Text

Hartsville Nuclear Plants,Socioeconomic Monitoring & Mitigation Rept,Hnp SMR-10,810331
	ML20041C112
Person / Time
Site:	Hartsville
Issue date:	01/31/1982
From:	; TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
To:	;
Shared Package
ML20041C110	List: ML20041C109; ML20041C112;
References
	HNP-SMR-10, NUDOCS 8202260212
	Download: ML20041C112 (44)
	v • d • e

..

4.

l l

TRNNESSEE V/_LLEY AUTHORITY -

1 HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANTS SOCIOECONOMIC MONITORING AND MITICAfION REPORT HNP SMR - 10 March 31, 1981 t-t I

f I

I Knoxville. Tennessee l

January 1982

-4 8202260212 820218

^

PDR ADOCK 05000518 A

PDR

CONTENTS.

Page Background and Highlights.

v I.

General Status of Employment as of. March 31, 1981.

2 II.

General Characteristics of Movers.

4-III.

Secondary Employment 5

IV.

Functional' Area Impacts and Mitigation Actions 6

Tables-Table'l.

Estimates'of Population and Population Change between April 30, 1976 - March 31, 1981.....

6 Table 2.

School Systems' Report of Hartsville Nuclear Plants Direct Impact Students.

7-Table 3.

TVA Education Mitigation Operating Expense Payments.

8 Table 4.

TVA Local PJanning Assistance Payments 9-Table 5.

Traffic Evaluation.

11 4

Table 6.

Summary of TVA Mitigation-Expenditures as of March 31,_1981 14 Appendixes Appendix A - Detailed Survey Results-Table A-1.

Town of Current Residence.

17 Table A-2.

Source of Location of Construction Employees.

19 Table A-3.

Distribution of Movers and Associated Population by County and Community 20 Table A-4.

Comparison of Survey Results with Projections for Selected Parameters.

21 Table A-5.

Mover Summary.

22 Table A-6.

Macon - Employees Living Within the County 23 Table A-7.

Smith - Employees Living Within the County 24 Table A-8.

Sumner - Employees Living Within the County 25 Table A-9.

Trousdale - Employees Living Within the County 26 4

Table A-10.

Wilson - Employees Living Witnin the County 27

.,-.~-,,

y

1 CONTENTS (continued)

Page Table A-11.

Davidson - Employees Living Within the 28 County.

Table A-12.

Carthage -- Employees Living Within the City Limits................

Table A-13.

Gallatin - Employees Living Within the 30 City Limits.

Table A-l*.

Hartsville - Employees Living Within the City Limits.

31 Table A-15.

Hendersonville - Employees Living Within the City Limits.

32 Table A-16.

Lafayette - Employees Living Within-the 33 City Limits.

Table A-17.

Lebanon - Employees Living Within the 34 City Limits.

Appendix B - Secondary Socioeconomic Impact Monitoring of Hartsville Nuclear Plant Environmental Impact Area 35 Appendix C - Traffic Level Defined 37 Appendix D - Employee Questionnaire.

38 Appendix E - Socioeconomic Monitoring Cycle'.

41 Exhibits Figure 1 - Towns Containing Construction Employees 42

MTSVII E NUCLEAR PLANTS SOCIOECONOMIC MONITORING AND MITIGATION REPORT; Background and Highlights v

In permits to construct.the four-unit Hartsville Nuclear Plants located in Smith and Trousdale Counties, Tennessee, TVALagreed to undertake cer-tain monitoring and mitigation actions to reduce the socioeconomic impact caused by the inmoving population for the construction project. 'The impact area is defined as Trousdale, Smith, Macon, Sumner, and Wilson Counties, Tennessee. TVA also agreed to report to the Nuclear Regulatory; Commission the results of the monitoring efforts and mitigation actions taken to mitigate the impacts.

4 This is the tenth in a series of semiannual reports which.TVA agreed to; submit to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission-to report on the results of TVA's socioeconomic monitoring and mitigation efforts for the Hartsville Nuclear Plauts. This report is for the period October 1, 1980, through-March 31, 1981.

There was a slight increase in the employment level this period from 5,137 employees to 5,255 employees. There was a very slight increase in the number of movers to all five impact counties this period, but the population influx to Trousdale and Wilson Counties was reduced slightly.

The mover rate was 34 percent for a total of 1,762 movers.

s TVA has made mitigation expenditures totaling approximately $8.5 million.

-Approximately $4.4 million of this amount was for employee transportation.

~

o-HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANTS

. SOCIOECONOMIC MONITORING AND MITIGATION REPORT W

I.

General Status of Employment as of March 31, 1981

.i In Hey'a' survey of all TVA employees as of. March 31, 1981, was conducted. The timelag between employment and survey enables employees who moved to make personal adjustments and'should-provide a better picture of employee distribution, family characteristics, and housing choice..The: employment" level was 5,255 employees, and information was available for 5,110 employees (97 percent). Of those who provided information, 1,714 employees.

indicated they had moved resulting in a mover rate of about 34 percent (table A-1).

Information on the family status and housing choice was obtained _ for those who moved (table A-5).

4 Extrapolating on a ratio basis to the total 5,255 employees, we cetimate a total of 1,762 movers. Of this total, 1,342 wovers-located in the.five impact counties; 105 novers located'in Davidson County and 315 moved to other counties. As shown'.n table A-1 and figure 1, local workers (nonmovers) are commuting to the project f rom a much more widespread area.

Information on the distribution of both movers and residents is fcond in tables A-1, A-2, and figure 1.

Additional information on the distribution and characteristics of movers is contained in

~

tables A-3 through A-17.

Table A-1 lists the town of current residence. This table is based on " Mailing Address" locations instead of jurisdictional locations.

All empicyees are asked to. provide a place name even though they may not live within any municipal limits. Figure 1 is based on this table. Table A-3 provides the movers' distribution which is based on city limits for the five impact communities and any other communities to which at least 50 employees moved.

Table A-2 shows both the origin and location of all employees. Tht.

diagonal line of the "From-To" tabulation shows resident employees.

For example, resident employees from Sumner County would be found by locating Sumner County in the "From" column and going across the table to the "To" column in which Sumner County also appears.

In this survey 738 residents of Sumner-County were employed at the end of March 1981. Mcvers are shown by all other data. For example, 19 employees moved from Sumner County to Trousdale County.

Table A-4 of this report series contains a comparison of-the survey results with the projections contained in the environmental impact statement (EIS). For a work force of approximately 5,000 employees, 54 percent had been projected to be movers. Ilowever, the survey found a mover rate of about 34 percent.

Sumner County is still' receiving the largest share of movers (29 percent) compared with the projected 20 percent. Even so, Sumner County has received fewer -

movers (517) than projected (568). The number of movers to Sumner County is close to that projected, but all other counties are receiving far fewer movers than expected. Macon County is receiving the smallest number of movers (161) compared with the projected (283).

l 1

-3 Smith and Wilson Counties were ~each projected to receive 568 movers; however, Smith County has received only 184 and Wilson Cour;ty.has received

~

a 226 movers.

McVer projections were made only for the five impact counties,

~but 105 movers have located in'Davidson County and 315 in other counties.

e The survey also indicated that 211 employees moved from Davidson County; and, of those, 164 moved to impact counties. The 315 movers are widely dispersed throughout numerous counties with no resultant, significant adverse impacts.

II.

General Characteristics of Movers Total Project--Table A-5 contains data on family status and characteristics-and housing choice for all movers. Table A-4 compares these results with TVA's projections of the characteristics on inmoving families. As 1

of March 31, 1981, 77 percent of those employees who moved brought their families; and 23 percent moved without their families. School-age children per family averaged 1.0 per family--the same as that projected, and the total average family size was 3.5 compared with the projected 3.0.

The survey of housing choice shows 58 percent are living in houses, 20 percent in mobile homes, 13 percent in apartments, 3 percent in motel and sleeping rooms, and 5 percent in other accommodations. The "other" category includes campers, motor homes, and vans.

Impact Counties and Communities

' Data on family status and characteristics and housing choice for movers into each impact county are contained in tables A-6 through A-ll and for movers within the city limits of each of the impact communities containing at least 50 movers in tables A-12 through A-17.

._z_.

Other Counties and' Communities TVA also accumulates data on counties and communities which~were not.

identified as-impact counties or communities in the original. impact analysis. Once the construction-related inmoving population' reaches a level of'50 inmovers for communities or.100'inmovers for counties, TVA begins monitoring and reporting impacts to ensure that no communities are inadvertently lef t out of the designated impact area. Hendersonville, with 72 inmovers as shown in table A-3, is a community which is being monitored. However, Hendersonville with an approximate population of 28,000 is not adversely affected by the influx of population it is servicing. David =0n County has receive. 105 movers. Detailed survey results for Davidson County are in table A-11.

The level.of movers into Nashville has dropped this period below the level which TVA monitors and reports.

III. Secondary Employment Secondary employment is defined as a temporary increase in the trade and service-related resident population which can be attributed to the Hartsville project. A population increase in a county which is greater than the number of movers directly attributed to the project or other primary employment increases indicates che possibility of growth from secondary employment.

The survey results of March 31, 1981, revealed an increase in project-a related population in four of the five impact counties from the September 30, 1980, survey. Only Wilson County experienced a slight decline in project-related population from the previous survey, 4

.w..

~ 5-Table l'contains data for the period of April 30, 1976, to March 31, 1981, covering the period from start of construction to the date.of the most current survey. All counties have experienced population change which a

cannot be explained by other primary employment. We have incorporated 1980 census population data in our population estimates, but do not have_the corresponding employment data from the.same census data source. All counties with the exception of Smith and Trousdale have

. experienced declines in nonproject-related employment since the last survey. Total employment-of Macon County residents has declined since the start of the project in April 1976, which is not consistent with the large estimated population increase. No firm judgment concerning secondary employment impact can be made until compatible resident employment a

data are available. The large unexplained populations in Sumner and.

Wilson Counties appear to be caused, at least partially, by the growth-in the Nashville SMSA.

IV.

Functional Area Impacts and Mitigation Actions Education--Monitoring direct impact on education continued to occur primarily through reports from the six school. districts and the Tennessee Department of Education. School-districts and the department submit reports in October and May of each school year showing the names of students whose parents are employed at the Hartsville Nuclear Plants, the school previously.

attended, school and grade in which enrolled, and essential attendance and transportation information. A summary of school districts reports is e

shown in table 2.

i I

?

Table 1 i

ESTIMATES OF POPUTATION AND POPLUTION CEANCE FOR MACON. SMITH. SUMNER. TROUSDALE. AND WILSON COUNTIES. TEW ESSEE FOR MONITORING SECONDARY SOCIO5t0NOMIC IMPACTS OF HARTSVILI.E NICLEAR PLANT CodSTRUCTION APRIt. 30. 1976 - MARCH 31, 1981 1

Remainder of Change in Population Population Change in Change in Project

Nonproject Related Population Possible Change in Eatinate Estimate Population Estimate Related Population Population as of From other

~ Population 4/30/76-3/31/81_

4/30/76 - 3/31/81_ 4/30/76 - 3/31/81 3/31/81 Primary Employment-Unemplained.

Macon County 13.602 16.086 2.484 511 1.973 0

1.973 Snith County 12.643 15.202 2.559 519 2.040 1.458 582 Sumner County 69.544 88.655 19.111 1.582 17.529 7.143 10.386 l

Trousdale County 5.232 6.245 1.013 631 382 237-145 o

Wilson County 45.709 58.040 12.331 683 11.648 4.395 7.253

TVA Employee Surveys.

Population estimates by Communit'y Economics.

I Comity Economics j

i 9

e e

a

7.;

6 Table 2 SCHOOL SYSTEM REPORTS OF HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANTS DIRECT IMPACT STUDENTS-March 31,.1981 Number of Children Number.of Children School System of Local Residents of Movers Total Macon County 193 132 325-Smith County 246 68-314 Sumner County 337 357 694 Trousdale County 145 120 265 Wilson County 213 43 256 Lebanon City 59 40 99 i

TOIAL 1,193-760 1,953~

TVA, the Tennessee Department of Education, and the six local school districts e

in the impact area have entered into agreements under which TVA provides funds for classrooms and schoolbuses to mitigate impacts, if any, upon educational services. No TVA mitigation payments were required during this period for clarsroom or buses.

.I a

Ali school systems in the Hartsville Nuclear Plant's project area are eligible to participate in School Assistance in Federally Affected Areas, Title I, Public Law 81-874 programs'in fiscal year 1981. Wilson County became-eligible for the first time in fiscal year 1978, Macon County in fiscal year f*

1977, and Trousdale in fiscal year 1976; Smith County, Sumner County, and Lebanon City were eligible and participated prior to fiscal year 1975. The l

number of students claimed by the four participating school systems in fiscal year 1976 was 983. In fiscal year 1977, 1,573 students were claimed by five

(

z

-, -participating school systems. In fiscal year 1978, the six' participating school systems claimed 2,467 students; in fiscal year 1979. 3,026 were reported; and in fiscal year 1980, 3,054 were reported..Even though therel is an increase of 28 students.for-fiscal. year;1980 over fiscal year 1979, there is an. apparent leveling off of TVA-related students.

Due to revenue shortfalls identified by TVA in the school operating budgets, TVA provided financial assistance to mitigate imoacts in the school operating budgets and maintain the quality of classroom instruction.

A summary of these payments is shown in table 3.

Table 3 TVA EDUCATION MITIGATION ~

OPERATING EXPENSE PAYMENTS (OCTOBER 1, 1980 - MARCH 31, 1981)

Macon County

$ 5,600 Smith County 9,825 Sumner County 20,200 l

Trousdale County 12,000 l

Wilson County 8,000 Lebanon City 4,300 l

TOTAL

$59,925 l

Housing--There was no change in the housing program for this reporting period.'

l l

l I

e.

_ 9_

Local Planning and Coordination Assistance--TVA is continuing to assist the. local' planning commissions affected by this project and has agreed to

~

. reimburse them for one-half of their cost obtaining the services of Tennessee State Planning Office for a-one-year period. The need for additional assistance. to -the local planning commission is evaluated and negotiated on a year-to-year basis as_ appropriate. A summary of these payments follows:

Iable'4 TVA LOCAL PLANNING ASSISTANCE PAYMENTS' Amount Paid Amount Paid Planning Commissions This Period To Date

~

ifartsville-Trousdale County S

5,567'

Smith Cou.;y 1,375 7,447 Sumner County 2,405

8,531 Wilson County 9,750 Carthage

'446 3,862

' South Carthage

~

2,225 Gordonsville 313 2,038

. Lafayette 2,094 i

Gallatin 1,562

_11,263 Lebanon 2,704-12,403 Hendersonville 781 10,482 Tennessee State Planning Of fice' 20,000 l

$9,586'

$95,662 TVA continues to provide annual support for the Hartsville Project' Coordination Committee for professional staff services. The committee is composed of the chief elected officials in the five-county impact area (five county judges

n

-10_

~

and the mayors'of the. incorporated towns within_the five counties). To

-date $275,000'has been provided to the committee with funding et $12,500 per quarter.-

-s Local Government Budgets-The impact 'of the'~Hartsville' construction -

~

project'on theIbudgets of local governments in the impact area is measured on an annual basis. This measurement..is'made by. comparing projected project-related revenues to projected project-related expenses to determine whether deficits will occur. 137A negotiates and executes contracts with local governments to provide payments.to cover.the amounts.

of any projected deficits' Payments made to local governments during this period are as follows:

City of. Carthage

$ 8,300 City of Hartsville 49,080 City of Lafayette 8,300-City of Lebanon

~7,000 Macon County 21,000 Smith County 40,000 Trousdale County 31,000 Wilson County 7,000-

$171,680 Water and Sewer--Of the $75,000 originally: paid' to Carthage for ' improvements to their water system which would increase their treatment capacity, $66,097 has been expended thus far for these purposes. The $8,903 remaining has been l.

increased by interest to $9,020 during the period the town has had the funds. TVA will continue to evaluate the water and sewage treatment systems in the impact counties to detect possible adverse mover impacts as

+

they occur.

l Health and Medical Services--Total expenditure for health this period was $5,000. This amount was awarded to Smith County to be used toward the t

L.

- ~

~

purchase of an ambulance. There were no other significant health impacts resulting 'from' the Hartsville proj ect. - ' Evaluation and monitoring of health

~

status and services are contir.uing as usual.

Intergenerat'ional Child are Program--TVA's contract with the Mid-Cumberland Human Resource Agency to operate the Hartsv'111e Intergenerational' Child' Care

Program ended on March 3, 1981. Payments of $23,439 were made this period, and TVA's role in this program has ceased.

Traffic--In accordance with an agreement between TVA'and the Tennessee

~ Department of Transportation, the department'has been supplying TVA with traffic counts for 12 locations on a quarterly basis beginning in October 1975. With approximately 5,300 employees, peak-hour traffic on Highway 25 was 480 vehicles per hour (VPH) east of the site and 850 VPH west of the site. Counts for other key highway segments are shown in the following table. Peak-hour volumes at all these locations are within'the limits of acceptable volumes for level of service D operation of these highways (see appendix C).

In an -ef fort to mitigate the peak-hour traffic volumes, TVA is continuing the mans transportation program (commuter vans and buses).

Table 5 TRAFFIC EVALUATION (October 1975 - March 1981)

Number of TVA Vehicles During-Commuter Peak Hour

Traffic 1975 1981 Highway 25. East of elant 120 480 350 Highway 25 West of Plant 120 850 700 Highway 25 West of Hartsville 290 770 500 Highway 25 West of 231 Junction 210 540 290 Highway 231 South of 25 Junction 150 290 140 Highway 231 North of Lebanon 150 280 120

The peak hour occurred during the 3-4 p.m. hour.

- Employee Transportation--During_this period.the Hartsville program continued to operate 24 buses as follows: _ Nashville - 8 buses; Gallatin buses; Lebanon and Lafayette - 2 buses each; Portland,.

Hermitage, Mt. Juliet, Murfreesboro, Hendersonville, ' Joelton, and Whitehouse, Tennessee, and Scottsville, Kentucky -~1 bus each. During -

.this same period, the number of vanpools operating to the plant site dropped from 56 to 46.

The average ridership on buses was 35 while the vans carried an average of 10 each. The transportation program is carrying 36 percent of the day shift employees in Agency-owned vehicles. This accounts for-approximately 520 cars being kept off the road. TVA's expenditure for employee transportation was approximately $390,201.

Local Recruitment'and Training--The Cooperative Craft Training Program for Boilermakers (one year full-time intensive training program) conducted at the i

Hartsville State Area Vocational Technical School graduated 26 boilermaker-

[

trainees on January 2, 1981. Twenty-five were placed at'the Gallatin Steam Plant in June, 1981 as Boilermaker Walder Trainee II.

One graduate could not be located.

Because of the reduced demand for boilermakers in the Hartsville area, the boilermaker program was discontinued after'the last class graduated.

t

,_y,,

, _., -n, w-r.we mrm~4np w

-==

m c'*-

~"*

'W"

^#

Recreation--TVA staff continued-to cooperate with local officials in an effort to identify potential impacts on localf recreational services.

Two agreements were executed'during the reporting period to mitigate t

increased demands on local recreation facilities. A contract for $46,650

}

was signed with Sumner County to assist in upgrading recreation facilities r

at 21 different school campuses throughout the county. The responsibility for Laplementing.these improvements will be shared by the Sumner County School Maintenance Department and local school and community groups.

TVA also entered into an agreement with the city of Hartsville and i

Trousdale County, Under it TVA is providing for $10,000 to assist in the restoration of.the old Ward School building. When completed,.the-facility will be used as a community center and will provide public meeting rooms and a regulation-size gymnasium. The.Hartsville/Trousdale 4

County Recreation and Parks Department will be responsible for all.

recreation programming at the r.ew facility.'

l l

TVA's payments for recreation mitigation projects this-period are:

Gallatin

$20,863 Hartsville 10,000 Trousdale 10,000 Macon

-32,000

$72,863

[

.., _... ~,.. _. _ _,,

,, ~ _.,

Table 6

SUMMARY

OF TVA MITIGATION EXPENDITURES AS OP MARCH 31, 1981 Expenditures-Expenditures This Period To Date Education

$ 59,925

$ 1,583,009 Housing 423,000a Local Planning and Coordination 34,586 369,357 Water and Sewer 38d,000b Health 5,000 113,772 Intergenerational Child Care Program 23,439 33,887 Local Governments 171,680 936,619 Employee Transportation 390,201 4,357,206 Recreation 72,863 211,738 TOTAL

$ 757,694

$ 8,408,588 a.

Includes $60,000 interest-bearing loan.

b.

Includes $125,000 noninterest-bearing loan, which was defaulted and written off January, 1981.

9

q

(

I s

(

e 9

e APPENDIXES e

D 9

-, Table A-1 FOLLOW UP SURVEY-TOWN OF CURRENT RESIDENCE RUN DATE 07/22/81 HARTSVILLC NUCLEAR PLANT EMPLOYEES RUN TIME 095129 ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 03-31-81 REPORT 2

MOVED TO ALRhA0Y TOWN TOWN IN TOWN TOTAL POPULATION ALEXANDAIA TN 11 34 45 640 8ANTER TN 11 48 59 1,314 CARTHAGE TN 62 126 188 2.491 COCKLVILLE TN 29 72 101 17,800 CROSSv!LLE TN 16 42 58 5,341 00WELLTOWN TN 7

15 22 329 GAINES0dRD TN 9

39 48 1,101 CALLATIN TN 297 355 652 13,362 CORDON SVIL L E TN 10 31 41 601 HARTSVILLE TN 247 178

~425 2.243 HENDERSONVILLE TN 78 135 213 28.000 LAFAYETTE TN 137 183 320 2,583 LEBANON TN 181 220 401 12,492 i

MANCHESTER TN 6

20 26 6.869 MURFREESBORO TN 21 37 58 28,700 NASHytLLE TN 50 426 476 469,000 PORTLAND TN 18 46 64 3.081 RED BUILING SPRINGS TN 14 49 63 956-SMITHVILLE TN 10 97 107 3,762 SMYRNA TN 5

7 12 5.698 30uTH CARTHACE TN 6

17 23 859 SPARTA TN 11 10 21 4e930 WESTPORELAND TN 23 61 84 1,423 WOODBURV TN 5

13 18 2.08T BETHPAGE TN 17 48 65 400 CASTALIAN SPRINGS TN 57 44 101 150 COTTONiawN TN 6

15 21 100 D I xOf4 SPRitdGS TN 55 28 83 100 GOODL E T TSVILL E TN 9

49 58 7.541 HERMITAGE TN 10 30 40 6.000 MADISDN TN 14 84 96 21.500 MOUNT JULIET TN 31 76 107 1,568 OLO HICKORY TN 12 50 62 6.000 PLEASANT SHA0E TN 17 32 49 150 6

R I DDL E TON TN 13 18 31 100 h1 TERT 0dN TN 6

27 33 1,061 hh!TE house TN 17 10 27 1.305 TOMPKINSVILLE KY 5

19 24 2.207 SUGTOTAL-A533 2791 432.

ALG000' TN 2

5 7

1.917 CELINA TN 3

19 22 1,370 CHARLOf fE TN 2

6 8

610 e

--n.

Table A-1 (Continued)

FOLLOW UP SURVEY TUWN UF CURRENT RESIDENCE RUN DATE 07/22/81 HARTSVILLE NUCLLAR PLANT EMPLUYEE5 RUN TIMC 095129 ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 03-31-81 REPORT 2

MOVED TO ALR E ADY 10WN TUWN IN TOWN TOTAL POPULATION CLARKSVILLE TN 1

8 9

44,900 UICKSON TN 2

5 7

16,377 GREEN BRIER TN 4

28 32 2,279 LA VERGNE TN 3

8 11 5,209 LIBERTY TN 2

19 21

.332 NCMINNVILLE TN 3

1 LL 11,610 AIDGETOP TN 2

5 7

810 SHELBYVILLE TN O

10 10 11,900 SPRINCFIELO TN 3

20 23 9,720 TULLAHOMA TN 1

6 7

15,577 AN T IOCH TN 2

17 19 900 ASHLAND CITY TN 4

13 17 2,027 8 RUSH CREEK TN 3

17 20 230 BUFFALO VALLEY TN 1

11 12 100 CHESTNUT MOUND TN O

7 7

125 CROSS PLAINS TN 0

8 8

261 DONELSON TN 1

12 13 25.500 ELMwuGO TN 4

13 17 100 GRANVILLE TN 0

5 5

100 HICKMAN TN 3

19 22 200 JUELTUN TN 1

18 19 900 LANCASTER TN 2

7 9

150 N055 TN 2

9 11 200 SILVER POINT TN 4

16 20 150 WHITLEYVILLE TN 1

5 6

50 GAMALIEL KY 0

5 5

431 SCO T T SVIL L E KY 4

71 75 3,584 ADOLPHUS KY 1

7 8

250 SUGTOTAL 61 407 468 OTHER 120 198 318 TOTAL RESPONSES 1714 3396 5110 HNP WORKFORCE TOTAL 5255 03-31-81 I

I

. Table A-2 FULLOW UP SURVEY SOURCE AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYEES RUN DATE.07/22/81 HARTSVILLE NUCLE AR PLAT 4T RUN TIME 095235-ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 03-31-81 REPORT 4

OTHER OTHER OTHER

I MP AC T COUN T I E S-------

REC.

TENN.

KENTUCRY F RO M --- TO TROUS D AL E SMITH MACON SUMN5R WILSON DAVIDSON C0 tt4 T I ES COUNTIES CUU'4T I ES OTHER I41 TOTAL TROUSD ALE (1) 180 10 8

26 4

4 4

1 237 SMITH Ill 8

335 9

4 12 4

9 1

1 383 MAC3M Ill 4

4 248 7

6 3

272 SUMNER Ill 19 6

11 73 8 11 15 12 3

2 817 WILSON Ill 9

8 2

18 328 9

11 6

391 DAVIDSON Ill 18 17 4

86

'35 697 2T 18 902 G THER RECRUI TING COUN 123 13 21 16 23 11 9

712 23 4

832 CTHER TN. COU?4iIES 131 94 55 37 146 69 27 3 fe 252 1

7 724 OTHER.KY. COUNTIES 131 4

7 10 4

2 13 40 ALADAMA 18 13

.7 55 25 7

7 1

12 145 ARXANSAS 1

2 2

4 1-1 1

12 CEORGIA 5

2 2

4 2

2 1

18 NISSISS!PPI 5

1 4

1 1

2 14 NORTH CAROLINA 1

1 3

3 1

9 SOUTH CAROLINA 1

2 1

2 6

CTHER STATES 48 26 38 83 33 17 12 14 1

36 308

- - TOTAL 426 499 393 1211 547 792 a40 320 22 60 5110 NOTE: DAT A ON DI AGONAL INDICATE F40NMOVERS e WITH THE EXCEPTION OF HOVES WITHIN A COUNTY.

ALL OTHER DATA INDICATE MOVERS.

Ill RECRUITING COUNTY I23 TENT 4ESSEE COUNTIESs CANN0ft, CLAY. DhKALD, JACKSON, PUTNAM, RODERTSON, RUTitE RFO RD kEt4TUCKY COUNTIES ALLEN. MONROE, $lt4PSUN 131 ALL CCUNTIES IN KENTUCKY AND TEt4NESSEE OTHER THAN RECRUITING COUNTIES I41 *0THER" INCLUDES NON-RESPONSES OR ERRONEDUS RESPONSES FOR CURRENT ADDRESS.

Table A-3 Hartsville Nuclear Plants

~ Distribution of Movers and-Associated Population by County and Community March 31, 1981 I

Percent Number I

of of Population Influx County Movers Movers School age Total Trousdale 14 254 154 631 Smith 10 184 131 519 Macon 9

161 145 511 Sumner 29 517 427:

1,582 Wilson 13 226 190 683 Davidson 6

105 48 259-Other Counties 18 315 230 885 2

Totals 100 1,762 1,325 5,070 3

Community Carthage 3

49 16 105 Gallatin 11 189 129 545 Hartsville 9

.163 78 359 Hendersonville 4

72 43 186 Lafayette 4

64 65 200 Lebanon

_JL 64 33 154 Totals 35 601 364 1,558 1.

Numbers extrapolated.

2.

Percentages may not add to 100 because of rounding.

3.

Within municipal limits.

Table A-4 Hartsville Nuclear Plants Comparison of Survey Results with Projections for Selected Parameters Employment Level - 5,255 I

Projected Surveyed Number Movers 2,838 1,762 Percent Movers 54 34 School Age Children 1,845 11,325 School Age Children / Family 1.0 1.0 Total Population 6,528' 5,070 Percent Number Percent Number Movers With Families 65 1,845 77 1,350 Movers Without Families 35 993 23 412 Percent Number Percent Number Housing Choice:

Houses 31 880' 58 1,029 Mobile Homes 47 1,334 20 361-Apartments 18 511 13 227 Motel and Sleeping Rooms 4

113 3

57 Other 0

0 5

88 Totals 100 2,838 100 1,762 Percent Number Percent Number Distribution by County:

Trousdale 30 851 14 254 Smith 20 568 10 184 Macon 10 283 9

161 Sumner 20 568 29 517 Wilson 20 568 13 226 Davidson 0

0 6

105 Other Counties IO O

18 315 Totals 100 2,838 100 1,762 1.

Numbers extrapolated.

2.

Percentages may not add to 100 hecause of rounding.

3 m

Table A-5 FOLLOW UP SURVEY WORKERS WHO MdVfD INTO HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR YLANT AREA PAGE 018 RUN DATE 07/22/81 MOVER

SUMMARY

REPORT 1F ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 03-31-81 RUN TINC 095119 WITH TOTAL CHILDREN CHILOREN MOVERS CHILOREN NUMBER IN IN MOVERS WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH WITHOUT ~ TOT AL FAMILY SCHOOL CHILOREN SCHCOL SCHOOL FAMILY MOVERS AhMUAL EMPLOYEES h0dSE OWNED 243 142 361 188 70 14 257 HOUSE RENTED 43 12 47 17 5

11 54 APARTMENT RENTED 27 9

19 11 1

38 65 POSILE HOME RENTED 7

6 7

7 1

4 11 POSILE HOME OWNED 20 6

22 5

2 11 31 SLEEPING ROOM 2

2 5

4 0

3 5

MOTEL 0

0 0

3 3

OTHER 5

1 3

1 1

3 8

TOTAL 347 178 464 233 80 87 434 HOURLY EMPLOYEES hCUSE OWNED 379 238 633 316 145 21 400 NOUSE RENTED 230 119 364 177 64 60 290 APARTMENT RENTED 95 35 93 33 17 61 156 POSILE HUME RENTED 62 28 84 46~

7 50 112 POSILE HCNE OhhED 155 77 211 102 41

'2 197 SLEEPIldG ROOM 5

2 7

2 0

11 16 MUTEL 7

3 7

4 0

24 31 OPHER 33 14 37 17 5

45 78 TOTAL 966 516 1441 697 279 314 1280 ALL EMPL0rEES HOUSE OWNED 622 380 994 504 215 35 657 HCUSE RENTED 273 131 411 194 69 71 344 APARTMENT RENTED 122 44 117 44 18 99 221 POSILE HOME RENTED 69 34 91 53 8

54 123 P0d!LE HOME OWNED 1 15 83 233 107 43 53 228 SLEEPING ROOM 7

4 12 6

0 14 21 POTEL 7

3 7

4 0

27 34 CTHER 38 15 40 18 6

48 86 TOTAL 1313 694 1905 930 359 401 1714 9

Table A-6 FOLLOW UP SURVEY WORKERS WHO MOVED INTO HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANT AREA PAGE 006 MACON RUN DATE O T/22/81 EMPLOYEES LIVING WITHIN THE COUNTY TOTAL REPORT

-18 ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 03-31-81 RUN TIME 095119-WITH TOTAL CHILOREN CHILDREN FOVERS CHI L DR EN NUMBER IN IN MOVERS WITH.

IN OF GRADE HIGH WITHOUT TOTAL FAMILY SCHOOL CHILOREN SCHOOL SCHOOL FAMILY MOVERS ANNUAL EMPLOYEES hDUSE OWNED.

12 8

17 11 2

0 12 HOUSE RENTED 7

3 11 3

2 2

9 APAR THENT RENTED 1

1 2

1 0

0 1

MOBILE HOME RENTED 3

2 2

2 0

2 5

MOSILE HOME OWNED 1

0 0

1 2

SLEEPING ROOM MOTEL C THER TOTM.

24 14 32 17

+

5 29 HOURLY EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED-52 31 82 39 21 3

55 POUSE RENTED 21 15 43 27 4

4 25 APARTMENT RENTED 3

2 5-3 0

0-3 PUBILE HOME RENTED

-10 5

18 9

0 3

13 MU8stE HCHE CWNEu 19 8

25 8

6 4

23 SLEEPING ROOM 0

0 0

2 2

POTEL 0

0 0

2 2

GTHER 3

2

-3 2

1 2

5 TOTAL 108 63 176 88 32 20 128 ALL EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 64 39 99 50 23 3

67 HOUSE RENTED 28 18 54 30 6

6 34 APAR TMENT RENTED 4

3 7

4 0

0 4

908ILE HOME RFNTED 13 7

20 11 0

5 18 M0alLE HOME OhhEO 20 8

25 8

6 5

25 SLEEPING ROOM 0

0 0

2 2

POTEL 0

0 0

2 2

CTHER 3

2 3

2 1

2 5

TOTAL 132 77 208 105 36 25 157 S

4 Table A-7 FOLLOW UP SURVEY-WORKERS WHO MuvEO INTO HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANT AREA PAGE 007 SHITH RUN OATC 07/22/81 EMPLOYEES LIVING WITHIN THE COUNTY TOTAL REPORT 18 ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 03-31-81 RUN TIME 095119 WITH TOTAL CHILOREN CHILOREN MOVERS CHILOREN NUMBcR IN IN MOVERS WITH IN OF

> GRADE HIGH WITHOUT TOT AL FAMILY SCHOOL CHILDREN SCHOOL SCHOOL FAMILY MOVERS ANNUAL EMPLOYEES FOUSE OWNED 10 6

17 10 4

1 11 HOUSE RENTED 7

2 6

3 0

2 9

APAR TMENT RENTED 0

0 0

1 1

P0 BILE HCME REATED 2

2 4

4 0

1-3 MOSILE HOME OWNE0 4

1 l'

0 1

1 5

SLEEPING ROOM 0

0 0

1

'1 M O T El, C THr.R 1

1 2

1 1

0 1

IUTAL 24 12 30 18 6

7 31 HOURLY EMPLOYEES FOUSE OWNED 32 23 60 25 17 2

34 HOUSE RENTED 26 11 45 19 7

4 30 A PARTMENT RENTED 5

1 4

0 1

6 11 PUBILE HOME RENTED 5

3 0

4 0

8 13 PCBILE HOME OdNED 33 13 37 17 4

16 49 SLEEPING ROOM 0

0 0

4 4

POTEL 1

1 1

1 0

0.

1 C THER 5

4 10 6

2 1

6 TOTAL 107 56 165 72 31 41 148 ALL EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 42 29 77 35 21 3

45 FOUSE RENiED 33 13 51 22 7

6 39 AFARTMENT RENTfD 5

1 4

0 1

7 12 POSILE HOME RENTED 7

5 12 8

0 9

I t, MODILC HOME CahED 37 14 38 17 5

17 54 SLEEPING ROOM 0

0 0

5 5

MOTEL i

1 1

1 0

0 1

GTHER 6

5 12 7

3 1

7 TOTAL 131 68 195 90 37 48 179 e

Table A-B FOLLOW UP SURVEY WORKERS WHO MOVED INTO HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANT AREA PAGE 008 SUMNER.

RUN DATE 07/22/81 EMPLOYEES LIVING WITHIN THE COUNTY TOTAL REPORT 18 ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 03-31-8L AUN TIME 095119 WITH TOTAL CHILDREN CHILDREN MOVERS CHIL DR EN NUMBER IN IN MOVERS WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH WITHOUT. TOTAL FANILY SCHOOL CHILDREN SCHOOL SCHOOL FAMILY MOVERS ANNUAL EMPLOYEES HOUSE OdhhD 141 84 221 112 45 7

148 FOUSE RENTED 11 2

9 1

L 2

13 APARTMENT RENTED 16 4

10 5

1 19 35 POSILE HOME RENTED NOBILE HOME OWNED 6

2 11 3

0 2

8 SLEEPING ROOM 1

1 3

2 0

1 2

MOTEL OTHER 2

0 1

0 0

1 3

TOTAL 177 93 255 123 47 32 209 HOURLY EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 106 64 168 91 35 5

111 HOUSE RENTED 60 34 103 50 14 15 75 APARTMENT RENTED 35 15 38 18 5

14 49 70DILE HOME RENTED 8

2 8

2 1

9 17 N08ILE HOME ChNED 28 16 41 18 9

7 35 SLEEPING ROOM MOTEL CTHER 5

2 4

1 L

2

-7 TOTAL 242 133 362 180 65 52 294 ALL EMPLOYEES

(

NOUSE OWNED 247 148 389 203 80 12 259 HOUSE RENTED 71 3o 112 51 15 17 88 l

APAR TMENT RENTED 51 19 48 23 6

33 84 l

NOBILE HOMc RENTED 8

2 8

2 1

9 17 NOBILE HOME UWNED 34 18 52 21 9

9 43 St.EEPING ROOM 1

1 3

2 0

1 2

POTEL OTHER 7

2 5

1 1

3 10 TOTAL 419 226 611 303 112 84 503 l

1

Table A-9 FOLLOW UP SURVEY WORKERS WHO MOVED INTO HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANT' AREA PAGE 009 TROUSDALE RUN DATE 07/22/81 EMPLOYEES LIVING WITHIN THE COUNTY TOTAL REPORT 18 ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 03-31-81 RUN TIME 095119 WITH TOTAL CHILDREN CHILDREN n0VER S CHILDREN NUM86R IN IN MOVERS WITH IN

~0F GRADE HIGH WITHOUT TOTAL FAMILY SCHOOL CHILDREN SCHOOL SCHOOL FAMILY MOVERS ANNUAL EMPLOYEES J

HOUSE OWNED 6

5 11 7

3 0

6 HOUSE RENTED 5

2 9

6 2

1 6

APARTMENT RENTED 2

1 1

1 0

6 8

MOBILE HOME RENTED 1

1 0

1 2

PCBILE HOME OWNED 7

2 6

1 1

5 12 SLEEPING ROOM 0

0 0

1 1

MOTEL C THER TOTAL 21 11 2T 16 6

14 35 HOURLY FMPLOYEES HGUSE OWNED 21 11 33 18 6

3 24 HOUSE RENTED 30 17 42 18 13 10 40 APARTHtNT RENTED 12 3

9 2

1 14 26 70 BILE HOME RENTED 25 12 33 21 6

20 45 PCBILE HCME OWNED 36 20

-54 26 11 8

44 SLEEPING ROOM 2

1 5

1 0

4 6

POTEL 4

1 5

2 0

10 14 CTHER 3

2 5

3 0

to 13 TOTAL 133 67 186 91 37 79 212 ALL EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 27 16 44 25 9

3 30 POUSE RENTED 35 19 51 24 15 11 46 APAR TMENT RENTED 14 4

to 3

1 20 34 N0dILE HCME RENTED 26 13 33 22 6

21~

47 NOBILE HOME 0aNED 43 22 60 27 12 13 56 SLEEPING ROOM 2

1 5

1 0

5 7

MOTEL 4

1 5

2 0

10 14 GTHER 3

2 5

3 0

10 13 TOTAL 154 78 213 107 43 93 247 I

l t

I i

__ Table A-10 FOLLOW UP SURVEY WORKERS WHO MOVED INTO HARTSVILLE N CLEAR PLANT AREA PAGE 010 WILSON RUN DATE 07/22/81 EMPLOYEES L1VING WITHIN THE COUNTY TOTA 1.

REPORT 18 ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 03-31-81 RUN TIME 095119 WITH TOTAL CHILDREN CHILOREN MOVERS CHILDREN NUMSER IN IN MOVERS WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH WITHOUT TOTAL FAMILY SCHOOL CHILDAEN SCHOOL SCHOOL FANILY MOVERS AhNUAL EMPLOYEES HOUSE UWNED 56 31 78 37 11 3

59 h0USE RENTED 6

1 2

1 0

3 9

APARTMENT RENTED 4

2 2

2 0

5 9

i MOBILE HOME RENTED 1

1 1

0 1

p.

70 BILE HOME OWNED 2

1 4

1 0

2 4

SLEEPING ROOM 1

1 2

2 0

0 1

POTEL 0

0 0

1 1

OTHER 0

0 0

1 1

TOTAL 70 37 89 43 12 15 85 HOURLY ENPLOYEES EDUSE OWNED 49 34 83 42 24 1

50 NOUSE RENTED 19 13 39 17 13 7

26 APARTMENT RENTED 20 9

23 7

6 6

26 PuaILE HOME RENTED 3

2 3

3 0

4 7

PCDILE HOME ChNED 15 8

18 14 1

3 18 SLEEPING RUGM MOTEL 0

0 0

2 2

CTHER 6

2 7

2 1

0 6

TOTAL 112 68 173 85 45 23 135 l

ALL EMPLOYEES

(

h00SE OWNED 105 65 161 79 35 4

109 HOUSE RENTED 25 14 41 18 13 10 35 l

APAR TMENT RENTED 24 11 25 9

6 11 35 P0b!LE HOME RENTED 4

-3 4

3 1

4 8

MOBILE HOME UWNED 17 9

22 15 1

5 22 SLEEPIhG ROOM 1

1 2

2 0

0 1

MOTEL 0

0 0

3 3

CIHER 6

2 7

2 1

1 7

TOTAL 182 105 262 128 57' 38 220 l

l i

L.-

i l

l i

t D

' Table A-ll FOLLOW UP SURVEY WGRKERS WHO MOVED INTO HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANT AREA PAGE 017 DAVIDSUN RUN DATE 07/22/81 EMPLOYEES LIVING WITHIN THE COUNTY - TOTAL REPORT 1E ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 03-31-81

-RUN TIME 095119 WITH.

TOTAL CHI LDR EN CHILDREN MOVERS CHILDREN NUMBER IN IN NOVERS-WITH IN OF GRADE FAMILY SCHOOL CHILDREN SCHOOL

. HIGH h!THOUT TOTAL SCHUOL FAMILY NOVERS AhNUAL EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 2

0 0

0 0'

2 4

NOUSE RENTED 1

1 3

1 0

0 1

APARTMENT RENTED-1 0

2 0

0 6

7 HOBILE HOME RENTED PCSILE HCME OWNED I

'4LEEPING R0rM POTEL OTHER 1

0 0

0 1

TOTAL 5

1 5

1 0

8 13 FOURLY EMPLOYEES HUUSE OWNED 26 14 29 16 6

1 27 FouSE RENTED 20 9

25 12 3

3 23 APARTMENT RENTED 15 4

15 3

1 13 28 POSILE HOME RENTED 1

1 1

1 0

0 1

70 BILE HOME OWNE0 3

2 3

3 0

0 3

SLEEPING ROOM MOTEL 1

1 1

1 0

3 4

CTHER 0

0 0

3 3

TOIAL 66 31 74 36 10 23

'89

, ALL EMPLOYEES t

F0uSE OWNED 28 14 29 16 6

3 31 HOUSE RENTED 21 10 28 13 3

3 24 APAR TMENT RENTED 16 4

17 3

1 19 35 ACdILE'HCME RENTLD 1

1 1

1 0

0 1

POSILE HOME OWNED 3

2 3

3 0

0 3

l SLEEPING ROOM MOTEL 1

1 1

1 0

3 4

C TH t R 1

0 0

3 4

TOTAL T1 32 79 37 -

10 31 102 l

l t

w-Table A-12 FOLLOW UP SURVEY WOAKERS WHO MOVt0 INTO HAR TSV ILL E PUCLEAR PLANT AREA PAGE 001 CARTHAGE RUN DATE 07/22/81 EMPLOYEES LIVING WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS REPORT 1A ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 03-31-81 RUN TIME 095119 WITH TOTAL CHILDREN CHILDREN MOVERS CHILDREN NUMBER IN IN MOVERS WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH WITHOUT TOTAL FAMILY SCH OOL' CHILDREN SCHOOL SCHOOL FAMILY MOVE RS ANNUAL EMPLOYEES FOUSE OWNED 0

0 0

-0 0

1 1

HOUSE RENTED 1

0 1

0 0

1 2

APARTHENT RENTED 0

0 0

1 1

P081LE HOME RENTED 0

0 0

1 1

MOBILE HCME CWNED SLEEPING ROOM 0

0 0

1 1

MOTEL OTHER TOTAL 1

0 1

0 0

5 6

FOURLY. E MPLOY E E S HOUSE OWNED 5

3 6

3 2

0 5

FOUSE RENTED 5

1 8

3 1

1 6

APARTHENT RENTED 3

1 2

0 1

4 7

POSILE HOME RENTED 1

0 1

0 0

4 5

MOSILE HOME OWNED 9

3 7

4 0

5 14 SLEEPING ROOM 0

0 0

2 2

PUTEL 1

1 1

1 0

0 1

OTHER 1

1 2

1 0

1 2

TOTAL 25 10 2T 12-4 17 42 ALL EMPLOYEES HCUSE OWNED 5

3 6

3 2

1 6

tt00SE RENTED 6

1 9

3 1

2 8

(

APARTMENT RENTED 3

1 2

0 1

5 8

P0dILE H0:4E REhTED 1

0 1

0 0

5 6

PCSILE HOME OWNED 9

3 T

4 0

5 14 SLEEPING ROOM 0

0 0

3 3

MOTEL 1

1 1

1 0

0 1

GTHER 1

1 2

1 0

1 2

TUTAL 26 10 28 12 4

22 48 Table A-13 FOLLOW UP SURVEY a

WORKERS WHO MOVED INTO HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANT AREA PAGE 002 GALLATIN RUN DATE 07/22/81 EMPLOYEES LIVING WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS REPORT 14 ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 03-31-81 RUN TIME 095119 WITH TOTAL CHILCREN CHILDREN MOVERS CHILDREN NUMBER IN' IN MOVERS WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH WITHOUT TOTAL FAMILY SCHOOL CHILOREN SCHOOL SCHOOL FAMILY MOVE RS AhNUAL EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 39 20 52 25 6

3 42 h00SE RENTED 4

1 4

3 0

1 5

APAR TMENT RENTED 7

2 5

3 0

8 15 P081LE HOME RENTED POSILE HOME OWNE0 4

'O 6

0 0

1 5

SLEEPING ROOM 0

0 0

1 1

MOTEL OTHER 0

0 0

1 1

TOTAL 54 23 6T 29, 6

15 69

~

FOURLY EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 37 21 49 29 12 2

39 HOUSE RENTED 27 14 41 17 7

2 29 APARTMENT RENTED 18 9

21 8

5 6

24 P OSILE HOME R ENTED 1

0 1

0 0

5 6

POSILE HCHE 0'NED 12 7

14 7

4 1

13 n

SLEEPING ROOM MOTEL CTHER 2

1 2

1 0

2 4

TOTAL 97 52 128 62 28 18 115 ALL EMPLOYEES house OWNED 76 41 101 54 18 5

81.

HOUSE RENTED 31 15 45 18 7

3 34 APAR TMENT RENTED 25 11 26 11 5

14 39 MOBILE HCHE RtNTED 1

0 1

0 0

5 6

PCdlLE HOME OWNED 16 7

20 7

4 2

18 SLEEPING ROOM 0

0 0

1 1

MOTEL C THER 2

1 2

1 0

3 5

TOTAL 151 75 195 91 34' 33 184 9

Table A-14 FOLLOd UP SURVEY WORKERS WHO NOVED INTO HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR % PLANT AREA PAGE 003 HARTSVILLE RUN DATE 07/22/81 EMPLOYEES LIVING WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS REPORT 1A ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 03-31-81 RUN TIME 095119 WITH TOTAL CHILDREN CHILDREN MOVERS CHILDREN NUMBER IN IN MOVERS WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH WITh WT TOTAL FAMILY' SCHOOL CHILDREN SCHOOL SCHOOL FAMILY MOVERS AANUAL EMPLOYEES FOUSE OWNED 3

2 5

3 1

0 3

POUSE RENTED 1

1 5

4 0

0 1

APAR TMENT RENTED 2

1 1

1 0

6 8

N08ILE HCME RENTED 0

0 0

1 1

70 BILE HOME OWNED 1

0 0

0 0'

4 5

SLEEPING ROOM 0

0 0

'O O

1 1

MOTEL CTHER-TOTAL 7

4 11 8

1 12 19 HOURLY EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 7

3 9

5 2

2 9

POUSE RENTED 18 12 25 13 9

4 22 APARTHENT RENTED 12 3

9 2

1 14 26 PUBILE HOME RENTED 15 7

17 11 4

17 32 NCBILE HOME OWNED 20 10 25 12 5

8 28 SLEEPING ROOM 2

1 5

1 0

4

'6 MOTEL 3

1 4

2 0

6 9

GTHER 1

0 0

7 8

TOTAL 78 37 94 46 21 62 140 ALL EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWhED-10 5

14 8

3 2

12 FOUSE RENTED 19 13 30 17 9

4 23 APARTHthi RENTED 14 4

10 3

1 20 34 POSILE HOME RENTED 15 7

17 11 4

18 33 NGBILE HCHE CANED 21 10 25 12 5

12 33 SLEEPING ROUM 2

1 5

1 0

5 7

NOTEL 3

1 4

2 0

6 9

GTHER 1

0 0

7 8

TOTAL 85 41 105 54 22 74 159 0

-.-r Table A-15 FOLLOW UP SURVEY WORKERS WHO MOVED INTO HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANT AREA PAGE 016 HENDERSJNVILLE RUN DATE 07/22/81-EMPLO' TEES LIVING WITHIN CITY LIMITS REPORT 1D ACTIVE EMPLOYELS 03-31-81 RUN TIME 095119 WITH-TOTAL CHILOREN CHILDREN MOVERS CHIL DREN NUM8ER IN IN MOVE RS WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH WITHOUT TOTAL FAMILY SCHOOL CHILDREN SCHOOL SCHOOL FAMILY MOVF.RS ANNUAL EMPLOYEES h00SE UWNED 5

2 4

2 1

2 7

h0USE RENTED APARTMENT RENTED 7

2 5

2 1

9 16 MCBILE HOME RENTED FOBILE HOME OWNED SLEEPING ROOM MOTEL OTHER TO TAL 12 4

9 4

2 11 23 HOURLY EMPLOYEES FOUSE OWNED 18 12 34 20 6

'O 18 HOUSE RENTED 5

2 5

1 2

4 9

APARTMENT RENTED 12 5

14 7

0 6

18 PCBILE HDME RhhTED MOBILE HOME OWNED 1

0 0

0 1

SLEEPING ROOM POTEL CTHER 1

0 0

0 1

TOTAL 3T 19 53 28 8

to 47 ALL EMPLOYEES hDOSE OWNED 23 14 38 22 7

2 25 HOUSE RENTED 5

2 5

1 2

4 9

APARTMENT RENTED 19 7

19 9

1 15 34 70blLE HOME RENTED POSILE HOME OWNhD 1

0 0

0 1

SLEEPING ROOM PCTEL OTHER 1

0 0

0 1

TOTAL 49 23 62 32 10-21 70

-4 r-Table A-16 FOLLOW UP SUAVEY WORKERS WHO MOVED INTO HART SV ILL E NUCLEAR PLANT ARE A PAGE 004 LAFAYETTE RUN DATE 07/22/81 EMPLOYEES LIVING WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS REPORT 1A ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 03-31-81 RUN TIME 095119 WITH TOTAL CHILDREN CHILDREN MOVERS CHILDREN NUMSER

-!N IN MOVERS WITH IN FAMILY SCHOOL.

- 0F GRADE HIGH WITHOUT TO T AL CHILDREN SCHOOL SCHOOL FAMILY MOVERS ANNUAL EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 3

2 4

3 1

0 3

FOUSE RENTED 2

1 2

1r 0

2 4

APARTMENT RENTED 1

1 2

1

.0 0

1 POSILE HOME RENTED 1

1 1

1 0

1 2

POSILE HOME OhNED SLEEPING ROOM POTEL CTHER TOTAL 7

5 9

6 1

3 10 HOURLY EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED -

24 15 41 20 11 1

25 HOUSE RENTED 11 8

23 15 1

2-13 APARTMENT RENTED 3

2 5

3 0

0 3

NOSILE HGME-RENTED 5

3 13 6

0 1

6 708tLE HOME OWNED 0

0 0

1 1

SLEEPING ROOM 0

0 0

2 2

MOTEL 0

0 0

1 1

GTHER 0

0 0

1 1

TOTAL 43 23 82 44 12 9

52 ALL EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 27 17 45 23 12 1

28 HOUSE RENTED 13 9

25 16 1

4 17 APARTMENT RENTED 4

3 7

4 0

0 4

POSILE HOME RENTED 6

4 14 7

0 2

8 6081LE HOME OnN63 0

0 0

1 1

SLEEPING ROOM 0

0 0

2 2

POTEL 0

0 0

1 1

CinER 0

0 0

1 1

T OT AL 50 33 91 50 13 12 62 9

.,n Table A-17 FOLLOW UP SURVEY WORKERS WHO MOVED INTO HARISV ILL E NUCLEAR PLANT AREA PAGE 005 LEBANON RUN DATE 07/22/81 EMPLOYEES LIVING WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS REPORT 1A ACTIVE EMPLOYEES -

03-31-61 RUN TIME 095119-WITH TOTAL CHILCREN CHILDREN MOVERS CHILDREN NUMBER IN IN MOVERS WITH IN OF

. GRADE HIGH WITHOUT TOTAL FAMILY SCHOOL CHILDAEN SCHOOL SCHOOL FAMILY MOVERS ANNUAL EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 8

4 10 4

1 0

'8 HOUSE RENTED APARTMENT RENTED 3

I 1

1 0

5 8

POSILE HOME RENTED MCBILE HOME OWNED 0

0 0

1 1

SLEEPING ROOM POTEL 0

0 0

1 1

CTHER 0

0 0

1 1

TOTAL 11 5

11 5

1 8

19 HOURLY EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 6

5 9

6 2

1 7

HOUSE RENTED 5

3 10 5

3 4

9 APARTMENT RENTED 13 4

12 4

2 5

18 POSILE HOME RENTED POSILE HOME OWNED 5

2 3

2 1

1 6

SLEEPING ROOM

0TEL 0.

0 0

1

-1 CIHER 2

1 1

1 0

0 2

TOTAL 31 15 35 18 8

12 43 ALL EMPLOYEES h0USE OWNED 14 9

19 10 3

1 15 HOUSE RENTED 5

3 10 5

3 4

9 APAR TMENT RENTED.

16 5

13 5

2 10 26

'70 BILE HOME RENTED P081LE HOME OWNED 5

2 3

2 1

2 7

SLEEPING ROOM MUTEL 0

0 0

0

.0 2

2 CTHER 2

1 1

1 0

1 3

TOTAL 42 20 46 23 9

20 62 9

4 / Appendix B ISECONDARY SOCIOECONQ4IC IMPACT MONITORING OF HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANTS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AREA

~

Secondary impact.is defined as a temporary increase in the trade-and service related resident population of the five-county area-having an impact.on community facilities and services which.can be attributed to the Hartsville construction project.

TVA's monitoring program.will consist of a three-step procedure during each reporting period for estimating and reconciling population changes for_each of the impact area counties. Residential customers of power distributors and school enrollment win be used to provide independent estimates of county residential population change during a given reporting period. Population for the beginning of the first reporting period will be estimated by. applying the procedure outlined in Step I below to the most.

current estimate of county population provided by U.S. Bureau of the Census Current Population Reports.. Subsequent estimates of population for the start of a reporting period will be the TVA estimate at.the end of the.

previous reporting period and will be adjusted each. time more current census estimates are available.

An estimate of secondary impact. win be made using the following three-step process.

Step I Ratios of school enrollment and residential customers to population will be calculated at the beginning of the reporting period for _each of the i

impact area counties. These ratios will be applied to the number'of resi-dential customers and school enrollment at the end of the period.- This yields. two estimates of population change during the reporting period.-

These two estimates are averaged to produce a single estimate of populaticn change for each of the impact area counties.

4 Step II Project employment population, taken from TVA employee surveys, will be subtracted from total adjusted population.

If a_ residual population is derived, the analysis will continue to Step III.

Step III-This step comprises an. analysis of nonproject related primary employment and its secondary effect to determine what part of the remaining

-unexplained population change should not be attributed to the project.

An estimate of change in ' total employment in each of the impact area. counties during the reporting period is made using monthly data from the " CPS Labor Force Summary" produced by the Tennessee Department of Employment Security. In order to determine that part of the change in total employment which can be attributed to forces other than the construction project, it is necessary to estimate the change in nonproject related employment. Change in nonproject related primary employment'is estimated using a linear interpolation of primary employment as a percent of total employment in 1970 and projected to 1980, as given in the 1974 report by the Tennessee State Tlanning Office, Tennessee Migration, Population Families, Income, and Manpower Demand Projections to 1990 for Development Districts and Counties. A ratio of.65 will be applied to the change in nonproject related primary employment to determine that part of the change in secondary employment which can be considered nonproject related. The total employment change is converted to population using an average family size of three and.

subtracted from any unexplained population remaining. [~Ifthereisnoother explanation for the remaining population, then the possibility of it being the result of secondary employment does exist. However, there may be a delay of undetermined duration betwaen a' change in employment and the resultant; change in population. Therefore, the unexplained population in any particular county should persist through more than one reporting period before it is termedassecondaryimpact.]

As results of the 1980 Census of Population or any other special census or census estimates are published, the population base of the impact area counties will be recalibrated. Residential customers, school enrollment, and total. population will be recorrelated. Essentially, a new population base will be estimated from which to measure change throughout the remainder of the monitoring period.

j[ Revised 3/16/78j7

L37-Appendix C.

TRAFFIC-LEVEL DEFINED Level of Gervice -D Level of service D approaches unstable flow, with tolerable operating speeds bein6 maintained though considerably affected by chan6es in operati=g conditions. Fluctuations in volume and temporary restrictions to flow may cause substantial drops in operating speeds. Drivers have little freedom to maneuver, and comfort and convenience are low, but conditions can be tolerated for short periods of' time.

Source:

Highway Capacity Manual, Highway Research Board-Special Report 87, _1%5, 1

6 a

4

-y.

9

4 Appendix D-1 EMPLOYEE QUESTIONNAIRE - TRADES AND LABOR NAME SOCIAL SECURITY NO.

LAST FIRST f.

WHIRE 010 YOU LlVE BEFORE LEGINNING WORK ON TH15 PROJECT 7 CITY COUNTY STATE 2.

WHERE ARE YOU NOW LivlNG OURING THE WORK WEEK 7 STREET ADDRESS CITY COUNTY

'5 TATE 1-DO YOU LIVE INSIDE THE CITY LIMITS?

YES NO 4 HOW D10 YOU OBTAIN MOST OF THE TRAINING THAT PREPARED YOU FOR YOUR PRESENT TRADE OR TYPE OF WORK 7 (CHECK ONLY ONEl

1. HIGH SCHOOL

4. ARMED SERVICES

2. COLLEGE

5. ON THE JO8 BUT NOT FORMAL

3. VOCATIONAL SCHOOL OR. FORMAL APPRENTICESHIP PROGR AM APPRENTICESHIP PROGRAM S. OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY) 5.

IMMEDIATELY BEFORE ACCEPTING EMPLOYMENT ON THIS PROJECT WHAT WAS YOUR LASTJOS ISUCH AS STEAMF87 TING. LABOFtER. F ARMING, MAINTENANCE. ETC.)?

6.

WHAT TYPE OF BUSINESS WERE YOU IN (SUCH AS MANUFACTURING CONSTRUCTION, REPAlR OR MAINTENANCE SHOP. ETC.37 -

7. WHERE WAS THIS 80$lNESS LOCATED 7 CITY STATE 5.

CHECK WHICH TYPE OF RE:;lOENCE IN THE PROJECT AREA WHERE YOU NOW LIVE.

1. BOARDING OR SLEEPING ROOM

4. MOBILE HOME

2. MOTEL

5. HOUSE

3. APARTMENT

6. OTHEH (PLE ASE SPECIFY) 9.

IF YOU LIVE IN A HOUSE OR MOnsLE HOME IN THE PROJECT AREA.00 YOU OWN ITF YES NO

90. IN THE PROJECT AREA, CHECK WITH WHOM YOU LIVE.

I. 8Y MYSELF

3. WITH ROOMM ATES.

2. WITH MY F AMILY HOW M ANYF

~

4. OTHER (PLE ASE SPECatY)

I 1.

6*0W uANY CHeLOREN Live WITH YOUIN THE PROJECT AllE AP OF THESE.8 SOW MANY GO TO GR ADE SCHOOLP OF THESE. HOW M ANY CO TO HICH SCHOOD

- 17. HAVE YOU LIVED AT YOUR PRESENT ADDRESS MOnE THAN SIX MONTHSP YES NO TH ANE YOtl FOR COOPE H A TING IN THIS SURVEYS HAH TSVittE NUCLE AR PL.tr*T NEW EMPLOYEE SURVEY 4

Appendix D-2 EMPLOYEE QUESTIONNAIRE - SALARY POLICY 3

NAME SOCIAL SECURITY NO.

LAST FIRST 1.

WHE RE DIO YOU LIVE SEFORE SECINNaNG WORK ON THIS PROJECT?

CITY COUNTY STATE 2.

WHERE ARE YCU NO'.V LIVING OURING THE WORK WEEK?

STREET ADDRESS CITY COUNTY STATE 3.

CO YOU LIVE lies 10E TH2 CITY LlulTS?

YES

~NO 4.

HOW DID YCU 03TAIN !. TOST OF THE TRAINING THAT PREPARED YOU FOR YOUR PRESENT TRADE OR TYPE OF WCRX? (CHECK ONLY Cr. EOF THE FOLLOWING)

1. HIGH SCHOOL

4. ARMED SERVICES

2. COLLEGG

5. ON THE JOB SUT FJOT FORMAL

3. VOCATICNAL SCHOOL TRAINING PROGRAM

6. OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY) 5.

luutDIATELY BEFORE ACCEPTING EMPLOYMENT ON THIS PROJECTWHATWASYOUR LASTJOS (SUCH AS CLERICAL,$1CRETARIAL, ENGitJEERING AIDE, LABORER. ETC.l?

6.

WHAT TYPE OF EUsit4ESS WERE YOU IN lSUCH AS f,lANUFACTURING. CONSTRUCTION, RETAIL, SAL ES. SE RVICES. ETC.]?

7. WHERE WAS THIS 30 SINES $ LOCATEDP CITY KTATE 2.

CHECK W14tCH TYPE C* RESIDEfJCE IN THE PROJECT AREAWHERE YOU NOW LIVE.

1. 80ARair*4 OH SLEEPIFJG ROCAS

4. MOBILE HOME i

2. VOTEL

5. HOUSE

]

3. APARTMENT

6. OTHEH tPLEASE SPECIFY) 9.

IF YOU LIVE IN A HOUSE Oli MOceLE HOME IN THE PROJCCT ARE A.DO YOU CWN 8T7 YES PeO 10.

IN THE PROJECT AHE A. CHECK WITH WHOM YOU Live.

1. SYF.tvSELF

3. WITH HOOMMATES.

2, We TH 'AY FAMILY HOW MANY?

~

4. OTHER (PLEASL SPECIF Yl

31. HOW #4ANY CHILDHEN LIVF WITH YOU IN THE FHOJECT AHEA?

OF THESE, HOW MANY GO T() GH ADE SCHOOL 7 OF THEST. HOW Mar 4Y GO TO HIGH SCHOOL 7

12. HAVE YOU LIVED AT YOuH PnLSENT A00RESS MORE THAN Six MONTHS?

YES NO TH AP4IC YOU FO*1 COO'F R ATING IN T68*5 $U64VEY, H ARISVILLE NeJCL( AR PL AN T tetw E9PLCDEE SURVEY

- Appendix D-3 FOLLOW UP QUESTIONNAIRE 1.

Do you still live at (Emoloyee's Address)

T YES.

OF SO, SKlP TO QUESTJON 2.

NO.

IF NOT,PLEASE ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:

WHERE ARE YOU NOW LIVING DURIPv3 THE WORK WEEKF STREET ADDRESS CITY COUNTY-STATE DO YOU LIVE INSIDE THE CITY LIMITS 7 YES~

NO CHECK WHICH TYPE RESIDENCE W THE PROJECT AREA YOU LIVE IN

1. EsOARDING OR SLEEPING AOOM

2. MOTEL

3. APARTMENT 4 MOBILE HOME

, 5. HOUSE

6. OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY) 2.

IF YOU LIVE IN A HOUSE OR MOBILE HOME IN THE PROJECT AREA,DO YOU OWN ITF YES NO 3.

IN THE PROJECT ARE A CHECK WITH WHOM YOU NOW LIVE:

1.

8Y MYSELF

2. WITH M*. F AMILY

3. WITH ROOMMATES. HOW MANY?

4 OTHE R (PLE ASE SPECIFY) 4 HOW MANY CHILDREN LIVE WITH YOU IN THE PROJECT AREA 7 08 THESE. HOW MANY GO TO GRAOE SCHOOLF OF THESE. HOW MANY GO TO HIGH SCHOOL?

5.

HAVE YOU LIVED AT YOUR PRESENT ADDRESS MORE THAN SIX MONTHS 7 YES NO-6.

HAVE YOU OR ANY OF YOUR FAMILY LIVING WITH YOU IN THE PROJECT AREA HAD ANY OlF FICULTY OOTAINING HEALTH TREATMENT 7 YES. IF SO, CHECK THOSE WHICH YOU HAD DIFFICULTY OBTAINING:

DOCTOR (NOT EMERGENCY)

OEN TIST EMERGENCY MEDICAL TREATMENT HOSPITALIZATION OTHE R (PLEASE SPECIFY)

NO 7.

HAVE YOUOR ANYOF YOUR FAMILY LIVING WITH YOU IN THE PROJECT AREA HAD TO TRAVEL OUTSIDE YOUR PRESENT CO':dTY TO OBTAIN HEALTH TREATMENT 7 YES. IF SO WH AT WAS THE SERVICE AND WHERE 010 YOU HAVE TO GO?

NO THANK YOU FOR COOPERATING IN THIS SURVEY.

H ARTSVILLE NUCLE AR PLANT FCLLOWuP

4 Appendix E Socioeconomic Monitoring Cycle Time Required from Official Survey Date*

. Activity' 2 weeks Allow for personnel paperwork 3 weeks Print address labels, survey forms and mail to project.

3 weeks Conduct survey and return forms.

2 weeks Code forms, update files, produce tables,'and send tables to coordinator.

4 weeks contingency time for reproduction, mail, or project site problems.

2 weeks Prepare first two sections of report and send to functional staff.**

3 weeks Functional staffs draf t sections and submit them.

4 weeks Prepare and distribute' draft report and receive comments.

2 weeks Incorporate comments and-send final report to reproduction.

2 weeks Printing.

2 weeks Contingency time for mail, typing, or other delays.

I week Distribute reports.

The survey date for each project is the last day a person can be hired and still be surveyed.

~

- Functional staff are those dealing with specific areas such as education or health.

,m

%p s;

4 4

gynop=,n.a. rg h y

~w "m

l e, vi a,w. J.-.,--

. 4 g..

1

~=

l,..l.\\...

,/

g, - l y y j' s

g-

' ' ' $ *2 *,

[

4 l

).,. "[ \\ /

~

' ~ '. d

/

'~l/

s y.,0, 4t y j

b:%y % <... i, y',;N j

," M,

'N w-nnoo e w

-,f ~

y r/

-g-L--- {'. m.c%jZ e.}.3., /,

h.~.a. I

\\

/

j'

.J

-- -, sa:.n.

imnonumrio _ T $

${

-y,4

.mm,, 3L

,g e

, g, t r-----

j

_.e

~~~T> _

j --

.. _.J

.I ra[*7 wh ' %.~3 \\

g.

a

-~

g@

s

'W t;-h

. e s o.ca.

A e

\\

suuuee &

-%p-g # c $. -g.:.s 7-

. ~

-\\,

e

~-

a---

g a/

, o,,

.~

s g

JM[,./

.J \\ - -.i#M " "E._il 4T

' ~

.h:~;' =,E A,x' E}.,.)x f ;, [ '

(

('

ic 4T-au sy E

'I # h<,s_,,

d

& L

~ ~ *

, t,s e

g m1 m' ' " l s 3

H.

.~

rH M $al

\\

[,,

r.

i TON

. ; g,(,

~

?

J n

... y,&

<3 p.,

x, r

. ~.

I M.o.

j,,it g W.

sin u

- ~

f]'

s/

,,, / % -- -E g/

ag g_---

p.

', M

^~

f-

~'

N SHVI

. ~ ~ w1tch.nQ...,.

pa.g,,; ; e.,co 4

uo AN ycnu,,u.'.-

\\

mcT!?,u w\\

g q e v m ;,M4 -

j

[

- 1.. A

^*t@

u

.?

8 f A'

_J f,;f f~ -~ %

,,,,,,g i

i

~

~~~- z 2-1

[,>.

- - j' f

N

l 7e s.,

.7 y,

'a~

T

~*-

'~

^ -

c

~

., / _ _,, '7 - Z.. ~ -

e 0

'HRLYS

~

W f N-

[D w

'd*""'-

\\ H=+ a M

KA,_

u ttiA acj i sy

,. (

r,..u.y

^. -

y-

, ~ ~ ~

L[

'g,-

-/hg,,

cy

\\ p,,,

j l

/

M-

-g I-A,11 rt A n

t=

e nsrc y..'*

. ammL m

lx -

-J y,.

a n >upa [

-(

e

.4

.N y=p.

j.1 1

~

> g..G

}.c A n rm

"= 3 N

(

[-s.k y j

v v

. b.- ' b, 'N].8 1 '. M *.vg[

]

~~T>~~ e.-[....-,

/.

4.,,/

d M

M

.,5 g---._

~ / _}/

~

s.. V /

7 4.'m.va y " "e* 6 f

'T-O*

b-U ~g j[i=dt ' f *T

=g'L*~,',

~Q

'N/

~

coeu

(

'Mu a

h. -

f$e rum -.=

r 'IV

- pY I

_ ' ocm 04 %

' " "'t ^ ' """

'"'n M

t, t

atc,soo..

j l

of rr 1,

t og" Q,, - - @-.u,h. L n, A

~.1.._.,, /*--;g'

's

/,

r,, N 4 r y-x x

s

's m.

',,1

,,{

.,J

%. _7 -

3 u

v u.~.

b

.g'-

L\\

gs g FIGURE I MA-HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANT

~ k void-h f'.

.. _. - 3 s

Y -- - ',3 s

i TOWNS CONTAINING CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYEES T'

l

/

+

R - ae-.- '

1

'r yg-aa34 Q,! -

A PLANT SITE N;/oc.e

/Lp.[ *{, /'f.~

'^

1 MARCH I9 81 4Q

l

,3 7

15 0

15 30

- W

,,,,L.y.

u-~.7

=

A.

SCALE OF MILES y ~~'~~.

eaa u

p fi Ab'E' N '*i l NOTE: TOWNS UNDERLINED CONTAIN EMPLOYEES M _ L.i i

f"

.e 1 -..

ML20041C112

Text

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

Search