ML12352A068

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Attachment 1, Seismic Walkdown Report GGNS-CS-12-00002, Rev. 0, Attachment C, Seismic Walkdown Checklists (Swcs), Page 252 of 345 Through Page 345 of 345
ML12352A068
Person / Time
Site: Grand Gulf Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 11/15/2012
From: Wharton C
Entergy Corp
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
GNRO-2012/00141 GGNS-CS-12-00002, Rev 0
Download: ML12352A068 (94)
v • d • e


Text

Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS- 12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 252 of 345 Status: YM NEI Ut]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 075 Equipment ID No. M71NO26A Equip. Class' 19 -Temperature sensors Equipment Description Temperature Element (Suppression Pool)Location:

Bldg. CTMT Floor El. 135 Room, Area 1A3 11, CTMT Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Thermo Electric, 27620 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YE] N 0 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Connected to steel plate 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Welds are in good condition.

There is very mild surface oxidation judged to have negligible affects on structural ability 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Connection plate is welded to a base plate.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YM NEI U-- N/AL]YE NEI- U-- N/A--YE] NEI Ut] N/AN Yt] Nt]I Ut N/AZ Y[ NO U--1 Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286 Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 1 of 4 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-1 2-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 253 of 345 Status: YO NEL UFJ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELu- 075 Equipment ID No. M71NO26A Equip. Class, 19- Temperature sensors Equipment Description Temperature Element (Suporession Pool)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Soft targets are protected by steel plating.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Steel plates protect the over head.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?A flexible hose attached to the Temperature element with adequate clearance 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NE] UP] NlA[]YZ NEI U-J N/AL-Y[ Nij U[] N/A-]YO UEI Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NJ] UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments None C/ý' ý4-Evaluated by: Chase Wharton Fred Hooki s Date: 9/27/2012 9/27/2012 Page 2 of 4 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 254 of 345 Status: YZ NR UOil Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 075 Equipment ID No. M71NO26A Equip. Class' 19 -Temperature sensors Equipment Description Temperature Element (Suppression Pool)Photographs Note: Note: Page 3 of 4 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS- 12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 255 of 345 Status: YZ NE-' U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 075 Equipment ID No. M71NO26A Equip. Class' 19 -Temperature sensors Equipment Description Temperature Element (Suppression Pool)Page 4 of 4 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS- 12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 256 of 345 Status: YN NDI UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 076 Equipment ID No. T46NO03A Equip. Class' 19 -Temperature Sensors Equipment Description Temperature Element (ESF Elec Switchgear East Room)Location:

Bldg. AB Floor El. 119 Room, Area 1A208, 07 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Thermo Electric, 27620 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YN N[D 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Angle member supporting temerature element is mounted to the wall using (2) 1/2" dia. concrete anchor bolts. See photo.No bent, broken, missing or loose hardware found.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Wall is covered with epoxy coating; no visual indication of corrosion found 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Wall is covered with epoxy coating; no visual indication of concrete crack found 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage was checked against drawing J-0157T Rev. 6, and the configuration shown on the drawing matched the field condition.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YN NEI U-- N/Ai-YN NEI UED N/AD-YZ ND] UDý N/A[D]YO ND U- N/AD-]Y[ NEI U--I Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286 Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 1 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 257 of 345 Status: YED N[i U[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 076 Equipment ID No. T46NO03A Equip. Class, 19 -Temperature Sensors Equipment Description Temperature Element (ESF Elec Switchqear East Room)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

All surrounding equipments/structures are rigidly supported.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

All overhead items (cable tray, conduit) are rigidly supported.

Temperature element is supported on masonry block wall, which is seismically qualified per calculation C-Ho15.2.Nearby Gai-Tronics speaker is judged to be acceptable based on existing clearance.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Flex conduit has been used for routing cable to the temperature element, therefore attached line has adequate flexibility.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YEI NE-] Ur- N/A-]YE NEI U[] N/A-]YN NM] ur- N/AE'Y NE-I U-]Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N' U[-]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments None Evaluated by: Krone S. Jason) Pak Tod Robinson LAftýfýDate: 10/812012 10/812012 Page 2 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS- 12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 258 of 345 Status: YM NEI UF-i Seismic Walkd own Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 076 Equipment ID No. T46NO03A Equip. Class' 19 -Temperature Sensors Equipment Description Temperature Element (ESF Elec Switchqear East Room)PhotoaraDhs 7-Note: Temperature Element Note: General view of the area Page 3 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS- 12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 259 of 345 Status: YZ ND-- UD--Seismic Walkd own Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 077 Equipment ID No. Y47NO05B Equip. Class' 19 -Temperature Sensors Equipment Description Temperature Element (SSW Pump House B Space Temperature Element)Location:

Bldg. SSW Floor El. 133 Room, Area 2M110, SSW Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Thermo Electric, 27620 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[ NO].of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Angle member supporting temerature element is mounted to the wall using (2) 1/2" dia. concrete anchor bolts. See photo.No bent, broken, missing or loose hardware found.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

No visual indication of corrosion found.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No visual indication of concrete crack found.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage was checked against drawing J-0157T Rev. 6, and the configuration shown on the drawing matched the field condition.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YZ NEI UD N/AD Y[ NEI UD N/AL]YM NE] UL] N/AD-YN Nil U- N/AD YN N-] u--1 Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286 Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 1 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS- 12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 260 of 345 Status: YZ N[3 UE-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 077 Equipment ID No. Y47NO05B Equip. Class, 19 -Temperature Sensors Equipment Description Temperature Element (SSW Pump House B Space Temperature Element)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

All surrounding equipments/structures are rigidly supported.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

All overhead items (mainly cable trays) are rigidly supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Flex conduit has been used for routing cable to the temperature element, therefore attached tine has adequate flexibility.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y[ NEI Ui- N/A" YO) NE] UI" N/A[-]YO N[-] U[] N/AE1 YG3 U-Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN N[] UfI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Asset Suite shows this equipment is in Room 2M 12, but it is in Room 2M1 10.Evaluated by: K ong S. Jason -Pak03 Tori Robinson Date: 9/24/2012 9/24/2012 Page 2 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS- 12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 261 of 345 Status: YZ N'- UOJ-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 077 Equipment ID No. Y47NO05B Equip. Class, 19 -Temperature Sensors Equipment Description Temperature Element (SSW Pump House B Space Temperature Element)Photographs Note: Temperature Element Note: Temperature Element Page 3 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 262 of 345 Status: YN NRI- U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 078 Equipment ID No. B21N697B Equip. Class' 20 -Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description Trip Unit (REACTOR VESSEL PRESSURE BLOW(ECCS INJ PERM) SWITCH)Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 166 Room, Area 0C504,CB Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

ROSEMOUNT, 710DUOTS Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y-I NE 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Item is mounted to panel H13P618, and panel is bolted to structural steel. All anchorage in good condition and existing.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

There is no apparent oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Panel anchored to steel I-Beams 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage verified with 865E715.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YN NDl UD- N/AD-Y[ NEI UD- N/AD1 Y[D ND_ UD- N/AN YDI NDI U- N/A[YZ NDl UD-]1 Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286 Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 1 of 4 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 263 of 345 Status: YZ NE] u[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 078 Equipment ID No. B21N697B Equip. Class, 20 -Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description Trip Unit (REACTOR VESSEL PRESSURE BLOW(ECCS INJ PERM) SWITCH)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Adequate clearance is provided 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead lighting appears to be adequately supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Connecting wires and flex conduit have adequate flexibility
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y[ NO] U0] N/A-YE N] N/AJ]YO NE] U[] N/AE" Y; NEI ur]Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y23 NII Ut]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

.Comments None Evaluated by: Chase Wharton OA 1 tU , Fred Honkins Date: 10/2t2012 10/2/2012 Page 2 of 4 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 264 of 345 Status: YZ NOI U[Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 078 Equipment ID No. B21N697B Equip. Class, 20 -Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description Trip Unit (REACTOR VESSEL PRESSURE BLOW(ECCS INJ PERM) SWITCH)Photographs Note: Note: Page 3 of 4 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 265 of 345 Status: YEE NI-- U[-i Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 078 Equipment ID No. B21N697B Equip. Class, 20 -Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description Trip Unit (REACTOR VESSEL PRESSURE BLOW(ECCS INJ PERM) SWITCH)Note: Note: Page 4 of 4 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS- 12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 266 of 345 Status: Y[ NF- Ul--Seismic Walkd own Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 079 Equipment ID No. H13P669 Equip. Class, 20 -Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description Power Range Monitor A (DIV I NEUT and Radiation Monitoring Cabinet)Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 189 Room, Area 0C703, CB Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

General Electric CO Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YLI NEE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

YZ NEI uLIr N/AL]Panel is anchored to the floor beams.In Bay A & B, four out of eight screws are missing for the mounting plate. See photos. (CR 2012-11465 initiated WR# 00286756)In Bay B, bolt/nut is missing on one of the flex conduit support clamp.See photo. In Bay B, nut for mounting elec. board to the side of panel is not fully engaged (threaded stud is not long enough). (CR 2012-11461 initiated WR# 00286750)In Bay C, four out of eight bolts are missing for connecting panel H13P669 to the Halon panel H13P913. Also, one of installed bolt is loose. See photo. Halon panel is anchored to the floor beams. There is no concern for potential seismic interaction between the non-safety related Halon Panel 1H13P913and the Upper Control Room (UCR)Panels 1H13P669.

The halon panels are installed at the end of a series of UCR panels. The halon panels are bolted to the UCR floor.Experience and seismic testing indicated that in the side-to-side direction the UCR panels are rigid. The Halon panels and the UCR panels are butted together with no gaps. With no gap, the displacement experienced would be minimal During a seismic event the panels would act together as a rigid body and will not adversely affect any of the other panels. Therefore, the impact from the halon panels on the UCR panels would not induce any significant additional loading during a seismic event.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ No U[-] N/A[-]oxidation?

No visual indication of corrosion found.1 Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286 Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 1 of 4 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS- 12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 267 of 345 Status: YN N[7 UM-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 079 Equipment ID No. H13P669 Equip. Classw 20 -Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description Power Range Monitor A (DIV I NLEUT and Radiation Monitoring Cabinet)4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the YEI NEI U-I NIAZ anchors?No concrete attachment

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y[E NEI U[E NIAN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN N[E UE]potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y[E NE-] UE: N/A[This equipment is not a soft target.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NEI UE- N/AE-]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

All overhead items (HVAC duct, conduit, cable tray) are rigidly supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NE U[-E NIAE-All attached lines inside of the panel have sufficient flexibility.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NEI UE'of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NEI uE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Evaluated by: Fred Hookins AZ-a ~4~~x KTO~6L~IIA~A~

Date: //q Z-( P4-e2o Page 2 of 4 Toi Robinson Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS- 12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 268 of 345 Status: YZ NEI uo-E Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 079 Equipment ID No. H13P669 Equip. Class' 20 -Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description Power Ranqe Monitor A (DIV I NEUT and Radiation Monitoring Cabinet)Photographs Note: General view, front of the panel Note: Panel anchorage Note: Missing screws (Bay A)Note: Missing screws (Bay B)Page 3 of 4 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 269 of 345 Status: Y[ NE] UOr-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 079 Equipment ID No. H13P669 Equip. Class, 20 -Instrumentation and Control Panels Eauioment Description Power Rance Monitor A (DIV 1 NEUT and Radiation Monitorino Cabinet)1 Note: Nut not fully engaged to the threaded stud Note: Missing bolt and nut on clamp Note: Note: Missing bolt (between two panels)Page 4 of 4 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS- 12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 270 of 345 Status: YE N-IFj ur-Seismic Walkd own Checklist (SWC) SWELi- 080 Equipment ID No. H13P691 Equip. Class, 20- Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description Pressure Indicating Switch (Division I RPS Logic VB)Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 189 Room, Area 0C703, CB Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

General Electric CO Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Panel is anchored to the floor beams.In Bay A, nut on the bracket that mounts the wire support plate to the unistrut is loose (hand verified by electrician). (CR 2012-11459 initiated WR# 00286749)In Bay B, nut is missing on the bracket that mounts the wire support plate to the unistrut. (CR 2012-11458 initiated WR# 00286748)In Bay B, few nuts for mounting elec. board to the side of panel are not fully compressed or not fully engaged (threaded stud is not long enough). (CR 2012-11458 initiated WR# 00286748)3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

No visual indication of corrosion found.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No concrete attachment

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Per drawing 865E712, panel is mounted to the floor beams using welded studs. Studs are welded to the beams every 6" C-C where panel's slotted holes fit in to, and this condition has been verified.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

See question number 2.Y[ NEI Y[-- NZ Ul[] N/Ai]YZ NI UL-I N/AL]Y--] NEI UE-- N/AZ YN NO- UO-] N/AD YEI NZ UD--'Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286 Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 1 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 271 of 345 Status: Y] Nio U[Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 080 Equipment ID No. H13P691 Equip. Class' 20 -Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description Pressure Indicating Switch (Division I RPS Logic VB)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

This equipment is not a soft target.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

All overhead items (conduit) are rigidly supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?All attached lines inside of the panel have sufficient flexibility.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YCE NEIl ULII NlA9 YE NF] UEZ NIALI YG3 NEI UE N/AE1 YN NEIUUD Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEj UE]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Blake Rice (NRC Inspector) came with us to the walkdown, and Troy Pate (Electrician) opened the panel door for SWE.Evaluated by: K on S. Jason Pak Tori Robinson Date: 10/9/2012 10/9/2012 Page 2 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 272 of 345 Status: YN NO U'-D Seismic Walkd own Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 080 Equipment ID No. H13P691 Equip. Class, 20 -Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description Pressure Indicating Switch (Division I RPS Logic VB)Photoqraphs Note: missing nut (not snown) on mounting bracket for cable bundle support Note: Nut not fully engaged to the threaded stud Note: Nut not fully compressed Page 3 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS- 12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 273 of 345 Status: YN Nn Uni-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 081 Equipment ID No. H13P872 Equip. Class' 20 -Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description Level Indicating Switch (Division 2 ESF Logic VB)Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 166 Room, Area 0C504, CB Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

General Electric CO., 1H13P872 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YZ NI 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Panel is anchored to the floor beams.No bent, broken, missing or loose hardware found.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

No visual indication of corrosion found.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No concrete attachment

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Per drawing 865E707, panel is mounted to the floor beams using welded studs. Studs are welded to the beams every 6" C-C where panel's slotted holes fit in to, and this condition has been verified.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YN NEI UFD N/A-YM NEI UO N/AD YD ND UD- N/AZ Y[ ND UD N/AD-]YE NDI UD' Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286 Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 1 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS- 12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 274 of 345 Status: Y9 NE] ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 081 Equipment ID No. H13P872 Equip. Class' 20 -Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description Level Indicating Switch (Division 2 ESF Logic VB .Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

This equipment is not a soft target.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

All overhead items (air vent is secured to the ceiling with screws) are rigidly supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?All attached lines inside of the panel have sufficient flexibility.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y'] NEI U[i N/AN YZ NE] U[] NIAF-1 YN NEI ur] N/AL-]YO NFI UFI Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE] U[-]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments David Jones (Electrician) opened panel for SWE.-I.'Kon ~Evalae bv Ktfln S ... l o ......T~2 Date: 10/2/2012 10/2/2012 Frederick Hookins.. ... %. m- 7, ......Page 2 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 275 of 345 Status: YN N-] Ur-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 081 Equipment ID No. H13P872 Equip. Class' 20 -Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description Level Indicating Switch (Division 2 ESF Logic VB)Photographs Note: Anchorage of panel to the floor beam (studs), 6" C-C Note: Back of the panel (Opened)Page 3 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS- 12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 276 of 345 Status: YZ NE-- UF-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 082 Equipment ID No. E31N602A Equip. Class' 20 -Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description Temo Switch (RCIC Equipment Area Temperature Switch)Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 189 Room, Area 0C703, CB Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Scientech Inc./NUS Corp., NUS-AO76PA-1 LDTM-T Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Temp switch E31N602A, among with other components, is mounted to the mounting plate. Mounting plate is attached to the panel H13P632 using (4) screws. Panel is anchored to the floor beams.In Bay B, one of nut/lock washer for mounting elec. board to the side of panel is not fully compressed. (CR 2012-11457 initiated WR#00286746)

See photo.In Bay C, one of nut for mounting elec. board to the side of panel is not fully engaged (threaded stud is not long enough). (CR 2012-11456 initiated WR# 00286759)3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

No visual indication of corrosion found.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No concrete attachment

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question 6nly applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Per drawing 865E712, panel is mounted to the floor beams using welded studs. Studs are welded to the beams every 6" C-C where panel's slotted holes fit in to, and this condition has been verified.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

See question number 2.YE NM-]Y[I: NO U- N/A[-]YE NEI U[I N/AD1 Y[I' NEI Ui- N/AO YO NEI u-1 N/AD-Y-I NO U[I'Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286 Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 1 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 277 of 345 Status: YE N[] i-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 082 Equipment ID No. E31N602A Equip. Class' 20 -Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description Temp Switch (RCIC Equipment Area Temperature Switch)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

All equipments/structures nearby are rigidly supported.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

All overhead items (conduit, pipe) are rigidly supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Flex cable has been used, therefore attached line has adequate flexibility.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ ND UD N/AD YU ND U- N/AD YU NDI UD" NIADI YED ND UO Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y; ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Blake Rice (NRC Inspector) came with us to the walkdown, and Troy Pate (Electrician) opened the panel door for SWE.Evaluated by: K Ron i S. Jaon Pk Todi Robinson Date: 10/9/2012 10/9/2012 Page 2 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 278 of 345 Status: YE NE-1 UF-1i Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 082 Equipment ID No. E31N602A Equip. Classi 20 -Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description Temp Switch (RCIC Equipment Area Temperature Switch)Photographs"SECURITY SENSITIVE PHOTO PHOTO REMOVED" Note: Temp. Switch, E31N602A, on front of the panel H13P 632 imote: t-'anei ancnarage Note: Panel anchorage Note: Nut not fully compressed Page 3 of 3 Engineering Report No. .GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 279 of 345 Status: YZ NR U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 083 Equipment ID No. E31N690A Equip. Class, 20 -Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description Pressure Differential Switch (RCIC Steam Line Flow Hiqhswitch)

Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 189 Room, Area 0C703, CB Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Rosemount, 510DU7 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Pressure Differential switch E31N690A, among with other components, is mounted to the mounting plate. Mounting plate is attached to the panel H13P629. Panel is anchored to the floor beams.In Bay C, five out of eight bolts are missing for connecting panel H13P629 to the Halon panel H13P936. Halon panel is anchored to the floor beams. There is no concern for potential seismic interaction between the non-safety related Halon Panel 1H13P936 and the Upper Control Room (UCR) Panel 1HP629. The halon panels are installed at the end of a series of UCR panels. The halon panels are bolted to the UCR floor. Experience and seismic testing indicated that in the side-to-side direction the UCR panels are rigid. The Halon panels and the UCR panels are butted together with no gaps. With no gap, the displacement experienced would be minimal. During a seismic event the panels would act together as a rigid body and will not adversely affect any of the other panels. Therefore, the impact from the halon panels on the UCR panels would not induce any significant additional loading during a seismic event.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

No visual indication of corrosion found.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No concrete attachment YO N[-YM NEI UIE] N/A[--YN N[- UIEI N/ADl Y ND-] uiID N/AN' Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286 Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 1 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 280 of 345 Status: NE]--I O-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 083 Equipment ID No. E31N690A Equip. Class, 20 -Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description Pressure Differential Switch (RCIC Steam Line Flow Hiqhswitch)

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YN NEI url NIAEI-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Per drawing 865E71 1, panel is mounted to the floor beams using welded studs. Studs are welded to the beams every 6" C-C where panel's slotted holes fit in to, and this condition has been verified.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NE] U[]potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YO1 NEI Ur-- N/A[-]All equipments/structures nearby are rigidly supported.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NE] UD- N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

All overhead items (HVAC duct, conduit, cable tray, etc.) are rigidly supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO ND-I UD-- N/AD--Flex cable has been used, therefore attached line has adequate flexibility.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[1 NDI uD-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y] NDI UD-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Plastic bag left inside of the panel. See photo.Evaluated by: Fred Hopkins -Tori Robinson 4(.Date: ___ _ __(-(_ _//-/f -/2-Page 2 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 281 of 345 Status: YZ NIIJ U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 083 Equipment ID No. E31N690A Equip. Class, 20 -Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description Pressure Differential Switch (RCIC Steam Line Flow Hiahswitch)

Photographs Note: Genei Note: Ir in.Rider Note: i-anei ancnorage Page 3 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 282 of 345 Status: YZ N ULI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 084 Equipment ID No. B21N682D Equip. Class' 20 -Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description Level Switch (REACTOR VESSEL LEVEL LOW (PCIS/SCI/RWCU)

SWITCH)Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 166 Room, Area 0C504,CB Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

ROSEMOUNT,510DU7 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Item mounted to panel H13P694 with vendor provided mounting slots. 3 slots per side with 1.75" spacing and 3.5" spacing 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?One nut missing on panel stud. CR-GGN-2012-11255 Y[ N[-]Y[-- NZ Ul-- N/AD 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

There is no apparent oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Panel anchored to steel I-Beams 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Equipment mounts consistent with QP388. Panel anchorage missing one nut and washer. See Question 2 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y[ NEI ULI N/A--YEI N[- UD] N/AZ YE[- NI U[:] N/AD-YI- NZ U[-1 Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286 Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 1 of 4 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS- 12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 283 of 345 Status: YZ NDi U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 084 Equipment ID No. B21N682D Equip. Classi 20 -Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description Level Switch (REACTOR VESSEL LEVEL LOW (PCIS/SCI/RWCU)

SWITCH)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Adequate clearance is provided.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead lighting appears to be adequately supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Connecting wires and flex conduit have adequate flexibility
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YED NDI UO N/AD YO NOJ UD N/ADJ YM NO UD N/AD-YM ND UDl Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments None rz/6t4V iK-Evaluated by: Chase Wharton Fred Hopkins Date: 10/2I2012 10/2/2012 Page 2 of 4 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 284 of 345 Status: Y[ NEI UIO Seismic Walkd own Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 084 Equipment ID No. B21N682D Equip. Class' 20 -Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description Level Switch (REACTOR VESSEL LEVEL LOW (PCIS/SCI/RWCU)

SWITCH)Photographs Note: Note: Front mounts.Page 3 of 4 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 285 of 345 Status: YZ NEI Ur Seismic Walkd own Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 084 Equipment ID No. B21N682D Equip. Classi 20 -Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description Level Switch (REACTOR VESSEL LEVEL LOW (PCIS/SCI/RWCU)

SWITCH)Note: Note: Missing nut and washer.Page 4 of 4 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 286 of 345 Status: YN Ni-- U[--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 085 Equipment ID No. E31N608B Equip. Class' 20 -Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description Temp Switch (RHR B EQUIPMENT AREA I TEMPERATURE SWITCH)Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 166 Room, Area 0C504,CB Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

NUS INSTRUMENTSAO76PA-1 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y NO-2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?All anchorage in good condition and existing.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

There is no apparent oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Panel anchored to steel I-Beams 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Panel anchorage is consistent with 865E715, and Section 4.3 the Qualification Report in QP 367. Four (4) Screws attach the mounting plate to the panel 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE N[-- U[-- N/A[-]YE NEI ULI N/A--Y-I NEI U-- N/AZ YE NEI U-' N/ADl YN NE-I U-1 Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286 Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 1 of 4 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS- 12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 287 of 345 Status: YO NE] UM]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 085 Equipment ID No. E31N608B Equip. Classi 20 -Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description Temp Switch (RHR B EQUIPMENT AREA 1 TEMPERATURE SWITCH)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Adequate clearance is provided.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead lighting appears to be adequately supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Connecting wires and flex conduit have adequate flexibility
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ Nil ur-l N/AU-Y] NDI Ui- N/ADI YZ NEI UE] NIA-'YO NEI UD Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NE] Uti adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments NoneýI GV ý-.Evaluated by: Chase Wharton Fred Hopkins Date: 10/212012 10/2/2012 Page 2 of 4 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 288 of 345 Status: YN Nn Ul--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 085 Equipment ID No. E31N608B Equip. Class' 20 -Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description TemD Switch (RHR B EQUIPMENT AREA 1 TEMPERATURE SWITCH)Photographs Page 3 of 4 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 289 of 345 Status: YE NEI Ur-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 085 Equipment ID No. E31N608B Equip. Class, 20 -Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description Temp Switch (RHR B EQUIPMENT AREA I TEMPERATURE SWITCH)Page 4 of 4 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 290 of 345 Status: YN ND-] UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 086 Equipment ID No. H13P601 Equip. Class, 20 -Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description Level Recorder (Reactor Core Cooling BB)Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 166 Room, Area 0C503, CB Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

General Electric Co.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YZ N-2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Panel is anchored to the floor beam's welded studs. Studs are welded to the beams every 6" C-C where panel's slotted holes fit in to.No bent, broken, missing or loose hardware found.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

No visual indication of corrosion found.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No concrete attachment

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Per drawing 865E675 & 865E721, panel is mounted to the floor beams using welded studs. Studs are welded to the beams every 6" C-C where panel's slotted holes fit in to, and this condition has been verified.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YN N- ui-I N/A-YE NO UO-I N/ADl YEJ NEI U-- N/A[YN ND Ur- N/AD YJZ NE--I U 1 Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286 Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 1 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS- 12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 291 of 345 Status: Y] NEI U[Ij]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl-Equipment ID No. H13P601 -Equip. Class, Equipment Description Level Recorder (Reactor Core C 20 -Instrumentation and Control Panels ooling BB)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

This equipment is not a soft target.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

All overhead items (air vent is secured to the ceiling with screws) are rigidly supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?All attached lines inside of the panel have sufficient flexibility.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YE] NE] UrL NIAN YN NEI U-I N/A-]YZ No] UF] N/AL]Y N[-] UM'Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE] Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Gregory Wilson (Electrician) opened panel for SWE.Evaluated by: K on S. Jaso P.Tori Robinson Date: 10/4/2012 10/4/2012 Page 2 of 3 Engineei Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 086 Equipment ID No. H13P601 Equip. Class' 20 -Instrumentation and Equipment Description Level Recorder (Reactor Core Cooling BB)ring Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 292 of 345 Status: YZ NRIl UO]Control Panels Photographs Note: Inside of panel Note: Anchorage of panel to the floor beam Page 3 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS- 12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 293 of 345 Status: YZ ND-- Ur-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 087 Equipment ID No. H22P150 Equip. ClassI 20 -Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description Remote Shutdown Panel A Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 111 Room, Area 0C208,CB Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YrI N E 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Panel welded to chanel, chanel welded to tube steel, tube steel welded to plate, plate anchored to concrete.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Anchorage is coated 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No visible cracks 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE NI ui-1 N/AD1 YN NEI U-- N/AD1 YN NDl UD- N/A"-Y[-] NDlJ U- N/AN YZ ND-' U--1 Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286 Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 1 of 4 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 294 of 345 Status: YN N[] U]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 087 Equipment ID No. H22P.150 Equip. Class' 20 -Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description Remote Shutdown Panel A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Item has no soft targets 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead equipment above the Remote Shutdown Panel is seismically restrained and does not create an adverse seismic condition 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibUity to avoid damage?Flexible conduit is attached to Remote Shutdown Panel with adequate clearance 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YE-- NO-] U-] N/A22 YEQ NJ] UL] N/AO-]YN NEl UI'] N/AU Y[ Nn UF1 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ N[. U.....adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments None Evaluated by: Chase Whartn r) ( AJ Fred Hopkins/11, Date: 10/10/2012 10/10/2012 Page 2 of 4 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 295 of 345 Status: YZ NFI- UE-Seismic Walkd own Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 087 Equipment ID No. H22P150 Equip. Class' 20 -Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description Remote Shutdown Panel A Photographs"SECURITY SENSITIVE PHOTO PHOTO REMOVED" Note: Note: Page 3 of 4 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 296 of 345 Status: UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 087 Equipment ID No. H22P150 Equip. Class, 20 -Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description Remote Shutdown Panel A"SECURITY SENSITIVE PHOTO PHOTO REMOVED" Note: Note: Page 4 of 4 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS- 12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 297 of 345 Status: YNJ ND- UD-1 Seismic Walkd own Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 088 Equipment ID No. H22P296 Equip. Class' 20 -Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description Alternate Shutdown Panels Location:

Bldg. AB Floor El. 119 -Room, Area 1A219, 09 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

STUART, IRBY C. CO Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Panel is mounted to the unistrut on support frame, and support frame is anchored to the floor using (4) 5/8" dia. anchor bolts.Panel is mounted to the unistrut using spring nut. Plate inside unistrut (part of mounting assembly) is misaligned. (CR 2012-11455 initiated WR# 00286745)

See photo.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Floor is covered with epoxy coating; no visual indication of corrosion found 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Floor is covered with epoxy coating; no visual indication of concrete crack found 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage was checked against drawing IA-209-3026, CSD- 14 &CSD-15. The configuration shown on the drawing matched the field condition, but minor discrepancies found on field vs. drawing dimensions.

However, these minor differences doesn't pose a seismic concern, therefore acceptable.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YZ Nr-]YF1 NM UD N/AD YN NEI UD N/A[D YE] NO U[-- N/A[--YZ ND UD- N/AD YZ NO UD I Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286 Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 1 of 4 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 298 of 345 Status: Y9 NI-" UFI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 088 Equipment ID No. H22P296 Equip. Class' 20- Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description Alternate Shutdown Panels Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

This equipment is not a soft target.8, Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

All overhead items (mainly cable trays) are rigidly supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Flex conduit has been used for routing cable to the panel, therefore attached lines have adequate flexibility.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YE NE: Ur] N/AZ Y; NEI U- N/Ar-YZ NEI U-I NiALI Y[ Nn U[M Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Troy Pate (Electrician) opened the panel for SWE.Evaluated by: Kyonq S. Jason Pak Date:10/8/2012 Tori Robinson Date: 10/8012..10/8&2012 Page 2 of 4 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS- 12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 299 of 345 Status: YZ NEIr U-Seismic Walkd own Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 088 Equipment ID No. H22P296 Equip. Class, 20 -Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description Alternate Shutdown Panels Photographs Note: Front view of the panel Note: Rear view of the panel.I Page 3 of 4 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 300 of 345 Status: YN NE] U[-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 088 Equipment ID No. H22P296 Equip. Classi 20 -Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description Alternate Shutdown Panels"SECURITY SENSITIVE PHOTO PHOTO REMOVED" Note: Panel's front door opened Note: Misaligned/twisted mounting assembly for panel mounted on unistr ut Page 4 of 4 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS- 12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 301 of 345 Status: YM ND- UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 089 Equipment ID No. H22P331 Equip. Class, 20 -Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description DIVISION I LOAD SHED SEQ PANEL Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. III Room, Area 0C202, CB Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y[:] NZ 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Panel is mounted to plate, plate is anchored to concrete.YN NO U[-D N/A-3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Mild surface oxidation, but does not effect structural ability.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No visible cracks 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YN NF u- N/ADl YE ND UD- N/AF-D Y[-D ND uD N/AN YN ND U-1 Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286 Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 1 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS- 12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 302 of 345 Status: Y] N[I- U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 089 Equipment ID No. H22P331 Equip. Class, 20 -Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description DIVISION 1 LOAD SHED SEQ PANEL Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Item has no soft targets 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead equipment is adequately supported 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Flexible conduit is attached to Battery Charger with adequate clearance 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO- N-] U'] NIA[YN NiE U-] N/A--YN NE] U[-] N/AU-YN N[3] U-Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NE] UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Cable lubricant found at bottom of panel, Comments None Evaluated by: Chase Wharton Lv -Fred Hopkins Date: 10/10/2012 10/10/2012 Page 2 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS- 12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 303 of 345 Status: YZ Nil U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 089 Equipment ID No. H22P331 Equip. Class, 20 -Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description DIVISION I LOAD SHED SEQ PANEL Photographs Page 3 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS- 12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 304 of 345 Status: YZ Nn U-Seismic Walkd own Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 090 Equipment ID No. H22P401 Equip. Class' 20 -Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description STBY DG Engine Control Panel (Diesel Generator Instrument Panel Div 2)Location:

Bldg. DG Floor El. 133 Room, Area 1D308, DSL Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Cooper Energy, SVSS 09-500-74033 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YDJ NE 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Panel is supported by channel frame which is anchored to the floor.See photo.No bent, broken, missing or loose hardware found.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Floor is covered with epoxy coating; no visual indication of corrosion found.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Floor is covered with epoxy coating; no visual indication of concrete crack found.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y[ NiD U[-- N/A[-YM Nn ui- N/AD-YN NDi U[- N/A[-D YD- NDi U- N/AN YZ Nr-D U--1 Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286 Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 1 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS- 12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 305 of 345 Status: Nt] Ut-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 090 Equipment ID No. H22P401 Equip. Class, 20 -Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description STBY DG Engine Control Panel (Diesel Generator Instrument Panel Div 2j Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

This equipment is not a soft target.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

All overhead items (mainly cable trays) are rigidly supported.

In the vicinity, light fixtures are hung with chain using S-hook.However, light fixtures are not directly located over any safety related equipmenL Therefore, this condition doesn't pose a seismic concern.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?All conduits routed to the panel have flex connections, therefore acceptable.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YE] NEI Ut] NIA;YZ NE] UM] N/A[]YZ N[3] u-] NIA]Y~N NFUE]Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NM] U[]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Blake Rice (NRC Inspector) came with us to the walkdown, and Electrician opened the panel door for SWE.Evaluated by: Kyong S. (Jason) Pak ýTord Robinson Date: 9/27/2012 9/2712012 Page 2 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 306 of 345 Status: YEE NEI UO Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 090 Equipment ID No. H22P401 Equip. Class' 20 -Instrumentationand Control Panels Equipment Description STBY DG Engine Control Panel (Diesel Generator Instrument Panel Div 2)Photographs Note: Panel H22P401 Note: Anchorage to the floor Note: Inside of the panel Note: Page 3 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS- 12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 307 of 345 Status: Y[ NF-- ul--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 091 Equipment ID No. M71N602A Equip. Class, 20 -Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description Strip Chart Recorder (RG 1.97) (Containment Pressure Hiqhswitch)

Location:

Bldg. CB Floor El. 189 Room, Area 0C703, CB Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Rosemount, 510DU237155 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YiI NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Y-I NN UI- N/AD-Strip chart recorder M71N602A is mounted to the panel H13P871.Panel is anchored to the floor beams.In Bay A, one screw (out of 12 total) is missing on mounting plate for WAKI-YX-P871.

Also, cable bundle on top of the panel is not properly secure to the wire support plate nearby. (CR 2012-11464 initiated WR#00286754)In Bay D, bolts/nuts are missing on two of flex conduit support clamps.See photo. Additionally, two flex conduits shown on photo are not properly supported. (CR 2012-11463 initiated WR# 00286753)In Bay E, one screw (out of four total) is missing on mounting plate/bracket of M71N606A and M71N616A. (CR 2012-11462 initiated WR #00286751)

See photo.In Bay H, Panel H13P871 and Halon panel right next to it are not connected to each other. There are holes on halon panel but not on panel H13P871. Halon panel is anchored to the floor beams. There is no concern for potential seismic interaction between the non-safety related Halon Panel 1H13P915 and the Upper Control Room (UCR)Panels 1H13P871.

The halon panels are installed at the end of a series of UCR panels. The halon panels are bolted to the UCR floor.Experience and seismic testing indicated that in the side-to-side direction the UCR panels are rigid. The Halon panels and the UCR panels are butted together with no gaps. With no gap, the displacement experienced would be minimal. During a seismic event the panels would act together as a rigid body and will not adversely affect any of the other panels. Therefore, the impact from the halon panels on the UCR panels would not induce any significant additional loading during a seismic event.1Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286 Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 1 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 308 of 345 Status: YE NEI UD]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 091 Equipment ID No. M71N602A Equip. Class, 20 -Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description Strip Chart Recorder (RG 1.97) (Containment Pressure Hiahswitch)

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[D N[] U-- N/AD-oxidation?

No visual indication of corrosion found.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No concrete attachment

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

See question number 2.Y['] NDI UD- N/AE YD- NDI UD N/AE YD-] NEI UD-Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

All equipmentslstructures nearby are rigidly supported.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

All overhead items (HVAC duct, conduit, etc.) are rigidly supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Flex cable has been used, therefore attached line has adequate flexibility.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NDI uD- N/AD-YO ND] UD-] N/AD-]YO ND] uD- N/AD-]YO NDI UDI Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YEI ND] UD-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments In bay C, three broken tie-wraps found.Evaluated by: Fred Ho kins Tod Robinson Date: ,/-I,- 1/17.__Page 2 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 309 of 345 Status: YZ NEI Ur]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 091 Equipment ID No. M71N602A Equip. Class, 20 -Instrumentation and Control Panels Equipment Description Strip Chart Recorder (RG 1.97) (Containment Pressure Hfihswitch)

Photouraghs Page 3 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS- 12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 310 of 345 Status: YZ NF-] UF-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 092 Equipment ID No. E12BOO2B Equip. Class' 21 -Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description RHR Heat Exchanger Location:

Bldg. AB Floor El. 93 Room, Area 1A 106, 08 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. 762E987 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Item achored to civil structure at the 108' elevation.Structural columns are anchored to concrete at 93' elevation.

Horizontal load supports at 119 EL had fire proof coating, but keys and key ways were visible and in compliance with plant documents.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Missing second nut on one bolt (CR-GGN-2012-11311).

1/4" gap between bolt head and washer(CR-GGN-2012-11312).

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Anchorage is coated and there is no apparent oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Heat exchanger anchored to stee ColumnL. Column anchorage has no visible cracks 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Drawing indicates 2 nuts for anchor bolts. Documents used for verification are 131C8536, C-1365 E, C-1365D.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YLI N[- N YE] N[Z UO- N/A[-]YN NEI UD- N/A-YZ N[-] Ur- N/AF-D Y[D NZ UD- N/AD-]Y[:- N M UDE-I 1 Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286 Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 1 of 4 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 311 of 345 Status: YZ NE' U-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 092 Equipment ID No. E12Bo02B Equip. Class, 21 -Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description RHR Heat Exchanger Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Item has no soft targets 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Structural steel, concrete, grating and lights are installed in the overhead and they do not create any adverse seismic conditions.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?RHR Heat Exchanger 8 pipe is rigidly supported and no flex pipes are installed on the RHR Heat Exchanger.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO' NEI UE- N/AZNEI U- N/Af.J YN; NE U'I N/ACI Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YGI NE] Ufi]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments Gap in weld on angle iron drawing shoes all around weld CR-GGN-2012-11314.

Fire protection was installed on the Key ways identified on elevation 119'. There are no signs of degradation to the fireproofing the connection points were considered intact.Evaluated by: Chase Wharton (/- 1/,/'-A Fred Hookin Date: 10/3/2012 10/3/2012 Page 2 of 4 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 312 of 345 Status: YZ NRII UOI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 092 Equipment ID No. E12BOO2B Equip. Class' 21 -Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description RHR Heat Exchanger Photoaraohs Note: Missing second nut Note: Gap between nut and washer Page 3 of 4 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 313 of 345 Status: YZ NF UF Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 092 Equipment ID No. E12B02B Equip. Classi 21 -Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description RHR Heat Exchanger Page 4 of 4 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 314 of 345 Status: YN NFi UI-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 093 Equipment ID No. P75BO06A Equip. Class, 21 -Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Standby DG Lube Oil Cooler Location:

Bldg. DG Floor El. 133 Room, Area 1D310, DSL Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Thermxchancqer, #2020 Type SP Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YN N[l 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Item is welded to saddles, and bolted to steel plates. Steel Plates are bolted to concrete 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

All anchorage is coated, free from oxidation.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No visual cracks in concrete 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage is consistent with E-1052 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y[ NEI Ul-I N/A[-YE N[-- U'- N/A]J Y[ ND-- UE-- N/A[]Y[ NE] UFD N/AD:-YERNEIUEI I Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286 Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 1 of 4 Engineering Report No. GGN S-CS- 12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 315 of 345 Status: YO NEI0 UL'Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 093 Equipment ID No. P758006A Equip. Class, 21 -Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Standby DG Lube Oil Cooler Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Item is protected by over head grating.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NEI UO NIAEK YZ NOJ UL N/AE3 Y[:] Nfl Uf N/AZ Y0 NEIUL1 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[D N-' U["]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments None Evaluated by: Chase Me on C t, Fred Hopkins ( z Date: 9/26/2012 9/2612012 Page 2 of 4 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 316 of 345 Status: YN NEI Ul-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 093 Equipment ID No. P75BO06A Equip. Class' 21 -Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Standby DG Lube Oil Cooler Photographs Note: Anchorage Note: Page 3 of 4 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 317 of 345 Status: YZ NEI U-Seismic Walkd own Checklist (SWC) SWELl- 093 Equipment ID No. P75BO06A Equip. Class' 21 -Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Standby DG Lube Oil Cooler Page 4 of 4 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 318 of 345 Status: Ni--I UI--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 001 Equipment ID No. G41COOIA Equip. Class' 5 -Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description FUEL POOL PUMP/MOTOR Location:

Bldg. AB Floor El. 166 Room, Area 1A432 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Pump: UNION PUMP CO,6X6X10-1/2 HHM Motor: GE SK444EK134 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y-- NZ 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Item is mounted to pedestal 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Anchorage is coated 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?No visible cracks in concrete 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YM NEI UI N/A-I YN NDI UD-] N/A-Y[ NI U[I- N/AD--YM NI U-i N/AD-YE NII U[-I Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286 Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 1 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-(2S-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 319 of 345 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 001 Equipment ID No. G41COOIA Equip. Class' 5 -Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description FUEL POOL PUMP/MOTOR Status: YN NO- UrL Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Item has no soft targets 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YEI N[:] ULEl N/AN YZ] NEI ULI- NIAL]YN N[:] U[] N/A[L]YN NEI UI]Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE3 NE] ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments None fLI4-Evaluated by:Wh~rtnn Fred Holnkins Date: 10/10/2012 10/10/2012 Page 2 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 320 of 345 Status: YZ NEI uOF]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 001 Equipment ID No. G41COOIA Equip. Classi 5 -Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description FUEL POOL PUMP/MOTOR Photographs Page 3 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 321 of 345 Status: Y[ N-I UF-1 Seismic Walkd own Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 002 Equipment ID No. G41F501 Equip. Class' 8 -Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment Description Fuel Pool CLG SYS ISO VLVF045 Solenoid Location:

Bldg. AB Floor El. 185 Room, Area 1A527 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Asco- Automatic Switch C. NP8321A6E Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YE] NZ 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A, in-line equipment YE]l NEI IJE] N/AZ YDI NEI ULI N/AN YEll NEIl UE] NIAZ YO NDI U[:] NIAO YZ NEIUO 1 Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286 Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 1 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS- 12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 322 of 345 Status: YZ N[] U-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 002 Equipment ID No. G41F501 Equip. Class' 8 -Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment Description Fuel Pool CLG SYS ISO VLVF045 Solenoid Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

All equipments/structures nearby are rigidly supported.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

All overhead items are rigidly supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Tubing has adequate flexibility.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YS N- ULI N/AL]YZ ND U] N/Al]YZ NF" UI N/AD-YM NEI UM Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N[] UD-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments None Evaluated by: Kyonq S. (Jason) Pak _, " Tori Robinson Date: 1013/2012 101312012 Page 2 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS- 12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 323 of 345 Status: YZ Nr-E U'I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 002 Equipment ID No. G41F501 Equip. Class' 8 -Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment Description Fuel Pool CLG SYS ISO VLVF045 Solenoid Photographs I Note: Valve G41F045 Note: Valve G41F501 Page 3 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS- 12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 324 of 345 Status: YN NiO U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 003 Equipment ID No. G41F045 Equip. Class, 8 -Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment Description Filter Demin Inlet Valve Location:

Bldg. AB Floor El. 185 Room, Area 1A527 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Valve: Henry Pratt Co., Actuator:

Bettis Corp.Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring~such verification)?

Y[-] NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A, in-line equipment YO-- NEI U- N/AZ YO'- NEI Ui[] N/AZ YOi NEI- UF-] N/AZ YO ND ULI N/AZ YZ NOI U IEnter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286 Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 1 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 325 of 345 Status: YO NnJ UI-'Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 003 Equipment ID No. G41F045 Equip. Classx 8 -Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment Description Filter Demin Inlet Valve Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

This equipment is not a soft target.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

All overhead items are rigidly supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Attached lines (tubing, flex conduit) have adequate flexibility.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YE] NEI UEI N/AO YO NEI U[] N/AE]YE NEI] UI N/AEI YO N'-] U[-]Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE] NO url adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

One of the nut on flange connection for the valve G4 1F045 is missing.See Photo. (CR 2012-11306 initiated WR# 00285926)Comments None Evaluated by: Ky onS"JsnSa Tori Robinson Date: 10/312012 10/3/2012 Page 2 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS- 12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 326 of 345 Status: YV NR UO Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 003 Equipment ID No. G41F045 Equip. Class, 8 -Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment Description Filter Demin Inlet Valve Photographs Note: Valve G41F045 Note: Valve G41F045 Note: Missing nut on valve G41F045 Note: Page 3 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS- 12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 327 of 345 Status: YN ND Iur Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWELe2- 004 Equipment ID No. G41N012 Equip. Class' 18 -Instrument Racks Equipment Description Filter/Demineralizer Bypass Flow Transmitter Location:

Bldg. AB Floor El. 185 Room, Area 1A527 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Rosemount, 1151DP5C22TOOOIPB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YD- NZ 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Flow Transmitter is mounted to TS 6x6 vertical post which is anchored to the floor using (4) 1/2" dia. anchor bolts.No bent, broken, missing or loose hardware found.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Floor is covered with epoxy coating; no visual indication of corrosion found 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Floor is covered with epoxy coating; no visual indication of concrete crack found 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YM NEI UO N/AD YE NEI UD N/AD Y[ ND U[-- N/AD YO ND U- N/A[YN N- UDý1 Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286 Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 1 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 328 of 345 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 004 Equipment ID No. G41N012 Equip. Class, 18 -Instrument Racks Equipment Description Filter/Demineralizer Bypass Flow Transmitter Status: YO N[-] U-]Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

All equipment/structures are rigidly supported.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

All overhead items (cable tray, light fixture, conduit, etc.) are rigidly supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Flex conduit has been used for routing cable to the flow transmitter, and tubing attached to the transmitter has adequate flexibility.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?NM U[-] N/A[-]Y] N[] UL] N/AE]YS NE] U[] N/AL]YN NI] ur-]Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yo NM] U[]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments None Evaluated Date: 10/3/2012 10/3/2012 Page 2 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 329 of 345 Status: YE NEI U--I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 004 Equipment ID No. G41N012 Equip. Class' 18 -Instrument Racks Equipment Description Filter/Demineralizer Bypass Flow Transmitter Photographs Note: General view of the overhead area Note: General view of the area Page 3 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS- 12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 330 of 345 Status: Y[ ND7 UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 005 Equipment ID No. G41NOO7B Equip. Class' 18 -Instrament Rack Equipment Description FUEL POOL PUMP CO01B DISCH PRESSURE LOW SWITCH Location:

Bldg. AB Floor El. 166 Room, Area 1A428 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

BARKSDALE CONTROL DIV B2T-A12SS Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YD-- N[0 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Item is mounted on floor mounted tube steel. The tube steel is mounted on a base plate.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

No oxidation all anchor bolts are coated 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?All base plates and floor anchorage is coated no visual cracks.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y[ ND-] uD- N/AD-YN NDI UDI N/AD 1 YN ND UD- N/AD-1 YD- NDI uD- N/AE YE NDi uD I Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286 Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 1 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS- 12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 331 of 345 Status: Y9 NI-] U[7 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 005 Equipment ID No. G41NO07B Equip. Class, 18 -Instrament Rack Equipment Description FUEL POOL PUMP COO 1B DISCH PRESSURE LOW SWITCH Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Item is in open area.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

All overhead raceways are supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Flex conduit is connected to item.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NO UE] N/A[: YZ NO IJLJ N/AEl YN NO UFl N/AO YE NEI UFI Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NO Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments ri4 " Evaluated by: Chase Wharton Fred Hopkins Date: 9/26/2012 9/26/2012 Page 2 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS- 12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 332 of 345 Status: YE NFI UI]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 005 Equipment ID No. G41NOO7B Equip. Class, 18 -Instrament Rack Equipment Description FUEL POOL PUMP COQIB DISCH PRESSURE LOW SWITCH Photographs Note: Note: Page 3 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS- 12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 333 of 345 Status: YZ Nj-- U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2t 006 Equipment ID No. G41N011 Equip. Class' 18 -Instrument Racks Equipment Description Upper Containment Pool Retrun Flow Transmitter Location:

Bldg. AB Floor El. 185 Room, Area 1A527 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Rosemount.

1152DP5E22T0280PB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y[-] N[2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Flow Transmitter is mounted to TS 6x6 vertical post which is anchored to the floor using (4) 1/2" dia. anchor bolts.One of the bolt on the flow transmitter mounting bracket is not fully engaged. See photo. (CR 2012-11307 initiated WR# 00285927)3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Floor is covered with epoxy coating; no visual indication of corrosion found 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Floor is covered with epoxy coating; no visual indication of concrete crack found 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

See question number 2.Y-- NO UD- N/ADl YE NEI U-- N/AD-1 YO NO UD N/AD YD- NDI UD- N/AZ YDI NO U0'Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286 Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 1 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 334 of 345 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL 008 EquipmentID No. G4INOII Equip. Class, 18 -Instrument Racks Equipment Description Uppier Containment Pool Retrun Flow Transmitter Status: YZ NE] u-]Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

All equipment/structures are rigidly supported.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting.and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

All overhead items (cable tray, light fixture, conduit, etc.) are rigidly supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Flex conduit has been used for routing cable to the flow transmitter, and tubing attached to the transmitter has adequate flexibility.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y[ NC] U-] N/AE--YN NE] U] N/AL]YN NEI] u] NIAI-YN NE] u-]Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YED NE:] U[]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments None Evaluated by: K.on. S. (Jason) Pak Tori Robinson .Date: 10/3/2012 10/3/2012 Page 2 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 335 of 345 Status: YZ NE-' UF-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 006 Equipment ID No. G41N011 Equip. Class, 18 -Instrument Racks Equipment Description Upper Containment Pool Retrun Flow Transmitter Photographs Note: Flow Transmitter Note: General view of the area Page 3 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS- 12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 336 of 345 Status: YN NIF U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 007 Equipment ID No. G41NO18B Equip. Class, 18 -Instrament Rack Equipment Description FUEL POOL PUMP B DISCH PRESSURE TRANSMITTER Location:

Bldg. AB Floor El. 166 Room, Area 1A428 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

ROSEMOUNT 1151GP7A22TOOOIPB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YZ Nr-2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Item is mounted on floor mounted tube steel. The tube steel is mounted on a base plate.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

No oxidation all anchor bolts are coated 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?All base plates and floor anchorage is coated no visual cracks.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Bracket anchorage is consistent with vendor drawings.

Base plate anchor bolts are 9" OC with 1.5" edge distance.

Consistent with FSK-I-01 13G-808-V 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YN NI u-I N/A-]YM NEI U-- N/Ail YE NF- UD- N/AF-1 YE NO UI] N/A[--YZ N[: U--I Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286 Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 1 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 337 of 345 Status: Y] NM-J ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 007 Equipment ID No. G41NO18B Equip. Class, 18- Instrament Rack Equipment Description FUEL POOL PUMP B DISCH PRESSURE TRANSMITTER Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Item is in open area.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

All overhead race ways are supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Flex conduit is connected to item.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NO UW NIAW YZ NW ULJ N/AEJ YEI N[J U-I NIAO YZ NE UO Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YED NEI U[:]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments None (Aýý/Evaluated by: Chase Wharton Fred Hopkins-r%

Aýý'I -JF Date: 9/2612012 9/26/2012 Page 2 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS- 12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 338 of 345 Status: YE Nr-1 Ur-Seismic Walkd own Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 007 Equipment ID No. G41NO18B Equip. Class' 18 -Instrament Rack Equipment Description FUEL POOL PUMP B DISCH PRESSURE TRANSMITTER Photographs Page 3 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS- 12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 339 of 345 Status: Y[ NF1 Uo-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 008 Equipment ID No. G41PO02 Equip. Class, 20 -Instrumentation and Contol Panels Equipment Description DIV I EMERGENCY SAFEGUARDSYSTEM SM CONTROL PANEL Location:

Bldg. AB Floor El. 166 Room, Area 1A432 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO-- NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Panel is welded to steel plate 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

anchorage is coated 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Anchored to steel 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y[ ND UD N/AD YZ ND UD N/AD YD ND U[-- N/AZ YO NDI UD N/AZ YN NEI U-I Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286 Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 1 of 4 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 340 of 345 Status: YZ NI- Ui Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 008 Equipment ID No. G41PO02 Equip. Class, 20- Instrumentation and Contol Panels Equipment Description DIV I EMERGENCY SAFEGUARDS YSTEM SM CONTROL PANEL Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Item has no soft targets 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YOI NEI UI N/AZ YN NO] U-] N/A--Y0 NEI u-I N/AL]Y; NEI ur Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 NO U[-]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments None Evaluated by: Chase W arton Fred Hopkins Date: 10/10/2012 10/10/2012 Page 2 of 4 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 341 of 345 Status: YN NOI ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 008 Equipment ID No. G41P002 Equip. Class' 20 -Instrumentation and Contol Panels Equipment Description DIV I EMERGENCY SAFEGUARDSYSTEM SM CONTROL PANEL Photographs Page 3 of 4 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 342 of 345 Status: Y[ NF- uo-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 008 Equipment ID No. G41P002 Equip. Class' 20 -Instrumentation and Contol Panels Equipment Description DIV I EMERGENCY SAFEGUARDSYSTEM SM CONTROL PANEL Page 4 of 4 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS- 12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 343 of 345 Status: YZ NO. UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 009 Equipment ID No. G41AOOI Equip. Class' 21 -Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Fuel Pool Drain Tank Location:

Bldg. AB Floor El. 191 Room, Area 1A537 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Buffalo Tank Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YE NEI 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Fuel pool drain tank is support by two heavy duty saddles. Each saddle is anchor to the floor using (4) 1 1/8" dia. anchor bolts. See photos.No bent, broken, missing or loose hardware found.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Floor is covered with epoxy coating; no visual indication of corrosion found 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Floor is covered with epoxy coating; no visual indication of concrete crack found 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage was checked against vendor drawings L-3264A, SK-F2-2009NC-4A, & SK-F2-2009NC-5A in QP 62. 00, and the configuration shown on the drawings matched the field condition.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YN ND-I U-I N/A-1 Y[ NR ui- N/AR-YN NEI U[D] N/ADl YN NDI U[D N/AD: YN NDI u[--I Enter the equipment class name from EPRI 1025286 Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 1 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 344 of 345 Status: Y[ NID- U0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 009 Equipment ID No. G41AO01 Equip. Class' 21 -Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Fuel Pool Drain Tank Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

This equipment is not a soft target.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

All overhead items (piping/pipe supports) are rigidly supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibiity to avoid damage?Piping attached to the tank have adequate flexibility.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y-] NE] U[- N/AgNEI U[I N/ALI YU N[:] U"] N/AD]YEI NE] Ur Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YJZ N'-J uJ-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments None (9~Y Evaluated by: Kyonq S. (Jason) Pak Tori Robinson ( 4 A~Date: 10/3/2012 10/3/2012 Page 2 of 3 Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS- 12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment C Page 345 of 345 Status: YN NEI U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) SWEL2- 009 Equipment ID No. G4IAO01 Equip. Class' 21 -Tanks and Heat Exchanqers Equipment Description Fuel Pool Drain Tank Photographs Note: Fuel Pool Drain Tank Note: Tank support saddle Page 3 of 3

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML12352A068&oldid=1363014"