ML061000298: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 02/07/2006
| issue date = 02/07/2006
| title = Facility Post-examination Documents Cover Letter and Enclosures 3,4,5 and 7 for the Palisades Retake Examination - February 2006
| title = Facility Post-examination Documents Cover Letter and Enclosures 3,4,5 and 7 for the Palisades Retake Examination - February 2006
| author name = Harden P A
| author name = Harden P
| author affiliation = Nuclear Management Co, LLC
| author affiliation = Nuclear Management Co, LLC
| addressee name = Bies M A, Walton K
| addressee name = Bies M, Walton K
| addressee affiliation = NRC/RGN-III
| addressee affiliation = NRC/RGN-III
| docket = 05000255
| docket = 05000255
Line 20: Line 20:
February 10, 2006 Mr. Keith Walton, Lead Examiner U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 2443 Warrenville Road Suite 21 0 Lisle. IL 60532-4352 ATTENTION: Mary Ann Bies Reactor ODerator Initial License Written Examination Administration (Retest)
February 10, 2006 Mr. Keith Walton, Lead Examiner U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 2443 Warrenville Road Suite 21 0 Lisle. IL 60532-4352 ATTENTION: Mary Ann Bies Reactor ODerator Initial License Written Examination Administration (Retest)
On February 7, 2006, Nuclear Management Company, LLC, administered the subject written examination to one Reactor Operator (RO) candidate at the Palisades Nuclear Plant (PNP).
On February 7, 2006, Nuclear Management Company, LLC, administered the subject written examination to one Reactor Operator (RO) candidate at the Palisades Nuclear Plant (PNP).
An examination review was conducted on February 8, 2006, with the candidate and appropriate training personnel, in accordance with NUREG-1021, "Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors," Revision  
An examination review was conducted on February 8, 2006, with the candidate and appropriate training personnel, in accordance with NUREG-1021, "Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors," Revision
: 9. There were no substantive comments from the candidate, and no issues identified as a result of the written examination performance analysis. Therefore, there are no formal comments to submit. The following enclosures constitute the examination documentation per NUREG-1021, Revision 9, ES-501, "Initial Post-Examination Activities:" Enclosure 1 : Form ES-401-7, "Site-Specific RO Written Examination Cover Sheet," signed by applicant with appropriate exam Start Time and Finish Time. Please note the Finish Time reflects a 15 minute time extension as requested and granted by telephone conversation. Stapled to the back of this form is the applicant's original answer sheet, graded in red ink. Enclosure 2: Clean copy of applicant's answer sheet. Enclosure 3: "Distracter Adjustments." A summary of several adjustments made to distracter sequencing for balancing the number of As, B's, etc. Enclosure 4: "Cross Reference of Written Exam Sequencing Numbers." This matrix indicates the actual sequence of questions administered during the exam, with a cross reference to the question number of the original exam submittal.
: 9. There were no substantive comments from the candidate, and no issues identified as a result of the written examination performance analysis. Therefore, there are no formal comments to submit. The following enclosures constitute the examination documentation per NUREG-1021, Revision 9, ES-501, "Initial Post-Examination Activities:" Enclosure 1 : Form ES-401-7, "Site-Specific RO Written Examination Cover Sheet," signed by applicant with appropriate exam Start Time and Finish Time. Please note the Finish Time reflects a 15 minute time extension as requested and granted by telephone conversation. Stapled to the back of this form is the applicant's original answer sheet, graded in red ink. Enclosure 2: Clean copy of applicant's answer sheet. Enclosure 3: "Distracter Adjustments." A summary of several adjustments made to distracter sequencing for balancing the number of As, B's, etc. Enclosure 4: "Cross Reference of Written Exam Sequencing Numbers." This matrix indicates the actual sequence of questions administered during the exam, with a cross reference to the question number of the original exam submittal.
27780 Blue Star Memorial Highway Covert, Michigan 49043-9530 Telephone: 269.764.2000 FEE 13 2006 Mr. Keith Walton Page 2 Enclosure 5: Original answer key used to perform preliminary grading by PNP personnel.
27780 Blue Star Memorial Highway Covert, Michigan 49043-9530 Telephone: 269.764.2000 FEE 13 2006 Mr. Keith Walton Page 2 Enclosure 5: Original answer key used to perform preliminary grading by PNP personnel.
Line 30: Line 30:
ENCLOSURE 4 CROSS REFERENCE OF WRITTEN EXAM SEQUENCING NUMBERS 1 Page Follows Palisades Nuclear Plant Feb. 2006 RO Initial License Exam Cross Reference of Written Exam Sequencing Numbers Orig. No.  
ENCLOSURE 4 CROSS REFERENCE OF WRITTEN EXAM SEQUENCING NUMBERS 1 Page Follows Palisades Nuclear Plant Feb. 2006 RO Initial License Exam Cross Reference of Written Exam Sequencing Numbers Orig. No.  
= Sequence number of the original submittal New No. = Sequence number as administered to the candidate ENCLOSURE 5 ORIGINAL ANSWER KEY USED TO PERFORM PRELIMINARY GRADING 1 Page Follows K t\l i-cfi FORMNO.8 -E REORDER ONLINE www scantroiifnrnis corn l!!i ENCLOSURE 7 WRITTEN EXAMINATION GRADING QUALITY CHECKLIST 1 Page Follows   
= Sequence number of the original submittal New No. = Sequence number as administered to the candidate ENCLOSURE 5 ORIGINAL ANSWER KEY USED TO PERFORM PRELIMINARY GRADING 1 Page Follows K t\l i-cfi FORMNO.8 -E REORDER ONLINE www scantroiifnrnis corn l!!i ENCLOSURE 7 WRITTEN EXAMINATION GRADING QUALITY CHECKLIST 1 Page Follows   
- I ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-I Quality Checklist Item Description  
- I ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-I Quality Checklist Item Description
: 1. 2. Clean answer sheets copied before grading Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)
: 1. 2. Clean answer sheets copied before grading Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)
Grading for all borderline cases (80 i2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable,  YO on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity 3. 4. 5. 6. evel: ROEJSROO Initials - Date a. Grader b. Facility Reviewerr) 2/7A L c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) d. NRC Supervisor  
Grading for all borderline cases (80 i2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable,  YO on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity 3. 4. 5. 6. evel: ROEJSROO Initials - Date a. Grader b. Facility Reviewerr) 2/7A L c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) d. NRC Supervisor
(*) fi~nzyn z\14)w (') The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; ES-403, Page 5 of 5 Letter to File, This letter is to document that the licensee did not have any post-exam comments for the Palisades Retake written exam of February 2006. Rkymondl Keith Walton Chief Examiner}}
(*) fi~nzyn z\14)w (') The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; ES-403, Page 5 of 5 Letter to File, This letter is to document that the licensee did not have any post-exam comments for the Palisades Retake written exam of February 2006. Rkymondl Keith Walton Chief Examiner}}

Revision as of 21:24, 13 July 2019

Facility Post-examination Documents Cover Letter and Enclosures 3,4,5 and 7 for the Palisades Retake Examination - February 2006
ML061000298
Person / Time
Site: Palisades Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 02/07/2006
From: Harden P
Nuclear Management Co
To: Bies M, Walton K
NRC/RGN-III
Shared Package
ML060760460 List:
References
50-255/06-301
Download: ML061000298 (13)


Text

FACILITY POST-EXAMINATION DOCUMENTS COVER LETTER AND ENCLOSURES 3,4,5, AND 7 FOR THE PALISADES RETAKE EXAMINATION - FEBRUARY 2006 Palisades Nuclear Plant Operated by Nuclear Management Company, LLC Cornmined ro NMC> Nw/em *xce//en~

February 10, 2006 Mr. Keith Walton, Lead Examiner U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 2443 Warrenville Road Suite 21 0 Lisle. IL 60532-4352 ATTENTION: Mary Ann Bies Reactor ODerator Initial License Written Examination Administration (Retest)

On February 7, 2006, Nuclear Management Company, LLC, administered the subject written examination to one Reactor Operator (RO) candidate at the Palisades Nuclear Plant (PNP).

An examination review was conducted on February 8, 2006, with the candidate and appropriate training personnel, in accordance with NUREG-1021, "Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors," Revision

9. There were no substantive comments from the candidate, and no issues identified as a result of the written examination performance analysis. Therefore, there are no formal comments to submit. The following enclosures constitute the examination documentation per NUREG-1021, Revision 9, ES-501, "Initial Post-Examination Activities:" Enclosure 1 : Form ES-401-7, "Site-Specific RO Written Examination Cover Sheet," signed by applicant with appropriate exam Start Time and Finish Time. Please note the Finish Time reflects a 15 minute time extension as requested and granted by telephone conversation. Stapled to the back of this form is the applicant's original answer sheet, graded in red ink. Enclosure 2: Clean copy of applicant's answer sheet. Enclosure 3: "Distracter Adjustments." A summary of several adjustments made to distracter sequencing for balancing the number of As, B's, etc. Enclosure 4: "Cross Reference of Written Exam Sequencing Numbers." This matrix indicates the actual sequence of questions administered during the exam, with a cross reference to the question number of the original exam submittal.

27780 Blue Star Memorial Highway Covert, Michigan 49043-9530 Telephone: 269.764.2000 FEE 13 2006 Mr. Keith Walton Page 2 Enclosure 5: Original answer key used to perform preliminary grading by PNP personnel.

Enclosure 6: Documentation of "Questions Asked by the Applicant During Examination Administration." Enclosure 7: Completed Form ES-403-1, "Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist." Per NRC instructions, a seating chart is not included, since there was a single candidate.

Form ES-201-3, "Examination Security Agreement," will be forwarded upon completion of all final signoffs.

-.. Paul A. Harden Site Vice President, Palisades Nuclear Plant Nuclear Management Company, LLC Enclosures (7)

ENCLOSURE 3 DISTRACTER ADJUSTMENTS 1 Page Follows Palisades Nuclear Plant February 2006 RO Initial License Exam Distractor Adjustments Please note the following changes made to the answer key for the purpose of balancing distractors. These adjustments were made on February 1, 2006 as part of preparation for exam administration.

4 Question 18 Changed answer from C to A 4 Question 56 Changed answer from D to C 4 Question 57 Changed answer from D to C 4 Question 61 Changed answer from D to A Also, please note that the sequencing of exam questions was adjusted (with permission of NRC examiner) prior to exam administration. The question numbers referred to in this document reflect the new question numbers that resulted from the new sequence.

ENCLOSURE 4 CROSS REFERENCE OF WRITTEN EXAM SEQUENCING NUMBERS 1 Page Follows Palisades Nuclear Plant Feb. 2006 RO Initial License Exam Cross Reference of Written Exam Sequencing Numbers Orig. No.

= Sequence number of the original submittal New No. = Sequence number as administered to the candidate ENCLOSURE 5 ORIGINAL ANSWER KEY USED TO PERFORM PRELIMINARY GRADING 1 Page Follows K t\l i-cfi FORMNO.8 -E REORDER ONLINE www scantroiifnrnis corn l!!i ENCLOSURE 7 WRITTEN EXAMINATION GRADING QUALITY CHECKLIST 1 Page Follows

- I ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-I Quality Checklist Item Description

1. 2. Clean answer sheets copied before grading Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)

Grading for all borderline cases (80 i2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, YO on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity 3. 4. 5. 6. evel: ROEJSROO Initials - Date a. Grader b. Facility Reviewerr) 2/7A L c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) d. NRC Supervisor

(*) fi~nzyn z\14)w (') The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; ES-403, Page 5 of 5 Letter to File, This letter is to document that the licensee did not have any post-exam comments for the Palisades Retake written exam of February 2006. Rkymondl Keith Walton Chief Examiner