ML19318C323

Socioeconomic Monitoring & Mitigation Rept, Data as of 790930

ML19318C323
Person / Time
Site:	Hartsville
Issue date:	05/31/1980
From:	TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
To:
Shared Package
ML19318C312	List: ML19318C311 ML19318C323
References
NUDOCS 8007010350
Download: ML19318C323 (52)

Text

m. m.

r i

" ' ' ~ '

~g e

u.

9..

~

{-ly \\ l..&:a L ~,,,,,.

}\\h.

?

S30Vd linVnD E00d

&4 "h StjlVit!00 li13WD000 SI'l1 1,

,4

/s.

?

-uw ). Fr. g ~,

t TENNESSEE VALLEY AUT110RITY y

j i

n

.'M

,Il I

~/

~

/

.[.

i

_ ;.Y.

. 34E

~

'[ha!

. z <u. dsb

?

• j 7..

g..

IIARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANTS SOCIOECONOMIC MONITORING AND MITIGATION REPORT IINP - SMR-7 September 30, 1979 j

Knoxville, Tennessee l

l May 1980 80 0 7 0103fD.:

CONTENTS Page Y

Background and Highlights.

a I.

General Status of Employment as of September 30, 1979.

1 II.

General Characteristics of Movers.

3 III.

Secondary Employment 5

IV.

Functional Area Impacts and Mitigation Actions 8

Tables Table 1.

Estimates of Population and Population Change.

6 Table 2.

Estimates of Population and Population Change between April 30, 1976 - September 30, 1979.

7 Table 3.

School Systems' Report of Hartsville Nuclear Plants Direct Impact Students.

9 Table 4.

TVA Education Mitigation Payments.

9 Tab 1 e 5.

TVA Local Planning Assistance Payments 12 Table 6.

Traffic Evaluation 15 Table 7.

Summary of TVA Mitigation Expenditures as of September 30, 1979 19 Appendixes Appendix A - Detailed Survey Results Table A-1.

Town of Current Residence.

21 Table A-2.

Source of Location of Construction Employees.

23 Table A-3.

Distribution of Movers and Associated Population by County and Community 24 Table A-4.

Comparison of Survey Results with Projections for Selected Parameters.

25 Table A-5.

Mover Summary.

26 Table A-6.

Macon - Employees Living Within the County 27 Table A-7.

Smith - Employees Living Within the County 28 Table A-8.

Sumner - Employees Living Within the County 29 Table A-9.

Trousdale - Employees Living Within the County 30 j_

c:

CONTENTS (Continued)

Page Table A-10.

Wilson - Employees Living Within the 31 County Table A-11.

Davidson - Employees Living Within the 32 County Table A-12.

Carthage - Employees Living Within the 33 City Limits.

Table A-13.

Callatin - Employees Living Within the City Limits.

34 Table A-14.

Hartsville - Employees Living Within the City Limits.

35 Table A-15.

Hendersonville - Employees Living Within the City Limits.

36 Table A-16.

Lafayette - Employees Living Within the City Limits.

37 Table A-17.

Lebanon --Employees Living Within the City Limits.

38 Table A-18.

Nashville - Employees Living Within the City Limits.

39 Appendix B - Secondary Socioeconomic Impact Monitoring of Hartsville Nuclear Plant Environmental Impact Area.

40 Appendix C - Traffic Level Defined 43 Appendix D - Employee Questionnaire.

44 Exhibits Figure 1 - Towns Containing Construction Employees 47 t.

x,

_ BACKGROUND AND HIGHLIGHTS For permits. to construct the four-unit Hartsville Nuclear Plants located in Sm'ith and Trousdale Counties, Tennessee, TVA agreed to certain moni--

. toring and mitigation actions to reduce the socioeconomic impact in the

_ area expected to accommodate movers. The impact area is defined as Trousdale, Smith, Macon, Sumner, and Wilson Counties,. Tennessee. TVA also agreed to report to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission the results of the monitoring efforts and mitigation actions taken to accommodate the impacts.

This is the seventh in a series of semiannual reports which will be submitted during construction of the Hartsville project, including three I

reporting periods following issuance of the operating license for the last unit. This report is for the period April 1, 1979, through September 30, 1979.

Peak employment this period occurred during the week of May 4, 1980, when total canployment reached 6,996.

The employment level on September 30, 1979, was 6,340. The mover rate was 31 percent for a I

total of 1,950 movers. Projections contained in the environmental impact statement (EIS) stopped at 5,000 employees, but the mover rate is l

i much lower than would be expected for a workforce of over 6,300 employees.

Thirty-seven percent of the workforce was. hired from the impact counties.

The two impact counties that gained movers this period were Smith and

-Macon Counties. Other Counties contain fewer movers than at the end of the last' reporting period.

V

. y r

TVA's major mitigation. expenditures this period were for ' employee trans-portation ($560,000) and education ($84,000 - $28,000 of which was

- erroneously reported' in the last report). TVA's total Hartsvilla mitigation payments at the end of March were $5,645,063.

O 4

1

,1 l

4 o

9 4

J J

vi

HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANTS-SOCIOECONOMIC MONITORING AND MITIGATION REPORT I.

General Status of Employment as of September 30,-1979

' A survey of all TVA employees as of September 30, 1979, was con-ducted during' November of 1979. The timelag between employment and survey enables employees who moved to make personal adjust-ments and should provide a better picture of employee distribu-tion, family characteristics, and housing choice. The employment 1

level was 6,340 ; and 6,104 (96 percent) employees were surveyed.

Of those surveyed,1,877 employees said they had moved for a mover rate of about 31 percent (table A-1).

Information on the family status and housing choice was obtained for those who moved (table A-ST.

The data on movers have been extrapolated on a ratio basis to the total'6,340 employees, which results in an estimated total number of movers of'1,950.

Of the total, 1,518 movers located in the five impact counties; and 432 moved to other counties. As shown in table' A-1 and figure 1, local workers (nonmovers) are commuting to'the project from a much more widespread area.

'1.

1u1 interim peak employment occurred this period during the week of May 4, 1980, when total employment reached.6,996.

Employment is expected to drop further, stabilize, and then increase again to a level higherLthan 7,000.

g.

-.s

'Information on the distribution of both movers and residents is' found in tables A-1, A-2, and figure 1.

Additional information on 1

-]

'the distribution.and characteristics ^of movers is continued in j.

tables A-3'through A-18.

Table A-1 lists the town of current residence. This table is based ~on " mailing address" locations instead of-jurisdictional locations. All employees are asked to provide a place name even though they may not live within any municipal ~1'imits.

Figure 1 is based on this table. Table A-3 provides a mover's distribution which is based on city limits for the seven communities to which at least 50 employees moved.

1 4

e Table A-2 shows both the origin and location of all employees.

The diagonal line of the "From-To" tabulation shows resident employees (nonmovers).

For example, resident employees from Sumner County would be found by locating Sumner County in the "From" column and going across the table to the "To" column which also reads Sumner County. In this survey, 871 residents of Sumner.

County were employed at the end of September 1979. Movers are.

t shown by any other data in this table.

For example, 174 employees moved from Other Tennessee Counties to Sumner County.

i.

i

=

L

. Table A-4 of this-report series contains a comparison of the survey: results with the ' projections ' contained in the environmental-impact statement 1(EIS). However, the projections stopped at 5,000 L

-which was near the then projected peak of '5,300.

'Since this l -

km-

3 survey covers approximately-6,300 employees, an estimate of 66'

~

percent was used based on an earlier analysis used in the' two previous reports.- This was then used in table A-4 for comparison purposes. The mover rate during this period was'31 percent instead of the projected 66 percent. Sumner County is still receiving the-largest share of movers (28 percent) compared with the projected 20 percent. Macon County is receiving the smallest number of

-movers at 8 percent which is close to the projected 10 percent.

The mover distribution to' Smith County is low at 12 percent com-i pared with a projected 20 percent. The mover rate to Trousdale County has dropped since the last reporting period from 17 percent to 16 percent. The projected mover rate to Trousdale County was 30 percent. The mover distribution to Wilson County remained at 14 percent compared with the projected 20 percent. Sumner County now has 554 movers compared with 837 that were projected for approximately 6,300 employment level, but all other counties contain far fewer movers than expected. Mover projections were made only for the five impact counties, but 432 employees moved to other counties. Davidson County has received 129 movers. However, 179 employees said they moved from Davidson County; and 138 of the l

179 said they moved to impact counties.

l-II.

General Characteristics of Movers-Total Project--Tab 1'e A-5 contains data on f amily' status and

' characteristics and housing l choice for a11' movers. Table A-4 contains a comparison of f the extrapolation of 'some of-these results with projections. As of September 30, 1979, 73-percent of.

k I

q.

. W' a

s, 4

those employees who' moved; brought ~theirIfamilies. The remaining

~

27. percent moved without their families. School-age children ~per family averaged ~0.9~ compared:witnlthe projected 1.0.

The total:

average family size was 3.3 compared with the, projected 3.0.

The survey of housing ' choice -shows 51 percent are livingL in houses, :2-4 percent in mobile homes, 15 percent-in apartments,'4 percent in moteliand sleeping rooms, and 6 percent in other accommodations.

. The "Other" category includes campers, motor homes, and vans.

Impact Counties and Communities--Data on family status and charac-4 teristics and housing choice for movers into L each impact county are contained in tables A-6 through A-10 and for movers'within the city limits of each of the impact. communities in tables A-12 l-through A-16.

Other Counties and Communities--One part of the computer program which processes the survey data was designed to print.out separate reports for counties and communities other-than those identified in the inpact analysis when a certain number of movers located there.- The level chosen for communities was 50 and.for counties 4

100.~

These were judged to be small enough~ to serve as an "early warning system" for those jurisdictions if the actual -location pattern varied aignificantly from the projected location-pattern.

They include'Davidson' County (129 movers), Hendersonville (70 movers), and Nashville '(66 movers) as shown in ' tables ' A-3 and A-4.

The detailed' survey results are found in tables A-11, A-15, andJ g

LA-18.;

4 i

5 III.

Secondary Employment Secondary employment impact is defined as a temporary increase in the trade and service-related resident population which can be attributed to :he Hartsville project. - If the population increase

.o in a county is greater than that arising directly from the project or from other primary employment increases, the possibility of secondary employment exists.

Again during this period only Macon County had an increase in population (298) which was more than could be explained by pro-ject-related influx and change in population associated with other primary employment (see table 1).

In fact, Sumner, Trousdale, and Wilson Counties experienced declines in project-related population.

During this reporting period (March 31, 1979 - September 30, 1979),

Macon County experienced a decrease in nonproject-related primary and total employment.

Table 2 shows the application of our monitoring process applied to the period from April 30, 1976, to September 30, 1979. The results of the analysis show that the only county in which population change cannot be totally explained is Macon County. During this three-year period, the population of Macon County increased almost 2,200 persons while employment of Macon County residents declined.

This decline in employment was felt. both in primary and secondary sectors. The methodology which we are using in monitoring the Hartsville project provides reasonable results only when the change in the resident population and the change in resident 1

_m..

4 o

. ' W-Table 1 P.ITIMATES OF POIULATION AND POtUIATIOri CHANGE FOR HAC0fl. CHITif. SU!CTER, TROU3D31.E. AND WIIS0ri CulmTIES. TENNESSEE FOR M0titTORING SEC0flDARY SOCIOfrON34IC It& ACTS OF HARTSVII.f E faJCI. EAR PIANT CONSTIuJCTION MARCII 31. 1979 - SEPrmBER 30. 1979 Remainder of Population Population Change in Change in Project Nonproject Related Change in Population - Change in f J Estimate

-Estimate Population Estimate Related Population Population as of Possible Prom other

' Population

_3/31/79 9/30/79 3/31/79 - 9/30/79 3/31/79 - 9/30/79 9/30/79 Primary h ploys.ent Unerplained

!! acon County

'15,418 15,793 375 77 298

.o 298 Smith Couni/

13,856 13,858

-2 96 Surner County 79,576 80,h88 912

-9

~--

' Trousdale County 5.302 5,364 62

-40 Wilson County 50,512 50,1t+6

-366

-3 MVA hployee Surveys.

Population estimatas by Conraunity Economics Projects Group.

Community Economics Projects Group

- 4/24/80

$,'(

s s

I

(

Table 2-ESTD4ATES OF POIULATION AND POIUIATIOff CHA!;GE FCR MACON, SMITif, StSttfER,' TROU3 DALE, AND WIISON COUinIES T12iNESSEE FOR f40NITORITU SECONDARY SOCIDOCONGtIC D4 PACTS OF HARTSVILIE taJCIEAR PIANT CONSTRUCTIQt APRIL 30,1976 - SEPTD4BER 30,' 1979 Remainder of Population Population-Change in Change in Project, Nonproject Related - Change in Population.. Change in

' Estimate Estimate Population Estimate Related Population Population as of Possible Prom Other.

Population, 4/30/76 9/30/79 4/30/76 - 9/30/79 4/30/76 - 9/30/79 9/30/79' Primary Baployment. Unerplained.

. Hacon County '

13,602 15,793 2,191 479 1s712 o

l1,712 Smith County 12,643 13,858 1,215 562

'653 4,331.

Sur.ner. County

' 69,544 80,488 10,944 1,596 9,348

-33,174-Trousdale County 5,232 5,364 132 718 o

' Wilson County' 45,709 50,146 4,437 761 3,676 20,196 MVA Employee Surveys.

~ Population estimates by Community Economics Projects Group.

' Community Economics Projects Group

. 4/24/80 w

8 employment are directly related. This opposite relationship observed in Macon County defies explanation.

IV.

Functional Area Impacts and Mitigation Actions Education--Monti.oring direct impact on education continued to occur primarily through reports from the seven school districts and the Tennessee Department of Education. School districts and the department submit reports in October and May of each school year showing the names of students whose parents are employed at tha Hartsville Nuclear Plants, the school previously attended, school and grade in which enrolled, and essential attendance and transportation information. A summary of school districts reports for fall 1979 is shown in table 3.

All school districts reported fewer direct impact student enrollment than anticipated. Also, there is a large dif ference between the number of children reported by the school systems and the number of school-age children reported by empicyees. Meetings are being scheduled with the school systems to attempt to resolve this disparity.

TVA, the Tennessee Department of Education, and the seven local school districts in the impact area continue to operate under agreements for alleviating impacts on local school districts.

Under these agreements, TVA provides / n's for classrooms and J

schoolbuses. Education mitigati n r w,

s tris period totaled eighty-four thousand dollars ($84,000) as ch9wt in table 4.

s

7 J

9 q

TABLE 3:

School Systems Report of Hartsville Nuclear Plants.

Direct Impact Students September 30, 1979 Number of Children Number of Children School System of Local Residents

" Movers" Total Smith 289 61 350 Sumner 502 274 776 Trousdale 230 79 309 Wilson 208 30

238 Macon 221 120 341 Lebanon 124-13 137 Watertown 12 4

16 TOTAL 1,586 581 2,167 TABLE 4 TVA Education Mitigation Payments (April 1, 1979 - September 30, 1979)

School System Facilities Buses Totals

$28,000 Macon County

$28,000*

Smith County 56,000 Sumner County 56,000**

Trousdale County Wilson County Lebanon City Watertown City TOTAL

$84,000 '

(0)

$84,000

• Note:

(Reserved Fund)--entered as paid in March 31, 1979,- report in error.

l

• • Reserve Fund.'

NOTE: Public Law 81-874 assistance is available to the school systems to offset additional operating cost.

$)~

~

+

1 x:

'10.

l L

Through'a local refe~rendum, on June 30,:1980,-the Watertown Six.

l

' teenth Special District School' System will cease -to exist and wilL

become a part of the Wilson County School System.

As Watertawn

will1become a part--of the county, a request-has been made by.

Wilson County that the funds allocated by TVA for.the Watertown-Special School District be reallocated and made available to the Wilson County School System. Steps are being taken to implement-

-this reallocation plan.

All school systems in the Hartsville Nuclear Plants project are eligible to participate-in School Assistance in Federally Affected i.

Areas, Title I, Public Law 81-874 programs for fiscal year 1979.

i Wilson County became eligible for the first tLae in fiscal year 1979; Macon County in fiscal year 1977; Trousdale County in fiscal.

year 1976; Smith County, Cumner County, and Lebanon City were eligible and participated prior to fiscal year 1975.

Since fiscal year 1976, all school systems in the area have experienced signi-ficant increases in the number of students claimed. The number of.

students claimed by the'four participating school systems in-fiscal year 1976 was 983.

In fiscal year 1977, 1,573 students i

were claimed by the five participating school systems.

In fiscal year 1978, the'six participating school systems claimed 2,467.

In~

1 1

fiscal year.1979, the six participating school systems claimed

~

l l

_3,026;. and the number of students reported at this time is 3,200.

Even though there'is an increase of 174 students for fiscal year-F 1980. over:1979, there Lis, an apparent leveling off of TVA-related '

l l

l students.

L 4

l

11J According to the school systens in the impact' counties and the

. Tennessee Department of Education, TVA is meeting its commitments; and the school systems are able to serve the direct Lapact students.

Housing--The-objective of the Hartsville Nuclear Plants housing mitigation program has been to assist in the development of mobile home parks in Macon and Trousdale Counties as a base for temporary housing demanded by TVA construction workers. One hundred sixty-nine (169) mobile home spaces have. been developed through this -

program.- The Shady Grove Mobile Home Park in Hartsville, Tennessee, has 93 spaces. All units are presently occupied. The Hillsdale Mobile Home Park, located approximately seven miles from the construction site, has 47 of their 76 units presently occupied.

The Upper Cumberland Housing Development Corporation, is in the process of redeveloping the Hillsdale Mobile Home Park to create additional requested spaces.

Local Planning and Coordination Assistance--TVA is continuing to assist the local planning commissions affected by this project.

Letters of agreement covering half of their cost for Tennessee State Planning Office services for a period from October 1 each

_ year through September 30 of the following calendar year has been-executed for the major impact communities. The need for additional assistance to.the local planning commissions is evaluated and negotiated on a year-to-year basis as appropriate. A summary of these payments are shown on table 5.

5 f12 :

TABLE 5.-

-TVALLocal Planning Assistance-Payments.

Amount-Paid

' Total' Paid Planning Commissior.a

This Period to Date Hartsville-Trousdale County-

.$'3,307.90 Smith. County :

-4,625.75~

Sumner County 3,750.00 Wilson County 3,750.00 Carthage-

$ 850.00 3,252.38 South Carthage 850.00-1,819.88

.Gordonsville -

475.63 Lafayette

,1,221.26-Callatin 743.75 6,256.25 Lebanon 6,725.00 Hendersonville 2,231.25 5,981.25 Tennessee State Planning Office ~

20,000.00 TOTAL

$4,675. 00

$61,165.30 TVA continues to provide annual support for the Hartsville Project Coordination Committee-for professional staff services. The committee is composed of the chief elected-officials in.the five-county impact area (five county judges and the mayors'of the-incorporated towns within the five-counties). To date, $200,000

'has been provided to the committee with. funding at $12,500 per quarter.

m.

~

13.

Water and Sever--The water '~and sewer systems l in' the-impact coun-

~

tties continue to;be monitored periodically to determine if these -

systems are adequate:to handlel-the anticipated mobilethome~connec-

^

J:

_tions. -However,"the total. number of actua11 movers continues to be

~

smaller than originally projected and a large number of movers i

continue; to locate-outside the impact ' area. Therefore, the water' supply treatment capacities throughout the impact area are more -

than adequate to accommodate the inmoving. customers. 'Similarly,

[-

the-sewer systems, some of which may be overloaded during periods--

I of heavy rainfall, are able to treat the wastes' generated-by the inmoving construction ~ workers and their families in addition to that of the permanent residents. -

I i

i TVA has assisted and is continuing to assist those communities i

that have experienced significant temporary adverse water and sewer-impacts from inmoving mobile' homes of construction workers..

g The town of Carthage -continues to use money from the $75,000' mitigation payment TVA made to them to improve their water treat-ment facilities. This period the expenditure was for repairing

. leaks and replacing defective water mains. ' In addition'to expen-ditures previously reported, the town has recently. spent $500 i*~

for legal services in ~ connection with their, water treatment plant.

1-

-The installation of the new~ eight-inch waterline in Hartsville between the; junction-of East Main Street and McMurray. Boulevard -

e and extending westward along McMurray Boulevard-to :the pumping -

~

E station east of: Goose Creek has been' completed. This line should f

9 2 1 1

g n

y s.

m

=-

r S

~'

t" e g

s 14 7'

relieve low pressures which-occasionally occur in the Shady Grove-

' Mobile Home Park and the : elementary school on Lock Six. Road caused by the relatively high water demands at the nuclear plant con-

'struction-site.

Pk) impact mitigation payments' for water and sewer were made during the reporting period. However, TVA will continue to monitor the water and -sewer systems in the impact counties to _ determine their -

capability to handle any mover impacts as they occur.

Health and Medical Services--There were' no health impact mitiga-tion payments made during this monitoring period. TVA's contracts with Mid-Cumberland Regional Health Department, for partial support of an environmentalist, and the Upper Cumberland Regional Health Department, for partial support of a public health nurse, expired without renewal prior to April 1,1979. Therefore, there are no active health impact mitigation contracts at this time.

TVA will continue to assess the health needs of the five-county Hartsville area; however, it is not aaticipated that significant additional expenditures will be required.

Traffic--In accordance with an agreement between TVA and the Tennessee Department of-Transportation, the department has been supplying TVA with traffic counts for 12 locations on a quarterly

-basis beginning in October 1975. With approximately 6,300 employees, peak-hour traffic on Highway 25.has increased from 120 vehicles

E

~

.~

1

- A,-

~

15 '

~

per hourL(VPH)).to 510 VPH east'oftthe site'and from'120 VPH to'

1',040;VPH west :of the site. Counts-for other. key-highway. segments-

-are shown in the following table. < Peak-hour volumes'at all theses L

locations are within the -limits of acceptable; volumes for: level of service:D ' operation of these highways - (eee appendix C).

In ant effort to mitigate the peak-hour: traffic volumes, TVA'is continuing

'the mass transportation l program (Commuter vans and' buses).

TABLE 6 Traffic Evaluation

~

(October 1975 - September 1979)-

Number of TVA Vehicles During.

Commuter Peak Hour *

. Traffic 1975

-1979 N?ghway 25 East of Plant 120 510 400 Highway. 25. West of Plant -

120 1,040 930 Highway '25 West of Hartsville 290-

=750 600.

Highway 25 West of 231 Junction 210 520 280 Highway 231 South of 25 Junction 150 300 200 Highway 231 horth of Lebanon 150 320 150~

s

- *The-current peak hour occurs during the 3-4 p.m. hour.

Employee Transportation--Two new buses were added-during this period'forfa-total of 17.

One bus serves the Murfreesboro commu-4 nity, the other serves the east Nashville area along Dickerson:

Ro ad.

In-' addition, bus serviceto and from Hartsville Nuclear-j Plants incit ies:. Nashville seven~ buses; Lebanon and Gallatin-

~.

e

-16' two: buses'each; and' Portland, Hermitage,' Mount Juliet, Murfreesboro, Lafayette,-and Manchester one bus.each.. The' number of. van pools-dropped to 148' from an-earlier high of 155. : Aidership remained

. steady with 47. percent of the employees on the day shift ridihg

~

vans and buses to work. An estimated 950 cars are being kept off the road as a result of the TVA-sponsored van pools and buses.

.TVA's expenditures for employee. transportation for this period was approximately $560,000.

Local Government Budgets--The impact of the Hartsville construc-tion project on the budgets of local governments in the impact area is measured on an annual basis. This measurement is made by comparing projected project-related expenses incurred by the local governments to projected project-related revenues received to determine whether deficits will occur. TVA negotiates and exe-cutes contracts with local governments to provide payments to cover the amounts of any projected deficits. Payments made to local governments during this period are as follows:

Trousdale County

$12,100 Macon County 1,100 City of Gallatin 4,000 City of Hendersonville 2,200 Town of Carthage 900 Total

$20,300 i

B j;g n7f' ;

sn,

Tw

V' 17;

,~ ~., ' -

,. i'-._

A monitoring:and accountability. plan-is being used by TVA to help; project any deficitsithat mayioccur in, local governments'.' budgets.

1 Al study"has~ been made: to determine the' increases in revenues and'

~

expenditures. experienced.by the local' governments in the years-before.the. Hartsville construction = project started. -These'results.

are comp'ared=to-the increases in revenues and' expenditures experi-

- enced by the loca1' governments after the:Hartsville construction proj ect-started. The results.of this comparison are.used to help

~ determine both the negative'and positive impacts on'the budgets of~

i

- local governments in the impact area. The results of'the study.

are used in negotiating mitigation payment contracts with local ~

government officials in the Hartsville project impact area.

Local Recruitment and Training--The local recruitment and training initiatives are continuing to be successful in reducing overall-socioeconomic' impact within the five counties. The steamfitter training program graduated 20 trainees in July 1979, who have-filled jobs at.the Hartsville Nuclear Plants. The boilermaker training program graduated 23 trainees in May 1979. Eight of these graduates are working at the Hartsville Nuclear Plants, f

Thesa two programs were developed to help meet the demand for r.

. highly? skilled' craftsmen in critical skill manpower' shortage areas r

' and to ' lessen 'TVA's construction mover impact. Trainees in these L

programs are from the'16-county recruitment area.

b f.

[

u 5

i T

5

,.,+n 4,

- - - -....,, ~

-18'-

Recreation--Community. recreation impacts were monitored.by. TVA staff, and technical assistance was'_provided to several communi-ties for site design and recreation program development.

-/W a direct resul.t of our: ef forts in Trousdale County, a full-time recreation and parks department has been formed. A contract was executed in September 1979 with the ~ city of Hartsville and Trousdale County for $15,520 to help implement the new department and employ a full-time director. Additional financial assistance is antici-pated for Trousdale County for the development of needed park facilities.

Additional contracts are also anticipated for.the city of Lebanon and the city of Gallatin to implement needed park. improvement projects. This assistance should result in long-term benefits for the communities as well as alleviate temporary inmover impacts.

Summary of Mitigation Fxpenditures--In the functional areas of mitigation, TVA has_ made payments totaling $5,645,063 as noted in table 7, the major expenditures this reporting period were for employee transportation ($560,000) and education ($84,000 - see table 6).

S s

19'-

TABLE 7.

Summa'y of TVA Mitigation Expenditures r

as of September 30, 1979-Expenditures Expenditures-This Period To Date 1

4

' Education S 84,000

$1,496,759 Housing 423,000 Local. Planning and Coordination Assistance 29,675 260,696 Water and Sewer 380,000 Health 108,772 4

Local Governments 20,300 612,153 Employee Transportation 560,000 2,363,683 TOTAL

$693,975

$5,645,063

- 1.

Includes $28,000 previously reported in error.

2.

Includes $60,000 f.nterest-bearing loan.

3.

Includes $125,000 noninterest-bearing loan.

1 9

s

w-n.

.5 P

E I

kl.

[

G-J l.

I

)

l i

APPENDIXES i

l I

t i

e 9

WMy we a--

y 3

mew,

,w--

gy

,,m,-e,-w,

.-,-,,r----

-,,,e_,, - - -, - - - - - -,,, -, - - -

.---,-,.--,-,-n-e~-,----,

-, - - -, -_. - - - - - - -., - - - - -..~-

---n----m-e,-

21 TABLE A-1 FULLOW UP $URVEY TOWN OF CURRENT RESIDENCE RUN DATE 02/08/80 H A RT SV I LL E NUCLEAR PLANT EMPLOYEES RUN TIME 114251 ACTIVE EMPLOYEE 5 09-3D-79 REPORT 2

MOVED TO ALREADY TOWN TuvM In TOWE TOTAL "0PULATION ALEXANDRIA TN 10 43 53 680 8AITER IN 11 62 73 1,314 CARTHAGE TN 78 137 215 2,493 COOKEVILLE TN 35 90 125 176800 CR055VILLE IN 32 45 57 5,381 DOWELLTOWN TN 5

25 30 329 GAINE580R0 TN 5

48 53 1,301 GALLATIN TN 324 424 T48 13,362 GORDON$VILLE TN 9

42 51 601 HARTSVILLE Th 300 238 538 2.243 HENDERSONVILLE TN 78 161 239 28,000 LAFAYETTE TN 138 219 357 2,583 LE8 ANON TN 222 286 508 12,492 MCMINNVILLE TN 5

9 14 11,610 MANCHESTER TN 6

34 40 6,869 MUAFREE580R3 TN 19 44 63 28,7D3 NA5HVILLE TN 74 533 607 469,000 PORTLAND TN 15 62 77 3.081 RED 8 OILING SPRINGS TN 12 69 81 956 3MITHVILLE TN 12 129 141 3,762 SOUTH CARTHAGE TN 13 31 44 859 SPARTA TN 10 14 24 4,933 WE5TRORELAND TN 22 73 95 1,423 BETHPAGE TM 22 57 79 400 CASTALIAN SPRINGS TN 59 40 99 150 COTTONTOWN TN 7

17 24 300 OlION SPRINS$

IN TO 38 138 100 ELNdOOD TN 5

15 20 100 G000LETT5VILLE TN 9

62 71 7.541 HERMITAGE TN 9

30 39 6,000 LA N L AS TER TN 6

9 15 150 P40150N TN 17 113 130 21,500 MOUNT JULIET TN 27 83 110 1.568 OLD HICRORY TN 9

58 67 6,000 PLEASANT SH4DE TN 14 34 48 150 RIDDLETON TN 10 21 31 100 5ILVER POINT TN 6

26 32 350 WATERTOWN TN 6

36 42 1,063 WHITE HOUaE TN I2 11 23 1,305 SCOTT 5VILLE RT 5

83 88 3, 54 4

$UST0TAL 1738 3551 5759 ALGOOD TN 2

6 8

1,917

22 4

a TABLE A-1, PAGE 2 FOLLON UP 5URVEY TOWN OP CURRENT RESIDENCE RUN D ATE D2/08/03 HARTSVILLE BUCLEAR' PLANT EMPLOYEE 5 RUE TINE 114251 ACTIVE EMPLOYEE S 09-30-79 REPORT 2

MOWED TO ELREADT TOW 1 TOWN IE TOWN TOTAL P3PUL47105 CELIs4 TN 4

26 30 1.370 i

CHARLOTTE TN 3

6 9

610 i

CLARESVILLE TN 3

7 10 44.900 DICK 5DN TN 3

5 8

16.377 FAIRVIEW TM 2

5 7

1.925 FRAGELis TN O

8 8

11.298.

GAEEN BRIER TN 2

30 32 2.279 i

LA VERGNE TN 4

13 17 5.209 LIBERTY TN 2

26 25 332 LIVINGSTON TR 2

5 7

3.050 MONTEREY TN 3

6 9

2.351 RIDGETOP TN 1

7 8

810 5HELBTVILLE IN 0

15 15 11.900 SMYRNA TN 2

11 13 5.698 SPRINGFIELD IN 2

33 35 9.720 TULLAHOMA TN 3

7 10 15.577 WOODBURY TN 3

15 le 2.087 AaTIOCH TN 4

14 18 900 ASHLAND CITY TN 4

11 15 2.027 AUBURNTOWN TN 1

6 7

213 BRU5H CREEK TN 3

22 25 230 BUFFALD WALLEY TN 2

14 16 100 CHESTNUT 90JND TN 0

10 10 125 CROSS PLAIN 5 TN O

9 9

251 DONEL5ON TN O

12 12 25.500 GRANVILLE TN 1

6 7

100 MICRMAN TN 3

25 28 200 J0ELTON TN 1

24 25 903 M055 TN 2

11 13 200 WHITLEYv!LLE IN 1

7 e

50 BOWLING GREEN KY I

7 a

39.400 FRANELIN KY 2

10 12 7.176 GAMALIEL KY 0

5 5

431 TOMPKIN$tILLE KY 4

17 21 2.2D7 A00LPHU5 KY 1

13 14 25 0 FOUNTAIN RUN KY 4

6 10 125

$UBTOTAL 75 460 535 OTHER 94 216 31 0 i

TOTAL RESPON5ES 3877 4227 6104 HNP kOREFORCE YOTAL 6340 09-30-79

4 TABLE A-2 F 3L L OW UP SURdEV 53JRCE 44D LOC &IIDA 0F CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYEES RJN DAIE 32/27/80 HART 5VILLE N UC LE AR PLA4T RUN T!1E 125033 ACildt [MPL0 TEE 5 09-30-79 REPORT 4

OliER OTHER OTHER

---

------------ 14 P A C T C O U N T I E 5 --------

REC.

TENT.

KENTUCKY FROM --- TO TRtW5DILE SWITH 9& CON SUMNER WILSON DAVID 5ON C0JNilES COUNIIES COUNTIES UTHER.(4)

TOTAL TROU504LE (Il 240 7

7 23 T

I 2

287 SMITH (1) 9 437 6

1 S

I 7

2 1

442 MACON (1) 4 5

301 4

6 2

1 323

$UMNEk (1) 20 6

10 a71 5

14 6

3 1

936-WIL5ON til 14 6

14 412 13 8

5 469 DAVID 504.til le

.22 3

63

'32 859

?!

?)

1038 OTHER R E CRUIT ING COUN (2) 16 27 16 la 12 10 733 13 3

1023 OTHER TN. COUNTIES (3) 11 5 70 40 174 94 37 48 30b 2

10 896 01HER KY. [004 TIE 5 131 5

2 7

10 6

3 20

.53 ALABAMA 27 17' 6

63 28 9

6 3

11 170 ARRAN5A5 2

1 2

4 1

10 GEORGIA 6

4 1

5 6

2 2

1 2

29 MI55IS$1PPI 3

1 5

1 2

1 8

14 NORTH C AROL IN A 2

1 2

5 5

1 16 SOUTH CAR 0 LINA 1

2 2

1 6

OTHER STATES 57 29 45 108 45 30 -

25 23 28 390

• • • TOTAL 539

$38

'. 4 7 1370 66B 979 1)33 382 27 51 6104 N3I E : DLIA 04 DIAGUNAL INDICATE NUNMOVERS. WITH THE EXCE Pil0N OF M3VE 5 W11HIN A COUNTV.

ALL CTHER DATA INDIC ATE MOVE R 5.

III RECla tilNG COUNT Y (2) TE 41E 55EE COUNI IE S: C&NN04 CLAY. DEKnLS. JACK 5ON, PuiNAM, R O B E R I SD N. PUTHERFORD kENIUCKY COUNTIES : ALLEN. MUNRDE. SI4P50N N

(3) ALL COUNTIE S IN-KENIUCKY AN3 TENNESSEE OTHER THAN RfCRUlilNG COUNTIES 141 "OliE R" 11CLUDE5 4DN-4E 5P 3NS E S 3R ERR 34E005 RESP 065ES FOR CURRENI ADDRESS.

,24 Table A-3 Hartsville Nuclear Plants Distribution of Movers and Associated Population by County and Community.

September 30,'1979 7

1 Percent-LNumber g

of of Population Influx County-Movers Movers Schoolage Total Trousdale l'6 312 137-718 Smith 12 225 120 562 Macon 8

160 129 479-Sumner 28 554 395 1,596 Wilson 14 267 188' 761 Other Counties 22 432 148 1,109 Total 100 1,950 1,217 5,225 3

Community Carthage 3

53 15 97 Gallatin 11 206 104 547 i

Hartsville 11 214 68 429-Hendersonville 4

70 52 188 Lafayette 3

66 70 211 Lebanon 5

88 37 208 Nashville

_j!

66 24 138 To tal 40 763 370 1,818

.1.

Numbers er.trapolated.

2.

Percentages may not add to 100 because of rounding.

3.-

Within municipal limits.

+

e

25 Table'A-4 Hartsville Nuclear ~ Plants Comparison of Survey _Results with1 Projections for Selected Parameters-Employment Level 6,340 Projected Surveyed Number Movers 4,184 1,950-Percent Movers 66 31 Schoolage Children 2,720 1,217 Schoolage Children / Family 1.0

.9 Total Population 9,624 5,225 i

Percent Number Percent Number Movers with Families 65 2,720 73 1,428 Movers without Families 35 1,464 27 521 Percent Number Percent Number i

Housing Choice:

Houses 31 1,297 51 999 Mobile Homes 47 1,967 24 465 Apartments 18 753 15 297 Motel and Sleeping Rooms 4

167 4

-78 Other 0

0 6

111 2

Total 100 4,184 100 1,950 Percent Number Percent Number Distribution by County:

Davidson 0

0 7

129 Trousdale 30 1,255 16 312 Smith 20 837 12 225 Macon 10 413 8

160 Sumner 20 837 28 554' Wilson 20-837 14 267 Other Counties 0

0 16 303 2

Total 100 4,184 100 1,950 1-t l '. ' Numbers extrapolated.

- 2.

. Percentages may not add to 100 because of rounding.

26 TABLE A-5 FOLLOW UP $URVEY WORRERS WHO MOVED INTO HAR T 5VIL L E NUCLEAR PLANT AREA RUN.DATE 32/08/80 MOWER Sut1ARY REPORT IF ACTlWE EMPLOYEE 5 09-30-79 RUN TIME 114139 WITH TUTIL CNILDREN CHILDREN MOWERS CHILDREN NUMBER IN IN M3YERS WITH IN DF GRADE HIGH WITHOUT TOTAL FAMILY SCHOOL C'H ILD R E N SCH00L SCHOOL FANILY MOVER 5 ANNUAL EMPLOYEE S j

HOUSE DWNED 248 139 354 184 61 15 263 HOUSE RENTED 43 17 4T 23 7

14 57 APARTMENT RENTED 37 9

18 10 4

54 91 MOBILE HOME RENTED 5

3 6

4 0

12 17 MOBILE HOME OWNED 31 to 22 10 2

15 46 SLEEPING ROOM 2

2 5

4 0

3 5

MOTEL 1

0 1

0 0

4 5

O THE R 10 1

2 1

0 4

14 TOTAL 377 181 455 236 74 121 498 HOURLY EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 338 205 548 281 116 30 348 HOUSE RENTED 237 104 310 163 39 57 294 APARTMENT RENTED 99 27 31 30 9

96 195 MOBILE rQME RENTED 116 44 141 58 24 77 193 MOBILE HOME DWNED 145 58 174 78 26 46 191 SLEEPING ROOM 8

2 9

6 2

24 32 MOTEL 9

4 13 6

0 24 33 OTHER 46 16 53 18 6

47 93 YOTAL 998 460 1323 640 222 381 1379 ALL EMPLOYEE 5 HOUSE OWNED 586 344 932 465 177 25 611 l

HOUSE RENTED 280 121 LST 186 46 71 351 AP ALTMENT RE NTED 136 36 99 40 13 1 50 286 N083LE HOME RENTED 121 47 14T 62 24 89 210 MOBILE HOPE DWNED 176 6G 196 88 28 61 237 SLEFPING ROOM 10 4

14 10 2

27 37 MOTEL 10 4

11 6

0 28 38 OTHER 56 17 52 19 6

51 107 TDTAL 1375 641 1778 876 296 502 1877 O

27 TABLE A-6 FOLLOW UP $JA VEV WORtER5 WHO MOVED INTO HARTSylLLE EUCLEAR PLANT ARE A MACON RUN DATE 02/08/80 EMPLOYEE 5 LIVING WITHIN THE COUNTY TOTAL REPORT 18 A:TIVE EMPLOTEE5 09-30-79 RUN TIME 174139 WITH.

TOTAL CNILDREN CHILDREN MOVERS CHILDREN kUMBER IN IN MOVER 5 WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH WITHOUT TOTAL FAMILY SCH03L CHIL3 TEN SCHOOL SCHOOL FARILT MOVERS ANNUAL EMPLOYEE 5 HOUSE OWNED 6

4 13 6

0 0

6 HOUSE RENTED 5

4 7

5 2

0 5

RPARTMENT RENTED 2

0 3

0 0

0 2

M081LE HOME RENTED 2

1 1

1 0

1 3

MD81LE HOME OWNED 1

0 3

0 0

2 3

SLEEPING ROOM MOTEL DTHER TOT AL 16 9

13 12 2

3 19 HOURLY EMPLOYEE 5 l

HOUSE OWNED 47 27 TF 48 14 3

47 NOUSE RENTED 14 7

25 12 2

0 14

[

AP AR TMENT RENTED 4

2 6

3 0

0 4

H081LE HOME RENTED 26 11 34 14 7

10 36 4081LE HOME DdNED 18 6

IS 6

2 6

24 SLEEPING R03M 0

0 2

0 0

2 2

j MOTEL 0

0 3

0 0

1 1

GTHER 3

2 3

2 0

4 7

TOTAL 112 55 161 85 25 23 135 ALL E4PLOYE!5 NOUSE OWNED 53 31 ST 54 14 0

53 HOUSE aENTED 19 11 36 17 4

0 19 APARTMENT RENTED 6

2 6

3 0

0 6

i MOBILE HOME RENTED 28 12 35 15 7

El 39 MOBILE HOME OWNED 19 6

18 6

2 8

27 SLEEPING 800M 0

0 0

0 0

2 2

i MOTEL 0

0 3

0 0

1 1

(

OTHER 3

2 5

2 0

4 7

TOTAL 128 64 177 97 27 26 154 4

l

28 TABLE A-7 FOLLOW UP SWRVEY

~

WORRERS WHO MOVED INTO WAR T 5VIL L E NUCLEAR PLANT AREA SRITH RUN CATE 32/08/80 EMPLOVEE5 LIVING WITHIN THE COUNTY TOT AL REPORT 18 ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 09-30-79 RUN TIME 114339 WITH

-TOTAL CHILDREN CHILDREN MDVERS CHILDREN RUMBER IN IN MDTERS WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH WITHOUT TOTAL FAMILY SCHOOL CHILDREN SCHOOL SCHOOL FAMILY MOVERS ANNUAL EMPLOYEES HLU5E OWNED 8

6 17 12 4

1 9

HOUSE RENTED 3

1 2

0 1

3 6

APARTMENT RENTED 0

0 3

0 0

3 3

MOBILC HOME RENTED 1

1 2

2 0

6 7

MOBILE HOME OWNED 7

2 3

2 1

2 9

5LEEPING ROOM 0

0 0

0 0

1 1

MnTEL OTHER I

O 3

0 0

3 1

TOTAL 20 10 24 16 6

16 36 HOURLY EMPLOYEE 5 HOUSE OWNED 34 21 53 23 14 1

35 HOUSE RENTED 35 14 41 19 4

4 39 APARTMENT RENTED 2

0 2

0 0

6 8

MOBILE HOME RENTED 11 4

12 6

0 19 30 M081LE HOME DWNED 39 14 38 17 6

12 51 5LEEPING ROOM 0

0 3

0 0

7 7

MOTE L 2

1 1

1 0

2 4

OTHER 5

2 5

3 1

2 7

TOTAL 328 56 152 69 25 53 181 ALL EMPLOYEES i

HOUSE OWNED 42 27 73 35 18 2

44 HOUSE RENTED 38 15 43 19 5

7 45 APARTMENT RENTED 2

0 2

0 0

9 11 MOBILE HOME RENTED 12 5

14 8

0 25 37 i

MOBILE HOME OWNED 46 16 41 19 7

14 60 SLE E PING ROOM 0

0 3

0 0

8 8

l MOTEL 2

1 1

1 0

2 4

OTHER 6

2 5

3 1

2 8

TOTAL I48 66 175 85 31 69 217 i

i O

29 TABLE A-8 FOLLOW UP SURVEY WORRER5 WHO MOVE 0 INTO HA R T 5VI L L E NUCLEAR PL ANT ARE A SUMNER RUN DATE 32/08/80 EMPLOYE ES L IVI kG WITHIN THE COUNTY TOT AL REPORT 18 ACTIVE EMPLOVEE5 09-30-79 RUM TIME 114139 WITH TOT &L CMI LD R EN CHILDREN MOVERS CHILDREN NUMBER IN IN M3 VERS WITH IK OF GRADE HIGH WITHOUT TOTAL FAMILY SCHOOL CHILDREN SCHOOL SCHOOL FAMILt MOVERS ANNUAL EMPLOYEE 5 HOUSE DWNED 154 84 219 109 42 9

163 HDU5E RENTED 14 7

14 7

4 4

18 APARTMENT RENTED 18 5

12 5

3 23 41 MOBILE NOME RENTED 2

1 3

1 0

0 2

4081LE HOME OWNED 8

2 7

2 0

3 11 SLEEPING 200M 1

1 3

2 0

1 2

MOTEL 1

0 1

0 0

1 2

OTHER 2

0 0

0 0

0 2

TOTAL 2D0 100 259 126 49 41 241 HOURLY EMPLOYEES HOU5E OWNED 94 62 162 89 26 5

99 HOUSE RENTED 57 24 77 39 7

11 68 APARTMENT RENTED 31 11 34 14 3

19 50 H08ILE h0ME RENTED 10 5

13 7

0 13 23 M081LE HOME OdNED 23 10 33 16 4

6 29 SLEEPING ROOM 1

0 3

0 0

4 5

MOTEL 4

0 4

0 0

2 6

OTHER 4

1 4

0 1

8 12 TOTAL 224 113 321 165 41 68 292 ALL EMPLOYEE 5 HOUSE DWNED 248 146 381 198 68 14 262 HOUSE RENTED 71 31 91 46 11 15 86 APARTMENT RENTED 49 16 46 19 6

42 91 M081LE HOME RENTED 12 6

13 8

0 13 25 M081LE HOME OdNED 31 12 37 18 4

9 40 SLEE P ING ROOM 2

1 3

2 0

5 7

MOTE L 5

0 5

0 0

3 8

OTHER 6

1 4

0 1

8 14 TOTAL 424 213 533 291 90 109 533 i

(

l

30 TABLE A-9 FOLLOW UP $URVEY WORRERS WHO MOVED INTO HAR T 5WI L L E NUCLEAR PLANT ARE A IROU$DLLE RUN 04TE 32/0s/80 EMPLOYEE 5 LIVING W]lHIN THE COUNTY TOTAL REPORT 18 ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 09-30-79 RUN TINE 114139 WITH TOT 3L CHILDREN CHILDREN MovfR5 CHILDRE4 RUNSER IN IN M3WERS WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH WITHOUT TOTAL FAMILY SCHOOL CHILDRER SCHOOL SCHOOL FANILY NOVERS ANNUAL EMPLOYEE 5 HOUSE DWNED 7

4 11 4

1 1

8 HOUSE RENTED 5

2 5

5 0

2 7

APARTMENT RENTED 6

1 1

1 1

8 14 MuslLE HOME RENTED 0

0 0

0 0

4 4

M DAILE HOME O dNED 11 5

3 5

3 6

17 SLEEPING ROOM 0

0 3

0 0

1 1

MOTEL 0

0 3

0 0

1 1

GTHER 1

0 3

0 0

0 1

70EAL 30 12 29 15 3

23 53 HOURLY EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED is 5

19 e

2 0

1s HOUSE RENTED 28 17 41 19 11 7

35 APARTMENT RENTED 17 3

7 2

1 26 43 MOSILE HOME RENTED 46 15 54 19 13 25 71 HOBILE HOME DdMED 35 21 52 24 11 14 49 SLEE PING R004 1

0 3

0 0

9 10 MOTEL 1

1 2

2 0

9 10 4

DTHER 4

2 T

2 0

7 11 j

TOTAL 150 64 182 76 38 97 247 ALL EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNE3 25 9

33 12 3

1 26 HOUSE RENTED 33 19 43 24 11 9

42 APARTMENT RE NTED 23 4

8 3

2 34 57 MOBILE HOME RENTED 46 15 54 19 13 29 75 MOSILE HOME OdNED 46 26 61 29 12 20 66

$LEEPIEG ROOM 1

0 3

0 0

10 11 MOTE L 1

1 2

2 0

10 11 OTHER 5

2 T

2 0

7 12 TOTAL 180 76 211 91 41 120 300 l

l r

1

31 TABLE A-10 FOLLOW UP SURVEY WDRRERS WHO MOVED INTO HA R T 5VIL L E NUCLE AR PL ANT ARE A WILSON RUN DATE 32/08/80 EMPLOVEE5 LIVING WITHIN THE COURTY TOTAL REPORT 18 ACTIVE EMPLOTEES 09-30-79 RUN TIME 114139 WIIH 70TLL CHILDBEN CHILOREN MOVERS CHILDREN NUM B E R IN IN MOVER 5

)

WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH WITHOUT TOTAL FAMILY SCHOOL CHILDRE N SCHOOL SCHOOL FAMILY NOVERS ANNUAL EMPL3YEES HDUSE DWNED 63 35 84 46 10 2

65 HOUSE REMIED 8

2 5

5 0

4 12 APARTMENT RE NTED 5

2 3

2 0

8 13 MOSILE HOME RENTED MOBILE HOME OdNED 3

1 3

1 0

2 SLEEPING ROOM 1

1 2

2 0

0 1

MOTEL 0

0 3

0 0

1 1

OTHER 4

1 2

1 0

0 4

TOTAL 34 42 133 57 10 37 101 o

HOURLY EMPLOYEE 5 HOUSE OWNED 40 25 6B 23 20 0

40 HOUSE RENTED 29 17 44 26 8

9 38 AP AR TMENT RE NTED 24 7

21 7

2 11 35 MOBILE HOME RENTED 6

4 3

5 1

4 10 MOBILE HUME OWNED 11 3

IS 6

2 5

16 5LEEPING RQ3M 2

1 5

3 2

0 2

MOTEL 1

1 1

1 0

4 5

OTHER 7

1 12 1

2 3

10 TOTAL 120 59 172 77 37 36 156 ALL EMPLOYEE 5 HOUSE DWNE3 103 60 147 74 30 2

105 HOUSE RENTED 37 19 53 31 8

13 50 APARTMENT RE NTE D 29 9

24 9

2 19 48 MOSILE HOME RENTED 6

4 S

5 1

4 10 MOBILE HOME OdNED 14 4-21 7

2 7

21 SLEEPING ROOM 3

2 7

5 2

0 3

MOTEL 1

1 1

1 0

5 6

OTHER 11 2

14 2

2 3

14 TOTAL 204 101 272 134 47 53 257 t

l l

l l

l

32.

TABLE A-11 FOLLOW UP SURVEY WORtER5 WHO KOVED INTO 4 ART 5tILLE NUCLE AR PL ANT ate A DAY 1050m RUN DATE 02/08/80 EMPLOVE ES LIVING WITHIM THE COUNTY - TOT AL REPORT 1E ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 09-30-79 RUN TIME 114139 4

WITN TDT 4L CNILDREN CHILDREN MOVERS CHILDREN NUMBER IN IN MOVERS WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH WITHOUT TDTAL FAMILY SCH00L CHILDREM SCHOOL SCHOOL F4MILv MOVER 5 ANNUAL EMPLOYEE 5 HOUSE DWNED 2

0 1

0 0

1 3

H3USE RENTED 2

3 4

1 0

1 3

APARTMENT RENTED 2

0 0

0 0

8 10 MOSILE HOME RENTED M081LE HOME OWNED SLEEPING ROOM M OTE L OTHER 1

0 0

0 0

2 3

YOTAL 7

1 5

1 0

12 19 HOURLY EMPLOYEE 5 HOUSE OWNED 21 13 27 13 8

I 22 HOUSE RENTED 21 8

16 12 3

6 27 LPARTMENT RENTED 14 3

8 4

0 19 33 M081LE HOME RENTED 9

3 11 5

1 D

9 MOSILE HOME OWNED 1

1 1

1 0

1 2

SLEE PING ROOM 1

1 3

3 0

0 1

MOTEL I

I 2

2 0

1 2

OTHER 5

1 2

1 0

4 9

TOTAL 73 31 73 41 10 32 105 ALL EMPLOYEE 5 HOUSE OWNED 23 13 2B 13 8

2 25 HOUSE RENTED 23 9

23 13 1

7 30 APARTMENT RENTED 16 3

8 4

0 27 43 MOSILE HOME RENTED 9

3 11 5

1 0

9 M081LE HOME OWNED 1

1 1

1 0

1 2

5LEEPING ROOM 1

1 3

3 0

0 1

MOTEL 1

1 2

2 0

1 2

OTHER 6

1 2

1 0

6 12 TOTAL 80 32 75 42 10 44 124

-v

i 33 TABLE A-12 FOLLOW UP 53tVEY WOREER5 WHO MOVED INTO H AR T 5WI L L E NUCLEAR PLANT AREA CARTHAEE RUN DATE 02/08/80 EMPLOYEE 5 LIVING WITHIN THE CITT LIMITS REPORT 1A ACTIVE EMPLOYEE 5 09-30-79 RUN TIME 114139 WITH TOTEL CMILOREN CHILDREN MOVERS CHILDREN Rtn8E R IN IN MOVER 5 WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH WITHOUT TOTAL FAMILY SCHOOL CHILDREM SCHOOL SCHOOL FtMILT MOVERS ANNUAL EMPLOYEE 5 I;0USE OWNED 0

0 0

0 0

1 1

HOUSE RENTED 1

1 2

0 1

3 4

APARTMENT AENTED 0

0 0

0 0

3 3

MOBILE HOME AENTED 3D31LE HOME DdNED SLEEPING ROOM 0

0 0

0 0

1 1

HOTEL OTHER TOTAL 1

1 2

0 1

8 9

HOURLY EMPLOYEES HOUSE DWNED 4

2 4

3 1

0 4

HOUSE RENTED 5

3 7

6 0

1 6

APIRTMENT AE NTED 1

0 3

0 0

3 4

MOBILE HOME RENTED 2

0 2

0 0

5 7

i MOBILE HOME OWNED 7

2 4

2 0

6 13 SLEEPING A00M 0

0 0

0 0

4 4

MOTEL 2

1 1

1 0

2 4

GTHER TOT 7t 21 8

18 12 1

21 42 ALL EMPLOYEE 5 HOUSE OWNED 4

2 4

3 1

1 5

HQUSE REMIED 6

4 9

6 1

4 10 APARTMENT RE NTED 1

0 3

0 0

6 7

MOBILE HOME RENTED 2

0 2

0 0

5 7

MOSILE HOME OWNED 7

2 4

2 0

6 13 SLEE PING ROOM 0

0 3

0 0

5 5

MOTEL 2

1 1

1 0

2 4

OTHER TOTAL 22 9

23 12 2

29 51 S

34

-TABLE A-13 FOLLOW UP SURVEY WORRERS WHO MOVE D INTO MART 5VILLE NUCLEAR PLANT ARE A GALLATit RUN DATE 32/08/80 EMPLOYEE 5 LivlNG WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS REPORT 1A ACTIVE EMPLOYEE 5 09-30-79 RUN TIME 114339 WITH TOTAL CHILDREN CHILDREN MOVERS CHILDREN N UMB E R IN IN MOVER $

WITH IN OF GR ADE HIGH WITH0df TOTAL FAMILY SCHOOL CHILDREN SCHOOL SCM00L FAMILT MOVERS ANNUAL EMPLOVEE5 HOUSE OWNED 45 18 51 21 S

6 51 NOU1E RENTED 6

4 7

3 2

1 7

APART 4ENT RENTED 11 3

7 2

2 3

19 N081LE HOME RENTED I

O 2

0 0

0 1

M081LE HOME OWNED 5

0 2

0 0

2 7

SLEEPING ROOM 0

0 3

0 0

1 1

MOTEL 0

0 3

0 0

1 1

DTHER TOTAL 63 25 69 26 10 19 87 HOURLY EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 30 21 53 26 32 2

32 MOUSE RENTED 23 9

26 9

2 2

25 AP AR TMENT RE NTED 16 6

19 8

1 9

25

?.081LE HOME RENTED 3

1 2

1 0

7 10 MOBILE HOME OdNED 6

2 6

3 2

1 7

5LEEPING ROOH I

0 0

0 0

3 4

MOTE L 2

0 0

0 0

1 3

OTHER 2

0 1

0 0

3 5

TOTAL 83 39 139 47 17 28 111 ALL EMPLOYEE 5 HOUSE OWNED 75 39 134 47 18 8

83 HOUSE RENTED 29 13 33 12 4

3 32 APARTMENT RENTED 27 9

26 10 3

17 44 MD8ILE HOME RENTED 4

1 4

1 0

7 11 MOSILE HOME UWNED 11 2

10 3

2 3

14 SLEEPING R03M 1

0 3

0 0

4 5

l MOTEL 2

0 3

0 0

2 4

OTHER 2

0 1

0 0

3 5

TOTAL 151 64 178 73 27 47 198

35 l

l l

TABLE A-ll+

FOLLDW UP $3AVEY WORKERS WHO MOVE 0 INTO MART 5VILLE NUCLEAR PLANT AREA HART 5VILLE RUN DATE 02/08/80 E MPLOYE E 5 L IVING WITHIS THE CITY LIMITS REP 3RT 1A ACTIVE EMPLOYEES 09-30-79 RUN IIME 114139 WITH TOTAL CHILDREN CHILDREM MOVERS CHILDREN NUMBER IN IN MOVERS dlTH IN OF GRADE HIGH WITHOUT TOTAL FAMILY 3CHOOL CHILDREX SCHOOL SLHOOL F4MILY MOVERS ANNUAL EMPLDYEE5 HOUSE DWNED 3

2 5

2 1

1 4

HOUSE RENTED 2

1 5

4 0

0 2

APARTMENT RENTED 5

0 3

0 0

8 13 M08tLE HOME RENTED 0

0 0

0 0

3 3

MOSILE HOME OWNED 4

2 4

3 0

5 9

SLEEPING ROOM 0

0 3

0 0

1 1

MOTEL 0

0 3

0 0

1 1

OTHER 1

0 3

0 0

0 1

TOTAL 15 5

15 9

1 19 34 HOURLY EMPLOYEE 5 HOUSE DWNED 8

2 3

4 2

0 3

HOUSE RENTED 17 11 25 13 7

5 22 APARTMENT RENTED 17 3

7 2

1 25 42 MOSILE HOME RENTED 29 3

31 8

5 21 50 MOSILE HOME OWNED 17 3

16 8

3 13 30 SLEEPING ROOM 1

0 0

0 0

8 9

MOTE L 1

1 2

2 0

6 7

DTHER 0

0 3

0 0

4 4

TOTAL 90 33 BF 37 18 82 172 ALL EMPLOYEE 5 MOUSE DWNED 11 4

13 6

3 1

12 HOUSE RENTED 19 12 11 17 7

5 24 APARTMENT RENTED 22 3

7 2

1 33 55 MOSILE HOME RENTED 29 8

31 8

5 24 53 MOBILE HOME OdNED 21 10 15 11 3

10 39

$LEEPING ROOM 1

0 3

0 0

9 10 MOTEL 1

1 2

2 0

7 8

GTHER 1

0 3

0 0

4 5

TOTAL 105 38 102 46 19 101 206 y

)

)

36 i

TABLE A-15 FOLLDW UP SURVEY WDARERS WHO MOVED INTO HARTSVILLE EdCLE AR PL ANT ARE A HE ND E R SON VILLE RUM DATE 02/08/00 EMPLOVEES LIVING WITHIN CITY LIMITS DEPORT 10 ACTIVE E4PLOTEE5 09-30-79 AUN TIME 114139 WITH TOTAL CHILDREN CHILDREN MOVERS CHILDREN NUMBER IN IN MOVER 5 WI*H IN OF GRADE HIGH WITH00T TOTAL FAMILY SCH03L CHIL3tER SCHOOL SCHOOL FAMILf MOVERS AmauRL EMPLOYEE 5 HOUSE DWNED 5

2 6

2 1

1 6

HOU5E RENTED 1

1 2

1 0

0 1

RPARTMENT RENTED 7

2 5

3 1

12 19 M09tLE HOME RENTED M; ' ? ' E HOME DWNED 5 LEERING E00M MOTEL OTHER TOTAL 13 5

13 6

2 13 26 HOURL T EMPLOYEE 5 HOUSE OdNED 12 11 29 20 5

3 13 HOUSE RENTED 7

3 12 4

2 0

7 RPARTMENT RENTED 7

4 11 4

2 8

15 MOBILE HOME RENTED MD5tLE HOME DdNED 4

2 4

5 0

0 4

SLEEPING ROOM MOTEL 1

0 1

0 0

0 1

OTHE R 0

0 3

0 0

1 1

TOTAL 31 20 57 33 9

10 41 RLL EMPLOYEE S HOUSE OWNED 17 13 15 22 6

2 19 HOUSE RENTED 8

4 14 5

2 0

8 LPARTMENT RENTED 14 6

16 7

3 20 34 MOBILE HOME RENTED AOSILC HOME OWNED 4

2 4

5 0

0 4

SLEEPING ROOM MOTEL 1

0 1

0 0

0 1

OTHER 0

0 0

0 0

1 I

TOTAL 44 25 73 39 11 23 67

37 TABLE A-16 FOLLOW UP SURVEY WORRERS WHO MOVED INTO HART 5VILLE SUCLEAR PL ANT ARE A LAFATETIE RUN ORTE 32/0s/80 EMPLOYEE 5 LIWINL WITHIt THE CITY LIMIT 5 REP 3RT 1A ACTIVE EMPLOVEES 09-30-79 RUN TIME 114139 WifH TOTAL CNILDREN CHILDREN MOVERS CHILDREN NUMBER IN IN M3VER$

WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH WITH3JT TOTAL FAMILY SCHOOL CH,ILDREN SCHOOL SCHOOL F4MILY MOVERS ANNURL E MPLOYEE5 HOUSE OWNED 2

1 3

2 0

0 2

HOUSE RENTED 2

2 3

3 0

0 2

APAATMENT RENTED 1

0 0

0 0

0 1

HOBILE HOME RENTED 0

0 3

0 0

1 1

M081LE HOME OWNED 5LEEPING A00M MOTE L OTHER TOTAL 5

5 6

5 0

1 6

HOURLY EMPLOYEE 5 HOUSE QWNED 21 13 39 25 10 3

21 HOUSE RENTED 7

2 11 5

0 0

7 APARTMENT RE NTED 4

2 6

3 0

0 4

MOSILE HOME RENTED 16 9

25 13 6

3 19 NOBILE HOME DdNED 0

0 3

0 0

2 2

SLEEPING ROOM 0

0 3

0 0

2 2

MOTEL 0

0 3

0 0

1 1

OTHER 0

0 3

0 0

2 2

TOTAL 48 26 33 46 16 10 58 RLL EMPLOYEE 5 HOUSE DWNED 23 14 41-27 10 0

23 HOUSE RENTED 9

4 14 8

0 0

9

&PARTMENT RENTED 5

2 5

3 0

0 5

M081LE HOME RENTED 16 9

25 13 6

4 20 MuBILE HOME DWNED 0

0 0

0 0

2 2

SLEEPING ROOM 0

0 0

0 0

2 2

MOTEL 0

0 3

0 0

1 1

OTHER 0

0 3

0 0

2 2

TOTAL 53 29 B6 51 16 11 64

38 TABLE A-17 EDLLOW UP SJLVEV WOR (ERS WHO MOVE 0 INTO HARTSVILLE E'JCLEAR PL ANT ARE A LEBANON RUN DATE 32/08/00 EMPLOYEE 5 LIVING WITHI4 THE CITY LIMITS REPORI I4 ACTIVE E1PLOYEES 09-30-79 RUN IIME 114139 WITH TOILL CHILDREN CHILDREN MOVERS CHILDREN NUMBER IN IN N09E R 5 WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH WITH037 TOTAL i

FAMILY SCH00L CHILDtEN SCHOOL SCHOOL FAMILY MOVER $

ANNUAL EMPLOYEES HOU3E DWNE D 8

3 3

4 1

0 8

HOUSE RENTED 3

1 4

3 0

1 4

AP AR TMENT RE NTED 3

1 1

1 0

7 10 MOSILE HOME RENTED M081LE HOME OWNED 2

1 1

1 0

1 3

SLEEPING ROOM MOTEL 0

0 0

0 0

1 1

DIHER 2

0 1

0 0

0 2

TOTAL la 6

15 9

1 10 24 HOURLY EMPLOYEES HOUSE DWNED 4

2 6

2 2

0 4

HOUSE RENTED 13 9

21 14 3

5 18 APARTMENT RE NTED 13 2

3 2

1 7

20 M081LE HOME RENTED 0

0 3

0 0

2 2

MD81LE HOME OWNED 4

1 6

0 1

2 6

5 LEE PleG R00M 1

0 3

0 0

0 1

MOTE L 1

1 I

O 2

3 OTHER 2

0 2

0 0

1 3

TD T AL 33 15 44 19 7

19 57 ALL EMPLOTEE5 HOUSE OWNED 12 5

14 6

3 0

12 40USE AE NTE D 16 10 25 17 3

6 22 APARTMENT R E NT ED 16 3

7 3

1 14 30 MOBILE HOME RENTED 0

0 3

0 0

2 2

MOBILE HOME DWNED 6

2 7

1 1

3 9

SLEE PING ROOM 1

0 0

0 0

0 1

MOTEL 1

1 1

1 0

3 4

OTHE R 4

0 3

0 0

1 5

TOTAL 56 21 59 28 8

29 85 1

39 TABLE A-18 FOLLOW UP SURVEY WORLE RS WHO MOVED INTO HARTSVILLE NUCLE AR PL ANT ARE A 4ASHVILLE RUN DATE 32/08/80 EMPLOVEE5 LIVING WITHI4 CITT LIMIT 5 REP 3RT 1D ACTIVE EMPLOVEES 09-30-79 RUN TIME 114139 WITH TOTAL CNILDREN CHILDREN MOWERS CHILDREN NUMBER IN IN MOVER 5 WITH IN OF GRADE HIGH WITH0JT TOTAL FARILY SCHDOL CHILDREN SCHOOL SCHDOL FANILF MOVERS ANNUAL EMPLOYEES HOUSE OWNED 2

0 1

0 0

1 3

HOU5E RENTED APARTMENT RENTED 0

0 3

0 0

6 6

MOBILE HOME RENTED M081LE HOME OWNEO SLEEPIDG R03M MOTEL OTHER 1

0 3

0 0

1 2

TOTAL 3

0 1

0 0

8 11 HOURLY EMPLOYEE 5 HOUSE DW4ED 8

7 lb 7

A 1

9 HOUSE RENTED 15 5

13 8

1 4

19 APARTMENT RENTED 8

1 2

2 0

30 18 M0dILE HOME RENTED 2

1 2

1 0

0 2

MD81LE HOME OdNED SLEEPING ROOM NOTEL 0

0 3

0 0

1 1

DTHER 2

0 3

0 0

2 4

TOTAL 35 14 33 18 5

18 53 ALL EMPLOYEE 5 HOUSE DWNED 10 T

17 7

4 2

12 HOUSE RE NTE D 15 5

10 8

1 4

19 APARTMENT RE NTED 8

1 2

2 0

16 24 M081LE HOME RENTED 2

1 2

3 0

0 2

MOSILE HOME DWNED SLEEPING ROOM MOTE L 0

0 0

0 0

1 1

DTHER 3

0 3

0 0

3 6

TOTAL 38 14 31 18 5

26 64 l

l

40 Appendix B SECONDARY SOCIOECONOMIC IMPACT MONITORING OF IIARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AREA 9

Secondary impact is defined as a temporary increase in the trade and service related resident population of the five-county area having an impact on community facilities and services which can be attributed to the !!artsville construction project.

TVA's monitoring program consists of a three-step procedure during each reporting period for estimating and reconciling population changes for each of the impact area counties. Residential customers of power distributors and school enrollment are used to provide independent estimates of county residential population change during a given reporting period. Population for the beginning of the first reporting period is estimated by applying the procedure outlined in Step I below to the most current estimate of county population provided by.U.S.

Bureau of the Census Current Population Reports. Subsequent estimates of population for the start of a reporting period is the TVA estimate at the end of the previous reporting period and is adjusted each time more current census estimates are available.

An estimate of secondary impact is made using the following three-steps process.

i Step I Ratios of school enrollment and residential customers to population is calculated at the beginning of the reporting period for each of the impact area counties. These ratios are applied to the number of residential

41 customers and school enrollment at the end of the period. This yields two estimates of population change during the reporting period.

These two estimates are averaged to produce a single estimate of population change for each of the impact area counties.

Step II Primary employment population, taken from TVA employee surveys, is subtracted from total adjusted population.

If a residual population is derived, the analysis will continue to Step III.

Step III This step comprises an analysis of nonproject related primary employment and its secondary effect to determine what part of the remaining unexplained population change should not be attributed to the project.

An estimate of change in total employment in each of the impact area counties during the reporting period is made using monthly data from the " CPS Labor Force Summary" produced by the Tennessee Department of Employment Security.

In order to determine that part of the change in total employment which can be attributed to forces other than the construction project, it is necessary to estimate the change in nonproject related employment. Change in nonprojected related primary employment is estimated using a linear interpolation of primary employment as a percent of total employment in 1970 and projected to 1980, as given in the 1974 report by the Tennessee State Planning Office, Tennessee Mitigation, o

Population Families, Income, and Manpower Demand Projection to 1990 for Development Districts and Counties. A ratio of.65 will be applied to the t

J

42 change in nonproject related primary employment to determine that part of the change in secondary employment which can be considered nonproject related. The total employment change is converted to population using an average family size of three and subtracted from any unexplained population remaining.

If no other reason exists for the remaining population it will be considered as secondary impact.

As results of the 1980 Census of Population or any other special census of census estimates are published, the population base of the inpact area counties will be recalibrated. Resi ential customers, school enrollmen t, and total population will be recorrelated.

Essentially, a new population base will be established f rom which to measure change throughout the remainder of the monitoring period.

Community Economics Prcjects 2/23/77

43 Appen<lix C THAFFIC LEVEL DEFINED Level of Service D Level of Service D approaches unstable flow, with tolerable operating speeds being maintained though considerably affected by changes in.

operating conditions. Fluctuations in volume and temporary restrictions to flow may cause substantial drops in operating speeds.

Drivers have little freedom to maneuver, and comfort and convenience are. low, but conditions can be tolerated for short periods of time.

Source:

liighway Capacity Manual, Highway Research Board Special Report 87, l%5

- W L_ m _

c.

44

-Appendix D-1 1

I EMPLOYEE QDESTIONNAIRE - TRADES AND LAEOR 2

NAME^

SOCIAL SECURITY NO.'

LAST FIRST 1.

WHE RE 000 YOU LIVE BEFORE SEGINNING WORK ON THIS PROJECT?

CITY COUNTY STATE 2.

WHERE ARE YOU NOW LIVING DURING THE WORK WEEKF STREET ADDRESS CITY COUNTY STATE 3.

DO YOU LIVE INSIOE THE CITY LIMITS?

YES

'NO 4.

HOW OID YOU OBTAiN MOST OF THE TRAINING THAT PREPARED YOU FOR YOUR PRESENT TRADE OR TYPE OF WORK 7 (CHECK ONLY ONE)

~

2. COLLEGE

~

4. ARMED SERVICES

1. HIGH SCHOOL

5. ON THE JOB BUT NOT FORMAL 3, VOCATIONAL SCHOOL OR FORMAL APPRENTICESHIP PROGRAM APPRENTICESHIP PROGRAM

6. OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY) 5.

IMMEDIATELY BEFORE ACCEPTING EMPLOYMENT ON THIS PROJECT WHAT WAS YOUR LASTJOS (SUCH AS STE AMFITTING, LABORER, F ARMING, MAINTEN ANCE, ETC.)?

6.

WHAT TYPE OF BUSINESS WERE YOU IN (SUCH AS MANUFACTURING, CONSTRUCTION, REPAIR OR MAINTENANCE SHOP, ETC.)?

7.

WHERE WAS THIS BUSINESS LOCATED?

C' Y

~ STATE 8.

CHECK WHICH TYPE OF RESIDENCE IN THE PROJECT ARE A WHERE YOU NOW LIVE.

1. BOARDING OR SLEEPING ROOM

4. MOBILE HOME

2. MOTEL

5. HOUSE

3. APARTMENT

6. OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY) 9.

IF YOU LIVE IN A HOUSE OR MontLE HOME IN THE PROJECT AREA,DO YOU OWN IT?

YES NO 10.

IN THE PROJECT AREA, CHECK WITH WHOM YOU LIVE.

1. BY MYSELF -

3. WITH ROOMMATES

~

2. WITH MY F AMILY HOW MANY? -

4. OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)

11. HOW MANY CHILDREN LIVE WITH YOU IN THE PROJECT ARE A?

OF THESE, HOW MANY GO TO GRADE SCHOOL 7 OF THESE, HOW MANY GO TO HIGH SCHOOL?

- 12 HAVE YOU LIVED AT YOUR PRESENT ADDRESS MORE THAN SIX MONTHS?

YES

- NO

' TH ANK YOU FOR COOPERATING'IN THIS SURVEY.

HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANT NEW EMPLOYEE SURVEY -

45 Appendix D-2 EMPLOYEE QUESTIONNAIRE - SAI ARY POLICY e

3 NAME SOCIAL SECURITY NO.

LAST FIRST 1.

WHERE DID YOU LIVE t1EFORE BEGINNING WORK ON THIS PROJECT?

CITY COUNTY STATE 2.

WHERE ARE YOU NOW LIVING OUPING THE WORK WEEK?

STREET ADDRESS '

CITY COUNTY STAT E 3.

00 YOU LtVE INSIDE THE CITY LIMITS?

YES NO 4.

HOW DID YOU 00TAIN MOST OF THE TRAINING THAT PREPARED YOU FOR YOUR PRESENT TRADE OR TYPE OF WCRK7 (CHECK ONLY OP.E OF THE FOLLOWING)

1. HIGH SCHOOL

4. ARMED SERVICES

2. COLLEGE

5. ON THE JOB BUT NOT FORMAL

3. VOCATICN AL SCHOOL TRAINING PROGRAM

6. OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY) 5.

IMMFDI ATELY BEFORE ACCEPTING EMPLOYMENT ON THIS PROJECT WHATWAS YOUR LAST JOB (SUCH AS CLERICAL, SECRET ARI AL, ENGINEERING AIDE, LABORER, ETC.)?

6.

WHAT TYPE OF EUSINESS V.ERE YOU IN ISUCH AS MANUFACTUntNG, CONSTRUCTION, RETAIL, SALES, SE RVICES, ETC.)?

7.

WHERE WAS THIS BUSINESS LOCATEDP CITY STATE E.

CHECK WHICH TYPE Oc RESiOENCE IN THE PROJECT AREA WHERE YOU NOW LIVE.

1. BOARDING OR Sm _ PING ROO*.1

4. MOBILE HOME

2. MOTEL

5. HOUSE

3. APARTMENT

6. OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY) 9.

IF YOU LIVE IN A HOUSE OR M00lLE HOME IN THE PROJECT AREA,DO YOU OWN IT?

YES NO 10.

IN THE PROJECT ARE A, CHECK WITH WHOM YOU LtVE.

1. DY MYSELF

3. WITH ROOMMATES,

2. W1TH MY F AMILY HOW M ANY?

4. OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY) 11, HOW HANY CHILDREN LIVE W1TH YOU IN THE PROJECT AREA?

OF THESE, HOW MANY GO TO GR ADE SCHOOf.?

OF THESE, HOW MANY GO TO HIGH SCHOOL?

12. HAVE YOU LIVED AT YOUR PRESENT ADDRESS MORE THAN StX MONTHS?

YES NO THANK YOU FOR COOPERATING IN THISSURVEY, HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANT NEW EMPLOYEE SURVEY

46 Appendix D-3 FOLLOW UP QUESTIONNAIRE 1.

Do you still live at

/ Employee's Address)

?

YES.

IF SO, SKtP TO QUESTION 2.

NO.

IF NOT, PLEASE ANSWER THE FOLLOWING OUESTIONS:

WHE RE ARE YOU NOW LIVING OURING THE WORK WEEK 7 STREET ADDRESS CITY COUNTY STATE DO YOU LlVE INSIDE THE CITY LIMITS?

YES NO CHECK WHICH TYPE RESIDENCE W THE PROJECT AREA YOU LIVE IN 1.

BOARDING OR SLEEPING ROOM

2. MOTEL

3. APARTMENT 4.

MOBILE HOME

5. HOUSE

6. OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY) 2.

IF YOU LIVE IN A HOUSE OR MOBILE HOME IN THE PROJECT AREA,DO YOU OWN ITF YES NO 3.

IN THE PROJECT ARE A. CHECK wtTH WHOM YOU NOW LIVE:

L BY MYSELF

2. WITH MY F AMILY

3. WITH ROOMMATES. HOW MANY?

4.

OTHE R (PLE ASE SPECIFY) 4.

HOW MANY CHILOREN LIVE WITH YOU IN THE PROJECT AREA?

OF THESE, HOW MANY GO TO GRADE SCHOOL?

OF THESE HOW MANY GO TO HIGH SCHOOL 7 5

HAVE YOU LIVED AT YOUR PRESENT ADDRESS MORE THAN SIX MONTHS 7 YES

.NO 6.

HAVE YOU OR ANY OF YOUR FAMILY LIVING WITH YOU IN THE PROJECT AREA HAD ANY DIF FICULTY OBTAINING HEALTH TREATMENT?

YES. IF SO. CHECK THOSE WHICH YOU H AD DIFFICULTY 08TAINING:

DOCTOR {NOT EMERGENCY)

OENTIST EMERGENCY MEDICAL THEATMENT HOSPITALIZATION OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)

NO 7.

HAVE YOUOR ANYOF YOUR FAMILY LIVING WITH YOU IN THE PROJECT AREA HAD TOTRAVEL OUTSIDE YOUR PRESENT COUNTY TO OLTAIN HEALTH TREATMENT?

YES. IF SO. WHAT WAS THE SE RVICE AND WHERE DID YOU HAVE TO GC P NO THANK YOU FOR COOPERATINGIN THIS SURVEY, HARTSVILLE NUCLE AR PLANT FOLLOWUP

_ [

{ __.

_[/

'f_(.p_ r'}~

y NhdREEN *--

GfangoW ~~

{

.h.____,

~~'*

'~~~~N ow v

/

A-6 '

\\ "D p

Qg..'*.

1

f. _Ni

~

~'

eAe9n 3

w~

s I

s "7

'/

[ '

c. N '- 3 _' g;..nor.., i.

1, a

,1.-- g pG j

(<

p.,.... e r/-

.: p, N. /

e a

W

' J (%!

s j e"*

x; i/

g.

/ n, 4' 34_ a yr

m,4

\\

/

~:

A

~

t...,

-,I. ~

, -- a' C -

h _.l W 5.3; b-( $5 $-.-.

-d..- J. & Y } %.. g" %

" o c..

I_..._j'--

1-

-,1 l

.= q x. - y q

--.h.

., - MT.,.

'r g e.,,(".o rdr u-nau j,,,

g 1

k lL"U unnat.inastavarion :..n- )

. j< ', >

M<, i F

,1g r - u' e.t i* [' t,.~. ~

\\.

.y i

1

~.

~

n

Ism

"*"== -.

m 1

=

N LE m

SUMNEP I

e**^

_[

p n

s_

m 3

/'

h>lN'

\\

L;

[

\\.

=~ N, c.,$~5 if o ' \\ -- h

~

~~~--

., C- (

\\

~~ >

/ !.r,f] : o u.it E(2, *; 'l,***.

M...-Q

%.,37 s ~.p., ' N

'~J,~,.,,

1 q-q

• "g"r

• ~

I V'

. v"'.(~~ ~,{N.

S' _

f j"*.,,,,,,,.

s== =n. :

' ~ ~ - - -

v 3

. :Y7-y~

J p

g: ~

r,_-.

e :,

d =..q.

A. %, "" ;<,

~

\\

A.

..... +..

u o o m, n

,, - =. ~..

Ma+

m

'1 y %

--t.

%[j -,

r

~

.-t,

,, y,

s.,

m-__

• • ~'~"'\\-

/

SHhI [

[bk.d*7

..?

N 0,

m, 7.

44 rn

\\

o'cT

/

" f S- % gppC Q h ~ ~ " _

." W ~

j'~~ f.

f u

3 y hif.-Q Q*~~

T

7. _j *C ~w.x....s M - --- --* - y.._.,,

- (-- j wp ' '.. ~-_.m,V

-a.

.1

' E"'

aa!. -.

u gj,,s E y s 4,

4.' _..

4,

,c 3

)f s' (.

)

j

-~,,c )

. -] (,

_s

/

". x g,

1 'x

,n s m

,.s. -- m.

w g' x. ~ i__ _,

• =\\'h

~"~x y[**

e..

"tT' bn

,3

t'-f$

?.!*^

./

~~'

a.~. s V~ T'N.*} s T 8y '..... 7 fC^""N c;-Ep

,j.

w..Q t

m

,.y w.

V.

r4 Rh

.A. W ~ ' Q,,===f,x,.Q %,,,J._..y I

.T 6p. n.

+

r-i[u.

m,'./

y 1 -.,. /'.-,' )/ _ p y,

w y

< 4d. ua#m C W"

.%~

^.

k. ' ' H..

u T

4 in k..

/

/AF;'" e nu // aam coi

,N/

r' (

Th;, /i"*"I@9

'x

~~~;.-

s b N i h

._.47...

7

=

.J-j m.

- oe\\- l T h tE f

3

,~ %.... -.- %

i I

FIGURE I t

~

s.

w e

52.,,

r1

. L..

1 ~~'#

j HARTSVILLE NUCLEAR PLANT

[" M c.,,....,,.N.

.3 M, N f uwt

s. I-TOWNS CONTAINING CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYEES VCJ %ds*_j T,.,.

F k1y \\

- / ar

$, * (,.

N*

A PLANT SITE MA 7, -

. y,_a

~ ~g - g' -

SEPTEMBER 1979 g

u a,

l

,3 o

is 3o

"- I 1 ',

'u-

h..

.L, /,

~~~[N"[%cpgg)%y@:.:-

,,,./.j

..d

~

Sc^" o' "'"S

• ^

(g NOTE: TOWNS UNDERLINED CONTAIN CMPLC'rEES j

i[

1

.y

-