ML17352A640: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
| author name = Lenning E
| author name = Lenning E
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DLP/PLPB
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DLP/PLPB
| addressee name = Morey D C
| addressee name = Morey D
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR/DLP/PLPB
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR/DLP/PLPB
| docket = 99902038, PROJ0700
| docket = 99902038, PROJ0700
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:January 10, 2018  
{{#Wiki_filter:January 10, 2018 MEMORANDUM TO: Dennis C. Morey, Chief Licensing Processes Branch Division of Licensing Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM:                 Ekaterina Lenning, Project Manager         /RA/
 
Licensing Processes Branch Division of Licensing Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
MEMORANDUM TO: Dennis C. Morey, Chief Licensing Processes Branch   Division of Licensing Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation  
 
FROM:   Ekaterina Lenning, Project Manager
/RA/ Licensing Processes Branch   Division of Licensing Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation  


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF CLOSED AUDIT FOR THE WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY TOPICAL REPORT WCAP-18032-P, REVISION 0 AND WCAP-18032-NP, REVISION 0, "CALCULATION OF  
OF CLOSED AUDIT FOR THE WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY TOPICAL REPORT WCAP-18032-P, REVISION 0 AND WCAP-18032-NP, REVISION 0, "CALCULATION OF MIXED CORE SAFETY LIMIT MINIMUM CRITICAL POWER RATIO" (TAC NO. MF9017)
 
On October 17-18, 2017, a closed audit was conducted by U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff at the Westinghouse Electric Company (Westinghouse) in Cranberry Township, PA, to review and discuss proprietary information related to the review of the WCAP-18032-P, Revision 0 and WCAP-18032-NP, Revision 0, "Calculation of Mixed Core Safety Limit Minimum Critical Power Ratio, topical report (TR). As a result of the audit draft requests for additional information (RAI) questions were sent to Westinghouse via encrypted email on November 2, 2017, to give opportunity to Westinghouse review and provide proprietary markings before the NRC staff issued final RAI questions.
MIXED CORE SAFETY LIMIT MINIMUM CRITICAL POWER RATIO" (TAC NO. MF9017)  
Docket No. 99902038 CONTACT:       Ekaterina Lenning, NRR/PLPB 301-415-3151 Ekaterina.Lenning@nrc.gov
 
On October 17-18, 2017, a closed audit was conducted by U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff at the Westinghouse Electric Company (Westinghouse) in Cranberry  
 
Township, PA, to review and discuss proprietary information related to the review of the
 
WCAP-18032-P, Revision 0 and WCAP-18032-NP, Revision 0, "Calculation of Mixed Core  
 
Safety Limit Minimum Critical Power Ratio," topical report (TR). As a result of the audit draft  
 
requests for additional information (RAI) questions were sent to Westinghouse via encrypted  
 
email on November 2, 2017, to give opportunity to Westinghouse review and provide proprietary markings before the NRC staff issued final RAI questions.  
 
Docket No. 99902038  
 
CONTACT: Ekaterina Lenning, NRR/PLPB 301-415-3151  
 
Ekaterina.Lenning@nrc.gov


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF CLOSED AUDIT FOR THE WESTINGHOUSE
OF CLOSED AUDIT FOR THE WESTINGHOUSE


ML17352A640; *concurrence via e-mail   NRC-001 OFFIC E DLP/PLPB/PM DLP/PLPB/LA* DSS/SNPB/BC* DLP/PLPB/BC* DLP/PLPB/PM NAME ELenning DHarrison RLukes DMorey ELenning DATE 12/18/2017 12/28/2017 1/4/2018 1/5/2018 1/10/2018  
ML17352A640; *concurrence via e-mail           NRC-001 OFFIC   DLP/PLPB/PM DLP/PLPB/LA* DSS/SNPB/BC* DLP/PLPB/BC*     DLP/PLPB/PM E
 
NAME     ELenning     DHarrison       RLukes         DMorey     ELenning DATE     12/18/2017   12/28/2017     1/4/2018       1/5/2018 1/10/2018 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
Enclosure U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF CLOSED AUDIT FOR THE WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY TOPICAL REPORT WCAP-18032-P, REVISION 0 AND WCAP-18032-NP, REVISION 0, "CALCULATION OF MIXED CORE SAFETY LIMIT MINIMUM CRITICAL POWER RATIO"
OF CLOSED AUDIT FOR THE WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY TOPICAL REPORT WCAP-18032-P, REVISION 0 AND WCAP-18032-NP, REVISION 0, "CALCULATION OF MIXED CORE SAFETY LIMIT MINIMUM CRITICAL POWER RATIO
 
==1.0  INTRODUCTION==
 
By letter dated December 12, 2016, Westinghouse Electric Company (Westinghouse) submitted WCAP-18032-P, Revision 0, and WCAP-18032-NP, Revision 0, "Calculation of Mixed Core
 
Safety Limit Minimum Critical Power Ratio," topi cal report (TR) for the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) review and approval. In September 2017, the NRC staff informed
 
Westinghouse of its intent to conduct a regulatory audit. The main purpose of the audit was for
 
the NRC technical reviewer to better understand the TR and to have an opportunity to ask
 
Westinghouse representatives clarifying questions regarding the information contained within
 
the submittal. After a detailed review of the TR, the NRC staff developed 202 comprehension
 
questions that required clarification before request for additional information (RAI) questions
 
could be drafted. Therefore, the NRC staff conducted a closed audit of understanding for the
 
WCAP-18032-P, Revision 0, and WCAP-18032-NP, Revision 0, TR review, between October 17
 
and 18, 2017, at the Westinghouse facilities in Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania.
 
2.0  AUDIT TEAM
 
Joshua Kaizer (NRC)
 
Kevin Heller (NRC)
 
3.0 AUDIT RESULTS
 
Discussion of Topical Report
 
The audit consisted of a detailed walkthrough of WCAP-18032-P, Revision 0, and 
 
WCAP-18032-NP, Revision 0. The NRC staff used this opportunity to resolve
 
202 comprehension questions which were developed from an earlier extensive study of TR.
Westinghouse provided explanations for the comprehension questions, enabling the NRC staff
 
to identify nine specific areas of concern that would allow them to draft RAI questions.
 
Generation of RAI Questions
 
Westinghouse was able to clarify information contained in TR during the audit. However, the
 
NRC staff believes that most of the pertinent information presented during the audit was not
 
reflected in the submittal. Therefore, the NRC staff proposed to have two rounds of RAI
 
questions. The first round of RAI questions focuses specifically on the proprietary information
 
discussed during the audit that is essential for the NRC staff's review and is not contained within
 
the submittal. The draft RAI questions were provided to Westinghouse for review and
 
proprietary determination on November 2, 2017, via encrypted email. After responses to formal


RAI questions are submitted, the NRC staff will review them and make a decision if a second
==1.0 INTRODUCTION==


round of RAI questions is needed in order to complete NRC draft safety evaluation.
By letter dated December 12, 2016, Westinghouse Electric Company (Westinghouse) submitted WCAP-18032-P, Revision 0, and WCAP-18032-NP, Revision 0, "Calculation of Mixed Core Safety Limit Minimum Critical Power Ratio," topical report (TR) for the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) review and approval. In September 2017, the NRC staff informed Westinghouse of its intent to conduct a regulatory audit. The main purpose of the audit was for the NRC technical reviewer to better understand the TR and to have an opportunity to ask Westinghouse representatives clarifying questions regarding the information contained within the submittal. After a detailed review of the TR, the NRC staff developed 202 comprehension questions that required clarification before request for additional information (RAI) questions could be drafted. Therefore, the NRC staff conducted a closed audit of understanding for the WCAP-18032-P, Revision 0, and WCAP-18032-NP, Revision 0, TR review, between October 17 and 18, 2017, at the Westinghouse facilities in Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania.
2.0 AUDIT TEAM Joshua Kaizer (NRC)
Kevin Heller (NRC) 3.0 AUDIT RESULTS Discussion of Topical Report The audit consisted of a detailed walkthrough of WCAP-18032-P, Revision 0, and WCAP-18032-NP, Revision 0. The NRC staff used this opportunity to resolve 202 comprehension questions which were developed from an earlier extensive study of TR.
Westinghouse provided explanations for the comprehension questions, enabling the NRC staff to identify nine specific areas of concern that would allow them to draft RAI questions.
Generation of RAI Questions Westinghouse was able to clarify information contained in TR during the audit. However, the NRC staff believes that most of the pertinent information presented during the audit was not reflected in the submittal. Therefore, the NRC staff proposed to have two rounds of RAI questions. The first round of RAI questions focuses specifically on the proprietary information discussed during the audit that is essential for the NRC staffs review and is not contained within the submittal. The draft RAI questions were provided to Westinghouse for review and proprietary determination on November 2, 2017, via encrypted email. After responses to formal RAI questions are submitted, the NRC staff will review them and make a decision if a second round of RAI questions is needed in order to complete NRC draft safety evaluation.
Westinghouse agreed with this course of action.
Enclosure


Westinghouse agreed with this course of action. 4.0 PARTICIPANTS NAME     ORGANIZATION Joshua Kaizer   NRC Kevin Heller   NRC Eric Frantz   Westinghouse Bradley Maurer   Westinghouse Anghel Enica   Westinghouse Uffe Bergman   Westinghouse Jean-Marie Le Corre   Westinghouse Kaj Thorselius   Westinghouse Patricia Quaglia   Westinghouse Scott Vrtiska   Westinghouse}}
4.0 PARTICIPANTS NAME               ORGANIZATION Joshua Kaizer       NRC Kevin Heller       NRC Eric Frantz         Westinghouse Bradley Maurer     Westinghouse Anghel Enica       Westinghouse Uffe Bergman       Westinghouse Jean-Marie Le Corre Westinghouse Kaj Thorselius     Westinghouse Patricia Quaglia   Westinghouse Scott Vrtiska       Westinghouse}}

Latest revision as of 21:33, 3 February 2020

Summary of Closed Audit for the Westinghouse Electric Company Topical Report WCAP-18032-P, Revision 0 and Wcap-18032-NP, Revision 0, Calculation of Mixed Core Safety Limit Minimum Critical Power Ratio.
ML17352A640
Person / Time
Site: Westinghouse, PROJ0700
Issue date: 01/10/2018
From: Ekaterina Lenning
NRC/NRR/DLP/PLPB
To: Dennis Morey
NRC/NRR/DLP/PLPB
Lenning E
References
TAC MF9017
Download: ML17352A640 (5)
v • d • e


Text

January 10, 2018 MEMORANDUM TO: Dennis C. Morey, Chief Licensing Processes Branch Division of Licensing Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM: Ekaterina Lenning, Project Manager /RA/

Licensing Processes Branch Division of Licensing Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF CLOSED AUDIT FOR THE WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY TOPICAL REPORT WCAP-18032-P, REVISION 0 AND WCAP-18032-NP, REVISION 0, "CALCULATION OF MIXED CORE SAFETY LIMIT MINIMUM CRITICAL POWER RATIO" (TAC NO. MF9017)

On October 17-18, 2017, a closed audit was conducted by U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff at the Westinghouse Electric Company (Westinghouse) in Cranberry Township, PA, to review and discuss proprietary information related to the review of the WCAP-18032-P, Revision 0 and WCAP-18032-NP, Revision 0, "Calculation of Mixed Core Safety Limit Minimum Critical Power Ratio, topical report (TR). As a result of the audit draft requests for additional information (RAI) questions were sent to Westinghouse via encrypted email on November 2, 2017, to give opportunity to Westinghouse review and provide proprietary markings before the NRC staff issued final RAI questions.

Docket No. 99902038 CONTACT: Ekaterina Lenning, NRR/PLPB 301-415-3151 Ekaterina.Lenning@nrc.gov

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF CLOSED AUDIT FOR THE WESTINGHOUSE

ML17352A640; *concurrence via e-mail NRC-001 OFFIC DLP/PLPB/PM DLP/PLPB/LA* DSS/SNPB/BC* DLP/PLPB/BC* DLP/PLPB/PM E

NAME ELenning DHarrison RLukes DMorey ELenning DATE 12/18/2017 12/28/2017 1/4/2018 1/5/2018 1/10/2018 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

SUMMARY

OF CLOSED AUDIT FOR THE WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY TOPICAL REPORT WCAP-18032-P, REVISION 0 AND WCAP-18032-NP, REVISION 0, "CALCULATION OF MIXED CORE SAFETY LIMIT MINIMUM CRITICAL POWER RATIO

1.0 INTRODUCTION

By letter dated December 12, 2016, Westinghouse Electric Company (Westinghouse) submitted WCAP-18032-P, Revision 0, and WCAP-18032-NP, Revision 0, "Calculation of Mixed Core Safety Limit Minimum Critical Power Ratio," topical report (TR) for the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) review and approval. In September 2017, the NRC staff informed Westinghouse of its intent to conduct a regulatory audit. The main purpose of the audit was for the NRC technical reviewer to better understand the TR and to have an opportunity to ask Westinghouse representatives clarifying questions regarding the information contained within the submittal. After a detailed review of the TR, the NRC staff developed 202 comprehension questions that required clarification before request for additional information (RAI) questions could be drafted. Therefore, the NRC staff conducted a closed audit of understanding for the WCAP-18032-P, Revision 0, and WCAP-18032-NP, Revision 0, TR review, between October 17 and 18, 2017, at the Westinghouse facilities in Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania.

2.0 AUDIT TEAM Joshua Kaizer (NRC)

Kevin Heller (NRC) 3.0 AUDIT RESULTS Discussion of Topical Report The audit consisted of a detailed walkthrough of WCAP-18032-P, Revision 0, and WCAP-18032-NP, Revision 0. The NRC staff used this opportunity to resolve 202 comprehension questions which were developed from an earlier extensive study of TR.

Westinghouse provided explanations for the comprehension questions, enabling the NRC staff to identify nine specific areas of concern that would allow them to draft RAI questions.

Generation of RAI Questions Westinghouse was able to clarify information contained in TR during the audit. However, the NRC staff believes that most of the pertinent information presented during the audit was not reflected in the submittal. Therefore, the NRC staff proposed to have two rounds of RAI questions. The first round of RAI questions focuses specifically on the proprietary information discussed during the audit that is essential for the NRC staffs review and is not contained within the submittal. The draft RAI questions were provided to Westinghouse for review and proprietary determination on November 2, 2017, via encrypted email. After responses to formal RAI questions are submitted, the NRC staff will review them and make a decision if a second round of RAI questions is needed in order to complete NRC draft safety evaluation.

Westinghouse agreed with this course of action.

Enclosure

4.0 PARTICIPANTS NAME ORGANIZATION Joshua Kaizer NRC Kevin Heller NRC Eric Frantz Westinghouse Bradley Maurer Westinghouse Anghel Enica Westinghouse Uffe Bergman Westinghouse Jean-Marie Le Corre Westinghouse Kaj Thorselius Westinghouse Patricia Quaglia Westinghouse Scott Vrtiska Westinghouse

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML17352A640&oldid=2422765"