ML20069D524

Socioeconomic Monitoring & Mitigating Rept,Sept 1981

ML20069D524
Person / Time
Site:	Hartsville
Issue date:	09/10/1982
From:	TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
To:
Shared Package
ML20069D519	List: ML20069D516 ML20069D524
References
HNP-SMR---11, NUDOCS 8209210259
Download: ML20069D524 (40)

Text

,- .. .-

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY l

t i

e i

i i

HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANTS j SOCIOECONOMIC MONITORING AND MITIGATION REPORT

! HNP SMR - 11 i September 30, 1981 i

1 k

I

?

-f i

i 1

i l

I i

1 I

l t

l. Knoxville, Tennessee i

i August 1982 i

i, i

i 1

l 4

l 8209210 951

CONTENTS Page Background and Highlights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v I. General Status of Employment as of September 30, 1981 . . . . 1 II. General Characteristics of Movers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 III. Secondary Employment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 IV. Functional Area Impacts and Mitigation Actions . . . . . . . 5 Tables Table 1. TVA Local Planning Assistance Payments . . . . . . 5 Table 2. Traffic Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Table 3. Summary of TVA Mitigation Expenditures as of September 30, 1981 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Appendixes Appendix A - Detailed Survey Results

• Table A- 1. Town of Current Residence . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Table A- 2. Source of Location of Construction Employees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Table A- 3. Distribution of Movers and Associated Population by County and Community . . . . . . . 15 Table A- 4. Comparison of Survey Results with Projections for Selected Parameters . . . . . . 16 Table A- 5. Mover Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Table A- 6. Macon - Employees Living Within the County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Table A- 7. Smith - Employees Living Within the County . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . 19 Table A- 8. Sumner - Employees Living Within the County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Table A- 9. Trousdale - Employees Living Within the County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Table A-10. Wilson - Employees Living Within the

. County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 Table A-11. Carthage - Employees Living Within the City Limits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Table A-12. Gallatin - Employees Living Within the City Limits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Table A-13. Hartsville - Employees Living Within the City Limits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 Table A-14. Hendersonville - Employees Living Within the City Limits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

~

CONTENTS (continued)

Page Lafayette - Employees Living Within the Table A-15.

City Limits .................. 27 Table A-16. Lebanon - Employees Living Within the City Limits ................. 28 '

Appendix B - Secondary Socioeconomic Impact Monitoring of Hartsville Nuclear Plant Environmental Impact Area . ................... 29 Appendix C - Traffic Level Defined . .............. 31 Appendix D - Employee Questionnaire .............. 32 Appendix E - Socioeconomic Monitoring Cycle .......... 35 Exhibits Figure 1 - Towns Containing Construction Employees ....... 36 e

D

d HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANTS SOCIOECONOMIC MONITORING AND MITIGATION REPORT s

Background and Highlights e

In permits to construct the four-unit Hartsville Nuclear Plants located in Smith and Trousdale Counties, Tennessee, TVA agreed to undertake certain monitoring and mitigation actions to reduce the socioeconomic impact caused by the inmoving population for the construction project. The impact area is defined as Trousdale, Smith, Macon, Sumner, and Wilson Counties, Tennessee.

TVA also agreed to report to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission the results of the monitoring efforts and mitigation actions taken to mitigate the impacts.

l l

This is the eleventh in a series of semiannual reports which TVA agreed to 1

submit to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to report on the results of TVA's l

l socioeconomic monitoring and mitigation efforts for the Hartsville Nuclear l

Plants. This report is for the period April 1, 1981, through September 30, 1

l 1981.

l There was a decrease in the employment level this period from 5,255 employees to 4,360 employees. There was a corresponding decrease in the number of

• movers and population influx to all five impact countics. The mover rate was 33 percent for a total of 1,419 movers.

TVA has made mitigation expend.itures totaling approximately $8.8 million.

Approximately $4.7 million of this amount was for employee transportation.

i

_ m _ _.. - _ . _ _ _ . _ . _ . . ,_. , - , - , .

HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANTS l

l SOCIOECONOMIC MONITORING AND MITIGATION REPORT

• I. General Status of Employment as of September 30, 1981 In November a survey of all TVA employees as of September 30, 1981, was conducted. The timelag between employment and survey enables employees who moved to make personal adjustments and should provide a better picture of employee distribution, family characteristics, and housing choice. The employment level was 4,360 employees, and information was available for 4,219 employees (97 percent). Of those who provided information, 1,374 employees indicated they had moved resulting in a mover rate of about 33 percent (table A-1). Informa-tion on the family status and housing choice was obtained for those who moved (table A-5).

Extrapolating on a ratio basis to the total 4,360 employees, we estimate a total of 1,419 movers. Of this total, 1,101 movers located in the five impact counties and 318 moved to other counties. As shown in table A-1 and figure 1, local workers (nonmovers) are commuting to the project from a much more widespread area.

Information on the distribution of both movers and residents is found in tables A-1, A-2, and figure 1. Additional information on the distribution and characteristics of movers is contained in tables A-3 through A-16.

Table A-1 lists the town of current residence. This table is based on " Mailing Address" locations instead of jurisdictional locations.

All employees are asked to provide a place name even though they may 4

not live within any municipal limits. Figure 1 is based on this 9

table. Table A-3 provides the movers' distribution which is based on ,

city limits for the five impact communities and any other communities to which at least 50 empicyees moved.

Table A-2 shows both the origin and location of all employees. The diagonal line of the "From-To" tabulation shows resident employees.

For example, resident employees from Sumner County would be found by locating Sumner County in the "From" column and going across the table to the "To" column in which Sumner County also appears. In this survey 621 residents of Sumner County were employed at the end of September 1981. Movers are shown by all other data. For example, 19 employees moved from Sumner County to Trousdale County.

Table A-4 of this report series contains a comparison of the survey results with the projections contained in the environmental impact statement (EIS). For a work force of approximately 4,400 employees, about 45 percent had been projected to be movers. However, the survey found a mover rate of about 33 percent. Sumner County is still receiv-ing the largest share of movers (30 percent) compared with the projected .

20 percent. Sumner County also has received slightly more movers (425) than projected (392). While the number of movers to Sumner County is close to that projected, all other counties are receiving far fewer movers than expected. Trousdale County is receiving the smallest number of movers (193) compared with the projected (589).

Smith and Wilson Counties were each projected to receive 392 movers; however, Smith County has received only 154 and Wilson County has received 193 movers. Mover projections were made only for the five impact counties, but 79 movers have located in Davidson County and 239

) in other counties. The survey also indicated that 192 employees moved from Davidson County; and, of those, 151 moved to impact counties. The 239 other movers are widely dispersed throughout numerous counties with no significant adverse impacts.

II. General Characteristics of Movers Total Project--Table A-5 contains data on family status and character-istics and housing choice for all movers. Table A-4 compares these results with TVA's projections of the characteristics on inmoving families. As of September 30, 1981, 80 percent of those employees who moved brought their families; and 20 percent moved without their families. School-age children per family averaged 1.0 per family--the same as that projected, and the total average family size was 3.5 compared with the projected 3.0. The survey of housing choice shows 64 percent are living in houses, 19 percent in mobile homes, 12 percent in apartments, 2 percent in motel and sleeping rooms, and 4 percent in other accommodations. The "other" category includes campers, motor homes, and vans.

Impact Counties and Communities Data on family status and characteristics and housing choice for movers into each impact county are contained in tables A-6 through A-10 and for movers within the city limits of each of the impact communities containing at least 50 movers in tables A-11 through A-16.

. - - . _ . _ - . . _ = - .. . -_ - . . - - _ _ - .

Other Counties and Communities TVA also accumulates data on counties and communities which were not i identified as impact counties or communities in the original impact ,

analysis. Once the construction-related inmoving population reaches a i level of 50 innovers for communities or 100 inmovers for counties, TVA .

begins monitoring and reporting impacts to ensure that no communities are inadvertently left out of the designated impact area. Hendersonville, with 55 inmovers as shown in table A-3, is a community which is being I

monitored. However, Hendersonville with an approximate population of i 28,000 is not adversely affected by the influx of population it is servicing. Detailed survey results for Hendersonville are in table A-14.

III. Secondary Employment In previous monitoring reports secondary employment impact has been ,

defined as a temporary increase in the trade and service-related resident population which can be attributed to the Hartsville project.

If the population increase in a county is greater than that arising l directly from the project or from other primary employment increases,

{

the possibility of secondary employment exists.

i l

The methodology which we have used in monitoring the Hartsville project I (see Appendix B) provides reasonable results only when the change in project related employment and resident population are directly related. .

l Declining employment at the project induces lags in area population which are impossible to detect and quantify using the current methodology.

I I

i i

IV. Functional Area Impacts and Mitigation Actions Education--TVA is continuing to monitor impacts on the six school districts in the impact area. However, the detailed data on enrollments usually l

presented in these reports was not available at the time of publication.

I i

• That information will be included in the next impact report. It is important to note that as a result of the decrease in plant employment, no additional impacts on school systems would be expected.

Local Planning and Coordination Assistance--TVA continued to assist the local planning commissions affected by this project by reimbursing them for one-half of their cost of obtaining the services of the Tennessee State Planning Office for a one-year period. The need for additional assistance to the communities is evaluated and negotiated on a year-to-year basis as appropriate. A summary of these payments follows:

Table 1 TVA Local Planning Assistance Payments Amount Paid Amount Paid Planning Commissions This Period To Date Hartsville-Trousdale $

--- $ 5,567 Smith County 1,444 8,891 Sumner County --- 8,531 Wilson County 3,019 12,769 Carthage 659 4,521 South Carthage --- 2,225 Gordonsville 328 2,366 Lafayette --- 2,094

. Gallatin --- 11,263 Lebanon --- 12,403 Hendersonville 781 11,263 Tennessee State Planning Office --- 20,000

$6,231 $101,893 TVA continues to provide annual support for the Hartsville Project Coordination Committee for professional staff services. The committee is composed of the chief elected officials in the five-county impact area

t (five county judges and the mayors of the incorporated towns within the five counties). As of September 1981, $300,000 has been provided to the-committee with funding at $12',500 per quarter.

Local Government Budgets--The impact on the budgets of local governments ,

in the impact area of the Hartsville construction project is measured on an annual basis. - This measurement is made by projecting the proje'ct-related revenues to be received by the local governments. The projected revenues and expenditures are then cocpired to determine whether deficits will occur. TVA has executed contracts, which are modified as appropriate, with local governments to provide payments to cover the amounts of any projected deficits. The only payment made to local governments during this period was $18,600 to the city of Gallatin.

Water and Sewer--TVA continued to assess the water and sewer needs for the five-county impact area. Additional mitigation efforts were not necessary during this period.

Health and Medical Services--TVA continued to assess the health needs for the five-county impact area. Jowever, these assessments have not indicated a need for additional health mitigation efforts.

Traffic--In accordance with an agreement between TVA and the Tennessee ,

Department of Transportation, the department has been supplying TVA with traffic counts for 12 locations on a quarterly basis beginning in October 1975. With approximately 4,400 employees, peak-hour traffic on Highway 25 was 410 vehicles per hour (VPH) east of the site and 770 VPH

. west of the site. Counts for other key highway segments are shown in the following table. Peak-hour volumes at all these locations are within the limits of acceptable volumes for level of service D operation of these highways (see appendix C). TVA is continuing the mass transportation

. program (commuter vans and buses) at a reduced level to mitigate the peak-hour traffic volumes.

Table 2 Traffic Evaluation (October 1975 - September 1981)

Number of TVA Vehicles During Commuter Peak Hour

• Traffic 1975 1981 Highway 25 East of Plant 120 410 270 Highway 25 West of Plant 120 770 540 Highway 25 West of Hartsville 290 680 430 210 Highway 25 West of 231 Junction 210 460 Highway 231 South of 25 Junction 150 250 120 Highway 231 North of Lebanon 150 260 100

• The peak hour occurred during the 3-4 p.m. hour.

Employee Transportation--During this period the employee transportation program at the Hartsville Nuclear Plant operated 43 vans and 23 buses.

This was a reduction of I bus and 3 vans from the previous reporting period. The average bus ridership was 34, while the vans carried an average of 9.6 each. The transportation program carried 36 percent of the day shift employees and reduced traffic by approximately 702 vehicles per day. TVA's expenditure for employee transportation this period was

. $349,531.

.g.

Local Recruitment and Training--There were no employee recruitment and training activities during this period.

Recreation--Potential negative impacts on recreation services were monitored during the reporting period by TVA recreation staff. In ,

response to a request from Trousdale County, the recreation staff prepared a conceptual site plan and cost estimate for a new county park. TVA also provided $18,450 to assist the city of Hendersonville in construction of a new soccer field and playground in Drakes Creek Park. This was the only payment for recreation mitigation made during this period.

, The city of Lafayette submitted a request for technical assistance in developing a new city park on land donated to the city from a private estate. Recreation staff will meet with city officials to assist them in planning the new park.

i .

i .

, -9_

Table 3 Summary of TVA Mitigation Expenditures

. As of September 30, 1981 Expenditures Expenditures This Period To Date Education $

--- $ 1,583,009 D

Housing --- 423,000 Local Planning & Coordination 31,231 400,588 C

Water & Sewer --- 380,000 Health --- 113,772 Intergenerational Child Care Program --- 33,887 Local Governments 18,600 955,219 Employee Transportation 349,531 4,706,737 Recreation 18,450 230,188 TOTAL $417,812 $8,826,400

a. Education mitigation expenditures for this period are not available.

b. Includes $60,000 interest-bearing loan.

c. Includes $125,000 noninterest bearing loan, which was defaulted and written off January 1981.

l -

4 4 .

1 4

.I 4

i 1

8 l D 4

I 4

I b

1 4

v 4

il 1

J

(

4 i

4 i APPENDIXES i .

d, 4

4 i.

I 1

.i l

1 i

I 4

i l

1 4

h 4

4 l,

(

d n

l 4

i 0

k I

Table A-1 FoLLau er suRVtv TOWN OF CURRENT RES10ENCE RUN DATE 03/11/82 HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANT EMPLOYEES RUN TIME 09042R ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 09-30-81 REPORT 2 MOVED TO ALREADY TCWN TOWN IN T0nN TOTAL POPULATION ALEXANDRIA TN 10 35 45 680 BAXTER TN 11 40 51 1,314 CARTHAGE TN 48 115 163 2,491 COOKEV ILLE TN 20 59 79 17,800 TN 14 32 46 5,381 CROS$VILLE D0hELLTOWN TN 8 11 19 329 TN 8 3. 40 1,101 GAINES80R0 TN 244 299 541 13,362 GALLATIN GO RDONSV IL L E TN 11 27 38 601 TN 187 152 339 2,243 HARTSVILLE TN 60 114 174 28,000 HENDERSONVILLE TN 118 166 284 2,583 4 L AFAYE TTE TN 151 191 342 12,492 LEBANON TN 5 20 25 6,869 M ANCHE STE R MURFREESBORO TN 15 34 49 28,700 TN 40 343 383 469,000 NASHVILLE TN 12 35 47 3,081 PORTLAND

• RED BOILING SPRINGS TN 11 42 53 956 TN 7 77 84 3,762 S M ITHV ILL E SOUTH CARTHAGE TN 5 17 22 859 SPARTA TN 7 9 to 4.930 TN 19 50 69 1,423 WESTMORELAND TN 5 10 15 2,087 WOCOBURY BETHPAGE TN 16 41 ST 400 CASTALIAN SPRINGS TN 49 39 88 150 COTTONTOWN TN 5 11 16 100 OINON SPRINGS TN 45 22 6F 100 G000LETTSVILLE TN 7 44 50 7,541 TN 12 66 78 21,500 MADISON HouNT JULIET TN 28 64 92 1 568 TN 10 40 50 6,000 OLO HICKORY PLEASANT SHADE TN 14 27 41 150 R IODL E TON TN 11 IF 28 100 TN 6 22 28 1,061 WATERichN TN 14 9 23 1,305 WHITE HOUSE KY 5 58 61 3,584 SCOTTSVILLE SUBTOTAL 1238 2369 3607 14 11 1,370 CELINA TN 3

) a CHARLOTTE TN 2 5 7 610 9 10 44,900 CLARKSVILLE TN 1 TN 2 23 25 2,279 GREEN BRIER TN 2 10 12 5,209 i LA VERGNE I

s a

_ ,- y _- ._ _,

Table A-1, Page 2 FOLLOW UP SURVEY T0hN CF CURRENT RESIDENCE RUN DATE 03/11/82 .

HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANT EPPLCYEES RUN TIME 090428 ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 0(s-30-01 PEPORT 2 MOVE 0 TC ALREADY TOWN TOWN IN TChN TOTAL POPULATICN LIBERTY TN 2 17 19 332 MCMINNVILLE TN 3 6 9 11 610 SHEL8YVILLE TN O 6 6 11.900 SMYRNA TN 3 7 to 5.698 16 19 9,720 SPRINGFIELO TN 3 TN 6  ? 15,57T TULLAHOMA 1 ANTIUCH TN 3 12 15 900 TN 3 10 13 2,027 ASHLAND CITY BRUSH CREEK TN 4 14 18 230 BUFFALO VALLEY TN 1 9 10 100 CHESTNUT MOUND TN O 6 6 125 00hELSCN TN 1 15 16 25.500 ELMWOOD TN 3 11 1, 100 HERMITAGE TN 4 23 27 6.000 .

HICKMAN TN 3 14 17 200 J0ELTON TN 1 17 18 90C LANCASTER TN 2 7 9 150 MOSS TN 1 7 8 230

• SILVER POINT TN 2 8 10 150 WHITLEYVILLE TN 1 5 6 50 GAMALIEL KY u 5 5 431 TOMPKINSVILLE KY 3 16 19 2.20f ADOLPHUS KY 1 7 8 250 SUBTOTAL 55 305 360 OTHER 81 171 252 TOTAL RESPONSES 1374 2845 4219 HNP WORKFORCE TOTAL 4360 09-30-81 9

Table A-2 FOLLCm UP SURWEY SOUPCE ANC LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTI3N EMPLJYEES RUN DATE 03/11/82 NARTSVILLE NUCLE AR PLANT RUN TIME 090454 ACT IVE EMPLOYEES 09-30-81 REPORT 4 UTHtR CTHER GTHER

--IPPACT CGUNTIES REC. TENN. KENTUCKY ,

F RCM --- TO TROUSDAL E SMITH MACON SUMNER WILSCN DAVIDSON C O UNT I E S COUNTIES COUNTIES CTHER I43 TOTAL l T ROUSD AL E til 155 8 4 21 4 3 4 199 .

SMITH (13 8 293 6 3 11 5 8 336 MACCN (18 3 2 221 6 6 1 4 1 244 SLMNER ( 1) 19 6 9 621 6 to 10 3 2 686 WILSCN til 6 7 2 15 281 8 9 5 333 DAVIDSON (1) 14 19 3 76 31 566 23 15 746 OTHER RECRUITING COUh (28 10 17 17 17 9 9 59F 21 4 701 GTHER TN. COUNTIES (31 71 4T 34 119 60 2s 28 205 1 2 590 GTHER KY. CCbMTIES (3) 4 4 8 4 1 8 1 10 CLABAMA 16 1C 6 45 19 5 2 2 135 i

ARKAh5AS 1 1 2 2 6 CEORGIA 3 1 1 2 2 I 10 CISSISSIPPI 2 1 2 l' 6 .

CORTH C AROL INA 1 2 2 5 SOUTH C AROLINA 1 1 2 4 -

STHER STATES 29 19 30 67 32 11 8 to 12 21d l Co* TOTAL 341 429 343 1005 467 642 699 260 15 13 4219 NOTE: DATA ON DIAGONAL INDICAff NOAM0 VERS, WITH THE EXCEPT!dN OF MGvES alTH1N A CLW.T Y.

Al L CTNFR DATA INCICAT E MGVERS.

(16 HECRLI TING COUNTY (2) TEAhESSEE COUNTIES: CANNON, CL AY , DL K AL S , JACKST4, PUTNAM, kC8LkTSON, RUTHERFORD MEhTUCWY COUNTIES : ALLEN. MONROE, alMPSUN (33 ALL CCUNTILS IN AENTUCKY AND TENNESSEE OTHER THAN RECRJITINS C0JNTIES f*1 "CTHER" INCLUCES NON-RESPONSES GR E4dONEGUS RE SPONSLS FOR CURRENT A MWESS.

Table A-3 Hartsville Nuclear Plants Distribution of Movers and Associated Population by County and Community September 30, 1981 ,

Percent Number g of of Population Influx County Movers __ Movers School age Total Trousdale 14 193 142 520 Smith 11 154 105 443 Macon 10 136 134 442 Sumner 30 425 365 1,313 Wilson 14 193 170 586 Other Counties 21 318 252 937 .

Total 100 1,419 1,168 4,241 3

Community Carthage 2 35 10 77 Gallatin 10 145 93 407 Hartsville 8 118 67 278 Hendersonville 4 55 39 150 Lafayette 4 58 63 193 Lebanon _j! 48 23 107 Total 27 459 295 1,212

1. Numbers extrapolated.

2. Percentages may not add to 100 because of rounding.

3. Within municipal limits.

Table A-4 Hartsville Nuclear Plants Comparison of Survey Results with Projections for Selected Parameters Employment Level - 4,360 Projected Surveyed Number Movers 1,962 1,419 Percent Movers 45 33 School age Children 1,275 1,168 School age Children / Family 1.0 1.0 Total Population 4,512 4,241 Percent Number Percent Number Movers with Families 65 1,275 80 1,134 Movers without Families 35 687 20 285 Percent Number Percent Number

- Housing Choice:

Houses 31 608 64 902 Mobile Homes 47 922 19 269 Apartments 18 353 12 167 Motel and Sleeping Rooms 4 79 2 31 Other _j[ 0 4 51 Total 100 1,962 100 1,419 Percent Number Percent Number Distribution by County:

Davidson 0 0 6 79 Trousdale 30 589 14 193 Smith 20 392 11 154 Macon 10 196 10 136 Sumner 20 392 30 425 Wilson 20 392 14 193 Other Counties 0 0 15 239 2

Total 100 1,962 100 1,419

1. Numbers extrapolated.

2. Percentages may not add to 100 because of rounding.

Table A-5 .

FOLLCW UP SURviv WORKERS WHO MOVED INTO HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANT AREA PAGE 017 .

RUN DATE 03/11/82 REPCRT LF MOVER

SUMMARY

ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 09-30-81 RUN TIME 090415 WITH IOTAL CHILOREN CHILDREN IN IN MOVERS MOVERS CHILDREN AUMBER WI THCUT 10TAL WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH SCHOOL F AM IL Y MOVERS FAMILY SCHOOL CHILDREN SCFCCL AhNUAL EMPLOYEES 119 345 178 72 12 244 HOUSE OWNED 232 10 50 39 17 2 HOUSE RENTED 40 12 30 55 APARTMENT RENTED 25 8 17 to 2 6 6 0 4 9 MOBILE HCME RENTED 5 4 6 16 e 2 9 26 MCBILE HOME OWNED 17 4 5 3 1 2 SLEEPING ROOM 2 2 0 0 3 3 0 C 0 MOTEL 1 2 6 .

4 1 3 1 GTHER 80 72 397 325 168 431 221 TOTAL HOURLY EMPLOYEES 557 286 126 20 351 H00SE OWNED 331 214 228 97 299 137 58 41 HOUSE RENTED 187 50 107 SF 25 71 23 16 APARTMENT RENTED 4 28 62 MOBILE HOME RENTED 34 18 48 28 67 186 90 36 33 163 MOBILE HCME OWNED 130 6 8 1 1 1 SLEEPING ROOM 2 1 8 4 1 9 15 MCIEL 6 3 33 15 4 17 43 OTHER 26 12 1203 584 246 204 917 TOTAL 7F3 437 ALL EMPLOYEES 902 464 198 32 595 HOUSE OWNED 563 349 2Td 109 338 154 60 51 HOUSE RENTED 227 80 16/

82 33 88 33 18 APARTMENT RENTED 4 12 71 39 22 54 34 MOBILE HCME RENTED 38 42 189 147 73 202 96 MOBILE HOME OWNED 2 8 12 4 3 6 4 SLEEPING ROOM 4 1 12 18 MOTEL 6 3 8 36 16 5 19 49 OTHER 30 13 605 1634 805 326 276 13F4 ,

TOTAL 1098

l d

1 Table A-6 FOLLCW UP SURVEY

, WURKERS WHC MOVED INTO HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANT ARLA PAGE 006 MACON RUN DATE 03/11/82 EMPLOYEES LIVING WITHIN THE COUNTY TOTAL RE POR T 18 ACTIVE EMPLOYEES C9-30-91 RUN TIME 990415 WITH TOTAL CHILDREN CHILDREN MOVERS CHILDREN NUMBER IN EN MOVERS WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH WITHOUT TOTAL' FAMILY SCHOOL CHILDREN SCHOOL SCHOOL FAMILY MOVERS AhNUAL EMPLOYEES HCUSE OWNED 15 9 22 12 3 0 15 MOUSE RENTED 4 2 > 2 0 2 6 APARTMENT REhTED 1 1 2 1 0 1 2 R081LE HOME RENTED 3 2 2 2 0 1 4 MC81LE HOME CWNED 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 SLEEPING ROOM MCTEL G TH ER TCTAL 24 14 31 17 3 5 29 HOURLY EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 44 27 72 38 19 0 44 HOUSE RENTED 19 14 37 22 4 4 23 APAR TMENT RENTED 2 1 3 2 0 0 2 MCBILE HCME RENTED 5 5 10 9 0 2 7 MOBILE HOME OWNED 16 7 27 9 4 5 21 SLEEPING ROOM 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 MOTEL 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 GTHER 3 2 3 2 1 0 3 TOTAL 89 56 152 82 28 14 103 ALL EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 59 36 94 50 22 0 59 HOUSE RENTED 23 16 42 24 4 6 29 APARTMENT RENTED 3 2 5 3 0 1 4 MCBILE HCME RENTED 8 T 12  !! O 3 11 ROBILE HOME OWNED 17 7 27 9 4 6 23 SLEEPING ROOM 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 MOTEL 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 OTHER 3 2 3 2 1 0 3 TOTAL 113 70 183 59 31 19 132

Table A-7 FOLLCW UP SURVEY WORKERS WHO MOVED INTO HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANT AREA PAGE 007 ,

SMITH RUN DATE 03/11/82 EMPLOYEES LIVING WITHIN THE CCLNTY TOTAL REPORI 18 ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 09-30-81 RUN TIME 090415 WITH TOTAL CHILOREN CHILDREN MOVE RS CHILOREN AUMBER IN IN MOVERS WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH WITHouT TOTAL SCHOOL CHILOREh SLbtCL SCHOOL FAMILY MuvERS FAMILY AhNUAL EMPLOYEES 9 6 19 12 4 1 10 HOUSE OWNED 9 7 2 6 3 0 2 HOUSE RENTED APARTMENT RENTED 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 MO8ILE HOME RENTED 2 2 4 4 0 1 3 0 1 0 4 MC8tLE HCME OWNED 4 1 1

$LEEPING ROOM 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 MOTEL

• OTHER 1 1 2 1 1 0 1 23 12 32 20 6 6 29 TOTAL

>0URLY EMPLOYEES 24 17 46 17 14 2 26 HCUSE OWNED 25 12 46 14 7 4 29 HOUSE RENTED 3 0 1 4 6 APARTMENT RENTE0 2 1 5 3 3 1 5 10 MOBILE HOME RENTED F 28 to 32 13 4 14 42 MOBILE HCME CWhEO

$LEEPING ROOM 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 MCTEL 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 OTHER 2 1 2 2 0 1 3 TOTAL 87 44 138 49 27 33 120 ALL EMPLOYEES 33 23 65 29 18 3 36 HOUSE OWNED 32 14 54 17 7 6 38 HCUSE RENTED 3 0 1 5 7 APARTMENT RENTED 2 1 7 5 11 7 1 6 13 ROSILE HCME RENTED 32 11 33 13 5 14 46 4081LE HOME OWNED 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 SLEEPING ROOM POTEL 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 3 1 1 4 OTHER 3 2 TOTAL 110 56 170 69 33 39 149 .

l l

Table A-8 FOLLCW UP SURVEY

• WORKERS WHO MOVED INTO HARTSVILLL NUCLEAR PLANT AREA PAGE 008 SUMNER RUN DATE 03/11/82 EMPLOYEES LIVING WITHIN THE CCUNTY TUTAL REPORT LB ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 09-30-51 RUN TI:4E 070415 WITH TOTAL CHILDREN CHILDRLN MOVERS CHILDREN huMBER IN IN MOVERS WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH h1 TH OUT TOTAL FAMILY SCHOOL CHILDREN SCFCCL SCHOOL FAMILY MOVERS AhNUAL EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 128 73 198 16 46 6 134 HOUSE RENTED 15 4 11 3 2 1 16 APARTMENT RENTED 14 3 8 4 1 14 28 MOBILE HCME RENTED MOBILE HCME OWNED 3 2 5 3 0 2 5 SLEEPING RUOM 1 1 3 2 0 1 2

. MOTEL OTHER 2 0 1 0 0 0 2 TOTAL 163 85 226 1C8 49 24 187 HOURLY EMPLOYEES HCUSE OWNED 96 60 154 21 32 5 101 HOUSE RENTED 41 20 59 30 11 6 47 APARTMENT RENTED 21 9 23 11 5 10 31 MOBILE HOME RENTED J 1 2 1 0 5 8 MODILE HCME OWNED 25 14 31 14 9 5 30 SLEEPING ROOM MOTEL 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 QTHER 5 2 5 1 1 1 6 TOTAL 191 106 280 138 58 13 224 ALL EMPLOYEFS HOUSE OWNED 224 135 352 177 16 11 235 HOUSE RENTED 56 24 70 33 13 7 63 APARTMENT RENTED 35 12 31 15 6 24 59 M08tLE HCME RENTED 3 1 2 1 0 $ 8 M0d t LE HOME OWNED 28 16 42 17 9 7 35 SLEEPING ROOM 1 1 3 2 0 1 2 MOTEL 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 GTHER 7 2 6 1 1 1 8 TOTAL 354 191 506 246 LOT 5F 411 1

e

Table A-9 FOLLOW OP SURVEY WORKERS WHO MOVED INTO HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANT AREA PAGE 009 TROUSDALE RUN DATE 03/11/82 REPORT 1B EMPLOYEES LIVING WITHIN THE CCLNTY TUTAL ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 09-30-81 RUN TIME 090415 WITH TOTAL CHILOREN CHILDREN MOVERS CHILDREN NU"RER IN IN MOVE R S WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH WITHOUT TUTAL SCHOOL CHILDREN SCHOOL SCHOOL FAMILY MOVERS FAMILY

. ANNUAL EMPLOVEES 5 12 8 3 0 7 HOUSE OWNED 7 5 4 0 2 5 HOUSE RENTED 3 1 0 0 0 0 4 5 APARTMENT RENTED 1 2

MOBILE HCME RENTt0 0 0 0 0 0 2 8 3 9 3 1 4 12 M08tLE HOME OWNED SLEEP!hG ROOM MOTEL 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 OTHER 9 25 15 4 LJ 32 TOTAL 19 HOURLY EPPLCYEES 18 8 26 14 5 2 20 NOUSE OWNED 34 HOUSE RENTED 27 19 50 21 16 7 9 3 12 3 1 10 19 APARTMENT RENTEC 29 15 25 13 3 14 MOBILE HCME RENTED 1 4 34 M08tLE HOME OWNED 30 17 45 24 11 1 1 1 2 3 SLEEPING ROOM 1 1 3 6 MOTEL 3 1 5 2 0 2 2 5 3 0 8 10 OTHER 105 58 16F 81 3F 50 155 TOTAL A LL EMPLOYEE S 25 13 38 22 8 2 27 HOUSE OWNED 9 39 HOUSE RENTED 30 20 55 25 16 3 12 3 1 14 24 APARTMENT RENTED 10 23 13 3 16 31 NC8tLE HOME RENTED 15 7 20 53 27 12 6 46 M081LE HOME OWNED 38 1 1 1 2 3 SLEEPING RDOM 1 1 3 6 MOTEL 3 1 5 2 0 2 2 5 3 0 9 11 OTHER

• 124 67 192 96 41 63 1d1 1

TOTAL 4

Table A-10 FOLLOW UP SURVEY WOAKERS WHO MOVED INTO HARTSVILLE huCLEAR PLANT AREA PAGE 010 WILSON RUN DATE 03/11/82 EMPLOYEES LIVING hlTHIN THE CCUNTY TalAL REPORT 18 ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 09-30-81 RUN TIME 090415 WITH TOTAL CHILDREN CHILDREN MOVERS C HI L DREN NUM8ER IN IN MOVERS WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH WITH00T l0TAL FAMILY SCHOOL CHILDREN SCF00L SCHUOL FAMILY MOVERS ANNUAL EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 57 33 78 4C 11 2 59 HCUSE RENTED 4 1 2 2 0 2 6 APARTMENT RENTED 5 3 3 3 1 3 8 MOBILE HCME RENTED MOBILE HOME OWNED 1 0 2 0 0 2 3 SLEEPING ROCM 1 1 2 1 1 0 1

• MOTEL 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 GTHER 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 TOTAL 68 38 87 46 13 11 T9 HOURLY EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 43 33 68 40 20 3 46 HOUSE RENTED 14 7 27 9 8 7 21 APARTMENT RENTE0 13 7 20 5 5 to 23 MOBILE HCME RENTED MC8ILE HCME OWNED 10 7 14 12 1 2 12 SLEEPING ROOM MOTEL OTHER 6 3 10 4 2 0 6 j TOTAL 86 57 139 TC 36 22 108 ALL EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 100 66 14o 80 31 5 105 HOUSE RENTED 18 8 29 11 8 9 2T APARTMENT RENTED 18 10 23 8 6 13 31

, NOBILE HOME RENTED

! MCSILE HOME OWNED 11 F 16 12 1 4 15 SLEEPING ROOM 1 1 2 1 1 0 1 MCTEL 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 OTHER 6 3 10 4 2 1 7 TOTAL 154 95 226 116 49 33 187 I

Table A-ll FOLLOW LP SLRVEY WORKERS WHO MOVED INTO HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANT AREA PAGE 001 ,

CARTHAGE RUN DATE 0 3/11/ 82 EMPLOYEES LIVING WITHIN TFE CITY LIMITS REPORT 1A ACTIVE EMPLOYEES C9-30-81 RUN TIME 090415 WITH TOTAL CHILOREN CHILOREN MOVERS CHIL DR EN NUMBER IN IN MOVERS WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH h1THOUT 10TAL FAMILY SCHOOL CHILOREA SCHCCL SCHOOL FAMILY MOVERS AhNUAL EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWhED 1 1 3 3 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 2 MOUSE RENTED 1 1 APARTMENT RENTED 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 ROBILE HOME RENIED 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 MOBILE HOME OWhED SLEEPING RDOM 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 MOTEL '

OTHER TOTAL 2 1 4 3 0 5 7 l

HOURLY EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 3 2 3 1 1 0 3 HOUSE RENTED 5 2 7 2 0 0 5 0 1 2 3 APARTMENT RENTED 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 3 NCBILE HCME RENTED L 1 MOBILE HCME CWNED 7 2 5 2 0 3 10 SLEEPING ROOM 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 MOTEL 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 TOTAL 18 7 IT S 2 9 27 ALL EMPLOYEES 4 3 6 4 1 1 5 HOUSE OWNED 4 HOUSE RENTED 6 2 8 2 0 1 1 0 1 3 4 4PARTMENT RENTED 1 1 1 0 0 0 3 4 MOSILE HOME RENTED 1 1 MCBILE HCME OWNEC 7 2 5 2 0 3 '1 i SLEEPING ROOM 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 NOTEL 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 T O T AL 20 8 21 8 2 14 34 .

._ . - . - _ . - _ _ . . _ . , _ _ _ . , . . - , _ _ m _

~

F Table A-12 FOLLCW UP SURVEY

. WORKERS WHG MOVED INTO HARTSWILLE NUCLEAR PLANT AREA PAGE 002 GALLATIN RUN DATE 03/11/82 EMPLOYEES LIVING WITHIN TFE CITY LIMI TS REPORT 1A ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 09-30-81 RUN TIME 090415 WITH TOTAL CHILDREN CHILDREN MOVERS CHILDREN huMBER IN IN MOVERS WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH W I THOUT TOTAL FAMILY SCHOOL CHILDREN SCbCCL SCHOOL FAMILY MOVERS ANNUAL EMPLCVEES HOUSE OWNED 35 18 43 21 6 2 37 HOUSE RENTED 5 1 4 1 0 1 6 APARTMENT RENTED 8 2 - 6 3 0 7 15 MOBILE HCME RENTED MC8tLE HCME OWNED 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 SLEEPING ROOM J 0 0 0 0 1 1

. NOTEL OTHER TOTAL 49 21 53 25 6 12 61 HOURLY EMPLOYEES HCUSE OWNED 27 16 35 20 9 1 28 HOUSE RENTED 18 7 22 8 4 1 19 APARTMENT RINTED 12 7 14 6 5 4 16 NOBILE HOME RENTED 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 MCBILE HOME CWNED to 5 10 3 3 0 10 SLEEPING ROOM MCTEL OIHER 2 1 2 1 0 1 3 TOT AL 69 36 83 18 21 10 T9 ALL EMPLOVEE S HOU$E OWNED 62 34 78 41 15 3 65 HCUSE RENTED 23 8 26 9 4 2 25 APARTMENT RENTED 20 9 20 9 5 11 31 MOBILE HEME RENTED 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 N081LE HOME OWNED t1 5 10 3 3 1 12 SLEEPING RCCM 0 0 C 0 0 1 1 MOTEL OTHER 2 1 2 1 0 1 3 TOTAL 118 57 136 63 27 22 140 l'

l i

l

s l .

Table A-13 .

FCLLCW UP SURVEY WORKERS WHO MOVED INTO HAR T SVILL E NUCLEAR PLANT AREA PAGE 003 ,

HARTSVILLE RUN DATE 03/11/82 EMPLOYEES LIVING WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS REPORT 1A ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 09-30-81 RUN TIME 090415 WITH TOTAL CHILDREN CHILOREN MOVERS CHILDREN NUMBER IN IN MOVE R S WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH WITHOUT TOTAL FAMILY SCHOOL CHILDREN SCFn0L SCHOOL FAMILY MOVERS A hhUAL EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 3 2 6 3 1 0 3 HOUSE RENTED 1 1 5 4 0 1 2 APARTMENT RENTED 1 0 0 0 0 4 5 MCBILE HCME RENTLD 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 M081LE HOME OWNED 3 0 2 0 0 3 6 SLEEPING ROOM MOTEL

• OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 TOTAL 8 3 13 7 1 11 19 HOURLY EMPLOYEES .

HCUSE OWNED 8 3 10 5 2 1 9 HOUSE RENTED 12 8 19 9 7 3 15 APARTMENT RENTED 9 3 12 3 1 9 18 MOBILE HOME RENTED 9 5 15 9 2 12 21 MOBILE HOME OWNED 15 8 17 10 5 4 19 SLEEPING ROOM 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 MOTEL 2 1 4 2 0 1 3 OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 7 7 TOTAL 56 29 78 re 18 39 95 A LL EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 11 5 th 8 3 1 12 HOUSE RENTED 13 9 24 13 7 4 17 APARTMENT RENTED 10 3 12 3 1 13 23 MOBILE HOME RENTED 9 5 15 9 2 14 23 MOBILE HOME CWNED 18 8 19 10 5 7 25 SLEEPING RDOM i 1 1 1 1 2 3 MOTEL 2 1 4 2 0 1 3 OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 TOTAL 64 32 91 46 19 50 114 .

Table A-14 FOLLOW LP SURVEY WORKERS WHO MOVED INTO HART SVILL E NUCLEAR PLANT AREA PAGE 016 HENDERSONVILLE RUN DATE 03/11/82 EMPLOYEES LIVING WITHIN CITY LIMITS REPORT 10 ACTIVE EMPLOYEES C9-30-91 RUN TIME 090415 WITH TOTAL CHILDREN CHILDREN MOVERS CHILDREN NUMBER IN IN MOVERS WITH IN OF GRACE HIGH WITHOUT TOTAL FAMILY SCHOOL CHILDREN SCHOCL SCHOOL FAMILY MOVERS A NNUAL EMPLOYEES HCUSE OWNED 6 2 4 2 1 2 8 HOUSE RENTED APARTMENT RENTED 4 1 2 1 1 5 9 MOBILE HCME RENTED MOBILE HCME GWNED SLEEPING ROOM MCTEL

, O TH ER TOTAL 10 3 6 3 2 7 17 HOURLY EMPLOYEES HDUSE OWNED 18 11 34 19 7 0 18 HOUSE RENTEC 5 3 5 3 2 1 6 APARTMENT RE NTED 5 1 6 2 0 5 10 MOBILE HCME RENTED M08ILE HOME OWNED 2 0 1 0 0 0 2 SLEEPING ROOM MOTEL OTHER TOTAL 30 15 46 24 9 6 36 ALL EMPLOYEES POUSE OWNED 24 13 38 21 8 2 26 HOUSE RENTED 5 3 5 3 2 1 6 APARTMENT RENTED 9 2 8 3 1 10 19 MCBILE HCME RENTED MOSILE HCME OWNED 2 0 1 0 0 0 2 SLEEPING ROOM MOTE 1 OIHER TOTAL 40 18 52 27 11 13 53 s

'tw 4 S

L w ,

f Y I

• g si g 4

' ~

mmm m- a- -- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ - - - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - _ _ . _ _ _ _

Table A-15 FOLLOW UP SURVtY WORKERS kHO MOVE 9 INTO HARTSVILLE NUCLE AR PL ANT ARE A PAGE 004 .

LAFAYEiff RUN DATE 03/11/82 EMPLOYEES LIVING hlTHIN TFE CITY LtdliS REPORT 1A ACTIVE EMPLOYtES C9-30-81 RUN ilME 090415 WITH 10TAL CHILCREN CHILOREN MOVERS CHILCREN NUMBER IN IN PCVE R S WITH IN CF GRACE FIGH W!iHOUT TOTAL FAMILY SCHOOL C H IL CR E N SCHCOL SCHOOL FAMILY POVERS thNUAL EMPL0 FEES HOUSE OWNED 3 2 4 3 1 0 3 -

HOUSE RENTE0 2 1 4 1 'O 2 4 4PARTMENT RENTED 1 1 2 1 0 1 2 MOBILE HCME RENTED 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 MOBILE HOME ChhE0 SLEEPING ROOM MOTEL .

OTHER TOTAL 7 5 9 6 1 3 10 HCURLY EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 23 15 39 23 10 0 73 HCUSE RENTED 9 6 17 8 1 2 11 APARTMENT RENTED 2 1 3 2 0 0 2 MCBILE HCME RENTED 3 3 6 6 0 1 4 NOBILE HOME OWNED 3 2 10 3 1 1 4 SLEEPING ROOM 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 MOTEL 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 OTHER TOTAL 40 27 75 42 12 6 46 ALL EMPLOYEES HCUSE OWhED 26 17 43 26 11 0 26 HOUSE RENTED 11 7 11 9 1 4 15 APARTMENT RENTED 3 2 5 3 0 t 4 MOBILE HOME RENTED 4 4 7 7 0 1 S MCBILE HCME UhhED 3 2 to 3 1 1 4 SLEEPING ROOM 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 MOTEL 0 0 3 0 0 1 1 OTHER TOTAL 47 32 84 4R 16 9 $6

• l l

Table A-16 FOLLCW UP SURVEY WORKERS WHO MOVED INTO H AR T SV IL L E NUCLEAR PLANT AREA PAGE 005 LEBANON RUN DATE 03/11/82 EMPLOYEES LIVING WITHIN TFE CITY LIMITS RE PORT 1A ACTIVE EMPLOYEES C9-3C-81 RUN TIME 090415 WITH TOTAL CHILDREN CHILOREN MOVERS C HILDR EN NUMBER IN IN MOVERS WITH IN CF GRACE blGH WITHOUT TOTAL FAMILY SCHOOL CHILOREN SCHOCL SCHOOL FAMILY FOVERS ANNUAL EMPLOYEES NOUSE OWNED T 4 9 4 1 0 7 HOUSE RENTED APARTMENT RENTED 3 1 1 1 U 3 6 MCBILE HCME RENTED NOBILE HOME ChNED 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 SLEEPING ROOM MOTEL 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 DTHER 0 0 0 C 0 1 1 TOTAL 10 5 9 5 1 6 16 6 00RLY EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 5 4 9 7 1 1 6 HOUSE RENTED 1 0 0 0 0 3 4 APARTMENT RENTED 6 3 10 2 2 9 15 RCBILE HCME RENTED MOBILE HCME OWNED 3 2 3 2 1 1 4 JLEEPING ROCM MOTEL OTHER 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 TOTAL 16 10 23 12 4 14 30 ALL EMPLOYEES

. HOUSE OWNED 12 8 17 11 2 1 13 HOUSE RENTED 1 0 0 0 0 3 4

, APARTMENT RENTED 9 4 11 3 2 12 21 MOBILE HCME RENTED MOBILE HOME OWNED 3 2 3 2 1 2 5 SLEEPING ROOM MOTEL 0 0 0 C 0 1 1

, OTHER 1 1 1 1 0 1 2 TOTAL 26 15 32 IF 5 20 46 l

l

Appendix B SECONDARY SOCICECONQ4IC IMPACT MONITORING OF ILUtTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANTS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AREA Secondary impact is defined as a temporary increase in the trade and service related resident population of the five-county area having an impact on community facilities and services which can be attributed to the Hartsville construction project.

TVA's monitoring program will consist of a three-step procedure during each reporting period for estimating and reconciling population changes for each of the impact area counties. Residential customers of power distributors and school enrol.1 ment will be used to provide independent estimates of county residential population change during a given reporting period. Population for the beginning of the first reporting period will be estimated by applying the procedure outlined in Step I-below to the most current estimate of county population provided by U.S. Bureau of the Census Current Population Reports. Subsequent estimates of population for the i start of a reporting period will be the TVA estimate at the end of the previous reporting period and will be adjusted each time more current census estimates are available.

An estimate of secondary impact win be made using the following three-step process.

Step I Ratios of school enrollment and residential customers to population will be calculated at the beginning of the reporting period for each of the impact area counties. These ratios will be applied to the number of resi-dential customers and school enrollment at the end of the period. This yields two estimateu of population change during the reporting period.

These two estimates are averaged to produce a-single estimate of population

. change for each of the impact area counties.

Step II Project employment population, taken from TVA employee surveys, will be subtracted from total adjusted population. If a residual population is derived, the analysis will continue to Step III.

Step III This step comprises an analysis of nonproject related primary employment and its secondary effect to determine what part of the remaining unexplained population change should not be attributed to the project. .

An estimate of change in ' total employment in each of the impact area counties during the reporting period is made using monthly data from ,

the " CPS Labor Force Summary" produced by the Tennessee Department of Employment Security. In order to determine that part of the change in total employment which can be attributed to forces other than the construction project, it is necessary to estimate the change in nonproject related employment. Change in nonproject related primary employment is estimated using a linear interpolation of primary employment as a percent of total employment in 1970 and projected to 1980, as given in the 1974 report by the Tennessee State Planning Office, Tennessee Migration, Population Families, Income and Mancower Demand Projections to 1990 for Development Districts and Counties. A ratio of .65 will be applied to the chan6e in nonproject .

related primary employment to determine that part of the change in secondary employment which can be considered nonproject related. The total employment ,

change is converted to population using an average family size of three and subtracted from any unexplained population remaining. [~Ifthereisnoother explanation for the remaining population, then the possibility of it being the result of secondary employment does exist. However, there may be a delay of undet7rmined duration between a change in employment and the resultant change in popu_'ation. Therefore, the unexplained population in any particular county should persist through more than ene reporting period before it is termed as secondary impact._[

As results of the 1980 Census of Population or any other special census or census estimates are published, the population base of the impact area counties will be recalibrated. Residential customers, school enrollment, and total population will be recorrelated. Essentially, a new population base will be estimated from which to measure change throughout the remainder of the monitoring period. -

l 1

[~ Revised 3/16/78]

I .

. Appendix C TRAFFIC LEVEL DEFINED Level of Service D Level of service D approaches unstable flow, with tolerable operating speeds bein6 maintained though considerably affected by changes in operatir.g conditions. Fluctuations in volume and temporary restrictions to flow may cause substantial drops in operating speeds. Drivers have little freedom to maneuver, and comfort and convenience are low, but conditions can be tolerated for short periods of time.

Source: Highway Capacity Manual, Highway Research Board Special Report 87, 1965 4

4 I

i l-i l

s Appendix D-1 EMPLOYEE QUESTIONNAIRE - TRADES AND LABOR .

NAME ' SOCIAL SECURITY NO.

LAST F IP.5T

3. WHE RE DIO YOU LIVE ttE FOP.! *,,EGINNING WORK ON THl$ PROJECTP CITY COUNTY STATE

7. WHERE ARE YOU NOW LIVING DURING THE WORK WEEKP STREET ADDRESS CITY COUNTY STATE 1 00 YOU LIVE INSIDE THE C1TY LIMITSP YES NO 4 HOW OID YOU OBTAIN MOST OF THE TRAINING THAT PREPARED YOU FOR YOUR PRESENT ,

TRADE OR TYPE OF WORKP (CHECAC ONLY OrJE)

1. HIGH 5CHOOL _

4. arf /.ED SERVICES-

2. COLLEGE 5. ON THE JOB BUT NOT FORMAL

3. VOCATIONAL SCHOOL OR FORMAL APPR ENTICESHIP PROG R AM ,

APPRENTICESHIP PROGHAM _ 6. OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)

5. IMMEDI ATE LY BEFORE ACCEPTING EMPLOYMENT ON THIS PROJECT WHAT WAS YOUR LASTJO8 (SUCH AS ST E AMFITTING, LABOR E R. F ARMING. M AINTEN ANCE. ETC.)?

6. WHAT TYPE OF BUSINESS WERE YOU IN ($UCH AS MANUFACTURING. CONSTRUCTION, REPAIR OR MAINTENANCE SHOP, ETCJP

7. WHERE WAS THIS BUSINESS LOCATE DP l CITY STATE

5. CHEC< WHsCH TYPE OF RESIDENCE IN THE PROJECT ARE A WHE RE YOU NOW LIVE.

t. BOARoeraC OR SLEEPING ROOM _ 4. MOsttE HOME

7. MO T E L E HOUSE

3. AFARTMENT 6. OTHEH (PLEASE SPECIFY)

9. IF YOU LIVE IN A HOUSE On MORILE HOME IN THE PROJECT arf A.00 YOU OWN IT7 YES NO

10. IN T HE PHOJECT ARE A, CHECK WITH WHOu YOU LIVE.

1. 8Y MYCELF 3. WITH HOOYM ATES, *

~

2. WiiH MY F AM8LY HOW M AN Y P

4. OTHf R (PLE ASE SPECIFYa t 1. HOW uaNY CHiLCHEN LIVE WITH YOU IN THE PROJECT AHE AP

• OF THESE, HOW MANY GO TO GR ADE SCHOOLP OF THE 5E, HOW uaNY GO TO HIGH WHOOt.'

t 7. HAVE YOU L8vtO AT YOUR PHESEN T A00RE'5 73 ORE THAN SIX MONTHS 7 YES NO TH ANic vois FOR COOPE H A TING IN THis $Unvf Y.

H AR T5yst t E NuCL( AR PL AN T P4EW E.'.1PLO VE E SURVEY

Appendix D-2

~

EMPLOYEE QUESTIONNAIRE - SALARY POLICY 3

NAME SOClAL SECURITY NO.

LAST FIRST

t. WHERE DIO YOU LIVE REFORE SEGINNING WORK ON THl$ PROJECT 7 CITY COUNTY STATE

! 2. WHERE ARE YCU NOW LIVl?JG OURING THE WORK WEEK 7 STREET ADDRESS CITY COUNTY STATE

, 3. CO YOU LIVE st*5101 THI CITY Lit.tiTSP YES NO 4 HOW DIO YGU 03TA4.*J ?. TOST OF THE TRAINING THAT PREPARED YOU FOR YOUR PRESENT TRADE OR TYPE OF WCRX? (CHECK ONLY ONE 0F THE FOLLOWING)

1. HIGH SOHCOL _

4. ARMEO SERVICES 2.COLLEG2 S. ON THE JOB SUT NOT FORMAL

3. VOCATICNAL SCHCOL TR AINING PROGR AM

_ 5. OTHER [PLEASE SPECIFY)

5. ifAMEDIATELY BEFORE ACCEPTING EMPLOYMENT ON THIS PROJECTWHATWAS YOUR LAST JOB (SUCH AS CLEECAL SICRETARIAL.ENGitJEERING ABOE, LA80RER.ETC.)?

6. WHAT TYPE OF EUS:tJESS WERE YOU IN (SUCH AS MANUFACTURING. CONSTRUCTION, RETAIL, SALES. SERVICES. ETC.)?

i

7. WHERE WAS THIS DUSIPJESS LOCATEO8 CITY STATE E. CHECK W?tlCH TYPE C' f4ESIDENCE IN THE PROJECT AREAWHERE YOU NOW LIVE.

l. 80 ARailid OH SLE EPING ROEAl _ 4. MOslLE HOME

2. VOTEL _ S. HOUSE

_ 1 APARTMENT

_ _ 6. OTHEH lPLEASE SPECIFY) j 9 IF YOU LIVE I?s A HOUSC CH M00sLE HOME IN THE PHOJCCT ARE A 00 YOU OWN 877 YES NO l

10. IN THE PROJECT ANE A CHECK WITH WHOM YOU LIVE.

l. SY !.tVSEL F 3. WITH HOOMMATES.

~

2. WITH MY F AMILY HOW DA ANY?

4. OTHER IPLEASL SPECIFY) ll. HOW P4ANY CHILDHEid LIVF WIDs YGU IN THE P8tOJECT AHE A7 OF THESE. HOW MANY CO T() Gil ADE SCHOOL 7 OF THESE. HOW Mat 4Y CO TO HIGH SCHOOL 8 92 HAVE YOU LIVEO AT YOUH PRESENT ADOnESS MORE THAN SIX MONTHS 7 YES NO l

THANK YOU F04 COO'E R ATI'dG IN TH'S SUHVE Y HAR TSVILLE *e JCL( AR PLAN T t.Ew EWLOvf E SURVEY e

l I

Appendix D-3 FOLLOW-UP QUESTIONNAIRE I

1. Do you still live at (Emolovee's Address)  ? -

YES. IF SO, SKIP TO QUESTION 2.

N O. IF NOT. PLEASE ANSWER THE FOLLOWING OUESTIONS:

WHERE ARE YOU NOW LIVING DURING THE WORK WEEK?

STREET ADDRESS CITY CJUNTY STATE DO YOU LIVE INSIDE THE CITY LIMITS 7 YES NO CHECK WHICH TYPE RESIDENCE WJ THE PROJECT AREA YOU LIVE IN

1. bO ARDING OR SLEEPING ROOM

2. MOTEL

3. APARTMENT 4 MOBILE HOME

5. HOUSE .

6. OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)

2. IF YOb LlVE IN A HOUSE OR MOBILE HOME IN THE PROJECT AREA.00 YOU OWN IT?

YES NQ

3. IN THE PROJECT ARE A CHECK WITH WHOM YOU NOW LIVE:

1. BY MYSELF

2. WITH MY F AMILY

3. WITH ROOYMATES. HOW MAfJY?

4 OTHE R (PLE ASE SPECIF Y) 4 HOW MANY CHILDREN LIVE WITH YOU IN THE PROJECT AREA?

OF THESE. HOW MANY GO TO GRADE SCHOOL?

OF THESE. HOW MANY GO TO HIGH SCHOOL?

t

5. HAVE YOU LIVED AT YOUR PRESENT ADDRESS MORE THAN SIX MONTHS 7 YES .NO a

6. H AVE YOU OR ANY OF YOUR F AMILY LIVitJG WITH YOU IN THE PROJECT AREA HAD ANY DIF FICULTY OOTAINING HE ALTH TREATMENT?

YES IF SO, CHECK THOSE WHICH YOU HAD OlFFICULTY OBTAINING:

DOCTOR (NOT EMERGENCY)

OE N TIST EMERGENCY MEDICAL TREATMENT j HOSPI TAllZATION .

OTHE R (PLE ASE SPECIFY)

NO

7. H AVE YOUOR ANY OF YOUH FAMILY LIVING WITH YOU IN THE PROJECT ARE A HAD TO TRAVEL .

OUTS 40E YCUR PRESENT COUNTY TO OSTAIN HEALTH TREATNIENT?

YES. IF SO. WH AT WAS THE SERVICE AND WHERE DID YOU HAVE TO GO?

NO TH ANe( YOU FOR COOPE R A TING IN THIS SURVEY.

H ARTSVILLE NUCLE AR PL AN T FCL(Q Aup

Appendix E Socioeconomic Monitoring Cycle Time Required from Official .,

Survey Date* Activity 2 weeks Allow for personnel paperwork 3 weeks Print address labels, survey forms and mail to project.

3 weeks Conduct survey and return forms.

2 weeks Code forms, update files, produce tables, and send tables to coordinator.

4 weeks Contingency time for reproduction, mail, or project site problems.

2 weeks Prepare first two sections of report and send to functional staff.**

- 3 weeks Functional staffs draf t sections and submit them.

4 weeks Prepare and distribute draft report and receive comments.

2 weeks Incorporate comments and send final report to reproduction.

2 weeks Printing.

2 weeks Contingency time for mail, typing, or other delays.

1 week Distribute reports.

• The survey date for each project is the last day a person can be hired and still be surveyed.

• • Functional staff are those dealing with specific areas such as education or health.

Q

-s ..h-' -

aw .

c.:, , - %,~ .. y r, eu. - 9

.k

, v,6 i y

• n \uv.a.. \ / .

opw.n. /u.

. s._ .3 p j *l.

g " I' ;--i j - rjC!g'

.. i - . . ~ v N. q ~ .

- e 9

- . < - ~

1

... :.r""~"i [ ,, s.

f, q

~

\ hdv c n [c . - }N g. \ /A-x

/ sy b

~

TJG(,u y' - .. -

• ~ ~ ~

.;i

- i

,< =:Q%. q\. ".,p ' .

f._5

/1 i.

,... f. 3,..,,.

s. 3.. *. e r$mog gna _<  ;

J

, s.._.....

f. / .. , g F rg'\ ./ ,*'s

. . . _ - . 1

. . ,- ,,. r-, e.

w. .

-m 'l l .. -

- /

. ..- ----.- ,/ L .... . L.__ ~< cW L. W.s *T

.. L ,")' %' o.

. .. _.t.v. 3.PCL,.';.L .-"

/ ~~m -I; s-, w V *Vm c -7 :- : , r-- -- -- ,.

=- ,oJ, '

t5 ff - - - -

- \ . . J u .. -

s > .. - - - - \y. -

cV' ..:d. "~~re ,;: -. b ~-- N -

e n

.^" @==, - ' =:-

.*-'.x 1._.

. - _s.=

1. "'-Si "s /

't::" M O-A ' A Le . s suunon

' P" i -- " - '-

.s. g / A.E

" U)m a N .. . #

-- ( l

..i.c  ;

SO'7Ilf~ J --.t Q--7n L ( ~~g. s g 3_

N *i _

Ml"./E,/...

P"-[jg:.-h.:: ' E2K i/ V..N) e a

"' T -

f ( ' k,,'a,.\ - y.

[

'T' --

a w . H M: * - -

[ ta ms.v.iu,g nucana Amar

.u>+ _ - l t u ..

4 3-'

c.

'--.~a s

~ r.~.t-. .# =~% 'r

\ ~. n,

u. -

.-.~L .9 t uauaT .. *

,--. g

,, /. g,,,. y _ y ,

f.,,,,,,, ,, .

, y '

..n. - -

~

'~. . $1 N , .

2.:N . ,

~

~'~ a

\ mum y u" * .-a  % --

< -.s . ~ ,

n - ~ _ u. m -

4 * ' - ~ m ul * * ~ ' ' " '

^ '

5 -- W':' W .; m- &$ . . .l 5'...f'~">p L'I ?+,~~

L% x 4 y J}W

. o u n w e e V p- -

~

3. fr.]- ,e- ,=

N- ww-

_N.e -- - - -

k.~,

-,w- --

.,, y :

< ;- _ .r6._ -m u .l 4  : 'Y sj  %.._. --.

3'. f- .e .! .

~

<m'. s -

'7'- 3,Harr',*

% .s m., ._.. s p/. .c. * '"y .,/

~~~

y .-... ..

_. d, . n\ . <g > ,,,7"~f

. x

~~

+

! n m. g.,~ y + --.V g-

- I g m , - / s -

4 --

- h m lx -. ~~; y s

. l. . ,-

N re/m: v e m ,.,s

'r .  ; { ,{.;l ,y--,

j . ,,,,, y+< . y,/

'/.e aq y

/r..m

~~ ..c .

x ,. =:

6 ,,,,.. ;'

+

M.,i

( J . ..

I g,,,.+( f 3 j v [ _C A % ,y,_g,, . 7,

,_y 4

%v ae w t. :&m a "'" j' d __m "

G s 1,i.;; w. s

.' a ~~~ i

> A -

la=.f j;,n. '-~-N J . 2 -. +

.\, Qr y ., J ,..u / . c-. v

..(,

y~ e I r s ,

. u m ,- . , .c.

Y ',4 g

~yl.

N s,- v- f f co- .ct.- h' 8 E-e.... 4 .T '%.-~ D O '  !

, .~ ^

'~

f n

\[) b. -.' 5 h

~ ' y ., u.i n ..~ -

i

~~~E '"

,_" Y ., @ -  ! FIGURE I

--4.~'.' .Dr.[.-- s i f"i %.

b \"" * \ " {

~

HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANT

]M*:h f ._W...

s f' t t hs _, . ,6 , ...L -- ' m{ t t TOWNS CONTAINING CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYEES 1

C "g '

~

' bY "'i"*

l [ A PLANT SITE --- RECRUITING AREA y 4 h, \;'*s a~..,.e d

,c w# y4.em . "y M

[E s~,7

- - - - - ^_ J ,,

- ~- ma m ist ' ;-' 44 SEPTEMBER 19 81 y d[,;h ..e*[--"4lm\,

. .- .- a is o is so

. . - . - ~ . - -

_; p ,

3 4 ~~'9/

l i

i 1 ..

[

f._,

'g'o c .

a h y'*'*'N

.arut 1 .

NOTE: TOWNS UNDERLINED CONTAIN EMPLOYEES SCALE oF MILES y _ a W u.d <, A .)

7 x --W sA s ~. .

t

_L

_ _ _ _ _ _ _