ML17334B615

Forwards Response to RAI Re GL 87-02,including Responses to Nine Items from NRC Staff & Seismic Evaluation Work Sheets

ML17334B615
Person / Time
Site:	Cook
Issue date:	03/10/1997
From:	FITZPATRICK E INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
AEP:NRC:1040E, GL-87-02, GL-87-2, TAC-M69437, NUDOCS 9703170230
Download: ML17334B615 (850)

Text

CATEGORY 1 REGULAT INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION STEM (RIDS)ACCESSION NBR:9703170230 DOC.DATE: 97/03/10 NOTARIZED:

YES DOCKET FACIL:.50-315 Donald C.Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, Indiana M 05000315 50-316 Donald C.Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2, Indiana M 05000316 AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION FITZPATRICK,E.

Indiana Michigan Power Co.(formerly Indiana 6 Michigan Ele RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)

SUBJECT:

Forwards response to RAI re GL 87-02,including responses to nine items from NRC staff!seismic evaluation work sheets.C DISTRIBUTION CODE: A025D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE: TITLE: Seismic Qualification of Equipment in Operating Plants-A-46-GL-87 T NOTES: RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME OGC/HDS2 HICKMAN,J COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 1 1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD3-3 PD COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 E 0 INTERN: FILE CE DE/ECGB NRR/DRCH/HHFB NRR/DRPE/PD1-3 EXTERNAL: NRC PDR 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 NRR/DE NRR/DE/EMEB NRR/DRCH/HICB NRR/DSSA/SRXB 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 D U NOTE TO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENTS:

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE!CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM OWFN 5D-5(EXT.415-2083)TO ELIMINATE YOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 13 ENCL 13 Indgana Mich!gan~Power Company 500 CircIe Orive Buchanan, MI 491071395 INOlANSl MlCMGAN PQWM March 10, 1997 Docket Nos.: 50-315 50-316 U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.20555 Gentlemen:

AEP: NRC: 1040E Donald C.Cook Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 RESPONSE TO NRC LETTER REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RELATED TO COOK NUCLEAR PLANT'S RESPONSE TO GENERIC LETTER 87-02 (TAC NO.M69437)By letter dated October 21, 1996, the NRC requested additional information regarding our January 30, 1996, response to generic letter 87-02.The following attachments contain the requested information.

Attachment No.1 contains the responses to the nine items from the NRC staff Attachment No.2 Attachment No.3 Attachment No.4 Attachment No.5 Attachment No.6 contains the sample seismic evaluation work sheets (SEWS)and anchorage calculations as requested in item 2 contains the sample SEWS and anchorage calculations for tanks and heat exchangers as requested in item 5 contains the seismic adequacy calculations for tanks 1-TK-33 and 2-TK-32 as requested in item 6 contains the SEWS and anchorage calculations for horizontal tanks and heat exchangers as requested in item 7 contains the calculations for limited analytical reviews (LARs)of the cable and conduit raceways as requested in item 8 PP~j~Vice President vlb Attachments

'P703i70230 9703i0 PDR ADOCK 05000315 P PDR r UUrg.g SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME THIS IO~DAY OF Qd t 199,7 JAM NNSOW NOTARY PUBUC,BERRIEN COUNY, Ml MYCOMMISSION EXPIRES FEB.10,1999 rrrrrrrrInrrrrrrgmrrI[ItrllrgrrgIrgfr D~g/Notary Public JI My Commission Expires Ilil Ill ll>>l I~~p~I II I\J I' U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 AEP: NRC: 1040E CC A.A.Blind A.B.Beach MDEQ-DW 6c RPD NRC Resident Inspector J.R.Padgett ATTACHMENT 1 TO AEP:NRC:1040E RESPONSES TO NRC REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INI"ORMATION (RAI)RELATED TO COOK NUCLEAR PLANT'S RESPONSE TO GENERIC LETTER 87-02 (TAC NO M69437)>)ozg ops

" ll r/I r.J l'PaO.i tf9,"

RESPONSE TO THE USNRC REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION UNRESOLVED SAFETY ISSUE USI A-46 REVIEW FOR DONALD C.COOK NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1&2%ith rcspcct to Section 2.2, page 2-2, discuss the engineering basis for using the In-Structure Response Spectra (ISRS)developed for the Diesel Generator Building to determine loads in the Auxiliary Building at Elevation 609 fcct, and provide the Diesel Generator Building and Auxiliary Building ISRS.The basis for using the ISRS developed for the.diesel generator building to determine loads in the auxiliary building at elevation 609 feet is provided in the third full paragraph of page 2-2 of the final Seismic Evaluation and Walkdown Summary Report submittal.

This paragraph states: "The ISRS are not available at some of the floor elevations where safe shutdown equipment is located.When this is the case, either the ISRS for a higher elevation or the ISRS developed by a linear interpolation between existing ISRS may be used in the evaluation.

In the case of the auxiliary building elevation 609 feet, since the interpolated ISRS are very close to the corresponding ISRS for the diesel generator building, the ISRS for the diesel generator building were used." To further illustrate this basis, figure 1 shows a plot of four ISRS (SSE, 5%equipment damping)for the elevations in question.These spectra include the auxiliary building 587'nd 633'levations which are the elevations where developed spectra exist directly'above and below the 609'levation, and the spectra at 609'n the diesel generator building.In addition to these spectra, a 609'uxiliary building spectra is provided that was generated by interpolating the spectral acceleration values at 587'nd 609'.The auxiliary building and diesel generator building share a common foundation mat.As shown in figure 1, there is essentially no difference between the diesel generator spectra at 609'nd the interpolated auxiliary building spectra at 609', and, therefore, there is no.engineering significance with regard to the load determination if either of these are used.With regard to the diesel generator building and auxiliary building ISRS, the ISRS for all elevations of all buildings at Cook Nuclear Plant included in the USI A-46 evaluation for 2%and 5%equipment damping have been provided in appendix 8 of the final Seismic Evaluation and Walkdown Summary Report submittal.

1.50 Donald C.Cook Nuclear Plant Comparison of Selected Auxiliary Building FRS and 1.5xBS to Diesel Generator Building FRS at Elevation 609 feet-5%Damping Ql O Q Q O O C OCL G9 1.00 0.50 0.00 0.1 10 50 Frequency (Hz)Oteeel 609'ux 609'nterpohted 1.5xBS Figure l ISRS for D.G.Building El 609'ompared to ISRS for Auxiliary Building El.587', 609'633'5%Damping Discuss key examples of designated"rigorously analyzed anchorages," (page 4-6)using hand calculations and ANCHOR4 sofhvarc package and provide copies of their engineering calculations.

Also discuss a few cases of anchorage verification based on thc results of tug tests conducted and provide a description of the tests and applicable engineering justification for such an approach.Table I provides a list of key examples of equipment items with varying levels of anchorage evaluations.

These examples include"rigorously analyzed anchorages," comparisons to analyzed equipment items and judgments based on the anchorage inspection and in some cases judgments supplemented by tug tests.Copies of the completed seismic evaluation work sheets (SEWS), the analysis (if applicable) and the corresponding anchorage inspection sheets are included in attachment 2 of this response to the RAI for those items marked with a*in table l.When comparison or judgment was used to satisfy the GIP anchorage criteria an appropriate description of the evaluation is documented in the notes of the SEWS.The anchorage inspections and installation testing performed for the Cook Nuclear Plant USI A-46 evaluations, discussed in greater detail in the response to RAI question 4, greatly exceed the requirements of the GIP.This provides greater confidence in the judgments made by the seismic review team (SRT)that capacity greatly exceeded demand when a formal anchorage calculation was not made.A review of notes within the data base for each equipment item in the Cook Nuclear Plant USI A-46 effort was conducted in order to respond to this request'for additional information (RAI).Anchorage evaluations performed can be categorized as follows: a)a detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation was performed; b)a detailed hand calculation was performed; c)the anchorage was screened based on an anchorage evaluation on an identical item of equipment and anchorage or a worst case evaluation of a similar equipment item;or d)the SRT judged, based on the weight and anchorage of the equipment, that the anchorage obviously met the GIP screening criteria.In some cases when method (d)was used, a tug test was performed.

This was performed by an SRT member that would tug on the assembly in the weakest direction to a level of about two times the estimated weight of the item.The tug test from a practical standpoint was unnecessary due to the relative light weight and robust'anchorage of the equipment.

Each anchorage evaluation whether detailed or by judgment was based on a detailed anchorage inspection and the SRT inspection.

Items tug tested were in general light weight components.

Samples of detailed analysis performed by ANCHOR4 and by hand calculations are included with the sample SEWS in attachment 2.When judgment was used the basis for the judgment is included in the notes section of the SEWS.The detailed anchor inspection documentation is also included with each SEWS provided.The engineering justification for the approach used for performing the anchorage evaluations is described in section 4.4, page 4-26 second paragraph of the Rev.2 GIP.This paragraph states: "There are various combinations of inspections, analyses, and engineering judgment which can be used to verify the adequacy of equipment anchorage.

The Seismic Capability Engineers should select the appropriate combination of elements for each anchorage installation based on the information available.

For example, a simple hand calculation may be sufficient for a pump which has only a few, very rugged, anchor bolts in a symmetrical pattern.On the other hand, at times it may be advisable to use one of the computer codes to determine the loads applied to a multi-cabinet motor control center if its anchorage is not symmetrically located." The anchorage evaluations used the appropriate combinations of elements necessary to determine that any screened equipment met the GIP criteria.Table 1 provides a brief description of the anchorage evaluation performed.

There is a good cross section of examples that include all equipment classes on the Cook Nuclear Plant safe shutdown equipment list (SSEL)(1 to 20)and categories of anchorage evaluations performed.

Examples of class 0 and 21 anchorage evaluations are provided in response to RAI questions 5 and 7.Table 1 Examples of Anchorage Evaluations Class Equipment ID 1-AB-N 1-ABD-A*2-ABV-A 2-AM-D 2-EZC-D 1-11A 1-52-RTB 2-21B 2-T21B 1-T11A 1-CRID-III-CVT I-TR11B 2-CRID-I-CVT*

Anchorage Evaluation Performed Three section MCC.Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.

Six section MCC.Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.

Six section MCC.Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.

Eight section MCC.Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.

Eleven section MCC (including attached EZC-BS).Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.

Large Multisection 600V Switchgear.

Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.

Reactor Trip Breaker Units composed of 4 breaker vertical sections.Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.

Large'ultisection 600V Switchgear.

Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.

Large Multisection 4KV Switchgear...

Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.

Large Multisection 4KV Switchgear.

Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.

Small Transformer 4'-6" x 2'-6" x 2'-4".Weight estimated at 1180 lbs.Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.

Large supply transformer.

Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.

Small Transformer 4'-6" x 2'-6" x 2'-4".Weight estimated at 1180 lbs.Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.

Table I (Continued)

Examples of Anchorage Evaluations Class Equipment ID 2-TR-ELSC 1-PP-10W*1-PP-4 1-PP-50W 1-QT-111-AB 12-PP-31S 2-PP-26N 2-PP-3E 2-PP-46-4*

2-PP-82S 2-QT-106-CD1 1-PP-7W 2-PP-9W 1-HV-AFP-8 RE-2 Anchorage Evaluation Pcrformcd Small Transformer 20" D x 30" W x 36" H.Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.

.900 GPM pump.'etailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed including nozzle loadings on the suction and discharge piping.440 GPM pump.Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed including nozzle loadings on the suction and discharge piping.Large Pacific Pump with a weight of 20,000 lbs.Detailed , ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.

Small 90 GPM Pump-weight about 800 lbs.Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.

100 GPM pump-2076 lbs.Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed..

Item was designated an outlier until nozzle loads are defined.Pacific Pump-total weight 5500 lbs.Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed including nozzle loadings on the suction and discharge piping.Large Ingersoll Rand Pump-7935 lbs.Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.

Small Goulds Pump-511 lbs.Nozzle loads judged to be small by SRT.Anchorage screened by judgment after review of the anchorage inspection documentation (four 5l8" anchors)and the walkdown.Small Goulds Pump-214 lbs.Nozzle loads judged to be small by.SRT.Anchorage screened by judgment after review of the anchorage inspection documentation (four 5/8" anchors)and the walkdown.Small Worthington Pump-135 lbs.Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed induding nozzle loadings on the suction arid discharge piping.Large vertical pump with a 45'ong vertical casing.Screening of anchorage based on a review of existing qualification that included an anchorage evaluation.

Vertical pump.Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed'including nozzle loadings on the suction and discharge piping.Small light weight fan-154 lbs.Anchorage accepted by judgment aAer a review of the anchorage drawings.

Table 1 (Continued)

'xamples of Anchorage Evaluations Class 9 10 10 14 14 14 14 Kquipmcnt ID 1-HV-AFP-M1*

1-HV-AFP-Xl I-HV-CEQ-I 12-HV-ES W-7*12-HU-ESW-1 2-HU-AFP-BRE-1 2-HV-DGS-1 2-HV-DGX-1 1-HV-ACRA-1 1-HV-AES-1 (FLT)1-AFW*1-BCTC-AB 1-CRCD 1-ELSC 1-ELSCX Anchorage Evaluation Performed Medium size fan-500 lbs, mounted with 16 1/2" steel to steel bolts.Anchorage accepted by judgment after a review of the anchorage drawings.Small light weight fan-287 lbs, mounted with 12 3/8" steel to steel bolts.Anchorage accepted by judgment after a review of the anchorage drawings.Large fan unit.Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.

Large fan unit.Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.

Large fan unit similar to 12-HV-ESW-7.

Anchorage screened based on comparison to ANCHOR4 evaluation for 12-HV-ESW-7.

Small light weight fan-154 lbs.Anchorage accepted by judgment after a review of the anchorage drawings.Large fan-1531 lbs.Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.

Large fan-1100 lbs.Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.

Cooler unit with a weight estimate of 3000 lbs.Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.

Large filter unit-24,000 lbs.Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.

Small wall mounted panel (36" H x 20" W x 6" D).Panel estimated to weigh 50 lbs.Anchorage screened by judgment after a review of the anchorage description and a 100 lb.tug test.Panel 38" W x 60" H x 9" D.Weight estimated at 300 lbs.Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.

Rack 38" W x 84" H x 9" D-Weight estimated at 400 lbs.Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.

Small wall mounted panel (36" H x 20" W x 6" D).Panel estimated to weight 50 lbs.Anchorage screened by judgment after a review of the anchorage description and a 100 lb.tug test.Small distribution panel 57" H x 22" W x 6" D.Weight estimated at 370 lbs.Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.

Table 1 (Continued)

Examples of Anchorage Evaluations Class 14 14.14 14 14 14 14 15 16 16 16 16 Equipment ID 1-M DAB 1-TDAB 1-VDCD-1 8.2 2-AFWX 2-BATT-N-SH 2-DCN 2-VDAB-1&2 2-BATT-AB*

1-BC-AB1 1-CIUD-I-INV 2-BC-A 2-D GAB-INV 1-OME-150-AB*

Anchorage Evaluation Performed Wall mounted switchboard 38" W x 84" H x 9" D.Anchorage accepted by comparison to the ANCHOR4 evaluation performed for 1-MCAB.Wall mounted switchboard 38" W x 84" H x 9" D.Anchorage accepted by comparison to the ANCHOR4 evaluation performed for 1-MCAB.Pair of 22" W x 38" H x 7" D distribution panels.Anchorage accepted by comparison to the ANCHOR4 evaluation performed for 1-V DAB-1 (Identical Construction).

Wall mounted panel-57" H x 22" W x 6" D.Weight estimated at 100 to 150 lbs.Anchorage screened by judgment after a review of the anchorage description and a tug test.Wall mounted Battery Shunt.Weight estimated at 100 lbs.Anchorage screened by judgment after a review of the anchorage description, the ANCHOR4 evaluation performed for 1-BATT-N-SH and a tug test.Switchboard bolted to a steel rack.Anchorage screened based on comparison to the ANCHOR4 analysis for similar panel 1-DCN.Pair of 22" W x 38" H x 7" D distribution panels.Anchorage screened based on comparison to the detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed for similar panel 1-V DAB-1.Substantial 2-step battery rack.Anchorage evaluation based on a review of existing anchorage and recent modifications made to the racks.Battery Charger 3025 lbs.Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.

Inverter 2'-5" x 3'6'-3"-2100 lbs.Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.

Battery Charger 32" L x 24" W x 46" H.Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.

Inverter 28" x 28" x 57".Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.

Large Diesel Generator.

Anchorage capacity for 2-OME-150-CD indicated an additional margin of 36.Anchorage screened based on comparison to that evaluation.

Table 1 (Continued)

Examples of Anchorage Evaluations Class 18 18 1&18 18 1&18 18 18 18 18 Equipment ID 1-CLI-113 1-CPS-317 1-CPS-410 1-MPP-232 1-NPP-151 2-8LI-110 2-CLI-113 2-CPS-410 2-FFI-210 2-IFI-311 2-IFI-51 Anchorage Evaluation Performed Small transmitter

-27 lbs.Anchorage screened by judgment after review of the anchorage inspection documentation and the walkdown.Small 9" x 9" panel.Anchorage screened by judgment after review of the anchorage inspection documentation and the walkdown.Rack supported device.One detailed ANCHOR4 analysis was performed to encompass 1-CPS-410, 8c 420 and 2-CPS-410 Ec, 420.Small pressure transmitter

-35 lbs.Anchorage screened by judgment after review of the anchorage inspection documentation and the walkdown.Small pressure transmitter

-24 lbs.including bracket.Anchorage screened by judgment aAer review of the anchorage inspection documentation and the walkdown.Instrument on small, stiff bracket.Assembly weighs less than 100 lbs.Anchorage screened by judgment after review of the anchorage inspection documentation and ,the walkdown.Transmitter bolted to support composed of a small diameter pipe.Anchorage screened by judgment after review of the anchorage inspection documentation and the walkdown.Small device on a rack.Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.

Transmitter bolted to support composed of a small diameter pipe.Anchorage screened by judgment after review of the anchorage inspection documentation and the walkdown.Transmitter bolted to support composed of a small diameter pipe.Anchorage screened by judgment after review of the anchorage inspection documentation and the walkdown.Transmitter bolted to support composed of a small diameter pipe.Anchorage screened by judgment after review of the anchorage inspection documentation and the walkdown.

Table 1 (Continued)

Examples of Anchorage Evaluations Class 18 19 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 Equipmcnt ID 2-XRY-153 1-VTS-356 2-Al 1*1-AC RA-2 1-CAS 1-D GAB 1-GR-1 1-HSD1 1-NRI-23-ISO 2-CG2 2-PRZ 2-RPS-A 2-SWRR Anchorage Evaluation Performed Small rack consisting of a small panel bolted to P1000 unistruts.

Anchorage screened by judgment after review of the anchorage inspection documentation and the walkdown.Light weight component-5 lbs.Anchorage screened by judgment after review of the anchorage inspection documentation, the walkdown and a tug test.Relay panel included in a section of panel from A6 to A15.Weight estimate of entire panel 3000 lbs.Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.

Stand alone panel 24" L x 24" D x 84" H.Weight estimated@700 lbs.Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.

Large Control Panel 24'-6" L x 6'-3" D x 7'.Hand calculation performed on the weak link in the anchorage system and found to be more than adequate.Large Control Panel in Diesel Generator Room.Detailed ANCHOR4'evaluation performed.

Relay Rack 6'-6" L x 8'.Weight estimated300 lbs./lineal foot of rack.Hand calculation performed on the weak link in the anchorage system and found to be more than adequate.Walkthrough cabinet 12'x 6'x 8'.Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.

Heavy duty rack.Anchorage judged adequate based on review of the anchorage inspection documentation, the walkdown and the obvious ruggedness and installation of this new design.Control cabinet 5'-6" L x 2'-6" W x 7'-7" H.Anchorage screened based on comparison to the ANCHOR4 evaluation performed for similar panel 1-RPC-1.Item is included in a Control Panel with two other items.Total panel is 12'-3" L x 8'.Weight estimated at 300 Ibs/lineal ft.Anchorage screened based on comparison to the ANCHOR4 evaluation performed for 1-SG, Relay cabinet 90" W x 30" D x 90" H, welded to embedded steel.Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.

Cabinet 16'x 8'x 18" D.Weight estimated at 300 lbs/lineal ft.Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.

3)Table 4.5 shows that the 1.5 x Bounding Spectrum and the, GERS with an amplification factor of 7 do not cnvclopc thc floor response spectra.Provide copies of thc seismic demand versus capacity spectral comparison.

The location of the devices that are documented as outliers in table 4.5 are at elevation 687'n the containment building.Figure 2 shows a comparison of the ISRS at elevation 687'n the containment building to 1.5 times the bounding spectrum.The GERS must be compared to 1.5 times the demand spectra for median centered spectra because Cook Nuclear Plant response spectra was designated as median centered spectra by the NRC.An amplification factor through the piping and support of the piping system must also be considered when comparing GERS to the demand spectra.The GIP defines the upper bound amplification factor as 7.Therefore, the total ISRS was multiplied by 1.5 x 7 (10.5)to define the demand that is compared to the GERS.Figure 3 shows a comparison of the GERS for air operated valves (AOVs)to 10.5 x the ISRS at containment building elevation 687'.Figure 4 shows a comparison of the GERS for solenoid operated valves (SOUs)to 10.5 x the ISRS at containment building elevation 687'.Figure 5 shows a comparison of the GERS for motor operators to 10.5 x the ISRS at containment building elevation 687'.As shown in figures 2, 3, 4, and 5, the demand exceeds the capacity.The outlier resolution for these items is to review the existing piping analyses and compare the demand acceleration from the analysis to the capacity acceleration.

It is believed that the actual amplification factor is less than 7 and the capacity will be shown to be greater than the demand once the outlier resolution has been completed.

10

2,00 Donald C.Cook Nuclear Plant Cont.Bldg.Elev.687.5 feet vs 1.5xBS 5%Damping 1,50 C 0 GJ S Q)u 1,00 0 0 0.50 P~~~~~~0~~~~I r:~~i~.:~:~X I~~I I~I~'I~5~~~~\~r,,~J'~~~~'1~~I 0~00 0.1 10 Frequency (Hz)1.5xBS EL667.5 Figure 2 ISRS for Containment El.6".7.5'.Vs.1.5 x Bounding Spectrum-5%Damping 11

20 Donald C.Cook Nuclear Plant Amplified Containment Building El.687.5 feet vs AOV GERS 5o/o Damping 15 C 0 6$l 0)10 (5 D S a.5 (0'I r~r r~~'~h~~~~r~~~~~~~~~r/:.'/'.: r~..~~~~~~~~-:.r~~~-'..~~':~~:~':~:.~~r 0 0.1~\4~10 Frequency (Hz)1 O.Gx EL687 AOV GERS Figure 3 Amplified ISRS for Containment El.687.5's.AOV GERS-5%Damping Donald C.Cook Nuclear Plant Amplified Containment Building El.687.5 feet vs Solenoid Valve GERS-5/o Damping 20~r I I I I 1 h~\I 15 O C I u 10 O C S 0 Q)a.5 CO~\h~I'I'I~r e~I~I\~h h I~~~h~~h j I~I'~P 0~h~~'I~~/~g~~~~~~I~~~~~/~~~~h~~~~~\~~0.1 10 50.Frequency (Hz)1 0.5x EL687 Solenoid GERS F<igure 4 Amplified ISRS for Containment El.687.5's.Solenoid Valve GERS-5%Damping 13 25 Donald C.Cook Nuclear Plant Amplified Containment Building El.687.5 feet vs MOV GERS 5%Damping~~'r~~~~r~'~r 20 C 0 C 6 O O 10 0CL (0-5~4%~~e~e e~~~'r~o'~r~~~~~~~~~t I.r~~~~~;:.I-.I......'~0~~~~~J'~~~I~~~I'I.~s...~.s.)~~....~~:-~~~-': I~:.~-~~./~t r~~~5 0 0.1~5 0 0 4 1~8~I 10 50 Frequency (Hz)3 0.5x MOV EL687 GERS Figure 5 Amplified ISRS for Containment El.687.5's.Motor Operator GERS-5%Damping l4 Regarding thc tightncss check of expansion anchors performed on a representative number of mechanical and electrical components, state whether the representative number meets thc sample size for expansion anchor tightness check as listed on table C.2-4 of the GIP.The number of expansion bolts tightness tested for the Cook Nuclear Plant VSI A-46 effort exceeded the sample size for expansion anchor tightness check as listed on table C.2-4 of the GIP.Bolt tightness checks were conducted on every accessible expansion bolt in the scope of USI A-46 equipment on the SSEL.In addition all accessible steel to steel and cast-in-place bolts/nuts were visually inspected and loose nuts were tightened as needed.This was done to ensure that the bolts were snug and therefore active in the event of vertical reaction loadings on the anchorage during an earthquake.

Other tests using ultrasonic techniques to determine embedment length and weld quality were also performed as an enhancement to the program.Anchorage inspection documentation is included with the SEWS in attachment 2 of this RAI.When the type of expansion anchor used could not be positively determined, a 0.6 reduction factor for unknown expansion bolts was used in the anchorage evaluations performed in accordance with the GIP.Inaccessible anchor bolts were not tightness tested.The GIP excludes inaccessible anchors from the sample and states in the second paragraph of section 4 4.1 that"all accessible anchorages should be visually inspected.

All practicable'means should be tried to inspect inaccessible anchorages or those obstructed from view if they are needed for strength to secure the item of equipment or if they secure'quipment housing essential relays (to avoid impact or excessive cabinet motion).For exam'pie, it is not considered practicable to resort to equipment disassembly, removal, etc., to inspect inaccessible anchorages.

The basis for the engineering judgment for not performing these inspections should be documented." The majority of anchorages for SSEL equipment were accessible.

These anchorages were tightness tested, had their embedment length verified and were visually inspected by the anchorage inspection team and were again visually inspected by the SRT.There were some fans that had inaccessible anchorages that would have required removal of fire protection material to inspect and disposal of material that could possibly be contaminated.

This would not have been consistent with the ALARA goals at the site (dust and exposure).

These fans had calculated or judgmental anchorage margins of 10 or greater and therefore were not inspected.

Anchorages for these were primarily cast in place or steel to steel bolts and the tightness check was not required to be performed.

The regenerative heat exchanger anchorages were also not visually inspected due to the time required to remove insulation and to perform the anchorage inspection in a high radiation area.There werc also a number of wall mounted panels (class 14 and 20)that were not tightness checked.Tightness checking of these bolts would have required complete equipment disassembly and removal of the equipment.

This activity would be contrary to section 4.4.1 of the GIP.These panels also had very high margins even when considering a 0.6 reduction factor for unknown expansion anchors.In the cases mentioned above, the engineering judgment for not performing the inspections were documented on the SEWS for the equipment item.There were also some cases when isolated bolts were not tested on a given assembly because they could not be reached without disassembly.

These cases are documented in the anchorage inspection documentation.

5)Table 5.1 shows only four (4)vertical tanks for GIP review.Provide the engineering criteria for sclccting only four vertical tanks and thc justification of the structural integrity of the other smaller vertical tanks for Safe Shutdown E<arthquakc (SSK).Indicate the number of vertical tanks supported on skirts and structural legs at Cook Nuclear Plant, Units 1 8r, 2.Table 5.1 of the final Seismic Evaluation and Walkdown Summary Report submittal includes only the flat bottom vertical tanks that may be evaluated using the GIP methodology in section 7 of the GIP.These tanks are described in the first paragraph of section 7.3.1 of the GIP which states: "The type of vertical tanks covered by the screening guidelines are large, cylindrical tanks whose axis of symmetry is vertical and are supported, on their flat bottoms, directly on a concrete pad or a floor." The evaluation of the remaining tanks are documented in table 4-7 of the final Seismic Evaluation and Walkdown Summary Report submittal.

Items 1 and 2 of table 4-7"Commentary on Equipment Items Meeting the Intent of the GIP Caveats" discuss this evaluation.

Item 1 includes class 0 equipment items and states"There are 50 and 51 equipment items identified as class 0 in unit 1 and unit 2 respectively.

These items were primarily passive and were similar to items considered as components of the class 21 equipment.

For these equipment items the SRT assessed the potential for seismic damage and made the necessary evaluations.

All these items were at locations in the plant where 1.5 times the bounding spectrum is greater than the floor response spectra where they are located.Anchorage was evaluated using the GIP criteria." Item 2 includes class 21 tanks and heat exchangers not covered by the GIP criteria (section 7 of the GIP).This item states:."There are 63 and 58 equipment items identified as class 21 in unit 1 and unit 2 respectively.

Of these tanks and heat exchangers, there were only 20 where the GIP criteria was applicable.

The remaining 98 were evaluated by meeting the intent of the GIP criteria.Anchorage was evaluated using the GIP criteria." The class 0 and 21 equipment items on the SSEL that may be categorized as tanks and heat exchangers for unit 1 and 2 are listed in tables 2&, 3, respectively.

The table includes a description of the tank or heat exchangers configuration and anchorage evaluation.

Included in that list are all tanks supported on skirts and structural legs that are on the Cook Nuclear Plant SSEL.Tanks on legs include 1,2-QT-113-AB1, AB2, CD1, CD2 (eight diesel oil filters);1,2-QT-144-AB, CD (four diesel oil filters};1,2-TK-10 (two reactor coolant letdown volume control tanks);1,2-TK-11 (two boron injection tanks);1-TK-12-N, 12-TK-12-M and 2-TK-12S (three boric acid storage tanks}.Tanks on skirts include 1,2-TK-37 (two component cooling water surge tanks);and 1,2-QT-141, AB1, AB2, CD1, CD2 (eight diesel starting air receivers).

Sample SEWS (including the calculations and anchorage inspection documentation) are provided in attachment 3 for the tanks that have an*aAer the equipment ID in tables 2 and 3.

Table 2 Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit 1)Class ID I-QT-112-AB

&, CD (2 filters)Description AB&CD EMERG DIESEL FULL FLOW LUBE OIL FILTERS Building El.AUXILIARY 579 Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation Small tank-like component containing oil, with a height of about 5', and a diameter of 3'.Weight full=2707 lbs.Anchored by three 3/8" diameter J-bolts and three 5/8" wedge anchors at 60 degree intervals (i.e., evenly spaced).I-QT-I 13-AB I*, 113-AB2, 113-CD I, 113-CD2 (4 strainers)

I-QT-116-AB

&CD (2 heater tanks)I-QT-118-AB

&CD (2 filters)AB&, CD EMERG DIESEL FULL FLOW LUBE OIL STRAIN ERS AB&, CD EMERG DIESEL LUBE OIL HEATER (TANK)AB EMERG DIESEL BYPASS LUBE OIL FILTER AUXILIARY 579 AUXILIARY 579 AUXILIARY 579 The anchorage was screened based on a review of an existing vendor calculation that indicated a high anchorage margin.Strainer supported on 4 angle legs.Each leg is anchored by one 1/2" J-bolt anchor.The total weight is 1730 lbs.The ANCHOR4 analysis performed for 1-QT-113-AB1 and 1-QT-113-AB2 together, since they are connected by a relatively rigid piping segment, indicated that the anchorage was adequate..

Heaters anchored by three 3/8" J-bolts at 120 degrees apart, on a 5" high concrete pad.The weight of the tank is approximately 152.5 lbs.Anchorage screened by an ANCHOR4 evaluation.

Filter anchored by three 3/8" J-bolts with a minimum embedment of 10.25", at 120 degrees.The approximate weight of the tank is estimated to be the same as 1-QT-112-CD (Wt=2707 lbs.), because the tanks are of the same manufacturer, and size, and both hold oil.Anchorage screened by an ANCHOR4 evaluation.

Table 2 (Continued)

Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit 1)Class ID Description Building El.Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation I-QT-143-AB I, AB EMERG AB2, CD I&DIESEL CONTROL CD2 (4 dryers)AIR DRYER I AUXILIARY Air dryer mounted on 2-1/2" x 2-1/2" x 1/4" angle steel frame with other air dryer tanks.Angle frame on 1-3/4" Grout Pad.Frame anchored by eight 1/2" non-shell type expansion anchors, four per base plate.Tanks hold air and are the size of fire extinguishers.

I-QT-144-AB AB EMERG&CD (2 filters)DIESEL FUEL OIL TRANSFER FILTERS AUXILIARY 58 7 Anchorage judged adequate based on the walkdown and review of the anchorage inspection documentation.

Small filter 10" in diameter, 44" high, mounted on three angle legs anchored by three 5/8" Phillips Red Head Wedge/coupling anchors Anchorage screened based on an ANCHOR4 evaluation for 1-QT-144-AB.I-TK-253-1, 2, 3&4 (4 tanks)PRESSURIZER TR"B" PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE NRV-152 RESERVE CONTROL AIR TANKS CONTAIN MENT 61 2 This horizontal tank contains air and is supported by other than standard saddles: Tank is well welded to building steel, and judged adequate by the SRT.12-TK-207 REACTOR PLANT NITROGEN BULK STORAGE TAN KS¹3,4,5,6,7,8 GROUNDS 60 9 Similar to a horizontal heat exchanger; each tank is approximately 2'n diameter and 20'ong (about 15'etween supports).

Tank weight is about 4800 lbs.Anchorage consists of four cast-in-place (in buried concrete pedestals) 3/4" diameter J-Bolts.Anchorage screened based on an ANCHOR4 evaluation.

18 Table 2 (Continued)

Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit 1)Class 21 21 ID I-HE-11 I-HE-13*Description REACTOR COOLANT PUMP SEAL WATER HEAT EXCHANGER EXCESS LET DOWN HEAT EXCHANGER Building AUXILIARY CONTAINMENT El.609 612 Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation Vertical Heat Exchanger is identical to 2-HE-11.The anchorage was screened by comparison to the calculation for 2-HE-11.Relatively small exchanger (1600 lbs)on two saddles in extremely high rad area.Anchorage includes four 3/4" diameter J-bolts, embedded at least 2 feet into piers.Could not inspect the anchorage due to ALARA considerations.

21 I-HE-14 LETDOWN HEAT EXCHANGER AUXILIARY 633 Due to large anchorage (four 3/4" bolts)and small exchanger, the anchorage was judged adequate by the SRT.Exchanger anchored with two 7/8" diameter J-bolts on 11-3/8" spacing.Vertical distance from the base of exchanger to the C.G.of exchanger is 13".Vertical distance from the base of the exchanger to the top nozzle is 29".Anchorage adequacy was accepted based on a short hand calculation..

21 I-HE-15E 8c EAST AND WEST W (2 CCW HEAT exchangers)

EXCHANGERS AUXILIARY 609 Component Cooling Water Heat Exchanger on two reinforced saddles.Anchorage is two 7/8" diameter J bolts.There are four 1" wedge expansion anchors in one pedestal in the horizontal direction.

C.G.of exchanger from the top of the saddle pedestal about 3'.A hand calculation was performed for the heat exchanger and the results show that the anchor bolts and saddles are adequate.19 Table 2 (Continued)

Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit 1)Class ID Description Building El.Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation 21 21 I-HE-I7E&W (2 exchangers)

I-HE-18E'W (2 exchangers)

EAST&WEST RHR HEAT EXCH ANGERS EAST&WEST CONTAINMENT SPRAY HEAT EXCH ANGERS AUXILIARY 6P9 AUXILIARY 6P9 Anchorage more than adequate based on previous analysis of exchanger without top braces.Braces had since been installed.

Very well engineered support structure.

There is a ring support at top of the exchanger bracketed to the mall in each of the four quadrants.

This takes the overturning loads on the exchanger.

Bottom support (at about the 1/4 point of the exchanger, with the remainder of the exchanger hanging below)is a heavy duty ring with gussets at the bolt locations.

These are bolted to a steel support structure that is obviously well engineered.

21 I-HE-32E&32W (2 exchangers)

EAST RHR PUMP PP-35E MECHANICAL SEAL HEAT EXCHANGERS AUXILIARY 573 Qualification data indicates an analysis to the design basis.Based on the review of this analysis and anchorage inspection documentation the Heat Exchanger is adequate.8" diameter by 2" wide exchanger, attached to East Residual Heat Removal Pump with two 1/2" bolts.Could have been considered with the pump'using the rule of the box, however the exchanger was listed separately on the SSEL.Anchorage to the pumps was judged adequate by the SRT.20

~>

Table 2 (Continued)

Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit I)Class 21 ID I-HE-33E&W(2 exchangers)

Description EAST AND WEST CONTAINMENT SPRAY PUMP PP-9E MECHAN ICAL SEAL HEAT EXCHANGER Building El.AUXILIARY 573 Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation 6" diameter by 8-3/4" high exchanger, attached to East Containment Spray Pump with two 1/2" bolts.Could have screened with the pump using the rule of the box, however the exchanger was listed separately on the SSEL.Anchorage to the pumps was judged adequate by the SRT.21 I-HE-34-NE*, 34-NW, 34-SE,&34-SW (4 exchangers)

NORTH SAFETY INJECTION PUMP PP-26N INBOARD*MECHANICAL SEAL HEAT EXCHAN GERS AUXILIARY 587 6" diameter by 8-3/4" high exchanger, attached to North Safety Injection Pump with two 1/2" bolts.Could have screened with the pump using the rule of the box, however the exchanger was listed separately on the SSEL.Anchorage to the pumps was judged adequate by the SRT.21 I-HE-35N, 35S (2 coolers)NORTH SAFETY INJECTION PUMP PP-26N LUBE OIL COOLERS AUXILIARY 587 Small exchangers 1'-5" long and 4" in diameter attached to North Safety Injection Pump with four 1/4" bolts.Could have screened with the pump using the rule of the box, however the exchanger was listed separately on the SSEL.Anchorage to the pumps was judged adequate by the SRT.21 I

Table 2 (Continued)

Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit 1)Class ID Description Building El.Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation 21 I-HE-36-EN, 36-ES, 36-WN, 36-WS (4 exchangers)

EAST&WEST CENTRIFUGAL CHARGING PUMP PP-50E INBOARD MECHANICAL SEAL HEAT EXCHANGERS AUXILIARY 587 6" in diameter 8-3/4" high heat exchanger, attached to East Centrifugal Charging Pump with two 1/2" bolts.Could have screened with the pump using the rule of the box, however the exchanger was listed separately on the SSEL.Anchorage to the-pumps was judged adequate by the SRT.21 I-HE-37E, 37W (2 coolers)EAST&, WEST CENTRIFUGAL CHARGING PUMP PP-50E,&50WGEAROIL COOLERS AUXILIARY 537 Small exchanger 1'-6" long and 5" in diameter attached to reinforced plate support with four 1/2" bolts.Plate support bolted to East Centrifugal Charging Pump with three 1/2" bolts.Could have screened with the pump using the rule of the box, however the exchanger was listed separately on the SSEL.21 I-HE-38E&38W (2 coolers)EAST&WEST CENTRIFUGAL CHARGING PUMP BEARING LUBE OIL COOLERS AUXILIARY 5g7 Anchorage to the pumps was judged adequate by the SRT.Small exchangers 1'-6" long and 5" in diameter bolted to two 1'ong channel columns that are welded to the skid of the East Centrifugal Charging Pump.Could have screened with the pump using the rule of the box, however the exchanger was listed separately on the SSEL.Anchorage to the pumps was judged adequate by the SRT.22 Table 2 (Continued)

Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit 1)Class 21 ID-I-HE-47-ABN

&47-ABS, 47-CDN&47-CDS (4 aItercoolers)

I-QP-21 Description AB&CD EMERG DIESEL NORTH COMBUSTION AIR AFTERCOOLERS NORTH BORIC ACID BLENDER (MIXING TEE)Building AUXILIARY AUXILIARY El.587 587 Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation Aftercooler on Diesel Generator skid transfers its lateral load to the inlet manifolds.

Gravity loads are carried by a post on a spring hanger base, so the post is incapable of carrying lateral or longitudinal load.The Diesel Generator Turbochargers in Unit 1 were replaced in a recent outage.As part of the modification, an analysis was perforined for the associated piping and the aftercoolers.

All supports met D.C.Cook acceptance criteria.Boric Acid Blender supported by piping.It is in-line with the pipe between two pipe supports off the floor.Blender very small (6" in diameter and 11" long).21 I-QT-107-AB&CD (2 tanks)CD EMERG DIESEL FUEL OIL DAY TANKS AUXILIARY 587 Screened based on drawings (insulation precluded inspection of the blender connection to the piping system)and inspection for interactions.

Horizontal tanks which sits on two saddles.Each saddle has two, 1/4" thick plates, forming a"U", with no gussets.There are two 5/8" anchors per saddle.21 I-QT-110-AB

&CD (2 Coolers)AB&CD EMERG DIESEL LUBE OIL COOLERS AUXILIARY 587 A Horizontal Tank Analysis was performed to show that the tank anchorage is adequate.Lube Oil Coolers mounted to wall with fourteen 3/4" wedge type expansion anchors.External Anchor Analysis was performed on the Unit 2 Jacket Water Heater 2-QT-131-CD which has the same configuration as 1-QT-110-AB.Based on this.analysis, both supports are adequate.23 Table 2 (Continued)

Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit 1)Class 21 ID I-QT-131-AB

&, CD (2 Coolers)Description AB 64 CD EMERG DIESEL JACKET WATER COOLERS Building AUXILIARY El.587 Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation Jacket Water Cooler mounted to wall by fourteen 3/4" wedge type expansion anchors.External Anchor Analysis was performed on the Unit 2 Jacket Water Heater 2-QT-131-CD..

Based on this analysis both supports are adequate.I-QT-133-AB

&CD (2 Tanks)AB 8c CD EMERG DIESEL JACKET WATER SURGE TANKS AUXILIARY 587 100 Gal.Tanks, 2'-6" D x 3'.Notes and the ANCHOR4 analysis for 1-QT-133-CD also apply to 1-QT-133-AB since they are essentially identical.

The surge tanks are supported (bolted)to a shelf.The shelf is bolted to the wall by four J-bolts.In addition, two 3/4" wedge anchors attach the top channel to the wall.The wedge anchors were conservatively left out of the ANCHOR4 analysis.21 I-QT-134-AB

&134-CD (2 Tanks)AB&CD EMERG DIESEL AUX JACKET WATER HEATERS (TANKS}AUXILIARY 587 The anchorage was screened based on an ANCHOR4 analysis for the anchorage to the shelf.The AB tank is the same as the CD tank except that 3/8" bolts were measured in the field instead of the 1/4" bolts on the drawings for AB.The ANCHOR4 analysis for 1-QT-134-CD (using 1/4" diameter Phillips Redhead Wedge Anchors)demonstrated adequacy.The base plates were also shown to be adequate.24

Table 2 (Continued)

Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit I)Class ID Description Building'l.

Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation 21 21 21 I-QT-141-AB I, 141-AB2, 141-CD I, 141-CD2 (4 air receivers)

I-TK-10 I-TK-11*AB&CD EMERG DIESEL STARTING AIR RECEIVERS I&2 REACTOR COOLANT LETDOWN VOLUME CONTROL TANK BORON INJECTION TANK AUXILIARY AUXILIARY AUXILIARY 5S7 Air tanks anchored by four 5/S" J-bolts (Ref.1, 4).Total weight for each tank is 6000 lb.Tank anchorage was verified by an ANCHOR4 analysis.Nozzle loads were included.609 Tank on 4 wide flange legs, 90 inches in diameter and 120 inches in height.Tank 1-TK-10 is similar to the 2-TK-10.Tank anchorage and wide.flange legs were evaluated in a hand calculation for 2-TK-10 and found to be adequate.612 Tank is 5'iameter by 10'n height supported by 4 Wide Flange Leg supports (10" WF w/5/S" flange)4'-4" in height...Each leg is bolted to the pedestal w/two embedded 1 3/4" bolts.21 I-TK-200 MAIN STEAM LEADS CONDENSATION DRAIN TANK (POT)The Seismic Evaluation of the Boric Acid Tank (2-TK-12S) is seismically adequate.The Boron Injection Tank (1-TK-11)is much smaller but has about the same support.Therefore, Tank 1-TK-11 is judged adequate based on comparison.

621 Small tank supported from floor.Anchorage judged acceptable based on the walkdown and the anchorage inspection documentation.

25

Table 2 (Continued)

Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit 1)Class 21 ID I-TK-32 Description CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK Building El.GROUNDS 609 Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation Large flat bottom tank 52'-0" inside diameter 34'-5 1/2" height (31'-7" liquid tank).500,000 gallons and weighs 128,700 lbs.Anchored with thirty 3/8" th x 5" w x 4'-4" long strap that is embedded in the concrete at a 2'epth with a 2" radius hook at the end.The strap detail is identical to the strap for the Unit 1 and 2 Refueling Water Storage Tanks (RWST)1-TK-33 and 2-TK-33.The calculation for the RWST resulted in the conclusion that the meld to the tank and embedment in the concrete was sufficient to develop the full yield strength of the strap.The RWST has a very similar configuration as this CST.The calculation for the RWST using the GIP methodology indicated an overall safety factor of 2.57 for overturning and 1.72 for shear.21 I-TK-33 REFUELING WATER STORAGE TAN K G ROUN DS 609 The CST was screened based on a comparison of the significant attributes to the RWST.Large flat bottom tank 48'-0" inside diameter 32'-3" height (31'iquid tank).420,000 gallons, weight 94,000 lbs.The tank is founded on a concrete pad and anchored with twenty-five 3/8" th x 5" W x 4'4" L strap, embedded in concrete a 2'epth with a 2" radius hook at the end.A detailed calculation was performed to the SQUG GIP criteria.The calculation resulted in the conclusion that the weld to the tank and embedment in the concrete was sufficient to develop the full yield strength of the strap.The calculation for the RWST using GIP methodology indicated an overall safety factor of 2.57 for overturning and 1.72 for shear.26

Table.2 (Continued)

Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit I)Class ID Description Building El.Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation 21 I-TK-37*COMPONENT COOLING NATER SURGE TANK AUXILIARY 650 Skirted tank 11'-10 1/4" diameter and 17'n height.Skirt is 4'-6" high from the top of the pad to skirt connection to tank.Skirt has I/2" thickness.

There are 8 bolts evenly spaced around tank, with a solid steel washer 3-3/4" high x 4" length x 2" width.Bolts suppoited from 3" x 3 x I/2" angle.21 21 I-TK-76N, 76S I-TK12-N CONTROL ROOM A/C NORTH AND SOUTH CHILL V/ATE R EXPANSION TANKS NORTH BORIC ACID STORAGE TANK AUXILIARY 650 AUXILIARY 537 The anchorage was screened based on a hand calculation performed for the bolt stresses.Small tank 2'n length x 9" in diameter on a I" diameter piping system.Tank in-line with pipe, supported by a U-bolt on a cantilevered angle (2 I/2" x 2 I/2" x 3/8")about I'6" long.Angle welded to a plate that is bolted to the wall with 2 I/2" expansion anchors.Anchorage and support for these small tanks were accepted by SRT judgment after the walkdown and a review of the anchora e ins ection documentation.

Boric Acid Tank on 4 Wide Flange Beam Legs.This Tank is identical to tank 2-TK-12S which was evaluated-by means of a calculation.

The calculation indicated that the legs and anchorage are adequate.21 I 2-HE-I 6N NORTH SPENT FUEL PIT HEAT EXCHANGER AUXILIARY 609 3'2" diameter horizontal heat exchanger about 22'ong on two saddles supported by piers, Total weight full given as 26,200 lbs.Exchanger bolted into pier with four 7/8" diameter bolts per saddle.Piers are doweled into floor.The results of tank anal sis show that the tank anchora e and saddles are ade uate.

Table 2 (Continued)

Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Kxchangers (Unit 1)Class 21 ID 12-OME-44N-2

&44S-2 Descri tion NORTH&SOUTH RADIOACTIVE WASTE GAS COMPRESSOR OME-44N-2 SEAL WATER HEAT EXCHANGERS EI.Buildin AUXILIARY 609 Descri tion of Confi uration and Anchora e Evaluation Small Heat Exchanger 3'-2" long by 10" in diameter attached to South Radioactive Waste Gas Compressor OME-44S-1 with 4-1/2" bolts.Compressor anchored to ground with 4 3/4" bolts.The SRT reviewed the anchorage drawings for the compressor and judged the anchorage to be adequate (4 J-bolts).The compressor is not on the SSEL and only anchorage adequacy is required.21 12-TK-47-AB*

&47-CD AB&CD EMERG DIESEL FUEL OIL STORAGE TANKS GROUNDS The anchorage of the compressor was judged acceptable after a review of the anchorage during the walkdown.609 Underground tanks.SRT evaluated this tank based on the available documentation in the equipment package.A tank calculation was performed by hand.The tank was modeled as a beam on elastic foundation.

The overall tank stresses were very low (on the order of 3.6 ksi).21 12-TK12-M MIDDLE BORIC ACID STORAGE TANK AUXILIARY 587 Boric Acid Tank on 4 Wide Flange Beam Legs.All dimensions for the tank, legs, connections and anchorage given in the anchorage package for the tank.This Tank is identical to tank 2-TK-12S which was evaluated by means of a hand calculation.

The calculation indicated that the legs and anchorage are adequate.This tank was screened based on comparison to the Unit 2 calculation.

28

'k Table 3 Description of Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat E<xchangers (Unit 2)Class ID 12-HE-25A Description 15GPM RADIOACTIVE WASTE EVAPORATOR HE-25 CONDENSER Building AUXILIARY El.600 Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation Component is supported off shell of much larger (about 4.0')diameter tank 12-TK-148 which is not on the SSEL.This component is designated an outlier due to concerns related to the anchorage for 12-TK-148 and nozzle loads.12-HE-25B&C (2 Coolers)2-QT-112-AB

&CD (2 filters)15 GPM RADIOACTIVE WASTE EVAPORATOR HE-25 DISTILLATE COOLERS AB&CD EMERGENCY DIESEL FULL FLOW LUBE OIL FILTER AUXILIARY AUXILIARY 587 579 The Heat Exchanger is about 14" in diameter and 10 feet long, supported by stiffened saddles with two 3/4" diameter anchor bolts in each saddle, supported off of a steel platform.Weight of HX<2000 lbs.Capacity exceeds demand for saddles, support frame and platform by inspection.

Small tank, with a ht of about 5'nd a diameter of 3', anchored by six 1/2" expansion anchors at 60 degree intervals.

Tank contains oil, total maximum approximate weight=2707 lbs.ANCHOR analysis shows high margins and includes inlet and outlet nozzle loads.29 Table 3 (Continued)

Description of Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit 2)Class Descri tion Buildin El.Descri tion of Confi uration and Anchora e Evaluation 2-QT-113-ABI, AB2, CDI&CD2 (4 Strainers)

AB EMERGENCY DIESEL FULL FLOW LUBE OIL STRAINER 5 I AUXILIARY 579 Supported on four angle legs.Each leg is anchored by one I/2" J-bolt anchor.Weight=17304, c.g.at approx.mid-height

=33".The ANCHOR analysis performed for CDI&CD2 including nozzle loads showed a high margin.The inlet and outlet nozzle loads were assumed equally distributed between the two strainers.

Anchorage for ABI and AB2 was acceptable by corn arison.2-QT-116-AB

&CD AB&CD EMERGENCY DIESEL LUBE OIL HEATER TAN K AUXILIARY 579 Small heater 9.5" Dia.x 3'-9.5" Ht.Anchorage screened based on the ANCHOR4 analysis for 116-CD.II 2-QT-118-A B&CD AB EMERGENCY DIESEL BYPASS LUBE OIL FILTER AUXILIARY 579 Filter anchored by nine anchors in three groups of three, so each group is 120 degrees for the next (i.e., evenly space).The approx.syeight of the tank is estimated to be the same as that of 2-QT-I l2-CD (Wt=2707//), because the tanks are of the same manufacturer, size, and both hold oil.2-QT-143-ABI, AB2 and CD I, CD2 (4 dryers)AB EMERGENCY DIESEL CONTROL AIR DRYER/II AUXILIARY 587 Anchorage screened based on an ANCHOR4 evaluation.

Small tank mounted together on steel frame with the other air dryer tank (ABI with AB2 and CDI with CD2).Frame anchored by eight 3/8" non-shell type expansion anchors, four per base plate.Tanks hold air and are the size of fire extinguishers, (approx.8.9 lbs.filled weight each).The nozzle loads are not a concern.Anchorage screened based on judgment aAer walkdown and review of anchorage inspection documentation.

30 Table 3 (Continued)

Description of Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit 2)Class ID 2-QT-l44-AB

&CD (2 filters)Description AB&CD EMERGENCY DIESEL FUEL OIL TRANSFER FILTER Building AUXILIARY El.587 Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation Small filter on three angle legs anchored by three 5/8" Phillips Red Head Wedge anchors.No interactions.

Anchorage screened by judgment after walkdown and review of anchorage inspection documentation.

0 2-TK-253-1

&2 0 2-TK-253-3

&4 PRESSURIZER TRAIN'A'RESSURE RELIEF VLV NRV-153 RESERVE CONTROL AIR BOTTLE RACK PRESSURIZER TRAIN'B'RESSURE RELIEF VLV NRV-152 EMERGENCY AIR BOTTLE RACK CONTAINMENT 612 CONTAINMENT 650 This component is a small (about 4.5'ong x 16" diameter)air tank horizontally mounted (welded)on a short length of I beam which in turn is welded to building steel.Tank weight was assumed to be 250 lbs.An ANCHOR4 analysis showed a very high margin.This component is a cylindrical compressed air"bottle" about 12" in diameter and 60" tall, secured to the crane wall with steel straps that are attached to a very stout steel bracket arrangement, secured to the wall with a number of expansion anchors.AEPSC Structural

&Analytical Design Nuclear Section reviewed the as-found condition of the support for this tank, and found it to be adequate for design loads.21 12-HE-16S SOUTH SPENT FUEL PIT HEAT EXCHANGER AUXILIARY 609 Horizontal heat exchanger 3'2" diameter, and about 22'ong on two saddles supported by piers.Total weight full given as 26,200 lbs.Exchanger bolted into pier with four 718" diameter bolts per saddle.Piers are doweled into floor.The tank anchorage and saddles were adequate based on the analysis for 12-HE-16N as noted in Table 2.

Table 3 (Continued)

Description of Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit 2)Class 21 ID 2-HE-I I>>Description REACTOR COOLANT PUMP SEAL WATER HEAT EXCHANGER Building AUXILIARY El.609 Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation Vertical Heat Exchanger on a Gusseted steel pedestal.Each Pedestal is anchored to the floor with eight 3/4" J-Bolts embedded 20" into floor.Exchanger is 16" in diameter and 14'n height.Exchanger is bolted to the steel pedestal with two 1" diameter steel bolts on 6" centers in weak direction and 2'-8" in strong direction.

This connection is more limiting than the anchorage to the floor.21 2-HE-13 EXCESS LETDOWN CONTAINMENT 612 HEAT EXCHANGER A hand calculation was performed to demonstrate the adequacy of these four bolts.Heat exchanger (1600 Ibs)on two saddles in extremely high rad area.Anchorage includes four 3/4" diameter J-bolts, embedded at least 2 feet into piers.Due to large anchorage (four 3/4" bolts)and small exchanger, the anchorage is acceptable by SRT judgment.21 21 2-HE-14 2-HE-15E&15W (2 exchangers)

LETDOWN HEAT EXCHANGER EAST k WEST COMPONENT COOLING WATER HEAT EXCHANGER AUXILIARY AUXILIARY 633 609 Exchanger anchored with two 7/8" diameter J-bolts on 11-3/8" spacing.Vertical distance from the base of exchanger to the C.G.of exchanger is 13".Vertical distance from the base of the exchanger to the top nozzle is 29".Anchorage adequacy was accepted based on a short hand calculation.

Component Cooling Water Heat Exchanger on two reinforced saddles.Anchorage is two 7/8" diameter J bolts.There are four 1" wedge expansion anchors in one pedestal in the horizontal direction.

C.G.of exchanger from the top of the saddle pedestal about 3'.Anchorage screened based on a hand calculation for 1-HE-15E.32 Table 3 (Continued)

Description of Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit 2)Class 21 2-HE-17E&17W Descri tion EAST&WEST RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL HEAT EXCHANGER Buildin AUXILIARY El.609 Descri tion of Confi oration and Anchora e Evaluation Very well engineered support structure.

There is a ring support at top of the exchanger bracketed to the wall in each of the four quadrants.

This takes the overturning loads on the exchanger.

Bottom support is a heavy duty steel gusset structure supported by two peers.There are two bolts in each peer.The support structure for the exchanger is obviously well engineered.

21 2-HE-18E&18 W EAST&WEST CONTAINMENT SPRAY HEAT EXCHANGER AUXILIARY 609 Qualification data indicates an analysis to the design basis.Based on the inspection and anchorage data collected, the Heat Exchangers are adequate.Very well engineered support structure.

There is a ring support at top of the exchanger bracketed to the wall in each of the four quadrants.

This takes the overturning loads on the exchanger.

Bottom support (at about the quarter point of the exchanger, with the remainder of the exchanger hanging below)is a heavy duty ring with gussets at the bolt locations.

These are bolted to a steel support structure that is obviously well engineered.

21 2-HE-32E&32W EAST&WEST RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL PUMP PP-35E MECHANICAL SEAL HEAT EXCHANGERS AUXILIARY 573 Qualification data indicates an analysis to the design basis.Based on the inspection and anchorage data collected the Heat Exchanger is adequate.8" in diameter by 2" long exchanger, attached to East Residual Heat Removal Pump with two 5/8" bolts.Could have screened with the pump using the rule of the box, however the exchanger was listed separately on the SSEL.Anchorage to the pumps was judged adequate by SRT judgment.33 Table 3 (Continued)

Description of Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit 2)Class 21 ID 2-HE-33E&33W (2 exchangers)

Description EAST&WEST CONTAINMENT SPRAY PUMP PP-9E MECHANICAL SEAL HEAT EXCHANGERS Building AUXILIARY El.573 Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation 6" diameter by 8-3/4" high exchanger, is not attached to the East Containment Spray Pump as shown on the anchorage sketch, however piping can support the small exchanger.

Could have screened with the pump using the rule of the box, however the exchanger was listed separately oh the SSEL.21 2-HE-34-NE, 34-NW, 34-SE,&34-SW (4 exchangers)

NORTH&SOUTH SAFETY INJECTION PUMP PP-26N OUTBOARD MECHANICAL SEAL HEAT EXCHANGERS AUXILIARY 587 Anchorage to the pumps was judged adequate by the SRT.6" diameter by 8-3/4" high exchanger, attached to North Safety Injection Pump with two 1/2" bolts.Could have screened with the pump using the rule of the box, however the exchanger was listed separately on the SSEL.Anchorage to the pumps was judged adequate by the SRT.2-HE-35N&NORTH&SOUTH 35S (2 Coolers)SAFETY INJECTION PUMP PP-26N LUBE OIL COOLERS AUXILIARY 587 Small exchanger 1'-5" long by 4" in diameter by 8-3/4", attached to North Safety Injection Pump with four 1/4" bolts.Could have screened with the pump using the rule of the box, however the exchanger was listed separately on the SSEL.Anchorage to the pumps was judged adequate by the SRT.

Table 3 (Continued)

Description of Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit 2)Class ID Description Building El.Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation 21 2-HE-36-EN, 36-ES, 36-WN, 36-WS (4 exchangers)

EAST&WEST CENTRIFUGAL CHARGING PUMP PP-50E INBOARD MECHAN ICAL SEAL HEAT EXCHANGERS AUXILIARY 587 6" in diameter 8-3/4" high heat exchanger, attached to East Centrifugal Charging Pump with two I/2" bolts.Could have screened with the pump using the rule of the box, however the exchanger was listed separately on the SSEL.Anchorage to the pumps was judged adequate by the SRT.21 21 2-HE-37E, 37W~2-HE-38E*&38W EAST&WEST CENTRIFUGAL CHARGING PUMP PP-50E GEAR OIL COOLER EAST&WEST CENTRIFUGAL CHARGING PUMP PP-50E LUBE OIL COOLER AUXILIARY 587 AUXILIARY 587 Exchanger I'-6" long and 5" in diameter attached to reinforced plate support with four I/2" bolts.Plate support bolted to East Centrifugal Charging Pump with three I/2" bolts.Could have screened using the rule of the box, however the exchanger has a separate SSEL listing.Anchorage to the pumps was judged adequate by the SRT.Small exchanger I'-6" long and 5" in diameter bolted to 2 1'ong channel columns that are welded to the skid of the East Centrifugal Charging Pump.Could have screened with the pump using the rule of the box, however the exchanger was listed separately on the SSEL.21 2-HE-47-ABN

&, 47-A BS, 47-CDN&47-CDS (4 aAercoolers)

AB&CD EMERGENCY DIESEL NORTH COMBUSTION AIR AFTER-COOLERS AUXILIARY 587 Anchorage to the pumps was judged adequate by the SRT.Aftercooler transfers its lateral load to the inlet manifolds.

Gravity loads are carried by a post on a spring hanger base, so the post is incapable of carryin lateral or longitudinal load.The Diesel Generator Turbochargers in Unit 2 were replaced in a recent outa<e.As part of the modil ication an analysis was perlonned for thc associated piping and the aAercoolers.

All supports met the D.C.Cook acceptance criteria.35 Table 3 (Continued)

Description of Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit 2)Class ID Description Building El.Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation 21 2-QP-21 SOUTH BORIC ACID BLENDER AUXILIARY 587 Boric Acid Blender supported by piping.It is in-line with the pipe between two pipe supports off the floor.Blender very small (6" in diameter and I I" long).21 21 21 21 2-QT-107-AB&CD (2 tanks)2-QT-110-AB

&CD (2 Coolers)2-QT-115-AB

&CD(2 Tanks)2-QT-131-AB

&CD(2 Coolers)AB&CD EMERGENCY DIESEL FUEL OIL DAY TANKS AB&CD EMERGENCY DIESEL LUBE OIL COOLER AB&CD EMERGENCY DIESEL LUBE OIL SUMP TANKS AB&CD EMERGENCY DIESEL JACKET WATER COOLER AUXILIARY 587 AUXILIARY 5/7 AUXILIARY 5 79 AUXILIARY 587 Screened based on drawings (insulation precluded inspection of the blender connection to the piping system)and inspection for interactions.

Horizontal tanks which sits on two saddles.Each saddle has two I/4" thick plates, forming a"U", with no gussets.There are two 5/8" anchors per saddle.A Horizontal Tank Analysis was performed to show that the tank anchorage is adequate.Lube Oil Coolers, mounted to wall by fourteen 3/4" Wedge type anchors.External ANCHOR4 analysis for 2-QT-110-CD was performed.

Based on the results of this evaluation both coolers were screened.The tank sits on two saddles, two plates per saddle, I/O" thick.There are two 3/4" anchors per saddle.There are four anchors in total for the tank.Anchorage screened based on review of the anchorage inspection documentation and the vendor qualification of the tanks.Jacket Water Cooler mounted to wall by fourteen 3/4" wedge type expansion anchors.An ANCHOR4 was performed on 2-QT-131-CD.

Based on that analysis both coolers were screened.36

Table 3 (Continued)

Description of Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit 2)Class ID Description Building El.Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation 21 2-QT-133-A B&CD (2 tanks)AB&CD EMERGENCY DIESEL JACKET WATER SURGE TANK AUXILIARY 587 100 GAL.TANK, 2'-6" D x 3'.The surge tanks are supported (bolted)to a shelf.The shelf is bolted to the wall by four 7/8" anchors.21 2-QT-l34-AB&CD4 (2 tanks)AB&CD EMERGENCY DIESEL AUXILIARY JACKET WATER HEATER (TANK)AUXILIARY 587 An ANCHOR4 was performed on 2-QT-133-CD.

Based on that analysis both coolers were screened.Heater tanks separately mounted by three 1/2" coupling rods and Phillips Redhead wedge type anchors.An ANCHOR4 was performed on 2-QT-134-CD.

Based on that analysis both coolers were screened.21 2-QT-14 I-ABI, AB2, CDI,&CD2(4 Air Receivers)

AB EMERGENCY DIESEL STARTING AIR RECEIVER II I AUXILIARY 587 Air tanks anchored by four 5/8" J-bolts.Total weight for the tank is 6000 lbs.The tank anchorage was verified by an ANCHOR4 analysis.Nozzle loads were included.21 2-TK-10 REACTOR COOLANT LETDOWN VOLUME CONTROL TANK AUXILIARY 609 Tank on four wide flange legs, 90 inches in diameter and 120 inches in height.The tank leg support and anchorage was screened based on a hand calculation.

37 Table 3 (Continued)

Description of Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit 2)Class 21 ID 2-TK-I I Description BORON INJECTION TANK Building AUXILIARY El.612 Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation Tank is about 5'n diameter by 10'n height supported by 4 Wide Flange Leg supports (10" WF w/5/8" flange)4'-4" in height..Each leg is bolted to the pedestal w/two embedded 1 3/4" bolts.Weld of leg to tank about 14" in length and 1/4" thickness on each side of the wide flange and 10" at the top of the wide flange.21 21 2-TK-12S 2-TK-150 SOUTH BORIC ACID STORAGE TANK MAIN STEAM LEADS CONDENSATE DRAIN TANK AUXILIARY AUXILIARY 587 600 The seismic evaluation of the Boric Acid Tank (2-TK-12S) indicates that it is seismically adequate.The Boron Injection Tank is much smaller but has about the same support.Therefore, Tank 2-TK-11 is judged adequate based on comparison Boric Acid Tank on four Wide Flange Beam Legs.Tank anchorage and wide flange legs were evaluated using a hand calculation.

The calculation indicated that the legs and anchorage are adequate.Small horizontal tank bolted to wall in-line with the piping system.Anchorage was judged acceptable based on the walkdown and a review of the anchorage inspection documentation.

38 Table 3 (Continued)

Description of Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit 2)Class 21 ID 2-TK-32 Description CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK Building GROUNDS 609 Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation Large flat bottom tank 52'-0" inside diameter 34'-5 1/2" height, 500,000 gallons and weighs 128,700 lbs.Anchored with thirty 3/8" th x 5" w x 4'4" long strap that is embedded in the concrete 2'epth with a 2" radius hook at the end.The strap detail is identical to the strap for the Unit 1 and 2 RWST 1-TK-33 and 2-TK-33.The calculation for the RWST resulted in the conclusion that the weld to the tank and embedment in the concrete was sufficient to develop the full yield strength of the strap.The RWST has a very similar configuration as this CST.The calculation for the RWST using GIP methodology indicated an overall safety factor of 2.57 for overturning and 1.72 for shear.21 2-TK-33 REFUELING WATER STORAGE TANK GROUNDS 609 The CST was screened based on a comparison of the significant attributes to the RWST.Large flat bottom tank 48'-0" inside diameter 32'-3" height (31'-0" liquid tank 420,000 gallons and weighs 94,000 lbs.Anchored with twenty-five 3/8" th x 5" w x 4'4" long strap that is embedded in the concrete 2'epth with a 2" radius hook at the end.A detailed calculation was performed to the SQUG G1P criteria.The calculation resulted in the conclusion that the weld to the tank and embedment in the concrete was sufficient to develop the full yield strength of the strap.The calculation for the RWST using the GIP methodology indicated an overall safety factor of 2.57 for overturning and 1.72 for shear.39 Table 3 (Continued)

Description of Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit 2)Class ID Description Building El.Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation 21 2-TK-37 COMPONENT COOLING WATER SURGE TANK AUXILIARY 650 Skirted tank 11'-10 1/4" diameter and 17'n height.Skirt is 4'-6" high from the top of the pad to skirt connection to tank.Skirt has 1/2" thickness..

There are eight bolts evenly spaced around tank, with a solid steel washer 3-3/4" high x 4" length x 2" width.Bolts supported from 3" x 3" x 1/2" angle.21 2-TK-76N*, 76S CONTROL ROOM AIR CONDITIONING NORTH AND SOUTH CHILL WATER EXPANSION TANKS AUXILIARY 650 2-TK-37 is similar to 1-TK-37.The support for 2-TK-37 was screened based on the hand calculation for 1-TK-37.Small tank 2'n length x 9" in diameter on a 1" diameter piping system.Tank in-line with pipe, supported by a U-bolt on a cantilevered angle (2 1/2" x 2 1/2" x 3/8")about 1'-6" long.Angle welded to a plate that is bolted to the reinforced block wall with three 5/8" diameter through bolts (other side of wall inspected and bolts came through).Anchorage and support for these small tanks were accepted by SRT judgment after the walkdown and a review of the anchorage inspection documentation.

40 r

Section 5.1.2 states that all four tanks reviewed met the intent of the GIP.Indicate that thc GIP-2 guidclincs and methodology are fully.mct or identify any deviations from thc guidelines and thc methodology.

Provide calculations for determining thc seismic adequacy of the tanks (ID 1-TK-33 and 2-TK-32)using thc methodology dcscribcd in section 7 of thc GIP-2.The evaluation of thc anchors which restrain the tank movement should also be provided.The flat bottom tanks were screened based on calculations performed on August 25, 1989, prior to the publication of the rev.2 GIP.The evaluation performed followed the procedure available at the time in the rev.1 GIP.There are only minor differences between the two revisions that do not affect the results due to the resulting high margins.There are two differences in the configuration of the RWST (1-TK-33)that are not in conformance with the GIP procedure:

a)the t JR=.0007351 which is less than the limits of the GIP screening table of.001;and b)the tank was not anchored with bolts but rather with twenty-five 3/8" x 5" x 4'4" long straps that are embedded in the concrete at a two foot depth with a two inch radius hook at the end.The t JR issue was accounted for by making an appropriate adjustment in the calculated natural frequency for the tank.The anchorage was considered by replacing the strap in the calculation with bolts of equivalent area and strength.Both of these modifications meet the intent of the GIP guidelines.

The calculation resulted in the conclusion that the weld to the tank and embedment in the concrete was sufficient to develop the full yield strength of the strap.The calculation for the RWST using the Rev.1 GIP methodology indicated an overall safety factor of 2.57 for overturning and 1.72 for shear.In order to obtain further assurance that the RWST is seismically adequate a calculation that conformed to'ASCE Standard 4-86 was performed and'yielded similar results.The strap detail for the CST (2-TK-32)is identical to the strap for the RWST (1-TK-33).

The calculation for the RWST resulted in the conclusion that the weld to the tank and embedment in the concrete was sufficient to develop the full yield strength of the strap.The CST also has a very similar configuration as this RWST.The CST was therefore screened based on a comparison of the significant attributes to the RWST.The SEWS for 1-TK-33 and 2-TK-32 including the calculations are included as attachment

4.

7i Section 5.1.5 states that horizontal tanks and heat cxchangers rcviewcd mct thc intent of thc GIP.Indicate that the GIP-2 guidelines and methodology are fully met or identify any deviations from them.Provide calculations using the methodology described in section 7 of the GIP-2 for the following tanks and cxchangers:

1-HE-14, 2-HK-15K, 12-HE-16N, 1-QT-107-AB and 2-QT-115-CD.

The evaluation of the anchors which restrain thc tank movement should also be provided.As previously discussed in response to questions 2 and 5, anchorage and support evaluations took several different forms consistent with the GIP.These forms included for tanks and heat exchangers:

a)detailed evaluations using the step by step procedure in section 7.4 of the GIP;b)detailed hand calculations; c)screening based on an anchorage evaluation for an identical item of equipment and anchorage or a worst case evaluation of a similar item;or d)the SRT judged, based on the weight and anchorage of the equipment, that the anchorage obviously met the GIP screening criteria.The GIP-2 guidelines for adequate strength of the tanks or exchangers, saddles and anchorage are met for all horizontal tanks and heat exchangers that were identified in the final report as screened.The step by step procedure in section 7.4 was not used for supports that were obviously rugged based on the inspection.

Exchangers that did not meet'the applicable ranges of parameters and assumptions contained in table 7-6 of the GIP could not be evaluated with the section 7.4 procedure.

These tanks were evaluated as, described in tables 2 and 3 of this response to item 5 of the RAI.SEWS that include the calculations and the anchorage inspection documentation for 1-HE-14, 2-HE-15E, 12-HE-16N, 1-QT-107-AB and 2-QT-115-CD are contained in attachment 5 of this submittal.

The evaluations for 1-HE-15E and 1-QT-107-CD are also provided since the screening for 2-HE-15E and 1-QT-107-AB are based on these evaluations, respectively.

These SEWS and calculations provide a good cross section of the evaluations performed.

The calculation for 1-HE-14 was a short hand calculation that indicated the anchorage had a safety margin of eight.A hand calculation was performed for 1-HE-15E that was also used to screen 2-HE-15E.These had a calculated safety margin of four.Heat exchanger 12-HE-16N and tanks 1-QT-107-CD and 2-QT-115-CD included a calculation using the step by step methodology in section 7.4 of the GIP.

S)Tables 6-1 and 6-2 provide a summary of the limited analytical reviews (LARS)for thc sclcctcd cable and conduit raceways.Provide copies of the calculations of the analyses for resolution of thc outlicrs listed as LAR Numbers 005, 011, 022 and 023.Also provide typical sample calculations for thc raceways that arc not selected as outliers (i.e., LAR Numbers 001, 010, 027 and 030).The requested information is contained in attachment 6 to this RAI.

A' y 9)Discuss thc issue described in thc Information Notice 95-49 regarding Thermo-Lag panels, in particular, thc issue regarding seismic resistance capability of the cable tray and its support when appropriate weight and modulus of the Thermo-Lag are included in thc analysis.The fire-wrapped raceways were walked-down as part of the USI A-46 raceway evaluations, along with all of the other raceways in the plant.The weight of the Thermo-Lag material was considered in choosing LARS for the USI A-46 effort.None of the hangers supporting fire-wrapped raceways were selected for LAR because: (1)the SRT did not find them to be an enveloping case, i.e., other hangers of similar construction were more heavily loaded;and (2)the SRT was aware that the hangers supporting the fire-wrapped raceways had been evaluated and, unlike most other rod hangers in the plant, had been laterally braced.In addition, in response to NRC bulletin 92-01 and generic letter 92-08, we performed a walk down of all Thermo-Lag installations in the plant to determine whether seismically induced failure of the Thermo-Lag could result in the Thermo-Lag falling and damaging nearby equipment.

This walk down covered all Thermo-Lag installations, including conduits and cable trays, wall pilasters, and electrical equipment.

The walkdown team concluded that the Thermo-Lag was well secured, so that large sections could not fall, but smaller pieces (golf ball size and smaller)could fall if local sections of the Thermo-Lag fractured.

As a result of the walkdown Thermo-Lag material was removed from some of the conduits to address the safety interface condition.

In the mid 1980s, a minimum number (<10%)of the cable tray and conduit raceways were fire-wrapped with Thermo-Lag material as part of our 10 CFR 50 Appendix R efforts.Some of the Thermo-Lag material in the plant is being removed and will be replaced with DARMATT material.In some instances, the Thermo-Lag was removed and was not replaced by any other type of material...

44 ATTACHMENT 2 TO AEP:NRC:1040E SAMPLE SEWS, ANCHORAGE CALCULATIONS, AND ANCHORAGE INSPECTION DOCUMENTATION FOR CLASS 1 THROUGH 20 EQUIPMENT RAI ITEM 2 This attachment includes sample SEWS, anchorage calculations and anchorage inspection documentation for a cross section of class 1 through 20 equipment items.The samples selected are designated with an*in Table 1 of this RAI.The following examples are included: lass 1-ABD-A 2-CRID-1-CVT 1-1'P-10W 14 17 1-HV-AFP-Mk 12-HV-E W-7 1-A W-A-A 1-Mk:-15-AB 2-Mk:-150-2-A11 Ol/16/92 PG.HO.I)SAfE SNUIOOuN EoulpHENT LIST (SSELup)f UHCI ION: 600 VAC STSTEH Equipment Io~1-ABD-A Equi pment Class: Train: I Drawing Number: 1-12001 1-12010 Systemt ELECTRICAL OlSTRIBUTIOH 600VAC Equip

Description:

600VAC NCC ABD-A Bul l ding: AUX IL I ART Roomt AB EHERG OIESEL GENERATOR ROON Etevationt 587 Normal state: Desired st'ate: Power Required: Sort: U, Supporting System Drawing Munbert Required Interconnections and Suppo t C upport ing Components:

Safety Related Status: NUCLEAR SR flin/Opt t HIMAlias Hubert AOOITIOHAL IMFORNATIOM Power Train: B Component Scrvedt 600Y KCC ABD-A Manufacturer:

CUTLER-HAMMER Model: Panel: Elem Drawing: uiring Drawingt 1-9QOS I-9C206 Power Source: 1-llAS ualkdownt F Relay Only: H Component Type: HCC ISO Drawings: Detailed Location: IN tHE MU RE'GIOM OF tHE ROON ROON, NEAR THE NORTH MALL D.C.COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 1 of 12 ID: 1-ABD-A(Rev.0)Description:

600VAC MCC ABD-A Class: 1.Motor Control Centers Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG RM, IN THE NWREGN OF THE RM, NEAR THE N WALL Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: CUTLER-HAMMER SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND Elevation where equipment receives seismic input Elevation of seismic input below about 40'rom grade (grade=608.00)Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz (est.frequency=)Capacity based on: 1.50 Bounding Spectrum Demandbasedon:

1.00 RealisticMedian-CenteredFloorResponseSpectra 587.00 N/A N/A'I.200LOG 0.000 0.50 1'I I\/I//LOG Hz Capacity.....Demand 50.00 Capacit Demand 1 Demand 2 File CAGIPtGIPtspectra.des C:tGIP'PROJ0035tspectra.des C.'tGIPIPROJ0035'Lspectra.dos Label Boundin S ctrum BUILDING Auxilia ELEVATION 587 BROADEN N BUILDING Auxilia ELEVATION 587 BROADEN N Does capacity exceed demand' D.C.COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 2 of 12 ID: 1-ABD-A(Rev.

0)Class: 1.Motor Control Centers

Description:

600VAC MCC ABD-A Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG RM, IN THE NW REGN OF THE RM, NEAR THE N WALL Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: CUTLER-HAMMER CAVEATS-BOUNDING SPECTRUM MCC/BS Caveat 1-Earthquake Experience Data Base MCC/BS Caveat 2-Rating of 600 V or Less.MCC/BS Caveat 3-Adjacent Cabinets Bolted Together MCC/BS Caveat 4-Attached Weight of 100 Pounds or Less.MCC/BS Caveat 5-Externaliy Attached Items Rigidly Anchored.MCC/BS Caveat 6-General Configuration Similar to NEMA Standards.

MCC/BS Caveat 7-Cutouts Not Large MCC/BS Caveat 8-Doors/Buckets Secured.MCC/BS Caveat 9-Natural Frequency Relative to 8 Hz Limit Considered.

MCC/BS Caveat 10-Adequate Anchorage.

MCC/BS Caveat 11-Potential Chatter of Essential Relays Evaluated.

MCC/BS Caveat 12-No Other Concerns Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum/ANCHORAGE Yes Yes Yes N/A Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A Yes Yes Yes 1.The sizes and locations of anchors have been determined 2.Appropriate equipment characteristics have been determined (mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation).

3.The type of anchorage is covered by the GIP 4.The adequacy of the anchorage installation has been evaluated (weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion anchor tightness, etc.)5.Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety have been considered:

embedment length, anchor spacing, freewdge distance, concrete strength/condition, and concrete cracking.6.For bolted anchorages, any gaps under the base are less than 1/4.7.Factors affecting essential relays have been considered:

gaps under the base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors.8.The base has adequate stiffness and the effect of prying action on anchors has been considered.

9.The strength of the equipment base and the load path to the CG is adequate 10.The adequacy of embedded steel, grout pads or large concrete pads have been evaluated.

11.The anchorage capacity exceeds the demand.Are anchorage requirements met'?Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes D.C..COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 3 of 12 ID: 1-ABD-A(Rev.

0)Description:

600VAC MCC ABD-A Building: AUXILIARY Class: 1.Motor Control Centers Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG RM, IN THE NW REGN OF THE RM, NEAR THE N WALL Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: CUTLER-HAMMER INTERACTION EFFECTS 1.Soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures 2.If the equipment contains sensitive relays, it is free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures.

3.Attached lines have adequate flexibility.

4.Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse.5.No other adverse concerns were found.Is equipment free of interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes CO+IME~N 1-ABD-A&1-ABD-B in the same box.5 vertical panels on 4" concrete pad.Anchorage by bolts in front 4 1/2" J-bolts and 2 1/2" expansion anchors.Anchorage by welds in back 6 2" long 3/16" fillet.Anchor Pattern: f x][x][x][x][x x]Weight of MCC is a maximum of 800 Ibs/cabinet x 5=4000 Ibs, which was used in the anchor analysis.The AEPSC Rev.0 report" Fundamental Resonant Frequencies of Cook Nuclear Plant Cabinets, Panels, and Racks in Auxiliary Building Complex (Determined By In-Situ Modal Testing;Year 1985 and 1986)" dated August 10, 1994 documents the testing of four MCC assemblies.

The minimum fundamental frequancy from these tests was 9.6 Hz for MCC assembly 2-ABD-B/ABD-A.

The SRT based on this report judged that the frequancy for MCC assembly 1-ABD-A/ABD-B was above 8 Hz.However, for conservatism credit for MCC Assembly 1-ABD-A/ABD-B being above 8 Hz.was not taken, and therefore the caveats on this SEWs related to the 8 Hz issue were answered N/A.This enabled the conservative use of the 1.5 x Bounding Spectrum vs.floor spectrum comparison for capacity vs.demand and the use of the peak of the 5%damped floor spectrum for the anchorage calculations.

No interaction concern.Zap 345 MCC ABD-ABB Zap,346 Typ.Opening@bottom.Anchor Evaluation Performed by Bahaa Mahmoud-S8A Checked by George Gary Thomas.

D.C.COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 4 of 12 ID: 1-ABD-A(Rev.0)Class: 1.Motor Control Centers

Description:

600VAC MCC ABD-A Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG RM, IN THE NW REGN OF THE RM, NEAR THE N WALL Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: CUTLER-HAMMER Anchor calculation additional margin=1.634 Evaluated by Gary Thomas and Satyan Sharma on 7/17/92.Evaluated by: Date:

D.C.COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 5 of 12 ID: 1-ABD-A(Rev.0)Description:

600VAC MCC ABD-A Building: AUXILIARY Class: 1.Motor Control Centers Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG RM, IN THE NW REGN OF THE RM, NEAR THE N WALL Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: CUTLER-HAMMER MCC ABD-AM TYP.OPENING AT BOTTOM.

D.C.COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 6 of 12 ID: 1-ABD-A(Rev.

0)Description:

600VAC MCC ABD-A Class: 1.Motor Control Centers Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG RM, IN THE NW REGN OF THE RM, NEAR THE N WALL Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: CUTLER-HAMMER ANCHOR Report Eargm~Z'esponse Spectrum: Instructure Realistic Frequency:

GIP-Flexible Percent Damping: GIP-5.00 Spectral Values: Direction North-South East-West Vertical Acceleration (g's)1.04 1.04 0.17 Angle (N-S Direction makes with the X Axis): 0.00 Combination Criteria: SRSS~We ggs Number of Weights: 1 No Weight 1 4000.00 50.000 10.000 45.000 Fgrrgg Number of External Forces: 0 Eunmh'umber of External Moments: 0 fgc~LIRJRR Number of Anchor types: 2 Tension Shear Ultimate Ultimate Inter Inter Saf D.C.COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 7 of 12 ID: 1-ABD-A(Rev.0)Class: 1.Motor Control Centers

Description:

600VAC MCC ABD-A Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EOG RM, IN THE NW REGN OF THE RM, NEAR THE N WALL Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: CUTLER-HAMMER No.Dia Manufact Product Tension Shear Coeff Coeff Fact 1 1/2 2 1/2 Other Other J-Bolt (90 deg)Unknown Expansion Anchor 6660.00 3330.00 2290.00 2380.00 1.00 1.00 0.30 0.30 1.00 1.00 Czmrch.Ultimate Stress: 3500.00 psi.Reduction Factor: 0.85 W~Allowable Stress: 30600 psi.Surry~c Number of Surfaces: 1 Surface Orientation No Direction Comp 0.000 Direction Comp Ny 0.000 Direction Comp 1.000 Anchor Pattern for Surface¹1 D.C.COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 8 of 12 ID: 1-ABD.-A(Rev.

0)Description:

600VAC MCC ABD-A Class: 1.Motor Control Centers Building: AUXILIARY Floor EI.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG RM, IN THE NW REGN OF THE RM, NEAR THE N WALL Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: CUTLER-HAMMER 4x Legend for Anchor Patterns Anchor Bolts: Concrete Uncs: Concrete Potnts:~IIII Neid Uncs: knobs" Number of Anchors: 6 Anch No.Id 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 2 5 2 6 1 Coord 3.750 36.500 43.800 76.600 83.900 96.300 Coord 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 Coord 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 000 Surf Id D.C.COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2l14I92 Status: Yes Sheet 9 of 12 ID: 1-ABD-A(Rev.0)Description:

600YAC MCC ABD-A Class: 1.Motor Control Centers Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Rovi/Col: AB EDG RM, IN THE NW REGN OF THE RM, NEAR THE N WALL Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: CUTLER-HAMMER

¹of elements per line: 1 Number of Concrete Lines: 4 No Start X-Coord 0.000 100.00Q 100.000 0.000 Start Y-Coord 1.500 1.500 17.000 17.000 Start Z-Coo rd 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 End X-Coord 100.000 100.000 0.000 0.000 End Y-Coo rd 1.500 17.000 17.000 0.000 End Z-Coord 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Sf Id Line Width 2.000 2.000 2.QQQ 2.000 Number of Concrete Points: 0¹of elements per line: 1 Number of Weld Lines: 6 Start No X-Coord Start Y-Coo rd Start Z-Coord End X-Coord End Y-Coo rd End Z-Coo rd ld Line Width 0.000 15.400 3-19.400 56.500 59.900 96.100 18.500 18.500 18.500 18.500 18.500 18.500 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.250 17.600 21.600 58.600 62.100 98.400 18.500 18.500 18.500 18.500 18.500 18.500 0.000 1 0.000 1 0.000 1 0.000 1 0.000 0.000 1 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.187 0.187 0.187 Reduction Factor Input for Anchor¹1 Embedment Length: (1 3.60 in.Min Reqd.to achieve full capacity):=27.25 in.Essential Relays in Cabinet: Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor¹2 Embedment Length: (13 40 in.Min Reqd.to achieve full capacity):=27.25 in.Essential Relays in Cabinet: Yes D.C.COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 10 of 12 ID:1-ABD-A(Rev.

0)Class: 1.Motor Control Centers

Description:

600VAC MCC ABD-A Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 58?.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG RM, IN THE NW REGN OF THE RM, NEAR THE N WALL Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: CUTLER-HAMMER Reduction Factor Input for Anchor¹3 Embedment Length: (13.60 in.Min Reqd.to achieve full capacity):=27.25 in.Essential Relays in Cabinet: Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor¹4 Essential Relays in Cabinet: Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor¹5 Essential Relays in Cabinet: Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor¹6 Embedment Length: (13.50 in.Min Reqd.to achieve full capacity}:=27.25 in.Essential Relays in Cabinet: Yes Reduction Factors Data Current: Yes Anc No Id 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 2 5 2 6 1 PaIV Vali 3750.91 3330.00 3708.29 3330.00 3750.91 3330.00 1717.50 1785.00 1717.50 1785.00 3729.60 3330.00 Pallr/Vallr N/A N/A NIA N/A N/A NIA N/A N/A N/A N/A RT RN RL X 0.56 X 1.00 X 0.56 X 1.00 X 0.56 X 1.00 X X X X X X X X X 0.56 X 1.00 RG RS RE X X X X, X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X RF RC X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X RR RP RB 1.00 X X 1.00 X X 1.00 X X 1.00 X X 1.00 X X 1.00 X X 0.75 X X 0.75 X X 0.75 X X 0.75 X X 1.00 X X 1.00 X X RM N/A=Not Applicable Pall=Allowable Pull without Reduced Inspection Vali=Allowable Shear without Reduced Inspection Pallr=Allowable Pull with Reduced Inspection Vallr=Allowable Shear with Reduced Inspection

=Outlier=Reduction Factor Not Used RT=Reduction Factor for Type of Anchorage RN=Reduction Factor for Installation Adequacy D.C.COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 11 of 12 ID: 1-ABD-A(Rev.0)Description:

600VAC MCC ABD-A Class: 1.Motor Control Centers Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 687.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG RM, IN THE NW REGN OF THE RM, NEAR THE N WALL Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: CUTLER-HAMMER RL=Reduction Factor for Embedment RG=Reduction Factor for Gap at Anchors RS=Reduction Factor for Spacing RE=Reduction Factor for Edge Distance RF=Reduction Factor for Concrete Strength RC=Reduction Factor for Concrete Cracks RR=Reduction Factor for Essential Relays RP=Reduction Factor for Base Stiffness and Prying Action RB=Reduction Factor for Base Strength and Load Path RM=Reduction Factor for Embed.Steel and Pads e Analysis Performed:

Yes Type of Analysis: Regular Spectral Accelerations (G's)10 12 13 14 16 17 19 20 22 N-S 1.038-1.038-1.038 1.038 1.038-1.038 1.038-1.038 0.415-0.415 0.415-0.415-0.415 0.415 0.415-0.415 0.415-0.415 0.415-0.415-0.415 0.415 0.416 0.415-0.415 0.415-0.415-0.415 0.415 0.415-0.415 1.038-1.038-1.038 1.038 1.038-1.038 1.038-1.038 0.415-0.415 0.415-0.415 0.415-0.415-0.415 Vertical 0.067-0.067 0.067-0.067 0.067-0.067-0.067 0.067 0.067-0.067 0.067-0.067 0.067-0.067-0.067 0.067 0.167-0.167-0.167 0.167 0.167-0.167 0.167 Safety Factor 3.653 7.048 3.526 7.085 6.863 3.652 3.787 6.819 1.634 3.990 3.976 1.676 1.643 4.055 1.666 3.912 3.816 9.487 4.302 8.494 3.838 9 673 8.579 D.C.COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 12 of 12 ID: 1-ABD-A(Rev.

0)Class: 1.Motor Control Centers

Description:

600VAC MCC ABD-A Building: AUXILIARY Floor EI.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG RM, IN THE NW REGN OF THE RM, NEAR THE N WALL Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: CUTLER-HAMMER 24 Z.415 0.415-0.167 4.333 Minimum Safety Factor: 1.634.The Anchorage Capacity is 1.634 times greater than the Demand

• • 12 CHP 5021.CCD.019 TTACHHENT NO.1 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET Bldg.Location Installation dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch Equipment No./II VIE L~Q 4 p Og (7 E,-v.K E.i Lco'm<G.0 QOCOC.RETG (P~o 4 Drawn by: Verified by: QuM./Cert.

Inspector Date: Date: l~q~n Reviewed by: Date: nstructz.on Anchor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1

• • 12 CHP 5021.CCD.019 TTACHMENT NO.1 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET Ab F~c,.i-..Ce~Q.~Unzt I Bldg.Locate.on Installation dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch Equipment No.I 0~0~~r~1 I CLEi'-;8))/~r>Z~r-~I rr 0 ELCJ./AC+Lop>W)l'h Z Drawn by: Verified by: Qua1./Cert.Inspector Date: Date.Reviewed by: Date: 7 2>>~nstructzon Anchor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1

• 'CHP 5021.CCD.019.TTACHMENT NO.1 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET 4'b C~c,.~.egg P~Un 3.t g-3"/&-Bldg.Locate.on Installation dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch Equipment No.3-'I 6'-0 t<cpa pygmy 4p&%%cd P'g)g Q c~ll LJL~>A~5 An~So~(~!2-'FV>>0 1~/A, l 3'/g l'/i Typ 0VL fg Drawn by: Verified by: Qual./Cert.

Inspector Date: Date:>-r~Reviewed by: Date: onstructzon Anchor Reve.ew Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1

!D~~II 0~~~~C~I I~~I~~~l~4~~~~~~~~~o~~~~II II~-r.Q P 0 R%Ã~%~%~%%%~~~

j IIIIHRIIIIIIIIWH IIINIIIRIIIRRLL I551IIWIIILL eimmmimemrr RRIml%NIRSIj!mLL WRSHHR%WSLL

~~5%~Wiiiimeemrr 0'I$~%k%$%R%5%$%WW~~l.~l I'alMKWF sC

• • 12 CHP 5021.CCD.03.9 ATTACHMENT NO.1 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET Equipment No.: l-SO-Embedded Steel Dwg.No.:!-G3-PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS Dwg No.: 2"3 Weld ID T e Size Len th Cracks Yes 0 Yes Yes 3 I I Yes de C 3 II I Yes Yes<HZ'es No Yes No Weld T e Codes 1=Fillet 2=Plug/Slot 3=Groove Lack of Penetration Porosity Yes Yes CZb Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No 0 (=SC(-Qs 4 Wrv~a.r<4'.W~4(nc++0 aO KWUQS~Q gh'4e.UL LQ DCTRIL Equipment base flexible: 0 Yes 8 No Reviewed by: ons ruc ron re Date: 7 z fe Date: Verified by:ua.era.npsec or 0,:;I",: t!.<(.'i:I..".I"l!i!!Ao(.LLiP i>IJ('I':.: 4-'uc ron nc or eve.ew ngzneer f6~~(r;,i>(;!(I;.(r

"..I('('((lhI; LI,:V/E!)Date: QQIIIJ(~~,.'age 3 of 3 Equipment No.: Tightness esvaoxzsned by"Snug Fit" Tightness verif ied by:~-',(Qual./Cert.Inspector Comments: 4 Mc~9 4c>)z s

S 5 A DEPARTl4ENT CONTROLLED DOCUMENT COPY NO.JOB ORDER NO.: 12 SHP 5050 NDE.008 ATTACHMENT NO.1 Uf TRASONXC TEST REPORT REPORT DATE: 8~REQUEST NO.IDENTIFICATION Unit Component:

Item Material Other Test Unit/S/NW Frea./Diameter Reference Standard Couplant/Batch No.TEST DATA REMARKS Icc 8'ERFORMED BY: REVIEWED BY: WD FORM NO.12 SHP 5050 NDE.008-1 f EVEf:~DATE: 'VEE:~DATE: Page 1 OE Revision 0 Equip Xd: 2-CRID-I-CVT Train: 2 Equip Class: 4 Drawing No.: 2-12050 ction: 120 VAC SYSTEM System: 120V CONTROL ROOM XNSTRUMENTATXON DXSTRIBUTXON Equip Desc: 10KVA TRANSFORMER

-CONSTANT VOLTAGE Building: AUXILIARY Room: 4KV ROOM-600 VOLTS SWITCHGEAR AREA Elev: 609 Sort: S,R Notes: Normal State: Desired State: Power Req'd: Support System Drawing: 2-98077, 2-12050 Req'd Support Comp: Safety Related Status: STANDARD Min/Opt: MXN Alias No: Comp Served: Power Train: A MFR: SOLIDSTATE CONTROLS INC.el: XSL12100 el: Elem.Drawing: 2-98077 Wiring Drawing: 2-91332 Power Source: 2-EZC-C-5AR Walkdown: F Relay Eval: Y Comp Type: TRANSFORMER k Xso Diawing: Location: XN THE MIDDLE EAST REGXON OF THE ROOM, 7 FEET SOUTH OF 600VAC BUS 21B SUPPLY TRAIN DC Cook Unit 2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 1 of 11 ID: 2-GRID-I-CVT (Rev.0)Class: 4.Transformers

==

Description:==

10KVA TRANSFORMER

-CONSTANT VOLTAGE Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: 4KV RM-600V SWGR AREA-IN THE MIDDLE EAST REGION OF THE ROOM, 7 FEET SOUTH OF 600VAC BUS 21B SUPPLY TRAIN Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: SOLIDSTATE CONTROLS INC.ISL12100 SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND Elevation where equipment receives seismic input Elevation of seismic input below about 40'rom grade (grade=608.00 Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz (est.frequency=8.00)Capacity based on: 1.50*Bounding Spectrum Demand based on: 1.00*Realistic Mean-Centered Floor Response Spectra 633.00 N/A N/A 1.200 LOG 0.085\/\r/I////r 0.S0 LOG Hz Capacity.....Demand S0.00 Capacity Demand 1 Demand 2 C:tGIPLGIPtspectra.des C."tGIP'PROJ0032tspectra.des C:tGIPLPROJ0032tspectra.des Record LabellBounding Spectrum BUILDING Auxilia ELEVATION 633 BROADEN N BUILDING Auxilia ELEVATIONI633IBROADEN N Does capacity exceed demand' DC Cook Unit 2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/1 4/92 Status: Yes Sheet 2 of 11 ID: 2-CRID-I-CVT(Rev.0)Class.'.Transformers

==

Description:==

10KVA TRANSFORMER

-CONSTANT VOLTAGE Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: 4KV RM-600V SWGR AREA-IN THE MIDDLE EAST REGION OF THE ROOM, 7 FEET SOUTH OF 600VAC BUS 21B SUPPLY TRAIN Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: SOLIDSTATE CONTROLS INC.ISL12100 CAVEATS-BOUNDING SPECTRUM TRN/BS Caveat 1-Earthquake Experience Equipment Class TRN/BS Caveat 2-Rating of 4.16 KV or Less.'RN/BS Caveat 3-Transformer Coils Postively Restrained Within Cabinet TRN/BS Caveat 4-Coils Top Braced or Anal zed for Large Transformers.

TRN/BS Caveat 5-Clearance Between Energized Component and Cabinet.TRN/BS Caveat 6-Adequate Slack in High Voltage Leads.TRN/BS Caveat 7-Wall-Mounted Units Anchored Close to Enclosure Structure.

TRN/BS Caveat 8-Weak-Way Bending of Thin Webs Evaluated.

TRN/BS Caveat 9-Adjacent Cabinets Bolted Together.TRN/BS Caveat 10-Doors Secured.TRN/BS Caveat 11-Adequate Anchorage TRN/BS Caveat 12-Potential Chatter of Essential Relays Evaluated.

TRN/BS Caveat 13-No Other Concerns.Yes Yes Yes N/A Yes Yes N/A Yes N/A Yes Yes N/A Yes Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum?ANCHORAGE 1.The sizes and locations of anchors have been determined 2.Appropriate equipment characteristics have been determined (mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation).

3.The type of anchorage is covered by the GIP 4.The adequacy of the anchorage installation has been evaluated (weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion anchor tightness,'etc.)

5.Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety have been considered:

embedment~length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength/condition, and concrete-cracking.6.For bolted anchorages, any gaps under the base are less than 1/4 7.Factors affecting essential relays have been considered:

gaps under the base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors.8.The base has adequate stiffness and the effect of prying action on anchors has been considered.

9.The strength of the equipment base and the load path to the CG is adequate.10.The adequacy of embedded steel, grout pads or large concrete pads have been evaluated.

11.The anchorage capacity exceeds the demand.Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A Yes Yes Yes Yes Are anchorage requirements met?

DC Cook Unit 2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 3 of 11 ID: 2-GRID-I-CVT'(Rev.0)Class: 4.Transformers

==

Description:==

10KVA TRANSFORMER

-CONSTANT VOLTAGE Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: 4KV RM-600V SWGR AREA-IN THE MIDDLE EAST REGION OF THE ROOM, 7 FEET SOUTH OF 600VAC BUS 21B SUPPLY TRAIN Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: SOLIDSTATE CONTROLS INC.ISL12100 INTERACTION EFFECTS 1.Soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures 2.If the equipment contains sensitive relays, it is free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures.

3.Attached lines have adequate flexibility.

4.Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse.5.No other adverse concerns were found.Yes N/A Yes Yes Yes Is equipment free of interaction effects'P C L D~CON IE~S SRT: George G.Thomas (S8A)and Satyan Sharma-10/29/92 Anchorage:

Anchorage is 1/2" diameter wedge expansion bolts.Most likely they are Phillips anchors based on the Unit 1 GRID-CVT's.

Used unknown expansion anchor in ANCHOR analysis for conservatism.

Minimum embedment is 2-13/16" above GIP minimum embedment for all types of 1/2" expansion anchors.Weight estimate based on maximum weight for an inverter in Table C.1-1 of the GIP (configuration similar to an inverter).

Weight estimate is 45 Ibs/ft"3.Weight=(4.5'2.5'2.33')x 45 Ibs/ft"3=1180 Ib Fluorescent light above unit could come out.However interaction judged non4amaging Thin 3/16" thick angles at base of transformer that is bolted to the base channel is gusseted in two locations.(No weak way bending).Frequency judged by the SRT to be at least 8 Hz.ANCHOR analysis indicates an additional factor of safety of 1.97.Pictures: Zap shot 2629-Inside Cabinet Zap shot 2630-Outside of Transformer Zap shot 2631-Braced Base Channels DC Cook Unit 2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 4 of 11 ID: 2-GRID-I-CVT (Rev.0)Class: 4.Transformers

==

Description:==

10KVA TRANSFORMER

-CONSTANT VOLTAGE Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: 4KV RM-600V SWGR AREA-IN THE MIDDLE EAST REGION OF THE ROOM, 7 FEET SOUTH OF 600VAC BUS 21B SUPPLY TRAIN Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: SOLIDSTATE CONTROLS INC.ISL12100 Evaluated by: Date://<<gz

Attachment:

Pictures

Attachment:

ANCHOR Report

DC Cook Unit 2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 5 of 11 ID: 2-GRID-I-CVT (Rev.0)Class: 4.Transformers

==

Description:==

10KVA TRANSFORMER

-CONSTANT VOLTAGE Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: 4KV RM-600V SWGR AREA-IN THE MIDDLE EAST REGION OF THE ROOM, 7 FEET SOUTH OF 600VAC BUS 21B SUPPLY TRAIN Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: SOLIDSTATE CONTROLS INC.ISL12100 P IC~UIRg$C t Braced Base Channels Inside Cabinet'Outside of Transformer DC Cook Unit 2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 6 of 11 ID: 2-GRID-I-CVT(Rev.0)Class: 4.Transformers

==

Description:==

10KVA TRANSFORMER

-CONSTANT VOLTAGE 8uilding: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: SOLIDSTATE CONTROLS INC.ISL12100 Room, Row/Col: 4KV RM-600V SWGR AREA-IN THE MIDDLE EAST REGION OF THE ROOM, 7 FEET SOUTH OF 600VAC 8US 218 SUPPLY TRAIN ANCHOR Report~~~use'esponse Spectrum:!nstructure Realistic Frequency:

User-8.00 Percent Damping: User-5.00 Spectral Values: Direction North-South East-West Vertical Acceleration (g's)0.36 0.36 0.18 Angle (N-S Direction makes with the X Axis): 0.00 Combination Criteria: SRSS W~~s'umber of Weights: 1 No Weight 1 1180.00 14.000 14.250 35.375 Porcine Number of External Forces: 0 gl~oe~s Number of External Moments: 0~llowat~s.

~n~Number of Anchor types: 1 Ultimate Ultimate Tension Inter Shear Inter Saf No Dia Manufact Product Tension Shear'oeff Coeff Fact 1/2 Other Unknown Expansion Anchor 2290.00 2380.00 1.00 0.30 1.00~rgb Ultimate Stress: 3500.00 psi.

DC Cook Unit 2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 7 of 11 ID: 2-GRID-I-CVT(Rev.

0)Class: 4.Transformers

==

Description:==

10KVA TRANSFORMER

-CONSTANT VOLTAGE Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: SOLIDSTATE CONTROLS INC.ISL12100 Reduction Factor: 0.85 Room, Row/Col: 4KV RM-600V SWGR AREA-IN THE MIDDLE EAST REGION OF THE ROOM, 7 FEET SOUTH OF 600VAC BUS 218 SUPPLY TRAIN~W Allowable Stress: 0 psi.~u Number of Surfaces: 1 Surface Orientation Direction Comp 0.000 Direction Comp 0.000 Direction Comp 1.000 Anchor Pattern for Surface 0 1 Legend for Anchor Patterns DC Cook Unit 2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 8 of 11 ID: 2-GRID-I-CVT(Rev.0)Class: 4.Transformers

==

Description:==

10KVA TRANSFORMER

-CONSTANT VOLTAGE Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: 4KV RM-600V SWGR AREA-IN THE MIDDLE EAST REGION OF THE ROOM, 7 FEET SOUTH OF 600VAC BUS 21B SUPPLY TRAIN Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: SOLIDSTATE CONTROLS INC.ISL12100 Anchor Bolts: Concrete Lines:~Itin Concrete Points:~mtm W'eld Lines'.~Ge retry An(QIL'Number of Anchors: 4 No Anch Id Coord 1.500 26.438 1.750 26.875 Coord 0.750 0.750 27.750 27.750 Coord 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Surf Id ft of elements per line: 1 Number of Concrete Lines: 2 No Start X-Coord 0.000 0.000 Start Y-Coord 0.891 27.609 Sta~Z-Coord 0.000 0.000 End X-Coord 28.063 28.000 End Y-Coord 0.891 2 7.609 End Z-Coord 0.000 0.000 Sf Id Line Width 1.781 1.781 Number of Concrete Points: 0 KeldJ.um 4 of elements per line: 5 Number of Weld Lines: 0 er i in u i a o Reduction Factor Input for Anchor 0 1

OC Cook Unit 2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 9 of 11 ID: 2-GRID-I-CVT(Rev.

0)Class: 4.Transformers

==

Description:==

10KVA TRANSFORMER

-CONSTANT VOLTAGE Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: 4KV RM-600V SWGR AREA-IN THE MIDDLE EAST REGION OF THE ROOM, 7 FEET SOUTH OF 600VAC BUS 21B SUPPLY TRAIN Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: SOLIDSTATE CONTROLS INC.ISL12100 Adequately Installed:

Yes Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.Edge Distance-Edge 1: 5.00 in.Crack Size: 0.000 in.-Cracks Affect<=50%Bolts Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed:

Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor¹2 Adequately Installed:

Yes Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.Edge Distance-Edge 1: 5.00 in.Crack Size: 0.000 in.-Cracks Affect<=50%Bolts Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed:

Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor¹3 Adequately Installed:

Yes Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.Edge Distance-Edge 1: 5.00 in.Crack Size: 0.000 in.-Cracks Affect<=50%Bolts Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed:

Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor¹4 Adequately Installed:

Yes Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.Edge Distance-Edge 1: 5.00 in.Crack Size: 0.000 in.-Cracks Affect<=50%Bolts Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed:

Yes Reduction Factors Data Current: Yes Anc No Id PaIV Vali Pallr/Vallr RT RN RL RG RS RE RF RC RR RP RB RM 1'1202.25 N/A 0.60 1.00 X 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1428.00 1202.25 N/A N/A 0.60 1.00 0.60 1.00 X 1.00 1.00 X 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

DC Cook Unit 2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 10 of 11 ID: 2-GRID-I-CVT(Rev.0)Class: 4.Transformers

==

Description:==

10KVA TRANSFORMER

-CONSTANT VOLTAGE Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: 4KV RM-600V SWGR AREA-IN THE MIDDLE EAST REGION OF THE ROOM, 7 FEET SOUTH OF 600VAC BUS 21B SUPPLY TRAIN Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: SOLIDSTATE CONTROLS INC.ISL1 2100 1428.00 NIA 0.60 1.00 X 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3 1 1202.25 NIA 1428.00 NIA NIA 1202.25 1428.00 NIA 0.60 1.00 X 0.60 1.00 X 0.60 1.00 X 0.60 1.00 X 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OO O.88 1.OO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 N/A I ali Van Pallr Vallr RT RL RG RS RC RR RP=Not Applicable

=Allowable Pull without Reduced inspection

=Allowable Shear without Reduced Inspection

=Allowable Puli with Reduced Inspection

=Allowable Shear with Reduced Inspection

=Outlier=Reduction Factor Not Used=Reduction Factor for Type of Anchorage=Reduction Factor for Installation Adequacy=Reduction Factor for Embedment=Reduction Factor for Gap at Anchors=Reduction Factor for Spacing=Reduction Factor for Edge Distance=Reduction Factor for Concrete Strength=Reduction Factor for Concrete Cracks=Reduction Factor for Essential Relays=Reduction Factor for Base Stiffness and Prying Action=Reduction Factor for Base Strength and Load Path=Reduction Factor for Embed.Steel and Pads Analysis Performed:

Yes Type of Analysis: Regular Spectral Accelerations (G's)N-S 0.362-0.362-0.362 0.362 0.362-0.362 0.362-0.362 0.145 E-W 0.145-0.145 0.145-0.145-0.145 0.145 0.145-0.145 0.362 Vertical 0.073-0.073 0.073-0.073 0.073-0.073-0.073 0.073 0.073 Safety Factor 1.969 2.006 2.009 1.971 1.971 2.008 1.969 2.007 3.820 DC Cook Unit 2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 11 of 11 ID: 2-GRID-I-CVT(Rev.

0)Class: 4.Transformers

==

Description:==

10KVA TRANSFORMER

-CONSTANT VOLTAGE Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: SOLIDSTATE CONTROLS INC.ISL12100 Room, Row/Col: 4KV RM-600V SWGR AREA-IN THE MIDDLF EAST REGION OF THE ROOM, 7 FEET SOUTH OF 600VAC BUS 21B SUPPLY TRAIN 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24-0.145 0.145-0.145-0.145 0.145 0.145-0.145 0.145-0.145 0.145-0.145-0.145 0.145 0.145-0.145--0.362-0.362 0.362 0.362-0.362 0.362-0.362 0.145-0.145 0.145-0.145 0.145-0.145-0.145 0.145-0.073 0.073-0.073 0.073-0.073-0.073 0.073 0.183-0.183-0.183 0.183 0.183-0.183 0.183-0.183 4.196 3.811 4.198 3.86T 4.144 4.146 3.869 4.917 5.010 4.922 5.016 5.027 4.934 4.928 5.022 Minimum Safety Factor: 1.969 The Anchorage Capacity is 1.969 times greater than the Demand Coo ComponentÃo.2 (~~~"T C4T Claca~Any particular area tha Sei.smic Review Team should pay extra attention tot Yes W Ho (Xf yes, check items that, apply.)Anchor Type Anchor Diameter Anchor Spacing Anchor Number Anchor Embedmentv Anchor Edge Distance Anchor Gap Anchor Thread Engagement Anchor Grip Anchor Angularity Concrete Crack Others (describe briefly)If there is concern for Design Basis Di.screpancy, circle the<<pplicable item and explain.Harcfvare Haintenance Type Discrepancy Drawing Update Type Di.screpancy S igni.f f cant Operability/Design Basi.s Discrepancy Others Condition:

Actions Taken: Prepared Sy Dsta~R-<<3

• • 12 CHP 5021.CCD.019 ATTACHMENT NO.1 Un1t ypt4 tR T3/2-W<~-n-9>Installation dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch ANCHOR jNSPECTION DATA SHEET AuK VAv~0'7-'ldg.Location 4 Q.Pro-+-C.v w Equipment No.2-CFiQ-7=C.VT I~II"'iiÃ7 OS>leaf.OV>>3II il 9 clonic)ELp V.V low Looki'n g tl'Pao~i NoR~h Drawn by: Verified by.Q~(Date: ri zv e>>Qual./Cert.Inspector Reviewed by: T Date:~~(l-'l~Construction Anc or Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1

• • 12 CHP 5021.CCD.019 ATTACHMENT NO.1 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET Un1t Bldg.T3'~-II-9 W Location Installation dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch Equipment No.+/a.BoLT GYP EI-BQ-glE,A Lope.<toG-ER Drawn by: Verified by: Date: Date:, I~.7-lZ.Qual./Cert.Inspector Reviewed by: T" 4>'~4~~.Date: Construction An hor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1 I

++12 CHP 5021-CCD.Q19 ATTACHMENT NO.1 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET VA v~~0.'g'z5 Un>.t 5 Bldg.Location i>-Sq.7&-t 7~><I'I>C.~SO 2-Qvf Installation dwg./Rev.Equipment No.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch~ls~i)d O'A~~IPIt e~~"~i"i>~(Cur Y t~".;ll>O)f95 Date:/l 2'.7 Drawn by: Verified by: 8 8 (f.Date: I Z=l-I Z.Qual./Cert.Inspector Reviewed by: T.+~'-<k.Date: Construe won An hor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1

• • 12 CHP 502 1.CCD.0 1.9 (ATTACHMENT NO.1 ANCHOR XNSPECTXON DATA SHEET g/CA+~g v'P~Dg-g" Fc Unxt 5 Bldg.Location)~-3 q)'o-('))/)%-)l-I)>g Q I O-Z-C.vg Installation dwg./Rev.Equipment No.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch e el 0'"4')I: Ii~I l~~I I I I-3 II3II~rIrJ~)D 3-D'li~II-9'/i).l e n~+</)p'II'IA::<<U lQ90 R'h l=)Lc'qy,$Drawn by: Date: Date:/2 7-"~.Verified b (Qual./Cert.Xnspector Reviewed by: I')&<L~I Date: Construction Anchor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1 lSSRSSLLLL RSLLL5 WWHRES HWl5WRHS RI--WLHLL~RHSSWS~~~~

55%5%5%RHWS.

5%RSWMMMWRI

~~~~~~~M

4*12 CHP 5021.CCD.019 ATTACHMENT NO.1 ANCHOR XNSPECTXON DATA SHEET Equipment No.:~.C~0--VT'mbedded Steel Dwg.No.: PHYSXCAL CHARACTERXSTXCS Dwg No..:~V~<7 i<-3 q7b-te T~i~-n-'I Weld XD T e Size Len th O'I 4/~Weld T e Codes 1=Fillet 2=Plug/Slot 3=Groove Cracks Lack of Penetration Porosity Yes Yes N s 0 0 Y s 0 Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Vt."~B)0 18'~Equipment base Reviewed'y:

Verified by: flexible: 0 Yes I No T'>u~~4~~~ons r c ron e ons r son nc o evxew ngxneer n ua.er.npsec or Date: Date: I l.-il-Date: I Z.7-~L Page 3 of 3 Revision 1

S 8 A DEPARTMENT CONTROL.FO OOCUMENT COPY NO.12 SHP SOSO NDE.008 ATTACHMENT NO.1 ULTRASONIC TEST REPORT ZOB ORDER NO.: REPORT DATE://3:~~REQUEST NO.IDENTIFICATION Unit/~Component Item r" J Material>5 Other Test Unit/S/N Freq./Diameter Reference Standard Couplant/Batch No.c-'()~TEST DATA REMARKS/, g PERFORMED BY: REVIEWED BY: FORM NO.12 SHP S050 NDE.008-1 LEVEL:~DATE:/LEVEL:~DATE: ll Page'f 1 Revision 0 Equipment No.:-CQX'Q-X-C.'d Tightness established by"Snug Fit" Tightness verif ied by:&(."z<PL'ual./Cert.Inspector Comments:

01/16/92>G.MG.72 sAFE'KvtoouN EGUIpHENT LisT (ssELMp)FUMCTIOM: CCM Equipment Class: 5 train: 1 Equipment IO: I-PP.IOM Orauing H+bert 1.5135A SyStem: CCM Equip

Description:

LIESt CCM PVHP Building: AUXILIARY Room: 609 KALLMAY Elevation:

609 Normal state: R/NR Oesired state: R Pouer Required: Y Sort: M,R Suceorting System Orauing Herbert 1-12001 1-12060 1-98/05 Required Interconnections and Supporting Coeponentst

'I-T11A7 I.HCAB-3 fetv Related Status: NUCLEAR SR (Hin/Opt: HIN AOOITIONAL IHFORHATION I Al ias Hubert Pouer Train: 8 C~nt Served: VEST CCM PVHP Hanufacturer:

IHGERSOI.L-RANO CO Hodel: 9000CPH Panel: I-CCM I-HSOI E I cm Orauing: 1-98405 Miring Orauing: 1-93011 Pover Source: 1-1'I IA7, 1-HCAB-3 ual tdount F Relay Only: Y C~nent Type: PVHP ISO Orauings: Oetai led Location:

D.C.COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 1 of 11 ID: 1-PP-10W(Rev.0)Description:

WEST CCW PUMP Class: 5.Horizontal Pumps Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: HALL AY, Manufacturer, Model;Etc.: INGERSOLL-RAND CO 9000GPM SEISMIC CAPACITY YS DEMAND 1.Elevation where equipment receives seismic input Elevation of seismic input below about 40'rom grade (grade=608.00)3.Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz (est.frequency=20.00)Capacity based on: 1.00*Bounding Spectrum Demand based on: 1.00 Design Basis Ground Response Spectrum 609.00 Yes Yes 0.800 c'OCi 0.090/rr////r/0.50 LOG Hz Capacity.....Demand 33.00 Capacity Demand 1 Demand 2 C:tGIPtGIPtspectra.des C:tGIPLPROJ0035tspectra.des CAGIPIPROJ0035tspectra.des Record Label Bounding Spectrum BUILDING Ground(ELEVATIONI608 BROADEN N BUILDING Ground ELEVATION 608 BROADEN N Does capacity exceed demand?

D.C.COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 2 of 11 ID:1-PP-10W(Rev.

0)Description:

WEST CCW PUMP Class: 5.Horizontal Pumps Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: HALLWAY, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: INGERSOLL-RAND CO 9000GPM CAVEATS-BOUNDING SPECTRUM HP/BS Caveat 1-Earthquake Experience Equipment Class HP/BS Caveat 2-Driver and Pump on Rigid Skid HP/BS Caveat 3-Thrust Bearings in Both Axial Directions HP/BS Caveat 4-Check of Long Unsupported Piping HP/BS Caveat 5-Base Vibration Isolation System Checked.HP/BS Caveat 6-Sufficient Slack and Flexibility of Attached Lines.HP/BS Caveat 7-Adequate Anchorage.

HP/BS Caveat 8-Potential Chatter of Essential Relays Evaluated.

HP/BS Caveat 9-No Other Concerns.Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum?ANCHORAGE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A Yes 1.The sizes and locations of anchors have been determined 2.Appropriate equipment characteristics have been determined (mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation).

3.The type of anchorage is covered by the GIP 4.The adequacy of the anchorage installation has been evaluated (weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion anchor tightness, etc.)5.Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety have been considered:

embedment length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength/condition, and concrete cracking.6.For bolted anchorages, any gaps under the base are less than 1/4 7.Factors affecting essential relays have been considered:

gaps under the base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors.8.The base has adequate stiffness and the effect of prying action on anchors has been considered.

9.The strength of the equipment base and the load path to the CG is adequate 10.The adequacy of embedded steel, grout pads or large concrete pads have been evaluated.

11.The anchorage capacity exceeds the demand.Are anchorage requirements met?INTERACTION EFFECTS Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A Yes Yes Yes Yes*1.Soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures 2.If the equipment contains sensitive relays, it is free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures.

3.Attached lines have adequate flexibility 4.Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse.5.No other adverse concerns were found.Yes N/A Yes Yes Yes Is equipment free of interaction effects?

D.C.COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 3 of 11 ID: 1-PP-10W(Rev.

0}Description:

WEST CCW PUMP Class: 5.Horizontal Pumps Building: AUXILIARY Floor EI.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: HALLWAY, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: INGERSOLL-RAND CO 9000GPM IS E UIPME T SEISMIC LLY DE UATE>~es CO MEN S SRT: John D.Stevenson, Paul Wilson, Rick Leonard, and Kaifash Mahajan on 10/5/93.MFG: INGERSOLL-RAND PUMP, 9000 G.P.M.Anchorage:

6-3/4" J-Bolts.Total WT=9580 lbs.C.G.=35" above base.'Minor cracks in non-Struct.

pad judged insignificant.

Nozzle loads were applied in the ANCHOR analysis.Nozzle loads were obtained from AEP"

SUMMARY

OF LOAD ON EQUIPMENT" 11/2/71, Summary of Loads on Pumps for CCWÃ1W PUMP, (microfilm page 00100020022) and included deadweight, thermal, thermal anchor movements, and seismic loads.Ref.Drwgs.: Ingersoll-Rand C-14ALV86X51, W-16ALV500X17, AEPSC 12-3286-9, 12-3073B-2, 12-3073A-3, 12-~~~3285-23, Livsey 8 Co.1-CCW-37, Rev.5, Sh.2 of 2.Picture f/12, Wk1, Tmi, Disk2 Evaluated by: c-/Date: Ot 8-ZS-qS tta nt'i u es achm'e 0

D.C.COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 4 of 11 ID: 1-PP-10W(Rev.0)Class: 5.Horizontal Pumps

Description:

WEST CCW PUMP Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: HALLWAY, Manufacturer, Model~Etc.: INGERSOLL-RAND CO 9000GPM CTUR S 4~L j 4 1-PP-10W West CCW Pump-Anchorage D.C.COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 5 of 11 ID: 1-PP-10W(Rev.0)Class: 5.Horizontal Pumps

Description:

WEST CCW PUMP Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: HALLWAY, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: INGERSOLL-RAND CO 9000GPM ANCHOR Report~Ea h ua e: Response Spectrum: SSE Frequency:

GIP-Rigid Percent Damping: GIP-5.00 Spectral Values: Direction North-South East-West Vertical Acceleration (g's)0.38 0.38 0.25 Angle (N-S Direction makes with the X Axis): 0.00 Combination Criteria: SRSS~We'gag'umber of Weights: 1 No Weight 1 9580.00 105.400 20.750 35.000 o ces Number of External Forces: 2 No Fx Fy Fz 1 2.86E+003 1.24E+003-3.24E+003 2-2.36E+003 2.24E+003-4.85E+003 26.870 26.870-5.250 47.750 17.000 19.000/~mme Number of External Moments: 2 No Mx My 1 4.88E+004 1.68E+005 2 6.32E+004 8.76E+004 3.34E+004-1.60E+004

D.C.COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 6 of 11ID: 1-PP-10W (Rev.0)Description:

WEST CCW PUMP Class: 5.Honzontal Pumps Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: HALLWAY, Manufacturer, Model~Etc.: INGERSOLL-RAND CO 9000GPM~llowal>les:

~nor'umber of Anchor types: 1 Ultimate Ultimate Tension Inter Shear Inter Saf Dia Manufact Product Tension Shear Coeff Coeff Fact 3/4 Other J-Bolt (90 deg)15030.00 7510.00 1.00 0.30 1.00 Gmseng Ultimate Stress: 3500.00 psi.Reduction Factor: 0.85 Allowable Stress: 30600 psi.S~ua c~Number of Surfaces: 1 Surface Orientation No Direction Comp Nx 0.000 Direction Comp Ny 0.000 Direction Comp Nz 1.000 Anchor Pattern for Surface¹1 t'

D.C.COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 7 of 11 ID:1-PP-10W(Rev.

0)Description:

WEST CCW PUMP Class: 5.Honzontal Pumps Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: HALLWAY, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: INGERSOLL-RAND CO 9000GPM Legend for Anchor Patterns Anchor Bolts:~IIIK'~Concrete Lines:~[~<nggg Concrete Points: Weld Lines.'~e Number of Anchors: 6 Anch Id 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 Coord 10.000 59.750 109.500 10.000 59.750 109.500 Coord 4.250 4.250 4.250 37.250 37.250 37.250 Coord 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Surf Id r in D.C.COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 8 of 11 ID: 1-PP-1 OW (Rev.0)Description:

WEST CCW PUMP Class: 5.Horizontal Pumps Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: HALLWAY, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: INGERSOLL-RAND CO 9000GPM¹of elements per line: 1 Number of Concrete Lines: 4 No Start X-Coord 8.250 8.250 8.250 129.000 Start Y-Coo rd 2.625 2.625 37.250 2.625 Start Z-Coord 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 End X-Coord 129.000 8.250 129.000 129.000 End Y-Coord 2.625 37.250 37.250 37.250 End Z-Coord 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Sf Line Width 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 r Pin Number of Concrete Points: 0¹of elements per line: 5 Number of Weld Lines: 0 D ter inati du on a Reduction Factor Input for Anchor¹1 Adequately Installed:

Yes Embedment Length: (19.50 in.Min Reqd.to achieve full capacity):=40.88 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.Edge Distance-Edge 1: 4.00 in.Crack Size: 0.016 in.-Cracks traverses thru Installation Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed:

Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor¹2 Adequately Installed:

Yes Embedment Length: (19.50 in.Min Reqd.to achieve full capacity):=40.88 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.Edge Distance-Edge 1: 4.63 in.Crack Size: 0.016 in.-Cracks traverses thru Installation Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed:

Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor¹3 I

D.C.COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 9 of 11 Oa ID: 1-PP-10W (Rev.0)Description:

WEST CCW PUMP Class: 5.Horizontal Pumps Room, Row/Col: HALLWAY, Floor El.: 609.00 Building: AUXILIARY Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: INGERSOLL-RAND CO 9000GPM Adequately Installed:

Yes Embedment Length: (19.50 in.Min Reqd.to achieve full capacity):=40.88 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.Edge Distance-Edge 1: 4.00 in.Crack Size: 0.016 in.-Cracks traverses thru Installation Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed:

Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor f/4 Adequately Installed:

Yes Embedment Length: (20.06 in.Min Reqd.to achieve full capacity):=40.88 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.Edge Distance-Edge 1: 4.50 in.Crack Size: 0.016 in.-Cracks traverses thru Installation Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed:

Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor 0 5 I Adequately Installed:

Yes Embedment Length: (20.00 in.Min Reqd.to achieve full capacity):=40.88 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.Edge Distance-Edge 1: 4.63 in.Crack Size: 0.016 in.-Cracks traverses thru Installation Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed:

Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor f/6 Adequately Installed:

Yes Embedment Length: (19.25 in.Min Reqd.to achieve full capacity):=40.88 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.Edge Distance-Edge 1: 4.38 in.Crack Size: 0.016 in.-Cracks traverses thru Installation Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed:

Yes Reduction Factors Data Current: Yes Anc No Id Pall/Vali 5342.33 2798.39 Pallr/Vallr N/A N/A RT RN 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 RL RG 0.54 1.00 1.00 1.00 RS RE 1.00 0.65 1.00 0.37 RF RC 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 RR 1.00 1.00 RP RB RM 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

D.C.COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 10 of 11 ID: 1-PP-10W(Rev.

0)Description:

WEST CCW PUMP Class: 5.Horizontal Pumps Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: HALLWAY, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: INGERSOLL-RAND CO 9000GPM 5508,76 N/A 1.00 1.00 0.54 1.00 1.00 0.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3741.21 NIA 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5342.33 N/A 1.00 1.00 0.54 1.00 1.00 0.65 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2798.39 5562.31 3541.72 NIA 1.00 N/A 1.00 N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.56 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.37 1.00 1.00 0.67 1.00 1.00 0.47 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5586.05 N/A 1.00 1.00 0.55 1.00 1.00 0.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3741.21 1 5403.66 N/A 1.00 NIA 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.54 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 1.00 1.00 0.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3347.69 N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 0.45 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 N/A=Not Applicable Pall=Allowable Pull without Reduced Inspection Vali=Allowable Shear without Reduced Inspection Pallr=Allowable Pull with Reduced Inspection Vallr=Allowable Shear with Reduced Inspection

=Outlier X=Reduction Factor Not Used RT=Reduction Factor for Type of Anchorage RN=Reduction Factor for Installation Adequacy RL=Reduction Factor for Embedment RG=Reduction Factor for Gap at Anchors RS=Reduction Factor for Spacing RE=Reduction Factor for Edge Distance RF=Reduction Factor for Concrete Strength RC=Reduction Factor for Concrete Cracks RR=Reduction Factor for Essential Relays RP=Reduction Factor for Base Stiffness and Prying Action RB=Reduction Factor for Base Strength and Load Path RM=Reduction Factor for Embed.Steel and Pads al is Re Is'nalysis Performed:

Yes Type of Analysis: Regular Spectral Accelerations (G's)No'-S 0.375-0.375-0.375 0.375 E-W 0.150-0.150 0.150-0.150 Vertical 0.100-0.100 0.100-0.100 Safety Factor 3.680 4.948 4.002 4.555 D.C.COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 11 of 11 ID: 1-PP-10W(Rev.0)Class: 5.Horizontal Pumps

Description:

WEST CCW PUMP Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: HALLWAY, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: INGERSOLL-RAND CO 9000GPM 10 12 13 14 15 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 0.375-0.375 0.375-0.375 0.150-0.150 0.'I50-0.150-0.150 0.150 0.150-0.150 0.150-0.150 0.150-0.150-0.150 0.150 0.150-0.150-0.150 0.150 0.150-0.150 0.375-0.375-0.375 0.375 0.375-0.375 0.375-0.375 0.150-0.150 0.150-0.150 0.150-0.150-0.150 0.150 0.100-0.100-0.100 0.100 0.100-0.100 0.100-0.100 0.100-0.100-0.100 0.100 0.250-0.250-0.250 0.250 0.250-0.250 0.250-0.250 4 428 4.181 3.741 4.641 2.376 3.601 3.403 2.503 2.479 3.448 2.400 3.418 4.907 7.950 5.450 6.260 4.909 7.606 6.417 5.768 Minimum Safety Factor: 2.376 The Anchorage Capacity is 2.376 times greater than the Demand

• • 12 CHP 5021.CCD.019 ATTACHNENT NO.1 ANCHOR NSPECTXON DATA SHE..Unxt Bldg.Zocatzon I-t-iow'nstal at>.on dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch X-PP-(ox Equipment No.'IO<'-z'l~"l-3 l~-0 0$~/~"~$cP I cJ I IN+0 I A 0 pk 8"I-3.VI INOIANA MICHIGA SITE OESIGN CON WORKING C jUL 201 RC'Efi LERKT Drawn by: Verified by: Date: t"-/Z V/~Z.Date: Qual./Cert.Inspector Reviewed by.Date:.Construction Anc or Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 3

~~Jd ('HJ 502 J~CCD.Qlg ATTACHMENT NO.l Unit CHOR NSP CT ON DATA SHE Bldg.CG RAh Locat1'on Installation dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch X-PP-lnvl Equ1pment No.INOIANA IIICIIIGAN P0%'R SITE DESIGN CONTROLLcO WORKING COPY JUL 201995 LERK+Drawn by: Verified by: Reviewed by: Date:/zl Date: Qual./Cert.Xnspector r-Date: 1 l I<2 Construct1on chor Rev1ew Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision ATTACHMENT NO.ANCHOR ZNSPECTXON DATA S O I A Unxt-5 8t'o-'t Bldg.Location g-I P-IQWf Znstallatz.on dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch Equipment No.Q l)~z-FLE,U.Ux.ew uonxx.ea~urn+INOIANA IAICHIGAN POVIER SITE DESIGN CONTROLLED WORKING COPY)Ut.20$9SK LERK T Drawn by: Date: Date:+-lF-Qua./Cert:.Xn pector Reviewed by: Dat Construction nchor Review Engineer Verified by: 1-('i-9 x Page 1 of 3 Revision 0

J4 QJ4L Vv4 4~QPP gd y.TTACHMZNT Np.Equipment No.:-PP-'IO~Anchor type:~oi-~YPE.Z, Dia: Tightness established by: 0"Snug Fit" Torque Wrench No.: Tightness verified?0 Yes Dwg No.: Dwg No.: l2: 3A3g 0 Torque Cal, Due Date: 0 No Nk'ns ruc Date:--2 ion Date: ruc 1 n ARE Equipment base flexible?0 Yes g, No ons Bolt ID Gaps Comments Anchor len th Protruding

<g len th.~Embedment fI v'1" Il fq-3~Bolt-P r1 Concrete condition Edge distance-'In<i"~~4,~r~'a KDc.E, oe Qo<-~TK'XC.T.Pac g'lq'A~Anchor s acin Anchor an larit Thread engagement

~~I Z-5q 2:5~(Z.-'3 2-Sg Q~Q<Oa OK Q<Og Qa g.Qa Q<O<OK Comments: C s~o-S~aucv.P DR.x, V erified by: Q a./Cert.Inspector Revieved by: Construct1on IHOIAHA MIC4IGAW POWER WORKlt(G COPY JUL 20 1993 Date: ago 2 of 3 e r ion 3

S&A DEPARTMENT CONTROLLED DOCUMENT CopY NO.~SHP 5050 NDE pp8 ATTACHNEHT NO.ULTRASONIC TEST REPORT JOB ORDER NO.: REPORT DATE: u-aO~i9 REQUEST NO.IDENTIFICATION Unit On c Component J-7'P-)0 0 Item Material Test Unit/S/N 4 Frey./Diameter Jjz.Reference Standard 4-8 Couplant/Batch No.4<./TEST DATA REMARKS 4 wA-'~PERFORMED BY: REVIEWED BY;I.EVEE'~I EVEI:~DATE: DATE: FORM NO.12 SHP 5050 NDE.008-1 Page 1 of 1 Revision 0 Equip Xd: 2-PP-46-4 Train: 1 Equip Class: 5 Drawing No.: 12-5131 12-5131A tion: RI Syst: em: BORON MAKEUP (CVCS)Equip Desc: BORIC ACXD STORAGE TANKS TRANSFER PUMP g4 Building: AUXILXARY Room: BORXC ACID STORAGE TANK AREA Elev: 587 Sort: S,R Notes: Normal State: NR Desired State: R Power Req'd: Y Support System Drawing: 2-12010 2-98272 Req'd Support Comp: 2-AB-A-1D Safety Related Status: NUCLEAR SR Min/Opt: MIN Alias No: Power Train: B ,Comp Served: BAST MFR: GOULDS PUMPS XNC.Mo el: 3196 1: 2-BA 2-HSD2 Elem.Drawing: 2-98272 Wiring Drawing: 2-94217 Power Source: 2-AB-A-1D Walkdown: F Relay Eval: Y Comp Type: PUMP Iso Drawing: 0-DR-724'ocation: XN THE MXDDLE EAST REGION OF THE ROOM, 15 FEET'OUTHEAST OF MXDDLE BORIC ACXD STORAGE TANK 512-TK-12M, NEAR THE FLOOR D.C.COOK Unit 2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 1 of4 ID: 2-PP-46-4 (Rev.0)Class: 5.Horizontal Pumps Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: GOULDS PUMPS INC.3196 SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND 1.Elevation where equipment receives seismic input

Description:

BORIC ACID STORAGE TANKS TRANSFER PUMP f/4 Room, Row/Col: BORIC ACID STOR TANK AREA-IN THE MIDDLE EAST REGION OF THE ROOM, 15 FEET SOUTHEAST OF MIDDLE BORIC ACID STORAGE TANK It/12-TK-12M, NEAR THE FLOOR 587.00 Elevation of seismic input below about 40'rom grade (grade=608.00)3.Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz (est.frequency=20.00)Capacity based on: 1.50" Bounding Spectrum 5.Demand based on: 1.00 Realistic Median-Centered Floor Response Spectra N/A N/A 1.200 LOG: 0.080 l I\I\I I I I I I j/I r~0.50 LOG Hz Capacity.....Demand 50.00 Capacit Demand 1 Demand 2 File C:tGIP>GIP'Lspectra.des C:tGIPIPROJ0034tspectra.des C:tGIPIPROJ0034'Lspectra.des Record Label(Bounding Spectrum BUILDING Auxilia IELEVATION 587IBROADEN(N BUILDING Auxilia ELEVATION 587 BROADENIN Does capacity exceed demand?

D.C.COOK Unit 2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 2 of 4 ID: 2-PP-46-4 (Rev.0)Class: 5.Horizontal Pumps Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: GOULDS PUMPS INC.3196

Description:

BORIC ACID STORAGE TANKS TRANSFER PUMP&Room, Row/Col: BORIC ACID STOR TANK AREA-IN THE MIDDLE EAST REGION OF THE ROOM, 15 FEET SOUTHEAST OF MIDDLE BORIC ACID STORAGE TANK 012-TK-12M, NEAR THE FLOOR CAVEATS-BOUNDING SPECTRUM HP/BS Caveat 1-Earthquake Experience Equipment Class HP/BS Caveat 2-Driver and Pump on Rigid Skid.HP/BS Caveat 3-Thrust Bearings in Both Axial Directions HP/BS Caveat 4-Check of Long Unsupported Piping.HP/BS Caveat 5-Base Vibration Isolation System Checked HP/BS Caveat 6-Sufficient Slack and Flexibility of Attached Lines.HP/BS Caveat 7-Adequate Anchorage.

HP/BS Caveat 8-Potential Chatter of Essential Relays Evaluated.

HP/BS Caveat 9-No Other Concerns.Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A Yes Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum7 ANCHORAGE 1.The sizes and locations of anchors have been determined 2.Appropriate equipment characteristics have been determined (mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation).

3.The type of anchorage is covered by the GIP 4.The adequacy of the anchorage installation has been evaluated (weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion anchor tightness, etc.)5.Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety have been considered:

embedment length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength/condition, and concrete cracking.6.For bolted anchorages, any gaps under the base are less than 1/4 7.Factors affecting essential relays have been considered:

gaps under the base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors.8.The base has adequate stiffness and the effect of prying action on anchors has been considered.

9.The strength of the equipment base and the load path to the CG is adequate 10.The adequacy of embedded steel~grout pads or large concrete pads have been evaluated.

11.The anchorage capacity exceeds the demand.Are anchorage requirements met?Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes.Yes N/A Yes Yes Yes Yes D.C.COOK Unit 2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 3 of 4 ID: 2-PP-46-4 (Rev.0)Class: 5.Horizontal Pumps Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: GOULDS PUMPS INC.3196

Description:

BORIC ACID STORAGE TANKS TRANSFER PUMP I/4 Room, Row/Col: BORIC ACID STOR TANK AREA-IN THE MIDDLE EAST REGION OF THE ROOM, 15 FEET SOUTHEAST OF MIDDLE BORIC ACID STORAGE TANK 012-TK-12M, NEAR THE FLOOR INTERACTION EFFECTS 1.Soft targ'ets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures 2.If the equipment contains sensitive relays, it is free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures.

3.Attached lines have adequate flexibility.

4.Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse.5.No other adverse concerns were found.Yes NIA Yes Yes Yes ls equipment free of interaction effects?IS E U P ENTSEISIVIICA Y D U T~Ys COMMEN S SRT: John D.Stevenson, Paul Wilson, Rick Leonard, and kailash Mahajan on 10/05/93.GOULDS PUMP.Anchorage Four 5/8" diameter Ram anchor expansion bolts.Pump WT 511lbs, C.G=12 3/8" above base.The 5/8" diameter expansion anchors have 4" embedment into the base concrete below the 8" pad, per the anchorage inspection.

This judged adequate by the SRT for the light (511 (bs)pump.Attached piping is 2" or less.Nozzle toads judged not to be a problem by the SRT.Picture 0 49, Wk1, Tm1, Disk1.Evaluated by: Date: achm t: Pictures

D.C.COOK Unit 2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 4 of 4 ID: 2-PP-46-4 (Rev.0)Class: 5.Horizontal Pumps

Description:

BORIC ACID STORAGE TANKS TRANSFER PUMP N4 Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: BORIC ACID STOR TANK AREA-IN THF MIDDLE EAST REGION OF THE ROOM, 15 FEET SOUTHEAST OF MIDDLE BORIC ACID STORAGE TANK f/12-TK-12M, NEAR THE FLOOR Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: GOULDS PUMPS INC.3196 ICTUR S Boric Acid Storage Tank Transfer Pump 2-PP-46A-~Anchors Coo Component No.Claaa Any payticular prea the Seismic Review Team should pay extra attention tot Yam~No W (If yea, check items that apply.)Anchor Type Anchor Diameter Anchor Spacing Anchor Number Anchor Embedment Anchor Edge Distance Anchor Gap Anchor Thread~Engagement Anchor Grip v'nchor Angularity Concrete Crack Others (describe briefly}If there is concern for Design Basis Discrepancy, circle the applicable item and explain.1.2.3.Hardvare Maintenance Type Discrepancy Drawing Up&,te Type Discrepancy Significant Operability/Doaign Basis Discrepancy Others Condition:

l4-33-Actions Taken: PreI ared By T Data

• (*'.CHP 5021.CCD.019 ZTACHMENT NO.1 Unxt NCHOR NS ECTION DATA SH E Bl g.l TO A I=%ASK A,Re.I'-.Location Installation dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch Equipment No.M5QLAT i CIA Ol I l (AP)Chorq CcO!l (ARE Z~<<~fyZ V)IR:P.I I I 1 I l gI l Ol',O'-',OI All/I J/C.IIORq+g Pf/>>'o"/-'8Ã" PL%,M VIKVf r~I J PLA-rE>g pPz x pP~~~INQIANA hIICHIGhN POwFR SITE DESIGN CONTRQI.LEO WORKING COPY JUL t Z t995 I.ERK T Drawn by: Verified by: Date: Date: Qua./Cert.Inspector~~Reviewed by: 7'ate: Construction An hor Revs,ew Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1

~~l~~~~~~~r~%~1~II o s~~~R%WWK~%WW&&

C4541%1LHLL KlSSWL1%%L

~LISWLRSL 5%5%WKRILSL mmWSLLXLL~HRRKR'%%saaslmMMM&i&

5%L%SKRRLR I r 4 a r i k JSC~r i~

-pp'>T]ig,lg l (("~i'!":iROLl.E%

DOCui4&4T 2 SHP 50SO NDE.008 ATTACHMENT NO.1 UK TRASON I C TEST REPORT JOB ORDER NO.: REQUEST NO./A IDENTIFICATION Unit Component Item Material Other 5 P.s Test, Unit/S/N Freq./Diameter Reference Standard Couplant/Batch No.g l4 DS/TEST DATA REMARKS nc r PERFORMED BX: REUIEMED BY: FORM NO.12 SHP SOSO NDE.008-1 Page 1 of Revision 0:~Z-'3 Database: K:SSEL1B.DBF Equip XD: 1-HV-AFP-M1 Train: 2 Equip Class:9 ing No.: 12-5148B ction: HVAC System: TURBXNE BUXLDXNG VENTXLATION Equip Desc:.EAST MOTOR DRXV AUX FEEDWATER PUMP ROOM EXHAUST FAN Building: TURBXNE Room: EAST MOTOR DRIV.AUX FEEDWATER PUMP ROOM Elev: 591 Sort: S,R Notes: Normal State: Desired State: Power Req'd: Y Support System Drawing: 1-12030 1-98214 Req'd Support Comp: 1-AB-D-R2D Safety Related Status: NUCLEAR SR Min/Opt: MIN'lias No: Power Train: A Comp Served: EAST MOTOR DRXV AUX FEED PUMP MFR: 1: 10000 FT 3/MIN Panel: Elem.Drawing: 1-98214 Wiring Drawing: 1-94228 Power Source: 1-AB-D-R2D Walkdown: F Relay Eval Comp Type: VENT FAN Y Xso Drawing: Location: XN THE SW CORNER OF THE ROOM, 10'W OF EAST MDAFWP, ON THE WEST WALL, 12'BOVE THE FLOOR.

D.C.COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet1 of3 ID: 1-HV-AFP-M1 (Rev.0)Class: 9.Fans

Description:

EAST MOTOR DRIV AUX FEEDWATER PUMP ROOM EXHAUST FAN Building: TURBINE Floor El.: 591.00 Room, Row/Col: E MOTOR DRIV AUX FDWTR PUMP RM, IN THE SW CORNER OF THE RM, 10'W OF E MDAFWP, ON THE W WALL, 12'BOVE THE FLR.Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: JOY MANUFACTURING CO.~10000 FT"3/MIN SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND Elevation where equipment receives seismic input 2.Elevation of seismic input below about 40'rom grade (grade=608.00)Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz (est.frequency=10.00)4.Capacity based on: 1.00 Bounding Spectrum 5.Demand based on: 1.00" Design Basis Ground Response Spectrum 591.00 Yes Yes 0.000 LOG 0.090/r r r 0.50 LOG Hz Capacity.....Demand 33.00, Capacit Demand 1 Demand 2 File C:tGIPtGIPtspectra.des C:LGIPLPROJ0035tspectra.des CAGIPLPROJ0035tspectra.des Record Label Bounding Spectrum BUILDING Ground ELEVATION 608 BROADEN N BUILDING Ground ELEVATIONI608 BROADEN N Does capacity exceed demand' D.C.COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 2 of 3 ID: 1-HV-AFP-M1 (Rev.0)Class: 9.Fans

Description:

EAST MOTOR DRIV AUX FEEDWATER PUMP ROOM EXHAUST FAN Building: TURBINE Floor El.: 591.00 Room, Row/Col: E MOTOR DRIV AUX FDWTR PUMP RM, IN THE SW CORNER OF THE RM, 10'W OF E MDAFWP, ON THE W WALL, 12'BOVE THE FLR.Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: JOY MANUFACTURING CO., 10000 FT"3/MIN CAVEATS-BOUNDING SPECTRUM FAN/BS Caveat 1-Earthquake Experience Equipment Class FAN/BS Caveat 2-Drive Motor and Fan Mounted on Common Base.FAN/BS Caveat 3-Long Shafts Supported at Fan and at Motor.FAN/BS Caveat 4-No Possibility of Excessive Duct Distortion Causing Binding or Misalignment of Fan.FAN/BS Caveat 5-Base Vibration Isolation System Checked FAN/BS Caveat 6-Sufficient Slack and Flexibility of Attached Lines.FAN/BS Caveat 7-Adequate Anchorage.

FAN/BS Caveat 8-No Other Concerns Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum7 ANCHORAGE Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A Yes Yes Yes 1.The sizes and locations of anchors have been determined 2.Appropriate equipment characteristics have been determined (mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation).

3.The type of anchorage is covered by the GIP 4.The adequacy of the anchorage installation has been evaluated (weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion anchor tightness, etc.)5.Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety have been considered:

embedment length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength/condition, and concrete cracking.6.For bolted anchorages, any gaps under the.base are less than 1/4 7.Factors affecting essential relays have been considered:

gaps under the base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors.8.The base has adequate stiffness and the effect of prying action on anchors has been considered.

9.The strength of the equipment base and the load path to the CG is adequate.10.The adequacy of embedded steel, grout pads or large concrete pads have been evaluated.

11.The anchorage capacity exceeds the demand.Are anchorage requirements met?Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A Yes Yes Yes Yes D.C.COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 3 of 3 ID: 1-HV-AFP-M1 (Rev.0)Class: 9.Fans

Description:

EAST MOTOR DRIV AUX FEEDWATER PUMP ROOM EXHAUST FAN Building: TURBINE Floor El.: 591.00 Room, Row/Col: E MOTOR DRIV AUX FDWTR PUMP RM, IN THE SW CORNER OF THE RM, 10'W OF E MDAFWP, ON THE W WALL, 12'BOVE THE FLR.Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: JOY MANUFACTURING CO., 10000 FT"3/MIN INTERACTION EFFECTS 1.Soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures 2.If the equipment contains sensitive relays, it is free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures.

3.Attached lines have adequate flexibility 4.Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse.5.No other adverse concerns were found.Is equipment free of interaction effects'P Yes NIA Yes Yes Yes S U~CIELIRXR SRT: Gary Thomas, Gunnar Harstead and Harry Young on 10/20/93.Anchorage:

.Fan mounted to embedded plate structure with at least 16 steel to steel bolts at least 1/2" in diameter.Weight of fan 500 lbs.No anchorage calculation required for a fan of this size with this robust anchorage.

Therefore anchorage is OK based on SRT judgement and inspection.

Interaction:

Insulated pipe running outside the room the fan services could impact the outside screen of the fan.Pipe well insulated and will cushion the impact, therefore the SRT judged this as non4amaging.

Photo: Fan mounted outside the room with the damper on the inside, therefore could not get a good picture of fan.Evaluated by: Date:

0 2 CHP 5021.CCD.019 ATTACHMENT NO Unct I i 2.-5(:8 Xnstallatxon dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch ANCHOR XNSPECTXON DATA SHEET TuRsit4P.OI4VW/gal Pq<~'T~~a,l 2 h&ogC R.oat FCMg v)ATCR.Paine poenh SauTuMCsT c~IM Bldg.Location i-t<-V-hFP-Mi Equipment No.Dla4~ON'5'p (g FP-Old7 Q SuP PO T~.Drawn by: Date:~'-8-~1~Verified by: Reviewed by Hh Date: Qual./Cert.Xnspector Anal~Date: Construction Anchor Review Engineer).-<)-~(3 Page 1 of 3 Revision 1

Database: K:SSEL1B.DBF Eguip ID: 12-HV-ESW-7 Train: 2 Equip Class:9 wing No.: 12-5148B ction: HVAC System: SCREENHOUSE VENTXLATXON Equip Desc: UNIT Q1 EAST ESW PUMP ROOM SUPPLY VENTXLATION FAN Building: SCREENHOUSE Room: EAST ESW PUMP ROOM Elev: 591 Sort: S,R Notes: Normal State: Desired State: Power Req'd: Y Support System Drawing: 1-12033 1-98415 Req'd Support Comp: 1-PS-D-2B Safety Related Status: NUCLEAR SR Min/Opt: MXN Alias No: Power Train: A Comp Served: EAST ESW PUMP MFR: BUFFALO FORGE CO l: 5000 FT"3/MIN Panel: Elem.Drawing: 1-98415 1-98721 Wiring Drawing: 1-95103 Power Source: 1-PS-D-2B Walkdown: F Relay Eval: Y Comp Type: VENT FAN Xso Drawing: Location: IN THE SW CORNER OF THE ROOM, 15'E OF EAST ESW PP, 13'BOVE THE FLOOR.

l~I D.C.COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)'IP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet1 of11 ID: 12-HV-ESW-7 Rev.0 Class: 9.Fans Descri tion: UNIT 41 EAST ESW PUMP ROOM SUPPLY VENTILATION FAN Building: SCREENHOUSE Floor El.: 591.00 Room, Row/Col: E ESW PUMP RM, IN THE SW CORNER OF THE RM, 15'SE OF E ESWPP, 13'BOVE THE FLR.Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: BUFFALO FORGE CO., 5000 FT"3/MIN SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND 1.Elevation where e ui ment receives seismic in ut Elevation of seismic in ut below about 40'rom rade rade=608.00 3.E ui menthasfundamentalfre uenc aboveabout8Hz est.fre uenc=10.00 Ca acit based on: 1.50'Boundin S ectrum Demand based on: 1.00*Realistic Median-Centered Floor Res onse S ectra 587.00 N/A N/A 1.200 LOG 0.080 0.50 l'\\\I\I I r j r LOG Hz Capacity.....Demand 50.00 Ca aci Demand 1 Demand 2 File C:tGIP<GIPIs ra.des C:(GIPIPROJ0035ls.des C:(GIPPROJ003Qs lra.des Record Label Boundin S trum BUILDING Auxilia ELEVATION 587 BROADEN N BUILDING Auxilia ELEVATION 587 BROADEN N Does capacity exceed demand?Yes

D.C.COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 2 of 11 ID: 12-HV-ESW-7 Rev.0 Class: 9.Fans Descri tion: UNIT N EAST ESW PUMP ROOM SUPPLY VENTILATION FAN Building: SCREENHOUSE Floor El.: 591.00 Room, Row/Col: E ESW PUMP RM, IN THE SW CORNER OF THE RM, 15'SEOF E ESWPP, 13'BOVE THE FLR.Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: BUFFALO FORGE CO., 5000 FT"3/MIN CAVEATS-BOUNDING SPECTRUM FAN/BS Caveat 1-Earth uake Ex erience E ui ment Class FAN/BS Caveat 2-Drive Motor and Fan Mounted on Common Base.FAN/BS Caveat 3-Lon Shafts Su orted at Fan and at Motor.FAN/BS Caveat 4-No Possibility of Excessive Duct Distortion Causing Binding or Misali nment of Fan.FAN/BS Caveat 5-Base Vibration Isolation S stem Checked FAN/BS Caveat 6-Sufficient Slack and Flexibilit of Attached Lines.FAN/BS Caveat 7-Ade uate Anchora e.FAN/BS Caveat 8-No Other Concerns Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A Yes Yes Yes ts the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum'ANCHORAGE 1.The sizes and locations of anchors have been determined 2.Appropriate equipment characteristics have been determined (mass, CG, natural freq., dam in, center of rotation.3.The t e of anchora e is covered b the GIP.4.The adequacy of the anchorage installation has been evaluated (weld quality and length, nuts and washers, ex ansion anchor ti htness, etc.5.Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety have been considered:

embedment length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength/condition, and concrete crackin.6.For bolted anchora es, an a s under the base are less than 1/4 7.Factors affecting essential relays have been considered:

gaps under the base, capacity reduction for ex ansion anchors.8.The base has adequate stiffness and the effect of prying action on anchors has been considered.

9.Thestren th of thee ui mentbaseand the load athto the CG isade uate.10.The ade uac of embedded steel, rout ads or la e concrete ads have been evaluated.

11.The anchora e ca acit exceeds the demand.Are anchorage requirements met7 INTERACTION EFFECTS Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 1.Soft tar ets are free from im act b nearb e ui mentorstructures.

2.If the equipment contains sensitive relays, it is free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures.

3.Attached lines have ade uate flexibilit

.4.Overhead e ui ment or distribution s stems are not likel to colla se.5.No other adverse concerns were found.Yes N/A Yes Yes Yes ls equipment free of interaction effects?Yes D.C.COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALLIATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 3 of 11 ID: 12-HV-ESW-7 Rev.0 Class: 9.Fans Descri tion: UNIT¹1 EAST ESW PUMP ROOM SUPPLY VENTILATION FAN Building: SCREENHOUSE Floor El.: 591.00 Room, Row/Col: E ESW PUMP RM, IN THE SW CORNER OF THE RM, 15'E OF E ESW PP, 13'BOVE THE FLR.Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: BUFFALO FORGE CO., 5000 FT"3/MIN IS EQUIPMENT SEISMICALLY ADEQUATE'P Yes COMMENTS SRT: Gary Thomas, Gunnar Harstead and Harry Young on 10/19/93.Capacity vs Demand: Component is in Screenhouse building using Auxiliary building Response Spectra for calculation Anchorage:

Fan sits on steel platform, bolted to the wall on two sides with 2-3/4" through bolts on each side, and hung at opposite corner by a 4x4x3/8" angle.Calculation should be rerun.This fan is the limiting analysis fo 12-HV-ESW-1,2,3,4,5,6,7,&8 Anchorage is adequate.The calculated anchorage safety factor is 32.8.~~Photo: Wk.2, Tm.2, Disk 1, Picture 29 Fan;30 Underside of frame showing two bolts to wall;31 Top of angle hanger support for platform.Evaluated by: Date:

Attachment:

Pictures

Attachment:

ANCHOR Re ort 0

D.C.COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVAI UATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/1 4/92 Status: Yes Sheet 4 of 11 ID: 12-HV-ESW-7 Rev.0 Class: 9.Fans Descri tion: UNIT P1 EAST ESW PUMP ROOM SUPPLY VENTILATION FAN 1 Building: SCREENHOUSE Floor El.: 591.00 Room, Row/Col: E ESW PUMP RM, IN THE SW CORNER OF THE RM, 15'E OF E ESW PP, 13'BOVE THE FLR.Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: BUFFALO FORGE CO., 5000 FT"3/MIN PICTURES Figure 1: Fan 12-HV-ESW-7 Figure 2: Underside of frame showing two bolts to wall Figure 3: Top of angle hanger support for platform D.C.COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 5 of 11 ID: 12-HV-ESW-7 Rev.0 Class: 9.Fans Room, Row/Col: E ESW PUMP RM, IN THE SW CORNER OF THE RM, 15'SEOF E ESWPP, 13'BOVE THE FLR.F,loor El.: 591.00 Building: SCREENHOUSE Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: BUFFALO FORGE CO., 5000 FT"3/MIN ANCHOR Report Descri tion: UNIT¹1 EAST ESW PUMP ROOM SUPPLY VENTILATION FAN Response Spectrum: SSE Frequency:

GIP-Flexible Percent Damping: GIP-5.00 Spectral Values: Direction North-South East-West Vertical Acceleration

's 0.60 0.60 0.25 Angle (N-S Direction makes with the X Axis): 0.00 Combination Criteria: SRSS~Wei htn: Number of Weights: 1 No Wei ht 1 500.00 35.000 23.000 18.000 Forces: Number of External Forces: 0 Moments: Number of External Moments: 0 Allowables:

Anchor: Number of Anchor types: 1 Tension Shear Coeff Fact Shear Product Dia Ultimate Ultimate Inter Inter Saf No.Manufact Tension Coeff D.C.COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 6 of 11 ID: 12-HV-ESW-7 Rev.0 Class: 9.Fans Descri tion: UNIT¹1 EAST ESW PUMP ROOM SUPPLY VENTILATION FAN Building: SCREENHOUSE Floor El.: 591.00 Room, Row/Col: E ESW PUMP RM, IN THE SW CORNER OF THE RM, 15'EOF E ESW PP, 13'BOVE THE FLR.Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: BUFFALO FORGE CO., 5000 FT"3/MIN 1 3/4 Other Grouted In 1500.00 7510.00 1.00 Place 0.30 1.00 Concrete: Ultimate Stress: 3500.00 psi.Reduction Factor: 0.85 Weld: Allowable Stress: 31200 psi.Surfaces: Number of Surfaces: 2 Surface Orientation Direction Com No 0.000 1.000 Direction Com N 1.000 0.'000 Direction Com Nz 0.000 0.000 Anchor Pattern for Surface¹1 Anchor Pattern for Surface//2

D.C.COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 7 of 11 ID: 12-HV-ESW-7 Rev.0 Class: 9.Fans Descri tion: UNIT¹1 EAST ESW PUMP ROOM SUPPLY VENTILATION FAN Building: SCREENHOUSE Floor El.: 591.00 Room, Row/Col: E ESW PUMP RM, IN THE SW CORNER OF THE RM, 15'E OF E ESW PP, 13'BOVE THE FLR.Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: BUFFALO FORGE CO., 5000 FT"3/MIN Legend for Anchor Patterns Anchor Bolts: Concrete Uncs:~mm Concrete Points: Weld Uncs: Geometrei:

Anchor: Number of Anchors: 4 Anch Surf No.Id 1 2 1 3 4 1 Coord 16.100 52.600 70.000 70.000 Coord 46.000 46.000 41.300 4.800 Coord 4.000 4.000 4.000 4.000 Id Concrete Lines:

D.C.COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 8 of 11 ID: 12-HV-ESW-7 Rev.0 Class: 9.Fans Descri tion: UNIT¹1 EAST ESW PUMP ROOM SUPPLY VENTILATION FAN Building: SCREENHOUSE Floor El.: 591:00 Room, Row/Col: E ESW PUMP RM, IN THE SW CORNER OF THE RM, 15'EOF E ESW PP, 13'BOVE THE FLR.Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: BUFFALO FORGE CO., 5000 FT"3/MIN¹of elements per line: 1 Number of Concrete Lines: 2 No start X-Coo rd 0.000 70.000 start Y-Coo rd 46.000 0.000 start Z-Coo rd 4.000 4.000 End X-Coord 70.000 70.000 End Y-Coord 46.000 46.000 End Z-Coord Id 4.000 1 4.000 2 Line Width 3.000 3.000 Concrete Points: Number of Concrete Points: 0 Weld Lines:¹of elements per line: 5 Number of Weld Lines: 0 Determination of Reduction Factors: Reduction Factor Input for Anchor¹1 Adequately Installed:

Yes Embedment Length: (7.50 in.Min Reqd.to achieve full capacity):=

7.50 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.Edge Distance-Edge 1: 6.63 in.Crack Size: 0.000 in.Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed:

Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor¹2 Adequately Installed:

Yes Embedment Length: (7.50 in.Min Reqd.to achieve full capacity):=

7.50 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.06 in.Edge Distance-Edge 1: 6.63 in.Crack Size: 0.000 in.Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed:

Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor¹3 Adequately Installed:

Yes

D.C.COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 9 of 11 ID: 12-HV-ESW-7 Rev.0 Class: 9.Fans Descri tion: UNIT f/1 EAST ESW PUMP ROOM SUPPLY VENTILATION FAN Building: SCREENHOUSE Floor El.: 591.00 Room, Row/Col: E ESW PUMP RM, IN THE SW CORNER OF THE RM, 15'E OF E ESW PP, 13'BOVE THE FLR.Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: BUFFALO FORGE CO., 5000 FT"3/MIN Embedment Length: (7.50 in.Min Reqd.to achieve full capacity):=

7.50 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.13 in.Edge Distance-Edge 1: 6.63 in.Crack Size: 0.000 in.Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed:

Yes Reduction Factor input for Anchor 0 4 Adequately Installed:

Yes Embedment I.ength: (7.50 in.Min Reqd.to achieve full capacity):=

7.50 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.13 in.Edge Distance-Edge 1: 6.63 in.Crack Size: 0.000 in.Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed:

YesReduction Factors Data Current: Yes No Anc Pall/Vali 1500.00 7510.00 1500.00 7510.00 1500.00 7510.00 Pallr/Vallr RT RN NIA N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NIA 1.00 1.00 N/A 1.00 1.00 N/A 1.00 1.00 N/A'l.oo 1.00 RL RG 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 RS RE 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 RF RC 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 RR RP RB 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 RM 1 1500.00?510.00 NIA 1.00 1.00 NIA 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00~Le eed: N/A=Not A licable Pall=Allowable Pull without Reduced Ins ection Vail=Allowable Shear without Reduced Ins ection Pallr=Allowable Pull with Reduced Ins ection Vallr=Allowable Shear with Reduced Ins ection=Outlier=Reduction Factor Not Used RT=Reduction Factor for T e of Anchora e RN=Reduction Factor for Installation Ade uac RL=Reduction Factor for Embedment=Reduction Factor for S acin RS RG=Reduction Factor for Ga at Anchors D.C.COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 10 of 11 ID: 12-HV-ESW-7 Rev.0 Class: 9.Fans Descri tion: UNIT N EAST ESW PUMP ROOM SUPPLY VENTILATION FAN Building: SCREENHOUSE Floor El.: 591.00 Room, Row/Col: E ESW PUMP RM, IN THE SW CORNER OF THE RM, 15'SEOF E ESWPP, 13'BOVE THE FLR.Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: BUFFALO FORGE CO., 5000 FT"3/MIN RF RC RR RP RB=Reduction Factor for Ed e Distance=Reduction Factor for Concrete Stren th=Reduction Factor for Concrete Cracks=Reduction Factor for Essential Reta s=Reduction Factor for Base Stiffness and P in Action=Reduction Factor for Base Stren th and Load Path=Reduction Factor for Embed.Steel and Pads Anal sis Results: Analysis Performed:

Yes Type of Analysis: Regular S ectral Accelerations G's No 10 12 13 14 15 16 18't9 20 21 N-S 0.600-0.600-0.600 0.600 0.600-0.600 0.600-0.600 0.240-0.240 0.240-0.240-0.240 0.240 0.240-0.240 0.240-0.240 0.240-0.240-0.240 E-W 0.240-0.240 0.240-0.240-0.240 0.240 0.240-0.240 0.600-0.600-0.600 0.600 0.600-0.600 0.600-0.600 0.240-0.240 0.240-0.240 0.240 Vertical 0.100-0.100 0.100-0.100 0.100-0.100-0.100 0.100 0.100-0.'I 00 0.100-0.100 0.100-0.100-0.'I00 0.100 0.250-0.250-0.250 0.250 0.250 Safet Factor 44.553 59.948 77.054 50.897 48.716 59.565 49.641 106.184 31.796 53.068 91.151 32.444 33.585 56.103 33.321 87.648 56.453 59.642/6.162 205.015 67.138 22~0.240 0.240-0.240-0.240-0.250 0.250 67.333 76.365 24-0.240 0.240-0.250 59.986 Minimum Safety Factor: 31.796 D.C.COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 11 of 11 ID: 12-HV-ESW-7 Rev.0 Class: 9.Fans Descri tion: UNIT¹1 EAST ESW PUMP ROOM SUPPLY VENTILATION FAN Building: SCREENHOUSE Floor El.: 591.00 Room, Row/Col: E ESW PUMP RM, IN THE SW CORNER OF THE RM, 15'SEOF E ESW PP, 13'BOVE THE FLR.Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: BUFFALO FORGE CO., 5000 FT"3/MIN The Anchorage Capacity is 31.796 times greater than the Demand Coo Component No.I'Z"&G~+-1 Cla>>a Any particular prea the Seismic Review Team>>hould pay extra attontion to7 Yes No v'Lf ye>>, check item>>that apply.)Anchor Type Anchor Diameter Anchor Spacing Anchor Number Anchor Embedment Anchor Edge Distance Anchor Cap Anchor Thread Engagement Anchor Crip Anchor Angularity Concrete Crack Other>>(describe brief].y)If there item and l.2.3.i>>concern.for Desi.gn Basis Discrepancy, circle tho applicable explain.Hardvare Maintenance Type Discrepancy Drawing Update Type Discrepancy Significant Operability/Do>>ign Basis Discrepancy Others Condi tion: Actions Taken: Prepared By~'aca~5>'" 3

• c'CHP@021.CCD.019.ZTACHNENT NO.1 O(v Unxt Xnstallatxon dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch NCHOR XNSPECTION DATA SHEE E.M ea 4o~Bldg.Location iZ-9-ES-7 Equipment No.rAu&r I (OIAi~A MlCHIQAy POWER SITE i)ES I'H CO ITROLLEO WORKIIIQ COPY JUL>S tsSS<<RZ l.DETAIL A DETAIL(I 0 (0 CoHPon(EQ r I 8 I'-ITTAC'AGO T(o/V Cu~l QZ'Q'P I ATE a~(~)zz"p5~-as'~+~1rI cj(((I((VB AprlrI,E I I I F-(I (I l~3-P 8 eche~4AL~/A" B.<T't~f(pf,Q oP Top/)~i(J oo o Drawn by: Verified b Date: Qual./Cert.Xnspector Reviewed by: pate.F-RI-t 3 Construction An hor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1

• • l2 CHP 5021.CCD.019 I'TACHMENT NO.1 Unzt Xnstallatz.on dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch NCHOR INSPECTXON DATA SHEET c.Yc.t Quod 0~E U 7 oow~Bldg.Location IZ,-Av-F>g-7 Equipment No.\Ow~I I I I I I'I I-~+/6 f'THRV Cbo'Erb I.7YP.Z lo Yig EL'E.V lEw'w Meir I IOIANA h'ICHIGAIJ POP,'/II Sl fF.OCSIGH CONTROLLED YIORKIIIG COPY JUL tg19SS.LCRK~Drawn by: Verified b Date: Y/2 q Date: 'PD Qual./Cert.Inspector~~~~~Reviewed by: T Date:~<'-'I~Construct>on A chor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1 i~2 CHP 5021-CCD.019 ATTACHMENT NO.1 Unct bNcHQR Bldg.NSPECTION DATA SHEET E Few Q~Locatzo Installation dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch Equipment No.Top Wgo sps i pc Pbi77u~IV'2Z I'I~I-4/iS'I I)-4/iy I I~4'ib I WwACcc:ssibt 8 Pi@~TOP Mc)xwsoC vc Q II1vg 0 M V d Z" 5/POp Wc v~S<QQ Mib BO77~+i@I/u" PLtI Y-e i S S Ti Y'CS WE't DED YO Tnt')'Lr rv>c L.Sc CHANNEL IS bta'vT 87'FNos AnlQ HEEDED VOLrt-TI cr>>fi 7I 7 7<.L>>" 7c" TOP Qi~ZJlMg VV lbvt48~Itt DIANA MICiIIGQN PPWt R SITC PESld't(CONTROLLt.J WORKING COPY f UL 1g tSSS~pRg T~E'WPD n'rawn by: Date:~~~~Verified by Qual./Cert.Inspector Reviewed by: T, Date: Construct>.on A chor Review Engineer')"2.I-Qg Page 1 of 3 Revision 1

• " 2 CHP 5021-CCD~019 ATTACHMENT NO.1.Unxt NC OR INSPECTIO D TA S E C/8 N uSE Bldg.F..FSM R>iP oe Location 4-7 Installation dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch Equipment No.C.0 gA"/Z./Q"/g" O>Oy ECT VI e&AA 0'5'~'~'+,>,~C, o tQg+>',:<-',~l8"+:~W.A~%~XI'>"5'I (rd S'4~~)'>-4<J~-56 AntChoI POWER SITE OESlut<CONTfiOLLEO WORKING COPY lUL 1519S5 LCRK Drawn by: Date: Qual./Cert.Inspector Reviewed by: Date: Construction An hor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1

~~~e~~a-~~~~~9~~~e s~~~~o 14 V t 5%RRSRSHKLP MWWMMM&W R%1%RRRRSL MMWMMMW&RSRSSWRHLL 555%655%%LL R5%%%5%%88~~~~

5555WRIHHSE 54WWHRRSRI

%8%Ã%R4%~~M5%K'WWMMMWW P t 4 P C.4 4 c

'12 CHP 5021.CCD.03.9 ATTACHMENT NO.1 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET Equipment No.: IZ-AV'-Embedded Steel Dwg.No.: PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS Dwg No.': Iz.-$4 82-7 Weld ID T e Size Len th Cracks/3/Yes 57@Yes dRP Yes Yes~i M~w'~w//Yes cHZP Yes QRD~/i<"/'/y" Y s Weld T e Codes 1=Fillet 2=Plug/Slot 3=Groove Lack of Penetration Ye's Yes Yes Yes@HE Yes c85+Ys Yes 429 Yes CPS Porosity Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes cHZP.895 Yes<HE lhQIAt(A te1ICH~GA I POII~R SlTE OrSlGH CONTROLLED WORKING COPY JUL t~199~LrPg T~CA Equipment base flexible: G Yes 8 No Reviewed by: ons ruc on re ns ruc 1on c or ev1ew ng1neer~~~verified by: ua.er.npsec or Date: Date: g-Ah-93 Page 3 of 3 Revision 1 (12 CHP 5021.CCD.019 ATTACHMENT NO.1 ANCHOR TNSPECTXON DATA SHEET quipment No.: l~-/-r V'-E'SV Embedded Steel Dwg.No.: h PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS Dwg No.: t+-W 4BZ.-7 Weld XD T e Size Len th Cracks Lack of Penetration Porosity'lie.Yes Yes Yes w'io Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4lZP Yes'RAN Qes Yes CfB Yes Ch Yes KD Yes Weld T e Codes 1=Fillet 2=Plug/Slot 3=Groove liVOIANA h".CH IGnN PO)".ER SITE OFSICH COlITROaa.EL'CRNlIt(C CCRC'UI.>g]995-tres T~~Equipment base flexible: 0 Yes 5 No T Reviewed by: ons ruc 1o re Date: 0->>-'l'3 Date: b-2,(-f2 Verified by:~~ons ruc 1on nc or ev1ew ng1neer ua.er.npsec or Date: Page 3 of 3 Revision 1

C'2 CHP 5021.CCD.019 ATTACHMENT NO-1 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET quipment No.:/Z-A'mbedded Steel Dwg.No.: gh PHYSlCAL CHARACTERISTICS Dwg No..'Z-WC SZ-~Weld XD T e Size Len th Cracks Lack of Penetration Porosity Yes Yes Yes ges 3" Yes@Ys Yes Cb 3/s 0 Yes s Yes s 0 3/Yes 0 s Yes Weld T e Codes 1=Fillet 2=Plug/Slot 3=Groove INDI/(JA>.',~Q<ICAN PP;ygII SITC O~SlCN CONT(IDLI.ED YYDIIKIIIC CQP'f lUL~q 199" Equipment base flexible: 0 Yes 5 No on ruc x n re Date'2I Reviewed by: V rified by: on ruc>on nc o ua.er.npsec or evxew ngxneer Date: Page 3 of 3 Revision 1

12 CHP 5021.CCD.019 ATTACHMENT NO.1 ANCHOR XNSPECTXON DATA SHEETquipment No.: 2--Sld-7 Embedded Steel Dwg.No.: g-3L8~PHYSXCAL CHARACTERXSTXCS Dwg No.: Z-W Z-7 Held XD T e 4JZ IJ~L 4AV Weld T e Codes 1=Fillet Size Len th Cracks Lack of Penetration Porosity Yes Yes kS'es 855 Yes Yes B5 Yes Yes QRI Yes c55'es Yes Yes cd&7'Fq Yes cRED Yes drab Yes CKb Yes es Yes Yes Yes mz.Hh Yes No Yes No Yes No 2=Plug/Slot 3=Groove QEhlOTES An/XII$4O~AJW uJEL A.INOIANA tIICHIGAN POWER SITE DESIGN CONTROLLED WORKING COPY JUL>~1995.LEAK 7 Eguipment base flexible: 0 Yes 8-No Reviewed by: ons uc zo re Date: ons ruc son or evzew ngxneer Verified by: ua.er.npsec or Date: Y-<-9'3 Page 3 of 3 Revision 1 II 1 S 8.A.DEPARTMENT CONTPOLLED DOCUtvlciNT COPY NO.3-l SHP 5050 NDE.008 ATTACHMENT NO.1 ULTRASONIC TEST REPORT JOB ORDER NO.:/8 REPORT DATE: 4-/-'73 REQUEST NO.IDENTIFICATION Unit Component Item n/i Material/<Other 5-FS i~~" Test Unit/S/N>(wS'r.'-5'2F-P~Freq./Diameter 7 zsZ~Reference Standard C-~P Couplant/Batch No.'=.c/~7aZ TEST DATA REMARKS PERFORMED BY: REVIEWED BY: FORM NO.12 SHP 5050 NDE.008-1:~3 LEVEL:~DATE:~///+Page 1 of 1 Revision 0 Equip XD: 1-AFW Train: 2 Equip Class: 14 Drawing No.: 1-12035 sction: 120 VAC SYSTEM stem: 120/208V MISC.SAFTEY RELATED POWER DXSTRIBUTXON J Equip Desc: POWER PANEL Building: AUXILIARY Room: CD EMERGENCY DXESEL GENERATOR ROOM Elev: 587 Sort: S, Notes: ,Normal State: Desired State: Power Req'd: Support System Drawing: Req'd Support Comp: Safety Related Status: NUCLEAR SR Alias No: Power Train: A Comp Served: Mfr: POWER ELECTRIC INC.Model: Min/Opt: MIN E em.Drawing: 1-98215 Wiring Drawing: 1-95022 Power Source: 1-ABD-C-2A Walkdown: F Relay Eval: N Comp Type: DISTRIBUTXON PANEL XSO Drawing: Location: 10 FEET NW OF CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR gl-OME-150-CD(ON THE NORTH WALL DC Cook Unit1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/1 4/92 Status: Yes Sheet 1 of 3 ID: 1-AFW (Rev.0)Description:

POWER PANEL Building: AUXILIARY Class: 14.Distribution Panels F(oor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EDG RM, 10 FEET NW OF CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR C1-OME-150-CD, ON THE N WALL Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: POWELL ELECTRIC INC.SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND Elevation where equipment receives seismic input Flevation of seismic input below about 40'rom grade (grade=608.00)Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz (est.frequency=)Capacity based on: 1.00'ounding Spectrum Demand based on: 1.00*Design Basis Ground Response Spectrum 587.00 Yes SRT 0.000 LOG r////////0 090 0.50 LOG Hz Capacity.....Demand 33.00 Capacity Demand 1 Demand 2 File C:tGIPtGIPtspectra.des C:LGIPIPROJ0031tspectra.des C:tGIPtPROJ0031tspectra.des Record Label Bounding Spectrum BUILDING GroundlELEVATION 608 BROADEN N BUILDING Ground(ELEVATION 608 BROADEN N Does capacity exceed demand?

DC Cook Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 2 of 3 ID: 1-AFW (Rev.0)Description:

POWER PANEL Building: AUXILIARY Class: 14.Distribution Panels Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EDG RM, 10 FEET NW OF CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR f/1-OME-150-CD, ON THE N WALL Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: POWELL ELECTRIC INC.CAVEATS-BOUNDING SPECTRUM DP/BS Caveat I-Earthquake Experience Equipment Class DP/BS Caveat 2-Contains only Circuit Breakers and Switches DP/BS Caveat 3-Doors Secured.DP/BS Caveat 4-Adjacent Cabinets Bolted Together.DP/BS Caveat 5-General Configuration Similar to NEMA Standards.

DP/BS Caveat 6-Adequate Anchorage DP/BS Caveat 7-Potential Chatter of Essential Rela s Evaluated.

DP/BS Caveat 8-No Other Concerns.Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum'7 Yes Yes Yes N/A Yes Yes N/A Yes ANCHORAGE 1.The sizes and locations of anchors have been determined 2.Appropriate equipment characteristics have been determined (mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation).

3.The type of anchorage is covered by the GIP 4.The adequacy of the anchorage installation has been evaluated (weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion anchor tightness, etc.)5.Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety have been considered:

embedment length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength/condition, and concrete cracking.6.For bolted anchorages, any gaps under the base are less than 1/4.7.Factors affecting essential relays have been'considered:

gaps under the base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors.8.The base has adequate stiffness and the effect of prying action on anchors has been considered.

9.The strength of the equipment base and the load path to the CG is adequate.10.The adequacy of embedded steel, grout pads or large concrete pads have been evaluated.

11.The anchorage capacity exceeds the demand.Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A Yes Yes N/A Yes Are anchorage requirements met?

DC Cook Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 3 of 3 ID: 1-AFW(Rev.0)Description:

POWER PANEL Class: 14.Distribution Panels Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EDG RM, 10 FEET NW OF CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR 81-OME-150-CD, ON THE N WALL Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: POWELL ELECTRIC INC.INTERACTION EFFECTS 1.Soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures 2.If the equipment contains sensitive relays, it is free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures.

3.Attached lines have adequate flexibility 4.Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse.5.No other adverse concerns were found.Is equipment free of interaction effects?Yes N/A Yes Yes Yes S'E I NT ES C L Y DE U E SRT: George Gary Thomas (S&A)and Tom Huang (AEP)on 10/7/1993 Ref.1: Anchor Inspection Data Sheet: Anchorage Arrangement Sheet, 1/21/93.Ref.2: Dwg 0 1-12035-12 (internal components dwg).Capacity: BSCav.2: Verified by walkdown and Ref.2.Anchorage:

Wall mounted panel with dimensions:

36"Hx20Wx6"Deep.

Anchorage was not accessible.

Panel estimated to weigh less than 50 lbs.Tug tested by G.Thomas to at least 100 Ibs, OK;therefore, no explicit anchorage evaluation necessary.

Evaluated by: Date:

(12 CHP 5021.CCD.019 ATTACENENT NO.1 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET COE E gg I, Un>.t Bldg.Location Installation dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch Equipment No.PHOO uuislr<<k 1-'8" C~lr (YI'I'.)t-a" r&AQUI!M)qua%lo un,pl~CASa)~)I'-8wZ-II 8!<<5/8~~l I 8 lv I (~)5Ctcwg~/~ssl cps LJII tC H Cd/AEc.f.un:sic<<I, H ufo'A.(9'rP)II'IDIMIt,'!CHICA,I

~W~II GITE DESIGII COII TIIOU.'60 VFORXING COPY APH 0 8 tS93..I.EAK Drawn by: verified by-Reviewed b 7-Date: 1-~I-'l3 ual./ert.nspector Date: Construction A chor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1 g~-eemseaarx RRRRRSRSHHEL RSRSRRRRMML&

WRRRSHHHRL QSSISLRLS HRRRRRRLLLL MWWWWW&W RWRlWRHSL W558WRLEL MWWWWMW&I k i 0 f~J4>~~

Database: K:SSEL2C.DBF Equip ID: 2-BATT-AB Train: 1 Equip Class:15 ywing No.: 2-12003 nction: 250 VDC SYSTEM System: 250VDC DISTRXBUTXON Equip Desc: PLANT BATTERY AB Building: AUXILIARY Room: AB BATTERY EQUIPMENT AREA Elev: 609 Sort: S,R Notes: Normal State: Desired State: Power Req'd: Support System Drawing: 2-98055, 2-12003 Req'd Support Comp: Safety Related Status: NUCLEAR SR Min/Opt: MIN Alias No: Power Train: B Comp Served: MFR: C 6 D BATTERIES l: LC-25 Panel: 2-BC-AB Elem.Drawing: 2-98055 Wiring Drawing: 2-91012, 2-91301 Power Source: 2-TDAB-5 Walkdown: C Relay Eval: Y Comp Type: BATTERY,*RHR WALKDOWN COMPONENT Iso.Drawing: Location: IN THE CENTER OF THE ROOM, 3 FEET NORTH OF THE ENTRANCE DOOR D.C.Cook Unit 2 Screening Evaluation Worksheet (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2114/92 Status: No Sheet 1 of 6 ID: 2-BATT-AB (Rev.0)Class: 15.Batteries on Racks

Description:

PLANT BATTERY AB Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: AS BATTERY EQUIP AREA-IN THE CENTER OF THE ROOM, 3 FEET NORTH OF THE ENTRANCE DOOR Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: CBD Power Systems LC-25 Cells SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND 1.Elevation where equipment receives seismic input Elevation of seismic input below about 40'rom grade (grade=608.00)3.Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz (est.frequency=8.00)Capacity based on: 1.00 Bounding Spectrum 5.Demand based on: 1.00" Design Basis Ground Response Spectrum 609.00 Yes SRT 0.850 LIN I r r~1 r r er~t 0.000 1.00 LOG Hz Capacity~....Demand 33.00 Capactt Demand 1 Demand 2 HAGIPtGIPtspectra.des H:tGIPtPROJOOSStspectra.des H:tGIPV'ROJ0058tspectra.des Record Label Bounding Spectrum BUILDING Ground Spectrum ELEVATION BROADEN BUILDING Ground Spectrum ELEVATION BROADEN Does capacity exceed demand'

D.C.Cook Unit 2 Screening Evaluation Worksheet (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: No Sheet 2 of 6 ID: 2-BATT-AB (Rev.0)Description:

PLANT BATTERY AB Building: AUXILIARY Class: 15.Batteries on Racks Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: AG BATTERY EQUIP AREA-IN THE CENTER OF THE ROOM, 3 FEET NORTH OF THE ENTRANCE DOOR Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: CSD Power Systems LC-25 Cells CAVEATS-BOUNDING SPECTRUM BAT/BS Caveat I-Earthquake Experience Equipment Class BAT/BS Caveat 2-Battery Cell Plates are Lead-Calcium Flat-Plate, Plante, or Manchex Design.BAT/BS Caveat 3-Each Individual Battery Weighs Less Than 450 Pounds.BAT/BS Caveat 4-Close-Fitting Spacers between Cells..BAT/BS Caveat 5-Batteries Restrained by Side and End Rails BAT/BS Caveat 6-Battery Racks Have Longitudinal Cross Bracing.BAT/BS Caveat 7-Racks Constructed of Wood Evaluated.

BAT/BS Caveat 8-Batteries Greater Than 10 Years Old Evaluated.

BAT/BS Caveat 9-Adequate Anchorage BAT/BS Caveat 10-No Other Concerns.Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum?Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A Yes Yes ANCHORAGE 1.The sizes and locations of anchors have been determined 2.Appropriate equipment characteristics have been determined (mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation).

3.The type of anchorage is covered by the GIP 4.The adequacy of the anchorage installation has been evaluated (weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion anchor tightness, etc.)5.Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety have been considered:

embedment length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength/condition, and concrete cracking.6.For bolted anchorages, any gaps under the base are less than 1/4 7.Factors affecting essential relays have been considered:

gaps under the base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors.8.The base has adequate stiffness and the effect of prying action on anchors has been considered.

9.The strength of the equipment base and the load path to the CG is adequate 10.The adequacy of embedded steel, grout pads or large concrete pads have been evaluated.

11.The anchorage capacity exceeds the demand.Are anchorage requirements met?Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A Yes Yes N/A Yes D.C.Cook Unit 2 Screening Evaluation Worksheet (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: No Sheet 3 of 6 ID: 2-BATT-AB (Rev.0)Description:

PLANT BATTERY AB Class: 15.Batteries on Racks Building: AUXILIARY Floor EI.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: AB BATI ERY EQUIP AREA-IN THE CENTER OF THE ROOM, 3 FEET NORTH OF THE ENTRANCE DOOR Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: C&D Power Systems LC-25 Cells INTERACTION EFFECTS 1.Soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures 2.If the equipment contains sensitive relays, it is free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures.

3.Attached lines have adequate flexibility 4.Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse.5.No other adverse concerns were found.Is equipment free of interaction effects?Yes N/A Yes Yes Yes S IC LLY D U~CON I~EN Date: 10/18/93 SRT: Tom Huang (AEP), Steve Anagnostis (S&A), Paul Krugh (AEP), Randy Steele (AEP)

References:

1.Cook Dwgs 12-3476-18, 12-3073A-3, 12-3073D 2.C&D Power Systems Inc Dwgs K-5629-3, M-8654-C, M-8655-C, M-8665-D 3.Anchorage Package Four substantial welded steel 2-step battery racks well braced in both directions.

Two racks house 28 cells each, and two racks house 30 cells each.Each cell is a C&D Power Systems LC-25.The cells are well secured.Each rack is anchored with twelve (12)3/8" anchors.-see references for details.Frequency>8 Hz by inspection.

BS Caveat 2: Batteries are C&D lead calcium flat plate (per label on battery).BS Caveat 3: Each cell weighs 325 Ibs (Reference 2)BS Caveat 8: Batteries were installed in 1985.SQUG Action Item 002 was written to address the aging issue.ANCH Caveat 1: The anchorage package specifies the anchors as unknown 3/8" non-shell type expansion anchors.The original plant drawings (Ref 1)specify 3/8" J-bolts (90 degrees, 9", embedment), but when the current battery rack was replaced in 1985, a note was added to the plant drawing that, where necessary due to bolt hole misalignment in the rack, the original J bolts were to be cut off and replaced with 3/8" Kwik bolts.The current bolts are exactly where the original plant drawings locate the J bolts, and they look like J-bolts (cut-off threaded end).ANCH Caveat 2: Per Ref 2, the 28 cell racks weigh 10231 Ibs and the 30 cell racks weigh 10920 lbs.The cells are about 90%of the weight and the rack is about 10%of the weight.The attached"Battery Rack Weight Distribution" shows the geometry.ANCH Caveat 4, 6: Installation checked per Ref 3.

D.C.Cook Unit 2 Screening Evaluation Worksheet (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: No Sheet 4 of 6 ID: 2-BATT-AB (Rev.0)Description:

PLANT BATTERY AB Building: AUXILIARY Class: 15.Batteries on Racks Floor EI.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: AB BATTERY EQUIP AREA-IN THE CENTER OF THE ROOM, 3 FEET NORTH OF THE ENTRANCE DOOR Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: C8D Power Systems LC-25 Cells ANCH Caveat 5: In the SRT's judgement, the anchors are the original J bolts.Per GIP Table C.4-1, these have nominal capacities of 3.74k pullout and and 1.87 kip shear.The pullout capacity is reduced by 0.51 to 1.91 kips due to the 9" embedment length.No other reductions are required.Note that if the anchors were 3/8" Kwik bolts (the replacements specified in Ref 1), the nominal capacities would be 1 46 k pullout and 1.42 kip shear.The pullout capacity would be reduced by 0.88 to 1.28 kips due to 3.5 ksi concrete.No other reductions would be required." ANCH Caveat 8: The racks are anchored through a pair of 3/4" thick plates that run along the front and back of the racks (see references and photos).This configuration may produce some prying on the anchors;although the plate may be stiff enough relative to the anchors to keep this to a minimum.Per the discussion for ANCH Caveat 11, the pullout load would have to increase by a factor of 6.2 for J-bolts (3.6 for Kwik,bolts) to reach the allowable limits.ANCH Caveat 11: The attached"Battery Rack Weight Distribution" shows that the front-to-back overturning moment for one rack is 55648 in-lbs.That moment is resisted by six anchors with a moment arm of 30", which produces a per bolt pullout load of 55648/6/30

=309 lbs.The side-to-side seismic loads will not produce any significant pullout loads.The shear load is 4586 Ibs for one horizontal direction of input.SRSS'ing the two horizontal directions and dividing by the number of bolts produces a per bolt shear load of 1.41 x 4586/12=539 lbs.Using the bi-linear shear-tension interaction in GIP Figure C.3-2, the interaction for a J bolt anchor is 309/1910=0.16 (Note that the shear is less than 0.3 of the shear allowable).

If a 3/8" Kwik bolt were assumed, the interaction would be 0.7 x (309/1280)

+(539/1420)

=0.55.Photos: W2T1.11, 12 Evaluated by: Date:/c'o~S

Attachment:

Pictures

Attachment:

Battery Rack Weight Distribution

D.C.Cook Unit 2 Screening Evaluation Worksheet (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: No Sheet 5 of 6 ID: 2-BATT-AB (Rev.0)Description:

PLANT BALI ERY AB Class: 15.Batteries on Racks Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: A8 BATTERY EQUIP AREA-IN THE CENTER OF THE ROOM, 3 FEET NORTH OF THE ENTRANCE DOOR Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: C8D Power Systems LC-25 Cells JPPGTUR s 0.12 L 0 D.C.Cook Unit 2 Screening Evaluation Worksheet (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: No Sheet 6 of 6 ID: 2-BATI-AB (Rev.0)Description:

PLANT BATTERY AB Class: 15.Batteries on Racks Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: AB BATTERY EQUIP AREA-IN THE CENTER OF THE ROOM, 3 FEET NORTH OF THE ENTRANCE DOOR Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: C8D Power Systems LC-25 Cells ac W s ib P-11 CC of upper tie W x Sah=2295 Ib W x (1-0.4 Sov)~4958 Ib CG of lower tier W x Sah~2293 fb W=1/2 rack weight=5460 Ibs Soh=1.5 x 57.FRS O 8 Hz=0.42g Sav=2/3 x 1.5 x 5K FIIS I 20 Hz=0.23g'ateral Load=2 x 2293 Ib=4586 W x (1-0.4 Sov)=4958 Ib Overturning Momen't (sum moments about 8)~(2293 x 26)+(2293 x 48)-(4958 x 23)=55648 in fbs Base Channet Bolt lines D.C.Cook Unit 2 Outlier Seismic Verification Sheet (OSVS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected 2/14/92 Sheet 1 of 4 ID: 2-BATT-AB (Rev.0)Description:

PLANT BATTERY AB Building: AUXILIARY Class: 15.Batteries on Racks Floor EI.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: AB BATTERY EQUIP AREA-IN THE CENTER OF THE ROOM, 3 FEET NORTH OF THE ENTRANCE DOOR.OU L I SU DE I I ION-ec calan Eeet ical E u'a.Identify all the screening guidelines which are not met.(Check more than one if several guidelines could not be satisfied.)

Capacity vs.Demand Caveats Anchorage Seismic Interaction Other b.Describe all the reasons for the outlier (i.e., if all the listed outlier issues were resolved, then the signatories would consider this item of equipment to be verified for seismic adequacy).

The battery rack is an outlier due to BAT/BS Caveat 8-Batteries Greater Than 10 Years Old.2 P D DO U E 0 U N~ono, a.Defined proposed method(s)for resolving outlier.The attached"Position Paper on the Replacement of the Safety Related Batteries at the Donald C.Cook Nuclear Plant" (R.J.Roman May 10, 1993)states that AEPSC has committed to adopting the replacement criteria stated in ANSI/IEEE Std 450-1987.AEPSC's position is that this commitment resolves the outlier.b.Provide information needed to implement proposed method(s)for resolving outlier (e.g., estimate of fundamental frequency).

3 C 4CE C 0 The information on this OSVS is, to the best of our knowledge and belief, correct and accurate, and resolution of the outlier issues listed on the previous page will satisfy the requirements for this item of equipment to be verified for seismic adequacy: F Approved by: Date:

Attachment:

Position Paper on the Replacement of Saf Related Batteries

~QI I~~~~~I II'It~I~I~~Ml~~'~, I~~t~I S I V~~I~~I~~I I s~C'>>I~s I I I I~I~~>>>>I~~~~~I~~II I~~~~I>>.~.~I I I II~I~I~~I~~II~I I I I~II I l I II.S~I~.~~I'Jl~>>I~~~~~~~>>'~I~~~~~~~~~~I~~~~I~~~I~I~~I II I~~I~~I Ii.~~I~'~~>>O~I~~~>>I~~~I~~I~~~I>>\~V~I I~~~I>>~I~~~~~~~C~~~~~~~'~~~~~~~~~~~I'I~I>>J~1J~I~I~4 I l L.~I~>>

CHARTER POWER ersAfMS, INC, Plyrrmuth Meeting, Pennsyh an(a DATE: TO: FROM'6 February 1984 Ron Roman American Electric Power Service Corp.Graham Walker CM Charter Power Systems, inc.

SUBJECT:

O.C, Cook Nuclear Plant Tmfn N, 250 Voft Safety Refatad Battery Seismic and Ufe Qualification I In response to your1B Feb 94 memo, our mes indicate the following;

'I 1.The Train N batteries were originally purchased ln May 1979 under, P.O.No.0887M21-8, as the Train C Auxiliary Feedwater System dattarfea.

2.The original Technical Specification, DCCEE-183&CN, Rev.2, 1 May 1878, requfmd only seismic qualification, 3, The C&Q Seismic QuafNcatfon Report submfttid for these batteries and racks fs No.VL7S10-02, ReV.2, dated 16 July 1878:.All doCumentatfcn at that time was submitted tha AEPSC offices In New Yofft', City.I I 4.The 3DCU-g has a 20 qualified life at a 77F arinual average operating ,l tomporature.

Qualification is by equivalence af conffguratfon, desfgn and materials to previously tested 3DCU-5, 3DCU-7 and OCU-17 models which were 20 years artNcfaffy aged in acconfance with fEEE<36 prfor to seismic testfng.The fEEE-344 seismfc qualNcation testing these caffe experienced envelopes the D.C.Cook fioor responsa spectrum.The reports for these!qualification tests are located at C&D Headquirters fn Plymouth Meeting, PA,.and are avaffabfa for review.I I lf you have any questions, pfease call me.I I Sincerely, Graham Wafkor Manage;Applications Engineering TOTAL P.03 volt-u->>ax Note 7671~~S~S Co JOopn Pnono N vs From.Co.Phono s Fat 0~4>>'>>~V t Date May 10, 1993 nnnpeot Position Paper on the RepIacemeat of the Safety Related Batteriea at the Donald C.Cook Nuclear Plant tron P~~Ro Je Roman/D~Re Smith%pie 1)J.A ra l+)s)+~~vA~~~l+CA<<~I"i><+~r/qg Based on a review of the surveillance raporto, history, and maintenance records/trend charta for the 2AB battery, tho decision hae been made to replace this battery during thc 1994 Unit 2 refueling outage.The results of similar raviaws for the five other safety-related batterieo has led to the decision to not replace any of these batteries during tho upcoming xafueling outages.Tha following discussion addreaaas the dotails of the reviews that, led to this decision.AEPSC'a plan had boon to replace the oafoty-related batteriea at the Donald C.cook Nuclaax Plant ovary-10 years even though they are purchased aa 20 year batteriea.

a nav lated to ton nt, was developed aaod on prev oua premature p a er eo and high temperatures oxperiencod in the battory rooms.Beforo the decision was made to adopt this plan, a study waa conducted by HVAC showing that it would ba lees expansive to raplaco the battaries avory tan years than to air condition the battery rooms.Baood on this plan alone, tha lAB battaxy should ba replaced in 1995 (since it wao manufactured in 1985), tha 1CD battery in 1995, the 1N battery in 1999, tha 2AB battory in 1994, the 2CD battery in 1996, and the 2N in 1998.During the EDSFI, the 10 year x'eplacemont pl,an came into qucation during a review of the original battary sizing calculationo.

After lengthy discussions between the inspector and Mr.Roman<AEPSC ccaxnittad to adopting the replacement criteria stated in ANSI/IEEE Std 450"1987r IEEE Rocoaaended Practice for Maintenance, Testing, and Replacement of Large Lead Storago Batteries fox'enerating Stations and Substations.

Specifically, IEEE 450 recommends replacing a battery when its capacity, aa determined by the 60 month performance tost, ia bolow 80t of tha manufacturer's rating.Under ideal conditions, a battery would roach'L A rule of thumb regarding high temperature is that, for ovary 15'F above a 77'F average temperature, a battery'lifo io shortened by 50%~The average temperatures in the battery roomo at the DCCNP are leoo than 92'F (77'F+15'F)however other factors, ao discussed in the body of this report, lead to accelerated aging and/ox aarly roplacament of large lead-acid storage bat'terios.

77 F average temperature, thorough maintenance throughout battery lifo, etc.intra-System r v~raa>>>>>>u~VC Poaition Paper on the R<<pl<<cement of the Safoty@el<<ted Batteries<<t tb+Donald C.Cook Nuclear Plant May 10, 1993 Page 2 thi.o point somewhere around 20 years.Under current DccNp conditions, battery could reach this point sooner (due to the high battery room tcmpcraturee mentioned previously).

Ao implied in the previous two statements however, factors other than age affect the viability of the battery.Physical characteristics, such as plate condition together with agc, are often determinants for complete battery replacement.

Failure to hold a charge, as shown by cell voltage and specific gravity readi.ngo, io a good indicator for further investigation into the need fox replacement.

lt io a combination of those factors, and not simply the age or capacity alone, that haa led to the decision to replace the 2AB battery during the 1994 Unit 2 refueling outage.Neither these factors, nor the age or capacity alone, indicate the need to replace any of tho other safety"related batteries at this time.Xn support of the decision to not xaplace any of the other safety" related batteries during 1994 r~fucling outagco, the following information i.a provided.QQCA Voc~g~2)3)4)March/April voltage trends of these batteries i.ndicatc that all of thc calls have voltagoa in the normal range of 2.20-2.24 volts (on a float charge).For comparison purpooao, thirteen (13)of the 2AB cell voltages ware leos than (or equal to)2.20 volts.A cursory review of the past tcn year's worth of these safety-reLated battery files reveals few occurrences, i.f any, involving cell low voltages, electrolytelspecific gravity concerns, and overall less than dcaircable physical conditions.

Ao a contrast, there wexe many instances of these same concerns regarding the 2AB battery.The files do not indicate that an issue waa made xagaxding the temperatures of the 1AB<1CD, 1N, 2CD,&2N battery xooms.Thc fi.lco do show, however, that, upon procuxement

&i.notallation of the 2AB battery, the manufacture'o xapxeaentativc atatod that the battery life would be shortened due to the high ambient temperatures in the battery room.While this is a recognized attribute for all of thc batteries/roomo, it appeared to be morc severe at the time fox tha 2AB battery room.Routine preventive and corrective maintenance ie a part of any battery's life.This maintenance should be fairly consistent from ono safety-xelated battery to another, ao they are all large, lead-acid stationary batteriee.

For the most part, thi.o maintenance hae been consistent for the majority of the Class 1E batteries.

As expected then, these Class 1E battcrico arc experiencing a normal, predictaEXe decrease in their ecrvico li.fc.The 2AB battery, howavex, hae demanded considerable additional maintenance and engineering time i.n the past couple of years n Nine (9)cells had voltages leoa than 2.20 vDc and four (4)cells had voltagco equal to 2.20 VDC.4 The aforcmcntioned study comparing the coot of more fx'cqucnt battory replacement versus ai.r conditioning the battery rooms supporto this otatament.

The atnbiont temperatures axe generally higher i.n the AB battery rooms, when compaxed to the cD and N Txain rooms, due to their physical location in the plant and their ventilation systems.

Position Paper on the Replacement of the Safety Related Batteriea at the Donald C.Cook?tucloar Plant May 10, 1993 Page 3 resolving issues concerning low voltages, specific gravities.

etc.Ae the additional time spent maintaining this battery is significant, it is believed that this is signaling tho end of this battery's useful life and that it will most probably not stay within the Tech Spec range for individual coll voltages beyond tho upcoming refueling outage.Toad acid storage batterieo are dynamic electrochemical devices.As ouch, the ability to predict their future performance and/or capacity represents a near formidable Cask.The decision to not replace any of tho other safety-related batterios outside of 2KB dura,ng the upcoming refueling outages was arrived at after careful consideration of all the factors involved-Tho information available simply does not support their replacement at this time.Therefore, it is recommended that those battories continue to be maintained and tasted in accordance with tho IREE standards and the recommendation to replace them corno when tho maintenance/testing data supports it.Preparod By/Date: os'/o 9 g Concurrence 8y/Date: n~~AC~~pS'07'.Concurranco Statement:

ass m~~~~~c: 0+Co Joffxoy/4+Rr tdlderoon/Reit+

Roman R.I.Ghoborg J.A.Kobyra D.R.Smith/J.Murtha-Bridgman T.A.Kratt-Bridgman AEPSC/NEEP Gafoty Related Battery File (c:ir$rXbatteryioefmemo.wp)

TOTAL P.G3

0~~I~~~~L~~0 0~~~~~mr r r~~I e~-h 0 Q~~0.104~-0~0~0~RSRKRIRWRSRIISII:-

RSMIIIII55III mmlsIIRIISIIB 55 I IRSIIII RIRSIRIIIRIRRIIII y 4 e o o IIHRIIRW~RwmIIER MWWWWMWW J 0 0 H j 0 e r~+~t 0 0~MWWMMWWW~~C r 0 h~'tta;EERIER 0 L~

• • 12 CHP 5021~CCD.019".TACHMENT NO.1 NCHOR INS ECTION DATA SHEET W KV A6 CIAT7Egg ROOD Unz.t Bldg.Location z.-34~-8 t z.-3z z-serT-Installatxon dwg./Rev.Ecpxxpment No.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch Rr T-aQ ('T~r II INDIANA MICHIGAN POKIER SITE OESIGt<COtITIIOLLEO WOfiKIIIG COPY OCT 0 5 3995 I.ER'K T@I Q(~QJ.<l>.1r Il1 I 3-8/q.+~I)I'<(.Typ))I-3$<.>)c)/i 7 C/fhhlhgBL TYP, Eca.M Ni~Q 400k i'd&N<RAN 9.Drawn by: Verified by: Reviewed by:~~Date: 2 3 Date: I->6"4>I r-r-'2 Qual./Cert.Inspector w%n Date: Constructs.on Anchor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1

(>*12 CHP 5021.CCD.0].9 ATTACHMENT NQ.1 i i/vO Unct NS CT 0 T Avx (D C'F Bldg.AS E P V I P I'I!=U~Location/2" 3~='i'-7 Installation dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch 2.->i il-A'ElEquipment No.INDIANA MICHIGAtt POVlCR SITC DESIGN CONTROLLCO lVORKING COPY OCV 05>99S GAY TBRY l 0 Yz.A I 4~20/q (spp-Sut'PoRr DI=TAI L)VJ Q L H f4'1 E." J: Q X3 4 4 i ORi<~D AhrGCC FRANC~<AT TB R'lO~L pc I e"X ZO'i+" (SPE ZLI!PORl QFTWI I S7g 4.g'$2 p II 2C-8~I I cRov t P&e T C.I4AN V I=I-GAS Ecv>o A Drawn by: Verified by: Date: Date: ual./Cert.

inspector Reviewed by: T'4~4 Date: Construction Anc or Review Engineer t o.-5-'I3 Page 1 of 3 Revision.3

• • 12 CHP 5021.CCD.019 ATTACHMENT NO.1 UnLt Ig-3P ZP-y P CT 0 T u cq'ldg.~&QA~raRg~JUL f'ME.~T.Boo H Location Installation dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch//2, BAR aOi T.aC Equipment No.iiii)ll'lA:<iCi'IC" SIIE 0"SiGi'l CO"~'ii'OR!.IhC

(.Oi'OCT 05 1995>'+z Q 1I WI'h I'~4 Date: 2 Date: Drawn by: l g.-z-c.'~Verified by: Qual./Cert.

Inspector Reviewed by: T'i'v~v~~=~.;Date: Construct'>on Anchor Reve.ew Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision.3 r h

(>*12 CHP 5021.CCP.019 ATTACHMENT NO.Tkvo Unzt N ECT 0 T.-ux got Bldg.A, 5.BA>~E.RY EC V'~>%COO;-q Location Installation dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch Equipment No.II DIP.~Q.BOP EVERY 2.Wu OR ERD CATTP R'f FOR C-I MG-UMISTRVTS T'IG-HT A~IN S, r WTTI=RY INDIANA MICHIGAN PO'V(f R SITE DESIGN CONTROLLED WORKING COPY OCT 0 5 1995 UNl STRv 7 (hR>C.gI-=

T wa+,-2o58 II Yz Tt+K.E'c.OF RiGID Ih/SV LOFTI ON SOAR lo QR~~W GATTBRI&5 QP,~<Pg'I'VAPOR i DP.l Al L Drawn by: Verified by: ,Date: Date: Qual./Cert.Inspector Reviewed by: I'~F'I'5'h~-~(bQn Date: Construct>on Anchor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision.3

• • 12 CHP 5021.CCD.019 (ATTACHMENT No.Equipment No.: Embedded Steel Dwg.No.: CHOR XNS CT 0 HYS ICAL CHARACT RIST C Dwg No..: j Q-QQp-p Weld ID T e Size Len th Cracks Lack of Penetration Wi Q/~@CC es N Yes I/cr Yes 0 Y s Ct s es Yes Yes W3 w4 Yes No Yes No Yes No'Yes No es Yes No Yes No Yes 0 We d e Codes 1=Fillet 2=Plug/Slot 3=.Groove Porosity es es es o es 0 Yes No Yes No Yes No Y No INDIANA 41ICHIGAII POPOVER SITE OESIGII CONTROLLED WORKING COPY 0CT 05 19,I5 I.EP'K T'quipment base flexible: 0 Yes 8 No ons ruc ron re Date:-24 Reviewed by: Verified by: ons ruc z.o c or evxew ngzneer ua.e.npsec or Date: Date: (o-5'-f3 Page 3 of 3 Revision 3 I~

~~)0$t'R~~~~~~~~~~~~s~e~RRRSRRRRRSRWRSI5--.

I MIIIIIR8imi mmmSRIMIIMII IKRIIRRIIIIIII RSRIIIHRR I ERRI milli AIR%%LRRHLL/S~

0 0~~~~~t E 0~te a~E o~0 0~a~r~-l-~Q t l~l'4~-)f s 4~~o~0~IBK~EP~0~~RK~~~~RR

-,-RRRRRSRSRSRSRSRR~

.MRRRSMR58%55W RSMRIRSIH555$

55 RHRRSSRRRRRRRSRR RSESRRRHMRRWW RSRRRRRSRRRSRRS

~RWRHHEQHKRH5%6%

IHMWRRRSRHRIRH r e a e r r MMWMMMWW a~a-..EL.a ka~r g~r g e~W~J'He~~:aneesmw 8K e Ak'I~s

~y~I~~~~4 lj~~e~~e~~~~~~~-~~.~%4~-0~~.e e~~~e~~~~'RRRRRRRRRRRRRImi:;:

mmmmilmMIII RRRSElKRMIII IHIRRIIIMlmlm IIISmimimlRI y y r e~IIIIIREQR!SRwRSII MWWMWMWW r e 1 e r y r p i P t e MW&MMMW&Ca~C a'YSMe!E RP%%9&UIKQWJC

'h~P~MWaMNaLMC)

HNk&&%4%~a~~

~~I~f~~~~~~~~~4~Q 0~-~~~5-8 o 1~4 o~RRNNRNR%5%5%555%-

-.IKmmmmmmmm

-mmlESRNmmmmm RES 1 mmmKlmm RSMEWRSmMMIR y e o r e r o~mmmmhhRRWHRmmmm mmmmmmm55m r~y~MWWMMM&W a j~0 C.'~~4~0 HFJBESISSI%leaSKHKaeRKSSP

~i.K~%K8'

~~I~~~~~~,.~~~s~I~~~~~~~-~~.s is)~-C~s~~~s~t KRERHHRWHMSRRSIIIII

.RRRSNIRSRRR%mm5I=-

I IIMIIIII 55IIISRIEIIII IIIIRRRRSRI5%

MIEIIRSRSRSIIIS 0~~~IIIIRWRESHESIIII IIEIIIIIIIIIIRHIRl 0 I'0 y MWWMMMW&~~4 4~s a 8 a R E M a%4%%~<'a..a i o~la a~sssIsss~'%81sssssssssi%1E

's~s.ssvissw.ssaake~sssIMII 25a4KM<ÃtRQRUPk%0 r~~rr~O~l~e APL~~~1 S 8 A DEPART)so=AT CONTROl.LED DOCUMENT COPY NO.i 12 SHP 5050 NDL-008 ATTACPNENT HO.UITRASONIC TEST REPORT JOB ORDER NO.: REPORT DATE: REQUEST NO.IDENTIFICATION Unit~Q Component--A Item-~rS Material~S Other Test Unit/S/N (Freq./Diameter 5 m4z Reference Standard Couplant/Batch No.i<.TS c c-9 TEST DATA REMARKS AM r u.s'/z k.L PERFORMED BY: C REVIEWED BY: '" M~.Pc&FORM NO.12 SHP 5050 NDE.008-1 I EVE E,:.~~I EVEI'age 1 of Revision 0 DATE: C/.-5 y3 oly16192 PG.N0.425 SAFE'HUTDOWN EOUIPNEHT LIST (SSELUP)FUNCT IOH: 01ESEL GENERAT IOM Equipment Class: 17 Train: 1 Equipment ID: I-DHE-150-AB DraMing Number: 1.12001 1-5151A 1-51510 System: DIESEL GEHERATOR COM1'ROL AHD IHSTRlNENTAT ION Equip

Description:

AB EKERG DIESEL GEHERATOR Bui l ding: AUXILIARY Roan: AB EHERG DIESEL GEHERAI'OE ROOM Elevation:'87 Normal state: Desired state: Pouer Required: Sort: lI,R Si~rting System Orauing Number: Recnsired Interconnections and Supporting Conponentsl ty Related Status: E.NUCLEAR SR Min/Dpt: KIM ADDITIOMAL INFORHATIOH alias Number: Prier I'rain: B Conponent Served: AB EKERG DIESEL GEHERATOR Nanufacturerl GENERAL ELECIRIC CO Model: 'Pnneil 1-OGAB 1-OGABX Elcm Orauing: 1-98032 1-98051 1-98052 Uiring Drawing: 1-95301 Paver Source: 1-T11A11 1-T1164 1-TOAD-2 un I Ldoun: F Relay Only: Y Component'Type: ENG.GEN 3500XU,4KV ISO Drauingsl Detailed Location: IN tHE CENTER OF THE ROON

DC Cook Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet1 of4 ID: 1-OME-150-AB (Rev.0)Class: 17.Engine-Generators

==

Description:==

AB EMERG DIESEL GENERATOR Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 687.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG RM, IN THE CENTER OF THE RM Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: GENERAL ELECTRIC CO SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND 1.Elevation where equipment receives seismic input Elevation of seismic input below about 40'rom grade (grade=608.00)3.Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz (est.frequency=20.00)4.Capacity based on: 1.00 Bounding Spectrum Demand based on: 1.00" Design Basis Ground Response Spectrum 687.00 Yes Yes 0.800 G LOG 0.090 0.50 LOG Hz Capacity.....Demand 33.00 Ca aci Demand 1 Demand 2 C:IGIPtGIPLspectra.des C:tGIPLPROJ0031 tspectra.des C:LGIPIPROJ0031tspoctra.des Record Label Boundin Spectrum BUILDING Ground EI.EVATION 608 BROADEN N BUILDING Ground ELEVATION 608 BROADEN N Does capacity exceed demand'CAVEATS-BOUNDING SPECTRUM'G/BS Caveat 1-Earthquake Experience Equipment Class EG/BS Caveat 2-Driver and Driven Component on Rigid Skid.EG/BS Caveat 3-Base Vibration Isolation System Checked.EG/BS Caveat 4-Sufficient Slack and Flexibility of Attached Lines.EG/BS Caveat 5-Adequate Anchorage EG/BS Caveat 6-Potential Chatter of Essential Relays Evaluated.

EG/BS Caveat 7-No Other Concerns.Yes Yes N/A Yes Yes N/A Yes Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum' DC Cook Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)Glp Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet2of4 ID: 1-OME-.150-AB (Rev.0)Class: 17.Engine-Generators

==

Description:==

AB EMERG DIESEL GENERATOR Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG RM, IN THE CENTER OF THE RM Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: GENERAL ELECTRIC CO ANCHORAGE 1.The sizes and locations of anchors have been determined 2.Appropriate equipment characteristics have been determined (mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation).

3.The type of anchorage is covered by the GIP 4.The adequacy of the anchorage installation has been evaluated (weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion anchor tightness, etc.)5.Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety have been considered:

embedment length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength/condition, and concrete cracking.6.For bolted anchorages, any gaps under the base are less than 1/4 7.Factors affecting essential relays have been considered:

gaps under the base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors.8.The base has adequate stiffness and the effect of prying action on anchors has been considered.

9.The strength of the equipment base and the load path to the CG is adequate.10.The adequacy of embedded steel, grout pads or large concrete pads have been evaluated.

11.The anchorage capacity exceeds the demand.Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A Yes Yes Yes Yes Are anchorage requirements met'P INTERACTION EFFECTS 1.Soft targets are free from impact b nearby equipment or structures 2.If the equipment contains sensitive relays, it is free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures.

3.Attached lines have adequate flexibility 4.Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse.5.No other adverse concerns were found.Is equipment free of interaction effects'Yes N/A Yes Yes Yes C L D~Clggg~g SRT: George Gary Thomas (S&A)and Tom Huang (AEP)on 10/16/93.Diesel Generator and driver not on same skid, however large contrete foundations originate from common floor, differential motion not a concern.

DC Cook Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 3 of 4 ID: 1-OME-150-AB (Rev.0)Class: 17.Engine-Generators

==

Description:==

AB EMERG DIESEL GENERATOR Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG RM, IN THE CENTER OF THE RM Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: GENERAL ELECTRIC CO No interations.

See AEP anchorage data for seismic qualification.

Engine anchored by fourteen 2" or larger anchors.Generatoranchoredbyeight1" anchors.Generatorshaftendanchoredbyfour1.75" anchors.the ANCHOR analysis gives a large safety margin (36)as shown by that done for 2-OME-150-CD.

Concern noted with regard to support of air manafold that supports aftercooler.

Aftercooler supported by spring mounted column.This concern was tracked and reconciled with items 1-HE47-ABS 8 ABN.Zap shot Wk.2, Team 2, Disk 2, Picture 20 8 21.Evaluated by: Date: i(-~-

Attachment:

Pictures DC Cook Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 4 of 4 ID: 1-OME-1 50-AB (Rev.0)Class: 17.Engine-Generators

==

Description:==

AB EMERG DIESEL GENERATOR Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: GENERAL ELECTRIC CO Room, Row/Col: AB EDG RM, IN THE CENTER OF THE RM AB Emerg Diesel Generator 1-AB-150-AB AB Emerg Diesel Generator, 1-OME-150-AB AB Emerg.Diesel Generator 1-OME-150-AB AB Emerg.Diesel Generator, 1-OME-150-AB

~>12 CHP 5021~CCD 019 ATTACHMENT NO.1 CT Unzt IZ.-3458-3 Bldg.Instailat on dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch~T'PcF DI~BL EV&INE GeS~ROT OR ROOnA Location r.'&ME.-/50-3 6 Equipment No./r l~z~g~~g 0, INDIANA MICHIG P SITE DESIGN NT L WORKING C Y SEP 2 7$995 EII D LERK/~gap-dv~Ion Vlpw Lmwivs BAs~D rawn by: (Verified by: Q a C rt.Xnspector Date: Date:~-8'Y-~.8 Reviewed by: Date: Construction chor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 3

• 12 CHP 5021.CCD.019 ATTACiQ&NT NO~1 PME'n t l2.-3468-l3 Installat on dwg./Rev.Eh/Q OP C(E.SE.I-G;euERATaR Roof.Bldg-Locatzon y.-awe,-l4o-AE Equipment No.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch COg r't+Cp/3y 9$9 tl Oo Oo s"q F Sf'I'/~g" 5fv'Q 5q~O Qo o PENT MACHlh/E BASF ft msanom~H.GRou T Paw INOIANA MICHIGAN POIVCII SITE DESIGN CONTROLLEO WORKING COPY SEP 27 1995 I Ol G H Qo Qo qual QMCHa R-MUV'" Ra.~SSaa lZ 2.+4"g x)5><"DE, (gEe C'BORE, TyP.(g)PL@5, KT I,J.Z.L A..-<sr<" Loll,-A45%ÃS-kE-ABC+r//To EueZODEO mfa.Drawn by: Verified by.q.ert.Reviewed by: Construe on Date: Date: r-2~-F~Cn'age 1 of 3 Revision.3 Vvu Inspector ('2 chor Review Engineer

• • 12 CHP 5021.CCD.019 ATTACHKENT NO.1 I Equipment No.-Anchor type: re~c r Tightness established by: Torque Mrench No.: Tightness verified?0 Yes Equipment base flexible?0"Snug Fit" Q 8 No ons ruc 0 Yes N No ons DWg NOe'orque Cal.Due Date: Date: 1on ruc 1on ARE Bolt ZD Caps"I/I/CCATS I El 6 D W W&O'omments AIU'T<Ec SEE roc're" Anchor len th protruding len th Embedment 3~" 37>" rk Bolt;ri Concrete condition Edge distance ACC og eh'K1 b LE gq q gg C9,~'II Q~Rt'Xu rr4 6800 T&%DAN>EE~T~<i~" 3" v" Anchor+y~y.Anchor an larit O 0 Thread Fees engagement

~, I~-y'I QQ O 76cE556p ccs58 cc d8 cfcEIch emcee~z Comments: c~tA Verified by:., Cert:.Inspector I Reviewed by: Construct1on I MICHIGAN POWER SITE DESIGN CONTROLLED WORKING COPY SEP 2 7 1995 (tat I~+'AA~vl Date: Date: Paga 2 of Revision 3 S 8 A DEPARTMENT CONTROLLED DOCUMENT COPY NO.3 JOB ORDER NO.: SHP 5050 NDE.008 ATTACHMENT NO.1 ULTRASONIC TEST REPORT REPORT DATE:/d" 3 REQUEST NO.IDENTIFICATION Unit Component-OWN-/&Item AC+o S Material.S.Other TEST DATA REMARKS Test Unit/S/N Freq./Diameter Reference Standard Couplant/Batch No.Vs" Vs" PERFORMED BY: REVIEWED BY: FORM NO.12 SHP 5050 NDE.008-1 I.EVEI: M DATE:/P I EVE I:~DATE: Page 1 of 1 Revision 0 Equip Id: 2-OME-150-CD Train: 2 Equip Class: 17 D~<wing No~: 2-12002,,2-5151C, 2-5151D tion: DIESEL GENERATION System: DXESEL GENERATION, CONTROL&INSTRUMENTATXON Equip Desc: CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR Building: AUXILXARY Room: CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR ROOM Elev: 587'ort: S,R Notes: Normal State: Desired State: 'ower Req'd: Support System Drawing: 2-98033, 2-98051, 2-98052, 2-12002 Req'd Support Comp: Safety Related Status: NUCLEAR SR Min/Opt: MXN Alias No: Power Train: A Comp Served: CD EMERGENCY DXESEL GENERATOR MFR: GENERAL ELECTRXC CO.2 SAs 2 DGCD 2 DGCDX Elem.Drawing: 2-98033, 2-98051, 2-98052 Hiring Drawing: 2-95302 7 Power Source: 2-T21C3, 2-T21D8, 2-TDCD-2 Halkdown: F Relay Eval: Y Comp Type: ENG.GEN-3500KW, 4KV Iso Drawing: Location: XN THE CENTER OF THE ROOM, 10 FEET NORTH OP THE MAXN ENTRANCE DOOR D.C.COOK Unit 2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet1 of14 ID: 2-OME-150-CD (Rev.0)Class: 17.Engine-Generators

==

Description:==

CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR Building: AUXILIARY Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL GEN RM-IN THE CENTER OF THE ROOM, 10 FEET NORTH OF THE MAIN ENTRANCE DOOR SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND 1.Elevation where equipment receives seismic input Elevation of seismic input below about 40'rom grade (grade=608.00)3.Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz (est.frequency=)Capacity based on: 1.00 Bounding Spectrum Demand based on: 1.00*Design Basis Ground Response Spectrum 587.00 Yes SRT 0.800 LOG////r/r~/r 0.090 0.50 LOG Hz Capacity.....Demand 33.00'apacit Demand 1 Demand 2 File C:LGIPtGIPLs ectra.des C:tGIPIPROJ0034ts ectra.des C:tGIPtPROJ0034tspectra.des Record Label Boundin Spectrum BUILDING Ground ELEVATION 608 BROADEN N BUILDING Ground ELEVATION 608 BROADEN N Does capacity exceed demand?

0 0 D.C.COOK Unit 2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 2 of 14 ID: 2-OME-150-CD (Rev.0)Class: 17.Engine-Generators

==

Description:==

CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR Building: AUXILIARY Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL.GEN RM-IN THE CENTER OF THE ROOM, 10 FEET NORTH OF THE MAIN ENTRANCE DOOR CAVEATS-BOUNDING SPECTRUM EG/BS Caveat 1-Earthquake Experience Equipment Class EG/BS Caveat 2-Driver and Driven Component on Rigid Skid EG/BS Caveat 3-Base Vibration Isolation System Checked EG/BS Caveat 4-Sufficient Slack and Flexibili of Attached Lines EG/BS Caveat 5-Adequate Anchorage.

EG/BS Caveat 6-Potential Chatter of Essential Relays Evaluated.

EG/BS Caveat 7-No Other Concerns.Yes Yes N/A Yes Yes NIA Yes Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum'ANCHORAGE 1.The sizes and locations of anchors have been determined 2.Appropriate equipment characteristics have been determined (mass, CG, natural freq., damping, center of rotation).

3.The type of anchorage is covered by the GIP 4.The adequacy of the anchorage installation has been evaluated (weld quality and length, nuts arid washers, expansion anchor tightness, etc.)5.Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety have been considered:

embedment length, anchor spacing, freewdge distance, concrete strength/condition, and concrete cracking.6.For bolted anchorages, any gaps under the base are less than 1/4 7.Factors affecting essential relays have been considered:

gaps under the base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors.8.The base has adequate stiffness and the effect of prying action on anchors has been considered.'.

The strength of the equipment base and the load path to the CG is adequate 10.The adequa of embedded steel, grout pads or large concrete pads have been evaluated.

11.The anchorage capacity exceeds the demand.Are anchorage requirements met?INTERACTION EFFECTS Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A Yes Yes Yes Yes 1.Soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.

2.If the equipment contains sensitive relays, it is free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures.

3.Attached lines have adequate flexibility 4.Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse.5.No other adverse concerns were found.Is equipment free of interaction effects?Yes NIA Yes Yes D.C.COOK Unit 2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 3 of 14 ID: 2-OME-150-CD (Rev.0)Class: 17.Engine-Generators

==

Description:==

CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR Building: AUXILIARY Manufacturer, Model~Etc.: Floor EI.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL GEN RM-IN THE CENTER OF THE ROOM, 10 FEET NORTH OF THE MAIN ENTRANCE DOOR S U SESMC LL D~cbmgp~SRTs are TR Satyan-Sharma, W.Djordjevic, J.Nieto, and R.Steele.-.10/5/93 REF: 1.Anchorage Inspection Data Sheet, Anchorage Arrangement Sketches of generator anchorage, 9/8/93.2.Report on Seismic Analysis of Equipment Supplied by Worthington Compressors Inc.for the D.C.Cook Nuclear Plant, Report EG-37017, 9/20/74-Engine on Foundation calculation.

3..Dwgs 12-3241-12, 12-3468-13.

4.Anchor Bolt Schedule, Dwg 12-3073A-3.

5.General Arrangement Dwg W501812AT.

Anchorage:

See Reference 0 2 for seismic qualification of Engine.Engine is anchored by 14-2" anchors.Generator anchored by 8-1" CIP anchors.An edge distance reduction factor is taken for the 4 inside anchors (they are located approx.3.7" from the pit's edge).Generator shaft end anchored by 4-1.75" CIP anchors (modeled as 1.375" anchors ANCHOR because this is the largest size anchor covered in the GIP).See ANCHOR analysis.Photo: DG21-34&35, 36 and 37 (-34 of bolt,-35 from SW corner,-36 from NW corner, and-37 from NE corner).Evaluated by: Date: 9 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 4 of 14 Class: 17.Engine-Generators ID: 2-OME-150-CD (Rev.0)Description:

CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR Building: AUXILIARY Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Rov//Col: CD EMER DSL GEN RM-IN THE CENTER OF THE ROOM, 10 FEET NORTH OF THE MAIN ENTRANCE DOOR D.C.COOK Unit 2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)PJCT~UQS Figure 2: 2-OME-150-CD (Photo DG21.35)Figure 3: 2-OME-150-CD (Photo DG21.36)Figure 4: 2-OME-150-CD (Photo DG21.37)Figure1: 2-OME-150-CD (Photo DG21.34)

D.C.COOK Unit 2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 5 of 14 ID: 2-OME-150-CD (Rev.0)Class: 17.Engine-Generators

==

Description:==

CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR Building: AUXILIARY Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: ANCHOR Report~Ea t~e Response Spectrum: SSE Frequency:

GIP-Rigid Percent Damping: GIP-5.00 Spectral Values: Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL GEN RM-IN THE CENTER OF THE ROOM, 10 FEET NORTH OF THE MAIN ENTRANCE DOOR Direction.

North-South East-West Vertical Acceleration (g's)0.38 0.38 0.25 Angle (N-S Direction makes with the X Axis): 0.00 Combination Criteria: SRSS Wejg+g'umber of Weights: 1 No Weight 1 10000.00 50.500 85.400 51.250 alee Number of External Forces: 0 Number of External Moments: 0~li wattg~hach@.'umber of Anchor types: 2 Tension Shear D.C.COOK Unit 2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 6 of 14 ID: 2-OME-150-CD (Rev.0)Class: 17.Engine-Generators

==

Description:==

CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR Building: AUXILIARY Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL GEN RM-IN THE CENTER OF THE ROOM, 10 FEET NORTH OF THE MAIN ENTRANCE DOOR Ultimate Ultimate Inter Inter Saf Dia Manufact Product Tension Shear Coeff Coeff Fact 1-3/8 Other Other Cast In Place (A-307)Cast In Place (A-307)26690.00 13350.00 50400.00 25250.00 1.00 1.00 0.30 0.30 1.00 1.00 Ultimate Stress: 3500.00 psi.Reduction Factor: 0.85~WI Allowable Stress: 30600 psi.~ance Number of Surfaces: 2 Surface Orientation No Direction Comp 0.000 0.000 Direction Comp 0.000 0.000 Direction Comp Nz 1.000 1.000 Anchor Pattern for Surface ff.1

D.C.COOK Unit 2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 7 of 14 ID: 2-OME-150-CD (Rev.0)Class: 17.Engine-Generators

==

Description:==

CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR Building: AUXILIARY Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: Floor EI.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL GEN RM-IN THE CENTER OF THE ROOM, 10 FEET NORTH OF THE MAIN ENTRANCE DOOR Anchor Pattern for Surface//2 Legend for Anchor Patterns D.C.COOK Unit 2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 8 of 14 ID: 2-OME-150-CD (Rev.0)Class: 17.Engine-Generators

==

Description:==

CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR Building: AUXILIARY Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL GEN RM-IN THE CENTER OF THE ROOM, 10 FEET NORTH OF THE MAIN ENTRANCE DOOR Anchor Bolts.'oncrete Lines'.Concrete Points.Weld Lines.mmmm geoJHefXK'umber of Anchors: 12 10 12 Anch Id Coord 98.700 93.200 93.200~98.700 2.300 8.060 8.060 2.300 30.750 30.750 70.250 70.250 Coord 76.750 76.750 129.250 129.250 129.250 129.250 76.750 76.750 10.000 22.000 10.000 22.000 Coord 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 8.500 8.500 8.500 8.500 Surf Id ttt of elements per line: 5 Number of Concrete Lines: 4 sta~stan s~art End End End sf Line X-Coord 5.000 96.000 35.500 Y-Coord 39.360 39.360 0.000 Z-Coord 0.000 0.000 8 500 X-Coo rd 5.000 96.000 35 500 Y-Coo rd 131.360 131.360 32.000 Z-Coord id 0.000 1 0.000 1 8.500 2 Width 10.000 10.000 30.000 D.C.COOK Unit 2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 9 of 14 ID: 2-OME-150-CD (Rev.0)Class: 17.Engine-Generators

==

Description:==

CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR Building: AUXILIARY Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL GEN RM-IN THE CENTER OF THE ROOM, 10 FEET NORTH OF THE MAIN ENTRANCE DOOR 4 65.500 0.000 8.500 65.500 32.000 8.500 2 30.000 Number of Concrete Points: 0¹of elements per line: 5 Number of Weld Lines: 0 Dete a'educti F Reduction Factor Input for Anchor¹1 Adequately Installed:

Yes Embedment Length: (61.38 in.Min Reqd.to achieve full capacity):=10.00 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.Edge Distance-Edge 1: 8.75 in.Crack Size: 0.000 in.Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed:

Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor¹2 Adequately Installed:

Yes Embedment Length: (61.38 in.Min Reqd.to achieve full capacity):=10.00 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.Edge Distance-Edge 1: 3.70 in.Crack Size: 0.000 in.Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed:

Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor¹3 Adequately Installed:

Yes Embedment Length: (61.38 in.Min Reqd.to achieve full capacity):=10.00 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.Edge Distance-Edge 1: 3.70 in.Crack Size: 0.000 in.ssential Relays in Cabinet: No D.C.COOK Unit 2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 10 of 14 ID;2-OME-1 50-CD (Rev.0)Class: 17.Engine-Generators

==

Description:==

CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR Building: AUXILIARY Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL GEN RM-IN THE CENTER OF THE ROOM, 10 FEET NORTH OF THE MAIN ENTRANCE DOOR Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed:

Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor¹4 Adequately Installed:

Yes Embedment Length: (61.38 in.Min Reqd.to achieve full capacity):=10.00 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.Edge Distance-Edge1:

8.75in.Crack Size: 0.000 in.Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed:

Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor¹5 Adequately Installed:

Yes Embedment Length: (61.38 in.Min Reqd.to achieve full capacity):=10.00 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.Edge Distance-Edge 1: 8.75 in.Crack Size: 0.000 in.Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes.Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed:

Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor¹6 Adequately Installed:

Yes Embedment Length: (61.38 in.Min Reqd.to achieve full capacity):=10.00 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.Edge Distance-Edge 1: 3.70 in.Crack Size: 0.000 in.Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed:

Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor¹7 Adequately Installed:

Yes Embedment Length: (61.38 in.Min Reqd.to achieve full capacity):=10.00 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.Edge Distance-Edge 1: 3.70 in.Crack Size: 0.000 in.Essential Relays in Cabinet: No dequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes

D.C.COOK Unit 2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 11 of 14 ID: 2-OME-1 50-CD (Rev.0)Class: 17.Engine-Generators

==

Description:==

CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR Building: AUXILIARY Manufacturer, Model, Etc.'.Floor El.: 687.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL GEN RM-IN THE CENTER OF THE ROOM, 10 FEET NORTH OF THE MAIN ENTRANCE DOOR Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed:

Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor¹8 Adequately Installed:

Yes Embedment Length: (61.38 in.Min Reqd.to achieve full capacity):=10.00 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.Edge Distance-Edge 1: 8.75 in.Crack Size: 0.000 in.Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed:

Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor¹9 Adequately Installed:

Yes Embedment Length: (54.50 in.Min Reqd.to achieve full capacity):=13.75 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.(Edge Distance-Edge 1: 8.75 in.Crack Size: 0.000 in.Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed:

Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor¹10 Adequately Installed:

Yes Embedment Length: (54.50 in.Min Reqd.to achieve full capacity):=13.75 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.Edge Distance-Edge 1: 8.76 in.Crack Size: 0.000 in.Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed:

Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor¹11 Adequately Installed:

Yes Embedment Length: (64.50 in.Min Reqd.to achieve full capacity):=13.75 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.Edge Distance-Edge 1: 8.75 in.Crack Size: 0.000 in.Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes=mbedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed:

Yes D.C.COOK Unit 2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 12 of 14 ID: 2-OME-1 50-CD (Rev.0)Class: 17.Engine-Generators

==

Description:==

CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR Building: AUXILIARY Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: Floor EI.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL GEN RM-IN THE CENTER OF THE ROOM, 10 FEET NORTH OF THE MAIN ENTRANCE DOOR Reduction Factor Input for Anchor¹12 Adequately Installed:

Yes Embedment Length: (54.50 in.Min Reqd.to achieve full capacity):=13.75 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.Edge Distance-Edge 1: 8.75 in.Crack Size: 0.000 in.Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed:

Yes Reduction Factors Data Current: Yes No Anc Paii/Vail Paltr/Vallr RT RN RL RG RS RE RF RC RR RP RB RM 7 1 20671.79 13350.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 20671.79 13350.00 1 20907.90 13350.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 20907.90 N/A 1.00 1.00 N/A 1.00 1.00 N/A 1.00 1.00 NIA 1.00 1.00 N/A N/A N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 N/A N/A 1.00 1.00 N/A 1.00 1.00 N/A 1.00 1.00 N/A 1.00 1.00 NIA 1.00 1.00 N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.77 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.77 1.00 0.77 1.00 0.77 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.78 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.78 1.00 0.78 1.00 0.78 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.M 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.M 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 13350.00 2 39829.26 N/A N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.M 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 12 13395.02 2 39829.26 13395.02 2 39829.26 13395.02 2 39829.26 13395.02 NIA 1.00 1.00 N/A 1.00 1.00 N/A 1.00 1.00 NIA 1.00 1.00 NIA 1.00 1.00 NIA 1.00 1.00 N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.53 0.88 0.90 1.00 0.53 0.88 0.90 1.00 0.53 0.88 0.90 1.00 0.53 1.M 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00'i.oo 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 N/A=Not Applicable Pall=Allowable Pull without Reduced Inspection Vali Pallr=Allowable Shear without Reduced Inspection

=Allowable Pull with Reduced Inspection 0

D.C.COOK Unit 2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 13 of 14 ID: 2-OME-1 50-CD (Rev.0)Class: 17.Engine-Generators

==

Description:==

CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR Building: AUXILIARY Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSI GEN RM-IN THE CENTER OF THE ROOM, 10 FEET NORTH OF THE MAIN ENTRANCE DOOR Vallr=Allowable Shear with Reduced Inspection

=Outlier=Reduction Factor Not Used RT=Reduction Factor for Type of Anchorage RN=Reduction Factor for Installation Adequacy RL=Reduction Factor for Embedment RG=Reduction Factor for Gap at Anchors RS=Reduction Factor for Spacing RE=Reduction Factor for Edge Distance=Reduction Factor for Concrete Strength RC=Reduction Factor for Concrete Cracks RR=Reduction Factor for Essential Relays RP=Reduction Factor for Base Stiffness and Prying Action RB=Reduction Factor for Base Strength and Load Path RM=Reduction Factor for Embed.Steel and Pads SI u Analysis Performed:

Yes Type of Analysis: Regular Spectral Accelerations (G's)No 10 12 13 14 15 17 N-S 0.375-0.375-0.375 0.375 0.375-0.375 0.375-0.375 0.150-0.150 0.150-0.150-0.160 0.150 0.150-0.150 0.150 E-W 0.150-0.150 0.150-0.150-0.150 0.150 0.160-0.150 0.375-0.375-0.375 0.375 0.375-0.375 0.375-0.375 0.150 Vertical 0.100-0.100 0.100-0.100 0.100-0.100-0.100 0.100 0.100-0.100 0.100-0.100 0.100-0.100-0.100 0.100 0.250 Safety Factor 49.387 66 437 49.196 66.700 36.848 79.872 80.174 36.703 84.089 84.919 41.166 124.223 84.082 85.264 124.223 41 142 57.447

D.C.COOK Unit 2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 14 of 14 ID: 2-OME-1 50-CD (Rev.0)Class: 17.Engine-Generators

==

Description:==

CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR Building: AUXILIARY Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL GEN RM-IN THE CENTER OF THE ROOM, 10 FEET NORTH OF THE MAIN ENTRANCE DOOR 18 19 20 22 23 24-0.150 0.150-0.150-0.150 0.150 0.150-0.150-0.150 0.150-0.150 0.150-0.150-0.150 0.150-0.250-0.250 0.250 0.250-0.250 0.250-0.250 2091.746 735.385 37.892 57.220 2091.804 38.041 735.242 Minimum Safety Factor: 36.703 The Anchorage Capacity is 36.703 times greater than the Demand REPORT ON SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF EQUIPMENT SUPPLIFD BY WORTffINGTON CohfPRFSSORS INC.FOR TllE D.C.COOK NUCLEAR PLANT or AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICF.CORPORATION REPORT HG-37017, Ldition C September 20, 1974 CC 05A SUMKCT RL oooo Sheet ofSee.'Comment No.DES CRXPTXOH Engine SepecMications Foundation Bolt Specifications

@@gine Flange Specifications Poundation Bolts Operating,-Tension-Rocking, Tightening, Seismic~Stresses 8c F.S.lA,3 Foundation Bolts-Bending Foundation Bolts-Shear S Combined Stresses K F.S.15 P1ange-Bending-Rocking, Torque, Stress&;P.S.Conclusions

su~acr E~~i<<P~~~rzow TYPF~RG No W-$0/B/Zg a~~~J2sr.x a 0 x O Q z x 0 g=44\~p'iv&dpggeV Soar S CZPr)(z~g.r.s~)Ill/SO (ke 44~m.sK-w~ssa)b)C'.k-4s Swuc w ('r~~A~w Jaia)c)Ovr~pci c&nv.-/r J>ocul J)po~g~w~<g=gfdP ('y~~5>~ca.)eg pe.=5z~Cr~+>~w Js-t1>sA)~)louadareu AzT 5rsds(rkE8=+CA kA X~srcw)wr

'(-goaooaHW odour'~She<<t of~Shts./7 a/s~+WCL.5 D3 Li=8.)l,g.L,=6.O iH.L~=6~.0 iN.F<vgb/lTioH UogTS b,: 'l,8I5'4 D.-S.~Pjog.~25 iH~.35'Z.X io'"/L/~EioNP/ToH Lb c-..lo8 s io'H/Lb+(~4is7 N.)(So o'PSib.Ol&y.io'"/gb+(Io 6o>lN)(Polio PSi)42,0 IN ('3.sb7&iu)(s y>oo'si)4,,-4,+6, tK,-golstil<R.

Rargr<oH gpouT Poise.06%iiio" 7 A////4'o//L As%/pccu~n r.'oh'/o (o/g]<I~7 go.v s (g./Cr/t I o//.'/.by, 7 g/o

<.~'~S CAL 8Y E>4<>>~l<FPu<DATiwAf

~g No 4'CIL/ZA~+aucu.I oaovp Sheet M of~Shte.0 C5 z I a F l-(I~4)SK 5'u)c$5.5<8+-W CdiV'f/~==,o=D 7P/0 l.8g'Wi>Ssdrss gp~~PF~ouwmw~+irg:

7(':/gyp'~<')~j~>eA iud+u+swrs>/gvw.worww

/4'~size~~~

/oAyzcwy~c

@/<~dN>~c 7o P~~c" Pw dwy~w gi pg, 4'e Fp)=WP~)H~~=Pc/'file 5 jeers J~~goer=~.-~~ggjjgY, Pve rp kc~rwq i/~

J il g su~m+86/PE ON+@nba/7/PW MRG.No.-E(O 5 A~gp.C-J: i" Qwet of~~%4.x 0 I I<fg~x 0 I C9 z I 0 3 bh C4-Z3(4'7S)/2~<<~zz~4.io c~os~.zs 3 y ro'" Z~e JL DS.S zo/JY-Z Q~io=Z/p, 37 xl0/gaa g.ZD3'0 5 pic'+c Cc h's7 lh'FRzzs uir4 a~~v-y: A'p I~P goLTS 5.@gal x/0//2l9,37>./0 5.p x ro Cd~~A-A s5sw r~" gZSg/o

~)~~~Fk'/r/Pr A fuuPddziu//

~RG No W g OY64~CAL BY oaoue Sheet~of~Shte./E4.4 z.~.Odd&O x O z K 0 4ryz~c A+u~a///ruN; use Lk r HrrupE-Wc~-/ou//ORnu//

ur.rz Ckr XA'c: Jig~~/~~sruti.8)F<ung gwsAwsw S/uWc'HW+i'm/.'zEu=QS7 As, g~s/s azw/rr pu~er/=.04dN'XwC.Pju, g)~s/o 4>~uurb co g.gag, g gpss+=8/parr/rN=.2~75oi.ru~/C+aoe S3~~~zCz.~),=

id<-le~'<.~crs 5)Cl&'rPilA'$5jgp(g-/ZcRc err Po giv4rrru 4/puu cb A/5/pYw B$" J'zi/I,gag/f/P/OD',p (Sl QGES oH SAhl.LEs 7 CR~AS<Cc.7>apJ OF COM HD2 (T u FOUN DA'TI0H 60(1)

++4/A 8'w Fp~A////J/4//'YPF

~Rg.N<>k-S/0'/A/0 CAL BY GROUP X O" X 0 fee CO X 0 e)/w/r~>r/cA~/m tw Aces Pic'o//y//jew///t':

us~~<4/+ed~4zwx~~z~~c~c=4 z.(/Arm gzEuc n//(gc'y/eupcuys-////////<~

Cf~srr~~~r X~/x A.~)2=Aw,A~~Pr~=Z/~/-/Ai////a/o+gw-@os des-Fj.PAP'w.XA c)7~<8+z~~e, A ((zP@)c8 (y.z.)(Z.xx/)gP~00<Q 0 I TYPF CAL SY QiVr,rate-giY tl&h/87iVpl RG N~+-/096//GROUP'"~Sheet of~Shte.!/od 0, 3 Esp 5 9$r 3 f'sl 3z 6/,9 aa~s/7=r~o/7 r fzAnt Ezj'PcPsr SPE<148 ZnP/E+4 6.<+-g~yt/iFzM=9=//l A~/>)-iHC~'>~8 (pg)=~P/g/fg~)=/o 776 6=~/p)/o7766'(, 2)>6,Zog.<j F><iN~rMS=(rcw&oa Cw gers)P~~l~r~(SEJM/L=/8 5/I/'s/4'4arw'Cr Sw/os s'z pdwl~lc" Sea'sue+5)scrag PF 5$FE/Y,+E y/B'av AFF+~<+y-~+J<it'Ides

/8'gvos/Ed

~uAP~rnw Mrs, h PA&i<rivx~c.

+aserrv~swiA g/lg gg Jgr PP gjP gcs8d.cQ P(rrre~r~/aa~iWe,<'gzyp~+r (S~ss.fr~ri~s:

sUMKT+$gp~+oPA84Xi4~TYPE......~RG.

No.~~CAL BY oaove Sheet~of~~Shta.z 0 z 0 Q z K 0 Fi~v~lAloklHirlklopl P4Tc~lAL 5/diiFic~7r~h'f.

CAL BY E8/cpwE'iY fpuHorg/'roAI gg N 5 00009k~GROUP Sheet of~Shh.hde z 0 Iz 0 Q z I 0 W/%dr dF rsrugg-swdN4-/Sw&'riuw gers los jg Pip/Pop'<gr$

d/J'WIC 5W~,=8+/rw 8=~6,+/rrr.8,=<LOr+8 4=,oe9'8=.ot"/(I8IS)

=4'ZZ./+o<P~>)=9!oo+err o~ji+-~~p(~~~)+-/256 rrr TYPF CAL BY Ew&Ne gw Wiu&4PJ~~G.No.CALCU.oaom Sheet of~Shts.lo z 0 X 0 0 x 0/J Y Scdstrtutlug (g/rrro Qi'oiN4 y Sug&8rrn/4 Jlr l OLmcuW4," fur~ag-.pq cx437 GRoUp r z.C't Sheet of J..Shts, gJ Inrccc//ri//r, g~.co://1 P Pc/(x M)$//(w-oL)j p//(x-$)g+C3 X 0 I Q~y/E"/g p~(gg e~~]I+'3/(X~L)Pc(Cy cL)-X 0 0 X 0 8cZcc<rrc/o/,'

SPA///'G Lo//cm'//r lu Lciroiuyg gUgpg ZiVW/A+Pp 845PPA/fdic MG.Ro.~I oooo Sheet~of 7$hh.Date/Z4 s~c 8)/E.~i8i~A4f~gg~r J~i5 CPA~~g~~zcrrum~c

~a~wc g7wru~w+wuzmw WoaWaaWru~

.P" X~ew~r~~~a=(P~)~(+~~c~Pu~Sr7~e+w./or gS/Pd&E/c'>c'clxwzg

~c'cw)=ld/6'(i vJc'Eo.~oog-prpr,z3=zunis-wd@e~WwlcleeAr~Q 5+$/zc c vf

cuuiw~ck X~w8/jail SUEJECT CAL BY f"Shoo'Pi/M caecU.eaoUp Sheet~of Shit.~oo~zi>rgro~//c1ro j/1'>>Saf/rs/o'vd/+pe//48'//n//

4/047.F~B/A~z Nc c Ac uA/pe/o///F////oF/ower.

Pnwr:i+6"/s//~@//82'0/?/PcvYE/Pc g~r/~+cP/7sis/8'o/-/so/ipAe//f P/r///./u Xrt~/auwda/~w Aces go~Wo 5M>M/e 4nwds'.

~~>~E~EIIIrIIIIC.P'OWIII47IoII f'-5-~Do o&PJW RG.No.oaout Sheet of~Shto.//~l~III Moof OF FAllVFE SHcno-ill FouuoArloH Boa rS bul: To Sogt>o/7'Ai s6IRWIC-I.oh,JIHAD, F=(FI~>t.urh CW'h~tg(ZS'O)=FRom P P" I OO'fl L F'g, I c T to H FgloT)~pl~'Io 9ol'L).LE'tI l 9 7Pd W8'/citaly QEscu E:tnt i'd r orred/7i'c h'+YE~A IH 6 88$E rj cf uM Po SHCJ+For2i 85 Tc F4+WSW j7TE8 EO 7M Fpc aOarroN got.rS.3E f oubNA<ro N goer w iriHl.revctoo)jt'.F tom l I9u Wogttt<)Le--o Rove CTtH II.'3IR 6 I-)gQ GEE.T'CS l ToQ.QVG=l%CO-~s<0 Fr-imp Ftt+M bCt the OC+AC NNC LINEA CH15 4 i)l r'Iti'C, (5QP C.=,~b.-(r>-cc)(.tug cb 7p Ooo L6~hQ VIlIl&k.C Mttad;~Q.A~"-LSg tel SHAR<p<=2, 6 ie 7-=-=t<9IY.i-.',G~f>9 III IN 4$40~%%.5ccito 4 n pig Ag~3.16 rt.(5pg~g g:,),Q 76 (ll iver/~r.9V75" t g.76/H cg F.~., (ualaa')..icalo~g p 5-.(6)(lo(o~o) 4 lirl.9-I r ivv<<l l b~F~.(~.~ay)-]999>v1'3

CAL SY EWp/A/E t/+~~~~gQ Sly~6 No-0 Yd<W aaovv....<Sheet~of MZ, Shts.o x O I 0 X O X a/~d~~F Hh~uP<ocul%'/~N E H~~4'J>4 fane i6'.4: 7=.pion~~~FZow~sP~us~fjwcXm&Cw>wg.grf4A'ri l~-HgZ sic 5')Ck.w)(P~~~w)/Fire=gd.7 8A rifpl/i 4 M~8~x 4cdg, c>)f'~~IZocA/A di, (p~)(pic,~iz~~+g

=rs<F~p/w=wg)=(q,>~a):~~)

=see.~V~>;>>/J/<(lib>/)6 l9)pg~~L/If iYPE CAL SY&CIIIO@~yAIDHTi~II

~RG.No.>~~~"~<~L CALCU.c-.j.~GROUP" Shoot of~Shta.X 0 C 4r~/>Cu44 r)//oc44$///op/P~A/Pp//r//c 6/fislc i)~upas gC~qL/W///~ju/a/8'/-QcM+i+//'rc-///II@

Zu~~5'Ad/+~ILo+Fl g/~E+8 g+4P c4'4~~>/II'I/

'C8 0'/IWCy JFx2c sr Pew/'//Ir//II<~o+

rI lp FaW>C///4c FCr~r~rS r-put-g.(gl/IS IJ PVEPII'dII'SFNVllI ILI'P DOC~r//E rp/~ocrIn/'E coI/I/IIJ 4)'gdcrs g~I/I/'I/g$E:(ddiuoI4$

)O~a ef~<rrwq Z, 3+j ZIO~4DZ P Z/.7a e)5plcrf/8cpo/2,~3o Z4 7Z yy=7<, uc//.'L/0 WPI, J'>OC C~/'

SUBJ~ENGINE ON FOUNDATION-TYPF CAL BY G.No.GROUP I Sheet~>of~>She.z 0 CONCLUSIONS<

POUNDATXON BOLT F S~2 4'P>4)j F THXS SAFETY FACTOR IS DUE TO THE PREIOAD ON THE FOUNDATION BOLT AND OCCURS ON THE LOWER PART OF THE 3-PIECE BOLT, FRXCTXON BETWEEN THE ENGINE AND FOUNDATION ALIDW NO SHEAR OR BENDING IN THE BOLTSE SO THE PRETENSIONS BEING CONSIDERABLY GREATER THAN TZNSIXZ IOADS CAUSED BX ENGINE ROCKING, IS THE GOVERNING FACTOR.0v XI ENGINE MOUNTING FLANOES: R.S.-<<.23 (P.Z6)FREQUENCIES:

k A)ENGZNE ROCKZNG: F 3 9:('PS ((')THXB IS VERY CONSERVATIVE BECAUSE XT IS BASED ON FOUNDATXON BOLT EIDNGATION AND THE PKDENSION SHOULD ALMW NONE~B)VERTLCAL-'.~44 CPS cr'p v3 Coo Componene Po.2-086-ISO-~Claia~l Any pazpicular area che Seismic Roviev Team should pay extra actontion cot Yes~No (If yea, check icema that apply.)Anchor Type Anchor Diameter/Anchor Spacing~Anchor Number Anchor Embedment Anchor Edge Distance~Anchor Gap'Anchor Thread Engagement Anchor Grip Anchor Angularity Concrete Crack/wG~A Others (describe briefly)IE chere ia concern.for Design Basis Discrepancy, circle the applicable itom and explain.l.2.3.Hardvare maintenance Type Discrepancy Drawing UpWt~Type Discrepancy Significant Operability/Dosign Basis Discrepancy Others Condition:

k)ORB Actions Taken: Proparad By T.Dato 1-~-'V~

~K A~~r s s~~~~y~0~I P~~~o~~r N I'P e MPWi.I I'L PV~~o s s 0/~y~//~r~0/~i~~4~~

~a~~~I P~~~~P~~8~~~~e~o~P.I e y I~a O~O~O~0>>P~I~I'I~'g o I I~P~I i/if r./r~~~~

<<1Z CHP>Ox l.CCD.O 1 g ATTACHMZHT No.~g No.:/2-Z4C8-l3 Dwg No.:/Z-30T5A,-g 0 Torque Cal.Due Date: Date: ons r c zo Equipment No.: Anchor type: UD A CHEART PF-~~Dia: Tightness established by: 0"Snug Fit Torque Wrench No.: QA Tightness verified?0 Yes 8, No Equipment base flexible?0 Yes 8-No 7 ons uc P YSICAL CHARACT RUSTIC Date: ARE Bolt ZD Gaps Anchor len th/Arpa7 eRMJ 5-Cu'AGL-.-bV S-5" S-4 CE.SS B s-(" H'omments pv A c oPQPc.R.'Dw&.~~+~-"/z-Zo~:A, Protruding len th Embedment/I 5-I/g II 5-I-/Cn 3/l g II S-Ig 6-ling g-2.13 ll/II I~l I 3 ll S-I~(5-l~S-lg, Bolt ri Concrete condition Edge distance ll Z zg V'~e" I'll Z~/b 5"/&I/2/)(ly/I I(.2/&gk CK Anchor s acin~Il 5 cg p/I 5~II S-B/3" Z'~/3 II gll S~~S~Anchor an larit Thread engagement Ol(old oh OK 0" 0V oK.Comments: W A C.AC.Q H F:C.OOR C AT'I&6-WA A,.H RS PRF-SP.=&~, Verified by: Qual./Cert.Xnspector I Reviewed by: T Construction INDIANA ESIGN CONTROLLCD WORKING COPY SEP 08 1998 Date: Date: I->-J~I.CRK~'~~age 2 of 3 gvi<IoA

~/

S 8 A DEt'ARTMEt'GHTROLLED Du CUt4tNT COPY NO.12 SHP 5050 NDE-008 ATTACHMENT NO-1 ULTRASONIC TEST REPORT JOB ORDER NO~: REPORT DATE: REQUEST NO.(Q)Q IDENTIFICATION Unit Component-pr E,.0-C Item Material C.&Other TECHNI UE Test Unit/S/N k.Freq./Diameter Reference Standard Couplant/Batch No.S S TEST DATA REMARKS c-S-Qvc~I'/z PERFORMED BY: REVIEWED BY: (FORM NO.12 SHP 5050 NDE.008-1 LEVEL:~DATE: Page 1 of 1 Revision 1 Uatabase: K: SSEL2C.DBF Equip Xd: 2-All Train: NA Equip Class: 20 Drawing No.: NONE~~~nction: System: EQUIPMENT CONTROL AND XNDXCATXON STATXONS Equip Desc: AUXXLIARY RELAY PANEL All Building: AUXXLIARY Room: CONTROL ROOM Elev: 633 Sort: S, Notes: Normal State: Desired State: Power Req'd: Support System Drawing: Req'd Support Comp: Safety Related Status: NUCLEAR SR Min/Opt: MIN Alias No: Comp Served: MFR Power Train: Model: Elem.Drawing: Wiring Drawing: 2-92071 Power Source: Walkdown: F Relay,Eval:

N Comp Type: INSTRUMENT/RELAY RACK Xso Drawing: Location: XN THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE ROOM 0 T D.C.Cook Unit 2 Screening Evaluation Worksheet (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes'Sheet 1 of 8 ID: 2-A11 Rev.0 Descri tion: AUXILIARY RELAY PANEL A11 Class: 20.Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Building: AUXILIARY Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: Floor El.: 633.00 Room, Row/Col:.CONTROL ROOM-IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE ROOM SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND Elevation where e ui ment receives seismic in ut Elevation of seismic in ut below about 40'rom rade rade=608.00 E ui menthasfundamental fre uenc above about8Hz est.fre uenc=11.00 Ca acit based on: 1.00'Boundin S eclrum Demand based on: 1.00*Desi n Basis Ground Res onse S ectrum 633.00 Yes Yes 0.850 LIN 0.000 1.00 LOG Hz Capacity.....Demand 33.00 Ca ac'emand 1 Demand 2 File H:tGIPLGIPts ectra.des H:$GIPIPROJ0059ts tra.des H:LGIPIPROJ0059ts tra.des Record Label Boundin S trum BUILDING Grounds ectrum ELEVATION BROADEN BUILDING Ground S ectrum ELEVATION BROADEN Does capacity exceed demand?Yes

D.G.Gook Unit 2 Screening Evaluation Worksheet (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 2 of 8 ID: 2-A11 Rev.0 Descri tion: AUXILIARY RELAY PANEL A11 Class: 20.Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Building: AUXILIARY Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: Floor El.: 633.00 Room, Row/Col: CONTROL ROOM-IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE ROOM CAVEATS-BOUNDING SPECTRUM l&C/BS Caveat 1-Earth uake Ex erience E ui ment Class l&C/BS Caveat 2-Com uters and Pro rammable Controllers Evaluated Se aratel l&C/BS Caveat 3-Stri Chart Recorders Evaluated.

l8 C/BS Caveat 4-Structural Ade uate.l&C/BS Caveat 5-Ad acent Cabinets or Panels Bolted To ether I8,C/BS Caveat 6-Drawers or E ui ment on Slides Restrained 18C/BS Caveat 7-Doors Secured.l&C/BS Caveat 8-Sufficient Slack and Flexibilit of Attached Lines.l8 C/BS Caveat 9-Ade uate Anchora e.l8C/BS Caveat 10-Potential Chatter of Essential Rela s Evaluated.

I&C/BS Caveat 11-No Other Concerns.Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum'Yes N/A N/A Yes Yes N/A Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes ANCHORAGE 1.The sizes and locations of anchors have been determined 2.Appropriate equipment characteristics have been determined (mass, CG, natural freq., dam in~center of rotation.3.The t e of anchora e is covered b the GIP 4.The adequacy of the anchorage installation has been evaluated (weld quality and length, nuts and washers, ex ansion anchor ti htness, etc.5.Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety have been considered:

embedment length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength/condition,-and concrete crackin.6.For bolted anchora es, an a s under the base are less than 1/4 7.Factors affecting essential relays have been considered:

gaps under the base, capacity reduction for ex ansion anchors.8.The base has adequate stiffness and the effect of prying action on anchors has been considered.

9.Thestren thofthee ui mentbaseandtheload athtotheCGisade uate.10.The ade uac of embedded steel, rout ads or lar e concrete ads have been evaluated.

11.The anchora e ca acit exceeds the demand.Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Are anchorage requirements met?INTERACTION EFFECTS 1.Soft ta etsare free fromim act b nearb e ui mentorstructures 2.If the equipment contains sensitive relays, it is free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures.

3.Attached lines have ade uate flexibilit 4.Overhead e ui ment or distribution s stems are not likel to colla se.5.No other adverse concerns were found.ls equipment free of interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes D.C.Cook Unit 2 Screening Evaluation Worksheet (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 3 of 8 ID: 2-A11 Rev.0 Descri tion: AUXILIARY RELAY PANEL A11 Class: 20.Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Building: AUXILIARY Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: Floor El.: 633.00 Room, Row/Col: CONTROL ROOM-IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE ROOM IS EQUIPMENT SEISMICALLY ADEQUATE?Yes COMMENTS Date: 11/1/93 SRT: Satyan Sharma (AEP), Paul Krugh (AEP), Steve Anagnostis (S&A), Randy Steele (AEP-Relay Engineer)

References:

1.Anchorage Package 2.AEPSC USI A-46 Project Report No MT2, Rev 0,"Summary Report of Fundamental Frequencies Determined by ln-Situ Transfer Function Modal Testing at Cook Nuclear Plant", Aug 1994.3.Drawing No 12-3388-3 A11-15 form an 10"-2" long x 8'all x 2'eep control panel.The panel is constructed of welded steel plate, angles, and channels.The panel is welded along the front to embedded steel at 4 points, and along the back at two points.A11 and A13 contain essential relays.Based on modal test data of similar panels in the control room (Ref 2)~the SRT estimates the lower bound fundamental frequency at 11 Hz.The overhead control room ceiling and raceways have been evaluated as part of the raceway walkdown and judged acceptable

-see the control room PASS form for details.There is a door at the far end of the A6-A15 bank that is commonly left open.The door could, strike the panel, but the SRT judges the impact is far enough away from the essential relays not to be significant.

There is a ladder secured against the wall in front of the panel-it is secured so it will not strike the panel-judged acceptable.

There is a fire extinguisher hung on the end of A6 that wilt bang against the cabinet.The SRT judges that it will not affect the essential relays in A11 and A13.Anchorage:

1.The anchorage package shows details for 1 of the four front edge weldments-the others are similar.2.The back edge weldments were not detailed-the SRT added these details to the anchorage package.3.The SRT conservatively estimates the weight at 300 Ibs/lineal foot.4.The strength of the weldments is equivalent to at least a 1.5" x 1/8" fillet weld (4 kips per GIP Table C.6-1).The embedded steel is a 5/16" steel plate anchored with a 1/2" x 4" Nelson stud every 12" (4.4 kips per GIP Table C.3-1 including a.65 knockdown for embedment length).The weldment controls.The attached ANCHOR analysis shows a margin of 3.3.

D.C.Cook Unit 2 Screening Evaluation Worksheet (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 4 of 8 ID: 2-A11 Rev.0 Descri tion: AUXILIARY RELAY PANEL A11 Room, Row/Col: CONTROL ROOM-IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE ROOM Floor El.: 633.00 Building: AUXILIARY Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: Class: 20.Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Evaluated by: Date:

Attachment:

ANCHOR Report

D.C.Cook Unit 2 Screening Evaluation Worksheet (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 5 of 8 ID: 2-A11 Rev.0 Descri tion: AUXILIARY RELAY PANEL A11 Class: 20.Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Building: AUXILIARY Manufacturer, Model, Etc ANCHOR Report Floor El.: 633.00 Room, Row/Col: CONTROL ROOM-IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE ROOM Response Spectrum: Instructure Realistic Frequency:

User-11.00 Percent Damping: User-5.00 S ectral Values: Direction Acceleration

's North-South 0.314 East-West Vertical 0.314 0.183 Angle (N-S Direction makes with the X Axis): 0.00 Combination Criteria: SRSS~eicehts: Number of Weights: 1 No Wei ht 1 3000.00 60.000 0.000 50.000 Forces: Number of External Forces: 0 Moments: Number of External Moments: 0 Allowables:

Anchor: Number of Anchor types: 1 Tension Shear Dia Manufact Product Ultimate Tension Ultimate Shear Inter Coeff Inter Saf Coeff Fact 3/8 Hilti Kwik-Bolt N 1460.00 1420.00 1.00 0.30 1.00 Concrete: Ultimate Stress: 3500.00 psi.Reduction Factor: 0.85 Weld: Allowable Stress: 30600 psi.

D.C.Cook Unit 2 Screening Evaluation Worksheet (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 6 of 8 ID:2-A11 Rev.0 Descri tion: AUXILIARY RELAY PANEL A11 Class: 20.Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Building: AUXILIARY Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: Floor El.: 633.00 Room, Row/Col: CONTROL ROOM-IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE ROOM Surfaces: Number of Surfaces: 1 Surface Orientation Direction Com No 0.000 Direction Com 0.000 Direction Com 1.000 Anchor Pattern for Surface¹1gY Legend for Anchor Patterns Anchor Bolts: Concrete Vines:~Ppgy(Peg!P Concrete Points:~5m+Weio uncs:~5~5~Geomer Anchor: Number of Anchors: 0 Concrete Lines:¹of elements per line: 1

D.C.Cook Unit 2 Screening Evaluation Worksheet (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 7 of 8 ID: 2-A11 Rev.0 Descri lion: AUXILIARY RELAY PANEL A11 Class: 20.Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Building: AUXILIARY Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: Floor El.: 633.00 Room, Row/Col: CONTROL ROOM-IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE ROOM Number of Concrete Lines: 0 Concrete Points: Number of Concrete Points: 6 No Coord 19.000 47.000 75.000 103.000 2.000 118.000 Y Coord 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.00Q 22.000 22.000 Coord 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Surf Id Conc-Pt Area 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 9.000 Weld Lines:¹of elements per line: 1 Number of Weld Lines: 6 No Start X-Coo rd 19.000 47.000 75.000 103.000 2.000 118.000 Start Y-Coord 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 22.000 22.000 Staa Z-Coord 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 X-Coord 20.500 48.500 76.500 104.500 3.500 119.500 End Y-Coord 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 22.000 22.000 Z-Coo rd 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 St Id Line Width 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125 Determination of Reduction Factors: Reduction Factors Data Current: Yes Anal sis Results: Analysis Performed:

Yes T eofAnal sis:Re ular S ectral Accelerations G's No N-S 0.314-0.314-Q.314 0.314 0.314-0.314 E-W 0.125-0.125 0.125-0.125-0.125 0.125 Vertical 0.073-0.073 0.073-0.073 0.073-0.073 Safet Factor 13.973 8.111 13.973 8.111 8.500 18.535-0.314-0.125 0.073'8.500 7 0.314 0.125-0.073 18.535 0

D.C.Cook Unit 2 Screening Evaluation Worksheet (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 8 of 8 IO: 2-A11 Rev.0 Descri tion: AUXILIARY RELAY PANEL A11 Class: 20.Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Building: AUXILIARY Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: Floor EI.: 633.00 Room, Row/Col: CONTROL ROOM-IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE ROOM 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 0.125-0.125 0.125-0.125-0.125 0.125 0.125-0.125 0.125-0.125 0.125-0.125-0.125 0.125 0.125-0.125 0.314-0.314-0.314 0.314 0.314-0.314 0.314-0.314 0.125-0.125 0.125-0.125 0.125-0.125-0.125 0.125 0.073-0.073 0.073-0.073 0.073-0.073-0.073 0.073 0.183-0.183-0.183 0.183 0.183-0.183 0.183-0.183 7.505 3.290 3.352 8.921 7.505 3.290 8.921 3.352 12.626 7.842 37.028 8.816 12.626 7.842 8.816 36.553 Minimum Safety Factor: 3.290 The anchorage can withstand 3.290 times greater seismic demand I**12 CHP 502 1.CCD.019 ATTACHMENT NO.1 Unzt z-maw'-o CT 0 Bldg-Mop<H E+SI-coR+FR, O(=l HE'ROOM Location Installation dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch Equipment No.AVx, Pa.LA,Y PAMC-LS A-II T'HRL(A-IS I'BR DMS I, 2,-Zg'I'F-lo 2-SS'<0-0?-C4 4<A-I g~2."ZZ'46-I~lg/o-?p A-IS Q-0 IHOIAHA t(IICHICAH POW-A SITE OESIGH COHTAOLLEO WOAKIHG COPV SEP 21 1995 SEC DE,r4.I L I'(z, g I'!'a x S 4 SH(n ELev.VIEw LYG-, EAST'LEAK+Drawn by: Verified by: Date:/Date: ga.g9 Qual./Cert.inspector Reviewed by: F Date: Construction Anch r Review Engineer-2-I-t3 page 1 of 3 Revision.3

~fq

• • 12 CHP 5021 CCD p19 ATTACHMENT NO.NS CT 0 T V Bldg.yCR+E4gl COB.IVI=-R 3F T F.~WH Location Installation dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch Ecgxzpment No.E~A)~~~i t.A'(g~~I~~'9v D~CD"S~~~~V~/tb 1~gltVC~'SK4<~I~~V9 r I'Lk~~~VS I os~~S>D e')~/I II I lg~II (6~~28~28'Z8~IB~Q I I~I 28 2B ZB ZB'Ie ZE:E: DF-1 AIL I CTI"A A'A..'NOIAtIA MICklGAt(POWER SITE OESIGN Cott TAOLLEO WORKING COP'f SEP 2i>99<5t~o (I.~~A=jhrPCCF S5]BLK LEAK T Drawn by: Verified by-Date: Date:/y 3 Qual./Cert.Inspector Reviewed by: Date: Construction Anc or Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision

""~4<Ha'021.CCD oa9 ATTACHMENT NO.a Equipment No.: Embedded Steel Dwg.No.: CHOR INS CTIO H S ICAL CHARACTERIS C.: 2~22 eV-Weld ID T e Size Len th Cracks WJ WZ I I y//g I/0 W3 W<WS I TAcK.I/II'3/'l W7'z" Y No Weld e Codes 1=Fillet 2=Plug/Slot 3 Groove Lack of Penetration Porosity o o o 0 Ye No Yes No W I IS WELD Pb oN 1=OUR S(DE.S, W Q Y8" L/hrQE.R CV1 W 3+8 ClhJC)BQCL/

7 W 4./4 LrNDCR Cu T'/4.UIVO E:P, CU t.4v Cg/4 UMDL=RCV T'8/4 UADER cvT II 3 Ia 8 I2 Q HOLW WIt-H WASHSR5 RMBE.@DE 0~C I 4l X 3 X~PING LI:-3 HAGI, 0 a WI SEc.TIo~e E'aYAIL-I S E.c-~101 C C.Equipment base flexible: Cl Yes E No ons ruc son re Reviewed by: Verified by: ua.er.npsec or Irrl)IANA FiIICHIGAN PO'V/FTI SITE OCSIOrr Cotr TIIOLLt.o V/OII~Ir G COI V SEP 2 l 1993 ons ruc son c or evzew ngzneer Date: Date: 5+page 3 of Revision

ATTACHMENT 3 TO AEP:NRC:1040E SAMPLE SEWS, ANCHORAGE CALCULATIONS, AND ANCHORAGE INSPECTION DOCUMENTATION FOR TANKS Ec HEAT EXCHANGERS EVALUATED FOR USI A-46 THAT ARE NOT COVERED BY THE PROCEDURES IN SECTION 7 OF THE GIP RAI ITEM 5 This attachment includes sample SEWS, anchorage calculations and anchorage inspection documentation for a cross section of class 0 and 21 tanks and heat exchangers that are not covered by the procedures in Section 7 of the GIP.The samples selected are designated with an*in Table 2 and 3 of this RAI.The following examples are included: lass 21 1-T-113-AB1 1-HE-13 21 21 21 1--34-1-'I'K-11 1-'1 K-37 21 21 21 2--11 2--3 2--134-D Equip ID: 1-QT-113.-AB1

" wing No.: 1-5151Ation: EMERG DXESEL Train: 1 Equip Class:0 System: DIESEL LUBE OXL Equip Desc: AB EMERG DIESEL PULL PLOW LUBE OIL STRAINER 1 Building: AUXILIARY Room: AB EMERG DXESEL LUBE OXL PXT Elev: 579 Sort: S, Notes: Normal State: Desired State: Power Req'd: N Support System Drawing: Req'd Support Comp: Safety Related Status: NUCLEAR SR Min/Opt: MIN Alias No: Power Train: NA Comp Served: LUBE OXL STRAXNER 1 MPR: NUGENT 1'1554-4L3B P l Elem.Drawing: N/A Wiring Drawing: N/A Power Source: N/A Walkdown: A Relay Eval;Comp Type: STRAINER Xso Drawing: Location:

DC Cook Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet1 of11 ID;,1-QT-113-AB1 (Rev.0)Class: 0.Other Descnption:

AB EMERG DIESEL FULL FLOW LUBE OIL STRAINER 1 Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 579.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG LUBE OIL PIT, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: NUGENT 1554PL3B SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND 1.Elevation where equipment receives seismic input Elevation of seismic input below about 40'rom grade (grade=608.00)Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz (est.frequency=8.00)Capacity based on: Judgment 5.Demand based on: 1.00'ealistic Mean-Centered Floor Response Spectra 587.00 N/A N/A Ca acit Demand 1 Demand 2 File C:LGIPtPROJ0031tspectra.des C:<GIPIPROJ0031'Lspectra.des Record BUILDING uxilia ELEVATION 587 BROADEN N BUILDING uxilia ELEVATION 5S7 BROADEN N Does capacity exceed demand'ANCHORAGE 2.Appropriate equipment characteristics have been determined (mass, CG, natural fretful., damping, center of rotation).

3.Thh pe of anchorage is coveredb the GIP.4.The adequacy of the anchorage installation has been evaluated (weld quality and length, nuts and washers, expansion anchor tightness, etc.)5.Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety have been considered:

embedment length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength/condition, and concrete cracking.6.For bolted anchorages, any gaps under the base are less than 1/4.7.Factors affecting essential relays have been considered:

gaps under the base, capacity reduction for expansion anchors.8.The base has adequate stiffness and the effect of prying action on anchors has been considered.

9.The strength of the equipment base and the load path to the CG is adequate.10.The adequac of embedded steel, grout pads or large concrete pads have been evaluated.

11.The anchorage capacity exceeds the demand.Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A Yes Yes Yes Yes Are anchorage requirements met?

DC Cook Unit1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)~GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 2 of 11 ID: 1-QT-113-AB1 (Rev.0)Class: 0.Other

Description:

AB EMERG DIESEL FULL FLOW LUBE OIL STRAINER 1 Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 579.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG LUBE OIL PIT.Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: NUGENT 1554PL3B INTERACTION EFFECTS 1.Soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures 2.If the equipment contains sensitive relays, it is free from all impact by nearby equipment or structures.

3.Attached lines have adequate flexibili.4.Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse.5.No other adverse conce'ms were found.Yes N/A Yes Yes Yes Is equipment free of interaction effects'SRT: Tom Huang (AEP)and George Gary Thomas (S&A)on 10/6/93 REF: 1.Anchor Inspection Data Sheets: Anchorage Arrangement Sketches and Physical Characteristics Data Sheet, Certified 6//6/92 for both 1-QT-113-AB1 and 1-QT-113-AB2.

2.Dwg 0 10-089 3.Worthington Co.Full Flow Oil Lube Strainer Calculation, 8/26/74.MFG: NUGENT, WM W8Co-1554M-L3B-DN-100 Seismic Capacity vs Demand: The Bounding Spectrum does not apply for Class 0 items.This component is seismically rugged based on SRTIudgement and inspection, and anchor analysis.Anchorage:

Supported on 4 angle legs.Each leg is anchored by one 1/2" J bolt anchor.The ANCHOR analysis was performed for 1-QT-113-AB1 and 1-QT-113-AB2 together, since they are connected by a relatively rigid piping segment.Frequency was judged to be greater than 8 Hz.The total weight is 17305, with the CG located at an approx.mid-height

=33" (Ref.2).The minimum embedment of the 1/2" J-bolts for 1-QT-113-AB1 and'1-QT-113-AB2 is 9.125" and was used for the embedment reduction factor for the J-bo!ts.T he SRT also judged the bolts may be subject to prying.therefore a very conservative.5 reduction factor was applied for prying.ANCHOR analysis includes nozzle loads as specified in Ref.3, Sheet 15.Conservatively assume that the inlet and outlet nozzle loads are distributed between the two strainers, 1-QT-113-AB1 and AB2, because of the way they are joined (see Ref.2).Therefore the nozzle loads modeled in the ANCHOR analysis are the absolute values of DC Cook Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUA'TION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 3 of 11 ID: 1-QT-113-AB1 (Rev.0)Class: 0.Other

Description:

AB EMERG DIESEL FULL FLOW LUBE OIL STRAINER 1 Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 579.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG LUBE OIL PIT, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: NUGENT 1554AL3B the larger of the two loads specified in Ref.3, Sheet 15.The way the loads are defined in Ref.3," they correspond to the x,y,z coordinate system as follows: c=x, a=y, and b=z.The ANCHOR analysis even with the highest nozzle loads and anchorage reduction factors, shows a high margin of safety (2.5).Zap Shot, Wk1, Tm 2, Disk 1, Picture 45 Evaluated by: Date:

Attachment:

Pictures

Attachment:

ANCHOR Report 0

DC Cook Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 4 of 11 ID: 1-QT-113-AB1 (Rev.0)Class: 0.Other

Description:

AB EMERG DIESEL FULL FLOW LUBE OIL STRAINER 1 Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 579.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EOG LUBE OIL PIT, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: NUGENT 1554<L3B P~CI BKR AB Emerg Diesel Full Flow Lube Oll Strainer 1, 1-QT-113-ABI DC Cook Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 5 of 11 ID: 1-QT-113-AB1 (Rev.0)Class: 0.Other

Description:

AB EMERG DIESEL FULL FLOW LUBE OIL STRAINER 1 Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 579.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG LUBE OIL PIT, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: NUGENT 1554-4L3B ANCHOR Report gy~gi~g'esponse Spectrum: Instructure Realistic Frequency:

User-8.00 Percent Damping: User-5.00 Spectral Values: Direction North-South East-West Vertical Acceleration (g's)0.32 0.32 0.17 Angle (N-S Direction makes with the X Axis): 0.00 Combination Criteria: SRSS Nciahtm Number of Weights: 2 No Weight 1730.00 1730.00 22.875-22.875 0.000 1.000 33.000 33.000 EQKQR Number of External Forces: 2 No Fx Fy Fz 1.23E+002 3.31E+002 1.23E+002 7.03E+002 4.02E+002 6.24E+002 0.000 0.000 12.000-12.000 24.000 24.000%@arnis'umber of External Moments: 2 Mx 1 8.64E+003-1.86E+004 2 3.98E+003-8.52E+002 6.86E+003 2.54E+003 hlhMrat~haabuc'umber of Anchor types: 1 DC Cook Unit 1 SCREENING EYALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GlP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 6 of 11 ID: 1-QT-113-AB1 (Rev, 0)Class: 0.Other

Description:

AB EMERG DIESEL FULL FLONl LUBE OIL STRAINER 1 Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 579.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG LUBE OIL PIT, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: NUGENT 1554<L3B Ultimate Ultimate Tension Inter Shear Inter Saf No.Dia 1 1/2 Manufact Other Product J-Bolt (90 deg)Coeff Shear Tension 6660.00 3330.00 1.00 Coeff Fact 0.30 1.00 Qaac&c'ltimate Stress: 3500.00 psi.Reduction Factor: 0.85~i Allowable Stress: 30600 psi.Qi~g~Number of Surfaces: 1 Surface Orientation Direction Comp Nx 0.000 Direction Comp Ny 0.000 Direction Comp 1.000 Anchor Pattern for Surface¹1 Legend for Anchor Patterns DC Cook Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 7 of 11 ID: 1-QT-113-AB1 (Rev.0)Class: 0.Other

Description:

AB EMERG DIESEL FULL FLOW LUBE OIL STRAINER 1 Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 579.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG LUBE OiL PIT, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: NUGENT 1554-4L3B Anchor Bolts: mmmm Concrete Lines:~mt//+Concrete Points.'eld Lines.'ux;hrzhac.'umber of Anchors: 8 No Anch Id Coord-30.719-16.531-30.719-16.531 30.719 16.531 30.719 16.531 Coord-7.260-7.250 7.250 7.250-7.250-7.250 7.250 7.250 Coord 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Surf Id 0 of elements per line: 4 Number of Concrete Lines: 0 Number of Concrete Points: 8 No Coord-30.719-16.531-30.719-16.531 30.719 16.531 30.719 16.531 Coord-7.250-7.250 7.250 7.250-7.250-7.250 7.250 7.260 Coord 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Surf Id Conc-Pt Area 4.000 4.000 4.000 4.000 4.000 4.000 4.000 4.000 DC Cook Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEvVS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 8 of 11 ID: 1-QT-113-AB1 (Rev.0)Class: 0.Other

Description:

AB EMERG DIESEL FULL FLOW LUBE OIL STRAINER 1 Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 579.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG LUBE OIL PIT, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: NUGENT 1554AL3B EcldJ.iaaf

'of elements per line: 4 Number of Weld Lines: 0 Reduction Factor Input for Anchor 0 1 Adequately Installed:

Yes Embedment Length: (27.25 in.Min Reqd.to achieve full capacity):=

9.13 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.Edge Distance-Edge 1: 4.38 in.Crack Size: 0.000 in.-Cracks traverses thru Installation Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed:

Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor 0 2 Adequately Installed:

Yes Embedment I.ength: (27.25 in.Min Reqd.to achieve full capacity):=

9.13 in.Gap at Three'ded Anchor: 0.00 in.: Edge Distance-Edge 1: 4.38 in.Crack Size: 0.000 in.-Cracks traverses thru Installation Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed:

Yes Reduction Factor Input for..ichor 0 3 Adequately In" tailed: Yes Embedment Length: (27.25 in.Min Reqd.to achieve full capacity):=

9.13 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.Edge Distance-Edge 1: 4.38 in.Crack Size: 0.000 in.-Cracks traverses thru Installation Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed:

Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor 0 4 Adequately Installed:

Yes Embedment Length: (27.25 in.Min Reqd.to achieve full capacity):=

9.13 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.Edge Distance-Edge 1: 4.38 in.Crack Size: 0.000 in.-Cracks traverses thru Installation Essential Relays in Cabinet: No DC Cook Unit1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 9 of 11 ID: 1-QT-113-AB1 (Rev.0)Class: 0.Other

Description:

AB EMERG DIESEL FULL FLOW LUBE OIL STRAINER 1 Building: AUXILIARY Floor EI.: 579.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG LUBE OIL PIT, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: NUGENT 15544L3B Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed:

Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor¹5 Adequately Installed:

Yes Embedment Length: (27.25 in.Min Reqd.to achieve full capacity):=

9.13 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.Edge Distance-Edge 1: 4.38 in.Crack Size: 0.000 in.-Cracks traverses thru Installation Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed:

Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor¹6 Adequately Installed:

Yes'mbedment Length: (27.25 in.Min Reqd.to achieve full capacity):=

9.13 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.Edge Distance-Edge 1: 4.38 in.Crack Size: 0.000 in.-Cracks traverses thru Installation Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed:

Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor¹7 Adequately Installed:

Yes Embedment Length: (27.25 in.Min Reqd.to achieve full capacity):=

9.13 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.Edge Distance-Edge 1: 4.38 in.Crack Size: 0.000 in.-Cracks traverses thru Installation Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed:

Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor¹8 Adequately Installed:

Yes Embedment Length: (27.25 in.Min Reqd.to achieve full capacity):=

9.13 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.Edge Distance-Edge 1: 4.38 in.Crack Size: 0.000 in.-Cracks traverses thru Installation Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed:

Yes DC Cook Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 10 of 11 ID: 1-QT-113-AB1 (Rev.0)Class: 0.Other

Description:

AB EMERG DIESEL FULL FLOW LUBE OIL STRAINEP.1 Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 579.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG LUBE OIL PIT, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: NUGENT 1554-4L3B Reduction Factors Data Current: Yes Anc No ld 1 1 2 1 Pall/VaIl 1398.60 3330.00 1398.60 3330.00 Pallr/Vallr N/A N/A N/A N/A RT 1.00 1.00 1.00 RN RL 1.00 0.42 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.42 1.00 1.00 RG RS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 RE RF RC 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 RR RP RB 1.00 0.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 RM 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3 1 4 1 1398.60 N/A 3330.00 N/A 1398.60 N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.42 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.42 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.M 1.00 0.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 3330.00 NIA 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 1 6 1 1398.60 N/A 3330.00 N/A 1398.60 N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.42 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.42 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 1.00 1.0Q 1.0Q 1.00 1.00 0.50 1.00 1.00 1.QO 1.00 3330.00 N/A 1.QO 1.00 1.00 1.QO 1.00 1.QO 1.QO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 1 8 1 3330.00 1398.60 N/A N/A 1398.60 N/A 1.00 1.QO 1.00 1.00 0.42"s.00 1.00 1.00 0.42 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.GO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.M 0.50 1.'00 1.00 1.00 3330.00 NIA 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.M 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 N/A all=Not Applicable

-Allowabi Pull without Reduced Inspection Vail=Allowable Shear without Reduced Inspection Pallr=Allowable Pull with Reduced Inspection Vallr=Allowable Shear with Reduced Inspection

=Outlier=Reduction Factor Not Used RT=Reduction Factor for Type of Anchorage RN=Reduction Factor for In tallation Adequacy RL=Reduction Factor for Embedment RG=Reduction Factor for Gap at Anchors RS=Reduction Factor for Spacing RE=Reduction Factor for Edge Distance RF=Reduction Factor for Concrete Strength RC=Reduction Factor for Concrete Cracks RR=Reduction Factor for Essential Relays RP=Reduction Factor for Base Stiffness and Prying Action RB=Reduction Factor for Base Strength and Load Path RM=Reduction Factor for Embed.Steel and Pads Analysis Performed:

Yes ype of Analysis: Regular I A elerations (G's)

DC Cook Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUAl ION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet11 of11 ID: 1-QT-113-AB1 (Rev.0)Class: 0.Other

Description:

AB EMERG DIESEL FULL FLOW LUBE OIL STRAINER 1 Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 579.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG I.UBE OIL PIT, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: NUGENT 1554-4L3B No 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 20 21 22 23 N-S 0.325-0.325-0.325 0.325 0.325-0.325 0.325-0.325 0.130-0.130 0.130-0.130-0.130 0.130 0.130-0,130 0.130-0.130.130-0.130-0.130 0.130 0.130-0.130 E-W 0.130-0.130 0.130-0.130-0.130 0.130 0.130-0.130 0.325-0.325-0.325 0.325 0.325-0.325 0.325-0.325 0.130-0.130 0.130-0.130 0.130-0.130-0.130 0.130 Vertical 0.067-0.067 0.067-0.067 0.067-0.067-0.067 0.067 0.067-0.067 0.067-0.067 0.067-0.067-0.067 0.067 0.167-0.167-0.167 0.167 0.167-0.167 0.167-0.167 Safety Factor 5.843 7.456 5.843 7.456 5.853 7.213 7.213 5.853 2.478 2.756 2.503 2.695 2.478 2.756 2.695 2.503 5.114 9 385 8.752 5.040 5.114 9.385 5.040 8.752 Minimum Safety Factor: 2 I78 The Anchorage Capacity is 2.478 times greater than the Demand

SUBJECT F F nM CAL BY S AIN R G.No.ak GROUP~~of Sos.PAGE DESCREPTIOH z 0 O X QX I 0 2-S 7-9 10-11 12 13 14 15 29 30 Fig.1 Frequency of System Seismic leg forces Nozzle loads Leg forces due to nozzle loads Leg stresses Base Plate Flolding down bolt Meld of leg to tank Local Shell Stresses Recommendation sketch (SK-7940)Summary

Calculations

SUBJECT:

WC/-/Ci iC~(Q..(JOB NUMBER/8/'/'ILE NUMBER"(0 SHEET/OF SY A Y/'A/OATE~F APP CATE Calculations

SUBJECT:

JOB NUMBER FILE NUMBER SHEET Z BY~~1 APP Z5-r d C-<0 OF DA~DATE l 27'r ps S fif FA'r/~f 0' Calculations SU6JECT: SHEET Z OF BY A TH/DATE~'PP DATE+Cj 2 t/Ol\g+Q 4<<4<<L/gS<<t~AC AZg A'47 4 Sds gC 7/0>Q/4 t g<<Z//2 B CF N7/S IdZ4/2~S" r-.Se~p~'i 0'5/.rg./r='+44 C rim<</P4 f g'(/z w" FAC(t'/Sgs Q~Z'c~~F r J Car:~C g/FÃ~Q 4<<~~

0 Calculations

~" EU@EDT: fjord JIVE re Q/g.~1~/AJ/E+t~, I SHEET BY OF DA I JOB NUMBER 26 I TdJ FILE NUMBER APP DATE~WcrvOM F~eA rW')P 7u~)(r-~o>'-.+6v S'.~r~/)l-a'gw E C<<34>EE MOTIF 5+

/UA7 V Calculations

SUBJECT:

LJog~)ply~y pl 8 654 Or l.~A/&k 4 Fzr uw<c o<FILE NUMBER SHEET OF BV I~DATIVE APP DATE 7)rr ZZC7)od~p g (-F." FEZ 5 F.gg~px~~z)r~rJ)C x (I S&4S ZC~)AJ C x~AFEF xxlz'x,assed+sZ Q~)my Is?+PD4 T 9?e t 24/7 P~7~/2d 0 cga Z rr 29/2 llrS 99~6 l z~l.6?~l 2 87+3,{?r, ll)&I QZ,M x 7,(2.]Ax/g/WA5%CfpfC./)r-))

~~<"i/8&Formals-iA Fizgcy~&~g~Ay/~-l P~'t 6xsnc 8esEr p sr+~srs~az F)~l x?zoP+sos g F~v azszj'El CC~K l2)'4 (FEE@w EP~~>1~~5 lO Z+O 4>g4 rg>EE(O I/224 4 Cak:ulations.

SUBJECT:

FILE NUMBER C I 0 SHEET~OF APP DATE Calculations SUSJECTI,~P FILE NUMBER+l 0 SKEET~OF eV A L H DATE29 APP DATE x DS C~X ZzC 25 p4/7a>gi 2.¹/

Calculations

SUBJECT:

~P FILE NUMBER SHEET~OF BY+CW DATE APP DATE 3 l I/F/K O z X O Cele Uiations

SUBJECT:

FILE NUMBER Q~l SHEET~OF APP DATE z 0

'~E~Calculations

SUBJECT:

, IJy~rHW C7 oA/rl/o J-~)f8 A7 G4 SIT PP'EtZW FILE NUMBER SHEET OF BYE r OA~~/g DATE pr AC r]a+i P PierrlCrlOV

~Srg<CrxOal D an dr/~ca r/2.6 mid-W.i-Hr Z W.j-a,d Wc 7-4dr3 g,5-asA i e-ig,/-Wee irk iS,S-/4P u.i-I/AZ-39rd-77,'5'82li

-87)]~0//Qr S NEO/D7.0 A7 Co<By/Al/045-/IB-5-+S'Z->Br 7-/&Br'B.7)-a7Z-l~~)O CC O Calcuiations suwscTI QocruFFT'o&

5reru A.Zs-~fr OP I-r~C~JOB NUMBER FILE NUMBER SHEET BY APP 619,o OF DATE DATE~Eh/A F OL(F 4 OFF g ATF<GO~~cg CJ g~PC (gA~~FFFDOF'F"/0)c-Pg,P Sq'cnxc y-<<B,G~~-iS'S,G'g 482F)+$7+-/99r 7"/9917'/r>e'er&+

5+rB>l/i~w~b-S'~/g-//,34-w,47-/.5<<48 7&-/7,/2 Ws/(sFrd sziFrrr Fo)/'r~44?M P rŽg/'(V<M~ld+3 aqua++

Calculations su+EcT: 4~grA w'c7ohl/age&dr Sos'p&cd'5 JOB NUMBER FILE NUMBER SHEET C BV l APP OF ATE OA7E./a)LÃT/vmr/jiZ 4,7-8r 7-/6il a,2-Br graf 3//5i5-St are

Calculations sUBJEGT:~4R7//IA<re fuge&g/9QsF np Z4'F I LE NUMB E R SHEET BY APP OF DA~TE DATE JOB NUMBER N/rO/&mr JWLEP F~Wc/7 2 8'E2-5ZA-37-Bdr7 8(7-28$C3rg Fdic-/B A,9-e/~5',P.ER/DOr 2', Or 0-le-II&~7 z&-as4'7r,l?Br2.~I 4d.4r3 muvt7Zo+S's Q,B-aZ.1/7Pr 9-XZ.4-77-2-/LS M (~.r~5 r 69,8,~Xj/r 7-'+7'T i E'0 z 0 Calculations

'UBJECT: PoA?c~g7 9AM~'c5 JOB NUMBER FILE NUMBER SHEET K BY APP/,o OF'ATE/DATE IHuZ7 C~l IecEp Aur/3F6 HC'i/8F5 HE 7 IWi4-m,5-/6i/ZSA-Wr3 BS(d sc}E3-/o70-4i 7-3g2-JCO-BF g~D F7 40F3-/8S j4P 77iS//5i-zs>i$)C/~5"I Calculations

SUBJECT:

~f FILE NUMBER s t 0 SHEET~/OF APP OATS.u~r 3's'K SF K o 6'P+~OPIA s+g E'j, K Ce'zs.~SSS'4 gg WF Sl i~s" Y~oh~)3C~-'>C:C-'4's/~QgSF P FQ~I fez'6/g l~so 4s" 4i x+v~-c~~+X=-4'dv-/XX F S'g=-A/SF~y F~~I QS~j=~2k'5-res--rOZZ rr>-"=-res Krrs<&9g r24" s~rr'w4~s-<ro Pw 7O

Calculations

SUBJECT:

JOB NUMBER FILE NUMBER 6 I 0 SHEET~OF APP OATS-r~S~-g~~-/5~y~+(g gr.-g'.g y=-)s's.y-4 s=-ag.p'~rti.~<<>>..~PEP" t r 4'/CP J V 7 (/4/K 6 sC'I/O'P s//)//.S I~d5S W rSC rr~+AO>P'4'po w'~y.0~MA" Ping'SFFS-5'C r-Ss c r7pa H fr~4 K~-S'Z.7 rO+~S'4's'=145 3'I r'C~<<'~rg V=,~s>~..zn C~we c.~ASIA+Qp (r/j..~C'~w~i Aging o z VA~ES~FS E'Fg~p pro/rr g'/p/r 0 gag/f SE'.~E 8 gus'K~Z r~1 ne/.r S r=rrv' Calculations

SUBJECT:

JOB NUMBFR FILE NUMBER SHEET BY/O DATE DATE/~p/A g;~~'f~<<vj M~@r" (/&W+l~&)<<A (IC'rE!+y C 2 ai 2 lo2P I p g e~rEEE rr't/r.gr'(.jr'<<<7l rx<<AE.w)mArD E y,lrcP.'jvr~

~W E'~/(4 o'MW~/i>p+/4 h~

Calculations

SUBJECT:

FILE NUM8ER SHEET ev APP Q.-(c OF OA~k DATE A.JE ((:Z~r/de o CI'+0/4 to+(~~~-D)J'.DgP~%~1&o(~ogp/C 7c a~&r-y.Z,y C C FK P~" M.(r.~~2IJJ 7-g.~y r FS Arf><j~~~rSy g~~A/0 CC 0 z Calculations SUMECT:,~F'F.FILE NUMBER SHEET~OF APP OATS E" y"~Ca AVE g>E5'7 I~JA.z~y'&Ma 4'm JP4&~iT'C r s4~I~~'j~ZPE'ii)Igg Z Ted>K s C t~gfs APtg S ggP~~gg-~c J d~St 8'c tS 0

Calculations

SUBJECT:

JOB NUMBER FILE NUMBER SHEET BY r~APP OF DATE 0 ATE~~rr rr rr,/rr M/r~p~r r r/r f p/(Z,(e~/rr/(A~C4F/~~-Q7P lj Qow7LR C>0, lr HLC r afUrr apF-~47 raw.T 2<L t./i9 2./44~lC~zcZ5 X.~dZ.~T~~I o<.98~,

~8"~2 ,'~~Euic Fiow L~ac.Gt~'STRAINER TYP RG.No./0-O89 CAL BY C-I 0 GROUP Sheet of a/z~/~~z 0u Local S Hc~~-Tz.css as'go~'hem LoAbs~(As pEi sn/~r.i VZZS C.Q-/29 Lb~F8++/0/6/-7o3 Lb~fc~/zZ/bg,-sr~>g j4 t5'L>(A)w-Q I-IA7cl)w-/bg A+s~zbz)w zb<,-z-i;z&4i~-+

Ac t y4j(il)iN Lbg-7z-ci&z)ur , C c+c iaI.C.f 6/zA 7+3 OLl7 LET;++0l lb(~/$+O Lby,-Ca+48<,-~L.b~k p>oft)~-lQ~-lf]2)/n'-LLg 2/2 ((Z)lpl-lip 2 C(E)ll 45'/o(>R)w~by-3ER.C/~)w-4@~Y+0LJ7+@l5.Gr2.5 TYP CAL BY RS.No.~~SU~EOT FULL FL>'W LU E OiL STRA IN ER.eaour Sheet of Shta, XL T'RANKKtL OF LoAbh FR<M IDYLL'T g OUT LCT'HOKKLEh To TAvK sH<it Ho~zizs.: (sxgrcH P.ts)ASSo&E eHvg oHE Ho4ht t Peg TAHE 5t cs NC LeA1%PRO&~C (HECT g OVT<6 r)JG4%LE'Sf

"~Fr.~Fa.: FR.I f Fig I~~+i3 y=~=as/k l No KRC.E S 4)A":~i g]ace~=w (m<h SK I v>>=w.~~~~.(;~+~Fj...)(z)bv.6LR 8=(i>>+i>>(')(s.l.~)8 5 3/Pg gp(L5g'l Fa.Fa leg our'a/VORRLEg 2 Alp-(~<jpg~F1,p)(l)(li b l3).(>'Zq~VOL)(~)(gJ,Q)P e 8 2 07/~7/jll LSy a)Fiz.~F6: iZ F6/s,;Fb,~t6,".,~"~zo~L4-/~ppp aceg<)p'=(Fb;~F'<;,')(x)(igloo))

Ce"~~)(t)(cpu) 8=go/.5 jL ('Fb'-/b..,),g(qi0~)

j-=zqgc)zH.6 g~p'0 Qp c.Cg TYP CAL BY RG.No.lO-DBS p t ULL FLoW LLJE,F OIL~i TRAtHEk, eaom Shoat of Sh?s.8/26/>+$>f5,6--(Fs,-F h,, ()(.z-v)()4 go4%v6g ag Fh,F'k,~: (F8-Pk)~~'oy~~Pc RRc.FS Y=Py-zg')(/i,sc>)

(<<y wry)(i)-(n.<cry 8 w-44'p/~+'Fb,>

Fb+)(is)(6iv vilo)(iz)X pro Z4l 55 Z Fb,.";=(F8,z~b+,)('i)(ir 6~r)(7~>-~)(z)(vc6is3 3 s 8 2.7f 4 i/lu-L 4+=(r-b,,~t h,+,)(i~)(go~+.)(i~))QRR Lc.5 L mL sV FUI-l-t l.ow vila Ole Cl RAIIIER RG N C-IO OROLP i8 Sheet a f Shh.8/2~/w-c)[rooc FC.-Fc+'c+F-F, KE I-l23 hlo+KLC.L<)poor goALy, cesE.o>, p.II3: Fy=p.=6-(+L-*)L=2iL a.-+.cC i)(F""<<cJ 6~5 IL,6 aj c (2LIc-p~)=~/~Fc)I 2 (I 3 itzs s,g IN-LQ c)L I.c,-f c~+go<a<6$>gr 6iS ig(Fc,cr~I'c.,j~76-">I'IS~l~6g'(,vS)(ii)(3occ'3')

IJ, 6ig'>e~u (2cr 3~oo~~icS)g 6 yg I f o6 L S=l2<~~in~'oor)l"(IC3'4)29'J 3<<)~Cooj h)I+F'cia"" adT~~70 t~~~/OR+(t 5 Fy CFc,-F I)(>r'I (-'ll-3zl (i\(>I)2Q 3 IC 6'/0,6>5'c)Q z-i (F2c Itl co lb>>(j~e 3II)-

l$gU~E~FULL I~4&L~4'C QlL R t k.Av<C TYP RG.No.GAL BY mOuI C JO z 0 I I z 0 O z I 0+b)I'ly+

C gU~~FUI.U FLDw LDEE OIL~TRAI<KN TYP RG.No.CAL BY CAMl.c-P Sheet of Shts.ZO<2 Fa+I4: rsvp///ulcc'b 5 0.'/'46~/6...: Fi8a&//>'/98K'CPS'8'3 7 P//g.y=R=6'(gL-~)L=23.('~)($7?.W 1I Q PI@~)fiam/des', dgM:v,/.//>: Ega.-gq.g=pl<&>>&l 3!" L cg)p: 5+bw+~~aug Zfia L~7g (..IH,>>pJ.7g (iL 5 1l-l<)3 Q.,(n/7,'6 Z p/6't)-~be-r<<(s~i-]i): NFa i~LQ-gU@ECT FvW.MW Lv K6~tL.Sl l~hlA~K.Re.No.CAL BY L~GROlP Shoot af Shta.>/F]Fl~!!!!!N C, pgAHE!.A'TC to 0,@5 p+!!e,+Hc,(<Q(~el+<<<3 avf szS.7 b)A y=(gFp (is (!.t')xt i~<!'(!r iver!).3-I'l7/,$/8-C4~8 Pp c.g c y (Q(yq)ply)+plo~kt,c.5 M~,+AC,t>(al.o eP~X)g (<~q l C (x)\.I K.(l5.6>J5 p (!iL)(>ggi~)7.o 5 g, 7 aJ-l.4+8~c-Hc l.(l Ac'+~>!!Rc~ii(<!!l-'B<)

<q l.C<1)y (I h)/!!y=(i!(F~)(<!

~6U~(L)(!'l,!)(u'6'L!).8 8)pg H,z+c~<zt(991 3!31$=Ob>E'-~4' Qe FLow 4'u KE.Qlc Cli2AIHKR.

RG No uu sv C-I<Sheet of Sos.22 Si23 jXy X 0 8c,, Wc+22)'F+=8 c)p)(:~t,~)a (.1~)2.(.F~)C~r.ecr)cg3.si)(iroc3')g rVc+COol-i3.(X3OF 3CO)¹Plo+W (C$'=Jggp X 0 O z 0 6J CoNPCLAT<oN OF I RAHC feR'Peg/Mal.e LCO*bC'q Fv.')Fy=Fg>+Fx<=~F3.3+2.nx

=6Y$5 Lbg~)Fy-Fy+p>=~~~~py=all Lbg zq Fy,'+'+I'5)<I~~F Yy-2(LAPGJ f'4'fl>4-0"rclFyi+Fy<"FYoi=&33+2.el+i~i 8"-'is 6:S~F-=.'.f~"t F~+F+>-fogy 3'/pv 3K',g"-By/,g Q~6)F4=FZ+I'+++FK>='663,3 0/332 3P 5%.=2'52VJ+.'I

~'l x:<<q Ax=P1x+Nx~=62ov e sszcx=@733'j w-t5<6)8x: iitp+<x<=l2is+v63's.

-" 8866 Q jiff;@Ay=py>+p7y2+/ye=l6ol p+il9yvi27ls=seUio.c6>

s)Ny=Ny,+Ny~~ayz=no~.6+Shl~zosv',7

=/wf).3 63~~: a)0+=Pa,~I'1a 2<isa~-col.2+iso3 t s22.=23 e 6 3 m 26g-iilfh+/fan t g<=aoxV,2%/363+S'3S2'78/;2 IO 26S-/

CK~IA l~~FULL FLoW LU5E QlL S1 RANEE'.TYP RG.Na gy RL5 OkOVF Sheet M of Shh, 8 gt/7P Hj Dlo<'o&ENTAY loN OP TRANLF'EgpED goK+lc LaAgg'gi-(F y,=+6%5, g Lb<,-Kll LI+FY=+>>&.S L4q,-<<-~.e+Fh=+8'll.S L4~'~-lying,g LIl iH)4 Ll)Bi/IH c'4g)8 BC6 w-LL<.p H Y+%(41 I tH LQ j IYl893nr 5,'~X~AK+2s sag'3 lN L4y~"s 78/,Q N.t.g~I o I II*

-',"U~I.ui-r" Luis;Q)~=pi(p,i~i<<

RG.No CAL BY oooo C Sheet M of Shts.82m O TAH V.5 H C I<I H)Q 6 iE<1 Y J I>RikaH TAa aEl<KlC.Bt HbiNQ~pi2C(t c7=I-o~4r n orNHC 5T'rc c'A d~d r~Pc/r pc/~IWc.t 5 C/J~/p g.Np+g, (Rcvhirlgg AT l3-2 P]C-rl.dLJ 3=3A',+iu 0 zz.(P,Sg (~.<)"/p)(l'L)g(I>S QJ(~)(gg-y/,p) g~~(>(, g)=+is4.I'"'/>

il",~~I uii)ioW LueE Qi STggiHZP RG No Io-O 0S CAL BY L Sheet of Shta.a~s/~3 K GlcMH Fi'6<Q QH blH ro CpiEr i ic 6 t)v r 7~Jl/o y~(g gQA ii6'lT t~f~v 8 LQ SAT QE FcLLumtHQ l oAb~Cog't~<lg vga MW Y LANK c4~5 R VA TtV C$6 HQlfFQ Lgg Qg po~g++gal.,SIi.e l-CH P.>3)Rg H>=l>,6'(FV)i My=la,g ('l i Hi6$++Si 6.-~i+88, 6 iH-L)g P$py=i;r(ry)(~)('Fp)+H)=n.S(~ii')<<(e)(2~-LS.S')

+iqiZS,>)->>oiler,iH--le I/l.i'9 Al LloÃ6+87ol.l.,I'26op7 bt MPob 4uo~.7 cr--=-+'ll7o.5 64/<+g Pg H.//H V~o>(o Rc Sri>ess~LuE To gogz<v Leppy I)a=~g YX~'f 7 g,~/u AREA/<(g, gg, L y g-F~-(io'-iS.Pl-)F}CooihiHeh 6tH eH EiL STso sr@6!++l 0+O=~+~+-cr+os'+c I dye~tie.i+f8,6+

u>5, 3 S<i~v, C+7S,q=~S eo,~jw.~s l~P 5 a+~~~+~1(l, I+Fc,~+li'70,5+w1 (--J1oG~l+HL46,7/iH~Thai Q

, CAL BY t us.s-fMsss Luge Ola STRA(HC 6 RG.N NSIH Q WRC QOl L.6 T'Ihl I>1, 7HC I-DC 6E PRI AHP l 5'l PE'Sr~S THE~A~~SHEI.~, OVC F~VERY CoI4EERVd>IVY'R.AI4SFKRL64 H~'%+I-6~DO f oN P.2.3*g.E SHOm 8 OA Qht'h'SHEE, T, P.L'7>F POD PQIHT Oug,P, X5, SIHCE:Pt<5 H6AR IH'r6HSI t'r i f<ma((, gapa@.TIDE 2.F'ak 7He CoebIH6l-R.e~S IOTGH(Ir r uH beer-8 S~F7, P.~7, LVI<i'QE ll 5 6 0, z 0 I-u n.8~),=Sy($)+a~78<9./m.=5"%IS~3?.i 7l(I'Nsgi-~01,/iIX84.7 t'ss7,2./ohio 9.il KP9',7 ltz80,p n7't,7 t'337,l.-3i7/.I los 0, Q-9o)tl/p2I4'lo897,-3>>i I 7s-34,i->oJ O',I 2~~1 4 loZ37,I>f96,X Dc.&29,7'7$36,2 R 2.'19~7 0 I 0 z 0~IJ H 5AFET'r F8ct"u r2$(7oOD il 2t Y, 7~e f.S.-" 9oaov P5/<ftA 8"4'2 A~-~Z,64 i LILI 7'I asm LaaP(.UII b 7 fdlSIIILfc L=2)77.S C" Tg.-)(x&t'o, I)(P.te AS~li04 I ooo~Radial loof, Circ, Itaieant~Loilp Honiont a~'T~talon Houont, Shoot Load, Sheer Loode 1>>.C 1;~lb.IIL I.".lan~~lb si e st/+lan Ib>>Vc~lb VL T~VIb 2.Geoee~Iris Poionerera (0.4)$)-~0 e3 Rin'c L/2 Ou OL Au-XTabto 5-Computation Shoat for Local Strossos in Cylindrical Shells c.b)H2g a a~by Cb Q g-//e,tro P SQ c=/s.cis ot)w=g.f'g Mr ROUND ATTACHMENT Bu 2I Oueu Hrr Vessel Ihicl I~aa, Atteclvaent rudiva, Yo~aot Iediv~~I IS)1 r 5II~I~ConceniI~Iion due I~I/~)Ieenbiano Ised, Kn b)bondtnp leod, Kb~r.0'HOT EI Ent~I oil 4tco valves in~ccoidence arith~ipn convention uCL X/CYLINDRICAL SHELL ,o L5 F~Flp Sc IC Rood cvrvsa lor His d/Rie Course~ebsolvt~valves~f~II~I~~Iid enter I~@ii)I~Kb~Av AL Bu BL Cu CL Dv 7 89'/In'/I STRE$5ES if lead a~OSSOIII~thor shove, teeerse~ipns shove OL y Fa.I)/g Ag , CIOBQ 2A 2~14~r'I~I Hc/Rut/i~I IS sar/Ruff HIS~HL/N~>/7 Hier HL/a ll 77 77SS 7)S'7 0/7$C)/'7it 0/7f 0 3.'t cC H~lr I I'Add~Itehiotseur 4I aueueonoo~IIS~Ilsaaes,~Ics P 4 I 5>X>+Tfa/69I'0/69 sq 1 2.'l+'s/oS ,Ol 2C dA 2A da 2O or I Hs I r Ne Itc/Rutll Hs Hc/Rural Na HL/RntP Ha IaL/Reel)He\HL HV~tg/R I/)T+5 Ht IIS~r~Si 2d It T 0 Sheer stress duo te lee~Iuu Ils Add~Iceluoiaollr 4I ouu vien~I K ateeaaia,na

~(i=<>is')+L 6fs 6fs3 1.7S L7r 7 S'l>>S6+5heor arrest 40 I~leod.Yc 5heor steer~duo to leod, VL r aaS V VL Y Add Altearolcatlr fer eurenenen~I sacer~iieaaea, r COII~IHED 5TRE55 IHTEHSITTI

$I)when ny~, tr hero lthe sites t I a it~lna'I IIOFI Cr 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 2l trhear'O Sl Wh d~an hoes uafko Htaa 5 4iseei ol$$~Ie er t IISI~)5 t I'isis es)'~rr I~I~,~I l0 ,Iifrrapra irt>bohr IIR Qd~~(?JDC, I?~1 f\~/~eV p p (~P Jorp('F:;C,F IUn F.F.L.0.strainer'C,ODf!,!i.!, KD 14~p 3~42r(p G~G J/1~((1~("(L',: (T, V'",'lL.:*4>o 5/27uu~'2g$41v3 o>y 1 17 I~(/r'025 g lo 3((',~~O.C4'p>2 o 35.//p F'k A/F 2 r'1 p i~4 D p F 2 ('/3~3<~Ql,"~2;'025 g 1~35/3'i,!7S (.014~Vg I g',(,'"~(.'.~(I~J o~~..'iCn'I o~~r~:."~rF P=l.r r 537" LAX=""':.:.i7SO.'C.",=(""17 lu D":!=~;..7755-.r.P v'130 F~X=1698 1102 SG54 3.51 q 4if55 11630 (~~~I~~I~~4'('d j'.gczupg 8/'gg//m Ni~Y'i~i~/('((//(gzz>: rP4z vu~p~;<-.-..;./Wy+~jvzcj~j'.,P/"-:".

'I~O,','.Pq~'I~~"~I Ot 4>~AAT N(L VAICAW tATT.NO iy, d/A'A'///.

4 g5A'$Pfd'dPAcwb

<<~/St.'."45~ah//COP<WliVFg z.y c xc DiZ3 A/~t l the/aiA~~SO 5 4/A'C,'.:VP/Z5 jg/$j/h/&/.F8-/5'/5g.x5 4 ppP ig Tl I I~ms/coypu..Ep/$j/h+800 j'/arV 8-8 s~ir-:r~~~"alp'vP s4L d~$gAAi+HA'gdPM

~/0~~~+f/HA-XZg-Pdldd SuZ/i'd&~.a<Crx~ag SPW/h/+g/-M IWEPg.486/O.P8$~W==.k~/.F4uiAffbk j'~g fgK FEF7 kfJ$7 8f-A@/ddt>'c.v'=6I jHg oF Pp'z$fwd-LEE'S 7d/CCoyyaORPa g~Z MzrV,"'7/4 FFS j 8'/jl~g R/7ERlh'CT.

SQAÃlhFR Pafs j/d/i~ti~u;i5 dddE.;A$///E--SEC foal~&A/$g/4&i~<'/35Cg/h/6-Oh/M)ygz>C ACE t'A'Cc&VNIXSS DIN(ANISE SttC.DNICNSIONS

~NNAI\I ID(CA, CEO<<CIA(0 STVSOES 1 VSAII TI~I IIEA~IlAihlll S I NAICN I 1 C$S CI AOVNotI($$II tAAAllllllV tf 1 t(N OI CVEAA ANCLIAAITT Aoh(VT I AOC toll I ION DON((NI1Iclff STVNII1I I IlACC DCC (Cal t tlACC DCC IS>Sf S t(ACC DCC D(attl ANCECS TIISCADL VN IAI~al at a(o r$(C tllltft aSA le AAA~ACAA CONN(AS at~Er IIAC.1ENOYt SVAAS Ssipgic Sf"Pf~I tOII ION~II INC(ON (ANION<<Ohltlal IOCO<<ONII~Ihlln I~IAII~NOAINV CION Ol<<CAVO slvNAN Ioo<<n.vah t CS(ttfl NOA MNO Oh~~AA\<<Ohl INOI(h 1~Sf//>JMEA/OVil i&pOOIF: p WO~TIIISC501 Cotto~ATIOII CCVtttf tnt~CACIAC DIT.SVf f1(0, A.5, Ohh g g(CW~L Attn, g l$'N"-"-"-VM J cy~I>I I I Calculations SUBJECT-'/

04KB/h(<-'C"c/4 2 u8<C~u~rp~wEp~o'MMAK Y'OB NUMBER FILE NUMBER SHEET 0 BY APP C-/0 OF DA~DATE Cr F F5/8)P//FE/-Z Pid ('w C F (4.TK4'~l A,<~.OEEE WS/rn F wein.r c'(4 T'c'4 F Acct Fc.FAF+cccccf r Ei;cr cc I 6 Cd~~y FA+c,cAA~1o l<.r&PPd~CHAFE PF 5K PLATO.SW I r/,'7c cr.'-~EEOC Fr>r</~7'~~E/~4&l~~gf 4(r r/8/EE g,g4 g IM 3 rrt Cr (F A dcS Qr O z

• • 12 CHP 5021.CCD.019 ATTACHMENT NO.1 Unxt N/8-J9 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET Bldg.CION'RO.Qiagai L~OL: Qc, Pi-, Location Installation dwg../Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch Equipment No.0-6"~g~g~g g~~I~I~~~~~~I~~~i V~'(%e)~g 5 g Type>Qol%5 Cfyp))I sc&L (',iLDrawn by: Verified by: Reviewed'by: Date: Date: '2--')-/2 Qual./Cert.onstructz.on Page 1 of 3 h~Inspector Date: l Anchor Review Engineer

• • 12 CHP 5021-CCD-019 ATTACHMENT NO.1 C OR INSPECTION DATA SHEET Give LMM'ic/i i Unzt/2-3zae Bldg.Location-Ql-/13-A82 Installation dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch Equipment No.-Q/z Drawn by: Verified by: Reviewed by: Qu./Ce t.Inspector nstructxon Anchor Review Date: Date: Date: Engineer 5 r3~A+Q~"p)G lc 5'<Page 1 of 3 Revision 1

~~~0~~II~~a i e~~~~~~r o~0~s~RSR%RRKi%WW&W

.a a o o mRSRIN WALLS wwweaarr m55555LSRL RSmmmRHE%RRHHRRHHEL mRSmmELSL lIRSHRRELLL MW&M MWW~II II 0'rr~s~1~JUL i I~~hl sir~~

• +12 CHP 5021.CCD.019 ATTACHMENT NO.1 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET ipment No.: l-6 t-II3-8 edded Steel Dwg.No.:~lb PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS Dwg No.: l&3cÃV-//Held ID T e Size Len h Cracks Lack of Penetration Porosity Yes Yes c3g9 Yes 3'lL Yes CRh Yes QtV Yes Yes Yes Yes HZP Yes es Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No'es No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Held T e Codes 1=Fillet 2=Plug/Slot 3=Groove 5~7'PGR<QQac.~-evhu s Qg~ggg (gal.kl0%bb 0 0 Ecpxipment hase flexible: Cl Yes 8 No ons ruc won e Date: cP-Reviewed by: V'ed by: ons ruc ron c or evzew ngxneer~/'a.er.npsec or Date: Date:~'~~'i Page 3 of 3 Revision 1

• • 12 CHP 5021 CCD 019 ATTACHMENT NO~1 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET ipment No.:-GT-i(3-6 mbedded Steel Dwg.No.: PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS Weld ID T e Size Len Cracks Lack of Penetration Yes~Ys Yes 0 Yes Yes 0 Yes Yes Yes@Ys Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Weld T e Codes 1=Fillet 2=Plug/Slot 3=Groove Porosity Yes 0 Yes es Yes Yes 65 Yes No Yes No Yes No SQPPoR 7 QRhc.k.-E'YFh~s Qg~ggg$g>c.atoll~fP)~I a 0'O Ecpxipment base flexible: 0 Yes 8 No ons ruc son re Date: Reviewed by: V'fied by: ons ruc son c or evxew ngxneer ua;er.npsec or Date: Date: 0 35 9" Page 3 of 3 Revision 1

• • 12 CHP 502 1.CCD.0 19 ATTACHMENT NO.1 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET quipment No.:/---Q3.Embedded Steel Dwg.No.: A PHYSICAL CHARACTERXSTXCS Dwg No.: IB-8"zV-il Weld ID T e Size Len h Cracks Lack of Penetration Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes'Lto Yes No Yes No Yes No Weld T e Codes 1=Fillet 2=Plug/Slot:

3=Groove Porosity Yes Y s Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No 50PPoR 7 QPhck c-EYRi~s+KCT Qg~gg+(<xc,Kf4%'bb Ecpxiyment hase flexible: CI Yes 8 No ons ruc won re Reviewed by: ified by: ons ruc ron c or evxew ngzneer ua-.e.npsec or Date: Date:~r 5 y.'age 3 of 3 Revision 1

'I 4

~~j.~(riP 4021 CCD 019 ATTACHMENT NO-1 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET ipment No.:-97-I/g mbedded Steel Dwg.No.: PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS g.:~g Weld ID T e Size Len h Cracks Lack of Penetration Porosity Yes Yes Yes Yes QRD Yes cKRP Yes Cgg)Yes Yes Yes 0 Yes 0 Yes 0 Yes Yes Yes 0 Yes o Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Weld T e Codes 1=Fillet 2=Plug/Slot 3=Groove 507'PoQ~QQ&ck-EYRg 5,~I O BS.RC.kC 7 (Hi(.k8%&:

Equipment base flexible: 0 Yes 8 No Date: ons ruc 1on re Reviewed by: V'fied by: ons ruc 1on c or ev1ew nglneer ua.e.npsec or Date: Date: Page 3 of 3 Revision 1 Equipment No.: (-G~-<6-RSX~~~Tightness established by"Snug Fit" Tight:ness veri f i ed by: Qual./Cert.Xnspector Comments:)pP Equip ID: 1-HE-,13 Train: 12 Drawing No.: 1-5129A 1-5135.ction: RI~~Equip Class: 21 Sys tern: CVCS Equip Desc: EXCESS LETDOWN HEAT EXCHANGER Building: CONTAINMENT Room: REGENERATIVE HEAT EXCHANGER ROOM, AZ 295 Elev: 612 Sort: S, Notes: Normal State: Desired State: Power.Req'd:

N Support System Drawing: Req'd Support Comp: Safety Related Status: NUCLEAR SR Min/Opt: MIN Alias No: Power Train: NA Comp Served: EXCESS LETDOWN HEAT EXCHANGER Mfr: ATLAS INDUSTRIAL MANUFACTURING CO Model: Elem.Drawing: Wiring Drawing: Power Source: Walkdown: F G Relay Eval: N Comp Type: HEAT EXCHANGER XSO Drawing: Location: ON THE CONTAXNMENT WALL SIDE OF THE RM DC Cook Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)Status: Yes Sheet 1 of 1 ID: 1-HE-13 (Rev.0)Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers

==

Description:==

EXCESS LETDOWN HEAT EXCHANGER Building: CONTAINMENT Floor El.: 612.00 Room, Row/Col: REGENERATIVE HEAT EXCHANGER RM, ON THE CONT WALL SIDE OF THE RM Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: ATLAS It!DUSTRIAL MANUFACTURING CO BASIS: External analysis 1.The buckling capacity of the shell of a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank is equal to or greater than the demand.2.The capacity of the anchor bolts and their embedments is equal to or greater than the demand.3.The capacity of connections between the anchor bolts and the tank shell is equal to or greater than the demand.4.Attached piping has adequate fiexibility to accommodate the motion of a large, fiat-bottom, , vertical tank.5.A ring-type foundation is not used to support a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank.N/A Yes Yes Yes C~MMEE.'Q SRT: George G.Thomas (SS A)and Tom Huang (AEP), April 13, 1995.l Ref: Unit'1 and 2 Anchor Bolt Schedule (Drwg.¹3073A-3 and 3073D), and Unit 1 8 2 Containment Building Concrete Floor (Drwg.¹1-2-3207-23)

Relatively small exchanger (1600 Ibs)on two saddles in extremely high rad area.Could not inspect anchorage due to it being hidden from view with insulation.

Removal of insulation was not performed because of ALARA considerations.

Anchorage includes four 3/4" diameter J-bolts, embedded at least 2 feet into piers.Due to large anchorage (four 3/4" bolts)and small exchanger, the anchorage is acceptable by SRT judgment, Evaluated by: Date: iz/~/~s 01/16/92 PG.NO.539 SAFE SHUTDOuN EOUIPHENT LIST (SSELMP)FUHCTIOH: ESN Equipment Class: 2'I Train: 2 Eeiirment IO: 1-HE-IBE Drawing Nunbert 1-5113 I-51C4 Svstem: COHTAINHENT SPRAY Enufo

Description:

EAST CONTAINHENI'PRAY HEAT EXCHANGER Rui lriing: AUX I L IARY Room: E CONTAINHENI'PRAY HEAT EXCKAHGER ROOII Elevation:

609 wnr~l state: Desired state: Power Required: N Sort: u, Siaoorting System Drawing Number: Required Interconnections and Supporting Components:

fetv Related Status: NUCLEAR SR Hin/Opt: HIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 4l ias Number: Power Train: NA Cnmcx nent Served: EAST COHTAINMENT SPRAY HEAT EXCHANGER wsnufacturer:

YUSA Node l: oanel: EIem Drawing: H/A wiring Drawing: N/A cower Source: N/A ualtdown: F Relay Only: NO Comoonent Type: HE ISO Drawings: Detailed Locatian:

.DC COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 1 of 2 ID: 1-HE-18E (Rev.0)Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers

==

Description:==

EAST CONTAINMENT SPRAY HEAT EXCHANGER Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: E CONT SPRAY HEAT EXCHANGER RM, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: YUBA (VERTICAL)

BASIS: External analysis 1.The buckling capacity of the shell of a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank is equal to or greater than the demand.2.The capacity of the anchor bolts and their embedments is equal to or greater than the demand.3.The capacity of connections between the anchor bolts and the tank shell is equal to or greater than the demand.4.Attached piping has adequate flexibility to accommodate the motion of a large, fiat-bottom, vertical tank.5.A ring-pe foundation is not used to support a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank.N/A Yes Yes Yes N/A C LL 0 T?~C)JJV~N$SRT: Gary Thomas, Tom Huang and Kailash Mahajan on 11/3/93.ery well engineered support structure.

There is a ring support at top of the exchanger bracketed to the wall in each of the 4 quadrants.

This takes the overturning loads on the exchanger.

Bottom support (at about the 1/4 point of the exchanger, with the remainder of the exchanger hanging below)is a heavy duty ring with gussets at the bolt locations.

These are bolted to a steel support structure that is obviously well engineered.

Qualification data (Yuba Heat Transfer Division Calculation 69-G-226)indicates an analysis to the design basis.Based on the inspection and anchorage data collected the Heat Exchanger is adequate.Evaluated by: cQ Date:>/I g/8-~-fi

Attachment:

Pictures DC COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 2 of 2 ID: 1-HE-18E (Rev.0)Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers

==

Description:==

EAST CONTAINMENT SPRAY HEAT EXCHANGER Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: E CONT SPRAY HEAT EXCHANGER RM, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: YUBA (VERTICAl)

ELC3XKE>BASE GUSSETED SUPPORT TOP SUPPORT

P.O.BOX 3158~TULSA, OKLAHOMA 74101 o (918)939.2201 December 7, l971 YUSA ItlOUSTA!SS, lNC.American Electric Power Two Broadway New York, New York 10004 Attention:

Mr.R.A.Kadlec Mechanical Engineering Division

Subject:

Indiana&Michigan Electric Company Donald CD Cook Nuclear Plant Contract 1241 Containment Spray Heat Exchangers Yuba Job Number 69-G-226 ,C~~~F'LA~>ORD-grD f,gpss~rCTIDN E~~GtNV;.q DATE~LEANT LIPEy~ME DATE TO PLANT 0 NOH pERHAHENr HlNQfUM g~~N~Gentlemen:

(6)'f our Seismic Stress Analysis for the subject gob.Qe are enclosing six (6)copies o our b"" 9 1971.written by your Mr.A.Sherman, request'ing ji refer to a letter of Novem Qr~~~~~a'suit we have completely rewritten this a y*additional clarification.

As a resu as Rev.2.nts at our earliest Please return one ()copy in i (1)d'cating your approval and/or comment convenience.

Uery truly yours, YUBA HEAT TRANSFER CORPORATION B.F.Forman Des ign Engineer BFF:dc cc: Mr.A.Sherman Main File Eng.File/U J I 1 Y\/."!<.!!::/s7 1 8 N" SF 0!'l V I S I Ql~>U3/s l(vov~>ales, Inc, Seismic S trc.s Anal vsis Indiana&Michigan Electric Company Donald C.Cook tiuc lea r Plant Contract 1241 Containment Spray Heat Exchangers Yuba Reference 69-G-226 Page 1 op Rev.2 S tresses in the support ring structure resulting from the operating load on supports, thc forces due to seismic acceleration and operating pressure will be investigated using the refer-ences listed below.The support structur'e consists of two 4" x 2" rings encircling the exchanger together with a 1" thick wear plate and q" shell plate.Refer to Page 5 for vertical support details.The following stresses will be calculated:

1.Longitudinal bending stress due to shell acting as a cantilever beam and loaded with horizontal seismic force.2.Bending stress in ring structure loaded with operating wt.and vertical seismic and horizontal seismic force acting at center of gravity of exchanger.

3.Circumferential and longitudinal stress in shell due to pressure in shell.The period of vibration'is determined using References 1 and 2 below: l."Introduction to Matrix Method of Structural Analysis", by Harold C.Martin, McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1966.2.Yuba Computer Program to determine loads and reactions in structures by the direct stiffness method per reference 1 above.The program also/I calculates the natural frequencies of structures.

See discussion on Pages 10 and 11.

"LIU/i I SCAT TRANSF!.R 0!Vl" IQl':.'OA IYOUSTalas, INC.('..'u<g u/l~U 4 Page 2 ci Rcv.k~~W=94.4 Total Operating Wt.<Vertical, Acceleration Av=.17*Horizontal Acceleration AH=.3 A=10/12 Ft-B=18/12 Ft.C=9.42 Ft.D=3.46 Ft.E=6.92.Ft.(See Fig.2 Page 5)6=45'k HF=W x AH=94.4 x.3=28.3 VF=W x (1$A)=94.4 x 1.17=110.4 2 PE Sin 8=VF D Sin 6+CHF.2 P x 6.92 x.707=110.4" x 3.46'.707]9.42'28.3 P=54.9 k (Vertical reaction at one support)'Zhe following forces are horizontal components acting normal to the rings.Tvo forces act at each support-See Fig.2 Page 5.A x P'/12'54.9k Rl 2/3B x 2 2/3 (]8/]2)2 22.8 k (Force due to moment caused by ver tica 1 reac Lion)HF/2 Sin 0 1=4x2 HF Sin 6 hg=4x2=2.5 (Force due to moment cuased by horizontal k reaction)28.3/2 x.707 I=1.25 (Horizontal shehr in each ring)28.3 x.707 k 4x2

".,I-:l 7 Tf?ANSF ER DIVISION YVOfi'IIIDVSTAICS, II6c.U i'(.'i Pago 3 o~Rev.2 h~h R=l~, 1 I 2-"228'k~125k>25k I=26.55 k, 24.05 k (Total horizontal force acting normal to the ring See Fig.2 Page 4)Using2" Rings and the loading"R" shown in Figure 2, calculations were made to determine stresses.For stress in rings see Page 6.Stress in Shell (Due to HF Acting at CG)k M='F x C=28.3 x 9.42'12=3200 in k (Moment in Shell)Section Modulus Where d=outside diameter of shell, in.(d4~~=.049087 R d 4)di=inside diameter of shell, in.30 3=1426 ill 43300 M 3 200.000 in lb Stress=S=.1426 2245 psi Shell Stress The above calculations werebased on the horizontal

&vertical acceleration given in your specification 42373-NK.I The accelerations used to obtain stresses correspond closely to those obtained by calculating the natural frequency of the exchanger see Page 9 for values plotted on the response spectra curve it Floor EL.633.I The natural period of the exchanger as obtained from our computer program and based on loadings shown on Figure 1.Page 4 is 1.275 Second (maximum).

~('

f

~~v'y V)jI (.I,~,.r..Q," i~k~~'I C Hr-Wrr7r&C.C 0l (.C..C Og t Qa'0 (I)4 ('Xl+7~-'ll rt~/rr'g" t:f c 5i Hcg++O OO c'as".I I S+7W 7 SS r/7u4<Sr'.,r/r Or~(K ,:7~/-~o'l(Q Phoo 6+~7'nA.~zS Wa I:~WC>QOyZ'7.lII'LVO I.i V6i};:,.A VS!M7'1 I..'.~I."i:.."i'-FL Ci~e~f'O'LCAVlIf.u;.-'iI

~<11'L" kic=zG ir 7S~~rm s.cvvvIIIIrIIv oI Y~i:A COI:."r~iIufTZC>

l!:Dl1~Tl'.lI."..

ll!C.(3515 Ol'V.ON lmAO.1'Ut'a.0!LAf<Q1.1A I I A VI: 4 1%.".t 0 0 0~~ill h~tr'I'A ltWLV 0Vo'C.ez-g-~=a-/

l l~~L r,~~J 0'4~~v 4 4 dA~r I V J A U%Iran'llha~~~J~~~

Q I\:j.I'.!J:;.4, 4 aI YUUh HLAI 1'AANSF 613 Ol VISION YVOA IMDVSTAIFS, INC.STRRSS I!;Rl;;CS Reference"Formulas For Stress 6 Strain" by Roark (See Page 7)Miome'nts in Rin Pa e Go.." Rev.2=17'-~=28'os ()k=.9563 Cos e-~=.8830 R='26.55 k r=31.5" 26.55 k x 31.5" 2'MR=-~3-R MR'5 R r r (--Cote)1 e (si e 1-)e=418 in k M'0=4 R r (.--)1 1 sin e e R (Cos o(1)Sin e e MR=-418 (-1.7853=418 ('8830.707 1)=-113.8 in k (Moment at load due to load)1)=-10.4S in Ic (Moment at R'ue to load at R).7853 Q Oc.plH5 418 (--)=59.4 in k (Moment at 0 due to load zt R)1 1.707.7853 418 (-}=33.4 in k (Moment at 0'ue to load at R).9563 1.707.7853 I=59.51 in4 S 59.51=14.9 in3 MR (Total)=(113.8+10.45)=-.124.25 in k M0 (Total)=(59.4 p 33.4)=92.8 in k Moment of Inertia of Rin.3 3 1=12+12 q L 8x 22+22 5m 2 x 4 15 x 1.5 1 T.752]QF.~ll~ti RADlVS Max.Stress (at load)-124250 in.lbs.14-9 in3 Mc or I-124250 in.lbs.x 1.5" 8,350 psi (in 4" x 2" ring)a 22.5 x.75 8 x 3.5 CG=2 x 4$1.5 x 15 59.51 in 3,140 psi (in shell)5II Y'J13fs r'L;AT TftAl"SFCR DIVISrQN YVOA INOUSTAI SS, INC.isa.re: o', Copy Taken From"Formulas For Stress and Strain" by Roark Tauu: VIII.-Fonstur~s ron Clncof,*n Braes win Ancnns Bf'n 2'n Vn Bf, T, and V arc positive xvhcn as shosvn, negative ivhcn reversed.All applied forces and couples arc positive svhcn as sirocco, negative svhcn reversed.The follosving notation is ctnploycd:

g w niodufug~of elasticity (lb.ppr sq.in.);f~moment of incrl,ia bf ring cross section (in.');1V or F as shovrn~applied load or I y/~reaction (lb.);w~applied load (lb.pcr lin.in.);l:~freight of contain'd liquid (lb.pcr cu.in.)~~si<<~~i'~cosa;s~sin 0,c~cos0;n~sinO, c~cos O;p sruti,q~cosp.Allanglcs~uradians,distanccsin NI'2 inches, forces in pounds, moments in inch-pounds.

+D, or+Drncans incrcasc,-D, or-Dmeans decrease in diamctcrs.

+drR means increase,-aR means dccrcasc, in upper half of vertical diameter.C TI trtn VIII.-FolMULAs l'OR ClncvLAR Itngcs A'Ho Ar'cncs.-(Confinucd) fzalin ruppxe and cow numM Formulas for tending moment II, eireumfere rfsl 4ensfon 2', rsdtst shear V at a u!ar dieesneo r from toirnm o ting and for Vi.shan't in Lairosut drnmeeer, and D,.change in versiesi dismerer f fdK under sny num bx of equal radial forem cqusay spsad I Il/IO'~./,0'I'Jlr Z(b.-.0 Ilr (a~eton~I)It'-frI!(---):hfag+If

~rfP/x at o,h,dd, l/u l/l c)" 4s e)r~-'I r eot C at toads.l ludisl disrtseement ef each load foist~-@L (y+,e 2n.L, (2 2)lrlfs/2 1'X.ftsdisi dupfae me t se r 0, 2I, In, ere.'C-fnsrsrd gal (C~ss)htss-hf~--frP(--eor I}sr each load l/l (o

.VU/i II::Al'I IIAisSICI:II OIVISIQN YVOA ftaovSTRIES.

tNc.SUlMARY OF STRESSES Combined Lon itudinal Stress s r x Longitudinal stress due to pressure=2t-.2 p ghere r=inside radius of shell, t=shell thickness&p=design pressure 2x 5".2 x 150 psi=4,470 psi Combines stress=pressure stress+bending stress (Page 3)=4,470+2,245=6,715 psi h Combined Circumferential Stress r x Circumferential stress due to pressure=-.6 p t~Combined stress=pressure stress$bending s tress (Page 6)=8,910+3,140=12,050 psi Shear S tress s'Xhe shear stress in the shell can be ignored since the ring structure takes the load in bending.

ggll alii 5alll gmgg~~gg gggg~g55I~SR~g)~

'<<i'..cc'ice!i

'j'his procvc(ct7 uses the direcL sti.'.i'(.ss Ur Lilod as si:o-:n b>Ii.C<<I.'artif!jn s';AL')i;(f'jnL'hlods ol.Stl.uctul:al tlnal)'8).s

~l Xn the case or: "-been a:ith a distributed load, the load is d'vide(.into f an...pOint lOadS SpaCed alOng thf: Laealf}.g i:/f't.L=len('th The problenl (!ould be appzo>:ifvated as F F F F t: 'p I'I~I/('<<1))<he)e H='fao~pk Load l pints Fro}fr here t>e program calculates ti:e nov>'<<ts at each loari point and th reactions at each load point and the reactions at each support.Also, (:ith the input:, the natural fzcque;.cies may be calculated.

'Co find tl.e natural fze(Iucncv tnc stiifness:".atri>:

Sound above is used in r.:;:"'.the sa.,~a@ay..".spring constant in a vibrating spriqg and'rf".ss systera.For a spring F="IZ hl F=--.X I oo=-g: buL for 48)'S teal rrC4-}IV or (W'-);;-0 Z[CD EY.v l~<<I I aa<<a~~w vhv J~N ta p J AIf~an of;cillil ting$c/is in radians/sec 'iV=g/~phd'fa}O i ('l<<l<<I<<<<I<<<<Illa lc II I pre~cly cf lllcl Yrvracflr I)!ci~ivr.,'<<ld I~rc I lc.Lc r~>'.d da'd I~4 IClc~~I\I l J~l, I<<Ir I IC<<C l~Cr 4 l val~f,l ca Crr.rr fr.V<<ll<<C l f<<r V<<.lcf Il I~CCCC<<l~.C<<l, (V~ra}~t C<<f~VII(<<CCC I'I~4f CICr Jl Cl ll 0 l C<<l I Ivr Cf~I (<<IVI IICA Ercq..-~/Z g rye le<</ccc~<<<<<<4<<rv vva~v v J cv IA a v~C<<C.C: aa<<va<<<<v~<<<<a ~l avv4<<wav~k a<<t J 1~I J<<ae~~ve<<A4U 1 Ca'vr v Ca<T I YUB.'.i,'.'}':YRI=.S. lNC.I'(:f'>:..(:l:.l'.ll!!I!r'I:I(<<.::}I(;<<f.f I'<<l"l<I!

Fo our case F=: 1', aa!Ia"r'e 1 1S'Lh<.: S t it llfeS fr i'eai tr).".I"1 1 r-;F f.t point loGds O'Ad are the displace.~. nt..at the point loads.p wt+2)e vllere H=-hV or"11)i X-.KZ, where X..2 or (1'H tf)X=0, since'tlie displecer.ents"re not nll equal to Zero the deterninate of.thc 1!atria (1;+H X.)aust equal Ze.o.Then W'=~7'nd P--..cycles/sec.. W 2 A 4 ev e v PLRv~vev v'lie.alt-%Let 4tnvle.g>11 11 a fena till CI Ievbt ftnhatae fteaetfCte ~~hV e~I Vl IC 1 V 1~eV Ovnta IC~'t vlf~tet Iti pCII~hOf I~Cr I.~ge'r pre~ehntt Othtt It.nn Il.nt fn~a haah il ea tr'l~'IeCCelf f at hlahnef~vllhnvl It.et C v 0~4 tvl Cf Iv LC tta 41 Tent.liat fraeetecee ~'ve vvv ear teaa et, C cate..at r.k4it4A a~ra acr A'L~v re A~e pv JNrv vh eva e~>dva vlNkbr"~/I4+je 1~I'.a'~I'~,aa~'$I I~(I pt(Z~~fJLeefw a~e s'a i~~af e~aa~I Ij'at J lw~Vl~Y U'5r 1r"i~hIS'1 f1'L: lflC t (: tr'Or'a wl aell I lf.'era i.'I'etc!II ala I'I'I.I L'h.:.4 i e'a'rreaeaealwre ~vie'AAwAA,av e ee r~TITI.Ir 0'cela". XNSTRUC LIONS FOR XNSTALLATXON, OPERATXON AM)MA XIQENANCE or SHELL AM)TUBE IIEAT EXCHAlxGERS FOR AZRXCAIT ELECTRIC POHEP, P'HVXCE CORPORATXOH XIIDXAIIA 8: 11XCHXOAD ELECTRXC CO&ZiQK DONALD C.COOK IICL" P3 PL~I'HXT 1 AllD 2 GUSTO."KR' PURCHASE ORDER IMBIBER Contract 1243.YUBA HEAT TRANSFER DIVISION JOB NUIIBER 69-G-226 DESIGNED AM)BUILT BY YUBA HEAT TRANSFER DXVXSXON TULSA, OKLAHOa~M, VV'I: D HHQ,'I7 ll i;ZQ,I.JGL-;.2 L'3i"'7J"I'~"'~I.G P.O.OOX 3158~TULSA, OKLAIIOMA 24101~19161 939 2201 EXCHANGER SPECIFICATION SHEET;,Qg ,/69-G-226 YVGA INOUSTAIES. INC, CUSTOI 1E R American Electric Power Corn.OAT F.CVST.NO.9-18-70 42373-P(IY PROPOSAL NO.OG-898-64 PLANT LocATIQN Donald C~Cook tguclear Plant SIZE 60-355 TYPE CFU POSITION Vertxca'ontainment S ra Cooler EA" 1 ITEMi NO 200 sHELLs PF Four NO.OF UNITS One SHELL ARRANGEMENT PARALLEL ENGRS.TEB PERFORMANCE OF ONE UNIT 10 VAPOR LIQVIO/HR.v.-/KA.FLVIO CIRCVLATEO B TOTAL FLVIO ENTERING lHR.SH'ELL SIDE Lake Hichigan Ilater 1 650,000-3300 GPI~I 1 650 000 TVOE SIDE Boraced NaOH I ater 1,600,000-3200 GPif 1 600 000 STEAM/HR.'NON CONOENSAGLES /HR.13 FI.VIO VAPORI?ED OR CONOENSEO/HA.14 STEAM Coia/OENSEO 15 GRAVITY.I,IQUIO 16 VISCOSITY-I.IQVIO MOLcCULAR.V(EIGHT VAPORS=/HR.oAP I CP.16 SP.HEAT-GTV/=(aF FNTHAL.PY-GTV/='G TEMPERATURE IN 20 TEMPEAATVRE OVT oF 76 141.5 167.5 100 21 OPERATING PRESSVRE P.S.I.A.P.S.I.G.IMPER OF P S tWO 24 LOCITY pRcssuRc ORop F ov'LING REslsTANcE F TJSEC.PD.t.001.0005 3.7 10 at.LowEo l,4 c" t.c.10 aLLowEo 4.0 cat.c.26 HEAT EXCHANGco-G.T.U JHR.22'RANSFER RATE SERVICE 107, 850, 000 375 M.T.O.~+~V-~OF.25~6 29 OESIGN PRESSVAE CON STR UCTI ON-EACH SHEL L 150 300 GO TEST PRESSURE DESIGN TEMPERATURE A249 TP316 Steel I a.t.225 oF 200 No-1150 U 450 200 0 0 5/8 IN 20 GwG.AvG.gt+;vaLL LENGTH 29 7 PITCH'l 3/l 6<<~>7LYA((INOM.I.O.60<<o.o.'QS SKELI.COVER IINTEGRAL Qp<~~~QItS+ 26 CKANNEL.304 S ta in less Steel o?TUBE sHEETs sTATIONARY Steel 6 Overlav F LTG.KO.COVER CHANiiIE L COV E R 304 S.Steel Cla FLOATING GB BAFFI.Es sEGME'(TAL Steel P ITCH lt CUT F I.OW QG BAFFLE-LONG Steel IMP'T.Stainless Steel 40 TYPC JQINTs sHELL.Bo1 ted TUBES Bolted 41 GAsKETs-sHELL S.Steel Clad 4?CONNECTIONS-SHEI.L-IN 18 CHANNEL-IN 44 CORROSION ALLQIVANCE SKELL SIOB l./8 FLTG.HO cHaNNEL S.Steel Clad OUT 18 SEAIES oUT t,2<<SERIES VE TUBE SIOE FULI-OF lvATEA 94,400 4 HTS EacH sHELI ANO GUNQI E 60 000 GVNOLE ONLY EMARKs:-Edd current cesc tubes.Seal weld tuoes.Full suo ort olace a U bends.E"REQUIREMENTS-as<<E 1968 Sect.I IC Tube Sec=8 STA'.I~IYEst 6~Y TEMAcLAss JUL 11 M~4'i(/7I'~ C-7//f YQBA HEAT TRANSFER CRPORATION P.O.BOX 3158~TULSA, OKLAHOMA 74101~(9181 939-2201 July 9, 1.975 American Electric Power Service Corporation Two Broadway New York, New York 10004 Attention: Mr.Cherry

Subject:

Indiana&Michigan Electric Co.Donald C.Cook Nuclear Plant Contract 1241 Containment Spray Heat Exchanger Yuba Job Number 69"G-226

Reference:

Seismic Report for American Electric Power Gentlemen: Confirming our recent telephone conversations regarding,our Seismic Analysis, our 69-G-226 vertical containment spray'heat exchanger for t'e-Donald C.Cook Nuclear Power Plant, the natural period of vibration is.108 sec.rather than.787 sec.as stated in the report.Please note that the.108 sec.perio'd will result in lower accelerations and stresses than those in the Seismic Report.If we may be of further assistance, please contact us.Very truly yours, YUBA HEAT TRANSFER CORPORAT N WCN/et cc:.Mr.R.H.Shaw Mr.T.R.Harrington Mr.Bill Newland Main File Engineering File WiXliam C.Newland, Jr.Design Engineer , ALL AGREEMENTS CONTINGENT UPON STRIKES, ACCIOENTS ANO OTHER CONOITIONS BEYONO OUR CON o'LLC N O TRACTS ARE SVLIECT TO APPROVAL SY AN OFFICER OF THE COMPANY.QUOTA'TIONS SUMECT TO CHANGE YYITHOUT NOTICE, 712"V I U-TUBE EXCHANGER REMOVABLE CHAN."$=L AND COVER TOO PASS SHELL EVEN PASS TU" E SIDE TEMA CLASS'R'ONSTRUCTION VUGG V~CaV Vna,usvt-:v. D<vrorota YVOA INOVSTAI4S'NC ir~~~TYPICAL CONSTR U CTION FEATURES OF YUBA TYPE CFU EXCHANGER

0 e'%f'l~~l IT~>V" g(y(/

rr:o/re%ro r<<o~,t/%',0 gg~~t a~/SOAP got 4~Ctootorr ooo goo<</7 L f.ooo tr I w ooo<<<<to lo tv<<or It Coo<<rtt/~tr raW/rtoooota o~I/k C.(iPICC tS/<</<<J trf CC~ao<<o rto<</tt.4 tp<<r~.o J ot Ct o/%it ct.~.toI oo h>to/I/~A'too J.Sc r r/root B P g Cooo toIl too.YVSA lQAT TRAPGFA NYIQIOII TIBIA WKANlWoo, poC,<<o,~oC rttr~oo too r<</~ro fr&rot.rtrrtce ar o<<rrro o/II<<o to<<tD<<4 ro<<oorrI rw to<<<<<<r~r//r/~rtl';~'.It 4'oI Co Component Zo.t H 6-(8 6 Class Any particular area the Seismic Review Team should pay extra attontion to?Yes No (If yes, check items that apply.)Anchor Type Anchor Diameter hnchor Spac:fag~Anchor Number Anchor Embedment Anchor Edge Distance Anchor Gap Anchor Thread Engagement Anchor Grip Anchor Angularity Concrete Crack Others (describe briefly)If there is concern for Design Basis Discrepancy, circle the applicable item and explain.l.2.3, Hardvare Maintenance Type Discrepancy Drying Up&,te Type Discrepancy Significant Operability/Design Basis Discrepancy .Others Condition: Actions Taken: t4 odC Prepared By T.naos><3 7Z ~~l4 Vrxr'441.V O.ulr ATTACHMENT NO-1 Equipment No.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch.ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET Avx E.c.bog'-g u Unxt 0 Bldg.Location t'Z-)5 A-0, I 2-39I>-J 1-H~8f Installation dwg./Rev.1 (a~)~~z VI 0~r (AO'-0" It(OlAl(P 4ICHI(tahiseg MAR 2g A g flQ)l~4, i'l fPOi.'rdnY LORY.T~~4 or>'0'gp)(~ELGu.i"4 Loose)6 NGS g 4 4~V~r Drawn by: Date: Date: Verified by:~~~Q al./Cert.nspector Reviewed by: Date: 8<>83 Construction An or Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1

• • 12 CHP 5021 CCD 01'TTACHMENT NO.CHOR INSPECTION DATA S EE ,~~<T.5'PR~%.6-R~g 0 0'ldg.Location Installation dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch Equxpm'ent No.kg+p oiT, 4lh5~,HMT (STCAM)Sl'."=~~~~J~', ik I~g Q 2S 1995'ngr lp~4'Fg I8 W$g ig 4'rawn by: T'~Lmt-mm,a Date: Verified by:~~~~Date: Q al./Cert.Inspector Reviewed by: Date: Construction An hor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
  • 12 CHP 5021.CCD.019 ATTACHMENT NO.1 Unxt i<-'39IS S I-HG-I55 Ecpxxpment No.Installation dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch NCHOR INSPECTION D TA SHEE ,~WvT SPRR'/~6-RooI4 A'~.Ct.Voq-o" Bldg.Location II II II II II I'g~fpll c CE'c IVV'i.<~ii MAR 2g the~II II II II II II~l PLP,g Ul~.(B e.Oe t mme.886<I) 7.W..U Date: 3-I'i<~Date: Drawn by: Verified by: qual./Cert.

Inspector Reviewed by: Date: 3-aS-'f>Construction An hor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1

• • 12 CHP 5021.CCD.019 ATTACHMENT NO.1 Unxt 12-39 lb A Installatl.on dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEE~!.pg q~40NT 5 PRA'/H Q-Pop~Bldg.Location A 1-~-(QE.Equipment No.6 I&s~/sP!9 24,+jg~p4.

>40 50!.T,!o~<-~Wh5~, NOT (~r.5)SE.CT.'A,-A S'ECT.5-8 2/g+'/g~pg)!3~h.~4gw)3'/2 xg x>/y x 8'jf (p~)4 c 4-IO ACCT,'c-c I t<0!*!!A V.!,"'l!" t:: WOc",Kl!":" C~MAR 7 Z l~~'BCT 0-D Date:~-~~-'~Z Date:&~L4nln.Drawn by: Verified by: Qual./Cert.Inspector Reviewed by: T-Date: Constru son An hor Pevxew Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1

• +12 CHP 5021.CCD.019 ATTACHMENT NO.1 Un t>A Installat on dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA S EE w~t-zpn.~w c-a<p~Bldg.Location 0 I-l-h=--ISI: Equipment No.p l/++p~i~~ll 5/cp 54l T w 1TH lo 4.M Hh&%9 RHOT IB<</zX g" I~I/a x Wy (STI~a Wmeg+~I/2 R)StHM K OH CIT~Se6 Or RR HEe I~VO7 S~WH SECT.F-E (RW)0~g p l I 0 I~:>l~!i>i'cV.CQpy MAR 2Z 1S95-LCRK,T 5CcT.F-F T AuL4esp Date:~-'-'(~Date: Drawn by: Date: hor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1 Verified by: ua./Cert.Tnspector Reviewed by: Constru son

~~~~II~~~~i~+~~s~~s~~-~'L I W 1 KR~~~RRKR~+~~~~~v l~j-mmwmmlHmm m mml@mmR1mmRI e~mRSWRIRRNSNKl MWWWWW&W 5%mmRMSRRmm RQmmmRRRRR%l% ~0 I 0 Cs 4~MW&MMWW&~r~gs r W 0 tW-~~

• • 12 CHP 5021.CCD.019 ATTACHMENT NO.1 Dwg No.:)~-S))SA-0 Dwg No.:Equipment No.: Anchor type NR)GC t.lfeR.Dia:>/Tightness established by: 0"Snug Fit" 5 Torque Torque Nrench No.:~~+~))Cal.Due Date: C 04 3 Tightness verified?5.Yes 0 No 7-'~'~'<~'i Date: "-<)-')3 ons ruc ron Equipment base flexible?0 Yes 8 No.""""<>>"l:

Date: 3'-l3 Bolt ID Caps Anchor len th l 0 tL lK)'5 84 sq s4" l S'lo Comments GETw&&nJ CoNC:Q L Protruding len th Embedment Bolt ri/S S/j'/II" tp g"'"/s l)(3y 653~4.~/g Concrete condition Cj OQQ 0 00$G,OOg g o 0g (WOOLD 40OP'oop Coop Edge distance Anchor s acin Anchor an larit Thread engagement +(l~rr gl l/eI m&S OK olc.oL g 9/)@4 Il Q II OE Og.hJUT tsSl~" T&lclL.Comments: Verified by: q a./Cert.Inspector Date:+Reviewed by: T-Const ct og I II)Ir Nh tfil~rI Gr'll I<Wr;'rYODK)AG COPY y;qB 23 1993 Pago 2 of 3 1-Revision Date: 3-a3-qg gu4 J.~<i', ggg ATTACHMENT NO.ANCHOR INSPECT ON D T S~~~~Equipment No.: I-1+6-<SG Embedded Steel Dwg.No.: HYSICAL C CT RIST C D g No.: I-Bhi5A-a Weld ID T e Size Len h Cracks Lack of Penetration 3lltp Yes Yes 0 Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Weld e Codes 1=Fillet 2=Plug/Slot 3=Groove Porosity Yes Yes No Yes No Yes'o Yes No Yes Yes No No R&.os 8 TYpLce io<+71()N< AAB g~6 pg, sTR084 R~~T-'-re-'tz INGIABO'<t SITe 0=<" VIP LEACH+r Equipment base flexible: Reviewed by: Qns ruc Ops'Qy Verified by: ua.e Q Yes Q.No 7 43 Lw~<w-u ons c 1on re xon c or evzew ngxneer ov hy'.npsec or Date: 3-<" Date: Date: Page 3 of 3 Revision 1

S 8 A CEPARTMENT CONTROL.LEO DOCUMc 8'l COPY NO.12 SHP 5050 NDE.008 ATTACHMENT NO.1 Ul',TRASONIC TEST REPORT JOB ORDER NO.:>If(REPORT DATE:>'+lZ REQUEST NO.l IA.IDENTIFICATION Unit C hlE Component l AC.l F Item Material Other TECHNI UE Test Unit/S/N Freq./Diameter 6 Reference Standard C.Ke Couplant/Batch No.i~cMA 6t=o".'3e TEST DATA REMARKS PERFORMED BY: REVIEWED BY: FORM NO.12 SHP 5050 NDE.008-1 I EVEI:~DATE: E.EVEL:~DATE: 5 Page 1 of 1 Revision 0 0 01/16/92 PG.MO.SC5 SAFE SHUTOOMM EOUIPHENT LIST (SSELMP)FUNCTION: Equipment Class: 21 I'rain: 2 Equipment IO: 1-HE-3C-HE Drawing Number: 1-5135A Svstem: CCM Equip

Description:

NORTH SAFETY INJECTION PUMP PP.26N OUTBOARD MECHANICAL SEAL HEAT EXCHANGER Building: AUXILIARY Room: NORTH SAFETY INJEC'IIOH PUMP ROOII Elevation: 587 Normal State: Desired state: iPower Required: M Sort: lf, Suoonrting System Drawing Humber: omvired Interconnections and Supporting Components: fety Related Status: NUCLEAR SR Min/Opt: MIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AIIas Number: Cnmonnent Served: NORTH SAFETY INJECTION PUMP PP 26N Power Train: MA wanufacturert BORG.MARNER Kodeit NX 0500-FM Panel EC~Drawing: H/A Miring Drawing: N/A Pnwer Source: N/A Mal%down: F Relay Only: M Comoonent I'ype: ISO Drawings: HE~Detailed Location: DC COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 1 of 2 ID: 1-HE-34-NE (Rev.0)Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers

== Description:==

NORTH SAFETY INJECTION PUMP PP-26N INBOARD MECHANICAL SEAL HEAT EXCHANGER Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: N SAFETY INJECTION PUMP RM, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: BORG-WARNER, NX-0500-FW BASIS: External analysis 1.The buckling capacity of the shell of a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank is equal to or greater than the demand.2.The capacity of the anchor bolts and their embedments is equal to or greater than the demand.3.The capacity of connections between the.anchor bolts and the tank shell is equal to or greater than the demand.4.Attached piping has adequate flexibility to accommodate the motion of a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank.5.A ring-type foundation is not used to support a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank.N/A Yes Yes Yes N/A S S C~co vins SRT: Gary Thomas, Tom Huang and Kailash Mahajan on 11/1/93.ANCHORAGE ACCEPTABLE BY ENGINEERING JUDGMENT OF THE SRT.6" diameter by 8-3/4" high exchanger, attached to North Safety Injection Pump with 2 1/2" bolts.Could have screened with the pump using the rule of the box, however the exchanger was listed seperately on the SSEL.Crane above in a parked and locked position.Evaluated by: Date:

Attachment:

Pictures DC COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)~GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 2 of 2 ID: 1-HE-34-NE (Rev.0)Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers

== Description:==

NORTH SAFETY INJECTION PUMP PP-26N INBOARD MECHANICAL SEAL HEAT EXCHANGER Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: N SAFETY INJECTION Pt MP RM, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: BORG-WARNER, NX-0500-FW NORTH SAFETY IN JECTION PUMP PP-26N ~~xc vnr~vs~iiu.via ATTACHMENT NO.1 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET Un1t g Bldg.A.5a4z h~e~', 9Rn Locat1on C Installat1on dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement, Sketch Equ1pment No.F46'v.J>I=4 45DksQl c yj'4 Ooi~Yyp Vlc o.O.INDiAHA." llCHIGA"I POY(ER CONSTRLICT!Oib CGLTROLLEO EYORKING COPY S~P g g tqap Oo I~l FLo'E4.'-0~T, 4 Gr a q'i CLERK k 7 ,:I Drawn by: Verified by: Reviewed by: Date:/8-/-Date: L-Z.-'P<Qual./Cert.Inspector Date: nstruct1on Anchor Rev1ew Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1 Equipment No.: Tightness Veri f ied by: Tightness established by"Snug Fit" Tightness veri'ed by: 'C.goal./Cert. Inspector onstruction ARE Comments: Equip ID: 1-TK-11 Train: 12 Equip Class: 21 Drawing No.: 1-5142 ction: RI ys tern: BORON INJECTION Equip Desc: BORON INJECTION TANK Building: AUXILXARY Room: BORON INJECTION TANK ROOM Elev: 612 Sort: S, Notes: Normal State: Desired State: Power Req'd: Support System Drawing: Req'd Support Comp: Safety Related Status: NUCLEAR SR Alias No: Power Train: Comp Served: BORON INJECTION TANK Mfr: STRUTHERS-WELL-CORP. Model: 900 GALS, O'I'.Elem.Drawing: 1-98282 Wiring Drawing: 1-95222 Power Source: '1-AM-D-5A 1-AM-A-2A Walkdown: F Relay Eval: N Comp Type: TANK a ISO Drawing: Min/Opt: MIN Location: XN THE MIDDLE OF ROOM, 15'W OF THE ROOM'S ENTiVQICE DOORWAY. DC COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 1 of 3 ID: 1-TK-11 (Rev.0)Description: BORON INJECTION TANK Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 612.00 Room, Row/Col: BORON INJECTION TANK RM, IN THE MIDDLE OF RM, 15'WOF THE RM'S ENTRANCE DOORWAY.Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: STRUTHERS-WELL-CORP. 900 GALS, 4'l BASIS: External analysis 1.The buckling capacity of the shell of a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank is equal to or greater than the demand.2.The capacity of the anchor bolts and their embedments is equal to or greater than the demand.3.The capacity of connections between the anchor bolts and the tank shell is equal to or greater than the demand.4.Attached piping has adequate flexibility to accommodate the motion of a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank.5.A ring-type foundation is not used to support a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank.N/A Yes Yes Yes N/A SMC~CO~~S SRT: Gary Thomas, Tom Huang and Kailash Mahajan on 11/3/93.ADEQUACY OF ANCHORAGE AND TANK TO SUPPORT CONNECTION BASED ON JUDGMENT BY THE SRT AND COMPARISON TO THE BORIC ACID TANK EVALUATION. Tank is 5'iameter by 10'n height supported by 4 Wide Flange Leg supports (10" WF w/5/8" flange)4'R" in height..Each leg is bolted to the pedestal w/two embedded 1 3/4" bolts with 2'-11" embedment Weld of leg to tank about 14" in length and 1/4" thickness on each side of the wide flange and 10" at the top of the wide flange.Adjacent Block wall reinforced with column supports and it is not an interaction concern.The Seismic Evaluation of the Boric Acid Tank (2-TK-12S) is seismically adequate.The Boron Injection Tank (1-TK-11)is much smaller but has about th.same support.Therefore, Tank 1-TK-11 is judged adequate. DC COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 2 of 3 ID: 1-TK-11 (Rev.0)Description: BORON INJECTION TANK Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 612.00 Room, Row/Col: BORON INJECTION TANK RM, IN THE MIDDLE OF RM, 15'WOF THE RM'S ENTRANCE DOORWAY.Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: STRUTHERS-WELL-CORP. 900 GALS.4'l Evaluated by: Date:-fs.

Attachment:

Pictures

DC COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 3 of 3 ID: 1-TK-11 (Rev.0)Description: BORON INJECTION TANK Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 612.00 Room, Row/Col: BORON IN JECTION TANK RM, IN THE MIDDLE OF RM, 15'W OF THE RM'S ENTRANCE DOORWAY.Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: STRUTHERS-WELL-CORP. 900 GALS, 4'l ELILlEH BASE ANCHORAGE PEDESTAL SUPPORT COLUMN TO TANK CONNECTION

Coo Component No.~TK.<laic Ql Any payticulir area the Seismic Revue~Teaa should pay extra attention to?Yes~No (If yea, check items that apply.)Anchor Type Anchor Diameter Anchor Spacing Anchor Number Anchor Embedment<Anchor Edge Distance Anchor Cap Anchor Thread Engagement Anchor Crip Anchor Angularity Concrete Crack Others (describe briefly)If there ts concern for Design Basis Discrepancy, circle the applicable item and explain.l.2.3.4(,.Hardvare Maintenance Type Discrepancy Drawing Up&,teType Discrepancy Significant Operability/Design Basis Discrepancy Others Condition: Actions Taken: Prepared By D444 0 L2 CHP 5021.CCD.019 ATTACHM.NT NO.1 AQ'L~~I'-0" Cl Bldg.I-T>C.-Il Equipment Un t I2-3514.-17 Installation dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch BORON'MKCTIOM tAMI(t=.I GM Location O NO.Ycxwk, Loc.=+i@~+aK<Ir Pro~Dwg.(0-33]"t-l7 E I" x I5"X l5" W IO>>4.5 I~1~'+AMOS HQLY'5 PEP DRAINlklC)Q.357')-20 o O.6J Qc 4 0 Qg INOI.-'sic. r'.I.,r<~".SITE 0::SIGN COr WORKING CGc~JUL lg tSS5 LERK Drawn by: Verified, by:~Qua.Cert.Inspector Date: Reviewed by:=4, Construct on Date: c or Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1 .2 CHP 5021.CCD.019 ATTACHMENT NO.1 Un t AUX.(oQ'-0" EL.Bldg.BQROQ M,K,CT'lQKL TAMK PQQM Location Installation dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch I-TK-)i Equxpment No.)8 ELK.V.LKC.UHH I NOI AN A MICK IGAN POWER SITE DESIGN CONTROLLEO WORKING COPY lUt.1)1995 LERK~Drawn by: Verified by: Reviewed by: Date: Date: Construction An Date: or Review Engineer Qua.Cert.Xnspector 3 Page 1 of 3 Revision 1

~~~4 4 vo 4~gag t/i y)ATTACHMENT No.quipment No, I-Vl(-iL~No i~pe.c i-.Yaw<~g No.: Anchor type:>~+~"P~~I~~Dia: I++Dwg No.: Tightnass cata isnas hy: FJ"snug Fit" 0 Torque g Torque Wrench No.: hlh Cal.Due Date:+Q-Tightness verified'? 0 Yes 0 No Date: ons ruc ron q Equipment base flexible7 D Yes I No'<">l Date: ons ruc xo ARE/o Pj~J I~)Q%~7+Bolt ID'/tie" A'13K A COIIIments I Anchor len h s//'w'//'j 1eb'v 4 Z'-II"@0~'-I I"~g 2'-I FE.CE~RGCLGSE.O Protruding p~~T~o<~/.,~a ga len th P.ECESXQ<ITT I HICK Ill 4 p/+>>)/In~>+@Ih I ICD Embedment~v 2-6'/s" 2'-5'e Bolt ri Z."~<~" 2'~o" 6'4" 2'/e" E>4" V<t." GPGUY condition'""'te CO~Cea iS CeC~IL BELD-LCa PER CPAV{LLLCs Edge 4/A N/A M/'A IM/4, 4/A 4/0, hL/0, g/A&z)g<distance TIS IQ Q.m Anchor s acin Anchor an larit 6'/z" 8'/z" 8" B" 8" 5" 8" Atu QIOR 4/4 4/A kVA U JA kl/A IJ/A U/4 4/A&Hi u~TW (N>/S'I+"~/~-our mi~~a-.Thread"~ecE~t-I<RE~a RccEss 0 i4 P,G Ess DK.H IC engagement Comments,+UA'TA,'QoT QwtlkiEQ DUE'To 7 AYLQM.IN A UUOKTALNA LIE TCi T P, Verified by-gua ,//Cert inspector Ravieved by: Construct on ARE INDIANA LIIGHT'..: SITE OESIGN CONTRC~0 WORKING COPY Date:->3 Pago 2 of 3 Revision 1 LERK 9'~I S'8'A DEPAR'FMENT CONTROLLED DOCUMENT COPY NO.'P-l 2 SHP 5050 NDE.008 ATTACP2KNT NO.1 ULTRASONiC TEST REPORT C A'/Tg gy REQUEST NO.JA IDENTIFICATION Unit+e Component: -7 f-//Item n/A/'/--Naterial~/Other C)TECHNI UE-'tl Test Unit/S/NL(.i-'/'S Freq./Diameter Reference Standard Couplant/Batch No.Cz c"RQS TEST DATA RENARKS A/T c'L C PERFORMED BY: REVIEWED BY:" FORM NO.12 SHP 5050 NDE.008-1 LEVEL~DATE: 3 23~13 LEVEL:~DATE: Y ZS Page 1 of 1 Revision 0 Equip ID: 1-TK-37 Train: 12 Equip Class:21 Drawing No.: 1-S13SA ction: CCW~~System: CCW Equip Desc: COMPONENT COOIING WATER SURGE TANK ggc Building: AUXILIARY Room:~HALLWAY$5o Elev:%69-Sort: S, Notes: Normal State: Desired State: Power Req'd: N Support System Drawing: Req'd Support Comp: Safety Related Status: NUCLEAR SR Min/Opt: MIN Alias No: Power Train: NA Comp Served: CONDENSATE COOLING TANK MFR: SPEAR AND WOOD Y"Gel: 10000GAL, 2'x 12lem.Drawing: N/A Wiring Drawing: N/A Power Source: N/A Walkdown: F Relay Eval: N Comp Type: TANK (COMMON DIVIDED BY BAFFLE}Iso Drawing: Location: DC Cook Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet1 of5 ID: 1-TK-37 (Rev.0)Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers

== Description:==

COMPONENT COOLING WATER SURGE TANK Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 650.00 Room, Row/Col: HALLWAY, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: SPEAR AND WOOD, 10000GAL, 2'x 12'BASIS: External analysis 1.The buckling capacity of the shell of a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank is equal to or greater than the demand.2.The capacity of the anchor bolts and their embedments is equal to or greater than the demand.3.The capacity of connections between the anchor bolts and the tank shell is equal to or greater than the demand.4.Attached piping has adequate flexibility to accommodate the motion of a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank.5.A ring-pe foundation is not used to support a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank.N/A Yes Yes Yes N/A SRT: Gary Thomas and Tom Huang on 11/3/93.Skirted tank 11'-10 1/4" diameter and 17'n height.Skirt is 4'4" high from the top of the pad to skirt connection to tank.Skirt has 1/2" thickness. There are 8 bolts evenly spaced around tank, with a solid steel washer 3-3/4" high x 4" length x 2" width.Bolts supported from 3" x 3" x 1/2" angle.Crane above tank has been evaluated by AEPSC for seismic loads.The results gave a safety factor of 1.06 for the anchor bolts using the GIP penalty for J-bolt embedment. A hand calculation that included in the package was performed for the bolt stresses.Evaluated by: Date:

Attachment:

Pictures

Attachment:

External Anchorage Analysis for 1-rK-37 DC Cook Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet2of5 ID: 1-TK-37 (Rev.0)Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers

== Description:==

COMPONENT COOLING WATER SURGE TANK Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 650.00 Room, Row/Col: HALLWAY, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: SPEAR AND WOOD, 10000GAL, 2'x 12'BOLT TO TANK DETAIL CUENT<<Iota S'+t-I"" attar~or~Stevenson and Assodates 8 A Structural Meelto atcol Coo<atria<5 Eat<to<<a<toy Fr<ra D 5~~5P fA~~6 Cl>>th~.\<It>>tu l.'.-<o>>(<<o 45 i~'I'L~I I, A,S>>hf tht I hr h>>ft gl Pg ti<;>>I'<<rtr l tth.I~I I (~f~~<<'l'\I~I*I>>5 p.<<, I~'<~.,~.If yh(l~5\~of (tl'551<>>>>~r>>Cf Pl>>h I ftjj I I<<L pt'p tr 5>>I ttI 11 lh l O.Il trrlh I u (5>>r l>>g r~tt ro~t 55>'5 t,:.It}I~ CIJENT 4(S Sl.8"" L I.,'7 M stru.~I SUBJECT~~s'1 P w w Cg<<I Ccs~.~uI<, I(J>1.c 7E A Ic-[<<~g~5 7 Stevenson and Assodates A S(ruccurc!.MccIsr aces l Coarul((s(r Ea(r(act((ay E(rsi is>>I 4.,".~, gc'?N.4 E~E.I<<II)I IEII,(u~1'ilr 7 r(c'I~~8'ci 1*5~1 1.'cc~II'I~4 r?~>>1~h.Il.CI V I Qlr~1 I 41\5,*4~4)i%tl7 (l>>P re>>~t (1;I.I lrr,'114"C?u qg.c i r PL?cl>>>>I>>cl'4'i.7(~C 7('5.Itrr~I~C E~'~l C'I cgt 114 QI CI fine>>4 1~l,F V I\~~ir p7~t I rli~roc 2?P O'<<'>>I'r I-,c;r(lr>>;~ir c>>I x 5 7 4 44 ktI lr>>E 1 I>>7 S"Cj 4'PW I'ic~CI C("'"'I t<<lv,<<(7s, c~'r<<r,.Ttt(I I 5>>r:Lt~I".1 ()r E~4 r' 4 CuEHT Y)9~'" SHEET OF g@~C~~~F~~a V~c.ter-4-IJt r.Z>>7 ht tc, (h'r Steve@son and Assodatcs 0*Stractara)-Mac)raalcal Coarldttay Ka2ltaccrlatr Ftral 44 (2 2 7.'2 4"4'fcr.gf ,44 rr~44144 2 I F Jt ll~I r-'29'vY t~".4.r Jtt'2 4" V i g 2'tFI't 4)'I I~\Fr YYt g'I~'~'1'.~>r.Vr x 2FI'-41.241~4 h~4 1~Pl 2~44,'Yr Y I;"2~Ih 222~1 fI rl\IF)4Y.C 44 Y'4 22Y2", I.f~.g;\s Yl*)f.h'F.y I

• • 12 CHP 5021.CCD.019 ATTACHMENT NO.1 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET Unxt"/2-3 Z7 Bldg.Y(-Location Installation dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch Equipment No.'w MG ORNA INDIANA CONST RU w a 3~992 MICHIGAN POWER TION CONTROLLEO RKIHG COPY<<~L 4-o Drawn by.Verified by Date: Date: Reviewed by: Q al./Cert.Inspector Date: S nstructzon Anchor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
  • 12 CHP 5021 CCD O19 ATTACHMENT NO.1 ANCHOR INSPECT10N DATA SHEET Unxt g Q-3 Bldg.Locate.on Installation dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch Ecpxzpment No.INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CONSTRUCTION CONTROLLED WORKING COPY AUG 1>1992 CLERK.>+~~8/y.:c"a q'.e Drawn by: Verified by: Reviewed by: QG./Cert.nstructxon Date: Date: Inspector P Date: Anchor Review Engineer-I-l Page 1 of 3 Revision 1 0
  • 12 CHP 5021.CCD.019 ATTACHMENT NO.1 r ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET Unxt g Bldg.Location Installatz.on dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch Equipment No.1--3 (gp($+4<4(QH>GAB POWER QON$TQQCv n~GONTSOLLEO wOR~.'Ci CC('Y azw p~l~b c<~(omnlsonS Votv SrC r~a~+i~>Leo+H>>+Fl 6 oP)s 4r 3+c//<Ãs B%3'ls Drawn by: Verified by: Reviewed by: Date: Date: Q l./Cert.Inspector Date: onstructxon Anchor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1 l s fi~~~I~~,;~/~N~~~~~~s~~W~sRM~RHR%

a~~a MMIIIIIII II585mmlmmm RSIIIRIMIIIII RSIIISIIIRSRRIIII 55.Iles%..l%I%IIIIIISIIIHII a Rse&R4%Ã%RM~RJ%8%5% MWWMWMW&I~La Sl~~i~~K9MEX>L L~L~(~~asia~~~I~~~~~~~i f~~~ Equipment No.: I.!-~'ightness established by"Snug Fit" Tightness veri fi ed by: Qual./Cert.Xnspector Comments: Equip XD: 12-TK-47-AB Train: 1 Equip Clays,:21 wing No.: 2-5151C tion: EMERG DIESEL System: DIESEL FUEL OXL Equip Desc: AB EMERG DIESEL FUEL OIL STORAGE TANK (BURIED IN THE YARD)Building: GROUNDS Room: INNER PLANT GROUNDS Elev: 609 Sort: S, Notes: Normal State: Desired State: Power Req'd: N Support System Drawing: Req'd Support Comp: Safety Related Status:.NUCLEAR SR Alias No: Power Train: NA Comp Served: AB FUEL OXL STORAGE TANK MFR: 60,000 GALS (12'IA X 72'ONG)'Panel: Elem'.Drawing: NgA Hiring Drawing: N/A Min/Opt: MIN Power Source: N/A Walkdown: F Relay Eval: N Comp Type: TANK (COMMON FOR UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2)240 HRS FULL LOAD.Xso Drawing: 7 Location: BEXNG REPLACED UNDER RFC 12-4113,, CI NOT APPROVED AS OF 9-15-92.

DC Cook Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 1 of 11 ID: 12-TK47-AB (Rev.0)Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers

== Description:==

AB EMERG DIESEL FUEL OIL STORAGE TANK Building: GROUNDS Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: INNER PLANT GROUNDS UNIT 0 2 BURIED SOUTH OF TURBINE BUILDING Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 12'IA X 69'-10"LONG, 60000 GALS BASIS: External analysis 1.The buckling capacity of the shell of a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank is equal to or greater than the demand.-2.The capacity of the anchor bolts and their embedments is equal to or greater than the demand.3.The capacity of connections between the anchor bolts and the tank shell is equal to or greater than the demand.4.Attached piping has adequate flexibility to accommodate the motion of a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank..5.A ring-type foundation is not used to support a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank.N/A Yes Yes N/A N/A mQKS SRT: George G.Thomas (SBA)and Tom Huang (AEP)'C Underground tank.SRT evaiuated this tank based on the ave~~able documentation in the equipment package.A tank calculation was performed (included in the tank package)based on the reference drawings The tank was modeled as a beam on elastic foundation. The overall tank stresses were very low (on the order of 3.6 ksi).Evaluated by:~g i-)Date: il/Z~low"

Attachment:

EVALUATION OF STRESSES IN THE TANK CUENT g-a4CttO 5~Stcvcnson and Assodatcs EI A Structural Maclen aleut Conautttatr Kntrtncartng Ftrra>cn tn-OSC CLlEHT SUMECT Stevenson and Associates El A scuctvcal Mechanical coasulctsy Elplaoocno f4' CUENT Stcvcnson and Associates k A Stsucturel-M eAe nlesl Coaoultlaa Koalnooriay Fina.C.~Ca~4

CUENT Stevenson and Assodates R A StnsctvcehMocha alcal Coaaoltlay Eagtoeeaay Fina De+e C-WO W CUENT Stevenson and Assodates h st(udvrasMecha aleaf Coawltlay Knylnoodng fire

g CUENT Stevenson and Assodates Il A Structursl-Mschs nicsl Consulting Engtn<<ring Sirrn z 0 8 Pu 5~4, No~o-1'3 lOc 3%c 4 CUENT Stevenson end Assodatcs l5 A Srrucrural.Mcchaalcal Caarulung Kaalaccriny flrra Pr Cr 8 WOCr CUENT Stevenson and Associates II h StructurohM echo uk ol Cuaoulttau Kactaoortatr f to ra I 2.S ( 0 CUENT Stevenson and Assodates 8 A SICIICIVC1I.MWL4OIC4I Coaoul5sy Kaylneorlng Feaa D.a ggg V i' CUENT SVMEGT Stcvcnson and hssodatcs 8 A Svuctural.Mechanical Coaaultiog K~laoeclny Eitoa Y-t A. Equip ID: 2-HE-11 Train: 12 Equip Class: 21 Drawing No.: 2-5129A 2-5135~~~ction: RI System: REACTOR COOLANT PUMP SEAL WATER INZ/LEAKOFF Equip Desc: REACTOR COOLANT PUMP SEAL WATER HEAT EXCHANGER Building: AUXILIARY Room: SEAL WATER HEAT EXCHANGER ROOM Elev: 609 Sort: S, Notes: Normal State: Desired State: Power Req'd: N Support System Drawing: Req'd Support Comp: Safety Related Status: NUCLEAR SR Alias No: Power Train: NA Comp Served: REACTOR COOLANT PUMP Mfr: ATLAS INDUSTRIAL MANUFACTURING CO.Blem.Drawing: N/A Wiring Drawing: N/A Power Source: Walkdown: F Relay Bval: N Min/Opt: MIN Comp Type: HEAT EXCHANGER ISO Drawing: 2-CS-91 2-CS-100 Location: IN WEST AREA OF ROOM DC COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 1 of 7 ID: 2-HE-11 (Rev.0)Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers

== Description:==

REACTOR COOLANT PUMP SEAL WATER HEAT EXCHANGER Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: SEAL WTR HEAT XCHGR RM-IN WEST AREA OF ROOM Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: ATLAS INDUSTRIAL MANUFACTURING CO.BASIS: External analysis 1.The buckling capacity of the shell of a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank is equal to or greater than the demand.2.The capacity of the anchor bolts and their embedments is equal to or greater than the demand.3.The capacity of connections between the anchor bolts and the tank shell is equal to or greater than the demand.4.Attached piping has adequate flexibility to accommodate the motion of a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank.5.A ring-type foundation is not used to support a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank.N/A Yes Yes Yes N/A S U~CVIF~S SRT: Gary Thomas and Tom Huang on 11/3/93.Vertical Heat Exchanger on a Gusseted steel pedestal.Each Pedestal is anchored to the floor with 8-3/4" J-Bolts embedded 20" into floor.Exchanger is 16" in diameter and 14'n height.Exchanger is bolted to the steel pedestal with,2 1" diameter steel bolts on 6" centers in weak direction and 2'-8" in strong direction. This connection is more limiting than the anchorage to the floor.Attached calculation was to judge adequacy of these for bolts.The exchanger has a frequency of 10.6 Hz and the bolts had a safety factor in tension of 3.54.Evaluated by: Date: IC)/4~g~CZ

Attachment:

Pictures ttachment: Verification of Bolt Connection

DC COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 2 of 7 ID: 2-HE-11 (Rev.0)Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers

== Description:==

REACTOR COOLANT PUMP SEAL WATER HEAT EXCHANGER Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: SEAL WTR HEAT XCHGR RM-IN WEST AREA OF ROOM Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: ATLAS INDUSTRIAL MANUFACTURING CO.ECUlKR SUPPORT PEDESTAL TOP OF THE EXCHANGER CUENT SUBJECT t'()Ne.Q CaO<~Stevenson and Assodates S A Sllvclvl al-MCCIII alcol Coalvlgag Saglaotllag Fitch Ahchol'~Acca oaohC Slcatch 2-HHI Ioalcro Vatlaco tacofa SllC DYSICN CDNYIDSIIO clalclha cotY Sfp lS 1SSS I~I(I~h'YI'nt>NYCT lS fC(WF)~, Cl yl ,~')eIC.S~qvr)"..'LEV l K(o C)SST~~~~r~~~.~~.~I~~I~I~-~~~~~~~r er'~~~'~~h'~~rt'acatl4c ".)pP;I@aha'li cac~\hr 5't,o IODIINC IVQOCAN YOOC~cl 5 Dcslca cahl caslto voc claa can SSP lS lSSS SIC IYCSO IAI L~FA)AD CI Yclta J IICCDI13 (YYY)<<CIO II3 (rlrg.-,'t IYCSO'Wt (tel Y3)~ICSDWI lg~I~'I."~T eotT trit)tr (>>3ECY.'t\3 c cc(cccl c-c N occuv)r~C A B l I'oh 0 0 p 0 0 0 c e o.~0 0 II IC 0 0 F>3 e(FID)0 0 IC 0 0 C I\L C,caclr~E sell:'rc I 0 0 T.rL~,Ql 01hhc I cocah cocca<<lc Dl gas cac IDLsco aacclha catt Sf P'S SSSS acscT r 0~aa Iaa S.g.)i~r g+Ps Yah CI'I c I, tC'Ã)'~'S C CUEHF QJBJECT Stevenson and Assodatcs 8 A Structural-Mectfaalcal Coaru!o oft Eatftocurtafr Fifa<P P.~i'I, h ,f~P.'~cK<<<><YA ~iver fl" gv vruhu'.'P<%.fc\u<K h..'g"I~)I t>>f<<~lg'tfr lg<<>>u'P vh tlap P..~,'<<r r'pi t,'hr>f.~I~p pfr>>~>>I~<<~u/Pf>>P h P..htrfu P~h<<I P gh'I l'I r<up I'P H f'<<'~ru~I~I qtr~>>Irph r'tfu Ip.hFrutarp toKj.ifu*~h r, CUENT JOB No.SUBJECT~@Awe EW Stevenson and Assoctntes IR.A St(ucfuf al.Macha afccl Cuafulffaff Raff face(Lay Sic(a 4~1~+1~I Jul gl>>~'g I u4<<P Irp (~/<<<<<<ls 1,14'la>>n.~\'..IP'f>>J Sir!I'I.4.'"4,')!e/Off P CP'"'5 II I,I(lr<<"<<>>l<<'+rrf>>V tf PP P rir I~1~I ru I'<<"f~'I~p I'-l-'5 4 crap l>>Q,:If (~"r,~44I (l<<>>I'l('l I~uf'I 14.C'<<PPP~1,1 P~<<1<<1 1(Q/'1>>t%14 r I II u~rpl rp I 0(fg ff CUENT JOB No.~'HEET OF Stevenson and Assodatcs 5 A Structural.l4ucha attut Coaruttiag Kagtauurtag Firar L.~r~r, Coo Componone yo, 2 Class l Any paxpicular area the Seismic Review Teaa should pay extra attention tot Yes<No (Xf yea, check items that apply.)Anchor Typo Anchor Diameter Anchor Spacing Anchor Number Anchor Embodmont< Anchor Edge Distance Anchor Cap Anchor Thread Engagement Anchor Crip Anchor Angularity Concrete Crack~qs~~~T gjO I/E;Q Pl I IJ (.)<Al (=(g E'L Other'a (describe bri.oily)TE there is concern for Design Basis Discrepancy, cir'clo the applicable item and explain.1.2.3.Hardware Maintenance Type Discrepancy l'raving Upd?te Typo Discrepancy Signil.'icant Operability/Design Basis Discrepancy Others Condition: Actions Taken: Prepared By

• • 12 CHP 5021.CCD.019 ATTACHMENT NO.1 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEE SBfn DATER I+&AT AX.M@Oq-01'AC,HAhl4BR g.oug Bldg.Location Installation dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch 2..~-I t Ectuzpment No.2-HG"I I INDIANA I IICMIGAN POWCR SITE DESIGN CONTROLLEO WORKING COPY SEP t)1995 g (~Il<YPg~i1 R(7<~)I/Z,R.(~p)

~Ag~b<~0\~h~<~b PLED.gK.G C A&T Date: Date: Drawn by: Date: Engineer.Verified by:~ual./Cer.Inspector Reviewed by: T Construe won An hor Review Page 1 of 3 Revision 1

• • 12 CHP 5021.CCD.019 ATTACHMENT NO.1 ANCHOR INSPECT ON DATA SH E Unxt l2-3z Xnstallatxon dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch Equipment No.(>yp)IVB&(T9P)I ,'A 0 0 P 0 0 I~4 I 0 0 0 0>/g Z(~p)0 0 8 C AFOOT Pee.0 0 I-O'RP I IOIAPIA iVICHIGAN POPOVER SITE OESIGN CONTROlLED YPORKIHG COPY SEP t~1995.LFRKT Drawn by: Date: Verified by: Date: al.Cert.Xnspector Reviewed by: Date: Construction Anch r Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
• 12 CHP 5021.CCD.019 ATTACHMENT NO.1 CHOR INSPECTION DAT S A"SX~gPa'-O" S~%PITCH&BR'T BXCHfHI GBR.RooH Unit l 2-525s Bldg.Installation dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement SketchH~-1(Equipment No.Location INDIANA I.IICHIGAN PO'ilE'R SITE DLSIGN COMTROLLiD WORKING COPY SF.P 13 ISSUE LERK W~Hb ('TYPE)3/(y WMA j~/II (~P'L)/I g HMH$~P2.)~I(w~wB wm wl.bi,'ob'4'ga J BoiT (~P)e'$~~5CCT, Z-8 (scca c;c~<<~+~~)Drawn by: Date:~1 Verified by:~~ual Cert.Inspector Reviewed by: T Construe won chor Review Date: Date: Engineer-F-F Page 1 of 3 Revision 1 ATTACHMENT NO~1 ANC OR SP Equipment No.-'mbedded Steel Dwg.No.: YS I CA CHARA IS C Dwg No.: Weld ID T e Size Len th Cracks 2I/Yes Yes Yes Yes s'/~II I>/II 3li t l II/%4"<4'8I/Yes o Yes No Yes No Weld e Codes 1=Fillet 2=Plug/Slot 3=Groove Lack of~e Penetration es Yes es QeQs Yes No No Yes No Porosity Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes'es Yes No Yes No INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER SITE DESIGN CONTROLLED WORKING COPY SEP tg t995 LERK Equipment base flexible: 0 Yes 5-No ons ruc z n e Date: Reviewed'y:

Verified by: ons ruc won c or evzev ngxneer V a..e.npsec or Date: t l2 3 Date: Page 3 of 3 Revision

• ~12 CHP 5021~CCD.019 ATTACHMENT NO.1 Equipment No.: Anchor type: GODET Tightness established by: 0 Torque Wrench No.: Tightness verified?0 Yes Equipment base flexible?0 Dia: "Snug Fit" Dwg No.: l2-32 pwg No~: I 2-'32 8$0 Torque Cal.Due Date: No Date: 1 ons c 10 Yes C(No~.Date: 0 1-13 ons uc 1 n ARE C C Bolt ID Gaps Anchor len th A 5 C O e.F c l aeT I/S~"em Yg>'ST c$$$Hpv gpss\It I"'I V<ii i il c</~~"/g Z~Jy edment)I)I//)~i iI qu 1<qu lI-1" li q'i~I 1 qy8)q Bolt ri Concrete condition Edge distance g (2./I X P I 2.">I W)I>W t 2.0 I 2.7i2-Anchor s acin Anchor an larit Thread engagement

@II@tl@'II@II (4 u~4 Oo i~o 00 g0 OO O4 ()0 oy 0 y ng oK.ot.ck ok o((Comments: Verified by: r9 a., ert.Inspector Revieved by: Construct on ARE SITE DESIGN CONTROLLED WOIIKING COPY SEP l~1995 LEIIK Date: Date: ago2of 3 ovision-3 r4 ~I e~~k~~'~~~~e~~e~~I-~~4'~/I e 14 elec~~II I-d e W'.R Lk o mmmmiimmmi .-IIIIIIIIHI mmmIIRlmmmm RRIIIRI mm58~~~o p o~-=ISRIIRHIIIIIIR5lRR REMI IMMIT&~i g$J I']'0)J WW%%~.0 S 8 A DEPARTMENT CONTROLLEO DOCUMENT COPY NO.12 SHP 5050 NDE.008 ATTACHMENT NO.1 ULTRASONIC TEST REPORT JOB ORDER NO.: CQ 4, REPORT DATE: REQUEST NO.M A, IDENTIFICATION Unit'l~CD Component 2--l l Item Material+S Other TECHNI UE Test Unit/S/Frey./Diameter Reference Standard Couplant/Batch No.C<TEST DATA REMARKS PERFORMED BY: REUIEWED BY: FORM NO.12 SHP 5050 NDE.008-1 LEVEL: M~DATE:/5 Page 1 of 1 Revision 0 Emlip ID: 2-HE-38E Train: 2 Equip Class:21 J wing No.: 2-5135A ction: CCW System: MISCELLANEOUS SEALING AND COOLXNG Equip Ddsc: EAST CENTRIFUGAL CHARGING PUMP PP-50E LUBE OIL COOLER Building: AUXILIARY Room: EAST CENTRIFUGAL CHARGING PUMP ROOM Elev: 587 Sort: S, Notes: Normal State: Desired State: Support System Drawing: Req'd Support Comp: Safety Related Status: NUCLEAR SR Power Req'd: N Min/Opt: MIN Alias No: Power Train: NA Comp Served: EAST CENTRXFUGAL CHARGING PUMP MFR: AMERXCAN PRECISION INDUSTRIES (BASCO)M Pa l Elem.Drawing: N/A Wiring Drawing: N/A Power Source: N/A Walkdown: F Relay Eval: N Comp Type: HE Iso Drawing: 2-CCÃ-515, 2-CCW-508 Location: XN THE NORTHEAST PART OF THE ROOM, 2 FEET NORTHEAST OF EAST CENTRXFUGAL CHARGING PUMP g2-PP-50E DC COOK Unit 2 SCREENING EVALUA PION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 1 of 2ID: 2-HE-38E (Rev.0)Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: E CENTRIFUGAL CHARG PMP ROOM-'IN THE NORTHEAST PART OF THE ROOM, 2 FEET NORTHEAST OF EAST CENTRIFUGAL CHARGING PUMP¹2-PP-50E Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: MIDLAND-ROSS/ROSS-OPERATING VALVE CO.BASIS: External analysis

Description:

EAST CENTRIFUGAL CHARGING PUMP PP-50E LUBE OIL COOLER 1.The buckling capacity of the shell of a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank is equal to or greater than the demand.2.The capacity of the anchor bolts and their embedments is equal to or greater than the demand.3.The capacity of connections between the anchor bolts and the tank shell is equal to or greater than the demand.4.Attached piping has adequate flexibility to accommodate the motion of a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank.5.A ring-type foundation is not used to support a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank.N/A Yes Yes Yes N/A C Y D SRT: Gary Thomas, Tom Huang and Kailash Mahajan on 11/2/93.ANCHORAGE TO PUMP ACCEPTABLE BY ENGINEERING JUDGMENT OF THE SRT Small exchanger 1'W" long and 5" in diameter bolted to 2 1'ong channel columns that are welded to the skid of the East Centrifugal Charging Pump.Could have screened with the pump using the rule of the box, however the exchanger was listed seperately on the SSEL.Crane above in a parked and locked position.Evaluated by: Date:

Attachment:

Pictures DG COOK Unit 2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet2of2 ID: 2-HE-38E (Rev.0)Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers

== Description:==

EAST CENTRIFUGAL CHARGING PUMP PP-50E LUBE OIL COOLER Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: E CENTRIFUGAL CHARG PMP ROOM-IN THE NORTHEAST PART OF THE ROOM, 2 FEET NORTHEAST OF EAST CENTRIFUGAL CHARGING PUMP¹2-PP-50E Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: MIDLAND-ROSS/ROSS-OPERATING VALVE CO.EAST CENTRIFUGAL CHARGING PUMP PP-50E LUBE OIL COOLER

• • 12 CHP 5021~CCD.019 ATTACHMENT NO.1 Un1t NA Installation dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET hu-&.g z'-o'ldg.Location'2-H-E-5 6 Ecgxzpment No.INDIANA MICHIGAN PPW'Fg SITE DESIGN CONTROLLED WORKING COPY AUG 25 t985 LEgK T'(eek>~O'-III"~~~7O QCIC E, g,g<, wssT Date: 6 a-pa Drawn by-Verified by: goal.]ert.Inspector Reviewed by: Dt: Constructxon nchor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
  • 12 CHP 5021~CCD.019 ATTACHMENT NO.1 Unct g Mh Installation dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET~gT c.CHTRi~h~

C.~)gg~X-BL 5'5 t-0 Puca A.o~e Bldg.Location a-~-BEE Equipment No.INOIAtEA PiCHIGAW"OWER SITE OESICh CON~RGu.EO AORKltIQ COPT AUG 25 1885 I.ERi<7 y+'~PPI T, CJ~~~qq~si~e u)~T~P)~l I ookiQt ORTH Drawn by-Verified by'-~/~la,~D t Date: ual./Cert. Inspector Reviewed by: T Date: Construct@on An hor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1 Equip ID: 2-QT-134-CD Train: 2 Equip Class:21 D awing No.: 2-5151D tion: EDG System: DIESEL JACKET WATER Equip Desc: CD EMERGENCY DIESEL AUXILIARY JACKET WATER HEATER (TANK)Building: AUXILIARY Room: CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR ROOM Elev: 587 Sort: S, Notes: B Normal State: Desired State: Power Req'd: Y Support System Drawing: 2-12030 2-98014 Req'd Support Comp: 2-ABD-C-1D Safety Related Status: STANDARD Min/Opt: MIN Alias No: Power Train: A Comp Served: CD AUXILIARY JACKET WATER HEATER MFR: INDEECO 75KW HEATER Panel: 2-DGCD Elem.Drawing: 2-98014 Wiring Drawing: 2-95302 Power Source: 2-ABD-C-1D Walkdown: F Relay Eval: N Comp Type: TANK Iso Drawing: Location: IN THE NORTHEAST PART OF THE ROOM, 5 FEET NORTH OF CD EMERGENCY DIESEL JACKET WATER PUMP g2-QT-130-CD2, DC Cook Unit 2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 1 of 14 ID: 2-QT-134-CD (Rev.0)Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers

== Description:==

CD EMERGENCY DIESEL AUXILIARY JACKET WATER HEATER (TANK)Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL GEN RM-IN THE NORTHEAST PART OF THE ROOM, 5 FEET NORTH OF CD EMERGENCY DIESEL JACKET WATER PUMP 82-QT-130-CD2, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 75KW HEATER BASIS: External analysis 1.The buckling capacity of the shell of a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank is equal to or greater than the demand.2.The capacity of the anchor bolts and their embedments is equal to or greater than the demand.3.The capacity of connections between the anchor bolts and the tank shell is equal to or greater than the demand.4.Attached piping has adequate flexibility to accommodate the motion of a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank.5.A ring-pe foundation is not used to support a large, fiat-bottom, vertical tank.N/A Yes Yes Yes N/A DE SRT: W.Djordjevic and TR Satyan Sharma.10/6/93.REF: 1.Anchor Inspection Data Sheets: Anchorage Arrangement Sketches and Physical Characteristics Data Sheet, Certified 8/31/93.2.Dwg 0 12-3468-13. 3.Worthington Corp.Dwg.SK7938, 8-23-74 Anchorage: 2-QT-134-CD is the J.W.Heater, separately mounted by three1/2" coupling configuration of rod and Phillips Redhead wedge type anchors.Tightness was verified by torque, 6/28/93.For anchorage evaluation, see External ANCHOR analysis, File: 2QT134CD.ANC. Weight of full water tank is estimated as 550 Ib (assumed with 12.75" OD,.375" Wall thickness, flat.375" thick end plates, 64" height, and 4.18 cu.ft volume of water).Considered as a cantilever with distributed load, the fundamental frequency is estimated to be 82.5 Hz.Actual response is governed by fixity of the base;anchorage system consists of three 5/16" x 2" x 6.25" plates welded to the bottom of the tank at 120 degree intervals. Considering the base flexibility and configuration, the frequency was estimated to be 8.96 Hz.as indicated on the attached calculation. The ANCHOR analysis intlicates a factor of safety of 3.74, however, the capacity of the anchorage is controlled by the base plates with a factor of safety of 1.84 as shown in the attached calculation. DC Cook Unit 2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS}GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2114I92 Status: Yes Sheet 2 of 14 ID: 2-QT-134-CD (Rev.0)Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers

== Description:==

CD EMERGENCY DIESEL AUXILIARY JACKET WATER HEATER (TANK)Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL GEN RM-IN THE NORTHEAST PART OF THE ROOM, 5 FEET NORTH OF CD EMERGENCY DIESEL JACKET WATER PUMP 42-QT-130-CD2, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 75KW HEATER Evaluated by: Date'./L/i 3~/~g

Attachment:

Pictures

Attachment:

Anchor Plate Seismic Capacity Evaluation for 2-QT-l34-CD DC Cook Unit 2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS'j GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 3 of 14 ID: 2-QT-134-CD (Rev.0)Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers

== Description:==

CD EMERGENCY DIESEL AUX!LIARY JACKET WATER HEATER (TANK)Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL GEN RM-IN THE NORTHEAST PART OF THE ROOM, 5 FEET NORTH OF CD EMERGENCY DIESEL JACKET WATER PUMP¹2-QT-130-CD2, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 75KW HEATER 2-QT-134-CD CUFNT SUBJECT Stovenson and Assodatcs 8 A S!rucru ral.Mocha a!col Coaoulaa4 KOO!aoorlaO Flrra ttt ch>>I~I I cA~gcggg~E//z$guG-8g+s~t,+~447rdP'p4/g, 0~~/GALS.(7-".zw.l~S)IOO'P~p//8&gdVf 8&.ChF gh'E-.~CU~ge~~Eg ti/VSr d~Q-//di~gg 444'/0~i gh~APOXg'rdn44 Q FC707 5'?h"4'.e i'~Sf l I.'r)I i 8 I$0'5 zo, III~~~~~I O~.i I>>ICg+rt)%hi kj.It'!ho'r I*I~h roll 04f8 Igd 095 t.tt).AMERlCAN ELECTRiC POWER.,'@RVICE CORPORATiON)gf'APPtHOVEO (N GENERAL"8-~IOVED EXCEPT AS NOTED'U:.NOT APPROVED 0:~MFEREN E ONLY DzR!.I l5 Zrv/./j I~or>>or Ioor IOIIC uott Iorouorltc OOI C.p4 c.ubr I IIIIO'c~LI'I~L t.tent L 4 I i':.~":5'l'Li Y'),, I~I

CUEN~P Stevenson and Assochtes 8 A Sttuctu tat.Mcchaatcal Coatutttay Eaglacortay Fttta z t~4',r.)}c%)~~~ul I ,1%St.~~i ag~i/pcs c rt ft u Mc 0 CUENT R~IZI qs.8 Stevenson and Assodatcs 5 A Sciacra ral44>eba alaal Caaralaay Karrlaeerlarr furr 1'1~r~h LA~'I'v>>r>>4+~>>I I LhU IC~'I Ah~I~A LV A I Il Al.LC hl 1 VC h.~gQ re<A g~'(if'J 5~>li~~;S>>1~ra av~b ALII U~IP I~, rv~1 I r>>>>'.IVI S~QI h>>Il iri A IL, ag~I ol I~Lr lh I Lhr.'I'Ij$>>>C'I ('I VI I a.l~'"i v4'C S 11>I:m al>.i~>>I.I).h I~A'Il'~I A I' CUENT SVBJECT SHEET OF Stevenson and Associates A SvvctuwhMeehs nleel Coaeu!tlag Kagiaoeriaq face\2/0 9s

CLiFNT Stevenson and Assodatcs 8 A Strttctttral Meeit4444eal COatultttty sag(4444tlttti fltat 4+0'-~P 4~4, 4~'S at" I*.g!tQ;,<J S*SS4 i+~I 4 St S p~S rs p 4 44

DC Cook Unit 2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 9 of 14 ID: 2-QT-134-CD (Rev.0)Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL GEN RM-IN THE NORTHEAST PART OF THE ROOM, 5 FEET NORTH OF CD EMERGENCY DIESEL JACKET WATER PUMP¹2-QT-130-CD2, Floor El.: 587.00 Building: AUXILIARY Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 75KW HEATER

Description:

CD EMERGENCY DIESEL AUXILIARY JACKET WATER HEATER (TANK)K Ij:tbaualx 'esponse Spectrum: User Frequency: User-8.96 Percent Damping: User-0.0G Spectral Values: Direction North-South East-West Vertical Acceleration (g's)0.38 0.38 0.23 Angle (N-S Direction makes with the X Axis): 0.00 Combination Criteria: SRSS~Wight umber of Weights: 1 No Weight 1 550.00 6.875 0.000 32.000 Number of External Forces: 0 Xmas Number of External Moments: 0 gggygiJPp~ hachar Number of Anchor types: 1 Ultimate Ultimate Tension Inter Shear Inter Saf No Dia Manufact Product Tension Shear Coeff Coeff Fact 1/2 Phillips Wedge (N)2290.00 2380.00 1.00 0.30 1.00 Qmmta'ltimate Stress: 3500.00 psi..eduction Factor: 0.8.

DC Cook Unit 2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/ti4/92 Status: Yes Sheet 10 of 14 ID: 2-QT-134-CD (Rev.0)Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers

== Description:==

CD EMERGENCY DIESEL AUXILIARY JACKET WATER HEATER (TANK)Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL GEI'I RM-IN THE NORTHEAST PART OF THE ROOM, 5 FEET NORTH OF CD EMERGENCY DIESEL JACKET WATER PUMP¹2-QT-130-CD2, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 75KW HEATER Kaid'llowable Stress: 30600 psi.Rzfvm'umber of Surfaces: 1 Surface Orientation No Direction Comp Nx 0.000 Direction Comp 0.000 Direction Comp Nz 1.000 Anchor Pattern for Surface¹1 Legend for Anchor Patterns Anchor Bolts.Concrete Linen:~mm Concrete Points.Vleld Lines:

DC Cook Unit 2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92'tatus: Yes Sheet 11 of 14 ID: 2-QT-134-CD (Rev.0)Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers

== Description:==

CD EMERGENCY DIESEL AUXILIARY JACKET WATER HEATER (TANK)Building: AUXILIARY Floor EI.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL GEN RM-IN THE NORTHEAST PART OF THE ROOM, 5 FEET NORTH OF CO EMERGENCY DIESEL JACKET WATER PUMP¹2-QT-130-C02, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 75KW HEATER Qmmdn hrzhar.Number of Anchors: 3 No Anch Id Coord 0.000 14.063 14.063 Coord 0.000-8.119 8.119 Z Coord 0.000 0.000 0.000 Surf Id¹of elements per line: 1 Number of Concrete Lines: 3 Start Start End End End Sf Line No X-Coord Y-Coo rd Z-Coord X-Coord Y-Coo rd Z-Coo rd Id Width-1.000 11.438 11.438 0.000-3.572 3.572 0.000 0.000 0.000 6.250 14.563 14.563 0.000-8.985 8.985 , 0.000 1 0.000 1 0.000 1 2.000 2.000 2.000 Number of Concrete Points: 0 EcldJ.bm'of elements per line: 4 Number of Weld Lines: 0 Reduction Factor input for Anchor¹1 Adequately Installed: Yes Embedment Length: (2.13 in.Min Reqd.to achieve full capacity):= 2.13 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.Edge Distance-Edge 1: 5.00in.Crack Size: 0.000 in.-Cracks Affect<=50%Bolts Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes mbedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes OC Cook Unit 2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 12 of 14 ID: 2-QT-134-CD (Rev.0)Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers

== Description:==

CD EMERGENCY DIESEL AUXILIARY JACKET WATER HEATER (TANK)Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL GEN RM-IN THE NORTHEAST PART OF THE ROOM, 5 FEET NORTH OF CD EMERGENCY DIESEL JACKET WATER PUMP¹2-QT-130-CD2, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 75KW HEATER Reduction Factor Input for Anchor¹2 Adequately Installed: Yes Embedment Length: (2.13 in.Min Reqd.to achieve full capacity):= 2.13 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.Edge Distance-Edge 1: 5.00 in.Crack Size: 0.000 in.-Cracks Affect<=50%Bolts Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor¹3 Adequately Installed: Yes Embedment Length: (2.13 in.Min Reqd.to achieve full capacity):= 2.13 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.Edge Distance-Edge 1: 5.00 in.Crack Size: 0.000 in.-Cracks Affect<=50%Bolts Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes Reduction Factors Data Current: Yes Anc No Id 1 1 2 1 3 1 PaIV Vali 2003.75 2380.00 2003.75 2380.00 2003.75 2380.00 Pallrl Vallr RT RN 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.M 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 RL RG RS 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.M 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 RE RF Rc RR 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.M 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.M 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 RP RB RM 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.M 1.M 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 N/A=Not Applicable Pall=Allowable Pull without Reduced Inspection Vali=Allowable Shear without Reduced Inspection Pallr=Allowable Pull with Reduced Inspection Vailr=Allowable Shear with Reduced Inspection =Outlier=Reduction Factor Not Used RT RL=Reduction Factor for Type of Anchorage=Reduction Factor for Installation Adequa=Reduction Factor for Embedment 0 DC Cook Unit 2,~'CREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 13 of 14 ID: 2-QT-134-CD (Rev.G)Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers

== Description:==

CD EMERGENCY DIESEL AUXILIARY JACKET WATER HEATER (TANK)Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL GEN RM-IN THE NORTHEAST PART OF THE ROOM, 5 FEET NORTH OF CD EMERGENCY DIESEL JACKET WATER PLIMP¹2-QT-130-CD2, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 75KW HEATER RG RS RF RC RR RP RB=Reduction Factor for Gap at Anchors=Reduction Factor for Spacing=Reduction Factor for Edge Distance=Reduction Factor foi Concrete Strength=Reduction Factor for Concrete Cracks=Reduction Factor for Essential Relays=Reduction Factor for Base Stiffness and Prying Action=Reduction Factor for Base Strength and Load Path=Reduction Factor for Embed.Steel and Pads Analysis Performed: Yes Type of Analysis: Regular Spectral Accelerations (G's)No N-S E-W Vertical Safety Factor 10 12 13 14 16 17 18 19 20 22 23 24 0.380-0.380-0.380 0.380 0.380-0.380 0.380-0.380 0.152-0.152 0.152-0.152-0.152 0.152 0.152-0.152 0.152-0.152 0.152-0.152-0.152 0.152 0.152-0.152 0.152-0.152 0.152-0.152-0.152 0.152 0.152-0.152 0.380-0.380-0.380 0.380 0.380-0.380 0.380-0.380 0.152-0.152 0.152-0.152 0.152-0.152-0.152 0.152 0.092-0.092 0.092-0.092 0.092-0.092-0.092 0.092 0.092-0.092 0.092-0.092 0.092-0.092-0.092 0.092 0.230-0.230-0.230 0.230 0.230-0.230 0.230-0.230 4.204 4.704 4.514 4.612 4.204 4.704 4.612 4.514 5.698 3.039 5.698 3.859 3.740 6.064 6.064 3.740 8.257 7.950 15.006 6.830 6.830 15.006 8.257 7.950

DC Cook Unit 2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet14 of14 ID: 2-QT-134-CD (Rev.0)Class: 21-Tanks and Meat Exchangers

== Description:==

CD EMERGENCY DIESEL AUXILIARY JACKET WATER HEATER (TANK)Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL GEN RM-IN THE NORTHEAST PART OF THE ROOM, 5 FEET NORTH OF CD EMERGENCY DIESEL JACKET WATER PUMP¹2-QT-130-CD2, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 75KW HEATER Minimum Safety Factor: 3.740 The Anchorage Capacity is 3.740 times greater than the Demand Coo ComponenC Po.'2" KT)~4'laia Any payticu1.ar area the Seismic Review Team should pay extra attention tot Yes V No (If yea, check itima that apply.)Anchor Type Anchor Diameter Anchor Spacing Anchor Number Anchor Embedmen'nchor Edge Distance Anchor Gap Anchor Thread Engagements~ Anchor Grip Anchor Angularity Concrete Crack&khumrJsa eA-Others (describe bri.eely)IE there is concern for Design Basis Discrepancy, circle th>>applicable i.tom and explain.1.2.3.Hardvc,re Maintenance Type Discrepancy Drawing Update Type Discrepancy Significant Operability/Design Basis Discrepancy Others Condition: a)c,(,~<)~P vV(c.8-o K b>p,>F.+g0+R j~)g->$4 Actions Taken: prepared By T.Dat.0>>/~ '.2 CHP 5021~CCD.019~TTACEQKNT NO.1 TWQ Un (Z-34K-l3 Znsta at on dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch~P,qHEA,gg F OR'f)OQ OF ROC'OOM.Sa7-0" L Bldg-Locat on 2,-GT-isa-CD Equipment No.IIZ'a l30LT VllTH QVERSlZED WASHY.R 4 NUT)hl>s" 38(CK, K, NG'9 54QTTEQ HQLE, L'-0'ia" MO WAG%.R+A QA INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER SITE DESIGN CONTROLLED WORKING COPY AUG 51 1S95 LERK~~Drawn by: Date: c Date:-0 Date: or Review Engineer Verified by: Qu./Cert.Xnspector Reviewed by: Construe on Page 1 of 3 Revision 1 ~~s~~0~~~~II~~~I~I~'~4~w~~~~~~ i I~r~~II 4~~~e'L~+~i~~'l~~~~~~~~~-.Ci~I l-s.L~o li)I I~~~II r~I I I~0 RHMeWsaMMMWW HHHL%%%EE.SL~LE55-ewmaaara 858QERLl LE WlRISR%i EL.-l%RiR~HRLWLL MWWWWW~W&mmRIHRHLIL 5%l%SRHRRli% &WWWWK%RRiRgRkigi%~~~~~~ ~S~~g'I~~IE>~l~,~'~' 5<".~A DEPT.Ri('v'.'=,". CONTROLLED DOCUMENT COPY NO.'2 SHP 5050 mE 008 ATTACPNENT NO.3 ULTRASONIC TEST REPORT JOB ORDER NO.:/A Q~)IDENTIFICATION Unit Component Material V~Other 5-.TECHNI UE Test Unit/S/N y'S-'l~CA.c'.-'s Freq./Diameter Reference Standard Couplant/Batch No.TEST DATA REMARKS~wl+%CC'.CS<<L c C+PERFORMED BX: REVIEWED BY: FORM NO.12 SHP 5050 NDE.008-1 LEVEL:~DATE: LEVEL~-DATE.Page 1 of 1 Revision 0 Equip XD: 2-TK-76N Train: 2 Equip Class:21 P~awing No.: 2-5149~~~~~ction: HVAC System: CONTROL ROOM AIR CONDXTXONING CHILL WATER Equip Desc: CONTROL ROOM AIR CONDITIONING NORTH CHXLL WATER EXPANSION TANK Building: AUXILIARY Room: CONTROL ROOM AXR CONDITIONER ROOM Elev: 650 Sort: S, Notes: Normal State: Desired State: Power Req'd: N Support System Drawing: Req'd Support Comp: Safety Related Status: STANDARD Min/Opt: MXN Alias No: Comp Served: MFR: Power Train: Panel: Elem.Drawing: NOT APPL Wiring Drawing: NOT APPL Power Source: Walkdown: F Relay Eval: N Comp Type: TANK.Iso Drawing: 2-VW-529 Location: 4 FEET EAST OF THE ROOM'S ENTRANCE GATE, AT THE NORTH WALL, 7 FEET ABOVE THE FLOOR DC COOK Unit 2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet1 of2 ID: 2-TK-76N (Rev.0)Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers

== Description:==

CONTROL ROOM AIR CONDITIONING NORTH CHILL WATER EXPANSION TANK Building: AUXILIARY Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: BASIS: External analysis Floor El.: 650.00 Room, Row/Col: CTRL RM AIR CONDIT RM-4 FEET EAST OF THE ROOM'S ENTRANCE GATE, AT THE NORTH WALL, 7 FEET ABOVE THE FLOOR 1.The buckling capacity of the shell of a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank is equal to or greater than the demand.2.The capacity of the anchor bolts and their embedments is equal to or greater than the demand.3.The capacity of connections between the anchor bolts and the tank shell is equal to or greater than the demand.4.Attached piping'has adequate flexibility to accommodate the motion of a large, flat-botton vertical tank.5.A ring-type foundation is not used to support a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank.N/A Yes Yes Yes N/A S C L DE~C SRT: Gary Thomas, Tom Huang and Kailash Mahajan on 11/3/93.ANCHORAGE AND SUPPORT OF TANK ACCEPTABLE BY JUDGMENT BY THE SRT FOR THIS SMALL TANK.Small tank 2'n length x 9" in diameter on a 1" diameter piping system.Tank in-line with pipe, supported by a U-bolt on a cantelevered angle (2 1/2" x 2 1/2" x 3/8")about 1'6" long.Angle welded to a plate that is bolted to the reinforced block wall with 3 5/8" diameter through bolts (other side of wall Inspecied and bolts came through).Glass site tube judged acceptable (no interactions). Evaluated by: Date:

Attachment:

Pictures DC COOK Unit 2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 2 of 2 ID: 2-TK-76N (Rev.0)Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers

== Description:==

CONTROL ROOM AIR CONDITIONING NORTH CHILL WATER EXPANSION TANK Building: AUXILIARY Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: QJCT~I=S Floor El.: 650.00 Room, Row/Col: CTRL RM AIR CONDIT RM-4 FEET EAST OF THE ROOM'S ENTRANCE GATE, AT THE NORTH WALL, 7 FEET ABOVE THE FLOOR CONTROL ROOM AIR CONDITIONING NORTH CHILL WATER EXPANSION TANK Coo Component go, 2 TK 7~~Class 2~Any payticular area the Seismic Review Team should pay axtra attention to?Yes<No (If'es, check items that apply.)Anchor Type Anchor Diameter Anchor Spacing AnchorÃumber Anchor Embedment Anchor Edge Distance Anchor Cap Anchor Thread Engagement Anchor Crip Anchor Angulari~Concrete Crack<Others (describe brieily)If there is concern for Design Basi.s Discrepancy, circle the applicable item and explain.l.3.Fardvare Naintenanc'a Type Discrepancy ruling Update Type Discrepancy Significant Operability/Dosi~ Basis Discrepancy Others Condition: WoH6 Actions Taken: Prepared B nasa 12 CHP 5021.CCD.019 ATTACHMENT NO.1 Unit 0-NSP CT 0 D T AU'L (50'-Q".Bldg.%ÃTHWE,ST CORKP OF CbNTRQl.RIM AlR (.:I'"lT>gq s ROOM IC WAL 1"0" AEOVF FLQClr Location Installation dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch Z.-Tl(-IC 0 Equipment No.R>g" x 4"x I'-4" ZI r~r'.IO~g e R{'.D'ltllTll-{.UE<C VUH'P.i Wl 83+/$g4.'t&L~QOCK%I&44 SEC TlQM"4-k" I7A Z>"x3"x~ra"-J Q LQ'iX 5'"+Z'6 I'r" I Z" Z." CO o~C.O>.-rL n-et;~Pp UO O C9 O 2.'Y.~~O 4/l ZO&~us Qy n t.4LI+amQ<S CRACWCD VC CBLIMG, ALSQ.MQPTAR BEl'WCCkl t" LQCI(5 C RACK E.Q~/s"4 5%6-ROD 0)-'EB5llED %A'5'.5 SEC Y."2-K'ECT. 'Y-C" Drawn by: Verified by:~~~ual./ert.Reviewed by: Construction Date: C.-/Date: Inspector Date: Anc or Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1 ATTACHMENT Np.Equipment No.: Embedded Steel Dwg.No.: Dwg No.: Weld ID size Len h cracks Lack of Penetration Porosity No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Ho No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes'es Yes No No No No No , No des 1~Fillet 2~Plug/s3.ot 3~Groove Yes No Yes No Yes No(MGLC.N'ES ~kFQQMQ'REM.YVC.LD I~UMQCR<U'T AND FMDS OF AMC LE.H<'~e" I" QF 7Hz TOP HQR I"'TAL WELD I 5 CQ~~<~>WASHER lh3IA;IA h'ijcH(QQN T~o~i~c woaxi-G carr AUG 181995 LKRK T I Equipment base flexible: 0 Yes 8 No ons ruc I.on e Date: Reviewed by: I Verified by: ua ons ruc won c or evxew gxneer npsec or Date: Pago 3 of 3 Revision 1 ATTACHMENT 4 TO AEP:NRC:1040E SAMPLE SEWS, ANCHORAGE CALCULATIONS, AND ANCHORAGE INSPECTION DOCUMENTATION FOR LARGE FLAT BOTTOM TANKS RAI ITEM 6 This attachment includes sample SEWS, anchorage calculations and anchorage inspection documentation for the large fiat bottom tank evaluations requested in RAI Question 6.Included in this attachment are the evaluations for 1-TK-33 (RWST)and 2-TK-32 (CST). wquip ID: 1-TK-33 Txain: 12 Equip Class: 21 Drawing No.: 1-5144~~~~.'ction: DRI System: REFUELING WATER STORAGE TANK SUPPLY Equip Desc: REFUELING WATER STORAGE TANK Building: GROUNDS Room: RWST ARBA Elev: 609 Sort: S, Notes: Normal State: Desixed State: Powex Req'd: Support System Drawing: Req'd Support Comp: Safety Related Status: NUCLBAR SR Min/Opt: MIN Alias No: Power Train: Comp Served: RWST Mfr: GRAVER TANK AND MAMJPACTURING CO Model: 420,000 GALS" Elem.Drawing: Wiring Drawing: Power Source: Walkdown: F Relay Bval: N Comp Type: TANK ISO Drawing: Location: 25'ORTH OF UNIT 1 CONTAINMENT BUILDING. >12 CHP 5021-CCD.019 ATTACHE'.NT NO.l Un t i-2-3049 GA, ufo+Bl g.25 HEPTA OI-Awrearr&T. Local on lc-33 Insta at on wg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch Equipment No.RW.S T 7~k.DiN&NCioM'.$DIRx 5'2'-'5 ttlAH 2'5~C.&R STR~Q&@A~(SB&hJRcy pa.g9 poP, aT~ncvWg<g gHC CT'%Re (S SW1 PraOuHO~e.~~w~c~~p,~<</$4 ove'e (e%ro4 TH@SoTTOM oF Ttl@~t46-GF~>(g CIaeug~WCP TeS V~T'tb array'OOR.IS TA.imM)fH~~~I~NX,l-Pagan.AROOHO SNaoTH MO They~~q Faorn~ll4)TO YQ (F R12T QF T~'2 Gtl>S~<0 FtC.SCL)SV: -To'4~&/$6~$6 0 F r~nC'e'7~&<~aiI mZ~Su~>oa), INDIANA I/ICHIGAN POWER SITE DESIGN CONTROLLED WORKING COPY OCT kB tSSZ LERKT Date: IQ-1 t2 D te: Drawn by: Verifiod by: gga.Ce.Znspector Reviewed by: 2 Cons ruct on Anc or Review Engineer Page 1 oi'Revision.3 '(I 0 >12 CHP 502 1~CCD~019 ATTACHMENT NO.1 B g.Insta at on dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch'2S NOR t H OF NOTWWYYI~.T Locat on'l-TK.-33 Equipment No.r=C+3uau>/II"<is'w IP I e<O u>qOMrI'S'NIIYI~hS Ceo~Q O I 3/br'" norns TRt4K.a4., 4 ,4 4 s 4~4~a INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER SITE DESIGN CONTROLLEIi WORKING COPY Ot;T 15 1995 LERK+SECT.'A A 8~04T 66 tYRACVAW~Q.AT~S~gg 4p M~All(.+K STRFtP (DCThiL c.av~a b be.measu.va a.c.cu.va4)T hue Q~iv su.toko av'F'adi~S Date: 1G 1 Drawn by: Uerified by: Date:/<'-Qua.Cert.Inspector Reviewed by: Date.l 0-13-'9'X Cons ruct on Anc or Rev ew Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision.3 DC Cook Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet1 of26 ID: 1-TK-33 (Rev.0)Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers

== Description:==

REFUELING WATER STORAGE TANK Building: GROUNDS Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: RWST AREA, 25'OF UNIT 1 CONT BUILDING.Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: GRAVER TANK AND MANUFACTURING CO.420,000 GALS BASIS: External analysis 1.The buckling capacity of the shell of a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank is equal to or greater than the demand.2.The capacity of the anchor bolts and their embedments is equal to or greater than the demand.3.The capacity of connections between the anchor bolts and the tank shell is equal to or greater than the demand..4.Attached piping has adequate flexibility to accommodate the motion of a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank.5.A ring-type foundation is not used to support a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank.Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes COJg NINES~~SRT: George G.Thomas and Tom Huang on 10/5/93 0 Large flat bottom tank 48'-0" inside diameter 32'-3" height (31'-0" liquid tank).Tank manufactured by Graver Tank, made of ASTM A240 Type 304 Steel, 420,000 gallons and weighs 94,000 lbs.Anchored with 25 3/8" th x 5" w x 4'4" long strap that is embedded in the concrete 2'epth with a 2" radius hook at the end.A detailed calculation was performed to the SQUG GIP criteria as part of the Stevenson 8 Associates report"Earthquake Analysis of D.C.Cook NPP Refueling Water Storage Tank Subjected to Nozzle Loadings to Original and Current Design Criteria", September 12, 1989.The calculation for the RWST resulted in the conclusion that the weld to the tank and embedment in the concrete was sufficient to develop the full yield strength of the strap.The calculation for the RWST using GIP methodology indicated an overall safety factor of 2.57 for overturning and 1.72 for shear.The calculation is included as a document of this SEWS.The tank is founded on a concrete pad per drawing 0 1-2-3048.g4 Although anchora the straps were not rusted to the degree that the SRT judged the;e should be reduction in capacity.A flin ing of the walkdown was that these straps should be cleaned and painted to maintain their integrity. Picture 2, Wk.1, Tm 2, Disk 1-Pipe at the Bottom of the RWST Picture 1, Wk.1, Tm 2, Disk 1-Typical Rusted Strap Picture 3, Wk.1, Tm 2, Disk 1-Buckled out Anchor Strap DC Cook Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 2 of 26 ID: 1-TK-33 (Rev.0)Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers

== Description:==

REFUELING WATER STORAGE TANK Building: GROUNDS Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: RWST AREA, 25'OF UNIT 1 CONT BUILDING.Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: GRAVER TANK AND MANUFACTURING CO.420,000 GALS Evaluated by: Date:/~-zg-

Attachment:

Pictures

Attachment:

Seismic Evaluation of The RWST &5 OC Cook Unit1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 3 of 26 ID: 1-TK-33 (Rev.0)Class: 21-Tanks and Meat Exchangers

== Description:==

REFUELING WATER STORAGE TANK Building: GROUNDS Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: RWST AREA, 25'OF UNIT 1 CONT BUILDING.Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: GRAVER TANK AND MANUFACTURING CO.420,000 GALS 5<<I!g5(Sl))I Buckled out Anchor Strap Pipe at the Bottom of the RWST)c"5'5'I E yj Rusted Anchor Strap 4 l'h pP 1 +pshsg"'"',ggr~t STEVENSON R ASSOCIATES a IlruclaiknoCnanlcal ccinclnng englnnnrlng flan CC,(WCC!4 Ev AL Q AT (a4 0 a,~(a 5 v8 I 3 I-, I (J s I L:O'+np.n.C.ERIC I/7 g~r~i~!~!'y p I IL.~~8~~/rs(PJ7 Ir-i-rl~~I I jd 7+t.I.h.k.+As.g (!e..IH~LC SgW I I I I I i I I gLCJ f!~I I~I'I$!f 6 cnI.Q,uy~i>~~<.I.I I i rr 7 I'I Ir I I!)!i I I I I I d,i I l I I~s~.Li 1~2.C (I.M s'i I s~~I I 1.CD&.ii I 7 7 I I I I P'H~.:--'25~I+L i l i I I o~qi gA~-r-j I I 1 j+I r V'-~-!(',C I(~..m I I" I I i!I 7'I 7 Mod.'C g I i I Icn e)!I-.i.I I~~t~C'Ial~O'.-PPl/~C~.OJ L kl I~I I Qgl I r h I I~~~I i~I~~~7 7 I Acct(a'rzan 0 RcJ STEVENSON 5 ASSOCIATES 0 Ifn>>clUTCHnechonlcot con>>vtttng engtneeltng ttt>>n NS-~.C e PP L.t~I I I I I'I.<<I!i~l I RQ.C.-I a.<)p~p I I I w~J.E,DclsP LL t c eL.Pp~i,~I,'pm, sb~~.FI,EE.I.'!>>i i~M.4 P~(A.'IFt IP/t ti i l t MBLc~I k t!r,aT~~i I~et-c.~'a~A~j:.SWJ I Q,>>ti m Pg I~':)3~'.ca:~: l g cc.Ec.~~Cw:.~)-'-C-~--'.-'-::-Ce)---'.--'C~-">-'-.----' C~>--'--: I'I I.=.I i']I i I Tl I I.C.'Z CC.j.z 6...,....5;. t.: '.,:2~.'.]!~T!~I>>~I~..l l%.O i W,O i I I i I I.,o.5:G.~,~i 09.Z->>I.t A EFA=.n.t.I I t~>>I~~I 1 i I I+I I 4~I I i I!I~, I I iI 7 8, I i'e:~I~I i'I I~.P M~K 7+Z,-olr,b, I'I I I i.,2A T j l~I I I i 1!i~~e*., i., I.~~t!.i.C,tq-.J Z.dD..VZ 0 Q.Q,~IS.g>>-! M~I fl>gs q P,s to>>I s.in F..,'E.F>>, a!FFE.c.'rP-'. FE, i P I g,r s~o a.etc E>>~-4-CM~-E M~-4/t.l~TEI m..cc'AGAN n.A'~a 6 c~,~~a.@~'~w~.s..y c.'F-M.c..ks.jpJ t i!i)rex t pU ws.(~-~, p-..Ei'.A.,c:)ir ..'<h,>>~<.J>>FAG,P.h EA.kaIP'nk ..i.m~46+S.IV S~P-,A..n.p.!WHX., H,z.&.t.D~I I I C C IFFY I 2 E i I I~l I i>>I I I~I~~~~rr-f~~~I~I I P~H~C~C.k..I Response Spectra EOASP 1.0 08-03-1989 g V~~FREO 1.0.10 2.0.13 3.0.16 4.0.20 5.0.25 6.0.32 7.0.40 a.O.5O 9.i 0.63 10.0.79 11.1.00 12.1.26 13.1.58 14.2.00 15.2.51 DAMP.050 9.872E-03 1.790E-02 2.700E-02 3.660E-02 4.832E-02 6.133E-b2 7.518E-02 9.276E.02 1.219E-01 1.434E-01 1.702E-01 2.040E-01 2.357E-01 2.604E-01 2.834E-01 DAMP.040 1.008E-02 1.846E-02 2.794E-02 3.798E-02 5~043E-02 6.432E-02 7.920E-02 9.817E-02 1.306E.01 1'40E-01 1.838E-01 2.217E-01 2.572E.01 2.849E-01 3.108E-01 1/3 FREQ 16.3.16 17.3.98 18.5.01 19.6.31 20.7.94 21.10.00 22.12.59 23.15.85 24.19.95 25.25.12 26.31.62 27.39.81 28.50.12 29.63.10 30.79.43 DAMP DAMP.050.040 2.288E-01~92~+2 G'$~~05&91~~1 Qv3BH.Ql~~1 0&61 2A78E 01 3.066E-01 3.371E-01 3.290E-01 3.629E-01 3.292E-01 3.630E-01 2.937E-O'1 3.208E-01 fo+'.591E-01 2.809E-01 2.337E-01 2.514E-01 2.20?E-01 2.367E-01 t'.Zc 2.292E-01 2%38~1 2/3 5 2-~6'5 cf-P-EF SHEETM~Ol42.~ g~S-S*\'I'STEVENSON R ASSOCIATES a Ittuatu)CHnechanlcaf consul)lng cnglnccnng nrrn 2)2,.e C+,4 23 (I.I 8 aS~'o ms 4w i!I L j (I I l I O'O i I I I~.s g 0 C., 3-8J~C.H&l?=~I I I w4w~w..P aEWEf=mA I I I f I'~-V'nil p~'.T F~l I f I I j I'I j""'.G.~~r~.b.of e.&v.'C,fw.C.A IA,.C~~~~.~)<.~'~I T!..c..)i.A&,c.y'.g f g, LV J.f,a4~oi,7 I,rl&.6)kd.MQA G.=Ex P'wv.'J I!I: I I I I j>~I~I~I I.io'z<~~I!'l I L-I wi.i ,b..~.f,a C.y...8.V.....VZa.,O L..fd..CV.Cv'6S.. ~l~I I l~f" i,*', I I I I I I l~pi 4 I I I: c.~~S~4./i'T ri-i'5 j I I I~/05 5"73 (I (I 5 l I i 3 M'Ao I (I i!(I I!I'I l 1~~I I i I~l I I I I f I I~g'" 3cO+J ji j=.o, a Ol....Ua CD;.3'~lIl I STEVENSON'ASSOCIATES a Iinrcturojtnochonlcot ccnsuNIAII oncinooring Ilrm SUBJECT~&~IC P6 JOB No.'e"'J'u'..C'C'*Q,P.P s(i g CPS'Q e-s.-e O CII III c o~<C!T li Tn I+I+L!I I~J M!5~~c~(~~.E~E.k'~~a I oj~N'"=RE..~C'4:.'...orrT=.. I.~!O'O.j I l.g.opj I Assio<<([a I I , nM.I r I I T'I~I I I~~<6,P."..==.I.-I I J+'L.Q~'~p.'i:MC' tj C.C K I i~}I!: I (I I I I I!o8~I,~I I I'I i~'I 4.:,4 c.c I I I I I i r<<T$'-'aZ.Z.I"~l I t I I'~Qo i i 3 4~I oI da , (6 I I~I T~r I i SUBJECT sosi(0.++<'1<~7'HssTMa oFEPM ,;-.'STEVENSON 8c ASSOClATES a ttructutoHnechantcot Cohuttt<<JQ cttglttcctut(I tttttt 5 (K O<<C j I H l-X,.9.~.~J3.6~j j L l j j j t I~t I I ((t I 1 t I I, (I<<J I (j<<MC P'-B~0 4<WGR'lJJ!~<<<<<<<<I. P Q P mJII J Q g S Q~P'4 e l W jy~C't i j I il I.!2Q I~$4<<L Ia4-I j~~+~I I-I i<<j i I~I!t<<~I'<<j 3~i I~I!'.I I.(~<<~I~~~I~t I~4 S.E GAA.P H.D~I~~-~L~a.t/,~6='.I I~<<~',.';.Sj..'S~P..J@.-.....,: G'.c~.-.gg;,~.~ i~a I.'t-.'.o....PP-.E'.'.s:~a.+:~ L~a g.;pl@&'C(A D-6 H.tat I Q'p, g~(g i.Jci~((<<-tc';T (7):~I I~, I l I t.<<0 (~~I*',~~pl Hr~..I j lQ ,'./g....j:,...Z 0...I.:~,=i j.'..+..)=.J<'>~p>>~<<I'<<-c--I I.!P. Pp STEVENSON h ASSOCIATES a IttuotWOHneChcnlCOI Cchfttltlttg OttghtOOttttg tttttl I=ID X O ttt)Itl IK t-trg.I~t I~~I I'/9?~(.'I!('t II g TLI g~iQ~l ((j~(K<M.c aA PA44 t t I.'j~I L..t,b I t r I t~I/trr 4 r'r*I I)1 3'~I~I IA/I I t.E8'.I WN D~..DE'te." I I y~~~lt x.EI..~~H.rw4R:.:,LoAD cd'i r I I~I I r I SUBJECT JOB Ng~r!s Ils-S/'s.s O'ZcJ V-S-S~/r I'TEVENSON 8c ASSOCIATES ccnrvttlng ongrnooltng trim~-Dc..RP;~LL Qs+3O LID 5 PEP>8 e, aa L,7 J KJ I r 4>.w I t~S..H.-fc i~I i I I s I r~s I I'..w c a~@'!I.>I I',;I', IIJ~>cp.p~Liri'Tlc>,nJ -r--~'--"---"~-~=~I I I I~~.5 WE,P I/.Q.....g.j..~C+5~CT*e icI:7-+);: I I i l q)S zap (...ID,....-... 2.>I r I" r'i L.J.'A.R.E....!.. W nH:C.c~I DQ I 4I~.t t 4 9~g~cA.&Q r~~I~'i'lt I O..~+H.Q I pQ p~i~f jig nI Lp~p.+~g~I I i~I..A-.M....,.. -'S~L?'FPI'l'-I Cia I 7.O:...Eg.5g.g/i;.. 'Z:B.Ai..+8;CQ ~'~~I I r~l t.'L.<mrt,a ww<.CA~+.c,.(mv'.I.I j~~I c.6 6;J..I.S&~3 I'4?I r.'C)I&.&I C p4(I, I], I I I I~~r<<'t~!I'.C n.y~: I (..I (.I!~s~I~.F I I II.(I~I i'R 2's/I('I L.Li-,.V~~, r r>0-r-~".I I IN\I t I'-I 1 r'r'V'.I ,.L l, I I'M r I I I I I I>~'s I vrl st I:lsr<<rr rT'.rs,!s,'i'I~!'I j J I I/I rl~3.I-s-...I I I j~~I j I*q~r t'!I I I: L,=..2+%~;L..ICE, I/.'I!--I l l I I~.,r s i" R'I~I I t~I I I~t I r.$sL~I I I i r~! SUBJECT i'A,VV.v.STEVENSON 8c ASSOClATES O ItnIClwalmechoNcol consaNng cnginoc!Ing II!m P~cv C Q.A/A~g vll.X A l AA~c-!i.T Ti,y~.+'ip i L L tk~~.3.l.8, i~I wP.EC Lam~8'e'A'.Pm Je'~.c.d'i i I i I P.I-.A.-I 6 8 B,Nm 4~~v p cI'I='.!ri, g./JAN'J,: 4 i'j ps';pv~i lDa lij~~ns A-I'~c5=.Q(y.e+$5c+=',,Lel... C?'ps i!os.d 2%co'p~S,UR E vvj E.~c.c A, FIc c-'l.=,$5.~i>/z'..".)..!2 =,<<!>."~7,.% ,~J C I v:,..t=wLQ f g.'wg.nL.v'... ~P g~~P'.P C..~'a I,.PC&,..~~..,...C!g.a ~i,a P..'.,: l I!'i~\I!i~'I~A Bee.'!N;v.D.i'~ .G'.HK'.~r L DA&~'~L~~I I i~~L t.:,'=.:>'rZ.: CZI.).=..2S;,3;:W ..2.>..~H~r~.~~A c T'~'~i T A,c.v.e~.'~+ !AacMk~i+.vv<~i.~, I!>J, 5 i i PA (rTVV'~T V~/aREFnR.Py~g.I I-, I l v I<I'!!I I t;I~'.i~a mZ!~vi vL..'.C'e S vILA~Kv iv'E v'.'I I;!: I l: l I'.!I!L: R.I,S~...:.H-C'.,CW .~o.GS.APE~4.9.:4:..~B'EF~Q.460 I I'I I I P I<, i~I.*.I)-.0~.T L!--I---.-,-,-.---,- !-.;--,-,,----,'PC I,'ai-I PL a'~'.I'&I f"Il r.T-'!.J, j:..'.LL~S v.D'~&rH.!=I2'C~7S)+!O'LZ,.5D=.I ?:'i i!!I!!.:.;:!i Y"'.vvc iv'v.'w'f7 E'...,.....,,......v....,. .....g,v./..T,...!i.....,J.L.:....'.. I.: I;',.ME~OI...CAP,...= I Z,5.(,.VCIP)....;'8;, C7~..: ".3.;.l..7.67,>C~.=.~~w v I~~'A>>vd~v v~JA<<~v v 4 v'~v 4 4 V4 lv ~s~2." s SUBJECT S I~I+~JOB NI4.+vl I id STEVENSON 80 ASSOCIATES a IIIIIChslCIIIIOChcnleol coniutiinII engineering turn 0,.C.o M K O Io III K f~ZZ 37" 7"~I QI ,'iT I I I I s I e~L'~C~I*'1!, 1 5 so..='e..~ I i L r~i$qf-r PAL I'.~ERE(F,'M.Lm.<wWCR&i~~lM.oC T I, s'9fz'l~r~g C I.~.$.I.m<.,5, I 1 M Pr4D i.PR=~,LED ag.c.".'I r I~l~dOSi I.Py~&$a my'~I I I I I I I I~~I I~r',.I I I l lgl r I'4$P.~c.c-.a~'..,H ctv E~m..8.<.]c.O.u R..I&..e r.II-.~,.CT.I.t.a I I'M.C}=i+D e MA 4 C..lc'i I.e,~c.r.nsr..~J'.I l'A.hD I ta,~i@ES.'t W.~..~....(.~l!L I'I i.Q>>~..C....C.C a.I~.ua iI j.W C.!,n.Wr~g-"..,Sq-..'ygPZ~ I L'e~k~~.', a.~..'..'.:~..~..~~.g i...S'n U.C-.'.U.S,Z.:.-:..+.6;'.!'.I.., I I Prs co+.sP=L.na sruti.or.'-.'-.rs 6 I CiZ..I ,'I III.f S M rE-.~'~--r I I!i I I I~*r I~s I I-I', rs I j I', I I'I I~I-~I I r I r~I r, I s't t r~~~I s s I~~~~\~I r I~I I I I r w r r I~r rr s~r I I I I I I I I \t~4 SUBJECT C ISnn I*oa er-P JOB No.~~+~+~~SHEETglll Ol4~STEYENSON 5 ASSOCIATES centeIIInii englnoednII nrm O Ii)ill CC i I 4.+~i i;I J~L I L I I~ll~i i I I I~i I I i3 I I i!i i~i I 8 Ec5!~., l.i i I p i I Ql I I I L, 8!7 i I.5 I'I I I f I I I I t~I I I i I:.2M LI'.3 I7 C;3Li I i,:I l I I I.F~.a]i I I I~~I":!I I I)II'g'~~i A I I, I I~,hlA~u P.B)i~i~O.g~v fo'~I I i)=N 4-.c-cn&lrACs d~'l I I t-.)C+i.X4D 8 i i t W, l! SHEET~~~'~~STEVENSON 5 ASSOCIATES conwNng onglnoorlng Irrm O~/5 I I 21E 2 h'I l!-'e!8~I F~'u.l2.4'I v J hAAv=~~~1 g+s.ss..D I l'I e I e PC<5'IW'V: a f-e~!l l l I I'I 1 l.h~~I e 1 k!I: 1~r I l H.K L(xP2.'~~I I 1 I l~QtJ I Ttt&kr I I e I!I!I I I I l..i I i I e I Lr g e&~e 32~2 I I I I~1~i 1 I 1-'-i I i i l J'E I Dj i 1-8-:5--f 1 J e e e~e e e l M1'..3.6I:..Ft'.E.'.MM.A. HE.H.'4 Z6<<<4 e e I 4 e l , j I J I I I I l.~l I l I i l I I'i'I.I I~~v r i~>>~e>>e>>e'~EE~ STEVENSON 5 ASSOCIATES O Itiuolvrolctt4Chorticol coriirrtttrco 44QIA44rtog Itrrri SUBJECT JOB No.(-I+I<<J.SHEETBL+'OfJQ-2-RM'F-S-CCCC: rir<<~" I , P 8+~~C 2K.2hz I-i~t 5-t zfz 8Se'~.3M'e6~~a"., JC,(M g i~7 L3~:~+I f~fg 5 I ri (I r I I I r 1~(y.g I~i!I'l(I (~~i-~~I'.r I I J~C I C'~C\r~~.~.,~~,.r,,..r i+-, i nrr~l4~1 (!, I I r~-'I I".*" I I 5 o<<<<.<<",f=rr r.I.="pa cr o-c,<<..r,r rrr<<rcrff;ao aa.6$*<<<<r.<<f r rrw I J~~~~~r~*I~I I I!.'.f, u P T-)Mphil Ql 8 A 0 ES P 5h CP X7-I('gP%gW jFi-,F X'uR~8 C 1 7.I{I=...,S~!5!!(~J,DMH Atua.HANS L Ecvz.a~0 I FRE.uEZ,C.r. C.r=., OV..A.I.I i~.6..RI'Xi'Oa.OF.4r H EROS JJ IM O 4 (LJC C~.HI~+~8++r',,'.re.J..g:S.. AS..A:.CS H~f f e~VSC-~,H.'r I i I!~~~~~~r'=.~C~~~r A5s~v K ggQ~JP-8'!l~I" I pl+(I~l I I (>r I!(-~4-(I r'I!I I r W 4,!...,.3,'5.'L4r?.EI Ir...MMs U 5.(.g,Q,>~~~i." QP'I(A.I~'.~l,'~w~ ~F.v.s.PPP.&x f M.A.+f~M<<<<c~H p rr A rrc rL.....CCI g Sg hl,~q.u j I'i l l I;I 5 8 g(g.~C~I f!,'~c (I i, t 4>>w t I C'r~<<-r r r~,;i!!~I l j r...~'..~~',~'a<<~! '"k>>'>>r~Irk I>>~r I 8~:-.STEVENSON'.-.;'.at, ASSOCIATES .';".'a It>>I>>CttltattnootlantCOI >>~'Ctcttttlg 0tlgtt>>00tttlg tits>>~k k SUBJECT I'JOB No.I k I>>A~V A i t~W~le P.~t f O Ill.k=!>>>>F-'>>'-'b 5~trYI~'I'C n"'f I>>>>~I I}((J LIJ T I~t j t gj I',li&Br~~i ij I.'J-i+-5 I'l CI-~Z~I I I~5 l.Z,.P (c 2S I o+z)o2>cQoQ (2e+ 4/g 4~' STEVENSON',.',&ASSOC3ATES ~o structrrroHnechohtcot COIN(tthg Oh(t(hchfthg (If!ill CVP u Arc~n(-0!ft (t KcJ-S-8'J>VV>VI>M>IJ}I I t~','3 i 3 t~t 3}!!i}~t}f;i I=I 3 i~>~I 1 3 I J I I]~!3 I~1 4'}(4 I I I t}+I J'(4 P y.fj, t 4 I}v 4D A i>}r.I(-I (+-I I I 1 I I I I L 3!i~~I t t~3~~3 k-~4 3 I I 4 I I~I~~I>>~'I L SUBJECT C STEVENSON 8('ASSOCIATES '6@G c o)ftucfut~cf)otucof tuA)uN(thg OtlglhOOflog fltm~'OB No.+++j+~~z O~I IH(IT~OIII N 9 cP'-5-8).'C.'-,y>,'pt 1', lh't'C~C s R.S i C>>I,'i~~I I I a Ii g'W7 P~~!I X~ESS~C.6.I i~~t~.i.S'~At.8'VT'I.O.+ ~I~~I)R!" I~, i I L.~I~~'I i I l I I e I I I i!)j, I t~I I l I&i%.j!!EQ R.~I!I t I I I I~c Dr~t-.~~I l~:, I i'i (&r.O..~.&.W.R.Q.;.):6,C EO Sm)4I':~~OK.D'~~s 4.~,'<w~nP,~c.~~ urn+~I i I i!t t I I I l C.35o+-I (D/p-~~i I E:j M I~i'C~tV'C fi..4!.D'.E't~..~~: ')I~I~'I I.I..Pg,.S.O~(=ty't=)j.Crt,igPP C.A.C I~~.~.t~I~-I a.,~,)~,,'I~,,~~,~~t'1~~~~~~.,~~.~~,~.~~~~~I g:0'0 STEVENSON'I ASSOCIATES a Itn(cturotrnochontcol coewWng eng(noortng firm h E E (~sm r E I~S 9$c(=I r E 2)I I I+~,.~r s 5'o I I Q~I I)LGJ I I I I , S I I (r r~~+&, l ln,sac 8&Vt5>QW I I-"/'i (s3!~(I (JVl (J.2 o5.k'Q Lo5 2 1 I: Cpp (I I 8&m 4)I (II I"i i)l i I~i~~7 I E L.'I X-CE L I (a g i).j L I.L tt d II 0 STEVENSON 8;ASSOC1ATES cont)itttng entttneerlntt tltm i UP7 tmA C F-ej&5 m r I-P.c)SHEET'4~~0 Ctt-s-z 0 Itt Ut~L~~l~f!7(o'i I (,I t.'o.+77gg cate jM~~!i'S.~~a.oJjR,O .I P.~~~V"4".!jct B I'R-O t'<5~Lt'QF 5 t:.SIC'R b j~jt I)l t l I 1~!i I I 3;4't)~~, if'OS)), J+i I~j.D CI 7~.~R C~....~i+, Q pent')'i<~~-.,r'" SVZ-,'ace.II"lo )','.c)n7'.""co s t)'i(3-'j, s',-'~I'I~~~Pi 3 35 5~~I I~~~*-I J i~'5'~~j~~I I i i I I l~I~)L I l I t.'...5 Q~pj, ij...h/+~+i i'P jc~l~&.2i tt t pea (2-.2..p,e I.....y.J3.3.4%9;.K 5;....'P~t.','...., y.:.=H CC3.C.'+5.O..t)S'.i.',Ir.i=.:.37'rr t.(n.,o po F.J'4-n p~g l t~i t, tt)I I I~~I~f'" I t~I~.....'3.,5.Q.p.s,.l,,=...tl jI)I J I I.='J&.2.:..!'I~I I I~I++tt~.3.l.f P s.i=.='.=.(t f~~i (*\~~4.A~<<IA 4)I~A'y I 5 i I jo i\i I.I~I t ti J I!I I I I i i I~ r'ai<Q, r'rot rr, s ,;.;";.'TEVENSON '"'-Ik ASSOCIATES o slructuroirnochonlcol consurrrng ongrneerlng tlrrn SUBJECT (C'OB No.~DC l~u'i(~cAP.R V)z O rrt cc ss ssr@~orrt< ~.~l~sls 4/~5~g s n-s~fs"s s~0 s rats c."J~r i;,~.r'M t J'.K L'u.P,.i l~r.....s..l ic k,.to y.I'P.~i gH~Im~r ((~g~.~Ž)M<.csO.A.a.,&,5 , i C.s..MH./i AsJ,rtc s.~~~~>Q 2 IO+'(-=,3 2 co.'c'rc....'-ps) r r~F R I=-~w.(.a.k'.~'..:.7~L~L~I A.w~~..$, p'.ig.'<i,.4 t.C.Pg;:C.~5 sJ r(c:C~F F~8 D.A.n'<E.,rt r.h:e r~!.t p'I.Q 6,.J., Cl t g r.o 4 r I r r I~((E L ,'3 4 5+~..I n.J.i f~I 7 Q I, r, I 8S x lc~HZ-(.2 359 t i~I L l~I I I<<',H..p h'..J'WnJ'g,g~<~'.s-r,~~.Ent.C.t W.'.~r,,<~~tl C I I=2-;I I i 3/a(e da~I r i t i e 4.+z'~I I I r I I~-.'I~1'i Lsd i.8-Q rns~MM L r'L~~-1 I ~4 CC,)C f~','TEVENSON ..-8CASSOClATES O Ithfotchc<<hOChoh<CO< cohfcfltlhp cop<hoof<tip hfhl SUBJECT Ar)'G.O'S<-.'G: c.c.~!A PP.':~'O R O V)U<SHEETS~ŽPF gP~'~.<r r'O<5j$<&S++!i I'C I~O I I I!','5o.8 I I~Jt0~$I x I+-l-3 I)~!i I I I T9-W!~UL3.ed1~C i I.~I 1,'~~~~I~I~I~', j W'7 ff'1 i c I~I I r, I I~1 1 r 1" I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I C S IO I~~I5+x In.~B'~~v5'3'f~~~R<j~..I 8 f l I i.,.7.e.Z), W, L-Z d,27~,g 4~E!,Q~~)I+-I I~~I<..~.I I i~!I M~'Z.I V~~I<~~~1 I I I I~',~.I!i I~~(J g.a I S.,i,)(,~.4 ...,E,0<~I.Oa. C.C-=A<<S.FuP-rt.v<..<S.. i og-I!I r I 1 I I r r I I~~I I:.~.~~'.I;I~c I~~I+,+<<.,~1 I...~*r.~~,.1.C...I.c~..A r~'r c rcr,~a.e~c.....I-rhrrrf....;,.I KSS:S....e&l~:.S'E+,:='.+.(C26 CClCS..)i..

4 J SUBJEGT~c.ri, jOBMJ:-J33C f55 9..'.'SHEET/2 I B~2Z::+Ac Y<g..f-d Wc'-5-STEVENSON 8c ASSOC}ATES O ItnjclllloH54Chonlcol conIIJINny englneerlny ntm 0 EO~'I~" IJS~J S k I7 axe~I cn+}I I;"}~~I ,po I I I 1~.7p~I I i r~)I I~J i 1 R!8~C-~iP'IO~IE.<~ L E~'I}I i C}A P'+!)'pl'.Qg t4'5(o 4~4 R.E I>>.1.F.U<~<6.%3:[ a~I?=Aj C L..S~IE-JJ JI I~I)I I~~1 ,.Z.B&'~I I SZ,I2 O I A I i g 0 1l R h>'I '1 1 1terrrr 14 r rA~1 rt SUBJECT'~Wr~--t;tt r~g~V.tri':4"""~~" STEVENSON"".-';;: "..'-".: 8t ASSOCIATES"'-', conrurrrnp enprnaorlng nrrn Ok&/."T et e:i ii'~>."""'11+'" X 0 ro UI cr..".ggq Jt..r" rut-r..rt)tpf.pPi 3~I~~Res 4~I ct W~8.~604 SW.'t52,4++~~~i~l i~I I g'7+-8+1-.(-1 I t ZSB-Z S.'8'~I.I e~I I I I I I 4~~i P-..C~~~QQ)8I I 2S.S II I I 2.B,B:,.5 IA I I!.f.'g tI ,w C.1!Let.1 r<J g~~i~s4!f.k.'-(.8 j 5.pc Wff..rf'~J 1~~I I t I , ('7 4rtt Ct~I.'real I'g, r r r--~l r (g~,gg)i I I I I I t I'CAP I I I 1 I t.t 2)+(7O,>u)(J (to 4.Q I+~g'++;~'h3'i'I l 1 I~1~t I Ki~S<J)~I~~V Equip Id: 2-TK-32 Train: 12 Equip Class: 21'ng No.: 2-5106A Function: D System: CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK SUPPLY Equip Desc: CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK Building: GROUNDS Room: INNER PLANT GROUNDS Elev: 609 Sort: Sg Notes: Normal State: Desired State: Power Req'd: N Support System Drawing: Req'd Support Comp: Safety Related Status: STANDARD Min/Opt: MIN Alias No: Power Train: NA Comp Served: CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK MFR: GRAVER TANK&MFG.CO., INC.l: 500,000 GALS.Panel: Elem.Drawing: NOT APPL Wiring Drawing: NOT APPL Power Source: Walkdown: F Relay Eval: N;i'omp Type: TANK Iso Drawing: Location: 50 FEET SOUTH OF THE UNIT 2 CONTAINMENT DOME DC Cook Unit 2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 1 of 3 ID: 2-TK-32 (Rev.0)Description: CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers Building: GROUNDS Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: INNER PLANT GROUNDS-50 FEET SOUTH OF THE UNIT 2 CONTAINMENT DOME Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: GRAVER TANK&MFG.CO., INC.500,000 GALS.BASIS: External analysis 1.The buckling capacity of the shell of a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank is equal to or greater than the demand.2.The capacity of the anchor bolts and their embedments'is equal to or greater than the demand.3.The capacity of connections between the anchor bolts and the tank shell is equal to or greater than the demand.4.Attached piping has adequate flexibility to accommodate the motion of a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank.5.A ring-type foundation is not used to support a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank.Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes E P El IC COJHI)LES SRT: George G.Thomas and Tom Huang on 10/5/93 Large flat bottom tank 52'-0" inside diameter 34'-5 1/2" height.Tank manufactured by Graver Tank, made of ASTM A240 Type 304 Steel, 500,000 gallons and weighs 128,700 lbs.Anchored with 30 3/8" th x 5" w x 4'4" long strap that is embedded in the concrete 2'epth with a 2" radius hook at the end.The strap detail is identical to the strap for the Unit 1 and 2 refueling Water Storage Tanks (RWST)1-TK-33 and 2-TK-33.The calculation for the RWST.resulted in the conclusion that the weld to the tank and embedment in the concrete was sufficient to develop the full yield strength of the strap.The RWST has a very similar configuration as this CST.The calculation for the RWST using GIP methodology indicated an overall safety factor of 2.57 for overturning and 1.72 for shear.Calculation is attached to the SEWS of 1-TK-33.Comparison of significant attributes of the tanks is shown below: RWST CST 48'iameter 31'iquid Height 25'trap Anchors 52'iameter 31'-7" Liquid Height 30'trap Anchors For shear the tanks are essentially identical since the demand and capacity are both proportional to the area under the base. 4%,h II's'.il r DC Cook Unit 2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 3 of 3 ID: 2-TK-32 (Rev.0)Description: CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK Class: 21-Tanks and Meat Exchangers Building: GROUNDS Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: INNER PLANT GROUNDS-50 FEET SOUTH OF THE UNIT 2 CONTAINMENT DOME Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: GRAVER TANK 8 MFG.CO., INC.500,000 GALS.ELXUHIR ,, jest 7 T y4)4X, h P~o'p ht~g t h 2'uckled Out Anchor Strap Pipes at the Bottom of the RWST +*12 CHP 5021.CCD.O].9 ATTACHMENT NO.I-K-30 B g.'2 Tg-'7'4 Location Insta at on wg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch Ecgxxpment No.~gDGg<RTE KToRRG6 fdic Ii DIN&4<<od.->< DIp g s4.-S/<%AH McA)R+'TRRPs~(bbJQ QT'p.~fQ)NQ~gQQ,~) >+B GF TM H~~U~y pp~~~~s~~<'T y+" p~T 4 FK.LES,Q)Gu6 ~<<~TIos 1 QF T W~TO~g~U RAT-INDIANA MICHIGAN POWE~R SITE DESIGN CONTROLLED WORKING COPY OCT$5 tBS5 Drawn by: Verified by: Qua.Ce Inspector Date: Date: Reviewed by: Date: Cons ruct on Anc or Review Engineer t o-l>page 1 of 3 Revision.3 0

• • 12 CHP 5021.CCD~019 ATTACHKENT NO.1 Un t I-'l-'90 4 9 B g.CQ N p Eblis~C S I 0 C,M c 2.T(c-'3Q Insta~at on dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ament Sketch Equipment No.~/g wl L Q~R Ae&-O~g, 0 I N 3/yx5"<Toms b INDIANA hflOg, AN POLI c SITE OKSIGN C"ITROLL WORKING OPY OCT'[5 1995 8("KY'r<Q~rb LERK T++4~'5 A'~'amS OIIYl~I4N~ts, 8Q'ECT.'A A+~847 rn&AS'uk'a~~~

e,~so'F%6$4~TIW-8'3 C7~~S WIICy)X 4~Re'>~T<<Date: I o-1-'l2 D te: Drawn by: Verified by: Qua./Ce.Inspector Reviewed by: Date: I o-<3-'7>Cons ruct on Anc r Rev ew Engineer Page 1 ol.'Revision ATTACHMENT 5 TO AEP:NRC:1040E SAMPLE SEWS, ANCHORAGE CALCULATIONS, AND ANCHORAGE INSPECTION DOCUMENTATION FOR HORIZONTAL TANKS AND HEAT EXCHANGERS RAI ITEM 7 This attachment includes sample SEWS, anchorage calculations and anchorage inspection documentation for the horizontal tank and heat exchanger evaluations requested in RAI Question 7.Included in this attachment are the evaluations for 1-HE-14, 2-HE-15E, 12-HE-16N, 1-QT-107-AB, 2-QT-1 1$-CD, 1-HE-.15E and 1-QT-107-CD. 01/16/92 PG.N0.53'AFE SHUTDOWN EQUIPMEHT I.IST (SSELWP)FUNCTION: CC'W Equipment Class: 21 Train: 12 Equipment ID: 1-NE-1C Drawing Number: 1-5135 System: CVCS Equip

Description:

LETDOWN HEAT EXCHANGER Ruilding: AUXILIARY Room: LETDOWN HEAT EXCHANGER ROOM Elevation: 633 Normal state: Desired state: Power Required: H Sort: Suooorting System Drawing Number: acquired Interconnections and Supporting Components: fety Related Status: NUCLEAR SR Min/Opt: MIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATIOQ Al ias Number: Power Train: NA Comnonent Served: LETDOWN HEAT EXCHAHGFR Manufacturer: AILAS INDUSTRAIAL MANUFACTURING CO Model: 1000 GPM Panel: Elem Drawing: H/A Wiring Drawing: N/A Power Source: N/A Walkdownt F Relay Only: N Comoonent Type: HE (ONE PER UHIT)ISO Drawings: Detailed Location: DC Cook Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet1 of3 ID: 1-HE-14 (Rev.0)Description: LETDOWN HEAT EXCHANGER Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 633.00 Room, Row/Col: LETDOWN HEAT EXCHANG, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: ATLAS INDUSTRAIAL MANUFACTURING CO, 1000 GPM BASIS: External analysis 1.The buckling capacity of the shell of a targe, flat-bottom, vertical tank is equal to or greater than the demand.2.The capacity of the anchor bolts and their embedments is equal to or greater than the demand.3.The capacity of connections between the anchor bolts and the tank shell is equal to or greater than the demand.4.Attached piping has adequate flexibility to accommodate the motion of a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank.-5.A ring-type foundation is not used to support a large, fIat-bottom, vertical tank.N/A Yes Yes Yes N/A SRT: Gary Thomas, and Tom Huang on 11/3/93.ANCHORAGE ADEQUACY ACCEPTABLE TO SRT BASED ON BACK OF ENVELOPE CALCULATION SHOWN BELOW.Nozzle loads on heat exchanger are small (on the order of 600 lbs.and 600 ft.-lbs.). Anchored with 2-7/8" diameter J-bolts on 11-3/8" spacing.Vertical distance from the base of exchanger to the C.G.of exchanger is 13".Vertical d'stance from the base of the exchanger to the top nozzle is 29".Supports for saddle dowled into base concrete.Saddle supports are adequately reinforced to transfer loads to bolts.SRT judged that the Heat Exchanger is rigid.Back of the envelope calculation: 0.24g (DBE ZPA at floor)x 1.25 (for realistic spectra)x 3320 lbs.(wt.of HX)x 13" (to C.G.)/[2 (bolts)x (11.375")] +700 Ibs x 29" (Nozzle loads)/(2 x 11.375"]+700 (ft.-Ibs)x12 in/ft/(2 x11.375")=1830 lbs.tension/bolt-3320 (.76g)/4 (dead wt.-vertical earthquake) )=1199 lbs.tension/bolt .24 x 1.25 x 3320/4 (bolts)+700/4=424 lbs.shear/bolt Embedment for the 7/8" diameter J-bolts is 19.5" or 19.5/.875=22.3 bolt diameters into concrete.RLp for embedment (90 degree hook)=]19.5+8(7/8)]/(62.5 x.875)=0.49. Allowable for tension=20.44 x 0.49=9.8 k>1.2 k.For shear=10.22 k>0.424 k.OK.

DC COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 2 of 3 ID: 1-HE-14 (Rev.0)Description: LETDOWN HEAT EXCHANGER Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 633.00 Room, Row/Col: LETDOWN HEAT EXCHANG, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: ATLAS INDUSTRAIAL MANUFACTURING CO, 1000 GPM Evaluated by: Date: 8/f5 (~>w (p (p-

Attachment:

Pictures DC COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS}GIP Rev 2 Corrected 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 3 of 3 ID: 1-HE-14 (Rev.0)Description: LETDOWN HEAT EXCHANGER Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 633.00 Room, Row/Col: LETDOWN HEAT EXCHANG, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: ATLAS INDUSTRAIAL MANUFACTURING CO, 1000 GPM Overall Exchanger Saddle Support Coo ComponenC No.Class Any parget:icular area the Seismic Roviev Teaa should pay oxtra attontion to?Yes<No (If yea, check items that apply.)5 Anchor Type Anchor Diameter Anchor Spacing Anchor Number Anchor Embedment~ Anchor Edge distance Anchor Cepv'nchor Thread Engagement Anchor Grip Anchor Angularity Concrete Crack khamxha lhd 4=kt('.~<fn r('I'<~~P~lg"~4/)J (T (p C04~AJ Others (((sstribs brisrly)"~N I Ik~~NO bl AS~5.)~5<,&~f (IE there ia concern, for Design Basis Discrepancy, circle the applicable item and explain.1.2.3.Hardvare Maintenance Type Discrepancy Dra~ing Up&,te Type Discrepancy Significant Operabili.ty/Design Basis Discrepancy Others Condition: Actions Taken: lJDIJB (AG.H P PrO(AT(O(~ Prepared By T Data ('s>l P--

'HP 5021 CCD.019..i'TACHMENT NO 1 lt 5bPI-ZZ lZ,-332.5-'9 ALlX I 33'-O" EL.LETDOWN BEAT EXCHANC ER RQQM Bl g.Location I-HE.-I4-Insta at on wg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch Equipment No.OI 4 CC'V DUE, TQ HIC H RADIA'TIOM AREA CSO v.~b HALT LOCKTIQMS WE.PE.NQT QBTALME.D QM THC KkG1 PE.D'E5'TAL C)GI VlERE, DEXERMME.Q 5(M(LAR TQ THE.WEST PE.QEGTAL. Wr II/N 5'~z-'a I'iz," 5'e" 0>5E.C T/QM"4-A" PLA,M I Drawn by: Verified by: Reviewed by: Date: 4!-Z>-'B Date: ua./Cert.Xnspector 7 Date: Construction An hor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1

++12 CHP 5021~CCD.019 ATTACHMENT NO.pgg No.: IZ-3)ZI-U. II IZ-3.)ZE~gag No.;IZ-50 t)-ZO Tightness verified?0 Yes 0 No Date: ons ruc on Equipment base flexible?0 Yes I No Date: ons ruc o ARE~~~quipment No.: I-HE-I4.Anchor type:~>~<~~~PE Z Dia: Tightness established by: 0"Snug Fit" 0 Torque Torque Wrench No.: Cal.Due Date: Bolt ID I~3 4 GaPs BFlwk5l BEfivEEIU I Comments Anchor len th 2'-I'~z" Z'-I'li-I~i" 7'-I'jz" 41'~z"~41'l4"4lg" 41"L Protruding ~sic~-~su--~6~.len th Bolt ri Concrete condition Edg>>distance,)I'-7 lc I'-7~i~" I.'-/'rz" I'-7Yz->8'/4">8" W Rli"dh a7Vr."~V~~'/2>/4" 2'1(" L>~C.SACK Ihl CGMCRETT:~1(UOTII SIDE5 4'/q 4'/4 Anchor s acin Anchor an larit Thread engagement I I~/s" II~~a" 4 IO'lQ (50'LQ CD I(OIC OK&IC Comments 4 QtlE TD Hlf'RADIKfloLI AREA Iso Ar'I MLT Loc.ATI wERc hloT QKTAll.l THC EAST P WERE DE:TER~I IMILAR, TO THE UV'C5i'T PE'0'TAI Ih A I hl SPEC T'L(5hl.15 I R\h H R R ll ICo Varified by: Qua./Cert.Inspector Revieved by!T'ons ruct on Date: Date!Page 2 of 3 Revision l siss've w i vvui ver ATTAVBKNT NO.l l-HE,-l 4-edded Steel Dwg.No.: Dug No.: re&Weld ID Size Cracks Lack of Penetration 3(/v ((/~~y&>>(/4IP 3(/gr I, (/Yes Yes No QKO Yes s Yes No/~/4"(('//,/y">>'//,lg">>'l4" Yes W~WS Vl4 WS'IMr-W V l l I/~I/~I/S des Yes Wa, l 1~Fillet~((~I/>>2~Plllg/slot 3~Groove Porosity Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes's Yes Equipment base flexible: 0 Yes 8-No ons ruc x Reviewed by: ons ruc son c or evxev ngxneer Uerified by: To<~+wc.s<<~o ua.e.npsec or Date: Page 3 of 3 Revision 1

ssaC aVC J~4 SU~V J V ATTACHMENT NO.1~ipment No.1-HE,-l4 added Steel Dwg.No.: Dwg No.: WR Meld ID Size Cracks g>/g'~~lg" Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes YQS No No No No No No No l~Fillet es'Plug/Slot 3~Groove Lack of.~Yes Yes.Yes Penetration KaJ No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No Porosity Y Yes Yes Yes Yes'es Yes Yes o No No No No No No No Equipment hase flexible: 0 Yas E No on ruc z n a Reviewed by: Veri.f ied by: 7c l e ons ruc son c or avxew gxnaer e.np ec r Date: Page 3 of 3 Revision 1 S 8 A DEPARTMENT CONTROLLED DOCUMENT COPY NO.3-~12 SHP 5050 NDE pp8 ATTACHMENT NO.1 ULTRASONIC TEST REPORT JOB ORDER NO.:~l REPORT DATE: REgUEST NO.IDENTIFICATION Unit Component Item Material Other 5 TECHNI UE Test Unit/S/N 5k Freq./Diameter Reference Standard Couplant/Batch No.'7 SB TEST DATA REMARKS PERFORMED BY: REVIEWED BY: FORM NO.12 SHP 5050 NDE.008-1 LEVEL~DATE LEVEL:~'-DATE: Z 5 Page 1 of 1 Revision 0 Equip ID: 2-HE-15E Train: 2 Equip Class:21 wing No.: 2-5135A 2-5113 tion: CCW System: COMPONENT COOLING WATER Equip Desc: EAST COMPONENT COOLING WATER HEAT EXCHANGER Building: AUXILIARY Room: 609 HALLWAY Elev: 609 Sort: S, Notes: Normal State: 4 Desired State: Power Req'd: N Support System Drawing: Req'd Support Comp: Safety Related Status: NUCLEAR SR Min/Opt: MIN Alias No: Power Train: NA Comp Served: EAST COMPONENT COOLING WATER HEAT EXCHANGER MPR: M.L.W.INDUSTRIES Pa el: Elem.Drawing: NOT APPL Wiring Drawing: NOT APPL Power Source: NOT APPL Walkdown: F Relay Eval: N Comp Type: HE Iso Drawing: 2-CCW-41, 2-CCW-42 Location: 30 FEET EAST OP THE N2 MONITOR TANK

DC COOK Unit 2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet1 of2 ID: 2-HE-15E (Rev.0)Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers

== Description:==

EAST COMPONENT COOLING WATER HEAT EXCHANGER Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: 609 HALLWAY-30 FEET EAST OF THE¹2 MONITOR TANK Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: M.L.W.INDUSTRIES (HORIZONTAL) BASIS: External analysis 1.The buckling capacity of the shell of a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank is equal to or greater than the demand.2.The capacity of the anchor bolts and their embedments is equal to or greater than the demand.3.The capacity of connections between the anchor bolts and the tank shell is equal to or greater than the demand.4.Attached piping has adequate flexibility to accommodate the motion of a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank.5.A ring-type foundation is not used to support a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank.N/A Yes Yes Yes N/A C LL 0~CO I~S SRT: Gary Thomas, Tom Huang, and Kailash Mahajan on 11/2/93.Component Cooling Water Heat Exchanger on two reinforced saddles.Anchorage is two 7/8" diameter J bolts.There are 4 1" wedge expansion anchors in one pedestal in the horizontal direction. C.G.of exchanger from the top of the saddle pedestal about 3'.Pedestal concrete is cracked.AEPSC tracking the problem through a condition report.SRT has reviewed the resolution of this problem and determined that it is resolved.This unit is the same as 1-HE-15E except there are no horizontal anchors on 1-HE-15E.The anchorage for this exchanger is more robust.The calculations of 1-HE-15E show that the anchors are adequate and the saddles are safe.Evaluated by: , sb.~Date: ttachment: Pictures DC COOK Unit 2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 2 of 2 ID: 2-HE-15E (Rev.0)Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers

== Description:==

EAST COMPONENT COOLING WATER HEAT EXCHANGER Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: 609 HALLWAY-30 FEET EAST OF THE¹2 MONITOR TANK Manufacturer, Model, Etc:: M.L.W.INDUSTRIES (HORIZONTAL) BLCLI le ONE SADDLE WITH 4 HORIZONTAL BOLTS OTHER SADDLE SUPPORT Coo Component No.'2--I S E Cloaa Any pazpicular area tho Seismic Review Teaa should pay extra attontion to?Yea<No (If yea, check Stoma that apply.)Anchor Typo Anchor Diameter Anchor Spacing Anchor lumbar Anchor Embodmont+ Anchor Edge Distance Anchor Gap M Anchor Thread Engagement Anchor Grip Anchor Angularity Concrete Cracks'thers (describe briefly)If there ia concern for Design Basis Discrepancy, circle tho applicable atom and explain.1.2.3.Hardvare Maintenanco Type Discrepancy Dra~ing Update Typo Discrepancy Significant Operability/Design Basis Discrepancy Others Condition: HotJ8 Actions Taken: 9 SING Preparod By Dasa

• • 12 CHP 5021 CCD.019 ATTACHMENT NO.1 Equipment No.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET 2 6)x B..goy'-0" worry sourH~w~q Unzt 0 Bldg.Location i2.-B~Qg-2s,iz-3zb-z-R6-l56 Installation dwg./Rev.74'-'/a~tt Ypg l~0-C,RPICe IIJ4ROVl.I J C+ACK II I 6 CCouT INDIANA MICHIGAN POVIER SITE DESIGN CONTROLLED Y(OR KING COPY AUG 24 1S95 LERK/~g CRAuC T'O FLIIIIR 0'-l'/a+'/5 (gyp)Drawn by: Date: Date:&~~~~~~~Verified by: Qual./Cert.Inspector Reviewed by: 7 Date: 8~t~Construction Anc or Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
  • 12 CHP 5021.CCD.019 ATTACHMENT NO.1 2.Unxt l 2.-3285-23 f2-'328 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET he~M bO I'-O" NORTH~GATV~W~q Bldg.Location Installation dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch Equipment No.INOIANA MICHIGAN POvggR SITE DESIGN CONTROLI.EP

'tYORKING COPY AUG 24 tSIIS I.ERK Y9P cR.Ac.z g~XoIVV e6T.08.00T 4 CoLlC, ROOT@TOP t BOGCf FB.Wl PB)K'TEIDE 't'L 0 IJ 0 ly+7z'y 7-E<S~<>xP)El Ev.~<ca UooicuQG Drawn by: Date: Dat:e: Verified by: gua./Cert.Inspector Reviewed by: T Date: Construct on An hor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1 0

• • 12 CHP 5021.CCD.019 ATTACHMENT NO.1 2 Unxt 0 l2.-N.SS-25, is-32eg-Installatz.on dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET Bl..IOOq'-g~I hJQATA COOT/HAU u~Bldg.Location z-HB-t58 Equipment No.z-Bg-i'd%Ql/g 9~lOC4TlOA 0$~(,N0R.d ItIDIANA MICMIGAW POWER SITE DESIGN CONTROLLED WORKING COPY AUG 24 1998 LERK T-4 gv i EL.CV.U'I-UO k IQ OuY C<~c 0 Date: Date: Drawn by: gual./Cert:.

Inspector Reviewed by: Dat Constru tron chor Review Engineer Verified by:~~~~e: Page 1 of 3 Revision 1 0

• • 12 CHP 5021.CCD.019 ATTACHMENT NO.1 2 Unzt 0 12.-8296-S t2.-3xg-Installation dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch Equipment No.ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET PrOX&1-boq'-o" NORTH SbQTH RPn~+Bldg.Location I/bklg (7Yp()7 6O~QOGIFI@)AT4X+CRRcX)'p j94C80 8, uJP 5AER 0 V INOIANA MICHIGAN PO)VER SITE DESIGN CONTROLLED YYOR KING COPY AUG 24 1895 LERK+~~p a CI d CPP~Q f~Volh)7 gC,TWd&hl 4,RouT~MQC.EI Eu.J)EM tppkxÃI 0 IA Drawn by: Verified by: Date: Date: Q a./Cert.InsPector Reviewed by: 7 Date: Construction An hor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
  • 12 CHP 502 1.CCD.0 19 ATTACHMENT No.Equipment No.: '-H C IGC Anchor type: Z BGU Dia: Tightness established by: 0"Snug Fit" 0 Torque Wrench No.: rJA Tightness verified?0 Yes 5 No HR ons ruc Equipment base flexible7 0 Yes S.No T'ns Dwg No.: IR-3298" f Dvg No.: Torque Cal.Due Date: c o ARE Bolt ED Gaps t 2, 3+o Comments Anchor+I p]~+I g/~'i I3q.~3(~" len th Protruding q3/~)IS(I>'en h Q~r I Embedment Z~~~~ZI~I~/', 2'4'/<37/~tv QW4>a-3o13 8-Z<o~mCC~>/8'.5'ee eEL v Bolt ri~/8 E"/IIo 2'IX.<"/II.To~mc6+>/g Sbg LjoTE GEL4w.Concrete CRAB CRACK.GRfKK GRhW condition Edge&" (oo distance CEGTcH To~&+~/~'nchor s acin Anchor an larit Thread engagement Tp L,~W<6 I/q" Comments.X/Ig'g~&67~QLITJtHASSSR, Yiq 4'GTW6&J Wm~oI PII R 0'I4h CRIT~P 0 Serai To OI'T RIP~HOT M u RR~C'T verified by: Qua./Cert.nspector Revieved by: Construct on SITE.DESIGN CONTROLLED YIOIIKING COPY'UG 2419SK Date: D te: 8->>"I'ERKT Pa Re e2of 3 ision 1
  • 12 CHP 5021.CCD.P19 ATTACHMENT No,~~~Equipment No.: Anchor type:<~t.PrH(&OP.Tightness established by: 0 Torque Wrench No.: P Tightness verified?I Yes Equipment base flexible?0 kg No.: '+>>S8-Dia: I'wg No.:~>8>"ZA"Snug Fit" E Torque l?--Board I Cal.Due Date: 0 No S%a~~Date: 4.<>95 ons ruc ion Yes 8 No~~Date: 0+>13 ons ruc on ARE Bolt ID Gaps Comments Anchor len Protruding len h 7~/y'ual Ct II Embedment 5l(q." Bolt ri C n ete C,~<MPCQ CRPcv CppcE.condition Edge distance Anchor s acin Anchor an larit Thread engagement

/I (p$~/l(p 4 4" (3/$V)3tqlI gyl/II 5" I g'3/8" 5', C~(<I," 0 0 0 Og.ot'K, Vo TOP OFC SHIIT Ta ToPoF AN<Comments: Y~gh ac.ss C'erified by: Qua./ert.Inspector evieved by: Const ct on ARE A~M J I INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER SITE DESIGN CONTROLLED WORKING COPY AUG 24 19S5 Re LERK Date: Date: o2of 3 ision 1

• • 12 CHP 5021.CCD.019 ATTACHMENT NO.1 Equipment No.: Embedded Steel Dwg.No.: OR S CT 0 CAL Dwg No.: I 2-8>98-Weld XD T e Size Len h Cracks~li Io~hb Yes Yes Yes No QL gZ W3 g]~Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No We e Codes 1=Fillet 2=Plug/Slot 3=Groove Lack of.Les Penetration QR Yes Yes No es Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Porosity Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No.No Yes No&GQ hi<'R.~/~3 RYgxqx.q" IA'4.4~J)44+4~4 o.0,~4.INDIANA MICHIGAN PO'LYER SITE DESIGN CONTRCI.LEO IVORKING COPY AUG 24 1895~~qyeHh RCCBpT 7~~O~" Equipment base flexible: 0 Yes g No 1 Date:<-2'~ons ruc z n e Reviewed by: ified by: ons ruc ron c or evxew ngxneer ua.e.npsec or:~S.-3 Date: Page 3 of 3 Revision 1 S 8 A DEPARTMENT CONTROLlED DOCUMENT COPY NO.~/12 SHP 5050 NDE.008 ATTACHMENT NO.1 Uf TRASONIC TEST REPORT JOB ORDER NO<<::~/.>>.~*./A IDENTIFICATION Unit Waa Component Item A~a.Material Other 5 Test Unit/S/Nfl VSR-CNC-9'K Freq./Diameter.asD Reference Standard&C'-8 Couplant/Batch No.~~/~lP88 TEST DATA REMARKS P.EPV C.EE E IJ~PERFORMED BY: REVIEWED BY: FORM NO.12 SHP 5050 NDE.008-1 LEVEL:~~DATE: IY'-/3~z3 LEVEL:~DATE: Page 1 of 1 Revision 0

~Yi atabase: K:SSEL1B.DBF Equip ID: 12-HE-16N Train: 12 Equip Class:21~~~ing No.: 12-5136, 1-5135 Function: SFP COOLING AND CCW System: SPENT FUEL PIT COOLING&CCW Equip Desc: NORTH SPENT FUEL PIT HEAT EXCHANGER Building: U-1 AUXILIARY Room: SPENT FUEL PIT HE ROOM Elev: 609 Sort: S, Notes: Normal State: Desired State: Power Req'd: N Support System Drawing: Req'd Support Comp: Safety Related Status: STANDARD Alias No: Power Train: NA~Comp Served: OAT, JOSEPH, CORP MFR: 5: Panel: Elem.Drawing: Wiring Drawing: Power Source: Walkdown: F Relay Eval: N Comp Type: HE Min/Opt: MIN Iso Drawing: 12-SF-5, 7, 1-CCW-l, 7 Location: NW AREA OF RM DC COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 1 of 9 ID: 12-HE-16N (Rev.0)Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers

== Description:==

NORTH SPENT FUEL PIT HEAT EXCHANGER Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: SPENT FUEL PIT HEAT XCHGR RM, NWAREA OF RM Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: OAT, JOSEPH, CORP.BASIS: Horizontal TANK analysis 1.The buckling capacity of the shell of a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank is equal to or greater than the demand.2.The capacity of the anchor bolts and their embedments is equal to or greater than the demand.3.The capacity of connections between the anchor bolts and the tank shell is equal to or greater than the demand.4.Attached piping has adequate flexibility to accommodate the motion of a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank.5.A ring-type foundation is not used to support a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank.N/A Yes Yes Yes N/A C~CM@NN Q RT: Gary Thomas, Tom Huang and Kailash Mahajan on 11/3/93.3'2" diameter horizontal heat exchanger about 22'ong on two saddles supported by piers.Total weight full given as 26,200 lbs.Exchanger bolted into pier with 4 7/8" diameter bolts per saddle.Piers are dowled into floor.The results of tank analysis show that the tank anchorage is adequate and also the saddles are safe.Evaluated by: Date:

Attachment:

Pictures

Attachment:

TANK Analysis Results

Attachment:

Check of Stresses in Saddles DC COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet2of9 ID: 12-HE-16N (Rev.0)Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers

== Description:==

NORTH SPENT FUEL PIT HEAT EXCHANGER Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: SPENT FUEL PIT HEAT XCHGR RIVI, NW AREA OF RM Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: OAT, JOSEPH, CORP.NORTH SPENT FUEL PIT HEAT EXCHANGER

DG COCK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 3 of 9 ID: 12-HE-16N (Rev.0)Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers

== Description:==

NORTH SPENT FUEL PIT HEAT EXCHANGER Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: SPENT FUEL PIT HEAT XCHGR RM, NW AREA OF RM Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: OAT, JOSEPH, CORP.TANK Analysis Results Step 1-Input Data a)Assumptions 1.Tank is cylindrical, horizontally oriented and supported on saddles.2.Tank and saddles are made of carbon steel 3.Saddles are uniformly spaced.4.Saddles overhang is less than spacing/2 5.Base plates have slotted anchor bolt holes for thermal growth except for the base plate under the fixed saddle.6.Imposed nozzle loads are not significant. 7.The tank foundation is adequate.8.Anchor bolts are cast in place or expansion type.Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes b)Materials Weight of Tank+Fluid Weight Density of Tank+Fluid Saddle Elastic Modulus Saddle Shear Modulus Base Plate Yield Strength Anchor Type c)Dimensions Tank Diameter, D Tank Length, L Tank Thickness, t Height of Tank+Fluid C.G., Hcg Number of Saddles Saddle Spacing, S Saddle Height, h Saddle Shear cross-sectional area Saddle Weak Axis Moment of Interia Number of Bolt Locations/Saddle Number of Bolts/Bolting Location Extreme Bolt Spacing, D'nchor Bolt Eccentricity, e Weld Thickness Base Plate Thickness 26.2 kips 151 Ibs/ftn3 30000.0 ksi 1".500.0 ksi 30000.0 ksi 7/8 in 90 deg.J-Bolts 3.17 ft 22.0 ft 0.44 in 2.16 ft 13.0 ft 4.9 in 23 63 inn2 24.36 in"4 1.83 ft 3.0 in 0.188 in 0.5 in

DC COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet4of9 ID: 12-HE-16N (Rev.0)Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers

== Description:==

NORTH SPENT FUEL PIT HEAT EXCHANGER Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: SPENT FUEL PIT HEAT XCHGR RM, NW AREA OF RM Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: OAT, JOSEPH, CORP.d)Anchor Bolts Type=90 Deg J-Bolt Manufacturer =Diameter=7/8 in Product Name=Nominal Capacity Pullout 20.44 kips Shear 10.22 kips Concrete Compression Strength, fc'3500.0 psi Reduction Parameters Capacity Reduction Factor Label Check Condition Pullout Shear 1.Type of Anchorage 2.Installation Adequacy Yes Yes Installation is adequate 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.Embedment Length Yes Embedment Length=18.75 in 0.47 1.0 4.Gap at Threaded Anchors 5.Spacing between Anchorages Yes Gap size=0.0 in Yes 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 7.Concrete Strength and Condition 8.Concrete Crack Location and Size 9.Essential Relays in Cabinets 10.Base Stiffness and Prying Action 11.Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path 12.Embedment Steel and Pads Yes Base strength and load path are O.K.Yes Installation is O.K.Yes Yes Crack Size=0.0 in No Yes 1.0 1.0'1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Does the tank satisfy all the assumptions and is within the applicable range of parameters? Step 2-The allowable bolt loads Allowable Tension Load, Pu'llowable Shear Load, Vu'.211 kips 7.967 kips Step 3-Determine base plate bending strength reduction factor RB 346.7068 DC COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes'heet 5 of 9 ID: 12-HE-16N (Rev.0)Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers

== Description:==

NORTH SPENT FUEL PIT HEAT EXCHANGER Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: SPENT FUEL PIT HEATXCHGR RM, NWAREAOF RM Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: OAT, JOSEPH, CORP.Step 4-Determine base plate weld strength reduction factor RW 3.3848 Step 5-Determine the anchorage tension and shear allowable loads Allowable Anchorage Tension Load, Pu Allowable Anchorage Shear Load, Vu 7.211 kips 7.967 kips Step 6-Calculate the ratios and values alpha (Pu/Vu)Vu/Wb Hcg/D'cg/S F1 F2 0.91 3.28 kips/bolt 2.43 1.18 0.166 2.236 2.475 Step 7-Determine the acceleration capacity of the tank anchorage lambda 1 lambda u Anchor Acceleration capacity, lambda 1.088 G 0.772 G 0.772 G Step 8-Determine the maximum saddle spacing for transverse and vertical rigid frequency response Maximum Saddle Spacing, Sc 13.45 ft Step 9-Compute the resonant frequency of the tank in the longitudinal direction Saddle Stiffness, Ks R nant Frequency of Tank in Longitudinal Direction 13948.206 kipsfin 72.15 Hz DC COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 6 of9 ID: 12-HE-16N (Rev.0)Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers

== Description:==

NORTH SPENT FUEL PIT HEAT EXCHANGER Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: SPENT FUEL PIT HEAT XCHGR RM, NW AREA OF RM Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: OAT, JOSEPH, CORP.Step 10-Determine the seismic demand acceleration ZPA 0.275 G Tank is rigid in all three directions. Tank anchorage is adequate because anchorage acceleration capacity is greater than ZPA Step 11-Check the saddle stresses The program does not check the saddle stresses Check the saddle stresses by an independent calculation CUENT Cr~H~hmou Stevenson and Associates A Struoiurnl Mnohnaionl conrulbag Engiauutiny Firm/gag:.4~J,l~s4 ke:ss e.s.i P II I I I I 1 I i3<<)VI S/r 24'z'""'j8'*'irin<yjt.p /g.u.IIII.<<.g'(., J=...3.I PS I-'A--n.o-L Aro-'n".CIopn.oI ig g'=r Ir0 J.--Z'.pa----.'pg j.E (I:rru CI'FiOar)I"~~I~-<<~I'I~Qf'W r<<I I I l I I I'I 1 u 2.l~I gg L Lire, r-ZBIrls..u ru.S j I~I I'I i I~I~~i i I I~4I i2!j i j I I I i l,I I CUENT SUBJECT W)JOB No.SHEET OF Stevenson and Associates 5 A Srrucrurnl Mcchnnrcnl Conrulnnrr Enprnncnnrr fum Z 0 8 5 o~~~~~ o~~~~~~II e e~0 II I I I I~~'~~~~I' eo r vms~we'll~Q J,g ATTACHMENT HO.l~g No.: IL 5L97A-I4 Dwg No.: IL M135 2 Equipaent No.: 'li-HE-(4 0 Anchor types.VDCY Dia: ie"+Tightness established by: 0"Snug Fit" 0 Torque Torque Wrench No.: Cal.Due Date: Tightness verified?0 Yes EI No Date: ((-(o-2 ons c n Equipment hase flexible?0 Yes K No Date:-(0-l2 ons ruc on ARE Bolt XD Caps Comments Anchor',,~m ox~len I'-l l" l'-ll" I'-I I" I'-l l" I'-l l" I'-l I" I'-I I" I'-(I" 1%" 30'73-g Pro~ding~i',-~"~p"8," 4iia'i len Edge distance gIz" C'i'."0~2,'2,'+" Concrete condition 0((Ql<QK QK OK OK OK 4.Anchor'acin Anchor an larit Thread engagement Q 7 IEI," 3 1/i>~tg">'iZ" 4 4 4 0 0 Zo po 4 4 4 4 OlC.OIC.QK Ok;..Ol('l(Qk GK Comments: 4 5QRr'Yean.m.IM T PER RA&I I Z,~CKo~W A~a, Verified by: Qua.Cert.nspect r Reviewed bye Construct on INDIA IA MICHIGAN POVIER SITE DESIGN CONTROLLED VlORKING COPY.Date: 5-2.z-)z AUG 2 4.1995 LEAK Page 2 of 3 Revision l

ATTAU96ÃZ NO.1 Equipment No.:)Z.-HC-IGM Embedded Steel.Dry.No.: Dug No.: I l I I I t I>li~/ic.1~Fillet 2~Plug/slot 3~Groove/~r~i<.~i(If~" IS~i i Size 5~~ic" 44.'i'z" Z.>a" 5'~s" 2." Z~a" L~~s".E.'~4" Lan Cracks Yea Yea Y s Yea Yes Yea No No No No No Yea Yea No No Yea Yes No No Yea Yea No No'AE.LDQ'INS.Vl4, WS.4 NIo RE.QDE.'5 T Lack of Yea Yes Yes.Y Penetration No No N Yea Yea No No Porosity Yea Yes s es Yea'es No No o No.No No CXlALLTY CQMTRQL TEC W MlC.IAU QLll Y VERIFIE,D PER COGGTRUCTLOM, AbKHQR REVlEVl E.MCLMEER,'5 W+HA'5 5LAC AND its" POPlTLOM 15 UklKR CUT.geld y'Ihfi Wz.Wa W<VVs Wr W~W s Wi Wz Wa WII BIO LJ~?~6~O>.Cg~NO<i-o QO~OQ OX-~@X co o ZO?O i-'l L UFV.LK.V/E.GY PAC E l QFK Equipment base flexihles 0 Yea 8 No ons Revieyed by n e Date: Date ons ruc on c or ev ev g eer Verified by: ua~~npsec or Date: Page 3 of 3 Revision 1 ATTAauKNT No.l Equipment No.: IZ HC IGM Embedded Steel Dry.No.:%g No.: Weld ID Size Lan Ws VYIo W ii'll iz I 1~l(c.~/I(Wi(5 A Z~s 4.4'i~5'4 Cracks Lack of Penetration o Porosity Y s Yes o No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes.Yes Yes Yes o No No No No Y Yes Yes Yes'es o No No No No l~Fillet 2~Plug/Slot 3~Groove s Yes N No Yes Yes No o Yes Y No No We'~s" PQRTIOkl CF VlE.EO)6 UQQE.RC O'T.INDIANA MICHIGAN PO(VER SITE DESIGN CONTROLLED 'IVORKING COPY AUG 24 1995"L ERK T PACE Z.OF5 Equipment base flexible: 0 Yes H.No T'on e Date: Reviewed by: Verified by:ons ru o a.e.npsec or c r evlev g eer Pago 3 of 3 Revision 3. ATTACEBKNT No.Equipment No.: 'lh HC)AU Embedded Steel Dwg.No.: Dwg No.: Weld ID size V/)s W i~W is W ic W..)~W)e I~/)C+Iso I I I I)/s,~ha-Pi~)IS 44'Iz" Z.'ls" Z'~z" L"e," Z."e" Z.'Iz" Z.'~e" Wm W 1~Fillet~~Is.2~Plug/Slot 3~Groove Cracks Lack of Penetration Porosity Yea Yes No No Yea Yes No No Yea Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yea No No No No Yea ,Yes Yea Yea No No No No Yes Yea Yes'es No No No No Yea No Yea No Yes No Yes No Yea No Yes No WELD'QM'THI5 PAC E.WC.KE.MOT'tE.RAFIEO aV a.C..T~~<~D~-W)+INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER SITE DESIGN CONTROLLED WORKING COPY~UG 24 tSSS W)s W)LERK T Equipment base flexible: 0 Yes EL No ona 0 e Date: Reviewed by: Verified by: ona ruc ua.o.npsec or on c o evxew gxneer Date:~-~-~~Date: Page 3 of 3 Revision 1 S Px A DEPARTMENT CONTROLLED DOCUMENT COPY NO.SHP 5050 NDE.008 ATTACHMENT NO.1 UITRASONIC TEST REPORT JOB ORDER NO.:~A REPORT DATE: 9 REQUEST NO.hl IDENTIFICATION Unit a Component Item Material Other TECHNI UE Test Unit/S/N Freq./Diameter Ra Reference Standard Couplant/Batch No.'g L S TEST DATA REMARKS r 4 Y T A LE SA'F'T't A.F wio PERFORMED BY: W REVIEWED BY: FORM NO.12 SHP 5050 NDE.008-1 DATE: Page 1 of 1 Revision 0 I EVER: I I EVE?:~DATE: Equip ID: 1-QT-107-AB Train: 1 Equip Class:21 Drawing No.: 1-5151A~~~~~~tion: EMERQ DIESEL System: DIESEL FUEL OIL Equip Desc: AB EMERG DXESEL FUEL OIL DAY TANK Building: AUXILIARY Room: AB EMERG DIESEL GENERATOR ROOM Elev: 587 Sort: S, Notes: Normal State: Desired State: Power Req'd: N Support System Drawing: Req'd Support Comp: Safety Related Status: NUCLEAR SR Alias No: Power Train: NA Comp Served: AB FUEL OXL DAY TANK MFR: el: 36" D x 108" L, 465 GAL.el: Elem.Drawing: N/A Wiring Drawing: N/A Power Source: N/A Walkdown: F Relay Eval: N Min/Opt: MIN Comp Type: TANK (CAPACITY-2HRS FULL LOAD OPERATION) Iso Drawing: Location: XN THE SW REGION OF THE ROOM INSIDE THE AB EMERGENCY DIESEL FUEL OIL DAY TANK ENCLOSURE,, AT 599 EL. DC Cook Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 1 of 2 ID: 1-QT-107-AB (Rev.0)Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers

== Description:==

AB EMERG DIESEL FUEL OIL DAY TANK Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG RM, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 36 D x 108 L,465 GAL.BASIS: External analysis 1.The buckling capacity of the shell of a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank is equal to or greater than the demand.2.The capacity of the anchor bolts and their embedments is equal to or greater than the demand.3.The capacity of connections between the anchor bolts and the tank shell is equal to or greater than the demand.4.Attached piping has adequate flexibility to accommodate the motion of a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank.5.A ring-type foundation is not used to support a large, fiat-bottom, vertical tank.N/A Yes Yes Yes N/A COh0iggNT!j SRT: George G.Thomas (SM)and Tom Huang (AEP), 10/7/93.~~Same as 1-QT-107-CD, except that the grout is in much better condition for 1-QT-107-AB. Evaluated by:

Attachment:

Pictures ed=/I Date:/I 9~85 e l DC Cook Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 2 of 2 ID: 1-QT-107-AB (Rev.0)Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers

== Description:==

AB EMERG DIESEL FUEL OIL DAY TANK Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG RM, Manufacturer, Model~Etc.: 36 D x 108 L, 465 GAL.~PC~FQ AB Emerg.Diesel Fuel Oil Day Tank 1-QT-1 07-AB ++12 CHP 5021~CCD~019 ATTACHMENT NO.1 AUX Un iQ-369Q-2-i-QT-ia7-A5 Equipment No.Insta at.on dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch 50UTH%E57 5'le QF'@o,g pM UP w~iCr)-O AG EMCPGt:M(Y QKSEL T11Q Oll OlE't XLktl(b'i Bldg.Location gl Qil 4e p4 II FfP.)+I Qll E l E.V.LM.5QUTH 5y'E.CY1 QD'A-A" D,rawn by: Q.ROTC, Verified by: Qua./Cart.Reviewed by: Construct on Inspector Date: Date: Date: Anc r Review Engineer f 2.-'LS-g g Page 1 of 3 Revision 1

~~l-~~~~~i S~~0-~s'%~4 l kt.S&5%~~%aaa ISWISRRRHLL mmeeasmmmm RRE555RRRLL WWWRHaLa ii)aa)kal ggggggggggg~~~~ gggg@gg++QQ %555%WLLLL ~4 k k 4 MWWMWWWW Pg I S (%A DEPAiRTMFNT CONTROLLED DOCUMENT COPY NO.SHP 5050 NDE.QQ8 ATTACHMENT NO.1 ULTRASONIC TEST REPORT JOB ORDER NO.: REPORT DATE: gr 1 REQUEST NO.IDENTIFICATION Unit Component Item Material Other TECHNI UE Test Unit/S/N Frey./Diameter ~ABC)Reference Standard Couplant/Batch No.L&p TEST DATA REMARKS W6/7~" 7c'PERFORMED BY: LEVEL:~&DATE:/REVIEMED BY: LEVEL: DATE: FORM NO.12 SHP 5050 NDE.008-1. Page 1 of 1 Revision 0 Page No.770 10/19/94 SYSTEM DESCRIPT DRAWINGNO BUILDXNG NORMSTATE DESXRSTATE POWERREQD ALIASNO POWERTRAXN COMPSERVED MANUFACTUR MODEL PANEL ELEMDWG WIRXNGDWG PWRSOURCE QUALXF WALKDOWN PFDOPT SUPPSYSDWG REQSUPP EVAL TYPE NOTES FUNCT XON.E'VATION KTXON.Y P TYPE ISO DWGS DETAIL LOC FLOOR FLOW PATH REV REV LOCK LOCK DATE SHOW INDEX TAG S IGNATURES REV NOTES 2 21 2-QT-115-CD DIESEL LUBE OIL CD EMERGENCY DIESEL LUBE OXL SUMP TANK 2-5151C AUXILIARY NA CD LUBE OIL SUMP TANK 775GALS NOT APPL NOT APPL NOT APPL NUCLEAR SR F MIN Seismic Only EDG 579.00 CD EMER DSL LUBE OIL PIT N TANK XN THE WEST PART OF THE PXT, NEAR THE WEST WALL, 3 FEET ABOVE THE S 0 N//Y N Donald C.Cook Niiclear Plant, Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EyALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)Status: Yes Sheet1 of7 ID: 2-QT-115-CD Rev.0 Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchan ers Descn tion: CD EMERGENCY DIESEL LUBE OIL SUMP TANK Building: AUXILIARY Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 775GALS BASIS: Horizontal TANK analysis Floor El.: 579.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL LUBE OIL PIT-IN THE WEST PART OF THE PIT, NEAR THE WEST WALL, 3 FEET ABOVE THE FLOOR 1.The buckling capacity of the shell of a large, fiat-bottom, vertical tank is equal to or greater than the demand.2.The capacity of the anchor bolts and their embedments is equal to or greater than the demand.3.The capacity of connections between the anchor bolts and the tank shell is equal to or reater than the demand.4.Attached piping has adequate flexibility to accommodate the motion of a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank.5.A rin-t e foundation is not used to su ort a la e, flat-bottom, vertical tank.N/A Yes Yes N/A N/A IS E UIPMENT SEISMICALLY ADE UATE?Yes COMMENTS SRT: W.Djordjevic and TR Satyan Sharma.10/6/93.REF: 1.Anchor inspection Data Sheets: Anchorage Arrangement Sketches and Physical Characteristics Data Sheet, Certi".:ed 10/1/93.2.Worthington Dwg¹700003BY.3.Worthington Co.Lube Oil Sump Tank Calculation, 8/22/74.Anchorage: The tank sits on 3 saddles, 2 plates per saddle, 1/4" thick.There are two 3/4" anchors per saddle.There are 4 anchors in total for the tank because the middle saddle has no anchorage on it.Horizontal Tank Analysis: Saddle Weak Axis Moment of Inertia=2I+2(ad"2)=2((36"x0.25in"3)/1 2)+2(1 8in"2 x (5"2)in"2") =900in"4.Saddle stresses analyzed in Ref.3.Nozzle loads judged not significant by SRT.Evaluated by: Date: U go 0 Donald C.Cook Nuclear Plant, Uni~2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 2 of 7 ID: 2-QT-115-CD Rev.0 Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchan ers Descri tion: CD EMERGENCY DIESEL LUBE OIL SUMP TANK Building: AUXILIARY Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 775GALS

Attachment:

Pictures

Attachment:

TANK Analysis Results Floor El.: 579.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL LUBE OIL PIT-IN THE WEST PART OF THE PIT, NEAR THE WEST WALL, 3 FEET ABOVE THE FLOOR Donald C.Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)Sheet 3 of 7 ID: 2-QT-115-CD Rev.0 Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchan ers Descri tion: CD EMERGENCY DIESEL LUBE OIL SUMP TANK Building: AUXILIARY Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 775GALS PICTURES Floor El.: 579.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL LUBE OIL PIT-IN THE WEST PART OF THE PIT, NEAR THE WEST WALL, 3 FEET ABOVE THE FLOOR 2-QT-115-CD Donald C.Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 4 of 7 ID: 2-QT-115-CD Rev.0 Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchan ers Descri tion: CD EMERGENCY DIESEL LUBE OIL SUMP TANK Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 579.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL LUBE OIL PIT-IN THE WEST PART OF THE PIT, NEAR THE WEST WALL, 3 FEET ABOVE THE FLOOR Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 775GALS TANK Analysis Results Step 1-Input Data a Assum tions 1.Tank is c lindrical, horizontall oriented and su orted on saddles.2.Tank and saddles are made of carbon steel 3.Saddles are uniforml s aced.4.Saddles overhan is less than s acin/2 5.Base plates have slotted anchor bolt holes for thermal growth except for the base plate under the fixed saddle.6.Im osed nozzle loads are not si nificant 7.The tank foundation is ade uate Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 8.Anchorbolts are cast in lace or ex ansion t e.b Materials Wei ht of Tank+Fluid Wei ht Densit of Tank+Fluid Saddle Elastic Modulus Saddle Shear Modulus Base Plate Yield Stren th Anchor T e 6.83 ki s 60 Ibs/ft*3 29000.0 ksi 1150.0 ksi 36.0 ksi 3/4 in 90 de.J-Bolts Yes c Dimensions Tank Diameter, D TankLen th, L Tank Thickness, t Hei ht of Tank+Fluid C.G., H Number of Saddles Saddle S acin, S Saddle Hei ht, h Saddle Shear cross-sectional area Saddle Weak Axis Moment of Interia Number of Bolt Locations/Saddle Number of Bolts/Boltin Location Extreme Bolt S acin, D'nchor Bolt Eccentricit, e Weld Thickness Base Plate Thickness 3.8 ft 10.0 ft 0.19 in 2.08 ft 7.67 ft 2.0 in 18.0 in"2 900.0 in"4 2.67 ft 0.02 in 0.19 in 0.25 in 0 Donald C.Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 5 of 7 ID: 2-QT-115-CD Rev.0 Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchan ers Descri tion: CD EMERGENCY DIESEL LUBE OIL SUMP Ti NK Building: AUXILIARY Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 775GALS d Anchor Bolts Floor El.: 579.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL LUBE OIL Pl,-IN THE WEST PART OF THE PIT, NEAR THE WEST WALL, 3 FEET ABOVE THE FLOOR T e=90 De J-Bolt Manufacturer =Diameter=3/4 in Product Name=Nominal Ca acit Pullout 15.03ki s Shear 7.51 ki s Concrete Com ression Stren th, fc'=4000.0 si Reduction Parameters Ca acit Reduction Factor Label 1.T e of Anchora e Check Yes Condition Pullout 1.0 Shear 1.0 2.Installation Ade uac 3.Embedment Length 4.Ga at Threaded Anchors 5.S acin betweenAnchora es Yes Embedment Length=27.0 in Yes Ga size=0.0 in Yes Yes installation is ade uate 1.0 0.7 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 6.Edge Distance Yes Edge Distance=6.0 in Another Edge Distance=4 in 0.41 0.31 7.Concrete Stren th and Condition 8.Concrete Crack Location and Size Yes Yes Crack Size=0.0 in 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 9.Essential Relays in Cabinets Yes Essential relays are not resent 1.0 1.0 10.Base Stiffness and P in Action 11.Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path 12.Embedment Steel and Pads Yes Yes Yes Installation is O.K.Base strength and load path are O.K.1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Does the tank satisfy all the assumptions and is within the applicable range of parameters? Yes Step 2-The allowable bolt loads Allowable Tension Load, Pu'llowable Shear Load, Vu'.344 ki s 2.346 ki s Step 3-Determine base plate bending strength reduction factor 0.1726 Donald C.Cook Nuclear Plant, Un<<2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 6 of 7 ID: 2-QT-115-CD Rev.0 Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchan ers Descri lion: CD EMERGENCY DIESEL LUBE OIL SUMP TANK Building: AUXILIARY Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 775GALS Floor El.: 579.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL'UBE OIL PIT-IN THE WEST PART OF THE PIT, NEAR THE WEST WALL, 3 FEET ABOVE THE FLOOR Step 4-Determine base plate weld strength reduction factor RW 0.0379 Step 5-Determine the anchorage tension and shear allowable loads Allowable Anchora e Tension Load, Pu Allowable Anchora e Shear Load, Vu 0."i64ki s 2.346 ki s Step 6-Calculate the ratios and values al ha Pu/Vu Wb Vu/Wb H/0'/S F2 0.07 1.71 ki s/bolt 1.37 0.779 0.271 2.236 1.779 Step 7-Determine the acceleration capacity of the tank anchorage lambda 1 lambda u Anchor Acceleration ca acit, lambda 0.614 G 0.568 G 0.568 G Step 8-Determine the maximum saddle spacing for transverse and vertical rigid frequency response Maximum Saddle S acin, Sc 14.2 ft Step 9-Compute the resonant frequency of the tank in the longitudinal direction 0 Donald C.Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 7 of 7 ID: 2-QT-115-CD Rev.0 Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchan ers Descri tion: CD EMERGENCY DIESEL LUBE OIL SUMP TANK Building: AUXILIARY Manufacturer Model, Etc.: 775GALS Floor El.: 579.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL LUBE OIL PIT-IN THE WEST PART OF THE PIT, NEAR THE WEST WALL, 3 FEET ABOVE THE FLOOR Saddle Stiffness, Ks Resonant Fre uenc of Tank in Lon itudinal Direction 10339.067 ki s/in 121.66 Hz Step 10-Determine the seismic demand acceleration ZPA 0.25 G Tank is rigid in all three directions. Tank anchorage is adequate because anchorage acceleration capacity is greater than ZPA Step 11-Check the saddle stresses The program does not check the saddle stresses Check the saddle stresses by an independent calculation ~Summa IS E UIPMENT SEISMICALLY ADE UATE'?The tank anchorage is adequate.

• 12 CHP 5021.CCD.019 ATTACHMENT NO.1 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET Unzt l 2.-5'2~<'~6.CD Bldg.Iz I Location 2.-QT-)I-CC Installation dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch Equipment No.I/O".Qp, UYe)bb'b P,~/X,ID a5-2" 7 DIM LZ.3241 12-8 G RouT PC%4, O'4 na I'-Z"(~p 0/4Q 3 604$('7$P)I/j.R AbSHCR INOIANA MICHIGAN POWE'ITE OKSIGN GONTPQLI.Q)O WOIIKINQ CQPY 0 AUG 271995 LKRK T D.te.Date: Drawn by: Verified by: ua./Cert.Inspector Reviewed by: Date: 8-+~+~Constructs.on An hor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1

• ~L2 CHP 0023..CCD.()]g ATTACHMENT NO l ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHE&x,g c.D PIT Locate.on 2.-a.y-(t g-C D Unit g l~-9 I ldg.Equipment No.Installation dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch 0 6 CQ p CL I---0 (o" INOIANA MICHIGAN POWER SITE OESIGN CONTROLLEO WORKING COPY AUG 2't 3995 LERK+Drawn by: Verified by: Date: Date: Q-t 0-gg ual.fCert.

Inspector Reviewed by: 7'ate: Construction A char Review Engineer-27-'t~Page 1 of 3 Revision 1

• • 12 CHP 5021.CCD.0 lg ATTACHMENT N(3.Dwg No.: I 2-3Z~t-1 Dwg No.: l 2-3qpZg PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS Equipment No.:+@T I<5lD~~~~Anchor type: BOL~Bl Tightness established by: 0"Snug Fit" 0 Torque Torque Vrrench No.: QA Cal, Due Date: Tightness verified?Cl Yes Cl No NPI 7': ll-""*ons ru t,z.on Equipment base flexible?0 Yes 8 No Date:~~D I~onstruc x n ARE Bolt ID Gaps Comments Anchor len th Protruding len th Embedment il 2-8'2-8 I I'l 2-3/Ib l2-Bolas 5~~~HOT Bolt ri Concrete condition Edge distance Anchor s acin Anchor an larit Thread engagement fIb~iY<9~ht"@Il<il 0 C,RhC I(IN QA.OVT CR~Itl QROV T 2.-oI 7((g+l'I~SC~<v(c.',AHhl0<

M~SR~GP-OUT T~~~~<~JS Il P JOT'P DOING (SoKaTH H~C C)Sl C?1&AC 9 ADDING I/T M~IL FR.OM, OP OF C ROOT.%ACC.~55IGL6 gl 4D I"Y&nl 5>3">I P 0 AC WP(5l R.CSPGC.TIV Y.Verif ied by:~~Qual./Cert.Reviewed by: T Construction nspector I NOI AN A kt ICHIGAN POWER SITE DESIGN CONTROLLED AUG 27 tS8~Date: Date: 8'1 I~LERK+Page 2 of 3 Revis ion 3 '8 A DEPARTMENT CONTROLLEO DOCUMENT COPY NO.2 I'SHP 5050 NDE.008 ATTACFNEVZ NO.LTRASONIC TEST REPORT JOB ORDER NO.: i 6 REPORT DATE-'~Q REQUEST NO.IDENTIFICATION Unit l~<3 Component-7-l-t 4 Item Material C.S, Other Test Unit/S/N Freer./Diameter h Reference Standard Couplant/Batch No.TEST DATA REMARKS 1&(l~L w l PERFORMED BY: REVIEWED BY: FORM NO.12 SHP 5050 NDE.008-1 EZVEI~DATE:~/7 Page 1 of Revision 0 01/16/92 PG.N0.535 SAFE SHUTDOWN EOUIPHENI'IST (SSELWP)FUNCTION: CCM Equipment Class: 21 Train: 2 Cauiamcnt IO: 1.HE.15E Orawing Nurbert\-5135A 1-5113 Svstcm: CCM Cauip Oescription: CAST CCM HEAT EXCHAHGER Building: AUXILIARY Room: 609 HALLMAY Elevation: 609 wnrmaI state-Oesired state: Po~er Required: MSort: M, Sunnorting System Drawing Number: oeauired Interconnections and Supporting Components: fety Related Status: NUCLEAR SR Nin/Opt 4 HIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Al ias Number: Power Train: NA C~nent Served: EAST CCW HEAT EXCHANGER Hanufacturcr: NL'M INOUSTRIES Model t Pahei 4 Elem Orawing: M/A Miring Orawing: N/A Po~er Source: N/A uaILdown: F Relay Only: N Comoonent Type: HE ISO Orawings: Octallcd Location: DC COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 1 of 6 ID: 1-HE-15E (Rev.0)Description: EAST CCW HEAT EXCHANGER Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: HALLWAY, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: MLW INDUSTRIES (HORIZONTAL) BASIS: External analysis 1.The buckling capacity of the shell of a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank is equal to or greater than the demand.2.The capacity of the anchor bolts and their embedments is equal to or greater than the demand.3.The capacity of connections between the anchor bolts and the tank shell is equal to or greater than the demand.4.Attached piping has adequate flexibility to accommodate the motion of a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank.5.A ring-type foundation is not used to support a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank.N/A Yes Yes Yes N/A IS E UP EN SEIS C L 0 U E?~Ye C~I~IVIEN S SRT: Gary Thomas, Tom Huang, and Kailash Mahajan on 11/2/93'.Component Cooling Water Heat Exchanger on two reinforced saddles.Anchorage is two 7/8" diameter J bolts.There are 4 1" wedge expansion anchors in one pedestal in the horizontal direction. C.G.of exchanger from the top of the saddle pedestal about 3'.Pedestal concrete in good condition, but can see the grout to concrete interface. Hand calculation was performed for the heat exchanger and the results show that the anchor bolts are adequate and the saddles are safe.Evaluated by: Date: L

Attachment:

Pictures

Attachment:

ANCHORAGE ANALYSIS FOR THE TANK DC COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 2 of 6 ID: 1-HE-15E (Rev.0)Description: EAST CCW HEAT EXCHANGER Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers Building: AUXILIARY Floor EI.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: HALLWAY, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: MLW INDUSTRIES (HORIZONTAL) CTU ES kgb I ONE SADDLE WITH 4 HORIZONTAL BOLTS OTHER SADDLE SUPPORT CUENT SUBJECT SHEEf OF Stevenson and Associates II h Svurtvsal Macha nial Conaulnnp Cnpmawlnp f neo 0 8 lU K It gfl(~~o I 2o-0 3 (gy)x5 8 g 6~a&<<Ig P(3g'0 P'I..7ke t./a. CUENT SUOJECT JOO No.SHEET Ft OF~Ah~rto>Stevenson and Associates 5l A Sicuniucni llsolsnnionl ConculnnSI EnqsnsucsnFI Fsc su i-H-tea I I i.i S.E.gojs,'TbM.X<'fnlg]..o.(.QM..~6OI';kx)it:.: I I'I c~,.~s I~'*~, s s C i, I I~'~I p..-Qn I i s IF~~~.l cn 51cuC40'f>el ty.Z-s~r w.o~~p.b'.=, A>(.oo gg s T.WS..SS.:=.~.=ISI TS/'S I ,.1.3.'gi~~s~~~.g>~~A..l'i<</g.n~g~ ~~~l'~2.M xS~y3 z zgh)., z 5'.~(+i.l~s)ly I~Vn'.Ess'J 4.)oscs O.I c}-.~I iI"7."2.>;"F"",Z, S/<356'I;~I~: s I~K7$(f 7qOD'), gQ~.87ESC+'7.O.O)cital 2~$,27S)+qboIS~~I V~J...3~~FE~4 n 2'6 sun*I'4.~<<I~~i I',.'c,l Jl 2CIC?.l,'.,='8 8 VS-ii,7 c D.'.,6): WSITSI II.I,.~']9, 8 O'CW I~F I s I~I I s s i I I~~I I I I J)I-s~~'I I*~ CLIENT SHEET OF~f~>"'KO cr p g Stevenson and Associates S A Srrncrvrnl hlcchcnrccl Consnlrlnp Enprnccrrnp Flrrn A,QIOg~io(r.'TE T'yY'$K$.tv'4 40(.$$l0(gxd~E.-.4CQ<4C>~4J(LE:k. "'-o5'(<<j 3xAo f~,q p~...'.,o-ro ~.yy-y.+t-lg.lg=.+.oc...:.3'.+6 .=.Io8 3 2-~5 X 37 3'E.g g (l 5)-'ZT I P TS CLIENT sHEET~oStcvcnson and Associates 0 A Srrucrurel hlechenreel Cnnsulrrng Engrneenng Frrnr I o,g75g VP//ader'<==2Zjyoo glOE.i 7y344 2 Jr zI~2 75)t', gg y~g.(g 1I)-Z 3 Z.6 5.J f.nl~~H~~Hg Z7 SoS.+/Z~~E 6)"'tSZ.lS 7.S)j'o8.SIPED.I (C<<)'~(I SS)'f, Se 7 77-(rlr I"g)I'-S r'e o.y 3 Z..$7 7Z Ts'27SX 2f go c~1 Z~z III~3 Z(V'~S.fT..-.

• • 12 CHP 5021~CCD.019 ATTACHMENT NO.1 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET Unzt g Bldg.@AU MA Location 1-H~-isG Installation dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch Equipment No.I-RE-'I5F PcQRGWA,c PZDE5t&a li"I CO 4 0 0 Ihtlh MiCHIGAN POWER STRUC IO."I COI': ROLLEO~'r'ORKI AG COPY f'UG1 (]quip T>~a"jg" Z-'vcr (vxP)a~4 cl 0'rawn by: Verified by: Reviewed by: Date:/D-7-Date: Q~l-/Cert.Xnspector Date: X/7 z.structxon Anchor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1

"*12 CHP 5021.CCD.019 ATTACHMENT NO.1 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET Un1t 0 Bldg.F->Location Installation dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch Equipment No.I<I 3 II il~)5-a/i~-I'/g'x INDIA%'i I8!CtOGAI'I POlVEI OiISTBlICTIO".I CO.'ITROLL 'ViOlIKii'IG COPY P,UG l 7 19gr CL RK Drawn by: Uerified by: Reviewed by: Qu./Cert.Inspector Date: onstructxon Anchor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1 ~' +*12 CHP 5021.CCD.019 ATTACHMENT NO.1 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET Unxt 0 Bldg.-I L" Location Installation dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch Equipment No.0-'9 ll O-S1i o 4'Nr:4'<I l,!CHIGA!< P0'ON'rr;;C .!!r~.0!nnP"i'0".K.'."<G CGPY C A 4 r~~II L Cicv.Ui-Vo GK lQ 00 Y'rawn by: Verified by: Date: Q l./Cert.Inspector Reviewed by: Date: onstructzon Anchor Review Engineer 4>-)2 Page 1 of 3 Revision 1 0 '+12 CHP 5021.CCD.019 ATTACHMENT NO.1 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET Unxt 4 Zl Bldg.Installatz.on dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch-E-eE Equipment No.Location-HE-i~For'r+O r Ei.Uicu goal 4oLH Imhusg V~e)0 0~y ll'(~'lbi/. V.i(::-'IGA'i PO'Q CQNGTR~.'"."IG:< C.l":.i: RG.LED AUG j.7 8,"'>0o CL'n~(Q-Pt<0-9 ELEv.48.&UookiAe 0 H O~0 V+<D Drawn by: Verified by: Reviewed by: Date: to-7-l Date: P-~/u>Q al./Cert.Inspector Date: onstructxon Anchor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1 ~~~e~t~~ti~)a)~~~~~~~~-)~'1~4 gQ+Q~gig~~~~ kRWWWKHEL mmmmmHHLL RSRSmmRRSL IR555m55LLLS RSWRIRHRRLS RSW~HLLLL K%%5..RRWWWW MWWREWW&W%%55WRIHR RSRRRSRRLL R%8%8%RRMMW& MWWWWMWW sl~!~I~C Iu>>Bl kl>>~~a al z&its~~ H )~r i aL a~s.~~t'~~s~~~~~~~~~~I r~r~->LkL'err-~0~e~~..t ia..'.~r'(~~1 4~r~~t~~~0 555%5%%%%LL RSR55%mHHLS 55Ã%8NNLLLL WISNRRRKLL RWWSWLLLL RIRSSRRLELE RRRWRWW RSWRWELLL RSWWQLEEL R%R%RSRWMMWW MW&WWW&&~~a.0~l 1 A 1 a a~~gh A..s OJ r~IL 5~~saaJ I/5 Ji4 4A L I~~f~i Equipment No.: Tightness established by"Snug Pit" 7 Tightness verified by:-c Qual./Cert.Inspector Comments: /w uEPARTPAENI CONTROLLED OOCUMEHT coPYI'-.9 I 12 SHP 5050 NCE.OOG ATTACHMENT NO.1 ULTRASONIC TEST REPORT JOB ORDER NO~:~$REPORT DATE: 2 REQUEST NO.IDENTIFICATION Unit Component Item Material C.S Other Test Unit/S/N ifj Freq./Diameter Reference Standard Cocuplant/Batch No.TEST DATA REMARKS ll~V II r/" II/I A PERFORMED BY: REVIEWED BY: FORM NO.12 SHP 5050 NDE.008-1 LEVEL:~DAT<: I'EVEL:~-DATE: Page 1 of 1 Revision 0 Equip ID: 1-QT-107-CD .Train: 2 Equip Class:21 Drawing No.: 1-5151C~~~~nction: EMERG DIESBL System: DXESEL FUEL OXL Equip Desc: CD EMERG DIESEL FUEL OXL DAY TANK Building: AUXILXARY Room: CD EMERG DIESEL GENERATOR ROOM Elev: 587 Sort: S, Notes: Normal State: Desired State: Power Req'd: N Support System Drawing: Req'd Support Comp: Safety Related Status: NUCLEAR SR Min/Opt: MXN Alias No: Power Train: NA Comp Served: CD FUBL OXL DAY TANK MPR: Model: 36" D x 108" L, 465 GAL.": El em.Drawing: N/A Wiring Drawing: N/A Power Source: N/A Walkdown: P Relay Eval: N Comp Type: TANK (CAPACITY-2 HRS PULL LOAD OPERATION) Xso Drawing: Location: XN THE NW REGXON OP THE ROOM, 10 FEET NW OP THE GEN END OP DGCD INSIDE THE FUEL OXL DAY TANK ENCLOSURE, AT THB 599 EL. DC Cook Unit1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet1 of6 ID: 1-QT-107-CD (Rev.0)Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers

== Description:==

CD EMERG DIESEL FUEL OIL DAY TANK Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EDG RM, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 36 D x108 L,465 GAL.BASIS: Horizontal TANK analysis 1.The buckling capacity of the shell of a large, fiat-bottom, vertical tank is equal to or greater than the demand.2.The capacity of the anchor bolts and their embedments is equal to or greater than the demand.3.The capacity of connections between the anchor bolts and the tank shell is equal to or greater than the demand.4.Attached piping has adequate flexibility to accommodate the motion of a large, fiat-bottom, vertical tank.5.A ring-type foundation is not used to support a targe, flat-bottom, vertical tank.N/A Yes Yes Yes N/A D T 7 SRT: George G.Thomas (SB A)and Tom Huang (AEP)-10/7/93.REF: 1.Anchor Inspection Data Sheets: Anchorage Arrangement Sketches and Physical Characteristics Data Sheet, Certified 4/5/93.2.Worthington Dwg it/700006BU 3.Worthington Co.Fuel Oil Day Tank Calculation, 8/1//74.Anchorage: 1-QT-107-CD is a horizontal tank which sits on 2 saddles.Each saddle has 2, 1/4" thick plates, forming a"U", with no gussets.There are 2-5/8" anchors per saddle.Cracks in the leveling grout on the concrete pad were identified. The SRT judged this acceptable since the structural concrete pads are intact.Horizontal Tank Analysis: Saddle Weak Axis Moment of Inertia=2I+2(ad*2)=2((30"x0.25in"3)/1 2)+2(15in"2 x (4"2)in"2") =480in"4.Results of Horizontal Tank Analysis show tank anchorage is adequate (conservatively using expansion bolts for the 5/8" diameter Nelson Stud anchors), and Ref.3 calculation contains saddle stresses check.Interactions: Block wall has been confirmed by AESPC to have been evaluated in the IE 80-11 program.Evaluated by: Date: I l/Z~!eW DC Cook Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 2 of 6 ID: 1-QT-107-CD (Rev.0)Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers

== Description:==

CD EMERG DIESEL FUEL OIL DAY TANK Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EDG RM, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 36 D x 108 L,465 GAL.

Attachment:

TANK Analysis Results DC Coo4;Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 3of6 ID: 1-QT-107-CD (Rev.0)Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers

== Description:==

CD EMERG DIESEL FUEL OIL DAY TANK Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EDG RM, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 36 Dx108 L,465GAL.TANK Analysis Results Step 1-Input Data a)Assumptions 1.Tank is cylindrical, horizontally oriented and supported on saddles.2.Tank and saddles are made of carbon steel 3.Saddles are uniformly spaced.4.Saddles overhang is less than spacing/2.5.Base plates have slotted anchor bolt holes for thermal growth except for the base plate under the fixed saddle.6.Imposed nozzle loads are not significant. 7.The tank foundation is adequate.8.Anchor bolts are cast in place or expansion type.b)Materials Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Weight of Tank+Fluid Weight Density of Tank+Fluid Saddle Elastic Modulus Saddle Shear Modulus Base Plate Yield Strength Anchor Type c)Dimensions Tank Diamete;D Tank Length, L Tank Thickness, t Height of Tank+Fluid C.G., Hcg Number of Saddles Saddle Spacing, S Saddle Height, h Saddle Shear cross-sectional area Saddle Weak Axis Moment of Interia Number of Bolt Locations/Saddle Number of Bolts/Bolting Location Extreme Bolt Spacing, D'nchor Bolt Eccentricity, e Weld Thickness Base Plate Thickness 4.5 kips 70.7 Ibs/ft" 3 29000.0 ksi 1150.0 ksi 36.0 ksi 5/8 in Expansion Bolts 3.03 ft 9.0 ft 0.19 in 1.71 ft 6.0 ft 2.38 in 15.0 in"2 480.0 in"4 2.1?ft 6.0 in 0.19 in 0.19 in DC Cook Unit1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 4 of 6 ID: 1-QT-107-CD (Rev.0)Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers

== Description:==

CD EMERG DIESEL FUEL OIL DAY TANK Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EDG RM, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 36 D x108 L,465 GAL.d)Anchor Bolts Type=Expansion Anchor Manufacturer =Phillips Stud (S)Diameter=5/8 in Product Name=Nominal Capacity Pullout 3.17 kips Shear 3.79 kips Concrete Compression Strength, fc'3500.0 psi Reduction Parameters Capacity Reduction Factor Label 1.Type of Anchorage Check Yes Condition Pullout 1.0 Shear 1.0 2.Installation Adequacy 3.Embedment Length 4.Gap at Threaded Anchors 5.Spacing between Anchorages 6.Edge Distance 7.Concrete Strength and Condition 8.Concrete Crack Location and Size Yes Installation is adequate Yes Embedment Length=2.38 in Yes Gap size=0.0 in Yes Yes Edge Distance=6.25 in Yes Yes Crack Size=0.0 in 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.88 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 9.Essential Relays in Cabinets 10.Base Stiffness and Prying Action 11.Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path Yes Yes Yes Essential relays are not present Base strength and load path are O.K.1.0 1.0'<.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 12.Embedment Steel and Pads Yes Installation is O.K.1.0 1.0 Does the tank satisfy all the assumptions and is within the applicable range of parameters? Step 2-The allowable bolt loads Allowable Tension Load, Pu'llowable Shear Load, Vu'.774 kips 3.79 kips Step 3-Determine base plate bending strength reduction factor RB 0.1562 DC Cook Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS}GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet5of6 ID: 1-QT-107-CD (Rev.0)Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers

== Description:==

CD EMERG DIESEL FUEL OIL DAY TANK Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EDG RM, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 36 D x 108 L, 465 GAL.Step 4-Determine base plate weld strength reduction factor RW 17.7858 Step 5-Determine the anchorage tension and shear allowable loads Allowable Anchorage Tension Load, Pu Allowable Anchorage Shear Load, Vu 0.433 kips 3.79 kips Step 6-Calculate the ratios and values alpha (Pu/Vu}Vu/Wb Hcg/D'cg/S F2 0.11 1.13 kips/bolt 3.37 0.788 0.285 2.236 1.804 Step 7-Determine the acceleration capacity of the tank anchorage lambda 1 lambda u Anchor Acceleration capacity, lambda 1.507 G'.715 G 0.715 G Step 8-Determine the maximum saddle spacing for transverse and vertical rigid frequency response Maximum Saddle Spacing, Sc 13.42 ft Step 9-Compute the resonant frequency of the tank in the longitudinal direction Saddle Stiffness, Ks Resonant Frequency of Tank in Longitudinal Direction 7230.98 kips/in 125.34 Hz DC Cook Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet 6 of6 ID: 1-QT-107-CD (Rev.0)Class: 21-Tanks and Heat Exchangers

== Description:==

CD EMERG DIESEL FUEL OIL DAY TANK Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EDG RM, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 36 D x 108 L, 465 GAL.4 Step 10-Determine the seismic demand acceleration ZPA 0.25 G Tank is rigid in all three directions. Tank anchorage is adequate because anchorage acceleration capacity is greater than ZPA Step 11-Check the saddle stresses The program does not check the saddle stresses Check the saddle stresses by an independent calculation 5mamaw IC The tank anchorage is adequate. Coo Component No.i QT-l 0"(-(i)Claaa IIEIUll Any pazticularprea the Seismic Review Teaa should pay axtra attention to1 Yes No~(Xf yea, check items that apply.)Anchor Type Anchor Diameter Anchor Spacing Anchor Number Anchor Embedment Anchor Edge Distance Anchor Gap Anchor Thread Engagement Anchor Grip Anchor Angularity Concrete Crack Others (describe bri.efly)If there ia concern for Design Basis Discrepancy, circle the applicable item and explain.l.2.3.4.Hardvaro Maintenance Type Discrepancy.rawing Update Type Discrepancy Significant Operability/Design Basis Discrepancy Others Condition: !'oo!6 Actions Taken: Jog~peaparad By T'~~co Dace 4'+~~ "*12 CHP 5021.'CCD. 019 ATTACHMENT NO.1 IZ..>>890 Bldg.TVE.Moli>tH 5F'~.QP"C D" D~~.CCi-'P IMSLQE IHE.TUEL OlL W.Y fh'tW-Locatxon Insta at on dwg./Rev.Anchora e Arran ement Sketch Equipment No.j'j4 5~a Ql Q/I EEEV.4K&.MQR'TH APR D 5 19S LEIIK~Q FACE'~W C,Rg8 (TVF Drawn by: Verified by: d.RQ~IL Date: Date: Reviewed by: Qua./Cert.Inspector T o.~l~Date: Construction chor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1 0 ~g~f'i y~i~~t+Jl~>e e~~~~~~~~-li I.e'l~l~-s.~r t L.S e~~~e~~~R%K~SWKiRWWWW .1 0 0 0 RRRSRSRS WWHHHHQL 88558LL55 WII~WHL 5 HHI%55%L 8 RESRE5555RWW&& 55RRRRHRilN 5%5%i%-%SIN 6%5%5%RSMMRaIR MWWMWWWW h 0 I J l'l a1~~~~ SHP 5050 NDE-008 ATTACHMENT NO.1 UI.TRASONIC TEST REPORT JOB ORDER NO.: REPORT DATE: g7 5 REQUEST NO.A IDENTIFICATION Unit Component Item Material Other Test Unit/S/N Freq./Diameter ~Reference Standard Couplant/Batch No.TEST DATA REMARKS~7D.7$" PERFORMED BY: REVIEWED BY: FORM NO.12 SHP 5050 NDE.008-1 LEVEL: W DATE:/I EVEE'DATE: Page 1 of 1 Revision 0 ATTACHMENT 6 TO AEP:NRC:1040E SAMPLE LARS CALCULATIONS 001, 005, 010, 011, 022, 023, 027 AND 030 RAI ITEM 8 This attachment contains thc following: 1.A 16 page document containing thc proccdurcs, input data, and rcfcrcnccs used in the Limited Analytical Reviews.2.The rcqucsted Limited Analytical Rcvicws: LAR IIs 001,005,010,011,022,023,027 and 030.3.Thc calculation used to resolve the outlicr gcncratcd by LAR 022.4.The proccdurc used to address the outlier gcneratcd by LAR 005. k'I PROCEDURES, INPUT DATA, AND REFERENCES USED IN THI: I,IMnZD ANAI,VSIS azmm S 3.LIMITED ANALYTICAL REVIEWS 3.1 Problem Statement This Limited Analytical Review (LAR), performed within the scope of Unresolved Safety issue (USI)A46, evaluates the structural integrity of cable tray and conduit supports which have been chosen as representative, worst case examples of the major different types of raceway support configurations within D.C.Cook Nuclear Power Plants 1 and 2.Twenty nine sample supports have been chosen from the plant raceway support systems for evaluation.

3.2 Summary

of Results The critical interaction value and related comments for each of the raceway support evaluations in this LAR are summarized in Table 3.1 below.Refer to the Attachments to this section for details of each of the evaluations. D.C.Cook A46 Cable Tray and Conduit Raceway Review October 1995 page 3-1 Table 3.1 Critical Interaction Values Interaction Value LAR No.001 002 Members/Connections 0.18 DL~ee Anchorage 0.68 3DL Maximum 0.68 3DL 003 0.50 OL 0.48 DL 0.50 DL 004 K":005."j!:.:::::-'i~ 0.29 DL<@FOP'<g~(LOW)...OL e~~c'~p;'e""w,'5'~< ~,'e<'ewe<gxQD<p,%:e 0.29 DL ItgQLKI 006 007 008 009 010 011 012 013 014 015 016 017 018 019 020 021 023 024 025 026 027 028 029 030 031 032 0.50 0.81 0.94 0.85 1.05 0.28 0.15 0.72 0.38 0.84 0.79 0.70 0.72 0.33 0.18 low 0.77 0.25 0.55*1~0.75 0.14~e*low 0.12 0.68 DL DL DL LL DL LL DL OI DL DL LL DL DL DL DL DL DL LL DL DL DL DL DL 0.76 0.56 0.33 0.43 1.02 0.45 0.58 0.93 0.32 0.40 0.31 1.04 0.67 0.22 0.90 0.10 0;23 0.96 low low 0.20 0.24 3DL 3DL DL LL DL LL DL LL 30L LL LL 30L 3DL DL DL DL DL OL LL 30L DL DL DL 0.76 0.81 0.94 0.85 1.05 1.02 0.45 0.72 0.93 0.84 0.79 0.70 1.04 0.33 0.67 0.22 0.90 0.25 0.55 0.96 0.14 low 0.19 0.68 30L DL DL LL OL LL DL DL 30L OL LL DL 30L DL DL DL O'D,L"':k DL OL LL 30L DL DL DL DL DL Dead Load 30L 3x Dead Load (Vertical Load Check)LL Lateral Load Check RF Rod Fatigue Check~f'i~/'::':: Qellier***Not used.D.C.Cook A-46 Cable Tray and Conduit Raceway Review October 1995 Page 3-2 i i m f a Tr v I i Logic diagrams indicating the evaluation path taken to demonstrate the acceptance of each of the raceway supports are shown below.Note that the particular evaluation path taken for the support in question is defined in heavy outline.LAR Nos.003, 004, 008, 010, 012, 019, 020, 021, 023, 024, 030, 031, 032 START 8.3.1 Does the Support Have Vertical Dead Load Capacity With Eccentricities ~t.0 x OL?Yes Yes 8.3.1 Directly mounted to or rigidly cantilevered from an adjacent structural wall or ceiling?+No 8.3.7 Floor mounted?;Ho Yes 8.3.2 Does the Support Have Vertical Capacity~3.0 x OL?Yes 8.3.3 Does the Supped Have Ductile Response to Lateral Loading?Yes 8.3.4 Does the Support Have Adequate Lateral Load Strength'?Yes No l 8.3.5 Is the Support a Fixed-End Rod Hanger?Yes 8.3.5 Does the Support Pass the Fatigue Evaluation? ~Yes tfo Pass Analytical Review Outlier (Rigid Mount)D.C.Cook AA6 Cable Tray and Conduit Raceway Review October 1995 page 3-3 LAR Nos.005, 022 START 8.3.1 Does the Support Have Vertical Dead Load Capacily With Eccentricities )1.0 x OL?No Yes 8.3.1 Directly mounted to or rigidly cantilevered from an adjacent structural wall or ceiling7 8.3,7 Floor mounted?No Yes 8.3.2 Does the Support Have Vertical Capacity-,.3.0 x DL?Yes8.3.3 Does the Support Havo Ductile Response lo Lateral Loading?Yes I No I 8.3.4 Does the Support Have Adequate Lateral Load Strength 7 Yes 8.3.5 Is the Support a Fixed-End Rod Hanger 7 No.V...1 Pass Analytical Review Yes 8.3.5 Does the Supporl Pass tho Fatigue Evaluation 7 Yes Outlier (Any support failing OL)D.C.Cook A-46 Cable Tray and Conduit Raceway Review October 1995 page 3A LAR Nos.009, 011, 016, 025 START 8.3.1 Does the Support Have Vertical Dead Load Capacity W~th Eccentricities ~1.0 x Dt.?Yes Yes 8.3.1 Directly mounted to or rigidly cantilevered from an adjacent structural wall or ceiling?No 8,3.?Floor mounted?l No I 8.3.2 Does the Support Have VeicaIG pocky 30xDL2 l Yes Yes 8.3.3 Does the Support Have Ouctge Response to Lateral Loading'7 Yes 8,3.4 Does the Support Have Adequate Lateral Load Strength?Yes 8.3.5 Is Ihe Supporl a Fixed-End Rod Hanger?Yes 8.3.5 Does the Support Pass the Fatigue Evaluation '?Yes Pass Analytical Review Outlier (Floor Mounted Support)j D.C.Cook AAG Cable Tray and Conduit Raceway Review October 1995 page 3-5 LAR Nos.014, 028 START 8.3.1 Does thc Support Havo Vertical Dead Load Capacity With Ecccntricities ~1.0 x DL'?Yes No Ycs 8.3.1 Directly mounted to or rigidly cantilevered from an adjacent structural wall or ceiting?No 8.3.7 Floor rnounted2 No Yes 8.3.2 Does the Support Have Vertical Capacity~3.0 x OL 2 Ycs 8.3.3 Does the Support Have Ductile Response to Lateral Loading 7 Yes 8.3.4 Does thc Support Have Adequate Lateral Load Strenglh 7 Ycs No 8.3.5 Is lhe Support a Fixed~End Rod Hanger'?Yes 8.3,5 Does the Support Pass thc Fatigue Evaluation? Yes Pass Analytical Review Outlier (Trapeze Frames)D.C.Cook AA6 Cable Tray and Conduit Raceway Review October 1995 page 3-6 LAR Nos.001, 006, 007, 017, 018, 027 START 8.3.1 Does the Support Have Vertical Dead Load Capacity With Eccentricities )1.0 x DL'?Yes No Yes 8.3.1 Directly mounted Io or rigidly cantilevered from an adjacent structural wall or ceiling?8.3.7 Floor mounted?Does the Support Kavo Vertical Capacity~3 o x OL?Yes 8.3.3 Does tho Support Have Ductile Response to Lateral Loading'?Yes 8.3.4 Does the Support Havo Adequate Lateral Load Strength 7 Yes 8.3.5 Is the Support a Fixed-End Rod Hanger?No I Yes 8.3.5 Does tho Support Pass tho Fatigue Evaluation? Yes Pass Analytical Review Outger (Rod Hanger Trapezes)D.C.Cook A46 Cable Tray and Conduit Raceway Review October 1995 page 3-7 LAR Nos.013, 015 START 8.3,1 Does the Support Have Vertical Dead Load Capacity With Eccentricities ~I.O x DL 7 Yes Yes 8.3.1 Directly mounted to or rigidly cantilevered from an adjacent structural wall or ceiting?8.3.?Floor mounted?Yes 8.3.2 Does the Support Have Vertical Capacity 3.0 x OL'?Yes 8.3.3 Does the Support Have Ouctige Response to Lateral Loading 7 Yes No 8.3.4 Does the Support Have Adequate'ateral Load Strength 2 Yes 8.3.5 Is the Support a Fixed-End Rod Hanger 7 No Yes 8.3.5 Does the Support Pass the Faligue Evaluabon? Yes Pass Analytical /Review Outlier (Floor to Ceiling Supports)D.C.Cook AA6 Cable Tray and Conduit Raceway Review October 1995 page 3-8

3.3 Method

of Solution Hand calculations are performed employing the methodology outlined in Section 8 of Reference 3.6.4,"Generic Implementation Procedure (GIP)for Seismic Verification of Nuclear Plant Equipment.",Support structures are broken down, where applicable, into subsections which lend themselves to common, closed form solutions for structures subjected to static loading.3.4 Allowables and Assumptions The following is a compilation of allowable stress and load criteria used throughout the raceway support evaluations. strength of 36 ksi.AISC Specification allowables for Allowable Stress Design (Ref.3.6.1)are used for the dead load analysis.For other analyses, the allowable stress is increased to 0.9 Fy=32.4 ksi.J2.5 of Ref.3.6.1, is 0.3 x 60=18 ksi for dead load analysis.For all other analyses, 1.7 x 0.3 x 60=30.6 ksi is used.i: Dimensions, properties, and allowables use'd to analyze various Unistrut support system components are based on the Manufacturer's Catalog Data provided in Refs.3.6.2 and 3.6.3.These values are used for the dead load analysis and all other analyses.Values for Unistrut components commonly used at D.C.Cook are summarized below: Unistrut bending moment: Ref.3.6.3, p.23 P1000: 5080 in-Ib (allowable bending stress of 25 ksi)Channel nuts/bolts Ref.3.6.3, p.69 5/8": pullout in P1000 or P3000: 2500 Ib 5/8": slip in P1000 or P3000: 1500 Ib 1/2": pullout in P1000 or P3000: 2000 Ib 1/2": slip in P1000 or P3000: 1500 Ib 3/8": pullout in P1000 or P3000: 1000 Ib 3/8": slip in P1000 or P3000: 800 Ib Bolts are assumed tightened to manufacturer's recommended values r I: D.C.Cook embedded channels are Unistrut P1000 (or equivalent) , galvanized, 12 ga.channels with a material yield strength=33 ksi, modilied by the addition of 3/8$x 4"L Nelson Studs at 12" o.c.Results of tests of modified channels (Ref 3.6.20)indicate a minimum pullout capacity of 6400 lb/ft.The mode of failure was ripping of strut material around the stud;stud remaining in concrete.Using the AISC Allowable Stress Design allowable shear stress of 0.4 x Fy=13.2 ksi on a 45'one shaped slip surface results in an allowable pullout of 13.2 ksi x n x (D+t)x t=13.2 x 3.14 x (0.375+0.105)x 0.105"=2090 Ib, therefore use the standard catalog value of 2000 Ib, but not more than the allowable value for pullout of Unistrut channel nuts/bolts as listed above.For all other load cases, use an allowable stress of 1.7 x 0.4 x Fy resulting in an allowable pullout of 3550 Ib, but not more than the catalog allowable value for the pullout of Unistrut channel nuts/bolts as listed above.D.C.Cook A-46 Cable Tray and Conduit Raceway Review October 1995 page 3-9 To summarize: Pullout of embedded strut: (dead load analysis)2000 Ib 2000 Ib 1000 Ib 5/8" channel nuVbolt 1/2" channel nut/bolt 3/8" channel nut/bolt Pullout of embedded strut: (all other analyses)2500 Ib 2000 Ib 1000 Ib 5/8" channel nut/bolt 1/2" channel nut/bolt 3/8" channel nut/bolt Concentrated loads may not be spaced closer than 12" apart unless the sum total of concentrated loads on any 12" of Unistrut length does not exceed the single load allowable. Reference 3.6.14, will be used unless noted otherwise within the individual LAR's.1/2" 3/4" 1 II 1-1/2" 2 II 3 I I 4ll 1.1 Ib/ft 1.3 Ib/ft 2.0 Ib/ft 3.5 Ib/ft 4.9 Ib/ft 11.1 Ib/ft 16.6 Ib/ft wide by 6" high)is 25 pounds per linear foot, unless noted otherwise within the individual LAR's.h I: Concrete anchor bolt allowables used in alf analyses are based on Tables C.2-1 and C.2-2 of the GIP, Ref.3.6.4.The anchor bolt type must be known to use the maximum values.If anchor bolts are'identified as"non-shell" type anchors on the PASS, then, per Ref.3.6.12, the anchors are either 5/8" Hilti"Kwik-Bolts" or 5/8" Phillips wedge-type anchors.All other anchors must be identified on the PASS or they will be considered"unknown." Unknown anchors require a reduction factor of 0.6 on the allowable toads provided in Ref.3.6.4, Tables C.2-1 and C.2-2.All concrete anchors, known or unknown, shell or non-shell type, which are not loaded in tension by dead weight, require an additional reduction factor of 0.75 for the"Reduced Inspection Alternative", and, because one third of the anchor bolts (there must be a minimum of six)must be assumed to be"not available", another reduction factor of 0.67 must be taken.The design concrete strength at D.C.Cook is 3500 psi.This requires a reduction factor of 0.875 to be applied to the pullout capacity of all anchors.No reduction is required for the shear capacity.If a tightness check has been performed, it will be so stated on the PASS and the"Reduced Inspection Alternative" reduction factors may be waived.'D.C.Cook A<6 Cable Tray and Conduit Raceway Review October 1995 Page 3-10 r n or I To summarize: "Known" concrete anchors such as 5/8" Hilti"Kwik-Bolts", 5/8" Phillips Wedge-type, or 5/8" Phillips Red Head"self drills": Pall=3.17 kips x 0.8T5 x 0.75 x 0.67=1.39 kips Vali=3.79 kips x 0.75 x 0.67=1.90 kips Pall=3.17 kips x 0.875=2.77 kips Vali=3.79 kips All other 5/8" concrete anchors: (not in tension by deadweight)(in tension by deadweight) I Pall=3.17 kips x 0.875 x 0.6 x 0.75 x 0.67=0.83 kips (not in tension by deadweight) Vali=3.T9 kips x 0.6 x 0.75 x 0.67=1.14 kips Pall=3.17 kips x 0.875 x 0.6=1.66 kips Vali=3.79 kips x 06=228 kips All 3/4" concrete anchors: (in tension by deadweight) Pall=4.69 x 0.875.x 0.6 x 0.75 x 0.67=1.23 kips Vali=5.48 x 0.6 x 0.75 x 0.67=1.65 kips Pall=4.69 x 0.&'F5 x 0.6=2.46 kips Vali=5.48 x 0.6=3.29 kips All 1/2" concrete anchors: (not in tension by deadweight)(in tension by deadweight) Pall=2.29 x 0.875 x 0.6 x 0.75 x 0.67=0.60 kips Vail=2.38 x 0.6 x 0.75 x 0.67=0.72 kips Pall=2.29 x 0.875 x 0.6=1.20 kips Vali=2.38 x 0.6=1.43 kips All 3/8" concrete anchors:.(not in tension by deadweight)(in tension by deadweight) Pall=1.46 x 0.875 x 0.6 x 0.75 x 0.67=0.39 kips Vali=1.42 x 0.6 x 0.75 x 0.67=0.43 kips Pall=1.46 x 0.875 x 0.6=0.77 kips Vall=142x06=085kips (not in tension by deadweight)(in tension by deadweight) Shear-tension interaction limitations per the GIP, Ref.3.6.4, Section C.2.11 will be used to evaluate the effect of combined anchor bolt loading.D.C.Cook A-46 Cable Tray and Conduit Raceway Review October 1995 Page 3-11

3.5 input

Data The hangers evaluated in this calculation were selected by the Seismic Review Team (SRT)that performed the raceway walkdown.The selections are documented in the Plant Area Summary Sheets (PASS), which are part of the project documentation. Pl ei i Horizontal seismic accelerations are required for the Lateral Load Evaluation and the Rod Hanger Fatigue Evaluations as defined in the GIP, Ref.3.6.4.Three options are presented in the GIP, Ref.3.6.4, Section 8.3.4 for determining the horizontal seismic acceleration to be used in lateral load evaluations. Acceleration values for D.C.Cook corresponding to each of the options are summarized below.Elevation ZPA Building Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 587 633 650 609 598 612 625 651 699 0.20 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.32 0.37 0.42 0.52 0.80 Aux Aux Aux DGB Cont Cont Cont Cont Cont 1.21 1.21 1.21 1.21 1.21 1.21 1.21 1.21 1.21 0.63 0.69 0.69 0.69 1.00 1.16 1.31 1.63 2.50 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 2.50 Option 1: 2g scaled by the maximum of SSE/Bounding Spectrum (ZPA value controls)Option 2: 2.5*1.25'Floor ZPA (1.25 is for'realistic'loor spectra)Option 3: 2.5'1.25 1.5'SSE ZPA (within 40'f grade)Conclusion: Option 2 for Aux and DGB, Option 3 for Containment D.C.Cook A-46 Cable Tray and Conduit Raceway Review October 1995 page 3-12 0 The rod fatigue bounding spectra provided in the GIP, Ref.3.6.4, Figure 8-9, are plotted below vs.the envelope of the D.C.Cook 5%damping spectra for the Auxiliary Building and the envelope for Containment at El.650'nd below.These curves are used to determine the applicable bounding curve in the Fatigue Evaluation Screening Charts, Figure 8-10 to 8-14 of the GIP.20 1.5 g 1.0 0.5 0 0.1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11 I I I I I I 1 I I I'I I I I I 11 I I r I I I I I I I I I I I I I'I'r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 111 I I I I I I I I I I r rr I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II~I I I I I I I I, I is/I/I s I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I~IN I I I I I I I I I 11 I I I I 11 I 11 I I~I I~I I I I I I I yl 1 I I I I I s I I I I I~I I~I I I I I I I~ss I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II~II I I I'I 1111 I I I I I I I I I I I I~I I I I I I I I I I I I ssl s I I~I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I~I I I I I I-rrrr gl I~II~111~I I I I~I I I I 10 I I I I I I I 11 I I I I I I I I I I sl I I I I 1 N I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 111 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I f I I I I I I I I~I I I I I I 11 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 111 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 111 I I I-I rrr I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I~~I I I I F~(Hz)20 1.5 I 1.0 0.5 I-0 0.1 I I I I I I I I I I H I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I~I I I I I~I I I I I s I~I I I~I I I I I I I I 1111 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SS'I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I rrrr I I I I I I I>I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I~I I I I~~I I I II I I I I I I I I I II s s~s I I I I I I I I I I I I II~6508AdbctoA) I s s I I~I I I I I I I I I I I~I I I I I I s~I I I I I I I I I I I I I I H I I I~I I)I I I I I I I I I I I I~I I I~~II I I I I I I I I~I I I I I I~I I I I~I I I~~I I I I-rrrs J I I I~111 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I'I I I 11 I I I I I/I I I~'ls I I I~I I~I I III~I I s I I I I I I~I I I s I~~~s I I I I I~~I I I I~II I I I~II II~~I 10 s I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I~339 I I I I I I~~~~I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I~I I I I I I I I I I I I I~I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SSI I I I I I I I I I I I I I ss I I I I I I I I I I I I rrr I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I 111 I I I I I I I I I I I I~~I 11~I I I~I~I I I~~I Frequency (H)(D.C.Cook A-46 Cable Tray and Conduit Raceway Review October 1995 page 3-13 i vl in r nn Po r All threaded rods used in raceway supports at O.C.Cook are manufactured all-thread rods.Some rods, however, are anchored using the welded rod coupler detail shown to the right.The SRT was concerned that the coupler material is not as ductile as the rod material, particularly after being welded.2.Fatigue tests were performed on O.C.Cook threaded rods with the welded rod coupler detail (Ref.3.6.23). These tests show that for the same ductilitydernand, the number of cycles to failure using the welded coupler detail is approximately half the number of cycles to failure using typical"nutted" rod connection details at O.C.Cook (Ref.3.6.6, Table 8-2).I The test data points for the welded coupler detail are plotted below on Figure 8=5 from Reference 3.6.6 (this figure was used to develop the fatigue evaluation screening charts in the GIP).Each test data point represents 3 tests (6 tests total)on 5/8" rods with an applied axial tensile preload (ITT)of 2.2 ksi (500 lb.)The test data points lie above the"2/3 Strain Acceptance l.ine", which represents the ductility demand vs.cycles to failure acceptance criteria for field-threaded rods.Therefore, in these LAR's, in order to cover rod-hung raceway supports that have not been selected as LAR candidates because of lower weight or longer length, but which may have welded coupler anchorage details, Rod Hanger Fatigue Evaluations will conservatively include the procedures specified in the G1P for field-threaded rods.3.20 FATIGUE DATA FOR THREADED RODS COMPEER.~INST.CVRV8 W/fl GD THRIVED 2.80 2.60 3 2a0 P 2.20 a 1.60 1.40 ACCEPTANCE LINE aa06 ltae~~~<<Ildt40W4c AQ(.1.20 0 1.00 1.008+00 NOt5lAUZED OVOllUIY Do&NOO.C.Cook AA6 Cable Tray and Conduit Raceway Review October 1995 page 3-14

3.6 References

3.6.1"Manual of Steel Construction, Allowable Stress Design", 9th Edition, American Institute of Steel Construction, lnc.Chicago, IL, 1989.3.6.2"General Engineering Catalog", No.10, Unistrut Building Systems, GTE Products Corporation, Wayne, Ml, 1983.3.6.3 3.6 4"General Engineering Catalog", No.12, North American Edition, Unistrut Corporation, Wayne, Ml, 1992.I"Generic Implementation Procedure (GIP), for Seismic Verification of Nuclear Plant Equipment", Revision 2A, March, 1993, Seismic Qualification Utility Group.3.6.5"Design of Welded Structures", Orner W.Blodgett, James F.Lincoln Arc Welding Foundation, July 1976.3.6.6"Seismic Evaluation of Rod Hanger Supports for Electrical Raceway Systems", EPRI NP-7152-D, March, 1991.3.6.7"Cable Tray and Conduit System Seismic Evaluation Guidelines", EPRI NP-7151-D, March, 1991.3.6.8"The Performance of Raceway Systems in Strong-Motion Earthquakes", EPRI NP-7150-D, March, 1991.3.6.9"Seismic Verification of Nuclear Plant Equipment Anchorage" EPRI NP 5228-SL, Revision 1,Volume 1, June, 1991.3.6.10 AEP Guideline No.18.3, Rev.4, 4/9/86: "Guide for Cable Tray Loading" 3.6.11 Test Report 91C1681-02, Testing of D.C.Cook typical Unistrut attachment brackets for rod hung cable trays.3.6.12 AEP Drawing No.1-2-EDS433-14, Sheet 1 of 2, 5/31/91.3.6.13"Longitudinal Load Resistance in Seismic Experience Database Raceway Systems", EPRI NP-7153-D, March 1991.3.6.14 AEP Document No.02-0120-1097, Revision 0, Page 3 (Rigid Conduit Weights)3.6.15 Letter from I.C.Huang of AEP Service Corporation to Steve Anagnostis of Stevenson and Associates, 1/10/94, re: as-installed conduit weights for raceway supports LAR011 and LAR017.3.6.16"Rigid Frame Formulas", A.Kleintogei, Frederick Ungar Publishing Co., New York, 1952./.D.C.Cook A-46 Cable Tray and Conduit Raceway Review October 1995 page 3-15 3.6.17 Donald C.Cook Nuclear Plant Drawings: 1-1594-4 1-1460-75 1-1528-51 1-1525-57 1-1464-83 3.6.18 AEP Guideline No.18.2A, Rev.0, 6/27/86: "Guide for Cable Tray System Design".3.6.19 Telecopy dated 4/29/94 from I.Huang of AEP to Steve Anagnostis of Stevenson and Associates regarding as-installed cable tray and conduit weights for LAR's 1,3,5,9",10,16,18, and 22.3.6.20 Letter from I.C.Huang/AEP to Steve Anagnostis/Stevenson and Associates, April 7, 1994-results of testing of D C Cook modified embedded Unistrut, 3.6.21 Stevenson 8 Associates Design Report, AEP Raceways 82C200-02, Cable Tray Testing-Analysis and Report, 9/30/83.3.6.22 Telecopy from I.C.Huang/AEP to Steve Anagnostis/Stevenson and Associates, May 6, 1994-Field information concerning LAR011 (bolt spacing and conduit spans).3.6.23"Low Cycle Fatigue Tests on 5/8 inch Threaded Road" by Dario A.Gasparini, P.E.IPh.D., Dept.of Civil Engineering, Case Western Reserve University for Stevenson 8 Associates, March 25, 1992.D.C.Cook A<6 Cable Tray and Conduit Raceway Review October 1995 page 3-16 REQUESTED SAMPLE LAR CALCULATIONS 001,005,010,011,022,023,027,030 I CUENT Fb~KM JOB No.IS'SHEET OF Stl.'VenSOn and ASSOdateS Hl A 5rruc rural Maclra alca I Coarultrag Eagiaaerrag Frrra./9 CUENT%6 DC 4 ZAZ-ooi Stevenson end Associates Il A SrrnclnrohMochoalcol Coaoolliag Englnoorlng flrra O5'C7~cr/( CUENT SUOJEGT gd g~g<Zs4-oo/Stevenson and Assodatcs 5I A Sauctural.Mechoolrsl coasu!5og Knylnoaanq Few~.aoP c Or8~Adds CUENT smu acr ce~~M-oat Stevenson and Associates R h Souelvwl.Mechanical Coasulaao Kayiaoorlaa Flies sa/Il 'Os6fyL ZXt$g C OMIQN-~Fthm<EHVDpQ..'sr.r,',.ss IIIII~1WT~7 I'~~'4I g.>.~'I>y~$I,V-RLl s S yV 0'cow vt YC'IsgL I sl I I sl I fs s P", s I s I I I I I'ag)~gL@0~rSI6,CW iW.80K 4 Q'IIILT4)~ IL 4" yss t,Mss's&s'ss~+Jlgt s'I LLI~t 1, t N.IHP B.631'-0".=r arS Wt+~~I.SI~gq~ g'laos'r.IL~"e~$3ss I'3s's 3y~II CIJLMIS (TC0$$I Skt"~h"s CI M Gib gs II lg ss gs, gII~~IoO ao IIEr~rrIar WI5~Et OVK IIEET WO GLKVhToR.. ~PPoRY¹2 ACeVa rL.LL cO1Lo" wY'g4iW.Qf&Ar II5I~P~(tPIlfyl.+PC~~'1 cAOA ling,, I I I I I I I I>>Y,'I~l n,>/sr>'4.Z4L+g>>ml>>)>VS~: fd Jla>>>>t i>>t>>%A>>~>>>>A>>>>e P>>>>>>J, Al-'P fdPP tL Na>22,15t 5 lts5IFT glc%$Ppi'>'h~x wan ar>>a tat u>>>>Ie>>'sr&.s.>>>>~~ ag 12.444 LSSlI=T II>>C I5~l I2,55t'$5/FT 1S;hLS>iFT 6,tA C GIAN 693 10.4$L$5lFT z C n m D O m N'z4.5(o4$5rFt'y>>v:c&ts N)~~AlRm+C1 6-4 sk@i 6~'4 1Q.625 LBSf FT YAM-FS 2.c,t23 l>>r.1LQI g>>)II hllKHHVf cd&'4'IGLOO g>>>>I>>ll 4'T%lC SVRh4 C46.I>>QY WO 5 LCVh'To@>>SUPPLY¹<-R.>>%L C>>5>>I>>r 0~At'TUEL VVEJC WT5 FOR LAR4'COH001T lOEHTlFI CATION UNKNOWN 0 L CUENT r Stevenson and Assodates II A s<ruclural Moehaalcal Coneulling Enylnooeny l'leaa<85$'D9 l'ScM/oZ .~ CUENT ggu~+'4@8 S Stevenson and Assodates II A svuciurel.Mechanical con oui li ay f agiaoorlny Fa w SS JQ x C.>> (Stcvcnson and Assodatcs Q A Suwtvral Moehoaleol Cosevl8og Eaylaoorlay Fires CUENT sum ccr~+'>DQ 2ccm 4 S CP CUENT Smuem P~rr Stevenson and Associates Q A SnueNral Mechanical cohsulUay laglaoo<lnp n<m 4'4rx Lad-Wc ID' CUENT SUOJ~4 b 4AZM SC'IC/HPO auaac 6 oa c Rcvcnson and Assodates H A Steuccusahkechaalcal Coa>ulpop Kaplaeeclop Fitch's~-cv5 AY~re M~roB~>Pz Ace~W~.ma.~~ Stevenson and Associates Il A Svuctuwl Moeho nlcsl Coaeu!5'nginooenp Fans Z4Z-oos S zs 9 p'g.A~1%AC~ear>~~We.ckc@D goo Yo RaD Cc&PL/JJh To L'j$',Q RgoUklP WSLD (mK)&EE VETAlL"C-C"~~~OQ~~/~TAI 2'-to U-eu MPs pp>Q I 11 2/g IAMC8 I AN P3 U-t'LAMPS QvQ f"1/g-4/g" 5~~6" l AM-XIO I AMP&EE PETA'lL Ie,"(n@l AN-CGQ)1 p gI f A,N<CG[l AM-C82 g1/Il 2'D I l/g.UN&BRUT~BoLl(~)i I lqx2x2 x)0 L I I I l l I I I 8 MC5>t=-0)I I)0+g" DEg Rv'T PETAlL"c.-c'PXT<wI'poRT TNP-~vPFg~')>r5 A HOT eAGHL=E '34 l8:46 FROn AEPSC NUCLEAR DES LEFT'O RIGHT IA."-2840(o-I, 2.98 LBS/FT I'I~"-50IIZR-I, 3.2.2 LK5/FT<r~--SOIOSV-I, S.ZZLS>r Vr I-9957R-I, I.73 LBS/FT'q~I"-205I3-I, I.BI(6 LHS/FT~~~j,Pp~o gg~PAGE.OQ4 ACTUAL NElGWT5 FOR LAR~5 2 3O'R&KP P eon U-cLkNPs a'<~~z We.Eke@&BOD~o Hot Cc vPLQK~-XC L 3/4.nu>aV4C>wctu>I'~eg&EE OFTA1L"c-c" l0.95 LB5/FT'29.Hr 5 L65IFT 3~C8 3AM PZ t-PIUM@EL.633'~f g'pg&hDP U-CVd4P5 C~Q yl1 w.~ra".3 1t 3g Q~)LEFT TO RKHT 0"-9Z.G2PS-I) IO;75 L55/FT 4'-'MBPS-I fO.GHL65/FT lANxto)ANTE.t-3 g LEFT TO RIGHT I4.291'o LD5/FT 25'H54L65/'I-T 3 AN-'C80 I~~CG t I AM-C82 l 25cg'xP"SF~(TYP)I.FI-T TO RISIIT+I.95 LSD/FT 34.Z7 LB5/FT>2,77 I.Pv/FT

Stevenson and Assodates R A svuctu(~I Mn<<hnnlcnl Cnnlulgng Knglnuuslng Elf'UENT D2 o 4AM-use Joulk>.+~~+~sHEEf~oFM~III O 8 LJ.OW CUENT~guECT D O Stovenson and Assodates II A Strwte re lkoAo nlcs1 cosoullsy Ksylaoooay Fleas o E CUENT muccr>C XeN.~<~<~~SHEET 3 OF~~Stevenson and Associates II AS(naciecabHocbaeleal Coasulliny Enolsoerlsa I<<w id'~Z 0 CUENT~c Stevenson and Assoclates im A slnscturel Mechanical Coastal'5aO Kngtnoedsg Fhm CUENT l Stcvcnson and Assodatcs ER A structural Hocbaaiea'I coneulsny Englnoodna Fcce V h CUENT Stevenson and Associates H A Slluclulnl Jlochn nlcnl Con<utgng Cnglnuurlng finn 7d~C CUENT mum Stevenson end Assodetes W h Srrac<arsl Mschsslcsl Cssralriarr taylssarlsy Firrs xg

Rcvcnson and Associates RI IL Suuctu<al Mochaalcal Con o villa@Esglaeorlay E'l(a CUENT JOG No.Stcvcnson and Associates Nm A ScwNral htoehonlcal CoaevlCng Caglaoeslsy Fwa o5' CUENT Stevenson and Assodatcs S A Stiactvial Mechanical Coaouluny Eaoisoeclsy flea CUENT SUBJECT Stevenson and Associates Rl A Sltvc(v ral MoAo alcsl Conoul5sa Kaylnoorlao Faa l/~~ CUENT Stevenson and Associates Il A S<oadvrol.Woc4alcsl Coaoultley Eaglnoo(lay Foes O E CUENTStevenson and Assodatcs E5 A sv~ousal Mechaaical Coa>vlsay Ksglaoerlay Fns

L CUENTStevenson and Associates l5 A Snvctssal l4ochaaks1 coao~hay Esyisoonay nba d CUENT Stevenson and Associates El A Suvelurst.Mechanical Consolan'aylneorlng fl<w 24&a 0 CD'c CUENT JOO Na MS O SliEEE~&OF~F Stcvcnson and Associates l5 h strvciscn Mechanical conovlUne ssolssorlnp fires/z CUE~r SUOJECr Stevenson and Associates II A suuelucol Mechanical Conouluna Esglaoorlsp Fifa .<'(((S ag~I W4~~I (p'rf+att/+ae a~~~, ACTUAI WEIG!FOV LAR~IO QJ IrJ a Q.I,~,~~ei tV~~r,'JI g" Jttr.~~'I+a~~e~r~~~t Sr 3c', J IS~~~I~~J~f r(fvyt tva~~~r th)~I.a(htJ (JC.S'.I I&PPoRT¹)0~~~t at te~I'I~t~*rat~~~t~~~~~)'jest I~'J ge (JJ CI R~I"-'253I-I~~I b'I LBS/Pg.')D z I"-2528-I~(IS(ng LES//I-T~N 0.a I(IQ.-'I 0 f(S 0 4.-I z I,(I5 LB5/I=T I~'.,~'C~I r~ml~l a~*IA I I~J m!I~(JJ: I~(SJ'/I Q..a,~I S I I et~te)~f I~~~r~I r rt~~~t t~r a I~, I~J J'I~~~e~'I~i I~~~~~~4-'+bI(JPY-f, IOIIl.LR5/FT~~r~$rat~1 i,.(p r II~\~~~+'l-8(l&qFf-I~IOI6 LSD/~: "$l: I~~I~I'a~~~t t~,C~'I~1~g)y;Nr.I kgu(r~~~I\\~g~I~I I"-9957R-I~'I~'i75'LB>/I: T~.I'I"-coNOUjT'.77 LM/i-"7'~COiOuITJ.'7s70 Leih/F.'.T i~I~~~Qg,~I er rt~~~'~+A~:jt'JI lt.lai JCJ!4 ICJ'CJ r I I;i~gt t~I r I Na~Ia~q~rTlt~~C~a IM N~~\~'V (ea I'IH I~~r)~~~~>V,.: QI(J'J r~~r'.J~~l CT C7 Ji.tt FROHT~~~~TRAY MIGII76 L 2;l,07 M5/k7 C I9, M,.LE'J/PTJ:~20.08 LP&/FT'REAR IGT.-I5 I CT-X I I~al Jg REAlZ~r (~I n>c a'I~C~(n..a!LRS/Xr ~J I'"I 80 LB5lPT'l't.. CI tl.Ii tait)VL"~.~/~..j;~TRAY L, TQ fZ'-':.,~ICT-C(l~:-;.(ri.,a I CT-Cet,s,".'>~~a]))Sg J('a I~~I~r> a4"~r r g4"recco~1~, Korrl~~~I~'I~F-bC~4~Ite)o Sel I~~4 I eh~r Oe~r4e r~vrouw SUPPoRT.¹>0~g I I~so~aClvej IS spl I h~o r'~r~I r I~\sg I~D eOeS I Sr\, I'"rll,'r r ,~~~11'Ji~~~\I'I I I I I I~@~~~I's~L~ff K IsosrtI Cutltf P I f>c'f K~L.-e~e'rie J"~rKr/I~"~\'P I r'o Qfttr J,I1 I s..IJIC I IJ~I'I I..'~~I.I I Ikl+'Cr~~s'I, I s'I'lr s<<I S S I'I I I JI I:II s I I.I f:4~3.I~II I)'Io s II I~I.'ll I I'~~I II I I.Il I I II~I,II@Ager I I I~~Il I~I sl rl~I I~'I II II~I I~I~e~~o~I~Ce6'I\$r r~e.Il I II~~~~I~s)~I i~I I I~IS~~e',I~~I~.IL.'I e ICI Cl etel~~ore e%%~~re tA~o e'I~~~~rrr'I~rsrr~~slee o~~leer ,r)I~(~~ro.'goJ'sA tp Atr I II('I~~O..Jgpq~q I<tr"~ef}e I~IAII A I~t.'~\ISnrICIrs AALU II~'le~AA'~I~Its!I'e.t' I:-rr~A.04~St.s'r 1 J')'I~~I Ie CIIJ)I')!I"r..~II A~~J'"~r.I rs I I In IA"~~'rt IeorSIII Ilsr't tt"'g Ietll'r t 0 CCW 5'S Stevenson and Associates @I A Structural Mechoslcil Cosovlllay Eaylaooclny Fam 6 0 SUOJFCT 4 d 844&DC Coen STEVENSON&ASSOClATES a slntctwo4nochonlcot conwtttng onglncottng tlrm H8'SS rD>rica"ro/M~A/ STEYENSON 5, ASSOCIATES 0 lttvclw04Mchonlcol conwNny enqlnoodnp Arm SUOJEGT A gA z449 O CO tU S JOB No.++~~~~SHEET~~OF~~ SUBJECT JOB No.~~~++~SKEET'=OF~ ~/STEVENSON 5 ASSOCIATES a sliucturo4neehonlecA conwWAg ong'Inoohng Nm DOC~b~r~J Du-o'er' 0 SUBJECT JOB No.o 5 SHEEf OF/~STEVENSON 84 ASSOCIATES a aovchroHnochoNcd COhWNAQ Ohglhlhrlhg Sftl D2 Caom~im S4M-w/'r'ASE rap Wca-S Xd' SUBJECT SHEET 0F STEVENSON K ASSOCIATES 0 IIWCfutCHAOChQhICCI COA WIIIAP CAQfhtOAlg fllfh 844-Oi/HA2~JDW P ag/0/~Nl 0 I/I 5 UJ~0

CLIENT amECT Qa Stevenson and Associates A suvctvtal Mochoslcol coneulusq ssolhttclly Flra 0 g~~S STEVENSON 5 ASSOCIATES a slrvcluroHn+chantcol conwmng nnglnonnng Arm xo/~j 6 CUGNT Stevenson and Associates 8 A stnaclvwl Hechaslcal cosevhisy tsglooonng f na

SUZeRT.-To -=jPSRS~"~~-~ SUPPORT...mHF NSro85-V"~)..'d'8'k3'~i~" L'2 24 27/ii&2Q.:ply Il 22 pal'2I~u.20~r-FL.EL.SSS'-o<<~~l.~8>, 8 QQp 19 lB i>-e rt)y lo]~.r>'lb is io Sf 3~X/qL---=~V---'-'A=---A '~.)5UI'f'opT AHCRog.PiN, PLBX i SL.P.C.OT tx 0)q>bc.PI>~)@8'4~l@>0 x)q ola M'M.H'.-..s ...(TYI',)~ms'eor.,Y= -ASQQo.R..piM~ioMG (T~P)25.7/')>8 sJ@~he bc:.1ND<kNP N~CWC kg po%ER DoNKLD c..cooK NuciEp,p PLAN~.DP-.B<.N.MAa~R...DATE: E4.BB&'-.o."........BUILp'1N&,"AUX.: LoC.P,YiOH RvJGw, can.;.:.PiPE .-YUQHEL JN/7@4 SR GHEE RH ant~AGEE LAP go pg .ATTACHMENT NQ.3 ypP'~Yt<lC))J~~>~vcr~'ue>oW'ery+~ g~un~sun~LoQ Bod 5o]JF YT SvPPi&T MlS SuFPoR~Ch)F iu Rv)<V'@Pc'Yu~)UF L Gun-<Phoo g/Wq//~l I I I I tl 5 I 7 r 5 pig Acx EoLTI+'ovC~I))l 0 lo+%"zg~g',dy~ 4v t}/ga/4Apg'3 glO ATTACHMENT NO.1 COOK NUCLEAR PLANT A-46 RACEWAY EVALUATIONS LARoll CONDUiT NO.(SEE ATTACH.3)10 CONDUXT SIZE AND TYPE 3/4" EMT 1" EMT 1" EMT 1 1/2" RIGID STEEL RIGID STEEL 1 1/2" RIGID STEEL 2" RXGXD STEEL 2" RIGID STEEL 3" RIGID STEEL 3" RIGID STEEL 2" RIGID STEEL 2 i'IGID STEEL 3" RXGXD STEEL CABLE TYPE AND SIZE XN CONDUIT 1-12/C f12 XLA 2-2T/C f16 1-STP g16 1-4/C g7/3.8 1-4/C g7/18 1-4/C g7/18 1-3TC g4 1-1/C g4 1-4/C gl2 1-3TC g2/0 1-1/C g2 1-3TC g2/0 1-1/C g"2 1-3TC g2 1-1/C g4 1-4/C/12 1-3TC g4/0 1-1/C g2/0 POUNDS PER FOOT OF CONDUIT AND CABLE 0.97 0.73 0'9 2.87 2.87 2.87 3.81 3'2 7'1 7'1 3'2 3'2 8'9 BASIS FOR WEIGHT.CALCULATION (SEE LXSTED ATTACH.NOS.)5&7C 5&8B 5&13B 6&7C 6&7C 6&7C 6i 9i&10 6&7C 6, 9,&10 6, 9,&10 6, 9,&10 6&7C 6c 9,.&10 f)p)i~'~giant~II%IS n)a~a<~)gg O l8)la)hl 4l 0 88 rn'rM KAF.'i%%f QSÃl.I%f4 Nr>%%.Pi~I%$4~C~5~~)+~eat I~03<iS Cl Ot l~0z,.'lRE J/J~'P A~ CUENT C.AQ 5 Stcvcnson and Associates Il llstevcwcal Hochanlcal CDlllll4llig KllglhoollhO Fcm GNAT iDP~-os~ezra~.

CLIENT SmuECT 4+6 Stevenson and Associates Q A Sttuatutal Nathan(cal CaaeulUntt Eaelnaatlng fltta SX i&~Zo r GUENON sujet~8'CA/Z~Stevenson and Associates Q A Snueivr~I.MecLanical Conevlsny Kayisoocag Firm SZ <s~s~nno5r~I GSZC-P2.~~CA Dirt hsf'Lo~l l gQQQ+C5>>I>s GSZC-CS 18.5'2 I.B5/I=T tt t'S ll'~~o~mrs" ZOO~JA 0 3-M.'T8"Z.9.'ISLETS/ T PIOOO Op L GUPPY%nAS: Sl f+/DAN L I'>>A'b SECT'AA07 d'iJ gp~~~'-IZ+KC-Z.<A4~~I 65(PT I5i01 ItIIgPy, I>>gO~~1'COT scrrrrH m v sum's Au~~~t,~,~~~Z.'>>7SGM 2.4.A 4 I.65/PX O D I 0 D Cl m Ci7 C)ACTUAL VJElC HT5 FOR 4/AR:~ZZ IQCMTIPICATIOH QF It<, Il/2." g C,D'5UNKHOWH g~o7 Tg 1I'JCC.N>2 L~t%555o Lk (Tf t3 ii~I II il il I I'O'I~I'it+It&to ue Octal.A L I'-44'4 SECT'A'A'g'll co-.%'tt cor~~l'a I&i('ii~I 4 CoiIOIItt BOVTEM MhY SVPT'5 PEAN VlEW~~t Pg M, f OX CII.I.HM4III II%CWTX II'IC~'ll. Egad o SHEEf OF CCW 5 dP d c STEVENSON 5.ASSOCIATES a Itntcfvtctmocttantcol conutttlnp onplnoottntt Ilrm 0 s5 zD8 Pea 659&~<9 gyy 4@f82/8~4..O CO tU K SUBJECT 4+5 848~JOB No.SHEET~UQF STEVENSON 5, ASSOCIATES a Auelvcahnoe~ cantina ongfnoodng nrm b 0 SUMFGT STEVENSON K ASSOCIATES o ttructurotrnnchontcol conautNng nnptneertnq nrm P 0 0 0 0 g1l@l<pl l Qll I'4~,~~:cga-TKg A-g SEE-.: DETAK.A 4~I ll e I fL.Gl 6l2-0" 0 SUNEGT STEVENSON 5.ASSOCIATES 0 ltmchnol4lochohlcol coneNnp onplnoonnp turn A5s ro+&W 9 uzi 5r sussex STEVENSON 8(ASSOCIATES

SUBJECT JOB Ho.+~~~SHEET&OF~~STEVENSON 8.ASSOCIATES a sovclvrounochoMol CchNNho Ohglhccdho Alhl 844-oP 2 PAz7 ESP SUBJECT STEVENSON 8c ASSOCIATES COhSVINhg OhQIA40tlhg flllA Goo~err S/D C 0 O r'/O S

SUBJECT JOB No STEVENSON 8(ASSOCIATES conwmng onpHoorlng am 0 STEVENSON 5 ASSOCIATES conweng onplnoonnp Arm Mrz P3~w//7 M 5 z,S 0 g 1/ 0! SUBJECT lPIIHF.STD/K 0 SHEET F OF STEVENSON 8(ASSOCIATES o Etructrrrolrnochonlcot consrrtttng ongtnoortng arm 0 su~O a7~F O

6w/i 2 STEVENSON 8t.ASSOCIATES Q ltntchl<OHTi4ctMtnlcnl cntuttlnp ongtnoorlnp tttm STEVENSON 8c ASSOCIATES o structurotrnoctronlccl conruttlng onglnoorlng llrm S O re ltt tt CCC 5/-/C.7

STEVENSON 8c ASSOCIATES o rrruclrrrcHnochanrccl conrrrrtlng onprnoodnp tlrm SUBJECT JOB Ho.STEVENSON 8(ASSOCIATES a ttructvrctrnochcnlcnl ccnwtttnp onglnoortnp hrm

SUBJECT+6 84r8 s Z JOB No.STEVENSON 8 ASSOCIATES eonsuenp onplntorlng tern 7%imam WC, fool l((f I o%~(((oA~S))1)OI SAC'lh.r el(<<UNh\'o Oe(ll'IAI(~1 ()(r 4 9((4 Alta Ci>f V14)f(IOA IIII'1o ,h4<)('()telo IOtfftf g W OV(f~~If~r SOT'TEN lRAYS-NC&c~~i CI,All II f(IIIKO ho CIA an t1'I'11~'Wb o[lo~I'~0~~~I ((~(lo C(OKAY C COSMIC lLCLIAt IAAI(f COnll((((n(%(Oftf IIO t~(fAS 0~L.01'4 CC IIO-1~I, WI((AS'5 t.((A(I4 LI('I OATC I(.1('%1.COL 17~I(f II)i/~AIII1AI I A(I K>I(IOI Cr Aflgis'It" I'Ia.a)It)fA t4 1S rCCTIC((I A A'~~~~)J LC1~'(f V tC C44 2c C~S I~1 2C'CW i 1 (J(~A-zc~I I~I I~I I I I I.l gpP T'II AY5-~ww SUBJECT...SZC/5 9o STEVENSON 8(ASSOCIATES o ssrvctwosrnochonrcol consurrlnSS onynoorhq rrrrn o>~i ZAg-o So 2oarÃrww)ewe 8cbp3-ro 0 rrs ro Og QC SUBJECT ZAN>r STEVENSON&ASSOCIATES 0 IoMclvfokhochnnkcl Conukonp onplnoohng ilrm

9'TEVENSON 8(ASSOCIATES 0 SlcUClvt04IhlChohtCN COAWNA9 OA9414OEIA9 llCN SUBJECT JOG No.6/SHEET~OF STEVENSON 8.ASSOCIATES 0 oltMcIvcoMlochofllcol consvNng onglnoodng tlcm"r'O 0 C/l UJ CC 2" 5/8 ROD BENT AROUND PIPE AND BOLTED INSIDE P1000 ANGLE I~~I I 5/8" EXPANSION ANCHORS EMBEDDED STRUT 2'-0" 2'-6" 31~10" PIPE 1'-0" CRANE WALL VIEW A-A o ALL ANGLES ARE 3X3X1/4 o PIPE PENETRATES CRANE WALL AT EL.603'10 AND RUNS UP INSIDE CRANE WALL TO A JUNCTION BOX AT EL.625'-6".THERE IS A LATERAL SUPPORT AT EL.610'.NO OTHER SUPPORTS EXCEPT PENETRATION AND JUNCTION BOX.o PIPE LAYOUT SHOWN IN DRAWING 1-1460 (SEE SECTION 1X-1X AND DRAWING 1-1525).UNIT 1, LOWER CONTAINMENT CONDUIT 1A1: 10" PIPE D.C.COOK A-46 RACEWAY WALKDOWN PASS ID//: RACE-1>1, LAR//2 CALCULATION USED TO RESOLVE THE OUTLIER GENERATED BY LAR 8022 89C1570-HF-OOI QUENT C/cuccc~a"~-Stevenson and Assodatcs mm A Sauctuccl Mochoalccl Coaoulu ap Kaplaocrlup Puca cc

CUENT nrem ran Stcvcnson and Assodatcs Q A Stractaral.Mochankal Conrrrttintt Enpinoortnrt Firm

CUENT SUOJECT Stevenson and Associates I A Sgupturnl Mnpbnnlpnl Cpneuliing Englnnoeng Fgw 1 CUENT SUBJECT 5 SHEET~OF~~.CF Stevenson and Associates R A STTHSTE T~I MSOiTSEICSI COOSE'lung EnglnESTing FTTES OF'I CUENT smM DF Stevenson and Associates R5 A Sfrucluf41 Muchnnicnl Cnnrulrinp Knpinnnrinp firm 6 4 3( 0 L CUENT C S~SHEEi.~pP~Stevenson and Associates Q A st<ucNs~I Mechanical conevaino Ksqineoano arm CUENTStevenson and Associates H h Suuct~ral Mechanical cossunisy Esglaoeany fnm S 8 C-OGQ

CUENT JOE HF C SHEET$OF~Stevenson and Associates l3 ii, SIT S Iiurs hMSSha OiC*l ConSVIITOTI KngiOSSriOTI fTTTTI 43 IF cuEwr SUBJECT Stevenson and Associates /55 A Suuc<u<~I Mechonlgal conovning engineering l'atm PS g l k PROCEDURE USED TO ADDRESS THE OUTLIER GENERATED BY LAR 8005

1.Introduction and Summary The prying-action detail documented in Plant Area Summary Sheet RACE103 and analyzed in Limited Analytical Review LAR005 resulted in an outlier.Per the Outlier Seismic Verification Sheet, the recommended resolution to this outlier is to walk-down the plant and document.all occurrences of this detail, screen the specific configuration of each detail using an acceptance criteria based on the LAR requirements, and modify those occurrences that do not meet the criteria.This document addresses the first part of this resolution -the walkdown and screening. The screening criteria is described in Section 2, the screening walkdown documentation is contained in Section 3.This walkdown was performed by the Seismic Review Team members that did the bulk of the original raceway walkdown: I.C.Huang (AEPSC)and Stephen Anagnostis (SEA).The walkdown included all the areas of the plant covered in the raceway walkdown except for the Unit 1 containment above El 650 and inside the crane wall below El 650, as the unit was operating (the Unit 1 containment annulus was included). Based on the original raceway walkdown and that this walkdown of the Unit 2 containment did not find any significant occurrences of the prying-action detail, the SRT concluded that the Unit 1 containment does not contain any significant occurrences of the prying-action detail.The results of this walkdown is summarized in Table 1.The first column contains the walkdown worksheet number (the worksheets are in Section 3), the second column describes the location of the hangers with the prying-action detail, and the third column states whether the hangers passed or failed the screening criteria.About 50 hangers with the prying-action detail were found (note.that some worksheets cover more than one hanger).Twelve of those hangers failed the screening criteria.All of the hangers that failed are located in one area of the plant-the Unit 1 Vestibule and the adjacent section of the Unit 1 Reactor Cable Tunnel.Table 1.Summary of the Prying Action Detail screening walkdown.Worksheet ff 1-092694-1 1-092694-2 1-092694-3 1-092694K 1-092694-5 1-092694-6 1-092694-7 1-092694-8 2-092794-1 2-092794-2 Hanger Location Aux1, El 596, RCT Quad 3 North Hangers 9, 10, 11 along the right wall counting from door 1-DR-AUX323. Aux1, El 596, RCT Quad 4 Hangers 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 on the left wall counting from door 1-DR-AUX329. Aux1, El 596, RCT Quad 4 Directly across the hall from penetration 1-CEP-4P5 Aux1, El 596, RCT Quad 4 Adjacent to penetration 1-CEP-4P5 Aux1, El 596, RCT Quad 1 Two hangers across the hallway from penetration 1-CEP-1PG One hanger near MCC 1-CT-BN Aux1, El 596, RCT Quad 1 Upper platform, 1st hanger on right facing door 1-DR-AUX467 Aux1, El 596, RCT Quad 1 Upper platform, first 3 hangers on left facing door 1-DR-AUX467 Aux1, El 596, RCT Quad 1 Upper platform, first hanger on right off the edge of the platform.Aux2, El 596, RCT Quad 3 South Near 2-VRS-2200 (Upper Cntmt RMS"B" Data Acq Module)Aux2, El 596, RCT Quad 1 Upper platform, two hangers about 3 hangers away from Door 2-OR-AUX468.Pass/Fail, Pass Pass Fail (1J P3ass Pass Pass (2)Pass[3]Fail Pass Pass Attachment to the OSVS for RACE103 Prying-Action Detail Screening Criteria and Walkdown page 1 1-092794-3 1-092794-4 1-092794-5 2-092894-1 2-092894-2 1-092894-3 2-092894-4 2-092894-5 1-0928944 1-092894-? 1-092894-8 1-092894-9 1-092894-1 0 1-092894-11 2-092894-12 2-092894-13 2-092994-1 Aux1, El 609, 4kV Area Above 600V Bus IIA Aux1, El 609, Transformer Room One hanger above 1-DGTAB and one hanger at the right side of the entrance.Aux1, Auxiliary Cable Vault 15'outh of the hatch Aux2, EI 573 6'outh of gate 2-GT-AUX1 013 (U2 Rx Coolant Drain Pump Room)Aux2, El 573 South end of the hallway common to both units Aux1, El 609, elevated area adjacent to the control room cable vault Above 12HV-ACA-FLT-3 Aux2, El 609 Near Miscellaneous Rack 2-H-H Aux2, El 609 Above cabinet 2-BITH2 Aux1, El 612, Vestibule, upper platform leading to RCT Next to 1-DR-AUX467 'ux1, El 612, Vestibule, upper platform leading to RCT 3rd hanger on left from the edge of the platform Aux1, El 612, Vestibule, upper platform leading to RCT 4th hanger on left from the edge of the platform Aux1, El 612, Vestibule, upper platform leading to RCT 2nd hanger on right from the edge of the platform Aux1~El 612, Vestibule 4 hangers along the containment wall just before the upper platform leading to the RCT.Aux1, El 612, Vestibule The hanger above the west end of 1-HE-22 and the next hanger west.The two or three hangers south of these running along the block wall.Aux2, El 612, Vestibule, upper platform leading to RCT 4th hanger on right from the edge of the platform Aux2, El 633 Hangers between the Containment Auxiliaries Panel and 2-MSI-1.Cont2, El 598, Annulus Several hangers near Column 1, Az 63, Quad 1 Pass Pass Pass[4]Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass[5]Pass Pass Fail[6]Fail Fait[73 Pass Pass Pass[1]The angle is"clipped" to the embedded channel with the edge of a washer bolted into the embedded channel.Repair by drilling a hole through the angle and rebolting. [2]This case doesn't meet the screening criteria, but was judged acceptable as the span between the tw'o adjacent supports is<=10', so GIP requirements would be met even if this support was removed.Note that the adjacent hanger would then have a tributary length of 8'5'n one side and 3'n the other)and a load per rod of 640ft..This load satisfies the allowables of 20000 for DL and 2500Ãfor 3DL as specified in the LAR calculation. [3]This case doesn't meet the screening criteria for 3DL, but was judged acceptable as the r/c wall on one side and a large pipe, and platform steel and handrail on the other side will prevent any significant lateral motion.'Attachment to the OSVS for RACE103 Prying-Action Detail Screening Criteria and Walkdown page 2 [4]This case doesn't meet the screening criteria, but was judged acceptable as the span between the two adjacent supports is<=10', so GIP requirements would be met even if this support was removed.Note that the adjacent hanger would then have a tributary length of 7'4.5'n one side and 3.5'n the other)and a load per rod of 440%This load satisfies the allowables of 2000@for DL and 2500@for 3DL as specified in the LAR calculation. [5]This case doesn't meet the screening criteria, but was judged acceptable as the span between the two adjacent supports is 9'<=10'), so GIP requirements would be met even if this.support was removed.Note that the adjacent hanger would then have a tributary length of 7.5'4.5'n. one side and 3'n the other)and a load per rod of 600iti.This toad satisfies the allowables of 2000'or DL and 2500ft for 3DL as specified in the LAR calculation. I[6]Both rods on this hanger do not meet the screening criteria (this hanger was the subject of LAR iIi'5, which initiated this effort).[7}The two hangers above 1-HE-22 probably need both rod anchorages to be modilied-these two hangers are on either side of a removable concrete hatch.The rods furthest from the corners of the hatch were clearly visible (and do not meet the criteria), the rods nearest the corner were not easily visible but look like they will also require modification. I The rods immediately adjacent to the block wall of two or three hangers running along the block wall were not clearly visible, but do not look like they will meet the screening criteria.i Attachment to the OSVS for RACE103 Prying-Action Detail Screening Criteria and Walkdown page 3 2.Screening Criteria 2.1 Criteria Development This criteria is for evaluating the D.C.Cook cable tray hanger anchorage detail shown below for seismic adequacy in accordance with GIP procedures (Ref.1).Lg v vpv'v P V I/2 OR 5/8 UNISTRUT NUT AND BOLT IN EMBEDDED UNISTRUT L2x2x1/4 or L3x3xl/4'c=Bearing force on concrete FR=Te'nsile load in threaded rod Fa=Tensile load on Unistrut bolt Force in Unistrut bolt: Fa=FR(1+Lg/Lq)=>FR=Fa/(1+Lg/L1)Maximum moment in angle: MMAx=FRL2 FRŽMAx/L2 In this detail, bending stresses in the angle and pullout force on the Unistrut bolt will each limit the capacity of the anchorage. The equations above show that the bending moment in the angle is related to L2, while the force in the Unistrut bolt is related to the ratio of L2 to L<.As the ratio L2/L<increases, the lever action on the Unistrut bolt increases for a given rod load FR.r li'I The anchorage detail above is used on rod-hung trapeze hangers.For trapeze-type supports, which may swing laterally during an earthquake, the GIP requires both a Dead Load Check and a Vertical Capacity Check (3 x DL)of the anchorage. The vertical capacity check ensures that there is extra design margin in the anchorage to account for additional loads due to support displacement. This detail is also used on wall-mounted brackets to provide vertical support at the cantilevered end.These supports are directly attached to building structure and are not free to move during an earthquake. Per GIP procedures, only a Dead Load Check is necessary for these supports.Attachment to the OSVS for RACE103 Prying-Action Detail Screening Criteria and Walkdown page 4 Allowa I n b ndi s ess Bending stresses in angles are calculated in accordance with the AISC specification for single-angle members, Ref.2.Per Section 5.2.1b of the specification, the calculated bending stress, fa, is: fa=1.25M/S=1.25FnLz/S where S is the geometric section modulus of the angle section.For the Dead Load Check, the working stress allowables given in Ref.2 are used.Per Sections 5.1 and 5.2 of Ref.2, the allowable bending stress is 0.66 Fq for 2x2x1/4 L's, and 0.6 Fq for 3x3x1/4 L's.For the 3 x DL Check, an allowable bending stress of 0.9FY is used for both angle sections.The bending stress, fa, and the stress limits are summarized as follows: 1.25FnLz/(0.247) 1.25FqLz/(0.577) 1.25FnLz/(0.247) 1.25FnLz/(0.577) 5 0.66Fy 5 0.60Fy 5 0.90Fy 6 0.90Fy for L2x2x1/4, DL Case for L3x3x1/4, DL Case for L2x2x1/4, 3DL Case for L3x3x1/4, 3DL Case liow le nis b llo I d Allowable pullout loads for the Unistrut bolt are summarized below (see Ref 3 for discussion): 1/2" bolt 5/8" bolt 1/2" bolt 5/8" bolt 2000 Ib, 2000 Ib, 2000 Ib, 2500 Ib, DL Case DL Case.3DL Case 3DL Case Limits for Lz and Lz/L<for a given Fz are listed below for all combinations of angle size, Unistrut bolt size, and load case.DL case, bending in L2x2x1/4: 1 25F+Lz/S 6 0 66Fy Lz 5 0 66 (36 000)(0 247)/(1 25Fn)>Lz 5 4690/Fn DL case, bending in L3x3x1/4: 1.25FnLz/S S 0.60Fy=>Lz 6 0.60 (36,000)(0.577)/(1.25Fn) =>Lz 6 9970/Fn 3DL case, bending in L2x2x1/4: 3x1.25FpLz/S s 0.9Fy=Lz s 0.90 (36,000)(0.247)/(1.25x3Fn) =>Lz s 2130/Fn 3DL case, bending in L3x3x1/4: 3x1.25FL,/S 6 0.9Fy 4990/Fn Lz 5 0.90 (36,000)(0.577)/(1.25x3Fq) =>Lz s Attachment to the OSVS for RACE103 Prying-Action Detail Screening Criteria and Watkdown page 5 DL case, pullout of 1/2" Unistrut bolt: FR(1+LE/Lq) 5 2000 Ib=>L2/Lq 5 (2000/FR)-1 DL case, pullout of 5/8" Unistrut bolt: FR(1+L2/Lq) 52000 Ib=>L2/Lq 5(2000/FR)-1 3DL case, pullout of 1/2" Unistrut bolt: 3FR(1+LE/Lq) 52000 Ib=>LP/Lq 5(667/FR)-1 3DL case, pullout of 5/8" Unistrut bolt: 3FR(1+L2/Lg) 52500 Ib=>LP/Lq 6(833/FR)-1 The equations above are summarized in table form below.(LB)ANGLE SIZE UNISTRUT BOLT SIZE LOAD CASE DL 3DL L2 (IN., MAX)L2/Lg(MAX) L2 (IN., MAX)Lp(L/(MAX) 2x2x1/4 3x3x1/4 1/2" 5/8" 1/2" 5/8" 4690/FR 4690/FR 9970/FR 9970/FR (2000/FR)1 I (2000/FR)1 l I (2000/FR)-1 '(2000/FR)-'I 2130/FR 2130/FR 4990/FR 4990/FR ((667/FR)-1 I (833/FR)1 l , (667/FR)-1 '833/FR)-1

2.2 References

1.Generic Implementation Plan Procedure (GIP), for Seismic Verification of Nuclear Plant Equipment", Revision 2A, March, 1993, Seismic Qualification Utility Group.2."Specification for Allowable Stress Design of Single-Angle Members," from Section 5 of the AISC Manual of Steel Construction, Allowable Stress Design, Ninth Edition, American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc.Chicago, IL, 1989.3.LAR criteria document Attachment to the OSVS for RACE103 Prying-Action Detail Screening Criteria and Walkdown page 6

2.3 Screening

Charts Screening charts for Fin increments of 25 lb up to 800 lb.appear on the following pages.SCREENlNG CHART FOR FR<'l00 LB LOAD CASE Fn (LB)ANGLE SIZE UNISTRUT BOLT SIZE DL L2/L)(MAX)L2 (IN., MAX)3DL L2 (IN., MAX)L2/L)(MAX)100 2x2x1/4 3x3x1/4 2x2x1/4 3x3x1/4'2x2x1/4 3x3x1/4 2x2x1/4 3x3x1/4 1/2" 6/8" 1/2" 5/8" 1/2" 5/8" 1/2" 5/8" 1/2" 5/8" 1/Z'/8" 1/2" 5/8" 1/2 II 5/8" 188 188 399 399 93.8 93.8 199 199 62.5 62.5 133 133 46.9 46.9 , 99.7 99.7 79.0 79.0 79.0 79.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 25.7 25.7 25.7 25.7 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 I 85.2'25.7 85.2 I 32.3 I I I 200 I 25.7 200 I 32.3 I I I 42.6'12.3 426 I 157 I I I 998 I 123 998 I 16,7 I I I 28,4 I 7,9 28.4 I 10.1 I I I 66.5 I 7.9 665 I 101 I I I 21.3 I 5.7 213 t 73 I I I 499 I 57 49.9 I 7.3 I I Attachment to the OSVS for RACE103 Prying-Action Detail Screening Criteria and Walkdown page 7 SCREENING CHART FOR FR<200 LB LOAD CASE Fr((LB)ANGLE SIZE UNISTRUT BOLT SIZE DL~~Lg/Li(MAxl L2 (IN., MAX)3DL L2(L)(MAXI L2 (IN., MAXI 125 2x2x1/4 3x3x1/4 1/2" 5/8" 1/2" 5/8" 37.5 37.5 79.8 79.8 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 17.0 17.0 39.9 39.9 4.3 5.7 4.3 5.7 150 2x2x1/4 3x3x1/4 1/2" 5/8" 1/2" 5/8"'1.3 31.3 66.5 66.5 12.3 12.3 12.3 12.3 14.2 14.2 33.3 33.3 34 4.6 34 4.6 175 2x2x1/4 3x3x1/4 1/2"'/8" 1/2" 5I8" 26.8 26.8 57.0 57.0 104 10.4 10.4 10.4 12.2 12.2 28.5 28.5 2.8 3.8 2.8 3.8 200 2x2x1/4 3x3x1/4 1/2" 5/8" 1/2" 5/8" 23.5 23.5 49.9 49.9 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 10.7 10.7 25.0 25.0 2.3 3.2 2.3 3.2 Attachment to the OSVS for RACE103 Prying-Action Detail Screening Criteria and Walkdown page 8 SCREENING CHART FOR FR<300 LB LOAD CASE Fn (LB)ANGLE SIZE UNISTRUT BOLT SIZE DL L2/LI lMAX)L2 tlN., MAX)3DL L2/LI lMAX)L2 lIN..MAX)225 2x2x1/4 3x3x1/4 1/2" 5/8" 1/2" 5/8" 20.8 20.8 44.3 44.3 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 9.5 9.5 22.2 22.2 2.0 2.7 2.0 2.7 250 2x2x1/4 3x3x1/4 1/2" 5/8" 1/2" 5/8" 18.8 18.8 39.9 39.9 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 8.5 8.5 20.0 20.0 1.7 2.3 1.7 2.3 2x2x1/4 3x3x1/4 1/2" 5/8 1/2" 5/8" 17.1 I I 17.1 I I I 36.3 36.3 I I 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3?.7 7.7 18.1 18.1 1.4 2.0 1.4 2.0 300 2x2x1/4 3x3x1/4 1/2" 5/8" 1/2" 5/8" 15.6 15.6 33.2 33.2 I 5.7 5.7 I I, I 5.7 5.7 I I 7.1 7.1 16.6 16.6 1.2 1.8 1.2 1.8 Attachment to the OSVS for RACE103 Prying-Action Detail Screening Criteria and Walkdown page 9 SCREENlNG CHART FOR FR<400 LB LOAD CASE Fr((LBj ANGLE UNISTRUT SIZE BOLT SIZE DL~~L2/Lt (MAX}Lp (IN., MAX}3DL L2/L)(MAX)Lp (IN., MAXl 325 2x2x1/4 3x3x1/4 1/2" 5/8" 1/2" 5/8" 14.4 14.4 30.7 30.7 5.2 5.2 5.2 , 5.2 6.6-6.6 15.4 15.4 1.1 1.6 1.1 1.6 350 2x2x1/4 3x3x1/4 1/2" 5/8" 1/2" 5/8" 13.4 13A 28.5 28.5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 6.1 6.1 14.3 14.3 0.9 1.4 0.9 1.4 375 2x2x1/4 3x3x1/4 1/2" 5/8" 1/2" 5/8" 12.5 12.5 26.6 26.6 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 5.7 5.7 13.3 13.3 0.8 1.2 0.8 1.2 400 2x2x1/4 3x3x1/4 1/2" 5/8" 1/2" 5/8" 11.7 11.7 24.9 24.9 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.3 5.3 12.5 12.5 0.7 1.1 0.7 1.1 Attachment to the OSVS for RACE103 Prying-Action Detail Screening Criteria and Wa}kdown page 10 SCREENING CHART FOR FR<500 LB LOAD CASE Fn (LBI ANGLE SIZE UNISTRUT BOLT SIZE DL L2/L>(MAxl L2 (IN., MAXl 3DL L,iL,(MAxl L2 (IN., MAX)425 2x2x1/4 3x3x1/4 1/2" 5/8" 1/2" 5/8" 11.0 11.0 23.5 23.5 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 5.0 5.0 11.7 11.7 0.6 0.6 1.0 450 2x2x1/4 3x3x1/4 1/2" 5/8" 1/2" 5/8" 10.4-10.4, 22.2 22.2 34 34 34 3.4 4.7 4.7 11.1 11.1 0.5 0.9 0.5 0.9 2x2x1/4 3x3x1/4 1/2" 5/8" 1/2" 5/8" 9.9 9.9 21.0 21.0 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 4.5 4.5 10.5 10.5 0.4 0.8 0.4 0.8 500 2x2x1/4 3x3x1/4 1/2" 5/8" 1/2" 5/8" 9.4 9.4 19.9 19.9 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 4.3 4.3 10.0 10.0 0.3 0.7 0.3 0.7 I Attachment to the OSVS for RACE103 Prying-Action Detail Screening Criteria and Walkdown page 11 0 SCREENlNG CHART FOR FR<600 LB LOAD CASE Fn (LB)ANGLE SIZE UNISTRUT BOLT SIZE DL L2/L)lMAX)L2 llN., MAX)3DL L2/L 1 lMA X)L2 llN., MAX)2x2x1/4 3x3x1/4 1/2" 5/8" 1/2" 5/8" 8.9 8.9 19.0 19.0 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 4.1 4.1 9.5 9.5 0.3 0.6 0.3 0.6 550 2x2x1/4 3x3x1/4 1/2" 5/8" 1/2" 5/8" 8.5 8.5 18.1 18.1 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 3.9 3.9 9.1 9.1 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.5 575 2x2x1/4 3x3x1/4 1/2" 5/8" 1/2" 5/8" 8.2 8.2 17.3 17.3 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 3.7 3.7 8.7 8.7 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.4 600 2x2x1/4 3x3x1/4 1/2" 5/8" 1/2" 5/8" 7.8 7.8 16.6 16.6 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 3.6 3.6 8.3 8.3 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.4 Attachment to the OSVS for RACE103 Prying-Action Detail Screening Criteria and Wa)kdown page 12 $CREENING CHART FOR FR<700 LB LOAD CASE Fn (LB)ANGLE SIZE UNISTRUT BOLT SIZE DL I 2/L)lMAX)L2 IIN., MAX)3DL L2/L)lMAX)L2 (IN., MAX)2x2x1/4 3x3x1/4 1/2" 5/8" 1/2" 5/8" 7.5 7.5 16.0 16.0 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 3.4 3.4 8.0 8.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 650 2x2x1/4 3x3x1/4 1/2" 5/8" 1/2" 5/8" 7.2 7.2 15.3 15.3 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 3.3 3.3 7.7 7.7 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 675 2x2x1/4 3x3x1/4 1/2" 5I8" 1/2" 5/8" 6.9 6.9 14.8 14.8 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.2 3;2 7.4 7.4-0.0 0.2-0.0 0.2 700 2x2x1/4 3x3x1/4 1/2" 5/8" 1/2" 5/8" 6.7 6.7 14.2 14.2 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 3.0 3.0 7.1 7.1-0.0 0.2.-0.0 0.2 Attachment to the OSVS for RACE103 Prying-Action Detail Screening Criteria and Watkdown page 13 SCREENING CHART FOR FR<800 LB LOAD CASE Fn LB)ANGLE UNISTRUT SIZE BOLT SIZE DL~~Lp(L){MAX)Lp{IN., MAX)30L L2{IN., MAXI L2/L]{MAX) 3x3x1/4 5/8" 1/2" 5/8" 6.5 13.8 13.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 2.9 6.9 6.9 0.1 N/A 0.1 750 2x2x1/4 3x3x1/4 1/2" 5/8" 1/2" 5/8" 6.3 6.3 13.3 13.3 1.7 1.7't.7 1.7 2.8 2.8 6.7 6.7 N/A 0.1 N/A 0.1 2x2x1/4 3x3x1/4 1/2" 5/8" 1/2" 5/8" 6.1 6.1 12.9 12.9 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 2.7 2.7 6.4 6.4 N/A 0.0 N/A 0.0 800 2x2x1/4 3x3x1/4 1/2" 5/8" 1/2" 5/8" 5.9 5.9 12.5 12.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 2.?2.7 6.2 6.2 N/A 0.0 N/A 0.0 Attachment to the OSVS for RACE103 Prying-Action Detail Screening Criteria and Walkdown page 14

2.4 Anchora

e Evaluation Works eet r, vVV VVV V t Fo LI VVVVV~~Hanger Identification and Location: I/2 DR 5/d VRIvvIRVI IIVI AND DDL'I VI CIIOCDDLD VIIISIRVl L2v2vl/I VI L2I2II/O Span: Estimated load on threaded rod, FR.FSTIMATED CABLE TRAY AND CONDUIT WEIGHTS, PLF Calculations: ITEM PLF CABLE TRAYS 25 1/2 CONDUIT 1.1 3/4 CONDUIT 1.3 1" CONDUIT 2.0 1.5" CONDUIT 3.5 2 CONDUIT 4.9 3 CONDUIT 11.1 4 CONDUIT 16.6 FIELD DATA: Angle size: Lengths: L1 Unistrut Bolt Size: L2/L1 LIMITING VALUES FROM SCREENING CHART FOR FR=LB: DL CASE 3 X DL CASE (IF APPLICABLE)* Max L Actual L Max L2/L1 Actual L>/L1 Max L Actual L Max L>/L1 Actual L>/L1 PASS: YES NO PASS: YES NO PASS: YES NO PASS: YES NO*3xDL case N/A for wall mounted brackets.Attachment to the OSVS for RACE103 Prying-Action Detail Screening Criteria and Walkdown 1 page 15 I 3.Screening Walkdown Worksheets Hanger Location Worksheot¹1-092694-1 1-092694-2 1-092694-3 1-0926944 1-092694-5 1-092694-6 1-092694-7 1-092694-8 2492794-1 2492794-2 1-092794-3 1-092794<1-092794-5 2-092894-1 2-092894-2 1-092894-3 24)92894M 2-092894-5 1-0928944 1-092894-7 1%92894%1492894-9 1-092894-10 1-092894-11 2-092894-12 2-092894-13 2-092994-1 Aux1, El 596, RCT Quad 3 North Hangers 9, 10, 11 along the right wall counting from door 1-OR-AUX323. Aux1~EI 596, RCT Quad 4 Hangers 5.6, 7, 8, 9 on the left wall counting from'd'oor 1-DR-AUX329. Aux1~El 596.RCT Quad 4 Directly across the hall from penetration 1-CEPAP5 Aux1~El 596, RCT Quad 4 Adjacent to penetration 1-CEP-4P5. Aux1, El 596, RCT Quad 1 Two hangers across the hallway from penetration 1-CEP-1P5 One hanger near MCC 1-CT-BN Aux1~El 596.RCT Quad I Upper platform, 1st hanger on right facing door 1-OR-AUX467 Aux1~El 596, RCT Quad I Upper platform, first 3 hangers on loft facing door 1-OR-AUX467 Aux1~EI 596, RCT Quad 1 Upper platform, first hanger on right off the edge of the platform.Aux2, El 596, RCT Quad 3 South Near 2-VRS-2200 tUpper Cntmt RMS"B" Data Acq Module)Aux2, EI 596, RCTQuad 1 Upper platform, two hangers about 3 hangers away from Door 2-DR-AUX468. Aux1, El 609, 4kV Area Above 600V Bus IIA Aux1~El 609, Transformer Room One hanger above 1-DGTAB and one hanger at the right side of the entrance.Aux1~Auxiliary Cable Vault 15'outh of the hatch Aux2, EI 573 6'outh of gate 2-GT-AUX1013 (U2 Rx Coolant Drain Pump Room)Aux2.EI 573 South end of the hallway common to both units.Aux1, El 609, elevated area adjacent to the control room cable vault Above 12HV-ACA.FLT-3 Aux2, El 609 Near Miscellaneous Rack 2-H.H Aux2, EI.609 Above cabinet 2-BITH2 Aux1, El 612, Vestibule, upper platform loading to RCT Next to 1-DR-AUX467 Aux1.EI 612, Vestibule. upper platform leading to RCT 3rd hanger on left from the edge of the platform Aux1~El 612, Vestibule, upper platform leading to RCT 4th hanger on left from the edge of the platform Aux1~El 612, Vestibule, upper platform leading to RCT 2nd hanger on right from the edge of the platform Aux1.EI 612, Vestibule 4 hangers along the containment wall just before the upper platform leading to the RCT.Aux1~El 612, Vestibule The hanger above the west end of 1-HE-22 and the next hanger west.The two or three hangers south of these running along the block wall.Aux2, EI 612, Vestibule. upper plalform leading to RCT 4th hanger on right from the edge of the platform Aux2, EI 633 Hangers between the Containment Auxiliaries Panel and 2-MSI-1.Cont2, El 598, Annulus Several hangers near Column 1.Az 63, Quad 1 Attachment to the OSVS for RACE103 Prying-Action Detail Screening Criteria and Walkdown page 16 Ip}}