Letter Sequence Approval |
|---|
|
|
MONTHYEARL-2009-217, Request for Exemption from Certain Requirements of the Fitness for Duty Rule for Managing Fatigue2009-10-16016 October 2009
Request for Exemption from Certain Requirements of the Fitness for Duty Rule for Managing Fatigue
Project stage: Request
L-2016-085, St. Lucie Unit 2, Updated Final Safety Analysis Report Amendment No. 23, Drawing 2998-G-078, Rev. 15, Sheet 1622009-10-26026 October 2009
St. Lucie Unit 2, Updated Final Safety Analysis Report Amendment No. 23, Drawing 2998-G-078, Rev. 15, Sheet 162
Project stage: Request
ML1002008292010-01-14014 January 2010
Request for Exemption from Certain Requirements of the Fitness for Duty Rule for Managing Fatigue
Project stage: Approval
ML1004715552010-02-19019 February 2010
Request for Additional Information Regarding Exemption Request from Certain Requirements of 10 CFR Part 26
Project stage: RAI
ML1025001402010-09-0909 September 2010
Request for Additional Information Regarding Exemption Request from Certain Requirements of 10 CFR Part 26 26 (TAC ME2946 & ME2947)
Project stage: RAI
ML1025809592010-11-19019 November 2010
Federal Register Notice - Environmental Assessment Letter and Finding of No Significant Impact
Project stage: Other
ML1025803892010-11-19019 November 2010
Letter - Environmental Assessment Letter and Finding of No Significant Impact
Project stage: Other
NRC-2010-0363, St. Lucie Plant, Units 1 and 2 - Federal Register Notice - Environmental Assessment Letter and Finding of No Significant Impact (TAC Nos. ME2946 and ME2947)2010-11-19019 November 2010
St. Lucie Plant, Units 1 and 2 - Federal Register Notice - Environmental Assessment Letter and Finding of No Significant Impact (TAC Nos. ME2946 and ME2947)
Project stage: Other
L-2010-292, Response to Request for Additional Information - Request for Exemption from Certain Requirements of the Fitness for Duty Rule for Managing Fatigue2010-12-10010 December 2010
Response to Request for Additional Information - Request for Exemption from Certain Requirements of the Fitness for Duty Rule for Managing Fatigue
Project stage: Response to RAI
L-2010-051, Licensee Commitment Regarding - Request for Exemption from Certain Requirements of the Fitness for Duty Rule for Managing Fatigue2010-12-22022 December 2010
Licensee Commitment Regarding - Request for Exemption from Certain Requirements of the Fitness for Duty Rule for Managing Fatigue
Project stage: Request
ML1102803442011-04-22022 April 2011
Federal Register Notice - Exemption
Project stage: Other
ML1102803382011-04-22022 April 2011
Letter - Exemption from the Requirements of 10 CFR Part 26 Work Hour Controls During Periods Immediately Prior and Subsequent to Severe Wind Conditions
Project stage: Approval
2010-12-10
[Table View] |
Text
From: Mozafari, Brenda Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 2:46 PM To: 'Katzman, Eric'; 'Frehafer, Ken'
Subject:
Acceptance review for TACs ME2946 and ME2947
SUBJECT:
REQUEST FOR EXEMPTION FROM CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS OF THE FITNESS FOR DUTY RULE FOR MANAGING FATIGUE (TAC NOS. ME2946 AND ME2947)
By letter dated October 26, 2009, Florida Power & Light submitted an exemption request for St.
Lucie Units 1 and 2. The purpose of this e-mail is to confirm in writing my verbally communicated results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this exemption request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to begin its detailed technical review.
Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. It is possible that additional information or clarification will be needed. In that case, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
- Thanks, Brenda L. Mozafari, Senior Project Manager Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation US Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301-415-2020
