ML14071A062: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3 UNIT 1 -SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS (SWCS)(Version 1.0 and Version 2.0)NO. SNCF164-RPT-01 Note: In Version 2.0 of the report only Pages 347, 348, 447, 501, 502 and 503 were revised. Also Page 504 was added.Page 1 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F/ z Sheet iof 3 Status: Y2'NEI U-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. NIP19PCV2228A Equip.Equipment Description PCV TO PORV BACKUP AIR SUPPLY PRESSURE CONTROL /Location:
{{#Wiki_filter:ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS               NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3 UNIT 1 - SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS (SWCS)
Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area (r.2I X, Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
(Version 1.0 and Version 2.0)
NJ Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
NO. SNCF164-RPT-01 Note: In Version 2.0 of the report only Pages 347, 348, 447, 501, 502 and 503 were revised. Also Page 504 was added.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchora2e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[- NJ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Page 1 of 562
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
 
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                           NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F/ z Sheet iof 3 Status: Y2'NEI U-]
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Y u- UCN/AC YV<l UC N/A-YV/NO UC N/AC YE] NO UC N/Aa Y/NO U-I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Equipment ID No. NIP19PCV2228A                   Equip.
Page 2 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y7 f0 U--I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. NIP19PCV2228A Equip. Class, 7 Equipment Description PCV TO PORV BACKUP AIR SUPPLY PRESSURE CONTROL Interaction Effects 7. Am soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Equipment Description PCV TO PORV BACKUP AIR SUPPLY PRESSURE CONTROL /
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121                     Room, Area   (r.2IX, Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)                                         NJ Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
9, Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y$4/4 0 UD N/AO Y4<D UD N/AO YIKN0 UD N/AD Y VN/UD Other Adverse Conditions lI. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could IVN" U]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Anchora2e
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[- NJ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             Y        UCN/AC u-
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YV<*l UC N/A-oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YV/NO UC N/AC
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YE] NO UC N/Aa (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           Y/NO U-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 2 of 562
 
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                       NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y7 f0 U--I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. NIP19PCV2228A               Equip. Class, 7 Equipment Description PCV TO PORV BACKUP AIR SUPPLY PRESSURE CONTROL Interaction Effects
: 7. Am soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?       Y$4/40 UD N/AO
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y4<D UD N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9, Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?               YIKN0 UD N/AD
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     Y VN/UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions lI. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could      IVN" U]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
_                /
                                      .f)1'I"l~              //
F-%>?.        /          (_
                                                                                      -Y       Lu(/~
Evaluated by:    5AnUW                  L.7V0)                                  Date:
J3 -Z9- C,()(2-Page 3 of 562
 
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                    NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 MPU~V222A            N1~9pC  2 22 6.iiKu At-R  hLpl-Page 4 of 562
 
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                              NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 rVs.-
Sheas 1 of,[
Status: YZ NEI U0-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QIB31HV8028                    Equip. Class, Equipment Description PRESSURE RELIEF TANK ISOLATION OUTSIDE CTMT VALVE, v4 Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121                    Room, Area  O *),B Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorae
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one  YO' N~I of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?            YO) NO UO N/AG&#xfd; WWAQ              flypcmylr1 ~,Vo  n      OY~zn~rm0*
31 Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface            YE] NC UE] N/A&#xfd;j]
oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?    YO) NO UO N/Aj&#xfd;
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?          YO NEI  UC N/Ag' (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of            YO NO Un potentially adverse seismic conditions?
    'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment Page 5 of 562
 
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                        NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 M3 Status: Y23 NOf UL Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. Q1831HV8028                  Equip. Class, 7 Equipment Description PRESSURE RELIEF TANK ISOLATION OUTSIDE CTMT VALVE Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?      YG6 NO  DUD N/AD
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yi    NO UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?              YW ND UD N/AD
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free      YE    NO UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could       Y6    ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
_ .f)1'I"l~
Evaluated by:                                                                     Date:                       S Page 6 of 562
/ // F-%>?. / -Y (_ Lu(/~Evaluated by: 5AnUW L.7V0) Date: J3 -Z9- C,()(2-Page 3 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 MPU~V222A N1~9pC 2 2 2 6.iiKu At-R hLpl-Page 4 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 rVs.-Sheas 1 of,[Status: YZ NEI U0-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIB31HV8028 Equip. Class, Equipment Description PRESSURE RELIEF TANK ISOLATION OUTSIDE CTMT VALVE, v4 Location:
 
Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area O  Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 7 of 562
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
 
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorae 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO' N~I of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS         NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 8 of 562
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?WWAQ flypcmylr1 n ~,Vo OY~zn~rm0*
 
31 Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                           NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of J'4 Status: Y13 NE] U[J]
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Equipment ID No. QICI1EOO4B                      Equip. Class' 2 Equipment Description REACTOR TRIP SWITCHGEAR NO. 2                        /
'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment YO) NO UO N/AG&#xfd;YE] NC UE] N/A&#xfd;j]YO) NO UO N/Aj&#xfd;YO NEI UC N/Ag'YO NO Un Page 5 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 M3 Status: Y23 NOf UL Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q1831HV8028 Equip. Class, 7 Equipment Description PRESSURE RELIEF TANK ISOLATION OUTSIDE CTMT VALVE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121                     Room, Area 235 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YG6 NO DUD N/AD Yi NO UD N/AD YW ND UD N/AD YE NO UD Other Adverse Conditions
Anchoraue
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y6 ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO Ni of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Reference SEWS package 0tC1 1E004B (April 1994)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           YO NEI U'    N/AD Anchorage of cabinet is welded per design.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YZ NEI UJi- N/AO oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors'?   Y9 NI U-I    N/A["I 5, Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YO NO UOI N/Al]
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YR NO UI-potentially adverse seismnic conditions?
Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 9 of 562
 
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                         NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of $X Status: Y      NI uCI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QICi1E0048                  Equip. Class' 2 Equipment Description REACTOR TRIP SWITCHGEAR NO. 2
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?       YZ NO UD N/AD
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Ys NO UO N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?               YN NO UO N/A-
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free       Y[  NO UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YZ NO U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Scaffold #6273 is located within 3 feet of panel 0 C11EOO4B but is adequately tied to a rigidpipe/ conduit supportand therefore is seismically adequate.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Date: S)2 Page 6 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 7 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 8 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QICI1EOO4B Equip. Class' 2 Equipment Description REACTOR TRIP SWITCHGEAR NO. 2 Sheet 1 of J'4 Status: Y13 NE] U[J]/Location:
Evaluated by: 4g=       'a   "  .- 0   A       Lcatra MotcI64-               Date:     --23-i
Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area 235 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
                                          /           e     ~V~At4LL~N~
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Page 10 of 562
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraue 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO Ni of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
 
Reference SEWS package 0tC1 1E004B (April 1994)2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Anchorage of cabinet is welded per design.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS               NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 11 of 562
YO NEI U' N/AD YZ NEI UJi- N/AO 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors'?
 
Y9 NI U-I N/A["I 5, Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS         NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 U7 s
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismnic conditions?
Page 12 of 562 I
YO NO UOI N/Al]YR NO UI-Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
 
Page 9 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of $X Status: Y NI uCI Equipment ID No. QICi1E0048 Equip. Class' 2 Equipment Description REACTOR TRIP SWITCHGEAR NO. 2 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                           NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 4 Status: YZ N[] U[]
YZ NO UD N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Ys NO UO N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NO UO N/A-Y[ NO UO Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NO U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Equipment ID No. QlE1lFCVO602A.                   Equip. Class, 8 Pka F1-5 Equipment Description RHR PUMP MINIFLOW VALVE Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 83                       Room, Area 128 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Scaffold #6273 is located within 3 feet of panel 0 C1 1EOO4B but is adequately tied to a rigid pipe/ conduit support and therefore is seismically adequate.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Evaluated by: 4g= 'a .-" 0 A Lcatra MotcI64-Date: --23-i/ e ~V~At4LL~N~
Anchoraie
Page 10 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 11 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 U7 s Page 12 of 562 I ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 4 Status: YZ N[] U[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QlE1lFCVO602A.
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE   NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Equip. Class, 8 Pka F1-5 Equipment Description RHR PUMP MINIFLOW VALVE Location:
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           YEI] NEI UE] N/A0
Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 83 Room, Area 128 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface           YE   NE] UE   N/AO oxidation?
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YE] NE] U-' N/AO 5, Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YE] NEI UE] N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraie 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YO NEI UE1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
YEI] NEI UE] N/A0 YE NE] UE N/AO 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE] NE] U-' N/AO 5, Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Page 13 of 562
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
 
YE] NEI UE] N/AO YO NEI UE1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                       NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NEI u[]
Page 13 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NEI u[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIEIIFCVO602A.
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equip. Class' 8 Pkq F1-5 Equipment Description RHR PUMP MINIFLOW VALVE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Equipment ID No. QIEIIFCVO602A.               Equip. Class' 8 Pkq F1-5 Equipment Description RHR PUMP MINIFLOW VALVE Interaction Effects
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?       Y0 NO UO N/AQ
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y0 NO UO N/AQ YS NO UO N/AO YN NO UQ N/AQ Y0 NO UO Other Adverse Conditions
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YS NO UO N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NOI UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?               YN NO UQ N/AQ
7 A WB is in folder F1 -77, Equipment 0 1P1 7MOV31865B.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free       Y0 NO UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could       YZ NOI UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
7   A WB is in folder F1-77, Equipment 0 1P1 7MOV31865B.
nts (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
nts (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Tis package was Originally signed on 6 12 but retyped for clarity on 10- 15-12.Date: 8/29/12 8/29/12 Page 14 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 15 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 16 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 PH, She tl of 3 Status: NE] u[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIEI1FTO605A Equip. Class',v Equipment Description RHR HEAT EXCHANGER DISCHARGE FLOW TRANSMITTER Location:
Tis package was Originallysigned on 6 12 but retyped for clarity on 10- 15-12.
Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 87 Room, Area I 2,0 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Date:     8/29/12 8/29/12 Page 14 of 562
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
 
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS           NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 15 of 562
YO D " 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
 
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS           NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 16 of 562
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
 
YAN0 UM N/AD YV0N0" UO N/AD Y[NI4 UD N/AD YO NM UD N/Adl Y/NNDUD Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                               NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 PH, She tl of 3 Status:     NE] u[]
Page 17 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0&#xfd;), LP Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y 0 0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIEIIFT0605A Equip. Class' 18 Equipment Description RHR HEAT EXCHANGER DISCHARGE FLOW TRANSMITTER Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Equipment ID No. QIEI1FTO605A                     Equip. Class'   ,v Equipment Description RHR HEAT EXCHANGER DISCHARGE FLOW TRANSMITTER Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY           Floor El. 87             Room, Area       I 2,0 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Ytz UQ N/AC3 4N UD N/AO Y//O UO N/AD YZ/ND UD Other Adverse Conditions
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y! oN1 UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Anchorage
: 1. is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one   YOD      "
of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             YAN0 UM N/AD
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface               YV0N0" UO N/AD oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?       Y[NI4 UD N/AD
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?             YO NM UD N/Adl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of             Y/NNDUD potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 17 of 562
 
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                         NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0
          &#xfd;), LP Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y     0     0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QIEIIFT0605A                 Equip. Class' 18 Equipment Description RHR HEAT EXCHANGER DISCHARGE FLOW TRANSMITTER Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?           Ytz UQ N/AC3
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, 4N        UD N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             Y//O UO N/AD
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YZ/ND UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could       Y!     oN1UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
<z'-Kg,'~.
Evaluated by:.  <z'-Kg,'~.                             Y*1,*L 4U(                 Date:   1, ' ,- . 20t2.,
Y*1,*L 4U(Evaluated by:.(~AI?~ / /,Th4'4, Date: 1, ' ,- .20t2.,'-U j L,-Page 18 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 19 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIE11LQ35948 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description CTMT SUMP LEVEL TRANSMITTER POWER SUPPLY Sheet 1 of 3 w Status: Y[5 NCI]UEI 'It-"t Location:
(~AI*?~     / /,Th4'4,
Bldg. dI/2LI6B Floor El, bf ( 3 Room, Area 3 1 8 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
                    '-U                     j   L,-
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Page 18 of 562
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraee 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
 
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS           NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 19 of 562
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
 
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                           NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 3 w Status: Y[5 NCI]UEI  'It-"t Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Y[jNE] U[] N/AC[Y [j'NE UO N/AC Y[/NE- U" N/AO YE] NE] U[3 N/A[U YET'N[] U0 IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment, Page 20 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0~'v1 Sheet 2 of X 5 ,,, Status: Y&#xb6;f NE] U[M 9&#xfd;+Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q1E11L03594B Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description CTMT SUMP LEVEL TRANSMITTER POWER SUPPLY Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Equipment ID No. QIE11LQ35948                     Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description CTMT SUMP LEVEL TRANSMITTER POWER SUPPLY Location: Bldg. dI/&#x17d;2LI6B         Floor El, bf ( 3         Room, Area   3 18 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y[&#xfd;iNE U- N/ADUr N/AD Y2+ND UD N/AD Yd0NO UO Other Adverse Conditions
Anchoraee
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YEA'NDO U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] NI*'
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 1 ///Evaluated by:/)e~a/% ~&.-Date: ____ ___ ___Page 21 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0-J Page 22 of 562 I ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 23 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0"......,, Ii Page 24 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of;#&#xfd;Status: Y[] N)4 Ur]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIE11MOV8812A Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description CTMT SUMP TO RHR PUMP IA ISOLATION Location:
of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 83 Room, Area 0SA Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           Y[jNE] U[] N/AC[
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             Y[j'NE UO N/AC oxidation?
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraie 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     Y[/NE- U"    N/AO
2, Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YE] NE] U[3 N/A[U (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YET'N[] U0 potentially adverse seismic conditions?
(6\ Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchoraje free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment, Page 20 of 562
m Y[:1NEA YO NEIUD YO NO U YONO UO YOJNO UO Y NEI UIJ NIA\NA I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
 
Page 25 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 FF- j~-Sheet 2 of Status: YDj] No UE]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIEIIMOV88I2A Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description CTMT SUMP TO RHR PUMP 1A ISOLATION M.I I;". " a f f rSA 7. Are soft targets 4 from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                         NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0
YO NP UC A I a~e~- IV o 4tr ad A" i fevN~ i % acp; r-,. t Coreab~a~
~'v1                                                                                               Sheet 2 of X 5   ,,,
W"SW PFv~ialx A~r-~* it*% equynxm.2 N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NO U[ N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Status: Y&#xb6;f NE]     U[M 9&#xfd;+
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YIf NO UD NI/AD YD NV UD Other Adverse CoudItions
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y# ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Equipment ID No. Q1E11L03594B                 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description CTMT SUMP LEVEL TRANSMITTER POWER SUPPLY Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     Y[&#xfd;iNE U-    N/AD
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y*/NO Ur      N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             Y2+ND UD N/AD
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     Yd0NO UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could       YEA'NDO U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 1   ///
Evaluated by:                                                                     Date: ____    ___    ___
                                                /
                                            )e~a/%             ~&.-
Page 21 of 562
 
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS               NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0
                                                                                      -J Page 22 of 562
 
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS               NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 23 of 562
 
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS               NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0
                                                                      "......,,
Ii Page 24 of 562
 
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                             NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of;#&#xfd; Status: Y[] N)4 Ur]
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QIE11MOV8812A                   Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description CTMT SUMP TO RHR PUMP IA ISOLATION Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 83                       Room, Area 0SA Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchoraie
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[:1NEA of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2, Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             YO NEIUD
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YO NO U      NIA\
oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YONO UO
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YOJNO UO NA (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
(6\ Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchoraje free of             Y NEI UIJ potentially adverse seismic conditions?                       m I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 25 of 562
 
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                               NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 FF- j~-
Sheet 2 of Status: YDj] No UE]
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QIEIIMOV88I2A                   Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description CTMT SUMP TO RHR PUMP 1A ISOLATION I I i.U@+*
M.
7.a
              ;".     " soft Are  f*"vutargets f     rSA 4   from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YO NP UC2 N/AD A Ia~e~-IV o ad4tr A" i fevN~                         i % acp; r-,. t Coreab~a~ W"SW PFv~ialx                   A~r-~*         it*% equynxm.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,   Y[   NO U[   N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
YIf NO UD NI/AD
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free         YD NV UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse CoudItions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could         Y#   ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluatedby:
Evaluatedby:             lwm-CM               AoaA1Ar#at   M-"'.4j                   Date: 9 IV                   I 1&sect;&#xfd;iL QiO              :-.- A.         AAULIxhJZI NFCJAJ             7   ~             .
lwm-CM AoaA 1Ar#at M-"'.4j IV I O 1&sect;&#xfd;iL Qi :-.- A.Date: 9 AAUL Ixh JZI NFCJAJ 7 ~ .Page 26 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 0 l~IIVO 2 8 4 Rig A Page 27 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 28 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 29 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0&#xfd;1-13 Sheetu ofZ N Status: Y Nf-1 UE-'Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIEIIMOV8888A Equip. Class, Equipment Description LHSI TO RCS COLD LEG Location:
Page 26 of 562
Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 l~IIVO 28 4 Rig A
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraze 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Page 27 of 562
YO N5(2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
 
YE" NDI UD- N/AGY YO ND Ur-D N/AE<4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YD] ND UD N/AEO/5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS               NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 28 of 562
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
 
YO NO UD N/Ad YJ2ND] UD Enter the equipment clan name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS             NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 29 of 562
Page 30 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Shet 2 of," LU Status: Y[S' Nn UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIEIIMOV8888A Equip. Class, Equipment Description LHSI TO RCS COLD LEG Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
 
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                             NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y&' ND U] N/At Y9 NO Ut N/AD Yfd NO UI= N/AQ Y6 NE Ut Other Adverse Conditions
&#xfd;1-13 SheetuN ofZ Status: Y     Nf-1 UE-'
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QIEIIMOV8888A                   Equip. Class, Equipment Description LHSI TO RCS COLD LEG Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121                     Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchoraze
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO N5(
of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           YE" NDI UD- N/AGY
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YO ND Ur-D N/AE<
oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   YD] ND UD N/AEO/
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YO NO UD N/Ad (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           YJ2ND] UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Enter the equipment clan name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 30 of 562
 
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                         NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Shet   2 of," LU Status: Y[S' Nn     UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QIEIIMOV8888A               Equip. Class, Equipment Description LHSI TO RCS COLD LEG Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?       Y&' ND U] N/At
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y9 NO Ut        N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?               Yfd NO UI=      N/AQ
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     Y6 NE Ut of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could       YZ NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Page 31 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 32 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 33 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Fi- 14'of 3 Status: ur]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q1EIIPO-IB Equip. Class'Equipment Description RHR PUMP 1B Location:
Page 31 of 562
Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 83 Room, Area 1 2.Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
 
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS               NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 32 of 562
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other com)nents.
 
Anchorave 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS             NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 33 of 562
Y/NO 7) 1-74,&#xfd;S5Z V EZ. 1-0 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
 
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                             NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Fi- 14' Sheet*i of 3 Status:     N*v"N] ur]
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Y ND U1 N/AQ Y UCI NIAD Y/N[ UO N/AO]Y6//O U-N I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment Page 34 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF1 64-RPT-01 , VERSION 2.0 FJ-Iq Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIEIIPOOIB Equip. ClassI 6 Equipment Description RHR PUMP 18 Sheetausof 3 Status: YPNM- un-Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Equipment ID No. Q1EIIPO-IB                       Equip. Class' Equipment Description RHR PUMP 1B Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 83                       Room, Area         1 2.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y/NO U- N/AI Y/Nt- UD N/AQ Yo INO U- N/AD W/NO U Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO/N" U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other com)nents.
Anchorave
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y/NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
7)1-74,&#xfd;S5Z                     VEZ. 1-0
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             Y  ND U1 N/AQ
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             Y      UCI NIAD oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           Y/N[    UO N/AO]
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of             Y6//O   U-N potentially adverse seismic conditions?
IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment Page 34 of 562
 
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                         NO. SNCF1 64-RPT-01 , VERSION 2.0 FJ-Iq Sheetausof 3 Status: YPNM- un-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QIEIIPOOIB                   Equip. ClassI 6 Equipment Description RHR PUMP 18 Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?       Y/NO U-      N/AI
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y/Nt- UD N/AQ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?               Yo INO U-    N/AD
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     W/NO U of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could       YO/N"   U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Page 35 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS
Page 35 of 562
'4!NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0:z" 0 Page 36 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ri-is/Sheet of.u Status: u ,&deg;] UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. OIE13PT0952 Equip. Class, 18 Equipment Description CTMT PRESSURE PROTECTION TRANSMITTER Location:
 
Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area ___Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS               NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
        '4!
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE N[a of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
:z" 0
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Page 36 of 562
YEIN- Ur NfAr Y2,NEl U- N/AE 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Ye NEI UE- N/AE 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
 
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                           NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ri-is/
YE NE UE N/Am'/Y&'N[E UE I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment Page 37 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment LD No. QIE13PT0952 Equip. ClassV 18 Equipment Description C TMT PRESSURE PROTECTION TRANSMITTER Sheet 2 Of '4" jm#Status: Yd NO tv Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Status:          UM Sheet of.u u ,&deg;]
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y 1 N- UE N/AD Y/N- UO N/AD Y&(/NO U- N/AD YQ"NO UD Other Adverse Conditions
Equipment ID No. OIE13PT0952                     Equip. Class, 18 Equipment Description CTMT PRESSURE PROTECTION TRANSMITTER Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121                     Room, Area ___
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YC/-NO Uri adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE N[a of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           YEIN-    Ur  NfAr
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             Y2,NEl U-   N/AE oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     Ye NEI UE- N/AE
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YE NE UE N/Am'/
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           Y&'N[E UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?
IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment Page 37 of 562
 
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                         NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 Of ' 4" jm#
Status: Yd NO UE* *"' tv Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment LD No. QIE13PT0952                   Equip. ClassV 18 Equipment Description CTMT PRESSURE PROTECTION TRANSMITTER Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?       Y 1 N-    UE  N/AD
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y/N-        UO N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             Y&(/NO U-      N/AD
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YQ"NO UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could     YC/-NO Uri adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
See K-h1c\\A~Q.Evaluated by: Date:~Th *ca$A-/ h 7-Page 38 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0/ -It, NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 taus 1--of ls Status: ENIuF Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q1E16HOO1A Equip. Class' 10 Equipment Description CHG/HHSI PUMP ROOM COOLER 1A (TRAIN A)Location:
                                                          \\A~Q.
Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area Ork Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
See                  K-h1c Evaluated by:                                                                     Date:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
                                                        ~Th         *ca                   $A-/   h7-Page 38 of 562
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchora*e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y/ N*'1 of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
 
NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                             NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 0/ -It, taus 1--of ls Status:   ENIuF Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Y[NC- UCI N/ACNE U- N/AC 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE"NO UC N/AC 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Equipment ID No. Q1E16HOO1A                       Equip. Class' 10 Equipment Description CHG/HHSI PUMP ROOM COOLER 1A (TRAIN A)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100                     Room, Area Ork Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
YC3 NC UC N/AL/X'0 NO UC]I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Page 39 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Fr-4 Sheet 2 0f,9 Status- Yt&#xfd;N[:] Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWt)Equipment ID No. QIE16HOOIA Equip. Class' 10 Equipment Description CHG/HHSI PUMP ROOM COOLER 1A (TRAIN A)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Anchora*e
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y/   N*' 1 of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? NO
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yg&#xfd; NEI UEJ N/A Y&1 NO UE" N/AD Yj&#xfd; NO UQ N/Ar YVNr UO Other Adverse Conditions
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?           Y[NC- UCI N/AC
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YYNO] U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             Y* NE U-     N/AC oxidation?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) a\V- 0Q)A G Page 40 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Shee: of.&*Status 7 NN"] U[-]p- il Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No, OIE16HO03B Equip. Class, 10 Equipment Description RHR PUMP ROOM COOLER 13 Location:
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     YE"NO UC N/AC
Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 83 Room, Area 2 , Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YC3 NC UC N/AL/
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of           X'0 NO UC]
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YO~ N1--1-MV1'O UOE N/AE]-46NO] UO NIAD 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y&/N- UE N/A-5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Page 39 of 562
YO NEI UID " 'U1D I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
 
Page 41 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS fl- 11 NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0of Status: NE U0" Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIE16HO03B Equip. Class' 10 Equipment Description RHR PUMP ROOM COOLER 1B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                       NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Fr-4 Sheet 2 0f,9 Status- Yt&#xfd;N[:]   Un-]*1)l Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWt)
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Equipment ID No. QIE16HOOIA                   Equip. Class' 10 Equipment Description CHG/HHSIPUMP ROOM COOLER 1A (TRAIN A)
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YOND UO N/AD YIAND UD N/AD y&#xfd;iNO UO N/AO Y(ND UD Other Adverse Conditions
Interaction Effects
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y'W/ND UD1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     Yg&#xfd; NEI UEJ N/A
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y&1 NO UE" N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?               Yj&#xfd; NO UQ N/Ar
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     YVNr    UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could       YYNO] U-adversely affect the safety functions ofthe equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) a\V-     0Q)AG Page 40 of 562
 
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                               NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 p-    il Shee: of.&*
Status 7   NN"] U[-]
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No, OIE16HO03B                       Equip. Class, 10 Equipment Description RHR PUMP ROOM COOLER 13 Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY           Floor El. 83             Room, Area       ,2 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO~ N1-                of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             MV1'O    UOE N/AE]
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             -46NO] UO NIAD oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?   Y&/N-     UE N/A-
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?         YO NEI UID N/A[I*
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of             "'U1D potentially adverse seismic conditions?
I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 41 of 562
 
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                         NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 fl- 11 Sheet*2 of Status:       NE U0" Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QIE16HO03B                   Equip. Class' 10 Equipment Description RHR PUMP ROOM COOLER 1B Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?     YOND UO N/AD
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YIAND UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?             y&#xfd;iNO UO N/AO
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free     Y(ND UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could       Y'W/ND UD1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
/IV PC L 5tT9A f (fPo .74:, 'e* I (;j&#xfd; /D eovornk 6Z It AxD I " 0--tlWer I -IV) 1frAYh Z,4t4-,6y 66d1ul-Evaluated by, S o-f/"'Ln e &I 14 Al, D h1l r&#xfd;"l 10W6~'Date: sitz, ZZZ,-7, Page 42 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0'.7 Page 43 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0;o -Sheet I of 3 Status: Y /N[-] UE" Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. OtE16HO04B Equip.Equipment Description CCW PUMP ROOM COOLER TRAIN B Location:
                          /IVPC  L             5tT9A         f (fPo         . 74:,         'e
Bldg. AUXILIARY FloorEl. 100 Room, Area " Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
  *I(;j&#xfd; eovornk 6Z ItAxD I/D                    " 0--tlWer I -IV)1frAYh Z,4t4-,6y 66d1ul-Evaluated by,     S     o-f/"
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
D h1l
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Auchorare  
                                                      'Lne&I                         Date:  sitz,  ZZZ,-7, r&#xfd;"l 10W6~' 14 Al, Page 42 of 562
/1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO N of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
 
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?o4Q.4 .OJ 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS             NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0
YM/No UO N/AQ YY&#xfd; U['-] N/AO AA1i pox'T F4-e I'zeA(% J4'4t JQ~~(t3 Y-4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? VINO -UO N/AV 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
      '.7 Page 43 of 562
 
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                             NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0
;o -
Sheet I of 3 Status: Y /N[-] UE" Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. OtE16HO04B                       Equip.
Equipment Description CCW PUMPROOM COOLER TRAIN B Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY FloorEl. 100                       Room, Area             "
Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Auchorare                                                                                     /
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO N of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?             YM/No UO N/AQ o4Q.4 OJ  .
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface             YY&#xfd;     U['-] N/AO oxidation?
AA1i pox'T F4-e                           I'zeA(%             J4'4t               JQ~~       (t3 Y-
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?     VINO       -UON/AV
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?           YO NO UE- N/A[i*
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YO NO UE- Ye&#xfd; NU0 IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Ye&#xfd;NU0 IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 44 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheets Of 3 Status: &#xfd;NEI ui-'Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIE16HOO4B Equip. Class, Equipment Description CCW PUMP ROOM COOLER T RAIN B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Page 44 of 562
Yj&#xfd;N[rJUC:N/Ajf*"&#xfd; 8, Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y INO- U- N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
 
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y6 NO UQ N/AO Y&NO UD Other Adverse Conditions
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                         NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheets Of 3 Status: &#xfd;NEI ui-'
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could XK6 NE] U0 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QIE16HOO4B                   Equip. Class, Equipment Description CCW PUMPROOM COOLER TRAIN B Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?       Yj&#xfd;N[rJUC:N/Ajf*"&#xfd; 8, Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y     INO- U-   N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?               Y6 NO UQ N/AO
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free       Y&NO UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could       XK6 NE] U0 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
>/KY~~~~~~e.~
                  >/KY~~~~~~e.~ iI/7o(~~f7 C'~c'                                6- 14Weza&&j eAedlIsk, Evaluated by:                                   )4/91/2 A)J                         Date:   !g -2 /. ZO/Z._
C'~c' iI/7o(~~f7 6- 14Weza&&j eAedlIsk, Evaluated by:)4/91/2 A)J C t~~41 LouetA~/~-
Ct~~41 LouetA~/~-
Date: !g -2 /. ZO/Z._Page 45 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 46 of 562 I}}
Page 45 of 562
 
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS           NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 46 of 562 I}}

Revision as of 08:03, 4 November 2019

Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 1 of 562 Through 46 of 562
ML14071A062
Person / Time
Site: Farley Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 02/20/2014
From:
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-14-0249
Download: ML14071A062 (46)
v • d • e


Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3 UNIT 1 - SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS (SWCS)

(Version 1.0 and Version 2.0)

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01 Note: In Version 2.0 of the report only Pages 347, 348, 447, 501, 502 and 503 were revised. Also Page 504 was added.

Page 1 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F/ z Sheet iof 3 Status: Y2'NEI U-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. NIP19PCV2228A Equip.

Equipment Description PCV TO PORV BACKUP AIR SUPPLY PRESSURE CONTROL /

Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area (r.2IX, Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) NJ Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchora2e

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[- NJ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y UCN/AC u-
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YV<*l UC N/A-oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YV/NO UC N/AC
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NO UC N/Aa (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y/NO U-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 2 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y7 f0 U--I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. NIP19PCV2228A Equip. Class, 7 Equipment Description PCV TO PORV BACKUP AIR SUPPLY PRESSURE CONTROL Interaction Effects

7. Am soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y$4/40 UD N/AO
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y4<D UD N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9, Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YIKN0 UD N/AD

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y VN/UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions lI. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could IVN" U]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

_ /

.f)1'I"l~ //

F-%>?. / (_

-Y Lu(/~

Evaluated by: 5AnUW L.7V0) Date:

J3 -Z9- C,()(2-Page 3 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 MPU~V222A N1~9pC 2 22 6.iiKu At-R hLpl-Page 4 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 rVs.-

Sheas 1 of,[

Status: YZ NEI U0-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIB31HV8028 Equip. Class, Equipment Description PRESSURE RELIEF TANK ISOLATION OUTSIDE CTMT VALVE, v4 Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area O *),B Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorae

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO' N~I of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO) NO UO N/AGý WWAQ flypcmylr1 ~,Vo n OY~zn~rm0*

31 Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE] NC UE] N/Aýj]

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO) NO UO N/Ajý
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NEI UC N/Ag' (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NO Un potentially adverse seismic conditions?

'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment Page 5 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 M3 Status: Y23 NOf UL Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q1831HV8028 Equip. Class, 7 Equipment Description PRESSURE RELIEF TANK ISOLATION OUTSIDE CTMT VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YG6 NO DUD N/AD
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yi NO UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YW ND UD N/AD
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NO UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y6 ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Date: S Page 6 of 562

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 7 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 8 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of J'4 Status: Y13 NE] U[J]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QICI1EOO4B Equip. Class' 2 Equipment Description REACTOR TRIP SWITCHGEAR NO. 2 /

Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area 235 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraue

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO Ni of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Reference SEWS package 0tC1 1E004B (April 1994)

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NEI U' N/AD Anchorage of cabinet is welded per design.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI UJi- N/AO oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors'? Y9 NI U-I N/A["I 5, Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO UOI N/Al]

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YR NO UI-potentially adverse seismnic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 9 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of $X Status: Y NI uCI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QICi1E0048 Equip. Class' 2 Equipment Description REACTOR TRIP SWITCHGEAR NO. 2

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NO UD N/AD
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Ys NO UO N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NO UO N/A-
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NO UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NO U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Scaffold #6273 is located within 3 feet of panel 0 C11EOO4B but is adequately tied to a rigidpipe/ conduit supportand therefore is seismically adequate.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: 4g= 'a " .- 0 A Lcatra MotcI64- Date: --23-i

/ e ~V~At4LL~N~

Page 10 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 11 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 U7 s

Page 12 of 562 I

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 4 Status: YZ N[] U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QlE1lFCVO602A. Equip. Class, 8 Pka F1-5 Equipment Description RHR PUMP MINIFLOW VALVE Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 83 Room, Area 128 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraie

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEI] NEI UE] N/A0
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NE] UE N/AO oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE] NE] U-' N/AO 5, Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NEI UE] N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI UE1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 13 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NEI u[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIEIIFCVO602A. Equip. Class' 8 Pkq F1-5 Equipment Description RHR PUMP MINIFLOW VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y0 NO UO N/AQ
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YS NO UO N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NO UQ N/AQ
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y0 NO UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NOI UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

7 A WB is in folder F1-77, Equipment 0 1P1 7MOV31865B.

nts (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Tis package was Originallysigned on 6 12 but retyped for clarity on 10- 15-12.

Date: 8/29/12 8/29/12 Page 14 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 15 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 16 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 PH, She tl of 3 Status: NE] u[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIEI1FTO605A Equip. Class' ,v Equipment Description RHR HEAT EXCHANGER DISCHARGE FLOW TRANSMITTER Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 87 Room, Area I 2,0 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YOD "

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YAN0 UM N/AD
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YV0N0" UO N/AD oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y[NI4 UD N/AD
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NM UD N/Adl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y/NNDUD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 17 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

ý), LP Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y 0 0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIEIIFT0605A Equip. Class' 18 Equipment Description RHR HEAT EXCHANGER DISCHARGE FLOW TRANSMITTER Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Ytz UQ N/AC3
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, 4N UD N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y//O UO N/AD
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ/ND UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y! oN1UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:. <z'-Kg,'~. Y*1,*L 4U( Date: 1, ' ,- . 20t2.,

(~AI*?~ / /,Th4'4,

'-U j L,-

Page 18 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 19 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 3 w Status: Y[5 NCI]UEI 'It-"t Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIE11LQ35948 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description CTMT SUMP LEVEL TRANSMITTER POWER SUPPLY Location: Bldg. dI/Ž2LI6B Floor El, bf ( 3 Room, Area 3 18 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraee

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] NI*'

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[jNE] U[] N/AC[
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[j'NE UO N/AC oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y[/NE- U" N/AO
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NE] U[3 N/A[U (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YET'N[] U0 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment, Page 20 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

~'v1 Sheet 2 of X 5 ,,,

Status: Y¶f NE] U[M 9ý+

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q1E11L03594B Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description CTMT SUMP LEVEL TRANSMITTER POWER SUPPLY Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ýiNE U- N/AD
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y*/NO Ur N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y2+ND UD N/AD
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Yd0NO UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YEA'NDO U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 1 ///

Evaluated by: Date: ____ ___ ___

/

)e~a/% ~&.-

Page 21 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

-J Page 22 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 23 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

"......,,

Ii Page 24 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of;#ý Status: Y[] N)4 Ur]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIE11MOV8812A Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description CTMT SUMP TO RHR PUMP IA ISOLATION Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 83 Room, Area 0SA Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraie

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[:1NEA of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2, Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NEIUD

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NO U NIA\

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YONO UO
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YOJNO UO NA (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

(6\ Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchoraje free of Y NEI UIJ potentially adverse seismic conditions? m I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 25 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 FF- j~-

Sheet 2 of Status: YDj] No UE]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIEIIMOV88I2A Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description CTMT SUMP TO RHR PUMP 1A ISOLATION I I i.U@+*

M.

7.a

". " soft Are f*"vutargets f rSA 4 from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NP UC2 N/AD A Ia~e~-IV o ad4tr A" i fevN~ i % acp; r-,. t Coreab~a~ W"SW PFv~ialx A~r-~* it*% equynxm.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NO U[ N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

YIf NO UD NI/AD

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YD NV UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse CoudItions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y# ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluatedby: lwm-CM AoaA1Ar#at M-"'.4j Date: 9 IV I 1§ýiL QiO  :-.- A. AAULIxhJZI NFCJAJ 7 ~ .

Page 26 of 562

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 l~IIVO 28 4 Rig A

Page 27 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 28 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 29 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

ý1-13 SheetuN ofZ Status: Y Nf-1 UE-'

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIEIIMOV8888A Equip. Class, Equipment Description LHSI TO RCS COLD LEG Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraze

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO N5(

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE" NDI UD- N/AGY
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO ND Ur-D N/AE<

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YD] ND UD N/AEO/
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO UD N/Ad (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YJ2ND] UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment clan name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 30 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Shet 2 of," LU Status: Y[S' Nn UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIEIIMOV8888A Equip. Class, Equipment Description LHSI TO RCS COLD LEG Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y&' ND U] N/At
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y9 NO Ut N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yfd NO UI= N/AQ
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y6 NE Ut of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Page 31 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 32 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 33 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Fi- 14' Sheet*i of 3 Status: N*v"N] ur]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q1EIIPO-IB Equip. Class' Equipment Description RHR PUMP 1B Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 83 Room, Area 1 2.

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other com)nents.

Anchorave

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y/NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

7)1-74,ýS5Z VEZ. 1-0

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y ND U1 N/AQ
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y UCI NIAD oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y/N[ UO N/AO]

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y6//O U-N potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment Page 34 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF1 64-RPT-01 , VERSION 2.0 FJ-Iq Sheetausof 3 Status: YPNM- un-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIEIIPOOIB Equip. ClassI 6 Equipment Description RHR PUMP 18 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y/NO U- N/AI
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y/Nt- UD N/AQ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yo INO U- N/AD
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free W/NO U of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO/N" U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Page 35 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

'4!

z" 0

Page 36 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ri-is/

Status: UM Sheet of.u u ,°]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. OIE13PT0952 Equip. Class, 18 Equipment Description CTMT PRESSURE PROTECTION TRANSMITTER Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area ___

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE N[a of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEIN- Ur NfAr
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y2,NEl U- N/AE oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Ye NEI UE- N/AE
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NE UE N/Am'/

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y&'N[E UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment Page 37 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 Of ' 4" jm#

Status: Yd NO UE* *"' tv Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment LD No. QIE13PT0952 Equip. ClassV 18 Equipment Description CTMT PRESSURE PROTECTION TRANSMITTER Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y 1 N- UE N/AD
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y/N- UO N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y&(/NO U- N/AD
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YQ"NO UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YC/-NO Uri adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

\\A~Q.

See K-h1c Evaluated by: Date:

~Th *ca $A-/ h7-Page 38 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 0/ -It, taus 1--of ls Status: ENIuF Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q1E16HOO1A Equip. Class' 10 Equipment Description CHG/HHSI PUMP ROOM COOLER 1A (TRAIN A)

Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area Ork Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchora*e

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y/ N*' 1 of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? NO
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[NC- UCI N/AC
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y* NE U- N/AC oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE"NO UC N/AC
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YC3 NC UC N/AL/

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of X'0 NO UC]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 39 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Fr-4 Sheet 2 0f,9 Status- YtýN[:] Un-]*1)l Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWt)

Equipment ID No. QIE16HOOIA Equip. Class' 10 Equipment Description CHG/HHSIPUMP ROOM COOLER 1A (TRAIN A)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Ygý NEI UEJ N/A
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y&1 NO UE" N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yjý NO UQ N/Ar
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YVNr UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YYNO] U-adversely affect the safety functions ofthe equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) a\V- 0Q)AG Page 40 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 p- il Shee: of.&*

Status 7 NN"] U[-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No, OIE16HO03B Equip. Class, 10 Equipment Description RHR PUMP ROOM COOLER 13 Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 83 Room, Area ,2 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO~ N1- of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? MV1'O UOE N/AE]
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface -46NO] UO NIAD oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y&/N- UE N/A-
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NEI UID N/A[I*

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of "'U1D potentially adverse seismic conditions?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 41 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 fl- 11 Sheet*2 of Status: NE U0" Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIE16HO03B Equip. Class' 10 Equipment Description RHR PUMP ROOM COOLER 1B Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YOND UO N/AD
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YIAND UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? yýiNO UO N/AO
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y(ND UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y'W/ND UD1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

/IVPC L 5tT9A f (fPo . 74:, 'e

  • I(;jý eovornk 6Z ItAxD I/D " 0--tlWer I -IV)1frAYh Z,4t4-,6y 66d1ul-Evaluated by, S o-f/"

D h1l

'Lne&I Date: sitz, ZZZ,-7, rý"l 10W6~' 14 Al, Page 42 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

'.7 Page 43 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

o -

Sheet I of 3 Status: Y /N[-] UE" Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. OtE16HO04B Equip.

Equipment Description CCW PUMPROOM COOLER TRAIN B Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY FloorEl. 100 Room, Area "

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Auchorare /

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO N of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YM/No UO N/AQ o4Q.4 OJ .
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YYý U['-] N/AO oxidation?

AA1i pox'T F4-e I'zeA(% J4'4t JQ~~ (t3 Y-

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? VINO -UON/AV
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO UE- N/A[i*

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YeýNU0 IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 44 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheets Of 3 Status: ýNEI ui-'

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIE16HOO4B Equip. Class, Equipment Description CCW PUMPROOM COOLER TRAIN B Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YjýN[rJUC:N/Ajf*"ý 8, Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y INO- U- N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y6 NO UQ N/AO
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y&NO UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could XK6 NE] U0 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

>/KY~~~~~~e.~ iI/7o(~~f7 C'~c' 6- 14Weza&&j eAedlIsk, Evaluated by: )4/91/2 A)J Date: !g -2 /. ZO/Z._

Ct~~41 LouetA~/~-

Page 45 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 46 of 562 I

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML14071A062&oldid=2051830"