ML17250A891: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| issue date = 07/19/1989 | | issue date = 07/19/1989 | ||
| title = LER 89-007-00:on 890619 & 21 Safety Injection Pumps B & C Inoperable Due to Assessed Design Flow Delivery Concerns. Caused by Recirculation Valves Being Full Open.Orifice Plates in Flow Loops Verified to Be correct.W/890719 Ltr | | title = LER 89-007-00:on 890619 & 21 Safety Injection Pumps B & C Inoperable Due to Assessed Design Flow Delivery Concerns. Caused by Recirculation Valves Being Full Open.Orifice Plates in Flow Loops Verified to Be correct.W/890719 Ltr | ||
| author name = | | author name = Backus W, Mecredy R | ||
| author affiliation = ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP. | | author affiliation = ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP. | ||
| addressee name = | | addressee name = | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:;A,CCELERATED Dl BUTION DEMONS TION SYSTEM REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RXDS)ACCESSION NBR:8907280303 DOC.DATE: 89/07/19 NOTARIZED: | {{#Wiki_filter:; A,CCELERATED Dl BUTION DEMONS TION SYSTEM REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RXDS) | ||
NO FACIL:50-244 Robert Emmet Ginna Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, Rochester G AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION MECREDY,R.C. | ACCESSION NBR:8907280303 DOC.DATE: 89/07/19 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET g FACIL:50-244 Robert Emmet Ginna Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, Rochester G 05000244 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION MECREDY,R.C. Rochester Gas & Electric Corp. | ||
Rochester Gas&Electric Corp.BACKUS,W.H. | BACKUS,W.H. Rochester Gas & Electric Corp. | ||
Rochester Gas&Electric Corp.RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION | RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION | ||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
LER 89-007-00:on 890619,safety injection pumps inoperability concerns due to flow meter calibration errors.W/8 ltr. | LER 89-007-00:on 890619,safety injection pumps inoperability concerns due to flow meter calibration errors. | ||
05000244 RECIPIENT XD CODE/NAME PD1-3 LA | W/8 ltr. | ||
$TCR GAS A>VD.I'-CITRIC CORPORATION o 89;=A~;,i,",,:NJ;.,">O',I<;.",'," July 19, 1989 U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 | DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE22T COPXES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE: | ||
TITLE: 50.73/50.9 Licensee Event: Report (LER), Incident Rpt, etc. | |||
~ | |||
NOTES:License Exp date in accordance with 10CFR2,2.109(9/19/72). 05000244 RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPXENT COPIES XD CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL PD1-3 LA 1 1 PD1-3 PD 1 1 JOHNSON,A 1 1 INTERNAL: ACRS MICHELSON 1 1 ACRS MOELLER 2 2 ACRS WYLIE 1 1 AEOD/DOA 1 1 AEOD/DSP/TPAB 1 1 AEOD/ROAB/DSP 2 2 DEDRO 1 1 IRM/DCTS/DAB 1 1 NRR/DEST/ADE 8H 1 1 NRR/DEST/ADS 7E 1 0 NRR/DEST/CEB 8H 1 1 NRR/DEST/ESB 8D 1 1 NRR/DEST/ICSB 7 1 1 NRR/DEST/MEB 9H 1 1 NRR/DEST/MTB 9H 1 1 NRR/DEST/PSB 8D 1 1 NRR/DEST/RSB 8E 1 1 NRR/DEST/SGB 8D 1 1 NRR/DLPQ/HFB 10 1 1 NRR/DLPQ/PEB 10 1 1 NRR/DOEA/EAB 11 1 1 NRR DREP/RPB 10 2 2 NUDOCS-ABSTRACT 1 1 egREC 02 1 1 RES/DSIR/EIB 1 1 RES/DSR/PRAB 1 1 RGN1 FILE 01 1 1 R EXTERNAL: EG&G WILLIAMS,S 4 4 FORD BLDG HOY,A. 1 1 I L ST LOBBY WARD 1 1 LPDR 1 l. | |||
NRC PDR 1 1 NSIC MAYS,G 1 1 D NSXC MURPHY,G.A 1 1 S | |||
A D | |||
D NOTE 'IO ALL ''RIC6" R1KIPZEÃIS'IZASE S | |||
HELP US 'IO RXXQCB HASTE! CGMI'ACT 'IHE DOCGMERI'ONGEAL DESK, RXH Pl-37 (EXT. 20079) K) XXi062QTB RX3R MME PBCH DIPZBIBUTXCN LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS KQ DOHiT NEED) | |||
FULL TEXT CONVERSION REQUIRED TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 43 ENCL 42 | |||
$ TCR GAS A>VD . I '-CITRIC CORPORATION o 89;=A~;,i,",,:NJ;.,">O',I<;.", '," | |||
July 19, 1989 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
LER 89-007, Safety In)ection Pumps Inoperability Concerns Due To Flow Meter Calibration Errors Could Be Of Generic Concern To Nuclear Industry R.E.Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Docket No.50-244 In accordance with 10 CFR 50.73, Licensee Event Report System, which permits and encourages Licensees to report signi-ficant, events that may be of generic interest or concern even though they may not meet the criteria contained in 10 CFR 50.73, the attached Licensee event report LER 89-007 is hereby submitted. | LER 89-007, Safety In) ection Pumps Inoperability Concerns Due To Flow Meter Calibration Errors Could Be Of Generic Concern To Nuclear Industry R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Docket No. 50-244 In accordance with 10 CFR 50.73, Licensee Event Report System, which permits and encourages Licensees to report signi-ficant, events that may be of generic interest or concern even though they may not meet the criteria contained in 10 CFR 50.73, the attached Licensee event report LER 89-007 is hereby submitted. | ||
This event has in no way affected the public's health and safety.Very truly yours, Robert C.Me General Manager Nuclear Production xco U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I | This event has in no way affected the public's health and safety. | ||
I>>X)(Al~0.224)(2)(rNIISI | Very truly yours, Robert C. Me General Manager Nuclear Production xco U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region 475 I | ||
On June 21, 1989 at 1401 a similar problem occurred with the<<B<<and<<C<<SI pumps and plant management decided to shut the plant down until the SI pump flow concerns were resolved.The plant was shutdown and subsequently cooled down to less than 350 F.Original calibration data provided by the plant design was incorrect for the installed application. | Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 Ginna USNRC Senior Resident Inspector 3907280303 890719 rDFl ODOCK 0~000244 S PDC | ||
The underlying cause of the event resulted from incorrect original calibration data, provided by the plant designer for the installed system.N1C lore 200 (242) | |||
NAC t>>e 200 UX. NVCLCA1 1lOULATOAYCOMMISSION IS021 AttAOVlDOMS NO.2100 OIOV LICENSEE EVENT REPORT ILERI CXtllll 0/SI/05 | |||
These changes to PT-2.1 were necessary to reflect modifications made to the Safety Injection (SI)pumps minimum flow recirculation lines during the recent annual refueling and maintenance outage.This modification in part increased the size of the SI pumps recirculation lines to increase the recirculation flow for better pump reliability. | ~ | ||
During the post modification testing of the SZ pumps, the"B" and."C" SI pumps exhibited problems meeting the design flow rates to the reactor coolant system as indicated on SI flow indicator FZ-925.Because of the above indicated design flow rate delivery problems, the"B" and"C" SZ pump minimum flow recirculation valves were throttled to 50 gpm to achieve the required design flow rates to the reactor coolant system.As the"A" SX pump did not exhibit problems achieving design flow rates to'he Reactor Coolant System (RCS), its recirculation valve was locked full open.II~DESCRIPTION OP.ER"NT A.DATES AND APPROXIMATE TIMES FOR MAJOR OCCUEKENCES o June 19, 1989, 1440 EDST: Event date and time.o June 19, 1989, 1440 EDST: Discovery date ynd time.o June 19, 1989, 1440 EDST: Started unit load reduction. | tACILITYNAMC Ill DOCS lT NVMStA (2) | ||
o June 19, 1989, 1515 EDST: Unusual Event declared.vttC xCAv 0XAA 0 00 I IUIC tone~IMMI | * R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant 0 6 oo0244IOF1 0 Safety injection Pumps inoperability Concerns Due To Flow Meter Calibration Errors Could Be Of Generic Concern To Nuclea- Indust tVCNT OATl ISI LtA NUMSCA Ill 1ttOAT OATC Ill OTHtA I'ACILITICS INVOLVCO ISI | ||
~ COUINTIAL I)", AlVNIQN MON'TH tACIUTV HAULS OOCX CT NVMSCAISI IeONTH OAY YCAA YCAA NUMetll ctt NUMeell OAY YCAA 0 6 0 0 0 06198 9 8 9 007 Ill(0 00 0 7 1 9 8 9 0 6 0 0 0 Ot t A AT INC THIS 1ttOAT IS SUSMITYCD tVASUANT T 0 THC AtOVIAtMCNTS Ot 10451 )I ICo>>e er>> er >>ere el Me lerrerrert) ill) | |||
1615 EDST: Stopped unit load 0 June 19, 1989, 1626 EDST: | MOOC Ill 20.402(ol 20.400(el 50.22(el(2l(lrl 222 (IS) | ||
June 21, 1989, 1915 EDST: Started unit load reduction. | ~ OrrlA 2ILe00(e) ~ 0DS(el(I) 00.254H2)(rl 12.1141 LCVSL 0 9 9 (101 20.e00 4) IllIll SOW(el(21 l0.224)(2) lrel DTHtA Ite>>IIV M Aereoct e>>e>> errt le TecL HAC t>>IN 20.e00 4) ll) IXII ~ 0.2 24)(2)10 00.2241(2) I>>X) (Al 20.e00 4 lll ) (III ~ 0.2 541(2) I ~ I ~ 0.224)(2)(rNIISI 20.e00 4)(1 I (el $ 0024I12IIXO 50.224) (2)(el I,ICCNSll CONTACT tOA THIS LCA 1121 HAMC TCLttHONl NUMSCA Wesley H. Backs AAtA COOl Technical Assistant to the Operations Manager 31 5524-4 446 COMtLCTC ONC LINC tOA tACH COMtONCNT tAILUAtOCSCAI ~ CD IN THIS AltOAT (12) | ||
0 | MANVtAC MANUSAC, CtOATASL CAV52 tYSTCM COMtONCNT CAUSC SYSTCM COMtONCNT TUACA TO NtAOS TVACA Fek&v | ||
o 3.3.1.1.C: | ~k4kW MONTH CAY YCAA SUttLCMCNTAL AltOAT CXt CCTCO lie) tXtCCTCD SVSMI$ $ ION OATS Ill) | ||
At or above a reactor coolant system pressure and temperature of 1600 psig and 350oFg except during performance of RCS Hydro Test, three safety injection pumps are operable. | YCS (H tre, CerVNr>> CXttCTCD SVSMISSIOH DATCI X ND AACTAAOT ILervc Io le00 ieec>>, le,. ettroeerN>>lt IHIuo vetreetue ctteorlr>>e xe>>I llsl On June 19, 1989 at 1440 EDST with the reactor at approximately 994 full power- the <<B" and <<C<< Safety In)ection (SI) pumps were declared inoperable due to assessed design flow delivery concerns. | ||
NAC Fetes | Declaring two (2) SI pumps inoperable placed the plant outside the Technical Specifications requiring a plant shutdown. While in the process of plant shutdown the SI pump flows were returned to the required flow rates by pump minimum flow recirculation line valve throttling. | ||
o In the event a Limiting Condition for operation and/or associated action requirements cannot be satisfied because of circumstances in excess of those addressed in the specification, within 1 hour action shall be initiated to place the unit in at least hot shutdown within the next 6 hours (i;e., a total of seven hours), and in at least cold shutdown within the following 30 hours (i.e., a total of 37 hours)unless corrective measures are completed that permit operation under the permissible action statements for the | On June 21, 1989 at 1401 a similar problem occurred with the <<B<< | ||
Because of the above specification a unit load reduction to hot shutdown was started June 19, 1989 at 1440 EDST.At approximately 1515 EDST, June 19, 1989, the Operations Shift Supervisor declared an Unusual Event in accordance with SC-100,"Ginna Station Event Evaluation and Classification" EAL: Loss of Engineered Safety Features: exceeding a Limiting Condition for operation on a safety system requiring a plant shutdown;Tech Spec section 3.3 Emergency Core Cooling System.All offsite notifications were made per SC-601,"Unusual Event Notifications". | and <<C<< SI pumps and plant management decided to shut the plant down until the SI pump flow concerns were resolved. The plant was shutdown and subsequently cooled down to less than 350 F. | ||
NIC IOlU)99A 9 | Original calibration data provided by the plant design was incorrect for the installed application. The underlying cause of the event resulted from incorrect original calibration data, provided by the plant designer for the installed system. | ||
All offsite notifications were made of the Unusual Event termination and the plant was subsequently returned to approximately full power.On June 21, 1989 at 1401 EDST with the reactor at approximately full power, periodic test procedure PT-2.1 (Safety Injection Pumps)was started for the monthly test of the safety injection pumps.The following is a sequence of important events that happened: The"A" SI pump was tested first and tested | N1C lore 200 (242) | ||
At approximately 1544 EDST, upon starting the"B" SI pump for the test, the pump minimum flow recirculation flow rate was found to be 70 gpm.This was contrary to the'required 50 gpm maximum flow rate.The recirculation flow rate was reset to 45 gpm per PT-2.1.0 At approximately 1637 EDST, upon starting the"C" SI pump for the test, the pump minimum flow recirculation flow rate was found to be 56 gpm.This was contrary to the required 50 gpm maximum flow rate.The recirculation flow rate was reset to 45 gpm per PT-2.1.%1C iOAM WA Y 4II | |||
o At approximately 1900 EDST a meeting between shift operations and plant staff was conducted and the following course of action was decided upon: 1)Shutdown the plant to less than 350 F and less than 1600 psig, until the problem with the"C" SI pump minimum flov recirculation line flov repeatability is found and corrected. | U.L NUCLCAA 004ULAfOAY CCXXXUWISI IIAC tea 000A IM0I LICENSEE EVENT REPORT ILER) TEXT CONTINUATION 4tt+OV lO OQC IIO. 4100&I/8 axxtACS anIICS | ||
2)Reset the"C" SI pump minimum flow xecircu-lation flov.3)Test repeatability of the"C" SZ pump minimum flow recirculation flov.4)Correct the cause of pump minimum flow recirculation flow problem.On June 22, 1989 at approximately 0707 EDST the reactor coolant system cold leg temperatures were less than 350 F and RCS pressure was less than 1600 pSige C | ~ A40 SACILlfY HAXIC Ill L0% IIIAX001 ICI I3I XXCU X tt T I k L vtxtott | ||
None.III CAUS OP A.IMMEDIATE CAUSE: The<<B<<and<<C<<SI pumps were thought to be inoperable because they could not meet their design flow rates to the RCS due to their recirc valves being | ~ t It lt 8 TACT Illawe ~ 4 I+tvlwL ~ ~ | ||
pump testing failed to achieve repeatable pump recirculation flow results.vaC POAU SSSA 9431~~V | R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant IICIC Axtx ~'ll l17l 0 5 0 0 0 2 4 4 8 9 0 07 00 0 2 of 0 7 PRE-EVENT PLANT CONDITIONS The unit was at approximately 994 steady state full power with no major activities in progress. Results and Test (R&T) personnel were in the Control Room discussing changes to periodic test procedure PT-2.1 (Safety Injection System Pumps) with the Control Room operators. These changes to PT-2.1 were necessary to reflect modifications made to the Safety Injection (SI) pumps minimum flow recirculation lines during the recent annual refueling and maintenance outage. This modification in part increased the size of the SI pumps recirculation lines to increase the recirculation flow for better pump reliability. During the post modification testing of the SZ pumps, the "B" and. | ||
There were no operational or safety consequences or implications attributed to the deemed to be inoperable"B" and"C" SI pumps because: o An analysis was performed using current calibration data, and it was determined that even with the"B" and"Cll SI pumps minimum flow recirculation valves full open, the SI design flow rates to the RCS were still achieved.Thus the'TBTT and"C" SI pumps were never truly inoperable. | "C" SI pumps exhibited problems meeting the design flow rates to the reactor coolant system as indicated on SI flow indicator FZ-925. Because of the above indicated design flow rate delivery problems, the "B" and "C" SZ pump minimum flow recirculation valves were throttled to 50 gpm to achieve the required design flow rates to the reactor coolant system. As the "A" SX pump did not exhibit problems achieving design flow rates to'he Reactor Coolant System (RCS), its recirculation valve was locked full open. | ||
Based on the above, it can be concluded that the public's health and safety was assured at all times.VAC+0AM)SSA t ttl | II ~ DESCRIPTION OP .ER"NT A. DATES AND APPROXIMATE TIMES FOR MAJOR OCCUEKENCES o June 19, 1989, 1440 EDST: Event date and time. | ||
0 The orifice plates installed in SI flow loops F-924 and F-925 were verified to be correct.0 | o June 19, 1989, 1440 EDST: Discovery date ynd time. | ||
Correct, calibration data was confirmed for each orifice/flow transmitter combination. | o June 19, 1989, 1440 EDST: Started unit load reduction. | ||
0 Affected calibration procedures were changed to reflect correct calibration data.0 The nuclear industry will be notified via NUCLEAR NETWORK of the generic concerns of correct calibration data for flow orifice/flow transmitter combinations. | o June 19, 1989, 1515 EDST: Unusual Event declared. | ||
VAC YOAM EEEA~E 401 AC Sana 500A 10451 LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)TEXT CONTINUATION | vttC xCAv 0XAA 0 00 I | ||
A | |||
None.PREVIOUS LERs ON SIMILAR EVENTS: A similar LER event historical search was conducted with the following results: No documentation of similar LER events with the same root cause at Ginna Station could be identified. | IUIC tone ~ H US NUCLCAr AIOULATCNY ~ISI IMMI UCENSEE EVENT REPORT HLER) TEXT CONTINUAT!ON ~rovao OUC ro. OIsoaICA cxiIrcl c131es JACILIZY NAAIC III COCKET IIUUCCW Ql LI1 rlrICIO IQ ~ AOC IS | ||
C.SPECIAL COMMENTS: 'one.wAC sOlQ SSSA 0 SSI}} | $ 44UIIITIAL vavIr vtAA M r U r teer (A' ~r 1vrvrrL ~ ~ | ||
R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant WC'IrrI~'11 Im o s o o o 2 4 4 007 00 03 OF 1 0 June 19, 1989, 1615 EDST: "B" and "C" SI pumps declared operable. | |||
June 19, 1989, 1615 EDST: Stopped unit load reduction. | |||
0 June 19, 1989, 1626 EDST: Unusual Event ter-minated. | |||
0 June 21, 1989, 1401 EDST: Started PT-2.1 on the SI pumps. | |||
0 June 21, 1989, 1728 EDST: Declared the "C" SI pump inoperable. | |||
0 June 21, 1989, 1915 EDST: Started unit load reduction. | |||
0 June 22, 1989, 0707 EDST: Reactor Coolant System (RCS) cold leg temperatures less than 350 F and RCS pressure less than 1600 psig. | |||
B. EVENT: | |||
On June 19, 1989 at 1440 EDST the reactor was at approximately 994 full power. During discussions in the Control Room between R&T personnel and Control Room operators concerning proposed changes to procedure PT-2.1, it became apparent that the "B and "C" SI pump minimum flow recirculation line valves were locked full open rather than the recpxired throttled position. | |||
The Operations Shift Supervisor determined at this time that if the "B" and "C SI pumps were not aligned as per design, then the pumps were inoperable and this placed the plant operations outside of Technical Specification 3.3.1.1.C and 3.3.1.4 which state the following: | |||
o 3.3.1.1.C: At or above a reactor coolant system pressure and temperature of 1600 psig and 350oFg except during performance of RCS Hydro Test, three safety injection pumps are operable. | |||
NAC Fetes I$4ll | |||
~ UCENSEE EVENT REPORT ILER} TEXT CONTINUATION II.L NUCllAA AIOVLATOAYCAN%ION AtfAOV lO OUO NO. )I94&I04 CXAIACS enII99 AACII.ITYNAMt Ill OOCAIT NUMlN Ql L41 NUU4l1 I9I ~ AOl Iel 1 9 OMAH fI Al veaoc U H U TTST Id aaae ~ N NWWC ~ ~ | |||
R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant A9K'IAAA~'AlIITl o 5 o o o 24 489 00 7 00 040' 3.3.1.4: The requirements of 3.3.1.1.C may be modified to allow one .safety injection pump to be inoperable for up to 72 hours. | |||
Because more than one SI pump was declared inoperable, this placed the plant - in a condition covered by Technical Specification 3.0.1 which states the following: | |||
o In the event a Limiting Condition for operation and/or associated action requirements cannot be satisfied because of circumstances in excess of those addressed in the specification, within 1 hour action shall be initiated to place the unit in at least hot shutdown within the next 6 hours (i;e., a total of seven hours), and in at least cold shutdown within the following 30 hours (i.e., a total of 37 hours) unless corrective measures are completed that permit operation under the permissible action statements for the specified time interval as measured from initial discovery or until the reactor is placed in a mode in which the specification is not applicable. | |||
Because of the above specification a unit load reduction to hot shutdown was started June 19, 1989 at 1440 EDST. | |||
At approximately 1515 EDST, June 19, 1989, the Operations Shift Supervisor declared an Unusual Event in accordance with SC-100, "Ginna Station Event Evaluation and Classification" EAL: Loss of Engineered Safety Features: exceeding a Limiting Condition for QADI operation on a safety system requiring a plant shutdown; Tech Spec section 3.3 Emergency Core Cooling System. All offsite notifications were made per SC-601, "Unusual Event Notifications". | |||
NIC IOlU )99A 9 | |||
11.4. NUCI,CAN 1!OQLAYOLYCOMMI&lOW AttLOVtO OM4 NO. JlÃ&104 LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LEA) TEXT CONTINUATION CLiiLee alii eS OOCLLY NVIMILQI ~ A44 1$ | |||
LAClllYYNAME ill L44 NUMClL (41 1% 4MLH T I A I VeaN N N M N TKCf III'MWL~ N IOOeeC ~ ~ | |||
R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant NIC IINLI~'ll117) o s o o o 2 4 4 8 9 0 0 7 0 0 0 5 OF 1 0 At approximately 1615 EDST, June 19, 1989 subsequent to the satisfactory testing and throttling of the "B" and "C" safety injection pumps minimum flow recircula-tion valves to 50 gpm, the "B" and "C" safety in)ection pumps were declared operable and the load reduction stopped. | |||
With the "B" and "C" safety in)ection pumps declared operable and the load reduction stopped, the Operations Shift Supervisor," with approval and concurrence from the Plant Manager Ginna Station, and PORC declared the Unusual Event terminated at 1626 EDST, June 19, 1989 in accordance with SC-110, "Ginna Station Event Evaluation For Reducing the Classification". All offsite notifications were made of the Unusual Event termination and the plant was subsequently returned to approximately full power. | |||
On June 21, 1989 at 1401 EDST with the reactor at approximately full power, periodic test procedure PT-2.1 (Safety Injection Pumps) was started for the monthly test of the safety injection pumps. The following is a sequence of important events that happened: | |||
The "A" SI pump was tested satisfactorily. | |||
first and tested At approximately 1544 EDST, upon starting the "B" SI pump for the test, the pump minimum flow recirculation flow rate was found to be 70 gpm. | |||
This was contrary to the'required 50 gpm maximum flow rate. The recirculation flow rate was reset to 45 gpm per PT-2.1. | |||
0 At approximately 1637 EDST, upon starting the "C" SI pump for the test, the pump minimum flow recirculation flow rate was found to be 56 gpm. | |||
This was contrary to the required 50 gpm maximum flow rate. The recirculation flow rate was reset to 45 gpm per PT-2.1. | |||
%1C iOAM WA Y 4II | |||
U,l. ISUCLlAA Cl4ULATOIYC5++%$ 4SS INC Pens AIA 1044 I LICENSEE EVENT REPORT ILER) TEXT CONTINUATION AppsoYlo oU4 no. $ 1 90& I4s lX~ I'll SIT I ITS PACILITY NASSC Ill OOCIIlT IIU~CW Ql Llk IIUSSOC1 IN ~ j4l ISI vSAA SSOUSNSIAL vis sIn Q s v M s R.E. Qiana Nuc:lear Powe neer IS'~ ~ e nWeeC ~ ~ - Plant P494 Pens ~'sI I ITI o s o o o 2 4 4 89 00 7 00 0 6 ov 1 0 o At approximately 1726 EDST, the 99B" and I9C99 SZ pumps were started and stopped to verify recirc flov was less than or .equal to the required 50 gpm. Found the >>B" Sl pump recirc flow at 50 gpm and the "C" SZ pump recirc flov at 55 gpm. | |||
o At approximately 1728 EDST the "C" SZ pump was declared inoperable. | |||
o At approximately 1900 EDST a meeting between shift operations and plant staff was conducted and the following course of action was decided upon: | |||
: 1) Shutdown the plant to less than 350 F and less than 1600 psig, until the problem with the "C" SI pump minimum flov recirculation line flov repeatability is found and corrected. | |||
: 2) Reset the "C" SI pump minimum flow xecircu-lation flov. | |||
: 3) Test repeatability of the "C" SZ pump minimum flow recirculation flov. | |||
: 4) Correct the cause of pump minimum flow recirculation flow problem. | |||
On June 22, 1989 at approximately 0707 EDST the reactor coolant system cold leg temperatures were less than 350 F and RCS pressure was less than 1600 pSige C. INOPERABLE STRUCTURES P COMPONENTS P OR SYSTEMS THAT CONTRIBUTED TO THE EVENT: | |||
None. | |||
D. OTHER SYSTEMS OR SECONDARY FUNCTIONS AFFECTED: | |||
None. | |||
vsc polU sess 94SI | |||
Qec pena 000A II~ NLCLlAN XlOOLATONT CaaaaWON I%4SI UCENSEE EVENT REPORT ILER) TEXT CONTINUATION APPNOV lO 440 lXtiAIS SnIISS NO. )ISOMIOS PACILITY NA4l 111 OOCXXT NV40SN ISI LlN NINS0l1 Ill ~ AOl ISI vlAA SSOIISNTIAL VISION U N U a TENET IN rane ~ 0 rsSUSSX ~ ~ | |||
R.E. Ginna NUclear Power Plant ASIC Ireaa ~'ll I ITI 0 5 0 0 0 2 4 4 8 9007 00 07 OF 1 0 E. METHOD OF DISCOVERY'he first event was discovered during discussions between RET personnel and the Control Room operators, concerning proposed changes to PT-2.1. | |||
The second event was discovered during the monthly test of the safety in)ection pumps. | |||
F. OPERATOR ACTION: | |||
The ma)or operator action during the events was to reduce plant load and subsequently take the unit off line and cool down to less than 350 F. | |||
G. SAFETY SYSTEM RESPONSES: | |||
None. | |||
III CAUS OP A. IMMEDIATE CAUSE: | |||
The <<B<< and <<C<< SI pumps were thought to be inoperable because they could not meet their design flow rates to the RCS due to their recirc valves being rather than throttled as required. | |||
full open B. INTERMEDIATE CAUSE: | |||
0 The <<B<< and <<C<< SI pump minimum flow recirculation valves were positioned full open rather than throttled as required. | |||
0 With the pump minimum flow recirculation valves restored to the throttled position, subsequent. | |||
pump testing failed to achieve repeatable pump recirculation flow results. | |||
vaC POAU SSSA 9431 | |||
~ ~ | |||
V | |||
IIA. NJCLCASI 054UWTO4T COINNKIOIS IIC GYM 500A LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) TEXT CONTINUATION ktf0OV lO OM0 IIO. 5150%104 55NA55 lltt4$ | |||
SACII.ITV HMI5 Ill OOCÃ5T IIU1%50 Ill I.I0 IIIAN54 III ~ A45 I5I SSOVSNYIAl V%ION YTAA M A M R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant o s o o o ~4 4 89 00 7 0 08 oi mCrIS ~~e~ ~~ASSOIISMImauIITI C. ROOT CAUSE: | |||
The underlying cause of the event resulted from incorrect calibration data, provided by the plant designer for the installed system. The calibration data provided for flow transmitters FT-924 and FT-925 did not correlate accurately with the installed flow orifice plates, .FE-924 and FE-925. | |||
ALYSIS 0 The event is being reported in accordance with 10 CFR 50.73 Licensee Event Report System, which permits and encourages Licensees to report significant events that may be of generic interest or concern even though they may not meet the criteria contained in 10 CFR 50.73. | |||
An assessment was performed considering both the safety consequences and . implications of this event with the following results and conclusions: | |||
There were no operational or safety consequences or implications attributed to the deemed to be inoperable "B" and "C" SI pumps because: | |||
o An analysis was performed using current calibration data, and it was determined that even with the "B" and "Cll SI pumps minimum flow recirculation valves full open, the SI design flow rates to the RCS were still achieved. Thus the 'TBTT and "C" SI pumps were never truly inoperable. | |||
Based on the above, it can be concluded that the public's health and safety was assured at all times. | |||
VAC +0AM )SSA t ttl | |||
V.E. NVCLEAA EE4VLAEO4Y OSWE~ON LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) TEXT CONTINUATION AtMOYEO OME NO. $ 1%0MIOE | |||
~ XWAES EnIIEE EACILITYNAME lll OOCEEY NV~EE IEI LEi NVMEE1 IN ~ A4E 101 vEAA EEOVENYIAL VoeN H M N M R.E. Ginna Nuclem Power Plant o s o o o2 44 89 007 00 0 90' 0 TEXr IIY~ ~ 4 NeeeC ~ ~AEEC asa ~'u Im V. CO CTIVE ACTION A. ACTION TAKEN OR PLANNED TO PREVENT RECURRENCE: | |||
0 The orifice plates installed in SI flow loops F-924 and F-925 were verified to be correct. | |||
0 Flow transmitters FT-'924 and FT-925 were correctly calibrated to the installed orifice plates. | |||
0 The three sa fety in) ection pumps were tested with the pump minimum flow recirculation line throttling valves full open, and the required SI design flow to the RCS was achieved. | |||
o All installed safety-related flow orifice plates were assessed for correct installation and calibration. Correct, calibration data was confirmed for each orifice/flow transmitter combination. | |||
0 Affected calibration procedures were changed to reflect correct calibration data. | |||
0 The nuclear industry will be notified via NUCLEAR NETWORK of the generic concerns of correct calibration data for flow orifice/flow transmitter combinations. | |||
VAC YOAM EEEA | |||
~E 401 | |||
U~ lg&l5AAA54UMYOAYCCWWNICSS AC Sana 500A 10451 LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) TEXT CONTINUATION ASSAOVCO OU0 HO. 5150MIOS | |||
~ 5 ~ IA55 5151I55 SACICIYY IIAAI5 lll OOCKSY AU~CA ISI LCA AUSS051 ISI ~ Aoa Ia SSAA SSOUSASIAI, VAIOA Q ~ t U A R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant o s o o o 244 8 9 007 001 0 OF 1 0 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: | |||
A. FAILED COMPONENTS: | |||
None. | |||
B. PREVIOUS LERs ON SIMILAR EVENTS: | |||
A similar LER event historical search was conducted with the following results: No documentation of similar LER events with the same root cause at Ginna Station could be identified. | |||
C. SPECIAL COMMENTS: | |||
'one. | |||
wAC sOlQ SSSA 0 SSI}} |
Latest revision as of 11:30, 4 February 2020
ML17250A891 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Ginna |
Issue date: | 07/19/1989 |
From: | Backus W, Mecredy R ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP. |
To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
References | |
LER-89-007, LER-89-7, NUDOCS 8907280303 | |
Download: ML17250A891 (12) | |
Text
- A,CCELERATED Dl BUTION DEMONS TION SYSTEM REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RXDS)
ACCESSION NBR:8907280303 DOC.DATE: 89/07/19 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET g FACIL:50-244 Robert Emmet Ginna Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, Rochester G 05000244 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION MECREDY,R.C. Rochester Gas & Electric Corp.
BACKUS,W.H. Rochester Gas & Electric Corp.
RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION
SUBJECT:
LER 89-007-00:on 890619,safety injection pumps inoperability concerns due to flow meter calibration errors.
W/8 ltr.
DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE22T COPXES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE:
TITLE: 50.73/50.9 Licensee Event: Report (LER), Incident Rpt, etc.
~
NOTES:License Exp date in accordance with 10CFR2,2.109(9/19/72). 05000244 RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPXENT COPIES XD CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL PD1-3 LA 1 1 PD1-3 PD 1 1 JOHNSON,A 1 1 INTERNAL: ACRS MICHELSON 1 1 ACRS MOELLER 2 2 ACRS WYLIE 1 1 AEOD/DOA 1 1 AEOD/DSP/TPAB 1 1 AEOD/ROAB/DSP 2 2 DEDRO 1 1 IRM/DCTS/DAB 1 1 NRR/DEST/ADE 8H 1 1 NRR/DEST/ADS 7E 1 0 NRR/DEST/CEB 8H 1 1 NRR/DEST/ESB 8D 1 1 NRR/DEST/ICSB 7 1 1 NRR/DEST/MEB 9H 1 1 NRR/DEST/MTB 9H 1 1 NRR/DEST/PSB 8D 1 1 NRR/DEST/RSB 8E 1 1 NRR/DEST/SGB 8D 1 1 NRR/DLPQ/HFB 10 1 1 NRR/DLPQ/PEB 10 1 1 NRR/DOEA/EAB 11 1 1 NRR DREP/RPB 10 2 2 NUDOCS-ABSTRACT 1 1 egREC 02 1 1 RES/DSIR/EIB 1 1 RES/DSR/PRAB 1 1 RGN1 FILE 01 1 1 R EXTERNAL: EG&G WILLIAMS,S 4 4 FORD BLDG HOY,A. 1 1 I L ST LOBBY WARD 1 1 LPDR 1 l.
NRC PDR 1 1 NSIC MAYS,G 1 1 D NSXC MURPHY,G.A 1 1 S
A D
D NOTE 'IO ALL RIC6" R1KIPZEÃIS'IZASE S
HELP US 'IO RXXQCB HASTE! CGMI'ACT 'IHE DOCGMERI'ONGEAL DESK, RXH Pl-37 (EXT. 20079) K) XXi062QTB RX3R MME PBCH DIPZBIBUTXCN LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS KQ DOHiT NEED)
FULL TEXT CONVERSION REQUIRED TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 43 ENCL 42
$ TCR GAS A>VD . I '-CITRIC CORPORATION o 89;=A~;,i,",,:NJ;.,">O',I<;.", ',"
July 19, 1989 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555
Subject:
LER 89-007, Safety In) ection Pumps Inoperability Concerns Due To Flow Meter Calibration Errors Could Be Of Generic Concern To Nuclear Industry R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Docket No. 50-244 In accordance with 10 CFR 50.73, Licensee Event Report System, which permits and encourages Licensees to report signi-ficant, events that may be of generic interest or concern even though they may not meet the criteria contained in 10 CFR 50.73, the attached Licensee event report LER 89-007 is hereby submitted.
This event has in no way affected the public's health and safety.
Very truly yours, Robert C. Me General Manager Nuclear Production xco U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region 475 I
Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 Ginna USNRC Senior Resident Inspector 3907280303 890719 rDFl ODOCK 0~000244 S PDC
NAC t>>e 200 UX. NVCLCA1 1lOULATOAYCOMMISSION IS021 AttAOVlDOMS NO.2100 OIOV LICENSEE EVENT REPORT ILERI CXtllll 0/SI/05
~
tACILITYNAMC Ill DOCS lT NVMStA (2)
- R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant 0 6 oo0244IOF1 0 Safety injection Pumps inoperability Concerns Due To Flow Meter Calibration Errors Could Be Of Generic Concern To Nuclea- Indust tVCNT OATl ISI LtA NUMSCA Ill 1ttOAT OATC Ill OTHtA I'ACILITICS INVOLVCO ISI
~ COUINTIAL I)", AlVNIQN MON'TH tACIUTV HAULS OOCX CT NVMSCAISI IeONTH OAY YCAA YCAA NUMetll ctt NUMeell OAY YCAA 0 6 0 0 0 06198 9 8 9 007 Ill(0 00 0 7 1 9 8 9 0 6 0 0 0 Ot t A AT INC THIS 1ttOAT IS SUSMITYCD tVASUANT T 0 THC AtOVIAtMCNTS Ot 10451 )I ICo>>e er>> er >>ere el Me lerrerrert) ill)
MOOC Ill 20.402(ol 20.400(el 50.22(el(2l(lrl 222 (IS)
~ OrrlA 2ILe00(e) ~ 0DS(el(I) 00.254H2)(rl 12.1141 LCVSL 0 9 9 (101 20.e00 4) IllIll SOW(el(21 l0.224)(2) lrel DTHtA Ite>>IIV M Aereoct e>>e>> errt le TecL HAC t>>IN 20.e00 4) ll) IXII ~ 0.2 24)(2)10 00.2241(2) I>>X) (Al 20.e00 4 lll ) (III ~ 0.2 541(2) I ~ I ~ 0.224)(2)(rNIISI 20.e00 4)(1 I (el $ 0024I12IIXO 50.224) (2)(el I,ICCNSll CONTACT tOA THIS LCA 1121 HAMC TCLttHONl NUMSCA Wesley H. Backs AAtA COOl Technical Assistant to the Operations Manager 31 5524-4 446 COMtLCTC ONC LINC tOA tACH COMtONCNT tAILUAtOCSCAI ~ CD IN THIS AltOAT (12)
MANVtAC MANUSAC, CtOATASL CAV52 tYSTCM COMtONCNT CAUSC SYSTCM COMtONCNT TUACA TO NtAOS TVACA Fek&v
~k4kW MONTH CAY YCAA SUttLCMCNTAL AltOAT CXt CCTCO lie) tXtCCTCD SVSMI$ $ ION OATS Ill)
YCS (H tre, CerVNr>> CXttCTCD SVSMISSIOH DATCI X ND AACTAAOT ILervc Io le00 ieec>>, le,. ettroeerN>>lt IHIuo vetreetue ctteorlr>>e xe>>I llsl On June 19, 1989 at 1440 EDST with the reactor at approximately 994 full power- the <<B" and <<C<< Safety In)ection (SI) pumps were declared inoperable due to assessed design flow delivery concerns.
Declaring two (2) SI pumps inoperable placed the plant outside the Technical Specifications requiring a plant shutdown. While in the process of plant shutdown the SI pump flows were returned to the required flow rates by pump minimum flow recirculation line valve throttling.
On June 21, 1989 at 1401 a similar problem occurred with the <<B<<
and <<C<< SI pumps and plant management decided to shut the plant down until the SI pump flow concerns were resolved. The plant was shutdown and subsequently cooled down to less than 350 F.
Original calibration data provided by the plant design was incorrect for the installed application. The underlying cause of the event resulted from incorrect original calibration data, provided by the plant designer for the installed system.
N1C lore 200 (242)
U.L NUCLCAA 004ULAfOAY CCXXXUWISI IIAC tea 000A IM0I LICENSEE EVENT REPORT ILER) TEXT CONTINUATION 4tt+OV lO OQC IIO. 4100&I/8 axxtACS anIICS
~ A40 SACILlfY HAXIC Ill L0% IIIAX001 ICI I3I XXCU X tt T I k L vtxtott
~ t It lt 8 TACT Illawe ~ 4 I+tvlwL ~ ~
R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant IICIC Axtx ~'ll l17l 0 5 0 0 0 2 4 4 8 9 0 07 00 0 2 of 0 7 PRE-EVENT PLANT CONDITIONS The unit was at approximately 994 steady state full power with no major activities in progress. Results and Test (R&T) personnel were in the Control Room discussing changes to periodic test procedure PT-2.1 (Safety Injection System Pumps) with the Control Room operators. These changes to PT-2.1 were necessary to reflect modifications made to the Safety Injection (SI) pumps minimum flow recirculation lines during the recent annual refueling and maintenance outage. This modification in part increased the size of the SI pumps recirculation lines to increase the recirculation flow for better pump reliability. During the post modification testing of the SZ pumps, the "B" and.
"C" SI pumps exhibited problems meeting the design flow rates to the reactor coolant system as indicated on SI flow indicator FZ-925. Because of the above indicated design flow rate delivery problems, the "B" and "C" SZ pump minimum flow recirculation valves were throttled to 50 gpm to achieve the required design flow rates to the reactor coolant system. As the "A" SX pump did not exhibit problems achieving design flow rates to'he Reactor Coolant System (RCS), its recirculation valve was locked full open.
II ~ DESCRIPTION OP .ER"NT A. DATES AND APPROXIMATE TIMES FOR MAJOR OCCUEKENCES o June 19, 1989, 1440 EDST: Event date and time.
o June 19, 1989, 1440 EDST: Discovery date ynd time.
o June 19, 1989, 1440 EDST: Started unit load reduction.
o June 19, 1989, 1515 EDST: Unusual Event declared.
vttC xCAv 0XAA 0 00 I
IUIC tone ~ H US NUCLCAr AIOULATCNY ~ISI IMMI UCENSEE EVENT REPORT HLER) TEXT CONTINUAT!ON ~rovao OUC ro. OIsoaICA cxiIrcl c131es JACILIZY NAAIC III COCKET IIUUCCW Ql LI1 rlrICIO IQ ~ AOC IS
$ 44UIIITIAL vavIr vtAA M r U r teer (A' ~r 1vrvrrL ~ ~
R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant WC'IrrI~'11 Im o s o o o 2 4 4 007 00 03 OF 1 0 June 19, 1989, 1615 EDST: "B" and "C" SI pumps declared operable.
June 19, 1989, 1615 EDST: Stopped unit load reduction.
0 June 19, 1989, 1626 EDST: Unusual Event ter-minated.
0 June 21, 1989, 1401 EDST: Started PT-2.1 on the SI pumps.
0 June 21, 1989, 1728 EDST: Declared the "C" SI pump inoperable.
0 June 21, 1989, 1915 EDST: Started unit load reduction.
0 June 22, 1989, 0707 EDST: Reactor Coolant System (RCS) cold leg temperatures less than 350 F and RCS pressure less than 1600 psig.
B. EVENT:
On June 19, 1989 at 1440 EDST the reactor was at approximately 994 full power. During discussions in the Control Room between R&T personnel and Control Room operators concerning proposed changes to procedure PT-2.1, it became apparent that the "B and "C" SI pump minimum flow recirculation line valves were locked full open rather than the recpxired throttled position.
The Operations Shift Supervisor determined at this time that if the "B" and "C SI pumps were not aligned as per design, then the pumps were inoperable and this placed the plant operations outside of Technical Specification 3.3.1.1.C and 3.3.1.4 which state the following:
o 3.3.1.1.C: At or above a reactor coolant system pressure and temperature of 1600 psig and 350oFg except during performance of RCS Hydro Test, three safety injection pumps are operable.
NAC Fetes I$4ll
~ UCENSEE EVENT REPORT ILER} TEXT CONTINUATION II.L NUCllAA AIOVLATOAYCAN%ION AtfAOV lO OUO NO. )I94&I04 CXAIACS enII99 AACII.ITYNAMt Ill OOCAIT NUMlN Ql L41 NUU4l1 I9I ~ AOl Iel 1 9 OMAH fI Al veaoc U H U TTST Id aaae ~ N NWWC ~ ~
R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant A9K'IAAA~'AlIITl o 5 o o o 24 489 00 7 00 040' 3.3.1.4: The requirements of 3.3.1.1.C may be modified to allow one .safety injection pump to be inoperable for up to 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />.
Because more than one SI pump was declared inoperable, this placed the plant - in a condition covered by Technical Specification 3.0.1 which states the following:
o In the event a Limiting Condition for operation and/or associated action requirements cannot be satisfied because of circumstances in excess of those addressed in the specification, within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> action shall be initiated to place the unit in at least hot shutdown within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> (i;e., a total of seven hours), and in at least cold shutdown within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br /> (i.e., a total of 37 hours4.282407e-4 days <br />0.0103 hours <br />6.117725e-5 weeks <br />1.40785e-5 months <br />) unless corrective measures are completed that permit operation under the permissible action statements for the specified time interval as measured from initial discovery or until the reactor is placed in a mode in which the specification is not applicable.
Because of the above specification a unit load reduction to hot shutdown was started June 19, 1989 at 1440 EDST.
At approximately 1515 EDST, June 19, 1989, the Operations Shift Supervisor declared an Unusual Event in accordance with SC-100, "Ginna Station Event Evaluation and Classification" EAL: Loss of Engineered Safety Features: exceeding a Limiting Condition for QADI operation on a safety system requiring a plant shutdown; Tech Spec section 3.3 Emergency Core Cooling System. All offsite notifications were made per SC-601, "Unusual Event Notifications".
NIC IOlU )99A 9
11.4. NUCI,CAN 1!OQLAYOLYCOMMI&lOW AttLOVtO OM4 NO. JlÃ&104 LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LEA) TEXT CONTINUATION CLiiLee alii eS OOCLLY NVIMILQI ~ A44 1$
LAClllYYNAME ill L44 NUMClL (41 1% 4MLH T I A I VeaN N N M N TKCf III'MWL~ N IOOeeC ~ ~
R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant NIC IINLI~'ll117) o s o o o 2 4 4 8 9 0 0 7 0 0 0 5 OF 1 0 At approximately 1615 EDST, June 19, 1989 subsequent to the satisfactory testing and throttling of the "B" and "C" safety injection pumps minimum flow recircula-tion valves to 50 gpm, the "B" and "C" safety in)ection pumps were declared operable and the load reduction stopped.
With the "B" and "C" safety in)ection pumps declared operable and the load reduction stopped, the Operations Shift Supervisor," with approval and concurrence from the Plant Manager Ginna Station, and PORC declared the Unusual Event terminated at 1626 EDST, June 19, 1989 in accordance with SC-110, "Ginna Station Event Evaluation For Reducing the Classification". All offsite notifications were made of the Unusual Event termination and the plant was subsequently returned to approximately full power.
On June 21, 1989 at 1401 EDST with the reactor at approximately full power, periodic test procedure PT-2.1 (Safety Injection Pumps) was started for the monthly test of the safety injection pumps. The following is a sequence of important events that happened:
The "A" SI pump was tested satisfactorily.
first and tested At approximately 1544 EDST, upon starting the "B" SI pump for the test, the pump minimum flow recirculation flow rate was found to be 70 gpm.
This was contrary to the'required 50 gpm maximum flow rate. The recirculation flow rate was reset to 45 gpm per PT-2.1.
0 At approximately 1637 EDST, upon starting the "C" SI pump for the test, the pump minimum flow recirculation flow rate was found to be 56 gpm.
This was contrary to the required 50 gpm maximum flow rate. The recirculation flow rate was reset to 45 gpm per PT-2.1.
%1C iOAM WA Y 4II
U,l. ISUCLlAA Cl4ULATOIYC5++%$ 4SS INC Pens AIA 1044 I LICENSEE EVENT REPORT ILER) TEXT CONTINUATION AppsoYlo oU4 no. $ 1 90& I4s lX~ I'll SIT I ITS PACILITY NASSC Ill OOCIIlT IIU~CW Ql Llk IIUSSOC1 IN ~ j4l ISI vSAA SSOUSNSIAL vis sIn Q s v M s R.E. Qiana Nuc:lear Powe neer IS'~ ~ e nWeeC ~ ~ - Plant P494 Pens ~'sI I ITI o s o o o 2 4 4 89 00 7 00 0 6 ov 1 0 o At approximately 1726 EDST, the 99B" and I9C99 SZ pumps were started and stopped to verify recirc flov was less than or .equal to the required 50 gpm. Found the >>B" Sl pump recirc flow at 50 gpm and the "C" SZ pump recirc flov at 55 gpm.
o At approximately 1728 EDST the "C" SZ pump was declared inoperable.
o At approximately 1900 EDST a meeting between shift operations and plant staff was conducted and the following course of action was decided upon:
- 1) Shutdown the plant to less than 350 F and less than 1600 psig, until the problem with the "C" SI pump minimum flov recirculation line flov repeatability is found and corrected.
- 2) Reset the "C" SI pump minimum flow xecircu-lation flov.
- 3) Test repeatability of the "C" SZ pump minimum flow recirculation flov.
- 4) Correct the cause of pump minimum flow recirculation flow problem.
On June 22, 1989 at approximately 0707 EDST the reactor coolant system cold leg temperatures were less than 350 F and RCS pressure was less than 1600 pSige C. INOPERABLE STRUCTURES P COMPONENTS P OR SYSTEMS THAT CONTRIBUTED TO THE EVENT:
None.
D. OTHER SYSTEMS OR SECONDARY FUNCTIONS AFFECTED:
None.
vsc polU sess 94SI
Qec pena 000A II~ NLCLlAN XlOOLATONT CaaaaWON I%4SI UCENSEE EVENT REPORT ILER) TEXT CONTINUATION APPNOV lO 440 lXtiAIS SnIISS NO. )ISOMIOS PACILITY NA4l 111 OOCXXT NV40SN ISI LlN NINS0l1 Ill ~ AOl ISI vlAA SSOIISNTIAL VISION U N U a TENET IN rane ~ 0 rsSUSSX ~ ~
R.E. Ginna NUclear Power Plant ASIC Ireaa ~'ll I ITI 0 5 0 0 0 2 4 4 8 9007 00 07 OF 1 0 E. METHOD OF DISCOVERY'he first event was discovered during discussions between RET personnel and the Control Room operators, concerning proposed changes to PT-2.1.
The second event was discovered during the monthly test of the safety in)ection pumps.
F. OPERATOR ACTION:
The ma)or operator action during the events was to reduce plant load and subsequently take the unit off line and cool down to less than 350 F.
G. SAFETY SYSTEM RESPONSES:
None.
III CAUS OP A. IMMEDIATE CAUSE:
The <<B<< and <<C<< SI pumps were thought to be inoperable because they could not meet their design flow rates to the RCS due to their recirc valves being rather than throttled as required.
full open B. INTERMEDIATE CAUSE:
0 The <<B<< and <<C<< SI pump minimum flow recirculation valves were positioned full open rather than throttled as required.
0 With the pump minimum flow recirculation valves restored to the throttled position, subsequent.
pump testing failed to achieve repeatable pump recirculation flow results.
vaC POAU SSSA 9431
~ ~
V
IIA. NJCLCASI 054UWTO4T COINNKIOIS IIC GYM 500A LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) TEXT CONTINUATION ktf0OV lO OM0 IIO. 5150%104 55NA55 lltt4$
SACII.ITV HMI5 Ill OOCÃ5T IIU1%50 Ill I.I0 IIIAN54 III ~ A45 I5I SSOVSNYIAl V%ION YTAA M A M R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant o s o o o ~4 4 89 00 7 0 08 oi mCrIS ~~e~ ~~ASSOIISMImauIITI C. ROOT CAUSE:
The underlying cause of the event resulted from incorrect calibration data, provided by the plant designer for the installed system. The calibration data provided for flow transmitters FT-924 and FT-925 did not correlate accurately with the installed flow orifice plates, .FE-924 and FE-925.
ALYSIS 0 The event is being reported in accordance with 10 CFR 50.73 Licensee Event Report System, which permits and encourages Licensees to report significant events that may be of generic interest or concern even though they may not meet the criteria contained in 10 CFR 50.73.
An assessment was performed considering both the safety consequences and . implications of this event with the following results and conclusions:
There were no operational or safety consequences or implications attributed to the deemed to be inoperable "B" and "C" SI pumps because:
o An analysis was performed using current calibration data, and it was determined that even with the "B" and "Cll SI pumps minimum flow recirculation valves full open, the SI design flow rates to the RCS were still achieved. Thus the 'TBTT and "C" SI pumps were never truly inoperable.
Based on the above, it can be concluded that the public's health and safety was assured at all times.
VAC +0AM )SSA t ttl
V.E. NVCLEAA EE4VLAEO4Y OSWE~ON LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) TEXT CONTINUATION AtMOYEO OME NO. $ 1%0MIOE
~ XWAES EnIIEE EACILITYNAME lll OOCEEY NV~EE IEI LEi NVMEE1 IN ~ A4E 101 vEAA EEOVENYIAL VoeN H M N M R.E. Ginna Nuclem Power Plant o s o o o2 44 89 007 00 0 90' 0 TEXr IIY~ ~ 4 NeeeC ~ ~AEEC asa ~'u Im V. CO CTIVE ACTION A. ACTION TAKEN OR PLANNED TO PREVENT RECURRENCE:
0 The orifice plates installed in SI flow loops F-924 and F-925 were verified to be correct.
0 Flow transmitters FT-'924 and FT-925 were correctly calibrated to the installed orifice plates.
0 The three sa fety in) ection pumps were tested with the pump minimum flow recirculation line throttling valves full open, and the required SI design flow to the RCS was achieved.
o All installed safety-related flow orifice plates were assessed for correct installation and calibration. Correct, calibration data was confirmed for each orifice/flow transmitter combination.
0 Affected calibration procedures were changed to reflect correct calibration data.
0 The nuclear industry will be notified via NUCLEAR NETWORK of the generic concerns of correct calibration data for flow orifice/flow transmitter combinations.
VAC YOAM EEEA
~E 401
U~ lg&l5AAA54UMYOAYCCWWNICSS AC Sana 500A 10451 LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) TEXT CONTINUATION ASSAOVCO OU0 HO. 5150MIOS
~ 5 ~ IA55 5151I55 SACICIYY IIAAI5 lll OOCKSY AU~CA ISI LCA AUSS051 ISI ~ Aoa Ia SSAA SSOUSASIAI, VAIOA Q ~ t U A R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant o s o o o 244 8 9 007 001 0 OF 1 0 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
A. FAILED COMPONENTS:
None.
B. PREVIOUS LERs ON SIMILAR EVENTS:
A similar LER event historical search was conducted with the following results: No documentation of similar LER events with the same root cause at Ginna Station could be identified.
C. SPECIAL COMMENTS:
'one.
wAC sOlQ SSSA 0 SSI