IR 05000324/2016502: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML16243A477 | | number = ML16243A477 | ||
| issue date = 08/25/2016 | | issue date = 08/25/2016 | ||
| title = | | title = U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Emergency Preparedness Inspection Report 05000325/2016502 and 05000324/2016502 | ||
| author name = Bonser B | | author name = Bonser B | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-II | | author affiliation = NRC/RGN-II | ||
| addressee name = Gideon W | | addressee name = Gideon W | ||
| addressee affiliation = Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc | | addressee affiliation = Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc | ||
| docket = 05000324, 05000325 | | docket = 05000324, 05000325 | ||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ust 25, 2016 | ||
==SUBJECT:== | |||
BRUNSWICK STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 - U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS INSPECTION REPORT 05000325/2016502 AND 05000324/2016502 | |||
SUBJECT: BRUNSWICK STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 - U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS INSPECTION REPORT 05000325/2016502 AND 05000324/2016502 | |||
==Dear Mr. Gideon:== | ==Dear Mr. Gideon:== | ||
On July 28, 2016, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at your Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, Units 1 and 2. The enclosed inspection report (IR) | On July 28, 2016, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at your Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, Units 1 and 2. The enclosed inspection report (IR) | ||
documents the inspection results that were discussed on July 28, 2016, with you and members | documents the inspection results that were discussed on July 28, 2016, with you and members of your staff. | ||
of your staff. | |||
The NRC inspectors did not identify any findings or violations of more than minor significance. | The NRC inspectors did not identify any findings or violations of more than minor significance. | ||
In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, | In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, Public inspections, exemptions, requests for withholding, of the NRC's "Agency Rules of Practice and Procedure," a copy of this letter, its Enclosure, and your response if any, will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRCs Public Document Room, or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS); accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/ | ||
reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). | reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). | ||
Sincerely,/RA: Adam D. Nielsen for/ | Sincerely, | ||
/RA: Adam D. Nielsen for/ | |||
Brian R. Bonser, Chief Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos. 50-325 and 50-324 License Nos. DPR-71 and DPR-62 | Brian R. Bonser, Chief Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos. 50-325 and 50-324 License Nos. DPR-71 and DPR-62 | ||
===Enclosure:=== | ===Enclosure:=== | ||
NRC IR 05000325 and 324/2016502 | NRC IR 05000325 and 324/2016502 w/Attachment: Supplementary Information | ||
== | REGION II== | ||
Docket Nos: 05000325 and 05000324 License Nos: DPR-71 and DPR-62 Report Nos: 05000325/2016502 and 05000324/2016502 Licensee: Duke Energy Progress, Inc. | |||
Facility: Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, Units 1 and 2 Location: Southport, NC Dates: July 25-28, 2016 Inspectors: Steven P. Sanchez, Senior Emergency Preparedness Inspector Christopher A. Fontana, Emergency Preparedness Inspector John D. Hickman, Emergency Preparedness Inspector (Trainee) | |||
Wade T. Loo, Senior Health Physicist Mark Schwieg, Resident Inspector Approved by: Brian R. Bonser, Chief Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety Enclosure | |||
Facility: Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, Units 1 and 2 | |||
Location: Southport, NC | |||
Dates: July 25-28, 2016 | |||
Inspectors: Steven P. Sanchez, Senior Emergency Preparedness Inspector Christopher A. Fontana, Emergency Preparedness Inspector John D. Hickman, Emergency Preparedness Inspector (Trainee) | |||
Wade T. Loo, Senior Health Physicist Mark Schwieg, Resident Inspector | |||
Approved by: Brian R. Bonser, Chief Plant Support Branch 1 | |||
Division of Reactor Safety | |||
=SUMMARY= | =SUMMARY= | ||
Inspection Report (IR) 05000325/2016502 and 05000324/2016502; 7/25/2016 - 7/28/2016; | Inspection Report (IR) 05000325/2016502 and 05000324/2016502; 7/25/2016 - 7/28/2016; | ||
This report covers an inspection by three emergency preparedness inspectors, one senior health physicist, and one resident inspector. No findings of significance were identified. The | Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, Units 1 and 2; Exercise and Baseline Inspection This report covers an inspection by three emergency preparedness inspectors, one senior health physicist, and one resident inspector. No findings of significance were identified. The NRCs program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, Reactor Oversight Process, Revision 5. | ||
=REPORT DETAILS= | =REPORT DETAILS= | ||
Line 94: | Line 54: | ||
==REACTOR SAFETY== | ==REACTOR SAFETY== | ||
===Cornerstone:=== | ===Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness=== | ||
1EP1 Exercise Evaluation | 1EP1 Exercise Evaluation | ||
Line 101: | Line 60: | ||
====a. Inspection Scope==== | ====a. Inspection Scope==== | ||
The onsite inspection consisted of the following review and assessment: | The onsite inspection consisted of the following review and assessment: | ||
* The adequacy of the | * The adequacy of the licensees performance in the biennial exercise, conducted on July 26, 2016, was reviewed and assessed regarding the implementation of the Risk Significant Planning Standards in 10 CFR 50.47(b)(4), (5), (9), and (10); which address emergency classification, offsite notification, radiological assessment, and protective action recommendations, respectively. | ||
* The overall adequacy of the | * The overall adequacy of the licensees emergency response facilities with regard to NUREG-0696, Functional Criteria for Emergency Response Facilities, and Emergency Plan commitments. The facilities assessed were the Control Room Simulator, Technical Support Center, Operations Support Center, and Emergency Operations Facility. | ||
* Other performance areas, such as the emergency response | * Other performance areas, such as the emergency response organizations (ERO)recognition of abnormal plant conditions; command and control, intra- and inter-facility communications; prioritization of mitigation activities; utilization of repair and field monitoring teams; interface with offsite agencies; and the overall implementation of the emergency plan and its implementing procedures. | ||
* Past performance issues from NRC inspection reports and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)/Department of Homeland Security (DHS) exercise reports to determine the effectiveness of corrective actions as demonstrated during this exercise to ensure compliance with 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14). | * Past performance issues from NRC inspection reports and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)/Department of Homeland Security (DHS) exercise reports to determine the effectiveness of corrective actions as demonstrated during this exercise to ensure compliance with 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14). | ||
* The post-exercise critique process and the presentation to the licensee's senior management conducted on July 28, 2016, to evaluate the | * The post-exercise critique process and the presentation to the licensee's senior management conducted on July 28, 2016, to evaluate the licensees self-assessment of its ERO performance during the exercise, and to ensure compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Subsection IV.F.2.g. | ||
The inspectors reviewed various documents, which are listed in the Attachment. The inspectors also attended the FEMA-sponsored public meeting on July 28, 2016. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the exercise evaluation on a biennial basis. | The inspectors reviewed various documents, which are listed in the Attachment. The inspectors also attended the FEMA-sponsored public meeting on July 28, 2016. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the exercise evaluation on a biennial basis. | ||
Line 111: | Line 70: | ||
====b. Findings==== | ====b. Findings==== | ||
No findings were identified. | No findings were identified. | ||
1EP4 Emergency Action Level and Emergency Plan Changes | 1EP4 Emergency Action Level and Emergency Plan Changes | ||
====a. Inspection Scope==== | ====a. Inspection Scope==== | ||
Since the last NRC inspection of this program area, one revision to the emergency plan, one revision to emergency action levels, and several revisions to emergency plan implementing procedures had been made. The licensee determined that, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(q), the Plan continued to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b), | Since the last NRC inspection of this program area, one revision to the emergency plan, one revision to emergency action levels, and several revisions to emergency plan implementing procedures had been made. The licensee determined that, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(q), the Plan continued to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b),and Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50. The inspectors reviewed the revisions, and sampled implementing procedure changes to evaluate potential reductions in the effectiveness of the Plan. As this review was not documented in a Safety Evaluation Report, and does not constitute formal NRC approval of the changes, these changes remain subject to future NRC inspection in their entirety. | ||
and Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50. The inspectors reviewed the revisions, and sampled implementing procedure changes to evaluate potential reductions in the effectiveness of the Plan. As this review was not documented in a Safety Evaluation Report, and does not constitute formal NRC approval of the changes, these changes remain subject to future NRC inspection in their entirety. | |||
The inspection was conducted in | The inspection was conducted in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure (IP)71114, Attachment 04, Emergency Action Level and Emergency Plan Changes. The applicable planning standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b), and its related requirements in 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, were used as reference criteria. | ||
The inspectors reviewed various documents, which are listed in the Attachment to this report. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the emergency action level and emergency plan changes on an annual basis. | The inspectors reviewed various documents, which are listed in the Attachment to this report. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the emergency action level and emergency plan changes on an annual basis. | ||
Line 124: | Line 81: | ||
====b. Findings==== | ====b. Findings==== | ||
No findings were identified. | No findings were identified. | ||
1EP8 Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review | 1EP8 Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review | ||
====a. Inspection Scope==== | ====a. Inspection Scope==== | ||
Prior to the inspection activity, the inspectors conducted an in-office review of the exercise objectives and scenario submitted to the NRC using IP 71114.08, | Prior to the inspection activity, the inspectors conducted an in-office review of the exercise objectives and scenario submitted to the NRC using IP 71114.08, Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review, to determine if the exercise would test major elements of the emergency plan as required by 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14). | ||
Evaluation - Scenario Review, | |||
The inspectors reviewed various documents, which are listed in the Attachment to this report. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the exercise evaluation on a biennial basis. | The inspectors reviewed various documents, which are listed in the Attachment to this report. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the exercise evaluation on a biennial basis. | ||
Line 142: | Line 96: | ||
====a. Inspection Scope==== | ====a. Inspection Scope==== | ||
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals relative to the performance indicators (PIs)listed below for the period July 1, 2015, through March 31, 2016. To verify the accuracy of the PI data reported during that period, PI definitions and guidance contained in Nuclear Energy Institute 99-02, | The inspectors sampled licensee submittals relative to the performance indicators (PIs)listed below for the period July 1, 2015, through March 31, 2016. To verify the accuracy of the PI data reported during that period, PI definitions and guidance contained in Nuclear Energy Institute 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 7, was used to confirm the reporting basis for each data element. | ||
Emergency Preparedness Cornerstone | Emergency Preparedness Cornerstone | ||
* Drill/Exercise Performance (DEP) | * Drill/Exercise Performance (DEP) | ||
* Emergency Response Organization (ERO) Readiness | * Emergency Response Organization (ERO) Readiness | ||
* Alert and Notification System (ANS) Reliability For the specified review period, the inspectors examined data reported to the NRC, procedural guidance for reporting PI information, and records used by the licensee to identify potential PI occurrences. The inspectors verified the accuracy of the PIs for ERO and DEP through review of a sample of drill and event records. The inspectors reviewed selected training records to verify the accuracy of the PI for ERO drill participation for personnel assigned to key positions in the ERO. The inspectors verified the accuracy of the PI for ANS reliability through review of a sample of the | * Alert and Notification System (ANS) Reliability For the specified review period, the inspectors examined data reported to the NRC, procedural guidance for reporting PI information, and records used by the licensee to identify potential PI occurrences. The inspectors verified the accuracy of the PIs for ERO and DEP through review of a sample of drill and event records. The inspectors reviewed selected training records to verify the accuracy of the PI for ERO drill participation for personnel assigned to key positions in the ERO. The inspectors verified the accuracy of the PI for ANS reliability through review of a sample of the licensees records of periodic system tests. The inspectors also interviewed the licensee personnel who were responsible for collecting and evaluating the PI data. Licensee procedures, records, and other documents reviewed within this inspection area, are listed in the | ||
. | . | ||
This inspection satisfied three inspection samples for PI verification on an annual basis. | This inspection satisfied three inspection samples for PI verification on an annual basis. | ||
====b. Findings==== | ====b. Findings==== | ||
No findings were identified. | No findings were identified. | ||
{{a|4OA6}} | |||
{{a|4OA6}} | |||
==4OA6 Meetings== | ==4OA6 Meetings== | ||
On July 28, 2016, the inspection team presented the inspection results to Mr. R. Gideon and other members of the plant staff. The inspectors confirmed that no proprietary information was provided during the inspection. | On July 28, 2016, the inspection team presented the inspection results to Mr. R. Gideon and other members of the plant staff. The inspectors confirmed that no proprietary information was provided during the inspection. | ||
ATTACHMENT: | ATTACHMENT: Supplementary Information | ||
=SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION= | =SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION= | ||
Line 167: | Line 119: | ||
===Licensee personnel=== | ===Licensee personnel=== | ||
: [[contact::M. Austin]], Corporate Functional Area Manager | : [[contact::M. Austin]], Corporate Functional Area Manager | ||
: [[contact::R. Bassett]], Emergency Preparedness Specialist | : [[contact::R. Bassett]], Emergency Preparedness Specialist | ||
: [[contact::J. Bryant]], Regulatory Affairs | : [[contact::J. Bryant]], Regulatory Affairs | ||
: [[contact::K. Crocker]], Manager of Emergency Preparedness | : [[contact::K. Crocker]], Manager of Emergency Preparedness | ||
: [[contact::P. Dubrouillet]], Director of Engineering | : [[contact::P. Dubrouillet]], Director of Engineering | ||
: [[contact::J. Ferguson]], Manager of Nuclear Oversight | : [[contact::J. Ferguson]], Manager of Nuclear Oversight | ||
: [[contact::G. Galloway]], Radiation Protection | : [[contact::G. Galloway]], Radiation Protection | ||
: [[contact::R. Gideon]], Site Vice President | : [[contact::R. Gideon]], Site Vice President | ||
: [[contact::L. Grzeck]], Manager of Licensing/Regulatory Affairs | : [[contact::L. Grzeck]], Manager of Licensing/Regulatory Affairs | ||
: [[contact::B. Houston]], Manager of Maintenance | : [[contact::B. Houston]], Manager of Maintenance | ||
: [[contact::B. Kimray]], Corporate Emergency Preparedness | : [[contact::B. Kimray]], Corporate Emergency Preparedness | ||
: [[contact::K. Moser]], Plant General Manager | : [[contact::K. Moser]], Plant General Manager | ||
: [[contact::B. Nanney]], Corporate Emergency Preparedness | : [[contact::B. Nanney]], Corporate Emergency Preparedness | ||
: [[contact::J. Nolin]], General Manager of Engineering | : [[contact::J. Nolin]], General Manager of Engineering | ||
: [[contact::A. Pope]], Director Organizational Effectiveness | : [[contact::A. Pope]], Director Organizational Effectiveness | ||
: [[contact::K. Sawyer]], Emergency Preparedness Specialist | : [[contact::K. Sawyer]], Emergency Preparedness Specialist | ||
: [[contact::R. Wiemann]], Director of Engineering | : [[contact::R. Wiemann]], Director of Engineering | ||
: [[contact::B. Wooten]], Operations | : [[contact::B. Wooten]], Operations | ||
==LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED== | ==LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED== | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 19:19, 19 December 2019
ML16243A477 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Brunswick |
Issue date: | 08/25/2016 |
From: | Brian Bonser NRC/RGN-II |
To: | William Gideon Progress Energy Carolinas |
References | |
IR 2016502 | |
Download: ML16243A477 (12) | |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ust 25, 2016
SUBJECT:
BRUNSWICK STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 - U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS INSPECTION REPORT 05000325/2016502 AND 05000324/2016502
Dear Mr. Gideon:
On July 28, 2016, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at your Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, Units 1 and 2. The enclosed inspection report (IR)
documents the inspection results that were discussed on July 28, 2016, with you and members of your staff.
The NRC inspectors did not identify any findings or violations of more than minor significance.
In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, Public inspections, exemptions, requests for withholding, of the NRC's "Agency Rules of Practice and Procedure," a copy of this letter, its Enclosure, and your response if any, will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRCs Public Document Room, or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS); accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/
reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,
/RA: Adam D. Nielsen for/
Brian R. Bonser, Chief Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos. 50-325 and 50-324 License Nos. DPR-71 and DPR-62
Enclosure:
NRC IR 05000325 and 324/2016502 w/Attachment: Supplementary Information
REGION II==
Docket Nos: 05000325 and 05000324 License Nos: DPR-71 and DPR-62 Report Nos: 05000325/2016502 and 05000324/2016502 Licensee: Duke Energy Progress, Inc.
Facility: Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, Units 1 and 2 Location: Southport, NC Dates: July 25-28, 2016 Inspectors: Steven P. Sanchez, Senior Emergency Preparedness Inspector Christopher A. Fontana, Emergency Preparedness Inspector John D. Hickman, Emergency Preparedness Inspector (Trainee)
Wade T. Loo, Senior Health Physicist Mark Schwieg, Resident Inspector Approved by: Brian R. Bonser, Chief Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety Enclosure
SUMMARY
Inspection Report (IR) 05000325/2016502 and 05000324/2016502; 7/25/2016 - 7/28/2016;
Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, Units 1 and 2; Exercise and Baseline Inspection This report covers an inspection by three emergency preparedness inspectors, one senior health physicist, and one resident inspector. No findings of significance were identified. The NRCs program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, Reactor Oversight Process, Revision 5.
REPORT DETAILS
REACTOR SAFETY
Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness
1EP1 Exercise Evaluation
a. Inspection Scope
The onsite inspection consisted of the following review and assessment:
- The adequacy of the licensees performance in the biennial exercise, conducted on July 26, 2016, was reviewed and assessed regarding the implementation of the Risk Significant Planning Standards in 10 CFR 50.47(b)(4), (5), (9), and (10); which address emergency classification, offsite notification, radiological assessment, and protective action recommendations, respectively.
- The overall adequacy of the licensees emergency response facilities with regard to NUREG-0696, Functional Criteria for Emergency Response Facilities, and Emergency Plan commitments. The facilities assessed were the Control Room Simulator, Technical Support Center, Operations Support Center, and Emergency Operations Facility.
- Other performance areas, such as the emergency response organizations (ERO)recognition of abnormal plant conditions; command and control, intra- and inter-facility communications; prioritization of mitigation activities; utilization of repair and field monitoring teams; interface with offsite agencies; and the overall implementation of the emergency plan and its implementing procedures.
- Past performance issues from NRC inspection reports and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)/Department of Homeland Security (DHS) exercise reports to determine the effectiveness of corrective actions as demonstrated during this exercise to ensure compliance with 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14).
- The post-exercise critique process and the presentation to the licensee's senior management conducted on July 28, 2016, to evaluate the licensees self-assessment of its ERO performance during the exercise, and to ensure compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Subsection IV.F.2.g.
The inspectors reviewed various documents, which are listed in the Attachment. The inspectors also attended the FEMA-sponsored public meeting on July 28, 2016. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the exercise evaluation on a biennial basis.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
1EP4 Emergency Action Level and Emergency Plan Changes
a. Inspection Scope
Since the last NRC inspection of this program area, one revision to the emergency plan, one revision to emergency action levels, and several revisions to emergency plan implementing procedures had been made. The licensee determined that, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(q), the Plan continued to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b),and Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50. The inspectors reviewed the revisions, and sampled implementing procedure changes to evaluate potential reductions in the effectiveness of the Plan. As this review was not documented in a Safety Evaluation Report, and does not constitute formal NRC approval of the changes, these changes remain subject to future NRC inspection in their entirety.
The inspection was conducted in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure (IP)71114, Attachment 04, Emergency Action Level and Emergency Plan Changes. The applicable planning standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b), and its related requirements in 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, were used as reference criteria.
The inspectors reviewed various documents, which are listed in the Attachment to this report. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the emergency action level and emergency plan changes on an annual basis.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
1EP8 Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review
a. Inspection Scope
Prior to the inspection activity, the inspectors conducted an in-office review of the exercise objectives and scenario submitted to the NRC using IP 71114.08, Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review, to determine if the exercise would test major elements of the emergency plan as required by 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14).
The inspectors reviewed various documents, which are listed in the Attachment to this report. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the exercise evaluation on a biennial basis.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
OTHER ACTIVITIES
4OA1 Performance Indicator Verification
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals relative to the performance indicators (PIs)listed below for the period July 1, 2015, through March 31, 2016. To verify the accuracy of the PI data reported during that period, PI definitions and guidance contained in Nuclear Energy Institute 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 7, was used to confirm the reporting basis for each data element.
Emergency Preparedness Cornerstone
- Drill/Exercise Performance (DEP)
- Emergency Response Organization (ERO) Readiness
- Alert and Notification System (ANS) Reliability For the specified review period, the inspectors examined data reported to the NRC, procedural guidance for reporting PI information, and records used by the licensee to identify potential PI occurrences. The inspectors verified the accuracy of the PIs for ERO and DEP through review of a sample of drill and event records. The inspectors reviewed selected training records to verify the accuracy of the PI for ERO drill participation for personnel assigned to key positions in the ERO. The inspectors verified the accuracy of the PI for ANS reliability through review of a sample of the licensees records of periodic system tests. The inspectors also interviewed the licensee personnel who were responsible for collecting and evaluating the PI data. Licensee procedures, records, and other documents reviewed within this inspection area, are listed in the
.
This inspection satisfied three inspection samples for PI verification on an annual basis.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
4OA6 Meetings
On July 28, 2016, the inspection team presented the inspection results to Mr. R. Gideon and other members of the plant staff. The inspectors confirmed that no proprietary information was provided during the inspection.
ATTACHMENT: Supplementary Information
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
KEY POINTS OF CONTACT
Licensee personnel
- M. Austin, Corporate Functional Area Manager
- R. Bassett, Emergency Preparedness Specialist
- J. Bryant, Regulatory Affairs
- K. Crocker, Manager of Emergency Preparedness
- P. Dubrouillet, Director of Engineering
- J. Ferguson, Manager of Nuclear Oversight
- G. Galloway, Radiation Protection
- R. Gideon, Site Vice President
- L. Grzeck, Manager of Licensing/Regulatory Affairs
- B. Houston, Manager of Maintenance
- B. Kimray, Corporate Emergency Preparedness
- K. Moser, Plant General Manager
- B. Nanney, Corporate Emergency Preparedness
- J. Nolin, General Manager of Engineering
- A. Pope, Director Organizational Effectiveness
- K. Sawyer, Emergency Preparedness Specialist
- R. Wiemann, Director of Engineering
- B. Wooten, Operations