ML12352A069
| ML12352A069 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Grand Gulf |
| Issue date: | 11/15/2012 |
| From: | Wharton C Entergy Corp |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| GNRO-2012/00141 GGNS-CS-12-00002, Rev 0 | |
| Download: ML12352A069 (197) | |
Text
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 1 of 167 Attachment D AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS (A WCs)
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 2 of 167 Status: YZ NE-UF-1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 001 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 93 Room, Area' 1A 102,07 SWEL Components: SWELl- 024,030 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
All anchor bolts from visually inspection seem to be in intact. The supports were coated and some mild oxidation/dirt was noticed on some anchor supports in the room but were no concerns to the anchors as they can still perform as designed.
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
YE N[:] Ui-] N/AD--
YM N[-] UI-N/AD-YZ N[:] u[-] N/AD-Y ] N-- U[-
N/A[D]
1 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 1 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 3 of 167 Status: YZ NC-U--
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 001 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 93 Room, Area, IA102,07
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Y0 NE] Ur-N/AD YN NEI u[l N/AD-Y9 NE] U-] NIA-YZ NO U[-]
Comments Pry bar behind column. Temporary scaffold was identified in this area but did not create any seismic interaction issues. 18' line off RHR Heat exchanger A has a base plate that is not welded to embed plate for the support. The pipe support is for horizontal load of the pipe and allows the pipe to move in the vertical direction.
Evaluated by: Chase Wharton L
_,4 Fred Hopkins Date: 101812012 10/8/2012 Page 2 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 4 of 167 Status: YZ NEI[ U0 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 001 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 93 Room, Area, 1A102,07 Photographs Note:
Note: Pry bar Page 3 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 5 of 167 Status: YN NR] UD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 002 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 93 Room, Area' IA103,07 SWEL Components: SWELl - 012,033,072 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Y[
NO UD N/AD YZ NDI UD N/A-YM NDI UD N/ADi YN ND UD N/AD
' If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 1 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 6 of 167 Status: Y*] NE-UE-'
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 002 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 93 Room, Area' IA103,07
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NE] ur-N/A[-]
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN ND UL] N/ADI interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NEJ U[
N/AD interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NE] UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments temporary scaffold was identified in the area with a harness for climb protection, a black strap used for scaffold tie offs was lying on cable tray and one light was identified out in this area. The scaffold is seismically restrained in accordance with procedures and these identified issues do not create any seismic concerns.
.1 Evaluated by: Chase Wharton A Fred Hoakins
_.~_
Date: 10/8/2012 10/8/2012 Page 2 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 7 of 167 Status: YN NEIl ULIF Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 002 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 93 Room, Area, IA103,07 Photographs Note:
Note:
Page 3 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 8 of 167 Status: Y] ND] UD]
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 003 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 93 Room, Area, 1A104,AB SWEL Components: SWELl- 006,039 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
YZ NEI UL-N/A[--
YM NEI U[D N/AD-Y[
NDl UDI N/A[D]
YZ NDI UD-N/AD-
'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 1 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 9 of 167 Status: YZ NE] U-"
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 003 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 93 Room, Areal IAIO4,AB
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Y[I N[E] U-I NIAE-YN Nn ULI N/AL]
YZ NEI] U[] N/A[]
YO NEl UZ-'
Comments Equipment stored in LDWA. Two lights are out. TIA Turbine Inboard Axial Sensor is not mounted Evaluated by: Chase Wharton w
13r Fred Hopkins Ac<~
Date: 10/4/2012 1014/2012 Page 2 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 10 of 167 Status: YE NO U--
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 003 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 93 Room, Area' 1A104,AB Photographs Page 3 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 11 of 167 Status: YZ No UF]
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 003 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 93 Room, Area, 1A1O4,AB Page 4 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 12 of 167 Status: YV ND-U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 004 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 93 Room, Area' IA105,08 SWEL Components: SWELl- 031,035 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
YE ND Ui-1 N/A[D]
YN NDI UIE] N/A[--
YE ND UD N/ADl Y[
ND UD-- N/AD 1 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 1 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 13 of 167 Status: Y[I Nn' Ur-]
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 004 Location: Bldg. Ai Floor El. 93 Room, Area, IA105.08
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ Nn-] uF"] NIALI interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y] N-] U[-] NIA[]
interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO N"] U-] N/A[]
interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE] NZ U"]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Bent pipe support base plate CR-GGN-2012-11343.
Comments Temporary scaffold was identified in the area along with temporary extension cords and lighting in the area. There is stored scaffolds in the safe storage area and the temporary scaffold is seismically restrained in the area. The temporary lighting has flexibility so that seismic interaction will not be an issue. Broken conduit support conduit has adequate clearance from any safety related equipment and therefore is free of any potentially adverse seismic interactions CR-GGN-2012-12206.
Evaluated by: Chase Wharton (ii'A. 1 Fred Horpkins Date: 10/3/2012 10/3/2012 Page 2 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 14 of 167 Status: YN NEII UFl Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 004 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 93 Room, Area' 1A 105.08 Photographs Note: Bent base plate.
Note: Broken conduit support.
Page 3 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 15 of 167 Status: Y[* ND-UD--
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 005 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 93 Room, Area' IA106,08 SWEL Components: SWELl- 013, 092 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
3 nuts not fully engaged on L-Beam supprting grating CR-GGN-2012-11318.
YE-- NO UD-1 N/A[-
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
< 1/2" spcing from actuator wheel and pipe. Based on PDSOO69A, Rev.
10 and PDS0133, Rev. 3 the piping will not interact.
YO NDI uD-] N/AD-1 YZ NDl UD1 N/AD-YM N[D] UD N/AD:]
I If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 1 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 16 of 167 Status: YE NM UD' Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 005 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 93 Room, Area' IA106,08
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
There are wires attached to displacement transducers but the wires are covered, protected and not exposed to the environment, therefore would not create a fire hazard. The wires are flexible and will not create a seismic interaction issue.
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Long term scaffolding <2' away from valve. Scaffold was evaluated per the attached tag. Scaffold is also restrained in both N-S and E-W directions, and therefore does not cause an adverse seismic condition.
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
YZ NEI U[1 N/A--
Y] ND U-'
N/AE-YZ NEI U-' N/AD-YZ N'I
-UE Comments Temporary Scaffold in area. Threaded rod found leaning on column and tie off strap was attached to a pipe support(CR-GGN-2012-11317). I E12FO29B and 1E12FO03B are leaking onto piping and down to 93' elevation. (CR-GGN-2012-11315) Light out between heat exchangers. Mild surface oxidation on drain pipe. Cracked grout in penetration (CR-GGN-2012-11316). Housekeeping issues and oil was observed leaking from 108' elevation above down on an electrical box on the 93' floor elevation (CR-GGN-2012-11313).
Evaluated by: Chase Wharton rd Date: 10/3/2012 Fred Hopkins Zý'av 10/3/2012 Page 2 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 17 of 167 Status: YE NEI U-III Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 005 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 93 Room, Area, IA 106.08 Photographs Page 3 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 18 of 167 Status: YN N-l ur--
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 005 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 93 Room, Area' IA 106.08 Page 4 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 19 of 167 Status: YZ ND-UF-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 006 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 93 Room, Area, 1A 115, 09 SWEL Components: SWELl- 022,057 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
YZ NDI UD-N/A--
YZ NEI U-D N/AD YE NDI U['] N/AD-Y[
ND-UDI N/AD I If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 1 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 20 of 167 Status: YZ N[-] U]
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 006 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 93 Room, Area, IA 115. 09
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free or potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
YE NE] U[] N/A-]
YNJ N[-] U] N/A[D]
YED NEI uE] N/AD-YED NEI U-]
Comments Temporary scaffold in area. Plastic sink cover is not anchored, but does not cause any adverse seismic conditions.
I/4 (ýfo _
Evaluated by: Chase Wharton Fred Hopkins Date: 10/8/2012 10/8/2012 Page 2 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 21 of 167 Status: YZ NF-R U' Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 006 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 93 Room, Area' 1A 115, 09 Photoaraohs Page 3 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 22 of 167 Status: YE NEI Ilu-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 006 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 93 Room, Area, 1A 115, 09 Page 4 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 23 of 167 Status: YN Nr-UD-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 007 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 93 Room, Area, 1A 116, 10 SWEL Components: SWELl- 059 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
YE NEi U-] N/AR Y[
N[-] UL] N/AD-Y[
ND UD N/AR YE NDl UD-N/A[:D I If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 1 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 24 of 167 Status: Y] Nn Ui-J Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 007 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 93 Room, Area' IAl116, 10
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Ladders are tied-off to the large pipe or structural steel. Also, there are ladder and hose laying on the floor. However these items doesnt pose a seismic concern; therefore acceptable. See photos.
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
YO NO-U--
N/AE-YN NEI U-N/Al_.]
YZ NO] UOl] N/A[:]
Y ] Ni"] UMI'-
Comments Liquid was observed on the pedestal of pump El2COO5B; however no active leakage could be found.
See photo. (CR 2012-11309 initiated WR# 00285929)
Evaluated by: K on S. Jason Pk Tori Robinson 1ý7 Date: 10/3/2012 10/3/2012 Page 2 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 25 of 167 Status: YZ N-] ur"I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 007 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 93 Room, Area' 1A116, 10 Photographs Note: Ladder on the floor Note: General view of the area Page 3 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 26 of 167 Status: YZ NO ur-]
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 007 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 93 Room, Area' IA 116, 10 00,7-_
Note: Ladder in the area Note: Ladder in the area Note: Liquid on the pump/motor pedestal Note: Hose on the floor Page 4 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 27 of 167 Status: Y[
NEI Uir-1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 008 Location: Bldg. AS Floor El. 93 Room, Area' IA 120 SWEL Components: SWEI-l- 043, 044 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
Anchorages are coated.
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
YE ND_1 UD-N/AD-1 YE NEI UD-N/ADl YE N[D] U[D] N/AD YE NDI U-- N/AD-
' If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 1 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 28 of 167 Status: YZ NEI UE-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 008 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 93 Room, Area' IA120
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
YZ NO uEI N/AEI YZ NuLl UOI N/AEl YO N[:] UO N/AEI YZ NEIUEI Comments Welding/grinding Sheild in over head beam CR-GGN-2012-11123. Temporary scaffolding in area.
Evaluated by: Chase Wharton LA' Fred HopkinsV I
o Date: 9/27/2012 9/27/2012 Page 2 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 29 of 167 Status: Y
] NEI U-]
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 008 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 93 Room, Area, 1A 120 Photographs Note: Grinding Shield.
Note:
Page 3 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 30 of 167 Status: Y[
Ni U nl-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 009 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 103 Room, Area, 1A 121, 07 SWEL Components: SWELl- 061 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
All anchorage is in good condition. Panel is welded to supports.
YE NEI UD-N/A--
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
HVAC and Cable trays in the area appear to be seismically restrained.
YZ ND uD N/AD-YN NDI uD-N/AD
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Overhead HVAC and cable trays are adequately supported. Lights in the area may swing and contact hard pipe, HVAC or supports in a seismic event, but will not adversely affect the equipment.
YN NDI UD-N/AD
'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 1 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 31 of 167 Status: YO N[I-U-]
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 009 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El.
103 Room, Area, IA121, 07
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO No] U-N/A[]
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
Fire water pipe seems to be adequately supported. Appropriate sheilding of tire sprinklers.
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
Area is a combustible exclusion zone. Area is free of potential fire hazards.
YN NEI U-IE N/AL7
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Y[
NEI U[:] N/AED Y[
NEI UE-Comments None
< Evaluated by: Chase Wharon Fred Hop k.ns Z
Q_
Date: 9/2512012 9/2512012 Page 2 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 32 of 167 Status: YZ NFE U-I1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 009 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 103 Room, Area, IA 121, 07 Photographs Page 3 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 33 of 167 Status: Y[
NE] UOID Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 009 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 103 Room, Area' IA 121, 07 Note: Potential contact, no adverse seismic Note:
condition Page 4 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 34 of 167 Status: Y[
NF UD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 010 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 119 Room, Areal 1A201, 07 SWEL Components: SWELl- 068, 069, 070, 071 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
Tube steel members supporting conduits running to the P1 1-F064 and P11-F065 shows surface corrosion. The corrosion was visually inspected and determined to be limited in extent and depth. Therefore, it is judged to have negligible affects on the ability of the affected components. See photo.
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Clearance between tube steel member supporting tubing for level transmitter and the yoke of pump motor P1 1F067 (RWST XFER to CST) seems very close (-1/2" gap at top). See photo.
YN ND UD N/AD Y[
NO U-N/AD Y] NDI U-- N/AD--
YE ND U[1 N/AD:]
Based on review of Stress Calculation No. 35, anchors near P1 1F067 valve/motor will prevent displacment (<1/8') during a seismic event.
'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 1 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 35 of 167 Status: Y; NEI U[I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 010 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 119 Room, Area, 1A201. 07
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Yo NEI uJ N/AL]
YZ NO UL-N/AD Y[J NJE U[J] N/AJ]
YV N-I U[-]
Comments None Evaluated by: K ong S. (Jason) Pak
-° Tori Robinson Date: 9/25/2012 9/25/2012 Page 2 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 36 of 167 Status: YE NF-U--
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 010 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 119 Room, Area, 1A201, 07 Photographs Note: Surface corrosion on conduit support Note: Small gap between TS member and members yoke of actuator (-1/2')
Page 3 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 37 of 167 Status: YZ ND-U'-
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 011 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 119 Room, Area, IA204,08 SWEL Components: SWELl- 018 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
YN ND] U[-] N/A[-]
YE NEI UD'] N/A-YO NDI uD N/AD YM NDI UDl N/AD:-
1 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 1 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 38 of 167 Status: YZ NE] U-]
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 011 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 119 Room, Areat 1A204.08
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Y; NE] UE-N/Ar-YE NiD Ut-N/AD" Y[I N[-] UF] NIAI' YZ N[] u]
Comments One light bulb is out.
(kw_
Fvalijatp.d hv Chae.~ Wharton Comments One light bulb isouL Fred Hopkins 4*
d-*
Date: 10/9/2012 10/9/2012 Page 2 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 39 of 167 Status: YZK NEI U'-]
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 011 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 119 Room, Area' 1A204,08 Photographs Note:
Note: light out Page 3 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 40 of 167 Status: YZ NFI-UD-]
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 012 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 119 Room, Area, 1A205,08 SWEL Components: SWELl- 032, 034, 036 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
YE NDI U[--
N/A[D]
YN NDI U-D N/AD Y] NF UD-N/Ai--
YO NEI UD-N/AD 1 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 1 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 41 of 167 Status: YE] N-- U-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 012 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 119 Room, Areal IA205,08
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Y[D NEI UD-N/A[-]
YZ NEI U[-
N/AD YO NEI U[] N/AD-YO NEI UFD Comments Valve I E1 2F130B has minor leakage. Wire spanning overhead. Minor dammage to insulation.
Pen#AEF7B and AEF6B does not require grout seal.
Evaluated by: Chase Wharton (//
Fred Hopkin, Date: 10/4/2012 10/4/2012 Page 2 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 42 of 167 Status: YZ NEI UFII Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 012 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 119 Room, Area, 1A205,08 Photographs Note:
Note:
Page 3 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGN S-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 43 of 167 Status: YX N-I1 UD-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 013 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 119 Room, Area' IA208, 07 SWEL Components: SWELl- 047, 076 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
There are over 20 conduits routed from cable trays to the electrical boxes near the floor in this room. Only one conduit is not supported from the top unistrut before it enters to the cable tray, over 6'-6" of cantilever run. (CR 2012-11466) See photos.
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Multiple light fixtures in this room are hung with chain using S-hook.
There are no sensitive equipment nearby, therefore it is judged to be acceptable.
YE NDI UL-N/ADi YE N[-] U[- N/AD--
YE-I NE uD" N/AD-YN N[-- U-- N/AD-1 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page I of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 44 of 167 Status: YN N[] uF Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 013 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 119 Room, Area, IA208. 07
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE] NEL UI] N/Ar-interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Temporary scaffolding in the area; it doesn't pose a seismic concern.
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Masonry block wall is observed in this room. This wall is seismically qualified per calculation C-HO 15.2.
YU NEI UL-N/ALI YE NEI UI-N/A--
YZ Nn" UEI-Comments None Evaluated by: K on S. ason Pak Tori Robinson I
, (.
7 v
-r Date: 10/8/2012 10/8/2012 Page 2 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 45 of 167 Status: YN NEI ULO Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 013 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 119 Room, Area' 1A208. 07 Photographs Note: General view of the area Note: Gen, scaffolding view of the area, temporary Note: Conduits from cable tray Note: Only conduit without unistrut support clamp at this location Page 3 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 46 of 167 Status: YZ NO] UF-1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 014 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 119 Room, Area, 1A215, 09 SWEL Components: SWELl- 001 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visiblewithout necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Y[
NE-] UD-1 N/A--
Y[] NE] U[-] N/AE-YZ NE] uE-N/AE]
YN NE] UlID N/ADl
' If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 1 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 47 of 167 Status: Y; NEI] Ur-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 014 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 119 Room, Area, IA215, 09
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Two temporary carts inside containment are secured using clamps on the wheel or tied-off to the stair structure. These items doesn't pose a seismic concern. See photos.
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Y; NEI U[:] N/A[-
YN N-I UD-] N/A-YEI NEI] ur] N/AE YO NEI UE]
Comments Water from condensation found on top of the insulation of air supply line valve. See photo.
Evaluated by: K on S. JasonI Pa Tori Robinson Date: 9/2512012 9/25/2012 Page 2 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 48 of 167 Status: YZ NO Uo Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 014 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 119 Room, Area, IA215, 09 Photographs Note: Air supply line, 1P71-F546, water from Note: Temporary Power Supplies, sensor condensation cable (/&C EPU WO # 242339-02), wheels locked with clamps Note: Temporary Power Supplies, sensor Note:
cable (/&C EPU WO # 242339-02), cart tied off to the stair structure Page 3 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 49 of 167 Status: Y[
NDi UDF-1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 015 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 119 Room, Area' IA219, 09 SWEL Components: SWELl- 088 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
Surface corrosion has been observed on pipe. The corrosion was visually inspected and determined to be limited in extent and depth.
Therefore, it is judged to have negligible affects on the ability of the affected components. See photos.
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Multiple light fixtures in this room are hung with chain using S-hook.
There are no sensitive equipment nearby, therefore it is judged to be acceptable.
YM NDI U-- N/AD1 YO NEI U-I N/AD YN ND-1 U[D N/ADl Y[
NDI UD1 N/ADl I If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 1 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 50 of 167 Status: Y[
N[] U[]
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 015 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 119 Room, Area' 1A219, 09
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
YE] NEI-U-NIA[]
YM NO U-- N/A[-
YO NEI UI-NA Comments None Evaluated by: Kyong S. (Jason) Pak Date:
Tori Robinson 10/8/2012 10/8/2012 Page 2 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 51 of 167 Status: YEE NEI U-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 015 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 119 Room, Area' 1A219. 09 Photographs Note: General view of the area Page 3 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 52 of 167 Status: YZ NO U--I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 015 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 119 Room, Area' 1A219, 09 Note: Surface corrosion on pipe Note: Surface corrosion on pipe Page 4 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 53 of 167 Status: YZ NEI Ul-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 016 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 119 Room, Area' 1A220, 09 SWEL Components: SWELl- 026 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
Surface corrosion has been observed on bolts and steel members. The corrosion was visually inspected and determined to be limited in extent and depth. Therefore, it isjudged to have negligible affects on the ability of the affected components. See photos.
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
YO NEI Ui[-
N/AD, YN NDl UD N/AD-]
YEJ ND: U[-- N/AFD YN NDJ U[: N/AD:
' If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 1 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 54 of 167 Status: YZ NO] UL-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 016 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 119 Room, Area, 1A220, 09
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[
N] U[-] N/A[--
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NE] U[:] N/AE]
interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YEI Nn' UE] N/A[]
interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE] U' adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments Missing light bulb
-9 Evaluated by: Kvona S. (Jason) Pak AF
.14 o
Tori Robinson Date: 9/28/2012 912812012 Page 2 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 55 of 167 Status: Y[
NEI[
ULI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 016 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 119 Room, Area, 1A220. 09 Photoaraohs Note: General view of the area Note: General view of the area Page 3 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 56 of 167 Status: Y[R N-- UD-1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 017 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 119 Room, Area, 1A221, 10 SWEL Components: SWELl- 003 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
There are many light fixtures in this room nearby MCCs and LCCs.
However, these light fixtures are not directly located over any safety related equipment and they are all well supported; therefore, doesn't pose a seismic concern.
There are potential of fluorescent light bulbs fallout from fixture.
However, falling light bulb doesn't pose a seismic concern to MCCs and LCCs nearby; therefore acceptable.
YO NDI UD-N/AD-YE NDI U-- N/AD1 YN ND_
U[-] N/AD YM NDI UD-N/AD-]
I if the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 1 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev, 0 Attachment D Page 57 of 167 Status: YS NEI U--
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 017 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 119 Room, Area, 1A221, 10
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Y[9LNI Ujjj N/AEl YO NEI UO N/AOl YO NEI UE1I N/AFl YZ NEI UE Comments None Evaluated by: Kyon S. (Jason Pak Tori Robinson Date: 9/2812012 9/28/2012 Page 2 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 58 of 167 Status: YZ NEI UI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 017 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 119 Room, Area' 1A221, 10 Photoaraphs Note: General view of the area Note:
Page 3 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 59 of 167 Status: YN NL] urF-1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 018 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 139 Room, Area' IA304, 07 SWEL Components: SWELl- 015 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
Surface corrosion has been observed on many items (pipe, pipe support members, baseplate, hardware, etc.). The corrosion was visually inspected and determined to be limited in extent and depth.
Therefore, it is judged to have negligible affects on the ability of the affected components. See photos.
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Y[
NDJ U[D N/ADl YM NEI UEl N/AEl YN NDI U[-iD N/AD-Y[
ND IEU N/AD 1 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 1 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 60 of 167 Status: YE NF] U-]
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 018 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 139 Room, Area' 1A304, 07
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[D NE] U-] N/A-]
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ N[] UIM NtAr]
interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YED N[-] U[-] N/AL]
interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Housekeeping concern (see photos); however there are no sensitive equipments nearby such that it doesnt pose a seismic concern. (CR 2012-11467)
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NE] U-]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments None Evaluated by: Kyonq S. Jason Pak Tori Robinson
-/Z-Date: 10/8/2012 10/8/2012 Page 2 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 61 of 167 Status: YZ NEI ur-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 018 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 139 Room, Area, IA304, 07 Photographs Note: General view of the area Note: General view of the area Note: General view of the area Note: General view of the area Page 3 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 62 of 167 Status: YZ NOI UL-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 018 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 139 Room, Area, 1A304, 07 Note: Cart and wire on the floor Note: Rag and plastic bag on the floor Note: Harness on the floor Note: Cart on the floor Page 4 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 63 of 167 Status: YD-NO UD-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 019 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 139 Room, Area' 1A305, 07 and 08 SWEL Components: SWELl- 010. 025, 027, 037, 038, 073 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Y[:] ND U[] N/AD Y[-] N-UD-N/A[D YO-NDl UD-] N/AD-Y[:] ND U[-- N/AD-1 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 1 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 64 of 167 Status: Y--I NN U-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 019 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 139 Room, Area, 1A305, 07 and 08
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
YOI NEI UD-N/AD YD ND UD N/AD YD ND U-N/A[-D YO NDý UD-Comments Evaluated by:
Date:
Page 2,of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 65 of 167 Status: YE] NZ U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 019 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 139 Room, Area, 1A305, 07 and 08 Photographs Page 3 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 66 of 167 Status: YO--
NO* UiD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 019 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 139 Room, Area' 1A305, 07 and 08 Page 4 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 67 of 167 Status: YZ Nr] URi-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 020 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 139 Room, Area' 1A320, 08 SWEL Components: SWELl- 004 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
There are many light fixtures in this room nearby MCCs and LCCs.
However, these light fixtures are not directly located over any safety related equipment and they are all well supported; therefore, doesn't pose a seismic concern.
There are potential of fluorescent light bulbs fallout from fixture.
However, falling light bulb doesn't pose a seismic concern to MCCs and LCCs nearby; therefore acceptable.
Y[
NDI U[-] N/AD YO ND UD N/AD--
YZ ND U-N/ADl YZ NDI UD N/AD If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 1 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 68 of 167 Status: YE N-' U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 020 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 139 Room, Area, I1A320, 08
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
YO NEI ULI N/AI-YO NDI UI-NADI Y;
NEI UlD N/ADj YEE ND-UC-Comments None Evaluated by: K on S. Jason Pak Tori Robinson
~14Y Date: 9/27/2012 9/27/2012 Page 2 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 69 of 167 Status: YI NE] LIM Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 020 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 139 Room, Area' IA320, 08 Photoaraohs Note: General view of the area Note:
Page 3 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 70 of 167 Status: Y[
NO UD-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 021 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 166 Room, Area, 1A405, 08 SWEL Components: SWELl- 021 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
YZ NDl UlI N/AD--
YM NDI U[D N/AD:]
YN ND:] Ur-N/ADI YM N[D] U0 N/AD-1 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 1 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 71 of 167 Status: Y; NM UM-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 021 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 166 Room, Area, 1A405. 08
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Ladder was laying on the floor unsecured, and tool box was on the floor secured to the platform support structure with wire rope but wasnt snug (CR 2012-11084 initiated WR# 00285020). See photo.
However, there are no sensitive equipments nearby that could be affected by these temporary items during seimic event; therefore acceptable.
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
YO N[] UE] N/A[--
YN NE] UE] N/AO]
YO NE] U['] N/Ar-YZ NO U[-]
Comments Light bulb was missing on (3) light fixtures in this room (CR 2012-11084 initiated WR# 00285020).
Evaluatedby:Kon S. J fas Tori Robinson A r Date: 9126/2012 9/26/2012 Page 2 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 72 of 167 Status: YZ NEI UDI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 021 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 166 Room, Area, 1A405, 08 Photographs Note: Ladder on the floor Note:
Page 3 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 73 of 167 Status: YH NII UD]
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 022 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 166 Room, Areal 1A407, 08 SWEL Components: SWELl- 023 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
YN ND-] U[D N/A[--
YE NDJ UiI N/A[--
YN NE] u[-] N/A--
YE N[D U[D] N/A[-]
1 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 1 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 74 of 167 Status: YZ ND] UDI-'
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 022 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 166 Room, Area' 1A407. 08 5, Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YEI NE] U[] N/A[D interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Surface corrosion found on pipe (P41 system). The corrosion was visually inspected and determined to be limited in extent and depth.
Therefore, it is judged to have negligible affects on the ability of the affected components. See photo.
YZ NEI UE] N/AE]
YEI NE] UD-NIA--
YE] NEJ-] u]
Comments None Evaluated by:.
Date: 9/27/2012 9/27/2012 Page 2 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 75 of 167 Status: YZ NEI U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 022 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 166 Room, Area, 1A407. 08 Photographs Note: Surface oxidation on pipe Note: Surface oxidation on pipe Page 3 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 76 of 167 Status: Y[
ND-] U[-n Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 023 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 166 Room, Area' 1A417, 08 SWEL Components: SWELl- 066 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
YN NE] UD] N/ADl YZ ND:] UD N/A[D YZ NDI UD-N/ADý YZ NDI UF-I N/AD-I If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 1 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 77 of 167 Status: YE ND-' u0l Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 023 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 166 Room, Area, IA417, 08
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
YZ NO-UOI N/A1 YJ NO UZ-N/AD YS NE UO N/A-YO NEI u-Comments None Evaluated by: Kvong S. (Jason) Pak Date: 9/27/2012 9/27/2012 Tori Robinson Page 2 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 78 of 167 Status: YN NEI uFi Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 023 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 166 Room, Area, 1A417, 08 Photographs Note: General view of the area Note:
Page 3 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 79 of 167 Status: YZ N-I U E-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 024 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El.
111 Room, Area, 0C202,CB SWEL Components: SWELl- 005. 052. 054, 055, 089 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
YE NFI UD N/AD-YZ N[D] UD-- N/AD-YM N[-]
U-N/AD-YM N[D] U-- N/AD-]
1 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 1 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 80 of 167 Status: YE N-] UL-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 024 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 111 Room, Area, 0C202.CB
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ N[-] U'] N/A'-
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YO N[] U-I N/A[--
interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ Nl] UE] N/AF]
interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO N[:] UL-]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments Lights out. ladder in area is tied off.
Evaluated by: Chase Whartn 6ý6_
v-.4 Fred Hopkins Date: 10/10/2012 10/10/2012 Page 2 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 81 of 167 Status: YZ NI UI F1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 024 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 111 Room, Area, 0C202,CB Photographs Note:
Note:
Page 3 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 82 of 167 Status: Y[
NO] utl-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 025 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 111 Room, Area' 0C207, CB SWEL Components: SWELl- 050, 053 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Lighting over head but beacuse of the relatively light weight of the bulbs they do not cause any adverse seismic conditions.
YO NEI U-] N/AD--
YE N[D-UD] N/ADi YE ND-] UD N/AD-YN NEI UD N/AD--
' If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 1 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev, 0 Attachment D Page 83 of 167 Status: YN NE-Ur Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 025 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 111 Room, Area, 0C207, CB
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NO] U[] N/A-]
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
YN NE U-] N/ALi YN NE UE-N/AL]
Y0 NEI] UD Comments None rb ý Fvaluated by: Chase Whartnn 41*1 Date: 10/9/2012 10/9/2012 I I ýV I 1W -110 Page 2 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 84 of 167 Status: YZ NEIl ULi Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 025 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 111 Room, Area, 0C207. CB Photographs Page 3 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 85 of 167 Status: YZ NDI UI-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 026 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 111 Room, Area' 0C208, CB SWEL Components: SWELl- 087 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
YE ND-Ut--
N/A[D YO ND] UDl N/ADl Y[
NDl U[:] N/ADl YE ND-] U[:] N/ADl I If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 1 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 86 of 167 Status: YZ NEI UEl-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 026 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 111 Room, Area, 0C208. CB
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ NE] Ui-] N/A-]
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Y[
NE] UI] N/A-]
interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YZ N[] U[-] N/A"]
interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[
NE] U--
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments None Evaluated by: Chase Wharton D/at:101/21 Fred Ho kin Date: 10/10/2012 1011012012 Page 2 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 87 of 167 Status: YN NII UOF]
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 026 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 111 Room, Area, 0C208, CB Photographs Note:
Note:
Page 3 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 88 of 167 Status: YN NEI UL-1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 027 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 133 Room, Area, 0C302, CB SWEL Components: SWELl- 045, 046 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Multiple light fixtures in this room are hung with chain using S-hook.
However, this condition isjudged to be acceptable.
YN NEI u-1 N/AD-YO N[D ur-] N/AD:]
YN NEI U[D] N/AD-YE NDI U[:] N/ADl 1 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 1 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 89 of 167 Status: YEJ NEI U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 027 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 133 Room, Area' 0C302, CB
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Masonry block walls are observed in this room. These walls are seismically qualified per calculation C-T457. 1.
Y0 N-U[1 N/A[-]
YE NEI UL-- N/A[]
YZ N-U-
N/A' YZ NO U-Comments Water on the floor are ot~served during walkdown, however 'Wet Floor' signs were already in place (see photo). Therefore, no action taken related to this item, Evaluated by: K ong S. (Jason) Pak Date:
Tori Robinson 10/9/2012 10/9/2012 Page 2 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 90 of 167 Status: YZ N[-- U-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 027 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 133 Room, Area' 0C302, CB Photographs Note: General view of the area Note: General view of the area Note: General view of the area Note: Water on the floor Page 3 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 91 of 167 Status: YZ NEI ULF--
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 028 Location: Bldg. GB Floor El. 166 Room, Area' 0C503, GB SWEL Components: SWELl- 086 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
YN NEI U-N/A--
YE NO U-I N/AD Y[
NEI U[I N/AD--
YE NEI U[L3 N/A[--
I If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 1 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 92 of 167 Status: YN NM UE-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 028 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 166 Room, Area' 0C503, CB
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NE] U[] N/AL]
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YE No U[-] N/AO]
interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YG] NE] UIE] N/A-]
interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
There are working chairsltables/stands around this room; signs indicated that these items are qualified under procedure 01-S-07-43 and these items are not to be left near safety related equipment except for short breaks.
Fire extinguishers are supported to the wall using open hook. One of the bracket holding fire extinguisher is loose from the wall. However, this condition doesn't pose a seismic concern. (CR 2012-12041 initiated WR# 00289368) See photos.
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NE] UIE]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Comments None Evaluated by: Kyong S. (Jason) Evalate by Kvno. (aso) fDat:
1/11201 Date: 10/1112012 10/11112012 Tori Robinson Tod Robinson Page 2 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 93 of 167 Status: YN NF--1 Ur-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 028 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 166 Room, Area, 0C503, CB Photographs Note: Loose bracket on the wall supporting fire extinguisher Note: Loose bracket on the wall supporting fire extinguisher Page 3 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 94 of 167 Status: Y[
Nl-1 Ur-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 029 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 166 Room, Area' 0C504, CB SWEL Components: SWELl- 078, 081, 084, 085 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
One of the screw (total 4) in a plate on the back of E31A T5 (Oscilator) inside the panel H13P642 is loose. See photo. CR 2012-11254 (initiated WR #00285762) has been written to tighten the screw in place. These screws are a part of the component mounting. These screws are required to transfer seismic loads to the panel anchorage.
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
In general, cables inside panel are wrapped around with plastic tie-wrap, which is attached to adhesive sticky bracket. One of the sticky bracket holding cable inside the panel HI 3P642 fell off from the panel wall. However there are other supports nearby on both sides such that cable is sufficiently supprted. Therefore, this condition doesn't pose a seismic concern.
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Y[-] NO Ul-] N/ADl YZ Nr-1 Ur1 N/AD YZ NEI U[_
N/AD YZ ND--
U-N/AD-1 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 1 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 95 of 167 Status: Y[
No-U-]
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 029 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 166 Room, Area, 0C504, CB
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic Yo N] U[-] N/At]
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
There are working chairs/tables/stands around this room; signs indicated that these items are qualified under procedure 01-S-07-43 and these items shall not be left near safety related equipment except for short breaks.
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
YE NE] UO] N/A-]
YE Nt] Ut] N/At]
Y N'] U-'
Comments David Jones (Electrician) opened panels for SWE.
Temporary Mod. tags (#38230) are attached on front of the panels H13P618, H13P694, etc.
Evaluated by: K ong S. (Jason) ak Tori Robinson4 Date: 1012/2012 10/2/2012 Page 2 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 96 of 167 Status: Y; NF-I U[-
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 029 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 166 Room, Area, 0C504, CB Photographs Note: Loose bolt supporting E31A T5 (Isolator) inside the panel fH 13P642 Note: Loose/open tie-wrap (not supporting any cable)
Page 3 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 97 of 167 Status: YN N--i U-IF Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 030 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 189 Room, Area' 0C703, CB SWEL Components: SWELl- 079, 080, 082, 083, 091 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Multiple light fixtures in this room are hung with chain using S-hook.
However, these light fixtures are not directly located over any safety related equipment. Therefore, this condition is judged to be acceptable.
Y[
NDI U-- N/ADl YN ND:- U-N/AD-Y] N[D] UD N/AD-Y[
N-1 ULID N/AD-I I If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 1 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 98 of 167 Status: Y[
N--
UI-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 030 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 189 Room, Area, 0C703, CB
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
There are working chairs/tables in this room; signs indicated that these items are qualified under procedure 01-S-07-43 and these itmes are not to be left near safety related equipment except short breaks. At the time of walkdown, all items were stored against the wall away from panels.
Grounding mat was on the floor, however this item doesn't pose a seismic concern.
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
YS NEI U-N/A-]
YZ NO ULJ N/AD Y0 N U[-] N/A-YO NEI U"
Comments None Evaluated by:
Date: 10/9/2012 10/9/2012 Page 2 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 99 of 167 Status: YM N[-- U'-D Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 030 Location: Bldg. CB Floor El. 189 Room, Area, 0C703, CB Photographs Note: One of panel in this room.
Note: Light fixture hung with chain using S-hook.
Page 3 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 100 of 167 Status: YO-I NO UI-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 031 Location: Bldg. CTMT Floor El. 135 Room, Area' 1A 112, CTMT SWEL Components: SWELl- 009, 042, 067 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Y[-] ND-U0 N/A[D]
YO-1 ND-] U[-] N/ADI Y[--
NDl U[--
N/ADl YO NDI UD'-
N/ADl I If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 1 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 101 of 167 Status: YE] NZ U--
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 031 Location: Bldg. CTMT Floor El. 135 Room, Area' IA 112, CTMT
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Y-- N[-- uD-] N/A[:]
YDI NDi U[-- N/AD-Y[-] NDl UDI N/ADl YDI ND UD-Comments Evaluated by:
Date:
Page 2 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 102 of 167 Status: YO NZ U--
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 031 Location: Bldg. CTMT Floor El. 135 Room, Area' IA 112, CTMT Photographs Note:
Note:
Page 3 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 103 of 167 Status: Y-I NE ULI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 031 Location: Bldg. CTMT Floor El. 135 Room, Area' IA 112, CTMT Note:
Note:
Page 4 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 104 of 167 Status: YE ND UM Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 032 Location: Bldg. CTMT Floor El. 135 Room, Area' 1A3 11, CTMT SWEL Components: SWELl- 014. 029. 065. 075 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Y[
ND UDI N/AD--
YZ ND1 UD-N/AD-YN NDI uID] N/AFD YN ND: UID N/AD--
1 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 1 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 105 of 167 Status: Y[D NFI-ur-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 032 Location: Bldg. CTMT Floor El. 135 Room, Area, 1A3 11. CTMT
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
YED NEI UF-] N/AD YE NO-UJ--
N/AD-YZ NEI U-D N/AD YO NO U-Comments Bent support plate for M51SVF5O2B. Temporary cable with appropriate tags in area. temporary pipel hose at AZ-285 area. CR-GGN-2012-11122 Evaluated by: Chase Wharton Date: 9/27/2012 9/27/2012 Page 2 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 106 of 167 Status: Y] Nil U-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 032 Location: Bldg. CTMT Floor El. 135 Room, Area' 1A31 1. CTMT Photographs Page 3 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 107 of 167 Status: YO N[---
U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 033 Location: Bldg. CTMT Floor El. 135 Room, Area, 1A313, CTMT SWEL Components: SWELl- 058, 060. 074 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Y[
NDl U-D N/AD YE NF UD-N/AD-YM NDI UDI N/AF YO NDI UI-N/AD-1 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 1 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 108 of 167 Status: YN N[-] U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 033 Location: Bldg. CTMT Floor El. 135 Room, Area, 1A313, CTMT
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
YO NO-U-I N/A[]
YZ NF Ur-N/AOl YZ N-U['
N/Ar
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Fire extinguisher not secured properly, however this condition doesn't pose seismic concern since there are no sensitive equipment nearby.
See photo. (CR 2012-11129)
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Surface corrosion found on pipe. Based on visual inspection from distance away, the corrosion was determined to be limited in extent and depth. Therefore, it is judged to have negligible affects on the ability of the affected components. See photo.
Y0 NEI U-Comments Trash/debris (tie-wrap, pencil, pen, tape, etc.) around the area. See photos. (CR 2012-11129)
Tubing runs between two panels about knee high; unprotected from people bumping on it (dark area).
See photos.
Evaluated by: Kon S. (Jason Pak Tori Robinson Date: 9/27/2012 9/27/2012 Page 2 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 109 of 167 Status: YZ NEI UIF Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 033 Location: Bldg. CTMT Floor El. 135 Room, Area' 1A313, CTMT Photographs Note: Broken strap for fire extinguisher Note: Loose fire hose Page 3 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 110 of 167 Status: Y[
NO UE-]
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 033 Location: Bldg. CTMT Floor El. 135 Room, Area' 1A313, CTMT Note: Rusted pipe Note: Pencil and trash on top of cable tray Note: Tubing running between two instrument rack Note: Tubing running between two instrument rack Page 4 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-I 2-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 111 of 167 Status: Y[
N-- Ur-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 034 Location: Bldg. CTMT Floor El. 161 Room, Area, 1A445, CTMT SWEL Components: SWELl- 017, 019, 020, 064 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
Over head conduit and ducts are adequately supported.
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
YM NDI UD-N/AL]
Y[
N[-] U-- N/AD-YM NDI UD-N/Ar-D YM NEI UD-N/ADl Tube steel may contact with the insulation however this is adequate clearance from pipe.
1 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 1 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 112 of 167 Status: YER NO U[I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 034 Location: Bldg. CTMT Floor El. 161 Room, Area, 1A445, CTMT
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
Exposed copper wire in wall penetration. CR-GGN-2012-11154
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Chain for manual valve operator with adequate tied downs.
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
YO1 NE U-N/Ai-YN NOi-U[] N/AD Y[
NEI U-- N/Ani YS N-UM Comments Apparent shrinkage crack in concrete. Conduit Penetration is not labled. CR-GGN-2012-11153 Evaluated by: Chase Wharton C
/9/4 Fred Hopkinsl Date: 9/28/2012 9/28/2012 Page 2 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 113 of 167 Status: YN ND U0[D Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 034 Location: Bldg. CTMT Floor El. 161 Room, Area' 1A445, CTMT Photographs Note: Potential contact with tube steel and Note: Surface crack.
insulation. Tube steel and pipe are adequately supported and pipe has adequate clearance.
Page 3 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 114 of 167 Status: YN NDý UO-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 034 Location: Bldg. CTMT Floor El. 161 Room, Area, 1A445, CTMT Note: Exposed copper wire.
Note:
Page 4 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 115 of 167 Status: Y[
NI-UDF-1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC-0035 Location: Bldg. CTMT Floor El. 185 Room, Area' 1A509, CTMT SWEL Components: SWELo- 016 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
YN ND U-N/A-YO ND-I U-1 N/AD]
YE ND-] U[-D N/AD Y[E ND-] U[:- N/AD--
IIf the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 1 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 116 of 167 Status: YZ NF-] UF]
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 035 Location: Bldg. CTMT Floor El. 185 Room, Area, 1A509, CTMT
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Temporary installation (lighting with extension cord, drain hose on the floor, etc); doesn't pose a seismic concern.
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
YO NEI U[] NIAr-YO NEI] U] N/A-]
YO NEI U[: N/Au-YS N[:]UM Comments None Evaluated by: Kon S. (Jason) Pa Date:
Tori Robinson-4fo
-p 10/4/2012 10/4/2012 Page 2 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 117 of 167 Status: YN Nni Ul Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 035 Location: Bldg. CTMT Floor El. 185 Room, Area, IA509, CTMT Photographs Note: General view of the area, temporary lighting Note:
Page 3 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 118 of 167 Status: Y[
NEI UD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 036 Location: Bldg. CTMT Floor El. 185 Room, Area' 1A509, GTMT SWEL Components: SWELl- 040 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
YE ND UD N/A-]
YE N[D] UD-N/AD YE ND U-N/AD-]
YE NO U[: N/A[-]
1 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 1 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 119 of 167 Status: YS NEI UF-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 036 Location: Bldg. CTMT Floor El. 185 Room, Area' IA509, CTMT
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Temporary installation (scaffolding); doesn't pose a seismic concern.
YZ NO U[1 N/AO-YED NF UL-N/A[Z YZ Nr-O Ur] N/A[-]
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
YE N[] U[-]
Comments None Evaluated by: Kvong S. (Jason) Pak Tori Robinson Date: 10/4/2012 10/4/2012 Page 2 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 120 of 167 Status: YZ NEI ULIE Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 036 Location: Bldg. CTMT Floor El. 185 Room, Area, 1A509, CTMT Photographs Note: General view of the area Note: General view of the area Page 3 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 121 of 167 Status: YZ NF-UD-]
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 037 Location: Bldg. CTMT Floor El. 185 Room, Areal 1A5 12. CTMT SWEL Components: SWELl-051 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
Floor is coated. Surface hairline crack in the coating nearby baseplate found at multiple locations. See photo. (CR 2012-11335)
YE NDI ui-D N/A[-]
YO NO UDF-N/AL]
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
YZ Nl U[lD N/ADl YO NDl Ul-N/Ar-I If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 1 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 122 of 167 Status: Y[I Nil] U7 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 037 Location: Bldg. CTMT Floor El. 185 Room, Area, 1A512, CTMT
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
Abondon tubings found in the area. There are no soft target equipments nearby; therefore these items pose no seismic concern.
See photo.
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
YO NEI UL-N/A-Y[
NE] uP] N/AL-Y23 NEil U[
N/AL-Y] NEI UE-Comments Liquid dripping from FME bag near the valve P41FX255. (CR 2012-11337 initiated WR #00286062)
Evaluated by:Kon S. Jason Pak Tori Robinson Date: 10/4/2012 10/4/2012 Page 2 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 123 of 167 Status: YN NMI U[--M Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 037 Location: Bldg. CTMT Floor El. 185 Room, Area' 1A512, CTMT Photoaraohs Note: Liquid on FME bag, surface oxidation on pipe Note: Abandon tubing Note: Hairline crack on coating of the concrete floor Note: Hairline crack on coating of the concrete floor Page 3 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 124 of 167 Status: YM NF] U-]
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC-0038 Location: Bldg. CTMT Floor El. 185 Room, Area' 1A5 14. CTMT SWEL Components: SWEnBd- 028 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
The plate on the wall (G36FO30A) doesn't have any anchor bolts (all other similar plates in this room are bolted to the wall) and no visible welds. However, the plate is snug and not loose on the wall. Also, the nut for the manual operator is missing. See photo. (CR 2012-11334 initiated WR# 00286070)
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
Minor surface corrosion found on pipe/baseplate/steel members. The corrosion was visually inspected and determined to be limited in extent and depth. Therefore, it is judged to have negligible affects on the ability of the affected components. See photos.
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
YE-] NE UD--
N/A--
YO NEI UD-N/A[D YE NE] u[-] N/AD-YN N[:] urI N/AD-
' If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 1 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 125 of 167 Status: YZ NE-] UF-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 038 Location: Bldg. CTMT Floor El. 185 Room. Area' 1A514, CTMT
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Temporary ladder, used light bulb, tools, temporary lead shielding, etc.
found in this area; however doesn't pose seismic concern on the equipments nearby. See photo.
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
YZ NEI UI' N/AI-Y[
NFI-U--
N/Al-]
Y] NEI] UEr NIAI:]
YZ Nl U-'
Comments Missing light bulb.
Evaluated by: K on S. Jason Pak Tori Robinson k
4 ZC Date: 10/4/2012 1014/2012 Page 2 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 126 of 167 Status: YV Nrn-U-"
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 038 Location: Bldg. CTMT Floor El. 185 Room, Area, 1A514, CTMT Photoaranhs Note: General view of the area Note: General view of the area Note: Tools laying on top of equipment Note: Surface corrosion on pipe Page 3 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 127 of 167 Status: YEE NE-U i]
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 038 Location: Bldg. CTMT Floor El. 185 Room, Area' 1A514, CTMT Note: Temporary ladder on the platform Note: Used light bulb on top of the support beam Note: Missing anchor bolts / missing nut on the manual operator handle Note: Surface corrosion Page 4 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 128 of 167 Status: Y[
NF Ur-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 039 Location: Bldg. DG Floor El. 133 Room, Area' 1D302, DSL SWEL Components: SWELl- 063 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
YEI-ND I UD-N/A[D]
Y[-] ND: UD1 N/AD YE]i NE] UDJ N/AD--
Y[I NDI U[ID N/AD-]
' If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 1 of 2
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 129 of 167 Status: Y[D NE] UL]
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 039 Location: Bldg. DG Floor El. 133 Room, Area, 1D302, DSL
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
YI-NEI[ U-N/ASI YEll NI] U-I N/A--
YlI NEL Ui-N/AE1 YEI Nn] UIO Comments Room 1D302 and 1D310 are in same Div. 1 DG room, therefore AWC performed only once. See A WC of Room 1D310 for this room.
Evaluated by: K onq S. (Jason Pak Todi Robinson Date: 9/2612012 9/2612012 Page 2 of 2
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 130 of 167 Status: Y[
ND UI F-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 040 Location: Bldg. DG Floor El. 133 Room, Areal 1D308, DSL SWEL Components: SWELl- 090 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
Minor hairline indication found in the coating on the DG concrete pedestal. The visual crack doesn't line up with the bolt holes (CR 2012-11126).
Degraded grout (anchor bolt exposed) underneath of pipe support baseplate (P75 system) near the DG (CR 2012-11128 initiated WR#
00285189). See photos.
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
Conduit is not straight at one of support location for the conduit from CMPR Control Panel (SBY DSL GEN 12 SKID B). However, conduit is considered to be acceptable based on review of condition. See photo.
One of conduit support clamp is very close (-1/8") to edge of supporting unistrut; however this condition is judged to be acceptable.
See photo.
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Open-S hooks were identified as an IPEEE volnerability. Multiple light fixtures in this room are hung with chain using open S-hook. However, this condition is judged to be acceptable, because the light fixture was not directly above any soft targets.
Y[
NEI LiD] N/AD--
YDI NZ U[-D N/AD-]
YZ N[:] UD-N/AFD1 YN NO U[:] N/AD-1 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 1 of 5
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 131 of 167 Status: YN NF-1 UE]
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 040 Location: Bldg. OG Floor El. 133 Room, Area, 1D308, DSL
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Found temporary items, Operations Locker and Rag Basket, resting on the floor, however these items had sign indicating that they are qualified by procedure 01-S-07-43; therefore acceptable. See photos.
Fire extinguishers are supported to the wall using open hook.
However, this condition doesn't pose a seismic concern; therefore acceptable.
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
YN NE U[] NIAF YZ NO uE-N/AO YO NE]I UE NIAL]
Y; NE] U]
Comments Blake Rice (NRC Inspector) came with us to the walkdown.
Found visual oil mark and oil spill mats on the floor (CR 2012-11010). Also, paint chips on pedestal of equipment 1P75AO01D and on the floor are observed during walkdown (CR 2012-11009). See photos.
Evaluated by:
Date: 9/27/2012 912712012 Page 2 of 5
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 132 of 167 Status: YZ NEI Ur Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 040 Location: Bldg. DG Floor El. 133 Room, Area, 1D308, DSL Photoaranhs Note: Degraded grout under the baseplate of pipe support Note: Degraded grout under the baseplate of pipe support Note: 1" conduit with potential overspan concern and uncommon way of routing conduit Note: Conduit clamp being close to the edge of the supporting unistrut Page 3 of 5
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 133 of 167 Status: YN NF-U0I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 040 Location: Bldg. DG Floor El. 133 Room, Areal 1D308. DSL Note: Operations Locker on floor Note: Rag Basket on floor Note: Oil Mat on the floor Note: Visible oil mark Page 4 of 5
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 134 of 167 Status: YN NEI Ur Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 040 Location: Bldg. DG Floor El. 133 Room, Areal 1D308, DSL Note: paint chips on the concrete pedestal Note: paint chips on the floor Page 5 of 5
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 135 of 167 Status: YZ ND-- UDF Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 041 Location: Bldg. DG Floor El. 133 Room, Areal 1D310, DSL SWEL Components: SWELl- 002, 011, 056, 093 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
Minor hairline indication found in the coating on the DG concrete pedestal. The visual crack doesn't line up with the bolt holes (CR 2012-11077).
Degraded grout (anchor bolt exposed) underneath the pipe support (near valve P75-FO69B) near the DG (CR 2012-11080). See photos.
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Open S-hooks were identified as an IPEEE vulnerability. Multiple light fixtures in this room are hung with chain using open S-hook. However, these light fixtures are not directly located over any safety related equipment. Therefore, this condition is judged to be acceptable.
YE NEI UD-N/AD--
YEi-NO U--i N/AD YO NDI U-- N/AD-Y[
ND-UD1 N/AD
' If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 1 of 5
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 136 of 167 Status: YZ NO u--
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 041 Location: Bldg. DG Floor El. 133 Room, Area, ID310, DSL
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Found temporary items, Operations Locker and Rag Basket, resting on the floor; however these items had sign indicating that they are qualified by procedure 01-S-07-43; therefore acceptable. See photo.
Fire extinguishers are supported to the wall using open hook.
However, this condition doesn't pose a seismic concern; therefore acceptable.
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
YE NEI ULI-N/AZ]
YED NEI UM N/A"-
YED NEI Ur-N/AI-Y; NE] UIM Comments Dried oil residue in the area (CR 2012-11079), and soaked oil mats under the DG. Adhesive label attached to the valve 1P75F501A is peeling off (CR 2012-11081 initiated WR# 00285018).
Paint on bottom of duct is peeling off (CR 2012-11078 initiated WR# 00285015).
See photos.
Evaluated by: K on S. Jason Pak Tori Robinson 6
14 T
Date: 9/2612012 9/26/2012 Page 2 of 5
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 137 of 167 Status: YZ NEI OLI-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 041 Location: Bldg. DG Floor El. 133 Room, Area' 1D310, DSL Photographs Note: Degraded grout under the baseplate of Note: Degraded grout under the baseplate of pipe support pipe support Note: Light fixture mounted using S-hook Note: Operations Lockers and Rag Can Page 3 of 5
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 138 of 167 Status: Y[* NED uOli Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 041 Location: Bldg. DG Floor El. 133 Room, Area, 1D310, DSL Note: Oil spill on the floor Note: Oil spill on the floor Note: Soaked oil mat under the DG Note: Sign peeling off from the valve Page 4 of 5
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 139 of 167 Status: YZ NEI U[-
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 041 Location: Bldg. DG Floor El. 133 Room, Area, 1D310, DSL Note: Paint peeling off from bottom of the duct Note:
Page 5 of 5
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 140 of 167 Status: Y[Z ND UD-]
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 042 Location: Bldg. DG Floor El. 158 Room, Area, 1D403, DSL SWEL Components: SWELl- 049 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
Y[
ND-U-1 N/AD1 YN NDi UDI N/AD1 YN N[D] UD N/AD7 YN N[] UD-N/AD' IIf the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 1 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 141 of 167 Status: YE NE] Ul--
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 042 Location: Bldg. DG Floor El. 158 Room, Area, 1D403, DSL
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Temporary stand frame found; however it's tied-off to the handrail using wire rope. Temporary scaffolding (connected to the permanent platform structure) and control for the overhead hoist (see photo) found in this area doesn't pose a seismic concern.
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
YN NEI UD N/ADI YEJ NO UD N/AD Y0 NEI Ur-N/A-Y0 NO U-Comments One of the light fixture is missing light bulb.
Evaluated by:
Date: 9/26/2012 9/26/2012 Page 2 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 142 of 167 Status: YZ NEI UOF Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 042 Location: Bldg. DG Floor El. 158 Room, Area' 1D403, DSL Photographs Note: General view of area Note: Controls for the overhead hoist.
Page 3 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 143 of 167 Status: YZ ND-UD--
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 043 Location: Bldg. SSW Floor El. 133 Room, Area' IMI10, SSW SWEL Components: SWELl- 007. 048 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
Found many baseplates in this area with mix of using anchors (concrete wall) and weld connections (embeded plate). See photos.
Later walkdown revealed these are typical througout the plant.
YE NDI uD-- N/A-
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
Surface corrosion has been observed on several pipe supports. The corrosion was visually inspected and determined to be limited in extent and depth. Therefore, it is judged to have negligible affects on the ability of the affected components. (CR 2012-11008). See photo.
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
YZ NDl U[D-N/AD:]
YZ NDI uD-N/AD--
YZ ND I U[D] N/AD:]
I If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 1 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 144 of 167 Status: Y[] Nn U[]
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 043 Location: Bldg. SSW Floor El. 133 Room, Area, IMl10, SSW
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Fire extinguishers are supported to the wall using open hook.
However, this doesn't pose a seismic concern; therefore acceptable.
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
YN NE-U[i] N/A-'
YN NI--
UO-N/AF-YZ NEI UII N/A"-
YZ NO U[
u-]
Comments Pump room door wouldn't open (CR 2012-11007).
Evaluated by:Kon S. Jason Pak Tori Robinson
/
Date: 9/24/2012 9/24/2012 Page 2 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 145 of 167 Status: YZ NOI-UI--
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 043 Location: Bldg. SSW Floor El. 133 Room, Areal IMI10, SSW Photographs Note: Baseplate on the wall using anchor bolts (bottom side) and weld connection (top side), verified.
Note: Baseplate missing one anchor bolt, couldn't verify whether weld exists at that location.
Note: Coating deficiencies and surface corrosion found on colu mn/baseplate of pipe supports Note: Coating deficiencies and surface corrosion found on column/baseplate of pipe supports Page 3 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 146 of 167 Status: Y[
ND1 U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 044 Location: Bldg. SSW Floor El. 133 Room, Area' IMI11. SSW SWEL Components: SWELl- 008 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
YO-- ND UD N/A[:]
Y[-] ND UD N/AD YD ND Ul-- N/ADl YO NO Ui N/AF I If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 1 of 2
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 147 of 167 Status: YE] NO UE]
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 044 Location: Bldg. SSW Floor El. 133 Room, Area, IMI 11. SSW
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
YE] NE] UE] N/AU YE] NL] U[] N/A-YO-NO] uEr N/AE[
Y[:] NEI] UE Comments Room IMI 10 and 1MI I are in same area, therefore AWC performed only once. See AWC of Room IMI10 for this room.
Evaluated by: Kon
. Jason) ak Ton Robinson Date: 9/24/2012 9/24/2012 Page 2 of 2
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 148 of 167 Status: YV NF-UD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 045 Location: Bldg. SSW Floor El. 133 Room, Area' 1Ml12, SSW SWEL Components: SWELl- 041, 062 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
YE N[D ULE] N/A[-1 YZ NDI UI1 N/ADl YM N[:] Ui-N/AF-I Y[
N[--
UD-I N/AD-There is a fire exstinguisher on an open hook, but will not interact with other equipment.
'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 1 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 149 of 167 Status: YM NEI u-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 045 Location: Bldg. SSW Floor El. 133 Room, Area' 1M112. SSW
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
Heaters mounted overhead have adequate clearance and will not interact with other equipment.
YO NE" U-] N/AL]
YO NO] U-] N/A-]
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
A temporary coupon rack is in the area, but no intercation. A wet floor cone is in the area, but does not cause an adverse seismic condition.
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
There is a temporary corrosion coupon rack attached to plant equipment with a flexible line. This is located on a friction pad approximately 4.5' from any other plant equipment. The friction pad eliminates the concern of sliding during a seismic event. The coupon rack is less that 3' tall and will therefore not interact with other equipment if overturned.
YED NEI U[' N/A[]
YO NEI U]
Comments None Evaluated by:
Date: 9/24/2012 9/2412012 Page 2 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 150 of 167 Status: YZ NO-U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 045 Location: Bldg. SSW Floor El. 133 Room, Area' 1Ml12, SSW Photoaranhs Note: Lighting Page 3 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 151 of 167 Status: YZ N[* UF]
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 045 Location: Bldg. SSW Floor El. 133 Room, Area, IMI 12, SSW Page 4 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 152 of 167 Status: YZ Nr-D U-1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 046 Location: Bldg. SSW Floor El. 133 Room, Area, 2M110, SSW SWEL Components: SWELl- 077 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
Abondon conduit and tubings found in the room. There are no soft target equipments nearby, therefore these items pose no seismic concern. See photos.
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
YZ NDJ UI7 N/AD-Y[
NDý UD-N/AD-]
YN NDl Ui-'
N/AD-YN ND-U[D] N/AD I If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 1 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 153 of 167 Status: YZ N-- U--
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 046 Location: Bldg. SSW Floor El. 133 Room, Area, 2M1 10, SSW
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN N[-] UI'] N/Ai]
interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Fire extinguishers are supported to the wall using open hook.
However, this condition doesn't pose a seismic concern; therefore acceptable.
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
YN NEI UL] N/AD'-
YZ Nf-u[-] N/A-I YO N-u1r-Comments None Evaluated Date: 9/24/2012 9/24/2012 Page 2 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 154 of 167 Status: YN NrI U'-J Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 046 Location: Bldg. SSW Floor El. 133 Room, Area, 2M1 10, SSW Photographs Note:
Note: Abandon tubing Page 3 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 155 of 167 Status: Y] NF-UL--
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 047 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 166 Room, Area, 1A428 SWEL Components: SWEL2- 005. 007 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
All anchorage is coated.
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
YZ NDi UD-N/A--
YZ NEI UD-N/AD-YM NFI UD-N/AD-YE ND U-N/AD 1 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 1 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 156 of 167 Status: YE; NO Uj Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 047 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 166 Room, Area, IA428
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
Area is a combustible exclution area.
Y10 NEI ULI N/AUI YZ N~I3 UUj N/ALU
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Y23 NEIl UE NIAUI YO NEIJ ULI Comments Crack in penetratloin grout. Pen. # AP-58D. CR-GGN-2012-1 1083
-9 Evaluated by: Chase Wharton Fred Hopkins Date: 9/26/2012 9/26/2012 Page 2 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 157 of 167 Status: YZ N[Z UL]
Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 047 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 166 Room, Area, 1A428 Photographs Page 3 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 158 of 167 Status: YN NEI Ur-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 047 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 166 Room, Area, 1A428 Note: Visible crack in penetration grout.
Note:
Page 4 of 4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 159 of 167 Status: YZ NE-- Ur-D Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 048 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 166 Room, Area' 1A432 SWEL Components: SWEL2- 001, 008 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
YE NE-UD-I N/AD--
YM N[D] ui-D N/A[:-
YN N[:E uF-N/ADý Y[
N[D uLIE N/AD-I 1 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 1 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 160 of 167 Status: YEJ NE] ULI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 048 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 166 Room, Area, 1A432
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
YO NO] UrI N/ALI YN NE] U-] N/A[*]
YZ NDI UL" N/AI-Y[D NEI-U-Comments Temporary scaffording in area. Temporary RP sign post in area. Temporary ARM wires and temporary lighting in area.
Evaluated by: Chase Wha on Fred Hopkins Date: 10/1012012 10110/2012 Page 2 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGN S-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 161 of 167 Status: YZ NEI UIol Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 048 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 166 Room, Area, 1A432 Photographs Note:
Note:
Page 3 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 162 of 167 Status: YZ NFD UF-1 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 049 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 185 Room, Area' 1A527 SWEL Components: SWEL2- 002. 003. 004. 006 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
YN ND UI-- N/AD YE NEI Ui N/AD YED NO ufi N/AD-YN NO U-N/A[D-I If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 1 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 163 of 167 Status: YZ N[-] UFS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 049 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 185 Room, Area, 1A527
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Temporary 280V/480V electrical panel on the cart, extension cord, RP monitoring device, drain hose, abandon flex conduit, etc. found around the area; however these items doesn' pose a seismic concern. See photos.
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
Y0 NO U[-] N/AS YZJ N-j U-N/AD-YZ N5-1 U" N/A[:]
YEJ NEI U[-]
Comments Liquid was observed on the floor; however no active leakage could be found. (CR 2012-11308 initiated WR# 00285928)
Evaluated by: K ong S. (Jason) Pak Tori Robinson 4(
Date: 10/3/2012 10/3/2012 Page 2 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 164 of 167 Status: YZ NEI] Uor Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 049 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 185 Room, Areal 1A527 Photooraphs Note: General area view Note: Temporary 280V/480V electrical panel on the cart which is tied-off from structural steel, and extension cord Page 3 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 165 of 167 Status: YZ Nr-Ur--I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 050 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 191 Room, Area' 1A537 SWEL Components: SWEL2- 009 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?
- 2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?
- 3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?
- 4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?
YM NDi UD-N/AD--
YN ND:] Ur-N/AD-YM N[D] UD--
N/AD YE NDI UD1 N/AD-]
' If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described. This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.
Page 1 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 166 of 167 Status: YO NE] URJ Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 050 Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 191 Room, Areat 1A537
- 5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?
- 6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?
- 7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?
Temporary extension cord on the floor, however it doesn't pose a seismic concern to the equipments nearby.
- 8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?
YZ NE] U-N/AE]
YU NZ--
UI-N/A--
YO ND-'
UDI N/A[I YO NEI U--
Comments None Evaluated by:
Date: 10/3/2012 10/3/2012 Page 2 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment D Page 167 of 167 Status: YZ NEI U r-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)
AWC- 050 _
Location: Bldg. AB Floor El. 191 Room, Area, 1A537 Photographs Note: General view of the area Note: General view of the area Page 3 of 3
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment E Page 1 of 6 Attachment E POTENTIALL Y AD VERSE SEISMIC CONDITIONS
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment E Page 2 of 6
'TSWCIAW-C#
ID cflIADtI ND
&TUo 2012-11077 AWC-041 In the Div I Diesel Generator Room minor cracks were noticed in the Condition entered directly into CAP The observed condition does not create a seismic or structural integrity Closed to CR-GGN-2012-SWELl-056 concrete pedestal. There is a hairline crack running east to west along the concern for the Div I Diesel or associated components. Based on review of 11932 CA-03 pedestal. There is also hairline cracks running at the beginning of each the condition the crack does not appear to have originated from a stress plate attached to the pedestal. The cracks appear to be minor hair line concentration and per the originator does not have an adverse impact on the cracks in the coating on the pedestal, load bearing capability of the pedestal. Based on the visual inspection by the originator the cracks appear to be in the surface coating only. There was no visual indication of concrete to suggest cracking of the concrete structure.
The Div I Diesel is determined to be operable.
2012-11080 AWC-041 In the Div I Diesel Generator Room pipe supports were noticed with Condition entered directly into CAP Based on a review of CS03 6.1.1.5 the grout is capable of performing its Closed degraded grout underneath the support. The supports are still attached design function. The anchors are completely covered and protected by (WO# 328051) to the pedestal and all anchors are still intact even with the missing grout.
grout. The grout is providing a uniform contact surface. This condition does not create a seismic concern impacting the div I diesel generator. The Div I diesel generator is determined to be operable.
WO# 328051 - REPAIR GROUT UNDER PIPE SUPPORTS 2012-11126 AWC-040 In the Div. 2 Diesel Generator Room minor indications were noticed in the Condition entered directly into CAP The observed condition does not create a seismic or structural integrity Closed to CR-GGN-2012-O034 coating on the concrete pedestal. There is a hairline indication running concern for the Div I Diesel or associated components. Based on review of CA-67 east to west along the pedestal. There is also hairline indications running the condition the crack does not appear to have originated from a stress at the beginning of each plate attached to the pedestal.
concentration and per the originator does not have an adverse impact on the load bearing capability of the pedestal. Based on the visual inspection by the originator the cracks appear to be in the surface coating only. There was no visual indication of concrete to suggest cracking of the concrete structure.
The Div II Diesel is determined to be operable.
2012-11128 AWC-040 In the Div. 2 Diesel Generator Room pipe supports were noticed with Condition entered directly into CAP Based on a review of CS03 6.1.1.5 the grout is capable of performing its Closed degraded grout underneath the support. The supports are still attached design function. The anchors are completely covered and protected by (WO# 328052) to the pedestal and all anchors are still intact even with the missing grout, grout. The grout is providing a uniform contact surface. This condition does not create a seismic concern impacting the Division II Diesel Generator. The Division II Diesel Generator is determined to be OPERABLE for the condition described in this CR.
WO# 328052 REPAIR GROUT UNDER PIPE SUPPORTS 2012-11130 SWELI-058 Several racks in Containment on elevation 135-0 in areas 1A311 and Condition entered directly into CAP The panels were evaluated using a conservative assumption that 2 inch Closed to CR-GGN-2012-11932 SWELl-060 1A313 are mounted by 2 inch stich welds approximately 9 to 12 inches welds on 12 inch centers was how the panels were installed. The evaluation CA-4 SWELl-061 apart. The welds are located at bolt holes. The Seismic Qualification shows that even under these conditions the panels still satisfy the seismic states welds should be 2 inches ant every 6 inches.
stress calculations. Therefore, the panels and the equipment installed within are OPERABLE for the condition described in this CR.
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment E Page 3 of 6 2012-11254 AWC-029 A screw was partially screwed in a plate in panel 1H13-P642. The screw is Condition entered directly into CAP Missing fastener on a joint supporting a non EQ cover plate for an Closed currently attached to the plate by approximately two threads. The plate instrument, switch, cable tray cover or other similar application, provided (WO# 328693) attaches to the back of E31ATS oscillator in the leak detection panel H13-there are no more than two missing or loose fasteners AND no FME concern P642 division 2.
exists."
The plate that the screw is supporting is only separating instruments and therefore fits the definition of, "cable tray cover or other similar application" As for the screw being an FME concern, the screw is securely wedged in the hole and cannot be move by hand. In addition, there is nothing directly below the screw that it would damage or hinder if it were to come loose.
WO# 328693 TIGHTEN SCREW ON PLATE ATTACHED INSIDE PANEL 2012-11255 SWELI-084 A nut was missing off of the welded stud attached to the PGCC structural Condition entered directly into CAP The Operability evaluation attached to CAI of this CR provides Closed beam that bolts down the H13-694 panel in the Control Building on documentation that the strutural integrity / Seismic qualification of the pane (WO# 329993)
Elevation 166 in the control room. There are currently 7 out of the 8 bolts will remain intact under all conditions with with one stud missing. 1H13P694 securing the panel to the beam.
and associated RPS components are determined to be operable.
WO# 329993 has been written to replace missing nut.
2012-11306 SWEL2-003 In the Auxiliary Building on elevation 195'-6' near Area 1A538, one nut is Condition entered directly into CAP The nut that was missing on valve 1G41F045 was replaced in accordance Closed missing on Valve 1G41F045. The missing nut is located near the back side with WO# 328692.
(WO# 328692) of the valve. Valve 1G41FO45 has twelve 7/8" diameter studs on each face.
2012-11307 SWEL2-006 In the Auxiliary Building on elevation 185' in Area 1A527, Flow Transmitter Condition entered directly into CAP The nut was tightened by the I&C department therefore, No Degraded or Closed 1G41N011 has one nut that is not tight. The loose fastener is one of 4 Nonconforming Condition exists per EN-OP-104 Revision 6 Attachment 9.1 (actions taken) fasteners securing the flow transmitter to the tube steel support.
Table 1.
Flow transmitter 1G41N011 only feeds a local gauge and a computer point for flow. This transmitter is not required by any TS/TRM.
Actions taken under tool pouch.
2012-11334 AWC-03B In Containment on elevation 185' in Area 1AS14 valve 1G36FO30A has a Condition entered directly into CAP This CR describes a condition of an SSC that is not within the scope of the Closed reach rod that penetrates the wall. The plate on the wall does not have Operability Determination Process.
)WO# 329108) any Hilti bolts or visible welds, but the plate is snug and not loose on the wall. Also, the nut for the manual operator is missing for value WO# 329108 INSTALL HILTI BOLTS AT PLATE ON WALL FOR VALVE 1G36F030A.
1G36F030A 2012-11335 SWELl-O51 In Containment on elevation 185' in Area 1A512 minor indications were Condition entered directly into CAP Drywell Purge Compressor B is determined to be operable for this condition. Closed to CR-GGN-2012-11932 AWC-037 noticed in the coating on the concrete pedestal for 1E61C001B. The The indications will not adversely affect the compressive load capabilities of CA-4 hairline indications run down the pedestal to the concrete floor. One the concrete.
indication on the pedestal seemed to be propagating toward the bolt hole. There are other hairline indications on the concrete floor that appear to be minor hairline indications in the coating.
2012-11455 SWELl-088 In the Auxiliary Building on elevation 119' in Room 1A219 the mounting Condition entered directly into CAP Alternate Shutdown Panel, 1H22-P296, is required to be functional per Closed spring nut for Alternate Shut Down Panel, 1H22P296, is not mounted 10CFRSO, Append R. This panel also provides support functions for all of the (WO# 329358) properly to the unistrut. The misaligned mounting nut is located on the items controlled in this panel which are required to OPERABLE per their top left when facing the panel. The spring nut is twisted and provides respective Tech Spec or TRM as listed in the first operability version.
partial bearing but does not provide the manufacturer's requirement of contact with the unistrut. All other mounting bolts and nuts on the panel The Alternate Shutdown Panel repair Work has been completed under WO#
are mounted properly and will provide the anchors required for the panel.
329358 by the FIN Team.
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment E Page 4 of 6 2012-11456 SWEL1-082 In the Upper Control Room on elevation 189' in RoomOC703 in Panel Condition entered directly into CAP Per Engineering, the partial thread engagement on the weld stud is fully Closed H13P632 Bay C, a welded stud was not long enough to extend out of the capable of providing the required load capacity needed to support the light jWO# 329372) nut.
weight of the termination block under all loading conditions including seismic. The termination block is supported by other bolts that have full thread engagement. The requirement of having full thread engagement on the nut is to provide the full capacity of a structural joint. This requirement i based on American Institute of Steel Construction and is common practice.
Therefore, the condition described in this CR is screened OPERABLE.
WO# 329372 - TIGHTEN NUT ON THE WELDED STUD 2012-11457 SWELI-082 In the Upper Control Room on elevation 189' in Room OC703 in Panel Condition entered directly into CAP Per Engineering, bolted connections use lock washers to prevent applying a Closed H13P632 Bay B a lock washer is only partially compressed. The partially torque on the connection. The spring washer prevents the connection from (WO# 329359) compressed lock washer is located 4th from the bottom on the left side of loosening or backing off when subjected to long term vibration. None of the the panel.
panels in the control room are subject to long term vibration, and a seismic event is extremely short term (< 30 Seconds) and the bolted connection would not loosen in this short of a time span. The actual lock washer is partially engaged and will provide the bolted connection with the ability to not loosen in its current as-found condition. Therefore, the condition described in this CR is screened OPERABLE.
WO# 329359 -TIGHTEN SCREW IN PANEL 1H13P632 BAY 2012-11458 SWELI-Oe0 In the Upper Control Room on elevation 189' in Room OC703 in Panel Condition entered directly into CAP Per Engineering, bolted connections use lock washers to prevent applying a Closed H13PE91 Bay B a nut is missing on the L-bracket that mounts the wire torque on the connection. The spring washer prevents the connection from (WO# 329360) support plate to the unistrut. The missing nut is located on the right side loosening or backing off when subjected to long term vibration. None of the of the mounting plate at the top. Also, the lock washer (located 3rd from panels in the control room are subject to long term vibration, and a seismic the bottom on the left side) is only partially compressed.
event is extremely short term (v 30 Seconds) and the bolted connection would not loosen in this short of a time span. The actual lock washer is partially engaged and will provide the bolted connection with the ability to not loosen in its current as-found condition.
The partial thread engagement on the welded stud is fully capable of providing the required load capacity needed to support the light weight of the termination block under all loading conditions including seismic. The termination block is supported by other bolts that have full thread engagement. The requirement of having full thread engagement on the nut is to provide the full capacity of a structural joint. This requirement is based on American Institute of Steel Construction and is common practice.
Therefore, the condition described in this CR is screened OPERABLE.
WO# 329360 - REPLACE MISSING HARDWARE AND TIGHTEN LOOSE HARDWARE 2012-11459 SWELl-080 In the Upper Control Room on elevation 189' in Room OC703 in Panel Condition entered directly into CAP The nut in question in this condition report was tightened by the FIN team Closed H13P691 Bay A the nut is loose on the mounting plate to the unistut.
under WO 329361 after discovery of the condition. Therefore, the condition (WO# 329361) described in this condition report is screened as OPERABLE.
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment E Page 5 of 6 qtL~
P
-LICENSINGSBASIS#!
-4.~
"C oiSWCIAWu4 rV Ij
,6i
-qnf
-a" NTATUSN 2012-11461 SWELl-079 In the Upper Control Room on elevation 189' in Room OC703 in Panel Condition entered directly into CAP Per Engineering, the partial thread engagement on the welded stud is fully Closed H13P669 Bay B the clamp for the flex conduit is missing hardware. The capable of providing the required load capacity needed to support the light (WO# 329362) clamp missing hardware is located 2nd from the right on a unistrut in the weight of the termination block under all loading conditions including bottom of the panel. Also, there is a welded stud that is not long enough seismic. The termination block is supported by other bolts that have full to extended out of the nut.
thread engagement. The requirement of having full thread engagement on the nut is to provide the full capacity of a structural joint. This requirement i based on American Institute of Steel Construction and is common practice.
The conduit clamp with the missing bolt for the flex conduit is only in place tc route the conduit and keep it in place so that other work could be completed, if required. This clamp is not required to be installed, it is not needed for seismic loading or for Seismic 1l/1 concerns, nor is it needed to maintain the seismic qualification of the 1H13P669 panel. Therefore, the condition described in this CR is screened OPERABLE.
WO# 329362 - REPLACE HARDWARE ON CLAMP FOR FLEX CONDUIT 2012-11462 SWELl-091 In the Upper Control Room on elevation 189' in Room OC703 in Panel Condition entered directly into CAP The Work to replace the screw has been completed under WO 329363 by the Closed H13PB71 Bay E the mounting plate supporting 1M71N606A and FIN Team.
(WO# 329363) 1M71N616A is missing one screw out of four total. The missing screw is located on the top right corner of the mounting plate.
2012-11463 SWELl-091 While performing seismic walkdowns for Fukushima, in the Upper Control Condition entered directly into CAP Per Engineering, the conduit clamp with the missing bolt for the flex conduit Closed Room on elevation 189' in Room 0C703 in Panel H13P971 Bay D two is only in place to route the conduit and keep it in place so that other work (WO# 329365) pieces of flex conduit are located in one clamp that is missing the bolt and could be completed, if required. This clamp is not required to be installed, it nut that clamps the two straps together. This condition will not adversely is not needed for seismic loading or for Seismic I/1 concerns, nor is it needed affect the seismic qualification of the panel or any of the mounted to maintain the seismic qualification of the 1H13P871 panel. This conduit components in the panel, clamp has been installed to ensure that the flexible conduits do not interfere with other work that must be performed in the panel. The other flexible conduit that is near the first conduit is tie-wrapped to other flexible conduits thus providing insurance that it will not interfere with other future work.
Therefore, the condition described in this CR is screened OPERABLE.
WO# 329365 - REPLACE MISSING HARDWARE FOR FLEX CONDUIT AND TY-WRAP AS REQ 2012-11464 SWELl-091 In the Upper Control Room on elevation 189' in Room OC703 in Panel Condition entered directly into CAP anel HS3P871 contains Div I ESF logic described in section 3.3 of Tech Specs. Closed H13Pg71 Bay A the mounting plate for WAKI-YX-P871 is missing one The described has been corrected under WO# 329366. All associated (WO# 329366) screw.
equipment is determined to be operable.
WO# 329366 REPLACE MISSING HARDWARE ON MOUNTING PLATE.
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment E Page 6 of 6 2012-11465 SWEL1-079....
In the Upper Control Room on elevation 189' in Room 0C703 in Panel C-onditio en..tered directly into CAP Per Engineer.ing, the moun.ting plate that is missing 4 screws. ot of the eight Closed H13P669 Bays A and B the mounting plate (located in the center of the total screw locations, supports cable connection points. The components (WOe 329367) panel about eye level) is missing 4 out of B screws.,.
mounted on the plate are not seismically qualified. The mounting plate and cable connections must meet Appendix B Seismic Il/I concerns so that its failure could not adversely affect any other safety-related components in the 1H13P669 panel. Based on the light weight and the configuration of two screws on either side of the mounting plate, the 4 enisting screws are fully capable of maintaining the structural integrity of the mounting plate and will ensure that the other safety-related components in the 1H13P669 panel will continue to perform their safety-related design function. Therefore, the condition described in this CR is screened OPERABLE.
Wag 329367 - REPLACE MISSING SCREWS ON THE MOUNTING PLATES 2012-11466 AWC-013 In the Auxiliary Building on elevation 133'-0 in Room 1A2G8, an Condition entered directly into CAP The described condition has been corrected under Wag 329369. All Closed approulmate three inch diameter conduit (1AARNH19) is not supported associated equipment is determined to be operable (WOB 329369) from the top unistrut. The conduit is open ended and cantilever approulmately 6 feet from the last support.
2012-11311 SWEL1-092 While performing seismic walk downs for the Pukushima effort in the Condition entered directly into CAP From Engineering input, the Heat Exchanger supports are seismically Closed Auxiliary Building Elevation 93 there is a missing one of two required nuts designed and enaluated based on the single nut providing the required (10-O9-2012 CR0 closed on the bottom support bracket of 1612B0G2B. The studs should have tension on the bolt. The second nut does not provide any bolt tension, it is remaining actions to WOn double nuts on them in accordance with drawing C1365D. One nut is only required by a site specific drawing to prevent the first nut from backing 328676) wore than capable of prouiding the structural integrity for the bolted joint off over time. Currently the first nut is providing the tension required for the The second nut is only use to ensure that the first nut does hack off. WR tsupport bracket to be considered seismically designed. The Heat Evchanger 289936 has been written to correct this issue with the one missing jam nut is fully capable of performing is safety-related function.
2012-11312 SWEL1-092 In the Auviliary Building Elevation 108 the head of one of twelve bolts on Condition entered directly into CAP The Heat exchanger is held in place by a total of 24 -3inch bolts. Prom the CR Closed the lower west bracket is not fully in contact with the support (i.e. there is the gap will only affect the bolt tension. Shear and compressing capabilities (WO# 328677) a small gap between the support bracket and the head of the bolt.) The are maintained based on the configuration of the mounting bracket. This bolt is required to be flush with the bracket supporting heat euchanger slight loss of tension capability will not adversely affect the capability of the 1E12B002B.
heat euchanger support configuration. This condition does not impact the ability of the B RHR Heat Exchanger or system to perform its designed safety function. Therefore the RHR system and Heat Exchanger are OPERABLE.
WOn 328677 TIGHTEN BOLT ON THE SUPPORT BRACKET ON ELEVATION 108 2012-11318 AWC-0G5 In the Auxiliary Building Elevation 108 there is a angle that is attached to Condition entered directly into CAP The coodition does not impact the operation of the B RUB heat exchanger or Closed the wall on the north side of RHR B Heat exchanger 1E12BOO1B and System or prevent either from performing its designed safety functions.
(MOB 328680) 181280028 that is supporting the grating on elevation 119' that has nuts Therefore the B RHR heat euchanger and B RHR system remain OPERABLE.
attached to anchor bolts that do not have the entire nut thread engagement.
WOB 328680 TIGHTEN NUTS ON ANCHOR BOLTS, PLAN, 2A 2012-11343 AWC-0G4 In the RHR B Pump room a bent support plate was noticed. The support Condition entered directly into CAP The plate in question appears to be a legacy issue from initial plant Closed plate is bolted together cantilevered from the wall. The plate is bent construction. There is no evidence of movement of the plate as witnessed by (10-23-2012 CR0 approved across the top. The pipe support is almost floor level with the stairway the integrity of the protective coating present. This plate is a portion of a closing remaining actions to and the pipe support number is O1E12GO1OR16 reference drawing pipe support joint supporting a 4 inch pipe. There is no impact to either the B WOB 329298)
HL134BB.
RHR system as a whole or individual BHR components or primary containment.
Engineering Report No. CALC-GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment F Page 1 of 1 Attachment F Licensing Basis Evaluation Forms (NOT USED)
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment G Page I of 4 Attachment G PEER REVIEW CHECKLISTS FOR SWEL
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment G Page 2 of 4 Peer Review Checklist for SWEL Instructions for Completing Checklist This peer review checklist may be used to document the review of the Seismic Walkdown Equipment List (SWEL) in accordance with EPRI 1025286, Section 6: Peer Review. The space below each question in this checklist should be used to describe any findings identified during the peer review process and how the SWEL may have changed to address those findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
- 1. Were the five safety functions adequately represented in the SWEL 1 selection?
YE N[-]
Based on review of the SWELL and GGNS System knowledge, it was clear that a good cross section of the 5 safety functions were included. Many of the selected components perform more than one of the 5 safety functions.
- 2. Does SWEL 1 include an appropriate representation of items having the following sample selection attributes:
- a. Various types of systems?
YE N[-]
Systems represented are, ECCS, diesels, AC/DC power, drywell purge, Main Steam, Service Water, Component Cooling Water, Reactor Recirc, Control Room AC, Ventilation, Emergency AC.
- b. Major new and replacement equipment?
YE NE]
Significant replaced equipment are the SSWA Pump and motor, the HPCS SSW Pump, and valve E12FOO3A.
- c. Various types of equipment?
YZ N-E]
SRVs, MSIVs, globe valves, gate valves, butterfly valves, check valves, solenoid valves, various type transmitters, various type switches, trip units, MOVs, APRMs, heat exchangers, pumps, motors, temperature elements, compressors, instrument racks and panels, battery chargers, inverters, airlocks, recorders, fans, room coolers, LCCs, dampers, and diesel generators.
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment G Page 3 of 4 Peer Review Checklist for SWEL
- d. Various environments?
Nearly all GGNS seismically qualified equipment is located indoors. There are several examples of equipment that operates in higher normal operating radiation environments and high temperature environments.
- e. Equipment enhanced based on the findings of the IPEEE (or equivalent) program?
Not required for GGNS
- f. Were risk insights considered in the development of SWEL 1?
The IPEEE base list was prepared including high risk equipment.
YE ND-YLI NM YZ NEI
- 3. For SWEL 2:
- a. Were spent fuel pool related items considered, and if applicable included in SWEL 2?
SWEL 2 consists of spent fuel pool related components.
- b. Was an appropriate justification documented for spent fuel pool related items not included in SWEL 2?
Section 6.2.3 of the Seismic Walkdown report provides justification for the process used to determine SWEL 2. In addition, there were no components that could contribute to rapid SFP draindown that were identified.
YN NEI Y~N N
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment G Page 4 of 4 Peer Review Checklist for SWEL
- 4. Provide any other comments (Attachment 9.11) related to the peer review of the SWELs.
NA
- 5. Have all peer review comments been adeqiea;\\a )dressed in the final SWEL?
YO NO Peer Reviewer #1: D2u Jones Date:
Peer Reviewer #2: Robert Fuller Date:
/1-,
-/ 2
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment H Page 1 of 7 Attachment H PEER REVIEW COMMENT FORM
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment H Page 2 of 7 Seismic Walkdown Submittal Report
-Entegr Review Comments and Resolutions Form Engineering GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev.
Title Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Seismic Walkdown Submittal Report for Report Number 0
Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force recommendation 2.3: Seismic Quality Related: [] Yes Z No Special Notes or Instructions:
Comment Section/Page No.
Review Comment Response/Resolution Reviewer's Number Accept Initials 1
AWC-017, Need to discuss whether or not the lighting above the Additional write-up added to justify the SMM Question 4 load center could potentially fall and impact the load condition.
10/16/12 center. It appears this may be possible. If so, is the light sufficient to cause adverse results? Need to justify or needs to be identified as degraded.
2 SWELl -003, Is there a potential for the light bulbs to fall out and Additional write-up added to justify the SMM Question 8 impact the MCC during a seismic event? If so this should condition.
10/16/12 be discussed.
3 AWC-032, Need to add clarification as to why the swivel mounts The mention of swivel mount is not SMM Question 4 were judged to be acceptable.
required and was therefore removed.
10/16/12 4
SWEL1-065, Need to state the corrosion is judged to have negligible Incorporated.
SMM Question 3 affects on the welds structural ability.
10/16/12 5
SWELl-065 Answering N/A for this question would also be Answer changed to N/A SMM Question 4 acceptable. No change is required.
10/16/12 6
SWELl-064 According to the procedure description of anchorage Incorporated.
SMM Question 1 belongs in section 2.
10/16/12 7
AWC-050 Recommend adding an additional photo capturing the Incorporated, additional photo added.
SMM Photos lower part of the Room (i.e. photo 002 from SWC) 10/16/12
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment H Page 3 of 7 U*
Seismic Walkdown Submittal Report "Entery Review Comments and Resolutions Form Engineering GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev.
Title Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Seismic Walkdown Submittal Report for Report Number 0
Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force recommendation 2.3: Seismic Quality Related: 0 Yes Z No Special Notes or Instructions:
Comment Section/Page No.
Review Comment Response/Resolution Reviewer's Number Accept Initials 8
SWELl-056 This Section needs to be updated.
Incorporated.
SMM Question 2 10/16/12 9
SWELl-056 Need to quantify.
Incorporated.
SMM Question 3 10/16/12 10 SWELl-056 Was a condition report written? Is there an existing CR numbers added SMM Comments condition report for this issue? Something should be 10/16/12 stated in regards to CAP here.
11 SWELI-049 What is on the ground at the end of the cat walk? It Item added to the AWC-042, and SMM Photos appears to be the controls for the overhead hoist. Can justification write-up added why it is no 10/16/12 this item fall and impact the diesel below?
concern.
12 AWC-043 Suggest rewording this section to provide justification Section reworded as suggested.
SMM Question 2 used in applying engineering judgment 10/16/12 13 AWC-043 Attached photos include lighting fixtures which could As discussed, light fixture concern will be SMM Question 4 potentially impact equipment. Discussion needs to be added to the main body of the report as 10/16/12 added to discuss why this is not an adverse condition.
general observation that requires an action.
14 SWELl-007 This is a general comment. The way the procedure As suggested, sentence added to SMM Question 2 requires documenting the anchorage configuration leads document whether or not bent, broken, 10/16/12 the reader to wonder whether or not the anchorage is missing, or loose hardware has been bent, broke, etc. Recommend adding a sentence stating observed during walkdown. This whether or not bent, broken, etc. parts are present.
comment has been incorporated to all I SWCs.
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment H Page 4 of 7 Seismic Walkdown Submittal Report EnterV Review Comments and Resolutions Form Engineering GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev.
Title Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Seismic Walkdown Submittal Report for Report Number 0
Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force recommendation 2.3: Seismic Quality Related: E] Yes Z No Special Notes or Instructions:
Comment Section/Page No.
Review Comment Response/Resolution Reviewer's Number Accept Initials 15 AWC-045 Need to explain why the light doesn't affect the conduit.
Incorporated.
SMM Question 4 10/16/12 16 AWC-045 This is a bit confusing without pictures of the heater in Pictures added SMM Question 6 the report. Pictures should be added or describe the 10/16/12 location of the heaters relative to other equipment.
17 AWC-040 The cracking either was present near the bolt holes or Section reworded to more definitive SMM Question 2 not. Need to be definitive. It may be worth locating the answer.
10/16/12 concrete drawings for this area. It is not uncommon for the DG to be on a foundation separate from the structure. This would make the visible cracks negligible.
18 AWC-040 A licensing basis evaluation (or condition report) needs Based on judgment, this condition has SMM Question 3 to be conducted for this item. If has already been been accepted by SWE.
10/16/12 entered into the CAP process then simply add the CR number.
29 AWC-029 Need to identify the difference between mounting and Additional write-up added as suggested.
SMM Question 1 anchorage.
10/16/12 Reviewed By:
Shawn McFarland Date:
11/12/12 Resolved By:
Jason Pak / Chase Wharton Site/Department:
Ph.
Date:
11/12/12
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment H Page 5 of 7 Seismic Walkdown Submittal Report ni...
Review Comments and Resolutions Form Engineering GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev.
Title Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Seismic Walkdown Submittal Report for Report Number 0
Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force recommendation 2.3: Seismic Quality Related: E] Yes E No Special Notes or Instructions:
7 I.
Comment Number Section/Page No.
Review Comment Response/Resolution t
7 1
SWC/AWC None N/A Reviewed By:
Doug Jones j
L
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment H Page 6 of 7 Seismic Walkdown Submittal Report Review Comments and Resolutions Form Engineering GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev.
Title Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Seismic Walkdown Submittal Report for Report Number 0
Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force recommendation 2.3: Seismic Quality Related: E] Yes E No Special Notes or Instructions:
Comment Section/Page No.
Review Comment Response/Resolution Reviewer's Number Accept Initials 1
SWEL Remove multiple NUS switches off of the SWEL 1 list Incorporated since the designs on all the NUS switches are typical.
2 SWEL Replace equipment attached to the Diesel and add the Incorporated entire Diesel to SWEL 1 list.
3 SWEL Revise safety significant functions on the SWEL 1 Incorporated development list for equipment Reviewed By:
Doug Jones Date 11/13/12 Resolved By:
Fred Hopkins Site/Department:
Ph.
Date:
111/13/12
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment H Page 7 of 7 Seismic Walkdown Submittal Report Review Comments and Resolutions Form Engineering GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev.
Title Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Seismic Walkdown Submittal Report for Report Number 0
Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force recommendation 2.3: Seismic Quality Related: E] Yes Z No Special Notes or Instructions:
Comment Section/Page No.
Review Comment Response/Resolution Reviewer's Number Accept Initials 1
SWEL Revise safety significant functions on the SWEL 1 Done development list for equipment.
Reviewed By:
Robert Fuller Date 11/13/12 Resolved By:
Fred Hopkins Site/Department:
Ph.
Date:
11/13/12 U -
1 11I
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment I Page I of 11 Attachment I SEISMIC WALKDO WN ENGINEER TRAINING CERTIFICATES
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment I Page 2 of 11 Seismic Walkdown Engineers Chase Wharton Jason Pak Fredrick Hopkins Tori Robinson
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment I Page 3 of 11 L-xcelence-Evevyp pfject: Every aqy, Certificate of Completion is hereby granted to Chase Wharton for successful completon of TRAINING ON NEAR TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.3 PLANT SEISMIC WALKDOWNS Awarded: 7/11/2012 in Kennesaw, GA Kevin Bessell Kenneth Whitmore Certified Seismic Walkdown Engineer Certified Seismic Walkd own Engineer Palo Alto, CA-6/13/2012 Alexandria, VA - 6/20/2012
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment I Page 4 of 11 p
Certificateof Completio.n
.is hereby granted to Kyong S. (Jason) Pak for siuccess fulcampletion o*
TRAINING ONNEAR TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.3 PLANTSEISMIC WALKDO WNS
.Awarded. 7/11/Q012 in Kennesaw, GA K ve~ ~ ~se~I CertA a S~t m~e Wa! down F a'
P,,Ia Attn CA-~f13/2OI2 Cetf[ie d Saim! W alkdan Fge I', 1~
A 1
bA 2A 1
,,-t ýý",ýý
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment I Page 5 of 11 Certyicate of Completion Fredrick Hopkins Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.'3
- Plant Seismic: Walkdowns July I. 2012 Sncl~l ReB~by & I"wgultv
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment I Page 6 of 11 Certificate of Completion Tori Robinson Training on Near Term Task Force Re commendation 2.3
- Plant Seismic Walkdowns July 11 2012 D3ate r-PPI ?A ijo SRlwl PSiy& ln*0
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment I Page 7 of I I Seismic Walkdown Peer Reviewers Shawn McFarland
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment I Page 8 of 11 Shawn :McFarlandi Training onl :Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3.,
Plant
'S*eism Walkdowns
-7. ~,OL*
Mo~~
4
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment I Page 9 of 11 EPRI-Qualified SWE Trainers Kevin Bessell Ken Whitmore
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment I Page 10 of 11 Certificate of Completion Kevin Bessell Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3
- Plant Seismic Walkdowns hnxr 13, 2012 f
I-'
If
Engineering Report No. GGNS-CS-12-00002 Rev. 0 Attachment I Page It of 11 Certificate of Completion Kenneth Whitmore Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3
- Plant Seismic Walkdowns Juw2l, 2012 tfd.44414 6~~Roed,~~
I=
ttm
ATTACHMENT 2 GNRO-2012100141 LIST OF REGULATORY COMMITMENTS