ML12159A515

Review of 60-Day Response to Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendation 9.3 of the Near Term Task Force Review of Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident

ML12159A515
Person / Time
Site:	Grand Gulf
Issue date:	06/11/2012
From:	Wang A Plant Licensing Branch IV
To:	Entergy Operations
Wang A
References
TAC ME8679
Download: ML12159A515 (6)

Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555*0001 June 11, 2012 Vice President, Operations Entergy Operations, Inc.

Grand Gulf Nuclear Station P.O. Box 756 Port Gibson, MS 39150

SUBJECT:

GRAND GULF NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 1 - REVIEW OF 60-DAY RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR INFORMATION REGARDING RECOMMENDATION 9.3 OF THE NEAR-TERM TASK FORCE RELATED TO THE FUKUSHIMA DAI-ICHI NUCLEAR POWER PLANT ACCIDENT (TAC NO. ME8679)

Dear Sir or Madam:

By letter dated March 12, 2012, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or Commission) issued a Request for Information pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), paragraph 50.54(f) which included the Near Term Task Force (NTTF)

Recommendation 9.3 for Emergency Preparedness (EP). Specifically, licensees were requested to assess their means to power communications equipment onsite and offsite during a prolonged Station Blackout (SBO) event and to perform a staffing study to determine the staff required to fill all necessary positions in response to a multi-unit event. If a licensee could not meet the requested 90-day response, then that licensee was required to provide a response within 60 days of the issuance of the letter describing an alternative course of action and estimated completion date.

By letter dated May 9,2012, Entergy Operations, Inc., the licensee for the Grand Gulf Nuclear Station, Unit 1, submitted its 60-day response proposing an alternative course of action based upon the higher priority to complete the implementation of the revised EP Rule. As discussed in the enclosed NRC staff evaluation, the licensee's alternative approach outlined in its 60-day response letter is consistent with the guidance of industry document Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) 12-01, "Guidance for Assessing Beyond Design Basis Accident Response Staffing and Communications Capabilities, .. l and the direction of the Commission.

In addition, the NRC staff concludes that the licensee provided an adequate basis for its proposed alternative to responding to the 50.54(f) Request for Information regarding communications and staffing for NTIF Recommendation 9.3. In its letter dated May 9,2012, the licensee identified the regulatory commitments provided in the attachment to the enclosure to this letter.

NRC staff determined NEI 12-01 to be an acceptable approach in a letter dated May 15, 2012 (ADAMS Accession No. ML12131A043).

-2 If you have any questions, please contact me at 301-415-1445 orvia e-mail at Alan.Wang@nrc.gov.

Sincerely.

Alan B. Wang. Project Manager Plant licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-416

Enclosure:

Staff Evaluation cc w/encl: Distribution via listserv

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION STAFF EVALUATION INFORMATION REQUEST MADE UNDER 10 CFR 50.54(f)

REGARDING NEAR-TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 9.3 ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC.

GRAND GULF NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 1 DOCKET NO. 50-416 By letter dated March 12, 2012 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML12073A348), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or Commission) issued a Request for Information pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), paragraph 50.54(f) which included the Near-Term Task Force (NTTF)

Recommendation 9.3 for Emergency Preparedness (EP). Specifically, licensees were requested to assess their means to power communications equipment onsite and offsite during a prolonged Station Blackout (SBO) event and to perform a staffing study to determine the staff required to fill all necessary positions in response to a multi-unit event. If a licensee could not meet the requested 90-day response, then that licensee was required to provide a response within 60 days of the issuance of the letter describing an alternative course of action and estimated completion date.

By letter dated May 3,2012 (ADAMS Accession No. ML12125A410), the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) submitted NEI 12-01, "Guideline for Assessing Beyond Design Basis Accident Response Staffing and Communications Capabilities," Revision 0, May 2012. The NRC staff reviewed NEI 12-01 and found it to be an acceptable method for licensees to use when responding to the NRC's 10 CFR 50.54(f) Request for Information regarding communications and staffing for EP.

This staff evaluation is focused specifically on the licensee's response to the 10 CFR 50.54(f) letters and not on the associated Orders.

By letter dated May 9, 2012 (ADAMS Accession No. ML12130A418), Entergy Operations Inc., the licensee for the Grand Gulf Nuclear Station, Unit 1, submitted its 60-day response to the 10 CFR 50.54(f) Request for Information proposing an alternative course of action based upon the higher priority to complete the implementation of the revised EP Rule. The NRC staff reviewed the licensee's proposed alternative against the guidance contained in NEI12-01. In addition, the NRC staff also considered the direction given by the Commission in the Staff ReqUirements Memorandum (SRM) to SECY 12-0025, "Proposed Orders and Requests for Information in Response to Lessons Learned from Japan's March 11, 2011, Great Tohoku Earthquake and Tsunami," dated March 9,2012 (ADAMS Accession No. ML120690347). This SRM stated, in part, that Completing implementation activities associated with the rule we have already promulgated has greater safety significance and also involves the coordinated actions of our partners in State and local governments. Substantial public credibility benefits accrue from continuing these activities as a priority.

Enclosure

-2 The NRC staff considers the existing EP framework and regulations provides reasonable assurance of adequate protection of public health and safety in the event of a radiological emergency. The revised EP rule that was promulgated on November 23, 2011, initiated a number of activities that will enhance EP programs, including conducting a staffing analysis and enhancing public notification systems. The implementation of the EP rule was given priority by the Commission and the NTTF recommendations should not displace ongoing work that has greater safety benefit, higher priority, or is necessary for continued safe operation of nuclear power plants. The NTTF Report concluded that continued operation and continued licensing activities do not pose an imminent risk to the public health and safety and are not inimical to the common defense and security.

The phased approach to responding to the 10 CFR 50.54(f) letters, combined with the definition of new response requirements associated with Fukushima NTTF Recommendation 4.2, as subsequently modified by the NRC staff and issued as NRC Order EA-12-049 (ADAMS Accession No. ML12054A736), will ensure that enhancements will be made to staffing and communications by licensees. It should be noted that the 10 CFR 50.54(f) letter and implementation of the Order includes completion of actions related to response assignments, staffing changes, issuance of new or revised procedures or guidelines, and training. Activities are ongoing by both the NRC and industry to initiate interim actions as a result of lessons learned from the events which will be provided in the 90-day response such as:

• Methods to access the site

• Notification of staff

• Interim actions taken to date Given the above and that the licensee's approach was found to be consistent with the guidance of NEI 12-01 and the direction of the Commission, the NRC staff concludes that the licensee has provided an adequate basis for its proposed alternative responding to the 10 CFR 50.54(f) letters regarding communications and staffing for Recommendation 9.3.

In its letter dated May 9,2012, the licensee identified the regulatory commitments provided in the attachment to this staff evaluation.

Attachment

LIST OF REGULATORY COMMITMENTS PROVIDED IN ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC.'S LETTER DATED MAY 9,2012 The following table identifies those actions committed to by Entergy in this document.

TYPE SCHEDULED (Check One) COMPLETION COMMITMENT ONE~TIME CONTINUING DATE ACTION COMPLIANCE (If Required)

Provide an assessment of the current X" October 31, 2012 communications systems and equipment used during an emergency event to identify any enhancements that may be needed to ensure I communications are maintained during a large scale natural event.

Describe any interim actions that have been taken or X" June 11, 2012 are planned to be taken to enhance existing communications systems power supplies until the communications assessment and the resulting actions are complete.

Conduct the communications assessment. X September 28.

2012 Provide an implementation schedule of the time X" October 31,2012 needed to implement the results of the communications assessment.

Provide onsite and augmented staffing assessment X" October 21, 2015 considering functions related to NTTF i Recommendation 4.2.

Conduct the onsite and augmented staffing X September 21, assessment considering functions related to NTTF 2015 Recommendation 4.2.

Provide a schedule of the time needed to implement X" October 21, 2015 changes associated with the Phase 2 staffing assessment.

Identify how the augmented staff would be notified X" June 11, 2012 given degraded communications capabilities.

Identify the methods of access (e.g., roadways, X" June 11,2012 navigable bodies of water and dockage. airlift, etc.)

to the site that are expected to be available after a widespread large scale natural event.

Identify any interim actions that have been taken or X" June 11,2012 are planned prior to the completion of the staffing assessment.

Identify changes that have been made or will be X" October 21,2015 made to the emergency plan regarding the on-shift or augmented staffing changes associated with the Phase 2 staffing assessment.

"NRC submittal Attachment

-2 If you have any questions, please contact me at 301-415-1445 or via e-mail at Alan.Wang@nrc.gov.

Sincerely, IRA!

Alan B. Wang, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-416

Enclosure:

Staff Evaluation cc w/encl: Distribution via Listserv DISTRIBUTION:

PUBLIC RidsAcrsAcnw_M ai/CTR Resource RidsNrrDorlLpl4 Resource RidsNrrLAJBurkhardt Resource RidsNrrPMGrandGulf Resource RidsNsirDpr Resource RidsOgcRp Resource RidsRgn4MailCenter Resource CMurray, NSIR JShea, NRR/JLD JKratchman, NRRlJLD ADAMS Accession No. ML12159A515 "concurrence via email OFFICE I NRRIDORLlLPL4/PM NRRlDORLlLPL4/LA NSIR/DPRIDDEPElNRLB/BC.

iNAME AWang JBurkhardt KWilliams" DATE 6/11/12 6/8112 6/6/12 OFFICE NRRI.ILD/PMB/BC NRR/DORLlLPL4/BC NRR/DORLlLPL4/PM I NAME RPascarelli MMarkley AWang DATE 6/11/12 6/11/12 6/11112 OFFICIAL RECORD COpy