 Date:
1751994 I
C 1
i lNSP'PINGPUnit-1, ILRT 1994 Data Frequency 900 seconds Raw Transducer Data Plot 80.07 3
80.06 s
80.05 s
.s s
80.04 3
l e?
~
80.03 g
s E ' i=
A a
i-a
- 80. 02 Q
0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.20 Delta Time Hours Start Time:
19: 45: 00 Date:
1741994 End Time:
0: 45: 00 Date:
1751994 s
o
F NSP PINGP Unit-1 ILRT 1994 Data Frec;uency 900 seconds Raw Transducer Data Plot 260440.
260420.
3 1
260400.
m m
H 260380.
o8 260360.
s 8
en
~
b'!h 260340.
Q
- 0. 00
- 2. 00 4.00 6.00
- 8. 00
- 10. 00
~
Delta Time Hours Start Time:
19: 45: 00 Date:
1741994 End Time:
0: 45: 00 Date:
1751994 O
b
TABLE 1 ANS 56.8 Page 1
RT Integrated Leakage Rete Calculations UNt1 File: June. set Pagg 37 of 45 NSP PINGP Unti-1, TLRT 1994 Date Analysis Window Start Tine:
1:45: 0 Date: 1731994 End Time:
1:45: 0 Date: 1741994 Data Analysis Frequency 900 seconds DELTA TIME FRESSURE TEMP LSF UCL OMEGA 0.0000 39.4707 79.4644 0.0000 0.0000 260843.0000
.2500 39.4675 79.4287 0.0000 0.0000 260639.0000
.5000 39.4644 79.3990
.1840
.3558 260833.0000
.7500 39.4619 79.3681
.1435
.2173 260832.0000 1.0000 39.4591 79.3441
.1583
.1980 250825.0000 1.2500 39.4573 79.3155
.1253
.1720 260827.0000 1.5000 39.4549 79.2882
.1170
.1489 260824.0000 1.7500 39.4532 79.2588
.1082
.1332 260822.0000 2.0000 39.4516 79.2450
.0920
.1179 260824.0000 2.2500 39.450B 79.2305
.0797
.1035 260824.0000 2.5000 39.4488 79.2110
.0729
.0938 250821.0000 2.7500 39.4481 7S,1959
.0825
.0829 260824.0000 3.0000 39.4467 79.1848
.0590
.0764 260820.0000 3.2500 39.4457 79.1732
.0582
.0713 260S19.0000 3.5000 39.4444 79.1611
.0557
.0687 2G0816.0000 3.7500 39.4438 79.1490
.0526
.0643 250818.0000 4.0000 39.4431 79.1409
.0501
.0507 260817.0000 4.2500 39.4418 79.1297
.0494
.0588 260814.0000 4.5000 39.4403 79.1229
.0516
.0603 260808.0000 4.7500 39.4403 79.1196
.0519
.3597 260809.0000 5.0000 39.4392 79.1104
.0525
.0595 260807.0000 5.2500 39.4384 79.1092
.0544
.0511 260802.0000 5.5000 39.4372 79.1052
.0578
.0647 2E0796.0000 5.7500 39.4379 79.0979
.0558
.0632 250804.0000 S.0000 39.4367 79.09S7
.0582
.0E43 260795.0000 8.2500 39.4366 79.0927
.0582
.0538 250798.0000 6.5000 39.4358 79.0883
.0589
.0641 250794.0000 6.7500 39.4357 79.0896
.0593
.0541 260793.0000 7.0000 39.4349 79.0856
.0500
.0645 260790.0000 7.2500 39.4347 79.0852
.0504
.0546 260789.0000 7.5000 39.4345 79.0855
.0608
.0648 260787.0000 7.7500 39.4337 79.0862
.0518
.0657 260782.00Ps 8.0000 39.4337 79.0850
.0624
.0660 260782.0000 8.2500 39.4334 79.0865
.0629
.0553 250780.0000 8.5000 39.4336 79.0890
.0630
.0663 2G0780.0000 8.7500 39.4336 79.0920
.0531
.0662 260778.0000 9.0000 39.4334 79.0949
.0633
.0652 250776.0000 9.2500 39.4328 79.0982
.0G41
.0570 280770.0000 9.5000 39.4325 79.1017
.0649
.0572 260767.0000 9.7500 39.4331 79.1014
.0649
.0676 260771.0000 l
TN1 ANS 55.8 Page 2 ILRT Integrated Leskage Rate Calculations Urit 1 NO FAle: june. set NSP PINSP Unit-1, ILRT 1994 Data Analysis Window Start Time:
1:451 0 Date: 1731994 End Time:
1:45: 0 Date: 1741994 Data Analysis Frecuency 900 seconde DELTA 7IME FRESSURE TEMP LSF UCL OMEGA 10.0000 39.4334 79.1094
.0649
.0674 260759.0000 10.2500 39.4337 79.1148
.0648
.0572 2B0768.0000 10.5000 39.4333 79.1212
.0552
.0675 250762.0000 10.7500 39.4339 79.1228
.0649
.0571 260756.0000 11.0000 39.4340 73.1285
.0646
.0558 260764.0000 11.2500 39.4339 79.1353
.0548
.0569 250759.0000 11.5000 39.4341 79.1405
.0648
.0558 260758.0000 11.7500 39.4340 79.1468
.0650
.0570 250754.0000 12.0000 39.4332 79.1543
.0658
.0578 260748.0000 12.2500 39.4335 79.1584
.0564
.0585 250745.0000 12.5000 39.4346 79.1685
.0555
.0685 250748.0000 12.7500 39.4342 79.1777
.0671
.0591 260741.0000 13.0000 39.4347 79.1828
.0574
.0693 260742.0000 13.2500 39.4352 79.1928
.0577
.0595 250740.0000 13.5000 39.4355 79.2012
.0678
.0896 260739.0000 13.7500 39.4361 79.2058
.0679
.0896 250739.0000 14.0000 39.4362 79.2174
.0580
.0697 260735.0000 14.2500 39.4370 79.2258
.0580
.06S6 26073B.0000 14.5000 39.4372 79.2352
.0B80
.0595 260733.0000 14.7500 39.4376 79.2442
.0681
.0695 260731.0000 15.0090 39.4381 79.2502
.0600
.0695 250731.0000 15.2500 39.4379 79.2599
.0681
.0695 260726.0000 15.5000 39.4376 79.2706
.0685
.0700 260718.0000 15.7500 39.4381 79.2795
.0689
.0703 260717.0000 16.0000 39.4386 79.2890
.0692
.0706 260716.0000 l
15.2500 39.4383 79.2973
.0557
.0711 260710.0000 i
16.5000 39.4381 79.307i
.0703
.0718 250704.0000 l
16.7500 39.4382 79.3173
.0710
.0726 260700.0000 17.0000 39.4386 79.3283
.0716
.0733 260697.0000 17.2500 39.4388 79.3393
.0723
.0741 2B0693.0000 17.5000 39.4388 79.3505
.0731
.0749 250688.0000 17.7500 39.4394 79.3609
.0738
.0757 260686.0000 18.0000 39.4402 79.3695
.0743
.0782 260688.0000 18.2500 39.4405 79.3792
.0747
.0787 260586.0000 18.5000 39.4413 79.3908
.0751
.0770 280585.0000 18.7500 39.4416 79.4014
.0755
.07'i4 260681.0000 19.0000 39.4420 79.4090
.0759
.0777 260680.0000 19.2500 39.4426 79.4185
.07B1
.0780 250580.0000 19.5000 39.4432 79.4292
.0763
.0781 260679.0000 19.7500 39 4436 79.4405
.0755
.0783 260675.0000 lc.
ILRT TABLE 1 ANS 56.8 Page 3 Unit 1 Integrated Leakage Rate Calculations Page 39 of 45 File: June. set NSP PINGP Unit-1 ILRT 1994 Data Analysis Window Start Tine:
1:45: 0 Date: 1731994 End Time:
1:45: 0 Date: 1741994 Data Analysis Frequency 900 seconds DELTA TIME PRESSURE TEMP' LSF UCL OMEGA 20.0000 39.4453 79.4501
.0784
.0792 260682.0000 20.2500 39.4465 79.4595
.0762
.0779 250696.0000 20.5000 39.4479 79.4671
.0757
.0774 2G0692.0000 20.7500 39.4492 79.47B3
.0750
.0768 2E0696.0000 2f.0000 39.4498 79.4813
.0743
.0762 260E97.0000 21.2500 39.4507 79.4907
.0725
.0755 260598.0000 21.5000 35.4514 79.4953
.0728
.0749 2E0699.0000 21.7500 39.4521 79.5104
.0720
.0742 260698.0000 22.0000 39.4529 79.5146
.0712
.0734 2G0701.0000 22.2500 39.4531 79.5268
.0705
.0728 2GOS97.0000 22.5000 39.4540 79.5366
.0697
.0721 260698.0000 22.7500 39.4543 79.5473
.0690
.0714 260695.0000 23.0000 39.4551 79.5593
.0684
.0708 250694.0000 23.2500 39.4555 79.5680
.0577
.0702 260593.0000 23.5000 39.4561 79.5800
.0671
.0696 2S0691.0000 23.7500 39.4563 79.5875
.0666
.0690 260589.0000 24.0000 39.4572 79.5957
.0659
.0665 260691.0000 l
i
TABLE 2 ANS 56.8 Pege 1 Unh1 InteDrated Leskoge Rote Calculetions Page 40 of 45 File: june. set NSP PIN 6P Unit-1, ILRT 1994 Data Analysis Window Start Tine:
2:30: 0 Date: 1741994 End Tine:
13: 15:
Date: 1741994 Date Analysie Frequency 900 seconds DELTA TIME PRESSURE TEMP LSF UCL OMEGA 0.0000 39.4565 79.6185 0.0000 0.0000 260675.0000
.2500 39.4560 79.6268 0.0000 0.0000 260669.0000
.5000 39.4557 79.6376
.2578
.2578 260661.0000
.7500 39.4550 79.6472
.2909
.3472 260651.0000 1.0000 39.4552 79.6580
.2688
.3086 260647.0000 1.2500 39.4548 79.6597
.2662
.2900 260639.0000 1.5000 39.4545 79.6772
.2565
.2760 260634.0000 1.7500 39.4544 79.6870
.2495
.2655 260628.0000 2.0000 39.4543 79.6949
.2394
.2558 250624.0000 2.2500 39.4546 79.7047
.2272
.2455 260621.0000 2.5000 39.4537 79.7109
.2253
.2402 260612.0000 2.7500 39.4531 79.7240
.2297
.2428 260602.0000 3.0000 39.4525 79.7309
.2333
.2449 260595.0000 I
3.2500 39.4520 79.7415
.2384
.2495 260586.0000 3.5000 39.4513 79.7512
.2449
.2566 260576.0000 3.7500 39.4505 79.7622
.2520
.2645 260566.0000 4.0000 39.4501 79.7707
.2570
.2690 260559.0000 4.2500 39.4500 79.7781
.2586
.2693 260555.0000 4.5000 39.4497 79.7873
.2597
.2693 260548.0000 4.7500 39.4501 79.7922
.2562
.2656 260549.0000 5.0000 39,4495 79.7996
.2528
.2619 260544.0000 5.25B0 39.4500 78.B055
.2480
.2575 260542.0000 5.5000 39.4492 79.8126
.2453
.2544 260533.0000 5.7500 39.4492 79.8162
.2416
.2506 260531.0000 6.0000 39.4486 79.8249
.2391
.2478 260523.0000 6.2500 39.4483 70.8328
.2367
.-2450 260518.0000
{
6.5000 39.4479 79.8389
.2347
.2426 260512.0000 6.7500 39.4478 79.8434
.2321
.2399 260509.0000 7.0000 39.4474 79.8495
.2300
.2375 260503.0000 7.2500 39.4473 79.8526
.2272
.2348 260501.0000 7.5000 39.4473 79.8622
.2245
.2321 260497.0000 7.7500 39.4467 79.8669
.2225
.2298 260490.0000 8.0000 39.4465 79.8710
.2202
.2274 200487.0000 8.2500 39.4461 79.8735
.2179
.2250 260483.0000 8,5000 39.4459 79.8783
.2154
.2226 260480.0000 8.7500 39.4454 79.8855
.2136
.2206 260473.0000 9.0000 39.4450 79.8896
.2119
.2187 260468.0000 l
9.2500 39.4449 79.8948
.2100
.2167 260465.0000 9.5000 39.4444 79.9009
.2085
.2150 260459.0000 9,7500 39.4440 79.9069
.2072
.2135 260453.0000 l
TABLE 2 ANS 56.8 Page 2 ILRT Integrated Leskage Rate Calculations Unit 1 File: june. set NSP PItJGP Unit-1, ILRT 1994 Data Analysis Window Start Time:
2:30: 0 Date: 1741994 End Time:
13:15: 0 Date: 1741994 Data Analysis Frequency 900 seconds DELTA TIME PRESSURE TEMP LSF UCL OMEGA 10.0000 39.4440 79.9076
.2054
.2117 250453.0000 10.2500 39.4436 79.9139
.2039
.2100 260447.0000 10.5000 39.4438 79.9191
.2020
.2082 260446.0000 10.7500 39.4430 79.9232
.2006
.2056 260439.0000 1
l l
l
~
ILRT TABLE 3 Total Tine XDouble Uct >
Page 1 integrated Leakage Rate Calculations LNIIT 1 Page 42 of 45 _
File: june. set i
NSP PINGP Unit-1. ILRT 1994 Data Analysis Window Start Time:
13:30: 0 Date: 1741994 End Tine:
19:30: 0 Date: 1741994 Data Analysis Frequency 900 seconds DELTA TIME PRES 5URE TEMP LSF UCL OME6A
.2500 39.4432 79.9393 0.0000 0.0000
.03E9
.5000 39.4434 79.9438 0.0000 0.0000
.0359
.7500 39.4433 79.9473
.0471
.0957
.0491 l
1.0000 39.4436 79.9526
.0482
.0708
.0481 l
1.2500 39.4441 79.9594
.0385
.0738
.0295 1.5000 39.4444 79.9531
.0342
.0520
.0307 1.7500 39.4450 79.9691
.0248
.0532
.0158 2.0000 39.4458 79.9754
.0144
.0431
.0046 2.2500 39.4456 79.9778
.0122
.0381
.0154 2.5000 39.4460 79.9819
.0089
.0325
.0111 2.7500 39.4483 79.9835
.0054
.0270
. 0 D67 3.0000 39.4465 79.9902
.0035
.0244
.0092 3.2500 39.4468 79.9937
.0022
.0224
.0085 3.5000 39.4474 79.9972
.0003
.0189
.0026 3.7500 39.4479 80.0023
.0028
.0155 0.0000 4.0000 39.4480 80.0030
.0047
.0130 0.0000 4.2500 39.4482 80.0058
.0061
.0113 0.0000
(
4.5000 39.448S 80.0085
.0081
.0088
.0041 4.7500 39.4409 80.0114
.0096
.0070
.0039 5.0B00 39.4488 80.0139
.0101
.0070 0.0000 5.2500 39.4493 80,0180
.0108
.0066
.0018 5.5000 39.4434 80.0191
.0116
.0058
.0034 5.7500 39.4498 80.0224
.0125
.0049
.0048 6.0000 39.4496 80.0249
.0124
.0056 0.0000
\\.
TABLE 4 393 gg,3 p.g, j
IntoDrafed Leakage Rate Calculations Page 43 of 45 File: June. set NSP PINGP Unit-1, ILRT 1994 Data Analysis Window 5 tert Tine:
13:30: 0 Date: 1741994 End Time:
19 30: 0 Date: 1741994 Date Analysis Frequency 900 seconds DELTA TIME PRESSURE TEMP L5F UCL OMEGA 0.0000 39.4427 79.9313 0.0000 0.0000 260433.0000
.2500 39.4432 79.9393 0.0000 0.0000 250432.0000
.5000 39.4434 79.9438
.0369
.0369 250431.0000
.7500 39.4433 79.9473
.0479
.0567 260429.0000 1.0000 39.4435 79.9526
.0479
.0555 2B0428.0000 1.2500 39.4441 79.9594
.0358
.0516 250429.0000 1.5000 39.4444 79.9631
.0316
.0432 260428.0000 1.7500 39.4450 79.9591
.0211
.0355 260430.0000 2.0000 39.4458 79.9754
.0098 ~
.0263 250432.0000 2.2500 39.4455 79.9778
.0095
.0225 2B0429.0000 2.5000 39.4460 79.9819
.0074
.0180 2G0430.0000 2.7500 3S.4453 79.9835
.0044
.0137
.260431.0000 3.0000 39.4465 79.9902
.0036
.0115 2SO430.0000 3.2500 39.4468 79.9937
.0031
.0097 2SO430.0000 3.5000 39.4474 79.9972
.0008
.0070 2G0432.0000 3.7500 39.4479 80.0023
.0016
.0043 260433.0000 4.0000 39.4480 80.0030
.0032
.0023 250433.0000 4.2500 30.4482 80.0058
.0042
.0007 260433.0000 4.5000 39.4486 80.0086
.0061
.0013 260435.0000 4.7500 39,4489 60s0114
.0073
.0029 250435.0000 5.0000 39.4488 80.0139
.0072
.0032 2B0433.0000 5.2500 39.4493 80.0180
.0075
.0038 260434.0000 5.5000 39,4494 80.0191
.0080
.004G 280435.0000 5.7500 39.4498 80.0224
.0087
.0055 280436.0000 5.0000 39.4496 80.0249
.0081
.0052 260433.0000 l
l 1
l
~
IL TABLES Total Time < Double uct )
Page 1 Integrated Leakege Rate Calculations lhlit 1 File: June. set NSP PINSP Unit-1, ILRT 1994 Date Analysis Window Start Time:
19:45: 0 Date: 1741994 End Time:
0: 45: 0 Date: 1751994 Data Analysis Frequen:y 900 seconds DELTA TIME FRESSURE TEMP LSF UCL OMEGA
.2500 39.4485 60.0261 0.0000 0.0000
.2212
.5000 39.4480 80.0278 0.0000 0.0000
.1843
.7500 39.4472 80.0321
.1986 4416
.2089 1.0000 39.4463 80.0340
.2126
.3177
.2212 t.2500 39.4462 80.0339
.1965
.2758
.1843 1.5000 39.4458 80.0353
.1820
.2464
.1720 1.7500 39.4454 80.0358
.1897
.2238
.1532 2.0000 39.4449 80.0381
.1615
.2079
.1613 2.2500 39.4442 80,0389
.1574
.1993
.1638 2.5000 39.4439 80.0427
.1543
.1932
.1622 2.7500 39.4435 80.0433
.1508
.1871
.1575 3.0000 39,4432 80.0444
.1453
.1802
.1505 3.2500 39.4429 80.0453
.1423
.1743
.1474 3.5000 39.4423 80.0505
.1407
.1724
.1527 3.7500 39.4420 80.0510
.1383
.1691
.1474 4.0000 39.4414 80.0512
.1366
.1559
.1474 4.2500 39.4409 80.0517
.1352
.1654
.1474 4.5000 39.4399 80.0522
.1355
.1668
.1536 4.7500 39.4398 80.0546
.1350
.1654
.1494 5.0000 39.4391 80.0574
.1354
.1674
.1530
.-._--4
TABLE 6
~
ANS 55.B Page 1 ILRT Integrated Leakage Rate Calculations
() git i ON File: june. set NSP PIN 6P Unit-1, ILRT 1994 Data Analysis Window Start Tine:
19: 45: 0 Date: 1741994 End Time:
0: 45: 0 Date: 1751994 Data Analysis Frequency 900 seconds DELTA TIME PRESSURE TEMP LSF UCL OMEGA 0.0000 39.4492 BO 0247 0.0000 0.0000 260431.0000
.2500 39.4485 80.0261 0.0000 0.0000 260425.0000
.5000 39.4480 80.0278
.1843
.3564 260421.0000
.7500 39.4472 80.0321
.2027
.2447 260414.0000 1.0000 39.4463 80.0340
.2175
.2454 200407.0000 1.2500 39.4462 80.0339
.1959
.2272 2SO408.0000 1.5000 39.4458 80.0353
.1790
.2077 2S0403.0000 1.7500 39.4454 80.0358
.1653
.1914 250400.0000 2.0000 39.4449 80.0381
.1591
.t796 260395.0000 2.2500 39.4442 80.0389
.1568
.1731 260391.0000 2.5000 39.4439 80.0427
.1552
.1693 250387.0000 2.7500 39.4435 80.0433
.1525
.1537 250384.0000 3.0000 39.4432 80.0444
.1483
.1586 250382.0000 3.2500 39.4429 80.0453
.1445
.3541 280379.0000 3.5000 39.4423 80.0506
.1440
.1523 280373.0000 3.7500 39.4420 80.0510
.1421
.1495 260371.0000 4.0000 39.4414 80.0512
.1409
.1476 260367.0000 4.2500 39.4409 60.0517
.1402
.1482 260363.0000 a
4.5000 39.4399 80.0522
.1416
.1470 2503S6.0000 4.7500 39.4399 80.0546
.1415
.1455 260354.0000 5.0000 39.4393 80.0574
.1426
.1471 250348.0000
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _