Text

Hartsville Nuclear Plants Socioeconomic Monitoring & Mitigation Rept, 801031
	ML19340D480
Person / Time
Site:	Hartsville
Issue date:	10/31/1980
From:	; TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
To:	;
Shared Package
ML19340D474	List: ML19340D473; ML19340D480;
References
	HNP-SMR-8, NUDOCS 8012300665
	Download: ML19340D480 (50)
	v • d • e

i 9

1 TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANTS SOCIOECONOMIC MONITORING AND MITIGATION REPORT HNP SMR-8 March 31, 1980 s

t Knoxville, Tennessee October 1980 l

801230oM5

CONTENTS Page Background and Highlights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v I. Cencral Status of Employment as of March 31, 1980 . . . . . . 1 II. General Characteristics of Movers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 III. Secondary Employment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 IV. Functional Area Impacts and Mitigation Actions . . . . . . . 6 Tables Table 1. Estimates of Population and Population Change . . . 6 Table 2. Estimates of Population and Population Change between April 30, 1976 - March 31, 1980 . . . . . . 7 Table 3. School Systems' Report of Hartsville Nuclear Plants Direct Impact Students . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Table 4. TVA Education Mitigation Payments . . . . . . . . . 9 Table 5. TVA Local Planning Assistance Payments . . . . . . 10 Table 6. Traffic Evaluation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

. Table 7. Summary of TVA Mitigation Expenditures as of March 31, 1980. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Appendixes Appendix A - Detailed Survey Results Table A- 1. Town of Current Residence . . . . . . . . . 20 Table A- 2. Source of Location of Construction Employees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 Table A- 3. Distribution of Movers and Associated Population by County and Community . . . . 23 Table A- 4. Comparison of Survey Results with Projections for Selected Parameters . . . . 24 Table A- 5. Mover Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 Table A- 6. Fbcon - Employees Living Within the County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 Table A- 7. Smith - Employees Living Within the County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 Table A- 8. Sumner - Employees Living Within the County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 Table A- 9. Trousdale - Employees Living Within the County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 Table A-10. Wilson - Employees Living Within the County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 viii

1 CONTEJgj[(continued) f Table A-11.

Carthage - Employees Living Within the City Limits .

Table A-12. ...............

Gallatin - Employees Living Within the 31 City Limits .

Table A-13. ...............

Hartsville - Employees Living Within the 32 City Limits .

Table A-14.

Hendersonville

............... 33 the City Limits - Employees Living Within '

Table A-15. ..............

Lafayette - Employees Living Within the 34 City Limits .

Table A-16. ...............

Lebanon - Employees Living Within the 35 City Limits .

Table A-17.

Nashville -

. . . . .Living Employees

. . . Within

. . . .the

... 36 City Limits .

............... 37 Appendix B - Secondary Socioeconomic Impact Monitoring of Hartsville Nuclear Plant Environmental Impact Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 Appendix C - Traffic Level Defined

. . . . . . . . . . . , , 41 Appendix D - Employee Questionnaire .

. . . . . . . . . . . . 42 Exhibits .

Figure 1 - Towns Containing Construction Employees

. . . . . 45 l

iv l

HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANTS SOCI0 ECONOMIC MONITORING AND MITIGATION REPORT Background and Highlights e

For permits to construct the four-unit Hartsville Nuclear Plants located in Smith and Trousdale Counties, Tennessee, TVA agreed to certain monitoring and mitigation actions to reduce the socioeconomic impact in the area expected to accommodate movers. The impact area is defined as Trousdale, Smith, Macon, Sumner, and Wilson Counties, Tennessee. TVA also agreed to report to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission the results of the monitoring efforts and mitigation actions taken to accommodate the impacts.

This is the eighth in a series of semiannual reports which will be submitted during construction of the Hartsville project, including three e

reporting periods following issuance of the operating license for the last unit. This report is for the period October 1, 1979, through March 31, 1980.

Employment dropped from 6,340 to 5,436 this period. The number of movers and population influx to all five impact counties was lower than at the end of the previous reporting period. The mover rate was 32 percent for a total of 1,743 movers.

TVA has made mitigation payments totaling approximately $7 million.

i More than $3 million of this amount was for employee transportation.

HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANTS SOCIOECONOMIC MONITORING AND MITIGATION REPORT I. General Status of Employment as of March 31, 1980 A survey of all TVA employees as of March 31, 1980, was conducted i

during May of 1980. The timelag between employment and survey enables employees who moved to make personal adjustments and should provide a better picture of employee distribution, family characteristics, and housing choice. The employment had dropped to 5,436 employees and information was available for 5,286 employees (97 percent). Of those who provided informa tion, 1,696 employees indicated they had moved for a mover rate of about 32 percent (table A-1). Information on the family status and housing choice was obtained for those who moved (table A-5).

The data on movers have been extrapolated on a ratio basis to the total 5,436 employees which results in an estimated total number of movers of 1,743. Of the total, 1,377 movers located in the five impact counties; and 366 moved to other counties. As shown in table A-1 and figure 1, local workers (nonmovers) are commuting to the project from a much more widespread area.

Information on the distribution of both movers and residents is found in tables A-1, A-2, and figure 1. Additional information on the distri-bution and characteristics of movers is continued in tables A-3 through

, A-18.

d i/ l

% . ['

> > '1.* ,

i

s, 2

..,s.

O r

t %r

_ rs J #' j ,

Y-t I j, i

rr ; ,

A B.

a ,

' i

, . ~ . . ,

r

e. t-

~

I*^

r l ', .s i; 7 , .

'.aj. I( . ,,.,

t

-4,~

,;, iT<,, ,,

'C: l:, . 7

.' O .?c , , ,,,

.7h , ,, . ,

r

rate to both Smith and Trousdale Counties is still much lower than projected. Smith County received only 12 percent compared with the projected 20 percent and the mover rate to Trousdale County remained at only 16 perce: . compared with the projected 30 percent. The mover rate to Wilson County remained low at 14 percent compared with the projected 20 percent. Although Sumner County is receiving the largest number of movers, the survey shows that the number of movers dropped from 554 to 518 since the last report. The number of movers to Sumner County is close to that projected, but all other counties are receiving far f eser movers than expected. Mover projections were made only for the five Lmpact counties, but 275 employees moved to other counties. The number of movers from Davidson County dropped from 129 movers to 91. The survey revealed that 192 employees moved from Davidson County and of those 150 moved to impact counties.

11. General Characteristics of Movers Total project--Table A-5 contains data on f amily status and characteristics and housing choice for all movers. Table A-4 contains a comparison of the extrapolation of some of these results with pro-jections. As of March 31, 1980, 76 percent of those employees who moved brought their families and 24 percent moved without their families. School-age children per family averaged 0.9 compared with the projected 1.0, and the total average family size was 3.4 compared with the projected 3.0. The survey of housing choice shows 56 percent are living in houses, 23 percent in mobile homes, 14 percent in

, apartments, 3 percent in motel and sleeping rooms, and 5 percent in other accommodations. The "Other" category includes campers, motor homes, and vans.

- _ . .- ._ -- ~_ ,

Il ~

Y stat"

'OE coyers into throu ,

each Lep and ch racterssti cg ,ng j= pace "'10 ang ,or ~ov s ' '*Unty a7e Co"ns Usina chosCe

~

er 'ained

' ' ' == un g : Vithin 75 in taby thrcugh , ,* ' ntaining CY lL31ts o ~r 1 east each og zhe

~Ove7g

,n ta y, _

E'll .

othe' Coung,ec and C part og , M t ieg

as s

~esigneg o ,

=puter M ogr'* Whi c Toce GS

'*== unit;g ut se the survey When a ther ,han tyo repoits fo7 cou - gata se jgent nt,es

.o' certa,", number o <c fled ~

and canzun, :o ye 7', 3n 'be 1 Pact 1Ocated I YSis to '" Vas 59 there. .

s a ', ', d to '. The leye, enau count,* 100 jurigg, to sery Th f

Judgeg the p the .

jecteg , actua] ccat, atly ..g7nin, s syst e=u c ang .. '*E

'ashyj,,e c' tion patter n' n M tern yarieg those (52) These < ' Enifi

PPicx :gtg shown , 'nclug' Henderg C= .

be vupulat, n l e A-3* ,, hville (IO) afgecteg ~~ nende 5,'

an of n,000 and's' a h "Ville Vith a u rye ,,, e=e, x, c3y~, ~. ,

vglle an

esult are havn ,

3 cnaCGe at thig v th 45u 000>

e, - Vould no',

surv ,,, contg,n tabygg , 2,gnitude*

n'16 nd Det*iled n u b e ',. A.3 ,*

Of coyersed a '>3bles t*T D Tv.,o '"Ylier noe '~'oppeg avigson County.

IUde the geta; V 100 in this gu ' the s u r,,.gY r Ney' d , is esult, {c,* rep *?t d '8 David *= Coung D

l III. Secondar/ Employment Secondary employment impact is defined as a temporary increase in the trade and service-related resident population which can be attributed to the Hartsville project. If the population increase in a county is greater than that arising directly from the project a

or from other primary employment increases, the possibility of secondary employment exists.

The survey results of March 31, 1980, revealed a decline in project-related population in all impact area counties from the September 30, 1979, survey (see table 1) . Mbcon, Sumner, and Trousdale Counties experienced population declines according to the i

estimates while Smith and Wilson Counties showed population

! . increases. The declining proj ect-related populations remove the possibility of any secondary employment impact during this period.

9 Table 2 contains data for the period April 30, 1976, to March 31, 1980, covering the period f rom start of construction to the date of the most current su rvey. Only two counties, Macon and Smith, have experienced population change which cannot be explained by other primary employment. Macon County experienced a decline in total employment during the period which eliminates the possibility of any project-related secondary employment there. Smith County, on the other hand, experiencad a nonproj ect-related primary increase in employment, but was not sufficient to explain all the change in population. However, the unexplained change in population was only 1.3 percent of county population which is well within the errot of estimate.

Table 1 ESTIMATES OF POPULATIOI.' AITD FOPULATIOff CHMUE FOR MACQti, SMITH, SU::NER, TROUSDALE, MID WIIBON COUliTIES , TENITESSEE FOR MONITORIID SECONDARY SOCIOECONQiIC IMPACTS OF HARTSVIILE !iUCLEAR PLAliT CONSTRUCTION SEPTEtJBER 30, 1979 - MARCH 31, 1980 Population Population Change in Change in Project

Estimate Estimate Population Estinate Related Population

, 9/30/79 __}/31/80 9/30/79 - 3/31/80 9/30/79 - 3/31/80 i

Macon County 15,793 15,212 -581 -44 Smith County 13,858 14,176 318 -19 Sumner County 80,488 78,511 -1,977 -71 Trousdale County 5,364 5,278 -86 -60 Wilson County 50,146 50,930 784 -sh

TVA Dnployee Surveys.

Population estimates by Community Economics Projects Group.

Community Economics Projects Group 10/3/80

_ _ _ _, -_ - - - - - - ~

Table 2 EETDtATFE OF POIVIATION A'O PCIULATIGI THA?nE FG1 MACON, 9:IT1I, SU'mB, TmtGPA!I, /Jm WIIcot C0mTIF3 TEWFESEE FOR MTIITORI!O FECO?iPABY SOCIOFCCI!(t!IC IMTACTS OF !!ARTSVILIE I;t#'! EAR PI1JTT C0!CTIUCTIOPI AFM L 30, 1976 - IMC1! 31,1%O Remainder of Change in Population Population Change in Change in Project, Nonproject Related Pop 21ation Possible Change in Estimate Estimate Population Estfrate P. elated Population Pol.ulation as of From Other Population L/30/76 3/31/80 h/30/76 - 3/31/80 h/30/76 - 3/31/80 3/31/80 Prim w/ Frplopent Une g lairei

, Macon County 13,602 15.212 1,610 435 1,175 o 1,175 N Ecith Coul.+.y 12,643 14,176 1,533 543 990 810 180 t

su=ner County 69,5% 78,511 8,967 1,525 7,42 19,728 -

Trousdale County 5,232 5,273 46 658 o - -

Wilson County h5,709 50,930 5,221 707 4,514 10,620 -

TVA Empleyee Surveys.

Population estimates by Ccesunity Econcnies Projects Group.

Ccre: unity Economics Projects Group 10/3/80

Census of population data for 1980 will be available prior to the next report and all data will be revised.

IV. Functional Area Impacts and Mitigation Actions Education--Monitoring direct impact on education continued to occur primarily through reports from the seven school districts and the i Tennessee Department of Education. School districts and the department submit reports in October and May of each school year showing the names of students whose parents are employed at the Hartsville Nuclear Plants, the school previously attended, school and grade in which enrolled, and essential attendance and transportation information.

A summary of school districts reports i:, shown in Table 3. All school districts reported a smaller direct impact student enrollment than anticipated for school year 1979-80.

Table 3 School System Reports of Hartsville Nuclear Plants pirect Impact Students March 31, 1980 Number of Children Number of Children School System of Local Residents of Movers Total Macon County 221 120 341 Smith County 289 61 350 Sumner County 502 274 776 Trousdale County 230 79 309 Wilson County 208 30 230 Lebanon City 124 13 137

'l Watertown City 12 4 16 l TOTAL 1,586 581 2,167 TVA, the Tennessee Department of Education, and the seven local school districts in the impact area continue to operate under agreements for alleviating impacts on local school districts.

Under these agreements, TVA provides funds for classrooms and schoolbuses. Education mitigation payments this period totaled a $26,325.

Table 4 TVA Education Mitigation Payments (October 1, 1979 - March 31, 1980)

School System Facilities Buses Total Macon County - - -

Smith County - - -

Sumner County - $17,392 $17,392 Trousdale County $8.933 -

$ 8,933 Wilson County - - -

Lebanon City - - -

Watertown City - - -

TOTAL $ 8,933 $17,392 $26,325 Note: Public Law 81-874 assistance is available to the school systems to offset additional operating cost.

All school systems in the Hartsville Nuclear Plants project area are eligibile to participate in School Assistance in Federally Affected Areas, Title I, Public Law 81-874 programs in fiscal year 1980.

Wilson County became eligible for the fir st time in fiscal year 1978, Macon County in fiscal year 1977, and Trousdale in fiscal year

r I

I I

1976; S=ith County, Su=ner County, and I.ebanon City were eligible and participated prior to fiscal year 1975. atertevn Special School District did no: participate in fiscal year 1930. The nu=ber of students claimed by the four participating school systems in fiscal year 1976 was 933. In fiscal year 1977, 1,573 students were clai ed .

by five participating school syste=s. In fiscal year 1975, the .

six participating school systens claized 2,/.67 students; in fiscal year 1979, 3,026 were repor:ed. Even though there is aa increase of 174 students for fiscal year 1950, over fiscal year 1979, there is an apparent leveling cf f of TVA-related students.

i l

According to the school systers in the i= pact counties and the State Depart =ent of Educatic=, TVA is continuing to eet its ce==it=ents; and the school syste=s are able to serve the direct t -

l i= pact students.

t I

l 1

Housing--The objective of the Ear:sville Nuclear Plants hcusing l

l titigation pregra: has been te assist in the develop =ent of :obile bere parks in Macca and Trousdale Counties as a base for te:porary housing demanded ? y TVA ccastruction vorkers. One hundred sixty-nine (169) i nobile hone spaces have been developed thrcugh this program. Tne Shady c r

Grove & bile Ec=e Park in Hartsville, Tennessee, has 93 . spaces. At ;

present there are 73 units occupied. Tne Hillsdale Mobile Ho=e Park, located approxi=stely seven 2iles frc: the constructica site, has 43 cf ,

i their 76 units presently occupied. Due to financial difficul:y, the

i l'pper Cumberland Ecusing Develop ent Corporatica is in the piming I stages of possible liquidation of the Hillsdale & bile Ec=e Park.

t f

t I

l _ - . . _ -. . .- - . . . _ . - . . . _ -

Local Planning and Coordination Assistance--TVA is continuing to assist the local planning commissions affected by this project.

Letters of agreement covering half of their cost for Tennessee State Planning Of fice services for a period f rom October 1 each year through September 30 of the following calendar year hac Seen executed for the major impact communities. The need for additional

(

assistance to the local planning commissions is evaluated and negotiated on a year-to-year basis as appropriate. A summary of these payments are shown on table 5.

TVA continues to provide annual support for the Hartsville Project Coordination Committee for professional staff services. The committee is composed of the chief elected officials in the five-county impact area (five county judges and the mayors of the incorporated towns within the five counties) . To date, $225,000

. has been provided to the committee with funding at $12,500 per quarter.

Water and Sewer--The city of Lafayette requested TVA's assistance with water system problems that they felt were directly related to the impact of population increases resulting from the nuclear plant construction. Careful investigation has revealed that some of Lafayette's water problems have probably existed for quite some time. Actually the number of inmoving workers and their families were much less than had been originally projected for the Lafayette 1

area during peak employment at tl4e plant and no justification for assistance to Lafayette could be found.

TABLE 5 TVA LOCAL PLASNING ASSISTASCE PAYMENTS Amount Paid Total Paid .

Planning Commissions This Period to date Hartsville-Trousdale County $ 1,000 $ 4,308 ,

Smith County 688 5,313 )

Sumner County 2,375 6,125 Wilson County 3,000 6,750 Carthage - 3,252 South Carthage 625 2,444 Go rdonsv ille -

476 Lafayette - 1,221 Gallatin -

6,256 Lebanon -

6,725 Hendersonville 744 6,725 Tennessee State Planning Office - 20,000 TOTAL $ 8,432 $69,595

i Of the $75,000 originally paid to Carthage for improvements to l

their water treatment facilities, $66,097 has been expended thus far for these purposes.

Health and Medical Sarvices--TVA has provided technical assistance a

to Trousdale and Smith Counties in the operation and expansion of 4

their county ambulance services. These two counties are the primary ,

and secondary emergency medical backup systems for h'artsville Nuclear Plants. TVA will continue to assess the health needs of the 5-county impact area; however, it is not anticipated that i

significant additional expenditures will be required.

P Traffic--In accordance with an agreement between TVA and the Tennessee Department of Transportation, the department has been supplying TVA with traffic counts for 12 locations on a quarterly basis beginning i

in October 1975. With approximately 5,400 employees, peak-hour traffic on Highway 25 was 440 vehicles per hour (VPH) east of the site and 920 VPH west of the site. Counts for other key highway segments are shown in the following table. Peak-hour volumes at all these locations are within the limits of acceptable volumes for evel of service D operation of these highways (see appendix B).

In an effort to mitigate the peak-hour traffic volumes, TVA is continuing the employee transportation program (commuter vans and buses) .

I I

i

. .-. . .- - -_ __ - ~. . . . _ - _ _ _ - . _ _ - _ - - --

1 I

Table 6 TRAFFIC EVALUATION i

(October 1975 - March 1980) ,

1 Number of TVA ,

Vehicles During Commuter Peak Hour

Traffic i

1975 1980 Highway 25 East of Plant 120 440 340 1

Highway 25 West of Plant 120 920 850 i

Highway 25 West of Hartsville 290 720 530 Highway 25 West of 231 Junction 210 500 280 I Highway 231 South of 25 Junction 150 280 180 l

, Highway 231 North of Lebanon 150 300 110 l *The peak hour occurred during the 3-4 p.m. hour.

Employee Tre;goortation--During this period, one bus was discontinued serving the Manchester area due to insufficient ridership. This ,

brought the total number of buses operating to and from the Hartsville-Nuclear Plant to 16 as follows: Nashville - seven buses; Gallatin and Lebanon - two buses each; and Lafayette, Portland, Hermitage, Mt. Juliet, and Murfreesboro - one bus each. The number of van pools dropped to 131 from 148 last period. Ridership increased from 47 percent last period to 56 percent of the employees on the day shift riding vans and buses to work. An estimated 1,067 cars are being kept off the road as a result of the TVA-sponsored van pools and buses.

TVA's expenditures for employee transportation for this period were approximately $981,000.

,4

Local Government Budgets--The impact on the budgets of local governments in the impact area of the Hartsville construction project is measured on an annual basis. This measurement is made by projecting the

, project-related revenues to be received by the local governments.

The projected revenues and expenditures are then compared to determine whether deficits will occur. TVA then negotiates and executes contracts with local governments to provide payments to cover the amounts of any projected deficits. Payments made to local governments during this period are as follows:

Trousdale County $71,000 Macon County 22,786 Smith County 43,500 City of Gallatin 18,600

$155,886

.1

. In the previous reporting period, payments for local government budgets in the amounts of $2,200 for the city of Hendersonville and

$900 for the tos_a of Carthage were reported in error.

TVA continues to monitor local government impacts after the contracts are negotiated, and if additional impacts occur, TVA will renegotiate with the local governments in order to remove the deficit.

Local Recruitment and Training--A total cf 1,982 workers were local residents of the 5-county impact area, and 738 were residents of 3, Davidson County. This indicates that local recruitment and training 15 -

=__ _ __ _

1 initiatives are continuing to be successful in reducing the overall socioeccnomic impact within the five counties. The steamfitter training program has graduated a total of 73 trainees who have all taken jobs at the Hartsville Nuclear Plant. Due to the icveling .

off in demand for steamfitters at the plant, the steamfitter training program has been discontinued. The boilermaker training program .

has graduated 79, of which 29 are presently at the Hartsville

Nuclear Plant. Most of the other graduates are at other TVA plants in middle Tennessee (e.g. , Gallatin and Johnsonville steam plants).

These two programs were developed to help meet the demand for highly skilled craftsmen in critical skill manpower shortage areas and to lessen TVA's construction mover impact. Trainees in these programs are from the 16-county recruitment area.

Recreation--Community recreation impacts were monitored through local contacts and field review. Technical assistance was provided .

to several communities for design of recreation facilities. Communi-ties assisted during the reporting period include the following:

1. Gordonsville - Grading plan for development of Gordonsville City Park.

2. Hartsville - Trousdale County A. Architectural design assistance for renovation of Ward School Community Building.

B. Site design assistance for development for Kate Wilson School tennis courts.

4 C. Site design assistance far development for Taylor's Landing Recreation Area.

3. Macon County - Site planning assistance for development of Macon County Park.

9 Sumner County - Site design assistance for development of Sumner County Park.

5. Lafayette - Site design assistance for development of Key Jackson Park.

6. Westmoreland - Site design assistance for development of Westmoreland City Park.

l l

I Recreation mitigation assistance is also anticipated for Smith and i

Macon Counties to provide financial assistance for the construction of needed park facilities. Recreation Resources Program staff are currently working with local officials to implement these projects.

TVA will continue to provide technical and financial assistance to offset any significant impacts on community recreation resources.

i Hartsville Intergenerational Child Care Program--The contract to coordinate the program was signed on April 3, 1980, by the Executive Director of the Mid-Cumberland Human Resource Agency. The Tennessee Department of Human Services is also working closely with the program which is designed to supplement fixed incomes of area residents while it provides for increased child care ner ;s around the Hartsville Nuclear Plant s it e. Selection of six to eight residents to provide

, child care in their homes will occur prior to September 1,1980.

During the time period of October 1979 and March 1980 no money was spent.

Summary of Mitigation Expenditures--In the functional areas of mitigation, TVA has made payments totaling $6,838,605 as noted in table 7.

TABLE 7 Summary of TVA Mitigation Expenditures as of March 31, 1980 l

l Expenditures Expenditures I This Period To Date j Education S 26,325 $1,523,084 l Housing -

423,000 1

.l 1 Local Planning and Coordinat! n Assistance 33,431 294,127 ,

Water and Sewer - 380,000@

Health -

108,772 Local Governments 155,886 764,939 Employee Transportation 981,000 3,344,683 TOTAL $1,196,642 $6,838,605

1. Includes $60,000 interest-bearing loan.

2. Includes $125,000 noninterest-bearing loan.

e sam- 1 6m, L 1 Fk1mM -

- - --w2 aL-4-+ a --L- * " 4 7

t 4

i I

s i

O 1

l 1

l APPENDIXES I

f I

l t

e

Table A-1 F CL L CW UP SURVEY TOWS OF CURRENT RESIDENCE RUN DATE 07/29/80 HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANT EMPLOYEES RUN TIME 125047 .

ACTIVE EMPLOYEE S 03-31-80 REPORT 2 MOVED TO ALRE A DY Tc hN TCWN IN TGhN TOTAL POPULATION ,

AL E X AN DR I A TN 11 37 48 680 BA xTE R TN 8 53 61 1.314 C AR THA GE TN 74 121 195 2,491 COOK EV IL LE TN 32 76 108 17,800 CROS$VILLE TN 12 43 55 5,381 DO WELL T0hN TN 5 15 20 3 29 GAINESBORO TN 7 38 45 1.101 GALLATIN TN 301 374 675 13.362 GORDONSVILLE TN 11 34 45 601 HARTSVILLE TN 263 20 3 466 2,243 HE NDE R SONVILLE TN 75 137 212 28,000 LAFAYETTE TN 122 201 323 2,583 LEBANON TN 194 240 434 12,492 MC MI NN VI LL E TN 6 8 14 11,610 MANCHESTER TN 8 22 30 6,669 MURF RE E S BORO TN 15 39 54 28,700 N A SH VI LL E TN 57 432 489 469,000 PORTLAND TN 16 52 68 3,081 RED BOILING SERINGS TN 12 54 66 9 56 SM I THV IL L E TN 8 104 112 3,762 SOUTH CARTPAGE TN 9 25 34 859 SP AR T A TN 12 10 22 4, 9 30 WESTMORELAND TN 22 66 88 1,423 '

ASHLAND CITY TN 5 10 15 2,027 8ETHPAGE TN 18 46 64 400 CAST AL IAN SPRINGS TN 60 38 98 150 CO TT O NTCwN TN 6 15 21 100 .

DIXON SPRI NG S TN 71 34 105 100 GOOOL E TT SV IL L E TN 7 51 58 7,541 HERMITAGE TN 8 32 40 6,000 L ANC AS TER TN 5 7 12 150 MA0!$0N TN 9 95 104 21,500 MOUN T JUL I GT TN 29 77 106 1.568 OLD HICKOR Y TN 8 54 62 6,000 PLEAS ANT S HADE TN 13 30 43 150 R ID3tE TON TN 9 18 27 100 SILVER POINT TN 5 16 21 150 WATERTOWN TN 6 28 34 1.061 WHITE HOUSE TN 13 9 22 1,305 SUBTOTAL 1552 2944 .4496 CE LI NA TN 3 21 24 1,370 CHARLOTTE TN 2 8 10 610 3

_ 20 _

Table A-1, Page 2 FCLLOW UP SURVEY TOW 4 0F CURxE1T RESIDENCE RUN DATE 07/29/80 H ART Sv !LL E NUCLE AR PLANT EMPLOYEES RUN TI ME 125047 ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 03-31-80 REPORT 2 MOVED TO ALREADY 70hN TOWN IN TOWN TOTAL POP UL ATIO N CL ARKSVILL E TN 1 9 10 44,900 FRANKLIN TN O 6 6 11,298 GREEN BRIER TN 2 27 29 2,279 LA V ERGNE TN 3 11 14 5,209 LIBERTY TN 1 23 24 332 L IVI NG STON TN O 5 5 3.050 MONTEREY TN 3 5 8 2,351 RIDGETOP TN 1 1 8 810 SHELBYVILLE TN 0 11 11 11,900 SMYRNA TN 3 11 14 5.698

$PRI NG FI EL D TN 3 21 24 9,720 TULLAHOMA TN 2 7 9 15,577 WOODBURY TN 4 14 18 2,087 AN TI OCH TN 1 14 15 900 AUBURNTOWN TN 1 5 6 213 BRUSH CREEK TN 2 18 20 230 BUFFALO VALLEY TN 2 15 17 100 CHESTNUT MOUND TN 0 7 7 125 CROSS PLA!NS TN 3 8 8 261 DONELSON TN 0 11 11 25,500 ELMdOOD TN 3 12 15 100 GRANVILLE TN 0 6 6 100

. HICKMAN TN 3 20 23 200 JOELTON TN O 19 19 900 MOSS TN 2 'll 13 200 kHITLEYVILLE TN 1 5 6 50

, 8 OWL ING GR EEN KY 1 5 6 39,400 FRANKLIN KY 2 7 9 7,176 GA MA L I EL KY 0 5 5 431 SCOTTS VILL E KY 4 76 80 3,584 TOMPKI NSVI LLE KY 4 17 21 2,207 A00LPHUS KY 2 9 11 250 SUBTOTAL 56 456 512 OTHER 88 190 278 TOTAL RESPONSES 1696 3590 5286 HNP WORKFORCE TOTAL 5436 03-31-80

- 21 _

Table A-2 FOLLOW UP SURVEY SOURCE AND LOC ATION OF CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYEES RUN DATE 07/29/80 HART SVILLE NUCLEAR PL ANT RUN TIME 125211 ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 03-31-80 REPORT 4 OTHER OTHER OTHER F ROM --- T O ----------------- I M P AC T C O UN T I E S- ------- REC. TENN. K E NTUC K Y TROUSDALE SMITH MACON SUMNER WILSON D AVI DSON C O UNTI E S COUNTIES COUNTI ESTOTAL OTHER (4)

T RDUSDALE (1) 204 9 6 24 6 2 3 254 SMITH (1) 7 344 6 2 7 1 8 3 1 3T9 MACON til 4 4 268 6 4 1 1 288 SUMNER (1) 21 7 8 759 9 14 9 2 1 8 10 WILSON (Il 12 7 17 352 9 10 6 413 DAVIDSON (1) 13 21 3 74 35 717 20 21 904 OTHER RECRUITING COUN (2) 12 28 14 19 14 7 764 18 4 880 OTH7R TN. COUNTIE S (3) 104 63 37 165 80 28 39 262 2 6 786 i OTHER KY. COUNTIES ( 3) 4 1 8 8 3 3 m 20 47 N ALABAMA 22 18 6 57 24 8 4 i

2 5 146 ARKANSAS 2 1 2 4 9

GEORGIA 5 1 2 3 6 1 1 1 20 MI SSI S SI PPI 1 1 4 1 1 1 9 NORTH CAROLINA 1 1- 2 4 1 9 SOUTH CAROLINA 1 1 1 1 1 5

OTHER STATES 55 29 37 90 36 17 13 15 15 307

*

T O T AL 467 535 399 1235 581 806 877 330 28 28 5286 NOTE DATA ON DIAGONAL INDIC ATE NONMOVERS, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF MOVES WITHIN A COUNTY.

ALL OTHER DATA INDIC ATE MOVERS.

113 RECRUITING COUNTV (23 TENNESSEE COUNTIES: C ANNON, C L AY, DEKAL8, J ACKSON, PUTNAM, ROBERTSON, RUTHERFORD KENTUCKY COUNTIES

ALLEN, MO NR OE , SIMPSON 131 ALL COUNTIES IN (E1TUCKY AND TENNESSEE OTHER THAN RECRUITING COUNTIES 141 "UTHER" INCLUDES NON-RESPONSES OR ERRONEDUS RESPONSES FOR CURRENT ADDRESS.

0 0

Table A-3 Hartsville Nuclear Plants Distribution of Movers and Associated Population by County and Community March 31, 1980

. Percent Number 7

of of Population Influx County Movers Movers School age Total Trousdale 16 270 137 658 Smith 12 211 118 543 Macon 8 142 126 435 Sumner 30 518 382 1,525 Wilson 14 236 178 707 Other Counties 20, 366 247 1,014 Total 100 1,743 1,195 4,882 Community Carthage 3 51 17 102 Gallatin 11 190 103 516 Hartsville 10 175 79 383 Hendersonville 4 70 44 177 Lafayette 3 59 64 189 Lebanon 4 65 23 151 Nashville 3 52 23 122 Total 38 662 353 1,640

1. Numbers extrapolated.

. 2. Percentages may not add to 100 because of rounding.

3. Within municipal limits.

_ 23 -

_ m .

Table A-4 Hartsville Nuclear Plants Comparison of Survey Results with Projections for Selected Parameters Employment Level - 5,436 Projected Surveyed Number Movers 2,935 1,743 +

Percent Movers 54 32 School age Children 1,908 1,195 School age Children / Family 1. 0 0.9 Total Population 6,751 4,882 l

Percent Number Percent Number Movers with Families v> 1,908 76 1,333 !

Movers without Families 35 1,027 24 410 Percent Number Percent Number

, Housing Choice:

Houses 31 910 56 979 .

Mobile Homes 47 1,380 23 .392 Apartments 18 528 14 235 Motel and Sleeping Rooms 4 117 3 48 I Other 0 0 5 89 2

Total 100 2,935 100 1,743 Percent Number Percent Number Distribution by County:

Davidson 0 0 5 91 Trousdale 30 881 16 270 l Smith 20 587 12 211

{ Macon 10 293 8 142 Sumner 20 587 30 518 Wilson 20 587 14 236 i Other Counties __ 3, 0 16 275 Total 100 2,935 100 1,743 '

l 1. Numbers extrapolated. .

i

! 2. Percentages may not add to 100 because of rounding.

i

Table A-5 FCALOW UP SURVEY WORKERS kHO MOVED INTO HARTSVILLE huCLEAR PLANT AREA PAGE 018 RUN D ATE 07/29/80 MOVER

SUMMARY

REPORT 1F ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 03-31-80 RUN TIME 125018 WITH TOTAL CHILDREN CHILDREN MOVERS CHILDREN NUMBER IN IN MOVERS WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH WITHOUT TOTAL F AM IL Y SCH30 L CHILOREN SCHOOL SCHOOL F AMIL Y MOVERS ANNUAL EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 248 143 359 183 64 14 262 HOUSE RENTED 48 15 45 22 6 8 56 APARTMENT RENTED 29 7 16 7 2 55 84 MOBILE HOME RENTED 5 5 6 7 0 9 14 MOBILE HCME CWNED 25 7 22 6 2 16 41 SLEEPING ROOM 2 2 5 4 0 3 5 MOTEL 1 0 2 0 0 2 3 OTHER 8 3 1 0 0 5 13 TO TA L 366 179 456 229 74 112 478 HOURLY EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 340 2 09 553 278 131 14 354

. HOUSE RENT ED 225 100 307 142 56 55 280 APARTMENT RENTED 87 27 80 26 12 58 145 MOBILE HCME RENTED 81 32 102 44 15 55 136 MOBILE HOME CWNED 150 73 196 96 27 40 190 SLEEPI NG ROOM S O 3 0 0 16 21 MOTEL 4 2 8 4 0 14 18 OTHER 39 18 51 20 8 35 74 TOTAL 93 1 458 1300 610 249 287 1218 ALL EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 588 352 912 461 195 28 616 HOUSE RENTED 273 115 352 164 62 63 336 AP AR TMENT PENTED 116 34 96 33 14 113 229 MOBILE HCME RENTED 86 37 108 51 15 64 150 MOBILE HOME OWNED 175 77 218 102 29 56 231 SLEEPING ROOM 7 2 8 4 0 19 26 MOTEL 5 2 10 4 0 16 21 OTHER 47 18 52 20 8 40 87 TOTAL 1297 637 1756 839 323 399 1696 e

_ 25 _

4 Table A-6 FOLLOW UP SURVEY WORRERS WHO MOVED INT 3 H AR TSVI LLE huCLE AR PLANT AREA PAGE 036 MACON RUN CATE 07/29/80 EMPLOYEES Liv! NG WITHIN THE COUNTY TOT AL REPORT 18 ACTIVE EM PLOYEE S 03-31-80 RUN TIME 125018 WITH TOTAL CHILOREN CHILDREN

, MOVERS CHILOR EN NU MBER IN IN MOVERS i WITH IN OF GR ADE HIGH WI THO UT TOTAL FAMILY SC HOO L -CHILOREN SCHOOL SCHOO L FAMILY MOVERS ANNUAL EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 10 7 17 10 1 0 10 HOUSE RdNTED 4 3 5 3 2 0 4 AP ARTMENT RENTED 2 3 0 0 0 0 2 MOBILE HOME RENTE3 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 MOBILE HOME OWNED 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 SLEEPING ROOM MO TEL OTHER TOTAL 17 11 23 14 3 2 19 HOURLY EMPLOYEES

'40USE OWNED 45 26 72 43 16 0 45 HOUSE RENTED 14 9 24 18 3 2 16

APARTMENT RENTED 5 3 8 4 0 0 5 MOBILE HCME RENTED 14 4 18 6 2 8 22 MOBILE HGME OWNED 18 7 19 9 2 3 21 SLEEPING ROOM 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 MOTEL 0 3 0 0 0 1 1 -

OTHER 4 3 4 3 0 2 6 i TOTAL 10 0 52 145 83 23 19 119 i ALL E MPLOYEE S HOUSE OWNED 55 33 89 53 17 0 55 MOUSE RENTED 18 12 29 21 5 2 20 APARTMENT RENTED 7 3 8 4 0 0 7 MOBILE HOME RENT ED 15 5 19 T 2 8 23

, MOBILE HCME ChNED 18 7 19 9 2 5 23 i

SLEEPING ROOM 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 MOTEL 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 OTHER 4 3 4 3 0 2 6 TOTAL 117 63 168 97 26 21 138 D

_ 26 _

Table A-7 FOLLOW UP SURVEY WORKERS WHO MOVED INTO HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANT AREA PAGE 307 SMITH RUN DATE 07/29/80 EMPLOYEE S LIVI NG WITHIN THE COUNTY TOTAL REPORT 18

. ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 03-31-80 RUN TIME 125018 WITH TOTAL CHILDREN CHILDR EN MOVERS CHILDREN NUMBER IN IN MOVERS WITH IM OF GRADE HIGH WITHOUT TOTAL FAMILY SCHOOL CHILDREN SCHOOL SCHOOL FAMIL Y MOVERS ANNUAL EMPLOYEES HOUSE OhNED 8 6 16 10 3 1 9 HOUSE RENTED 7 3 9 4 1 3 10 AP ARTMENT RENT ED 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 MOBILE HOME RENTED 2 2 4 4 0 6 8 MOBILE HOME CWNED 6 1 1 0 1 2 8 SLEEP!NG ROOM 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 MOTEL OTHER 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 TOTAL 24 12 30 18 5 18 42 HOURLY EMPLOYEES

, HOUSE OWNED 31 23 48 23 16 1 32 H0r" RENTED 28 12 37 16 6 5 33 AP..i' MEN T RE NTED 2 0 2 0 0 5 7 AOBIL E HOME RENTED 13 5 14 6 0 13 26 N0 BILE HOME CWNED 38 13 45 16 5 13 51 SL EEPING ROOM 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 MOTEL 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 OTHE R 5 2 6 4 0 4 9 TOTAL 117 52 152 65 27 46 163 ALL EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNEO 39 26 64 33 19 2 41 HOUSE RENTED 35 15 46 20 7 8 43 A P AR TMENT RENTED 2 0 2 0 0 10 12 MOBILE HCME RF/4TE3 15 7 18 to 0 19 34 MOBI LE HCME ^dNE0 44 14 46 16 6 15 59 SLEE PI NG kCOM 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 MOTEL 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 OTHER 6 2 6

O 4 10 TOTAL 141 64 182 83 32 64 205 6

_ 27 _

Table A-8 F OL L OW UP SURVEY ,

WORKERS WHO MOVED INTD HARTSVILLE hCCLEAR PL ANT ARE A P AGE 008 SUMNER RUN DATE 07/29/80:

EMPLOYEES LIVING WITHIN THE COUNTY TOT AL R E P'JR T 18 ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 03-31-80 AUN TIME 125018

W ITH TOTAL CHILOREN CHILDREN MOVEa5 CHILDREN NUMBER IN IN MOVERS WI TH IN OF GRADE HIGH WITHOUT TOTAL F AMILY SC HDD L C HIL DR EN SCHOOL SCHOO L F AM IL Y MOVE R S ANNUAL E MPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 153 87 221 111 45 9 162 HOUSE RENTED 11 4 -8 5 2 2 13 AP ARTMENT RENTED 15 2 9 2 1 23 38 MOBILE HOME RENTED 1 1 1 1 0 1 2 M08ILE HOME CWNED 7 2 9 2 0 3 10 SLEEPING ROOM 1 1 3 2 0 1 2 MOTEL 1 3 2 0 0 0 1 OTHER 2 0 0 0 0 1 3 I TOTAL 19 1 97 253 123 48 40 231 i

HOUS LY EMPLOYEES h HOUSE OWNED 97 63 160 88 28 5 102 -

HOUSE RENTED 57 25 87 36 11 9 66 i AP AR TMEN T RE NTED 26 7 22 S 1 15 41 MOBILE HOME RENTED 5 2 4 2 0 11 16 M08tLE HCME CWNED 25 14 33 17 8 7 32 SLEEPING ROOM 1 0 0 0 0 3 4 l MOTEL 2 0 4 0 0 0 2 OTHER 6 2 6 1 1 4 10 )

TOTAL 219 113 316 152 49 54 273 ALL EMPLCYEES HOUSE OWNED 25C 150 381 199 73 14 264 HOUS E RENT ED 68 29 95 41 13 11 79 AP AR TMENT RENTED 41 9 31 10 2 38 79 MOBILE HOME RENTED 6 3 5 3 0 12 18 M081LE HCHE CWNED 32 16 42 19 8 10 42 SLEEPI NG ROOM 2 1 3 2 0 4 6 MOTEL 3 0 6 0 0 0 3 OTHER 8 2 6 1 1 5 13 TOTAL 410 210 569 275 97 94 50 4 9

4 Table A-9 FOLL OW UP SURVEY WO RKER S WHO MOVED INTO HARTSVILLE huCLEAR PLANT ARE A P AGE 009 TROUSD AL E RUN D ATE 07/29/80 EMPLOYEES LIVING WITHIN THE COUNTY TOTAL REPORT IS ACTIVE EMPLOYriS 03-31-80 RUN TIME 125018 W IT H TO TAL CHILDREN CHILDREN MOVERS CHILDREN NUM BER IN IN MOVERS WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH WITHOUT TOTAL F AM ILY SCWOL CHILDREN SCHOOL SCHOOL FAMILY MOVERS ANNUAL E MPLOYE ES HOUSE CWNED 6 3 10 3 0 0 6 HOUSE RENTED 8 2 8 5 1 1 9 APARTMENT RENTED 3 1 1 1 0 11 14 MOBILE HCME RENTED 1 1 0 1 0 2 3 MOBILE HOME OWNED 10 4 10 4 1 6 16 SL EEPING ROOM C 0 0 0 0 1 1 MOTEL OTHER TOTAL 28 11 29 14 2 21 49 HOURLY EMPLCYEES j HOUSE OWNED 20 9 30 15 5 1 21 HOUSE RENTED 32 18 45 20 13 8 40 APARTMENT RENTED 13 4 10 1 4 17 30 MOSILE HOME RENTED 32 12 42 20 9 19 51 MOBI LE HOME CWNED 36 22 46 25 8 11 47 SLEE PI NG ROOM 1 0 3 0 0 5 6 MOTEL 1 1 2 2 0 7 8 0THER 2 2 5 2 0 9 11 TOTAL 137 68 183 85 39 77 214 ALL EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 26 12 40 18 5 1 27 HOUSE RENTED 40 20 53 25 14 9 49 AP AR TMENT RE NT ED 16 5 11 2 4 29 44 MOBILE HCME RENTED 33 13 42 21 9 21 54 MOBILE HCME OWNED 46 26 56 29 9 17 f3 SLEEPING ROOM 1 0 3 0 0 6 7 MO TE L 1 1 2 2 0 7 8 OTHER 2 2 5 2 0 9 11 TOTAL 16 5 79 212 99 41 98 263

6 Table A-10 FOLLOW UP SURVEY WORKERS WHO MOVE 0 INTO HARTSVILLE NUCL E AR PLANT AREA PAGE 010 WILSON RUN DAT E 07/29/80 EMPLOYEES L IVING WITHIN THE COUNTY TOT AL REPGRT IS .

ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 03-31-80 RUN TIME 125018 WITH TOTAL CHILDREN CHI LDR EN MOVERS CHILDREN NUMBER IN IN MOVERS WI TH IN OF GRADE HIGH W IT HOUT TOTAL F AM IL Y SC HOO L CHILDREN SCHOOL SCHOOL FAMILY MOVERS ANNUAL EMPLOYEES HOUS E OW NE D 59 33 80 41 9 2 61 HOUSE RE NTED 9 1 7 3 0 2 11 APARTMENT RENTED 5 2 2 2 0 6 11 MOBILE HOME RENTED MOBILE HCME OWNED 1 3 2 0 0 3 4 SL E E P I NG R OO M 1 1 2 2 0 0 1 MOTEL 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 OTHER 3 3 1 0 0 0 3 TOTAL 78 37 94 4E 9 14 92 DOURLY EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 45 31 75 36 21 0 45 HOUSE RENTED 22 14 33 17 10 9 31 A PARTMENT RE NTED 16 5 19 5 3 6 22 MOBILE HOME RENTED 5 3 5 4 0 1 6 MOBILE HOME OWNED 16 7 29 16 2 4 20 SLEE PI NG ROOM L 0 0 0 0 0 1 MOTEL 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 OTHER 9 1 11 1 1 2 11 TOTAL 114 61 172

79 37 24 138 ALL EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNE D 104 64 155 77 30 2 106 HOUSE RENTED 31 15 40 20 10 11 42 APARTMENT RENTED 21 7 21 7 3 12 33 MOBI LE HOME RENTED 5 3 5 4 0 1 6 HOBILE HOME OWNED 17 7 31 16 2 7 24 SLEEPING ROOM 2 1 2 2 0 0 2 MO TEL 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 OTHER 12 1 12 1 1 2 14 TOTAL 192 99 266 127 46 38 2 30

Table A-11 FOLLCW UP SURVEY WORKER S WHO MOVED INT 3 HARTSVILLE AUCLEAR PLANT ARE A PAGE 331 CARTHAGE RUN DATE 07/29/80 EMPLOYEES LIVING WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS REPORT 1A ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 03-31-80 RUN TIME 125018 WITH TOTAL CHILDREN CHILDREN MOVERS CHILDREN NUMBER IN IN MOVERS WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH WITHOUT TOTAL FAMILY SCHOOL CHILDREN SCHOOL SCH03L FAMIL Y MOVERS ANNUAL EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 0 3 0 0 0 1 1 HOUSE RENTED 2 2 6 3 1 3 5 APARTMENT RENTED 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 MOBILE HOME RENTED MOBILE HOME CWNED SLEEPING ROOM 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 MOTEL

, OTHER TOTAL 2 2 6 3 1 10 12 HOURLY EMPLOVEES HOUSE OWNED 6 3 6 3 2 0 6 HOUSE RENTED 4 3 7 6 0 1 5-AP AR TMEN T RENTED 1 0 0 0 0 3 4

, MOBIL E HOME RENT ED 1 0 2 0 0 4 5 MOBILE HCME CWNED 8 2 6 2 0 6 14 SLEEPING ROOM 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 MOTEL 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 TOTAL 20 8 21 11 2 18 38 ALL EMPLOYEES HOUSE OwNtu 6 3 6 3 2 1 7 HOUS E R E NT ED 6 5 13 9 1 4 10 APARTMENT RENTED 1 0 0 0 0 8 9 MOBILE HOME RENTED 1 0 2 0 0 4 5 MOEILE HOME CWNED 8 2 6 2 0 6 14 SLEEPI NG ROOM 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 MOTEL 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 OTHER 0 3 0 0 0 1 1 TOTAL 22 10 27 14 3 28 50 O

Table A-12 FOLLOW UP SURVEY WO RKERS WHO MOVED INTO HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PL ANT ARE A P AG E 002 GALLATIN RUN D ATE 07/29/80 EMPLOYEES LIVING WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS REPORT 14 .

ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 03-31-80 RUN TIME 125018 WITH TOTAL CHILOREN CHILDREN MOVERS CHILDREN NUM 8ER IN IN MOVERS WI TH IN OF GRADE HIGH W IT HOUT TOTAL F AM ILY SCHOOL CHILDREN SCHOCL SCHOOL F AM IL Y MOVERS ANNUAL E MDLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 42 19 52 23 6 5 47 !

HOUSE RE NTED 3 2 3 2 0 0 3 l l

APARTMENT RENTED 8 1 6 1 0 11 19 MOBILE HOME RENTED 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 l MOBILE HCME OWNED 4 0 4 0 0 2 6 SLEEPING ROOM 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 MOTEL OTHE R 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 i TOTAL 57 22 65 26 6 21 78 HOURLY EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 31 20 46 24 10 2 33 HOUSE RENTED 26 12 38 17 4 2 28 APARTMENT RE NTED 13 5 15 5 1 5 18 MOBILE HGME RENTED C 0 0 0 0 8 8 MOBILE HOME OWNED 8 4 9 3 3 1 9 SL EEPING ROOM 1 0 0 0 0 3 4 MOTEL 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 OTHE R 3 1 3 1 0 3 6 TOTAL 83 42 112 50 18 24 107 ALL EMPLOYEE S HOUSE OWNED 73 39 98 47 16 7 80 HOUSE RENT ED 29 14 41 19 4 2 31 A P AR TME N T RE NTED 21 6 21 6 1 16 37 MOBILE HOME RENTED 0 0 0 0 0 9 9 MOBILE HOME OWNED 12 4 13 3 3 3 15 SLEEPI NG ROOM 1 0 0 0 0 4 5 MOTEL 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 OTHER 3 1 3 1 0 4 7 TOTAL 160 64 177 76 24 45 185 e

4 4

1 J. !

1 Table A-13 Fa.L ow UP SURVEY WORKERS WHO MOVED INTO HARTSVILLE AUCLEAR PL ANT ARE A P AG E 00 3 HARTSVILLE RUN DATE 07/29/80 EMPLOYEES LIVING WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS REPORT 1A ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 03-31-80 RUN TIME 125018 i W IT H TO T AL CHILDREN CHILDREN l MOVERS CHILDREN NUM BER IN IN MOVERS WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH WITHOUT TOTAL F AM ILY SCHDDL CHILDREN SCHOOL SCHOOL FAMILY MOVERS ANNU AL E MPLOYE E S

! HOUSE OWNED 2 . 4 1 0 0 2 HOUSE RENTED 3 2 7 5 1 0 3 APARTMENT RENTED 3 1 1 1 0 10 13 MOBILE HCME RENTED 0 3 0 0 0 1 1 MOBILE HOME OWNED 4 2 4 3 0 4 8 SLEEPING ROOM 0 3 0 0 0 1 1 MOTEL OTHER .

TOTAL 12 6 16 10 1 16 -28 HOURLY E MPLOYE ES HOUSE OWNED 9 5 14 7 3 0 9 HOUSE RENTED 19 12 26 14 9 6 25 APARTMENT RENTED 13 4 10 1 4 16 29 MOBILE HOME RENTED 20 6 22 10 2 16 36 MOBI LE HOME OWNED 18 13 l' 11 3 10 28 SLEEPING ROOM 1 0 3 0 0 5 6 MOTEL 1 1 2 2 0 3 4 l OTHER 0 3 0 0 0 5 5

TOTAL 81 38 94 45 21 61 142 l

ALL EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 11 6 18 8 3 0 11 HOUS E RENT ED 22 14 33 19 '10 6 28 APAR TMENT RENTED 16 5 11 2 4 26 42 MOBILE HOME RENTED 20 6 22 10 2 17 37 MOBILE HOME OWNED 22 12 21 14 3 14 36 SL EE PI NG ROO M 1 3 3 0 0 6 7 MOTEL 1 1 2 2 0 3 4 l OTHER 0 3 0 0 3 5 5 TOTAL 93 44 110 55 22 77 170 i

l-I s I

i

, i

_ . . . , - . . . . . . . , . . _. _ . , , - - . , _ . . , . . . . , ,._ - ,. .__..__,..,__.,_,_...,_.m. . . _ . , . . . . . . . .-

- .- . . -. . . = = _ ._

h t

Table A-lk FOLLOW UP SURVEY WORKERS wHO NVED INTO HARTSVILLE MJCL E AR PL ANT ARE A PAGE 016 HENDERSONVILLE RUN DAT E 07/29/80 EMPLOYEES LIVING WITHIN CITY LIMITS REPORT 13 ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 03-31-83 RUN TIME 125018 4

I WITH TOTAL CHILOREN CHILDREN MOV ERS CHILDR EN WJMSER IN IN MOVERS WI TH IN OF GRADE . HIGH WIT @ uf TOTAL i

F AM IL Y SCKJ3 L CHILDREN SCHOOL SCHOOL F AMILY . MOVERS ANNUAL EMPLOYE*S l

HOUSE OWNED 5 2 6 2 1 2 7 HOUS E R E NT E D APARTMENT RENTED 7 1 3 1 1 10 17 MOBILE HO4E RENTE3

CBILE HOME CwNED j SLEEPIM ROOM MO TEL

'1 OTHER I TOTAL 12 3 9 3 2 12 24 {

d HOU2LY E "LO YE E S i

HOUSE OdNE3 16 12 39 20 6 0 16 . -

HOUSE RE NTED 6 3 10 2 3 0 6 APARTMENT RENTED s 2 7 3 0 9 18 "0 BILE HOME RENTE3 ,

) 40 BILE HOME CwNED 3 1 1 4 0 0 3 SLEEP!hG ROOM

, MOTEL "THE R 1 3 0 0 0 0 1 l TOTAL 35 18 48 29 9. 9 44 i

ALL EMPLOYEES

{

HOUSE 0=NED 21 14 36 22 7 2 23 HOUSE RENTED 6 3 10 2 3 0 6 i

APARTMENT RENTED 16 3 10 4 1 19 35

.w CBILE HOME RENTED

=0 BILE HOME CwNED 3 1 1 4 0 0 3 SLEE PI NG ROOM NO TEL OTHER 1 3 0 0 0 0 1

. TOTAL 47 21 ST '32 11 21 68 e

1 f

)- I

- 3h -

,,_.._c - _ , . , . 9 ..y,-.y.+y.,.,.,,.m.,,..,p.,,,y. yy ,,,,, ,,_,,gy. ,p-,., ,.9,., _.m m, y , _ . . , - . . . . ,, , . , .,- .

4 i

i Table A-15

'* F OL L OW UP SURVEY WORKERS WHO MOVED INTO HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PL ANT ARE A P AG E 00 4 LAFAYETTE RUN DATE 07/29/80 EMPLOYEES LIVING WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS REPORT 14 ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 03-31-80 RUN TIME 125018-W ITH TOTAL CHILDREN CHILDREN MCVERS CHILOREN NUMBER IN IN MOVERS WI TH IN CF GRADE HIGH WITHOUT TOTAL F AM ILY SC HOOL C H!L OR EN SCHOOL SCHOOL F AM IL Y MOVE R S ANNUAL E MPLO YE E S HOUSE OWhED 4 3 6 5 1 0 4 HOUSE RE NTED APARTMENT RENTED 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 MOBILE HCME RENTED MOBILE HOME CWNED SL EEPING ROOM MOTEL OTHER l TO TA L 5 3 6 5 'l 0 5 l

HOURLY EMPLOYEES

. HOUSE OWNE D 22 15 39 26 10 0 22 HOUS E R E NT ED 9 5 15 10 0 1 10 AP ARTMENT RE NTED 5 3 8 4 0 0 5 L

MOBILE HOME RENTED 7 3 11 4 2 2 9

MOBILE HGME OkNED 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 SLEEPI NG ROOM 0 3 0 0' O 3 3 MOTEL 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 TOTAL 43 26 73 44 12 9 52 ALL EMPLOYEE S HCUSE OW NED 26 18 45 31 11 0 26 HOUSE RENTED 9 5 15 10 0 1 10 APARTMENT RENTED 6 3 8 4 0 0 6 MOBILE HOME RENTED 7 3 11 4 2 2 9 MOBILE HDME OWNE0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 SLEEPING ROOM 0 3 0 0 0 3 3 MOTEL 0 3 0 0 0 1 1 OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 TOTAL 48 29 79 49 13 9 :57 e

Table A-16 F OLL OW OP SURVEY WORKERS WHO MOVED INTD HAR TSV ILL E NUCLE AR PL ANT ARE A P AGE 00 5 LEBANON RUN DATE 0T/29/80 EMPLOYEE S LIVING WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS REPORT 1A ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 03-31-80 RUN TIME 125018

WITH TOTAL CHILDREN CHIL DR EN MOVERS CHILDREN NUMBER IN IN MOVERS WITH IN OF GR ADE HIGH WITHOUT TOTAL FAMILY SCHOOL CHILOREN SCHOOL SCHOOL FAMILY MOVERS AN NU AL EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 7 3 5 3 1 0 7 HOUSE RENTED 2 1 4 3 0 0 2 APARTMENT RENTED 4 1 1 1 0 6 10 MOBILE HOME RENTED MOBILE HOME OWNED 0 3 0 0 0 2 2 SLEEPING ROOM MOTEL 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 OTHER 2 0 1 0 0 0 2 TOTAL 15 5 11 7 1 9 24 HOURLY E MP LO YE E S HOUSE OWNED 4 4 7 5 1 0 4 .

HOUSE RENTED 5 3 7 3 2 5 10 AP ARTMENT RENT ED 10 1 9 1 1 3 13 MOBILE HOME RENTED 1 3 0 0 0 0 1 MOBILE HOME CWNED 3 1 6 0 1 2 5 SLEEPING RDOM 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 MOTE L 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 ,

OTHER 3 0 2 0 0 0 ~3 I TOTAL 27 9 31 9 5 12 39 '

ALL EdPLOYEES H OUSE OW NE D 11 T 12 8 2 0 11 HOUSE RE NTED 7 4 11 6 2 5 12 APARTMENT RENTED 14 2 10 2 1 9 23 MOBILE HCME RENTED 1 3 0 0 0 0 1 MOBILE HOME ChNED 3 1 6 0 1 4 T SLEEPING ROOM 1 0 0 0 0 0- 1 MOTEL 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 O THE R 5 0 3 0 0 0 5 TOTAL 42 14 42 16 6 21 63 8

Table A-17 FOLLOW UP SURVEY WORKERS WHO MOVED INTO HARTSVILLE NUCL E AR PLANT ARE A PAGE 017 NASHVILLE RUN DAT E 07/29/80 EMPLOYEES LIVING WITHIN CITY LIMITS REPGRT 10 ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 03-31-80 RUN TIME 125018 WITH TOTAL CHILDREN CHILDREN MOVERS CHILDREN NUMBER IN IN MOVERS WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH W IT HOUT TOTAL F AM IL Y SCH3O L CHILDREN SCHOOL SCHOOL F AMIL Y MOVERS ANNUAL EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 2 0 2 0 0 1- 3 HOUSE RENTED APARTMENT RENTED 0 3 0 0 0 6 6 MOSILE HOME RENTED MOBILE HCME CWNEO SLEEPING ROOM MOTEL OTHER 1 0 0 0 0 2 3 TOTAL 3 3 2 0 0 9 12 HO UR LY EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 9 7 IT 8 4 1 10 HOUSE RENTED 11 3 6 5 0 3 14 APARTMENT RENTED 11 3 7 . 0 2 13 MOBILE HOME RENTED 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 MOBILE HOME OWNED SL EEPING ROOM MOTEL 0 3 0 0 0 1 1

. OTHER TOTAL 32 14. 31 18 4 7 39 ALL EMPLOYEE S HOUSE OWNED 11 7 19 8 4 2 13 HOUSE RENTED 11 3 6 5 0 3 14 APARTMENT RENTED 11 3 7 4 0 8 19 MOBILE HOME RENTED 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 MOBILE HCME ChNED SL EEPING ROOM MOTEL 0 3 0 0 0 1 1 OT HE R 1 3 0 0 0 2 3 TOTAL 35 14 33 18 4 16 51 I

Appendix B SECONDARY SOCI0 ECONOMIC IMPACT MONITORING OF MARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AREA Secondary impact is ^' fined as a temporary increase in the trade ,

and service related resident population of the five-county area having an impact on co=2 unity f acilities and services which can be attributed to the Hartsville construction project.

TVA's monitoring program consists of a three-step procedure during each reporting period for esti=ating and reconciling population changes for each of the impact area counties. Residential customers of power distributors and school enrollment are used to provide independent ;

esticates of county residential population change during a given reporting period. Population for the beginning of the first reporting period is l estimated by applying the procedure outlined in Step I below to the most current estimate of county population provided by.U.S. Bureau of the Census Current Population Reports. Subsequen'. esticatas of population for the start of a reporting period is the TVA-estimate at the end of the previous reporting period and is adjusted each time more current census estimates are available.

An estimate of secondary impact is made using the following three-steps process.

Step I Ratios of school enrollment and residential customers to population is calculated at the beginning of the reporting period for each of the impact area counties. These ratios are applied to the number of residential customers and school enrollment at the end of the period. This i

yields two estimates of population change during the reporring period.

t These two estimates are averaged to produce a single estimate of population change for each of the impact area counties.

, Steo II Primary employment population, taken from TVA employee surveys, is subtracted from total adjusted population. If a residual population is derived , the analysis will continue to Step III.

I l

l Steo III l

This step comprises an analysis of nonproject related primary employment and its secondary effect to determine what part of the remaining unexplained population change should not be attributed to the

- project.

An es t'imath of change in total employment in each of the impact area counties during the reporting period is made using monthly data from the " CPS Labor Force Summary" produced by the Tennessee Department of Employment Security. In order to determine that part of the change in total employment which can be attributed to forces other than the construction project, it is necessary to estimate the change in nonproject related employment. Change in nonprojected related primary employment is estimated using a linear interpolation of primary employment as a percent of total employment in 1970 and projected to 1980, as given in the 1974 report by the Tannessee State Planning Office, Tennessee Mitigation, Poculation Familiet Income, and Manpower Demand Projection to 1990 for

Development Districts and Counties. A ratio of .65 will be applied to the 1

change in nonproject related primary employment to determine that part of the change in secondary erployment which can be considered nonproject related. The total employment change is converted to population using an average family size of three and subtracted from any unexplained population remaining. If no other reason exists for the remaining population it will .

be considered as secondary Lapact.

As results of the 1980 Census of Population or any other special -

census of census estimates are published, the population b*ase of the impact area counties will be recalibrated. Residential customers, school l

enrollment, and total population will be recorrelated. Essentially, a new population base vill be established from which to measure change l

throughout the remainder of the monitoring period.

1 l

l i

e

l l

i l

i Community Economics Projects 2/23/77 -

L

Appendix C TRAFFIC LEVEL DEFINED Level of Service D Level of service D approaches unstable flow, with tolerable operating

,- speeds being maintained though considerably affected by changes ir operating conditions. Fluctuations in volume and temporary restrictions I to flow may cause substantial drops in operating speeds. Drivers have I

litt,le freedom to maneuver, and comfort and convenience are low, but conditions can be toleratea for short periods of time.

1 1

Source: Hi6hway Capacity Manual, Highway Research Bord Special Report 87, 1965 4

D N

Appendix D-1 EMPLOYEE QUESTI0h3 AIRE - TRADES /J'D LABOR 4

7 .

NAME SOCI AL SECURITY NO.

'LAST FIPST

t. WHE RE 013 YOU Live BEFOi:E

EGINNrt.G WOM ON THIS P40 JECT?

CITY COUNTY STATE

2. WHERE ARE YOU NOW LIVtNG DURING THE n%ORK V4EEKP j STREET ADDRESS CITY COUNTY STATE

3. DO YOU LIVE 1*GOE THE CITY LIMITS? _ fES _ NO 4 HOW 0;D YOU CBTAIN MOST OF THE TRAINir.G THAT PREPARED YOU FOR YOUR PRESENT TRAOE OR TYPE OF WCRK7 (CHECK CNLY ONE)

1. HtGHSCHOOL 4. ARMEO SE RVICES

2. COLLEGE S. CN THE JOB BUT NOT FCRMAL

3. VOCATIONAL SCHOOL OR FORMAL APPRENTICESHIP PROGRAW AFPRE NTICESHIP PR OG R AM _ 6. OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)

S. IYMEOI ATE LY EEFO A E ACCEPTING EMPLOYMENT ON THIS PROJE CT WHAT WAS YOUR LAST JOB (SUCH A5 STEAbFITTING, LABORER. F ARVING. MAINTEN ANCE ETCJ?

6. WH AT TYPE OF BUSI' ESS wERE YOU IN (SUCH AS MANUFACTURING, CONSTRUCTICN, REPAIR OR M AINTEN ANCE SHOP, ETCJ? j 4

7. WHE RE WAS THIS BUSINESS LOCATEDP CITY STATE

8. CHE CK WHICH TYPE OF RES10ENCE IN THE PROECT ARE A WHERE YOU NOW LIVE.

1. BOARDING OR SLEEPING ROOM 4. MOBILE HOVE

2. u]TEL S. HOUSE 1 APARTMENT 6. OTHE R (PLE ASE SPECIF Y) 9 IF YOU LIVE IN A HOUSE OR MODILE HOME IN THE P/:OJECT ARE A. DO YOU OWN IT7 YES NO

10. IN THE PROJECT AREA, CHECK WITH WHOM YOU LIVE.

t. 8Y MYSELF 1 WITH RCOYM ATES,

~

2. WITH MY F AMILY HOW M ANYP

4. OTHER LPLEASE SPECIFY) t f. HOW MANY CHILOREN LIVE nlTH YOUIN THE PROJECT AREA?

OF THESE, HOW M ANY GO TO GRACE SCHOOL' OF THESE, HOW M ANY GO TO HIGH SCHOOL'

12. H AVE YOU LIVED AT YOUR PRESENT ADortESS MORE THAN SIX MONTHS 7 YES NO '

TH ANK YOU FOR COCPE RATING IN THl$ SURVEY.

HARTSVf LLE NUCLE AR PLANT NEW EMPLOYEE SURVEY I

^

1 Appendix D-2

' EMPLOYEE QUESTIONNAIRE - SALARY POLICY 3

NAME SOCIAL $ECURITY NO.

LAST FIRST 1.

WHERE Df D YOU LIVY eTEFORE DEGwNiNG WORK ON THIS PROJECT?

CITY COUNTY STATE

2. WHERE ARE YCU NUW LIVING DUPING THE WORK WEEK?

STREET ADDRESS CITY COUNTY STATE

2. 00 YOU LIVE 6,*e5f DE Thi CITY LIMITS? Yi$ NO 4.

HOW DID YOU 03?AIN ?.'OST OF THE TRAINING THAT PREPARED YOU FOR YOUR PRESENT TRADE OR TYPE OF WCW (CHEC4 ONLY OP.E OF THE FOLLOWING)

1. HIGH SOHCOf. 4. ARMED SERVICES 2.CO LEGC

5. ON THE.Ca BUT NOT FORMAL

_ 3. VOCAT:CNR SCHOOL TR AINING PROGR AM

_ E. OTHER (PLEASE SPECIF Y)

. 5.

IMMEDIATELY BEFORE ACC;PitNG EMPLOYMENT ON THis PROJECTWHATWAS YOUR LAST JOB (SUCH AS CL,EHICAL,SICREY A Hf AL, ENGINEERING AIDE, LABORER, ETC.)?

6.

WH AT TYPE OF EUSir.ESS v.E RE YOU IN ISUCH AS f,fANUFACTURING, CONSTRUCTION, RETAIL, SALES. SERVICES. ETC.)?

7. WHERE WAS THIS BU5iNESS LOCATEDF CITY STATE 2.

CHECK W4fCH TY"E CE RESIDENCE IN THE PROJECT ARE A WHERE YOU NOW LIVE.

1. BOAROiNG OR SLE EPING ROGa.1 4. MO91Lli HOME

2. VOTEL 5. HOUSE i

_ 3 APARTMENT _ 6. OTHEH fPLEASE SPECIFY) 9.

IF YOU LIVE IN A HOUSE OH VOesLE 610ME IN THE PROJECT AREA.DO YOU OWN iTP YES NO

10. IN THE PROJECT AREJ. CHECK WITH WHOM YOU LIVE.

1. BY ?.tYSE LF 3. WITH HOOMM ATES,

_ 2. WITH YY F AYtLY HOW M ANY?

_ 4. OTHER (PLE ASE SPECIFY)

II.

HOW f 4ANY CHf LDHEN tIVF WITH YOU IN THE PROJECT AREA?

OF THESE, HOW MANY GO TO GR ADE SCHOOLP OF THESE, HOW MANY GO TO HIGH SCHOOLP 12.

HAVE YOU LIVED AT YOUH PRESENT ADDRESS MORE THAN SIX MONTHS?

YES NO THANK YOU FOR COO?ER ATING IN THtS SURVEY.

HART 5VILLE NUCLEAR PLANT NEW EMPLOYEE SURVEY

4 Appendix D-3 FOLLOW UP QUESTIONNAIRE

1. Do you stiH live at (E:nployee's Address) 7 .

V E S. IF SO. SKIP TO QUESTION 2.

NO. IF NOT, PLE ASE ANSWER THE FOLLOWING OUESTIONS:

Wr4ERE ARE YOU NOW LIVING DURING THE WORK WEEK?

STREET ADDRESS CITY COUNTY STATE DO YOU LIVE INSIDE THE CITY LIMITS? YES NO CHECK WHICH TYPE RESIDENCE 1N THE PROJECT AREA YOU LIVE IN

1. BO ARDING OR SLEEPING ROOM

2. VOTEL

3. APARTMENT

4. MOBILE HOME S. HOUSE

6. OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)

2. IF YOU LIVE IN A HOUSE OR MOBILE HOME IN THE PROJECT AREA,00 YOU OWN ITF l YES NO

3. IN THE PROJECT ARE A. CHECK WITH WHOM YOU NOW Live: *

t. SY MYSELF

2. WtTH MY F AMILY

3. WITH ROOVMATES. HOW MANYP

__4 OTHE R IPLE ASE SPECIF Y) 4 HOW MANY CHILOREN LIVE WITH YOU IN THE PROJECT AREA?

[ OF ThESE HOW MANY GO TO GRADE SCHOOL?

OF THESE. HOW MANY GO TO HIGH SCHOOL 7 5 H AVE YOU LIVED AT YOUR PRESENT ADDRESS MORE THAN SIX MONTHS? YES _NO

6. HAVE YOU OR ANY OF YOUR FAMILY LIVING WITH YOU IN THE PROJECT AREA HAD ANY DIF FICULTY OSTAINtNG HEALTH TREATMENT?

YES 1F SO, CHECK THOSE WHICH YOU HAO DIFFICULTY OBTAINING:

DOCYOR INOT EMERGENCY)

DEN TIST EMERGENCY MEDICAL TREATMENT HOSPI T A LIZ ATION OTHER {PLEASE SPECIFY)

NO *

? HAVE YOUOR ANYOF YOUR FAMILY LIVING WITH YOU IN THE PROJECT AREA HAO TO TRAVEL OUT540E YOUR PRESENT COUNTY TO OSTAIN HEALTH TREATMENT?

YES. IF SO. WHAT WAS THE SERVICE AND WHERE DIO YOU HAVE TO GOP '

NO THANK YOU FOR COOPE R ATING IN THIS SURVEY.

HARTSVILLE NUCLE AR PLANT FOLLOWUP

-M-

O D D"!9P f "

e .fL mL l n -,

e s, . N,---. , a;,,,,\, ,a / "* ,'v... .....) '. ',/ 's / ,. 'd< q .V, j 0

/

i~

..- %,['I. e ee n, =m a. .s 1 p;n/y#s

.{ a

./ .m- i.sm, .. vn, cru. t e. - . y j

.e4. w s

\e . , xv~ < 't ,-

. m

&j . j

.>,3 (,.o . 1~ -

f. s

\ ,// ), g. Y, a ,,., .y..g , g' 4.. . -

7 m.

,. yQ y,

,' -ta 4SlW ...wg.~'- ,, ft . n . h. se- : 9n.

p.M~ -\ h /_ @#,

. *Qy wmm.gy. q- opwi,,..,.ii. iT. r;',

..~,,a

,- r .A-;' 4;~.p, ,(*p' M ->_.

n . _ . .

s.

m+ i, a

,n :'~

... ( u n

. G,/

v Rl',.\ .%s/.

j; y / y--4l -

'~

y / A.~ cv.,4'4+ ,,

-, n,

+ i. :m;~---

! c n,(- b 2....s ..; ! sg., J .%

e/ o, .- A.rq,. <. ,7, ._\<, .:. i , ,

.t,

. v, .

rf%%e

> g g ,

j ~ ~.,f*vy&y, ~. ,y

, < sq .v<1. *

?=}% ;.f, p

.,.R. w.. ! ,/p.: ..,-. l 3 ! %, g 1 .,..,

._.e

'),[ s [s '

-.l , . . , . . s ..

.\ .

q... ...

~ ,

%wu 4 m. s .x<

-. ~

-c e+ - .

i .%~ c.s[_ , f*. f .,

c : __.. j-.

.,i I ..

~- T," i {_ 1 pn ~:..~, / %. e.. )~

.. : .:._ .1.s ;

I ... w

( . d . , A ;. N L 'R \,.,. n;# .f., j *Ss,@Wh..~..;.

! 7.,u.; -j -~ f, *9 . ., _=. .:------- ----

g,t%,w ; . . .,

.. .:p --

. . L._

L}4,

%' *A. <~.- .r..j m s/-- [.R --- :- .M .,h,h-c;:. . f . - - --

I. l - -ee '

y s. .. .

b.,i-f.

.. .n a- y 6.~

a, -: -

i . . , . . .

\;. ~ . . j Q. -- :; p f A, -'r*, v. .

. , . ~ ,

~.~

.,v, _fi ' ,

r .

[ . p . + - :~.+....,.t..,.. .,.t, - . -

kaarterr' s y .

'_ ,,2,pm ,.,i, p,,.. ... A ... ., .: - .

4 -. ,c, ~~~

g ,s- g ,~q' %,

.\ N g . . ,

q ,- j -

j'Q>a>Jf.Ni.,p1 -W ,g..

M....,,,,,,'J-,y g -

% '3 .. , ,

g / M. , *. , .

g s, . .

,;4.

. -4/k N.. O r n'\ > .. I ' f * ~... ,M% i>M g 1 j*i \

^

'""*y * *"'*U' . . . '.Yw "

4

/

' \'"~~ " 1 '- '~~~~'*~"

I.s. ark ..T.,Qw.'.~

e

,,_ k ,,, ,\c. ,,., '

A b a, )..j'M N, h.b I ~~'fE~~,"['

, ,,;3. W, % p ,y. . , ys u_3, a,,h I, l.[ 'd/ ih,...cf._

, . s ; .i

g 3

g i .- 4 ~-

s.1 s -f-7.- , . .# ,~-

'4*f y ( g =

. ;- % . a c. J. *

'a',"'le*'.,g'v_. 3 .o %-v Ca,ure.,

c.-Q.p.J e

/ I

-_.. -7 't

. g ,, .. . .

.e

,s q ,,-

I4,. , .J ,

gg, e

.n . pA.g.,,,

S m

q/ f" -s.;=. \,g. jy_,.

t

.,. n.,e

,,g,.j. .,,

j ,_..s.-)

_,-p.,,,. a o

,, l 4, Q,Q. ~saat , p 7 * ,fgm, -

, -m n.1 L.s.a.

%. a ,

.....<' q ,L[4 ,_( .

l g ; t e- w i

.' s .. ' t+ 1 n ,e. . '

- ....M... ,f+,,g, - . ..-- y ,e j g C.,. M { t'INr r I .-y -

-*'x "N.'%,,,,["ff, ,, ' [',% ~,. <. . . . , ., 'C e M N .u~-.J ,* * **~ ' ~""

i y-g-- *

,,,,j/ , 7 n' eam / <- . g.. .. .,,..

, q e

f

- . s. ,,. ' ',a . e

.+ -

o--*

'Aw.4 J ' ., , . ?. - 6 --

^ N,f.C.

eg ;,/ f y. .,.:.- .'8y,hq >ge %e.

j

~ ~ai m~~ n. ~

.y,-gg Q;,/..*'

t 1 , c .

,v n . ... ~c.z, . ....-.,.

\ .& , .S,g. -.r.- .. g

-~~ w*

Q,- ~ - -

.l

' N.m,aaa,o k.:a h*=.N-N

,e. 9 e $ ..

i mae'rtam . ,,,m e t, I x - " * * * * ' ' " '

4 . .,J, , / 9., s3 .sw 4

. . . . . . c h

'o.tUU.a't', s

"\/ -s - T - % s'

'e. :

,=,,'.c...../-

.s

-') \s s b.@,. -

. p '" b%, r. .~ \

Q .,"_, ' ' '*&.s_"

bus ae

' ff +- .""..y;_~W-' .a=--

_ _. 4

, V. ,

.s - -i 5 'F x# wk m. _.~ ~.,

', . ~ . .

..;( . **".w *.w.

M * *" y,' * "J .; y.

s s ..

.m

, j- _y - r , ., , . . . a r :--

g

\L. ,,;mts.6. .. '

13 (

't x .

w

- ,j

,. s f.4y su:uf +

A y

.b c = - ~ ~ ~

A 7

.i,

_j ., . , .

e

)-*f /' .*],, s ,,

Wl

\.,g ,j}'/me . e- r '

a;

'a #b ..,/

f.

p,.,,. *"J'

~ .y=i ef'-g;, .* t

( e N.,. /

\N. e.., . .,L ~ . - " *u

\ % -- s# t ; . 3 < .

. t - ..

. /" > ' J ,b . c. .e .g., f o 4 e

-J M, 5-- W1, 4[~s 0 >H f -

.n..... ./ g; o

--.- g i."*~" % ,,,,,3 , A s u . u., }

~i,,,.. _'x

,,...y-1q . ,

f,

.7 .

} ,. J,// -.

'*g a e

g c g.

y s

~,s'.g-%ff j 1 g )P.

. 1 -

.4 m ,,

-a rm

. .,.,4 .

, s

.a c .. ,

> . , . . p. 1 ,,

g 1 e

(

s m<.,.

,f,, t ..

,7(

n. Ca >

/.,,:.

.. /....,/ *.A rq .

l. r :. n.

,. 4 c ~. gi v L- e . -.-...-.

q m; ; .,e > ~ . . . y. - m/-

.k _M'

s -Mal 6'J

.i j" p~7@q .A.l c.pX s

-Q:. . i ,' A "\*T*;, f>.-f L %. -...'i t- %

J, afs l .. g mae 1 U

.. y o i 3- N ni,s v R$W

'M 9

' f,.,,, _Y. .." ,l/ l (

. .. [*"C3 \e r J, . A.. . N m..%x s ,J

/

x.,, - ,,

[ d Colv 1..',

r As %,<7 . ")I-m .. uw' **c-.- eN / }e" y, M ; ^ 1 l - - - . . .I 8

n

[ h'r -

i h

, y av g .I- g. .a .;. ,,s o - n wy

~-j*;' ,f s, .*.-b' W) _;

FIGURE I 1, / ( ; u t., '%s. . 9- < 4 *,.//. .. .V .j ? - V! -/

/( ,,

HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANT

}], % "*[,'"- , '

y

/ i . ._

s Ai ~M j

' /q ..- TOWNS CONTAINING CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYEES

,h:f ds; "[7 . ,i M/1'. . 't N*T h.3 *

.. N A PLANT SITE

,, .y. 4

[-,: .

u n.r. vp- , ..g1.g . .mj H

.,i . - - - - - +W mg - .

j , .g ,

.s p; .5 T . ...w P T~ - \. Q,-e.-M

,i e Nj% gA.o . j.

s ame* ..[.* ",. MARCH 1980 1 7~ . _ L .t,o,

\ .'Y c s 2. ,2 15 0 IS 30 p/ ,' . J.,[ ,, . .. s .* # '

e

- )}!

j ; p , [_/, .. . '1 3s V*

p *%T ' y Q /,or,,*'2 .

l SCALE OF MILES

- . . ' - ..-...y '

7\ ' ~($' [' ' ,M l /4 P . '

g[ , ' ~'"UI'y . -// d j;

}

,j '(j ;

d#k[. f-.'k' 9.* NOTE ' TOWNS UNDERLINED CON 1A!N EMPLOYEES

ML19340D480

Text

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

Search