IR 05000277/2016002: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML16221A342
| number = ML16221A342
| issue date = 08/08/2016
| issue date = 08/08/2016
| title = Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station; Unit 2 & 3 - Integrated Inspection Report IR05000277/2016002;05000278/2016002
| title = Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station; Unit 2 & 3 - Integrated Inspection Report Ir05000277/2016002;05000278/2016002
| author name = Schroeder D L
| author name = Schroeder D L
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-I/DRP
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-I/DRP

Revision as of 19:25, 18 February 2018

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station; Unit 2 & 3 - Integrated Inspection Report Ir05000277/2016002;05000278/2016002
ML16221A342
Person / Time
Site: Peach Bottom  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 08/08/2016
From: Schroeder D L
Division Reactor Projects I
To: Bryan Hanson
Exelon Generation Co, Exelon Nuclear
Barber G S
References
IR 2016002
Download: ML16221A342 (35)


Text

via E-mail DOCUMENT NAME: G:\DRP\BRANCH4\Inspection Reports\Peach Bottom\2016\Q2\PB IR 2016-002_Final.docx ADAMS Accession No. ML16221A342 SUNSI Review Non-Sensitive Sensitive Publicly Available Non-Publicly Available OFFICE RI/DRP RI/DRP R1/DRP NAME JHeinly/JH SBarber/SB DSchroeder/DS DATE 08/03/16 08/03/16 08/08/16 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

................................................................................................................................. ................................................................................................................ ..................................................................................... ................................................................................................ .......................................................................................................... ....................................................................................... .............................................................................................. ... ...................................................................................... ................................. .................................... .................................................................................................. ....................................................................................... .................................................................... ................................................................................................ ........................................................................................................ ............................................................................................................ ...................................................................... ............................................... ........................................ .............................................................................................................. .................................................................... ..................................................................... .................................. ........................................................................................... ....................................................................................... ................................................................................................... ..................................... ....................................................................................... ...........................................................................................................

Non REPORT DETAILS 1. REACTOR SAFETY .2 Readiness for Seasonal Extreme Weather Conditions a. Inspection Scope of seasonal high temperature The review focused on the emergency diesel generators (EDGs) and the circulating water pump house ventilatio The inspectors reviewed the updated final safety analysis report (UFSAR), TS, control room logs, and the CAP to determine what temperatures or other seasonal weather could challenge these systems, and to ensure Exelon personnel had adequately prepared for these challenge The inspectors on procedure and applicable operating procedures. The inspectors performed walkdowns of the selected systems to ensure station personnel identified issues that could challenge the operability of the systems during hot weather condition b. Findings No findings were identifie . RADIATION SAFETY Cornerstone: Occupational and Public Radiation Safety . OTHER ACTIVITIES This finding does not involve any enforcement action since no regulatory requirement violation was identifie Specifically, the human error reduction tools in are not required to be QA Progra Because the finding does not involve a violation of regulatory requirements and has very low safety significance, it is identified as FI (FIN 05000277/2016002-03, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION KEY POINTS OF CONTACT LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, DISCUSSED, AND UPDATED 05000277/2016002-03 FIN LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED

WO R1289015 R1343921 R1346942 Section 1EP6: Drill Evaluation

LIST OF ACRONYMS CR condition report CS core spray ECCS emergency core cooling system EDG emergency diesel generator EOC extent of condition EPU extended power uprate ESW emergency service water GPI groundwater protection initiative HPCI high pressure coolant injection HPSW high pressure service water HX heat exchanger IMC inspection manual chapter IP inspection procedure IR issue report