ML21040A387: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
FW: Acceptance Review for Battery Resistance LAR (EPID L-2021-LLA-0011) | FW: Acceptance Review for Battery Resistance LAR (EPID L-2021-LLA-0011) | ||
: Diane, By letter dated January 7, 2021 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Package Accession No. ML21007A264), Virginia Electric Power Company, submitted an amendment request for the North Anna Power Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2. The request would amend the requirements of TS 2.1.1.2 to reflect the peak fuel centerline melt temperature specified in Topical Report WCAP-17642-P-A, Revision 1, Westinghouse Performance Analysis and Design Model (PAD5). The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to begin its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the request has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | : Diane, By {{letter dated|date=January 7, 2021|text=letter dated January 7, 2021}} (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Package Accession No. ML21007A264), Virginia Electric Power Company, submitted an amendment request for the North Anna Power Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2. The request would amend the requirements of TS 2.1.1.2 to reflect the peak fuel centerline melt temperature specified in Topical Report WCAP-17642-P-A, Revision 1, Westinghouse Performance Analysis and Design Model (PAD5). The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to begin its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the request has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | ||
The NRC staff has reviewed your request and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to begin its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified in requests for additional information despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence. | The NRC staff has reviewed your request and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to begin its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified in requests for additional information despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence. | ||
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this LAR will take approximately 225 hours to complete. The NRC staff expects to compete this review by your requested date of January, 2022. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. | Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this LAR will take approximately 225 hours to complete. The NRC staff expects to compete this review by your requested date of January, 2022. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. |
Latest revision as of 20:08, 20 January 2022
ML21040A387 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | North Anna ![]() |
Issue date: | 02/08/2021 |
From: | Ed Miller NRC/NRR/DORL/LPL2-1 |
To: | Aitken D Dominion Generation |
References | |
L-2021-LLA-0011, WCAP-17642-P-A | |
Download: ML21040A387 (2) | |
Text
From: Miller, Ed Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 3:54 PM To: diane.aitken@dominionenergy.com
Subject:
FW: Acceptance Review for Battery Resistance LAR (EPID L-2021-LLA-0011)
- Diane, By letter dated January 7, 2021 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Package Accession No. ML21007A264), Virginia Electric Power Company, submitted an amendment request for the North Anna Power Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2. The request would amend the requirements of TS 2.1.1.2 to reflect the peak fuel centerline melt temperature specified in Topical Report WCAP-17642-P-A, Revision 1, Westinghouse Performance Analysis and Design Model (PAD5). The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to begin its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the request has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your request and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to begin its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified in requests for additional information despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence.
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this LAR will take approximately 225 hours0.0026 days <br />0.0625 hours <br />3.720238e-4 weeks <br />8.56125e-5 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to compete this review by your requested date of January, 2022. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.
These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they can change due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to review, or review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415 2481 or ed.miller@nrc.gov.
Ed Miller (301) 415-2481
Hearing Identifier: NRR_DRMA Email Number: 1011 Mail Envelope Properties (DM6PR09MB55443E7A9B267F0F9E9DE3BEE98F9)
Subject:
FW: Acceptance Review for Battery Resistance LAR (EPID L-2021-LLA-0011)
Sent Date: 2/8/2021 3:53:32 PM Received Date: 2/8/2021 3:53:32 PM From: Miller, Ed Created By: Ed.Miller@nrc.gov Recipients:
"diane.aitken@dominionenergy.com" <diane.aitken@dominionenergy.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office: DM6PR09MB5544.namprd09.prod.outlook.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2838 2/8/2021 3:53:32 PM Options Priority: Normal Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: