IR 05000220/2013301: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION une 10, 2013 | ||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
| Line 33: | Line 27: | ||
On May 21, 2013, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an examination at Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 1. The enclosed report documents the examination findings, which were discussed on June 4, 2013, with Jeffrey Gerber, Training Manager, and other members of your staff. | On May 21, 2013, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an examination at Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 1. The enclosed report documents the examination findings, which were discussed on June 4, 2013, with Jeffrey Gerber, Training Manager, and other members of your staff. | ||
The examination included the evaluation of eight applicants for reactor operator licenses, five applicants for instant senior operator licenses, and two applicants for upgrade senior operator | The examination included the evaluation of eight applicants for reactor operator licenses, five applicants for instant senior operator licenses, and two applicants for upgrade senior operator licenses. The written and operating examinations were developed using NUREG-1021, | ||
"Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors," Revision 9, Supplement 1. | |||
The license examiners determined that all applicants satisfied the requirements of 10 CFR Part 55, and the appropriate licenses were issued on June 3, 2013. | |||
No findings were identified during this examination. | No findings were identified during this examination. | ||
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of | In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs document system Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). | ||
Sincerely, | Sincerely, | ||
/RA/ Donald E. Jackson, Chief | /RA/ | ||
Donald E. Jackson, Chief | |||
==SUBJECT:== | |||
NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 1 - NRC INITIAL OPERATOR LICENSING EXAMINATION REPORT 05000220/2013301 | |||
==Dear Mr. Costanzo:== | |||
On May 21, 2013, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an examination at Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 1. The enclosed report documents the examination findings, which were discussed on June 4, 2013, with Jeffrey Gerber, Training Manager, and other members of your staff. | |||
The examination included the evaluation of eight applicants for reactor operator licenses, five applicants for instant senior operator licenses, and two applicants for upgrade senior operator licenses. The written and operating examinations were developed using NUREG-1021, | |||
"Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors," Revision 9, Supplement 1. | |||
The license examiners determined that all applicants satisfied the requirements of 10 CFR Part 55, and the appropriate licenses were issued on June 3, 2013. | |||
No findings were identified during this examination. | |||
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs document system Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). | |||
RidsNrrDorlLpl1-1 Resource ROPReports Resource | Sincerely, | ||
/RA/ | |||
Donald E. Jackson, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety Distribution: See Next Page DOCUMENT NAME: G:\DRS\Operations Branch\FISH\Exam 13-NMP1 May 13 (U01861)\EXAM REPORT.docx ADAMS PKG: ML12356A123 ADAMS ACCESSION NO.: ML13161A343 Non-Sensitive Publicly Available SUNSI Review Sensitive Non-Publicly Available OFFICE RI/DRS/OB RI/DRS/OB NAME TFish DEJackson DATE 6/7/2013 6/10/2013 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServ Docket No. 50-220 License No. DPR-63 Enclosure: NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination Report 05000220/2013301 w/Attachment: Supplemental Information Distribution w/encl: (via E-mail) | |||
W. Dean, RA (R1ORAMAIL RESOURCE) | |||
D. Lew, DRA (R1ORAMAIL RESOURCE) | |||
D. Roberts, DRP (R1DRPMAIL RESOURCE) | |||
M. Layton, DRP (R1DRPMAIL RESOURCE) | |||
C. Miller, DRS (R1DRSMAIL RESOURCE) | |||
J. Clifford, DRS (R1DRSMAIL RESOURCE) | |||
D. Schroeder, DRP A. Rosebrook, DRP T. Ziev, DRP K. Kolaczyk, DRP, SRI E. Miller, DRP, RI M. Rose, DRP, AA D. Huyck, RI OEDO RidsNrrPMNineMilePoint Resource RidsNrrDorlLpl1-1 Resource ROPReports Resource | |||
EXAMINATION REPORT U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | |||
Dates: May 13-17, 2013 (Operating Test Administration) May 21, 2013 (Written Examination Administration) May 28, 2013 (Licensee Submitted Post Exam Package) May 20-30, 2013 (NRC Examination Grading) | ==REGION I== | ||
June 3, 2013 (Licenses Issued) Examiners: T. Fish, Chief Examiner, Operations Branch B. Fuller, Operations Engineer M. Patel, Operations Engineer | Dockets: 50-220 Licenses: DPR-63 Report : 05000220/2013301 Licensee: Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, LLC Facility: Nine Mile Point, Unit 1 Location: P.O. Box 63 Lycoming, NY 13093-0063 Dates: May 13-17, 2013 (Operating Test Administration) | ||
May 21, 2013 (Written Examination Administration) | |||
May 28, 2013 (Licensee Submitted Post Exam Package) | |||
May 20-30, 2013 (NRC Examination Grading) | |||
June 3, 2013 (Licenses Issued) | |||
Examiners: T. Fish, Chief Examiner, Operations Branch B. Fuller, Operations Engineer M. Patel, Operations Engineer T. Hedigan, Operations Engineer Approved By: Donald E. Jackson, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety i Enclosure | |||
=SUMMARY OF FINDINGS= | |||
ER 05000220/2013301; May 13-17, 2013, and May 21, 2013; Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, | |||
Unit 1; Initial Operator Licensing Examination Report. | |||
NRC examiners evaluated the competency of eight applicants for reactor operator licenses, five applicants for instant senior operator licenses, and two applicants for upgrade senior operator licenses at the Unit 1 facility. The facility licensee developed the examinations using | NRC examiners evaluated the competency of eight applicants for reactor operator licenses, five applicants for instant senior operator licenses, and two applicants for upgrade senior operator licenses at the Unit 1 facility. The facility licensee developed the examinations using NUREG-1021, "Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors," Revision 9, | ||
Supplement 1. The written examination was administered by the facility on May 21, 2013. NRC examiners administered the operating tests on May 13-17, 2013. The license examiners determined that all applicants satisfied the requirements of 10 CFR Part 55, and the appropriate licenses have been issued. | |||
=== | ===NRC-Identified and Self-Revealing Findings=== | ||
No findings were identified. | No findings were identified. | ||
=== | ===Licensee-Identified Violations=== | ||
None. | None. | ||
ii | |||
=REPORT DETAILS= | =REPORT DETAILS= | ||
| Line 93: | Line 102: | ||
====a. Scope==== | ====a. Scope==== | ||
The examiners reviewed all 15 license applications submitted by the licensee to ensure the applications reflected that each applicant satisfied relevant license eligibility requirements. The applications were submitted on NRC Form 398, | The examiners reviewed all 15 license applications submitted by the licensee to ensure the applications reflected that each applicant satisfied relevant license eligibility requirements. The applications were submitted on NRC Form 398, Personal Qualification Statement, and NRC Form 396, Certification of Medical Examination by Facility Licensee. The examiners also audited four of the license applications in detail to confirm that they accurately reflected the subject applicants qualifications. This audit focused on each applicants experience and on-the-job training, including control manipulations that provided significant reactivity changes. | ||
====b. Findings==== | ====b. Findings==== | ||
| Line 103: | Line 112: | ||
On May 21, 2013, the licensee proctored the administration of the written examinations to all 15 applicants. The licensee staff graded the written examinations, analyzed the results, and presented their analysis to the NRC on May 28, 2013. | On May 21, 2013, the licensee proctored the administration of the written examinations to all 15 applicants. The licensee staff graded the written examinations, analyzed the results, and presented their analysis to the NRC on May 28, 2013. | ||
The NRC examination team administered the various portions of the operating examination to all 15 applicants on May 13-17, 2013. The eight applicants for reactor operator licenses participated in at least two dynamic simulator scenarios, in a control room and facilities walkthrough test consisting of 11 system tasks, and an administrative test consisting of four administrative tasks. The five applicants seeking an instant senior operator license participated in at least two dynamic simulator scenarios, a control room and facilities walkthrough test consisting of 10 system tasks, and an administrative test consisting of five administrative tasks. The two applicants for upgrade senior operator licenses participated in two dynamic | The NRC examination team administered the various portions of the operating examination to all 15 applicants on May 13-17, 2013. The eight applicants for reactor operator licenses participated in at least two dynamic simulator scenarios, in a control room and facilities walkthrough test consisting of 11 system tasks, and an administrative test consisting of four administrative tasks. The five applicants seeking an instant senior operator license participated in at least two dynamic simulator scenarios, a control room and facilities walkthrough test consisting of 10 system tasks, and an administrative test consisting of five administrative tasks. The two applicants for upgrade senior operator licenses participated in two dynamic simulator scenarios, a control room and facilities walkthrough test consisting of five system tasks, and an administrative test consisting of five administrative tasks. | ||
====b. Findings==== | ====b. Findings==== | ||
All of the applicants passed all parts of the operating test and the written examination. For the written examinations, the reactor operator applicants | All of the applicants passed all parts of the operating test and the written examination. | ||
For the written examinations, the reactor operator applicants average score was 88.50 percent and ranged from 84.00 to 96.00 percent; the senior operator applicants average score was 90.29 percent and ranged from 84.00 to 98.00 percent. The text of the examination questions and the licensees examination analysis may be accessed in the ADAMS system under the accession numbers noted in Attachment 1. In accordance with current NRC policy, the release of this written examination in ADAMS to the public will be delayed for 2 years. | |||
Chapter ES-403 and Form ES-403-1 of NUREG 1021 require the licensee to analyze the validity of any written examination questions that were missed by half or more of the applicants. The licensee conducted this performance analysis for four questions that met this criterion and submitted the analysis to the chief examiner. The analysis determined the questions were valid as written, and that no changes to the exam were necessary. | |||
===.3 Initial Licensing Examination Development=== | ===.3 Initial Licensing Examination Development=== | ||
====a. Examination Scope==== | ====a. Examination Scope==== | ||
The facility licensee developed the examinations in accordance with NUREG-1021, Revision 9, Supplement 1. All licensee facility training and operations staff involved in examination preparation and validation were listed on a security agreement. The facility licensee submitted both the written and operating examination outlines on | The facility licensee developed the examinations in accordance with NUREG-1021, Revision 9, Supplement 1. All licensee facility training and operations staff involved in examination preparation and validation were listed on a security agreement. The facility licensee submitted both the written and operating examination outlines on February 20, 2013. The chief examiner reviewed the outlines against the requirements of NUREG-1021, and provided comments to the licensee. The facility licensee submitted the draft examination package on March 15, 2013. The chief examiner reviewed the draft examination package against the requirements of NUREG-1021, and provided comments to the licensee on the examination on March 29, 2013. The NRC conducted an onsite validation of the operating examinations and provided further comments during the week of April 1, 2013. The licensee satisfactorily completed comment resolution on April 9, 2013. | ||
====b. Findings==== | ====b. Findings==== | ||
The NRC approved the initial examination | The NRC approved the initial examination outline and advised the licensee to proceed with examination development. | ||
The examiners determined that the written and operating examinations initially submitted by the licensee were within the range of acceptability expected for a proposed examination. | The examiners determined that the written and operating examinations initially submitted by the licensee were within the range of acceptability expected for a proposed examination. | ||
| Line 124: | Line 136: | ||
====a. Examination Scope==== | ====a. Examination Scope==== | ||
The examiners observed simulator performance with regard to plant fidelity during the examination validation and administration. | The examiners observed simulator performance with regard to plant fidelity during the examination validation and administration. | ||
====b. Findings==== | ====b. Findings==== | ||
| Line 136: | Line 148: | ||
====b. Findings==== | ====b. Findings==== | ||
No findings were identified. | No findings were identified. | ||
{{a|4OA6}} | |||
{{a|4OA6}} | |||
==4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit== | ==4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit== | ||
| Line 143: | Line 154: | ||
The licensee did not identify any information or materials used during the examination as proprietary. | The licensee did not identify any information or materials used during the examination as proprietary. | ||
: | : | ||
Supplemental Information | |||
Supplemental Information | |||
=SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION= | =SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION= | ||
| Line 152: | Line 162: | ||
===Licensee Personnel=== | ===Licensee Personnel=== | ||
: [[contact::D. Britt]], Operations Training Supervisor | : [[contact::D. Britt]], Operations Training Supervisor | ||
: [[contact::P. Isham]], Lead Exam Developer | : [[contact::P. Isham]], Lead Exam Developer | ||
==ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED== | ==ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED== | ||
None | None | ||
==ADAMS DOCUMENTS REFERENCED== | ==ADAMS DOCUMENTS REFERENCED== | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 15:33, 20 December 2019
| ML13161A343 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Nine Mile Point  |
| Issue date: | 06/10/2013 |
| From: | Diane Jackson Operations Branch I |
| To: | Costanzo C Nine Mile Point |
| Shared Package | |
| ML12356A123 | List: |
| References | |
| ER-13-301 | |
| Download: ML13161A343 (10) | |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION une 10, 2013
SUBJECT:
NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 1 - NRC INITIAL OPERATOR LICENSING EXAMINATION REPORT 05000220/2013301
Dear Mr. Costanzo:
On May 21, 2013, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an examination at Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 1. The enclosed report documents the examination findings, which were discussed on June 4, 2013, with Jeffrey Gerber, Training Manager, and other members of your staff.
The examination included the evaluation of eight applicants for reactor operator licenses, five applicants for instant senior operator licenses, and two applicants for upgrade senior operator licenses. The written and operating examinations were developed using NUREG-1021,
"Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors," Revision 9, Supplement 1.
The license examiners determined that all applicants satisfied the requirements of 10 CFR Part 55, and the appropriate licenses were issued on June 3, 2013.
No findings were identified during this examination.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs document system Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,
/RA/
Donald E. Jackson, Chief
SUBJECT:
NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 1 - NRC INITIAL OPERATOR LICENSING EXAMINATION REPORT 05000220/2013301
Dear Mr. Costanzo:
On May 21, 2013, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an examination at Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 1. The enclosed report documents the examination findings, which were discussed on June 4, 2013, with Jeffrey Gerber, Training Manager, and other members of your staff.
The examination included the evaluation of eight applicants for reactor operator licenses, five applicants for instant senior operator licenses, and two applicants for upgrade senior operator licenses. The written and operating examinations were developed using NUREG-1021,
"Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors," Revision 9, Supplement 1.
The license examiners determined that all applicants satisfied the requirements of 10 CFR Part 55, and the appropriate licenses were issued on June 3, 2013.
No findings were identified during this examination.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs document system Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams/web-based.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,
/RA/
Donald E. Jackson, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety Distribution: See Next Page DOCUMENT NAME: G:\DRS\Operations Branch\FISH\Exam 13-NMP1 May 13 (U01861)\EXAM REPORT.docx ADAMS PKG: ML12356A123 ADAMS ACCESSION NO.: ML13161A343 Non-Sensitive Publicly Available SUNSI Review Sensitive Non-Publicly Available OFFICE RI/DRS/OB RI/DRS/OB NAME TFish DEJackson DATE 6/7/2013 6/10/2013 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServ Docket No. 50-220 License No. DPR-63 Enclosure: NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination Report 05000220/2013301 w/Attachment: Supplemental Information Distribution w/encl: (via E-mail)
W. Dean, RA (R1ORAMAIL RESOURCE)
D. Lew, DRA (R1ORAMAIL RESOURCE)
D. Roberts, DRP (R1DRPMAIL RESOURCE)
M. Layton, DRP (R1DRPMAIL RESOURCE)
C. Miller, DRS (R1DRSMAIL RESOURCE)
J. Clifford, DRS (R1DRSMAIL RESOURCE)
D. Schroeder, DRP A. Rosebrook, DRP T. Ziev, DRP K. Kolaczyk, DRP, SRI E. Miller, DRP, RI M. Rose, DRP, AA D. Huyck, RI OEDO RidsNrrPMNineMilePoint Resource RidsNrrDorlLpl1-1 Resource ROPReports Resource
EXAMINATION REPORT U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION I
Dockets: 50-220 Licenses: DPR-63 Report : 05000220/2013301 Licensee: Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, LLC Facility: Nine Mile Point, Unit 1 Location: P.O. Box 63 Lycoming, NY 13093-0063 Dates: May 13-17, 2013 (Operating Test Administration)
May 21, 2013 (Written Examination Administration)
May 28, 2013 (Licensee Submitted Post Exam Package)
May 20-30, 2013 (NRC Examination Grading)
June 3, 2013 (Licenses Issued)
Examiners: T. Fish, Chief Examiner, Operations Branch B. Fuller, Operations Engineer M. Patel, Operations Engineer T. Hedigan, Operations Engineer Approved By: Donald E. Jackson, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety i Enclosure
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
ER 05000220/2013301; May 13-17, 2013, and May 21, 2013; Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station,
Unit 1; Initial Operator Licensing Examination Report.
NRC examiners evaluated the competency of eight applicants for reactor operator licenses, five applicants for instant senior operator licenses, and two applicants for upgrade senior operator licenses at the Unit 1 facility. The facility licensee developed the examinations using NUREG-1021, "Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors," Revision 9,
Supplement 1. The written examination was administered by the facility on May 21, 2013. NRC examiners administered the operating tests on May 13-17, 2013. The license examiners determined that all applicants satisfied the requirements of 10 CFR Part 55, and the appropriate licenses have been issued.
NRC-Identified and Self-Revealing Findings
No findings were identified.
Licensee-Identified Violations
None.
ii
REPORT DETAILS
OTHER ACTIVITIES (OA)
4OA5 Other Activities (Initial Operator License Examination)
.1 License Applications
a. Scope
The examiners reviewed all 15 license applications submitted by the licensee to ensure the applications reflected that each applicant satisfied relevant license eligibility requirements. The applications were submitted on NRC Form 398, Personal Qualification Statement, and NRC Form 396, Certification of Medical Examination by Facility Licensee. The examiners also audited four of the license applications in detail to confirm that they accurately reflected the subject applicants qualifications. This audit focused on each applicants experience and on-the-job training, including control manipulations that provided significant reactivity changes.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
.2 Operator Knowledge and Performance
a. Examination Scope
On May 21, 2013, the licensee proctored the administration of the written examinations to all 15 applicants. The licensee staff graded the written examinations, analyzed the results, and presented their analysis to the NRC on May 28, 2013.
The NRC examination team administered the various portions of the operating examination to all 15 applicants on May 13-17, 2013. The eight applicants for reactor operator licenses participated in at least two dynamic simulator scenarios, in a control room and facilities walkthrough test consisting of 11 system tasks, and an administrative test consisting of four administrative tasks. The five applicants seeking an instant senior operator license participated in at least two dynamic simulator scenarios, a control room and facilities walkthrough test consisting of 10 system tasks, and an administrative test consisting of five administrative tasks. The two applicants for upgrade senior operator licenses participated in two dynamic simulator scenarios, a control room and facilities walkthrough test consisting of five system tasks, and an administrative test consisting of five administrative tasks.
b. Findings
All of the applicants passed all parts of the operating test and the written examination.
For the written examinations, the reactor operator applicants average score was 88.50 percent and ranged from 84.00 to 96.00 percent; the senior operator applicants average score was 90.29 percent and ranged from 84.00 to 98.00 percent. The text of the examination questions and the licensees examination analysis may be accessed in the ADAMS system under the accession numbers noted in Attachment 1. In accordance with current NRC policy, the release of this written examination in ADAMS to the public will be delayed for 2 years.
Chapter ES-403 and Form ES-403-1 of NUREG 1021 require the licensee to analyze the validity of any written examination questions that were missed by half or more of the applicants. The licensee conducted this performance analysis for four questions that met this criterion and submitted the analysis to the chief examiner. The analysis determined the questions were valid as written, and that no changes to the exam were necessary.
.3 Initial Licensing Examination Development
a. Examination Scope
The facility licensee developed the examinations in accordance with NUREG-1021, Revision 9, Supplement 1. All licensee facility training and operations staff involved in examination preparation and validation were listed on a security agreement. The facility licensee submitted both the written and operating examination outlines on February 20, 2013. The chief examiner reviewed the outlines against the requirements of NUREG-1021, and provided comments to the licensee. The facility licensee submitted the draft examination package on March 15, 2013. The chief examiner reviewed the draft examination package against the requirements of NUREG-1021, and provided comments to the licensee on the examination on March 29, 2013. The NRC conducted an onsite validation of the operating examinations and provided further comments during the week of April 1, 2013. The licensee satisfactorily completed comment resolution on April 9, 2013.
b. Findings
The NRC approved the initial examination outline and advised the licensee to proceed with examination development.
The examiners determined that the written and operating examinations initially submitted by the licensee were within the range of acceptability expected for a proposed examination.
No findings were identified.
.4 Simulation Facility Performance
a. Examination Scope
The examiners observed simulator performance with regard to plant fidelity during the examination validation and administration.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
.5 Examination Security
a. Examination Scope
The examiners reviewed examination security for examination development and during both the onsite preparation week and examination administration week for compliance with NUREG-1021 requirements. Plans for simulator security and applicant control were reviewed and discussed with licensee personnel.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit
The chief examiner presented the examination results to Messrs. Jeffrey Gerber, Training Manager, and other members of the licensee's management staff on June 4, 2013. The licensee acknowledged the findings presented.
The licensee did not identify any information or materials used during the examination as proprietary.
Supplemental Information
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
KEY POINTS OF CONTACT
Licensee Personnel
- D. Britt, Operations Training Supervisor
ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED
None