ML17212B606: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:DEFINITIONS REACTORTRIPSYSTEMRESPONSETIME1.26TheREACTORTRIPSYSTEMRESPONSETIMEshallbethetimeintervalfromwhenthemonitored parameter exceedsitstripsetpointatthechannelsensoruntilelectrical powerisinterrupted totheCEAdrivemechanism.
{{#Wiki_filter:DEFINITIONS REACTOR  TRIP SYSTEM RESPONSE TIME 1.26 The REACTOR TRIP SYSTEM RESPONSE TIME          shall  be the time  interval from when the monitored parameter exceeds        its trip setpoint  at the channel sensor until electrical    power  is interrupted to    the  CEA  drive mechanism.
ENGINEERED SAFETYFEATURERESPONSETIME1.27TheENGINEERED SAFETYFEATURERESPONSETIMEshallbethattimeinter-valfromwhenthemonitored parameter exceedsitsESFactuation setpointatthechannelsensoruntiltheESFequipment iscapableofperformi.ng itssafetyfunction(i.e.,thevalvestraveltotheirrequiredpositions, pumpdischarge pressures reachtheir,requiredvalues,etc.).Timesshallincludedieselgenerator startingandsequenceloadingdelayswhereapplicable.
ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURE RESPONSE TIME 1.27    The ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURE RESPONSE TIME shall be that time inter-val from  when the monitored parameter exceeds its ESF actuation setpoint at the channel sensor    until  the ESF equipment is capable of performi.ng its safety function    (i.e.,   the valves travel to their required positions, pump discharge pressures reach their, required values, etc.). Times shall include diesel generator starting and sequence loading delays where applicable.
PHYSICSTESTS1.28PHYSICSTESTSshallbethosetestsperformed tomeasurethefundamen-talnuclearcharacteristics ofthereactorcoreandrelatedinstrumentation and1)described inChapter14.0oftheFSAR,2)authorized underthepro-visionsof10CFR50.59,or3)otherwise approvedbytheCommission.
PHYSICS TESTS 1.28    PHYSICS TESTS  shall  be those  tests performed to measure the fundamen-tal nuclear characteristics of the reactor core          and related instrumentation and  1) described in Chapter 14.0 of the FSAR,         2) authorized under the pro-visions of    10 CFR  50.59, or  3) otherwise approved by the Commission.
UNRODDEDINTEGRATED RADIALPEAKINGFACTOR-F1.29TheUNRODDEDINTEGRATED RADIALPEAKINGFACTORistheratioofthepeakpinpowertotheaveragepinpowerinanunroddedcore,excluding tilt.LOADFOLLOWOPERATION 1.30LOADFOLLOWOPERATION shallbedailypowerlevelchangesofmorethan10%ofRATEDTHERMALPOWERordailyinsertion ofCEAsbelow'theLongTermInsertion Limit.GASEOUSRADWASTETREATMENT SYSTEM1.31AGASEOUSRADWASTETREATMENT SYSTEMisanysystemdesignedandinstalled tqreduceradioactive gaseouseffluents bycollecting primarycoolantsystemoffgasesfromtheprimarysystemfordecay.OFFSITEDOSECALCULATION MANUAL(ODCM)1.32TheOFFSITEDOSECALCULATION MANUALshallcontainthemethodology andparameters usedinthecalculation ofoffsitedosesduetoradioactive gaseousandliquideffluents andinthecalculation ofgaseousandliquideffluentmonitoring alarm/trip setpointmethodology.
UNRODDED INTEGRATED RADIAL PEAKING FACTOR  F 1.29    The UNRODDED INTEGRATED RADIAL PEAKING FACTOR        is the ratio of the  peak pin power to the average pin power in an unrodded core, excluding           tilt.
ST.LUCIEUNIT1-68205200085 820513PDRADOCK05000335P.,-PDRNay13,1982 DEFINITIONS PROCESSCONTROLPROGRAM(PCP)1.33ThePROCESSCONTROLPROGRAMshallbetheprocedures usedbythelicenseeorhiscontractors, forthepurposeofassuringthatpriortoshipmenttoadisposalfacility, solidified radioactive waste(orwastecontaining freestandingliquids)willbeinaform(e.g.,freestandingliquidslessthan1%)thatmeetstherequirements fortransportation anddisposalpursuanttoTitle10oftheCodeofFederalRegulations andtheapplicable disposalsiteregulations.
LOAD FOLLOW OPERATION 1.30    LOAD FOLLOW OPERATION shall    be daily power level changes of more than 10% of  RATED THERMAL POWER or    daily insertion of CEAs below 'the Long Term Insertion Limit.
SOLIDIFICATION 1.34SOLIDIFICATION shallbetheprocesswhichinvolvestheadditionofasolidifying matrixtoradioactive wasteforthepurposeofbindingorencapsulating (solidifying) suchwasteinaform(e.g.,freestandingliquidslessthan1%)thatmeetstherequirements fortransportation anddisposalpursuanttoTitle10oftheCodeofFederalRegulations andtheapplicable disposalsiteregulations.
GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM 1.31    A GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM      is  any system designed  and installed tq reduce radioactive      gaseous  effluents by collecting primary coolant system    offgases from the primary system for decay.
DEWATERING 1.35DEHATERING shallbetheprocessofremovingliquidsfromradioactive wastewhichcontainfreestandingliquids,forthepurposeofassuringthatpriortodisposal, suchradioactive wasteisinaform(e.g.,freestandingliquidslessthan1%)thatmeetstherequirements fortransportation anddisposalpursuanttoTitle10oftheCodeofFederalRegulations andtheapplicable disposalsiteregulations.
OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM) 1.32    The OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL shall contain the methodology and parameters  used in the calculation of offsite doses due to radioactive gaseous and liquid effluents and in the calculation of gaseous and liquid effluent monitoring alarm/trip setpoint methodology.
ST.LUCIEUNIT11-6AMay13,1982I TABLE1.2FREQUENCY NOTATIONNOTATION4/g*SAS/UFREQUENCY Atleastonceper12hoursAtleastonceper24hoursAtleastonceper7daysAtleast4permonthandaminimumof48peryearAtleastonceper31daysAtleastonceper92daysAtleastonceper6monthsAtleastonceper18monthsPriortoeachreactorstartupCompleted priortoeachreleaseN/ANotapplicable
ST. LUCIE    UNIT                        1-6 8205200085 820513 PDR ADOCK 05000335                                                          Nay 13, 1982 .,-             PDR
*-ForRadioactive EffluentSampling**-ForRadioactive BatchReleaseonlyST.LUCIEUNIT1-8May13,1982 INSTRUMENTATIONMETEOROLOGICAL INSTRUMENTATION LIMITINGCONDITION FOROPERATION 3.3.3.4Themeteorological monitoring instrumentation channelsshallbeoperableasperTable3.3-8.APPLICABILITY:
AtalltimesACTIONaOWiththenumberofOPERABLEmeteorological monitoring channelsless'hanrequiredbyTable3.3-8,theLicenseeshouldsuspendallreleasesofgaseousradioactive materialfromtheradwastegasdecaytanksuntiltheinoperable channel(s) isrestoredtoOPERABLEstatus.'.
WithlessthantheMinimumChannelsOPERABLEasspecified byTable3.3-8,prepareandsubmitaSpecialReporttotheCommission pursuanttoSpecification 6.9.2withinthenext10daysoutlining thecauseofthemalfunction andtheplansforrestoring thechannel(s) toOPERABLEstatus.c.Theprovisions ofSpecification 3.0.3and3.0.4arenotapplicable.
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.3.3.4OneWINDSPEED,ONEWINDDIRECTION, andTWOAIRTEMPERATURE INSTRUMENTATION CHANNEL(S) shallbedemonstrated OPERABLEbytheperformance oftheCHANNELCHECKandCHANNELCALIBRATION operations atthefrequencies showninTable4.3-5.ST.LUCIEUNIT'I3/43-3OHay13,1982 TABLE3.3-8METEOROLOGICAL MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION INSTRUMENT 6ELEVATION INSTRUMENT MINIMUMMINIMUMCHANNELSACCURACYOPERABLE1.WINDSPEED a.NominalElev(10meters)b.NominalElev(60meters)2~WINDDIRECTION a.NominalElev(10meters)b.NominalElev(60meters)+0.5*mph+0.5*mph0+50+51AN.A.B1N.A.3.AIRTEMPERATURE (DeltaT)a.NominalElev(10meters)b.NominalElev(60meters)c.NominalElev(35meters)0+0,]C**00~1C**0+0.1C**C1'1N.A.*Starting speedofanemometer shallbe(1mph**DeltaTmeasurement channelsonlyA.The60meterChannelmaybesubstituted forthe10meterwindspeedforupto30daysintheeventthe10meterchannelisINOPERABLE.
WindSpeedDatafromthe60meterelevation shouldbeadjustedusingthewindspeedpowerlaw:S10meters=(60meters)(0.1727)n where:S=windspeedinmphn=0.25forPasquillVerticalStability ClassesA,B,C,D.n~0.50forPasquillVerticalStability ClassesE,F,G.1.727X10=constant=10meters/60metersB.The60meterChannelmaybesubstituted forthe10meterWindDirection Channelforupto30daysintheeventthe10meterChannelisINOPERABLE.
C.The35meterChannelmaybesubstituted foroneofthe10meteror60meterTemperature Channelsforupto30daysifoneoftheChannelsisINOPERABLE.
Thedata-shouldalwaysbenormalized toC/100meterstodetermine theverticalstability class.ST.LUCIEUNIT13/4Nay13,1982 TABLE4.3-5METEOROLOGICAL MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS INSTRUMENT CHANNELCHECKCHANNELCALIBRATION 1.WINDSPEEDa.NominalElev(10meters)b.NominalElev(60meters)SASA+2.WINDDIRECTION a.NominalElev(10meters)b.NominalElev(60meters)DSASA~3.AIRTEMPERATURE (DeltaT)a.NominalElev(10meters)b.NominalElev(60meters)c.NominalElev(35meters)SASASA~*Required onlyiftheseChannelsarebeingsubstituted foroneoftheMinimumChannelsOperableasperTable3.3-8.
INSTRUMENTATION RADIOACTIVE LIQUEFFLUENTINSTRUMENTATION LIMITINGCONDITION FOROPERATION 3.3.3.9Theradioactive liquideffluentmonitoring instrumentation channelsshowninTable3.3-12shallbeOPERABLEwiththeiralarm/trip setpoints settoensurethatthelimitsofSpecification 3."11.1.1arenotexceeded.
Thealarm/trip setpoints ofthesechannelsshallbedetermined inaccordance withtheODCMmethodology.
APPLICABILITY:
AsshowninTable3.3-12.ACTION:a.Witharadioactive liquideffluentmonitoring instrumentation channelalarm/trip setpointlessconservative thanavaluewhichwillensurethatthelimitsof3.11.1.1aremet,immediately suspendthereleaseofradioactive liquideffluents monitored bytheaffectedchannelordeclarethechannelinoperable.
b.WithlessthanthenumberofchannelsrequiredOPERABLEbyTable3.3-12,taketheACTIONshowninTable3.3-12.c.Theprovisions ofSpecifications 3.0.3and3.0.4arenotapplicable.
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.3.3.9Eachradioactive liquideffluentmonitoring instrumentation channel'shallbedemonstrated OPERABLEbyperformance oftheCHANNELCHECK,CHANNELCALIBRATION, ANDCHANNELFUNCTIONAL TESToperations duringtheModesandatthefrequencies showninTable4.3-8.ST.LUCIEUNIT13/43-45Hay13,1982 ff TABLE3.3-12RADIOACTIVE LIQUIDEFFLUENTMONITORING INSTRUMENTATION INSTRUMENT MINIMUMCHANNELSOPERABLEAPPLICABILITY ACTION1.GrossRadioactivity
: monitors, providing automatic termination ofreleasea.LiquidradwasteeffluentlineAtalltimes*18b.SteamGenerator blowdowneffluentlineAtalltimes*192.GrossRadioactivity Monitorsnotproviding automatic termination ofreleasea.Component coolingwatersystemAtalltimes*20*Duringreleasesviathispathway TABLE3.3-12TABLENOTATIONACTION18-WiththenumberofchannelsOPERABLElessthanrequiredbytheMinimumChannelsOPERABLErequirement, effluentreleasesmayberesumedforupto14days,providedthatpriortoinitiating arelease:1.Atleasttwoindependent samplesareanalyzedinaccordance withSpecification 4.11.1.1.1 and;2.Atleasttwotechnically qualified membersoftheFacilityStaff,onetoperform,andonetoverifythereleaseratecalculations anddischarge valving.Otherwise, suspendreleaseofradioactive effluents viathispathway.ACTON19WiththenumberofchannelsOPERABLElessthanrequiredbytheMinimumChannelsOPERABLErequirement, effluentreleasesviathispathwaymaycontinueforupto90daysifthereisnoprimary-to-secondary leakageindicated bytheairejectormonitor.Iftheairejectormonitorindicates primary-to-secondary leakage,releasesmaycontinueforupto30daysprovidedgrabsamplesareanalyzedforgrossradioactivity (betaorgamma)atlimitofdetection ofatleast2X10-7uCi/gm.1.Atleastonceper8hourswhenthespecific, activityofthesecondary coolantis)0.01uCi/gramDOSEEQUIVALENT I-131.2.Atleastonceper24hourswhenthespecificactivityofthesecondary coolantis<0.01uCi/gramDOSEEQUIVALENT I-131.EACTION20-WiththenumberofchannelsOPERABLElessthanrequiredbytheMinimumChannelsOPERABLErequirement, effluentreleasesviathispathwaymaycontinueforupto30daysprovidedthatatleastonceper8hourgrabsamplesarecollected andanalyzedforgrossradioactivity (betaorgamma)atalimitofdetection
.ofatleast2X10-7uCi/ml.ST.LUCIEUNIT3/43-47Hay13,1982 TABLE4.3-8RADIOACTIVE LIQUIDEFFLUENTMONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS INSTRUMENT CHANNELCHECKCHANNELCALIBRATION CHANNELFUNCTIONAL TEST1.GrossBetaorGammaRadioactivity Monitorsproviding alarmandautomatic isolation a.LiquidRadwasteEffluentLinePb.SteamGenerator BlowdownEffluentLine2.GrossBetaorGammaRadioactivity Monitorsproviding alarmbutnotproviding automatic isolation (4)a.Component CoolingWaterSys.R(3)R(3)R(3)Q(1)Q(1)Q(2)*Duringreleasesviathispathway TABLE4.3-8TABLENOTATION(l)TheCHANNELFUNCTIONAL TESTshallalsodemonstrate thatautomatic isolation ofthispathwayandcontrolroomalarmannunciation occursifanyofthefollowing conditions exist:l.Instrument indicates measuredlevelsabovethealarm/trip setpoint.
2.Circuitfailure.3.Instrument controlsnotsetinoperatemode.(2)TheCHANNELFUNCTIONAL TESTshallalsodemonstrate thatcontrolroomalarmannunciation occursifanyofthefollowing conditions exist:l.Instrument indicates measuredlevelsabovethealarm/trip setpoint.
2.Circuitfailure.3.Instrument controlsnotsetinoperatemode.(3)Theinitial'HANNEL CALIBRATION forradioactivity measurement instrumentation shallbeperformed usingoneormoreofthereference standards traceable totheNationalBureauofStandards orusingstandards thathavebeencalibrated againststandards certified bytheNBS.Thesestandards shouldpermitcalibrating thesystemoverits~intendedrangeofenergyandratecapabilities thataretypicalofnormalplantoperation.
Forsubsequent CHANNELCALIBRATION, buttonsourcesthathavebeenrelatedtotheinitialcalibration maybeused,atintervals ofatleastoncepereighteenmonths.Thiscannormallybeaccomplished duringrefueling outages.(4)Thisrequirement isapplicable onlytosystemswherethecomponent coolingwatersystemisdischarged toaneffluentstream.ST.LUCIEUNIT3/43-49May13,1982 INSTRUMENTATION RADIOACTIVE GASEOUSPROCESSAND'EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION LIMITINGCONDITION FOROPERATION 3.3.3.10Theradioactive gaseousprocessandeffluentmonitoring instrumentation channelsshowninTable3.3-13shallbeOPERABLEwiththeiralarm/trip setpoints settoensurethatthelimitsofSpecification 3.11.2.1arenotexceeded.
Thealarm/trip setpoints ofthesechannelsshallbedetermined inaccordance withtheODCMMethodology.
APPLICABILITY:
AsshowninTable3.3-13.ACTIONa.Witharadioactive gaseousprocessoreffluentmonitoring instrumentation channelalarm/trip setpointlessconservative thanavaluewhichwillensurethatthelimitsof3.11.2.1aremet,declarethechannelinoperable orresetthechannelsetpoints immediately toensurethatthelimi.tsof3.11.2.1aremet.b.WithlessthanthenumberofchannelsrequiredOPERABLEbyTable3.3-13,taketheACTIONshowninTable3.3-13.c.Theprovisions ofSpecifications 3.0.3and3.0.4arenotapplicable.
SURVEILLANCE REOUIREMENTS 4.3.3.10Eachradioactive gaseousprocessoreffluentmonitoring instrumentation channelshallbedemonstrated OPERABLEbyperformance oftheCHANNELCHECK,CHANNELCALIBRATION, andCHANNELFUNCTIONAL TESToperations duringtheMODESandatthefrequencies showninTable4.3-9.ST.LUCIEUNIT13/43-50May13,1982 TABLE3.3-13RADIOACTIVE GASEOUSEFFLUENTMONITORING INSTRUMENTATION AINSTRUMENT 1.WasteGasHoldupSystema.NobleGasActivityMonitorMINIMUMCHANNELSOPERABLEAPPLICABILITY PARAMETER ACTIONRadioactivity Rate25Measurement 2.PlantVent,FuelBldg.Vent,ECCS-AVent&ECCS-BVentAsperTable3.3-63.BlowdownBuildingVentSystema.NobleGasActivityMonitorb.IodineSamplerCartridge Radioactivity RateMeasurement Verifypresenceofcartridge 2730c.Particulate SamplerFilterVerifypresenceof-30filter4.AirEjectorVenta.NobleGasActivityMonitorRadioactivity Rate28Measurement 5.WasteGasHoldupSystemExplosive GasMonitoring System(GasSurgeTank)a.Hydrogenb.Oxygen(1)(1)%Hydrogen%Oxygen2929*DuringreleasesviathispathwayontrolTank**DuringWasteGasSystemOperation whenhydrogenisusedasacovergasontheVolumeControa TABLE3.3-13TABLENOTATIONACTION25-WiththenumberofchannelsOPERABLElessthanrequiredbytheMinimumChannelsOPERABLErequirement, thecontentsofthetanksmaybereleasedtotheenvironment forupto30daysprovidedthatpriortoinitiating therelease:1.Atleasttwoindependent samplesofthetank'scontentsareanalyzed, and2.Atleasttwotechnically qualified membersoftheFacilityStaff,onetoperform,andonetoverifythereleaseratecalculations anddischarge valvelineup;Otherwise, suspendreleaseofradioactive effluents viathispathway.ACTION27WiththenumberofchannelsOPERABLElessthanrequiredbytheMinimumChannelsOPERABLErequirement, effluentreleasesviathispathwaymaycontinueforupto30daysprovidedgrabsamplesarecollected andanalyzedforgrossactivityatleastonceper24hours.ACTION28-WiththenumberofchannelsOPERABLElessthanrequiredbytheMinimumChannelsOPERABLErequirement, immediately routetheAirEjectorVenttothePlantVentPathway.ACTION29-WiththenumberofchannelsOPERABLElessthanrequiredbytheMinimumChannelsOPERABLErequirement, operation ofthiswastegasholdupsystemmaycontinueindefinitely providedthatgrabsamplesarecollected andanalyzedatleastoncepershift.ACTION30-WiththenumberofchannelsOPERABLElessthanrequiredbytheMinimumChannelsOPERABLErequirement, effluentreleasesviathispathwaymayconti.nue forupto30daysprovidedsamplesarecontinuously collected withauxiliary samplingequipment forperiodsontheorderofseven(7)daysandanalyzedwithin48hoursoftheendofsamplecollection.
ST.LUCIEUNIT3/43-52Hay13,1982 TABLE4.3-9RADIOACTIVE GASEOUSEFFLUENZMONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE REUIREMENTS INSTRUMENT CHANNELCHECK"CHANNELCALIBRATION CHANNELFUNCTIONAL TEST1.WasteGasHoldupSystema.NobleGasActivityMonitor2.PlantVent,FuelBuildingVent,ECCS-AVent,6ECCS-BVentAsperTable4.3-3R(3)3.BlowdownBuildingVentSystema.NobleGasActivityMonitorb.IodineSamplerc.Particulate Sampler4.AirEjectorVentR(3)N/AN/AZ(2)N/AN/Aa.NobleGasActivityMonitor5.WasteGasHoldupSystemExplosive
-GasMonitoring Systema.Hydrogenb.OxygenD**R(3)q(4)q(5)a(2)*Duringreleasesviathispathway*"DuringWasteGasHoldupSystemOperation whenhydrogenisusedasacovergasontheVolumeControlTank TABLE4.3-9~)TABLENOTATION(1)TheCHANNELFUNCTIONAL TESTshallalsodemonstrate thatautomatic isolation ofthispathwayandcontrolroomalarmannunciation occursifanyofthefollowing conditions exist:l.Instrument indicates measuredlevelsabovethealarm/trip setpoint.
2.Circuitfailure.3.Instrument controlsnotsetinoperatemode.(2)TheCHANNELFUNCTIONAL TESTshallalsodemonstrate thatcontrolroomalarmannunciation occursifanyofthefollowing conditions exist:l.Instrument indicates measuredlevelsabovethealarm/trip setpoint.
2.Circuitfailure.3.Instrument controlsnotset.inoperatemode.(3)TheinitialCHANNELCALIBRATION forradioactivity measurement instrumentation shallbeperformed usingoneormoreofthereference standards traceable totheNationalBureauofStandards orusingstandards thathavebeencalibrated againststandards certified bytheNBS.Thesestandards shouldpermitcalibrating thesystemoveritsintendedrangeofenergyandratecapabilities thataretypicalofnormalplantoperations.
Forsubsequent CHANNELCALIBRATION, buttonsourcesthathavebeenrelatedtotheinitialcalibration maybeused,atintervals ofatleastoncepereighteenmonths.Thiscannormallybeaccomplished duringrefueling outages.(4)TheCHANNELCALIBRATION shallincludetheuseofstandardgassamplescontaining anominal:1.Nominalonevolumepercenthydrogen, balancenitrogen, and2.Nominalfourvolumepercenthydrogen, balancenitrogen.
(5)TheGUNNELCALIBRATION shallincludetheuseofstandardgassamplescontaining anominal:1.Nominalonevolumepercentoxygen,balancenitrogen, and2.Nominalfourvolumepercentoxygen,balancenitrogen.
ST.LUCIEUNIT13/43-54May13,1982 3/4~11RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.1LIQUIDEFFLUENTS CONCENTRATION LIMITINGCONDITION FOROPERATION 3.11.1.1Theconcentration ofradioactive materialreleasedfromthesitetounrestricted areas(seeFigure3.11-1)shallbelimitedtotheconcentrations specified in10CFR20,AppendixB,TableII,Column2forradionuclides otherthandissolved orentrained noblegases.Theconcentration fortotaldissolved orentrained noblegasesshallbelimitedto2X104uCi/ml.APPLICABILITY:
AtalltimesACTIONa~Withtheconcentration ofradioactive materialreleasedfromthesitetounrestricted areasexceeding, theabovelimits,immediately restoreconcentration withintheabovelimitsandprovidepromptnotification totheCommission pursuanttoSpecificatoin 6.9.1.12.
b.Theprovisions ofSpecification 3.0.3and3.0.4arenotapplicable.
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.1.1.1 Theradioactivity contentofeachbatchofradioactive liquidwasteto'edischarged shallbedetermined priortoreleasebysamplingandanalysisinaccordance withTable4.11-1.Theresultsofpre-release analysesshallbeusedwiththecalculational methodsinthe"ODCM"toassurethattheconcentration atthepointofreleaseislimitedtothevaluesinSpecification 3.11.1.1.
4.11.1.1.2 Theradioactivity concentration ofliquidsdischarged fromcontinuous releasepointsshallbedetermined bycollection andanalysisofsamplesinaccordance withTable4.11-1.Theresultsoftheanalysesshallbeusedwiththecalculational methodsinthe"ODCM"toassurethattheconcentrations atthepointofreleasearelimitedtothevaluesinSpecification 3.11.1.1.
4.11.1.1.3 Post-release analysesofsamplescomposited frombatchreleasesshallbeperformed inaccordance withTable4.11-1.ST.LUCIEUNIT13/411-1tray13,1982 "TABLEF11-1RADIOACTIVE LIQUIDWASTESAMPLINGANDANALYSISPROGRAMLiquidReleaseTypeA.BatchWasteReleaseTanksSamplingFrequency MinimumAnalysisFrequency TypeOfActivityAnalysisPrincipal
.GammaEmittersLowerLimitofDetection (LLD)(uCi/ml)a5X10EachBatchEachBatchI-1311X10pOneBatch/MDissolved andEntrained Gases1X10-5EachBatchComposite H-3GrossAlpha1X1051X10EachBatchComposite Sr-89,Sr-90Fe-55SX1081X10B.PlantContinuous Releasese,f4/M4/MPrincipal GammaEmittersI-1315X1071X10Dissolved andEntrained Gases1X10H-31X1054/MGrossAlpha1X107Composite 4/MQComposite Sr-89,Sr-90SX108Fe-551X10ST.LUCIEUNIT13/411-2May13,1982 TABLE4'l-lTABLENOTATIONa.TheLLDisthesmallestconcentration ofradioactive materialinasamplethatwillbedetectedwith95%probability with5%probability offalselyconcluding thatablankobservation-represents a"real"signal.TheLowerLimitofDetection isaprioriLimitwheretheanalysistechnique shallbecapableofdetecting thestatedvaluesifablanksamplewerecounted.LLD=4.66Sx106e-LambdatWhere:sbisthestandarddeviation ofthebackground countingrateorofthecountingrateofablanksampleasappropriate (incountsperminute)2.22Xisthecountingefficiency (ascountspertransformation) issamplevolumeinappropriate units610transformations perminutepermicroCurie istheChemicalSeparation Yield(whenapplicable) isbase2.71828Lambdaisdecayconstantiseither:2~Theelapsedtimebetweenthemidpointofsamplecollection andthetimeofcounting(forcomposite strontium only)Theelapsedtimebetweenthesampletimeandthetimeatmidcount(forphacountingonly)TheunitsoftshallmatchthetimeunitsofLambdainbothcases.b.Abatchreleaseisthedischarge ofliquidwastesofadiscretevolume.Eachbatchreleasetankshallbeisolatedandthoroughly mixedpriortosamplingforarelease.c.Theprincipal gammaemittersforwhichtheLLDlimitspecification willapplyareexclusively thefollowing radionuclides:
Mn-54,Pe-59,Co-58,Co-60,Zn-65,Mo-99,Cs-134,Cs-137,Ce-141,andCe-144.Thislistdoesnotmeanthatonlythesenuclidesaretobedetectedandreported.
Otherpeakswhicharemeasureable andidentifiable, togetherwiththeabovenuclides, shallalsobeidentified andreported.
NuclideswhicharebelowtheLLDfortheanalysesshouldnotbereportedasbeingpresentattheLLDlevel.ST.LUCIEUNITI3/411-3May13,1982 TABLE4.11-1TABLENOTATIONd.Acomposite sampleisoneinwhichthequantityofliquidsampledisproportional tothequantityofliquidwastedischarged andinwhichthemethodofsamplingemployedresultsinaspecimenwhichisrepresentative oftheliquidsreleased.
Priortoanalysis, allsamplestakenforthecomposite shallbethoroughly mixedinorderforthecomposite sampletoberepresentative oftheeffluentrelease.e.Acontinuous releaseisthedischarge ofliquidwastesofanondiscrete volume;e.g.,fromasystemthathasaninputflowduringthecontinuous release.f.IfComponent CoolingWateractivityis>1X10uCi/ml,performaweeklygrossactivityontheIntakeCoolingWaterSystemoutlettoensuretheactivitylevelis(a2X10uCi/mlLLDlimit.IfICWis)2X107uCi/ml,performanalysisinaccordance withaPlantContinuous ReleaseonthisTable.ST.LUCIEUNIT13/411-4May13,1982 Dcno'IESITEMinimumDistanceforRadioactive GaseousReleasesfromPlantVenttoSiteBoundryj,J~pi>+~i~
~.;~A:,;F.W,,c~yi~We<<-~~>d!>,
tcsUnrestricted Ar~Boundry I,inefor.theST.'I;<p;~kg'.:"',
~~,~".>~;"'g''j~::;;@.~;,
gFwj.:-".-:-
OutlettoDischarge Pipe(Liq.Radioactive Effluents NormalSCALEINFEET0100020003000I'~~<ere3.$l-lUarestxicied AreaSoumdryI'orYheSt.LucieSite11-5Hay13,1982 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS DOSELIMITINGCONDITION FOROPERATION II3.11.1.2Thedoseordosecommitment toanindividual fromradioactive materials inliquideffluents releasedtounrestricted areas(seeFigure3.11-1)shallbelimited:Duringanycalendarquarterto<1.5mremtothetotalbodyandto<5mremtoanyorgan.APPLICABILITY:
AtalltimesACTION:a.Withthecalculated dosefromthereleaseofradioactive materials inliquideffluents exceeding anyoftheabovelimits,prepareandsubmittotheCommission within30days,pursuanttoSpecification 6.9.2,aSpecialReportwhichidentifies thecause(s)forexceeding thelimit(s)anddefinesthecorrective actionstobetakentoreducethereleasesofradioactive materials inliquideffluents duringtheremainder ofthecurrentcalendarquarterandsubsequent quarters.
TheSpecialReportexemptsaLicenseeEventR'eportontheabovelimits.b.Theprovisions ofSpecifications 3.0.3and3.0.4arenotapplicable.
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.1.2.DoseCalculations.
Cumulative dosecontributions fromliquideffluents shallbedetermined inaccordance withthemethodology intheODCMatleastonceper31days.STLUCIEUNIT13/411-6May13,1982 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTSLIQUIDWASTETREATMENT LIMITINGCONDITION FOROPERATION 3.11.1.3Theappropriate subsystems oftheliquidradwastetreatment systemshallbeOPERABLEtoreducetheradioactive materials inliquidwastepriortotheirdischarge whentheprojected monthlydoseduetoliquideffluentreleasestounrestricted areas(seeFigure3.11-1)whenaveragedover31dayswouldexceed0.12mremtothetotalbodyand0.4mremtoanyorgan.APPLICABILITY:
AtalltimesACTION'ith theliquidradwastetreatment systeminoperable formorethan31daysorwithradioactive liquidwastebeingdischarged withouttreatment andinexcessoftheabovelimits,prepareandsubmittotheCommission within30days,pursuanttoSpecification 6.9.2,aSpecialReportwhichincludesthefollowing information (TheSpecialReportexemptsaLicenseeEventReportontheabovelimits):l.Identification ofequipment orsubsystems notOPERABLEandadescription ofalternate equipment usedfortreatment ofradioactive liquideffluent.
2.Action(s) takentorestoretheinoperable equipment, orbackupequipment, toOPERABLEstatus.J3.Summarydescription ofaction(s) takentopreventarecurrence.
b.Theprovisions ofSpecifications 3.0.3and3.0.4arenotapplicable.
SURVEILLANCE REUIREMENTS 4.11.1.3.1 Dosesduetoliquidreleasestounrestricted areasshallbeprojected atleastonceper31daysaspertheODCMmethodology unlesstheliquidradwastetreatment systemisbeingused.4.11.1.3.2 Theappropriate liquidradwastesubsystems shallbedemonstrated OPERABLEatleastonceper92daysunlesstheappropriate liquidradwastesubsystem hasbeenutilizedtoprocessradioactive liquideffluents duringtheprevious92days.ST.LUCIEUNIT13/411-7May13,1982 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4-11.2GASEOUSEFFLUENTS DOSERATELIMITINGCONDITION FOROPERATION 3.11.2.1Theinstantaneous doserateinunrestricted areas(seeFigure3.11-1)duetoradioactive materials releasedingaseouseffluents fromthesiteshallbelimitedtothefollowing values:a.Thedoseratelimitfornoblegasesshallbe<500mrem/yrtothetotalbodyand<3000mrem/yrtotheskin,andb.Fortheinhalation pathwaythedoseratelimitforI-131,Tritiumandforradioactive materials inparticulate formwithhalflivesgreaterthan8daysshallbe<1500mrem/yrtoanyorgan.'VAPPLICABILITY:
AtalltimesACTION:a~Withthedoserate(s)exceeding theabovelimits,immediately decreasethereleaseratetocomplywiththelimit(s)giveninSpecification 3.11.2.1andprovidepromptnotification totheCommission pursuant.toSpecification 6.9.1.12.
b.Theprovisions ofSpecifications 3.0.3and3.0.4arenotapplicable.
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.2.1.1 Theinstantaneous releaserateofnoblegasesingaseouseffluents shallbecontinuously monitored forthereleasepointsgiveninTable3.3-13.4.11.2.1.2 Thereleaserateofradioactive materials otherthannoblegases,ingaseouseffluents shallbedetermined byobtaining representative samplesandperforming analysesinaccordance withthesamplingandanalysisprogram,specified inTable4.11-2.4.11.2.1.3 Theinstantaneous doserateinunrestricted areas,duetoradioactive materials otherthannoblegasesreleasedingaseouseffluents, shallbedetermined tobewithintherequiredlimitsbyusingthemethodology prescribed bytheODCMontheresultsofthesamplingandanalysisprogramspecified inTable4.11-2.ST.LUCIEUNIT13/411-8May13,1982 TABLE4~11-2RADIOACTIVE GASEOUSWASTESAMPLINGANDANALYSISPROGRAMGaseousReleaseTypeA.WasteGasStorageTank(Batch)gSamplingFrequency PEachTankMinimumAnalysisFrequency PEachTankTypeOfActivitAnalysisNobleGasPrincipal GammaEmittersLowerLimitofDetection (LLD)(UCi/101) 1X104B.Containment PurgePEachPurgePEachPurgeNobleGasPrincipal GammaEmittersH-31X101X10C.PlantVent,FuelBuildingVent,)lowdownBuildingVentSystemD.AllReleaseTypesasListedinC.above4/MiContinuous
.Continuous Continuous Continuous 4/MCharcoalSample4MParticulate SampleMComposite Particulate Sample0Composite Particulate SampleNobleGasPrincipal GammaEmittersH-3H-3I-131.I-133Particulate Principal GammaEmittersGrossAlphaSr-89;Sr-901X1041X1O61X1O61x1o'21X101X1O"1X1O"1X1O"Continuous NobleGasMonitorNobleGasGrossBeta&Gamma1X1O4 TABLE4.11-2(continued)
TABLENOTATIONa.Thelowerlimitofdetection (LLD)isdefinedinTableNotationa.ofTable4.11-1.b.Theprincipal gammaemittersforwhichtheLLDLimitSpecification willapplyareexclusively thefollowing radionuclides:
Kr-87,Kr-88,Xe-133,Xe-133m,Xe-135,andXe-138fornoblegasemissions andMn-54,Fe-59,Co-58,Co-60,Zn-65,Mo-99,Cs-134,Cs-137,Ce-141,Ce-144,andI-131forparticulate emissions.
Thislistdoesnotmeanthatonlythesenuclidesaretobedetectedandreported.
Otherpeakswhicharemeasurable andidentifiable, togetherwiththeabovenuclidesshallalsobeidentified andreported.
NuclideswhicharebelowtheLLDfortheanalysesshouldnotbereportedasbeingpresentattheLLDlevelforthatnuclide.c.Tritiumgrabsamplesshallbetakenprior.toeachpurgerelease,butthesamplemaybeanalyzedafterthebatchreleasewhenthesamplecountingsolutionhasstabilized toallowanaccuratedetermination ofactivity.
d.SamplingFrequency andMinimumAnalysisFrequency areapplicable onlyduringreleasesviathispathway.e.TheratioofthesampleflowratetothesampledstreamflowrateshallbeknownforthetimeperiodinSpecifications 3.11.2.1,3.11.2.2,and3.11.2.3.f.Iftheanalysisfrequency isdaily,theLLDlimitmaybeincreased byafactorof10.g.Abatchreleaseisthedischarge ofgaseouswasteofadiscretevolume.h.Apurgeisabatchreleasefromthecontainment building.
ThePlantVentshallbesampledforTritiumatthisfrequency iftheContainment PurgeExhaustisoperating asacontinuous release.ST.LUCIEUNIT3/411-10Nay13,1982 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS DOSE,NOBLEGASESLIMITINGCONDITION FOROPERATION 3.11.2.2Theairdoseinunrestricted areas(seeFigure3.11-1)duetonoblegasesreleasedingaseouseffluents shallbelimitedtothefollowing:
a.Duringanycalendarquarter,to<5mradforgammaradiation and<10mradforbetaradiation.
APPLICABILITY:
AtalltimesACTION:a.Withthecalculated airdosefromradioactive noblegasesingaseouseffluents exceeding anyoftheabovelimits,prepareandsubmittotheCommission within30days,pursuanttoSpecification 6.9.2,aSpecialReportwhichidentifies thecause(s)forexceeding thelimit(s)anddefinethecorrective actionstobetakentoreducethereleasesofradioactive noblegasesingaseouseffluents duringtheremainder ofthecurrentcalendarquarter.TheSpecialReportexemptsaLicenseeEventReportontheabovelimits.b.Theprovisions ofSpecifications 3.0.3and3.0.4arenotapplicable.
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.2.2.1 DoseCalculations
-Cumulative dosecontributions forthecurrentcalendarquartershallbedetermined inaccordance withthemethodology intheODCMatleastonceevery31days.ST.LUCIEUNIT'13/411-11May13,1982 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS DOSE,RADIOIODINES, RADIOACTIVE MATERIALINPARTICULATE FORM,ANDRADIONUCLIDES OTHERTHANNOBLEGASESLIMITINGCONDITION FOROPERATION 3.11.2.3Thedosetoanindividual fromradioiodines, radioactive materials inparticulate form,andradionuclides otherthannoblegaeswithhalf-lives greaterthan8daysingaseouseffluents releasedtounrestricted areas(seeFigure3.11-1)shallbelimitedtothefollowing:
a.Duringanycalendarquarterto<7.5mremtoanyorgan.APPLICABILITY:
AtalltimesACTION:a.Withthecalculated dosefromthereleaseofradioiodines, radioactive materials inparticulate form,orradionuclides otherthannoblegasesingaseouseffluents exceeding anyoftheabovelimits,prepareandsubmittotheCommission within30days,pursuanttoSpecification 6.9.2,aSpecialReportwhichidentifies thecause(s)forexceeding thelimitanddefinesthecorrective actionstobetakentoreducethereleasesofradioiodines, radioactive materials inparticulate form,andradionuclides otherthannoblegaseswithhalf-lives greaterthan8daysingaseouseffluents duringtheremainder ofthecurrentcalendarquarter.TheSpecialReportexemptsaLicenseeEventReportontheabovelimit.b.Theprovisions ofSpecifications 3.0.3and3.0.4arenotapplicable.
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.2.3DoseCalculations
-Cumulative dosecontributions forthecurrentcalendarquartershallbedetermined inaccordance withthemethodology intheODCMatleastonceevery31days.ST.LUCIEUNIT3/411-12May13,1982


RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS GASEOUSRADWASTETREATMENT LIMITINGCONDITION FOROPERATION 3.11.2.4Theappropriate subsystems ofthegaseousradwastetreatment systemshallbeOPERABLE.
DEFINITIONS PROCESS  CONTROL PROGRAM (PCP) 1.33  The PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM shall be the procedures used by the licensee or his contractors, for the purpose of assuring that prior to shipment to a disposal facility, solidified radioactive waste (or waste containing free standing liquids) will be in a form (e.g., free standing liquids less than 1%) that meets the requirements for transportation and disposal pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations and the applicable disposal site regulations.
Thegaseousradwastetreatment systemshallbeusedtoreduceradioactive materials ingaseouswastepriortotheirdischarge whentheprojected gaseouseffluentdosesduetogaseouseffluentreleasestounrestricted areas(seeFigure3.11-1)whenaveragedover31dayswouldexceed0.4mradforgammaradiation and0.8mradforbetaradiation.
SOLIDIFICATION 1.34 SOLIDIFICATION shall be the process which involves the addition of    a solidifying matrix to radioactive waste for the purpose of binding or encapsulating (solidifying) such waste in a form (e.g., free standing liquids less than 1%) that meets the requirements for transportation and disposal pursuant to Title 10 of the  Code of Federal Regulations  and the applicable disposal site regulations.
APPLICABILITY:
DEWATERING 1.35 DEHATERING shall be the process of removing liquids from radioactive waste which contain free standing liquids, for the purpose of assuring that prior to disposal, such radioactive waste is in a form (e.g., free standing liquids less than 1%) that meets the requirements for transportation and disposal pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations and the applicable disposal site regulations.
AtalltimesACTION:a.WiththegaseousWasteTreatment Systeminoperable formorethan31daysorwithgaseouswastebeingdischarged withouttreatment andinexcessoftheabovelimits,prepareandsubmittotheCommission within30days,pursuanttoSpecification 6.9.2,aSpecialReportwhichincludesthefollowing information (TheSpecialReportexemptsaLicenseeEventReportontheabovelimits):1.Identification ofequipment orsubsystems notOPERABLEandadescription ofalternate equipment usedfortreatment ofradioactive gaseouseffluents.
ST. LUCIE UNIT  1                  1-6A May 13, 1982 I
2.Action(s) takentorestoretheinoperable equipment, orbackupequipment, toOPERABLEstatus.3.Summarydescription ofaction(s)takentopreventarecurrance.
b.Theprovisions ofSpecification 3.0.3and3.0.4arenotapplicable.
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.2.4.1 Dosesduetogaseousreleasestounrestricted areasshallbeprojected atleastonceper31daysaspertheODCMmethodology unlessgaseousradwastetreatment systemisinuse.4.11.2,.4.2 Theappropriate
'subsystems shallbedemonstrated OPERABLEatleastonceper92daysunlesstheappropriate subsystem hasbeenutilizedtoprocessradioactive gaseouseffluents duringtheprevious92days.ST.LUCIEUNIT'13/411-13May13,1982 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS EXPLOSIVE GASMIXTURELIMITINGCONDITION FOROPERATION 3~11.2.5Theconcentration ofoxygeninthegaseouswasteholdupsystemshallbelimitedto<4%byvolumewheneverthehydrogenconcentration exceeds4%byvolume.APPLICABILITY:
AtalltimeswhenhydrogenisusedasacovergasontheVolumeControlTank.ACTION:a.Withtheconcentration ofoxygeninthegaseouswasteholdupsystem)4%byvolume,immediately suspendalladditions ofwastegasestotheaffectedgasdecaytankandreducetheconcentration ofoxygenintheremainder ofthesystemtolessthan4%byvolumewithin8hours.Theaffectedgasdecaytankshouldbedischarged assoonaspossibleprovidedthattheSpecifications of3.11.2.1arenotexceededintheprocess.b.Theprovisions ofSpecifications 3.0.3and3.0.4arenotapplicable.
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.2.5Theconcentrations ofhydrogenandoxygeninthegaseouswasteholdupsystemshallbedetermined tobewithintheabovelimitsby monitoring thewastegaseswiththehydrogenandoxygenmonitorsrequiredOPERABLEbyTable3.3-13ofSpecification 3.3.3.10.
ST.LUCIEUNIT3/411-14 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS GASSTORAGETANKSLIMITINGCONDITION FOROPERATION 3.11.2.6Thequantityofradioactivity contained ineachgasstoragetankshallbelimitedto<285,000Curiesnoblegases(considered asXe-133).APPLICABILITY:
AtalltimesACTION:a.Withthequantityofradioactive materialinanygasdecaytankexceeding theabovelimit,immediately suspendalladditions ofradioactive materialtothetankandwithin48hourseitherreducethetankcontentstowithinthelimitorprovidepromptnotification totheCommission pursuanttoSpecification 6.9.1..12
'hewrittenfollow-up reportshallincludeadescription ofactivities plannedand/ortakentoreducethetankcontentstowithintheabovelimit.b.Theprovisions ofSpecifications 3.0.3and3.0.4arenotapplicable.
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.2.6Thequantityofradioactive materialcontained ineachgasdecaytankshallbedetermined tobewithintheabovelimitatleastonceper24hourswhentheReactorCoolantSystemGrossActivityexceedstheactivitylimitofSpecification 3.4.8.b.ST.LUCIEUNIT3/411-15May13,1982 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS
'OLIDRADIOACTIVE WASTELIMITINGCONDITION FOROPERATION 3.11.3Solidified radioactive wasteorwastecontaining freestandingliquidsshallbeprocessed inaccordance withaPROCESSCONTROLPROGRAMpriortobeingshippedtoaradioactive wastedisposalfacility.
APPLICABILITY:
AtalltimesACTIONa.Withthewasteformrequirements fortransportation ordisposalofsolidified radioactive waste(orwastecontaining freestandingliquids),
pursuanttoTitle10oftheCodeofFederalRegulations andtheapplicable burialsiteregulations, notsatisfied, suspendshipments ofsuchradioactive wastetotheburialsite.b.Theprovisions ofSpecifications 3.0.3and3.0.4arenotapplicable.
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.3Foreachradioactive wastecontainer usedtocollectliquidradioactive waste(orwastecontaining freestandingliquids),
priortoshipmenttoaradioactive wastedisposalfacility, thelicenseeshallcertifythathehasfollowedtheminimumrequirements oftheapplicable procedures ofthePROCESSCONTROLPROGRAM.ST.LUCIEUNIT]3/411-16May13,1982 3/4.123/4.12.1RADIOLOGIC ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING MONITORING PROGRAMLIMITINGCONDITION FOROPERATION 3.12.1Theradiologica environmental monitoring programshalleconducteasspecified inTable3.12-1andTable4.12-1.APPLICABILITY:
Atalltimes.ACTIONa~Withtheradiological environmental monitoring programnotbeingconducted asspecified inTables3.12-1and4.12-1,prepareandsubmittotheCommission, intheannualRadiological Monitoring Report,adescription ofthereasonsfornotconducting theprogramasspecified.
Deviations fromSpecification 3.12.1mayoccurbecausesamplesareunobtainable duetohazardous conditions, biological orseasonalunavailability, orduetovandalism, ortomalfunction ofsamplingoranalytical equipment, laboratory accidents, samplingerrors,orotherlegitimate reasons.Ifdeviations occurbecauseofmalfunction ofsamplingoranalytical equipment, everyeffortshallbemadetocompletecorrective actionpriortotheendofthenextsamplingperiod.Adescription ofalldeviations fromTables3.12-1and4.12-1,thereasonsforallsuchdeviations andadescription ofanycorrective actionsinitiated orplannedtobringtheradiological environmental surveillance programbackinaccordance withSpecification 3.12.1shallbeprovidedintheannualRadiological Environmental Monitoring Report.Acurrentlistofsamplelocations usedduringthereporting periodshallbeincludedintheannualRadiological Monitoring Report.Samplelocationchangesfromthe'receding year,ifany,shouldbeidentified alongwithabriefdescription ofthereasonforthechange.b.Withtheconfirmed*
levelofradioactivity inanenvironmental samplingmediumatoneormoreofthelocations, outsideoftheplantcirculating watersystem,specified inTable3.12-1exceeding thelimitsofTable6.9.3-2whenaveragedoveranycalendarquarter,prepareandsubmittotheCommission within30daysfromtheendoftheaffectedcalendarquarter(orfromthetimeoftheconfirmatory resultifsuchresultisnotreceiveduntilaftertheendofthequarterinwhichtheoriginalsamplewascollected),
aSpecialReportwhichincludesanevaluation ofanyreleaseconditions, environmental factorsorotheraspectswhichmayhavecausedthelimitsofTable6.9.3-2tobeexceeded.
Thisreportisnotrequiredifthemeasuredlevelofradioactivity wasnottheresultofplanteffluents; however,insuchanevent,theconditions shallbereportedanddescribed intheannualRadiological Environmental Monitoring Report.ThisSpecialReportexemptsaLicenseeEventReport.*Aconfirmatory reanalysis oftheoriginal, aduplicate, oranewsamplemaybedesirable, asappropriate.
Theresultsoftheconfirmatory analysisshallbecompleted atthe.earliesttimeconsistent withtheanalysis, butinanycasewithin30days.ST.LUCIEUNIT'I3/412-1May13,1982 c.Withmilkorgardenvegetation samplesunavalablefromanyofthesamplelocations requiredbyTable3.12-1,information shallbeincludedintheannualRadiological Monitoring Reportidentifying thecauseoftheunavailability andidentifying replacement locations wheresampleswereobtained.
Ifreplacement samplesareunavailable duringthespecified timeinterval, aspecialreportpursuanttospecification 6.9.2shallbesubmitted totheCommission within30daysfromthetimethelicenseehasbeenproperlynotifiedandwillidentifythecauseoftheunavailability ofthesamplesandadiscussion oftheplansforobtianing futuresamples.Ifnewpermanent samplelocations arerequired; oncetheyhavebeenselectedandsampleavailability isestablished, thelocations fromwhichthesamplesareunavailable maybedeletedfromtheprogram,andthelocations fromwhichthesampleswillbeobtainedinthefutureareincorporated intheenvironmental monitoring programasnewsamplelocations.
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.12.1.1Theradiological environmental monitoring samplesshallbecollected pursuanttoTable3.12-1andshallbeanalyzedpursuanttotherequirements ofTables3.12-1and4.12-1.ST.LUCIEUNIT13/412-2Hay13,1982 iL~
TABLE3.12-1ST.LUCIESITE-RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAMFxposurePathwayand/orSampleSampleLocations Samplingand(b)Collection Frequency TypeandFrequency (c)ofAnalysisl.Airbornea.Radioiodine
&Particulates 9locations Continuous operation ofsamplerwithcollection atleastweeklyRadioiodine filtersI-131-weeklyParticulate filtersGrossbeta-weekly:Analyzeeachfilterforgrossbetaradioactivity
>24hourfollowing filterchange.Gammaisotopic(Composite)
Quarterly Agammaisotopicisalsorequiredforeachsamplehavingagrossbetaradioactivity whichis>1.0pCilm3and whichisalso>10timesthatofthemostrecentcontrolsample.2.DirectRadiation 3.Waterborne 29locations Quarterly Gammaexposure'ate
-quarterly a.Surfaceb.Ground(well)c.Drinkingd.Sedimentfromshoreline 4locations 2locations 3locations 4locations MonthlyQuarterly Quarterly Semiannually Gammaisotopicandtritiumanalysis-MonthlyGammaisotopicandtritiumanalysis-Quarterly Grossbeta,gammaisotopicandtritiumanalysis-Quarterly Gammaisotopicanalysis-Semiannually TABLE3~12-1ST.LUCIESITE-RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAMExposurePathwaySampleSamplingandb)and/orSampleLocations Collection FreuencyTypeandFrequency (cofAnalysis4.Ingestion a.Milk2locations Semi-Monthly Controlsamples-MonthlyGammaisotopicandI-131analysis-Semi-monthly.-
Controlsamples-GammaisotopicandI-131analysis-Monthlyb.FishandInvertebrates 1.Crustacea 2.Fishc.FoodProducts1.Citrus2locations 2locations 5locations Semi-Annually Semi-Annually AtharvesttimeGammaisotopicanalysis-Semi-Annually Gammaisotopicanalysis-Semi-Annually Gammaisotopicanalysis-EachSampling2.EdibleGardenVegetation 2locations AtharvesttimeGammaisotopicanalysis-EachSampl TABLE3.12-1TABLENOTATION(a)Alistofsamplelocations willbeprovidedonaFigureandTableintheODCM.(b)Thefollowing definition offrequencies shallapplytoTable3.12-1only:Weekly-Notlessthanoncepercalendarweek.Amaximumintervalof11daysisallowedbetweenthecollection ofanytwoconsecutive samples.Semi-Monthly
-Notlessthan2timespercalendarmonthwithanintervalofnotlessthan7daysbetween,samplecollections.
Amaximumintervalof24daysisallowedbetweencollection ofanytwoconsecutive samples.Monthly'-Notlessthanoncepercalendarmonthwithanintervalofnotlessthan10daysbetweensamplecollections.
Quarterly
-Notlessthanoncepercalendarquarterwithanintervalofnotlessthan30daysbetweensamplecollections.
Semiannually
-Onesampleeachbetweencalendar, dates(January1-Junewillbeprovidedbetweensamplecollections.
(c)Frequency ofanalysestobeconsistent withcollection frequency.
(d)Nodrinkingwatersourcesareeffectedbyeffluents fromtheplant.ST.LUCIEUNIT3/412-5May13,1982  


TABLE4.12-1.DETECTION CAPABILITIES FORENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLEANALYSISLOWERLIMITOFDETECTION (LLD)ANALYSISWATER(PCI/L)AIRBORNEPARTI-CULATE0(GAS(pCi/m)FISH(pCi/Kg,wet)MILKpCi/LFOODPRODUCTS(pCi/Kg,wet)SEDIMENT(pCi/Kg,dry)GrossBetaH-3~Mn-54~Fe-59Co-58,60~Zn-65'Zr-95Nb-95I-131Cs-134Cs-137Ba/La-140 4c2000(1000)1530153030151c1518351X101X1O'X106X1O213026013026013015018356Od6O'Od150180Note:Thislistdoesnotmeanthatonlytheseradionuclides aretobedetectedandreported.
TABLE 1.2 FREQUENCY NOTATION NOTATION                                FREQUENCY At least once per    12 hours At least once per 24 hours At least once per    7  days 4/g*                         At least  4 per month and a minimum  of 48 per year At least once per 31 days At least once per    92  days SA                          At least once per    6 months At least once per    18 months S/U                          Prior to  each reactor    start  up Completed  prior to  each release N/A                         Not applicable
Otherpeakswhichareraeasurable andidentifiable (exceptnaturally occurring radionuclides) togetherwiththeaboveradionuclides shallalsobeidentified andreported.
* For Radioactive Effluent Sampling
TABLE4.12-1(continued)
                    **  For Radioactive Batch Release only ST. LUCIE UNIT                        1-8 May 13,     1982
NOTATIONa.Acceptable detection capabilities forthermoluminescent dosimeters used,forenvironmental measurements aregiveninRegulatory Guide4.13.b.Tableindicates acceptable detection capabilities forradioactive materials inenvironmental samples.Thesedetection capabilities aretabulated intermsofthelowerlimitsofdetection (LLDs).TheLLDisdefined,forpurposesofthisguide,asthesmallestconcentration, ofradioactive materialinasamplethatwillyieldanetcount(abovesystembackground) thatwillbedetectedwithatleast95%probability withatmost5%probability offalselyconcluding thatablankobservation represents a"real"signal.Foraparticular measurement system(whichmayincluderadiochemical separation):
LLD=466*sbEV'22YwhereLLDisthelowerlimitofdetection asdefinedabove(aspCiperunitmassorvolume).sbisthestandarddeviation ofthebackground countingrateorofthecountingrateofablanksampleasappropriate (ascountsperminute).Eisthecountingefficiency (ascountsperdisintegration).
Visthesamplesize(inunitsofmassorvolume).2.22isthenumberofdisintegrations perminuteperpicocurie.
Yisthefractional radiochemical yield(whenapplicable).
*4.66isthefactorusedwhenbackground has.beensubtracted fromthesamplecount.Formeasurements inwhichthebackground isnotsubtracted, thefactor3.29shallbeused.c-LLDfordrinkingwaterd-LLDforgardenvegetation e-TotalforparentanddaughterST.LUCIEUNIT13/4May13,1982 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 3/4.12.2LANDUSECENSUSLIMITINGCONDITION FOROPERATION 3.12.2Alandusecensusshallbeconducted annuallytoidentifythelocationofthenearestmilkanimal,thenearestresidence andthenearestgarden+ofgreaterthan500squarefeetproducing freshleafyvegetables ineachofthe16meteorological sectorswithinadistanceoffivemiles.APPLICABILITY:
AtalltimesACTION:a.Withalandusecensusidentifying alocation(s) whichyieldsacalculated doseordosecommitment greaterthanthevaluesccurrently beingcalculated inSpecification 4.11.2.3, prepareandsubmittotheCommission within60daysfromthetimethelicenseereceivestheresultsoftheLandUseCensus,pursuanttoSpecification 6.9.2,aSpecialReport,whichidentifies thenewlocation(s).
b.Withalandusecensusidentifying alocation(s) whichyieldsacalculated doseordosecommitment (viathesameexposurepathway)20%greaterthanatalocationfromwhichsamplesarecurrently beingobtainedinaccordance withSpecification 3.12.1,prepareandsubmittotheCommission within60daysfromthetimethelicenseereceivestheresultsoftheLandUseCensus,pursuanttoSpecification 6.9.2,aSpecialReport,whichidentifies thenewlocation(s).
Thenewlocationshallbeaddedtotheradiological environmental monitoring programwhensamplesbecomeavailable.
Thesamplinglocationhavingthelowestcalculated doseordosecommitment (viathesameexposurepathway)maybedeletedfromthemonitoring programafter(October31)oftheyearinwhichthelandusecensuswasconducted.
c.Theprovisions ofSpecifications 3.0.3and3.0.4arenotapplicable.
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.12.2.1Thelandusecensusshallbeconducted atleastonceper12monthsbetweenthedatesofFebruary1andJuly31,bydoor-to-door survey,aerialsurvey,orbyconsulting localagriculture authorities.
*Broadleafvegetation samplingmaybeperformed atthesiteboundaryinasectorwiththehighestD/Qinlieuofthegardencensus.ST.LUCIEUNIT).3/412-8May13,1982 iOI RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 3/4~12.3INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAMLIMITINGCONDITION FOROPERATION
*3.12.3Analysesshall'beperformed onradioactive materials suppliedaspartofan.Interlaboratory Comparison ProgramwhichhasbeenapprovedbyNRC.Thiscondition maybesatisfied byparticipation intheEnvironmental Intercomparison StudiesProgramconducted bytheEPA.APPLICABILITY:
Atalltimes.ACTION:Ia.Withanalysesnotbeingperformed asrequiredabove,notifytheCommission asapartoftheannualRadiological Environmental Monitoring Report.b.Theprovisions ofSpecification 3.0.3and3.0.4arenotapplicable.
IftheRadiologi'cal Environmental Surveillance Programiscarriedoutbythelicensee, thelicenseeshallestablish anInterlaboratory Comparison Programwhich'asbeenapprovedbytheNRC.Ifthelicenseeisnottheprinciple investigator, thelicenseeshallrequiretheprinciple investigator totakepartinanInterlaboratory Comparison Program.Thiscondition maybesatisfied byparticipation intheEnvironmental Radioactivity Laboratory Intercomparison StudiesProgram.SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.12.3Theresultsofavailable analysesperformed aspartoftheaboverequiredInterlaboratory Comparison ProgramshallbeincludedintheannualRadiological Environmental Monitoring ReportpursuanttoSpecification 6.9.3.2.ST.LUCIEUNITf3/412-9Hay13,1982 INSTRUMENTATION BASES3/4.3.3.9 RADIOACTIVE LIQUIDEFFLUENTINSTRUMENTATION Theradioactive liquideffluentinstrumentation isprovidedtomonitorandcontrol,asapplicable, thereleasesofradioactive materials inliquideffluents duringactualorpotential releases.
Thealarmtripsetpoints fortheseinstruments shallbecalculated inaccordance withapprovedmethodsintheODCMtoensurethatthealarm/trip willoccurpriortoexceeding thelimitsof10CFRPart20.TheOPERABILITY anduseofthisinstrumentation isconsistent withtherequirements ofGeneralDesignCriteria60,63and64ofAppendixAto10CFRPart50.3/4.3.3.10 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUSEFFLUENTINSTRUMENTATION Theradioactive gaseouseffluentinstrumentation isprovidedtomonitorandcontrol,asapplicable, thereleasesofradioactive materials ingaseouseffluents duringactualorpotential releases.
Thealarm/trip setpoints fortheseinstruments shallbecalculated inaccordance withmethodsintheODCMtoensurethatthealarm/trip willoccurpriortoexceeding thelimitsof10CFRPart20.TheOPERABILITY anduseofthisinstrumentation isconsistent withtherequirements ofGeneralDesignCriteria60,63and64ofAppendixAto10CFRPart50.ST.LUCIEUNIT1B3/43-4May13,1982 3/4~11RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASES3/4.11.1LIQUIDEFFLUENTS 3/4.11.1'CONCENTRATION Thisspecification isprovidedtoensurethattheconcentration ofradioactive materials releasedinliquidwasteeffluents fromthesitetounrestricted areaswillbelessthantheconcentration levelsspecified in10CFRPart20,AppendixB,TableII.Thislimitation providesadditional assurance thatthelevelsofradioactive materials inbodiesofwateroutsidethesitewillnotresultinexposures within(1)theSectionII.Adesignobjectives ofAppendixI,10CFRPart50,toanindividual and(2)thelimitsof10CFRPart20.106(e) tothepopulation.
Theconcentration limitfornoblegasesisbasedupontheassumption thatXe-135isthecontrolling radioisotope anditsMPCinair(submersion) wasconverted toanequivalent concentration inwaterusingthemethodsdescribed inInternational Commission onRadiological Protection (ICRP)Publication 2.3/4'1'.2DOSEThisspecification isprovidedtoimplement therequirements ofSectionsII.A,III.AandIV.AofAppendixI,10CFRPart50.TheLimitingCondition forOperation implements theguidessetforthinSectionII.AofAppendixI.TheACTIONstatements providetherequiredoperating flexibility andatthesametimeimplement theguidessetforthinSectionIV.AofAppendixItoassurethatthereleasesofradioactive materialinliquideffluents willbekept"aslowasisreasonably achievable".
Performing thedosecalculations intheODCMimplement therequirements inSectionIII.AofAppendixIthatconformance withtheguidesofAppendixIistobeshownbycalculational procedures basedonmodelsanddatasuchthattheactualexposureofanindividual throughappropriate pathwaysisunlikelytobesubstantially underestimated.
Theequations specified intheODCMforcalculating thedosesduetotheactualreleaseratesofradioactive materials inliquideffluents shouldbeconsistent withthemethodology providedinRegulatory Guide1.109,"Calculation ofAnnualDosestoManfromRoutineReleasesofReactorEffluents forthePurposeofEvaluating Compliance with10CFRPart50,AppendixI,"Revision1,October1977,andRegulatory Guide1.113,"Estimating AquaticDis'persion ofEffluents fromAccidental andRoutineReactorReleasesforthePurposeofImplementing AppendixI,"April1977.ST~LUCIEUNIT1B3/411-1May13,1982 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASESThisspecification-appliestothereleaseofliquideffluents fromeachreactoratthesite.Forunitswithsharedradwastetreatment systems,theliquideffluents fromthesharedsystemareproportioned amongtheunitssharingthatsystem.3/4~11~1.3LIQUIDWASTETREATMENT TheOPERABILITY ofappropriate subsystems oftheLWT"systemensuresthatthissystemwillbeavailable forusewheneverliquideffluents requiretreatment priortoreleasetotheenvironment.
Therequirements thattheappropriate portionsofthissystembeusedwhenspecified providesassurance thatthereleasesofradioactive materials inliquideffluents willbekept"aslowasisreasonably achievable."
Thisspecification implements therequirements of10CFRPart50.36a,GeneralDesignCriterion 60ofAppendixAto10CFRPart50anddesignobjective Section11.DofAppendixAto10CFRPart50.Thespecified limitsgoverning theuseofappropriate portionsoftheliquidradwastetreatment systemwerespecified asasuitablefractionoftheguidesetforthinSection11.AofAppendixI,10CFRPart50,forliquideffluents.
3/4.11.2GASEOUSEFFLUENTS 3/F11.2'DOSERATEThisspecification isprovidedtoensurethatthedoserateatanytimeattheexclusion areaboundaryfromgaseouseffluents fromallunitsonthesitewillbewithintheannualdoselimitsof10CFRPart20forunrestricted areas.Theannualdoselimitsarethedosesassociated withtheconcentrations of10CFRPart20,AppendixB,Table11.Theselimitsprovidereasonable assurance thatradioactive materialdischarged ingaseouseffluents willnotresultintheexposureofanindividual inanunrestricted area,eitherwithinoroutsidetheexclusion areaboundary, toannualaverageconcentrations exceeding thelimitsspecified inAppendixB,Table11of10CFRPart20(10CFRPart20.106(b)).
Forindividuals whomayattimesbewithintheexclusion areaboundary, theoccupancy oftheindividual willbesufficiently lowtocompensate fo'ranyincreaseintheatmospheric diffusion factorabovethatfortheexclusion areaboundary.
Thespecified releaseratelimitsrestrict, atalltimes,thecorresponding gammaandbetadoseratesabovebackground toanindividual atorbeyondtheexclusion areaboundaryto<(500)mrem/year tothetotalbodyorto<(3000)mrem/year totheskin.Thesereleaseratelimitsalsorestrict, atalltimes,thecorresponding organdoserateabovebackground toaninfantviatheinhalation pathwayto<1500mrem/year.
JST.LUCIEUNIT1B3/411-2May13,1982 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASES3/411.2.2DOSE,NOBLEGASESThisspecification isprovidedtoimplement therequirements ofSectionsII.B,III.AandIV.AofAppendixI,10CFRPart50.TheLimitingCondition forOperation implements theguidessetforthinSectionII.BofAppendixI.TheACTIONstatements providetherequiredoperating flexibility andatthesametimeimplement theguidessetforthinSectionIV.AofAppendixIassurethatthereleasesofradioactive materialingaseouseffluents willbekept"aslowasisreasonably achievable"
.TheSurveillance Requirements implement therequirements inSectionIII.AofAppendixIthatconformwiththeguidesofAppendixItobeshownbycalculational procedures basedonmodelsanddatasuchthattheactualexposureofanindividual throughtheappropriate pathwaysisunlikelytobesubstantially underestimated.
Thedosecalculations established intheODCMforcalculating thedosesduetotheactualreleaseratesofradioactive noblegasesingaseouseffluents shouldbeconsistent withthemethodology providedinRegulatory Guide1.109,"Calculation ofAnnualDosestoManfromRoutineReleasesofReactorEffluents forthePurposeofEvaluating Compliance with10CFRPart50,AppendixI,"Revision1,October1977andRegulatory Guide1.111,"MethodsforEstimating Atmospheric Transport andDispersion ofGaseousEffluents inRoutineReleasesfromLight-Water-Cooled Reactors,"
Revision1,July1977.TheODCMEquations providedfordetermi,ning theairdosesattheexclusion areaboundarywillbebaseduponthehistorical (orreal)averageatmospheric conditions.
3/4.11.2.3DOSE,RADIOIODINES, RADIOACTIVE MATERIALINPARTICULATE FORMANDRADIONUCLIDES OTHERTHANNOBLEGASESThisspecification isprovidedtoimplement therequirements ofSectionsII.C,III.AandIV.AofAppendixI,10CFRPart50.TheLimitingConditions forOperation aretheguidessetforthinSectionII.CofAppendixI.TheACTIONstatements providetherequiredoperating flexibility andatthesametimeimplement theguidessetforthinSectionIV.AofAppendixItoassurethatthereleasesofradioactive materials ingaseouseffluents willbekept"aslowasisreasonably achievable".
TheODCMcalculational methodsspecified inthesurveillance requirements implement therequirements inSectionIII.AofAppendixIthatconformance withtheguidesofAppendixIbeshownbycalculational procedures basedonmodelsanddatasuchthattheactualexposureofanindividual throughappropriate pathwaysisunlikelytobesubstantially underestimated.
TheODCMcalculational methodsforcalculating thedosesduetotheactualreleaseratesofthesubjectmaterials arerequiredtobeconsistent withthemethodology providedinRegulatory Guide1.109,"Calculating ofAnnualDosestoManfromRoutineReleasesofReactorEffluents for,thePurposeofEvaluating Compliance with10CFRPart50,AppendixI",RevisionI,October1977andRegulatory Guide1.111,"MethodsforEstimating Atmospheric Transport andDispersion ofGaseousEffluents inRoutineReleasesfromST.LUCIEUNIT1B3/411-3!Hay13,1982 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASESLight-Mater-Cooled Reactors",
Revision1,July1977.Theseequations alsoprovidefordetermining theactualdosesbaseduponthehistorical (orreal)averageatmospheric conditions.
Thereleaseratespecifications forradioiodines, radioactive materialinparticulate formandradionuclides otherthannoblegasesaredependent ontheexistingradionuclide pathwaystoman,intheunrestricted area.Thepathwayswhichareexaminedinthedevelopment ofthesecalculations are:1)individual inhalation ofairborneradionuclides, 2)deposition ofradionuclides ontogreenleafyvegetation withsubsequent consumption byman,3)deposition ontograssyareaswheremilkanimalsandmeatproducing animalsgrazewithconsumption ofthemilkandmeatbyman,and4)depositon onthegroundwithsubsequent exposureofman.3/4-11.2.4 GASEOUSWASTETREATMENT TheOPERABILITY oftheappropriate subsystems ofthegaseousradwastetreatment systemensuresthatthesystemwillbeavailable forusewhenevergaseouseffluents requireholduppriortoreleasetotheenvironment.
Therequirement thattheappropriate portionsofthesesystemsbeusedwhenspeci,fiedprovidesreasonable assurance thatthereleasesofradioactive materials ingaseouseffluents willbekept"aslowasisreasonably achievable".
Thisspecification implements therequirements of'10CFRPart50.36a,GeneralDesignCriterion 60ofAppendixAto10CFRPart50,anddesignobjective SectionIIDofAppendixIto10CFRPart50.Thespecified limitsgoverning theuseofappropriate portionsofthesystemswerespecified asasuitablefractionoftheguidesetforthinSections11Band11.CofAppendixI,10CFRPart50,forgaseouseffluents.
ST.LUCIEUNIT1B3/411-4May13,1982 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASES3/F11.2'EXPLOSIVE GASMIXTUREThis'pecification isprovidedtoensurethattheconcentration ofpotentially explosive gasmixturescontained inthewastegasholdupsystemismaintained belowtheflammability limitsofhydrogenandoxygen.Maintaining theconcentration ofhydrogenandoxygenbelowtheirflammability limitsprovidesassurance thatthereleasesofradioactive materials willbecontrolled inconformance withtherequirements ofGeneralDesignCriterion 60ofAppendixAto10CFRPart50.3/F11.2.6GASDECAYTANKSRestricting thequantityofradioactivity contained ineachgasdecaytankprovidesassurance thatintheeventofanuncontrolled releaseofthetanksconten6s, theresulting totalbodyexposuretoanindividual atthenearestexclusion areaboundarywillnotexceed0.5rem,asperSafetyGuide24.Thisisconsistent withStandardReviewPlan15.7.1,"WasteGasSystemFailure".
ST.LUCIEUNITIB3/411-5Hay13,1982  


s3/4.12RADIOLOGALENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING BASEStTheradiological monitoring programrequiredbythisspecification providesmeasurements ofradiation andofradioactive materials inthoseexposurepathwaysandforthoseradionuclides whichleadtothehighestpotential radiation exposures ofindividuals resulting fromthestationoperation.
INST RUMENTATION METEOROLOGICAL INSTRUMENTATION LIMITING CONDITION        FOR OPERATION 3.3.3.4   The      meteorological monitoring instrumentation channels shall  be operable as per Table 3.3-8.
Thismonitoring programtherebysupplements theradiological effluentmonitoring programbyverifying thatthemeasurable concentrations ofradioactive materials andlevelsofradiation arenothigherthanexpectedonthebasisoftheeffluentmeasurements andmodelingoftheenvironmental exposurepathways.
APPLICABILITY: At          all times ACTION aO  With the number of OPERABLE meteorological monitoring channels required by Table 3.3-8, the Licensee should suspend all less'han releases of gaseous radioactive material from the radwaste gas decay tanks until the inoperable channel(s) is restored to OPERABLE status.'.
Programchangesmaybeinitiated basedonoperational experience.
With less than the Minimum Channels OPERABLE as specified by Table 3.3-8, prepare and submit a Special Report to the Commission pursuant to Specification 6.9.2 within the next 10 days outlining the cause of the malfunction and the plans for restoring the channel(s) to OPERABLE status.
Thedetection capabilities requiredbyTable4.12.-1arestate-of-the-art forroutineenvironmental measurements inindustrial laboratories.
: c. The        provisions of Specification 3.0.3 and  3.0.4 are not applicable.
TheLLDlimitsfordrinkingwatermeettherequirements of40CFR141.3/4~12~1LANDUSECENSUSThisspecification isprovidedtoensurethatchangesintheuseofunrestricted areasareidentified and,thatmodifications tothemonitoring programaremadeifrequiredby'heresultsofthiscensus.Thiscensussatisfies therequirements ofSectionIV.8.3ofAppendixIto10CFRPart50.Restricting thecensustogardensofgreaterthan500squarefeetprovidesassurance thatsignificant exposurepathwaysvialeafyvegetables willbeidentified andmonitored sinceagardenofthissizeistheminimumrequiredtoproducethequantity(26kg/year)ofleafyvegetables assumedinRegulatory Guide1.109forconsumption byachild.Todetermine thismimimumgardensize,thefollowing assumptions wereused,1)that20Xofthegardenwasusedforgrowingbroadleafvegetation (i.e.,similartolettuceandcabbage),
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.3.3.4  One WIND SPEED, ONE WIND DIRECTION, and TWO AIR TEMPERATURE INSTRUMENTATION CHANNEL(S) shall be demonstrated OPERABLE by        the performance of the CHANNEL CHECK and CHANNEL CALIBRATION operations at the frequencies shown in Table 4.3-5.
and2)avegetation yieldof2kg/square meter.Broadleafvegetation samplingmaybeperformed atthesiteboundaryinthedirection sectorwiththehighest(D/Q)inlieuofperforming thegardencensus.3/4'2.3INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAMTherequirement forparticipation inanInterlaboratory Comparison programisprovidedtoensurethatindependent checksontheprecision andaccuracyofthemeasurements ofradioactive materialinenvironmental samplematricesareperformed aspartofaqualityassurance'rogram forenvironmental monitoring inordertodemonstrate thattheresultsarereasonably valid.ST.LUCIEUNIT'1B3/412-1May13,1982 ADMINISTRATIVE ROLSe.Investigation ofallviolations oftheTechnical Specifications including thepreparation and,forwarding ofreportscoveringevaluation andrecommendations topreventrecurrence totheManagerofNuclearEnergy,theVicePresident ofNuclearEnergyandtotheChairmanoftheCompanyNuclearReviewBoard.f.ReviewofthoseREPORTABLE OCCURRENCES requires24hournotification totheCommission.
ST. LUCIE UNIT        'I                3/4  3-3O Hay 13, 1982
g.Reviewoffacilityoperations todetectpotential safetyhazards.h.Performance ofspecialreviewsandinvestigations andreportsthereonasrequested bytheChairmanoftheCompanyNuclearReviewBoard.i.ReviewofthePlantSecurityPlanandimplementing procedures andshallsubmitrecommended changestotheChairmanoftheCompanyNuclearReviewBoard.ReviewoftheEmergency Planandimplementing procedures andshallsubmitrecommended changestotheChairmanoftheCompanyNuclearReviewBoard.k.Reviewtheresultsoftheradiological environmental monitoring programatleastonceper12months.1.ReviewoftheODCMandanychangestotheODCM.AUTHORITY 6.5.1.7TheFacilityReviewGroupshall:a.'ecommend tothePlantManagerwrittenapprovalordisapproval ofitemsconsidered under6.5.1.6(a) through(d)above.b.Renderdeterminations inwritingwithregardtowhetherornoteachitemconsidered under6.5.1.6(a) through(e)aboveconstitutes anunreviewed safetyquestion.
 
c.Providewrittennotification within24hourstotheVicePresident ofNuclearEnergyandtheCompanyNuclearReviewBoardofdisagreement
TABLE 3.3-8 METEOROLOGICAL MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION INSTRUMENT      MINIMUM MINIMUM        CHANNELS INSTRUMENT 6 ELEVATION                      ACCURACY      OPERABLE
'etweentheFRGandthePlantManager;however,thePlantManagershallhaveresponsibility forresolution ofsuchdisagreements pursuantto6.1.1above.ST.LUCIEUNIT16-7Hay13,1982 ADMINISTRATIVE ROLS6.7SAFETYLIMITVIOLATION 6.7.1Thefollowing actionsshall'etakenintheeventaSafetyLimitisviolated:
: 1. WINDSPEED
a.ThefacilityshallbeplacedinatleastHOTSTANDBYwithinonehour.b.TheSafetyLimitviolation shallbereportedtotheCommission, theVicePresident ofPowerResources andtotheCNRBwithin24hours.c.ASafetyLimitViolation Reportshallbeprepared.
: a. Nominal Elev (10 meters)              + 0.5 *mph        1A
ThereportshallbereviewedbytheFRG.Thisreportshalldescribe(1)applicable circumstances preceding theviolation, (2)effectsoftheviolation uponfacilitycomponents, systemsorstructures, and(3)corrective actiontakentopreventrecurrence.
: b. Nominal Elev (60 meters)               + 0.5 *mph      N.A.
d.TheSafetyLimitViolation Reportshallbesubmitted totheCommission, theCNRBandtheVicePresident ofNuclearEnergywithin14daysoftheviolation.
2 ~  WIND DIRECTION 0                B
6.8PROCEDURES 6.8.1Writtenprocedures shallbeestablished, implemented andmaintained coveringtheactivities'eferenced below:a~Theapplicable procedures recommended inAppendix"A"ofRegulatory Guide1.33,,November, 1972.b.Refueling operations.
: a. Nominal Elev (10 meters)              + 5               1 0
c.Surveillance andtestactivities ofsafetyrelatedequipment.
: b. Nominal Elev (60 meters)               + 5              N.A.
d.SecurityPlanimplementation.
: 3. AIR TEMPERATURE (Delta T)                         0
e.Emergency Planimplementation.
: a. Nominal Elev (10 meters)              + 0,] C**          1'C 0
f.FireProtection Programimplementation.
: b. Nominal Elev (60 meters)                0~1  C**        1 0
goh.PROCESSCONTROLPROGRAMforSOLIDIFIED radioactive wasteorwastecontaining freestandingliquid.Offsitereleasesofgaseousandliquideffluents containing radioactive materials, including effluentmonitorsetpoints.
: c. Nominal Elev (35 meters)              + 0.1  C**      N.A.
i.OffsiteDoseCalculation ManualST.LUCIEUNIT16-13May13,1982 ADMINISTRATIVE ROLSd.Reactivity anomalies involving disagreement withthepredicted valueofreactivity balanceundersteadystateconditions duringpoweroperation greaterthanorequalto1%Deltak/k;acalculated reactivity balanceindicating aSHUTDOWNMARGINlessconservative thanspecified inthetechnical specifications; short-term reactivity increases thatcorrespond toareactorperiodoflessthan5secondsor,ifsubcritical, anunplanned reactivity insertion ofmorethan0.5%Deltak/k;oroccurrence ofanyunplanned criticality.
  *Starting speed of anemometer shall    be  ( 1 mph
e.Failure ormalfunction ofoneormorecomponents whichpreventsorcouldprevent,byitself,thefulfillment ofthefunctional requirements ofsystem(s) usedtocopewithaccidents analyzedintheFSAR.f.personnel errororprocedural inadequacy whichpreventsorcouldprevent,byitself,thefulfillment ofthefunctional requirements ofsystemsrequiredtocopewithaccidents analyzedintheFSAR.g.Conditions arisingfromnaturalorman-madeeventsthat,asadirectresultoftheeventrequireunitshutdown, operation ofsafetysystems,orotherprotective measuresrequiredbytechnical specifications.
**Delta T measurement channels only A. The 60 meter Channel may be substituted for the 10 meter wind speed for up to 30 days in the event the 10 meter channel is INOPERABLE. Wind Speed Data from the 60 meter elevation should be adjusted using the wind speed power law:
h.Errorsdiscovered inthetransient oraccidentanalysesorinthemethodsusedforsuchanalysesasdescribed inthesafetyanalysisreportorinthebasesforthetechnical specifications thathaveorcouldhavepermitted reactoroperation inamannerlessconservative thanassumedintheanalyses.
S 10 meters = (    60 meters) (0.1727)n where:
i.Performance ofstructures, systems,orcomponents thatrequiresremedialactionorcorrective measurestopreventoperation inamannerlessconservative thanassumedintheaccidentanalysesinthesafetyanalysisreportortechnical specifications bases;ordiscovery duringunitlifeofconditions notspecifically considered inthesafetyanalysisreportortechnical specifications thatrequireremedialactionorcorrective measurestopreventtheexistence ordevelopment ofanunsafecondition.
S  = wind speed in mph n = 0.25 for Pasquill Vertical Stability Classes A, B, C, D.
j.Occurrence ofradioactive materialcontained gasdecaytanksinexcessofthatpermitted bythelimitingcondition foroperation established inthetechnical specifications.
n ~ 0.50 for Pasquill Vertical Stability Classes E, F, G.
k.Exceeding L.C.O.3~11~1~1(LiquidRadwasteConcentration) orL.C.O.3.11.2.1(GaseousDoseRate).STLUCIEUNIT6-17Hay13,1982 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLSTHIRTYDAYWRITTENREPORTS6.9.1.9ThetypesofeventslistedbelowshallbethesubjectofwrittenreportstotheDirectoroftheRegionalOfficewithinthirtydaysofoccurrence oftheevent.Thewrittenreportshallinclude,asaminimum,acompleted copyofalicenseeeventreportform.Information providedonthelicenseeeventreportformshallbesupplemented, asneeded,byadditional narrative materialtoprovidecompleteexplanation ofthecircumstances suxrounding theevent.a.Reactorprotection systemorengineered safetyfeatureinstrument settingswhicharefoundtobelessconservative thanthoseestablished bythetechnical specifications butwhichdonotpreventthefulfillment ofthefunctional requirements ofaffectedsystems.b.Conditions leadingtooperation inadegradedmodepermitted byalimitingcondition foroperation orplantshutdownrequiredbyalimitingcondition foroperation.
1.727 X 10    = constant = 10 meters/ 60 meters B. The    60  meter Channel may be substituted for the 10 meter Wind Direction Channel  for  up to 30 days in the event the 10 meter Channel is INOPERABLE.
c.Observedinadequacies intheimplementation ofadministrative orprocedural controlswhi'chthreatentocausereduction ofdegreeofredundancy providedinreactorprotection systemsorengineered safetyfeature'ystems.
C. The    35 meter Channel may be substituted for one of the 10 meter or 60 meter Temperature Channels for up to 30 days      if one of the Channels is INOPERABLE. The data -should always be normalized to C/100 meters to determine the vertical stability class.
d.Abnormaldegradation ofsystemsotherthanthosespecified in6.9.1.12.cabovedesignedtocontainradioactive materialresulting fromthefissionprocess.e.Anunplanned offsitereleaseof1)morethan1curieofradioactive materialinliquideffluents, 2)morethan150curiesofnoblegasingaseouseffluents, or3)morethan0.05curiesofradioiodine ingaseouseffluents.
ST. LUCIE UNIT    1                  3/4 Nay 13, 1982
Thereportofanunplanned offsitereleaseofradioactive materialshallincludethefollowing information:
 
1.Adescxiption oftheeventandequipment involved.
TABLE  4.3-5 METEOROLOGICAL MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS CHANNEL                              CHANNEL INSTRUMENT                              CHECK                            CALIBRATION
2.Cause(s) fortheunplanned xelease.3.Actions takentopreventrecurrence.
: 1. WIND SPEED
4.Consequences oftheunplanned release.ST.LUCIEUNIT'16-18Hay13,1982 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLSSPECIALREPORTSh.CoreBarrelMovement, Specifications 3.4.11and4.4.11.i.FireDetection Instrumentation, Specification 3.3.3.7.FireSuppression Systems,Specification 3.7.11.1.k.Exceeding oneormoreLCO'forSpecifications 3.11.1.2,3.11.1.3, 3.11.2.2, 3.11.2.3, or3.11.2.4, involving radiation dosefromradioactive effluents.
: a. Nominal Elev (10 meters)                                              SA
1.Measuredlevelsofradioactivity inanenvironmental samplingmediumdetermined toexceedthereporting levelvaluesofTable6.9.3-2whenaveragedoveranycalendarquartersamplingperiodpursuanttoSpecification 3.12.1.b.
: b. Nominal Elev (60 meters)                                              SA+
Whenmorethanoneoftheradionuclides inTable6.9.3-2aredetectedinthesamplingmedium,thisreportshallbesubmitted if:concentration (1)+concentration (2)+...>1.0limitlevel(1)limitlevel(2)Whenradionuclides otherthanthoseinTable6.9.3-2aredetectedandaretheresultofplanteffluents, thisreportshallbesubmitted ifthequarterly dosetoanindividual isequaltoorgreaterthanthequarterly limitsofSpecifications 3.11.1.2,3.11.2.2and3.11.2.3.Thisreportisnotrequiredifthemeasuredlevelofradioactivity wasnottheresultofplanteffluents; however,insuchanevent,thecondition shallbereportedanddescribed intheAnnualRadiological Environmental Monitoring Report.m.Milkorgardensamplesunavailable duringthespecified timeinterval, Specification 3.12.l.c.
: 2. WIND DIRECTION
,n.Thediscovery ofalocationwhichyieldsacalculated doseordosecommitment
: a. Nominal Elev (10 meters)          D                                  SA
>thevaluescurrently beingcalculated, Specification 3.12;2.a.
: b. Nominal Elev (60 meters)                                              SA~
o.Thediscovery ofalocationwhichyieldsacalculated doseordosecommitment 20%greaterthanatalocationfromwhichsamplesarecurrently beingobtained, Specification 3.12.2.b.
: 3. AIR TEMPERATURE (Delta T)
ST.LUCIEUNIT'I6-19Nay13,1982 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS6.9.3ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTSRADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT3/6.9.3.1Routineradiological environmental monitoring reportscoveringtheoperation oftheunitduringthepreviouscalendaryearshallbesubmitted priortoMay1ofeachyear.Theinitialreportshallbesubmitted priortoMay1oftheyearfollowing initialcriticality.
: a. Nominal Elev (10 meters)                                              SA
6.9.3.2Theannualradiological environmental monitoring reportsshallincludesummaries, interpretations, andinformation basedupontrendanalysisoftheresultsoftheradiological environmental surveillance activities forthereportperiod,including acomparison withpreoperational studies,operational controlst,asappropriate),
: b. Nominal Elev (60 meters)                                              SA
andpreviousenvironmental surveillance reportsandanassessment oftheobservedimpactsoftheplantoperation ontheenvironment.,
: c. Nominal Elev (35 meters)                                              SA~
ThereportsshallalsoincludetheresultsofthelandusecensusesrequiredbySpecification 3.12.2.Ifharmfuleffectsaredetectedbythemonitoring, thereportshallprovideananalysisoftheproblemandaplannedcourseofactiontoalleviate the'problem.
*Required only if these Channels are being substituted for one of the Minimum Channels Operable as per Table 3.3-8.
Theannualradiological environmental monitoring reportsshallincludesummarized andtabulated resultsintheformatsimilartoTable6.9.3-1ofallradiological environmental samplesrequiredtobetakenduringthereportperiod.Intheeventthatsomeresultsarenotavailable forinclusion withthereport,thereportshallbesubmitted notingandexplaining thereasonsforthemissingresults.Delayeddatashallbesubmitted inasupplementary reportwithin60daysfromthetimethelastanalysesarecompleted.
 
Thereportsshallalsoincludethefollowing:
INSTRUMENTATION RADIOACTIVE LIQU      EFFLUENT INSTRUMENTATION LIMITING CONDITION    FOR OPERATION 3.3.3.9  The radioactive    liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channels shown in Table  3.3-12 shall be OPERABLE with their alarm/trip setpoints set to ensure that the limits of Specification 3 ."11.1.1 are not exceeded. The alarm/trip setpoints of these channels shall be determined in accordance with the ODCM methodology.
asummarydescription oftheradiological environmental monitoring program;amapofallsamplinglocations keyedtoatablegivingdistances anddirections fromonereactor;theresultoflandusecensusesrequiredbytheSpecification 3.12.2;asummaryofavailable resultsfromtheInterlaboratory Comparison ProgramrequiredbySpecification 3.12.3,andadditional information asprovidedinSpecification 3.12.1.SEMIANNUAL RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTRELEASEREPORT3/6.9.3.3Routineradioactive effluentreleasereportscoveringtheoperating oftheunitduringtheprevious6monthsofoperation shallbesubmitted within60daysafterJanuary1andJuly1ofeachyear.Theperiodofthefirstreportshallbeginwiththedateofinitialcriticality.
APPLICABILITY: As shown      in Table  3 .3-12 .
3/Asinglesubmittal maybemadeforamultipleunitstation.Thesubmittal shouldcombinethosesectionsthatarecommontoallunitsatthestation;however,forunitswithseparateradwastesystems,thesubmittal shallspecifythereleasesofradioactive materialfromeachunit.ST.LUCIEUNIT16-20Hay13,1982 TABLE6.9.3-1FORHATFORENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAMSUMHARYNAMEOFFACILITYDOCKETNO.LOCATIONOFFACILITYREPORTING PERIODTypeandMediumorPathwayTotalNumberSampledofAnalyses(UnitofMeasurement)
ACTION:
Performed LowerLimitofDetection (LLD)AllIndicator Locations Mean(f)aRangeaLocationWithHighestAnnualMeanNameMean(f)aDistanceandDirection RaeControlLocations Mean(f)aRangeNumberofNonroutini
: a. With a radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channel alarm/trip setpoint less conservative than a value which will ensure that the limits of 3.11.1.1 are met, immediately suspend the release of radioactive liquid effluents monitored by the affected channel or declare the channel inoperable.
~ReportedMeasurements Meanandrangebasedupondetection measurements only.Fractionofdetectable measurements atspecified locations isindicated inparenthesis (f).
: b. With less than the number of channels required OPERABLE by Table 3.3-12, take the ACTION shown in Table 3.3-12.
ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS6.9.3.3.1 Theradioactive effluentreleasereportsshallincludeasummaryofthequantities ofradioactive liquidandgaseouseffluents andsolidwastereleasedfromtheunitasoutlinedinRegulatory Guide1.21Rev;1,"iMeasuring, Evaluating, andReporting Radioactivity.
: c. The  provisions of Specifications  3 .0.3 and 3 .0.4 are not applicable.
inSolidWastesandReleasesofRadioactive Materials inLiquidandGaseousEffluents fromLight-Mater-Cooled NuclearPowerPlants",withdatasummarized onaquarterly basisfollowing theformatofAppendixBthereof.Theradioactive effluentreleasereportsshallincludethefollowing information forallunplanned offsitereleasesofradioactive materials ingaseousandliquideffluents:
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.3.3 .9 Each  radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channel
a.Adescription oftheeventandequipment involved.
        'shall  be demonstrated OPERABLE by performance of the CHANNEL CHECK, CHANNEL CALIBRATION, AND CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST operations during the Modes and at the frequencies shown in Table 4.3-8.
b.Cause(s)fortheunplanned release.c.Actionstakentopreventrecurrence.
ST. LUCIE UNIT  1                   3/4   3-45 Hay 13, 1982
d.Consequences oftheunplanned release.Theradioactive effluentreleasereportsshallincludeanassessment ofradiation dosesfromtheradioactive liquidandgaseouseffluents releasedfromtheunitduringeachcalendarquarterasoutlinedintheODCM.Theassessment ofradiation dosesshallbeperformed inaccordance withmethodology intheODCM.ST.LUCIEUNITf6-22Hay13,1982 TABLE6.9.3-2NONROUTINE REPORTING LEVELSFORRADIOACTIVITY CONCENTRATIONS INENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLESAnalysisIH-3Mn-54Fe-59Water(pCi/1)2X1041X1034X102AirborneParticulate orGases(pCi/m)Fish(pCi/Kg,wet)3X1041X104Milk(pCi/1)BroadLeafVegetation (pCi/Kg,wet)IIICo-58Co-60Zn-65'Zr-Nb-95 I-1311X1033X103X104X1020.93X1041X102X1041X102ICs-134ICs-137I.Ba-La-140 30502X10210201X102X1060703X102(1)1X1032X103(1)Totalforparentanddaughter
 
<h ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLSe.Recordsofgaseousandliquidradioactive materialreleasedtotheenvironsf.Recordsoftransient oroperational cyclesforthosefacilitycomponents identified inTable5.9-1.g.Recordsoftrainingandqualification forcurrentmembersoftheplantstaff.h.Recordsofin-service inspections performed pursuanttotheseTechnical Specifications.
ff TABLE 3.3-12 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION MINIMUM CHANNELS INSTRUMENT                          OPERABLE            APPLICABILITY    ACTION
RecordsofQualityAssurance activities requiredbytheQAManualRecordsofreviewsperformed forchangesmadetoprocedures orequipment orreviewsoftestsandexperiments pursuantto10CFR50.59k.RecordsofmeetingsoftheFRGandtheCNRB1.RecordsofEnvironmental Qualification whicharecoveredundertheprovisions ofparagraph 6.13.m.Recordsoftheservicelivesofallhydraulic andmechanical snubberslistedonTables3.7-2aand3.7-2bincluding thedateatwhichtheservicelifecommences andassociated installation andmaintenance records.n.AnnualRadiological Environmental Monitoring Reports;andrecordsofanalysestransmitted tothelicenseewhichareusedtopreparetheAnnualRadiological Environmental Monitoring Report.o.Meteorological data,summarized andreportedinaformatconsistent withtherecommendations ofRegulatory Guides1.21and1.23.6.11RADIATION PROTECTION PROGRAMProcedures'or personnel radiation protection shallbepreparedconsistent withtherequirements of10CFRPart20andshallbeapproved, maintained andadheredtoforalloperations involving personnel radiation exposure.
: 1. Gross  Radioactivity monitors, providing automatic termination of release
ST.LUCIEUNITI6-24May13,1982 ADNINISTRATIVE CONTROLS6.12HIGHRADIATION AREA6.12~1Inlieuofthe"controldevice"or"alarmsignal"requiredbyparagraph 20.203(c)
: a. Liquid radwaste effluent line                                  At all times*      18
(2)of10CFR20,eachhighradiation areainwhichtheintensity ofradiation is1000mrem/hrorlessshallbebarricaded andconspicuously postedasahighradiation areaandentrancetheretoshallbecontrolled byrequiring issuanceofaRadiation WorkPermit*.Anyindividual orgroupofindividuals permitted toentersuchareasshallbeprovidedwithoraccompanied byoneormoreofthefollowing:
: b. Steam Generator blowdown effluent line                                            At all times*      19
a.Aradiation monitoring devicewhichcontinuously indicates theradiation doserateintheareab.Aradiation monitoring devicewhichcontinuously integrates theradiation doserateintheareaandalarmswhenapresetintegrated doseisreceived.
: 2. Gross  Radioactivity Monitors not providing automatic termination of release
Entryintosuchareaswiththismonitoring devicemaybemadeafterthedoseratelevelintheareahasbeenestablished andpersonnel havebeenmadeknowledgable ofthem.c.An,individual qualified inradiation protection procedures whoisequippedwitharadiation doseratemonitoring device.Thisindividual shallberesponsible forproviding positivecontrolovertheactivities withintheareaandshallperformperiodicradiation surveillance atthefrequency specified bythefacilityHealthPhysicist intheRadiation WorkPermit.6.12.2Therequirements of6.12.1,above,shallalsoradiation areainwhichtheintensity ofradiation ismrem/hr.Inaddition, lockeddoorsshallbeprovidedunauthorized entryintosuchareasandthekeysshalltheadministrative controloftheShiftSupervisor onHealthPhysicist.
: a. Component cooling water system                                    At all times*      20
applytoeachhighgreaterthan1000topreventbemaintained underdutyand/orthePlant*HealthPhysicspersonnel shallbeexemptfromtheRWPissuancerequirement duringtheperformance oftheirassignedradiation protection duties,providedtheycomplywithapprovedradiation protection procedures forentryintohighradiation areas.ST.LUCIEUNIT16-25May13,1982 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS6.17PROCESSCONTROLPROGRAM(PCP)6.17.1Thelicensee's PCPforSOLIDIFICATION (ifapplicable) shallbeapprovedbytheCommission priortoimplementation; or6.17.2Ifthelicenseeusesacontractor tosolidifyradioactive wastes,thelicenseeshalluseacontractor (orcontractor'-s PCP"forSOLIDIFICATION) whichhasbeenapprovedbytheCommission.
*During releases via this pathway
6.17.3Licenseeinitiated change(s) tohisPCPforSOLIDIFICATION:
 
1.Shallbecomeeffective uponreviewandacceptance bytheFRG2.Shallbe'ubmitted totheCommission inthesemi-annual Radioactive EffluentReleaseReportfortheperiodinwhichthechange(s) wasmade.Theinformation submitted shallcontain:a.Adescription ofthechange(s) whichwasmadeandthereasonsforsuchchanges.b.Adetermination thatthechangedidnotreducetheoverallconformance ofthesolidified wasteproducttoexistingcriteriaforsolidwastes;andc.Documentation ofthefactthatthechangehasbeenreviewedandfoundacceptable bytheFRG.6.17.4Licenseeinitiated changestothePCPforDEWATERING:
TABLE 3.3-12 TABLE NOTATION ACTION 18  With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases may be resumed for up to 14 days, provided that prior to initiating a release:
1.Shallbecomeeffective uponreviewandacceptance bytheFRG.6.18OFFSITEDOSECALCULATION MANUAL(ODCM)6.18.1TheODCMshallbeapprovedbytheCommission priortoimplementation 6.18.2Licenseeinitiated changestotheODCM:1.Shallbe'aprovedbytheFacilityReviewGroup(FRG)andshallbecomeeffective uponFRGapproval.
: 1. At least two independent samples are analyzed in accordance with Specification 4.11.1.1.1 and;
2.ShallbereportedtotheNRCasanattachment totheSemiannual Radioactive EffluentReleaseReportforthereporting periodthatthechange(s) wereimplemented.
: 2. At least two technically qualified members of the Facility Staff, one to perform, and one to verify the release rate calculations and discharge valving.
Thisattachedreportshallcontain:a.AFRGapprovedcopyoftheODCMshowingthechangesb.Adetermination thatthechangewillnotreducetheaccuracyorreliability ofdosecalculations orsetpointdeterminations.
Otherwise, suspend release of radioactive effluents via this pathway.
ST.LUCIEUNITI6-27tray13,1982 0ope}}
ACTON 19    With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue for up to 90 days    if there is no primary-to-secondary leakage indicated by the air ejector monitor. If the air ejector monitor indicates primary-to-secondary leakage, releases may continue for up to 30 days provided grab samples are analyzed for gross radioactivity (beta or gamma) at limit of detection of at least 2 X 10-7 uCi/gm.
: 1. At least once per  8 hours when the specific, activity of the secondary coolant  is )0.01  uCi/gram DOSE EQUIVALENT I-131.
: 2. At least once per 24 hours when the specific activity of the secondary coolant is <0.01 uCi/gram DOSE EQUIVALENT I-131.
E ACTION 20  With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue for up to 30 days provided that at least once per 8 hour grab samples are collected and analyzed for gross radioactivity (beta or gamma) at a limit of detection .of at least 2 X  10-7 uCi/ml.
ST. LUCIE UNIT                      3/4  3-47 Hay 13, 1982
 
TABLE  4.3-8 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS CHANNEL                    CHANNEL              CHANNEL INSTRUMENT                                CHECK                  CALIBRATION        FUNCTIONAL TEST
: 1. Gross Beta  or Gamma Radioactivity Monitors providing alarm and automatic isolation
: a. Liquid Radwaste Effluent Line      P                        R(3)                   Q(1)
: b. Steam Generator  Blowdown Effluent Line                                                R(3)                  Q(1)
: 2. Gross Beta or Gamma Radioactivity Monitors providing alarm but not providing automatic isolation (4)
: a. Component Cooling Water Sys.                                 R(3)                  Q(2)
*During releases via this pathway
 
TABLE  4.3-8 TABLE NOTATION (l)  The CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall also demonstrate that automatic isolation of this pathway and control room alarm annunciation occurs any of the following conditions exist:
if
: l. Instrument indicates measured levels above the alarm/trip setpoint.
: 2. Circuit failure.
: 3. Instrument controls not set in operate mode.
(2)  The CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST  shall also demonstrate that control room alarm annunciation occurs  if any  of the following conditions exist:
: l. Instrument indicates measured levels above the alarm/trip setpoint.
: 2. Circuit failure.
: 3. Instrument controls not set  in operate mode.
(3)  The  initial'HANNEL CALIBRATION for radioactivity measurement instrumentation shall be performed using one or more of the reference standards traceable to the National Bureau of Standards or using standards that have been calibrated against standards certified by the NBS. These standards should permit calibrating the system over its
    ~ intended range of energy and rate capabilities that are typical of normal plant operation. For subsequent CHANNEL CALIBRATION, button sources that have been related to the initial calibration may be used, at intervals of at least once per eighteen months. This can normally be accomplished during refueling outages.
(4) This requirement is applicable only to systems where the component cooling water system is discharged to an effluent stream.
ST. LUCIE UNIT                      3/4  3-49 May 13, 1982
 
INSTRUMENTATION RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS PROCESS AND 'EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION LIMITING CONDITION  FOR OPERATION 3.3.3.10 The radioactive gaseous process and effluent monitoring instrumentation channels shown in Table 3.3-13 shall be OPERABLE with their alarm/trip setpoints set to ensure that the limits of Specification 3 .11.2.1 are not exceeded. The alarm/trip setpoints of these channels shall be determined in accordance with the ODCM Methodology.
APPLICABILITY: As shown    in Table 3 .3-13 .
ACTION
: a. With a radioactive gaseous process or effluent monitoring instrumentation channel alarm/trip setpoint less conservative than a value which will ensure that the limits of 3.11.2.1 are met, declare the channel inoperable or reset the channel setpoints immediately to ensure that the limi.ts of 3.11.2.1 are met.
: b. With less than the number of channels required    OPERABLE  by Table 3.3-13, take the ACTION shown in Table 3.3-13.
: c. The  provisions of Specifications 3 .0.3 and 3 .0.4 are not applicable.
SURVEILLANCE REOUIREMENTS 4.3.3.10 Each radioactive gaseous process or effluent monitoring instrumentation channel shall be demonstrated OPERABLE by performance of the CHANNEL CHECK, CHANNEL CALIBRATION, and CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST operations during the MODES and at the frequencies shown in Table 4.3-9.
ST. LUCIE UNIT  1                3/4  3-50 May 13, 1982
 
TABLE 3.3-13 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION A
MINIMUM CHANNELS INSTRUMENT                                OPERABLE          APPLICABILITY          PARAMETER            ACTION
: 1. Waste Gas Holdup System
: a. Noble Gas  Activity Monitor                                                Radioactivity Rate      25 Measurement
: 2. Plant Vent, Fuel Bldg. Vent, ECCS-A Vent & ECCS-B Vent          As  per Table 3.3-6
: 3. Blowdown  Building Vent System
: a. Noble Gas  Activity Monitor                                                Radioactivity Rate      27 Measurement
: b. Iodine Sampler Cartridge                                                  Verify presence of      30 cartridge
: c. Particulate  Sampler  Filter                                              Verify presence of      -30 filter
: 4. Air Ejector  Vent
: a. Noble Gas  Activity Monitor                                                Radioactivity Rate      28 Measurement
: 5. Waste Gas Holdup System Explosive  Gas Monitoring System (Gas Surge Tank)
: a. Hydrogen                            (1)                                   % Hydrogen              29
: b. Oxygen                              (1)                                   % Oxygen                29
* During releases via this pathway                                                              ontrol Tank
  ** During  Waste Gas System Operation when hydrogen      is used as a cover gas on the Volume Contro    a
 
TABLE  3.3-13 TABLE NOTATION ACTION 25 With the      number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, the contents of the tanks may be released to the environment for up to 30 days provided that prior to initiating the release:
: 1. At least two independent samples of the tank's contents are analyzed, and
: 2. At least two technically qualified members of the Facility Staff, one to perform, and one to verify the release rate calculations and discharge valve lineup; Otherwise, suspend release of radioactive effluents via this pathway.
ACTION 27      With the number  of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels  OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue for up to 30 days provided grab samples are collected and analyzed for gross activity at least once per 24 hours.
ACTION 28 With the      number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels    OPERABLE requirement, immediately route the Air Ejector Vent to the Plant Vent Pathway.
ACTION 29-   With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, operation of this waste gas holdup system may continue indefinitely provided that grab samples are collected and analyzed at least once per shift.
ACTION 30-    With the number of channels      OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels    OPERABLE  requirement, effluent releases via this  pathway may  conti.nue for up to 30 days provided samples are continuously collected with auxiliary sampling equipment for periods on the order of seven (7) days and analyzed within 48 hours of the end of sample collection.
ST. LUCIE UNIT                      3/4  3-52 Hay 13, 1982
 
TABLE 4.3-9 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENZ MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS CHANNEL                          CHANNEL                          CHANNEL INSTRUMENT                                        CHECK"                      CALIBRATION                    FUNCTIONAL TEST
: 1. Waste Gas Holdup System
: a. Noble Gas  Activity Monitor                                      R(3)
: 2. Plant Vent, Fuel Building Vent, ECCS-A Vent,  6 ECCS-B Vent          As  per Table 4.3-3
: 3. Blowdown Building Vent  System
: a. Noble Gas  Activity Monitor                                      R(3)                              Z(2)
: b. Iodine Sampler                                                    N/A                              N/A
: c. Particulate Sampler                                              N/A                              N/A
: 4. Air Ejector  Vent
: a. Noble Gas  Activity Monitor                                      R(3)                             a(2)
: 5. Waste Gas Holdup System Explosive
      -Gas Monitoring System
: a. Hydrogen                                                          q(4)
: b. Oxygen                                  D**                      q(5)
*During releases via this pathway
*"During Waste Gas Holdup System Operation    when hydrogen  is used as a cover gas on the Volume Control Tank
 
                                  ~)
TABLE 4.3-9 TABLE NOTATION (1) The CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall also demonstrate that automatic isolation of this pathway and control room alarm annunciation occurs any of the following conditions exist:
if
: l. Instrument indicates measured levels above the alarm/trip setpoint.
: 2. Circuit failure.
: 3. Instrument controls not set in operate mode.
(2) The CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall  also demonstrate  that control room alarm annunciation occurs  if any of the following conditions exist:
: l. Instrument indicates measured levels above the alarm/trip setpoint.
: 2. Circuit failure.
: 3. Instrument controls not set. in operate mode.
(3) The  initial CHANNEL CALIBRATION for radioactivity  measurement instrumentation shall be performed using one or more of the reference standards traceable to the National Bureau of Standards or using standards that have been calibrated against standards certified by the NBS. These standards should permit calibrating the system over its intended range of energy and rate capabilities that are typical of normal plant operations. For subsequent CHANNEL CALIBRATION, button sources that have been related to the initial calibration may be used, at intervals of at least once per eighteen months. This can normally be accomplished during refueling outages.
(4) The CHANNEL CALIBRATION shall include the use of standard gas samples containing a nominal:
: 1. Nominal one volume percent hydrogen, balance nitrogen, and
: 2. Nominal four volume percent hydrogen, balance nitrogen.
(5) The GUNNEL CALIBRATION shall include the use of standard gas samples containing a nominal:
: 1. Nominal one volume percent oxygen, balance nitrogen, and
: 2. Nominal four volume percent oxygen, balance  nitrogen.
ST. LUCIE UNIT  1                  3/4  3-54 May 13, 1982
 
3/4 ~ 11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.1     LIQUID EFFLUENTS CONCENTRATION LIMITING CONDITION      FOR OPERATION 3.11.1.1 The concentration of radioactive material released from the site to unrestricted areas ( see Figure 3 .11-1) shall be limited to the concentrations specified in 10CFR20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 for radionuclides other than dissolved or entrained noble gases. The concentration for total dissolved or entrained noble gases shall be limited to 2 X 10 4 uCi/ml.
APPLICABILITY: At      all times ACTION a~      With the concentration of radioactive material released from the site to unrestricted areas exceeding, the above limits, immediately restore concentration within the above limits and provide prompt notification to the Commission pursuant to Specificatoin 6.9.1.12.
: b.     The provisions of Specification 3.0.3    and 3.0.4 are not applicable.
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.1.1.1    The  radioactivity content of each batch of radioactive liquid waste  to'e  discharged shall be determined prior to release by sampling and analysis in accordance with Table 4 .11-1. The results of pre-release analyses shall be used with the calculational methods in the "ODCM" to assure that the concentration at the point of release is limited to the values in Specification 3.11.1.1.
4.11.1.1.2    The radioactivity concentration of liquids discharged from continuous release points shall be determined by collection and analysis of samples in accordance with Table 4 .11-1. The results of the analyses shall be used with the calculational methods in the "ODCM" to assure that the concentrations at the point of release are limited to the values in Specification 3.11.1.1.
4.11.1.1.3 Post-release analyses of samples composited from batch releases shall be performed in accordance with Table 4.11-1.
ST. LUCIE UNIT    1                3/4  11-1 tray 13, 1982
 
TABLE F  11-1 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM Minimum                          Lower Limit of Sampling      Analysis        Type Of        Detection (LLD)
Liquid Release Type    Frequency    Frequency  Activity Analysis (uCi/ml) a A. Batch Waste                                    Principal  .Gamma Release Tanks                                    Emitters              5 X 10 Each Batch    Each Batch I-131            1 X 10 p                        Dissolved and One  Batch/M                  Entrained Gases        1 X 10-5 H-3              1X105 Gross Alpha          1 X 10 Each Batch    Composite Sr-89, Sr-90          SX108 Each Batch    Composite Fe-55            1X10 B. Plant Continuous                              Principal  Gamma Releases  e, f                                  Emitters            5 X 10 7 4/M          4/M I-131            1 X 10 Dissolved and        1  X 10 Entrained Gases H-3            1  X 10 5 4/M                        Gross Alpha          1X107 Composite 4/M            Q        Sr-89, Sr-90          SX108 Composite Fe-55            1  X 10 3/4    11-2 ST. LUCIE UNIT  1 May 13, 1982
 
TABLE 4  'l-l TABLE NOTATION
: a. The LLD    is the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that  will be    detected with 95% probability with 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation- represents a "real" signal. The Lower Limit of Detection is a priori Limit where the analysis technique shall be capable of detecting the stated values          if a blank sample were counted.
LLD=                          4.66  S x 106  e-Lambda  t Where:
sb        is the standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of a blank sample as appropriate (in counts per minute) is  the counting efficiency (as counts per transformation) is  sample volume  in appropriate units 6
2.22    X 10    transformations per minute per microCurie is the Chemical Separation Yield      (when applicable) is base 2.71828 Lambda    is decay constant is either:
The elapsed time between the midpoint of sample collection and the time of counting (for composite strontium only) 2 ~  The elapsed time between the sample time and the time at midcount (for pha counting only)
The  units of t shall match the time units of      Lambda in both cases.
: b. A batch release is the discharge of liquid wastes of a discrete volume.
Each batch release        tank shall be isolated and thoroughly mixed prior to sampling for a release.
: c. The  principal gamma emitters for which the LLD limit specification will apply are exclusively the following radionuclides: Mn-54, Pe-59, Co-58, Co-60, Zn-65, Mo-99, Cs-134, Cs-137, Ce-141, and Ce-144. This list does not mean that only these nuclides are to be detected and reported. Other peaks which are measureable and identifiable, together with the above nuclides, shall also be identified and reported. Nuclides which are below the LLD for the analyses should not be reported as being present at the LLD  level.
ST. LUCIE UNIT    I                    3/4  11-3 May 13, 1982
 
TABLE 4.11-1 TABLE NOTATION
: d. A  composite sample is one in which the quantity of liquid sampled is proportional to the quantity of liquid waste discharged and in which the method of sampling employed results in a specimen which is representative of the liquids released. Prior to analysis, all samples taken for the composite shall be thoroughly mixed in order for the composite sample to be representative of the effluent release.
: e. A continuous release  is the discharge of liquid  wastes of a nondiscrete volume; e. g., from a system  that has an  input flow during the continuous release.
: f. If Component  Cooling Water activity is >1 X 10    uCi/ml, perform a weekly gross  activity on the Intake Cooling Water System outlet to ensure the activity level is ( a 2 X 10 uCi/ml LLD limit. If ICW is )2 X 10 7 uCi/ml, perform analysis in accordance with a Plant Continuous Release on this Table.
ST. LUCIE UNIT  1                  3/4  11-4 May 13, 1982
 
Dcno tcs Unrestricted          Ar~Boundry I,ine for. the                  ST.  'IE SITE
          'I;<p;~kg'.:"', ~ ~,~".>~;"'g''j~::;;@.~;,  gFwj.:-".-:-
Minimum Distance for Radioactive Gaseous Releases from Plant Vent to Site Boundry j,J~pi>+~i~ .;~A:,;F
                                ~
                                                .W,,c~y  i~We<<-~~>d!>,
Outlet to Discharge Pipe ( Liq. Radioactive Effluents Normal SCALE IN FEET 0        1000 2000            3000 I'~~<ere 3.$              l-l Uarestxicied Area Soumdry I'or Yhe St. Lucie Site Hay 13, 1982 11-5
 
RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS DOSE LIMITING CONDITION    FOR OPERATION II 3.11.1.2    The dose  or dose commitment to an individual from radioactive materials in liquid effluents released to unrestricted areas (see Figure 3.11-1) shall be limited:
During any calendar quarter to <1.5 mrem to the    total body and to <5 mrem to any organ.
APPLICABILITY: At      all times ACTION:
: a. With the calculated dose from the release of radioactive materials in liquid effluents exceeding any of the above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report which identifies the cause(s) for exceeding the limit(s) and defines the corrective actions to be taken to reduce the releases of radioactive materials in liquid effluents during the remainder of the current calendar quarter and subsequent quarters.
The Special Report exempts a Licensee Event R'eport on the above limits.
: b. The  provisions of Specifications  3 .0.3 and 3 .0.4 are not applicable.
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.1.2  . Dose Calculations. Cumulative dose contributions from liquid effluents shall be determined in accordance with the methodology in the ODCM at least once per 31 days.
ST    LUCIE UNIT  1                3/4  11-6 May 13, 1982
 
RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT S LIQUID WASTE TREATMENT LIMITING CONDITION    FOR OPERATION 3.11.1.3    The appropriate subsystems of the liquid radwaste treatment system shall  be OPERABLE to reduce the radioactive materials in liquid waste prior to their discharge when the projected monthly dose due to liquid effluent releases to unrestricted areas (see Figure 3.11-1) when averaged over 31 days would exceed 0.12 mrem to the total body and 0.4 mrem to any organ.
APPLICABILITY: At      all  times ACTION'ith the  liquid  radwaste treatment system inoperable    for more than 31 days or    with radioactive liquid waste being discharged without treatment and in excess of the above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report which includes the following information (The Special Report exempts a Licensee Event Report on the above        limits):
: l. Identification    of equipment or subsystems not OPERABLE and      a description of alternate equipment used for treatment of radioactive liquid effluent.
: 2. Action(s) taken to restore the inoperable equipment, or backup equipment, to OPERABLE status.
J
: 3. Summary  description of action(s) taken to prevent      a recurrence.
: b. The  provisions of Specifications    3 .0.3 and 3 .0.4 are not applicable.
SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS 4.11.1.3.1 Doses due to liquid releases to unrestricted areas shall be projected at least once per 31 days as per the ODCM methodology unless the liquid  radwaste treatment system    is  being used.
4.11.1.3.2 The appropriate liquid radwaste subsystems shall be demonstrated OPERABLE  at least once per 92 days unless the appropriate liquid radwaste subsystem has been utilized to process radioactive liquid effluents during the previous 92 days.
ST. LUCIE UNIT    1                3/4  11-7 May 13,  1982
 
RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4-11.2    GASEOUS EFFLUENTS DOSE RATE LIMITING CONDITION      FOR OPERATION 3.11.2.1  The instantaneous dose rate in unrestricted areas (see Figure 3.11-1)  due to radioactive materials released in gaseous effluents from the site  shall be limited to the following values:
: a. The dose rate limit for noble gases shall be <500 mrem/yr to the      total body and <3000 mrem/yr to the skin, and
: b. For the inhalation pathway the dose rate      limit for I-131, Tritium and for radioactive materials in particulate form with half lives greater than 8 days shall be <1500 mrem/yr to any organ.
                                          'V APPLICABILITY: At      all  times ACTION:
a~    With the dose rate(s) exceeding the above limits, immediately decrease the release rate to comply with the limit(s) given in Specification 3.11.2.1 and provide prompt notification to the Commission pursuant .to Specification 6.9.1.12.
: b. The provisions of Specifications 3.0.3    and  3.0.4 are not applicable.
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.2.1.1    The  instantaneous release rate of noble gases in gaseous effluents shall    be  continuously monitored for the release points given  in Table 3.3-13.
4.11.2.1.2 The release rate of radioactive materials other than noble gases, in gaseous effluents shall be determined by obtaining representative samples and performing analyses in accordance with the sampling and analysis program, specified in Table 4.11-2.
4.11.2.1.3 The instantaneous dose rate in unrestricted areas, due to radioactive materials other than noble gases released in gaseous effluents, shall be determined to be within the required limits by using the methodology prescribed by the ODCM on the results of the sampling and analysis program specified in Table 4 .11-2 .
ST. LUCIE UNIT    1                  3/4  11-8 May 13, 1982
 
TABLE 4 ~ 11-2 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM Sampling            Minimum                                      Lower Limit of Gaseous Release Type      Frequency            Analysis                      Type Of      Detection (LLD)
Frequency                Activit Analysis      (UCi/101)
A. Waste Gas Storage Tank            P                  P          Noble Gas (Batch)g                    Each Tank            Each Tank      Principal  Gamma Emitters        1X104 B. Containment Purge                  P                  P          Noble Gas                        1  X 10 Each Purge          Each Purge      Principal  Gamma Emitters H-3                              1X10 C. Plant Vent, Fuel Building                                          Noble Gas                        1X104 Vent, )lowdown Building Vent                                      Principal  Gamma  Emitters System H-3                              1X1O6 4/Mi                4/M          H-3                              1X 1O6 D. All Release Types as  Listed                                      I-131                            1x 1o'2 in C. above                  Continuous  .        Charcoal Sample
                                                                    .I-133                          1  X 10 4 M Continuous          Particulate      Particulate Sample        Principal Gamma Emitters        1X1O" M
Continuous          Composite        Gross Alpha                    1X1O" Particulate Sample 0
Continuous          Composite        Sr-89; Sr-90                    1X1O" Particulate Sample Continuous      Noble Gas Monitor  Noble Gas Gross Beta  & Gamma    1  X 1O 4
 
TABLE  4.11-2 (continued)
TABLE NOTATION
: a. The lower    limit of detection    (LLD)  is defined in Table Notation    a. of Table 4.11-1.
: b. The  principal gamma emitters for which the LLD Limit Specification will apply are exclusively the following radionuclides: Kr-87, Kr-88, Xe-133, Xe-133m, Xe-135, and Xe-138 for noble gas emissions and Mn-54, Fe-59, Co-58, Co-60, Zn-65, Mo-99, Cs-134, Cs-137, Ce-141, Ce-144, and I-131 for particulate emissions. This list does not mean that only these nuclides are to be detected and reported. Other peaks which are measurable and identifiable, together with the above nuclides shall also be identified and reported.      Nuclides which are below the LLD for the analyses should not be reported as being present at the LLD level for that nuclide.
: c. Tritium grab    samples shall be taken prior .to each purge release, but the sample may be analyzed after the batch release when the sample counting solution has stabilized to allow an accurate determination of activity.
: d. Sampling Frequency and Minimum Analysis Frequency are applicable only during releases via this pathway.
: e. The ratio of the sample flow      rate to the sampled stream flow rate shall      be known for the time period in      Specifications 3 .11.2 .1, 3 .11.2 .2, and
: 3. 11.2.3.
: f. If the    analysis frequency is daily, the      LLD limit may be increased    by a factor of    10.
: g. A  batch release    is the discharge of gaseous waste of a discrete volume.
: h. A  purge  is  a  batch release from the containment building.
The  Plant Vent shall be sampled for Tritium at this frequency Containment Purge Exhaust is operating as a continuous release.
if the ST. LUCIE UNIT                          3/4  11-10 Nay 13, 1982
 
RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS DOSE,  NOBLE GASES LIMITING CONDITION    FOR OPERATION 3.11.2.2    The air  dose  in unrestricted  areas (see Figure  3 .11-1) due to noble gases released    in  gaseous effluents shall  be  limited to the following:
: a. During any calendar quarter, to <5 mrad      for  gamma radiation  and <10 mrad  for beta radiation.
APPLICABILITY: At    all  times ACTION:
: a. With the calculated air dose from radioactive noble gases in gaseous effluents exceeding any of the above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report which identifies the cause(s) for exceeding the limit(s) and define the corrective actions to be taken to reduce the releases of radioactive noble gases in gaseous effluents during the remainder of the current calendar quarter. The Special Report exempts a Licensee Event Report on the above limits.
: b. The  provisions of Specifications    3 .0.3 and 3 .0.4 are not applicable.
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.2.2.1 Dose Calculations  Cumulative dose contributions for the current calendar quarter shall be determined in accordance with the methodology in the ODCM at least once every 31 days.
ST. LUCIE UNIT  '1 3/4  11-11 May 13, 1982
 
RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS DOSE,  RADIOIODINES, RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL IN PARTICULATE FORM, AND RADIONUCLIDES OTHER THAN NOBLE GASES LIMITING CONDITION    FOR OPERATION 3.11.2.3    The dose  to an individual from radioiodines, radioactive materials in particulate form,    and radionuclides other than noble gaes with half-lives greater than 8 days in gaseous effluents released to unrestricted areas (see Figure 3.11-1) shall be limited to the following:
: a. During any calendar quarter to <7.5    mrem  to any organ.
APPLICABILITY: At    all times ACTION:
: a. With the calculated dose from the release of radioiodines, radioactive materials in particulate form, or radionuclides other than noble gases in gaseous effluents exceeding any of the above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report which identifies the cause( s) for exceeding the limit and defines the corrective actions to be taken to reduce the releases of radioiodines, radioactive materials in particulate form, and radionuclides other than noble gases with half-lives greater than 8 days in gaseous effluents during the remainder of the current calendar quarter. The Special Report exempts a Licensee Event Report on the above  limit.
: b. The  provisions of Specifications 3.0.3    and  3.0.4 are not applicable.
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.2.3 Dose Calculations  Cumulative dose contributions for the current calendar quarter shall be determined in accordance with the methodology in the ODCM at least once every 31 days.
ST. LUCIE UNIT                    3/4  11-12 May 13, 1982
 
RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT LIMITING CONDITION      FOR OPERATION 3.11.2.4 The appropriate subsystems of the gaseous radwaste treatment system shall be OPERABLE. The gaseous radwaste treatment system shall be used to reduce radioactive materials in gaseous waste prior to their discharge when the projected gaseous effluent doses due to gaseous effluent releases to unrestricted areas (see Figure 3 .11-1) when averaged over 31 days would exceed 0.4 mrad      for gamma radiation  and 0.8 mrad for beta radiation.
APPLICABILITY: At      all times ACTION:
: a. With the gaseous Waste Treatment System inoperable for more than 31 days or with gaseous waste being discharged without treatment and in excess of the above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report which includes the following information (The Special Report exempts a Licensee Event Report on the above limits):
: 1. Identification of equipment or subsystems not OPERABLE and    a description of alternate equipment used for treatment of radioactive gaseous effluents.
: 2. Action(s) taken to restore the inoperable equipment, or backup equipment, to OPERABLE status.
: 3. Summary  description of action( s) taken to prevent a recurrance.
: b. The  provisions of Specification 3 .0.3 and 3 .0.4 are not applicable.
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.2.4.1 Doses due to gaseous releases to unrestricted areas shall          be projected at least once per 31 days as per the ODCM methodology unless gaseous    radwaste treatment system    is in use.
4.11.2,.4.2    The appropriate 'subsystems shall be demonstrated OPERABLE at least  once per 92 days unless the appropriate subsystem has been utilized      to process radioactive gaseous effluents during the previous 92 days.
ST. LUCIE UNIT    '1 3/4  11-13 May 13, 1982
 
RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS EXPLOSIVE GAS MIXTURE LIMITING CONDITION      FOR OPERATION 3 ~ 11.2.5    The concentration of oxygen in the gaseous waste holdup system shall  be  limited to  < 4% by volume whenever the hydrogen concentration exceeds    4%  by volume.
APPLICABILITY: At all times when hydrogen        is  used as a cover gas on the Volume Control Tank.
ACTION:
: a. With the concentration of oxygen in the gaseous waste holdup system
        )4% by volume, immediately suspend all additions of waste gases to the affected gas decay tank and reduce the concentration of oxygen in the remainder of the system to less than 4% by volume within 8 hours. The affected gas decay tank should be discharged as soon as possible provided that the Specifications of 3.11.2.1 are not exceeded in the process.
: b. The  provisions of Specifications  3 .0.3  and 3 .0.4 are not applicable.
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.2.5    The concentrations of hydrogen and oxygen in the gaseous waste holdup system shall be determined to be within the above limitsby monitoring the waste gases with the hydrogen and oxygen monitors required OPERABLE by Table 3.3-13 of Specification 3.3.3.10.
ST. LUCIE UNIT                      3/4  11-14
 
RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS GAS STORAGE TANKS LIMITING CONDITION    FOR OPERATION 3.11.2.6    The quantity of radioactivity contained in each gas storage tank shall  be  limited to <285,000 Curies noble gases (considered as Xe-133).
APPLICABILITY: At    all times ACTION:
: a. With the quantity of radioactive material in any gas decay tank exceeding the above limit, immediately suspend all additions of radioactive material to the tank and within 48 hours either reduce the tank contents to within the limit or provide prompt notification to the Commission pursuant to Specification 6.9.1..12 'he    written follow-up report shall include a description of activities planned and/or taken to reduce the tank contents to within the above limit.
: b. The  provisions of Specifications 3.0.3 and 3 .0.4 are not applicable.
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.2.6    The quantity of radioactive material contained in each gas decay tank shall be determined to be within the above limit at least once per 24 hours when the Reactor Coolant System Gross Activity exceeds the activity limit of Specification 3.4.8.b.
ST. LUCIE UNIT                    3/4  11-15 May 13, 1982
 
RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS
'OLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE LIMITING CONDITION  FOR OPERATION 3.11.3    Solidified radioactive waste or waste containing free standing liquids shall be processed in accordance with a PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM prior to being shipped to a radioactive waste disposal facility.
APPLICABILITY: At    all times ACTION
: a. With the waste form requirements for transportation or disposal of solidified radioactive waste (or waste containing free standing liquids), pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations and the applicable burial site regulations, not satisfied, suspend shipments of such radioactive waste to the burial site.
: b. The provisions of Specifications 3.0.3  and 3 .0.4 are not applicable.
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.3 For each radioactive waste container used to collect liquid radioactive waste (or waste containing free standing liquids), prior to shipment to a radioactive waste disposal facility, the licensee shall certify that he has followed the minimum requirements of the applicable procedures of the PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM.
ST. LUCIE UNIT  ]                3/4  11-16 May 13, 1982
 
3/4. 12  RADIOLOGIC      ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 3/4.12.1    MONITORING PROGRAM LIMITING CONDITION      FOR OPERATION 3.12.1  The radiologica environmental monitoring program shall          e conducte as  specified in Table 3.12-1 and Table 4.12-1.
APPLICABILITY: At        all times.
ACTION a~  With the radiological environmental monitoring program not being conducted as specified in Tables 3.12-1 and 4.12-1, prepare and submit to the Commission, in the annual Radiological Monitoring Report, a description of the reasons for not conducting the program as specified. Deviations from Specification 3 .12.1 may occur because samples are unobtainable due to hazardous conditions, biological or seasonal unavailability, or due to vandalism, or to malfunction of sampling or analytical equipment, laboratory accidents, sampling errors, or other legitimate reasons. If deviations occur because of malfunction of sampling or analytical equipment, every effort shall be made to complete corrective action prior to the end of the next sampling period. A description of all deviations from Tables 3.12-1 and 4.12-1, the reasons for all such deviations and a description of any corrective actions initiated or planned to bring the radiological environmental surveillance program back in accordance with Specification 3.12.1 shall be provided in the annual Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report. A current list of sample locations used during the reporting period shall be included in the annual Radiological Monitoring Report. Sample location changes from the year,  if  any, should be identified along with a brief    'receding description of the reason for the change.
: b. With the confirmed* level of radioactivity in an environmental sampling medium at one or more of the locations, outside of the plant circulating water system, specified in Table 3.12-1 exceeding the limits of Table 6.9.3-2 when averaged over any calendar quarter, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days from the end of the affected calendar quarter (or from the time of the confirmatory result  if  such result is not received until after the end of the quarter    in which the original sample was collected), a Special Report which includes an evaluation of any release conditions, environmental factors or other aspects which may have caused the limits of Table 6.9.3-2 to be exceeded. This report is not required        if the measured level of radioactivity was not the result of plant effluents; however, in such an event, the conditions shall be reported and described in the annual Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report. This Special Report exempts a Licensee Event Report.
* A  confirmatory reanalysis of the original, a duplicate, or a new sample may be      desirable, as appropriate. The results of the confirmatory analysis shall be completed at the. earliest time consistent with the analysis, but in any case within 30 days.
ST. LUCIE UNIT    'I                    3/4  12-1 May 13, 1982
: c. With milk or garden vegetation samples unava lable from any of the sample locations required by Table 3.12-1, information shall be included in the annual Radiological Monitoring Report identifying the cause of the unavailability and identifying replacement locations where samples were obtained. If replacement samples are unavailable during the specified time interval, a special report pursuant to specification 6.9.2 shall be submitted to the Commission within 30 days from the time the licensee has been properly notified and will identify the cause of the unavailability of the samples and a discussion of the plans for obtianing future samples. If new permanent sample locations are required; once they have been selected and sample availability is established, the locations from which the samples are unavailable may be deleted from the program, and the locations from which the samples will be obtained in the future are incorporated in the environmental monitoring program as new sample locations.
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.12.1.1      The radiological environmental monitoring samples shall be collected pursuant to Table 3.12-1 and shall be analyzed pursuant to the requirements of Tables 3.12-1 and 4.12-1.
ST. LUCIE UNIT  1                  3/4  12-2 Hay 13, 1982
 
iL ~
TABLE 3.12-1 ST. LUCIE SITE  RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM Fxposure Pathway                Sample            Sampling and  (b)    Type and Frequency    (c) and/or Sample              Locations          Collection Frequency          of Analysis
: l. Airborne
: a. Radioiodine  &      9 locations          Continuous operation of Radioiodine filters Particulates                            sampler with collection    I-131  weekly at least weekly Particulate    filters Gross beta  weekly: Analyze each  filter  for gross beta radioactivity  > 24 hour following filter change.
Gamma  isotopic (Composite)
Quarterly A gamma isotopic is also required for each sample having a gross beta radioactivity which is >1.0 pCilm3and which is also >10 times that of the most recent control sample.
: 2. Direct Radiation      29  locations        Quarterly              Gamma  exposure'ate    quarterly
: 3. Waterborne
: a. Surface            4  locations          Monthly                Gamma  isotopic  and  tritium analysis    Monthly
: b. Ground  (well)    2  locations          Quarterly              Gamma  isotopic  and  tritium analysis  Quarterly
: c. Drinking          3  locations          Quarterly              Gross beta, gamma isotopic and tritium analysis  Quarterly
: d. Sediment from      4  locations          Semiannually            Gamma  isotopic analysis shoreline                                                        Semiannually
 
TABLE 3 ~ 12-1 ST. LUCIE SITE  RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM Exposure Pathway                Sample                Sampling and    b)            Type and Frequency  (c and/or Sample              Locations              Collection Fre uency                    of Analysis
: 4. Ingestion
: a. Milk              2  locations              Semi-Monthly                Gamma  isotopic and  I-131 analysis Control samples    Monthly Semi-monthly.-
Control samples  Gamma isotopic and I-131 analysis  Monthly
: b. Fish  and Invertebrates
: 1. Crustacea    2  locations              Semi-Annually              Gamma  isotopic analysis  Semi-Annually
: 2. Fish          2  locations              Semi-Annually              Gamma  isotopic analysis  Semi-Annually
: c. Food  Products
: 1. Citrus        5  locations              At harvest time            Gamma  isotopic analysis  Each Sampling
: 2. Edible Garden Vegetation    2  locations              At harvest time            Gamma  isotopic analysis  Each Sampl
 
TABLE  3.12-1 TABLE NOTATION (a)  A  list  of sample locations  will be  provided on a Figure and Table in the ODCM.
(b)  The  following definition of frequencies shall apply to Table 3.12-1 only:
Weekly  Not less than once per calendar week. A maximum interval of 11 days is allowed between the collection of any two consecutive samples.
Semi-Monthly  Not less than 2 times per calendar month with an interval of not less than 7 days between, sample collections. A maximum interval of 24 days is allowed between collection of any two consecutive samples.
Monthly '- Not less than once per calendar month with an interval of not less than 10 days between sample collections.
Quarterly  Not less than once per calendar quarter with an interval of not less than 30 days between sample collections.
Semiannually  One sample each between calendar, dates (January    1 - June will be  provided between sample collections.
(c)  Frequency of analyses    to be consistent with collection frequency.
(d)  No  drinking water sources are effected by effluents from the plant.
ST. LUCIE UNIT                      3/4  12-5 May 13, 1982
 
TABLE 4.12-1.
DETECTION CAPABILITIES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE ANALYSIS LOWER  LIMIT OF DETECTION (LLD)
ANALYSIS          WATER          AIRBORNE PARTI-          FISH            MILK      FOOD PRODUCTS  SEDIMENT (PCI/L)            CULATE 0( GAS      (pCi/Kg, wet)      pCi/L        (pCi/Kg, wet) (pCi/Kg, dry)
(pCi/m )
Gross Beta              4c                1 X 10 H-3                2000 (1000 )
  ~ Mn-54                  15                                      130
  ~ Fe-59                  30                                      260 Co-58, 60              15                                      130
' ~ Zn-65                  30                                      260 Zr-95                  30 Nb-95                  15 I-131                    1c              1X1O'                                                  6Od Cs-134                  15                X 10                130                                          150 6O'Od Cs-137                  18              6X1O2                150              18                          180 Ba/La-140              35                                                        35 Note:  This list does not mean that only these radionuclides are to be detected and reported.
Other peaks which are raeasurable and identifiable (except naturally occurring radionuclides) together with the above radionuclides shall also be identified and reported.
 
TABLE  4.12-1 (continued)
NOTATION
: a. Acceptable detection capabilities for thermoluminescent dosimeters used, for environmental measurements are given in Regulatory Guide 4.13.
: b. Table indicates acceptable detection capabilities for radioactive materials in environmental samples. These detection capabilities are tabulated in terms of the lower limits of detection (LLDs). The LLD is defined, for purposes of this guide, as the smallest concentration, of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count (above system background) that will be detected with at least 95% probability with at most 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real" signal.
For  a  particular    measurement  system (which may include radiochemical separation):
4  66* sb LLD =            E    V'22          Y where LLD    is    the lower  limit of detection    as  defined above (as pCi per unit    mass  or volume).
sb is the standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of a blank sample as appropriate (as counts per minute).
E  is the counting efficiency (as counts per disintegration).
V  is the    sample size    (in units of  mass or volume).
2.22    is  the number of disintegrations per minute per picocurie.
Y  is  the  fractional radiochemical yield        (when  applicable).
* 4.66 is the factor          used when background has. been subtracted from the sample count. For measurements in which the background is not subtracted, the factor 3 .29 shall be used.
c  LLD  for drinking water d  LLD  for  garden vegetation e  Total    for parent    and  daughter ST. LUCIE UNIT      1                      3/4 May 13, 1982
 
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 3/4.12.2    LAND USE CENSUS LIMITING CONDITION    FOR OPERATION 3.12.2 A land use census shall be conducted annually to identify the location of the nearest milk animal, the nearest residence and the nearest garden+ of greater than 500 square feet producing fresh leafy vegetables in each of the 16 meteorological sectors within a distance of five miles.
APPLICABILITY: At    all times ACTION:
: a. With a land use census identifying a location(s) which yields a calculated dose or dose commitment greater than the values ccurrently being calculated in Specification 4.11.2.3, prepare and submit to the Commission within 60 days from the time the licensee receives the results of the Land Use Census, pursuant to Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report, which identifies the new location(s).
: b. With  a land use census identifying a location(s) which yields a calculated dose or dose commitment (via the same exposure pathway) 20%
greater than at a location from which samples are currently being obtained in accordance with Specification 3.12.1, prepare and submit to the Commission within 60 days from the time the licensee receives the results of the Land Use Census, pursuant to Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report, which    identifies the new location(s). The new location shall  be added to the radiological environmental monitoring program when samples become available. The sampling location having the lowest calculated dose or dose commitment (via the same exposure pathway) may be deleted from the monitoring program after (October 31) of the year in which the land use census was conducted.
: c. The  provisions of Specifications  3 .0.3 and 3 .0.4 are not applicable.
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.12.2.1 The land use census shall be conducted at least once per 12 months between the dates of February 1 and July 31, by door-to-door survey, aerial survey, or by consulting local agriculture authorities.
* Broad  leaf vegetation sampling may be performed at the site boundary in      a sector with the highest D/Q in lieu of the garden census.
ST. LUCIE UNIT  ).                  3/4  12-8 May 13, 1982
 
iO I
 
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 3/4 ~ 12.3  INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM LIMITING CONDITION      FOR OPERATION
*3.12.3 Analyses shall 'be performed on radioactive materials supplied as part of an.Interlaboratory Comparison Program which has been approved by NRC. This condition may be satisfied by participation in the Environmental Intercomparison Studies Program conducted by the EPA.
APPLICABILITY: At      all times.
ACTION:
I
: a. With analyses not being performed as required above, notify the Commission as a part of the annual Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report.
: b. The  provisions of Specification  3 .0.3 and 3 .0.4 are not applicable.
If the  Radiologi'cal Environmental Surveillance Program is carried out by the licensee, the licensee shall establish an Interlaboratory Comparison Program which'as been approved by the NRC. If the licensee is not the principle investigator, the licensee shall require the principle investigator to take part in an Interlaboratory Comparison Program. This condition may be satisfied by participation in the Environmental Radioactivity Laboratory Intercomparison Studies Program.
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.12.3 The results of available analyses performed as part of the above required Interlaboratory Comparison Program shall be included in the annual Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report pursuant to Specification 6.9.3.2.
ST. LUCIE UNIT    f                  3/4  12-9 Hay 13, 1982
 
INSTRUMENTATION BASES 3/4.3.3.9    RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT INSTRUMENTATION The radioactive  liquid effluent instrumentation is provided to monitor  and control, as  applicable, the releases of radioactive materials in liquid effluents during actual or potential releases. The alarm trip setpoints for these instruments shall be calculated in accordance with approved methods in the ODCM to ensure that the alarm/trip will occur prior to exceeding the limits of 10 CFR Part 20. The OPERABILITY and use of this instrumentation is consistent with the requirements of General Design Criteria 60, 63 and 64 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50.
3/4.3.3.10    RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT INSTRUMENTATION The  radioactive gaseous effluent instrumentation is provided to monitor  and  control, as applicable, the releases of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents during actual or potential releases. The alarm/trip setpoints for these instruments shall be calculated in accordance with methods in the ODCM to ensure that the alarm/trip will occur prior to exceeding the limits of 10 CFR Part 20. The OPERABILITY and use of this instrumentation is consistent with the requirements of General Design Criteria 60, 63 and 64 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50.
ST. LUCIE UNIT  1              B  3/4 3-4 May 13, 1982
 
3/4  ~ 11  RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASES 3/4.11.1    LIQUID EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.1 '    CONCENTRATION This specification is provided to ensure that the concentration of radioactive materials released in liquid waste effluents from the site to unrestricted areas will be less than the concentration levels specified in 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B, Table II. This limitation provides additional assurance that the levels of radioactive materials in bodies of water outside the site will not result in exposures within (1) the Section II.A design objectives of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50, to an individual and (2) the limits of 10 CFR Part 20.106(e) to the population. The concentration limit for noble gases is based upon the assumption that Xe-135 is the controlling radioisotope and its MPC in air (submersion) was converted to an equivalent concentration in water using the methods described in International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Publication 2 .
3/4  '1 '.2    DOSE This specification is provided to implement the requirements of Sections II.A, III.A and IV.A of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50. The Limiting Condition for Operation implements the guides set forth in Section II.A of Appendix I. The ACTION statements provide the required operating flexibility and at the same time implement the guides set forth in Section IV.A of Appendix I to assure that the releases of radioactive material in liquid effluents will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable".
Performing the dose calculations in the ODCM implement the requirements in Section III.A of Appendix I that conformance with the guides of Appendix I is to be shown by calculational procedures based on models and data such that the actual exposure of an individual through appropriate pathways is unlikely to be substantially underestimated. The equations specified in the ODCM for calculating the doses due to the actual release rates of radioactive materials in liquid effluents should be consistent with the methodology provided in Regulatory Guide 1.109, "Calculation of Annual Doses to Man from Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I," Revision 1, October 1977, and Regulatory Guide 1.113, "Estimating Aquatic Dis'persion of Effluents from Accidental and Routine Reactor Releases for the Purpose of Implementing Appendix I," April 1977.
ST ~ LUCIE UNIT 1                B 3/4 11-1 May 13, 1982
 
RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASES This specification- applies to the release of liquid effluents from each  reactor at the site. For units with shared radwaste treatment systems, the liquid effluents from the shared system are proportioned among the units sharing that system.
3/4 ~ 11 ~ 1.3  LIQUID WASTE TREATMENT The OPERABILITY of appropriate subsystems of the LWT" system ensures that this system will be available for use whenever liquid effluents require treatment prior to release to the environment. The requirements that the appropriate portions of this system be used when specified provides assurance that the releases of radioactive materials in liquid effluents will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable." This specification implements the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50.36a, General Design Criterion 60 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50 and design objective Section 11.D of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50. The specified limits governing the use of appropriate portions of the liquid radwaste treatment system were specified as a suitable fraction of the guide set forth in Section 11.A of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50, for liquid effluents.
3/4.11.2      GASEOUS EFFLUENTS 3/F 11.2 '      DOSE RATE This specification is provided to ensure that the dose rate at anytime at the exclusion area boundary from gaseous effluents from all units on the site will be within the annual dose limits of 10 CFR Part 20 for unrestricted areas. The annual dose limits are the doses associated with the concentrations of 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B, Table 11. These limits provide reasonable assurance that radioactive material discharged in gaseous effluents will not result in the exposure of an individual in an unrestricted area, either within or outside the exclusion area boundary, to annual average concentrations exceeding the limits specified in Appendix B, Table 11 of 10 CFR Part 20 (10 CFR Part 20.106(b)). For individuals who may at times be within the exclusion area boundary, the occupancy of the individual will be sufficiently low to compensate fo'r any increase in the atmospheric diffusion factor above that for the exclusion area boundary.
The specified release rate limits restrict, at all times, the corresponding gamma and beta dose rates above background to an individual at or beyond the exclusion area boundary to <(500) mrem/year to the total body or to <(3000) mrem/year to the skin. These release rate limits also restrict, at all times, the corresponding organ dose rate above background to an infant via the inhalation pathway to < 1500 mrem/year.
J ST. LUCIE UNIT      1              B 3/4  11-2 May 13,  1982
 
RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASES 3/4 11.2.2    DOSE,  NOBLE GASES This specification is provided to implement the requirements of Sections II.B, III.A and IV.A of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50. The Limiting Condition for Operation implements the guides set forth in Section II.B of Appendix I. The ACTION statements provide the required operating flexibility and at the same time implement the guides set forth in Section IV.A of Appendix I assure that the releases of radioactive material in gaseous effluents will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable" . The Surveillance Requirements implement the requirements in Section III.A of Appendix I that conform with the guides of Appendix I to be shown by calculational procedures based on models and data such that the actual exposure of an individual through the appropriate pathways is unlikely to be substantially underestimated. The dose calculations established in the ODCM for calculating the doses due to the actual release rates of radioactive noble gases in gaseous effluents should be consistent with the methodology provided in Regulatory Guide 1.109, "Calculation of Annual Doses to Man from Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I," Revision 1, October 1977 and Regulatory Guide 1.111, "Methods for Estimating Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion of Gaseous Effluents in Routine Releases from Light-Water-Cooled Reactors," Revision 1, July 1977. The ODCM Equations provided for determi,ning the air doses at the exclusion area boundary will be based upon the historical (or real) average atmospheric conditions.
3/4 .11.2 .3  DOSE, RADIOIODINES, RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL  IN PARTICULATE  FORM AND RADIONUCLIDES OTHER THAN NOBLE GASES This specification is provided to implement the requirements of Sections II.C, III.A and IV.A of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50. The Limiting Conditions for Operation are the guides set forth in Section II.C of Appendix I. The ACTION statements provide the required operating flexibility and at the same time implement the guides set forth in Section IV.A of Appendix I to assure that the releases of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable". The ODCM calculational methods specified in the surveillance requirements implement the requirements in Section III.A of Appendix I that conformance with the guides of Appendix I be shown by calculational procedures based on models and data such that the actual exposure of an individual through appropriate pathways is unlikely to be substantially underestimated. The ODCM calculational methods for calculating the doses due to the actual release rates of the subject materials are required to be consistent with the methodology provided in Regulatory Guide 1.109, "Calculating of Annual Doses to Man from Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents for, the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I", Revision I, October 1977 and Regulatory Guide 1.111, "Methods for Estimating Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion of Gaseous Effluents in Routine Releases from ST. LUCIE UNIT  1                B 3/4  11-3 Hay 13, 1982
 
RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASES Light-Mater-Cooled Reactors", Revision 1, July 1977. These equations also provide for determining the actual doses based upon the historical (or real) average atmospheric conditions. The release rate specifications for radioiodines, radioactive material in particulate form and radionuclides other than noble gases are dependent on the existing radionuclide pathways to man, in the unrestricted area. The pathways which are examined in the development of these calculations are: 1) individual inhalation of airborne radionuclides, 2) deposition of radionuclides onto green leafy vegetation with subsequent consumption by man, 3) deposition onto grassy areas where milk animals and meat producing animals graze with consumption of the milk and meat by man, and 4) depositon on the ground with subsequent exposure of man.
3/4-11.2.4    GASEOUS WASTE TREATMENT The OPERABILITY    of the appropriate subsystems of the gaseous radwaste treatment system ensures that the system will be available for use whenever gaseous effluents require holdup prior to release to the environment. The requirement that the appropriate portions of these systems be used when speci, fied provides reasonable assurance that the releases of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable". This specification implements the requirements of'10 CFR Part 50.36a, General Design Criterion 60 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50, and design objective Section IID of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50. The specified limits governing the use of appropriate portions of the systems were specified as a suitable fraction of the guide set forth in Sections 11B and 11.C of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50, for gaseous effluents.
ST. LUCIE UNIT    1              B 3/4  11-4 May 13, 1982
 
RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASES 3/F 11.2 ' EXPLOSIVE GAS MIXTURE This'pecification is provided to ensure that the concentration of potentially explosive gas mixtures contained in the waste gas holdup system is maintained below the flammability limits of hydrogen and oxygen.
Maintaining the concentration of hydrogen and oxygen below their flammability limits provides assurance that the releases of radioactive materials will be controlled in conformance with the requirements of General Design  Criterion  60  of Appendix  A  to 10CFR Part 50.
3/F 11.2.6  GAS DECAY TANKS Restricting the quantity of radioactivity contained in each gas decay tank provides assurance that in the event of an uncontrolled release of the tanks conten6s, the resulting total body exposure to an individual at the nearest exclusion area boundary    will not exceed 0.5 rem, as per Safety Guide 24. This    is consistent with  Standard Review Plan 15.7.1, "Waste Gas System Failure".
ST. LUCIE UNIT  I                B 3/4  11-5 Hay 13, 1982
 
s 3/4. 12      RADIOLOG  AL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING BASES t
The  radiological monitoring program required by this specification provides measurements of radiation and of radioactive materials in those exposure pathways and for those radionuclides which lead to the highest potential radiation exposures of individuals resulting from the station operation.
This monitoring program thereby supplements the radiological effluent monitoring program by verifying that the measurable concentrations of radioactive materials and levels of radiation are not higher than expected on the basis of the effluent measurements and modeling of the environmental exposure pathways.        Program changes may be  initiated  based on  operational experience.
The  detection capabilities required by Table 4 .12 .-1 are state-of-the-art for routine environmental measurements in industrial laboratories. The LLD limits for drinking water meet the requirements of 40 CFR 141.
3/4 ~ 12 ~ 1  LAND USE CENSUS This specification is provided to ensure that changes in the use of unrestricted areas are identified and,that modifications to the monitoring program are made if required by'he results of this census.          This census satisfies the requirements of Section IV.8.3 of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part
: 50. Restricting the census to gardens of greater than 500 square feet provides assurance that significant exposure pathways via leafy vegetables will be identified      and monitored since a garden of this size is the minimum required to produce the quantity (26 kg/year) of leafy vegetables assumed in Regulatory Guide 1.109 for consumption by a child. To determine this mimimum garden size, the following assumptions were used, 1) that 20X of the garden was used for growing broad leaf vegetation (i.e., similar to lettuce and cabbage), and 2) a vegetation yield of 2 kg/square meter.          Broad leaf vegetation sampling may be performed at the site boundary in the direction sector with the highest (D/Q) in lieu of performing the garden census.
3/4 '2.3      INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM The requirement  for participation in  an Interlaboratory Comparison program      is provided to  ensure that independent  checks on the precision and accuracy of the measurements of radioactive material in environmental sample matrices are performed as part of a quality assurance'rogram for environmental monitoring in order to demonstrate that the results are reasonably valid.
ST. LUCIE UNIT      '1 B 3/4  12-1 May 13, 1982
 
ADMINISTRATIVE        ROLS
: e. Investigation of all violations of the Technical Specifications including the preparation and, forwarding of reports covering evaluation and recommendations to prevent recurrence to the Manager of Nuclear Energy, the Vice President of Nuclear Energy and to the Chairman of the Company Nuclear Review Board.
: f. Review  of those  REPORTABLE OCCURRENCES  requires 24 hour  notification to the Commission.
: g. Review  of  facility operations  to detect potential safety hazards.
: h. Performance of special reviews and investigations and reports thereon as requested  by the Chairman of the Company Nuclear Review Board.
: i. Review  of the Plant Security Plan and implementing procedures and shall submit recommended changes to the Chairman of the Company Nuclear Review Board.
Review of the Emergency Plan and implementing procedures and shall submit recommended changes to the Chairman of the Company Nuclear Review Board.
: k. Review the  results of the radiological environmental monitoring program at  least once per 12 months.
: 1. Review  of the  ODCM  and any changes  to the ODCM.
AUTHORITY 6.5.1.7    The Facility  Review Group  shall:
a.'ecommend      to the Plant Manager written approval or disapproval of items considered under 6.5.1.6(a) through (d) above.
: b. Render determinations    in writing with regard to whether or not each item considered under 6.5.1.6(a) through (e) above constitutes an unreviewed safety question.
: c. Provide written notification within 24 hours to the Vice President of Nuclear Energy and the Company Nuclear Review Board of disagreement the FRG and the Plant Manager; however, the Plant Manager      'etween shall have responsibility for resolution of such disagreements pursuant to 6.1.1 above.
ST. LUCIE UNIT  1                    6-7 Hay 13, 1982
 
ADMINISTRATIVE        ROLS 6.7  SAFETY  LIMIT VIOLATION 6.7.1  The  following actions    shall'e    taken  in  the event  a Safety Limit is violated:
: a. The  facility shall  be placed  in at least  HOT STANDBY  within one hour.
: b. The Safety  Limit violation shall      be reported to the Commission, the Vice President of Power Resources      and to the CNRB within 24 hours.
: c. A  Safety Limit Violation Report shall be prepared. The report shall be reviewed by the FRG.      This report shall describe (1) applicable circumstances preceding the violation, (2) effects of the violation upon facility components, systems or structures, and (3) corrective action taken to prevent recurrence.
: d. The Safety  Limit Violation Report shall be submitted to the Commission, the CNRB and the Vice President of Nuclear Energy          within 14 days of the violation.
6.8  PROCEDURES 6.8.1  Written procedures shall    be  established,    implemented and maintained covering the activities'eferenced        below:
a~  The  applicable procedures    recommended    in Appendix "A" of Regulatory Guide 1.33,,November,    1972.
: b. Refueling operations.
: c. Surveillance  and  test activities of safety related equipment.
: d. Security Plan implementation.
: e. Emergency Plan implementation.
: f. Fire Protection Program implementation.
go  PROCESS  CONTROL PROGRAM    for  SOLIDIFIED  radioactive waste or waste containing free standing liquid.
: h. Offsite releases of    gaseous and liquid effluents containing radioactive materials, including effluent monitor setpoints.
: i. Offsite  Dose  Calculation Manual ST. LUCIE UNIT  1                      6-13 May 13, 1982
 
ADMINISTRATIVE      ROLS d.Reactivity anomalies involving disagreement with the predicted value of reactivity balance under steady state conditions during power operation greater than or equal to 1% Delta k/k; a calculated reactivity balance indicating a SHUTDOWN MARGIN less conservative than specified in the technical specifications; short-term reactivity increases that correspond to a reactor period of less than 5 seconds or,      if  subcritical, an unplanned reactivity insertion of more than 0.5% Delta k/k; or occurrence of any unplanned  criticality.
e.Failure or malfunction of one or more components which prevents or could prevent, by itself, the fulfillment of the functional requirements of system(s) used to cope with accidents analyzed in the FSAR.
f.personnel error or procedural inadequacy which prevents or could prevent, by itself, the fulfillment of the functional requirements of systems required to cope with accidents analyzed in the FSAR.
g.Conditions arising from natural or man-made events that, as a direct result of the event require unit shutdown, operation of safety systems, or other protective measures required by technical specifications.
h.Errors discovered in the transient or accident analyses or in the methods used for such analyses as described in the safety analysis report or in the bases for the technical specifications that have or could have permitted reactor operation in a manner less conservative than  assumed    in the analyses.
i.Performance of structures, systems, or components that requires remedial action or corrective measures to prevent operation in a manner less conservative than assumed in the accident analyses in the safety analysis report or technical specifications bases; or discovery during unit life of conditions not specifically considered in the safety analysis report or technical specifications that require remedial action or corrective measures to prevent the existence or development of an unsafe condition.
jexcess
        .Occurrence of  radioactive material contained gas decay tanks in of that  permitted by the limiting condition for operation established in the technical specifications.
k.Exceeding L.C.O. 3 ~ 11 ~ 1 1 (Liquid Radwaste Concentration) or
                                  ~
L.C.O. 3.11.2.1 (Gaseous Dose Rate).
ST LUCIE UNIT                          6-17 Hay 13, 1982
 
ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS THIRTY DAY WRITTEN REPORTS 6.9.1.9 The types of events listed below shall be the subject of written reports to the Director of the Regional Office within thirty days of occurrence of the event. The written report shall include, as a minimum, a completed copy of a licensee event report form. Information provided on the licensee event report form shall be supplemented, as needed, by additional narrative material to provide complete explanation of the circumstances suxrounding the event.
: a. Reactor protection    system or engineered safety feature instrument settings which are    found to be less conservative than those established by the    technical specifications but which do not prevent the fulfillment of    the functional requirements of affected systems.
: b. Conditions leading to operation in a degraded mode permitted by a limiting condition for operation or plant shutdown required by a limiting condition for operation.
: c. Observed inadequacies      in the implementation of administrative or procedural controls whi'ch threaten to cause reduction of degree of redundancy provided in reactor protection systems or engineered safety feature'ystems.
: d. Abnormal degradation of systems other than those specified in 6.9.1.12 .c above designed to contain radioactive material resulting from the  fission process.
: e. An unplanned offsite release of 1) more than 1 curie of radioactive material in liquid effluents, 2) more than 150 curies of noble gas in gaseous effluents, or 3) more than 0.05 curies of radioiodine in gaseous effluents. The report of an unplanned offsite release of radioactive material shall include the following information:
1.A descxiption of the event and equipment involved.
2.Cause(s)    for the unplanned xelease.
3.Actions taken to prevent recurrence.
4.Consequences    of the unplanned release.
ST. LUCIE UNIT    '1 6-18 Hay 13, 1982
 
ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS SPECIAL REPORTS
: h. Core  Barrel Movement, Specifications  3 .4.11 and  4 .4.11.
: i. Fire Detection Instrumentation, Specification    3 .3.3.7.
Fire Suppression Systems, Specification    3 .7.11.1.
: k. Exceeding one or more LCO' for Specifications 3 .11.1.2, 3.11.1.3, 3.11.2.2, 3.11.2.3, or 3.11.2.4, involving radiation dose from radioactive effluents.
: 1. Measured  levels of radioactivity in an environmental sampling medium determined to exceed the reporting level values of Table 6.9.3-2 when averaged over any calendar quarter sampling period pursuant to Specification 3.12.1.b. When more than one of the radionuclides in Table 6.9.3-2 are detected in the sampling medium, this report shall be submitted  if:
concentration (1)      +    concentration (2)          +    ...>1.0 limit level  (1)            limit level (2)
When  radionuclides other than those in Table 6.9.3-2 are detected and are the result of plant effluents, this report shall be submitted the quarterly dose to an individual is equal to or greater than the if quarterly limits of Specifications 3 .11 .1 .2, 3 .11.2 .2 and 3.11 .2.3 .
This report is not required  if the measured level of radioactivity was not the result of plant effluents; however, in such an event, the condition shall be reported and described in the Annual Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report.
: m. Milk or garden samples unavailable during the specified time interval, Specification 3.12.l.c.
,n. The  discovery of a location which yields    a calculated dose or dose commitment > the values  currently being calculated, Specification 3.12;2.a.
: o. The discovery of a location which yields a calculated dose or dose commitment 20% greater than at a location from which samples are currently being obtained, Specification 3.12.2.b.
ST. LUCIE UNIT  'I                  6-19 Nay 13, 1982
 
ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS      6.9.3  ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTS RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT  3/
6.9.3.1 Routine radiological environmental monitoring reports covering the operation of the unit during the previous calendar year shall be submitted prior to May 1 of each year. The initial report shall be submitted prior to May 1 of the year following initial criticality.
6.9.3.2 The annual radiological environmental monitoring reports shall include summaries, interpretations, and information based upon trend analysis of the results of the radiological environmental surveillance activities for the report period, including a comparison with preoperational studies, operational controls t,as appropriate), and previous environmental surveillance reports and an assessment of the observed impacts of the plant operation on the environment., The reports shall also include the results of the land use censuses required by Specification 3.12.2. If harmful effects are detected by the monitoring, the report shall provide an analysis of the problem and a planned course of action to alleviate the 'problem.
The annual radiological environmental monitoring reports shall include summarized and tabulated results in the format similar to Table 6.9.3-1  of all  radiological environmental samples required to be taken during the report period. In the event that some results are not available for inclusion with the report, the report shall be submitted noting and explaining the reasons for the missing results. Delayed data shall be submitted in a supplementary report within 60 days from the time the last analyses are completed.
The  reports shall also include the following: a summary description of the radiological environmental monitoring program; a map of all sampling locations keyed to a table giving distances and directions from one reactor; the result of land use censuses required by the Specification 3.12.2; a summary of available results from the Interlaboratory Comparison Program required by Specification 3.12.3, and additional information as provided in Specification 3 .12.1.
SEMIANNUAL RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT  3/
6.9.3.3 Routine radioactive effluent release reports covering the operating of the unit during the previous 6 months of operation shall be submitted within 60 days after January 1 and July 1 of each year. The period of the first report shall begin with the date of initial criticality.
3/    A single submittal may be made for a multiple unit station. The submittal should combine those sections that are common to all units at the station; however, for units with separate radwaste systems, the submittal shall specify the releases of radioactive material from each unit.
ST. LUCIE UNIT  1                  6-20 Hay 13, 1982
 
TABLE 6.9.3-1 FORHAT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUMHARY NAME OF  FACILITY                          DOCKET NO.
LOCATION OF FACILITY                                  REPORTING PERIOD Type and    Lower Limit All Indicator Location With Highest Annual Mean                        Number  of Medium or Pathway    Total Number      of        Locations                                        Control Locations  Nonroutini Sampled          of Analyses Detection      Mean (f)a          Name              Mean( f) a    Mean (f)a      ~
Reported (Unit of Measurement)    Performed      (LLD)        Rangea    Distance and Direction Ra e              Range        Measurements Mean and range based  upon detection measurements only. Fraction of detectable measurements  at specified locations is indicated in parenthesis (f).
 
ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS 6.9.3.3.1 The radioactive effluent release reports shall include a summary of the quantities of radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents and solid waste released from the unit as outlined in Regulatory Guide 1.21 Rev; 1, "iMeasuring, Evaluating, and Reporting Radioactivity. in Solid Wastes and Releases of Radioactive Materials in Liquid and Gaseous Effluents from Light-Mater-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants", with data summarized on a quarterly basis following the format of Appendix B thereof.
The  radioactive effluent release reports shall include the following information for all unplanned offsite releases of radioactive materials in gaseous  and  liquid effluents:
: a. A description of the event  and equipment involved.
: b. Cause(s)  for the unplanned release.
: c. Actions taken to prevent recurrence.
: d. Consequences  of the unplanned release.
The  radioactive effluent release reports shall include an assessment of radiation doses from the radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents released from the unit during each calendar quarter as outlined in the ODCM. The assessment of radiation doses shall be performed in accordance with methodology    in the ODCM.
ST. LUCIE UNIT    f                  6-22 Hay 13, 1982
 
TABLE 6.9.3-2 NONROUTINE REPORTING LEVELS FOR RADIOACTIVITY CONCENTRATIONS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES Broad Leaf Water          Airborne Particulate              Fish                Milk            Vegetation Analysis        (pCi/1)            or Gases (pCi/m )          (pCi/Kg, wet)          (pCi/1)          (pCi/Kg, wet)
I H-3          2 X 104 Mn-54          1  X 103                                          3 X 104 Fe-59          4 X 102                                            1  X 104 I    Co-58            1  X 103                                          3 X 104 I    Co-60          3 X 10                                            1  X 10 I    Zn-65          3X10                                              2 X 104
  'Zr-Nb-95          4  X102 I-131                                      0.9                                                            1 X 102 I    Cs-134              30                      10                    1  X 10                60              1 X 103 I    Cs-137              50                      20                    2X10                  70              2 X 103 (1)
I
  . Ba-La-140        2 X 102                                                              3  X102 (1) Total for parent  and  daughter
 
< h ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS
: e. Records  of gaseous  and  liquid radioactive material released to the environs
: f. Records of  transient or operational cycles for those    facility components  identified in Table 5.9-1.
: g. Records  of training  and  qualification for current members  of the plant staff.
: h. Records of in-service inspections performed pursuant to these Technical Specifications.
Records of    Quality Assurance activities required by the    QA Manual Records of reviews performed for changes made to procedures or equipment or reviews of tests and experiments pursuant to 10 CFR 50.59
: k. Records of meetings    of the  FRG and the  CNRB
: 1. Records of Environmental Qualification which are covered under the provisions of paragraph 6.13.
: m. Records of the service lives of all hydraulic and mechanical snubbers listed on Tables 3.7-2a and 3 .7-2b including the date at which the service  life  commences and associated installation and maintenance records.
: n. Annual Radiological Environmental Monitoring Reports; and records of analyses transmitted to the licensee which are used to prepare the Annual Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report.
: o. Meteorological data, summarized and reported in a format consistent with the recommendations of Regulatory Guides 1.21 and 1.23 .
6.11  RADIATION PROTECTION PROGRAM Procedures'or personnel radiation protection shall be prepared consistent with the requirements of 10 CFR Part 20 and shall be approved, maintained and adhered to for all operations involving personnel radiation exposure.
ST. LUCIE UNIT    I                    6-24 May 13,  1982
 
ADNINISTRATIVE CONTROLS 6.12 HIGH RADIATION AREA 6.12 1 In lieu of the "control device" or "alarm signal" required by
      ~
paragraph 20.203(c) (2) of 10 CFR 20, each high radiation area in which the intensity of radiation is 1000 mrem/hr or less shall be barricaded and conspicuously posted as a high radiation area and entrance thereto shall be controlled by requiring issuance of a Radiation Work Permit*. Any individual or group of individuals permitted to enter such areas shall be provided with or accompanied by one or more of the following:
: a. A radiation monitoring device which continuously indicates the radiation dose rate in the area
: b. A radiation monitoring device which continuously integrates the radiation dose rate in the area and alarms when a preset integrated dose is received. Entry into such areas with this monitoring device may be made after the dose rate level in the area has been established and personnel  have been made knowledgable of them.
: c. An, individual qualified in radiation protection procedures who is equipped with a radiation dose rate monitoring device. This individual shall be responsible for providing positive control over the activities within the area and shall perform periodic radiation surveillance at the frequency specified by the facility Health Physicist in the Radiation Work Permit.
6.12.2 The requirements of 6.12.1, above, shall also    apply to each high radiation area in which the intensity of radiation is    greater than 1000 mrem/hr. In addition, locked doors shall be provided    to prevent unauthorized entry into such areas and the keys shall    be maintained under the administrative control of the Shift Supervisor on    duty and/or the Plant Health Physicist.
*Health Physics personnel shall be exempt from the RWP issuance requirement during the performance of their assigned radiation protection duties, provided they comply with approved radiation protection procedures for entry into high radiation areas.
ST. LUCIE UNIT    1                  6-25 May 13, 1982
 
ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS 6.17  PROCESS  CONTROL PROGRAM    (PCP) 6.17.1  The  licensee's    PCP  for SOLIDIFICATION (if applicable) shall      be approved by the Commission      prior to implementation; or 6.17.2 If the licensee uses a contractor to solidify radioactive wastes, the licensee shall use a contractor (or contractor'-s PCP"for SOLIDIFICATION) which has been approved by the Commission.
6.17.3  Licensee    initiated  change(s)  to his PCP  for  SOLIDIFICATION:
: 1. Shall  become  effective  upon review and acceptance    by the  FRG
: 2. Shall be'ubmitted to the Commission in the semi-annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report for the period in which the change(s) was made. The information submitted shall contain:
a.A description of the change(s)        which was made and the reasons      for such changes.
b.A determination that the change did not reduce the overall conformance of the solidified waste product to existing criteria for solid wastes; and c.Documentation of the fact that the change has been reviewed and found acceptable by the FRG.
6.17.4  Licensee    initiated  changes  to the PCP for  DEWATERING:
: 1. Shall  become  effective  upon review and acceptance    by the FRG.
6.18  OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM) 6.18.1  The  ODCM  shall  be approved by the Commission      prior to implementation 6.18.2  Licensee    initiated  changes  to the ODCM:
: 1. Shall be 'aproved by the Facility Review Group        (FRG) and  shall  become effective    upon FRG approval.
: 2. Shall be reported to the NRC as an attachment to the Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Report for the reporting period that the change(s) were implemented. This attached report shall contain:
a.A  FRG  approved copy of the      ODCM showing the changes b.A determination that the change        will not  reduce the accuracy or reliability of    dose  calculations or setpoint determinations.
ST. LUCIE UNIT    I                      6-2 7 tray 13, 1982
 
pe 0
o}}

Latest revision as of 14:36, 4 February 2020

Proposed Radiological Effluent Tech Specs
ML17212B606
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 05/13/1982
From:
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML17212B607 List:
References
NUDOCS 8205200085
Download: ML17212B606 (68)


Text

DEFINITIONS REACTOR TRIP SYSTEM RESPONSE TIME 1.26 The REACTOR TRIP SYSTEM RESPONSE TIME shall be the time interval from when the monitored parameter exceeds its trip setpoint at the channel sensor until electrical power is interrupted to the CEA drive mechanism.

ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURE RESPONSE TIME 1.27 The ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURE RESPONSE TIME shall be that time inter-val from when the monitored parameter exceeds its ESF actuation setpoint at the channel sensor until the ESF equipment is capable of performi.ng its safety function (i.e., the valves travel to their required positions, pump discharge pressures reach their, required values, etc.). Times shall include diesel generator starting and sequence loading delays where applicable.

PHYSICS TESTS 1.28 PHYSICS TESTS shall be those tests performed to measure the fundamen-tal nuclear characteristics of the reactor core and related instrumentation and 1) described in Chapter 14.0 of the FSAR, 2) authorized under the pro-visions of 10 CFR 50.59, or 3) otherwise approved by the Commission.

UNRODDED INTEGRATED RADIAL PEAKING FACTOR F 1.29 The UNRODDED INTEGRATED RADIAL PEAKING FACTOR is the ratio of the peak pin power to the average pin power in an unrodded core, excluding tilt.

LOAD FOLLOW OPERATION 1.30 LOAD FOLLOW OPERATION shall be daily power level changes of more than 10% of RATED THERMAL POWER or daily insertion of CEAs below 'the Long Term Insertion Limit.

GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM 1.31 A GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM is any system designed and installed tq reduce radioactive gaseous effluents by collecting primary coolant system offgases from the primary system for decay.

OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM) 1.32 The OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL shall contain the methodology and parameters used in the calculation of offsite doses due to radioactive gaseous and liquid effluents and in the calculation of gaseous and liquid effluent monitoring alarm/trip setpoint methodology.

ST. LUCIE UNIT 1-6 8205200085 820513 PDR ADOCK 05000335 Nay 13, 1982 P .,- PDR

DEFINITIONS PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM (PCP) 1.33 The PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM shall be the procedures used by the licensee or his contractors, for the purpose of assuring that prior to shipment to a disposal facility, solidified radioactive waste (or waste containing free standing liquids) will be in a form (e.g., free standing liquids less than 1%) that meets the requirements for transportation and disposal pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations and the applicable disposal site regulations.

SOLIDIFICATION 1.34 SOLIDIFICATION shall be the process which involves the addition of a solidifying matrix to radioactive waste for the purpose of binding or encapsulating (solidifying) such waste in a form (e.g., free standing liquids less than 1%) that meets the requirements for transportation and disposal pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations and the applicable disposal site regulations.

DEWATERING 1.35 DEHATERING shall be the process of removing liquids from radioactive waste which contain free standing liquids, for the purpose of assuring that prior to disposal, such radioactive waste is in a form (e.g., free standing liquids less than 1%) that meets the requirements for transportation and disposal pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations and the applicable disposal site regulations.

ST. LUCIE UNIT 1 1-6A May 13, 1982 I

TABLE 1.2 FREQUENCY NOTATION NOTATION FREQUENCY At least once per 12 hours At least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> At least once per 7 days 4/g* At least 4 per month and a minimum of 48 per year At least once per 31 days At least once per 92 days SA At least once per 6 months At least once per 18 months S/U Prior to each reactor start up Completed prior to each release N/A Not applicable

  • For Radioactive Effluent Sampling
    • For Radioactive Batch Release only ST. LUCIE UNIT 1-8 May 13, 1982

INST RUMENTATION METEOROLOGICAL INSTRUMENTATION LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.3.3.4 The meteorological monitoring instrumentation channels shall be operable as per Table 3.3-8.

APPLICABILITY: At all times ACTION aO With the number of OPERABLE meteorological monitoring channels required by Table 3.3-8, the Licensee should suspend all less'han releases of gaseous radioactive material from the radwaste gas decay tanks until the inoperable channel(s) is restored to OPERABLE status.'.

With less than the Minimum Channels OPERABLE as specified by Table 3.3-8, prepare and submit a Special Report to the Commission pursuant to Specification 6.9.2 within the next 10 days outlining the cause of the malfunction and the plans for restoring the channel(s) to OPERABLE status.

c. The provisions of Specification 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.3.3.4 One WIND SPEED, ONE WIND DIRECTION, and TWO AIR TEMPERATURE INSTRUMENTATION CHANNEL(S) shall be demonstrated OPERABLE by the performance of the CHANNEL CHECK and CHANNEL CALIBRATION operations at the frequencies shown in Table 4.3-5.

ST. LUCIE UNIT 'I 3/4 3-3O Hay 13, 1982

TABLE 3.3-8 METEOROLOGICAL MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION INSTRUMENT MINIMUM MINIMUM CHANNELS INSTRUMENT 6 ELEVATION ACCURACY OPERABLE

1. WINDSPEED
a. Nominal Elev (10 meters) + 0.5 *mph 1A
b. Nominal Elev (60 meters) + 0.5 *mph N.A.

2 ~ WIND DIRECTION 0 B

a. Nominal Elev (10 meters) + 5 1 0
b. Nominal Elev (60 meters) + 5 N.A.
3. AIR TEMPERATURE (Delta T) 0
a. Nominal Elev (10 meters) + 0,] C** 1'C 0
b. Nominal Elev (60 meters) 0~1 C** 1 0
c. Nominal Elev (35 meters) + 0.1 C** N.A.
  • Starting speed of anemometer shall be ( 1 mph
    • Delta T measurement channels only A. The 60 meter Channel may be substituted for the 10 meter wind speed for up to 30 days in the event the 10 meter channel is INOPERABLE. Wind Speed Data from the 60 meter elevation should be adjusted using the wind speed power law:

S 10 meters = ( 60 meters) (0.1727)n where:

S = wind speed in mph n = 0.25 for Pasquill Vertical Stability Classes A, B, C, D.

n ~ 0.50 for Pasquill Vertical Stability Classes E, F, G.

1.727 X 10 = constant = 10 meters/ 60 meters B. The 60 meter Channel may be substituted for the 10 meter Wind Direction Channel for up to 30 days in the event the 10 meter Channel is INOPERABLE.

C. The 35 meter Channel may be substituted for one of the 10 meter or 60 meter Temperature Channels for up to 30 days if one of the Channels is INOPERABLE. The data -should always be normalized to C/100 meters to determine the vertical stability class.

ST. LUCIE UNIT 1 3/4 Nay 13, 1982

TABLE 4.3-5 METEOROLOGICAL MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS CHANNEL CHANNEL INSTRUMENT CHECK CALIBRATION

1. WIND SPEED
a. Nominal Elev (10 meters) SA
b. Nominal Elev (60 meters) SA+
2. WIND DIRECTION
a. Nominal Elev (10 meters) D SA
b. Nominal Elev (60 meters) SA~
3. AIR TEMPERATURE (Delta T)
a. Nominal Elev (10 meters) SA
b. Nominal Elev (60 meters) SA
c. Nominal Elev (35 meters) SA~
  • Required only if these Channels are being substituted for one of the Minimum Channels Operable as per Table 3.3-8.

INSTRUMENTATION RADIOACTIVE LIQU EFFLUENT INSTRUMENTATION LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.3.3.9 The radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channels shown in Table 3.3-12 shall be OPERABLE with their alarm/trip setpoints set to ensure that the limits of Specification 3 ."11.1.1 are not exceeded. The alarm/trip setpoints of these channels shall be determined in accordance with the ODCM methodology.

APPLICABILITY: As shown in Table 3 .3-12 .

ACTION:

a. With a radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channel alarm/trip setpoint less conservative than a value which will ensure that the limits of 3.11.1.1 are met, immediately suspend the release of radioactive liquid effluents monitored by the affected channel or declare the channel inoperable.
b. With less than the number of channels required OPERABLE by Table 3.3-12, take the ACTION shown in Table 3.3-12.
c. The provisions of Specifications 3 .0.3 and 3 .0.4 are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.3.3 .9 Each radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channel

'shall be demonstrated OPERABLE by performance of the CHANNEL CHECK, CHANNEL CALIBRATION, AND CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST operations during the Modes and at the frequencies shown in Table 4.3-8.

ST. LUCIE UNIT 1 3/4 3-45 Hay 13, 1982

ff TABLE 3.3-12 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION MINIMUM CHANNELS INSTRUMENT OPERABLE APPLICABILITY ACTION

1. Gross Radioactivity monitors, providing automatic termination of release
a. Liquid radwaste effluent line At all times* 18
b. Steam Generator blowdown effluent line At all times* 19
2. Gross Radioactivity Monitors not providing automatic termination of release
a. Component cooling water system At all times* 20
  • During releases via this pathway

TABLE 3.3-12 TABLE NOTATION ACTION 18 With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases may be resumed for up to 14 days, provided that prior to initiating a release:

1. At least two independent samples are analyzed in accordance with Specification 4.11.1.1.1 and;
2. At least two technically qualified members of the Facility Staff, one to perform, and one to verify the release rate calculations and discharge valving.

Otherwise, suspend release of radioactive effluents via this pathway.

ACTON 19 With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue for up to 90 days if there is no primary-to-secondary leakage indicated by the air ejector monitor. If the air ejector monitor indicates primary-to-secondary leakage, releases may continue for up to 30 days provided grab samples are analyzed for gross radioactivity (beta or gamma) at limit of detection of at least 2 X 10-7 uCi/gm.

1. At least once per 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> when the specific, activity of the secondary coolant is )0.01 uCi/gram DOSE EQUIVALENT I-131.
2. At least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> when the specific activity of the secondary coolant is <0.01 uCi/gram DOSE EQUIVALENT I-131.

E ACTION 20 With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue for up to 30 days provided that at least once per 8 hour9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> grab samples are collected and analyzed for gross radioactivity (beta or gamma) at a limit of detection .of at least 2 X 10-7 uCi/ml.

ST. LUCIE UNIT 3/4 3-47 Hay 13, 1982

TABLE 4.3-8 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS CHANNEL CHANNEL CHANNEL INSTRUMENT CHECK CALIBRATION FUNCTIONAL TEST

1. Gross Beta or Gamma Radioactivity Monitors providing alarm and automatic isolation
a. Liquid Radwaste Effluent Line P R(3) Q(1)
b. Steam Generator Blowdown Effluent Line R(3) Q(1)
2. Gross Beta or Gamma Radioactivity Monitors providing alarm but not providing automatic isolation (4)
a. Component Cooling Water Sys. R(3) Q(2)
  • During releases via this pathway

TABLE 4.3-8 TABLE NOTATION (l) The CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall also demonstrate that automatic isolation of this pathway and control room alarm annunciation occurs any of the following conditions exist:

if

l. Instrument indicates measured levels above the alarm/trip setpoint.
2. Circuit failure.
3. Instrument controls not set in operate mode.

(2) The CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall also demonstrate that control room alarm annunciation occurs if any of the following conditions exist:

l. Instrument indicates measured levels above the alarm/trip setpoint.
2. Circuit failure.
3. Instrument controls not set in operate mode.

(3) The initial'HANNEL CALIBRATION for radioactivity measurement instrumentation shall be performed using one or more of the reference standards traceable to the National Bureau of Standards or using standards that have been calibrated against standards certified by the NBS. These standards should permit calibrating the system over its

~ intended range of energy and rate capabilities that are typical of normal plant operation. For subsequent CHANNEL CALIBRATION, button sources that have been related to the initial calibration may be used, at intervals of at least once per eighteen months. This can normally be accomplished during refueling outages.

(4) This requirement is applicable only to systems where the component cooling water system is discharged to an effluent stream.

ST. LUCIE UNIT 3/4 3-49 May 13, 1982

INSTRUMENTATION RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS PROCESS AND 'EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.3.3.10 The radioactive gaseous process and effluent monitoring instrumentation channels shown in Table 3.3-13 shall be OPERABLE with their alarm/trip setpoints set to ensure that the limits of Specification 3 .11.2.1 are not exceeded. The alarm/trip setpoints of these channels shall be determined in accordance with the ODCM Methodology.

APPLICABILITY: As shown in Table 3 .3-13 .

ACTION

a. With a radioactive gaseous process or effluent monitoring instrumentation channel alarm/trip setpoint less conservative than a value which will ensure that the limits of 3.11.2.1 are met, declare the channel inoperable or reset the channel setpoints immediately to ensure that the limi.ts of 3.11.2.1 are met.
b. With less than the number of channels required OPERABLE by Table 3.3-13, take the ACTION shown in Table 3.3-13.
c. The provisions of Specifications 3 .0.3 and 3 .0.4 are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE REOUIREMENTS 4.3.3.10 Each radioactive gaseous process or effluent monitoring instrumentation channel shall be demonstrated OPERABLE by performance of the CHANNEL CHECK, CHANNEL CALIBRATION, and CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST operations during the MODES and at the frequencies shown in Table 4.3-9.

ST. LUCIE UNIT 1 3/4 3-50 May 13, 1982

TABLE 3.3-13 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION A

MINIMUM CHANNELS INSTRUMENT OPERABLE APPLICABILITY PARAMETER ACTION

1. Waste Gas Holdup System
a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor Radioactivity Rate 25 Measurement
2. Plant Vent, Fuel Bldg. Vent, ECCS-A Vent & ECCS-B Vent As per Table 3.3-6
3. Blowdown Building Vent System
a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor Radioactivity Rate 27 Measurement
b. Iodine Sampler Cartridge Verify presence of 30 cartridge
c. Particulate Sampler Filter Verify presence of -30 filter
4. Air Ejector Vent
a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor Radioactivity Rate 28 Measurement
5. Waste Gas Holdup System Explosive Gas Monitoring System (Gas Surge Tank)
a. Hydrogen (1)  % Hydrogen 29
b. Oxygen (1)  % Oxygen 29
  • During releases via this pathway ontrol Tank
    • During Waste Gas System Operation when hydrogen is used as a cover gas on the Volume Contro a

TABLE 3.3-13 TABLE NOTATION ACTION 25 With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, the contents of the tanks may be released to the environment for up to 30 days provided that prior to initiating the release:

1. At least two independent samples of the tank's contents are analyzed, and
2. At least two technically qualified members of the Facility Staff, one to perform, and one to verify the release rate calculations and discharge valve lineup; Otherwise, suspend release of radioactive effluents via this pathway.

ACTION 27 With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue for up to 30 days provided grab samples are collected and analyzed for gross activity at least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.

ACTION 28 With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, immediately route the Air Ejector Vent to the Plant Vent Pathway.

ACTION 29- With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, operation of this waste gas holdup system may continue indefinitely provided that grab samples are collected and analyzed at least once per shift.

ACTION 30- With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may conti.nue for up to 30 days provided samples are continuously collected with auxiliary sampling equipment for periods on the order of seven (7) days and analyzed within 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br /> of the end of sample collection.

ST. LUCIE UNIT 3/4 3-52 Hay 13, 1982

TABLE 4.3-9 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENZ MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS CHANNEL CHANNEL CHANNEL INSTRUMENT CHECK" CALIBRATION FUNCTIONAL TEST

1. Waste Gas Holdup System
a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor R(3)
2. Plant Vent, Fuel Building Vent, ECCS-A Vent, 6 ECCS-B Vent As per Table 4.3-3
3. Blowdown Building Vent System
a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor R(3) Z(2)
b. Iodine Sampler N/A N/A
c. Particulate Sampler N/A N/A
4. Air Ejector Vent
a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor R(3) a(2)
5. Waste Gas Holdup System Explosive

-Gas Monitoring System

a. Hydrogen q(4)
b. Oxygen D** q(5)
  • During releases via this pathway
  • "During Waste Gas Holdup System Operation when hydrogen is used as a cover gas on the Volume Control Tank

~)

TABLE 4.3-9 TABLE NOTATION (1) The CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall also demonstrate that automatic isolation of this pathway and control room alarm annunciation occurs any of the following conditions exist:

if

l. Instrument indicates measured levels above the alarm/trip setpoint.
2. Circuit failure.
3. Instrument controls not set in operate mode.

(2) The CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall also demonstrate that control room alarm annunciation occurs if any of the following conditions exist:

l. Instrument indicates measured levels above the alarm/trip setpoint.
2. Circuit failure.
3. Instrument controls not set. in operate mode.

(3) The initial CHANNEL CALIBRATION for radioactivity measurement instrumentation shall be performed using one or more of the reference standards traceable to the National Bureau of Standards or using standards that have been calibrated against standards certified by the NBS. These standards should permit calibrating the system over its intended range of energy and rate capabilities that are typical of normal plant operations. For subsequent CHANNEL CALIBRATION, button sources that have been related to the initial calibration may be used, at intervals of at least once per eighteen months. This can normally be accomplished during refueling outages.

(4) The CHANNEL CALIBRATION shall include the use of standard gas samples containing a nominal:

1. Nominal one volume percent hydrogen, balance nitrogen, and
2. Nominal four volume percent hydrogen, balance nitrogen.

(5) The GUNNEL CALIBRATION shall include the use of standard gas samples containing a nominal:

1. Nominal one volume percent oxygen, balance nitrogen, and
2. Nominal four volume percent oxygen, balance nitrogen.

ST. LUCIE UNIT 1 3/4 3-54 May 13, 1982

3/4 ~ 11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.1 LIQUID EFFLUENTS CONCENTRATION LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.11.1.1 The concentration of radioactive material released from the site to unrestricted areas ( see Figure 3 .11-1) shall be limited to the concentrations specified in 10CFR20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 for radionuclides other than dissolved or entrained noble gases. The concentration for total dissolved or entrained noble gases shall be limited to 2 X 10 4 uCi/ml.

APPLICABILITY: At all times ACTION a~ With the concentration of radioactive material released from the site to unrestricted areas exceeding, the above limits, immediately restore concentration within the above limits and provide prompt notification to the Commission pursuant to Specificatoin 6.9.1.12.

b. The provisions of Specification 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.1.1.1 The radioactivity content of each batch of radioactive liquid waste to'e discharged shall be determined prior to release by sampling and analysis in accordance with Table 4 .11-1. The results of pre-release analyses shall be used with the calculational methods in the "ODCM" to assure that the concentration at the point of release is limited to the values in Specification 3.11.1.1.

4.11.1.1.2 The radioactivity concentration of liquids discharged from continuous release points shall be determined by collection and analysis of samples in accordance with Table 4 .11-1. The results of the analyses shall be used with the calculational methods in the "ODCM" to assure that the concentrations at the point of release are limited to the values in Specification 3.11.1.1.

4.11.1.1.3 Post-release analyses of samples composited from batch releases shall be performed in accordance with Table 4.11-1.

ST. LUCIE UNIT 1 3/4 11-1 tray 13, 1982

TABLE F 11-1 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM Minimum Lower Limit of Sampling Analysis Type Of Detection (LLD)

Liquid Release Type Frequency Frequency Activity Analysis (uCi/ml) a A. Batch Waste Principal .Gamma Release Tanks Emitters 5 X 10 Each Batch Each Batch I-131 1 X 10 p Dissolved and One Batch/M Entrained Gases 1 X 10-5 H-3 1X105 Gross Alpha 1 X 10 Each Batch Composite Sr-89, Sr-90 SX108 Each Batch Composite Fe-55 1X10 B. Plant Continuous Principal Gamma Releases e, f Emitters 5 X 10 7 4/M 4/M I-131 1 X 10 Dissolved and 1 X 10 Entrained Gases H-3 1 X 10 5 4/M Gross Alpha 1X107 Composite 4/M Q Sr-89, Sr-90 SX108 Composite Fe-55 1 X 10 3/4 11-2 ST. LUCIE UNIT 1 May 13, 1982

TABLE 4 'l-l TABLE NOTATION

a. The LLD is the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will be detected with 95% probability with 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation- represents a "real" signal. The Lower Limit of Detection is a priori Limit where the analysis technique shall be capable of detecting the stated values if a blank sample were counted.

LLD= 4.66 S x 106 e-Lambda t Where:

sb is the standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of a blank sample as appropriate (in counts per minute) is the counting efficiency (as counts per transformation) is sample volume in appropriate units 6

2.22 X 10 transformations per minute per microCurie is the Chemical Separation Yield (when applicable) is base 2.71828 Lambda is decay constant is either:

The elapsed time between the midpoint of sample collection and the time of counting (for composite strontium only) 2 ~ The elapsed time between the sample time and the time at midcount (for pha counting only)

The units of t shall match the time units of Lambda in both cases.

b. A batch release is the discharge of liquid wastes of a discrete volume.

Each batch release tank shall be isolated and thoroughly mixed prior to sampling for a release.

c. The principal gamma emitters for which the LLD limit specification will apply are exclusively the following radionuclides: Mn-54, Pe-59, Co-58, Co-60, Zn-65, Mo-99, Cs-134, Cs-137, Ce-141, and Ce-144. This list does not mean that only these nuclides are to be detected and reported. Other peaks which are measureable and identifiable, together with the above nuclides, shall also be identified and reported. Nuclides which are below the LLD for the analyses should not be reported as being present at the LLD level.

ST. LUCIE UNIT I 3/4 11-3 May 13, 1982

TABLE 4.11-1 TABLE NOTATION

d. A composite sample is one in which the quantity of liquid sampled is proportional to the quantity of liquid waste discharged and in which the method of sampling employed results in a specimen which is representative of the liquids released. Prior to analysis, all samples taken for the composite shall be thoroughly mixed in order for the composite sample to be representative of the effluent release.
e. A continuous release is the discharge of liquid wastes of a nondiscrete volume; e. g., from a system that has an input flow during the continuous release.
f. If Component Cooling Water activity is >1 X 10 uCi/ml, perform a weekly gross activity on the Intake Cooling Water System outlet to ensure the activity level is ( a 2 X 10 uCi/ml LLD limit. If ICW is )2 X 10 7 uCi/ml, perform analysis in accordance with a Plant Continuous Release on this Table.

ST. LUCIE UNIT 1 3/4 11-4 May 13, 1982

Dcno tcs Unrestricted Ar~Boundry I,ine for. the ST. 'IE SITE

'I;<p;~kg'.:"', ~ ~,~".>~;"'gj~::;;@.~;, gFwj.:-".-:-

Minimum Distance for Radioactive Gaseous Releases from Plant Vent to Site Boundry j,J~pi>+~i~ .;~A:,;F

~

.W,,c~y i~We<<-~~>d!>,

Outlet to Discharge Pipe ( Liq. Radioactive Effluents Normal SCALE IN FEET 0 1000 2000 3000 I'~~<ere 3.$ l-l Uarestxicied Area Soumdry I'or Yhe St. Lucie Site Hay 13, 1982 11-5

RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS DOSE LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION II 3.11.1.2 The dose or dose commitment to an individual from radioactive materials in liquid effluents released to unrestricted areas (see Figure 3.11-1) shall be limited:

During any calendar quarter to <1.5 mrem to the total body and to <5 mrem to any organ.

APPLICABILITY: At all times ACTION:

a. With the calculated dose from the release of radioactive materials in liquid effluents exceeding any of the above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report which identifies the cause(s) for exceeding the limit(s) and defines the corrective actions to be taken to reduce the releases of radioactive materials in liquid effluents during the remainder of the current calendar quarter and subsequent quarters.

The Special Report exempts a Licensee Event R'eport on the above limits.

b. The provisions of Specifications 3 .0.3 and 3 .0.4 are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.1.2 . Dose Calculations. Cumulative dose contributions from liquid effluents shall be determined in accordance with the methodology in the ODCM at least once per 31 days.

ST LUCIE UNIT 1 3/4 11-6 May 13, 1982

RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT S LIQUID WASTE TREATMENT LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.11.1.3 The appropriate subsystems of the liquid radwaste treatment system shall be OPERABLE to reduce the radioactive materials in liquid waste prior to their discharge when the projected monthly dose due to liquid effluent releases to unrestricted areas (see Figure 3.11-1) when averaged over 31 days would exceed 0.12 mrem to the total body and 0.4 mrem to any organ.

APPLICABILITY: At all times ACTION'ith the liquid radwaste treatment system inoperable for more than 31 days or with radioactive liquid waste being discharged without treatment and in excess of the above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report which includes the following information (The Special Report exempts a Licensee Event Report on the above limits):

l. Identification of equipment or subsystems not OPERABLE and a description of alternate equipment used for treatment of radioactive liquid effluent.
2. Action(s) taken to restore the inoperable equipment, or backup equipment, to OPERABLE status.

J

3. Summary description of action(s) taken to prevent a recurrence.
b. The provisions of Specifications 3 .0.3 and 3 .0.4 are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS 4.11.1.3.1 Doses due to liquid releases to unrestricted areas shall be projected at least once per 31 days as per the ODCM methodology unless the liquid radwaste treatment system is being used.

4.11.1.3.2 The appropriate liquid radwaste subsystems shall be demonstrated OPERABLE at least once per 92 days unless the appropriate liquid radwaste subsystem has been utilized to process radioactive liquid effluents during the previous 92 days.

ST. LUCIE UNIT 1 3/4 11-7 May 13, 1982

RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4-11.2 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS DOSE RATE LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.11.2.1 The instantaneous dose rate in unrestricted areas (see Figure 3.11-1) due to radioactive materials released in gaseous effluents from the site shall be limited to the following values:

a. The dose rate limit for noble gases shall be <500 mrem/yr to the total body and <3000 mrem/yr to the skin, and
b. For the inhalation pathway the dose rate limit for I-131, Tritium and for radioactive materials in particulate form with half lives greater than 8 days shall be <1500 mrem/yr to any organ.

'V APPLICABILITY: At all times ACTION:

a~ With the dose rate(s) exceeding the above limits, immediately decrease the release rate to comply with the limit(s) given in Specification 3.11.2.1 and provide prompt notification to the Commission pursuant .to Specification 6.9.1.12.

b. The provisions of Specifications 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.2.1.1 The instantaneous release rate of noble gases in gaseous effluents shall be continuously monitored for the release points given in Table 3.3-13.

4.11.2.1.2 The release rate of radioactive materials other than noble gases, in gaseous effluents shall be determined by obtaining representative samples and performing analyses in accordance with the sampling and analysis program, specified in Table 4.11-2.

4.11.2.1.3 The instantaneous dose rate in unrestricted areas, due to radioactive materials other than noble gases released in gaseous effluents, shall be determined to be within the required limits by using the methodology prescribed by the ODCM on the results of the sampling and analysis program specified in Table 4 .11-2 .

ST. LUCIE UNIT 1 3/4 11-8 May 13, 1982

TABLE 4 ~ 11-2 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM Sampling Minimum Lower Limit of Gaseous Release Type Frequency Analysis Type Of Detection (LLD)

Frequency Activit Analysis (UCi/101)

A. Waste Gas Storage Tank P P Noble Gas (Batch)g Each Tank Each Tank Principal Gamma Emitters 1X104 B. Containment Purge P P Noble Gas 1 X 10 Each Purge Each Purge Principal Gamma Emitters H-3 1X10 C. Plant Vent, Fuel Building Noble Gas 1X104 Vent, )lowdown Building Vent Principal Gamma Emitters System H-3 1X1O6 4/Mi 4/M H-3 1X 1O6 D. All Release Types as Listed I-131 1x 1o'2 in C. above Continuous . Charcoal Sample

.I-133 1 X 10 4 M Continuous Particulate Particulate Sample Principal Gamma Emitters 1X1O" M

Continuous Composite Gross Alpha 1X1O" Particulate Sample 0

Continuous Composite Sr-89; Sr-90 1X1O" Particulate Sample Continuous Noble Gas Monitor Noble Gas Gross Beta & Gamma 1 X 1O 4

TABLE 4.11-2 (continued)

TABLE NOTATION

a. The lower limit of detection (LLD) is defined in Table Notation a. of Table 4.11-1.
b. The principal gamma emitters for which the LLD Limit Specification will apply are exclusively the following radionuclides: Kr-87, Kr-88, Xe-133, Xe-133m, Xe-135, and Xe-138 for noble gas emissions and Mn-54, Fe-59, Co-58, Co-60, Zn-65, Mo-99, Cs-134, Cs-137, Ce-141, Ce-144, and I-131 for particulate emissions. This list does not mean that only these nuclides are to be detected and reported. Other peaks which are measurable and identifiable, together with the above nuclides shall also be identified and reported. Nuclides which are below the LLD for the analyses should not be reported as being present at the LLD level for that nuclide.
c. Tritium grab samples shall be taken prior .to each purge release, but the sample may be analyzed after the batch release when the sample counting solution has stabilized to allow an accurate determination of activity.
d. Sampling Frequency and Minimum Analysis Frequency are applicable only during releases via this pathway.
e. The ratio of the sample flow rate to the sampled stream flow rate shall be known for the time period in Specifications 3 .11.2 .1, 3 .11.2 .2, and
3. 11.2.3.
f. If the analysis frequency is daily, the LLD limit may be increased by a factor of 10.
g. A batch release is the discharge of gaseous waste of a discrete volume.
h. A purge is a batch release from the containment building.

The Plant Vent shall be sampled for Tritium at this frequency Containment Purge Exhaust is operating as a continuous release.

if the ST. LUCIE UNIT 3/4 11-10 Nay 13, 1982

RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS DOSE, NOBLE GASES LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.11.2.2 The air dose in unrestricted areas (see Figure 3 .11-1) due to noble gases released in gaseous effluents shall be limited to the following:

a. During any calendar quarter, to <5 mrad for gamma radiation and <10 mrad for beta radiation.

APPLICABILITY: At all times ACTION:

a. With the calculated air dose from radioactive noble gases in gaseous effluents exceeding any of the above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report which identifies the cause(s) for exceeding the limit(s) and define the corrective actions to be taken to reduce the releases of radioactive noble gases in gaseous effluents during the remainder of the current calendar quarter. The Special Report exempts a Licensee Event Report on the above limits.
b. The provisions of Specifications 3 .0.3 and 3 .0.4 are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.2.2.1 Dose Calculations Cumulative dose contributions for the current calendar quarter shall be determined in accordance with the methodology in the ODCM at least once every 31 days.

ST. LUCIE UNIT '1 3/4 11-11 May 13, 1982

RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS DOSE, RADIOIODINES, RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL IN PARTICULATE FORM, AND RADIONUCLIDES OTHER THAN NOBLE GASES LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.11.2.3 The dose to an individual from radioiodines, radioactive materials in particulate form, and radionuclides other than noble gaes with half-lives greater than 8 days in gaseous effluents released to unrestricted areas (see Figure 3.11-1) shall be limited to the following:

a. During any calendar quarter to <7.5 mrem to any organ.

APPLICABILITY: At all times ACTION:

a. With the calculated dose from the release of radioiodines, radioactive materials in particulate form, or radionuclides other than noble gases in gaseous effluents exceeding any of the above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report which identifies the cause( s) for exceeding the limit and defines the corrective actions to be taken to reduce the releases of radioiodines, radioactive materials in particulate form, and radionuclides other than noble gases with half-lives greater than 8 days in gaseous effluents during the remainder of the current calendar quarter. The Special Report exempts a Licensee Event Report on the above limit.
b. The provisions of Specifications 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.2.3 Dose Calculations Cumulative dose contributions for the current calendar quarter shall be determined in accordance with the methodology in the ODCM at least once every 31 days.

ST. LUCIE UNIT 3/4 11-12 May 13, 1982

RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.11.2.4 The appropriate subsystems of the gaseous radwaste treatment system shall be OPERABLE. The gaseous radwaste treatment system shall be used to reduce radioactive materials in gaseous waste prior to their discharge when the projected gaseous effluent doses due to gaseous effluent releases to unrestricted areas (see Figure 3 .11-1) when averaged over 31 days would exceed 0.4 mrad for gamma radiation and 0.8 mrad for beta radiation.

APPLICABILITY: At all times ACTION:

a. With the gaseous Waste Treatment System inoperable for more than 31 days or with gaseous waste being discharged without treatment and in excess of the above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report which includes the following information (The Special Report exempts a Licensee Event Report on the above limits):
1. Identification of equipment or subsystems not OPERABLE and a description of alternate equipment used for treatment of radioactive gaseous effluents.
2. Action(s) taken to restore the inoperable equipment, or backup equipment, to OPERABLE status.
3. Summary description of action( s) taken to prevent a recurrance.
b. The provisions of Specification 3 .0.3 and 3 .0.4 are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.2.4.1 Doses due to gaseous releases to unrestricted areas shall be projected at least once per 31 days as per the ODCM methodology unless gaseous radwaste treatment system is in use.

4.11.2,.4.2 The appropriate 'subsystems shall be demonstrated OPERABLE at least once per 92 days unless the appropriate subsystem has been utilized to process radioactive gaseous effluents during the previous 92 days.

ST. LUCIE UNIT '1 3/4 11-13 May 13, 1982

RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS EXPLOSIVE GAS MIXTURE LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3 ~ 11.2.5 The concentration of oxygen in the gaseous waste holdup system shall be limited to < 4% by volume whenever the hydrogen concentration exceeds 4% by volume.

APPLICABILITY: At all times when hydrogen is used as a cover gas on the Volume Control Tank.

ACTION:

a. With the concentration of oxygen in the gaseous waste holdup system

)4% by volume, immediately suspend all additions of waste gases to the affected gas decay tank and reduce the concentration of oxygen in the remainder of the system to less than 4% by volume within 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br />. The affected gas decay tank should be discharged as soon as possible provided that the Specifications of 3.11.2.1 are not exceeded in the process.

b. The provisions of Specifications 3 .0.3 and 3 .0.4 are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.2.5 The concentrations of hydrogen and oxygen in the gaseous waste holdup system shall be determined to be within the above limitsby monitoring the waste gases with the hydrogen and oxygen monitors required OPERABLE by Table 3.3-13 of Specification 3.3.3.10.

ST. LUCIE UNIT 3/4 11-14

RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS GAS STORAGE TANKS LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.11.2.6 The quantity of radioactivity contained in each gas storage tank shall be limited to <285,000 Curies noble gases (considered as Xe-133).

APPLICABILITY: At all times ACTION:

a. With the quantity of radioactive material in any gas decay tank exceeding the above limit, immediately suspend all additions of radioactive material to the tank and within 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br /> either reduce the tank contents to within the limit or provide prompt notification to the Commission pursuant to Specification 6.9.1..12 'he written follow-up report shall include a description of activities planned and/or taken to reduce the tank contents to within the above limit.
b. The provisions of Specifications 3.0.3 and 3 .0.4 are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.2.6 The quantity of radioactive material contained in each gas decay tank shall be determined to be within the above limit at least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> when the Reactor Coolant System Gross Activity exceeds the activity limit of Specification 3.4.8.b.

ST. LUCIE UNIT 3/4 11-15 May 13, 1982

RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS

'OLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.11.3 Solidified radioactive waste or waste containing free standing liquids shall be processed in accordance with a PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM prior to being shipped to a radioactive waste disposal facility.

APPLICABILITY: At all times ACTION

a. With the waste form requirements for transportation or disposal of solidified radioactive waste (or waste containing free standing liquids), pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations and the applicable burial site regulations, not satisfied, suspend shipments of such radioactive waste to the burial site.
b. The provisions of Specifications 3.0.3 and 3 .0.4 are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.3 For each radioactive waste container used to collect liquid radioactive waste (or waste containing free standing liquids), prior to shipment to a radioactive waste disposal facility, the licensee shall certify that he has followed the minimum requirements of the applicable procedures of the PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM.

ST. LUCIE UNIT ] 3/4 11-16 May 13, 1982

3/4. 12 RADIOLOGIC ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 3/4.12.1 MONITORING PROGRAM LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.12.1 The radiologica environmental monitoring program shall e conducte as specified in Table 3.12-1 and Table 4.12-1.

APPLICABILITY: At all times.

ACTION a~ With the radiological environmental monitoring program not being conducted as specified in Tables 3.12-1 and 4.12-1, prepare and submit to the Commission, in the annual Radiological Monitoring Report, a description of the reasons for not conducting the program as specified. Deviations from Specification 3 .12.1 may occur because samples are unobtainable due to hazardous conditions, biological or seasonal unavailability, or due to vandalism, or to malfunction of sampling or analytical equipment, laboratory accidents, sampling errors, or other legitimate reasons. If deviations occur because of malfunction of sampling or analytical equipment, every effort shall be made to complete corrective action prior to the end of the next sampling period. A description of all deviations from Tables 3.12-1 and 4.12-1, the reasons for all such deviations and a description of any corrective actions initiated or planned to bring the radiological environmental surveillance program back in accordance with Specification 3.12.1 shall be provided in the annual Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report. A current list of sample locations used during the reporting period shall be included in the annual Radiological Monitoring Report. Sample location changes from the year, if any, should be identified along with a brief 'receding description of the reason for the change.

b. With the confirmed* level of radioactivity in an environmental sampling medium at one or more of the locations, outside of the plant circulating water system, specified in Table 3.12-1 exceeding the limits of Table 6.9.3-2 when averaged over any calendar quarter, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days from the end of the affected calendar quarter (or from the time of the confirmatory result if such result is not received until after the end of the quarter in which the original sample was collected), a Special Report which includes an evaluation of any release conditions, environmental factors or other aspects which may have caused the limits of Table 6.9.3-2 to be exceeded. This report is not required if the measured level of radioactivity was not the result of plant effluents; however, in such an event, the conditions shall be reported and described in the annual Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report. This Special Report exempts a Licensee Event Report.
  • A confirmatory reanalysis of the original, a duplicate, or a new sample may be desirable, as appropriate. The results of the confirmatory analysis shall be completed at the. earliest time consistent with the analysis, but in any case within 30 days.

ST. LUCIE UNIT 'I 3/4 12-1 May 13, 1982

c. With milk or garden vegetation samples unava lable from any of the sample locations required by Table 3.12-1, information shall be included in the annual Radiological Monitoring Report identifying the cause of the unavailability and identifying replacement locations where samples were obtained. If replacement samples are unavailable during the specified time interval, a special report pursuant to specification 6.9.2 shall be submitted to the Commission within 30 days from the time the licensee has been properly notified and will identify the cause of the unavailability of the samples and a discussion of the plans for obtianing future samples. If new permanent sample locations are required; once they have been selected and sample availability is established, the locations from which the samples are unavailable may be deleted from the program, and the locations from which the samples will be obtained in the future are incorporated in the environmental monitoring program as new sample locations.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.12.1.1 The radiological environmental monitoring samples shall be collected pursuant to Table 3.12-1 and shall be analyzed pursuant to the requirements of Tables 3.12-1 and 4.12-1.

ST. LUCIE UNIT 1 3/4 12-2 Hay 13, 1982

iL ~

TABLE 3.12-1 ST. LUCIE SITE RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM Fxposure Pathway Sample Sampling and (b) Type and Frequency (c) and/or Sample Locations Collection Frequency of Analysis

l. Airborne
a. Radioiodine & 9 locations Continuous operation of Radioiodine filters Particulates sampler with collection I-131 weekly at least weekly Particulate filters Gross beta weekly: Analyze each filter for gross beta radioactivity > 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> following filter change.

Gamma isotopic (Composite)

Quarterly A gamma isotopic is also required for each sample having a gross beta radioactivity which is >1.0 pCilm3and which is also >10 times that of the most recent control sample.

2. Direct Radiation 29 locations Quarterly Gamma exposure'ate quarterly
3. Waterborne
a. Surface 4 locations Monthly Gamma isotopic and tritium analysis Monthly
b. Ground (well) 2 locations Quarterly Gamma isotopic and tritium analysis Quarterly
c. Drinking 3 locations Quarterly Gross beta, gamma isotopic and tritium analysis Quarterly
d. Sediment from 4 locations Semiannually Gamma isotopic analysis shoreline Semiannually

TABLE 3 ~ 12-1 ST. LUCIE SITE RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM Exposure Pathway Sample Sampling and b) Type and Frequency (c and/or Sample Locations Collection Fre uency of Analysis

4. Ingestion
a. Milk 2 locations Semi-Monthly Gamma isotopic and I-131 analysis Control samples Monthly Semi-monthly.-

Control samples Gamma isotopic and I-131 analysis Monthly

b. Fish and Invertebrates
1. Crustacea 2 locations Semi-Annually Gamma isotopic analysis Semi-Annually
2. Fish 2 locations Semi-Annually Gamma isotopic analysis Semi-Annually
c. Food Products
1. Citrus 5 locations At harvest time Gamma isotopic analysis Each Sampling
2. Edible Garden Vegetation 2 locations At harvest time Gamma isotopic analysis Each Sampl

TABLE 3.12-1 TABLE NOTATION (a) A list of sample locations will be provided on a Figure and Table in the ODCM.

(b) The following definition of frequencies shall apply to Table 3.12-1 only:

Weekly Not less than once per calendar week. A maximum interval of 11 days is allowed between the collection of any two consecutive samples.

Semi-Monthly Not less than 2 times per calendar month with an interval of not less than 7 days between, sample collections. A maximum interval of 24 days is allowed between collection of any two consecutive samples.

Monthly '- Not less than once per calendar month with an interval of not less than 10 days between sample collections.

Quarterly Not less than once per calendar quarter with an interval of not less than 30 days between sample collections.

Semiannually One sample each between calendar, dates (January 1 - June will be provided between sample collections.

(c) Frequency of analyses to be consistent with collection frequency.

(d) No drinking water sources are effected by effluents from the plant.

ST. LUCIE UNIT 3/4 12-5 May 13, 1982

TABLE 4.12-1.

DETECTION CAPABILITIES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION (LLD)

ANALYSIS WATER AIRBORNE PARTI- FISH MILK FOOD PRODUCTS SEDIMENT (PCI/L) CULATE 0( GAS (pCi/Kg, wet) pCi/L (pCi/Kg, wet) (pCi/Kg, dry)

(pCi/m )

Gross Beta 4c 1 X 10 H-3 2000 (1000 )

~ Mn-54 15 130

~ Fe-59 30 260 Co-58, 60 15 130

' ~ Zn-65 30 260 Zr-95 30 Nb-95 15 I-131 1c 1X1O' 6Od Cs-134 15 X 10 130 150 6O'Od Cs-137 18 6X1O2 150 18 180 Ba/La-140 35 35 Note: This list does not mean that only these radionuclides are to be detected and reported.

Other peaks which are raeasurable and identifiable (except naturally occurring radionuclides) together with the above radionuclides shall also be identified and reported.

TABLE 4.12-1 (continued)

NOTATION

a. Acceptable detection capabilities for thermoluminescent dosimeters used, for environmental measurements are given in Regulatory Guide 4.13.
b. Table indicates acceptable detection capabilities for radioactive materials in environmental samples. These detection capabilities are tabulated in terms of the lower limits of detection (LLDs). The LLD is defined, for purposes of this guide, as the smallest concentration, of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count (above system background) that will be detected with at least 95% probability with at most 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real" signal.

For a particular measurement system (which may include radiochemical separation):

4 66* sb LLD = E V'22 Y where LLD is the lower limit of detection as defined above (as pCi per unit mass or volume).

sb is the standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of a blank sample as appropriate (as counts per minute).

E is the counting efficiency (as counts per disintegration).

V is the sample size (in units of mass or volume).

2.22 is the number of disintegrations per minute per picocurie.

Y is the fractional radiochemical yield (when applicable).

  • 4.66 is the factor used when background has. been subtracted from the sample count. For measurements in which the background is not subtracted, the factor 3 .29 shall be used.

c LLD for drinking water d LLD for garden vegetation e Total for parent and daughter ST. LUCIE UNIT 1 3/4 May 13, 1982

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 3/4.12.2 LAND USE CENSUS LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.12.2 A land use census shall be conducted annually to identify the location of the nearest milk animal, the nearest residence and the nearest garden+ of greater than 500 square feet producing fresh leafy vegetables in each of the 16 meteorological sectors within a distance of five miles.

APPLICABILITY: At all times ACTION:

a. With a land use census identifying a location(s) which yields a calculated dose or dose commitment greater than the values ccurrently being calculated in Specification 4.11.2.3, prepare and submit to the Commission within 60 days from the time the licensee receives the results of the Land Use Census, pursuant to Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report, which identifies the new location(s).
b. With a land use census identifying a location(s) which yields a calculated dose or dose commitment (via the same exposure pathway) 20%

greater than at a location from which samples are currently being obtained in accordance with Specification 3.12.1, prepare and submit to the Commission within 60 days from the time the licensee receives the results of the Land Use Census, pursuant to Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report, which identifies the new location(s). The new location shall be added to the radiological environmental monitoring program when samples become available. The sampling location having the lowest calculated dose or dose commitment (via the same exposure pathway) may be deleted from the monitoring program after (October 31) of the year in which the land use census was conducted.

c. The provisions of Specifications 3 .0.3 and 3 .0.4 are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.12.2.1 The land use census shall be conducted at least once per 12 months between the dates of February 1 and July 31, by door-to-door survey, aerial survey, or by consulting local agriculture authorities.

  • Broad leaf vegetation sampling may be performed at the site boundary in a sector with the highest D/Q in lieu of the garden census.

ST. LUCIE UNIT ). 3/4 12-8 May 13, 1982

iO I

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 3/4 ~ 12.3 INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION

  • 3.12.3 Analyses shall 'be performed on radioactive materials supplied as part of an.Interlaboratory Comparison Program which has been approved by NRC. This condition may be satisfied by participation in the Environmental Intercomparison Studies Program conducted by the EPA.

APPLICABILITY: At all times.

ACTION:

I

a. With analyses not being performed as required above, notify the Commission as a part of the annual Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report.
b. The provisions of Specification 3 .0.3 and 3 .0.4 are not applicable.

If the Radiologi'cal Environmental Surveillance Program is carried out by the licensee, the licensee shall establish an Interlaboratory Comparison Program which'as been approved by the NRC. If the licensee is not the principle investigator, the licensee shall require the principle investigator to take part in an Interlaboratory Comparison Program. This condition may be satisfied by participation in the Environmental Radioactivity Laboratory Intercomparison Studies Program.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.12.3 The results of available analyses performed as part of the above required Interlaboratory Comparison Program shall be included in the annual Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report pursuant to Specification 6.9.3.2.

ST. LUCIE UNIT f 3/4 12-9 Hay 13, 1982

INSTRUMENTATION BASES 3/4.3.3.9 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT INSTRUMENTATION The radioactive liquid effluent instrumentation is provided to monitor and control, as applicable, the releases of radioactive materials in liquid effluents during actual or potential releases. The alarm trip setpoints for these instruments shall be calculated in accordance with approved methods in the ODCM to ensure that the alarm/trip will occur prior to exceeding the limits of 10 CFR Part 20. The OPERABILITY and use of this instrumentation is consistent with the requirements of General Design Criteria 60, 63 and 64 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50.

3/4.3.3.10 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT INSTRUMENTATION The radioactive gaseous effluent instrumentation is provided to monitor and control, as applicable, the releases of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents during actual or potential releases. The alarm/trip setpoints for these instruments shall be calculated in accordance with methods in the ODCM to ensure that the alarm/trip will occur prior to exceeding the limits of 10 CFR Part 20. The OPERABILITY and use of this instrumentation is consistent with the requirements of General Design Criteria 60, 63 and 64 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50.

ST. LUCIE UNIT 1 B 3/4 3-4 May 13, 1982

3/4 ~ 11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASES 3/4.11.1 LIQUID EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.1 ' CONCENTRATION This specification is provided to ensure that the concentration of radioactive materials released in liquid waste effluents from the site to unrestricted areas will be less than the concentration levels specified in 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B, Table II. This limitation provides additional assurance that the levels of radioactive materials in bodies of water outside the site will not result in exposures within (1) the Section II.A design objectives of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50, to an individual and (2) the limits of 10 CFR Part 20.106(e) to the population. The concentration limit for noble gases is based upon the assumption that Xe-135 is the controlling radioisotope and its MPC in air (submersion) was converted to an equivalent concentration in water using the methods described in International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Publication 2 .

3/4 '1 '.2 DOSE This specification is provided to implement the requirements of Sections II.A, III.A and IV.A of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50. The Limiting Condition for Operation implements the guides set forth in Section II.A of Appendix I. The ACTION statements provide the required operating flexibility and at the same time implement the guides set forth in Section IV.A of Appendix I to assure that the releases of radioactive material in liquid effluents will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable".

Performing the dose calculations in the ODCM implement the requirements in Section III.A of Appendix I that conformance with the guides of Appendix I is to be shown by calculational procedures based on models and data such that the actual exposure of an individual through appropriate pathways is unlikely to be substantially underestimated. The equations specified in the ODCM for calculating the doses due to the actual release rates of radioactive materials in liquid effluents should be consistent with the methodology provided in Regulatory Guide 1.109, "Calculation of Annual Doses to Man from Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I," Revision 1, October 1977, and Regulatory Guide 1.113, "Estimating Aquatic Dis'persion of Effluents from Accidental and Routine Reactor Releases for the Purpose of Implementing Appendix I," April 1977.

ST ~ LUCIE UNIT 1 B 3/4 11-1 May 13, 1982

RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASES This specification- applies to the release of liquid effluents from each reactor at the site. For units with shared radwaste treatment systems, the liquid effluents from the shared system are proportioned among the units sharing that system.

3/4 ~ 11 ~ 1.3 LIQUID WASTE TREATMENT The OPERABILITY of appropriate subsystems of the LWT" system ensures that this system will be available for use whenever liquid effluents require treatment prior to release to the environment. The requirements that the appropriate portions of this system be used when specified provides assurance that the releases of radioactive materials in liquid effluents will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable." This specification implements the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50.36a, General Design Criterion 60 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50 and design objective Section 11.D of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50. The specified limits governing the use of appropriate portions of the liquid radwaste treatment system were specified as a suitable fraction of the guide set forth in Section 11.A of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50, for liquid effluents.

3/4.11.2 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS 3/F 11.2 ' DOSE RATE This specification is provided to ensure that the dose rate at anytime at the exclusion area boundary from gaseous effluents from all units on the site will be within the annual dose limits of 10 CFR Part 20 for unrestricted areas. The annual dose limits are the doses associated with the concentrations of 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B, Table 11. These limits provide reasonable assurance that radioactive material discharged in gaseous effluents will not result in the exposure of an individual in an unrestricted area, either within or outside the exclusion area boundary, to annual average concentrations exceeding the limits specified in Appendix B, Table 11 of 10 CFR Part 20 (10 CFR Part 20.106(b)). For individuals who may at times be within the exclusion area boundary, the occupancy of the individual will be sufficiently low to compensate fo'r any increase in the atmospheric diffusion factor above that for the exclusion area boundary.

The specified release rate limits restrict, at all times, the corresponding gamma and beta dose rates above background to an individual at or beyond the exclusion area boundary to <(500) mrem/year to the total body or to <(3000) mrem/year to the skin. These release rate limits also restrict, at all times, the corresponding organ dose rate above background to an infant via the inhalation pathway to < 1500 mrem/year.

J ST. LUCIE UNIT 1 B 3/4 11-2 May 13, 1982

RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASES 3/4 11.2.2 DOSE, NOBLE GASES This specification is provided to implement the requirements of Sections II.B, III.A and IV.A of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50. The Limiting Condition for Operation implements the guides set forth in Section II.B of Appendix I. The ACTION statements provide the required operating flexibility and at the same time implement the guides set forth in Section IV.A of Appendix I assure that the releases of radioactive material in gaseous effluents will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable" . The Surveillance Requirements implement the requirements in Section III.A of Appendix I that conform with the guides of Appendix I to be shown by calculational procedures based on models and data such that the actual exposure of an individual through the appropriate pathways is unlikely to be substantially underestimated. The dose calculations established in the ODCM for calculating the doses due to the actual release rates of radioactive noble gases in gaseous effluents should be consistent with the methodology provided in Regulatory Guide 1.109, "Calculation of Annual Doses to Man from Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I," Revision 1, October 1977 and Regulatory Guide 1.111, "Methods for Estimating Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion of Gaseous Effluents in Routine Releases from Light-Water-Cooled Reactors," Revision 1, July 1977. The ODCM Equations provided for determi,ning the air doses at the exclusion area boundary will be based upon the historical (or real) average atmospheric conditions.

3/4 .11.2 .3 DOSE, RADIOIODINES, RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL IN PARTICULATE FORM AND RADIONUCLIDES OTHER THAN NOBLE GASES This specification is provided to implement the requirements of Sections II.C, III.A and IV.A of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50. The Limiting Conditions for Operation are the guides set forth in Section II.C of Appendix I. The ACTION statements provide the required operating flexibility and at the same time implement the guides set forth in Section IV.A of Appendix I to assure that the releases of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable". The ODCM calculational methods specified in the surveillance requirements implement the requirements in Section III.A of Appendix I that conformance with the guides of Appendix I be shown by calculational procedures based on models and data such that the actual exposure of an individual through appropriate pathways is unlikely to be substantially underestimated. The ODCM calculational methods for calculating the doses due to the actual release rates of the subject materials are required to be consistent with the methodology provided in Regulatory Guide 1.109, "Calculating of Annual Doses to Man from Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents for, the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I", Revision I, October 1977 and Regulatory Guide 1.111, "Methods for Estimating Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion of Gaseous Effluents in Routine Releases from ST. LUCIE UNIT 1 B 3/4 11-3 Hay 13, 1982

RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASES Light-Mater-Cooled Reactors", Revision 1, July 1977. These equations also provide for determining the actual doses based upon the historical (or real) average atmospheric conditions. The release rate specifications for radioiodines, radioactive material in particulate form and radionuclides other than noble gases are dependent on the existing radionuclide pathways to man, in the unrestricted area. The pathways which are examined in the development of these calculations are: 1) individual inhalation of airborne radionuclides, 2) deposition of radionuclides onto green leafy vegetation with subsequent consumption by man, 3) deposition onto grassy areas where milk animals and meat producing animals graze with consumption of the milk and meat by man, and 4) depositon on the ground with subsequent exposure of man.

3/4-11.2.4 GASEOUS WASTE TREATMENT The OPERABILITY of the appropriate subsystems of the gaseous radwaste treatment system ensures that the system will be available for use whenever gaseous effluents require holdup prior to release to the environment. The requirement that the appropriate portions of these systems be used when speci, fied provides reasonable assurance that the releases of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable". This specification implements the requirements of'10 CFR Part 50.36a, General Design Criterion 60 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50, and design objective Section IID of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50. The specified limits governing the use of appropriate portions of the systems were specified as a suitable fraction of the guide set forth in Sections 11B and 11.C of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50, for gaseous effluents.

ST. LUCIE UNIT 1 B 3/4 11-4 May 13, 1982

RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASES 3/F 11.2 ' EXPLOSIVE GAS MIXTURE This'pecification is provided to ensure that the concentration of potentially explosive gas mixtures contained in the waste gas holdup system is maintained below the flammability limits of hydrogen and oxygen.

Maintaining the concentration of hydrogen and oxygen below their flammability limits provides assurance that the releases of radioactive materials will be controlled in conformance with the requirements of General Design Criterion 60 of Appendix A to 10CFR Part 50.

3/F 11.2.6 GAS DECAY TANKS Restricting the quantity of radioactivity contained in each gas decay tank provides assurance that in the event of an uncontrolled release of the tanks conten6s, the resulting total body exposure to an individual at the nearest exclusion area boundary will not exceed 0.5 rem, as per Safety Guide 24. This is consistent with Standard Review Plan 15.7.1, "Waste Gas System Failure".

ST. LUCIE UNIT I B 3/4 11-5 Hay 13, 1982

s 3/4. 12 RADIOLOG AL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING BASES t

The radiological monitoring program required by this specification provides measurements of radiation and of radioactive materials in those exposure pathways and for those radionuclides which lead to the highest potential radiation exposures of individuals resulting from the station operation.

This monitoring program thereby supplements the radiological effluent monitoring program by verifying that the measurable concentrations of radioactive materials and levels of radiation are not higher than expected on the basis of the effluent measurements and modeling of the environmental exposure pathways. Program changes may be initiated based on operational experience.

The detection capabilities required by Table 4 .12 .-1 are state-of-the-art for routine environmental measurements in industrial laboratories. The LLD limits for drinking water meet the requirements of 40 CFR 141.

3/4 ~ 12 ~ 1 LAND USE CENSUS This specification is provided to ensure that changes in the use of unrestricted areas are identified and,that modifications to the monitoring program are made if required by'he results of this census. This census satisfies the requirements of Section IV.8.3 of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part

50. Restricting the census to gardens of greater than 500 square feet provides assurance that significant exposure pathways via leafy vegetables will be identified and monitored since a garden of this size is the minimum required to produce the quantity (26 kg/year) of leafy vegetables assumed in Regulatory Guide 1.109 for consumption by a child. To determine this mimimum garden size, the following assumptions were used, 1) that 20X of the garden was used for growing broad leaf vegetation (i.e., similar to lettuce and cabbage), and 2) a vegetation yield of 2 kg/square meter. Broad leaf vegetation sampling may be performed at the site boundary in the direction sector with the highest (D/Q) in lieu of performing the garden census.

3/4 '2.3 INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM The requirement for participation in an Interlaboratory Comparison program is provided to ensure that independent checks on the precision and accuracy of the measurements of radioactive material in environmental sample matrices are performed as part of a quality assurance'rogram for environmental monitoring in order to demonstrate that the results are reasonably valid.

ST. LUCIE UNIT '1 B 3/4 12-1 May 13, 1982

ADMINISTRATIVE ROLS

e. Investigation of all violations of the Technical Specifications including the preparation and, forwarding of reports covering evaluation and recommendations to prevent recurrence to the Manager of Nuclear Energy, the Vice President of Nuclear Energy and to the Chairman of the Company Nuclear Review Board.
f. Review of those REPORTABLE OCCURRENCES requires 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> notification to the Commission.
g. Review of facility operations to detect potential safety hazards.
h. Performance of special reviews and investigations and reports thereon as requested by the Chairman of the Company Nuclear Review Board.
i. Review of the Plant Security Plan and implementing procedures and shall submit recommended changes to the Chairman of the Company Nuclear Review Board.

Review of the Emergency Plan and implementing procedures and shall submit recommended changes to the Chairman of the Company Nuclear Review Board.

k. Review the results of the radiological environmental monitoring program at least once per 12 months.
1. Review of the ODCM and any changes to the ODCM.

AUTHORITY 6.5.1.7 The Facility Review Group shall:

a.'ecommend to the Plant Manager written approval or disapproval of items considered under 6.5.1.6(a) through (d) above.

b. Render determinations in writing with regard to whether or not each item considered under 6.5.1.6(a) through (e) above constitutes an unreviewed safety question.
c. Provide written notification within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> to the Vice President of Nuclear Energy and the Company Nuclear Review Board of disagreement the FRG and the Plant Manager; however, the Plant Manager 'etween shall have responsibility for resolution of such disagreements pursuant to 6.1.1 above.

ST. LUCIE UNIT 1 6-7 Hay 13, 1982

ADMINISTRATIVE ROLS 6.7 SAFETY LIMIT VIOLATION 6.7.1 The following actions shall'e taken in the event a Safety Limit is violated:

a. The facility shall be placed in at least HOT STANDBY within one hour.
b. The Safety Limit violation shall be reported to the Commission, the Vice President of Power Resources and to the CNRB within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.
c. A Safety Limit Violation Report shall be prepared. The report shall be reviewed by the FRG. This report shall describe (1) applicable circumstances preceding the violation, (2) effects of the violation upon facility components, systems or structures, and (3) corrective action taken to prevent recurrence.
d. The Safety Limit Violation Report shall be submitted to the Commission, the CNRB and the Vice President of Nuclear Energy within 14 days of the violation.

6.8 PROCEDURES 6.8.1 Written procedures shall be established, implemented and maintained covering the activities'eferenced below:

a~ The applicable procedures recommended in Appendix "A" of Regulatory Guide 1.33,,November, 1972.

b. Refueling operations.
c. Surveillance and test activities of safety related equipment.
d. Security Plan implementation.
e. Emergency Plan implementation.
f. Fire Protection Program implementation.

go PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM for SOLIDIFIED radioactive waste or waste containing free standing liquid.

h. Offsite releases of gaseous and liquid effluents containing radioactive materials, including effluent monitor setpoints.
i. Offsite Dose Calculation Manual ST. LUCIE UNIT 1 6-13 May 13, 1982

ADMINISTRATIVE ROLS d.Reactivity anomalies involving disagreement with the predicted value of reactivity balance under steady state conditions during power operation greater than or equal to 1% Delta k/k; a calculated reactivity balance indicating a SHUTDOWN MARGIN less conservative than specified in the technical specifications; short-term reactivity increases that correspond to a reactor period of less than 5 seconds or, if subcritical, an unplanned reactivity insertion of more than 0.5% Delta k/k; or occurrence of any unplanned criticality.

e.Failure or malfunction of one or more components which prevents or could prevent, by itself, the fulfillment of the functional requirements of system(s) used to cope with accidents analyzed in the FSAR.

f.personnel error or procedural inadequacy which prevents or could prevent, by itself, the fulfillment of the functional requirements of systems required to cope with accidents analyzed in the FSAR.

g.Conditions arising from natural or man-made events that, as a direct result of the event require unit shutdown, operation of safety systems, or other protective measures required by technical specifications.

h.Errors discovered in the transient or accident analyses or in the methods used for such analyses as described in the safety analysis report or in the bases for the technical specifications that have or could have permitted reactor operation in a manner less conservative than assumed in the analyses.

i.Performance of structures, systems, or components that requires remedial action or corrective measures to prevent operation in a manner less conservative than assumed in the accident analyses in the safety analysis report or technical specifications bases; or discovery during unit life of conditions not specifically considered in the safety analysis report or technical specifications that require remedial action or corrective measures to prevent the existence or development of an unsafe condition.

jexcess

.Occurrence of radioactive material contained gas decay tanks in of that permitted by the limiting condition for operation established in the technical specifications.

k.Exceeding L.C.O. 3 ~ 11 ~ 1 1 (Liquid Radwaste Concentration) or

~

L.C.O. 3.11.2.1 (Gaseous Dose Rate).

ST LUCIE UNIT 6-17 Hay 13, 1982

ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS THIRTY DAY WRITTEN REPORTS 6.9.1.9 The types of events listed below shall be the subject of written reports to the Director of the Regional Office within thirty days of occurrence of the event. The written report shall include, as a minimum, a completed copy of a licensee event report form. Information provided on the licensee event report form shall be supplemented, as needed, by additional narrative material to provide complete explanation of the circumstances suxrounding the event.

a. Reactor protection system or engineered safety feature instrument settings which are found to be less conservative than those established by the technical specifications but which do not prevent the fulfillment of the functional requirements of affected systems.
b. Conditions leading to operation in a degraded mode permitted by a limiting condition for operation or plant shutdown required by a limiting condition for operation.
c. Observed inadequacies in the implementation of administrative or procedural controls whi'ch threaten to cause reduction of degree of redundancy provided in reactor protection systems or engineered safety feature'ystems.
d. Abnormal degradation of systems other than those specified in 6.9.1.12 .c above designed to contain radioactive material resulting from the fission process.
e. An unplanned offsite release of 1) more than 1 curie of radioactive material in liquid effluents, 2) more than 150 curies of noble gas in gaseous effluents, or 3) more than 0.05 curies of radioiodine in gaseous effluents. The report of an unplanned offsite release of radioactive material shall include the following information:

1.A descxiption of the event and equipment involved.

2.Cause(s) for the unplanned xelease.

3.Actions taken to prevent recurrence.

4.Consequences of the unplanned release.

ST. LUCIE UNIT '1 6-18 Hay 13, 1982

ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS SPECIAL REPORTS

h. Core Barrel Movement, Specifications 3 .4.11 and 4 .4.11.
i. Fire Detection Instrumentation, Specification 3 .3.3.7.

Fire Suppression Systems, Specification 3 .7.11.1.

k. Exceeding one or more LCO' for Specifications 3 .11.1.2, 3.11.1.3, 3.11.2.2, 3.11.2.3, or 3.11.2.4, involving radiation dose from radioactive effluents.
1. Measured levels of radioactivity in an environmental sampling medium determined to exceed the reporting level values of Table 6.9.3-2 when averaged over any calendar quarter sampling period pursuant to Specification 3.12.1.b. When more than one of the radionuclides in Table 6.9.3-2 are detected in the sampling medium, this report shall be submitted if:

concentration (1) + concentration (2) + ...>1.0 limit level (1) limit level (2)

When radionuclides other than those in Table 6.9.3-2 are detected and are the result of plant effluents, this report shall be submitted the quarterly dose to an individual is equal to or greater than the if quarterly limits of Specifications 3 .11 .1 .2, 3 .11.2 .2 and 3.11 .2.3 .

This report is not required if the measured level of radioactivity was not the result of plant effluents; however, in such an event, the condition shall be reported and described in the Annual Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report.

m. Milk or garden samples unavailable during the specified time interval, Specification 3.12.l.c.

,n. The discovery of a location which yields a calculated dose or dose commitment > the values currently being calculated, Specification 3.12;2.a.

o. The discovery of a location which yields a calculated dose or dose commitment 20% greater than at a location from which samples are currently being obtained, Specification 3.12.2.b.

ST. LUCIE UNIT 'I 6-19 Nay 13, 1982

ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS 6.9.3 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTS RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT 3/

6.9.3.1 Routine radiological environmental monitoring reports covering the operation of the unit during the previous calendar year shall be submitted prior to May 1 of each year. The initial report shall be submitted prior to May 1 of the year following initial criticality.

6.9.3.2 The annual radiological environmental monitoring reports shall include summaries, interpretations, and information based upon trend analysis of the results of the radiological environmental surveillance activities for the report period, including a comparison with preoperational studies, operational controls t,as appropriate), and previous environmental surveillance reports and an assessment of the observed impacts of the plant operation on the environment., The reports shall also include the results of the land use censuses required by Specification 3.12.2. If harmful effects are detected by the monitoring, the report shall provide an analysis of the problem and a planned course of action to alleviate the 'problem.

The annual radiological environmental monitoring reports shall include summarized and tabulated results in the format similar to Table 6.9.3-1 of all radiological environmental samples required to be taken during the report period. In the event that some results are not available for inclusion with the report, the report shall be submitted noting and explaining the reasons for the missing results. Delayed data shall be submitted in a supplementary report within 60 days from the time the last analyses are completed.

The reports shall also include the following: a summary description of the radiological environmental monitoring program; a map of all sampling locations keyed to a table giving distances and directions from one reactor; the result of land use censuses required by the Specification 3.12.2; a summary of available results from the Interlaboratory Comparison Program required by Specification 3.12.3, and additional information as provided in Specification 3 .12.1.

SEMIANNUAL RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT 3/

6.9.3.3 Routine radioactive effluent release reports covering the operating of the unit during the previous 6 months of operation shall be submitted within 60 days after January 1 and July 1 of each year. The period of the first report shall begin with the date of initial criticality.

3/ A single submittal may be made for a multiple unit station. The submittal should combine those sections that are common to all units at the station; however, for units with separate radwaste systems, the submittal shall specify the releases of radioactive material from each unit.

ST. LUCIE UNIT 1 6-20 Hay 13, 1982

TABLE 6.9.3-1 FORHAT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUMHARY NAME OF FACILITY DOCKET NO.

LOCATION OF FACILITY REPORTING PERIOD Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location With Highest Annual Mean Number of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Control Locations Nonroutini Sampled of Analyses Detection Mean (f)a Name Mean( f) a Mean (f)a ~

Reported (Unit of Measurement) Performed (LLD) Rangea Distance and Direction Ra e Range Measurements Mean and range based upon detection measurements only. Fraction of detectable measurements at specified locations is indicated in parenthesis (f).

ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS 6.9.3.3.1 The radioactive effluent release reports shall include a summary of the quantities of radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents and solid waste released from the unit as outlined in Regulatory Guide 1.21 Rev; 1, "iMeasuring, Evaluating, and Reporting Radioactivity. in Solid Wastes and Releases of Radioactive Materials in Liquid and Gaseous Effluents from Light-Mater-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants", with data summarized on a quarterly basis following the format of Appendix B thereof.

The radioactive effluent release reports shall include the following information for all unplanned offsite releases of radioactive materials in gaseous and liquid effluents:

a. A description of the event and equipment involved.
b. Cause(s) for the unplanned release.
c. Actions taken to prevent recurrence.
d. Consequences of the unplanned release.

The radioactive effluent release reports shall include an assessment of radiation doses from the radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents released from the unit during each calendar quarter as outlined in the ODCM. The assessment of radiation doses shall be performed in accordance with methodology in the ODCM.

ST. LUCIE UNIT f 6-22 Hay 13, 1982

TABLE 6.9.3-2 NONROUTINE REPORTING LEVELS FOR RADIOACTIVITY CONCENTRATIONS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES Broad Leaf Water Airborne Particulate Fish Milk Vegetation Analysis (pCi/1) or Gases (pCi/m ) (pCi/Kg, wet) (pCi/1) (pCi/Kg, wet)

I H-3 2 X 104 Mn-54 1 X 103 3 X 104 Fe-59 4 X 102 1 X 104 I Co-58 1 X 103 3 X 104 I Co-60 3 X 10 1 X 10 I Zn-65 3X10 2 X 104

'Zr-Nb-95 4 X102 I-131 0.9 1 X 102 I Cs-134 30 10 1 X 10 60 1 X 103 I Cs-137 50 20 2X10 70 2 X 103 (1)

I

. Ba-La-140 2 X 102 3 X102 (1) Total for parent and daughter

< h ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS

e. Records of gaseous and liquid radioactive material released to the environs
f. Records of transient or operational cycles for those facility components identified in Table 5.9-1.
g. Records of training and qualification for current members of the plant staff.
h. Records of in-service inspections performed pursuant to these Technical Specifications.

Records of Quality Assurance activities required by the QA Manual Records of reviews performed for changes made to procedures or equipment or reviews of tests and experiments pursuant to 10 CFR 50.59

k. Records of meetings of the FRG and the CNRB
1. Records of Environmental Qualification which are covered under the provisions of paragraph 6.13.
m. Records of the service lives of all hydraulic and mechanical snubbers listed on Tables 3.7-2a and 3 .7-2b including the date at which the service life commences and associated installation and maintenance records.
n. Annual Radiological Environmental Monitoring Reports; and records of analyses transmitted to the licensee which are used to prepare the Annual Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report.
o. Meteorological data, summarized and reported in a format consistent with the recommendations of Regulatory Guides 1.21 and 1.23 .

6.11 RADIATION PROTECTION PROGRAM Procedures'or personnel radiation protection shall be prepared consistent with the requirements of 10 CFR Part 20 and shall be approved, maintained and adhered to for all operations involving personnel radiation exposure.

ST. LUCIE UNIT I 6-24 May 13, 1982

ADNINISTRATIVE CONTROLS 6.12 HIGH RADIATION AREA 6.12 1 In lieu of the "control device" or "alarm signal" required by

~

paragraph 20.203(c) (2) of 10 CFR 20, each high radiation area in which the intensity of radiation is 1000 mrem/hr or less shall be barricaded and conspicuously posted as a high radiation area and entrance thereto shall be controlled by requiring issuance of a Radiation Work Permit*. Any individual or group of individuals permitted to enter such areas shall be provided with or accompanied by one or more of the following:

a. A radiation monitoring device which continuously indicates the radiation dose rate in the area
b. A radiation monitoring device which continuously integrates the radiation dose rate in the area and alarms when a preset integrated dose is received. Entry into such areas with this monitoring device may be made after the dose rate level in the area has been established and personnel have been made knowledgable of them.
c. An, individual qualified in radiation protection procedures who is equipped with a radiation dose rate monitoring device. This individual shall be responsible for providing positive control over the activities within the area and shall perform periodic radiation surveillance at the frequency specified by the facility Health Physicist in the Radiation Work Permit.

6.12.2 The requirements of 6.12.1, above, shall also apply to each high radiation area in which the intensity of radiation is greater than 1000 mrem/hr. In addition, locked doors shall be provided to prevent unauthorized entry into such areas and the keys shall be maintained under the administrative control of the Shift Supervisor on duty and/or the Plant Health Physicist.

  • Health Physics personnel shall be exempt from the RWP issuance requirement during the performance of their assigned radiation protection duties, provided they comply with approved radiation protection procedures for entry into high radiation areas.

ST. LUCIE UNIT 1 6-25 May 13, 1982

ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS 6.17 PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM (PCP) 6.17.1 The licensee's PCP for SOLIDIFICATION (if applicable) shall be approved by the Commission prior to implementation; or 6.17.2 If the licensee uses a contractor to solidify radioactive wastes, the licensee shall use a contractor (or contractor'-s PCP"for SOLIDIFICATION) which has been approved by the Commission.

6.17.3 Licensee initiated change(s) to his PCP for SOLIDIFICATION:

1. Shall become effective upon review and acceptance by the FRG
2. Shall be'ubmitted to the Commission in the semi-annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report for the period in which the change(s) was made. The information submitted shall contain:

a.A description of the change(s) which was made and the reasons for such changes.

b.A determination that the change did not reduce the overall conformance of the solidified waste product to existing criteria for solid wastes; and c.Documentation of the fact that the change has been reviewed and found acceptable by the FRG.

6.17.4 Licensee initiated changes to the PCP for DEWATERING:

1. Shall become effective upon review and acceptance by the FRG.

6.18 OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM) 6.18.1 The ODCM shall be approved by the Commission prior to implementation 6.18.2 Licensee initiated changes to the ODCM:

1. Shall be 'aproved by the Facility Review Group (FRG) and shall become effective upon FRG approval.
2. Shall be reported to the NRC as an attachment to the Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Report for the reporting period that the change(s) were implemented. This attached report shall contain:

a.A FRG approved copy of the ODCM showing the changes b.A determination that the change will not reduce the accuracy or reliability of dose calculations or setpoint determinations.

ST. LUCIE UNIT I 6-2 7 tray 13, 1982

pe 0

o