ML19120A230: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 9
| page count = 9
}}
}}
See also: [[followed by::IR 05000373/2019012]]
See also: [[see also::IR 05000373/2019012]]


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:April 29, 2019
{{#Wiki_filter:April 29, 2019
  Mr. Bryan C. Hanson
Mr. Bryan C. Hanson
Senior VP, Exelon Generation Company, LLC
Senior VP, Exelon Generation Company, LLC
President and CNO, Exelon Nuclear
President and CNO, Exelon Nuclear
4300 Winfield Road
4300 Winfield Road
Warrenville, IL 60555
Warrenville, IL 60555
  SUBJECT: LASALLE COUNTY STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2
SUBJECT: LASALLE COUNTY STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2REQUEST FOR
-REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
              INFORMATION FOR AN NRC TRIENNIAL BASELINE DESIGN BASES
FOR AN NRC TRIENNIAL BASELINE DESIGN BA
              ASSURANCE INSPECTION (TEAM); INSPECTION REPORT 05000373/2019012;
SES ASSURANCE INSPECTION (TEAM);
              05000374/2019012
INSPECTION
Dear Mr. Hanson:
REPORT 05000373/2019012; 05000374/2019012
On July 22, 2019, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will begin a Triennial
  Dear Mr. Hanson: On July 22, 2019 , the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will begin a Triennial Baseline Design Bases Assurance Inspection (T
Baseline Design Bases Assurance Inspection (Team) at LaSalle County Station, Units 1
eam) at LaSalle County Station, Units 1  
and 2. This inspection will be performed in accordance with NRC Baseline Inspection
and 2. This inspection will be performed in accordance with NRC Baseline Inspection Procedure 71111.21 M. The Design Bases Assurance Inspection focuses on the design, maintenance, and operation  
Procedure 71111.21M.
of risk-significant components
The Design Bases Assurance Inspection focuses on the design, maintenance, and operation
with low margin, or associated with  
of risk-significant components with low margin, or associated with an accident scenario, or a
an accident scenario , or a specific system. The inspection also monitors the implementation of modifications to structures, systems, and components as modifications to one system may also affect the design bases and functioning of interfacing systems as well as introduce the potential for common cause failures. The components and modifications to be reviewed during this baseline inspection will be identified as part of the
specific system. The inspection also monitors the implementation of modifications to structures,
preparation for the inspection and finalized during the in-office preparation week that occurs prior to the first onsite inspection
systems, and components as modifications to one system may also affect the design bases and
week. In addition, operating experience issues, associated with the component samples, will also be selected for review. The inspection team may request scenarios to be performed on the simulator. This request would require support from you
functioning of interfacing systems as well as introduce the potential for common cause failures.
r simulator staff to validate scenarios, simulator time, and a crew to perform the actions which would most likely occur during the second onsite week. The team will work closely with your staff early on during the inspection process to ensure this activity can be accomplished with minimal impact.
The components and modifications to be reviewed during this baseline inspection will be
  The inspection will include  
identified as part of the preparation for the inspection and finalized during the inoffice
2 weeks onsite. The inspection team will consist of six NRC inspectors wh
preparation week that occurs prior to the first onsite inspection week. In addition, operating
o will focus on engineering/maintenance
experience issues, associated with the component samples, will also be selected for review.
/operations
The inspection team may request scenarios to be performed on the simulator. This request
of the selected components and modifications. The current inspection schedule is as follows:
would require support from your simulator staff to validate scenarios, simulator time, and a crew
  Preparation week: July 15
to perform the actions which would most likely occur during the second onsite week. The team
-19, 2019;  Onsite weeks:
will work closely with your staff early on during the inspection process to ensure this activity can
  July 22-26, 2019, and August 5-9, 2019.  
be accomplished with minimal impact.
B. Hanson -2- Experience with previous baseline design/modification
The inspection will include 2 weeks onsite. The inspection team will consist of six NRC
inspections of similar depth and length has shown that th
inspectors who will focus on engineering/maintenance/operations of the selected components
is type of inspection is extremely resource intensive, both for the NRC inspectors and the licensee staff. In order to minimize the inspection impact on the site and to ensure a productive inspection for both parties, we have enclosed a request for information needed for the inspection.
and modifications. The current inspection schedule is as follows:
  It is important that all of these documents are up
    *  Preparation week: July 15-19, 2019;
-to-date and complete in order to minimize the number of additional documents requested during the preparation and/or the onsite portions of the inspection. Insofar as possible, this information should be provided electronically to the lead inspector. The information request has been divided into three groups:
    *   Onsite weeks: July 22-26, 2019, and August 5-9, 2019.
  The first group lists information necessary for our initial inspection scoping activities. This information should be provided to the lead inspector no later than
 
June 10 2019. By June 24, 2019, the lead inspector will communicate the initial selected set of approximately seven components
B. Hanson                                       -2-
and seven modifications.   The second group of documents requested is
Experience with previous baseline design/modification inspections of similar depth and length
those items needed to support our  
has shown that this type of inspection is extremely resource intensive, both for the NRC
in-office preparation activities. This set of documents, including the calculations associated with the initia
inspectors and the licensee staff. In order to minimize the inspection impact on the site and to
l l y selected components
ensure a productive inspection for both parties, we have enclosed a request for information
and the modification packages associated with the initially selected modifications, should be provided to the lead inspector at the Regional Office no later than
needed for the inspection.
July 8, 2019
It is important that all of these documents are up-to-date and complete in order to minimize the
. During the in
number of additional documents requested during the preparation and/or the onsite portions of
-office preparation activities, the team may identify additional information needed to support the inspection.
the inspection. Insofar as possible, this information should be provided electronically to the lead
  The last group includes the additional information above as well as plant specific reference material. This information should be available to the team onsite on July 22, 2019. It is also requested that corrective action documents and/or questions developed during the inspection be provided to the lead
inspector. The information request has been divided into three groups:
inspector as the documents
    *  The first group lists information necessary for our initial inspection scoping activities.
are generated.
        This information should be provided to the lead inspector no later than June 10 2019.
  The lead inspector for this inspection is
        By June 24, 2019, the lead inspector will communicate the initial selected set of
Mr. Michael A. Jones Jr.
        approximately seven components and seven modifications.
  We understand that our licensing contact for this inspection is
    *  The second group of documents requested is those items needed to support our
James Patterson
        in-office preparation activities. This set of documents, including the calculations
of your organization. If there are any questions about the inspection or the material requested in the enclosure, please contact the lead inspector at 630
        associated with the initially selected components and the modification packages
-829-9745 or via e-mail at Michael.Jones@nrc.gov.   This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject  
        associated with the initially selected modifications, should be provided to the lead
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, Control Number 3150
        inspector at the Regional Office no later than July 8, 2019. During the in-office
-0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
        preparation activities, the team may identify additional information needed to support
respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control Number.  
        the inspection.
B. Hanson -3- This letter and its enclosure will be made available for public inspection and copying at http://www.nrc.gov/reading
    *  The last group includes the additional information above as well as plant specific
-rm/adams.html
        reference material. This information should be available to the team onsite on
and at the NRC Public Document Room in accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations , Part 2.390, "Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding."
        July 22, 2019. It is also requested that corrective action documents and/or questions
  Sincerely, /RA/   Michael A. Jones Jr., Reactor Engineer
        developed during the inspection be provided to the lead inspector as the documents
Engineering Branch 2
        are generated.
Division of Reactor Safety  
The lead inspector for this inspection is Mr. Michael A. Jones Jr. We understand that our
  Docket Nos. 50
licensing contact for this inspection is James Patterson of your organization. If there are any
-373; 50-374 License Nos. NPF
questions about the inspection or the material requested in the enclosure, please contact the
-11; NPF-18 Enclosure:
lead inspector at 630-829-9745 or via e-mail at Michael.Jones@nrc.gov.
Document Request for Design Bases
This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject
  Assurance Inspection
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information
  cc: Distribution via LISTSERV
collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, Control
 
Number 3150-0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
B. Hanson -4- Letter to Bryan C. Hanson from Michael A. Jones Jr. dated April  
respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the
29, 2019. SUBJECT: LASALLE COUNTY STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2
requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control
-REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
Number.
FOR AN NRC TRIENNIAL BASELINE DESIGN BA
 
SES ASSURANCE INSPECTION (TEAM);
B. Hanson                                   -3-
INSPECTION
This letter and its enclosure will be made available for public inspection and copying at
REPORT 05000373/2019012; 05000374/2019012
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and at the NRC Public Document Room in
  DISTRIBUTION
accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 2.390, Public Inspections,
: Michael McCoppin
Exemptions, Requests for Withholding.
RidsNrrDorlLpl3
                                            Sincerely,
RidsNrrPMLaSalle
                                            /RA/
RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource
                                            Michael A. Jones Jr., Reactor Engineer
Darrell Roberts
                                            Engineering Branch 2
John Giessner
                                            Division of Reactor Safety
Jamnes Cameron
Docket Nos. 50-373; 50-374
Allan Barker
License Nos. NPF-11; NPF-18
DRPIII DRSIII                           ADAMS Accession Number: ML19120A230
Enclosure:
  OFFICE RIII       NAME MJones:cl   DATE 04/29/19   OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
Document Request for Design Bases
 
Assurance Inspection
DOCUMENT REQUEST FOR DESIGN BASES ASSURANCE INSPECTION
cc: Distribution via LISTSERV
Enclosure Inspection Report
 
: 05000373/2019012; 05000374/2019012
B. Hanson                                 -4-
  Inspection Dates
Letter to Bryan C. Hanson from Michael A. Jones Jr. dated April 29, 2019.
: July 22-26, 2019, and August 5-9, 2019   Inspection Procedure
SUBJECT: LASALLE COUNTY STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2REQUEST FOR
: 71111.21 M , "Design Bases Assurance Inspection (Team)
            INFORMATION FOR AN NRC TRIENNIAL BASELINE DESIGN BASES
Lead Inspector
            ASSURANCE INSPECTION (TEAM); INSPECTION REPORT 05000373/2019012;
: Michael A. Jones Jr.
            05000374/2019012
63 0-829-9745 Michael.Jones@nrc.gov
DISTRIBUTION:
  I. Information Requested for Selection of Components/Modifications
Michael McCoppin
  The following information is requested by
RidsNrrDorlLpl3
June 10, 2019
RidsNrrPMLaSalle
, or sooner, to facilitate inspection preparation. If you have any questions regarding this information, please call the lead inspector
RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource
as soon as possible. (Please provide the information electronically in "pdf" files, Excel, or other searchable formats, preferably on some portable electronic media (e.g., CD-ROM, DVD, etc.). The portable electronic media
Darrell Roberts
should contain descriptive names, and be indexed and hyperlinked to facilitate ease of use. Information in "lists" should contain enough information to be easily understood by someone who has knowledge of light water reactor technology).
John Giessner
  1. Risk-ranking of top  
Jamnes Cameron
2 50 components from your site specific probabilistic safety
Allan Barker
analysis (PSA) sorted by Risk
DRPIII
-Achievement Worth. Include values for Birnbaum Importance, Risk
DRSIII
-Reduction Worth, and Fussell
ADAMS Accession Number: ML19120A230
-Veseley (as applicable).
  OFFICE       RIII
  2. Risk-ranking of top 100 containment
NAME         MJones:cl
-related components (i.e., Large Early
DATE         04/29/19
Release Frequency) from your site specific PSA sorted by
                                OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
Risk-Achievement  
 
Worth. See examples in Inspection Manual Chapter 0609, Appendix H, Table 4.1, "Containment
          DOCUMENT REQUEST FOR DESIGN BASES ASSURANCE INSPECTION
-Related SSCs
Inspection Report:             05000373/2019012; 05000374/2019012
[Structures, Systems, and Components]
Inspection Dates:               July 22-26, 2019, and August 5-9, 2019
Considered for
Inspection Procedure:           71111.21M, Design Bases Assurance Inspection (Team)
LERF [Large Early Release Frequency]
Lead Inspector:                 Michael A. Jones Jr.
Implications.
                                630-829-9745
3. Provide a list of the top 200 cut
                                Michael.Jones@nrc.gov
-sets from your PSA.
I.     Information Requested for Selection of Components/Modifications
  4. Provide a list of the top 100 cut-sets for each initiator modeled in the PSA that contributes more than 5
      The following information is requested by June 10, 2019, or sooner, to facilitate
percent to the baseline plant core damage frequency.
      inspection preparation. If you have any questions regarding this information, please call
  5. Copies of PSA "system notebooks" and latest PSA summary document.
      the lead inspector as soon as possible. (Please provide the information electronically in
  6. Provide copies of the emergency operating procedures.
      pdf files, Excel, or other searchable formats, preferably on some portable electronic
  7. If you have an External Events or Fire PSA Model, provide the information requested in Items 1 and 2 for external events and fire. Provide narrative description of each coded event (including fire, flood zone description)
      media (e.g., CD-ROM, DVD, etc.). The portable electronic media should contain
      descriptive names, and be indexed and hyperlinked to facilitate ease of use. Information
DOCUMENT REQUEST FOR DESIGN BASES ASSURANCE INSPECTION
      in lists should contain enough information to be easily understood by someone who
2 8. Any pre-existing evaluation or list of components and associated calculations with low design margins, (i.e., pumps closest to the design limit for flow or pressure, diesel generator close to design required output, heat exchangers close to rated design heat removal etc.).Electronic copy of the site Individual Plant Examination of External Events, if available.
      has knowledge of light water reactor technology).
  9. List of available design (setup) margins in both the  
      1. Risk-ranking of top 250 components from your site specific probabilistic safety
open and closed direction (identify safety
            analysis (PSA) sorted by Risk-Achievement Worth. Include values for Birnbaum
-related direction) for valves
            Importance, Risk-Reduction Worth, and Fussell-Veseley (as applicable).
in t he Motor-Operated Valve
      2. Risk-ranking of top 100 containment-related components (i.e., Large Early Release
and Air-Operated Valve Programs
            Frequency) from your site specific PSA sorted by Risk-Achievement Worth. See
. Identify the basis for how the margin was determined. 10. List of high risk Maintenance Rule systems/components based on engineering or expert panel judgment
            examples in Inspection Manual Chapter 0609, Appendix H, Table 4.1, Containment-
(i.e., those systems/components not identified high risk in the P S A). 11. SSCs in the Maintenance Rule (a)(1) category
            Related SSCs [Structures, Systems, and Components] Considered for LERF [Large
for the last  
            Early Release Frequency] Implications.
3 years. 12. Site top ten issues list (if applicable)
      3. Provide a list of the top 200 cut-sets from your PSA.
13. A list of operating experience evaluations for the last  
      4. Provide a list of the top 100 cut-sets for each initiator modeled in the PSA that
3 years. 14. Information of any common cause failure of components experienced in the last  
            contributes more than 5 percent to the baseline plant core damage frequency.
5 years at your facility
      5. Copies of PSA system notebooks and latest PSA summary document.
15. List of Root Cause Evaluations associated with component failures or design issues initiated/completed in the last  
      6. Provide copies of the emergency operating procedures.
5 years. 16. List of open operability evaluations.
      7. If you have an External Events or Fire PSA Model, provide the information requested
  17. List of SSCs considered operable but degraded/non
            in Items 1 and 2 for external events and fire. Provide narrative description of each
-conforming.
            coded event (including fire, flood zone description).
  18. List of "permanent plant modifications" to SSCs that are field work complete  
                                                                                        Enclosure
in the last 3 years. (For the purpose of this inspection, permanent plant modifications include permanent: plant changes, design changes, set point changes, equivalency evaluations, suitability analyses, and commercial grade dedications.) The list should contain the number of each document, title, revision
 
/date, and the affected system.
  DOCUMENT REQUEST FOR DESIGN BASES ASSURANCE INSPECTION
  19. A list of calculation changes that have been issued for use
8. Any pre-existing evaluation or list of components and associated calculations with
in the last 3 years
    low design margins, (i.e., pumps closest to the design limit for flow or pressure,
20. Copies of procedures addressing the following: modifications, design changes, set point changes, equivalency evaluations or suitability analyses, commercial grade dedications, and post-modification testing
    diesel generator close to design required output, heat exchangers close to rated
21. A list of corrective action documents (open and closed) in the last 3 years
    design heat removal etc.).Electronic copy of the site Individual Plant Examination of
that address permanent plant modification
    External Events, if available.
s issues, concerns, or processes.
9. List of available design (setup) margins in both the open and closed direction
  These documents should also include the corrective action documents associated with the modification implementation.
    (identify safety-related direction) for valves in the Motor-Operated Valve and
  22. Current management and engineering organizational chart
    Air-Operated Valve Programs. Identify the basis for how the margin was determined.
23. Electronic copies of Updated Final Safety Analysis Repo
10. List of high risk Maintenance Rule systems/components based on engineering or
rt, Technical Specifications, Technical Specifications Bases, and Technical Requirements Manual.
    expert panel judgment (i.e., those systems/components not identified high risk in the
 
    PSA).
DOCUMENT REQUEST FOR DESIGN BASES ASSURANCE INSPECTION
11. SSCs in the Maintenance Rule (a)(1) category for the last 3 years.
3 24. Major one line electrical drawings (ac and dc) and key diagrams (paper copies).
12. Site top ten issues list (if applicable).
  25. Electronic copy of Piping and Instrumentation Drawings
13. A list of operating experience evaluations for the last 3 years.
(if available).
14. Information of any common cause failure of components experienced in the last
  II. Information Requested (for the approximate 7 selected components
    5 years at your facility.
and 7 selected modifications) to be Available by
15. List of Root Cause Evaluations associated with component failures or design issues
July 8, 2019, (will be reviewed by the team in the Regional office during the week of
    initiated/completed in the last 5 years.
July 15, 2019).   This information
16. List of open operability evaluations.
should be separated for each selected component
17. List of SSCs considered operable but degraded/non-conforming.
or modification , especially if provided electronically (e.g., folder with component or modification name that includes calculations, condition reports, maintenance history, etc
18. List of permanent plant modifications to SSCs that are field work complete in the
.). Items 1-1 2 are associated with the selected components and item 1
    last 3 years. (For the purpose of this inspection, permanent plant modifications
3 for the selected modifications.
    include permanent: plant changes, design changes, set point changes, equivalency
  1. List of condition reports (corrective action documents) associated with each of the selected components for the last  
    evaluations, suitability analyses, and commercial grade dedications.) The list should
6 years. 2. The maintenance history (corrective, preventive, and elective) associated with each of the selected components for the last 10 years. Identify frequency of preventive maintenance activities.
    contain the number of each document, title, revision/date, and the affected system.
  3. Copies of calculations associated with each of the selected components (if not previously provided), excluding data files. Please review the calculations and also provide copies of important referenced material (such as drawings, engineering requests, and vendor letters). [Pipe stress calculations excluded from this request]
19. A list of calculation changes that have been issued for use in the last 3 years.
  4. System Health Reports, System Descriptions, Design Basis Documents, and/or Training Lesson Plans associated with each of the selected components.
20. Copies of procedures addressing the following: modifications, design changes, set
  5. A list of modifications, including equivalency evaluations and setpoint changes, associated with each of the selected components. This list should include a descriptive paragraph on the purpose of the modification. Please ensure this list only includes design completed (not canceled) modifications.
    point changes, equivalency evaluations or suitability analyses, commercial grade
  6. Copies of operability evaluations (open/closed for last 3 years) associated with each of the selected components and plans for restoring operability, if applicable.
    dedications, and post-modification testing.
  7. Copies of selected operator work
21. A list of corrective action documents (open and closed) in the last 3 years that
-around evaluations associated with each of the selected components and plans for resolution, if applicable.
    address permanent plant modifications issues, concerns, or processes. These
  8. Copies of any open temporary modifications associated with each of the selected components, if applicable.
    documents should also include the corrective action documents associated with the
  9. Trend data on the selected electrical/mechanical components' performance for last  
    modification implementation.
3 years (For example, pumps' performance including in
22. Current management and engineering organizational chart.
-service testing, other vibration monitoring, oil sample results, etc., for valves:  
23. Electronic copies of Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Technical Specifications,
stroke time and leak rate results, diagnostic trend data, etc.). 10. Provide copies of the normal and abnormal operating procedures associated with the selected components and selected scenarios.
    Technical Specifications Bases, and Technical Requirements Manual.
 
                                            2
DOCUMENT REQUEST FOR DESIGN BASES ASSURANCE INSPECTION
 
4 11. List of time critica
      DOCUMENT REQUEST FOR DESIGN BASES ASSURANCE INSPECTION
l or risk significant operator actions associated with components. Identify those actions that do not have job performance measures.
    24. Major one line electrical drawings (ac and dc) and key diagrams (paper copies).
  12. Copy of latest completed tests and surveillances for each component, for example:
    25. Electronic copy of Piping and Instrumentation Drawings (if available).
  a. Pumps: comprehensive test, quarterly test, flow balance, etc.  
II. Information Requested (for the approximate 7 selected components and
  b. Valves: stroke time testing, diagnostic testing, leak testing, interlocks, etc. c. Heat exchangers/room coolers
    7 selected modifications) to be Available by July 8, 2019, (will be reviewed by
: thermal performance, clean/inspect, fan flows, etc. d. Components:
    the team in the Regional office during the week of July 15, 2019).
  Technical Specification surveillances.
    This information should be separated for each selected component or modification,
  e. Acceptance criteria basis calculations should also be included.
    especially if provided electronically (e.g., folder with component or modification name
  13. For each of the selected modifications, copies of associated
    that includes calculations, condition reports, maintenance history, etc.). Items 1-12 are
documents such  
    associated with the selected components and item 13 for the selected modifications.
as modification package, engineering changes, 50.59 screening or evaluation, calculations, post
    1. List of condition reports (corrective action documents) associated with each of the
-modification test packages, corrective action documents, design drawings, preventive maintenance requirements and procedures, etc. 14. A copy of any internal/external self
        selected components for the last 6 years.
-assessments and associated corrective action documents generated in preparation for the inspection.
    2. The maintenance history (corrective, preventive, and elective) associated with each
  15. A copy of engineering/operations related audits completed in the last 2 years.
        of the selected components for the last 10 years. Identify frequency of preventive
  III. Additional Information to be  
        maintenance activities.
Provided on July 22, 2019
    3. Copies of calculations associated with each of the selected components (if not
, On site (for final selected components
        previously provided), excluding data files. Please review the calculations and also
and modifications
        provide copies of important referenced material (such as drawings, engineering
1. During the in
        requests, and vendor letters). [Pipe stress calculations excluded from this request]
-office preparation
    4. System Health Reports, System Descriptions, Design Basis Documents, and/or
activities, the team will
        Training Lesson Plans associated with each of the selected components.
be making final selections  
    5. A list of modifications, including equivalency evaluations and setpoint changes,
and may identify additional information needed to support the inspection. The lead inspector will provide a list of the additional information needed during the week of July 15, 2019.   2. Schedule of any
        associated with each of the selected components. This list should include a
testing/maintenance activities to be conducted on the selected components during the t
        descriptive paragraph on the purpose of the modification. Please ensure this list only
wo onsite inspection weeks.
        includes design completed (not canceled) modifications.
  IV. Information Requested to be Provided Throughout the Inspection
    6. Copies of operability evaluations (open/closed for last 3 years) associated with each
  1. Copies of any corrective action documents generated as a result of the
        of the selected components and plans for restoring operability, if applicable.
team's questions or queries during this inspection
    7. Copies of selected operator work-around evaluations associated with each of the
2. Copies of the list of questions submitted by the team members and the status/resolution of the information requested (provide daily by 2:00 p.m. during the inspection to each team member)
        selected components and plans for resolution, if applicable.
3. One complete set of Piping and Instrumentation Drawings
    8. Copies of any open temporary modifications associated with each of the selected
(paper copies)
        components, if applicable.
    9. Trend data on the selected electrical/mechanical components performance for last
DOCUMENT REQUEST FOR DESIGN BASES ASSURANCE INSPECTION
        3 years (For example, pumps performance including in-service testing, other
5 4. Reference materials. (make available if needed during all onsite weeks):
        vibration monitoring, oil sample results, etc., for valves: stroke time and leak rate
  a. Individual Plant Examination/Probabilistic Risk Assessment report; b. Procurement documents for components  
        results, diagnostic trend data, etc.).
and modifications selected (verify retrievable);
    10. Provide copies of the normal and abnormal operating procedures associated with the
c. Plant procedures (normal, abnormal, emergency, surveillance, etc.); and
        selected components and selected scenarios.
  d. Vendor manuals.
                                              3
  If you have questions regarding the information requested, please contact the lead inspector.
 
      DOCUMENT REQUEST FOR DESIGN BASES ASSURANCE INSPECTION
    11. List of time critical or risk significant operator actions associated with components.
        Identify those actions that do not have job performance measures.
    12. Copy of latest completed tests and surveillances for each component, for example:
        a. Pumps: comprehensive test, quarterly test, flow balance, etc.
        b. Valves: stroke time testing, diagnostic testing, leak testing, interlocks, etc.
        c. Heat exchangers/room coolers: thermal performance, clean/inspect, fan flows,
            etc.
        d. Components: Technical Specification surveillances.
        e. Acceptance criteria basis calculations should also be included.
    13. For each of the selected modifications, copies of associated documents such
        as modification package, engineering changes, 50.59 screening or evaluation,
        calculations, post-modification test packages, corrective action documents, design
        drawings, preventive maintenance requirements and procedures, etc.
    14. A copy of any internal/external self-assessments and associated corrective action
        documents generated in preparation for the inspection.
    15. A copy of engineering/operations related audits completed in the last 2 years.
III. Additional Information to be Provided on July 22, 2019, Onsite (for final selected
    components and modifications)
    1. During the in-office preparation activities, the team will be making final selections
        and may identify additional information needed to support the inspection. The lead
        inspector will provide a list of the additional information needed during the week of
        July 15, 2019.
    2. Schedule of any testing/maintenance activities to be conducted on the selected
        components during the two onsite inspection weeks.
IV. Information Requested to be Provided Throughout the Inspection
    1. Copies of any corrective action documents generated as a result of the teams
        questions or queries during this inspection.
    2. Copies of the list of questions submitted by the team members and the
        status/resolution of the information requested (provide daily by 2:00 p.m.
        during the inspection to each team member).
    3. One complete set of Piping and Instrumentation Drawings (paper copies).
                                                  4
 
          DOCUMENT REQUEST FOR DESIGN BASES ASSURANCE INSPECTION
        4. Reference materials. (make available if needed during all onsite weeks):
          a. Individual Plant Examination/Probabilistic Risk Assessment report;
          b. Procurement documents for components and modifications selected (verify
              retrievable);
          c. Plant procedures (normal, abnormal, emergency, surveillance, etc.); and
          d. Vendor manuals.
If you have questions regarding the information requested, please contact the lead inspector.
                                                5
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 19:45, 19 October 2019

Ltr. 04/29/19 LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2 - Request for Information for an NRC Triennial Baseline Design Bases Assurance Inspection (Team); Inspection Report 05000373/2019012; 05000374/2019012 (DRS-M.Jones)
ML19120A230
Person / Time
Site: LaSalle  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 04/29/2019
From: Michael Jones
Division of Reactor Safety III
To: Bryan Hanson
Exelon Generation Co
References
IR 2019012
Download: ML19120A230 (9)


See also: IR 05000373/2019012

Text

April 29, 2019

Mr. Bryan C. Hanson

Senior VP, Exelon Generation Company, LLC

President and CNO, Exelon Nuclear

4300 Winfield Road

Warrenville, IL 60555

SUBJECT: LASALLE COUNTY STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2REQUEST FOR

INFORMATION FOR AN NRC TRIENNIAL BASELINE DESIGN BASES

ASSURANCE INSPECTION (TEAM); INSPECTION REPORT 05000373/2019012;

05000374/2019012

Dear Mr. Hanson:

On July 22, 2019, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will begin a Triennial

Baseline Design Bases Assurance Inspection (Team) at LaSalle County Station, Units 1

and 2. This inspection will be performed in accordance with NRC Baseline Inspection

Procedure 71111.21M.

The Design Bases Assurance Inspection focuses on the design, maintenance, and operation

of risk-significant components with low margin, or associated with an accident scenario, or a

specific system. The inspection also monitors the implementation of modifications to structures,

systems, and components as modifications to one system may also affect the design bases and

functioning of interfacing systems as well as introduce the potential for common cause failures.

The components and modifications to be reviewed during this baseline inspection will be

identified as part of the preparation for the inspection and finalized during the inoffice

preparation week that occurs prior to the first onsite inspection week. In addition, operating

experience issues, associated with the component samples, will also be selected for review.

The inspection team may request scenarios to be performed on the simulator. This request

would require support from your simulator staff to validate scenarios, simulator time, and a crew

to perform the actions which would most likely occur during the second onsite week. The team

will work closely with your staff early on during the inspection process to ensure this activity can

be accomplished with minimal impact.

The inspection will include 2 weeks onsite. The inspection team will consist of six NRC

inspectors who will focus on engineering/maintenance/operations of the selected components

and modifications. The current inspection schedule is as follows:

  • Preparation week: July 15-19, 2019;
  • Onsite weeks: July 22-26, 2019, and August 5-9, 2019.

B. Hanson -2-

Experience with previous baseline design/modification inspections of similar depth and length

has shown that this type of inspection is extremely resource intensive, both for the NRC

inspectors and the licensee staff. In order to minimize the inspection impact on the site and to

ensure a productive inspection for both parties, we have enclosed a request for information

needed for the inspection.

It is important that all of these documents are up-to-date and complete in order to minimize the

number of additional documents requested during the preparation and/or the onsite portions of

the inspection. Insofar as possible, this information should be provided electronically to the lead

inspector. The information request has been divided into three groups:

  • The first group lists information necessary for our initial inspection scoping activities.

This information should be provided to the lead inspector no later than June 10 2019.

By June 24, 2019, the lead inspector will communicate the initial selected set of

approximately seven components and seven modifications.

  • The second group of documents requested is those items needed to support our

in-office preparation activities. This set of documents, including the calculations

associated with the initially selected components and the modification packages

associated with the initially selected modifications, should be provided to the lead

inspector at the Regional Office no later than July 8, 2019. During the in-office

preparation activities, the team may identify additional information needed to support

the inspection.

  • The last group includes the additional information above as well as plant specific

reference material. This information should be available to the team onsite on

July 22, 2019. It is also requested that corrective action documents and/or questions

developed during the inspection be provided to the lead inspector as the documents

are generated.

The lead inspector for this inspection is Mr. Michael A. Jones Jr. We understand that our

licensing contact for this inspection is James Patterson of your organization. If there are any

questions about the inspection or the material requested in the enclosure, please contact the

lead inspector at 630-829-9745 or via e-mail at Michael.Jones@nrc.gov.

This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject

to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information

collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, Control

Number 3150-0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to

respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the

requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control

Number.

B. Hanson -3-

This letter and its enclosure will be made available for public inspection and copying at

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and at the NRC Public Document Room in

accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 2.390, Public Inspections,

Exemptions, Requests for Withholding.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Michael A. Jones Jr., Reactor Engineer

Engineering Branch 2

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket Nos. 50-373; 50-374

License Nos. NPF-11; NPF-18

Enclosure:

Document Request for Design Bases

Assurance Inspection

cc: Distribution via LISTSERV

B. Hanson -4-

Letter to Bryan C. Hanson from Michael A. Jones Jr. dated April 29, 2019.

SUBJECT: LASALLE COUNTY STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2REQUEST FOR

INFORMATION FOR AN NRC TRIENNIAL BASELINE DESIGN BASES

ASSURANCE INSPECTION (TEAM); INSPECTION REPORT 05000373/2019012;

05000374/2019012

DISTRIBUTION:

Michael McCoppin

RidsNrrDorlLpl3

RidsNrrPMLaSalle

RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource

Darrell Roberts

John Giessner

Jamnes Cameron

Allan Barker

DRPIII

DRSIII

ADAMS Accession Number: ML19120A230

OFFICE RIII

NAME MJones:cl

DATE 04/29/19

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

DOCUMENT REQUEST FOR DESIGN BASES ASSURANCE INSPECTION

Inspection Report: 05000373/2019012; 05000374/2019012

Inspection Dates: July 22-26, 2019, and August 5-9, 2019

Inspection Procedure: 71111.21M, Design Bases Assurance Inspection (Team)

Lead Inspector: Michael A. Jones Jr.

630-829-9745

Michael.Jones@nrc.gov

I. Information Requested for Selection of Components/Modifications

The following information is requested by June 10, 2019, or sooner, to facilitate

inspection preparation. If you have any questions regarding this information, please call

the lead inspector as soon as possible. (Please provide the information electronically in

pdf files, Excel, or other searchable formats, preferably on some portable electronic

media (e.g., CD-ROM, DVD, etc.). The portable electronic media should contain

descriptive names, and be indexed and hyperlinked to facilitate ease of use. Information

in lists should contain enough information to be easily understood by someone who

has knowledge of light water reactor technology).

1. Risk-ranking of top 250 components from your site specific probabilistic safety

analysis (PSA) sorted by Risk-Achievement Worth. Include values for Birnbaum

Importance, Risk-Reduction Worth, and Fussell-Veseley (as applicable).

2. Risk-ranking of top 100 containment-related components (i.e., Large Early Release

Frequency) from your site specific PSA sorted by Risk-Achievement Worth. See

examples in Inspection Manual Chapter 0609, Appendix H, Table 4.1, Containment-

Related SSCs [Structures, Systems, and Components] Considered for LERF [Large

Early Release Frequency] Implications.

3. Provide a list of the top 200 cut-sets from your PSA.

4. Provide a list of the top 100 cut-sets for each initiator modeled in the PSA that

contributes more than 5 percent to the baseline plant core damage frequency.

5. Copies of PSA system notebooks and latest PSA summary document.

6. Provide copies of the emergency operating procedures.

7. If you have an External Events or Fire PSA Model, provide the information requested

in Items 1 and 2 for external events and fire. Provide narrative description of each

coded event (including fire, flood zone description).

Enclosure

DOCUMENT REQUEST FOR DESIGN BASES ASSURANCE INSPECTION

8. Any pre-existing evaluation or list of components and associated calculations with

low design margins, (i.e., pumps closest to the design limit for flow or pressure,

diesel generator close to design required output, heat exchangers close to rated

design heat removal etc.).Electronic copy of the site Individual Plant Examination of

External Events, if available.

9. List of available design (setup) margins in both the open and closed direction

(identify safety-related direction) for valves in the Motor-Operated Valve and

Air-Operated Valve Programs. Identify the basis for how the margin was determined.

10. List of high risk Maintenance Rule systems/components based on engineering or

expert panel judgment (i.e., those systems/components not identified high risk in the

PSA).

11. SSCs in the Maintenance Rule (a)(1) category for the last 3 years.

12. Site top ten issues list (if applicable).

13. A list of operating experience evaluations for the last 3 years.

14. Information of any common cause failure of components experienced in the last

5 years at your facility.

15. List of Root Cause Evaluations associated with component failures or design issues

initiated/completed in the last 5 years.

16. List of open operability evaluations.

17. List of SSCs considered operable but degraded/non-conforming.

18. List of permanent plant modifications to SSCs that are field work complete in the

last 3 years. (For the purpose of this inspection, permanent plant modifications

include permanent: plant changes, design changes, set point changes, equivalency

evaluations, suitability analyses, and commercial grade dedications.) The list should

contain the number of each document, title, revision/date, and the affected system.

19. A list of calculation changes that have been issued for use in the last 3 years.

20. Copies of procedures addressing the following: modifications, design changes, set

point changes, equivalency evaluations or suitability analyses, commercial grade

dedications, and post-modification testing.

21. A list of corrective action documents (open and closed) in the last 3 years that

address permanent plant modifications issues, concerns, or processes. These

documents should also include the corrective action documents associated with the

modification implementation.

22. Current management and engineering organizational chart.

23. Electronic copies of Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Technical Specifications,

Technical Specifications Bases, and Technical Requirements Manual.

2

DOCUMENT REQUEST FOR DESIGN BASES ASSURANCE INSPECTION

24. Major one line electrical drawings (ac and dc) and key diagrams (paper copies).

25. Electronic copy of Piping and Instrumentation Drawings (if available).

II. Information Requested (for the approximate 7 selected components and

7 selected modifications) to be Available by July 8, 2019, (will be reviewed by

the team in the Regional office during the week of July 15, 2019).

This information should be separated for each selected component or modification,

especially if provided electronically (e.g., folder with component or modification name

that includes calculations, condition reports, maintenance history, etc.). Items 1-12 are

associated with the selected components and item 13 for the selected modifications.

1. List of condition reports (corrective action documents) associated with each of the

selected components for the last 6 years.

2. The maintenance history (corrective, preventive, and elective) associated with each

of the selected components for the last 10 years. Identify frequency of preventive

maintenance activities.

3. Copies of calculations associated with each of the selected components (if not

previously provided), excluding data files. Please review the calculations and also

provide copies of important referenced material (such as drawings, engineering

requests, and vendor letters). [Pipe stress calculations excluded from this request]

4. System Health Reports, System Descriptions, Design Basis Documents, and/or

Training Lesson Plans associated with each of the selected components.

5. A list of modifications, including equivalency evaluations and setpoint changes,

associated with each of the selected components. This list should include a

descriptive paragraph on the purpose of the modification. Please ensure this list only

includes design completed (not canceled) modifications.

6. Copies of operability evaluations (open/closed for last 3 years) associated with each

of the selected components and plans for restoring operability, if applicable.

7. Copies of selected operator work-around evaluations associated with each of the

selected components and plans for resolution, if applicable.

8. Copies of any open temporary modifications associated with each of the selected

components, if applicable.

9. Trend data on the selected electrical/mechanical components performance for last

3 years (For example, pumps performance including in-service testing, other

vibration monitoring, oil sample results, etc., for valves: stroke time and leak rate

results, diagnostic trend data, etc.).

10. Provide copies of the normal and abnormal operating procedures associated with the

selected components and selected scenarios.

3

DOCUMENT REQUEST FOR DESIGN BASES ASSURANCE INSPECTION

11. List of time critical or risk significant operator actions associated with components.

Identify those actions that do not have job performance measures.

12. Copy of latest completed tests and surveillances for each component, for example:

a. Pumps: comprehensive test, quarterly test, flow balance, etc.

b. Valves: stroke time testing, diagnostic testing, leak testing, interlocks, etc.

c. Heat exchangers/room coolers: thermal performance, clean/inspect, fan flows,

etc.

d. Components: Technical Specification surveillances.

e. Acceptance criteria basis calculations should also be included.

13. For each of the selected modifications, copies of associated documents such

as modification package, engineering changes, 50.59 screening or evaluation,

calculations, post-modification test packages, corrective action documents, design

drawings, preventive maintenance requirements and procedures, etc.

14. A copy of any internal/external self-assessments and associated corrective action

documents generated in preparation for the inspection.

15. A copy of engineering/operations related audits completed in the last 2 years.

III. Additional Information to be Provided on July 22, 2019, Onsite (for final selected

components and modifications)

1. During the in-office preparation activities, the team will be making final selections

and may identify additional information needed to support the inspection. The lead

inspector will provide a list of the additional information needed during the week of

July 15, 2019.

2. Schedule of any testing/maintenance activities to be conducted on the selected

components during the two onsite inspection weeks.

IV. Information Requested to be Provided Throughout the Inspection

1. Copies of any corrective action documents generated as a result of the teams

questions or queries during this inspection.

2. Copies of the list of questions submitted by the team members and the

status/resolution of the information requested (provide daily by 2:00 p.m.

during the inspection to each team member).

3. One complete set of Piping and Instrumentation Drawings (paper copies).

4

DOCUMENT REQUEST FOR DESIGN BASES ASSURANCE INSPECTION

4. Reference materials. (make available if needed during all onsite weeks):

a. Individual Plant Examination/Probabilistic Risk Assessment report;

b. Procurement documents for components and modifications selected (verify

retrievable);

c. Plant procedures (normal, abnormal, emergency, surveillance, etc.); and

d. Vendor manuals.

If you have questions regarding the information requested, please contact the lead inspector.

5