ML20065D201: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot change)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML20065D201
| number = ML20065D201
| issue date = 09/07/1982
| issue date = 09/07/1982
| title = Responds to NRC 820811 Ltr Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-223/82-01.Corrective Actions:Procedures Prepared, Reviewed & Approved for All Subsequent Activities Dealing w/Co-60 Source Per Tech Spec Requirement
| title = Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-223/82-01.Corrective Actions:Procedures Prepared, Reviewed & Approved for All Subsequent Activities Dealing w/Co-60 Source Per Tech Spec Requirement
| author name = Wallace T
| author name = Wallace T
| author affiliation = MASSACHUSETTS, UNIV. OF, LOWELL, MA (FORMERLY LOWELL,
| author affiliation = MASSACHUSETTS, UNIV. OF, LOWELL, MA (FORMERLY LOWELL,
Line 11: Line 11:
| contact person =  
| contact person =  
| document report number = NUDOCS 8209240438
| document report number = NUDOCS 8209240438
| title reference date = 08-11-1982
| package number = ML20065D199
| package number = ML20065D199
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION TO NRC, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION TO NRC, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE
Line 17: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:)
A- s g
3                    //bW'.//            /'        / //.W
              \    ;N                      b/r    /thrs'ItYy ,S rsiyr e  tff  *.    /,j,j ff f' f/,)(k  hf)
(017) 452 5000 September 7, 1982 Docket !!o, 50-223 License No. R-125 Mr. Richard W. Starostecki Division of Project and Resident Programs U.S. Nuclear Regulatory ^ommissions Region I King of Pruusia, PA 19406
 
==Dear Sir:==
 
In response to your Notice of violation dated August 11, 1982, the University of Iu.vell submits the following information. Following your inspection of June 16, 1982, procedures were prepared, reviewed and approved as required by Technical Specifications. These procedures covered all of the areas identified as being inadequate in your inspection report. These procedures were reviewed by your office via telephone on June 17, 1982.
All subsequent activities dealing with the Co-60 source have been conducted according to these procedures.
All personnel responsible for the issuing and implementation of procedures were reminded that Technical Specifications and 10CFR require that written, approved precedurer are required for these kinds of activities.
We consider the University of Lowell to be in full compliance as of June 17, 1982.
Sincorely yours, YMw Thomas -        Wallace Nuclear Reactor Supervisor cc Dr. G.II. Kegel Dr. L. Beghian B209240438 820915 PDR ADOCK 05000223 G                  PDR}}

Latest revision as of 21:02, 31 May 2023

Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-223/82-01.Corrective Actions:Procedures Prepared, Reviewed & Approved for All Subsequent Activities Dealing w/Co-60 Source Per Tech Spec Requirement
ML20065D201
Person / Time
Site: University of Lowell
Issue date: 09/07/1982
From: Wallace T
MASSACHUSETTS, UNIV. OF, LOWELL, MA (FORMERLY LOWELL
To: Starostecki R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
Shared Package
ML20065D199 List:
References
NUDOCS 8209240438
Download: ML20065D201 (1)


Text

)

A- s g

3 //bW'.// /' / //.W

\ ;N b/r /thrs'ItYy ,S rsiyr e tff *. /,j,j ff f' f/,)(k hf)

(017) 452 5000 September 7, 1982 Docket !!o, 50-223 License No. R-125 Mr. Richard W. Starostecki Division of Project and Resident Programs U.S. Nuclear Regulatory ^ommissions Region I King of Pruusia, PA 19406

Dear Sir:

In response to your Notice of violation dated August 11, 1982, the University of Iu.vell submits the following information. Following your inspection of June 16, 1982, procedures were prepared, reviewed and approved as required by Technical Specifications. These procedures covered all of the areas identified as being inadequate in your inspection report. These procedures were reviewed by your office via telephone on June 17, 1982.

All subsequent activities dealing with the Co-60 source have been conducted according to these procedures.

All personnel responsible for the issuing and implementation of procedures were reminded that Technical Specifications and 10CFR require that written, approved precedurer are required for these kinds of activities.

We consider the University of Lowell to be in full compliance as of June 17, 1982.

Sincorely yours, YMw Thomas - Wallace Nuclear Reactor Supervisor cc Dr. G.II. Kegel Dr. L. Beghian B209240438 820915 PDR ADOCK 05000223 G PDR