ML14071A081: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML14071A081
| number = ML14071A081
| issue date = 02/20/2014
| issue date = 02/20/2014
| title = Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 162 of 217 Through 193 of 217
| title = Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 162 of 217 Through 193 of 217
| author name =  
| author name =  
| author affiliation = Southern Nuclear Operating Co, Inc
| author affiliation = Southern Nuclear Operating Co, Inc
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Fl- d -qSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIR41LOOO1B Equip. Class,Fquipment Deoscription 125VDC DISTRIBUTION PANELSheet I of 3Status: Y NEI u--18Location:
{{#Wiki_filter:ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                       NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 3 Fl- d -q Status: Y    NEI u-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139' Room. Area 343Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Equipment ID No. QIR41LOOO1B                       Equip. Class, Fquipment Deoscription 125VDC DISTRIBUTION PANEL-18 Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139'                     Room. Area 343 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions ror Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings.
Instructions ror Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist lor documenting other comments.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist lor documenting other comments.
Anchoraue
Anchoraue
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NOof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           YO NO Ur    N/AO
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surraceoxidation?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surrace            YO NO UO N/AO oxidation?
YO NO Ur N/AOYO NO UO N/AO4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   Yo NO U-     N/AI
Yo NO U- N/AI5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YO NOI Un N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage configuration veufed on 8128/12 per SEWS package dated 5/2594
Anchorage configuration veufed on 8128/12 per SEWS package dated5/25946. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of          YS NO U0 potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YO NOI Un N/ADYS NO U0' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
    ' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 162 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 2 of 3Status: YZ N[] U0Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIR41LOG5IB Equip. Class,Equipment Description 125VDC DISTRIBLrrON PANEI16Interacton Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or strutures?
Page 162 of 217
YO NO UO N/AO8. Are overhead equipment, distribution  
 
: systems, ceiling tiles and lighting.
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                               NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YZ N[] U0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Yj@ NE3 UI N/AOand masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Equipment ID No. QIR41LOG5IB                 Equip. Class, Equipment Description 125VDC DISTRIBLrrON PANEI 16 Interacton Effects
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YC9 NO UO N/AOYOEINO UOOther Adverse Condioions II. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO UOadversely affect the safety functions or the equipment?
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or strutures?       YO NO UO N/AO
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting. Yj@ NE3 UI   N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YC9 NO UO N/AO
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free    YOEINO UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Condioions II. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YO NO UO adversely affect the safety functions or the equipment?
Qoments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Qoments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Al cable had adequate flex. Al mnownin hardware Is Nc and In good CwdkmEvaluated by: Takvib YbVow d zd h- 'L 1 t1ldh Date:fBrian, NP hn~ , w; 1 4Page 163 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0F1-094Sheet 3 of 3Page 164 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0FI-0153Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 1 of 3Status: Y[] No UZEquipment ID No. .IR42BOOIB Equip. Class' 2Equipment Description 125VDC BUS 1BLocation:
Al cable had adequateflex. Al mnownin hardwareIs Nc and In good Cwdkm d   zd     h-         'L
Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room. Area 226Manufacturer.
* 1     t1ldh Evaluated by: Takvib YbVow                                                        Date:
Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
f 1        4
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings.
                                , w; Brian,NP hn~
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Page 163 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS       NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-094                                            Sheet 3 of 3 Page 164 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                       NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1of 3 FI-0153                                                                              Status: Y[] No UZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. .IR42BOOIB                       Equip. Class' 2 Equipment Description 125VDC BUS 1B Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121                       Room. Area 226 Manufacturer. Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorape
Anchorape
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y0 NOof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y0 NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           YO NO US N/AO
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface          YQI NO- US N/All oxidation?
YO NO US N/AOYQI NO- US N/All4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YO NOI Ur- N/A[
YO NOI Ur- N/A[5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YQ NO US N/All (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
See Comments
See Comments6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of          YO NEI UI potentially adverse seismic conditions?
See CommentsYQ NO US N/AllYO NEI UIIEnter the equipment class name from Appendix R: Classes of Equipment.
See Comments IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix R: Classes of Equipment.
Page 165 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q1R4280018 Equip.Equipment Description 125 VOC B0S 18Sheet 2 of 3Status: YO N8[ UOInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets fre from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Page 165 of 217
YO Nil Un N/A[-8. Are overhead equipment, distribution  
 
: systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO Ni3 U[3 N/AOand masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                   NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YO N8[ UO Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YE NO UF' N/ArlYO NE UiQOther Adverse Conditions I I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[g No Urladversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Equipment ID No. Q1R4280018                     Equip.
Equipment Description 125 VOC B0S 18 Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets fre from impact by nearby equipment or structures?       YO Nil Un N/A[-
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO Ni3 U[3 N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YE NO UF' N/Arl
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free    YO NE UiQ of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions I I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     Y[g No Url adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
This walkdown was perormed to the extent possble.
This walkdown was perormedto the extent possble. Intonals were Inspected and no adverse seismic conditionswere found. Anchorage verification was unable to be pedormed due to a bottom coverplate thatcan not be removed without racking out breakers. Therefore, this item will be consideredInaccessable. Item will be removed from the SWEL and this SWC will be includedIn the final report to document InternalsInspection.
Intonals were Inspected and no adverseseismic conditions were found. Anchorage verification was unable to be pedormed due to a bottomcover plate that can not be removed without racking out breakers.
Evaluated by:. a,       son     e~ý     i'     '   ? -                     Date:    f/,5,j-4 Nknl. ArrnnYjO/J(QQJJ rjyj                      O.J1Yi.PEt#~
Therefore, this item will beconsidered Inaccessable.
Nikole A Page 166 of 217
Item will be removed from the SWEL and this SWC will be included Inthe final report to document Internals Inspection.
 
Evaluated by:. a, son e~ý i' ' ? -Nknl. A rrnnYjO/J(QQJJ 4O.J1Yi.PEt#~
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS       NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-095                                          Sheet 3of 3 Page 167 of 217
Date: f/,5,j-Nikole A rjyjPage 166 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0F1-095Sheet 3of 3Page 167 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 1 of 5Status: Y0 NE U"]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIR42EOOIA Equip. Class'. 1Equipment Description Aux Slda Satteg= Charaer 1ALocation:
 
Bldg. AS .Floor El. 121' Room, Area 224Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                     NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: Y0 NE U"]
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Equipment ID No. QIR42EOOIA                       Equip. Class'. 1 Equipment Description Aux Slda Satteg= Charaer1A Location: Bldg. AS           .     Floor El. 121'           Room, Area 224 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Anchornee I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage was verfled in walkdowns dated 8W29/12.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
Anchornee I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
The anchorage Is free from potentially adverse seismic conditions.
Anchorage was verfled in walkdowns dated8W29/12.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           YO NO UI    N/AQ-The anchorageIs free from potentially adverseseismic conditions.
YO NEIYO NO UI N/AQ-YN NO3 UO N/AQ"4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface            YN NO3 UO N/AQ" oxidation?
YO NEI U0 N/AI-5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YO NEI U0 N/AI-
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YO NO UD! N/AQ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage is consistent with SEWS package dated 5/24194.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?
Anchorage is consistent with SEWS package dated 5/24194.
YO NO UD! N/AQYO N3 UQ'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of          YO N3 UQ potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Page 168 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 2 of 5Status: Y0 Nil UD"Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. O1R42EOOIA Equip. Class,Equipment Description Aux Bido Battery Charger 1AInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
    'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
YI NO Un N/AD8. Are overhead equipment, distribution  
Page 168 of 217
: systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NO] U[] N/AQand masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
 
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YC9 NO Un NIAOYO NO UrlOther Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO UOadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                               NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y0 Nil UD" Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
All equipment inside the battery charger was adequately restrained withno loose connections and no missing bolts.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Equipment ID No. O1R42EOOIA                 Equip. Class, Equipment Description Aux Bido Battery Charger 1A Interaction Effects
SWC originally completed on 8/29/12.
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YI   NO Un N/AD
Final walkdown performed to inspect battery charger internals and complete anchorage verification.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NO] U[] N/AQ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Area walk-by completed 8/29/12.Evaluated by: Laura Maclay A'1/UA MOVEDate: 9ý-'I/h7,1i /Z013Tern' Alan Mullen&\%'A -" --01 ePage 169 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 3 of 5Page 170 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 4 of 5Page 171 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 5 of 5Page 172 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet i of 5Status: Y NEI UDEquipment ID No. QAR43Eoo1A Equip. REquipment Description Sbeaurmencer BIELocation:
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YC9 NO Un NIAO
Bldg. AB Floor El. 139- Room, Area 335Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)  
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free    YO NO Url of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
-_____Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.
Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YO NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
All equipment inside the battery chargerwas adequatelyrestrainedwith no loose connections and no missing bolts.
Anchorase I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Anchorage was verified in walkdowns dated 8/28/122. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
SWC originallycompleted on 8/29/12. Final walkdown performed to inspect battery chargerinternals and complete anchorage verification.
The anchorage is free from potentially adverse seismic conditions.
Area walk-by completed 8/29/12.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?
Evaluated by: LauraMaclay A'1/UA         MO                                    Date:   9ý-'I/h VE Tern' Alan Mullen&                                                         7,1i /Z013
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
                                      \%'A-         "     --01   e Page 169 of 217
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
 
Anchorage is consistent with SEWS package dated 5/26/94.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS       NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 5 Page 170 of 217
YO NEIYO NEI U["] N/AllYO NEI UF N/AOYO NQ U0 NIAU-YO NOI Uil N/ADYO NEI UI' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
 
Page 173 of 217  
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS       NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 5 Page 171 of 217
.ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 2 of 5Status: YO NO U[3aSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. OIR4M A Equip. Clan'Equipment Description jM'aiuEcrBlF Ieacton t7. Am soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
 
Ye Nr3 U[3 N/An, CR 497075 was writton prior to and outside the scope of the 2.3 Seismic Walkdowns, which a potential seismic Interaction due to Elite 1115 being within 3" of the DO Sequencer E1lF. This condition has been evaluated to not poseaseismic Interaction  
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS       NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 5 of 5 Page 172 of 217
: concern, asdocumented In TI 497633. Since this condition was Identified prior to the walkdown, it will bejoi/l resolved by normal plant processes, and therefore is not contained in Table 8-1 of the Report.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution  
 
: systems, ceing tiles and lighting, YCI NO Ur3 N/Ar'and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                   NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i of 5 Status: Y NEI UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NO LO N/AOYZ NO UO3Othe Adj Condld11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO UrLadversely affect the safety ftnctions of the equipment?
Equipment ID No. QAR43Eoo1A                       Equip.     R Equipment Description Sbeaurmencer BIE Location: Bldg. AB                   Floor El. 139-           Room, Area 335 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)               -_____
Al equwat ki e O equNw "s adlqut* reahwtrafed  
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
*h nokwm cannecat and no mnaka bo&Con~ts (Addional pqaes nay be added as noeauy)SWC org com e on& 8/28/12.
Anchorase I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one  YO NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Final wakdown peonnmedto iwpwteq wneintwm andvom &et anchorage f t"kan.Area wak-bycoWfl~
Anchorage was verified in walkdowns dated 8/28/12
WWII12Evaluated by: Lu f flA _D ar:/.&zA%1\j 4yj -/(./Page 174 of 217 4 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 3 of 5Page 175 of 217 0 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 4 of 5Page 176 of 217 0 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 5 of 5Page 177 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 1 of 5Status: YO N[] uF]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. IFR43EOO2A Equip. Class,Equipment Description SeouencerBIFAux Relay PAneLocation:
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             YO NEI U["] N/All The anchorageis free from potentiallyadverse seismic conditions.
Bldg. A6 Floor El. 139' Room. Area 434Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface            YO NEI UF    N/AO oxidation?
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YO NQ U0 NIAU-
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YO NOI Uil N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorze1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Anchorage is consistent with SEWS package dated 5/26/94.
Anchorage in the panel was verified in walkdowns dated 8/28/12.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of          YO NEI UI potentially adverse seismic conditions?
The anchorage In the panel is free from potentially adverse seismiccondriolns.
  ' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?
Page 173 of 217
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
 
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
  . ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                           NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 a                                                                                              Sheet 2 of5 Status: YO NO U[3 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Anchorage In the panel was verified on 8/28/12 and Is consistent withSEWS package dated 5&25494.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?
Equipment ID No. OIR4M A                       Equip. Clan' Equipment Description       jM'aiuEcrBlF Ieacton           t
YO NOYS NO U[3 N/A[-IYO NOI UO N/AQYO NOI UQ3 N/AQlYO NO U3 N/AQ]YO NEIO Ur'Emcr the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 7. Am soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     Ye Nr3 U[3 N/An
Page 178 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 2 of 5Status: YZ NI] ur"]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIR43EO02A Equip. Classt.20 Equipment Description Seauencer BIFAux Relay PanelInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
      ,     CR 497075 was writton prior to and outside the scope of the 2.3 Seismic Walkdowns, which
YN NEI UD N/AQ8. Are overhead equipment, distribution  
    ,*.0tIdentified a potential seismic Interaction due to Elite 1115 being within 3" of the DO Sequencer E1lF. This condition has been evaluated to not poseaseismic Interaction concern, as documented In TI 497633. Since this condition was Identified prior to the walkdown, it will be joi/l resolved by normal plant processes, and therefore is not contained in Table 8-1 of the Report.
: systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NO UD N/AI-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceing tiles and lighting, YCI NO Ur3 N/Ar' and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NO U0 N/AllYCR NQ UQOther Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO UDadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?           YN NO LO N/AO
All equipment Inside the sequencer panel was adequately restrained with no loose connections and no missing bolts.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free  YZ NO UO3 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
SWC originally completed on 8/28/12.
Othe Adj        Condld
Final walkdown performed to inspect panel Internals andcomplete anchorage verification.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could   YO NO UrL adversely affect the safety ftnctions of the equipment?
Al equwatki Oe equNw "s adlqut* reahwtrafed *h no kwm cannecat andno mnaka bo&
Con~ts (Addional pqaes nay be added as noeauy)
SWC org         com e on&     8/28/12. Finalwakdown peonnmedto iwpwteq       wneintwm and vom &etanchoragef            t"kan.
Area wak-bycoWfl~ WWII12 Evaluated by: Lu                 fflA                      _                  Dar:
                                                                                                /.&zA%1
                                        \j 4yj -/                 (./
Page 174 of 217
 
4 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS       NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 5 Page 175 of 217
 
0 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS       NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 5 Page 176 of 217
 
0 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS       NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 5 of 5 Page 177 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                   NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1of 5 Status: YO N[] uF]
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.         IFR43EOO2A             Equip. Class, Equipment Description SeouencerBIFAux Relay PAne Location: Bldg. A6                 Floor El. 139'           Room. Area 434 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorze
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Anchoragein the panelwas verified in walkdowns dated8/28/12.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           YS NO U[3 N/A[-I The anchorageIn the panel is free from potentiallyadverseseismic condriolns.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface          YO NOI UO N/AQ oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YO NOI UQ3 N/AQl
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YO NO U3 N/AQ]
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage In the panelwas verifiedon 8/28/12 and Is consistent with SEWS package dated 5&25494.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of          YO NEIO Ur potentially adverse seismic conditions?
    'Emcr the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 178 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                       NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NI] ur"]
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QIR43EO02A                             Equip. Classt.20 Equipment Description SeauencerBIFAux Relay Panel Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?         YN NEI UD N/AQ
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NO UD N/AI-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?                 YN NO U0 N/All
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free        YCR NQ UQ of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could         YO NO UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
All equipment Inside the sequencerpanel was adequatelyrestrained with no loose connections and no missingbolts.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
SWC originally completed on 8/28/12. Finalwalkdown performed to inspect panelInternals and complete anchorageverification.
Area walk-by was completed 8/28/2012.
Area walk-by was completed 8/28/2012.
Evaluated by: Laura Maclay'Al JIA&76M/2(Lh.JJ"
Evaluated by: Laura Maclay       'AlJIA& 76M/2(Lh.JJ"
....................
                                        ....................             7 Date:  2-/1tŽLI.3.
7Term' A lan MAenix-4rZOi7O.-
St/ OL,,
4/-'ýDate: 2-/1tLI.3.
Term' Alan MAenix-4rZOi7O.- 4/-'ý
St/ OL,,<Jur~&7-Page 179 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 3 of 5Page 180 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 4 of 5Page 181 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 5 of 5Page 182 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. .SH21E525 Equip. Class, 20Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR 1-2A LOCAL CONTROL PANELSheet I of 7Status: Y0 NEI U[-'ILocation:
                                      <Jur~                                 &7-Page 179 of 217
Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 155' Room, Area 61Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS       NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 5 Page 180 of 217
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS       NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 5 Page 181 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS       NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 5 of 5 Page 182 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                 NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 7 Status: Y0 NEI U[-'I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. .SH21E525                       Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR 1-2A LOCAL CONTROL PANEL Location: Bldg. DIESEL             Floor El. 155'           Room, Area 61 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchoraze
Anchoraze
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Verified against SEWS for QSH21E525.
Verified againstSEWS for QSH21E525.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           YO NEI U0 N/AI-
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface          YN NEI U[    N/AO oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YO Nn u1" N/An
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         Y0 NEI U11    N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of          YNO        0U]
YO NOYO NEI U0 N/AI-YN NEI U[ N/AOYO Nn u1" N/AnY0 NEI U11 N/ADYNO 0U]I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Page 183 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0SH21E525 Equip. Class' 20Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR 1.2A LOCAL CONTROL PANELSheet 2 of 7Status: YO NO uOInteracto Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
YO NO U0 N/AO8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems.
Page 183 of 217
ceiling tiles and lighting, Ys NO UD N/ADand masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
 
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NEI UD N/A[YO N[3 UOOther Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO3 UDIadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                             NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 7 Status: YO NO uO Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. 0SH21E525                   Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR 1.2A LOCAL CONTROL PANEL Interacto Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YO NO U0 N/AO
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems. ceiling tiles and lighting, Ys NO UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YO NEI UD N/A[
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free    YO N[3 UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YO NO3 UDI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
ComentIs(Additional pages may be added as necessary)
ComentIs(Additional pages may be added as necessary)
AWB Checklist done with QSH22L502.
AWB Checklistdone with QSH22L502.
SWC completed SAT originly on 8/29/12.
SWC completed SAT originly on 8/29/12. Second performance beingperformed to inspect cabinet Internals.
Second performance being performed to inspect cabinetInternals.
IPEEE vulnerabilites(grout underpanel,add missing bolts, andrestrainoverheadlight) have been resolved.
IPEEE vulnerabilites (grout under panel, add missing bolts, and restrain overhead light) have beenresolved.
Walkdown and SWC performed on 10/25/12 has been retypd for clartly.
Walkdown and SWC performed on 10/25/12 has been retypd for clartly.Evaluated by: Ryan Harlos -Tailor Younsmblood  
Evaluated by: Ryan Harlos                                             -         Date:
~ .Date:Page 184 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS m 1s fi &#xfd; j --, --WNO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0a- "14%,-Page 185 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0VIPage 186 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0-IPage 187 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0-- I f '-pPage 188 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS
Tailor Younsmblood ~           .
;I- t~tC"_ All- X_._NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0&L." It -IPage 189 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0F! -6Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 1 of 4Status: YZ N[] U0Equipmnent ID No. 0SH21E0528 Equip. Class,_20 liquipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR 1C LOCAL CONTROL PANELLocation:
Page 184 of 217
Bldg. OE/EL Floor Il. 155' Room, Area 60Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may he used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEIL The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                 NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 m 1s fi &#xfd; j -- , -   -   W a- _*  "1 4%
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Page 185 of 217
AnchoagI. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NJof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
 
: 2. Is the anchorage frWe of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS       NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 V
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?
I Page 186 of 217
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
 
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS       NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?
                                                      -I Page 187 of 217
YIN NO UO N/ADYO NO Ur N/ADYI NO UO N/ADYO NO UD N/AE3YO NO UDI Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
 
Page 190 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0FI-lO4Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0=H21E0528 Sheet 2 of 4Status: Y0 NO UrEquip. Class' 20Equipment Description DIESE GENERATO 1C LOCALCONTROL PANEL7. Are sort targets 'ree from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS       NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0
YO NO 130 N/AQ8. Are overhead equipment.
                                                -- I f       '-p Page 188 of 217
distribution  
 
: systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NO UI-I N/AQand masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS         NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations.
                      ;I-t~tC"_ All- X_._
Is equipment freeof potentialiy adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NO UQ NIAOYO NO UOther Adverse Conditliob I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YIN NO UOadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
                                                  &L."   It -I Page 189 of 217
oMmR! flL(Additional pages may be added as necessary)
 
ANl cable had adequate flex. Instnumentaton was props* moW Them mes no misi hardwarefound. Baing of cabe to 1ca te ,loor appeard in good condiftk.
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                       NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1of 4 F! - 6 Status: YZ N[] U0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
IPEEE vulnerabili ee (grout under panel and restrain overhead ight) have been resolvedPage 191 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0F1-106Sheet 3 of 41C OGOCAL CONTROLPANELQSH21E528-A Page 192 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0F1-106Sheet 4 of 4Page 193 of 217}}
Equipmnent ID No. 0SH21E0528                       Equip. Class,_20 liquipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR 1C LOCAL CONTROL PANEL Location: Bldg. OE/EL               Floor Il. 155'           Room, Area 60 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may he used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEIL The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchoag I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NJ of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage frWe of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           YIN NO UO N/AD
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface          YO NO Ur N/AD oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YI  NO UO N/AD
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YO NO UD N/AE3 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of          YO NO UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?
I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 190 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                               NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 4 FI-lO4                                                                          Status: Y0 NO Ur Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. 0=H21E0528                 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description DIESE GENERATO 1C LOCALCONTROL PANEL
: 7. Are sort targets 'ree from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YO NO 130 N/AQ
: 8. Are overhead equipment. distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NO UI-I N/AQ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             YO NO UQ NIAO
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations. Isequipment free      YO NO U of potentialiy adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditliob I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YIN NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
oMmR! flL(Additional pages may be added as necessary)
ANl cable hadadequate flex. Instnumentaton was props* moW Them mes no misi               hardware found. Baing of cabe to 1ca te ,loor appeard ingood condiftk.
IPEEEvulnerabili ee (grout underpanel and restrainoverhead ight) have been resolved Page 191 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS       NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-106                                            Sheet 3 of 4 1C OG OCAL CONTROL PANEL QSH21E528-A Page 192 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS       NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-106                                              Sheet 4 of 4 Page 193 of 217}}

Latest revision as of 22:38, 5 February 2020

Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 162 of 217 Through 193 of 217
ML14071A081
Person / Time
Site: Farley Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 02/20/2014
From:
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-14-0249
Download: ML14071A081 (32)
v • d • e


Text

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 3 Fl- d -q Status: Y NEI u-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIR41LOOO1B Equip. Class, Fquipment Deoscription 125VDC DISTRIBUTION PANEL-18 Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139' Room. Area 343 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions ror Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist lor documenting other comments.

Anchoraue

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NO Ur N/AO
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surrace YO NO UO N/AO oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yo NO U- N/AI
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NOI Un N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage configuration veufed on 8128/12 per SEWS package dated 5/2594

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YS NO U0 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 162 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YZ N[] U0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIR41LOG5IB Equip. Class, Equipment Description 125VDC DISTRIBLrrON PANEI 16 Interacton Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or strutures? YO NO UO N/AO
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting. Yj@ NE3 UI N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YC9 NO UO N/AO
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YOEINO UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Condioions II. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO UO adversely affect the safety functions or the equipment?

Qoments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Al cable had adequateflex. Al mnownin hardwareIs Nc and In good Cwdkm d zd h- 'L

  • 1 t1ldh Evaluated by: Takvib YbVow Date:

f 1 4

, w; Brian,NP hn~

Page 163 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-094 Sheet 3 of 3 Page 164 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1of 3 FI-0153 Status: Y[] No UZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. .IR42BOOIB Equip. Class' 2 Equipment Description 125VDC BUS 1B Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room. Area 226 Manufacturer. Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorape

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y0 NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NO US N/AO
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YQI NO- US N/All oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NOI Ur- N/A[
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YQ NO US N/All (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

See Comments

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI UI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

See Comments IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix R: Classes of Equipment.

Page 165 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YO N8[ UO Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q1R4280018 Equip.

Equipment Description 125 VOC B0S 18 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets fre from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO Nil Un N/A[-
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO Ni3 U[3 N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NO UF' N/Arl
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NE UiQ of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions I I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[g No Url adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

This walkdown was perormedto the extent possble. Intonals were Inspected and no adverse seismic conditionswere found. Anchorage verification was unable to be pedormed due to a bottom coverplate thatcan not be removed without racking out breakers. Therefore, this item will be consideredInaccessable. Item will be removed from the SWEL and this SWC will be includedIn the final report to document InternalsInspection.

Evaluated by:. a, son e~ý i' '  ? - Date: f/,5,j-4 Nknl. ArrnnYjO/J(QQJJ rjyj O.J1Yi.PEt#~

Nikole A Page 166 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-095 Sheet 3of 3 Page 167 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: Y0 NE U"]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIR42EOOIA Equip. Class'. 1 Equipment Description Aux Slda Satteg= Charaer1A Location: Bldg. AS . Floor El. 121' Room, Area 224 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchornee I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Anchorage was verfled in walkdowns dated8W29/12.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NO UI N/AQ-The anchorageIs free from potentially adverseseismic conditions.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NO3 UO N/AQ" oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NEI U0 N/AI-
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO UD! N/AQ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage is consistent with SEWS package dated 5/24194.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO N3 UQ potentially adverse seismic conditions?

'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 168 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y0 Nil UD" Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. O1R42EOOIA Equip. Class, Equipment Description Aux Bido Battery Charger 1A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YI NO Un N/AD
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NO] U[] N/AQ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YC9 NO Un NIAO
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NO Url of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

All equipment inside the battery chargerwas adequatelyrestrainedwith no loose connections and no missing bolts.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWC originallycompleted on 8/29/12. Final walkdown performed to inspect battery chargerinternals and complete anchorage verification.

Area walk-by completed 8/29/12.

Evaluated by: LauraMaclay A'1/UA MO Date: 9ý-'I/h VE Tern' Alan Mullen& 7,1i /Z013

\%'A- " --01 e Page 169 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 5 Page 170 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 5 Page 171 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 5 of 5 Page 172 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i of 5 Status: Y NEI UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QAR43Eoo1A Equip. R Equipment Description Sbeaurmencer BIE Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 139- Room, Area 335 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) -_____

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorase I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Anchorage was verified in walkdowns dated 8/28/12

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NEI U["] N/All The anchorageis free from potentiallyadverse seismic conditions.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NEI UF N/AO oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NQ U0 NIAU-
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NOI Uil N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage is consistent with SEWS package dated 5/26/94.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI UI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 173 of 217

. ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 a Sheet 2 of5 Status: YO NO U[3 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. OIR4M A Equip. Clan' Equipment Description jM'aiuEcrBlF Ieacton t

7. Am soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Ye Nr3 U[3 N/An

, CR 497075 was writton prior to and outside the scope of the 2.3 Seismic Walkdowns, which

,*.0tIdentified a potential seismic Interaction due to Elite 1115 being within 3" of the DO Sequencer E1lF. This condition has been evaluated to not poseaseismic Interaction concern, as documented In TI 497633. Since this condition was Identified prior to the walkdown, it will be joi/l resolved by normal plant processes, and therefore is not contained in Table 8-1 of the Report.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceing tiles and lighting, YCI NO Ur3 N/Ar' and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NO LO N/AO
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NO UO3 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Othe Adj Condld

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO UrL adversely affect the safety ftnctions of the equipment?

Al equwatki Oe equNw "s adlqut* reahwtrafed *h no kwm cannecat andno mnaka bo&

Con~ts (Addional pqaes nay be added as noeauy)

SWC org com e on& 8/28/12. Finalwakdown peonnmedto iwpwteq wneintwm and vom &etanchoragef t"kan.

Area wak-bycoWfl~ WWII12 Evaluated by: Lu fflA _ Dar:

/.&zA%1

\j 4yj -/ (./

Page 174 of 217

4 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 5 Page 175 of 217

0 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 5 Page 176 of 217

0 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 5 of 5 Page 177 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1of 5 Status: YO N[] uF]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. IFR43EOO2A Equip. Class, Equipment Description SeouencerBIFAux Relay PAne Location: Bldg. A6 Floor El. 139' Room. Area 434 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorze

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Anchoragein the panelwas verified in walkdowns dated8/28/12.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YS NO U[3 N/A[-I The anchorageIn the panel is free from potentiallyadverseseismic condriolns.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NOI UO N/AQ oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NOI UQ3 N/AQl
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO U3 N/AQ]

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage In the panelwas verifiedon 8/28/12 and Is consistent with SEWS package dated 5&25494.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEIO Ur potentially adverse seismic conditions?

'Emcr the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 178 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NI] ur"]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIR43EO02A Equip. Classt.20 Equipment Description SeauencerBIFAux Relay Panel Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI UD N/AQ
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NO UD N/AI-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NO U0 N/All
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YCR NQ UQ of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

All equipment Inside the sequencerpanel was adequatelyrestrained with no loose connections and no missingbolts.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWC originally completed on 8/28/12. Finalwalkdown performed to inspect panelInternals and complete anchorageverification.

Area walk-by was completed 8/28/2012.

Evaluated by: Laura Maclay 'AlJIA& 76M/2(Lh.JJ"

.................... 7 Date: 2-/1tŽLI.3.

St/ OL,,

Term' Alan MAenix-4rZOi7O.- 4/-'ý

<Jur~ &7-Page 179 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 5 Page 180 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 5 Page 181 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 5 of 5 Page 182 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 7 Status: Y0 NEI U[-'I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. .SH21E525 Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR 1-2A LOCAL CONTROL PANEL Location: Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 155' Room, Area 61 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraze

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Verified againstSEWS for QSH21E525.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NEI U0 N/AI-
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NEI U[ N/AO oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO Nn u1" N/An
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y0 NEI U11 N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YNO 0U]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 183 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 7 Status: YO NO uO Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 0SH21E525 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR 1.2A LOCAL CONTROL PANEL Interacto Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NO U0 N/AO
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems. ceiling tiles and lighting, Ys NO UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NEI UD N/A[
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO N[3 UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO3 UDI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

ComentIs(Additional pages may be added as necessary)

AWB Checklistdone with QSH22L502.

SWC completed SAT originly on 8/29/12. Second performance beingperformed to inspect cabinet Internals.

IPEEE vulnerabilites(grout underpanel,add missing bolts, andrestrainoverheadlight) have been resolved.

Walkdown and SWC performed on 10/25/12 has been retypd for clartly.

Evaluated by: Ryan Harlos - Date:

Tailor Younsmblood ~ .

Page 184 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 m 1s fi ý j -- , - - W a- _* "1 4%

Page 185 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 V

I Page 186 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

-I Page 187 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

-- I f '-p Page 188 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

I-t~tC"_ All- X_._

&L." It -I Page 189 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1of 4 F! - 6 Status: YZ N[] U0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipmnent ID No. 0SH21E0528 Equip. Class,_20 liquipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR 1C LOCAL CONTROL PANEL Location: Bldg. OE/EL Floor Il. 155' Room, Area 60 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may he used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEIL The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoag I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NJ of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage frWe of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YIN NO UO N/AD
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NO Ur N/AD oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YI NO UO N/AD
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO UD N/AE3 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NO UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 190 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 4 FI-lO4 Status: Y0 NO Ur Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 0=H21E0528 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description DIESE GENERATO 1C LOCALCONTROL PANEL

7. Are sort targets 'ree from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NO 130 N/AQ
8. Are overhead equipment. distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NO UI-I N/AQ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NO UQ NIAO
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations. Isequipment free YO NO U of potentialiy adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditliob I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YIN NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

oMmR! flL(Additional pages may be added as necessary)

ANl cable hadadequate flex. Instnumentaton was props* moW Them mes no misi hardware found. Baing of cabe to 1ca te ,loor appeard ingood condiftk.

IPEEEvulnerabili ee (grout underpanel and restrainoverhead ight) have been resolved Page 191 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-106 Sheet 3 of 4 1C OG OCAL CONTROL PANEL QSH21E528-A Page 192 of 217

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-106 Sheet 4 of 4 Page 193 of 217

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML14071A081&oldid=2453509"