ML083040103

Draft - Outlines (Folder 2)

ML083040103
Person / Time
Site:	Nine Mile Point
Issue date:	09/01/2008
From:	Nine Mile Point
To:	D'Antonio J Operations Branch I
Hansell S
Shared Package
ML081060454	List: IR 05000220/2008302 ML081620386 ML082770233 ML082980037 ML083040099 ML083040103 ML083040108 ML083040111 ML083040117 ML083120374 ML083220034 ML083230106 ML083230120 ML083230370 ML083230376 ML083230387 ML083230427 ML083230440 ML083230507 ML090330469
References
50-220/08-302, ES-301, ES-301-1, TAC U01690 50-220/08-302
Download: ML083040103 (35)

Text

ES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 Type Code* D N N D Date of Examination: October 2008 Operating Test Number: 1 Describe activity to be performed Facility:

Examination Level: RO Administrative Topic (see Note) Nine Mile Point Unit 1 Conduct of Operations Conduct of Operations Equipment Control Emergency Plan PERFORM CONTROL SWITCH LINEUP VERIFICATION JVhile performing N1 -PM-DOO2 lineup verification, identify system components that are not in the correct lineup N 1 -PM-D002 2.1.29 (4.1) Knowledge of how to conduct system lineups, such ;as valves, breakers, switches, etc. DETERMINE PERSONNEL OVERTIME AVAILABILITY Given a list of personnel and their previous work hours, determine who is available for overtime and why others are not available based on Tech Spec and administrative requirements GAP- FFD-02 2.1.5 (3.9) Ability to use procedures related to shift staffing, such iaS minimum crew requirements, overtime limitations, etc. PERF'ORM DAILY THERMAL LIMIT SURVEILLANCE Perfo1.m the Daily Thermal Limit Surveillance and identify discrepancies N1-RIISP-1, 3D Monicore 2.2.1 ;! (3.7) Knowledge of surveillance procedures PERFORM ACTIONS FOR A MEDICAL EMERGENCY WITH AN INJURED, CONTAMINATED PERSON Given a report of a medical emergency with an injured, contaminated person, perform the actions of the Chief Shift Operator Medical Emergency Checklist.

EPIP-EPP-04 2.4.30 (3.9)

Knowledge of RO responsibilities in emergency plan iinplementation.

NOTE: All items (5 total) are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless they are retaking only the administrative topics, when all 5 are required.

• Type Codes & Criteria: (C)ontrol room, (S)imulator, or Class(R)oom (D)irect from bank

(~3 for ROs; (N)ew or (M)odified from bank (21) (P)revious 2 exams (51; randomly selected) 4 for SROs & RO retakes) xc ES-301 Administiative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 Facility:

Examination Level: SRO Nine Mile Point Unit 1 Date of Examination: October 2008 Operating Test Number: 1 Administrative Topic (see Note) Conduct of Operations Conduct of Operations Equipment Control Radiation Control Type Code* N N D P Describe activity to be performed PERFORM A TIME TO BOIL CALCULATION FOR THE SPENT FUEL POOL Giveri shutdown conditions perform a time to boil calculation N 1 -0DP-OPS-0108 2.1.3:' (4.6) Knowledge of procedures, guidelines, or limitations associated with reactivity management DETEiRMlNE PERSONNEL OVERTIME AVAILABILITY - Giveri a list of personnel and their previous work hours, determine who is available for overtime and why others are not available based on Tech Spec and administrative req u i r.emen ts. GAP-FFD-02 2.1.5 (3.9) Ability to use procedures related to shift staffing, such as minimum crew requirements, overtime limitations, etc. REVIIEW SURVEILLANCE DATA INCLUDING ACTIONS FOR UNSATISFACTORY CONDITIONS Reviemw and evaluate surveillance acceptance criteria inclucling TS implication for unsatisfactory conditions.

Nl-S'r-Ql9; Technical Specifications 2.2. I:? (3.4) Knowledge of surveillance procedures.

2.2.24 (3.8) Ability to analyze the effect of maintenance activities on LCO status. DETEiRMlNE ACTIONS REQUIRED FOR AN INOPERABLE EFFLUENT RADIATION MONITOR Giveri plant conditions, determine operability of an effluent radiation monitor and apply action statements contained in the station ODCM. (CR NM-2004-976) ARP H1-4-5, ODCM 2.3.1 .I (4.3) Ability to control radiation releases.

Emergency Plan N CLASSIFY EMERGENCY EVENTS AND COMPLETE NOTllFlCATlON FACT SHEET Classify emergency events based on plant conditions and complete the appropriate notification form(s). Given further degraded plant conditions, reclassify the emergency event. EPIP-EPP-01, EPIP-EPP-01-EAL, EPIP-EPP-20 2.4.40 (4.5) Knowledge of SRO responsibilities in emergency plan iinplementation 2.4.4'1 (4.6) Knowledge of the emergency action level thresholds and classifications NOTE: All items (5 total) are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless they are retaking only the administrative topics, when all 5 are required.

______~~ ~

• Type Codes & Criteria: (C)ontrol room, (S)imulator, or Class(R)oom (D)irect from bank (53 for ROs; 5 4 for SROs & RO retakes) (N)ew or (M)odified from bank (21) (P)revious 2 exams (51; randomly selected)

ES-301 Control Roomlln-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301-2 Facility: Nine Mile Point Unit 1 Date of Examination: October 2008 Exam Level: RO/SRO-I/SI?O-U Operating Test No.: 1 Control Room Systems@ (8 for RO); (7 for SRO-I); (2 or 3 for SRO-U, including 1 ESF) - SRO-U in BOLD - #'s S-I ,3,7/P-1,2 c Type Code*

Safety Function System / JPM Title I/ D,A, EN,S 1 Initiate Liquid Poison Injection, RWCCI Fails to Isolate WA 21 1000 AI .08 3.7/3.8 Transfer Torus Water to the Waste Collector Tank Using Containment Spray Loop 11 1 WA 295029 EA1.03 2.9/3.0 D.S 5 2 S-3 Transfer Load from #I 1 and #I 2 Feedwater Pumps to #13 Feedwater Pump, #I 3 Feedwater FCV fails closed WA 259001 A2.07 3.7/3.8 Startup Control Room Ventilation System WA 290003 A4.01 3.2/3.2 EDG 103 S/D - PB 103 Return to Normal Power WA 264000 A4.05 3.6/3.7 Perform RWM Diagnostic

& Rod Blocc Tests WA 201006 A4.01 thru A4.06, 2.9/2.9 to 3.3/3.4 S-4 S-5 S-6 9 6 NS 7 N .S 4 S-7 Remove the Generator from the Grid and Perform Emergency Governor Trip Test WA 245000 A4.02 (3.1/2.9), A4.06 (2.7/2.6) 3 S-8 RO ONLY Alternate RPV Blowdown Through Emergency Condenser Vents to Torus WA 207000 AI .05 (4.0/4.2), A4.05 (3.5/3.7), A4.07 (4.2/4.3) 11 Implant Systems@ (3 for RO; 3 or 2 for SRO-LI) P-I Air Start the Diesel Fire Pump WA 286000 A3.01 3.4/3.4 I P-2 Initiation of Emergency Condensers fr,om Remote Shutdown Panel 11 I I WA 29501 6 MI .09 4.0/4.0 1 1 P-3 Place UPS 162A in Standby from Shiitdown Condition and Transfer to Supply RPS 11 ES-301 Control Room/ln-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-30 1 -2 nt) systems must be different and serve different safety functions; safety functions; in-plant systems and functions may overlap

• Type Codes Criteria for RO / SRO-I / SRO-U - (A)lternate path (C)ontrol room (D)irect from bank s9I~als4 (E)mergency or abnormal in-plant SI I21 I21 (EN)gineered safety feature - I - I 21 (control room system) (L)ow-Power I Shutdown 21 I21 121 (N)ew or (M)odified from bank including 1(A) 2212212 1 (P)revious 2 exams 5 3 Is 3 I S 2 (randomly selected) (WA SI 121 I21 (S)imulator

-~

ES-301 Control Room/ln-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-30 1 -2 2007 NRC Examination Summary Description of JPMs s-I s-2 s-3 s-4 s-5 S-6 s-7 S-8 P-1 P-2 P-3 This is an alternate path bank JPM in thls Reactivity Control Safety Function area. The applicant will inject Liquid Poison N1-OP-12 and Reactor Water Cleanup will fail to isolate requiring manual actions. This is a bank JPM in the Containment Integrity Safety Function area. The applicant will transfer torus water to the Waste Collector Tank. using Containment Spray Loop 11 1 IAW N1-EOP-1, Att. 1 5. This is a new alternate path JPM in the Rx Water Inventory Control Safety Function area. The applicant will transfer load from

1. 11 and #I2 Feedwater Pumps to #I3 Feedwater Pump IAW NI- OP-16 and the #I 3 pump flow control valve will malfunction requiring manual actions to control vessel level. This is a bank JPM in the Radioactivity fielease Safety Function area. The applicant will startup Control Room Ventilation IAW Nl-OP-4!3. This is a new alternate path JPM in the IElectrical Safety Function area. The applicant will shutdown Emergency Diesel Generator 103 and return Powerboard 103 to Normal Power IAW N1-OP-45, section G.2.0. The Emergency Diesel Generator will fail to stop after a cooldown period, requiring a manual trip to be performed. This is a new JPM in the lnstrumentatiori Safety Function area. The applicant will perform Rod Worth Minimizer Post Maintenance Tests IAW Nl-ST-V3, Section 8.2 thru 8.4. This is a new JPM in the Heat Removal Safety Function area. The applicant will perform the Emergency Governor Trip Test and Rernove the Generator from the Grid IAW N1-OP-31, Section G.2.0 and Nl-PM-V7, Section 8.1. This is a bank JPM in the Reactor Pressure Control Safety Function area. The applicant will perform an Alternate RPV Blowdown Through the Emergency Condenser Vents to Torus IAW N1-EOP-1, Att.14.

This is a bank JPM in the Plant Service

!Systems Safety Function area.

The applicant will perform an Air Start of the Diesel Fire Pump IAb' Nl-OP-21A, Section H.4.4. This is an alternate path bank JPM in the Reactor Pressure Control Safety Function area. The applicant will perform an Initiation of EC:; from Remote Shutdown Panel 11 IAW N1-SOP-21.2. Additional actions will be required to control the reactor pressure. This is a modified bank JPM in the Eleclrical Safety Function area. The applicant will place UPS 162A in Standby from a Shutdown Condition and Transfer the supply to RPS 11 IAW N1-OP-40, Section E.l .O.

ES-401 NMPI Writtlsn Examination Outline Form ES-401-1 =acilitv:

NMPI NRC Date of Exam: October 2008 Note 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.

• 8. 9. Ensure that at least two topics from every applicable WA category are sampled within each tier of the RO and SRO-only outlines (i.e., except for one category in Tier 3 of the SRO-only outline, the "Tier Totals" in each WA category shall nclt be less than two). The point total for each group and tier in the proposed outline must match that specified in the table.

The final point total for each group aiid tier may deviate by k1 from that specified in the table based on NRC revisions. The final RO exam must total 75 points and the SRO-only exam must total 25 points. Systems/evolutions within each group are identified on the associated outline; systems or evolutions that do not apply at the facility should be deleted and justified; operationally important, site-specific systems that are not included on the outline should be added. Refer to section D.l .b of ES-401, for guidance regarding elimination of inappropriate WA statements. Select topics from as many systems and evolutions as possible; sample every system or evolution in the group before selecting a second topic for any system or evolution. Absent a plant specific priority, only those KAs having an importance rating (IR) of 2.5 or higher shall be selected. Use the RO and SRO iatings for the RO and SRO-only portions, respectively.

Select SRO topics for Tiers 1 and 2 .from the shaded systems and WA categories.

The generic (G) WAS in Tiers 1 and 2 shall be selected from Section 2 of the WA Catalog, but the topics must be relevant to the applicable evolution or system.

Refer to Section D.l .b of ES-401 for the applicable WAS On the following pages, enter the W,4 numbers, a brief description of each topic, the topics' importance ratings (IR) for the applicable license level, and the point totals (#) for each system and category. Enter the group and tier totals for each category in the table above. If fuel handling equipment is sampled in other than Category A2 or G* on the SRO-only exam, enter it on the left side of Column A2 for Tier 2, Group 2 (Note #I does not apply). Use duplicate pages for RO and SRO-only exams.

For Tier 3, select topics from Section 2 of the WA Catalog, and enter the WA numbers, descriptions, IRs. and point totals

(#) on Form ES-401-3. Limit SRO selections to WAS that are linked to .. 1 OCFR55.43 ES-40 1 Form ES-401-1 NMPI Written Examination Outline Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions - Tier 1 Group 1 295028 High Drywell 295006 SCRAM/ I 295003 Partial or Complete Loss of AC / 6 concepts as they apply to SCRAM CONDITION PRESENT AND REACTOR POWER ABOVE 295037 SCRAM Conditions Present and Reactor Power Above APRM Downscale or interrelations between PARTIAL OR COMPLETE LOSS OF A.C. POWER and the following:

Station ES-401 Form ES-401-1 NMPI Written Examination Outline Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions - Tier 1 Group 1 295026 Suppression Pool High Water Temp.

I 5 295006 SCRAM I 1 295030 Low Suppression Pool Water Level I5 295028 High Drywell Temperature I 5 295025 High Reactor Pressure I 3 295016 Control Room Abandonment I 7 295038 High Off-site Release Rate I9 600000 Plant Fire On-site I8 700000 Generator Voltage and Electric Grid Disturbances 295001 Partial or Complete Loss of Forced Core Flow Circulation I1 & 4 295021 Loss of Shutdown Cooling I4 295031 Reactor Low Water Level I2 X apply to LOW SUPPRESSION POOL WATER LEVEL:

+ X X X to HIGH OFF-SITE RELEASE RATE: Process liquid radiation monitoring system X T AND ELECTRIC GRID DISTURBANCES:

Generator frequency limitations.

IRCULATION

Neutron logic used to assess the status of safety functions, such as reactivity control, core cooling and heat removal, reactor coolant system integrity, containment conditions.

4.0 54 55 ES-40 1 Form ES-401-1 NMPI Written Examination Outline Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions - Tier 1 Group 1 -1 295019 Partial or Complete Loss of Inst. Air / 8 295023 Refueling Acc I 8 295018 Partial or Complete Loss of CCW 18 4 KIA Category Totals:

X 5 - monitor the following as they apply to PARTIAL OR COMPLETE LOSS OF COMPONENT COOLING WATER

Backuo ES-401 X X Form ES-401-1 X 21 NMPI Written Examination Outline Emergency and Abnormal Plant Evolutions - Tier 1 Group 2 - 295033 High Secondary Containment Area Radiation Levels I9 295032 High Secondary Containment Area 295020 lnadvertent Cont.

Isolation

/ 5 & 7 Hydrogen conc. I5 K/A Category Totals:

295007 High Reactor Pressure I3 1 295010 High Drywell Pressure / 5 I 295015 Incomplete SCRAM I 1 Ix I 295008 High Reactor Water Level I2 295002 Loss of Main Condenser Vacuum I3 295007 High Reactor Pressure 13 Temperature I5 500000 Hiah CTMT of bases in technical specificati6n.s Ability to verify system alarm setpoints and operate controls monitor the following as they apply to HIGH REACTOR PRESSURE

X - 3.4 4.2 - 4.0 3.8 3.1 3.4 3.7 3.8 3.3 3.1 - 83 84 - 85 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 713 ES-401 NMPI Written Examination Outline Plant Syslems - Tier 2 Group 1 Form ES-401-1 System # / Name 300000 Instrument Air 278000 ADS 205000 Shutdown Cooling 207000 Isolation (Emergency)

Coildenser 263000 DC Electrical Distribution 209001 LPCS I 239002 SRVs 1( impacts of the following on the AUTOMATIC DEPRESSURIZATION SYSTEM, and (b) based on those predictions, use procedures to correct, control, or mitigate the

consequencesofthose abnormal conditions or tions ADS failure to Plan. Knowledge of low power/ shutdown implications in accident I I specifications for a system I A2.02 - Abilify to (a) predict the impacts of the following on the D.C ELECTRICAL DlSTRlSUTlON, and (b) based on those predictions, use procedures to correct, control, or mitigate the consequences of those abnormal conditions or 2.8 4.2 - 4.6 - 4.7 2.9 Form ES-401-1 ES-401 NMPl Writien Examination Outline Plant Systems - Tier 2 Group 1 ES-401 Form ES-401-1 NMPI Writien Examination Outline Plant Systems - Tier 2 Group 1 I 262002 UPS (ACIDC) 206000 HPCl 263000 DC Electrical Distribution 21 1000 SLC 400000 Component Cooling Water 207000 Isolation (Emergency)

Condenser 223002 PClSINuclear Steam Supply Shutoff monitor changes in parameters associated with operating the D.C. consequences of those abnormal operation:

ES-401 Form ES-401-1 NMPI Writfen Examination Outline Plant Systems - Tier 2 Group 1 262001 AC Electrical Distribution 21 5004 Source Range Monitor 215005 APRM I LPRM 212000 RPS 215003 IRM ) 207000 Isolation (Emergency)

Condenser 400000 Component Cooling Water 223002 PClSlNuclear Steam Supply Shutoff

/A Category Totals

42 the control room: APRM I ,I channekdetectors 1 2.1.30 - Conduct of ODerations:

1 I ES-401 Form ES-401-1 NMPI Written Examination Outline Plant Systems - Tier 2 Group 2 impacts of the following on the FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM; and (b) based on those predictions, use procedures to correct control or miti - 2.9 - 4.6 physical connections I and/or cause- effect relationships between MAIN TURBINE GENERATOR AND AUXILIARY SYSTEMS and the following: Component cooling water interlocks which provide for the following: Draining of reactor water to various 2.6 - 3.2 3.6 2.9 the following concepts as they apply to CONTROL 2.5 ROD DRIVE HYDRAULIC SYSTEM : Solenoid operated valves I I I K6.09 - Knowledae of the effect 1 3.4 91 92 93 28 29 - 30 31 ES-401 Form ES-401-1 NMPl Written Examination Outline Plant Systems - Tier 2 Group 2 271000 Off-gas 288000 Plant Ventilation 219000 RHRILPCI:

Torus/Pool Cooling Mode 201001 CRD Hydraulic 201002 RMCS 290001 Secondary CTMT WA Category Totals:

SYSTEMS ; and (b) based on those predictions, use procedures to correct, control, or mitigate the consequences of those abnormal conditions or operations: Extreme outside weather conditions:

Plant-Specific I K5.04 - Knowledge of the operational implications of the following concepts as they apply to RHRILPCI:

TORUS/SUPPRESSION POOL COOLING MODE : Heat exchanger Operation system and integrated plant procedures during all modes of plant operation. Group Point Total: - 2.7 2.6 2.9 - 2.9 4.3 4.0 7 - 33 34 36 37 38 - I 12/3 I Form ES-401-3 NMPl Generic Knowledge and Abilities Outline (Tier 3) ES-401 Category 1. Conduct of Operations I 2. Equipment Control 3. Radiation Control NMPl Date: October 2008 RO SRO-On1 y Topic IR I Q# IR 3.2 4.6 requirements for 2.8 66 2.1 .40 2.1.23 integrated plant procedures during all modes 4.3 67 Knowledge of refueling administrative requirements Ability to perform specific system and of plant operaticin.

Ability to evaluate plant performance and make operation(s1 judgments based on operating characteristics, reactor behavior, 4.4 75 2'1 *7 1 and instrument interpretation.

I 2.2.12 Knowledge of surveillance procedures.

2.2.39 Knowledge of Icss than one hour technical Ability to manipulate the console controls as required to operate the facility between shutdown and designated power levels specification 2'2*2 1 4.6 1 74 I I Subtotal with radiation work permit normal or abnormal 3.5 70 ES-401 4. Emergency Procedures

/ Plan NMPI Generic Kriowledue and Abilities Outline (Tiet3) 1 high radiation areas, aligning filters, etc.

Subtotal abnormal operating in conjunction with in emergency plari implementation.

2,4.40 I 1 ,, ,, .l,, I Knowledge of operator response to loss of all implications of

• Subtotal Tier 3 Point Total - 3.6 3.8 Form ES-401-3 ES-401 NMPl Record of Rejected K/A's Form ES-401-4 Randomly Selected WA 295005 / AKI .01 Knowledge of the operational implications of the following concepts as they apply to MAIN TURBINE GENERATOR TRIP : Pressure effects on reactor power. 295004 / AKI .01 Knowledge of the operational implications of the following concepts as they apply to PARTIAL OR COMPLETE LOSS OF D.C. POWER: Automatic load sheeding 295024 / EK2.17 Knowledge of the interrelations between HIGH DRYWELL PRESSURE and the following:

Aux Bldg isolation logic 295006 / AK3.03 Knowledge of the reasons for the following responses as they amlv to SCRAM : Reactor pressure response 295030 / EK3.02 Knowledge of the reasons for the following responses as they apply to LOW SUPPRESSION POOL WATER LEVEL: HPCl operation 295025 / EA1.04 Ability to operate andlor monitor the following as they apply to HIGH REACTOR PRESSURE:

HPCI 29501 9 / 2.4.47 Partial or Complete Loss of Inst. Air I Ability to diagnose and recognize trends in an accurate and timely manner I utilizing the appropriate control room reference material.

295017 /AK2.12 Knowledge of the interrelations between HIGH and the following:

Standby gas treatmenVFRVS 295009 / AK3.01 Knowledge of the reasons for the following responses as they apply to LOW REACTOR WATER LEVEL

Recirculation pump run back: OFF-SITE RELEASE RATE

.. Plant-Specific 295033 / EA2.02 Ability to determine and/or Reason for Rejection

(#go) Topic oversampled (see # 62) Randomly selected AK 2.04 (#.$I) Topic does not apply to NMPl. Randomly selected AKI .05 (#42) Topic does not apply to NMPl. Randomly selected EK2.18 (#LE) Generic Fundamental Topic. Randomly selected AA1.02 - (#M6) Topic does not apply at NMPl. Randomly selected EK3.01 (M.8) Topic does not apply to NMPl . Randomly selected EA1.06

(#56) Topic not related to EPE. Randomly selected 2.4.49 (#60) Oversampled (see #38).

Randomly selected 295008 AK2.09 (#61) Topic does not apply at NMPl. Randomly selected 295002 AK3.02

(#63) Topic does not apply at NMPl for R

'.", ES-40 1 112 I /2 I /2 I /2 112 211 211 211 211 NMPI Record of Rejected WA's Form ES-401-4 interpret the following as they apply to HIGH SECONDARY CONTAINMENT AREA RADIATION LEVELS : Equipment operability 295032 12.4.30 High Secondary Containment Area Temperature

/ Knowledge of events related to system operation/status that must be reported to internal organizations or external agencies, such as the State, the NRC, or the transmission system operator.

295029 / 2.2.25 High suppression pool water level 295012 / 2.4.50 High Drywell temperature

/ Ability to verify system alarm setpoints and operate controls identified in tthe alarm response manual.

295036 / AA2.03 Ability to determine and/or interpret the following as they apply to SECONDARY CONTAINMENT HIGH SUMP/AREA WATER LEVEL: Cause of high water level 500000 I EK3.04 Knowledge of the reasons for the following responses as they apply to HIGH PRIMARY CONTAINMENT HYDROGEN CONCENTRATIONS:

Emergency depressurization 259002 I K2.02 Knowledge of electrical power supplies to the following: Feedwater coolant injection (FWCI) initiation logic:

FWCI/HPCI . 215003 I K3.05 Knowledge of the effect that a loss or malfunction of the INTERMEDIATE RANGE MONITOR (IRM) SYSTEM will have on followina:

APRM: - Plant-Specific 300000 I K5.13 Knowledge of the operational implications of the following concepts as they apply to the INSTRUMENT AIR SYSTEM: Filters 261 000 I K3.05 Knowledge of the effect that a loss or malfunction of the STANDBY GAS TREATMENT SYSTEM will selected EK2.01

(#64) Topic not related to APE for RO. Randomly selected 2.4.18 - (#134) Topic not addressed in TS bases. Randomly selected 295007

(#135) Topic tested in operating portion of exam. Randomly selected 295010 (#133) Similar EOP-5 concepts are tested throughout the exam. Randomly selected 295020 AA2.06 (#*i5) Topic does not apply to NMP 1, due to EOP change. Randomly selected EA2.01 (#[I) Topic was oversampled (power supplies) Randomly selected K1.03 (#e;) Topic does not apply at NMPI. Randomly selected K3.02 (#I 0) Oversampled (see #86). Randomly selected K5.01 (#E;) Oversampled (see #38).

Randomly selected K1.03 ES-401 NMPI Record of Rejected WAS Form ES-401-4 have on following:

Secondary containment contaminationlradiation levels 217000 I K4.05 Knowledge of REACTOR CORE ISOLATION COOLING SYSTEM (RCIC) design feature(s) and/or interlocks which provide for the following:

Prevents radioactivity release to auxiliary/reactor building 206000 I K6.08 Knowledge of the effect that a loss or malfunction of the following will have on the HIGH PRESSURE COOLANT INJECTION SYSTEM : Reactor pressure:

BWR-2,3,4 203000 I A3.09 Ability to monitor automatic operations of the RHR/LPCI:

INJECTION MODE (PLANT SPECIFIC) including: Emergency generator load sequencing 205000 / 2.4.4 I Shutdown Cooling

/ Knowledge of the emergency action level thresholds and classifications. 21 9000 I A3.01 Ability to monitor automatic operations of the RHR/LPCI:

TORUSlSUPPRESSlON POOL COOLING MODE including: Valve operation 201 004 I A4.02 Ability to manually operate andlor monitor in the control room: RSCS console switches and indicators:

BWR- 4,5 201002 / 2.1.27 Reactor manual control system / system purpose 2.4.40 - Knowledge of SRO responsibilities in emergency plan implementation.

2.2.4 - (multi-unit license) Ability to explain the variations in control board/control room layouts, systems, instrumentation, and procedural actions between units at a facility.

2.3.75 - Knowledge of radiation monitoring systems, such as fixed radiation nionitors and alarms, poifable survey instruments, personnel monitoring I equipment, etc.

(#7) System does not exist at NMPI. Randomly selected 21 2000 K4.11 (#I 2) Topic oversampled.

Randomly selected K6.03 (#'18) System does not exist at NMPl . Randomly selected 262001 A3.02 (#i38) Topic covered in operating exam.

Randomly selected 2.4.9 (#:35) Topic does not apply at NMPI. Randomly selected K5.04

(#:36) System does not exist at NMPI. Randomly selected 201001 A4.03 - (#:37) Topic does not lend itself to a discriminating question (system function)

Randomly selected 2.1.23 - (#72) Not an RO level topic. Randomly selected 2.4.32

(#:74) Not a multi unit license.

Randomly selected 2.2.2

(#!38) Topic covered in Admin JPM. Randomly selected 2.4.40 Appendix D Sclsnario Outline Form ES-D-1 Facility: Nine Mile Point 1 Examiners

Opera tors

Initial Conditions: Simulator IC 171 1. Reactor Power approximately 4% Turnover:

1. The crew is directed to shutdown ':he reactor by inserting control rods 2. Crew is directed to perform N1-OF'-09, N2 lnerting and H2-02 Monitoring Systems step G.l to de-inert the Primary Contaiiiment with Rx Coolant Temp >212"F Scenario No.: NRC-01 Op-Test No.:

October 2008 Event Malf. No. NO. 1 Event DescriDtion does NOT fully close I (7%) I I Radial:ion, requires a reactor scram (SOP-25.2) Multiple control rods fail to fully insert (SOP-I) I I - * (N)ormal, (R)eactivity, (I)nstrument, (C)omponent, (M)ajor NRC Scenario 1 October 2008 Facilitv: Nine Mile Point 1 Scenario No.:

NRC-01 Oo-Test No.: October 2008 TARGET QUANTITATIVE ATTRl BUTES (PER SCENARIO; SEE SECTION D.5.d) 1. Total malfunctions (5-8)

Events 2,4, 5, 6, 7, 9 2. Event 9 Malfunctions after EOP entry (1 -2) 3. Abnormal events (2-4) Events 4, 5, 6, 7 4. Major transients (1 -2) Event 8 5. EOPs enteredlrequiring substantive actions (1 -2) Event 8 (EOP-6) 6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive Events 9 (EOP-8) actions (0-2) 7. Critical tasks (2-3)

CRITICAL TASK DESCRIPTIONS:

CT-1.0 Given a fuel failure, the crew will scram the reactor and insert a manual vessel isolation when Main Steam Line radiation reaches 3.75 times normal. CT-2.0 Given unisolable primary system leak, indications of fuel failure and rising off-site release rates approaching the General Emergency level, the crew will perform an RPV Blowdown.

NRC Scenario 1 ACTUAL ATTRIBUTES 6 1 4 1 1 1 2 October 2008 SCENARIO

SUMMARY

Length: 90 minutes Initial Power Level:

4% with plant shutdown in progress Mitigating Strategy Code: RR4, fuel lealc with a failure of EC tubes and EC fails to isolate, requires RPV Blowdown to stop release The crew assumes the shift with the plant tleing shutdown. The crew is directed to de-inert the containment in accordance with N1-OP-9, Id2 lnerting and H2-02 Monitoring Systems.

When drywell pressure is lowered to 0 psig, the operator will secure the lineup, but one of the containment isolation valves will fail to fully close. This will require entry into Technical Specifications and ensuring a second valve in the line is isolated. Then the crew will continue the shutdown by inserting control rods. Next Reactor Building Radiation Monitor 12 will fail upscale causing a trip of RBVS and a start of RBEVS. Additionally there will be a failure of the Reactor Building to isolate. The crew must isolate the Reactor Building to restore Secondary Containment and the SRO must address Technical Specifications.

When these actions are complete, both seals on the 1 1 Recirculation Pump will fail requiring the crew to shutdowin and isolate the pump. Following the loss of the Recirculation Pump, a fuel failure will cause offgas and main steam line radiation levels to rise, requiring a reactor scram and vessel isolation. Multiple control rods will fail to fully insert during the scram requiring the crew to enter N1-SOP-1 and take alternate actions to insert the control rods. The rods are inserted using RMCS. Following the scram, the crew will diagnose an Emergency Condenser tube leak. They will try to isolate the affected EC but the isolation valves will fail to fully close. Rising off site radiation levels will require an RPV blowdown before General Emergency levels are reached. Major Procedures: N1-SOP-1.2, N1-SOP-25.2, N1-SOP-1.1, N1-SOP-1, N1-EOP-2, NI- EOP-6, and N1-EiOP-8 EAL Classification:

Site Area Emergency, EALs 3.4.1, 5.1.3 and 5.2.4 Termination Criteria:

RPV Blowdown in progress, RPV water level controlled in assigned band NRC Scenario 1 October 2008 Appendix D Scenario Outline Form ES-D Facility: Nine Mile Point 1 Examiners: Initial Conditions:

Simulator IC 172 Scenario No.: NRC-02 Op-Test No.: October 2008 0 pe ra to rs : 1. Reactor Power approximately 90% 2. Four Recirculation Loops in service Turnover:

1. Recirc Pump 15 MG set has been repaired and should be returned to service. 2. After starting Recirc Pump 15 MG set operate it for one hour while maintenance takes readings before returning to 100% power.

Event I c (SRoj I requiring shifting to the alternate FCV (SOP-5.1)

TS (SRO) I \-.--/ I .- I I I c ~sRO) I cause a scram (EOP-3) (N)ormal, (R)eactivity, (I)nstrument, (C)omponent, (M)ajor NRC Scenario 2 October 2008 Facilitv:

Nine Mile Point I Scenario No.: NRC-02 OD-Test No.: October 2008 TARGET QUANTITATIVE ATTRIBUTES - (PER SCENARIO; SEE SECTION D.5.d) 1. Total malfunctions (5-8)

Events 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 2. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1 -2) Event 8 3. Abnormal events (2-4) - Events 3,4, 5, 6 4. Major transients (1 -2) Event 7 - 5. EOPs enteredhequiring substantive Events 6 and 7 (EOP-5) actions (1 -2) 6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive Events 7, 8 (EOP-3, EOP-8) - 7. Critical tasks (2-3) CRITICAL TASK DESCRIPTIONS:

CT-1.0 Given an un-isolable RWCU leak outside primary containment and one general area temperature above the maximum safe limit, the crew will insert a manual reactor scram. CT-2.0 Given a failure of RPS to de- energize when a scram is required, the crew will insert control rods by initiating manual Alternate Rod Insertion (ARI). CT-3.0 Given an un-isolable RWCU leak outside primary containment and two general area temperatures above the maximum safe limit, the crew will Derform an RPV Blowdown.

actions (0-2) ACTUAL ATTRIBUTES 5 1 4 1 1 2 3 NRC Scenario 2 October 2008 SCENARIO

SUMMARY

Length: 90 minutes Initial Power Level:

90%, 4 Loop Opeipation Mitigating Strategy Code: SCI, un-isolable primary system leak in the Secondary Containment, RPV Blowdown required The crew assumes the shift with the plant operating at 90% power and four recirculation loops in service. Immediately after assuming the shift the crew will be directed to restore Recirculation Pump 15 to service and return to full power. The crew will assess plant conditions and lower power with Recirculation Flow until flow is less than 50 Mlbm/hr. They will then return Recirculation Pump 15 to service. After the crew has placed the pump in service, the Main Generator Auto Voltage Regulator will fail. The crew will diagnose the failure and take manual control of generator voltage and restore the correct generator output.

When a normal generator output is established, the Control Rod Drive Flow Control Valve fails closed, requiring shifting to the alternate FCV. After CRD flow is returned to normal, a loss of power to Power Board 11 occurs. The SRO will address Technical Specifications.

A Reactor Water Cleanup system line break. will occur in the Secondary Containment downstream of the Supply Isolation Valves. Reactor Water Cleanup will fail to isolate on high area temperature. The crew will attempt to isolate the system, but the valves will fail to fully close. This break will require a scram and RPV blowdown due to exceeding the Maximum Safe Value for general area temperatures.

When the Mode Switch is placed in SHUTDOWN and/or the Reactor Trip pushbuttons on the E Panel are pushed the reactor will NOT scram. ARI must be manually initiated to scram the control rods. Major Procedures: N1-SOP-1, N1-SOP-1.1, N1-SOP-1.3, N1-SOP-5.1, N1-SOP-30.1, N1-EOP-2, N1-EOP-3, N1-EOP-5, and N1-EOP-8 EAL Classification:

Site Area Emergency, EALs 3.4.1, 4.1 .I Termination Criteria: All control rods are in, RPV Blowdown in progress, RPV water level controlled in assigned band NRC Scenario 2 October 2008 Appendix D Scenario Outline Form ES-D Facility:

Nine Mile Point 1 Examiners

Operators: Initial Conditions:

Simulator IC 173 1. Reactor Power approximately 100% (CRD Pump 12 must be in service)

Turnover:

1. Turbine Surveillance Testing, NI-F'M-Q7, to be performed 2. Feed Pump 12 is out of service because of a burned out motor Scenario hlo.: NRC-03 Op-Test No.:

October 2008 Event Description Perform NI-PM-Q7, Turbine Thrust Bearing Test APRM 13 fails inop 3 ED08 C (BOP) ED21 C (SRO) TS (SRO) 4 FW02A C(B0P) Override C (SRO) TS (SRO) PB 10:3 and 178 trip on fault, crew must switch to CRD Pump 11 (SOP-5.1) I I I 1 Feedn,ater Booster Pump 11 Trip with failure of the standby pump :o auto start Failure of the Feedwater Master Controller AS-IS, requires Doard IV for Core Spray 11 1 fails to open and Core 121 fails to start manually controlling RPV water level (SOP-I 6.1 ) - Trip of Feedwater Pump 11 requires Emergency Power Reduction (SOP-16.1, SOP-I .I) - RPV coolant leak in the Primary Containment (EOP-2, EOP-

4) - (N)ormal, (R)eactivity, (I)nstrument, (C)omponent, (M)ajor NRC Scenario 3 October 2008 Facilitv:

Nine Mile Point 1 Scenario No.: NRC-03 OD-Test No.: October 2008 TARGET QUANTITATIVE ATTRIBUTES - (PER SCENARIO; SEE SECTION D.5.d) 7. Total malfunctions (5-8) Events 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9 2. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2)

Events 8,9 3. Abnormal events (2-4)

Events 2, 3,4, 5, 6, 8 4. Major transients (1 -2) Event 7 - 5. EOPs enteredhequiring substantive Events 7,9 (EOP-2, EOP-4) actions (1 -2) 6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive Events 7,9 (EOP-2 Alternate Level Leg, actions (0-2) EOP-8) 7. Critical tasks (2-3) CRITICAL TASK DESCRIPTIONS:

CT-1.0 Given a LOCA with a loss of high pressure injection, the crew will execute N1-EOP-8, RPV Blowdown when RPV water level drops below -84 inches. CT-2.0 Given a LOCA with a loss of high pressure injection and Core Spray, the crew will inject to the RPV with Condensate and Feedwater Booster pumps. CT-3.0 Given a LOCA in the Drywell, the crew will initiate Containment Sprays to prevent exceeding PSP. ACTUAL ATTRIBUTES 7 - 2 6 1 2 NRC Scenario 3 October 2008 SCENARIO

SUMMARY

Length : 90 minutes Initial Power Level: Approximately 1 OO%, above 100% rodline Mitigating Strategy Code: RL2, Small LOCA, RPV Blowdown required to permit injection with low pressure systems to recover RPV water level above TAF

SUMMARY

The crew assumes the shift with the plant ai: 100% power with Feedwater Pump 12 under clearance for maintenance. The crew will perform Nl-PM-Q7, Turbine Thrust Bearing Test from the Control Room. Next, APRM 13 fails. The crew will bypass the APRM and reset the half scram. Next, Powerboard 103 trips on fault. The crew will take action to secure EDG 103 and attempt to restore Powerboard 17B. Powerboard 103 and Powerboard 178 are both faulted and are not restored. The trip of CRD Pump 12 (PB 17B) will require starting CRD Pump 11 and the SRO must address Technical Specifications.

When the necessary steps for the loss of Powerboard 103 are completed, Feedwater Booster Pump 11 will trip with a failure of the standby pump to start. The standby pump can be manually started. The SRO must again address Technical Specifications.

When the standby Feedwater Booster Pump is manually started, the Master Feedwater Controller will fail as-is. RPV water level will slowly deviate from the set level. The crew must diagnose the failure and the BOP operator will be required to take manual coritrol of RPV level. With RPV water level in manual control, Feedwater Pump 11 will trip because of delayed effects from the earlier Feedwater Booster Pump trip. This will require an entry into N1-SOP-1 .I, Emergency Power Reduction to lower power to within the capacity of Feedwater Pump 13.

While troubleshooting the electrical faults and troubles with the Feedwater system, the crew recognizes a coolant leak in the containment. Drywell pressure and temperature rise, requiring the crew to insert a manual SCRAM on rising drywell pressure.

When the turbine trips, Powerboards 1 1 and 12 fail to automatically transfer. This results in a loss of feedwater, condensate, circulating water and other loads. Operators are able to restore these power boards. RPV water level continues to drop with only one liquid poison pump and CRD pump 11 available for injection. The crew will determine they cannot maintain level above -1 09" and enter N1-EOP-8, RPV Blowdown. While blowing down the crew must diagnose that the inboard IV for Core Spray 11 1 fails to open and Core Spray pump 121 fails to start. With Core Spray unavailable for injection, the crew will inject with the feedwater booster pumps using N1-EOP-1, Att 25 or 26. Major Procedures: Termination Criteria:

EAL Classification

N1-SOP-1, NI-SOP-'l.l, N1-SOP-5.1, N1-SOP-16.1, N1-SOP-30.1, N1- SOP-30.2, N1-EOP-1, N1-EOP-2, N1-EOP-4, N1-EOP-8 RPV Blowdown in progress, RPV water level above TAF and controlled in assigned band, containment pressure controlled in accordance with N 1 - EOP-1 Att 17 Alert, EAL 3.1 .I NRC Scenario 3 October 2008 Appendix D Scenario Outline Form ES-D-1 Event Malf. No. Event No. Type* Facility: Nine Mile Point 1 Examiners

Operators:

Initial Conditions: Simulator IC 174

1. Reactor Power approximately 90% for a rod pattern adjustment Turnover: 1. Maintenance completed work on TBCLC pump 12 2. APRM 13 bypassed due to failed power supply

3. Recirc Pump 14 OOC due to high vibrations Scenario No.: NRC-04 Op-Test No.: October 2008 Event Description Contrcl rod pattern adjustment I I I CW12 C(ALL) H2-1-3 Trip of Intake Traveling Screens resulting in a low level in the Intake Structure and loss of normal heat sinks, emergency power reduction required (SOP-I 8.1 ) I I B. C. D. E I I It will fail closed (EOP-8)

• (N)ormal, (R)eactivity, (I)nstrument, (C)omponent, (M)ajor NRC Scenario 4 October 2008 Facilitv:

Nine Mile Point I Scenario No.: NRC-04 Op-Test No.: October 2008 TARGET QUANTITATIVE ATTRIBUTES - (PER SCENARIO; SEE SECTION D.5.d) 1. Total malfunctions (5-8) Events 3,4, 5, 6, 8,9 2. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2)

Events 8, 9 3. Abnormal events (2-4)

Event 3, 4, 5, 6 4. Major transients (1 -2) Event 7 5. EO Ps en teredheq u i ri ng subs tan tive actions (1 -2) Event 8 (EOP-4) 6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive Events 7, 9 (EOP-3, EOP-8) actions (0-2)

7. Critical tasks (2-3)

CRITICAL TASK DESCRIPTIONS:

CT-1.0 Given a failure of the reactor to scram with power above 6% or unknown and RPV water level above

-41 inches, the crew will terminate and prevent all injection except boron and CRD. CT-2.0 Given a failure of the reactor to scram with RPV water level unable to be restored and maintained above

-109 inches with CondensatelFeedwater and CRD, the crew will perform an RPV Blowdown and re-establish injection with Core Spray. CT-3.0 Given a LOCA in the Drywell, the crew will initiate Containment Sprays to Drevent exceedina PSP. ACTUAL ATTRIBUTES 4 1 1 2 3 NRC Scenario 4 October 2008 SCENARIO

SUMMARY

Length: 90 minutes Initial Power Level:

Approximately 90%, 4 loop operation Mitigating Strategy Code: AT3, high power ATWS with small LOCA, Blowdown required, re- inject with Core Spray The scenario begins with the crew performing a control rod pattern adjustment. Next, the crew will be directed to return TBCLC Pump 12 to service and secure TBCLC Pump 11.

When this is complete, an RPS pressure transmitter will fail low, followed closely by the in-service feedwater system pressure transmitter also failing low. The crew will be required to shift to manual feedwater level control. The crew may then shift reactor pressure/level columns and return to automatic feedwater level control. Technical Specifications must be addressed due to the RPS pressure transmitter failure. Next the crew must respond to high D/P across one of the Service Water Pump Discharge Strainers. This will require placing another Service Water Pump in service. Once the standby Service Water Pump has been started, Mail7 Steam Line Radiation Monitor 11 1 will become inoperable. The SRO will determine the Technical Specification implications. Next the intake structure traveling screens clog causing high D/Ps. This will eventually result in a low level in the intake structure with the subsequent tripping of the Circulating Water pumps. This will require entering N1-SOP-18.1, Service Water Failure/Low Intake Level.

As intake level continues to lower, the crew will insert a manual scram.

When the scram occurs the control rods will not insert. This ATWS is complicated by the total loss of the normal heat sinks. Additionally, following the ATWS, a Recirculation Line break will cause RPV water level to lower, requiring the crew to re-establish injection.

When the crew attempts to re-establish Feedwater flow, the Feedwater isolation valves will not re-open.

When it is determined that RPV water level cannot be restored and maintained above -1 09 inches, the crew will perform an RPV Blowdown, and re-inject with Core Spray. Major Procedures: N 1 -SOP-I .I, N 1 -SOf3-1 6.1, N1 -SOP-I 8.1, N 1 -EOP-I, N 1 -EOP-2, N 1 -EOP-3, N 1 -EOP-3.1, N 1 -EOP-4, N1 -EOP-8 EAL Classification:

Site Area Emergency, EAL 2.2.2 Termination Criteria:

RPV Blowdown in progress, RPV water level above -1 09 inches and controlled in assigned band, containment pressure controlled in accordance with N1 -EOP-1 Att 17 NRC Scenario 4 October 2008