ML113080045: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML113080045
| number = ML113080045
| issue date = 11/03/2011
| issue date = 11/03/2011
| title = St. Lucie Unit 1 - Acceptance Review - One-Time Exemption Request 10 CFR 26.205(d)(3) - Work Hour Controls
| title = Acceptance Review - One-Time Exemption Request 10 CFR 26.205(d)(3) - Work Hour Controls
| author name = Orf T J
| author name = Orf T
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-2
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-2
| addressee name = Katzman E
| addressee name = Katzman E
Line 12: Line 12:
| document type = E-Mail, Acceptance Review Letter
| document type = E-Mail, Acceptance Review Letter
| page count = 1
| page count = 1
| project =
| stage = Acceptance Review
}}
}}


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:From: Orf, Tracy Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 7:29 AM To: Katzman, Eric Cc: 'Frehafer, Ken'  
{{#Wiki_filter:From:                       Orf, Tracy Sent:                       Thursday, November 03, 2011 7:29 AM To:                         Katzman, Eric Cc:                         'Frehafer, Ken'


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
St. Lucie Unit 1 - Acceptance Review - One-Time Exemption Request 10 CFR 26.205(d)(3) - Work Hour Controls  
St. Lucie Unit 1 - Acceptance Review - One-Time Exemption Request 10 CFR 26.205(d)(3) - Work Hour Controls


==Dear Mr. Katzman,==
==Dear Mr. Katzman,==
By letter dated October 14, 2011, Florida Power & Light Company submitted an exemption request for St. Lucie Plant, Unit No. 1. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this exemption request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.


By letter dated October 14, 2011, Florida Power & Light Company submitted an exemption request for St. Lucie Plant, Unit No. 1. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this exemption request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review.
The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Tracy J. Orf, Project Manager St. Lucie Plant Licensing Branch II-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Phone: (301) 415-2788}}
Tracy J. Orf, Project Manager St. Lucie Plant Licensing Branch II-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Phone: (301) 415-2788}}

Latest revision as of 12:24, 12 November 2019

Acceptance Review - One-Time Exemption Request 10 CFR 26.205(d)(3) - Work Hour Controls
ML113080045
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/03/2011
From: Orf T
Plant Licensing Branch II
To: Katzman E
Florida Power & Light Co
Orf, T J, NRR/DORL/301-415-2788
References
Download: ML113080045 (1)
v • d • e


Text

From: Orf, Tracy Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 7:29 AM To: Katzman, Eric Cc: 'Frehafer, Ken'

Subject:

St. Lucie Unit 1 - Acceptance Review - One-Time Exemption Request 10 CFR 26.205(d)(3) - Work Hour Controls

Dear Mr. Katzman,

By letter dated October 14, 2011, Florida Power & Light Company submitted an exemption request for St. Lucie Plant, Unit No. 1. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this exemption request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review.

The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact me.

Tracy J. Orf, Project Manager St. Lucie Plant Licensing Branch II-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Phone: (301) 415-2788

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML113080045&oldid=2110360"