ML092440189: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML092440189
| number = ML092440189
| issue date = 08/27/2009
| issue date = 08/27/2009
| title = San Onofre, Units 2 and 3 - Transmittal of Design Report for Structural Weld Overlays on Reactor Coolant System Hot Leg Dissimilar Metal Welds
| title = Transmittal of Design Report for Structural Weld Overlays on Reactor Coolant System Hot Leg Dissimilar Metal Welds
| author name = Scherer A E
| author name = Scherer A E
| author affiliation = Southern California Edison Co
| author affiliation = Southern California Edison Co

Revision as of 16:14, 9 February 2019

Transmittal of Design Report for Structural Weld Overlays on Reactor Coolant System Hot Leg Dissimilar Metal Welds
ML092440189
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 08/27/2009
From: Scherer A E
Southern California Edison Co
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML092440189 (3)


Text

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA A. Edward Scherer Director Nuclear Regulatory Affairs An EDISON INTERNATIONAL Company August 27, 2009 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory.Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555

Subject:

Docket Nos. 50-361 and 50-362 Design Report for Structural Weld Overlays on Reactor Coolant System Hot Leg Dissimilar Metal Welds San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3

References:

1) Letter from A. E. Scherer (SCE) to the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission dated November 12, 2008;

Subject:

Docket Nos.50-361 and 50-362, Revision to Third Ten-Year Inservice Inspection (ISI) Interval Requests ISI-3-27 and ISI-3-28, Use of Structural Weld Overlay and Associated Alternative Repair Techniques, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3 (ADAMS Accession No. ML083220131)

2) Letter from M. T. Markley (NRC) to R. T. Ridenoure (SCE), dated January 23, 2009,

Subject:

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3 -RE: Relief Requests ISI-3-27, Revision 1 and ISI-3-28, Revision 1, for the Application of Weld Overlay on Dissimilar and Similar Metal Welds (TAC Nos. ME0108 and ME0109)

Dear Sir or Madam:

The Design Report for the Structural Weld Overlays for the San Onofre Units 2 and 3 Reactor Coolant System (RCS) Hot Leg Dissimilar Metal Welds is provided as an enclosure to this letter.

Southern California Edison (SCE) committed to provide this report by letter dated November 12, 2008 (Reference 1).Reference 1 requested a Revision to previously approved Third Ten-Year Inservice Inspection (ISI) Interval Relief Requests ISI-3-27 and ISI-3-28.

These relief requests supported implementation of Structural Weld Overlays on the Dissimilar Metal Welds in the San Onofre Units 2 and 3 RCS Hot Leg. During implementation of these weld overlays in the Unit 3 Cycle 15 Refueling outage, SCE discovered that the Unit 3 Hot Leg Surge Line included additional Code-allowed Weld buildup that had not been previously identified.

To resolve this, the design of the associated weld overlay was modified to increase the length of the overlay, thereby including an additional weld. The purpose of Revision 1 to ISI-3-27 and ISI-3-28 was to include this additional weld in the scope of the Relief Requests.P.O. Box 128 C 2 .San Clemente, CA 92674SOUTHERN CALIfORNIA s: EDISON A. Edward Scherer Director Nuclear Regulatory Affairs An EDISON INTERNATIONAL Company August 27, 2009 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory ,Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555

Subject:

Docket Nos. 50-361 and 50-362 Design Report for Structural Weld Overlays on Reactor Coolant System Hot Leg Dissimilar Metal Welds San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3

References:

1) Letter from A. E. Scherer (SCE) to the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission dated November 12, 200B;

Subject:

Docket Nos. 50-361 and 50-362, Revision to Third Ten-Year Inservice Inspection (lSI) Interval Requests ISI-3-27 and ISI-3-2B, Use of Structural Weld Overlay and Associated Alternative Repair Techniques, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3 (ADAMS Accession No. MLOB3220131)

2) Letter from M. T. Markley (NRC) to R. T. Ridenoure (SCE), dated January 23, 2009,

Subject:

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3 -RE: Relief Requests ISI-3-27, Revision 1 and ISI-3-2B, Revision 1, for the Application of Weld Overlay on Dissimilar and Similar Metal Welds (TAC Nos. ME010B and ME0109)

Dear Sir or Madam:

The Design Report for the Structural Weld Overlays for the San Onofre Units 2 and 3 Reactor Coolant System (RCS) Hot Leg Dissimilar Metal Welds is provided as an enclosure to this letter. Southern California Edison (SCE) committed to provide this report by letter dated November 12, 200B (Reference 1). Reference 1 requested a Revision to previously approved Third Ten-Year Inservice Inspection (lSI) Interval Relief Requests ISI-3-27 and ISI-3-2B.

These relief requests supported implementation of Structural Weld Overlays on the Dissimilar Metal Welds in the San Onofre Units 2 and 3 RCS Hot Leg. During implementation of these weld overlays in the Unit 3 Cycle 15 Refueling outage, SCE discovered that the Unit 3 Hot Leg Surge Line included additional Code-allowed Weld buildup that had not been previously identified.

To resolve this, the design of the associated weld overlay was modified to increase the length of the overlay, thereby including an additional weld. The purpose of Revision 1 to ISI-3-27 and ISI-3-2B was to include this additional weld in the scope of the Relief Requests.

P.O. Box 128 San Clemente, CA 92674 Document Control Desk August 27, 2009 Due to the emergent nature of the overlay design modification, a complete revision to the weld overlay design analysis was not available at the time of submittal of Reference 1. In support of Reference 1, the ASME Section III and Fatigue Crack Growth calculations were reviewed and compared against the geometry of the modified weld overlay. It was conservatively concluded that the previous analysis would remain valid for the modified geometry, and the modified weld overlay configuration would be acceptable for a minimum of one cycle.The final analysis has now been completed and the summary is included in the enclosed Design Report. Table 5-1 of this report shows the actual limiting crack growth results for each of the nozzles repaired.Revision 1 to ISI-3-27 and ISI-3-28 was approved by the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission by Reference 2 (ADAMS Accession No. ML083640375) for the duration of the third ten-year ISI interval.There are no new commitments or required actions resulting from this letter.If you have any questions regarding this information, please feel free to contact Ms.Linda T. Conklin at (949) 368-9443.Sincerely, Enclosure cc: E. E. Collins, Regional Administrator, NRC Region IVR. Hall, NRC Project Manager, San Onofre Units 2 and 3G. G. Warnick, NRC Senior Resident Inspector, San Onofre Units 2 and 3 Document Control Desk August 27, 2009 Due to the emergent nature of the overlay design modification, a complete revision to the weld overlay design analysis was not available at the time of submittal of Reference

1. In support of Reference 1, the ASME Section III and Fatigue Crack Growth calculations were reviewed and compared against the geometry of the modified weld overlay. It was conservatively concluded that the previous analysis would remain valid for the modified geometry, and the modified weld overlay configuration would be acceptable for a minimum of one cycle. The final analysis has now been completed and the summary is included in the enclosed Design Report. Table 5-1 of this report shows the actual limiting crack growth results for each of the nozzles repaired.

Revision 1 to ISI-3-27 and ISI-3-28 was approved by the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission by Reference 2 (ADAMS Accession No. ML083640375) for the duration of the third ten-year lSI interval.

There are no new commitments or required actions resulting from this letter. If you have any questions regarding this information, please feel free to contact Ms. Linda T. Conklin at (949) 368-9443.

Enclosure cc: E. E. Collins, Regional Administrator, NRC Region IV R. Hall, NRC Project Manager, San Onofre Units 2 and 3 G. G. Warnick, NRC Senior Resident Inspector, San Onofre Units 2 and 3 Enclosure Design Report forStructural Weld Overlays San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2 and 3 Reactor Coolant System Hot Leg Dissimilar Metal Welds Enclosure Design Report for Structural Weld Overlays San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2 and 3 Reactor Coolant System Hot Leg Dissimilar Metal Welds