ML20268A073
| ML20268A073 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palisades  |
| Issue date: | 07/06/2020 |
| From: | Bryan Bergeon Entergy Nuclear Operations |
| To: | NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
| Bergeon B | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19213A180 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML20268A073 (2) | |
Text
ES-401 Record of Rejected K/As Form ES-401-4 PALISADES 2020 initial license exam outline feedback Tier / Randomly Reason for Rejection Group Selected K/A RO Outline 000033 AA2.04 Rejected 000032A2.09 because the SR Nuclear Instruments remain energized at all power levels at Palisades. High Voltage mis-adjustments Tier 1/ do not result in any protective functions (trips, etc) occurring too early or Group 2 too late based on poor discrimination of neutrons from gammas at low (Q#20) power.
Replaced with 0000033 AA2.04 to keep outline balance, and sample an APE that was not previously sampled on either section of exam.
RO Outline 015K3.01 Rejected 015K3.06 because there is NO Reactor Regulating System at Tier 2 / Palisades.
Group 2 Replaced with 015K3.01 to keep outline balanced and sample a concept (Q#58) that does apply to Palisades.
RO Outline 022AK1.03 Rejected 022AK1.04 because Palisades does NOT have a charge valve flow controller that is shifted from manual to automatic.
Tier 1 /
Group 1 Replaced with 022AK1.03 to keep outline balanced and sample a concept that does apply to Palisades.
(Q#6)
RO Outline 003AA1.05 Rejected 003AA1.02 because Palisades does NOT recover dropped rod(s),
thus there are no controls and components necessary to operate / monitor Tier 1 / to recover rod.
Group 2 Replaced with 003AA1.05 to keep outline balanced and sample a concept (Q#19) that does apply to Palisades.
RO Outline 003K3.04 Rejected 003K3.03 because I could not develop a psychometrically sound question that did not ask the same thing twice.
Tier 2 /
Group 1 Replaced with 003K3.04 to keep outline balanced and sample an operationally valid concept with RCPs and RPS.
(Q#28)
RO Outline 064K2.02 Rejected 064K2.03 because I could not develop a psychometrically sound question that did not create a double jeopardy situation with a previously Tier 1 / developed question (RO #27)
Group 2 Replaced with 064K2.02 to keep the outline balanced and sample an (Q#50) operationally valid concept that did not create double jeopardy.
RO Outline 051G2.1.8 Rejected 051G2.1.30 because I could not develop a psychometrically sound RO level question that did not test minutia Tier 1 /
Group 2 Replaced with 051G2.1.8 to keep the outline balanced and sample an operationally valid item.
(Q #21)
ES-401 Record of Rejected K/As Form ES-401-4 PALISADES 2020 initial license exam outline feedback Other Comments on the outline:
SRO Question #91 has selected 001A2.14, and quoted the verbiage of A2.14. but the K/A topic column has the wrong number (A2.12). The test item was developed for A2.14.
RO question 33 has selected 006A3.01, and has listed the text of the A3.01 KA in the topics column, but has listed the 01 in the A4 column, instead of the A3 category column. The test item was developed for A3.01.
A couple of questions (RO #17, RO#24) have KAs that deal with guidance in the EOPs, but at Palisades, there is no EOP for those E/APEs. There are AOPs, and the test items were developed for the AOPs. The KAs were NOT rejected.
SRO question #88 has selected KA 026A2.05 which deals with the failure of the chemical addition tanks to inject. Palisades has no chemical addition tanks, but the KA was not rejected because a test item was developed around the idea of failure to add the chemicals.
RO question 52 has selected KA 073 A4.02, but has the text for A4.03. Test item was written for A4.02.
RO question 42 has an incorrect Importance Rating listed. It should be 3.4 vice 3.9.