IR 05000219/2014502: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| author name = Dimitriadis A | | author name = Dimitriadis A | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-I/DRS/PSB1 | | author affiliation = NRC/RGN-I/DRS/PSB1 | ||
| addressee name = Pacilio M | | addressee name = Pacilio M | ||
| addressee affiliation = Exelon Generation Co, LLC, Exelon Nuclear | | addressee affiliation = Exelon Generation Co, LLC, Exelon Nuclear | ||
| docket = 05000219 | | docket = 05000219 | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:ril 29, 2014 | ||
SUBJECT: OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION - NRC EVALUATED EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS EXERCISE - INSPECTION REPORT NO. 05000219/2014502 | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION - NRC EVALUATED EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS EXERCISE - INSPECTION REPORT NO. 05000219/2014502 | |||
==Dear Mr. Pacilio:== | ==Dear Mr. Pacilio:== | ||
On March 20, 2014, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection of the March 18, 2014, evaluated emergency preparedness exercise at your Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on March 20, 2014, with Mr. G. Stathes, Site Vice-President, and other members of your staff. | On March 20, 2014, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection of the March 18, 2014, evaluated emergency preparedness exercise at your Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on March 20, 2014, with Mr. G. Stathes, Site Vice-President, and other members of your staff. | ||
The inspection examined activities conducted under your licenses as they relate to safety and compliance with the | The inspection examined activities conducted under your licenses as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license. | ||
The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel. | |||
Based on the results of this inspection, no findings were identified. | Based on the results of this inspection, no findings were identified. | ||
In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulation (10 CFR) 2.390 of the | In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulation (10 CFR) 2.390 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter and its enclosure and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRCs document system, Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). | ||
Sincerely,/RA/ Anthony Dimitriadis, Chief Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety | Sincerely, | ||
/RA/ | |||
Docket No. 50-219 License No. DPR-16 | Anthony Dimitriadis, Chief Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety Docket No. 50-219 License No. DPR-16 | ||
===Enclosure:=== | ===Enclosure:=== | ||
Inspection Report No. 05000219/2014502 | Inspection Report No. 05000219/2014502 | ||
REGION I== | |||
Docket No: 50-219 License No: DPR-16 Report No: 05000219/2014502 Licensee: Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon) | |||
Facility: Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station (Oyster Creek) | |||
Location: Forked River, New Jersey Dates: March 17-21, 2014 Inspectors: S. Barr, Sr. Emergency Preparedness Inspector, DRS, Region I (Lead) | |||
E. Burket, Emergency Preparedness Inspector, DRS, Region I P. Presby, Sr. Operations Engineer, DRS, Region I S. LaVie, Sr. Emergency Preparedness Specialist, EPD, NSIR L. McKown, Project Engineer, DRP, Region I B. Bollinger, Reactor Engineer, DRP, Region I Approved By: Anthony Dimitriadis, Chief Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety i | |||
Enclosure | |||
=SUMMARY= | =SUMMARY= | ||
IR 05000219/2014502; 03/17/2014 - 03/21/2014; Exelon Energy Company, LLC, Oyster Creek | IR 05000219/2014502; 03/17/2014 - 03/21/2014; Exelon Energy Company, LLC, Oyster Creek | ||
Nuclear Generating Station; Exercise Evaluation; Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review. | Nuclear Generating Station; Exercise Evaluation; Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review. | ||
This was an announced inspection conducted by five Region I-based inspectors and one Headquarters-based inspector. No findings were identified during the inspection. The | This was an announced inspection conducted by five Region I-based inspectors and one Headquarters-based inspector. No findings were identified during the inspection. The NRCs program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, Reactor Oversight Process, Revision 4, dated December 2006. | ||
No findings were identified. | No findings were identified. | ||
ii | |||
=REPORT DETAILS= | =REPORT DETAILS= | ||
| Line 53: | Line 63: | ||
==REACTOR SAFETY== | ==REACTOR SAFETY== | ||
===Cornerstone: | ===Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness (EP)=== | ||
Emergency Preparedness (EP) | |||
1EP1 Exercise Evaluation (71114.01 - 1 Sample) | |||
====a. Inspection Scope==== | ====a. Inspection Scope==== | ||
On March 18, 2014, Exelon conducted a biennial Oyster Creek Generating Station emergency preparedness exercise. This exercise had been scheduled for October 8, 2013, but was not conducted due to the Federal Government shutdown which occurred at that time. Exelon was granted a license exemption by the NRC staff to conduct the drill in March 2014, when Federal evaluation of the onsite and offsite portions of the exercise could be performed. The inspectors evaluated the adequacy of the | On March 18, 2014, Exelon conducted a biennial Oyster Creek Generating Station emergency preparedness exercise. This exercise had been scheduled for October 8, 2013, but was not conducted due to the Federal Government shutdown which occurred at that time. Exelon was granted a license exemption by the NRC staff to conduct the drill in March 2014, when Federal evaluation of the onsite and offsite portions of the exercise could be performed. The inspectors evaluated the adequacy of the licensees conduct of the exercise and its capability to assess their own staff performance via a formal critique process, as required by Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 50.47(b) (14). This overall exercise inspection activity represented the completion of one sample on a biennial cycle. | ||
The exercise evaluation consisted of the following review and assessment: | The exercise evaluation consisted of the following review and assessment: | ||
* The adequacy of | * The adequacy of Exelons performance in the biennial full-participation exercise regarding the implementation of the planning standards described in 10 CFR 50.47(b) (4), (5), (9), and (10), which are: emergency classification; offsite notification; radiological assessment; onsite protective actions, and public protective action recommendations, respectively. | ||
* The overall adequacy of | * The overall adequacy of Exelons emergency response facilities (ERFs) with regard to Emergency Plan commitments. The ERFs assessed were: the Control Room Simulator, the Technical Support Center (TSC), the Emergency Operations Facility (EOF), and the Joint Information Center (JIC). | ||
* A review of other performance areas, such as the | * A review of other performance areas, such as the licensees emergency response organization (ERO) recognition of abnormal plant conditions; command and control, including interactions with site security staff; intra-and inter-facility communications; prioritization of mitigating activities; utilization of repair and field monitoring teams; interface with offsite agencies, including local law enforcement agencies; staffing and procedure adequacy; and the overall implementation of the Emergency Plan and its implementing procedures. | ||
* A review of past performance issues from the last NRC Oyster Creek exercise inspection report and | * A review of past performance issues from the last NRC Oyster Creek exercise inspection report and Exelons EP drill reports, to determine the effectiveness of licensee corrective actions as demonstrated during the March 18, 2014, exercise and to ensure compliance with 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14). | ||
* A review of the | * A review of the licensees post-exercise critiques, to evaluate Exelons self-assessment of its ERO performance during the March 18, 2014, exercise and to ensure compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV.F.2.g. | ||
The inspectors reviewed the documents listed in the attachment to this report. | The inspectors reviewed the documents listed in the attachment to this report. | ||
| Line 70: | Line 81: | ||
====b. Findings==== | ====b. Findings==== | ||
No findings were identified. | No findings were identified. | ||
1EP8 Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review (71114.08 - 1 Sample) | 1EP8 Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review (71114.08 - 1 Sample) | ||
====a. Inspection Scope==== | ====a. Inspection Scope==== | ||
Prior to the March 18, 2014, emergency preparedness exercise, the NRC inspectors conducted an in-office review of the exercise objectives and scenario, which Exelon had submitted to the NRC, to determine if the exercise would test major elements of the Oyster Creek Emergency Plan as required by Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 50.47(b) (14). This overall exercise inspection activity represented the completion of one sample on a biennial cycle. The inspectors reviewed the documents listed in the attachment to this report. | Prior to the March 18, 2014, emergency preparedness exercise, the NRC inspectors conducted an in-office review of the exercise objectives and scenario, which Exelon had submitted to the NRC, to determine if the exercise would test major elements of the Oyster Creek Emergency Plan as required by Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 50.47(b) (14). This overall exercise inspection activity represented the completion of one sample on a biennial cycle. | ||
The inspectors reviewed the documents listed in the attachment to this report. | |||
====b. Findings==== | ====b. Findings==== | ||
No findings were identified. | No findings were identified. | ||
{{a|4OA6}} | {{a|4OA6}} | ||
==4OA6 Meetings, including Exit== | ==4OA6 Meetings, including Exit== | ||
On March 20, 2014, the inspectors presented the results of this inspection to Mr. G. Stathes, Site Vice-President, and other members of the Exelon staff. | On March 20, 2014, the inspectors presented the results of this inspection to Mr. G. Stathes, Site Vice-President, and other members of the Exelon staff. | ||
The inspectors verified that no proprietary information was retained by the inspectors | The inspectors verified that no proprietary information was retained by the inspectors or documented in this report. | ||
ATTACHMENT | ATTACHMENT | ||
=SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION= | =SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION= | ||
| Line 91: | Line 104: | ||
===Licensee Personnel=== | ===Licensee Personnel=== | ||
: [[contact::G. Stathes]], Oyster Creek Site Vice President | : [[contact::G. Stathes]], Oyster Creek Site Vice President | ||
: [[contact::M. Chanda]], Oyster Creek Emergency Preparedness Manager | : [[contact::M. Chanda]], Oyster Creek Emergency Preparedness Manager | ||
: [[contact::V. Cwietniewicz]], Exelon Mid-Atlantic Corporate Emergency Preparedness Manager | : [[contact::V. Cwietniewicz]], Exelon Mid-Atlantic Corporate Emergency Preparedness Manager | ||
==LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED== | ==LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED== | ||
None. | |||
None. | |||
==LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED== | ==LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED== | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 10:28, 20 December 2019
| ML14119A319 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oyster Creek |
| Issue date: | 04/29/2014 |
| From: | Anthony Dimitriadis Plant Support Branch 1 |
| To: | Pacilio M Exelon Generation Co, Exelon Nuclear |
| Dimitriadis A | |
| References | |
| IR-14-502 | |
| Download: ML14119A319 (9) | |
Text
ril 29, 2014
SUBJECT:
OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION - NRC EVALUATED EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS EXERCISE - INSPECTION REPORT NO. 05000219/2014502
Dear Mr. Pacilio:
On March 20, 2014, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection of the March 18, 2014, evaluated emergency preparedness exercise at your Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on March 20, 2014, with Mr. G. Stathes, Site Vice-President, and other members of your staff.
The inspection examined activities conducted under your licenses as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.
The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.
Based on the results of this inspection, no findings were identified.
In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulation (10 CFR) 2.390 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter and its enclosure and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRCs document system, Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,
/RA/
Anthony Dimitriadis, Chief Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety Docket No. 50-219 License No. DPR-16
Enclosure:
Inspection Report No. 05000219/2014502
REGION I==
Docket No: 50-219 License No: DPR-16 Report No: 05000219/2014502 Licensee: Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon)
Facility: Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station (Oyster Creek)
Location: Forked River, New Jersey Dates: March 17-21, 2014 Inspectors: S. Barr, Sr. Emergency Preparedness Inspector, DRS, Region I (Lead)
E. Burket, Emergency Preparedness Inspector, DRS, Region I P. Presby, Sr. Operations Engineer, DRS, Region I S. LaVie, Sr. Emergency Preparedness Specialist, EPD, NSIR L. McKown, Project Engineer, DRP, Region I B. Bollinger, Reactor Engineer, DRP, Region I Approved By: Anthony Dimitriadis, Chief Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety i
Enclosure
SUMMARY
IR 05000219/2014502; 03/17/2014 - 03/21/2014; Exelon Energy Company, LLC, Oyster Creek
Nuclear Generating Station; Exercise Evaluation; Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review.
This was an announced inspection conducted by five Region I-based inspectors and one Headquarters-based inspector. No findings were identified during the inspection. The NRCs program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, Reactor Oversight Process, Revision 4, dated December 2006.
No findings were identified.
ii
REPORT DETAILS
REACTOR SAFETY
Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness (EP)
1EP1 Exercise Evaluation (71114.01 - 1 Sample)
a. Inspection Scope
On March 18, 2014, Exelon conducted a biennial Oyster Creek Generating Station emergency preparedness exercise. This exercise had been scheduled for October 8, 2013, but was not conducted due to the Federal Government shutdown which occurred at that time. Exelon was granted a license exemption by the NRC staff to conduct the drill in March 2014, when Federal evaluation of the onsite and offsite portions of the exercise could be performed. The inspectors evaluated the adequacy of the licensees conduct of the exercise and its capability to assess their own staff performance via a formal critique process, as required by Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 50.47(b) (14). This overall exercise inspection activity represented the completion of one sample on a biennial cycle.
The exercise evaluation consisted of the following review and assessment:
- The adequacy of Exelons performance in the biennial full-participation exercise regarding the implementation of the planning standards described in 10 CFR 50.47(b) (4), (5), (9), and (10), which are: emergency classification; offsite notification; radiological assessment; onsite protective actions, and public protective action recommendations, respectively.
- The overall adequacy of Exelons emergency response facilities (ERFs) with regard to Emergency Plan commitments. The ERFs assessed were: the Control Room Simulator, the Technical Support Center (TSC), the Emergency Operations Facility (EOF), and the Joint Information Center (JIC).
- A review of other performance areas, such as the licensees emergency response organization (ERO) recognition of abnormal plant conditions; command and control, including interactions with site security staff; intra-and inter-facility communications; prioritization of mitigating activities; utilization of repair and field monitoring teams; interface with offsite agencies, including local law enforcement agencies; staffing and procedure adequacy; and the overall implementation of the Emergency Plan and its implementing procedures.
- A review of past performance issues from the last NRC Oyster Creek exercise inspection report and Exelons EP drill reports, to determine the effectiveness of licensee corrective actions as demonstrated during the March 18, 2014, exercise and to ensure compliance with 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14).
- A review of the licensees post-exercise critiques, to evaluate Exelons self-assessment of its ERO performance during the March 18, 2014, exercise and to ensure compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV.F.2.g.
The inspectors reviewed the documents listed in the attachment to this report.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
1EP8 Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review (71114.08 - 1 Sample)
a. Inspection Scope
Prior to the March 18, 2014, emergency preparedness exercise, the NRC inspectors conducted an in-office review of the exercise objectives and scenario, which Exelon had submitted to the NRC, to determine if the exercise would test major elements of the Oyster Creek Emergency Plan as required by Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 50.47(b) (14). This overall exercise inspection activity represented the completion of one sample on a biennial cycle.
The inspectors reviewed the documents listed in the attachment to this report.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
4OA6 Meetings, including Exit
On March 20, 2014, the inspectors presented the results of this inspection to Mr. G. Stathes, Site Vice-President, and other members of the Exelon staff.
The inspectors verified that no proprietary information was retained by the inspectors or documented in this report.
ATTACHMENT
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
KEY POINTS OF CONTACT
Licensee Personnel
- G. Stathes, Oyster Creek Site Vice President
- M. Chanda, Oyster Creek Emergency Preparedness Manager
- V. Cwietniewicz, Exelon Mid-Atlantic Corporate Emergency Preparedness Manager
LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED
None.