W3P87-1030, Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept Jan-Dec 1986

Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept Jan-Dec 1986

ML20209H760
Person / Time
Site:	Waterford
Issue date:	12/31/1986
From:	Cook K LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:	NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM)
References
W3P87-1030, NUDOCS 8705040114
Download: ML20209H760 (170)

Text

.

i ,

l s

i t

t-1 4

ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT -

FOR THE LOUISIANA POWER Ei LIGHT A iN WATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNIT 3 ,

} , t JANUARY l THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1986 '? /

s Docket Number : 50-382

, License Number : NPF-38 /

f k i

r l

k

\,

. , r. '

1 '

i

%(

en e

) # g

• i 4

2 8705040114 861231 /} ) l .

PDH ADOCK 05000382 1j( 1

R PDR 1

4

_ . _ . . _ . - _ J______--.._.. . _ - . . _ _ , . _ - . _ . . . . . _ . . . _ _ - _ _ . . . _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ . _

c ABSTRACT This report is issued pursuant to Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station (SES) Technical Specification 6.9.1.7. Its purpose is to discuss the Waterford 3 SES Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP), present the results of the program for the year of 1986, and to evaluate the radiological impact on the environ-ment resulting from plant operation.

The Waterford 3 SES REMP collected data on environmental radio-activity levels arouhl the Waterford 3 SES nuclear power plant.

These levels were deth::nined by analyzing samples of air, water, shoreline soil, fish,'vagatation, and milk from various locations around the facility.

Elevated levels of reactor produced radionuclides were detected in air, milk, and vegetation samples during 1986. However, comparing results obtained from environmental samples collected at locations least likely to be affected by plant operations (control locations) .to data obtained at locations most likely to be affected by plant operations (indicator locations) it was determined that the radioactivity did not result from the operation of Waterford 3 SES. Instead, the detected radic-activity appears to have originated from the April 26, 1986 explosion and subsetjuent fire at the Chernobyl reactor located in the Soviet Union. In fact, increased levels of radioactivity due

. _ to the Chernobyl incident were reported .throughout the United

'- States by the United States Environmental Protection Agency.

Finally, based on the evaluation of the environmental data collected, it was concluded that the operation of Waterford 3 SES exhibited no discernable impact on the levels of radioactivity in the environment during 1986.

i

( ,

i j e

/ -

V f

/

f

(

', LL

< -- ----,e- - * - - --,ry - - _ _ . -o . - - , _ , _,.-,__,----,.m. - - , _ , - - - , - - , - - , . . . , , , - , ,_ _ _ _ - _ _ , - - - , - - -

r_- _ __

i J

f- <

fj * '

N K.

• i' g TABLE OF CONTENTS

% )~

PAGE

. \

ABSTRACT . . . . . . . . . . . ,,. . . . . . . . . .E. . . . 11 I

i c 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS . . . . . . . . . . .>. . . . . . .... iii

.s *

.\ '

s LIST OF TABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4. " . . . .. vi '\

i%

>T i W.

LIST OF FIGURES .' , )1, , ...

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . s. . . ix

, s q ,

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1 3

1.1 Program and Report Object /ves . . . . . . . . . . . 1 J',7 - 1.2d Plant and Site Description . . . . . . . . . . . .- 1

-s 2.0 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . .b.

.[.

. . . 3 2.1 History and Development . . . . /. . . . . . . . 3 g i

k. . i 2.2 Sample Collection and Handling Procedures,. . . . . 4 ' ,e j 2.2.1 Direct Radiation Exposure Pathway / (f

!} Sample.s . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . 1 4

2.2.2 Airborne Exposure Pathway Samples . . . . . 5 y' '/ 2.2.3 Waterborne Exposure Pathway Samples- . . . . 5 2.2.4 Ingestion Exposure Pathway Samples'. . . . . 6 2.3 Analytical Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2.4 Laboratory Quality Assurance . . . . . . . . . . . 7 J}

" 3.0 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS ~

22 a

3.1 Direct Radiation L'ip0sure Pathway . . . . . . . . . 22 3.2 Airborne Exposure Pathway . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 3.2.1 Airborne Particulates . . . . . . . . . . . 23 3.2.2 Airborne Iodine . . . . . . .N . . . . , . . . 24 3.3 Waterborne Exposure Pathway .

l

• 3.3.1 Drinking / Surface Water .

4... 25 [,'

. . . . . . . . . .. 25 3.3.2 Groundwater . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 26 3.3.3 Shoreline Soil . . . . . . . . . . ... ." ; , .= 26 +

3.4 Ingestion Exposure Pathway . . . . . . . . .... 28 .)

.f l'3.4.1 Milk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 28

/ 3.4.2 Fishs. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . ...e. .

. 29

.~.

3.4.3 Broa4l Leaf Vegetation . . .

. . ". i .

I 29 ..

3.4.4 FoodfGarden Crops . . . . . . . . . . . . . .' 30 0 3.5 Deviations from the REMP . . . . . . . . . ...# 30 3.5.1 Unavailable Samples . . . . . . . . . . . .' 30 3.5.2 Missed Lower Limits of Detection . . . . . . 31

+

3.5.3 Changes to the REMP . . . . . . q .. . . . 31 3.6 Annual Land Use Census Results . . . . . . . . . . 32 ,

i

4.0 CONCLUSION

S . . . . . . . .: . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

35 J

F b.

k t ,

t 111 i

$ g s t

a 5

1. 4

k s

TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED)

PAGE APPENDIX A REMP DATA

SUMMARY

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36

,c " APPENDIX B REMP DATA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 APPENDIX C

SUMMARY

OF UNAVAILABLE SAMPLES AND MISSED 7;X LOWER LIMITS OF DETECTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119 h APPENDIX D

SUMMARY

OF INTERLABORATORY COMPARISONS . . . . . 125 APPENDIX E SYNOPSES OF ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES . . . . . . . . 131 E-1.0 ANALYSIS OF SAMPLES FOR GROSS BETA ACTIVITY . . . 132 E-1.1 Air Particulates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132 E-1.1 Water . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132 E-2.0 ANALYSIS OF WATER SAMPLES FOR TRITIUM . . . . . . 132 E-3.0 ANALYSIS OF SAMPLES FOR IODINE-131 . . . . . . . 132 E-3.1 Milk and Water . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132 E-3.2 Broad Leaf Vegetation . . . . . . . . . . . 133 E-4.0 GAMMA SPECTROSCOPY ANALYSIS . . . . . . . . . . . 133 E-4.1 Milk and Water . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133 E-4.2 Vegetation, Food and Garden Crops, and Fish . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134 E-4.3 Soils and Sediment . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134 E-4.4 Charcoal Cartridges (Air Iodine) . . . . . . 134 E-4.5 Air Particulates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135 E-4.6 Computer Software . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135 E-5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL DOSIMETRY . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135 APPENDIX F STATISTICAL ANALYSES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136 F-1.0 CALCULATION OF MEAN AND STANDARD DEVIATION . . . 137 F-2.0 COMPARING TWO SAMPLE POPULATION MEANS . . . . . . 137 F-3.0 TLD MEASUREMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139 F-4.0 GROSS BETA ACTIVITY ON AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139 F-5.0 GROSS BETA ACTIVITY IN MONTHLY DRINKING WATER COMPOSITES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139 APPENDIX G DUPLICATE SAMPLING PROGRAM RESULTS. . . . . . . . 144 G-1.0 DUPLICATE SAMPLING PROGRAM DESCRIPTION . . . . .

145 G-2.0 RESULTS COMPARISON . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145 G-2.1 Air Samples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145

- G-2.2 Water Samples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146 G-2.3 Shoreline Soil Samples . . . . . . . . . . . 147 G-2.4 Milk Samples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147 G-2.5 Broad Leaf Vegetation Samples . . . . . . . 147 G-

3.0 CONCLUSION

S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143 iv

TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED)

PAGE APPENDIX H RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RELATED TO THE CHERNOBYL INCIDENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156 H-

1.0 INTRODUCTION

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157 H-2.0 AIR SAMPLE RESULTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157 H-3.0 MILK SAMPLE RESULTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158 H-4.0 BROAD LEAF VEGETATION SAMPLE RESULTS . . . . . . 158 3

e k

V

LIST OF TABLES PAGE TABLE 2.1 RADIOIDGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM (REMP)

SUMMARY

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 TABLE

2.2 DESCRIPTION

OF REMP SAMPLING STATION LOCATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 TABLE 2.3 DETECTION CAPABILITIES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE ANALYSIS, LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION (LLD) . . . . . . . 18 4

TABLE 3.1 1986 DIRECT RADIATION DATA ORGANIZED BY COMPASS DIRECTION AND DISTANCE FROM WATERFORD 3 SES . . . . . . 33 TABLE 3.2 1986 ANNUAL LAND USE CENSUS RESULTS . . . . . . . 34 TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 TABLE B-1 QUARTERLY TLD DOSE RATES . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 TABLE B-2 AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS AND CHARCOAL CARTRIDGES:

GROSS BETA AND IODINE-131 ANALYSES . . . . . . . . . . 46

TABLE B-3 AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS

GAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSIS ON QUARTERLY COMPOSITES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 TABLE B-4 DRINKING WATER: IODINE-131 ANALYSIS . . . . . . . 77 l TABLE B-5 DRINKING WATER: GROSS BETA AND GAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSES ON MONTHLY COMPOSITES . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 TABLE B-6 DRINKING WATER: TRITIUM ANALYSIS ON QUARTERLY COMPOSITES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 TABLE B-7 SURFACE WATER: GAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSIS ON MONTHLY COMPOSITES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 TABLE B-8 SURFACE WATER: TRITIUM ANALYSIS ON QUARTERLY COMPOSITES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 TABLE B-9 GROUNDWATER: TRITIUM AND GAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 TABLE B-10 SHORELINE SOIL: GAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSIS . . . . . 99 TABLE B-ll MILK: IODINE-131 AND GAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSES . . 102 i TABLE B-12 FISH: GAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSIS . . . . . . . . . 111 i

vi

LIST OF TABLES (CONTINUED)

PAGE TABLE B-13 BROAD LEAF VEGETATION: IODINE-131 AND GAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112 TABLE B-14 FOOD / GARDEN CROPS: IODINE-131 AND GAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . lis TABLE C-1

SUMMARY

OF UNAVAILABLE SAMPLES AND MISSED LOWER LIMITS OF DETECTION DURING THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1 TO MARCH 31, 1986 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120 TABLE C-2

SUMMARY

OF UNAVAILABLE SAMPLES AND MISSED LOWER LIMITS OF DETECTION DURING THE PERIOD OF APRIL 1 TO JUNE 30, 1986 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121 TABLE C-3

SUMMARY

OF UNAVAILABLE SAMPLES AND MISSED LOWER LIMITS OF DETECTION DURING THE PERIOD OF JULY 1 TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1986 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122 TABLE C-4

SUMMARY

OF UNAVAILABLE SAMPLES AND MISSED IDWER LIMITS OF DETECTION DURING THE PERIOD OF OCTOBER 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 1986 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123 TABLE C-5

SUMMARY

OF UNAVAILABLE TLD MEASUREMENTS FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 1986 . . . . . 124 TABLE D-1 US EPA CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM RESULTS FOR 1986 . . . 126 TABLE D-2 EIGHTH INTERNATIONAL INTERCOMPARISON OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOSIMETER RESULTS . . . . . . . . . . . . 130 TABLE F-1 STATISTICAL COMPARISON OF TLD MEASUREMENTS FROM STATIONS GROUPED BY DISTANCE FROM WATERFORD 3 SES . . . 141 TABLE F-2 STATISTICAL COMPARISON OF GROSS BETA ACTIVITY ON AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS FOR 1986 . . . . . . . . . . . 142 TABLE F-3 STATISTICAL COMPARISON OF GROSS BETA ACTIVITY IN MONTHLY DRINKING WATER COMPOSITES FOR 1986 . . . . . . 143 l TABLE G DUPLICATE SAMPLING PROGRAM RESULTS: I-131 ANALYSIS ON DRINKING / SURFACE WATER SAMPLES . . . . . .

149 TABLE G-2 DUPLICATE SAMPLING PROGRAM RESULTS: GRCSS BETA AND GAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSES ON MONTHLY DRINKING / SURFACE WATER COMPOSITES . . . . . . . . . . . 150 l

t vii l

l

LIST OF TABLES (CONTINUED)

PAGE TABLE G-3 DUPLICATE SAMPLING PROGRAM RESULTS: TRITIUM ANALYSIS ON QUARTERLY DRINKING / SURFACE WATER COMPOSITES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151 TABLE G-4 DUPLICATE SAMPLING PROGRAM RESULTS: TRITIUM AND GAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSES ON GROUNDWATER SAMPLES . . . . 152 TABLE G-5 DUPLICATE SAMPLING PROGRAM RESULTS: GAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSIS ON SHORELINE SOIL SAMPLES . . . . . . . . . . 153 TABLE G-6 DUPLICATE SAMPLING PROGRAM RESULTS: I-131 AND GAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSES ON MILK SAMPLES . . . . . . . . 154 TABLE G-7 DUPLICATE SAMPLING PROGRAM RESULTS: I-131 AND GAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSES ON BROAD LEAF VEGETATION SAMPLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155 TABLE H-1

SUMMARY

OF CHERNOBYL RELATED DATA. . . . . . . . .

159 viii

LIST OF FIGURES PAGE FIGURE 2.1 REMP SAMPLE LOCATIONS WITHIN 2 MILES OF WATERFORD 3 SES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

19 FIGURE 2.2 REMP SAMPLE LOCATIONS WITHIN 10 MILES OF WATERFORD 3 SES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 FIGURE 2.3 REMP SAMPLE LOCATIONS WITHIN 50 MILES OF WATERFORD 3 SES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 1

e i

iX i

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This report describes the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) for the Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station (SES) t nuclear power plant and discusses the results obtained during the

^

calendar year 1986. The results discussed within this report were used to evaluate the radiological environmental impact resulting from the operation of Waterford 3 SES. The submission of this report to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission fulfills the requirements pursuant to Waterford 3 SES Technical Specification 6.9.1.7.

1.1 Procram and Recort Obiectives The cverall objective of the monitoring program was to evaluace the radiological envircnmental impact of the plant. The evaluation included an assessment of actual or potential exposures of humans to radioactive materials or radiation resulting from plant operation. In order to conduct this evaluation, the data analyses and interpreta-tions contained in this report fulfilled the following i

specific objectives:

a. identify if any radioactive materials or radiation in the environment were associated with plant operation;

b. compare the results obtained during the reporting period with past operational and preoperational data, when appropriate, to identify any trends or accumulation of radioactivity in the environment;

c. estimate the maximum exposure to a member of the general public from any environmental data which indicates the presence of plant related radioac-tivity; and

d. verify compliance, when appropriate, with relevant federal requirements.

i 1.2 Plant and Site Descrirtion I

The - Louisiana Power & Light Company, Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit No. 3 employs a pressurized water reactor for the production of approximately 1153 gross (1104 i

net) megawatts of electricity. The station uses a once l through flow of water obtained from and discharged to the Mississippi River for condenser cooling. On March 4, 1985, the unit achieved initial criticality.

i.

1

Waterford 3 SES is located on the west bank of the Missis-sippi River at River Mile 129.6 between Baton Rouge and New Orleans, Louisiana. The site is in the northwestern section of St. Charles Parish approximately 3 miles southeast of the St. John the Baptist Parish boundary near the towns of Killona and Taft. The Mississippi River is the closest prominent natural feature while others include Lac des ,

Allemends, about 5.5 miles southwest of the site, and Lake '

Ponchatrain, about 7 miles northeast of the site.

Most of the man-made features are located on the narrow strip of dry land between the Mississippi River and the wet-lands. Near the Waterford SES site are several large industrial facilities, including Waterford 1 and 2 Steam Electric Stations (0.4 miles northwest of the site) , Little Gypsy Steam Electric Station (0.8 miles north northwest of the site, across the river from Waterford 3 SES), Beker Industries, a fertilizer manufacturer (0.6 miles east southeast), Occidental Chemical Company (0.8 miles east southeast), and Union Carbide, a chemical manufacturer (1.2 miles east southeast). Louisiana Power & Light Company owns and operates the above mentioned steam electric stations. .

Major urban centers in the region of the site i.aclude New Orleans (approximately 25 miles east of the site) and Baton Rouge (approximately 50 miles west northwest) . Communities in St. Charles Parish near the site include Killona (0.9 miles west northwest), Montz (1.0 miles north) , Norco (1.9 miles east), Hahnville (3.7 miles east southeast), and Destrehan (6.3 miles east southeast). Laplace (4.7 miles north) is located in St. John the Baptist Parish.

I l

l 2

l l

2.0 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION A general summary of the REMP is given in Table 2.1. Brief descriptions of the sampling stations and their locations are given in Table 2.2. The locations of the sampling stations with i

respect to the Waterford 3 SES site are illustrated in Figures 2.1 through 2.3.- A more detailed description of the overall REMP is discussed in the following chapter.

2.1 History and DeveloDment

, The Waterford 3 SES REMP was initiated in April of 1983.

The program evolved from the Preoperational Environmental Radiological Surveillance (PERS) Program which was conducted from 1978 through 1982. The equipment, procedures, tech-4 niques, and many of the same sampling locations used during the preoperational survey were incorporated into the operational program. The environmental data collected during the first two years of the REMP (1983 and 1984), when Waterford 3 SES had not yet achieved initial criticality, were used to supplement the baseline data obtained during the PERS Program.

LP&L personnel were responsible for the proper implementa-

tion of the REMP and insuring that the program complied with federal regulatory requirements and Technical Specification requirements. Specific responsibilities of LP&L personnel included collecting (with the exception of fish samples),

preparing, and shipping of environmental samples; conducting environmental dosimetry measurements; reviewing analytical results reports; and preparing and submitting the Annual i Radiological Environmental Operating Report as well as any l other relevant report to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

A contract laboratory was responsible for performing radiological analyses; conducting the initial data review; preparing reports containing the results; and overseeing laboratory quality assurance and control. Teledyne Iso-

topes, Inc., located in Westwood, NJ, was the contract laboratory used since the REMP began in 1983. At the end of the first quarter in 1986, LP&L changed contract labora-tories to the Technical Services Department of Arkansas i Power & Light (AP&L) located in Little Rock, AR. During the I first quarter of 1986, a duplicate environnental sampling and analysis program was conducted to compara results from both laboratories to determine if any statistical bias or

, analytical discrepancies existed prior to changing. A dis-cussion on the duplicate program is included in Appendix G.

Overall, no major bias or discrepancies were observed. Two

separate contractors, Dames and Moore, and the Fisheries  ;

! Co-operative Extension Service of Louisiana State University 1

{

3

were responsible for the collection, and delivery to LP&L, of fish samples.

4 2.2 Samole Collection and Handlina Procedures

The types of samples collected, the analyses performed, the 1 sample collection frequencies, and the location of the )

sampling stations have been summarized in Tables 2.1 and '

2.2. The information contained in these tables is based on )

the requirements specified in Table 3.12-1 of Waterford 3 ,

SES Technical Specification 3.12.1. The locations of the l sampling stations with respect to the Waterford . 3 SES site are illustrated in Figures 2.1 through 2.3. Any deviations from the REMP (i.e., unavailable samples and missed lower limits of detection) observed during 1986 are discussed in )

, Section 3.5. Changes made to the REMP during 1986 as a result of the annual land use census are also' discussed in ,

Section 3.5.

]

The environmental samples collected were classified into l four general categories according to exposure pathwaysi: '

direct radiation, airborne, waterborne, and ingestion. The collection and handling procedures used to obtain these

samples are described in the following sections. The

! descriptions are intended to provide a concise overview of j what was done rather than to be step-by-step procedures.

2.2.1 Direct Radiation Exuosure Pathway Samoles Integrated external gamma exposures were determined

using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). Multi-ele-ment TLDs manufactured by Panasonic were placed at thirty-one locations as follows

a. an inner ring of stations, one in each of the sixteen meteorological sectors in the general area of the site boundary,

b. an outer ring of stations, one in ten of the meteorological sectors in the six to eight

- kilometer range from the site, and i

i c. the balance placed in areas of special l interest (e.g., population centers, schools,

etc.) with one area serving as a control.

I j The TLDs were exchanged and analyzed quarterly by LP&L j personnel.

i 4

h 2.2.2 Airborne Excosure Pathway Samoles Samples of airborne particulates end radioiodines were collected at five locations. The locations included  ;

four indicator stations (APP-1, APQ-1, APG-1, APC-1) i and one control station (APE-30). The samples were I collected using low-volume air sampling devices. The l devices were designed to sample air on a continuous basis and record the volume of air sampled. The pump and metering device were housed inside a weatherproof shelter.

j Airborne particulate samples were obtained by passing air through a particulate filter using the device described above. The filters were collected weekly by LP&L personnel and sent to the contract laboratory (Teledyne for the first quarter of 1986 and AP&L for the remainder of the year) for gross beta analysis.

These filters were composited by the contract labora-1 tory on a quarterly basis for analysis by gamma spectroscopy.

Airborne iodine sampling was done in conjunction with air particulate sampling. After the air passed through the particulate filter, it was passed through a charcoal cartridge to collect airborne iodine. The cartridges were collected weekly by LP&L personnel and sent to the contract laboratory (Teledyne Isotopes for

the first quarter of 1986 and APEL for the remainder of i the year) for iodine-131 analysis by gamma spectros-i copy.

2.2.3 Waterborne Exnosure Pathway Samoles The Mississippi River is the major source of drinking water in the vicinity of Waterford 3 SES and it is also i'

the surface water into which the plant discharges.

Therefore, water samples taken from the Mississippi 6

River were designated as both drinking water and surface water camples.

_ composite drinking / surface water samples were obtained

from the Mississippi River using automatic composite i samplers placed at one upstream (DWP-7) and two i

downstream (DWG-2, DWE-5) locations from the plant.

These composite water samples were collected biweekly by LP&L personnel. LP&L personnel acidified samples sent to AP&L with hydrochloric acid prior to shipment.

Samples sent to Teledyne Isotopes were acidified with hydrochloric acid and, in addition, had sodium bi-sulfite added (to prevent protein binding of iodine)

I l

l 5 l

l prior to shipment. The contract laboratories analyzed the biweekly samples for iodine-131. The biweekly samples were composited on a monthly basis by the contract laboratories for gross beta and gamma spec-

] troscopy analyses. The samples were also composited on a quarterly basis for tritium analysis.

i Due to the high water . table resulting from shallow aquifers in the vicinity of the site, groundwater discharge could be sampled from a drainage canal.

Groundwater samples were obtained quarterly by LP&L

, personnel from one sampling location (GWJ-1) using a i grab sampling technique. Samples sent to AP&L were acidified with hydrochloric acid prior to shipment.

Samples sent to Teledyne Isotopes were acidified with i hydrochloric acid and had sodium bisulfits added prior to sh.pment. The groundwater samples underwent tritium and gamma spectroscopy analyses.

Shoreline soil samples were obtained semi-annually from l two sampling locations by LP&L personnel. One station was located on the shoreline of the Mississippi River (SHWE-3) and the other was located on the shoreline o'f the 40-Arpent canal (SHWJ-1). The samples collected were shipped to the contract laboratories without further processing.

l '

2.2.4 Incestion Excosure Pathway Samnles

Milk samples were collected semi-monthly by LP&L

. personnel. Control samples for the first half of 1986 i were obtained through Louisiana Nuclear Energy Division personnel from the Louisiana State University Depart-ment of Agriculture (MKQ-50) located in Baton Rouge, i

LA. The control location was relocated during the second half of 1986 in order to obtain milk samples from cows that spent a larger portion of the year grazing on pasture. The new control station (MKQ-45) was located in Denham Springs, LA, approximately 42 miles northwest of Waterford 3 SES. Indicator samples

were collected locally from one station (MKQ-5).

Although two additional indicator locations were

! _ identified (MKQ-1 and MKE-4), no samples were available

from these locations during 1986 (see Section 3.5).

LP&L personnel, prior to shipment, added sodium

,' bisulfite (to inhibit the protein binding of iodine-131) to the milk samples sent to Teledyne

!. Isotopes for iodine-131 and gamma spectroscopy analy-ses. LP&L personnel, prior to shipment, added formalin l to those samples sent to AP&L for analysis.

I I

_ _ _ . _ _ . . _ . _ _ , , - _ _ _ _ . - ~

Fish samples were collected upstream (FH-1) and downstream (FH-2) from the plant by a contractor. The fish were obtained by netting. Tne contractor seg-regated the samples by species and location sampled prior to delivery to LP&L. The samples were shipped frozen to AP&L for analysis by gamma spectroscopy.

LP&L personnel collected broad leaf vegetation samples monthly by obtaining cuttings taken at least one inch above the ground. Samples were collected from two indicator locations (BLB-1, BLQ-1) and from one control locaticn (BLK-15). The samples were shipped to the contract laboratories without further processing.

A food / garden crop sample (soybeans) was collected by LP&L personnel from one location (FPP-1). The sample was collected by normal harvesting techniques at the time of harvest. The sample was sent to AP&L without l further processing for iodine-131 and gamma spec- l troscopy analyses.

2.3 Analvtical Procedures Brief synopses of the analytical procedures used by Teledyne Isotopes, AP&L, and LP&L are given in Appendix E. These synopses are intended to provide an overview of what was done rather than to be step-by-step procedures.

The minimum sensitivities for the analytical procedures used in the REMP are reflected by the Lower Limits of Detection (LLD) values presented in Table 2.3. These values are the same as the ones given in Table 4.12-1 of Waterford 3 SES Technical Specification 4,12.1. The LLD's are 'a nriori estimates based on assumed sample volumes, counting times, detector efficiencies, etc. These values reflect the lower levels of detection that were to be attained for the majority of the analyses performed. Deviations from the assumptions used in calculating these estimates (i.e.,

different sample volumes, counting times, etc.) may cause some actual values to be higher than the ones given in Table 2.3. All analyses that could not achieve these lower limits of detection are discussed in Section 3.5.

2.4 Laboratory Ouality Assurance Both Teledyne Isotopes and AP&L performed a variety of quality assurance analyses. Spiked and blank samples prepared in-house as well as and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) reference samples were analyzed. It was 7

estimated that at each laboratory, between 5% and 10% of all analyses were for quality assurance purposes.

AP&L also participated in the EPA radiological inter-laboratory comparison (cross-check) program. Participation in this program involved a number of analyses on various sample media typically found in REMP's. As a result of participation in the program, an objective measure of analytical precision, accuracy, and an estimation of bias were obtained. In the event that any results obtained by AP&L were not within control limits, as specified by the EPA, an investigation was conducted to determine the cause and corrective action was taken to prevent a recurrence.

Appendix D lists the 1986 results of AP&L's participation in the cross-check program.

During 1985 and 1986, LP&L participated in the Eighth and Ninth International Environmental Dosimeter Intercomparison Project sponsored jointly by the Department of Energy, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and the Environmental Protection Agency. Results of LP&L's participation in the eighth intercomparison study are summarized in Appendix D.

Results for the ninth intercomparison study were not available at the time of this report and will be included in the 1987 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report.

i j

l 4 l

~

i i

1 i

j i

8

TABLE 2.1 RADIOIDGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL g TORING PROGRAM (REMP)

SUMMARY

SAMPLE TYPE i LOCATION ANALYSIS FREQUENCY Direct A-2, B-1, C-1, D-2, E-1, TLD ganuna Quarterly Radiation F-2, G-2, H-2, J-2, K-1, L-1, M-1, N-1, P-1, Q-1, R-1, A-5, B-4, D-5, E-5, F-4, G-4, H-6, P-6, Q-5, R-6, F-9, G-9, E-15, J-15, E-30 Radioiodine and APP-1, APQ-1, APG-1, Gross beta, I-131 Weekly Particulates APC-1, APE-30 $ isotopic Quarterly composite Drinking Water DWG-2, DWE-5, DWP-7 H-3 Quarterly composite Gross beta, T iso *.opic Monthly composite I-131 Bi-weekly composite Surface Water SWG-2, SWE-5, SWP-7 H-3 Quarterly composite

1. isotopic Monthly composite Ground Water GWJ-1 I isotopic, H-3 Quarterly Shoreline Sediment SHWE-3, SHWJ-1 i isotopic Semi-annually Milk MKE-4, MKQ-5, MKQ-45 3 isotopic, I-131 Semi-monthly / monthly MKQ-50, MKQ-1 Fish FH-1, FH-2 I isotopic In season or semi-annually Food Products FPP-1 I isotopic At harvast time Broad Ioaf BIQ-1, BLB-1, BLK-15 I isotopic, I-131 Monthly

. When milk samples not collected

a. Based on requirements specified in Table 3.12-1 of Waterford 3 SES Technical Specification 3.12.1.

b. Drinking and surface water samples are identical.

TABLE

2.2 DESCRIPTION

OF REMP SAMPLING STATION LOCATIONS IDCATION LOCATION MILES FROM SECTOR NUMBER DESCRIPTION PLANT DIRECTION-DIRECT RADIATION (TLD)

A-2 (Eastbank) On fence enclosure 1.1 N surrounding water tower west of Little Gypsy opposite Etienne St.

Access from River Road (LA 628).

The TLD's are located on the (S) fence opposite the entrance gate to the water tower.

B-1 (Eastbank) On fence enclosing the 0.8 NNE .

transmission tower 0.3 miles west (up-river) from Little Gypsy.

Access from River Road (LA 628).

TLD's are located at SW corner of fence enclosure.

C-1 (Eastbank) On fence enclosing the 0.8 NE Littly Gypsy cooling water Intake..

Access is from River Road (LA 628) across from Little Gypsy Power Station entrance. TLD's are on the south side (inside) of the Cooling Water Intake fence enclosure, directly opposite the entrance gate.

D-2 (Eastbank) Located at USGS Witness 1.1 ENE Post Survey Marker approximately 0.3 miles east of Little Gypsy Power Station. Access from River Road (LA 628) near the west end of the Bonne Carre Spillway. TLD's are on the back of the Survey Marker Sign (located on levee).

E-1 (Westbank) Located on utility pole 0.2 E along River Road (LA 18) approxi-mately 0.3 miles east of Waterford 3 plant entrance. Access from LA

18. TLD's are on the third utility pole east of the construction entrance road.

10

. TABLE 2.2 1

(CONTINUED) i IOCATION LOCATION MILES FROM SECTOR NUMBER DESCRIPTION PLANT DIRECTION F (Westbank) Located on fence 1.1 ESE enclosure surrounding the LPGL substation on LA 3142. Access

, from LA 3142 approxiastely 0.2 miles south of LA 18. TLD's are i

on the southeast corner of the fence enclosure.

G-2 (Westbank) Iocated on utility pole 1.2 SE on East side of LA 3142 near Witco entrance gate (Next to Union Carbide .

Star Plant Gate 3). Access from LA 3142 approximately 0.2 miles north of railroad overpass.

H-2 (Westbank) Located on fence 1.2 SSE enclosure to shell road off of LA I 3142. Access from LA 3142 south of railroad overpass on east side of LA 3142. TLD's are on the south side of the gate for shell road. (Just south of Texaco pipeline station)

J-2 (Westbank) Incated on northeast 1.3 S corner of fence enclosing Texaco valve station south of LA 3127.

Access from LA 3127, approximately

, 0.6 miles west of LA 3127/3142 intersection.

K-1 (Westbank) Incated behind " Private 1.0 SSW Road" sign at Gate 8 entrance off of LA 3127. Access from LA 3127, I approximately 1.3 miles west of

, LA 3127/3142 intersection. (Gate j 8 is the access to the Waterford 3 switchyard station)

) L-1 (Westbank) Iocated behind " Private 1.0 SW Road" sign at LP&L Gate 9 entrance off of LA 3127, approximately 1.6 i miles west of LA 3127/3142 inter-section. (Gate 9 is an access road for Waterford 3)

I 11 i

l

TABLE 2.2 (CONTINUED)

J IDCATION LOCATION MILES FROM SECTOR NUMBER DESCRIPTION PLANT DIRECTION M-1 (Westbank) Iocated on south gate 0.7 WSW into the Waterford 1 and 2 fuel oil storage tank enclosure.

Access is either thru LP&L Gate 8, Gate 9 off of LA 3127, the shell access road from LA 18 between Waterford 3, or thru the Waterford 1 and 2 access road.

N-1 (Westbank) Incated behind the "No 0.9 W Trespassing" sign off of Short Street, in Killona, just south of the entrance to Killona Elementary School. .

P-1 (Westbank) Incated on Short Street, 0.8 WNW in Killona. TLD is on fence at air sample station APP-1.

t Q-1 (Westbank) Located on fence 0.8 NW enclosing air sample station approximately 0.5 miles west of Waterford 1 and 2 on River Road (LA 18).

R-1 (Westbank) Incated on fence 0.5 NNW

enclosure for Waterford 1 and 2 Cooling Water Intake Structure.

Access is from River Road (LA 18) opposite Waterford 1 a.nd 2.

TLD's are on the southwest corner of fence.

A-5 (Eastbank) Incated on utility 4.5 N pole just east of the Shady Nook Trailer Park on Hwy 61 in Laplace.

TLD's are on second utility pole east of trailer park on north side of Hwy 61 (eastern end of Laplace) .

B-4 (Eastbank) Incated on utility pole 3.8 NNE just east of shell access road to South Central Bell transmission tower on south side of Hwy 61.

Transmission tower is just east of j Weigh Station at St. John /St. Charles Parish line. TLD's are on the first l

utility pole east of access road.

j 12

- r- - - -.,._...,,,-,e-n--,_--m-~.,n,.-- . , , - . , --, --,,-,,- n n.,.,m _.,.__n-, ,n.,. ,, .--.,,,,,.n,,--n-., ,,n.-n -

TABLE 2.2 (CONTINUED)

LOCATION LOCATION MILES FROM SECTOR NUMBER DESCRIPTION PLANT DIRECTION D-5 (Eastbank) Located on fence gate 4.2 ENE on shell access road to Big 3 Chemical Plant. Shell access road is approximately 0.1 miles west of Hwy 61/48 intersection (at black and yellow gate). TLD's are on fence gate 0.1 adles north on shell access road from Hwy 61.

E-5 (Eastbank) Located on the Norco 4.2 E Substation fence enclosure. -

Access from River Road (LA 48) onto Wesco St. (adjacent to Norco Shell Chemical Plant), take Wesco St. to the dead end. TLD's are located on sixth fence post south of the north substation gate.

F-4 (Westbank) Located on utility pole 3.5 ESE behind blonde brick house on Aquarius St. in Hahnville. Access from River Road (LA 18) and turn onto Oak St. Follow Oak St. to Hickory St., turn right on Hickory St. and follow to Aquarius St. and turn left. Blonde brick house is second house on right (west) side of Aquarius St. heading south.

G-4 (Westbaak) Located on railroad sign 3.2 SE northwest side of LA 3160/ railroad track intersection. Access from

_ either LA 3127 or River Road (LA 18) onto LA 3160.

H-6 (Westbank) Located on a construction 5.7 SSE sign on the southwest side of the second canal bridge east of LA 3160 along LA 3127.

P-6 (Westbank) Located on utility pole 5.5 WNW at southwest corner of LA 640/

railroad track intersection.

Utility pole is just west of LA 640 and east of radio transmission tower.

13

TABLE 2.2 (CONTINUED)

LOCATION LOCATION MILES FROM SECTOR NUMBER DESCRIPTION PLANT DIRECTION Q-5 (Westbank) Located on post of fence 5.0 NW surrounding (green) river marker on levee just east of Edgard.

Fence post is located along River Road (LA 18) across from the Webre's house.

R-6 (Eastbank) Located on fence 5.3 NNW enclosing LP&L Laydown Yard on LA 3223 in Laplace. Access from Hwy 61 onto Ebn St. (LA 3223), .

take Elm St. to the northeast corner of LA 3223/ railroad intersection. TLD's are located on the southeast corner of fence enclosure.

F-9 (Eastbank) Located on entrance 8.2 ESE gate to Destrehan Substation Access from River Road (LA 48),

approximately 0.3 miles east of Luling-Destrehan Ferry, onto Destrehan Road (west of Bunge Corp. Grain Elevator), and proceed to substation gate.

G-9 (Westbank) Located on back fence 8.1 SE of LP&L District Office in Luling.

Access via Ellington St. from either River Road (LA 18); or Second or Third St. from Paul Mallard Rd. (LA 52) to Ellington St.

E-15 (Eastbank) Located on Kenner 11.8 E Substation fence enclosure.

Access from either River Road (LA 48) or Hwy 61, turn onto Alliance Ave. TLD's are located on the north side of the fence enclosure, near a light pole.

14

TABLE 2.2 (CONTINUED)

LOCATION LOCATION MILES FROM SECTOR NUMBER DESCRIPTION PLANT DIRECTION J-15 (Westbank) Located on fence 12.0 S enclosure surrounding LP&L switchyard at LA 631/ Hwy 90 intersection in Des Allemands.

TLD's are on the northwest corner of fence. Access from LA 631 via shell road.

E-30* (Westbank) Iccated on fence at 27.0 E LP&L General Office on Delaronde St. in Algiers. TLD's are on ,

the fence, facing the Mississippi River, in the passageway to the transformer shop.

AIRBORNE APP-1 (Westbank) Incated in soybean 0.8 WNW field at northwest corner of Short St. in Killona.

APQ-1 (Westbank) Located at northwest 0.8 NW corner of soybean field on east side of Killona. Access from River Road (LA 18) approximately 0.6 miles east of LA 18/3141 intersection.

APG-1 (Westbank) Incated at the north 0.5 SE side of the Secondary Meteorology Tower.

APC-1 (Eastbank) Incated inside the 0.8 NE Little Gypsy Cooling Water Intake Structure fence enclosure.

APE-30* (Westbank) Located on the roof of 27.0 E the LP&L General Office building on Delaronde St. in Algiers.

WATERBORNE DWG-2 (Westbank) Incated at the Union 2.0 ESE SWG-2 Carbide drinking water canal.

Access from LA 3142 through Gate 28.

15

l 1

TABLE 2.2 (CONTINUED)

IDCATION LOCATION MILES F 10M SECTOR NUMBER DESCRIPTION PLANT DIRECTION DWE-5 (Eastbank) Incated at the 4.5 E SWE-5 St. Charles Parish 5.aterworks off of River Road (LA 48) near New Sarpy.

DWP-7* (Westbank) Located at the St. 6.5 NW SWP-7* John Parish Waterworks off of LA 18 in Edgard.

i SHWE-3 (Westbank) Located at the Foot 3.0 E Ferry Landing off of LA 18 in .

Taft.

SHWJ-1 (Westbank) Incated at the 40 Arpent 1.0 S Canal south of the Plant. Access from LA 3127 through Gate 8.

GWJ-1 (Westbank) Located at 40 Arpent 0.3 S Canal south of the plant. Access from LA 3127 through LP&L Gate 8.

The canal is northwest of the shell access road / railroad track intersection.

INCESTION MILK MKE-4 (Westbank) Incated 0.8 miles west 4.0 E of the Time Saver in Hahnville off of River Road.

MKQ-1 ~

(Westbank) 1.0 miles west of 1.0 NW Waterford 3 at the corner of River Road and Post Street in Killona.

MKQ-5 (Westbank) Located at the Webre's 5.0 NW house, just across LA 18 from river marker, at the eastern end of Edgard.

MKQ-45* (Eastbank) Incated off of I-12 in 42 NW Denham Springs, take LA 3002 south to LA 1034, then right to LA 1032, then left. Farm 1 mile on right.

16

TABLE 2.2 (CONTINUED)

LOCATION LOCATION MILES FROM SECTOR NUMBER DESCRIPTION PLANT DIRECTION MKQ-50* (Eastbank) Incated at LSU Dairy 52 NW in Baton Rouge.

FISH FH-l* Upstream of the plant intake NA NA

, structure.

FH-2 Downstream of the plant intake NA NA structure.

BROAD LEAF BIQ-1 (Westbank) Incated between LA 18 0.8 NW and soybean field on eastern edge of Killona, near air sample station APQ-1.

BLB-1 (Eastbank) Incated at wooded area 0.8 NNE at the southwestern corner of the LP&L Little Gypsy plant along River Road.

BLK-15* (Westbank) Incated 3.5 miles SSW 15 SSW of Des Allemands on Hwy. 90.

FOOD PRODUCTS FPP-1 (Westbank) Located in soybean 0.8 WNW field on eastern edge of Killona, between air sample station APP-1 and APQ-1.

• DENOTES CONTROL LOCATION NA - NOT APPLICABLE 17

_ - . _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ - _ _ . _ _ - , . - - . . . _ _ - , _ = - _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ _ - _ - _ - _ - -

. - - - _ - _ _ - _ _ - _ - - - _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ - = . __.

TABLE 2.3

' DETECTION CAPABILITIES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION (LLD)

• WATER AIRBORNE PARTICULATE FISH MILK FOOD PRODUCTS (b) SEDIMENT ANALYSIS (pC1/1) OR CAS (pCi/m3 ) (pCi/kg-wet) (pCi/1) (pCi/kg-wet) (pCi/kg-dry) gross beta 4 0.01

• H-3 2000 Mn-54 15 130 Fe-59 30 260 co-58, 60 15 130 l

Zn-65 30 260 Zr-Nb-95 15 I-131 1 0.07 1 60 0.05 130 15 60 150 Cs-134 15 150 18 80 180 Cs-137 18 0.06 Ba-La-140 15 15

a. From Table 4.12-1 of Waterford 3 SES Technical Specification 12.4.1.

b. Applicable to broad leaf vegetation.

1 j'

jd I

I

' 7 *#. / .

i t -

p

/ o' j/

I

.ge - -

~.- , , , ,

gj l' R B j f

• A O' R f a, F.

s 1 l> I N

.i N u. Il D g

P s , y; '

stLLOpea 4 apg , f(

{ A / Hwy 4g N iPpg  :% -

FH 2 as  %

N .,

' = = ;- _ . _

l APG I Hwy 13 j

• w Jt ',

yary j '

F K5 [

=.**

M i.

?.?E J: G d 4

L

! HANNViLLc I

' 2" H i . . = K p1

1. .o AP Att P4AflCUL ATE ,400thf J Os Omisemisse WATER

%gp f

8W GAOuts0 WATER

(' FP FOOD Pet 00uCTS

' SW SURFACE WATER FM FISas l SL BROAO LE4F WESET ATION i

LOUISI A NA riaune eowca a tiswr ca. REMP SAMPLE LOC ATION S J 2.1

• gy,*j;'se*E .," WIT HIN 2 MILES OF WATERFORD 3 l O DC he

I 1

)

i i I 5 semi l svao-

]

A /

\

\ L*"I a -so PONTCH ART RAsti o c j

a

._WOS'

\ 3 \ L Act

\

\

j .T. 4 "*

j \

I * \

vttf utSE g e ,c .__ c _ s e -; D  %-

i s .

I

?\ H l

\ EIE888"" ,, s ...

' M 4 i

W

^

od r" - i t

! m i ,C M q' g E

~ * *F

- T T ,

/

-s - _1

~ r = .T - -

x =-

. ~ -

j l .

LAC DES AkgEMA86DS \ I s

s g,

% _'d* '

' 'l . 3

~" -

[' 'g =,T i:ya l

~ s . ' ~

\\

L"-

. ^

\

vLo 1 .. m.  % \s j s m - sco ""' K H -

O

,,f -

o on un.aae .Ana -

L '

sw FP sunFacs marta FOOD Pn000 CTS -

TJ l N e j

BL BRDAD LE AF w(GETATeoss , j

}

! "'"at Lou * *" * . 'REMP ' SAM PLE LOCATIONS power 8 LIGHT CO 2.2

]

4 .. . ... . s i. . . WITHIN 10 MILES OF WATERFORD 3 Ew. si.....

)

=. .

.. - - ~ , .

l - . _n.

w

~

, P I k m

.x ..

[

3 - EAST f l WASHANGTOH

\ -

h

1. FELICIANA 6 i-

[

ST at'Ea^ i

{

_2.. g nig V~

$ e EAsf __ __ _ ygnogy 4 h - I f i SATON ) } #

s' ,

ROUGE k 4, e ne4ANY #,#

3 l A as a f

- uFw ;mo o i. i- , i 1 --- 7 N. *.-

,5gp j* .

! hw BAT MKQ-4) NGSTON -

~

l i

(g s t

, j s s - TLo

' Y ~

Ua Paniscut ATE ,000mE i ~

eumsame ;5ik y _4d5 ~~==

""*)

+

l p

• r^ ac a L

_9 '-

gmj eE= m E 5 istag

, [=_E_E - == fair _- [ ' ,

-a==

n __

n_ esta A -

t. .

-a

~

• "=~

.. ,w ~-3 "IASN (STJA i g tr -- 'E er a s , --

y e .-

3:

'  % j LA 00 gg ST ,/

l 1 A

/

f massans a swa O

I

$7 AdAR l/ i apMg3 \g\ uses emmes

,,g ,ongg sr JAnets ===. ==am

~-

5_ A

- ggA _-

. a===g=m L N~ -

l y \ - - - - -- -

Q i

=

- a_7 D K H s==n-W_ . - N-

) _

r--

-='* a k 3 l

== *-= = _ - P -- !" _E*_1 -

,, .m ,

j

/ =_

j- =..se

_ ____ _ _ _ -,. =-___=d _ w r

~ = vi~uggue

= - _ _ _ _ _ .w A =-. . _ _ _

l LOutSIANA FIGURE i rowa a (KaiT c. REMP SAMPLE LOC ATION S l *^#, M ,l' % WITHIN 50 MILES OF WATERFORD 3 2.3

)

s g ,,

3.0DISCUSSkdNOF.RESULTS

/ ;4 f

Analytical results for 1986 are discussed in this secticn by exposure @athway, type of sample, and analysis performed. The analytical results of the REMP are summarized in Appendix A.

Since contract laboratories were not officially changed until after the first quarter of 1986, the information summarized in Appendix A was comprised of results ebtained from both Teledyne Isotopes (for the first quarter of 1986) and AP&L (for the remaining quarters of 1986). The results and data for the individual analyses from both laboratories are presented in the tables of Appendix B. A comparison of the Insults obtained from both laboratories analyzing duplicate samples is presented in Appendix G. All of the results discussed in this section and summarized in the appendices of this report focus only on man-made radioactivity and do not address any naturally occurring radioactivity that might have been detected.

During May and Jurie of 1986, reactor produced radioactivity was detected in various environmental media obtained from control and indicator locations monitoring the airborne exposure pathway around Waterford 3 SES. The detaction of this radioactivity and an overall increase in airborne radioactivity levels followed the April 26, 1986, explosion and subsequent fire at the Chernobyl reactor located. in the Soviet Union. Comparing the levels of radioactivity ' detected in environmental samples collected at control and ini'cator locaticns surrounding Waterford 3 SES suggested that the radioactivity did not result from plant operation. Instead,, the evidence indicated that the radio-activity originated'from the Chernobyl incident. In fact, increased levels of airmorne radioactivity were reported through-out the United States by the United States Environmental Protec-tion ' Agency (Environmental Radiation Data Report 46, EPA 520/5-07-004, September.1986). Increased levels,of radioactivity (in precipitation) were first detected by the EPA monitoring network on May 4, 1986, at Portland, OR. A brief summary and discussion of the Chernobyl data collected are presented in Appendix H.

i l

3.1 Direct Radiation Excosure Pathway l The average dose rates on both control and indicator Thermo-luminescent Dosimeters (TLDs) were 14, 12, 14, and 15 mram per standard quarter (90 days) for the first, second, third, and fourth quarters of 1986, respectively. The average of 115 TLD dose rates for all of the indicator locations was 14 mren/ standard quarter compared to 18 mram/ standard quarter for the average of four TLD dose rates at the control loca-tion. The lowest and highest individual dose rates were 6 and 30 mram per standard quarter for all locations. During the previous year, 1985, the average indicator and control 22

i t

dose rates observed were slightly higher at 17 and 21 ,

aren/ standard quarter, respectively. During 1983 and 1984,

, prior to plant operation, the average indicator and control dose rates were both 14 aren/ standard quarter.

i Table 3.1 compares the TLD results by direction and distance from the facility. The average dose rate from TLD's located l l within two miles from the plant was statistically lower than ,

the average dose rate from stations located more than five i miles away from the plant using the standard "t" test (see Appendix F) . The average dose rate from TLD's located between two and five miles away from the plant was statisti- ,

cally the same as the average dose rate from stations located more than five miles away from the plant. There-fore, Waterford 3 SES operation did not have a detectable impact on direct radiation exposures from gamma radiation.

3.2 Airborne Ernosure Pathway '

3.2.1 Airborne Particulates ,

The weekly gross beta activity ranged from 0.011 to 0.128 pCi/ cubic meter with an average of 0.027 pCi/ cubic meter for 245 measurements from all five sampling locations. The average weekly gross beta activity for the control location, APE-30, was the same as the average weekly activity for all four indicator locations (APP-1, APQ-1, APG-1, APC-1). In addition, the control station average of weekly gross beta

measurements was statistically the same as the average from each separate indicator station using the standard "t" test (see Appendix F). i During the period following the Chernobyl incident, j.

from May 5 to June 30, 1986, the weekly gross beta activity on the particulate filters from the control and indicator stations increased correspondingly. The average waakly activities at the control and indicator stations for this period were 0.077 and 0.071 pCi/ cubic meter, respectively (see Appendix H) . These results indicate that no influence from plant operation was discernable during this period. Furthermore, the

_ increased gross beta activity observed during this period correlated to historical increases observed in the preoperational monitoring program during periods l following atmospheric weapons testing.

I i Gross beta activity results observed prior to and after I

the period influenced by the Chernobyl incident are consistent with those observed prior to plant opera-tion. During the periods not influenced by the j Chernobyl incident, the average weekly gross beta 1

23 l

activities from the control and indicator stations were 0.020 and 0.021 pci/ cubic meter, respectively. During the preoperational survey, in periods not significantly influenced by nuclear weapons detonations, the weekly .

gross beta activity ranged between 0.02 and 0.04 pCi/ cubic meter. During the first two years of the REMP prior to Waterford 3 SES operation, the average weekly gross beta activity for all stations was 0.021 i pCi/ cubic :neter with a range of 0.006 to 0.05 pCi/ cubic meter.

Gamma spectroscopy results indicated detectable levels of man-made radionuclides in the composite filter samples obtained from both indicator and control stations for the second quarter 1986. No man-made radionuclides were detected above their respective lower limits of detection during the other quarters of 1986. The radionuclides detected during the second quarter included ruthenium-103, cesium-134, and cesium-137 at average quarterly concentrations for all sampling locations of 0.005, 0.004, and 0,006 pCi/ cubic meter, respectively. The average concentrations of ruthenium-103, cesium-134, and cesium-137 observed a't

~

the control location during the second quarter were 0.005, 0.004, 0.007 pCi/ cubic meter, respectively. The average concentrations observed at all of the indicator locations during the second quarter, in units of pci/ cubic meter, were 0.005 for ruthenium-103, 0.003 for cesium-134, and 0.006 for cesium-137. Therefore, since the radionuclide average concentrations observed at the indicator stations were similar to the concen-trations observed at the control station, it is evident t that the radioactivity detected during the second quarter was related to the Chernobyl incident and not to the operation of Waterford 3 SES. Since the radio-activity was not plant related, no dose calculations were requ' red.

3.2.2 Airborne Iodine Out of 245 measurements obtained from all stations, iodine-131 was detected in 18 samples collected during

.the period following the Chernobyl incident from May 5 through June 30, 1986. Prior to and after this period, I all measurements for iodine-131 were below the lower limits of detection. The average weekly iodine-131 activities detected at the control and indicator stations between May 5 and June 30, 1986, were 0.050 and 0.043 pCi/ cubic meter, respectively. Comparing the indicator and control averages suggests that there was

no discernable impact on airborne iodine-131 levels as  ;

Again, the evidence a result of plant operation.

4 1

24 l

indicates that the iodine-131 activity detected was related to the Chernobyl incident. Therefore, no dose calculations were required.

3.3 Waterborne ExDosure Pathway 3.3.1 Drinkina/ Surface Water As mentioned previously, drinking water is considered synonymous with surface water. Results obtained from samples collected and analyzed as drinking water can be 4

designated " surface water results". Therefore, the results of the monthly gamma spectral analyses as well as the quarterly tritium analysis reported as drinking water results are the same as for those reported as surface water results.

Seventy-six composite drinking / surface water samples were analyzed by a radiochemical procedure for i

iodine-131. All measurements were below the lower limits of detection. The samples were composited on.a monthly basis and analyzed by gamma spectroscopy. No i man-made gamma emitters were detected above their 1 respective lower limits of detection.

Teledyne Isotopes filtered the monthly composites through a Whatman number 54 filter and performed a gross beta analysis on the filtrate. APEL on the other hand did not filter the composite samples prior to analysis. Gross beta activity was detected in thirty-six of the thirty-nine composites with an average monthly activity of 9.0 pCi/ liter. The average monthly activity for the control location was 6.9 pCi/ liter, compared to the monthly averages of 12.9 and 7.2 pCi/ liter for indicator stations DWG-2 and DWE-5, respectively.

The average gross beta activities detected at indicator stations DWG-2 and DWE-5 are statistically the same as 1 that of control station DWP-7 using the standard "t" i test (see Appendix F) . However, the difference in the i analytical technique between AP&L and Teledyne resulted l

, in an increased standard deviation of the yearly l

-results (see Appendix G) . Therefore, more data need to l be compiled regarding the statistical fluctuations of the AP&L gross beta tschnique before comparisons can be  !

made to results from previous years.

Drinking / surface water samples were also composited quarterly and analyzed for tritium. Tritium was detected in one of the twelve quarterly composites at a concentration of 170 pCi/1. During the preoperational program, tritium was frequently detected in quarterly i

25

i composite samples at concentrations ranging between 70 and 180 pCi/l with an average quarterly concentration of 116 pCi/1. Therefore, the tritium activity detected in the current surface / drinking water composite was at a concentration comparable to natural background levels. Therefore, no dose calculations were re-quired.

j 3.3.2 Groundwater

, Four groundwater samples were collected from one sampling location, GWJ-1, and analyzed for tritium and gamma ray emitters. All measurements were below the lower limits of detect $on.

3.3.3 Shoreline Soil Four shoreline soil samples were collected from two sampling locations: two samples from the Mississippi River shoreline downriver of the plant (SHWE-3) and two samples from the shoreline of a . drainage canal into which turbine building sumps are discharged (SHWJ-1) .

No man-made radionuclides were detected in the samples obtained from the Mississippi River shoreline (station SHWE-3). However, man-made radioactivity, cesium-137 and cobalt-58, was detected in the samples obtained from station SHWJ-1. Cesium-137 was detectad in both samples from station SHWJ-1 at an average concentration of 64 pCi/kg(dry) . Cobalt-58 was detected in only one of the samples at a concentration of 38 pCi/1. No other man-made radionuclides were detected.

Radioactive release permits for the years 1985 and 1986 show that no cesium-137 was discharged into the drainage canal from which the sample came. Therefore, the presence of the cesium-137 is most likely attribu-table to fallout from past nuclear weapons detonations and, for the sample collected during the second half of 1986, the Chernobyl incident. This assumption is consistent with observations made during the preopera-

- tional survey for soil samples collected from the shoreline of the Mississippi River. During the preoperational program, cesium-137 was detected in 13 of 18 soil samples at concentrations ranging between 30 and 890 pCi/kg(dry) with an average concentration of 138 pCi/kg(dry).

Radioactive affluent release permits for 1985 show that a small quantity of cobalt-58 was discharged to the drainage canal. The cobalt-58 detected in the shore-26

line soil at station SHWJ-1 most likely originated from this discharge.

4 However, it was conservatively assumed that all of the cesium-137 and cobalt-58 activity detected in the shoreline soil at station SHWJ-l originated from the plant. The maximum doses to a member of the general public resulting from the cobalt-58 and cesium-137 were calculated. The methodology and assumptions used to calculate the maximum dose were based on the guidance provided in Regulatory Guide 1.109 (10/77). The dose to the maximum exposed individual, a teenager, was calculated by the following equation:

1 (1) R= (40) (C) (U) (D) where: '

R is the maximum annual dose to the skin or the total body in arem/ year due to each indi-

• vidual radionuclide; 40 is the area-mass conversion factor given in Appendix A of Regulatory Guide 1.109 in kg/ square meter;  ;

C is the concentration of each radionuclide in the shoreline soil sample in pCi/kg; U is the maximum exposure time given in Table E-5 of Regulatory Guide 1.109; the maximum

. exposure time would be 67 hours7.75463e-4 days <br />0.0186 hours <br />1.107804e-4 weeks <br />2.54935e-5 months <br /> for a teenager; and D is the external dose conversion factor for standing on contaminated ground given in Table E-6 of Regulatory Guide 1.109; the values for exposures resulting from cesium-137 to the skin and total body are 4.9E-09 and 4.2E-09 mram/hr per pCi/ square meter, respectively; the values for exposures resulting from cobalt-58 to the skin and

_ total body are 8.2E-09 and 7.0E-09 mrem /hr per pCi/ square meter, respectively.

Using Equation (1) , the maximum annual dose to a teenager due to cesium-137 was calculated to be approximately 0.001 mrem /yr to the skin and to the total body. The maximum annual dose to a teenager due to the cobalt-58 was also calculated to be 0.001 mrem /yr to the skin and to the total body. The total 27

- - . ~ . . _ .

maximum annual dose due to both r.sdionuclides is therefore 0.002 aren/yr to the skin and to the total

. body. Thus, any radiological impacts to the general public resulting from the man-made radioactivity detected in the shoreline soil are infinitesimal.

3.4 Incestion ExDosure Pathway 3.4.1 Milk Forty-six milk samples were collected from three sampling locations and analyzed by a radiochemical procedure for iodine-131. Iodin -131 was detected in three of the samples during the month following the Chernobyl incident. The average iodina-131 concentra- {

tion for the indicator samples was 8.3 pCi/l compared l to 1.4 pCi/l detected at control location MKQ-50. Upon I investigating the difference between the indicator and l control location results, it was discovered that the l cows at control location MKQ-50 were fed stored grain '

over a significant portion of the year. Based on thi's discovery, action was taken to find a new control location at which the animals spent a significantly i larger fraction of time grazing on pasture. During June of 1986, the control location was relocated to MKQ-45.

Despite the difference in the control and indicator station averages, the iodine detected in the milk samples was not due to plant operations. This con-clusion was based on the observation that the levels of airborne iodine-131 in the vicinity of Waterford 3 SES following the Chernobyl incident were not significantly different than those at the control station located 30 miles away (see Section 3.2.2) . Therefore, since the iodine in the milk was not attributed to plant opera-tions, no special reports to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (for exceeding the reporting levels of Table 3.12-2 of Technical Specification 3.12.1.b) or dose

calculations were required.

The samples were also analyzed by gamma spectroscopy.

1 Cesium-137 was detected in six samples from the control location at an average concentration of 5 pCi/1.

Cesium-137 was detected in one indicator location sample at a concentration 4 pCi/1. The cesium detected in all of the samples occurred during the period following the Chernobyl incident. Based on the i

comparison of results from the control and indicator stations, the detected activity was not attributed to plant operations. Therefore, no dose calculations 28

were required. All other man-made gamma emitters were below their respective lower limits of detection.

3.4.2 Fish Twelve fish samples, five upstream and seven downstream of the plant, were collected and the edible portions analyzed by gamma spectroscopy. No man-made gamma emitters were detected above their respective lower l limits of detection. '

3.4.3 Broad Leaf Vecetation Waterford 3 SES Technical Specification 3.12.1 requires broad leaf vegetation to be sampled in the avant milk samples are unavailable. Since milk samples could be collected reliably from only one sampling location within five miles of Waterford 3 SES, broad leaf vegetation was sampled monthly at two indicato,r locations and at one control location.

Thirty-five broad leaf vegetation samples were col-lected and analyzed for iodine-131. Samples sent to Teledyne Isotopes were analyzed for iodine-131 using a j radiochemical procedure, while those sent to AP&L were I analyzed for iodine-131 by gamma spectroscopy.

Although the radiochemical procedure resulted in lower limits of detection consistently less than those attained using the gamma spectroscopy method, both I methods were able to attain the required lower limit of detection. No significant difference was observed between the results obtained from both procedures. A l comparison of the results is discussed in Appendix G.

During the month immediately following the Chernobyl incident, iodine-131 was detected in all of the vegetation samples collected. The concentration of iodine-131 at the control station was 113 pCi/kg-wet.

The average concentration for the samples from the indicator stations was 209 pCi/kg-wat. All other iodine-131 measurements for the rest of the year were

_below the lower limits of detection. The positive iodine-131 results were attributed to the Chernobyl incident. This conclusion was based on the measured levels of airborne iodine-131 at the indicator location being similar to those at the control locations during the period immediately following the Chernobyl incident (see Section 3.2.2). The variation between the control I

and indicator averages was moct likely due to a combination of counting statistics and local variations in atmospheric deposition rates. Since the radioa-29

ctivity detected was not related to Waterford 3 SES operations, no special reports to the Nuclear Regula-tory Commission (for exceeding the reporting levels of Table 3.12-2 of Technical Specification 3.12.1.b) or dose calculations were required.

The samples were also analyzed by gamma spectroscopy.

Ruthenium-103, cesium-134, and cesium-137 were detected in-the samples collected during the month following the Chernobyl incident. Concentrations detected at the control station were 40, 23, and 40 pCi/kg-wet for ruthenium-103, cesium-134, and cesium-137, respec-tively. The average concentrations detected at the indicator stations were 16 and 26 pCi/kg-wet for ruthenium-103 and cesium-137, respectively. No cesium-134 was detected in the samples from either indicator station. No man-made radioactivity was detected in any other vegetation samples collected during 1986. These results indicate that the detected 4

activity resulted from the Chernobyl incident rather than from plant operation. Since the activity detected

' was not related to plant operation, no dose calcula-tions were required.

j 3.4.4 Food / Garden Croos one food / garden crop sample was collected and analyzed by gamma spectroscopy for iodine-131 and other gamma emitters. No man-made radionuclides were detected.

3.5 Deviations from the REMP 3.5.1 Unavailable Samoles During 1986 deviations from the REMP sampling schedule occurred. All of the deviations (with the exception of those associated _with TLDs) were the result of

, either events beyond the control of LP&L personnel-

- such as naturally occurring events and samples being lost by the air carrier during shipment - or equipment malfunctions. With respect to equipment malfunctions, the causes leading to the malfunction were identified and maintenance or replacement performed to prevent recurrence of the event. Deviations from the REMP associated with TLDs were beyond the control of LP&L and resulted from a few of the dosimeters being vandalized while in the field. When a dosimeter was discovered missing during a monthly inspection, the TLD 30

s was replaced and the deviation noted. A listing of all unavailable samples for 1986 along with associated explanations of why the samples were not collected is given in Appendix C. A more detailed explanation for milk and vegetation sample unavailability is discussed below.

No milk samples were available during all of 1986 from station MKQ-1 due to the cows not producing milk for human consumption. No milk samples were available at station MKE-4 due to the goats not lactating. With the absence of milk samples from these stations, broad leaf vegetation sampling was performed.

l One control location sample, MKQ-45, was unavailable during December of 1986 due tc acheduling problem with the animal owner. Broad leaf vegetation was sampled at the control location during this month in lieu of the milk sample.

Broad leaf vegetation was not sampled at the control location during the month February due to a lack of vegetation caused by the cold weather. However, milk samples were available from the control location during this month.

l 3.5.2 Missed Lower Limits of Detection All lower limits of detection specified in Table 4.12-2 of Waterford 3 SES Technical Specification 4.12.1 were attained during 1986.

3.5.3 Chances to the REMP During 1986 the control station for milk sampling was relocated from MKQ-50 to MKQ-45. The station was relocated to a station at which the animals spent a significantly larger portion of the year grazing on l pasture rather than being fed stored grain.

- The last change to the REMP occurring during 1986 involved the relocation of a TLD station. The TLD located at station P-1 was moved to a nearby, more secure location in order to reduce the possibility of vandalism.

31

3.6 Annual Land Use Census Results In compliance with Waterford 3 SES Technical Specification 4.12.2, the annual land use census was conducted on July 30 and August 14, 1986. The nearest residence, garden, and milking animal in each sector within a five mile radius of the plant were found by visual inspection and verbal inquiry. The results of the 1986 census are given in Table 3.2. No new residences, gardens, or milking animals were found.

The owner of the animals at station MKQ-1 stated that the cows were not producing milk for human consumption. The owner of milking gcats at location MKE-4 stated that the goats were not lactating. Although no samples were avail-able from either location during 1986, the stations will remain as part of the REMP and the owners will be contacted periodically to determine the status of obtaining samples.

l l

32

TABLE 3.1 1986 DIRECT RADIATION DATA

' ORGANIZED BY COMPASS DIRECTION AND DISTANCE FROM WATERFORD 3 SES BY COMPASS DIRECTION )

i SECTOR COMPASS AVERAGE STANDARD NUMBER DIRECTION- DOSE RATE DEVIATION IN (arem/std qtr) (arem/std qtr) GROUP A N 15 1.9 8 B NNE 15 1.2 7 C NE 9 1.0 4 D ENE 13 2.6 7 E(a) E 13 1.7 12 l

F ESE 15 4.7 11 l G SE 15 1.7 12 l H SSE 12 1.8 7 . !

J S 13 1.5 8 K SSW 13 1.6 4 L SW 14 1.6 4 M WSW 11 3.8 4

, N W 15 0.4 3 P WNW 15 2.9 8 Q NW 14 2.0 8 R NNW 18 7.5 8 l CONTROL E 18 1.6 4 BY DISTANCE FROM PLANT l

DISTANCE AVERAGE STANDARD NUMBER i

FROM PLANT DOSE RATE DEVIATION IN (miles) (arem/std qtr) (ares /std qtr) GROUP O-2 13 2.3 62 2-5 -

14 3.5 25

> 5(a) 15 4.4 28 CONTROL 18 1.6 4

a. Does not include control station data 33

TABLE 3.2 1986 ANNUAL LAND USE CENSUS RESULTS SECTOR DIRECTION DISTANCE FROM THE PLANT I

(miles)

MILK MILK VEGETABLE RESIDENCE COW GOAT GARDEN A N - -

1.1 0.8 B NNE - -

1.3 0.8 C NE - -

1.0 0.9 D ENE - -

0.9 0.9 E E -

3.3(a) 3.2 2.6 F ESE - -

2.3 3.4 .

G SE - -

2.3 3.9 H SSE - - - -

J S - -

0.9 -

K SSW - -

0.9 -

L SW - -

0.9 -

M WSW - -

0.9 -

N W - -

1.1 1.3 P WNW - -

0.9 0.9 Q NW 1.l(b,c) -

0.9 0.9 R NNW - -

2.9 2.0 Means none found in sector within a 5 mile radius of Waterford 3 SES.

a. Goats not lactating. The owner will be contacted on a periodic basis to determine availability of samples.

b. Milk cows do not supply milk for human consumption. The owner will be contacted on a periodic basis to determine availability of samples.

c. Samples will also continue to be taken at 4.4 miles (MKQ-5). This is the only reliable milk sample within 5 miles of Waterford 3 SES.

34

4.0 CONCLUSION

S Elevated levels of reactor produced radionuclides were detected in air, milk, and vegetation samples during 1986. However, comparing results obtained from environmental samples collected at locations least likely to be affected by plant operations (control locations) to data obtained at locations most likely to be affected by plant operations (indicator locations) it was determined that the radioactivity did not result from the operation of Waterford 3 SES. Instead, the detected radio-activity appears to have originated from the April 26, 1986, l explosion and subsequent fire at the Chernobyl reactor located in '

the Soviet Union. In fact, increased levels of radioactivity due l to the Chernobyl incident were reported throughout the United States by the United States Environmental Protection Agency.

The radiological environmental data collected during the periods of 1986 that were not affected by the Chernobyl incident are consistent with the data obtained during the Preoperational Environmental Radiological Surveillance (PERS) Program and during the first two years of the REMP prior to Waterford 3 SES initial criticality. The only man-made radionuclides - that were potentially related to plant operation - detected out of all o'f the environmental samples analyzed during 1986 were cesium-137 and cobalt-58 in shoreline soil. The origin of the cesium-137 is most likely attributable to fallout from past nuclear weapons detonations and not Waterford 3 SES operation. The cobalt-58 activity most likely did originate from the plant. However, to be conservative, dose calculations were performed assuming that both radionuclides originated solely from plant operation. The results of these calculations show that any exposure to the general public from this activity is infinitesimal.

In conclusion, based on the evaluation of the REMP data collected during 1986 the operation of Waterford 3 SES had no observable radiological impact on the environment.

l l

l f

1 35

e APPENDIX A REMP DATA

SUMMARY

36

t TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONME2 ITAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

Name of Facility Waterford 3 SES Docket No. 50-382 January I to location of Facility St. Charles, Louisiana Reporting Period December 31, 1986 (Parish, State)

NUMBER OF d HEDIUM OR PATHWAY A"

• I ~

ALL INDICAToit LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HICHES1 ANNUAL.MEAN CONTROL LOCATION MEAN>t NONROUTINE a MEAN " NAME 'HEAN" SAMPLED (UNIT OF MEASURDiENT) INE MUUG # MEENIWU @EU , m7q nrn n TLD 119 14(115/115) R-6 24(4/4) E-30 0

1. Direct Radiation 1 (5-30) 5.3 miles NNW (16-30) 18(4/4)

(mrem /Std. Qtr.) (17-21) 27(194/194) APC-1 27(48/48) APE-30 0

2. Airborne Partic- Cross 245 10 ulates Beta (11-128) 0.5 miles SE (13-128) 27(51/51)

(9-126)

(10-3p ct/m3 )

Camma 20 (d) 5(4/16) APG-1 6(1/4) APE-30 0 Ru-103 (4-6) 0.5 miles SE (-) 5(1/4)

(-)

Cs-134 50 3(4/16) APC-1 4(1/4) APE-30 0 (3-4) 0.5 miles SE (-) 4(1/4)

(-)

NOTE: Footnotes at end of table.

i TABLE A-1 (Cont.)

RADIO 1DCICAL ENVIRONNDITAL MONITORING PROGRAM SIM4ARY Name of Facility Waterford 3 SES Docket No. 50-382 January I to Location of Facility St. Charles, Louisiana Reporting Period December 31, 1986 (Parish, State)

I* ^

• LOCATION W11M !!ICHEST ANNUAL,MEAN CONTROL. TION NM OF MEDIUM OR PATHWAY ALL INDICATOR IACATIONS NONROUTINE TOTAL NUMBER OF NAME MEAN" MEAN SAMPLED a MEAN " REPO ED (RANCE) DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANCE) (RANCE)b (UNIT OF MEASURDlENT) , ,,

2. Airborne Partic- Cs-137 60 6(4/16) APG-1 7(1/4) APE-30 0 ulates (5-7) 0.5 miles SE (-) 7(1/4)

(~)

(10-3p ct/m3 )

(continued)

3. Airborne lodine g.131 245 70 41(14/194) APC-1 50(3/44) APE-30 0 (10-3p ci/ml ) (8-74) 0.8 miles NE (12-71) 50(4/51)

(13-90) 4 10(25/26) DWC-2 13(13/13) DWP-7 0

4. Drinking Water Cross 39 (pC1/1) Beta (3-60) 2.0 miles ESE (3-60) 6.9(11/13)

(3-18) 1-131 76 1 (LLD (0/50) NA NA DWP-7 0 g

(-) 4LLD (0/26) {

(-)

I NOTE: Footnotes at end of table.

ll l l q

T E u FN F OI T 0 RU 0 0 0 EO BR MN UO NNRu N

O I

)

T 3 ) ) )

A 1 4 4 4 C

Ob d /)

0 -

/)

0 -

/)

0 -

/)

0 -

LNE LE A 7( (

7((

7((

7( (

PD PD PD PD OMW R

T WL DL WL DL WL SL WL SL N ( ( ( (

O C

N A ) )

E M.

[ 4

/)

4)

/

1 -

1 -

L "N M (( ( i A A A 0 A 0 U

N H N

EW (

N 7 1

N 7 1

6 A 8

9 T 1 S E

W o, H t1 3

C I

M I

H E E ye r M S E

S E

2 rb h l

8 am i 3

ue nc W M s s 0 ae N 2 e 2 e Y

R 5 JD O M I

EM A A

- l Gi A

- 1 C1 T N Wm N Wm A d M

M i o A C

NW D 0

S 0 U r O S

P e L W 2 2

M A o. g R N n S G i N O t t O R e r I P k o T c p A G o e C N D R O

)

I L ) )

R O

T l"[

t O

6 2

6 2

t n I N

T A A NM /)

)

8

/)

0 -

)

8 o O C (0 ( /) (( /)

C M I D

E M

(

W D 1 -

(( D 1 -

((

( L 0 L 0 L N L 7 L, 7 1 A I

( 1 < 1 T

- N a L A E M n L A

N a E O i L R s i )

B I u e A V S o N t T

T E E S

L a t

I a

, S M L 3 s 1

A e . 1 F ) 0 ) 0 C d h c 0 c 0 I

r l

r s RO ( 0 ( 0 C E 2 2 D o a i r

f h L

I O r e

C P

(

a W t

D a t A W S R

R y

2E AB 9

3 2

1 9

3 2

1 t M e i SU m m l l y I N u u b i i t S a i a i a c

a i

l Y.AL l m t i

m m

t i

t F i AT , m r a r a f c NO C T G T o f a AT o F d e n f e m o a ) t N n T r a o N e r i E f t e s t Y a ) e a A D W d t

a t c W R U e W o o E S g u n l T A A n) n e) t i 1 i c1 o PDE k/t a/ o EM n1 n f 1 F RL iC o rC OPF O r Pc up D(( S(

MMT U

I I E

T O

D N 4 5 N E U 1 (

il; .*Sf h g9 i E

FN OI T

O O O O 0 RUORO MNP NNR OE

' i N 5

. O 4 I -

T Q A b K)

M2 Cb O

)

E 2 LNC ./)

AN 01 -

LEA E E E E 5((

N N N - 4 OMR ( O O N

O Q R O T N N N N K1 N M O

C N

A ))

E )

) ) 43 E ) 4 21 M. 4 40 / -

L "N C /) /1 25 A AN A A 1 - 2 - (

U EA N N (( (4 6 N MR 8 42 3. (3 8 N ( 3 6( 8 9 A N

1 T O S I

o. E T t1 3 H C C E 1 I R r H I ye D 2 rb i S W 8 am l l D S N 3 ue i N

- nc W A s s s 0 ae e 5 JD N EE l l e e Y O MC l l 5l

- i R I AN A A J m

- i - i A d T NA N N W J m Qm 1

o A T H3 W K C S H3 M0 .

M I

i r O I S

0 S S e L D 0 5 P

M .

g A o R N n S G i N O t t O R e r I P k o p

T c A G o e C N D R D I I R ) )

/

O t l " ) 4 4 ))

. T O E /) /) ) 43 t I T NC 0 - 0 -

)

) 4 21 n N A AN (( (( 4 40 / -

o O C EA /) /1 25 M I MR( D D 1 - 2 - (

C D L L (( ( 4

( L N L 8 42 3. (3 A I L. 3 6( 8 1 T 4 4 I

a L

- D n L A M N a A i

O E R s

)

L I i u e B V S o A N E t

a T E S L

t a

L . S A 3 s ) 0 e ,

F ) 0 C d h c 0 d 8 1 I

r l

r s O ( 0 ( 1 C o a i 2

4 f h r 1

O r C a I e P

(

D t a t A W S R

R 4 4 4 6 E 4 y B t M .

i U e l y N , m l i u 7 b i

c t

i L a i a 8 3 1 a

s t m 5 1 3 a l A , n a i m - - 1 t

F i T a r a o s - f c O C T CC C I o

f a T o F d

e f n m o e a )

N n T l t

a o N i i E o) t Y I s a A D r S y e c W R e r t t ed o o H U a n- n L T S )

A A w) i g 1

t PDE d1 l k

/

o EM n/ e/

k1 o RL u1 ri F OPF oC r p oc h p l C ip MMO UST C( S( M(

E I I .

T D N 7 8. O E U 6 N M (

pG

l t

TABLE A-1 (Cont.)

RADIO 1DCICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUM 1ARY Name of Facility Waterford 3 SES Docket No. 50-382 location of Facility St. Charles. Louisiana Reporting Period DecD r 31 1986 (Parish, State)

" LOCATION Willi HICHEST ANNUAL. MEAN CONTROL L TION ALL INDICATolt LOCATIONS

$ MEDIUM OR PA11tWAY SAMPLED p

a MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN POR M (RANCE) DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANCE) (RANCE)b (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) , ,

8. Milk Cassia 46 k Cs-137 18 4(1/24) 4(1/24) HKQ-50, MKQ-45 0 (pC1/1) MKQ-5 ,

(continued) (-) 5.0 miles NW (-) 5(6/22)  !

(3-6)

Casmaa 12 (c) 4LLD (0/6) NA NA FH-1 0

9. Fish (pC1/kg-wet) (-) (LLD (0/6)

(-)

l 0

I-131 50 209(2/24) BLQ-1 243(1/12) BLK-15 0 $

10. Broad Leaf 35 Vegetation (175-243) 0.8 miles NW (-) 113(1/11)

(pci/kg-wet) (-)

Camuna 35 Ru-103 (d) 16(2/24) BLB-1 20(1/12) BLK-15 0 (12-20) 0.8 miles NNE (-) 40(1/11)

(-)

2 130TE: Footnotes at end of table.

l f l .l l

! 6

'ft I.

E FN OI D TE 0 0 O RUT EOR BRO MNP

- UOE NNR N

O I

T A

C b ) ) )

Ob E LNC 51 51 11 1 1 AN - /) - /) E LEA K1 - K1 - N OMR ( L(( L(( O R B3 B0 N T 2 4 N

O C

N A

E )

). 2 M, 't 1 L "N C /)

A AN A 1 - A U EA N (( N 6 N MR( 7 8 N 2 9 A 1 N T O

o. S I t1 E T 3 H C 1 C E r I R ye H I E

2 rb I D N 8 am D D N 3 ue I N

- nc W A s 0 ae e 5 JD N EE 1l Y O MC A - i A R I AN N B m N A d T NA L 4 o A T B8 M

U i

r C

O S

I e L D 0 S

P M .

g A o R N n S G i N O t O R -e r I P k o p

T c A C o e C N D R D I I )

) R 4 )

. O R" ) 2 1 T O E /) )) /)

t I T NC 0-0 - 47 n N A AN (( 22 ((

o O M

C EA I MR(

/ -

D C D D L

24

( 2 L

( L N L L 6(

A I 4 2 <

1 T

- N a L E n L A M a A N i E O R

s L i )

B I V u e A N S o t E L a a T E S t

. S L 3 s )

A e ,

F C d l h 0 0 c I

r r s O 6 8 (

C o a i D f h r 1

O r C a I e P t . (

D a t A W S R

R 1 E .

y ^B t M e l

i U l y N 4 7 b e i t 3 3 a a c i L 1 1 n u

t a l A , - - m f F i T s s a o c O C C C f a T d o F n e f e m o p t

a ) o a N n T r o N C s i E ) )

t Y M t) nt e a A E f ned ee t o

c Wl R aowe d w n o U ei- u r -

L D A

S A

Lt gn ag t o

aki Ck o PDE dt/ t //

F EM ae1 n d1 RL o gC o oC OPF r epc op s O BV(( F( E M

UMT I I . . i i

l D N 0 1 t E U 1 1 M (

V

4 I

l t

l 4

' TABLE A-1 (Cont.)

, RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

FOOTNOTES t

4 4

• Nominal Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) as defined-in Waterford 3 Technical Specifications.

i b

] $ Mean and range based upon detectable measurements only. Fraction of detectable measurements as

{ specified locations is indicated in parenthesis. ,

" Lower Limits of Detection (LLD) for individual radionuclides analyzed for by gamma spectroscopy

are given in Waterford 3 Technical Specifications.

I No minimum Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) defined in Waterford 3 Technical Specifications.

1

'l 4

i i

1 APPENDIX B REMP DATA 44

TABLE B-1 QUARTERLY TLD DOSE RATES LOCATION 2ND QUARTER 3RD QUARTER 4TH QUARTER AVERAGE IST QUARTER (01/03-04/03) (04/03-07/02) (7/02-10/02) (10/02-01/02) DOSE RATE DOSE RATE DOSE RATE DOSE RATE DOSE RATE (mrem /s td qtd (mrem /std qtr) (mrem /std qtr) (mrem std qtd (mrem /std qtr)

A-2 16 14 17 19 16 A-5 14 13 14 16 14 B-1 14 14 15 17 15 B-4 14 NA 16 17 -15 C-1 10 8 10 10 9 D-2 17 11 17 12 14 D-5 NA 11 12 13 12 E-1 14 13 13 12 13 E-5 12 10 13 13 12 E-15 15 14 16 16 15 E-30 18 17 18 21 18 F-2 13 11 13 15 13 F-4 15 NA 28 18 20 F-9 14 12 14 15 14 G-2 16 15 16 18 16 G-4 13 12 13 15 13 G-9 15 13 15 16 15 H-2 14 13 15 NA 14 H-6 11 10 11 12 11 J-2 12 11 13 15 13 J-15 14 12 15 15 14 K-1 13 11 13 15 13 L-1 14 12 14 16 14 M-1 13 11 6 15 11 N-1 15 14 15 NA 15 P-1 15 11 12 13 13 P-6 18 15 16 20 17 13 11 14 15 13 Q-1

~ 15 14 16 18 16 Q-5 R-1 12 10 12 14 12 R-6 16 26 23 30 24 NA - Results not Available: See Table C-5 for Explanation.

45

' TABLE B-2 AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS AND CIIARCOAL CARTRIDGES :

GROSS BETA AND ICDINE-131 ANALYSES (TELEDYNE RESULTS)

STATION NUMBER APC-1 IT86 COLLECTION OATE MID COUNT A P FILTER MID COUNT CHARCOAL FILTEk START STOP TIME GROSS BETA TIME I-131 DATE DATE VOLUME UNITS DATE (pct /Cu. M.) OATE (pCl/Co. M.)

v

• 12/30 01/06 1.00E 04 CU. FT. 01/13 3.1 t 0.4 E-02 01/09 L.T. 3. E-02 01/06 01/13 9.78E 03 CU. FT. 01/22 3.1 1 0.4 E-02 01/15 L.T. 3. E-02 01/13 01/20 1.02E 04 CU. FT. 01/31 1.7 2 0.4 E-02 01/23 L.T. 2. E-02 01/20 01/27 1.01E 04 CU. FT. 01/31 2.9 1 0.4 E-02 01/29 L.T. 3. E-02 01/27 02/03 (a) l 02/03 02/10 (a) i 02/10 02/17 1.04E 04 CU. FT. 02/26 2.6 1 0.3 E-02 02/20 L.T. 3. L-02 02/17 02/25 1.06E 04 CU. FT. 03/03 2.7

• 0.3 E-02 02/27 L.T. 3. E-02 02/25 03/03 1.03E 04 CU. FT. 03/11 2.7 1 0.3 E-02 03/04 L.T. 2. E-02 03/03 03/10 1.07E 04 CU. FT. 03/19 1.9 1 0.3 E-02 03/13 L.T. 2. L-02 03/10 03/17 1.02E 04 CU. FT. 03/24 2.0 t 0.3 E-02 03/19 L.T. 4. L-02 03/17 03/24 6.81E 03 CU. FT. 04/01 1.9 t 0.5 E-02 03/26 L.T. 4. E-02 03/24 03/31 9.60E 03 CU. FT. U4/10 2.5 t 0.3 E-02 04/03 L.T. 2. L-02 (a) Sample not available due to sampler malfunction.

L.T. means less than.

TABLE B-2 (Cont.)

AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS AND CHARCOAL CARTRIDGES :

GROSS BETA AND IODINE-131 ANALYSES

, (TELEDYNE RESULTS)

STATION NUMBER APG-1 1966 COLLECTION DATE MID COUNT A P FILTER MID COUNT CHARCOAL FILTEM START STOP TIME GROSS BETA TIME l-131 DATE DATE VOLUME UNITS OATE (pct /Cu. M.) DATE (pct /Cu. M.)

12/30 01/06 9.57E 03 CU. FT. 01/13 3.5 t 0.4 E-02 01/09 L.T. 3. E-02 01/06 01/13 9.22E 03 CU. (T. 01/22 2.9 s 0.4 E-02 01/15 L.T. 3. E-02 01/13 01/20 1.01E 04 CU. FT. 01/31 1.6 1 0.3 E-02 01/23 L.T. 2. E-02 b 01/20 01/27 1.00E 04 CU. FT. 01/31 3.1 2 0.4 E-02 01/29 L.T. 3. E-02 01/27 02/03 9.99E 03 CU. FT. 02/11 2.1 2 0.4 E-02 02/05 L.T. 3. E-02 02/03 02/10 1.00E 04 CU. FT. 02/21 2.0 t 0.3 E-02 02/14 L.T. 3. E-02 02/10 02/11 9.83E 03 CU. FT. 02/26 2.9 1 0.3 E-02 02/20 L.T. 3. L-02 02/17 02/25 1.15E 04 CU. FT. 03/03 2.5 t 0.3 E-02 02/27 L.T. 3. E-02 02/25 03/03 8.25E 03 CU. FT. 03/11 2.6 1 0.4 E-02 03/04 L.T. 3. L-02 03/03 03/10 9.87E 03 CU. FT. 03/19 1.9 1 0.3 E-02 03/13 L.T. 3. E-02 03/10 03/17 9.66E 03 CU. FT. 03/24 1.6 1 0.3 E-02 03/19 L.T. 4. E-02 03/17 03/24 9.59E 03 CU. FT. 04/01 1.6 1 0.4 E-02 03/26 L.T. 3. E-02 03/24 03/31 9.58E 03 CU. FT. 04/10 2.8 1 0.3 E-02 04/03 L.T. 2. E-02 L.T. means less than.

TABLE B-2 (Cont.)

AIR PARTICUIATE FILTERS AND CHARCOAL CARTRIDGES :

GROSS BETA AND IODINE-131 ANALYSES (TELEDYNE RESULTS)

I STATION NUMBER APP-1 1986 COLLECTION DATE MID COUNT A P FILTER MID COUNT CHARC0AL FILTER 51 ART STOP TIME GROSS BETA TIME I-131 DATE DATE VOLUME UNITS DATE (pCl/Cu. M.) DATE (pct /Cu. M.)

a 12/30 01/06 1.01E 04 CU. FT. 01/13 3.5 2 0.4 E-02 01/09 L.T. 3. E-02 01/06 01/13 9.52E 03 CU. FT. 01/22 3.0 t 0.4 E-02 01/15 L.T. 3. E-02 01/13 01/20 9.87E 03 CU. FT. 01/31 1.9 i 0.4 E-02 01/23 L.T. 2. E-02 01/20 01/27 9.65E 03 CU. FT. 01/31 3.4 t 0.4 E-02 01/29 L.T. 3. E-02 01/27 02/03 9.83E 03 CU. FT. 02/11 2.6 1 0.4 E-02 02/05 L.T. 3. E-02 02/03 02/10 9.86E 03 CU. FT. 02/21 2.0 1 0.3 E-02 02/14 L.T. 3. E-02 02/10 02/17 9.79E 03 CU. FT. 02/26 2.8 2 0.3 E-02 02/20 L.T. 3. E-02 02/17 02/25 1.14E 04 CU. FT. 03/03 2.2 2 0.3 E-02 02/27 L.T. 3. E-02 02/25 03/03 8.33E 03 CU. FT. 03/11 2.6 1 0.4 E-02 03/04 L.T. 3. E-02 03/03 03/10 9.96E 03 CU. FT. 03/19 2.1 1 0.3 E-02 03/13 L.T. 3. L-02 03/10 03/11 9.76E 03 CU. FT. 03/24 1.9 1 0.3 E-02 03/19 L.T. 4. E-02 03/17 03/24 9.86E 03 CU. FT. 04/01 1.5 t 0.4 E-02 03/26 L.T. 3. L-02 03/24 03/31 9.94E 03 CU. FT. 04/10 2.4 t 0.3 E-02 04/03 L.T. 2. L-02 L.T. means less than.

4

TABLE B-2 (Cont.)

AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS AND CHARCOAL CARTRIDGES :

GROSS BETA AND IODINE-131 ANAL'ISES

, (TELEDYNE RESULTS)

STATION NUMBER APQ-1 T986 COLLECTION DATE MID COUNT A P FILTER MID COUNT CHARC0AL FILTER START STOP TIME GROSS BETA TIME I-131 DATE DATE VOLUME UNITS DATE (pct /Cu. M.) DATE (pCl/Cu. M.)

12/30 01/06 1.03E 04 CU. FT. 01/13 3.4 1 0.4 E-02 01/09 L.T. 3. E-02 01/06 01/13 9.71E 03 CU FT. 01/22 2.7 t 0.4 E-02 01/15 L.T. 3. E-02 01/13 01/20 1.04E 04 CU. FT. 01/31 1.7 1 0.4 E-02 01/23 L.T. 2. E-02 01/20 01/27 1.04E 04 CU. FT. 01/31 2.9 i 0.3 E-02 01/29 L.T. 3. L-02 01/27 02/03 1.0$E 04 CU. FT. 02/i1 2.4 t 0.4 E-02 02/05 L.T. 3. L-02 02/03 02/10 1.05E 04 CU. FT. 02/21 2.2 i 0.3 E-02 02/14 L.T. 3. E-02 02/10 02/17 1.00E 04 CU. FT. 02/26 2.7 1 0.3 E-02 02/20 L.T. 3. E-02 02/17 02/25 1.00E 04 CU. FT. 03/03 2.9 i 0.4 E-02 02/27 L.T. 3. E-02 02/25 03/03 9.40E 03 CU. FT. 03/11 2.5 t 0.3 E-02 03/04 L.T. 3. E-02 03/03 03/10 1.06E 04 CU. FT. 03/19 1.9 2 0.3 E-02 03/13 L.T. 2. L-02 03/10 03/17 1.04E 04 CU, FT. 03/24 1.1 1 0.3 E-02 03/19 L.T. 4. L-02 03/17 03/24 1.03E 04 CU. FT. 04/01 1.7 2 0.4 E-02 03/26 L.T. 3. E-02 03/24 03/31 1.05E 04 CU. FT. 04/10 2.3 1 0.3 E-02 04/03 L.T. 2. L-02 L.T. means less than.

TABLE B-2 (Cet. 5 AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS A G fMtRCOAL CARTRIDGES :

GROSS BETA AND 100M%~131 ANALYSES i (TELEDYNE .'*25JLTS)

STATION NUMBER APE-30 I

1986 COLLECTION DATE MID COUNT A P FILTER MID COUNT CHARC0AL FILTER START STOP TIME GROSS BETA TIME l-131 DATE DATE VOLUME UNITS DATE (pCl/Cu. M.) DATE (pCl/Cu. h.)

12/30 01/06 9.40E 03 CU. FT. 01/13 3.3 1 0.4 E-02 01/09 L.T. 2. E-02 01/06 01/13 9.55E 03 CU. FT. 01/22 2.6 1 0.4 E-02 01/lb L.T. 2. L-02

, 01/13 01/20 9.56E 03 CU. FT. 01/31 2.0 t 0.4 E-02 01/23 L.T. 2. L-02 01/20 01/27 9.60E 03 CU. FT. 01/31 3.0 t 0.4 E-02 01/29 L.T. 2. E-02 01/27 02/03 9.57E 03 CU. FT. 02/11 3.0 1 0.4 E-02 02/05 L.T. 3. E-02 I 02/03 02/10 1.01E 04 CU. FT. 02/21 1.7 1 0.3 E-02 02/14 L.T. 3. E-02 02/10 02/17 9.55E 03 CU. FT. 02/26 2.6 1 0.3 E-02 02/20 L.T. 2. E-02 02/17 02/25 9.71E 03 CU. FT. 03/03 2.8 1 0.4 E-02 02/27 L.T. 2. E-02 02/25 03/03 1.01E 04 CU. FT. 03/11 2.6 1 0.3 E-02 03/04 L.T. 1. E-02 03/03 03/10 1.00E 04 CU. FT. 03/19 1.9 1 0.3 E-02 03/13 L.T. 2. L-02 03/10 03/17 1.00E 04 CU. FT. 03/24 2.2 1 0.3 E-02 03/19 L.T. 2. E-02 03/17 03/24 9.82E 03 CU. FT. 04/01 1.9 t 0.4 E-02 03/26 L.T. 2. E-u2 03/24 03/31 1.03E 04 CU. FT. 04/10 2.4 t 0.3 E-02 04/03 L.T. 1. L-02 L.T. means less than.

I i

I

' TABLE B-2 (Cont.)

AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS AND CHARCOAL CARTRIDGES :

GROSS BETA AND IODINE-131 ANALYSES i (AP&L RESULTS)

SAMPLE IDCATION: APC-1 SAMPLE TYPE: AIR PARTICULATES UNITS: pCi/M**3

COLLECTION PERIOD GROSS l IAB NO. START STOP BETA i

860566 03/31/86 04/07/86 0.019+/-0.003 860615 04/07/86 04/15/86 0.020+/-0.003 04/15/86 04/21/86 SAMPLER MALFUNCTION

• 04/21/86 04/28/86 SAMPLER MALFUNCTION i

, 04/28/86 05/05/86 SAMPLE IDST IN SHIPMENT

- 860831 05/05/86 05/12/86 0.023+/-0.003 j 860919 05/12/86 05/19/86 0.091+/-0.004 l 860972 05/19/86 05/26/86 0.120+/-0.005 I 861035 05/26/86 06/02/86 G.114+/-0.005 ,

l 861081 06/02/86 06/09/86 0.042+/-0.003 l 861152 06/09/86 06/16/86 0.023+/-0.003 l

861204 06/16/86 06/23/s6 0.018+/-0.003

861298 06/23/86 06/30/86 0.018+/-0.002 861356 06/30/86 07/07/86 0.023+/-0.003 8G1417 07/07/86 07/14/86 0.012+/-0.002 861470 07/14/86 07/21/86 0.020+/-0.002 l 861512 07/21/86 07/28/86 0.016+/-0.002 1 861541 07/28/86 08/04/86 0.024+/-0.003 861586 08/04/86 08/11/86 0.022+/-0.003 08/11/E6 08/18/86 SAMPLER MALFUNCTION 861681 08/18/86 08/26/86 0.022+/-0.002 861706 08/26/86 09/02/86 0.013+/-0.003 l 861738 09/02/86 09/08/86 0.020+/-0.003 09/08/86 09/15/86 0.022+/-0.003 861788

861843 09/15/86 09/22/86 0.020+/-0.002 i 861859 09/22/86 09/29/86

• 0.014+/-0.002

• LOW SAMPI.E VOI.UME COI,I ECTED DUE TO SAMPI.E!! MAI FUNCTION.

1 I.

! TABLE B-2 (Cont.)

! AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS AND CHARCOAL CARTRIDGES :

GROSS BETA AND IODINE-131 ANALYSES (AP&L RESULTS)

I SAMPLE IDCATION: APC-1 SAMPLE TYPE: AIR PARTICUIATES UNITS: pCi/M**3 L

COLLECTION PERIOD GROSS l BETA IAB NO. START STOP l

i

861938 09/29/86 10/06/86 SAMPLER MALFUNCTION 861989 10/o9/86 10/13/86 o.005+/-o.004

• 862045 10/13/86 10/20/86 0.020+/-o.003 j 862099 10/20/86 10/27/86 0.015+/-o.003 1 862157 10/27/86 11/o3/86 0.021+/-o.003 l u 862189 11/03/86 11/1o/86 0.017+/-o.co2 l

862251 11/10/86 11/17/86 0.023+/-o.003

! 862307 11/17/86 11/25/86 c.015+/-o.002 j 862351 11/25/86 12/01/86 c.015+/-o.003 862369 12/o1/86 12/o8/86 0.013+/-o.002 o.018+/-o.002 3

862430 12/o8/86 12/15/86

862503 12/15/86 12/22/86 o.018+/-o.002 862529 12/22/86 12/29/86 0.019+/-o.002 i

I l

l

• 4 DAY SAMPLE DUE TO SAMPLER MALFUNCTION; RESULTS 110T INCLUDED IH DATA EVALUATION.

i 3

l TABLE B-2 (Cont.)

j AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS AND CHARCOAL CARTRIDGES :

GROSS BETA AND IODINE-131 ANALYSES

! (APEL RESULTS)

e APG-1 SAMPLE TYPE

AIR PARTICULATES UNITS: pCi/M**3 f SAMPLE IDCATION:

' COLLECTION PERIOD GROSS LAB NO. START STOP BETA l

860568 03/31/86 04/07/86 0.017+/-0.003 860612 04/07/86 04/15/86 0.018+/-0.002 04/15/86 04/21/86 SAMPLER MALFUNCTION

• 04/21/86 04/28/86 SAMPLER MALFUNCTION l

04/28/86 05/05/86 SAMPLE IDST IN SHIPMENT j 860828- 05/05/86 05/12/86 0.028+/-0.003 j U 860916 05/12/86 05/19/86 0.078+/-0.004 860973 05/19/86 05/26/96 0.126+/-0.005 861036 05/26/86 06/02/86 0.128+/-0.005 861082 06/02/86 06/09/86 0.061+/-0.004 861153 06/09/86 06/16/86 0.029+/-0.003 l 06/16/86 06/23/86 SAMPLER MALFUNCTION 1

! 861295 06/23/86 06/30/86 0.016+/-0.002 l 861353 06/30/86 07/07/86 0.023+/-0.003

! 861414 07/07/86 07/14/86 0.017+/-0.002

) 861467 07/14/86 07/21/86 0.020+/-0.003 861509 07/21/86 07/28/86 0.023+/-0.004

861538 07/28/86 08/04/86 0.021+/-0.003 861583 08/04/86 08/11/86 0.048+/-0.004 861636 08/11/86 08/18/86 0.017+/-0.003 861678 08/18/86 08/26/86 0.028+/-0.003 1 861703 08/26/86 09/02/86 0.013+/-0.002 861735 09/02/86 09/08/86 0.021+/-0.003 j 861785 09/08/86 09/15/86 0.021+/-0.003 j 861840 09/15/86 09/22/86 0.019+/-0.002 j 861856 09/22/86 09/29/86 . 0.014+/-0.002 i

i

• LOW SAMPLE VOLUME COLLECTED DUE TO SAMPLER MALFUNCTION.

i l TABLE B-2 (Cont.)

' t AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS AND CHARCOAL CARTRIDGES :

GROSS BETA AND IODINE-131 ANALYSES I

(AP&L RESULTS)

APG-1 SAMPLE TYPE: AIR PARTICULATES UNITS: pCi/M* *3

{ SAMPLE IDCATION:

1 COLLECTION PERIOD GROSS LAB NO. START STOP BETA I

! 861935 09/29/86 10/06/86 0.015+/-0.032 861986 10/06/86 10/13/86 0.015+/-0.003 j 862042- 10/13/86 10/20/86 0.028+/-0.003 e 862096 10/20/86 10/27/86 0.022+/-0.003

)

862154 10/28/86 11/03/86* 0.028+/-0.003 d

862186 11/03/86 11/10/86 0.020+/-0.003 j 862248 11/10/86 11/17/86 0.024+/-0.003 j 862304 11/17/86.11/25/86 0.016+/-0.002 862348 11/25/86 12/01/86 0.017+/-0.003 4

862366 12/01/86 12/08/86 0.017+/-0.003 j

862427 12/08/86 12/15/86 0.020+/-0.003 1 862500 12/15/86 12/23/86 0.022+/-0.002 1 862526 12/23/86 12/29/86 0.024+/-0.003 1

1 i

I j

• 6 DAY SAMPLE DUE TO SAMPLER MALFUNCTION.

1 1

i i

?

I l TABLE B-2 (Cont.)

1 AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS AND CHARCOAL CARTRIDGES :

, GROSS BETA AND IODINE-131 ANALYSES l

i (AP&L RESULTS)

SAMPLE IDCATION: APP-1 SAMPLE TYPE: AIR PARTICULATES UNITS: pCi/M**3 COLLECTION PERIOD GROSS LAB NO. START STOP BETA l

860565 03/31/86 04/07/86 0.019+/-0.002 l 0.017+/-0.002 860614 04/07/86 04/15/86 j 860681 04/15/86 04/21/86 0.017+/-0.003 860727 04/21/86 04/28/86 0.028+/-0.003 04/28/86 05/05/86 SAMPLE IDST IN SHIPMENT 860830 05/05/86 05/12/86 0.026+/-0.003 86G918 05/12/86 05/19/86 0.085+/-0.004 860974 05/19/86 05/26/86 0.116+/-0.005 861037 05/26/86 06/02/86 0.123+/-0.005 l 0.052+/-0.003 861083 06/02/86 06/09/86 i 861154 06/09/86 06/16/86 0.025+/-0.003 861205 06/16/86 06/23/86 0.018+/-0.002 l 861297 06/23/86 06/30/86 0.020+/-0.003

) 861355 06/30/86 07/07/86 0.022+/-0.003 861416 07/07/86 07/14/86 0.013+/-0.002

861469 07/14/86 07/21/8C 0.022+/-0.003

' 861511 07/21/86 07/28/86 0.015+/-0.002 861540 07/28/86 06/04/86 0.020+/-0.003 861585 08/04/86 08/11/86 0.039+/-0.003  ;

861638 08/11/86 08/18/86 0.018+/-0.002 861680 08/18/86 08/26/86 0.025+/-0.003 i

! 861705 08/26/86 09/02/86 0.014+/-0.002 .

861737 09/02/86 09/08/86 0.017+/-0.003 l 861787 09/08/86 09/15/86 , 0.021+/-0.003 1 861842 09/15/86 09/22/86 0.021+/-0.003 861858 09/22/86 09/29/86 0.014+/-0.002 s

I I

TABLE B-2 (Cont.)

, AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS AND CHARCOAL CARTRIDGES :

1 GROSS BETA AND IODINE-131 ANALYSES j (AP&L RESULTS)

SAMPLE IDCATION: APP-1 SAMPLE TYPE: AIR PARTICULATES UNITS: pCi/M**3 COLLECTION PERIOD GROSS LAB NO. START STOP BETA j

861937 09/29/86 10/06/86 0.014+/-0.002 l 861988 10/06/86 10/13/86 0.015+/-0.002 862044 10/13/86 10/20/86 0.021+/-0.003 g 862098 10/20/86 10/27/86 0.019+/-0.003 862156 10/27/86 11/03/86 0.024+/-0.003 j 862188 11/03/86 11/10/86 0.022+/-0.003 862250 11/10/86 11/17/86 0.028+/-0.003

! 862306 11/17/86 11/25/86 0.016+/-0.002 l 862350 11/25/06 12/01/86 0.017+/-0.003 862368 12/01/86 12/08/86 0.017+/-0.003 862429 12/08/86 12/15/86 0.022+/-0.003 862502 12/15/86 12/23/86 0.020+/-0.002

862528 12/23/86 12/29/86 0.022+/-0.003 1

1 1

TABLE B-2 (Cont.)

AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS AND CHARCOAL CARTRIDGES :

GROSS BETA AND IODINE-131 ANALYSES (AP&L RESULTS)

SAMPLE TYPE: AIR PARTICULATES UNITS: pCi/M**3 SAMPLE IDCATION: APQ-1 COLLECTION PERIOD GROSS LAB NO. START STOP BETA 860564 03/31/86 04/07/86 0.022+/-0.003 860613 04/07/86 04/15/86 0.017+/-0.002 860680 04/15/86 04/21/86 0.021+/-0.003 l 860726 04/22/86 04/28/86* 0.028+/-0.003 04/28/86 05/05/86 SAMPLE IDST IN SHIPMENT g 860829 05/05/86 05/12/86 0.026+/-0.003 860917 05/12/86 05/19/86 0.115+/-0.005 )

860975 05/19/86 05/26/86 0.104+/-0.005 861038 05/26/86 06/02/86 0.116+/-0.005 861084 06/02/86 06/09/86 0.043+/-0.003 861155 06/09/86 06/16/86 0.024+/-0.003 861206 06/16/86 06/23/86 0.017+/-0.002 861296 06/23/86 06/30/86 0.017+/-0.002 861354 06/30/86 07/07/86 0.021+/-0.002 861415 07/07/86 07/14/86 0.016+/-0.002 861468 07/14/86 07/21/86 0.022+/-0.002 861510 07/21/86 07/28/86 0.015+/-0.002 861539 07/28/86 08/04/86 0.030+/-0.003 861584 08/04/86 08/11/86 0.043+/-0.003 661637 08/11/86 08/18/86 0.019+/-0.003 861679 08/18/86 08/26/86 0.026+/-0.002 861704 08/26/86 09/02/86 0.014+/-0.002 861736 09/02/86 09/08/86 0.018+/-0.003 861786 09/08/86 09/15/86 0.022+/-0.003 861841 09/15/86 09/22/86 , 0.021+/-0.003 861857 09/22/86 09/29/86 0.012+/-0.002

• 6 DAY SAMPLE DUE TO SAMPLER MALFUNCTION. . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

4 i

4 1

TABLE B-2 (Cont.)

AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS AND CHARCOAL CARTRIDGES :

i GROSS DETA AND IODINE-131 ANALYSES (AP&L RESULTS)

I I SAMPLE IDCATION: APQ-1 SAMPLE TYPE: AIR PARTICULATES UNITS: pCi/M**3 COLLECTION PERIOD GROSS LAB NO. START STOP BETA l 861936 09/29/86 10/06/86 0.012+/-0.002 l

861987 10/06/86 10/13/86 0.013+/-0.002

! 862043 10/13/86 10/20/86 0.024+/-0.003 v, 862097 10/20/86 10/27/86 0.017+/-0.003

• 862155 10/27/86 11/03/86 0.023+/-0.003 862187 11/03/86 11/10/86 0.02s+/-0.003 l

862249 11/10/86 11/17/86 0.029+/-0.003

86230s 11/17/86 11/25/86 0. 018 +/-0. 002 i 862349 11/25/86 12/01/86 0.015+/-0.003

) 862367 12/01/86 12/08/86 0.019+/-0.003 862426 12/08/86 12/15/86 0.022+/-0.003

862501 12/1s/86 12/23/86 0.020+/-0.002 862s27 12/23/86 12/29/86 0.026+/-0.003 1

i l

l 1

j i

i 4

l

-l l

1 TABLE B-2 (Cont.)

AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS AND CHARCOAL CARTRIDGES :

' GROSS BETA AND IODIME-131 ANALYSES (APEL RESULTS)

SAMPLE TYPE: AIR PARTICULATES UNITS: pCi/M**3 SAMPLE IDCATION: APE-30 COLLECTION PERIOD GROSS i

START STOP BETA l

LAB NO.

l l 860567 03/31/86 04/07/86 0.020+/-0.003 860616 04/07/86 04/15/86 0.016+/-0.002 860683 04/15/86 04/21/86 0.009+/-0.002

$ 860728 04/21/86 04/28/86 0.026+/-0.003 04/28/86 05/05/86 SAMPLE IDST IN SHIPMENT 860832 05/05/86 05/12/86 0.030+/-0.003 860920 05/12/86 05/19/86 0.111+/-0.005 860976 05/19/86 05/26/86 0.121+/-0.005 861039 05/26/86 06/02/86 0.126+/-0.005 861085 06/02/86 06/09/86 0.045+/-0.003 861156 06/09/86 06/16/86 0.030+/-0.003 1 861207 06/16/86 06/23/86 0.021+/-0.003 861299 06/23/86 06/30/86 0.018+/-0.005 861357 06/30/86 07/07/86 0.019+/-0.003 l 861418 07/07/86 07/14/86 0.013+/-0.002 861471 07/14/86 07/21/86 0.021+/-0.003 861513 07/21/86 07/28/86 0.015+/-0.002 861542 07/28/86 08/04/86 0.021+/-0.003 861587 08/04/86 08/11/86 0.011+/-0.002 861639 08/11/86 08/18/86 0.011+/-0.002 861682 08/18/86 08/26/86 0.028+/-0.003 861707 08/26/86 09/02/86 0.013+/-0.002 861739 09/02/86 09/08/86 ,

0.018+/-0.003 861789 09/08/86 09/15/86 0.029+/-0.003 861844 09/15/86 09/22/86 0.019+/-0.003 861860 09/22/86 09/29/86 0.012+/-0.002

TABLE B-2 (Cont.)

AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS AND CHARCOAL CARTRIDGES :

GROSS BETA AND IODINE-131 ANALYSES (AP&L RESULTS)

SAMPLE IDCATION: APE-30 SAMPLE TYPE: AIR PARTICUIATES UNITS: pCi/M**3 l

COLLECTION PERIOD GROSS LAB NO. START STOP BETA e

o 861939 09/29/86 10/06/86 0.014+/-0.002 861990 10/06/86 10/13/86 0.015+/-0.003 862046 10/13/86 10/20/86 0.025+/-0.003 862100 10/22/86 10/27/86* o.010+/-0.002 862158 10/27/86 11/03/86 0.026+/-0.003 862190 11/03/86 11/10/86 0.021+/-0.003 862252 11/10/86 11/17/86 0.027+/-0.003 862308 11/17/86 11/25/86 0.015+/-0.002 862352 11/25/86 12/01/86 0.017+/-0.003 862370 12/01/86 12/08/86 0.016+/-0.003 862431 12/08/86 12/15/86 0.020+/-0.003 862504 12/15/86 12/22/86 0.021+/-0.003 862530 12/22/86 12/29/86 0.024+/-0.003 l

1

• 5 DAY SAMPLE DUE TO SAMPLER MALFUNCTION l

TABLE B-2 (Cont.)  ;

AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS AND CHARCOAL CARTRIDGES :

GROSS BETA AND IODINE-131 ANALYSES )

j (AP&L RESULTS)  ;

i APC-1 SAMPLE TYPE: AIR IODINE UNITS: pCi/M**3 SAMPLE IDCATION:

COLLECTION PERIOD IAB NO. START STOP I-131 860563 03/31/86 04/07/86 < 0.007 860611 04/07/86 04/15/86 < 0.005 04/15/86 04/21/86 SAMPLER HALFUNCTION*

04/21/86 04/28/86 SAMPLER MALFUNCTION 04/28/86 05/05/86 SAMPLE IDST IN SHIPMENT 860827D 05/05/86 05/12/86 < 0.009

- 860915D 05/12/86 05/19/86 0.068+/-0.014 860971A 05/19/86 05/26/86 0.071+/-0.017 861034A 05/26/86 06/02/86 0.012+/-0.005 861080D 06/02/86 06/09/86 < 0.011' 861151 06/09/86 06/16/86 < 0.006 861203 06/16/86 06/23/86 < 0.005 861294 06/23/86 06/30/86 < 0.007 861352 06/30/86 07/07/86 < 0.006 861413 07/07/86 07/14/86 < 0.010 861470 07/14/86 07/21/86 < 0.007 861512 07/21/86 07/28/86 < 0.007 861541 07/28/86 08/04/86 < o.008 861586 08/04/86 08/11/86 < 0.008 08/11/86 08/18/86 SAMPLER HALFUNCTION 861681 08/18/86 08/26/86 < 0.006 861706 08/26/86 09/02/86 < 0.006 861738 09/02/86 09/08/86 < 0.010 861788 09/08/86 09/15/86 < 0.010 861843 09/15/06 09/22/06 < 0.006 861859 09/22/86 09/29/86 . < 0.005

,

• LOW SAMPLE VOLUME COLLECTED DUE TO SAMPLER MALFUNCTION RESULTS NOT REPORTED,

4 1

i i

TABLE B-2 (Cont.)

i AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS AND CHARCOAL CARTRIDGES :

GROSS BETA AND IODINE-131 ANALYSES (AP&L RESULTS) l SAMPLE IDCATION: APC-1 SANPLE TYPE: AIR IODINE UNITS: pCi/M**3 COLLECTION PERIOD i LAB NO. START STOP I-131 j

) 861938 09/29/86 10/06/86 SANPLER NALFUNCTION 861989 10/09/86 10/13/86* < 0.013 I 862045 10/13/86 10/20/86 < 0.008 862099 10/20/86 10/27/86 < 0.009

) e

" < 0.006 862157 10/27/86 11/03/86 862189 11/03/86 11/10/86 < 0.005 862251 11/10/86 11/17/86 < 0.006 862307 11/17/86 11/25/86 < 0.004 862351 11/25/86 12/01/86 < 0.010 l

862369 12/01/86 12/08/86 < 0.010 862430 12/08/86 12/15/86 < 0.008 j

j 862503 12/15/86 12/22/86 < 0.009 862529 12/22/86 12/29/86 < 0.009 l

i I

i 1

I

• 4 DAY SAMPLE DUE TO SAMPLER MALFUNCTION; RESULTS NOT IN LUDED IN EVALUATION OR

SUMMARY

I i

4 --

TABLE B-2 (Cont.)

AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS AND CHARCOAL CARTRIDGES :

GROSS BETA AND IODINE-131 ANALYSES

, (AP&L RESULTS)

SAMPLE IDCATION: APG-1 SAMPLE TYPE: AIR IODINE UNITS: PCi/M**3 COLLECTION PERIOD IAB NO. START STOP I-131 860563 03/31/86 04/07/86 < 0.007 860611 04/07/86 04/15/86 < 0.005 04/15/86 04/21/86 SAMPLER MALFUNCTION

• i 04/21/86 04/28/86 SANPLER MALFUNCTION 04/28/86 05/05/86 St.MPLE IDST IN SHIPMENT

$ 860827A 05/05/86 05/12/86 0.008+/-0.005 860915A 05/12/86 05/19/86 0.072+/-0.015 8609718 05/19/86 05/26/86 0.052+/-0.017 861034B 05/26/86 06/02/86 0.010+/-0.008 861080A 06/02/86 06/09/86 < 0.010 861151 06/09/86 06/16/86 < 0.006 06/16/86 06/23/86 SAMPLER MALFUNCTION 861294 06/23/86 06/30/86 < 0.007 861352 06/30/86 07/07/86 < 0.006 861413 07/07/86 07/14/86 < 0.010 07/14/86 07/21/86 < 0.007 861467 861509 07/21/86 07/28/86 < 0.007 861538 07/28/86 08/04/86 < 0.008 861583 08/04/86 08/11/86 < 0.008 861636 08/11/86 08/18/86 < 0.005 861678 08/18/86 08/26/86 < 0.006 861703 08/26/86 09/02/86 < 0.006 861735 09/02/86*09/08/86 < 0.010 861785 09/08/86 09/15/86 < 0.010 861840 09/15/86 09/22/86 ,

< 0.006 861856 < 0.005 09/,22/86 09/29/86

• LOW SAMPLE VOLUME COLLECTED DUE TO SAMPLER MALFUNCTION RESULVS NOT REPORTFJD0 _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ -

TABLE B-2 (Cont.)

AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS AND CHARCOAL CARTRIDGES '

GROSS BETA AND IODINE-131 ANALYSES

' (AP&L RESULTS) i SAMPLE IDCATION: APG-1 SAMPLE TYPE: AIR IODINE UNITS: pCi/M**3 COLLECTION PERIOD IAB NO. START STOP I-131 861935 09/29/86 10/06/86 < 0.006 861986 10/06/86 10/13/86 < 0.013

) 862042 10/13/86 10/20/86 < 0.008 862096 10/20/86 10/27/86 < 0.009 g 862154 10/2e/86 11/03/86* < 0.006 862186 11/03/86 11/10/86 < 0.005 862248 11/10/86 11/17/86 < 0.006 862304 11/17/86 11/25/86 < 0.004 862348 11/25/86 12/01/86 < 0.010 862366 12/01/86 12/08/86 < 0.010 862427 12/08/86 12/15/86 < 0.008 862500 12/15/86 12/23/86 < 0.009 862526 12/23/86 12/29/86 < 0.009

• 6 DAY SAMPLE DUE TO SAMPLER MALFUNCTION.

TABLE B-2 (Cont.)

AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS AND CHARCOAL CARTRIDGES :

GROSS BETA AND IODINE-131 ANALYSES (APEL RESULTS) i

)

SAMPLE IDCATION: APP-1 SAMPLE TYPE: AIR IODINE UNITS: pC1/M**3 COLLECTION PERIOD LAB NO. START STOP I-131 860563 03/31/86 04/07/86 < 0.007 860611 04/07/86 04/15/86 < 0.005 860678 04/15/86 04/21/86 < 0.008 860725 04/21/86 04/28/86 < 0.009 04/28/86 05/05/86 SAMPLE IDST IN SHIPMENT l

! g 860827C 05/05/86 05/12/86 0.009+/-0.006 j 860915C 05/12/86 05/19/86 0.048+/-0.017 i 860971C 05/19/86 05/26/86 0.074+/-0.011 j 861034C 05/26/86 06/02/86 0.012+/-0.011 861080C 06/02/86 06/09/86 < 0.009 1

} 861151 06/09/86 06/16/86 < 0.006 861203 06/16/86 06/23/86 < 0.005 l < 0.007

861294 06/23/86 06/30/86 i

i 861352 06/30/86 07/07/86 < 0.006 i 861413 07/07/86 07/14/86 < 0.010 861469 07/14/86 07/21/86 < 0.007 861511 07/21/86 07/28/86 < C.OG7 861540 07/28/86 08/04/86 < 0.008

) < 0.008

! 861585 08/04/86 08/11/86 861638 08/11/86 08/18/86 < 0.005 --

861680 08/18/86 08/26/86 < 0.006

) 861705 08/26/86 09/02/86 < 0.006 1 861737 09/02/86 09/08/86 < 0.010 861787 09/08/86 09/15/86 < 0.010 l < 0.006 861842 09/15/86 09/22/86

• 861858 09/22/86 09/29/86 < 0.005 l

i i

I L __ _ _ _ _ _ __

4 3

i

.i

! TABLE B-2 (Cont.)

I AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS AND CHARCOAL CARTRIDGES :

1 GROSS BETA AND IODINE-131 ANALYSES

,' (AP&L RESULTS)

SANPLE IDCATION: APP-1 SANPLE TYPE: AIR IODINE UNITS: pCi/N**3 I COLLECTION PERIOD j LAB NO.

• START STOP I-131 1

j 861937 09/29/86 10/06/86 < 0.006

! 861988 10/06/86 10/13/8c < 0.013 1 862044 10/13/86 10/20/86 < 0.008 e 862098 10/20/86 10/27/86 < 0.009

• < 0.006

862156 10/27/86 11/03/86 862188 11/03/86 11/10/86 < 0.005 862250 11/10/86 11/17/86 < 0.006

} < 0.004 862306 11/17/86 11/25/86

! 862350 11/25/86 12/01/86 < 0.010 i 862368 12/01/86 12/08/86 < 0.010 1 862429 12/08/86 12/15/86 < 0.008 j 862502 12/15/86 12/23/86 < 0.009 862528 12/23/86 12/29/86 < 0.009 i

)

A l

i

t i

j i

i i

j TABLE B-2 (Cont.)

1 AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS AND CHARCOAL CARTRIDGES :

GROSS BETA AND IODINE-131 ANALYSES (AP&L RESULTS) j i SANPLE LOCATION: APQ-1 SAMPLE TYPE: AIR IODINE UNITS: pCi/M**3 i

l COLLECTION PERIOD LAB NO. START STOP I-131 860563 03/31/86 04/07/86 < 0.007 860611 04/07/86 04/15/86 < c.005

860678 04/15/86 04/21/86 < 0.008 I 860725 04/22/86 04/28/86 * < 0.009

, 04/28/86 05/05/86 SAMPLE LOST IN SHIPMENT

~ 8608278 05/05/86 05/12/86 0.014+/-0.008 0.052+/-0.015 j 860915B 05/12/86 05/19/86

] 860971D 05/19/86 05/26/86 0.063+/-0.010

861034D 05/26/86 06/02/86 < 0.012

8610808 06/02/86 06/09/86 < 0.006  !

} 861151 06/09/86 06/16/86 < 0.006 861203 06/16/86 06/23/86 < 0.005 l < 0.007 j 861294 06/23/86 06/30/86

< 0.006

) 861352 06/30/86 07/07/86

< 0.010  ;

l 861413 07/07/86 07/14/86 i 861468 07/14/86 07/21/86 < 0.007 861510 07/21/86 07/28/86 < 0.007 861539 07/28/86 08/04/86 < 0.008 861584 08/04/86 08/11/86 < 0.008 861637 08/11/86 08/18/86 < 0.005 i 861679 08/18/86 08/26/86 < 0.006 4

861704 08/26/86 09/02/86 < 0.006 861736 09/02/86 09/08/86 < 0.010 861786 09/08/86 09/15/86 < 0.010 861841 09/15/86 09/22/86 < 0.006 861857 09/22/86 09/29/86 - < 0.005 j

• -6 DAY SAMPI.E DUE TO SAMPLER MALFUNCTION.

j

]

i l

j TABLE B-2 (Cont.)

j , AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS AND CHARCOAL CARTRIDGES :

GROSS BETA AND IODINE-131 ANALYSES

) (APEL RESULTS)

SAMPLE IDCATION: APQ-1 SAMPLE TYPE: AIR IODINE UNITS: pCi/M**3 l

COLLECTION PERIOD LAB NO. START STOP I-131 I 861936 09/29/86 10/06/86 < 0.006 j 861987 10/06/86 10/13/86 < 0.013 862043 10/13/86 10/20/86 < 0.008

. 862097 10/20/86 10/27/86 < 0.009 l

= 862155 10/27/86 11/03/86 < 0.006

) 862187 11/03/86 11/10/86 < 0.005 j 862249 11/10/86 11/17/86 < 0.006

! 862305 11/17/86 11/25/86 < 0.004 j 862349 11/25/86 12/01/86 < 0.010 862367 12/01/86 12/08/86 < 0.010 862428 12/08/86 12/15/86 < 0.008 l

862501 12/15/86 12/23/86 < 0.009

862527 12/23/86 12/29/86 < 0.009

)

i i

)

1 t

i 1

TABLE B-2 (Cont.)

l AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS AND CHARCOAL CARTRIDGES :

GROSS BETA AND IODINE-131 ANALYSES (AP6L RESULTS)

{ SAMPLE IDCATION: APE-30 SAMPLE TYPE: AIR IODINE UNITS: pCi/M**3 ,

i l COLLECTION PERIOD 4

LAB NO. START STOP I-131

' 860563 03/31/86 04/07/86 < 0.007 .

I 860611 04/07/86 04/15/86 < 0.005 860678 04/15/86 04/21/86 < 0.008 860725 04/21/86 04/28/86 < 0.009

. 04/28/86 05/05/86 SAMPLE IDST IN SHIPMENT

• 860827E 05/05/86 05/12/86 0.013+/-0.003 860915E 05/12/86 05/19/86 0.074+/-0.014 860971E 05/19/86 05/26/86 0.090+/-0.018 861034E 05/26/86 06/02/86 0.023+/-0.012 861080E 06/02/86 06/09/86 < 0.007 861151 06/09/86 06/16/86 < 0.006 861203 06/16/86 06/23/86 < 0.005 861294 06/23/86 06/30/86 < 0.007 4

} 861352 06/30/86 07/07/86 < 0.006 861413 07/07/86 07/14/86 < 0.010

{' 861471 07/14/86 07/21/86 < 0.007 861513 07/21/86 07/28/86 < 0.007 861542 07/28/86 08/04/86 < 0.008 861587 08/04/86 08/11/86 < 0.008 861639 08/11/86 08/18/86 < 0.005 861682 08/18/86 08/26/86 < 0.006

{

861707 , 08/26/86 09/02/86 < 0.006 861739 09/02/86 09/08/S6 < 0.010

! 861789 09/08/86 09/15/86 < 0.010 861844 09/15/86 09/22/86 -

< 0.006 861860 09/22/86 09/29/86 < 0.005 i

1 i

l TABLE B-2 (Cont.)

] AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS AND CHARCOAL CARTRIDGES :  ;

j GROSS BETA AND IODINE-131 ANALYSES '

j (AP&L RESULTS) l SAMPLE LOCATION: APE-30 SAMPLE TYPE: AIR IODINE UNITS: pCi/M**3

, COLLECTION PERIOD LAB NO. START STOP I-131 1

? 861939 09/29/86 10/06/86 < 0.006 5

861990 10/06/86 10/13/86 < 0.013 o 862046 10/13/86 10/20/86 < 0.008 j 862100 10/22/86 10/27/86* < 0.009 i 862158 . 10/27/86 11/03/86 < 0.006 862190 11/03/86 11/10/86 < 0.00s j 862252 11/10/86 11/17/86 < 0.006

! 862308 11/17/86 11/25/86 < 0.004 j 862352 11/25/86 12/01/86 < 0.010 862370 12/01/86 12/08/86 < 0.010

!; 862431 12/08/86 12/15/86 < 0.008

862504 12/15/86 12/22/86 < 0.009

862530 12/22/86 12/29/86 < 0.009 i

i l

1 l

• 5 DAY SAMPLE DUE TO SAMPLER MALFUNCTION i

1 l

1 TABLE B-3 AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS :

GAMNA ISOTOPIC ANALYSIS ON QUARTERLY COMPOSITES I

(TELEDYNE RESULTS) i (pCl/Cu.M.)

STATION NUMBER APC-1 GAMMA SPECTRUM ANALYSIS FIRST QUARTER 12/20/85-03/31/80 BE-7 9.9b tl.00L-02 K-40 L.T. 2. E-02 i

MM-54 L.T. 6. E-04 C0-58 L.T. 7. E-04 FE-59 L.T. 2. E-03 CO-60 L.T. 7. E-04 ZN-65 L.T. 1. E-03 ZR-95/NB-95 L.T. 8. L-04 c RU-103 L.T. 1. E-03

.l RU-106 L.T. 6. E-03 l

l I-131 L.T. 1. L-02 C5-134 L.T. 7. E-04 C5-137 L.T. 6. E-04

)

BA-140/LA-140 L.T. 4. E-03 CE-141 L.T. 1. E-03 CL-144 L.T. 3. E-03 RA-226 L.T. 9. L-03 TH-228 L.T. 9. E-04 L.T. means less than.

TABLE B-3 (Cont.)

AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS :

GAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSIS ON QUARTERLY COMPOSITES (TELEDYNE RESULTS)

' (pct /Cu.M.)

i STATION NUMBER APG-1 GAMMA SPECTRUM ANALYSIS FIRST QUARTLN i 12/30/85-03/31/86 BE-7 1.05 10.11E-01 K-40 9. 4 6 14. 9 7E -03 MN-54 L.T. 5. E-04 C0-58 L.T. 7. E-04 u

N FE-59 L.T. 2. E-03 CO-60 L.T. 6. E-04 ZN-65 L.T. 1. E-03 ZR-95/NB-95 L.T. 7. E-04 RU-103 L.T. 8. E-04 RU-106 L.T. 5. E-03 I-131 L.T. 8. E-03 CS-134 L.T. 6. E-04 CS-137 L.T. 6. E-04 BA-140/LA-140 L.T. 4 E-03 CE-141 L.T. 1. E-03 CE-144 L.T. 3. E-03 NA-226 L.T 8. t-03 TH-228 L.T. 9. E-04 L.T. means less than.

4 TABLE B-3 (Cont.)

AIR PARTICUIATE FILTERS :

GAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSIS ON QUARTERLY COMPOSITES

, (TELEDYNE RESULTS)

(pct /Cu.M.)

STAil0N NUMBER APP-1 GAMMA SPECTRUM ANALYSIS FIRST QUARTER 12/30/85-03/31/8b

BE-7 8.03 to.80E-02 K-40 L.T. 2. E-02 MN-54 L.T. 6. E-04 U CO-58 L.T. 7. E-04 q FE-59 L.T. 2. E-03 CO-60 L.T. 9. E-04 1

ZN-65 L.T. 2. E-03 ZR-95/NB-95 L.T. 8. E-04 RU-103 L.T. 8. E-04 I

RU-106 L.T. 6. E-03 l

, 1-131 L.T. 8. E-03 l

C5-134 L.T. 7. E-04 C5-137 L.T. 7. E-04 BA-140/LA-140 L.T. 5. E-03 CE-141 L.T. 1. E-03 l

l CE-144 L.T. 3. E-03 RA-226 L.T. 7. E-03 TH-228 L.T. 6. E-04 i

l L.T. means less than.

TABLE B-3 (Cont.)

AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS :

GAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSIS ON QUARTERLY COMPOSITES

, (TELEDYNE RESULTS)

(pCl/Cu.M.)

STATION NUMBER AP4-1 GAMMA SPECTRUM ANALYSIS FIRST QUARTER 12/30/85-03/31/86 BE-7 1.20 10.12E-01 K-40 L.T. 2. E-02 MN-54 L.T. 5. E-04 u ComS8 L.T. 6. E-04 V

FE-59 L.T. 2. E-03 CD-60 L.T. 6. E-04 ZN-65 L.T. 1. E-03 ZR-95/N8-95 L.T. 7. E-04 i RU-103 L.T. 9. E-04 RU-106 L.T. 5. E-03 1-131 L.T. 8. E-03 CS-134 . L.T. 6. E-04

C5-137 L.T. S. E-04 BA-140/LA-140 L.T. 4. E-03 CE-141 L.T. 1. E-03 CE-144 L.T. 3. E-03 RA-226 L.T. 8. E-03 TH-228 L.T. 9. E-04 i,

L.T. means less than.

i i

i TABLE B-3 (Cont.)

AIR PARTICUIATE FILTERS :

GAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSIS ON QUARTERLY COMPOSITES (TELEDYNE RESULTS)

' (pCi/Cu.M.)

STATION NUMBER APE-30 CAMMA SPECTRUM ANALYSIS FIRST QUARTER 12/30/85-03/31/86 BE-7 9.62 tl.04E-02 K-40 L.T. 1. E-02 MN-54 L.T. 7. E-04 C0-58 L.T. 8. E-04 u

• FE-59 L ..T . 2. E-03

'CO-60 L.T. 7. E-04 ZN-65 L.T. 2. E-03 l

2R-95/N8-95 L.T 9. E-04 RU-103 L.T. 1. E-03 RU-106 L.T. 6. E-03 1-131 L.T. 1. E-02 CS-134 L.T. 7. E-04

. C5-137 L.T. 8. E-04 l

BA-140/LA-140 L.T. 5. E-03 CE-141 L.T. 2. E-03 CE-144 L.T. 4 E-03 RA-226 L.T. 1. E-02 TH-228 L.T. 1. E-03 L.T. means less than.

_-_ m_ ____m

_ _ _ _____ __. ._ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ - _ .___ . _ _ . . _ . _ _ .- . _ _ _ ~- -

TABLE B-3 (Cont.)

, AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS :

4 GAMMA ISCTOPIC ANALYSIS ON QUARTERLY COMPOSITES (AP&L RESULTS)

SAMPLE IDCATION: ALL UNITS: pCi/M**3l l

COLLECTION PERIOD LAB NO. SAM. I.D. START STOP Ru-103 Cs-134 Cs-137 i

861303 APC-1 03/31/86 06/30/86 0.004+/-0.001 0.003+/-0.001 0.006+/-0.001 862082 APC-1 06/30/86 09/29/86 < 0.0010 < 0.0008 < 0.0007 l' s 870112 APC-1 09/29/86 12/29/86 < 0.0008 < 0.0007 < 0.0006 861304 APE-30 03/31/86 06/30/86 0.005+/-0.001 0.004+/-0.001 0.007+/-0.001

! 862083 APE-30 06/30/86 09/29/86 < 0.0013 < 0.0010 < 0.0008 l 870113 APE-30 09/29/86 12/29/86 < 0.0005 < 0.0004 < 0.0004 l 861300 APG-1 03/31/86 06/30/86 0.005+/-0.001 0.004+/-0.001 0.007+/-0.001 j 862079 APG-1 06/30/86 09/29/86 < 0.0013 < 0.0011 < 0.0008 870109 APG-1 09/29/86 12/29/86 < 0.0007 < 0.0007 < 0.0005 j

! 861302 APP-1 03/31/86 06/30/86 0.006+/-0.001 0.003+/-0.001 0.006+/-0.001

862081 APP-1 06/30/86 09/29/86 < 0.0012 < 0.0010 < 0.0008 870111 APP-1 09/29/86 12/29/86 < 0.0006 < 0.0005 < 0.0004

. 861301 APQ-1 03/31/86 06/30/86 0.004+/-0.001 0.003+/-0.001 0.005+/-0.001 862080 APQ-1 06/30/86 09/29/86 < 0.0008 < 0.0005 < 0.0004 870110 APQ-1 09/29/86 12/29/86 < 0.0004 < 0.0004 < 0.0003 I .

i l

1

1 1 1 1 l 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 u 0 0 0 E E E E E E E E 7

P . . . . . .

W 3 3 4 3 2 4 3 5 O

T. T. T. T. T. T. T. T.

L L L L L L L L 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E E E E E E E E 5

E 3 3 4 3 4 5 3 4 W

D S T. T. T. T. T. T. T. T.

IS )S L L L L L L L L T

RY EL L )

4TA U S r

e

- AN E t BWA R i l

/

EG1 E t LN3 BI1 N Y C

(

p AK D TNE IN L E 1 3

1 1

0 1

0 1

0 0 1 1 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

RI DD E I E E E E E E E E O (T 2 I - . . . . . . . .

G 3 3 4 3 3 3 2 5 W

D T. T. T. T. T. T. T. T.

L L L L L L L L n

a h

t 1

6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 s E 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 s T

A

/ / / / / / / /

6 0 4 7 3 7 1 5 e l

D 0 2 0 1 0 1 3 1

/ / / / / / / / s N 1 1 2 2 3 3 3 4 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n I - - - - - - - - a T 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 e C 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 m E / / / / / / / /

L 3 6 0 4 7 3 7 1 L 2 0 2 0 1 0 1 3 O / / / / / / / / T.

C 2 1 1 2 2 3 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L

_ yu I! ,  ; ; l,  ; . ' i! I

I l TABLE B-4 (Cont.)

i DRINKING WATER :

l IODINE-131 ANALYSIS l (AP&L RESULTS) l i

SAMPLE IDCATION: DWG-2 UNITS: pCi/L l '

COLLECTION PERIOD IAB NO. START STOP I-131*

860022 12/23/85 01/06/86 < 0.3 j < 0.3 3

860111 01/06/86 01/20/86 <

860193 01/20/86 02/04/86 0.2

] < 0.4 j 860264 02/04/86 02/17/86 < 0.3 l

860338 02/17/86 03/03/86 < 0.4 j 860439 03/03/86 03/17/86 < 0.3

", 860524 03/17/86 03/31/86 I

860617 03/31/86 04/15/86 < 0.3 y

• 860729 04/15/86 04/28/86 < 0.3 860834 04/28/86 05/12/86 < 0.5 860977 05/12/86 05/26/86 < 0.5 j

861086 05/26/86 06/09/86 < 0.4 j <

861208 06/09/86 06/24/86 0.4 j

i j 861360 06/24/86 07/07/86 < 0.4 861472 07/07/86 07/21/86 < 0.3

! < 0.6 1 861543 07/21/86 08/04/86 < 0.4 I 861640 08/04/86 OC/18/86 <

861708 08/18/86 09/02/86 0.2 l

861790 09/15/86 ** < 0.3

}

< 0.3 1 861861 09/15/86 09/29/86

< 0.2 861991 09/29/86 10/14/86 < 0.2

] 862101 10/14/86 10/27/86 < 0.2 j 862191 10/27/86 11/10/86 < 0.5 l

862309 11/10/86 11/25/86 < 0.2 1

862371 11/25/86 12/08/86 < 0.6 I 862505 12/08/86 12/22/86 l

I f

• LOW LEVEL ANALYSIS; ** SAMPLER MALFUNCTION; GRAB SAMPLE OBTAINED.

j .

TABLE B-4 (Cont.)

DRINKING MATER :

IODINE-131 ANALYSIS (APEL RESULTS) 1 I

DWE-5 UNITS: pCi/L I SAMPLE LOCATION:

s COLLECTION PERIOD i

' START STOP I-131*

l LAB NO. '

< 0.3 860021 12/23/85 01/06/86 < 0.3 860112 01/06/86 01/20/86 < 0.2 860194 01/20/86 02/04/86 < 0.4 860265 02/04/86 02/17/86 < 0.3 j 860339 02/17/86 03/03/86 < 0.3 860440 03/03/86 03/17/86 < 0.4 03/17/86 03/31/86 1 860525 i

< 0.4 860618 03/31/86 04/15/86 < 0.3 860730 04/15/86 04/28/86 < 0.3 3 860833 04/28/86 05/12/86 < 0.5

) 860978 05/12/86 05/26/86 < 0.4 861087 05/26/86 06/09/86 < 0.3 861209 06/09/86 06/24/86

< 0.4 861361 06/24/86 07/07/86 < 0.5 861473 07/07/86 07/21/86 < 0.3 861544 07/21/86 08/04/86 < 0.4 a

j 861641 08/04/86 08/18/86 < 0.3 i 861709 08/18/86 09/02/86 < 0.3

861791 09/02/86 09/15/86 < 0.3 l

861862 09/29/86**

< 0.3 2 861992 09/29/86 10/13/86 < 0.3 j

862102 10/13/86 10/27/86 < 0.3 862192 10/27/86 11/10/86 < 0.5 862310 11/10/86 11/25/86 < 0.2 862372 11/25/86 12/08/86 < 0.6 l

862506 12/08/86 12/22/86 J

• Low Level Analysis; ** Grab sample

TABLE B-4 (Cont.)

DRINKING WATER :

IODINE-131 ANALYSIS l (APEL RESULTS)

! i SAMPLE IDCATION: DWP-7 UNITS: pCi/L COLLECTION PERIOD IAB NO. START STOP I-131*

860023 12/23/85 01/06/86 < 0.3 860113 01/06/86 01/20/86 < 0.3 860195 01/20/86 02/04/86 < 0.3 860266 02/04/86 02/17/86 < 0.4 860340 02/17/86 03/03/86 < 0.3 860441 03/03/86 03/17/86 < 0.3 860526 03/17/86 03/31/86 < 0.4 g

860619 03/31/86 04/15/86 < 0.3 860731 04/15/86 04/28/86 < 0.4 860835 04/28/86 05/12/86 < 0.5 860979 05/12/86 05/26/86 < 0.4 861088 05/26/86 06/09/86 < 0.4 861210 06/09/86 06/24/86 < 0.4 861362 06/24/86 07/07/86 < 0.3 861474 07/07/86 07/21/86 < 0.4 861545 07/21/86 08/04/86 < 0.4 861642 08/04/86 08/18/86 < 0.4 861710 08/18/86 09/02/86 < 0.3 861792 09/02/86 09/15/86 < 0.3 861863 09/15/86 09/29/86 < 0.3 10/13/86 < 0.3 861993 09/29/86 <

862103 10/13/86 10/27/86 0.3 862193 10/27/86 11/10/86 < 0.2 11/25/86 < 0.5 862311 11/10/86 ~

862372 11/25/86 12/08/86 0.2 12/22/86 < 0.6 862507 12/08/86

• Low Le_ vel Analysis

.= c o == o o o o ==

o o o o o o o o o o o o o oo -*

.e *

.J o I o o o o No

-e l

.n ame tad .ad =ad .ad had haJ .hd W =ad ena w nsJ and had and nad w ted N

T g3 e e e e o e o e e e e a e e e e . . .

= e

g e-o 4 @ @ er A ** w a @ 3 w N er w M N w - @

w AM og g e e e e e e e o e e e a e e o e e e m e== >= >=. >= >= p= 9= p= >= >= >= en >= >= >= >= e- >=

c e e o e e e e o e e e e e e e e e .

.J d .J .4 .J .J rJ .J .J J .J .J .4 .J .J J .J J o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o == o co oo o o o o e e - == N o

M hhj ted had %hd had I.ad and tad tad idJ bed bed bed had bad had led led med M @

go e e e e o e o e o e e o e e e e e o e wa .e in en W w m W N id's @ M w w w a* ** ar me e KM et o M

.. gg . e e e e e o e e e e e e e e e . .

Wd M o to 9= >= >=e >=e >= >= pm >= tue >= D= pm >= pe e

{Q g e e e e e e e o e . e=. >=. . >=. e e e g g N .A A .J J d .J .J d ed d .J .J .J .4 .4 .J .J .A g

> E a e 4

h.

og H

ed a

.. bHe -

N M o

C C O C e

C e o o o o o o -

O O O O O O O e o o - - -

O O O O O O O **

E s gg M o o ae ke %

i.e w w w J w w w w w ind w .*J w w w A w w

.e g <b m g m MM

o. . e e e e W

I <

o o. ,e e

,e e e e e e e e a . e Sgg N m er e e en e e m N @ M M er w e w e m -

e eo 40 Q su.e b

O had % *

• e e e o e o e e o e e e o e *

• b g

p N 2 bhe N N se I e o o e o e

pe e

>m e

km De $m De km $ne km eum De De >* >= De

>=. eg gH y >I ** @

e e e e e e . . e e e e .

4 W - *

.4 .J .J d .A .J J .J d .J J .J d .J d .J d .J D c

p20 0 E 3

H N . o

$Q Q U **

W Q2kN74 s 3< -e .

o w

4 I o - -. o o - o o o o c

H0 er o o o o o o o o o o o o - o o - - -

o o o o o oN o - W N o U N D= %

had had Lad ned had nad tad naJ &nd had had nad ted tad tad nne taJ heJ had &

g EN o 6 g Mo oe e e e e . . . . e e e e e e e o e e e O M EM as in N er en ** en W nn @ er N nn w ee e-o er == me  %

O a

• N

>N e e k

. . e e . e . . e o e e o e e e

.-a p. O.

'Q"o .N.e e e p.

e

>e e

>= e

>=e >.e >= >- o= >. p. >- p. p. p. >= >.e >=

e o e e e e e o e o e g

@ .J =J .J .J .J .J d .4 .d .A ad .J .J .J .J -J .4 .0 J3 ae O

c V

e 3

O o

e.

• - e. M p e d g e "* M" W 4 e > 80 ,g

> w g

.J K g 4 E g #

E et M e- 4 e @

o E ed p=4 tea a o o e

>* 4 E @

u W >= nn m g me g tes me W m e W

.J E tad 9 et W N

.4 i.e me a .J O 2R o X M E  % he W W  % M @ er N o me er te m Q o 4 w W m o en en o o me M M er er w N N

• tad == m E N o en en en to te e e=e em M me me ce se == N N e= o e E s my e e e e e e e e e.e e e e e g e e e-o

[.4 og og g e o a o o et had 0 E o had o E N o o e e M < nas nas et Z eeeg e as E w see v N N as as == u u a u w as -

81

1 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

_ / E E E L E E L E E E E E E E L L E E L4

. I0 . . . . . . .

R - ) . . . . . . . . . . .

P1 a 8 1 5 7 2 b 1 8 1 b 2 5 6 5 2 4 1 1 A3 (

/

3 0 T. T. T. T. T. T. T. T. T. T. T. T. T. T. T. T. T. T.

_ L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0

_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

_ 1 E E E E E E E E E E L E E E E E E E E

_ 3

_ / 7 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

_ H0 1 4 1 3 4 1 4 8 4 6 3 4 4 3 1 1 3 8 7

_ C -

N3

_ 2

_ A0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

M/

3 4

T. T. T. T. T. T. T. T. T. T. T. T. I. T. T. T. T. T.

- 0 4 L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L S

E S

Y L .

A d e

N .

v A 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 "1 0 i

e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c CSE E E E E e

r I 3 E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E

)

P T )S Y/

0 9 t t.RO IT R3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . o n TO S L ET O U 5 A0 U -

1 4 5 4 4 9 4 7 4 5 3 3 4 3 1 9 3 8 7 n e

C oAS P ME S )

r E

W

- R4 B0 E/ 9 1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . l p

(WI OCR t e D F2 0 4 T.

L T.

L T.

L T.

L T.

L T.

L T.

L T.

L T.

L T.

L T.

L T.

L T.

L T.

L T.

L T.

L T.

L T.

L m

a 5 GA - s t

NM Y E I

/ h l B IMKA LN Y l

C o

l i

r E ING H TD p i p

( A A

_ L RD N E L T

S d B DN O E n

_ A A MT 0

0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 o c

T 4 e A N(

- 0 E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E s T O

- /

Y2 7 e _

E R0 A - 1 4 6

4 4

9 4

8 5

5 4

2 4

4 1

1 3

8 8

. c n _

B U3 i N2 2 s _

S A/

J2 6 d

S 1 T. T. T. T. T. T. T. T. T. T. T. T. T. T. T. T. T. T. e O 4 L L L L L L L L L L t L L L L L L L m r

R o G f

. r e

p t

_ o

_ n

s n.

'  : S t S I syh a

I S S V l t Y L a L A n a s s

A N N

A A

a e l D M t E L U 0 e T A R 4 B s C C T 5 1 n E I C 9 - s a A s o e

_ L M E -

_ L E P 8 L

_ O H S m / r m_

C C / 3 6 4 7 0 1 4 6 8 G .

0 A 4 8 9 0 5 5 0 0 1 3 3 4 4 4 2 2 E

T I

D B

N N

7 0 4

5 5 5

6 6

9 1

1 3

1 1

1 1

1 1

2 2

- ) T_*

A A R A E - m 0 E 0 m R U U - 5 5 A E E A M a I" D R G G S K m C F C Z Z R R I C C B C C R T ( _

_ c o

, i  ;}  ;!

i 1

-* 3 O ao O O 3 3 == N O O == == == == O O O O O O Q O O O O O 3 O O O 3 O O o.

s tad end .ad one nad had ena .ma nas w .ad had taa maa tad end i,ad in s e

.Je De m o e e e e e o e e e e e e e e e o e x == = to @ w e == w .96 4 W W ** * *

• as m 00 N CL '9 w 4%

m e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e O > >= >= > >= e= .= e= e= >= >= > >=

. . e=. e. e e e e e o e e=. *=. e o e . n=.

.,J .a 4 .a e .a .6 .0 .e .J .6 ed .J .a .e .a .a .,a O e me 3 O O O O O O ** == O O == ** == ea 3 O O O O O O O O O 3 , O O O O O O O D D N

tas ned tas tea tea tad end nad tea taJ tad w tad taa tad naa tad nad taJ m CD go e e o e e a e e e o e e . e e e . . .

ve w are w w e w N w e M M w w ** ==e m N N mm CO *e e e e e e g% e e e . . e e e e e e e e m m >= a= e= p. n= e= e= e. >= e- > >= >= >= >= >=

O e e e e e e=. a=. e e e e e e e e e e o e e .a .J .J .a J .4 .J .d .J .A d .d .J .J d .d .a .A m

>A' '

< u. I D

o O =.e =* O O O O O O O ** me O O ==* O =e e=e O w C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O e U m b 1 m had had had had tad med had tea tas taa tad ned tas taa tad med had tea taa e ++ >g, s. O

% o

. mm O g 40 N. . . . . e e e . . e e e e . e e e a g D ,e m we w in w w @ m N e @ M M w w me et m 53 pg C D N e, O =O +' -

a'. ws e e e e e o e e a U g e . . . . . e . . e i

• • =* b 2 te. N in >= >= == >. >- e- >= >- e. e- p. >= >= g i e Q O e e . e e . >=. >=. e. e . . >=. >=. e o e e e e

• • N .A .J .d .J .4 .4 .J .a .J -s .4 .J .A .d .J -s a a e lO $ e=

l  % E =e mM M u ==

O 6 g

3 Q e E

8" W

$ O

( m O

O

==

O O O

e. O O O O O O O **

O C O O O O O O O O O e-o C O O O == - O ta O O O O e b ==s. w e O tad had tad ted and had tad ned had naa had had tas had had tad had tad had

>% g mN @ u 4O e e e e o e o e e e e e o e e o e o e g D e me m en m m e m e e ey m N m m e g m N pg Em en (N 4.

g *3 % e e a e e e o e e e o e e o e e e e g

>=. >= w g N @ n= >= >= >= e= to e= >* >= em p= >= >=

e e e=. >=. >=. s e e e e e e e e e . . e . e

\

Q w .4 .4 .4 a .e e .4 .e a .J .a .4 .J as .J e e e 6. t

% O I O

I.h en O

E

a. p e

• • M .C M ** e4 f5 i

• • @  % ,C l

@ > e= u

> .a q W 4 E g at E e E B 4 es ag e 47 e

O E es P

had a D C e

• = as as e as 40 W be a= to we g 1

tad ** W 96 e te q a E e in, e 4 to

.d had 6 en ma o O E M E  % b u u  % m @ w emm O me w w e e.g O W w W St O ten to O O .e m m e w w N N e had == E3 K N O nn to en w e et we em m ee e=e e=e ao me N N P*

>= Q e & a w e e e e e e a e me e e e e e e e an=

= ac as < w e 3 O ta, O E as n o e e at w w = = J Q as i.s is W ad E w ine u N N as as e. v v en w w as .z

= w 83

TABLE B-5 (Cont.)

DRINKING NATER :

GROSS BETA AND GAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSES

, ON MONTHLY COMPOSITES (AP&L RESULTS) uutis: pci/L SAfrLE LOCATIom: sus-2 COLLECTIGE PEeI S ESOES LAe aO. STAef STOP SETA Itt-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-ee 2n-65 sen-95 Zr-95 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 ee-140 La-140 e 5 <5 < 9 < 5 < 11 < 5 < 12 < 7 < 6 < 5 < 20 < 4 ana'Id4 81/06/M 02/M/06 23.4*/ 3.4 2.5+/-2.4 < 2 < 3 < 6 < 3 < 6 < 3 < 6 < 14 < 3 < 3 < 23 < 6 cm 884379 82/ M/06 e5/05/06 5.k/-2.5 < 3 < 3 e 6 <3 < & < 3 < 7 < 5 < 3 < 3 < 12 < 3 et0546 e5/e5/06 e5/31/e6 e68751 05/31/86 M/28/06 3.7+/-2.3 < 5 < 5 < S < 5 < 10 < 5 < 12 < 7 < & < 5 < 21 < 5 l

I e61828 M/aete6 85/3a/06 7.7+/-2.7 < 2 < 2 < 3 < 2 < 4 < 2 < 4 < 3 < 2 < 2 < 9 < 2 5.3*/-2.6

• 3 < 3

• 5 . ir < 5 < 3 < 6 < 4 < 3 < 3 < 11 < 3 M1214 e5/26/06 e6/26/06 4.1+/-2.5 < 3 < 3 < 6 < 3 < 6 < 3 < 7 < 5 < 3 < 3 < 13 < 3 M 147T se/26/06 ST/21/06

< 3 < 3 < 5 < 2 < 5 < 3 < 6 < 4 < 3 < 3 < 11 < 4 e61643 87/21/06 88/1e/06 68.1*/-4.5

< 2 < 2 < 4 < 2 < 4 < 2 < 5 < 5 < 3 < 2 < 13 < 3 l Mise 5* 08/1e/e6 09/15/e6 6.4+/-2.3 l

l 3.k / 2.4 < 2 < 3 < 6 < 2 < 5 < 3 < 6 < 7 < 3 < 3 < 15 < 4 862039 89/15/86 14/13/06

< 3 < 6 < 3 < 6 < 3 < 7 < 6 < 3 < 3 < 15 < 4 i

unu 1e/14/e6 11/1e/06 7.3+/-2.5 < 3 l acut 11/1e/06 12/e8/06 6.7*/-2.7 < 5 < 5

• 18 < 5 < 18 < 5 < 12 < 11 < 6 < 5 < 28 < 6

< 5 < 5 < 9

• 5 < 18 < 5 < 11 < 7 < 5 < 5 < 21 < 5 879031 12/e8/06 81/05/87 44.& /-4.1

• Crab Sample on 9/15/86

TABLE B-5 (Cont.)

l DRINKING WATER :

GROSS BETA AND GANNA ISOTOPIC ANALYSES ON MONTHLY COMPOSITES i

" (AF&L RESULTS) m g tacariam. m .5 COLLECTION PERI (3 EROS $

Co-58 fe-59 Co-60 2n 65 ab-95 Zr-95 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 sa 140 La-140 LAS up. $TaAT SieP GETA she-54

< 6 <3 < 6 < 3 < 6 < 4 < 3 < 3 < 11 < 3 aMM 91/M/M 82/06/ M 4.2+/-2.5 < 3 < 3

< 4 < 8 < 4 < 8 < 5 < 10 < 18 < 4 < 4 4 34 < 9 j e64371 02/04/M e3/03/e6 4.5+/-2.5 < 4

< 6 < 3 4 5 < 3 < 6 < 6 < 3 < 3 < 14 < 4 2.5+/-2.3 < 2 < 3 SteHT 03/95/06 85/31/M

< 5 e 2 < & < 3 < 6 < 3 < 3 < 2 < 11 < 3

< 3.5 < 2 < 3 Stet 52 83/31/e6 06/28/e6

• 6 <3 < 7 < 6 < 3 < 3 < 14 < 4

< 3 < 6 < 3 M1821 M/24/e6 85/26/M 3.b/-2.5 < 3

< T

• 4 < 8 < 5 < 4 < 4 < 4 < 4

< 3 < 3

• T < 4 e61215 05/26/06 86/24/06 22.4+/ 3.1 i

• 8 < 4

• 7 4 4

• 9 < S

• 4

• 4 < 19 < 5 5.6+/-2.5 < 4 4 4 MM75 06/26/06 47/21/06 < 5 4 2

• 6 < 4 < 3 < 3 < 11 < 3 7.4+/-2.5 < 2 < 3 < 5 < 2 M l644 ST/21/M 88/14/06 < 6

• 3 < 7 < 7 < 3 < 3 < 15 < 5 4.4+/-2.0 < 2 < 3 < 6' < 3 3610e6 08/141e6 N/15/M I

< 8 4 4 < 7 4 4 4 9 < 15 < 4 4 4 < 29 < T

< 4 <4 862e60 N/29/06* 18/13/M 18.3+/-2.T < 5 < 2 < 5 < 5 < 2 < 2 < 12 < 3

< 2 < 2 < 5 < 3 f 862231 14/13/06 11/14/06 4.7+/-2.5 < 7

• 3

• 8 < 5 < 4 < 3 e 15 < 4 4 3 < 3 < 6

• 3 MN 11/14/06 12/te/M 5.1+/-2.6 < 4 < 6 < 2 < 6 < 4 < 3 < 3 < 11 < 3

< 3 < 2 < 5 SNe32 12/ ente 6 81/95/8T 3.S+/ 2.7

• Crab Sample on 9/29/86 1

e l

i

l I TABLE B-5 (Cont.)

DRINKING WATER :

j '

GROSS BETA AND GAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSES ON MONTHLY COMPOSITES 4 (APEL RESULTS)

I units: pci/L SAMPLE LOCATIos: euP-7 CDLLEC110m M eIOD Geoss IWi-54 co-54 fe-59 co-60 Zar65 ab-95 Zr-95 t-151 ts-134 Cs-137 sa-140 to-160 LAS 30. Staat STOP eETA

< 4

• 4 < 8 <4 < S < 4 < 9 < 6 < 5 < 4 < 16 <4 364367 01/06/06 02/06/M 4.7+/-2.6 6.6 / 2.4 < 5 <4 < 12 < 5 < 12 < 7 < 13 < 27 < 6 < $ < 53 < 11 868572 02/06/06 05/03/M

< 3 < 3 < 5 < 2 < 5 < 3 < 6 < 6 < 3 < 3 < 14 < 4 co 368 % 8 85/95/M G3/31/06 4.1+/ 2.5 e

< 3 < 4 < 7 < 3 < 7 < 3 < 7 < 5 < 4 < 4 < 14 < 3 368753 03/31/06 06/2E/M 5.2+/-2.4

< 4 < 4 < 9 < 4 < 8 < 5 < 10 < 11 < 5 < 4 < 26 < 6 M 1822 86/M /06 85/26/M 2.5+/-2.5

• 4 < 4 < 4 < 4 < 8 < 4 < 9 < 6 < 5 < 4 e 17 < 4 M12M s /36/06 e6/24/ M 17. 6 /-2.9 l

< 3.4 < 3 < 3 < 6 < 3 < 6 < 3 < 7 < 6 < 3 < 3 < 14 < 4 MM79 M/24/06 87/21/06 e61645 ST/21/06 08/18/86 3.5+/-2.3 < 3 < 3 < 5 < 3 <a < 3 < 6 < 5 < 3 < 3 < 13 < 3 861885 88/14/06 SD/15/M 3.5+/-2.8 < 4 < 4 <a < 4 < 7 < 4 <a <s < 4 < 4 e 21 < 5 I

< 2 < 2 < 6 < 3 < 6 < 2 < 5 < 7 < 2 < 2 < 15 < 4 862e61 89/15/06 14/13/06 13.5+/-3.8

) appu 10/13/06 11/14/06 7.5+/ 2.5 4 3 4 4 < 7 < 4 4 8 4 4 4 8 < 8 < 4 < 4 < 20 < 4

< 3.9 < 2 < 2 < 4 < 2 < 4 < 2 < 5 < 3 < 2 < 2 < to < 3 862585 11/10/06 12/ ente 6

< 6 < 3 < 6 < 3 < & < 6 < 3 < 3 < 14 < 3 870853 12/estes et/05/ST 3.>/-2.5 < 3 < 3 I

, TABLE B-6 DRINKING WATER :

' TRITIUM ANALYSIS ON QUARTERLY CONPOSITES (TELEDYNE RESULTS)

(pCl/Ilter)

STATI0ms STA-DWG-2 STA-DWE-5 STA-DWP-7 tottECTIon DATES 12/23-03/31 12/23-03/31 12/23-03/31 RADI0 CHEMICAL AhALV515:

N-3 L.T. 2. E 03 L.T. 2. E 03 L.T. 2. E 03 L T. means less than.

i i

i' 9

TABLE B-6 (Cont.)

DRINKING WATER :

TRITIUM ANALYSIS ON QUARTERLY COMPOSITES (AP&L RESULTS)

ALL UNITS: pCi/l SAMPLE IDCATION:

I COLLECTION PERIOD LAB NO. IDCATION START STOP H-3 I $ 860549 DWG-2 01/06/86 03/31/86 < 250 860550 DME-5 01/06/86 03/31/86 < 250

860551 DNP-7 01/06/86 03/31/86 < 250 i'

861217 DWG-2 03/31/86 06/24/86 170+/-150 861218 DME-5 03/31/86 06/24/86 < 260 l < 260 1 861219 DNP-7 03/31/86 06/24/86 861929 DWG-2 06/24/86 09/15/86 < 260 861930 DWE-5 06/24/86 09/15/86 < 260 861931 DNP-7 06/24/86 09/15/86 < 260 870034 DWG-2 09/15/86 01/05/87 < 270 870035 DWE-5 09/15/86 01/05/87 < 270 DNP-7 09/15/86 01/05/87 < 270 870036 1

• 5 1

• • em o O .= O 3 3 O =* N O O == == *e N O 3 3 0 3 O O O O O O O O O 3 3 O 3 3 e W .ad tad .ad w w =ad em ned had .ad .ed med and and nad .ad .ad sad e . .

. .g o . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

@ d w e we w M e JD w N e e m N w *e D d ==.a.

3

4. m . . . .

q% . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

m e. == > >= >= om > e. em em em a=

O . . e=. >=. . e. >=. . . . . . om. . . >=. . .

.A d d .4 A .J .J .J A J .J .A .J e .A .J .4 .A e

e

• • =e O D D O O O O ** ** O O *=e ** ** N O 1 3 O O O O O O O O .3 O O O O O O O 3 "m w tad had had w tad w ned nad nad tad had had med had med med had m .

zO . . . e a . . . . . . . . . . . .

uo e in w w e w N 60 @ m w w w ** *e w em P mm to e g% e . . e . . . . . . . . . . e e e m ==. ,=. >= e. e= e- >= > e= e= e. p= p. > e= e.

O . e . e e e e e e e >=. . e . e=. .

.e .4 e =d .a me .e me .e ma me .a ma e,d =d .d ea ad l

I i.

i

(/) == =* O O O O O O O ** ** O O ** == == == 0 i H C C C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O >

m

(#3 O w in, w w and w tad med w w ind w w w had tad ind ned

=m

.. a <C . . . . . . . e . . . . . . . . . .

i 4 N me me w e w w e M N w W m M e w ** == w e e e GC D ca. qA gad % . . . . . . . . . , e e . . . . . .

O t. 2 in. N e. *=

g y e e O >=. >=. s=. a=. em. a=. e=. e=. a=. . . em. >=. >=. a=. e=. em. n=.

• • .4 .e .4 .4 .e .ud ad .o .a .4 .d ed ad ed ee ad .4 ed N == e

! k =

\

>  % 8

e a w w 4 4 M >=

H G m j

e

(/) IOM N

w w O

tad e .* O O .* O O O O .=

O O O O O O O O W tad ned tad tad had ted 6ad O O O O O O nad ted O O .*

w tad tad had e .e O O nad N

had

.e O

had .

]

1

p. %

O EN

<l 40 . . . . . * * * * . . . *

• e . .

D e nn h w in se en W en @ w N in w me m.e e g me m

' Em GN "3 % o e . o . e o e e e e . e e . . e e N .= e.= me en e= se >m e- p. se em ps p. e-ee e=. e e om. De. se. e a e e e e e e e e e a

<( se ed .4 .e ed me ed ed ed =d ad ed .J ed .d ed ed ed I

4 t

0 se e 9 1

4 e .C

> ae a e, i' .. W 8"*

O 3 tae n O 4 *= a w W w e- en se g w w e e g

<j .s tas e W

=* a m .4 i

O e 8  %

i w  % m is e m O e e e

• e w e e O in in O O .* m m e w w N N

k O in in in e e we m eo me no en no N N He

.has

- E e e e e e e e e. e.n e .e e e e e e e e

• w w o a a oN a e e = w w a m I i-O 3 m w e

EOw in, w N a m .ee w w a w w a ==

)

l 1

89 j

1 1

Y 1

N O O == 3 m O .* N O O e e N .=

m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

% .nJ tad had w' .ad w tad und ned ned sad and .ed med .nd gad ted .ad

-d

=. 3e .

ae . e . . . . . .

N A

d N w

a. ** # =* a e* ed d * # == d *

(m m . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

O >= e- >= >= e= >= > > >= > o= >= e.

,=. s=

. . . e. . . . . . e. . . . e=. . . .

.a .4 .4 .J .4 .d .J .6 .4 .d .J .J .* .d d .4 .d d me N O O == 3 O O O == == 0 0 =* =* ==

• O O O O O O O O O O. O O O O O O O O O

(

e= t.d 6ad ud med w nne tad tse led had w tad tad sad end tid had ud i m m . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . e .

2O e me M w me w se e e m e w M =* ** M CO N d

we um go . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . e . .

E% >= e= t= pa t= >= p. >= >=

m e=. e. . e pm. >=. . >=. e e=. e=. >=. . . . . e. .

O .4 .A .4 .d .J .J .A .d -d .a .4 .a .e .J w .4 .d .4 a

a ** == O O O O O O O == == 0 O se O ** %e O H O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O apa. m w ned and nad w had tid ud had and had ted and nad w td ud nad

.m WO e

,e

• w ~ w nn n

,. m n

e c ne ta, aIa t.

0 e ==

u =O - - -

>= >=

pe p=

- o 6. ~3 had %

~

>=

e p=

. e . De. >=.

em

, >=.

p=

. >=.

em

. . . e=. >=.

>=

p=

e pm.

i H ** O .d .4 .d .J .J .d .d .d d .d .A .J .d .d .d .d .d .d o a  : e I  % a a >a -

m .*

O O a *

$m E e

888o 8O 80 .o 8OO O O O O O .* - O

_ e e - e O O 0 O O O had 4.4 kne nne nad tad had tad had had had tad had tse tad tad had had 1

1 Q DN eO . . . . * * . . . . . . . * * . * .

4 e e d e W P W W e to w N w w me ** m 40 m 3m SN j q% . . . e e e e . . . . . . . . e e .

s= >= >= >= p= p= t= >= p= pm t= p= te.

L

• 1.N e e em. to. e to. e >=. . e e o e e e pe. e e el # e.d and .d .d .4 .d e .A .4 .d e .d .A e.d e.9 .d i

I e

.> @ O

== 4 in A*

• pd

.d q O R te at

\' ..

sn .oe ad t O

• = m e og i

u o= c me g

]' tad W @ e q ed 4.8 e 4

e. en N O e a

.d

% a w  % m ,e w  % O . . .:

• W e O to e O ** m m

• w w N N e h O c to in g g @ ene O.e s m se se me ao me N N h.

l ta.d

• e e e e e o e e e e .* e e e e e o e 4 4 tad a g O ned O a a D o e M to 4 and had 4 X 4 O La AB nd a W te. W N N es es ** W t.d at W W es >=

90

}

. - - . .-,--- - - , . . . - - , , - - , - - - - - , - - , - , - - _ _ - ~ - . - - - - - - - . - - - - - - - . . . , . - - , . - - _ . . _ , , - - ., - - . - - , - - - - - - - - ,

T

-l t - a - o . . - . o@ -. - - - .

.e O . 3 .o 3 . . 3 . N. O 3 3 . . 3 tad had 40 .3d ti.d tad dil had led .ad had led .hd tad tad tad .00 tad

_.d e. . . .

, . - - ,. ,. ~

G. M 4 . . . . . . .

.J .id .4 .d a .A .A .d .d .J a .e .J .a e .d .J .d i

5 5 3 8 8 8 8 8 S.3 5 3 8 5 3 3 3 8

~

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a .

]. m

.z,,..

,. ~

,. .,. e

~ ~

.4 .d .J .d ad d .4 ed .J .4 .4 .d .4 s d .A .4 .d

)

4 i

,io ,

. ~. g g g .= g 3 3 . . * . *. . g . . g in *

. h., . . t.d . . t.d 4.d e.d t.d 40 4.d 4.d 4.d - 4.d - t.0 j

1

. a...>a o

s^ t3o te

~ te

~ m

,. .e m

~

4

~. ..

- 40 % . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

t. t .~ --- -* - *- - - - - * - -* - * - -* - * -

1

~ u g  :

_d

.e

.4 a

.4 .d .4 .A

.d .e a .d .J .,

.d a

.d

.d i e, n. -

m I > 2 5 a v -

a -

4 i e q

i a

a:

e sIo W E58888338533338358 tad tad tad had tad ted had had had had tad had had had tad tad tad tad i, sN.

4 2 M e M M e m M

N m m

,. W M

~ ~

1 j

.N "3 % . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

i N >= - e. e s. s p. e. e. e > e.

j - . >=. . . . . . . . >=. . . . . . . ne. ne.

, a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 1

i

.s g e C

• 9

'" .C I

- a

.O =

4

' , . E pe tee n ,.

- e eg i w - e g W . a.o q e.$ tas 9 4 l d G. W .d

@ E  %

W  % M , ~ 9 ** . @ W M

. W . . @

g S ** M M.

se N N 8 4 me p se

,4 ta.d en. to. in. . m.e M. s.e s.e N. N.

I . . . N.

. . e i 4 had . $ . tad . S E 3 3 $ M M 4 t.ed ted 4 S M j G 4d E W en. W N N m a se WWGWW e 8 91 f

---_-----_------O---------

TABLE B-7 (Cont.)

SURFACE MkTER GAIStk ISOTOPIC AllALYSIS

' OIt IIOIITHLY COIEPOSITES (APEL RESULTS) tmITs: pCi/L Sa rLE LOCATI n : as-2 CELECTIM MAIS Las up. $Tast sie lee-54 Co-54 fe-59 Co-60 2n-65 ab-95 2r-95 1 131 Cs-134 Cs-13/ so-140 La-140 4 5

• 5 4 9 < 5 < 11 < 5 < 12 < 7 < 6

• 5 < 20 4 4 ana m ettege6 82/96/m

• 2 *3 < 6

• 3

• 6 < 3 < 6 4 14 < 3 < 3 < 23 < 6 e68579 82/96/M e5/83/96

< 3 < 3 < &

• 3 < 6 < 3 < 7 < 5 < 3 < 3 < 12 < 3 eneM6 este5/86 83/31/06

< 5 < 5 < 8 < 5 < 14 < 5 < 12 < 7 < 6 < $ < 21 < 5 ans51 e5/31/e6 e6/aste6

• 2 < 2 < 3 < 2 < 4 < 2 < 4 < 3 < 2 < 2 < 9 < 2 e61828 e6/2ete6 5/26/06

< 3 4 3 < 5

• 2 < 5 < 3 <6 < 4 < 3

• 3 < 11 < 3 e61214 m/3&e6 88/26/86

< 3 < 3 = 6 < 3 < 6 < 3 < 7 e 5 < 3

• 3 < 13 < 3 e6%77 06/26/06 87/21/m6

< 3 < 3 < 5 < 2 < 5 < 3 4 6 < 4

• 3 < 3 < 11 < 4 e61663 s7/21/e6 88/14/06

< 2 < 2 < 4

• 2 < 6 < 2 < 5 = 5 4 3 < 2 < 13 4 3 e618e5* M/1e/e6 89/15/06

< 2 < 3 < 6 < 2 < 5 < 3 4 6 < 7 < 3 < 3 < 15 < 4 e62e39 89/15/06 16/13/06 4 3 < 3 < 6 < 3 < 6 < 3 4 7 < 6 < 3 < 3 < 15 < 4 morta 1stute6 11/14te6

< 5 < 5

• to < 5 < 14 < 5 < 12 < 11 < 6 < 5 < 28 < 6 e62381 11/14te6 12/eStes

< 5 < 5 *9 < 5 < 14

• 5 < 11 < 7 < 5 < 5 < 21 < 5 87ee51 12/ete6 81/95/S7

• Crab Sample on 9/15/86

l i

i l TABI2 S-7 (Cont.)

! , sonPAct unTEa :

J GAISEA ISOTOPIC ANALYSIS 1 OIf IIDIfTRLY COIEPOSITES

",asett LOCAf ts- M -5 (AP&L RESUI.TS) tmars: peitt 1

l CIELEClam PEstCB LAS ES. STARI $W Ibe-54 Co-54 fe-59 Co-64 2n-65 w 95 Zr-95 3-131 Cs-134 Cs-13F so- Me La-144 I teste 81196tes ette6/e6 < 3 < 3 < 6 < 3 < & < 3 < 6 < 4 < 3 < 3 < 11 < 3 See5F1 ette6te6 05/e5/06

• 4

• 4

• 8

• 4

• 8 < 5 < 14 < 14 < 4 < 4 < 34 < 9 east 4T e5/e5/06 88/31/06 < 2 < 3 < 6 < 3 e 5 < 3 < 6 < 6 < J < 3 <M < 4 i

aseF52 85/31/06 86/28/06

• 2 < 3 4 5

• 2 < & 4 3 < 6 < 3 < 3 < 2 < 11 < 3

]

! atlett 86/ Mee6 05/36 des < 3 < 3 < 6 < 3 < 6 < 3 < T < 6

• 3 < 3 <M < 4 i

361215 5/3hfe6 86(34te6

• 3 < 3 < T < 4 < T < 4 <a < 5 < 4 < 4 < 4 < 4 3

MM3e 86/26Je6 er/21Je6

• 4 4 4 < 8 < 4 < T < 4 < 9 < 8

• 4 < 4 < 19 < 5 as1664 SF/21/06 se(1edes < 2 < 3 4 5 < 2 < 5

• 2 < 6 < 4 < 3 < 3 < 11 < 3 3618e6 seriefes est15te6

• 2 < 3 < 6 < 3 < 6

• 3 < T

• 7 4 3

• 3 < 15 < 5 apenas 3p/29/06 10/13/06 < 4 4 4 < S < 4 < T < 4 < 9 < 15 < 4 < 4 < 29 < T j a62251 18/13/06 11/14/06 < 2 < 2 < 5

• 3 < 5 < 2 < 5 < 5 < 2 < 2 < 12 < 3

ah2382 11/1eres 12/e8/06 < 3 < 3 < 6

• 3 < T < 3 < S < 5 < 4 < 3 < 15 < 4 838852 N offeEter < 3 < 2 < 5

• 4 <6 4 2 < 6 < 4 < 3 < 3 < 11 < 3 i

1 i

I

• Crab Sample on 9/29/86 I

I 1

1 1

TABI2 3-7 (Cont.)

SURFACE MkTER:

GAISEA ISOTOPIC AIEALYSIS CIE 3000rTMLY COIEPOSITES (AP&L RESULTS) tallTS: pCi/L Se p L1 LOCA!5m : SP-T I cettrCT:= mim 2sr65 > 95 Zr-95 1-131 Cs-1M Cs-137 Se-144 La-H e staat SOer ser % Co-54 fe-59 Co-44 I Las me.

< 4 <S < 4 <9 < 6 <5 4 4 <M < 4

• 4 4 4 4 S 1 See56F 411e6/06 EZ/ ewe 6 < 12 < 7 < 13 < 27 <& < 5 < 53 4 11

<5 <6 4 12 < 5 o anSF2 ettestes est45tes < 2 < 5 4 3 4 6 4 6 < 3 < 3 <M < 4

1. e 3 < 3 < 5 ame668 85desde6 85/31/06 4 3 < T < 3 < 7 < 5 < 4 < 4 <M < 3

< 3 < 4 < 7 1 ameF53 85/51Je6 e6/2 Gree

• 8 < 5 < 18 < 11 < 5

• 4 < 26 4 6

< 4 < 4 < 9

• 4 361822 es/ afes 5/36#e6 < 6 < 5 4 4 < 17 < 4

) 861216 85/36de6 emas < 4 4 4 < 4 < 4

• 8

• 4 < 9 l <M < 4

< 3 <a < 3 < T < 6 < 3 < 3 1

• 3 < 3 <6 1

86M79 at(3406 87/21/e6 < 3 < 6

• 3 < 6 *5 < 3 a 3 < 13 < 3

< 3 < 3 < 5 e61465 SF/21/e6 80/14/e6 < 4 <T < 4 <a <s e 4

• 4 < 21 < 5

• 4 < 4 < S a61085 Gar 1GfG6 88/15/96

<6

• 2 < 5 *7 < 2 < 2 < 15 < 4

< 2 4 2 < 6 < 3 M1 e 6 14/13/06 < 4 < T < 4 < 8 < 4 < S <S < 4 < 4 < 20 < 4

< 3 j 8a3E52 ter13#e6 11/14/06 < 4 < 2 < 5 < 3 < 2 < 2 < to e 3

< 2 < 2 < 4 < 2 862MB 11/18#e6 12/mpe6 < 6 < & < 3 < 3 <M < 3 l

• 3 < 3

• 6 < 3 e 6

• 3 4 830855 12/efe6 01/5/SF l

I

(

),

4 i

TABM B-8 SURFA G MkTER:

TRITIUM ANALYSIS ON QUARTERLY COMPOSITES t

(Ts uovum REs0LTs)

(pct /I1ter)

STATlee5 STA-SteG-2 5iA-SteE-5 SiA-5mP-7 CettEttise sate 5 12/23-03/31 12/23-03/31 12/23-03/31 statoCmEntCat Amat usts:

N-3 L.I. 2. E 03 L.T. 2. E 03 L.I. 2. E 03 L T. means less than.

--- - - - - - - - - - -- J

_ _ . _ _ _ . - _. __ _ _ __._ _ _ _ .m .___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ __ _ _ __

l

, TABLE B-S (Cont.)

SURFACE WATER:

j TRITIUM ANALYSIS ON QUARTERLY COMPOSITES l (APEL RESULTS) 4 SAMPLE IDCATION: ALL UNITS: pC1/1 COLLECTION PERIOD IAB NO. IDCATION START STOP H-3 i

i 860549 SUG-2 01/06/86 03/31/86 < 250 l $ 360550 SWE-5 01/06/86 03/31/86 < 250 j 860551 SUP-7 01/06/86 03/31/86 < 250 861217 SUG-2 03/31/86 06/24/86 170+/-150 861218 SWE-5 03/31/86 06/24/86 < 260 861219 SWP-7 03/31/86 06/24/86 < 260 861929 SUG-2 06/24/86 09/15/86 < 260 361930 SWE-5 06/24/86 09/15/86 < 260 861931 SUP-7 06/24/96 09/15/86 < 260 370034 SUG-2 09/15/86 01/05/87 < 270 870035 SWE-5 09/15/86 01/05/87 < 270 870036 SUP-7 09/15/86 01/05/87 < 270 I

I L_ __ - ___________ _ _____ _ _ _ _ _ _ ._. _. _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _- _ _ ____

.. -_ _. _. . _ = - . - . .- - . .. _

l l

l i

I M ** == 0 O O O O O O as =* O O O == ** N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O e ned w ned tea tad ned w w ned w w and ted w w and .4 w w e

e e

.d. e% e e e e o e e o e o e e o e o e e EN N 9 e M W D M @ 9 4A M N 9 T W se W ee @

i i 6%

4w o e e e e e O e e e e e e e e e e e e e

p= = >= > e= e= >= p= e= > >= > e= a= e= o= p. s

e e e e e e o e e e e e e e e e e e e

.4 .J .d ad .4 .J ad .A .e .4 .4 .d ad .e ed =n .d .J .a I.

De A

e4 5 ~ '

U '"' a. M - .e O O O e.e O O - - O O O - - N O

,, gs eme g O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O

@ w w tes tad ned ned tad ned med w w w ned ned and end eed w w g a me

= s%

to 5 4S e e e e e e e e e e e e e e o e e e e

@ tad 3O N tA O =A in se tA me en @ g me t#, @ p% me W ee @

8 %.

H .e.n g em 90 e e o e e e o e e e e a e e e e e o e

% S e= p. p= pm t= p= pm > >= e= >= >= >= em D. p. om e= p=

4= a e e o e o e o e o e e e o e o e e e ad .d and sud .d .d ad ed .J .O sud and .O .d .0 .d and .d .J e  ;

4 s.

e i I

l e

e. n.;e; e  !

e.

. e 81 e > J*.

se .d ad

.d 4 4 8 gg a e A j

• U E - l w O w

.a w

.E he tA me M w == w . @ e C1

.d R w e 4 et

.d men b q .a O e e m 5 W *ee M w me O .e w @ m W WD en C me M M 9 e e N N

• 4.s a= pm O to tn en e se me ev

- a M e , e e e e e . se. m.e .Me e e s.e m.e em. e N. He e e e = w w = z e as e a ow w teae wa wa waasa a

= = e w e O m a e e. w w as w w a >= 4 e

97

1 i

i i

f, i

i i

1 i

s J

j TABLE B-9 (Cont.)

GROUNDWATER :

j TRITIUM AND GAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSES i

' (AP&L RESULTS) i 1 uutis: pct /L 4

smME LeCalless asa-1 l

i Co-58 Fe-59 Co-48 Di-45 Zr/Nb-95 t-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 se-Ma La-Me US es. CELLECTleu Seit a-3 8bt-54

< 6 < 2 < & 46 4 4 < 3 <3 < 11 < 5

< 3 4 3

$ asse63 et/m/06 4 430 I < 9

< 11 < 5 < 14 < 13 < 16 < 5 < 5 < 36 i

3esr36 e6/29/e6 < 500 < 5 < 5

)

i

< 4 4 3 <8 < 6 < 4 < 4 < tr < 4 87/15/06 < ass < 4 < 4 < T 86M12

< 4 < T <8 < T 4 4 < 4 < 19 < 5 gg ,3gg < 4 < 4 4 3 l

4 i

i i

l 1

1

4 i

I TABLE B-10 SHORELINE SOIL :

GANNA ISOTOPIC ANALYSIS

. (TELEDYNE RESULTS) l

(pCi/kg DRV)

.I

STATION NUMBER SHWE-3 1

. GAMMA SPECTRUM ANALV5IS MARCH

} 03/11/86 i

! BE-7 L.T. 3. E 02 1

K-40 2.05 to.20E 04 ,

MN-54 L.T. 4.' E 01 jj CO-58 L.T. 4. E 01 FE-59 L.T. 8. E 01 l

CD-60 L.T. 4. E 01 2N-65 L.T. 8. E 01 28-95/NB-95 L.T. 4. E 01 RU-103 L.T. 4. E 01 80-106 L.T. 3. E 02 1-131 L.T. 8. E 01 I

C5-134 L.T. 4. E 01 C5-137 L.T. 4. E 01 i

sA-140/LA-140 7. E 01 L.T.

]

l CE-141 L.T. 6. E 01 l

l CE-144 L.T. 2. E 02 RA-226 2.45 to.55E 03  ;

TH-228 1.43 20.14E 03 J

4 L.T. means less than.

I .

1 i

1 TABLE B-10 (Cont.)

SHORELINE SOIL :

GAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSIS l

(TELEDYNE RESULTS)

' (pC1/kg ORT)

STATION NUMBER SHWJ-l l

1 I GAMMA SPECTRUM ANALYSIS MARCH f 03/11/86 BE-7 L.T. 3. E 02

{

K-40 1.45 10.14E U4 MN-54 L.T. 3. E 01 4 E o

CO-58 3.81 12.03E 01 FE-59 L.T. 5. E 01 CO-60 L.T. 2. E 01 1

2N-65 L.T. 5. E 01 f 2R-95/NS-95 L.T. 3. E 01 RU-103 L.T. 2. E 01 RU-106 L.T. 2. E 02 I-131 L.T. 5. E 01 2

C5-134 L.T. 3. E 01 C5-137 1.04 10.22E 02 BA-140/LA-140 L.T. 4. E 01 J

CE-141 L.T. 4. E 01 CE-144 L.T. 2. E 02 RA-226 1.78 20.40E 03 TH-228 9.86 20*.99E 02 L.T. means less than.

TABLE B-10 (Cont.)

t SHORELINE SOIL :

GAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSIS (APEL RESULTS)

SAMPLE IDCATION: ALL UNITS: pCi/Kg COLLECTION IAB NO. IDCATION DATE Cs-134 Cs-137 860437 SHWE-3 03/17/86 < 20 < 14 861984 SHWE-3 10/14/86 < 20 < 15 o

860438 SMILT-1 03/17/86 < 16 67+/- 6 861985 SIMJ-l 10/14/86 < 17 24+/- 4

TABLE B-11 MILK :

IODINE-131 AND GAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSES (TELEDYNE RESULTS)

(pCl/ liter)

STATION NUMBER MKQ-5 JANUARY JANUARY FEBRUANY DATE COLLECIED: 01/07/86 01/21/86 02/04/86 RADI0 CHEMICAL ANALYSIS:

I-131 L.T. 1. E-01 L.T. 2. E-01 L.T. 3. E-01 GAMMA $PECTRUM ANALVSIS:

8E-7 L.T. 4. E 01 L.T. 6. E 01 L.T. b. E 01 F.40 1.29 20.13E 03 1.27 10.13E 03 1.14 20.11L 03 MM-54 L.T. 4. E 00 L.T. 5. E 00, L.T. 5. E 00 CO-58 L.T. 4. E 00 L.T. 5. E 00 L.T. 5. E 00 FE-59 L.T. 9. E 00 L.T. 1. E 01 L.T. 1. E 01 CO-60 L.T. 4. E 00 L.T. 6. E 00 L.T. 5. E 00 ZN-65 L.T. 9. E 00 L.T. 1. E 01 L.T. 1. E 01 ZR-95/NB-95 L.T. 4. E 00 L.T. 6. E 00 L.T. 5. E 00 RU-103 L.T. 4. E 00 L.T. 7. E 00 L.T. 6. E 00 RU-106 L.T. 4. E 01 L.T. 5. E 01 L.T. 5. E 01 L.T. 5. E 00 L.T. 1. E 01 ' L.T. 7. E 00 1-131 i CS-134 L.T. 5. E 00 L.T. 6. E 00 L.T. 6. E 00 CS-137 L.T. 4. E 00 L.T. 6. E 00 L.T. 6. L 00 BA-140/LA-140 L.T. 4. E 00 L.T. 7. E 00 L.T. 5. E 00 CE-141 L.T. 7. E 00 L.T. 1. E 01 L.T. 8. E Uu CE-144 L.T. 3. E 01 L.T. 5. E 01 L.T. 4. E 01 RA-226 L.T. 1. E 02 L.T. 1. E 02 L.T. 1. E U2 TH-228 L.T. 9. E 00 L.T. 1. E 01 L.T. 9. L 00 I L.T. means less than,

e e M C o =4 O M C o em O 3 o 3 a.e e N *=

3 e

O o @ 3 0 o Q o C 3 o o 3 O C 3 3 O 4 4ed asJ naJ esJ tad ned had taJ had taJ and had had had had end .sJ tad had 23 N Z% *'*

u .,g.e m N

@ 3 @ 4 .= N e 4 @

F*.

4 re. e-o aft a=e e

eC N *e EM o . . as . . e . . . . . . . . . . . . .

>= >= t- >= t= t= >= >= >= >= >=

. >=. N. >=. >=. . . . >=. . . e. . . . . >=. . >=.

d =J M gh M M u.$ M e.$ M e.$ ed g.d $ M =J ed M

=

M M M M 8'E b o

e o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

@ had had 46. haJ had had LaJ haJ heJ taJ Led ned taJ Lee ned had tsJ nad had c0 Z% .Nm (n3 uw . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

g o N nn o en @ a.e gp a-o art @ en M ttt @ p=. en e e @

a.C N +e b Em Q o . . m . . . .

>= >= .=

>=. >=. . .=. .=. o . . . .

p

. . .=.

>=

>= >

. . M. M.

A O O O O & O S & & O S N A & & & &

U n He

. De to .n 9 h

• c a g O D E O ** to

, g to 6.

e m

• • naJ w GB H

o o oo oo oo o o o o o == o o o o o ==

- E == ** M aa O s g N = o o o o o o o o o o o o o

! N

. = e W

aE go>e a z

- o-

m. e a3 nsJ 6ad n.e.d.

e nad led LaJ had had taJ had ned had w nad ned had had ned had m.C N . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .

>= 3 l a o w e's W in m wm

• w w f") at G3 m m CO O C o'=

= .E.e +e itt g m co N see k e . N . . . e . . . e e

. . . . . e 4 .b, wo >= > am p= >= >= e= >=

>= o g . . . >=. >=. . >=. . >=. . >=. . >=. >=. . . e. . .

m a a M J a a , a , a a a .J a =J a J a a c1 M

1 N

2 H

Q O

H '

.. m

• C sn.

- t'3 m M.

m .:

n. =.6 s.s J et aC E gg 2 aC g

.. at o E D haa J D o t= 4 m w v v >= 6f4 a efl nad -

m e C w E u.a n e aC 11

=J o

ta.s z

an.

e en a N a o u u  % m e o M w e m E o *= 4 w G3 m o nn nrt o o .-. e.t c e=.,.

e w w w N N tas == fe t E 5. O tre en e e e.e == r.t e.e em e-o ew == N N

>= o e w to. e e e e e. . . e e e . . e o e la*

C < a .EC w e z o sad o aN a s s e e e < w naa s: z a m .=e Q CD nd E W w W N CC m == u u ao u u a > e.2 103

TABLE B-ll (Cont.)

MILK :

IODINE-131 AND GAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSES (TELEDYNE RESULTS)

(pct / liter)

STATION NUMBER MKQ-5 APRIL APRIL DATE COLLECTED: 04/08/86 04/22/86

. RADI0 CHEMICAL ANALYSIS:

1-131 L.T. 3. E-01 L.T. 5. E-01 GAMMA SPECTRUM ANALYSIS:

BE-7 L.T. 7. E 01 L.T. 6. E 01

- K-40 9.35 10.94E 02 1.49 10.15E 03 S E 00 MM-54 L.T. 7. L.T. 6. E 00 CO-58 L.T. 7. E 00 L.T. 6. E 00 FE-59 L.T. 1. E 01 L.T. 1. E 01 CO-60 L.T. 7. E 00 L.T. 7. E 00 ZN-65 L.T. 2. E 00 L.T. 1. E 01 ZR-95/NB-95 L.T. 8. E 00 L.T. 6. E 00 RU-103 L.T. 9. E 00 L.T. 7. 'E 00 RU-106 L.T. 7. E 01 L.T. 5. E 01 1-131 L.T. 2. E 01 L.T. 1. E 01 CS-134 L.T. 8. E 00 L.T. 7. E 00 CS-137 L.T. 7. E 00 L.T. 6. E 00 BA-140/LA-140 L.T. 1. E 01 L.T. 9. E 00 CE-141 L.T. 2. E 01 L.T. I. E 01 CE-144 L.T. 7. E 01 . L.T. 5. L 01 RA-226 L.T. 2. E 02 L.T. 1. E 02 TH-228 L.T. 2. E 01 L.T. 1. E 01 L.T. means less than.

TABLE B-ll (Cont.)

MILK :

IODINE-131 AND GAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSES (TELEDYNE RESULTS)

(pCf/ liter)

STATION NUMBER MKQ-50 JANUART FEbkOANY JAPUARY 01/21/86 02/03/86 01/06/86 DATE COLLECTED:

RAD 10EHEMICAL ANALYSIS: 2. E-01 L.T. 2. E-01 L.T.

L.T. 2. E-01 1-131 GAMMA SPECTRUM ANALYSIS: 7. E 01 L .T . 3. E 01 L.T.

L.T. 4. E 01 BE-7 1.24 10.12E C3 1.46 to.15E 03 1.23 10.12E 03 m K-40 L.T. 8. E 00

4. E 00 L.T. 4. E 00 L.T.

MM-54 7. E 00 L.T. 4. E 00 L.T.

L.T. 4. E 00 C0-58 L.T. 1. E 01

9. E 00 L.T. 9. E 00 L.T.

FE-59 L.T. 7. E 00 L.T. 5. E 00 L.T. 4. E 00 CO-60 2. E 01 L.T. 1. E 01 L.T.

L.T. 1. E 01 ZN-65 8. E 00

4. E 00 L.T.

L.T. 4, E 00 L.T.

ZR-95/NB-95 L.T. B. E 00 L.T. 4. E 00 L.T. 4. E 00 RO-103 7. L 01 L.T. 4. E 01 L.T.

L.T. 4. E 01 RU-106 E 01 E 00 L .T . 7. E 00 L.T. 1.

L.T. 6.

I-131 ' 8. L 00

4. E 00 L.T.

L.T. 5. E 00 L.T.

C5-134 L bu E 00 L.T. 8.

L.T. 4. E 00 L.T. 4.

CS-137 L .T . 6. E 00 L.T. 7. E 00 L.T. 4. E 00 I 8A-140/LA-140 2. E 01

8. E 00 L.T.

L.T. 8. E 00 L.T.

CE-141

3. E 01 L.T. 7. E 01 CE-144 L.T. 4. E 01 L.T.

L .T . 1. E 02 L.T. 2. E O2 RA-226 L.T. 9. E 01

9. E 00 L.T. 2. E 01 L.T. 9. E 00 L.T.

TH-228 L.T. ineans less than.

1 M ,:2 o o O o o O o o O .-. N o O O O O C D O 3 O O 3 O O D O C D o a e

@ hh4 naJ hsJ naJ ted had haJ taJ naJ 6aa w naJ had 6ed med te. naJ .sJ gad

& N EN u ri= .

• M. . * . * * * * * * * * . * * . .

m e-o N en C eJn @ a=8 @ s'* @ 4 nJD N d'b @ @ m W me 3 ,

aC % +e j EM o . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,

> e- >= > >= >= >= >= > >= >= >= >= p '

. . N. >=. . . . . >=. . . . . . . . >=. >=. .

M and W's em$ emI ed emE ej M =i$ anl amE M and amJ J gas) e,l ,,)

.* est O O a=e Q ** O O ** s=e 3 O O =* -. N -.

O Q Q O Q Q O O Q O O Q Q Q Q O O O o e

@ naJ 6ad nad Lad hsJ tad naJ naJ LaJ &ad hmA nad had ned had haJ had tad tail (f) CD M z%

N uw . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(f) MQ N N O Pam N ==* Pam N C m N N & Pa= m N Pi. N =.e p 4%

• EM

& C * . e e e . . e e . . . . . e e . . ,

( e.

>=

. M.

> >= > >= >=

. . . . . >=.

>= >= >=

D=

. e==.

>=

. >=.

. >=.

0 M M SIES suJ em$ =J =J M M gu$ ed euJ emu $ amJ esJ gJ gag o

O .

m Hn

. De (t) O 9

c a $

cr O D w U tn in w ,, H Te a a.a s

e dB

= E .=. == M O O == O .-* O O =* O O O O ** ** N *.

ri g M N

- z a O o O o o O o o o O o o o o o o o o o g

3 e mX > u a a

-o m

6.a w w M

saJ w w w saa w w w ina iaJ .ma w in, w , J ts o . u.C N . .

~

>= 3m m @ Q @ s-s N @ m r== N =se nn O 4 mm m Pan Pam Pam Pan CD N .-.

m M -

M

=%

wN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

WQ > M >= >= >= > > >= >=

8 w a

. >=. >=. . . >=. >=. >=. >=. . >=. >=. . >=. . >=. . .

H =J =a a a =J a a =J a =., a a a J a a ,

n ~

e4 1

M 2

H O

O H

.. sn M .= E

. ea @

M > f.

s= ,4 aJ

=J et 4 x e

~

z 4 to

- 4 g C 2 W =J 3 O

• >* 4 E W W W >= nn me 80 had = U m o C J "E taJ e aC @

w tad a. as a @

o z en E  % a u u w M @ W P=, O W @ co Q a=. et W W m O en in O O am M M W W W N N .

nad == M E N O nn nn en @ @ m ==

• M eo s=* ** *=. *=e N N b*

>= O s=* E e W e e e e e e e e s=e e e e e e e e 4 8C e 4 6ad e E O nad O E E D 2 e in en aC has i.4 aC 2 O E ** 1.3 53 3d E W w W N N E E ** U U G3 W W M >=

106

• TABLE B-ll (Cont.)

MILK :

IODINE-131 AND GANNA ISOTOPIC ANALYSES (TELEDYNE RESULTS)

(pC1/ liter)

STATION NUMBER MKQ-50 l

APRIL APRIL DATE COLLECIED: 04/07/86 04/21/86 RADI0 CHEMICAL ANALYSIS:

1-131 L.T. 3. E-01 L.T. 5. E-01 GAMMA SPECTRUM ANALYSIS:

BE-7 L.T. 5. E 01 L.T. 5. E 01

K-40 1.48 to.15E 03 9.98 tl.00E 02 MM-54 L.T. 5. E 00 L.T. 5. E 00 CO-58 L.T. 5. E 00 L.T. 5. E 00 FE-59 L.T. 1. E 01 L.T. 1. E 01 C0-60 L.T. 5. E 00 L.T. 6. E 00 2N-65 L.T. 1. E 01 L.T. 1. E O!

2R-95/N8-95 L.T. 6. E 00 L.T. 5. E 00 RU-103 L.T. 6. E 00 L.T. 6. E 00 RU-106 L.T. 5. E 01 L.T. 5. E 01 I-131 L.T. 1. E 01 L.T. 9. E 00 i

CS-134 L.T. 5. E 00 L.T. 6. E 00 CS-137 L.T. 6. L 00 L.T. 6. E 00 BA-140/LA-140 L.T. 7. E 00 L.T. 6. E 00 CE-141 L.T. 1. E 01 L.T. 1. E 01 CE-144 L.T. 4. E 01 L.T. 4. E 01 RA-226 L.T. 1. E 02 L.T. 1. E 02 TH-228 L.T. 1. E 01 L.T. 1. E 01 l

, , , , , L.T. means less than.

• • o.

-....se -

TABLE B-11 (Cont.)

MILK :

IODINE-131 AND GAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSES (AP&L RESULTS) t

SAMPLE LOCATION'..MKO-S UNITS

pCi/L COLLECTION

LAB NO. DATE I-131* I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 i 860019 01/07/86 < 0.3 < 3 < 3 < 3 < 10 < 3 I 860135 01/21/86 0.7+/-0.5 < 4 < 3 < 3 < 11 < 3 j 860196 02/03/86 < 0.3 < 3 < 3 < 3 < 10 < 4 860262 02/18/86 < 0.3 < 4 < 3 < 3 < 11 < 3 860341 03/04/86 < 0.4 < 3 < 3 < 3 < 9 < 2 860435 03/18/86 < 0.2 < 7 < 6 < 6 < 23 < 5 860561 04/08/86 < 0.5 < 3 < 3 < 2 < 9 < 2 860684 04/22/86 < 0.2 < 6 < 5 < 5 < 18 < 4

05/06/86 SAMPLE LOST IN SHIPMENT 860921 05/20/86 12.5+/-0.5 17+/- 3 < 3 < 3 < 9 < 2 861040 06/03/86 3.5+/-0.4 5+/- 2 < 3 4+/- 2 < 9 < 2 861107 06/12/86 < 0.S < 5 < 4 < 4 < 15 < 4 861157 06/17/86 < 0.3 < 6 < 5 < 5 < 15 < 4 i 861358 07/08/86 < 0.5 < 3 < 3 < 3 < 10 < 3 861475 07/22/86 < 0.4 < 3 < 3 < 3 < 10 < 2 861546 08/05/86 < 0.3 < 4 < 3 < 3 < 11 < 3 861634 08/19/86 < 0.3 < 3 < 3 < 3 < 10 < 3 861713 09/03/86 < 0.3 < 3 < 3 < 3 < 10 < 4 861783 09/16/86 < 0.3 < 5 < 4 < 4 < 15 < 4 861933 < < 3 < 3 < 3 < 9 < 3 10/07/86 0.3 i 862057 10/21/86 < 0.3 < 6 < 5 < 5 < 18 4

< < 4 < 3 < 3 < 11 < 2 862159 11/04/86 0.2 862253 11/18/86 < 0.2 < 4 < 4 < 4 < 12 4

< 0.2 < <.4 < 4 < 15 < 3

862386 12/09/86 4 862432 12/16/86 < 0.3 < 7 < 6 < 6 < 22 5 i

• Low level Analysis

l i

TABLE B-11 (Cont.)

MILK :

, IODINE-131 AND GAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSES (AP&L RESULTS)

SAMPLE IDCATION: MKQ-50 UNITS: pCi/L COLLECTION LAB NO. DATE I-131* I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 860020 01/06/86 < 0.4 < 5 < 5 < 4 < 15 < 4 860136 01/21/86 < 0.4 < 3 < 3 < 3 < 11 < 2 I 860197 02/03/86 < 0.3 < 5 < 4 < 4 < 15 < 5

~ 860263 02/18/86 < 0.3 < 6 < 5 < 4 < 16 < 3  ;

8 860342 03/04/86 < 0.4 < 5 < 5 < 5 < 15 < 4 '

860436 03/17/86 < 0.2 < 5 < 4 < 4 < 16 < 3 860562 04/07/86 < 0.5 < 4 < 3 < 3 < 11 < 3 860685 04/21/86 < 0.3 < 3 < 3 < 3 < 10 < 2 -

05/05/86 SAMPLE IDST IN SHIPMENT 860922 05/19/86 1.4+/-0.2 < 6 < 5 < 4 < 16 < 4 t

• Low Level Analysis

TABLE B-11 (Cont.)

MILK :

IODINE-131 AND GAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSES (AP&L RESULTS)

SAMPLE LOCATION: MKQ-45 UNITS: pCi/L COLLECTION LAB NO. DATE I-131* I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 861108 06/11/86 < 0.4 < 4 < 3 5+/- 2 < 10 < 3 861158 06/16/86 < 0.3 < 5 < 4 5+/- 3 < 14 < 3 861359 07/07/86 < 0.8 < 4 < 4 < 4 < 12 < 3 861476 07/21/86 < 0.5 < 4 < 4 < 3 < 12 < 3 861547 08/05/86 < 0.4 < 3 < 3 3+/- 2 < 9 < 2 861635 08/18/86 < 0.3 < 6 < 5 < 5 < 18 < 4 C 861714 09/02/86 < 0.4 < 6 < 5 < 5 < 18 < 4 861784 09/15/86 < 0.3 < 4 < 3 6+/- 2 < 11 < 3 861934 10/06/86 < 0.3 < 4 < 4 4+/- 1 < 12 < 3 862058 10/21/86 < 0.4 < 7 < 7 < 6 < 22 < 5 862160 11/04/86 < 0.2 < 5 < 5 < 4 < 16 < 3 862254 11/18/86 < 0.2 < 5 < 5 6+/- 2 < 15 < 4 12/09/86 SAMPLE UNAVAILIBLE 862433 12/15/86 < 0.2 < 4 < 3 < 4 < 12 < 3 i

• Low Level Analysis

, TABLE B-12

' FISH :

GAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSIS (AP&L RESULTS) i $ AMPLE LOCATION: ALL UNilS: pCl/Kg i COLLECTION LAs m _ ; SMI. I.O. DAli SAfl. TYPE em-54 Co 58 Fe-59 Co 60 2n 65 Cs-134 Cs 137 460062 FR 1 05/13/86 SLUE CATFISN < 3 < 4 < 11 < 4 < 8 < 4 < 4 MOM 4 FN-1 05/13/M

• GASPAR GOO < 17 < 20 < 4 < 20 < 39 < 19 < 19 M0063 FN-1 05/13/M YELLOW CATFISN #- to < 11 < 3 < 11 < 23 < 11 < 10 11/97/M *GAsPtJ GOO < 10 < 11 < 26 < 24 4 30 < 12 < 12

[ 362181 FN-1 862182 FN 1 11/97/M puJLLET < 28 4 29 4 47 < 29 < 63 < 32 < 29 862180 FN 1 11/07/M $NAD < 15 < 15 < 34 < 16

• 31 < 16 < 15 N0067 FN-2 05/13/M eLIE CATFism < 38 < 42 < 9 < 42 < 84 < 41 < 38 N0066 FN 2 05/13/M *GASPAR eDO < 6 < 7 c 15 < T < 16 < 6 < 6 860065 FN 2 05/13/M YELLOW CATFISM < S < & < 14 < 6 < 11 < 5 < 5 862185 FN-2 11/07/M CATFISN < 19 < 20 < 43 < 20 < 40 < 20 < 19 862185 FN 2 11/07/ M DeuN < 21 < 22 < 48 < 22 < 43 < 24 < 21 362184 FN-2 11/0T/ M SNAS < 24 < 26 < 54 < 27 < 50 < 29 < 25

• Also known as gaspergou.

- TABLE B-13 BROAD LEAF VEGETATION :

IODINE-131 AND GAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSES (TELEDYNE RESULTS)

(pCl/kg WET)

STATION - BLB-1 FEBRUARY MARCH APHIL JANUARY 04/29 01/30 02/25 03/25 DATE COLLECTE0:

RAOIOCHEMICAL ANALV515:

E 00 L.T. 9. E 00 L.T. 6. E 00 1-131 L.T. 4. E 00 L .T . 6.

GAMMA SPECTRUM ANALV515:

2.59 tl.10E 02 6.07 11.39E 02 9.92 to.99E 02 BE-7 8.94 tl.33E 02 4.64 10.46E 03 4.76 10.48E 03 8.52 20.85E 03 K-40 5.69 to.57E 03

1. E 01 L.T. 1. E 01 L.T. 8. E 00 N MM-54 L.T. 1. E 01 L.T.

L.T. 1. E 01 L.T. 1. E 01 L.T. 1. L 01 L.T. 9. E 00 CO-58 E 01 L.T. 3. E 01 L.T. 3. E 01 L.T. 2. E 01 FE-59 L.T. 3.

1. E 01 L.T. 1. E 01 L.T. 9. E 00 CO-60 L.T. 2. E 01 L.T.

3. E 01 L.T. 2. E 01 L.T. 2. E 01 ZN-65 L.T. 4. E 01 L.T.

1. E 01 L.T. 9. E 01 L.T. 9. L 00 ZR-95/NB-95 L.T. 1. E 01 L.T.

1. E 01 L.T. 1. E 01 L.T. 1. E 01 RU-103 L.T. 2. E 01 L.T.

1. E 02 L .T . 8. E 02 L.T. 7. E 01 RU-106 L .T . 1. E 02 L.T.

2. E 01 L.T. 2. E 01 L.T. 2. L 01 1-131 L.T. 2. E 01 L.T.

1. E 01 L.T. 9. E 01 L.T. 1. E 01 CS-134 L .T . 2. E 01 L.T.

1. E 01 L .T . 9. E 01 L.T. 8. L 00 CS-137 L.T. 1. E 01 L.T.

1. E 01 L.T. 1. E 01 L.T. 1. L 01 BA-140/LA-140 L.T. 1. E 01 L.T.

L .T . 3. E 01 L.T. 2. E 01 L.T. 2. E 01 CE-141 L.T. 3. E 01

1. E 02 L.T. 7. E 02 L.T. 7. E U1 CE-144 L .T . 1. E 02 L.T.

3. E 02 L.T. 2. E 02 L.T. 2. E O2 RA-226 L.T. 4. E 02 L.T.

3. E 01 L.T. 2. E 01 L.T. 2. E 01 TH-228 L.T. 3. E 01 L.T.

L.T. means less than.

TABLE B-13 (Cont.)

BROAD LEAF VEGETATION :

, IODINE-131 AND GAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSES l

(TELEDYNE RESULTS)

(pCl/kg WE T)

, STAil0N - blQ-1 JANUARY FE8RUARY MARCH APHIL DATE COLLECTED: 01/30 02/25 03/25 04/29

, RADI0 CHEMICAL ANALYSIS:

l l-131 L.T. 5. E 00 L.T. 4. E 03 L.T. 8. E 00 L.T. 7. L 00 GAMMA SPECTRUM ANALVSIS:

BE-7 8.25 kl.28E 02 2.25 10.76E 02 1.13 10.82E 02 8.68 tl.14E 02 K-40 4.45 20.45E 03 4.88 10.49E 03 4.93 to.49E 03 6.81 to.6bt UJ MN-54 L.T. 2. E 01 L.T. 1. E 01 L.T. 8. E 00 L.T. 1. E 01

" E 00 CO-58 L.T. 2. E 01 L.T. 1. E 01 L.T. 8. L.T. 1. E 01 FE-59 L.T. 3. E 01 L.T. 2. E 01 L.T. 2. E 01 L.T. 3. E 01 C0-60 -

L.T. 2. E 01 L.T. 1. E 01 L.T. 1. E 01 L.T. 1. L 01 ZN-65 L.T. 3. E 01 L.T. 2. E 01 L.T. 2. E D1 L.T. 3. L 01 ZR-95/N8-95 L.T. 2. E 01 L.T. 1. E 01 L.T. 1. E 01 L.T. 1. 5 01 RU-103 L.T. 2. E 01 L.T. 1. E 01 L.T. 1. E 01 L.T. 1. E 01 RU-106 L.T. 2. E 02 L.T. 9. E 01 L.T. 8. E 01 L.T. 1. E U2 I-131 L.T. 2. E 01 L.T. 1. E 01 L.T. 2. E 01 L.T. 3. L 01 CS-134 L.T. 2. E 01 L.T. 1. E 01 L.T. 9. E 00 L.T. 1. E 01 CS-137 L.T. 2. E 01 L.T. 1. E 01 L.T. 9. E 00 L.I. 1. E 01 BA-140/LA-140 L.T. 2. [ 01 L.T. 1. E 01 L.T. 1. E 01 L.T. 2. E 01 CE-141 L.T. 3. E 01 L.T. 2. E 01 L.T. 2. E 01 L.T. 2. E 01 CE-144 L.T. 1. E 02 L.T. 7. E 01 L.T. 7. E 01 L.T. 8. E 01 RA-226 L.T. 4. E 02 L.T. 2. E 02 L.T. 2. E 02 L.T. 3. E 02 TH-228 L.T. 4. E 01 L.T. 2. E 01 L.T. 2. E 01 L.T. 2. E 01 L.T. means less than.

. - . - .- . - .__ - . _ ~ _ _- - -

l l

l TABLE B-13 (Cont.)

BROAD LEAF VEGETATION :

IODINE-131 AND GANNA ISOTOPIC ANALYSES (TELEDYNE RESULTS)

(pCl/kg WET)

STATION - BLK-15 I

JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APkiL DATE COLLECTE0: 01/30 02/25 03/25 04/29 RADI0 CHEMICAL ANALV5l5:

1-131 . L.T. 5. E 00 (a) L.T. 7. E 00 L.T. 6. E 00 GAMMA SPECTRUM ANALYSIS:

BE-7 1.40 to.15E 03 3.23 10.88E 02 7.85 to.97E 02 l

K-40 8.01 10.80E 03 3.73 10.37E 03 7.43 to.74E u3 l

l MM-54 L.T. 1. E 01 L.T. 1. E 01 L.T. 1. E 01 7 C0-58 L.T. 1. E 01 L.T. 1. E 01 L.T. 1. E 01 FE-59 L.T. 3. E 01 L.T. 2. E 01 L.T. 3. E 01 CO-60 L.T. 2. E 01 L.T. 1. E 01 L.T. 1. E 01 ZN-65 L.T. 4. E 01 L.T. 2. E 01 L.T. 3. E 01 ZR-95/N8-95 L.T. 1. E 01 L.T. 1. E 01 L.T. 1. E 01 RU-103 L.T. 1. E 01 L.T. 1. E 01 L.T. 1. E 01 RU-106 L.T. 1. E 02 L.T. 9. E '01 L.T. 9. E 01 1-131 L.T. 2. E 01 L.T. 2. E 01 L.T. 3. E 01 C5-134 L.T. 1. E 01 L.T. 1. E 01 L.T. 1. E 01 C5-137 L.T. 2. E 01 L.T. 1. E 01 L.T. 1. E ol' BA-140/LA-140 L.T. 1. E 01 L.T. 1. E 01 L.T. 2. E 01 CE-141 L.T. 3. E 01 L.T. 2. E U1 L.T. 2. E 01 CE-144 L.T. 1. E 02 L.T. 7. E 01 L.T. 8. E 01 RA-226 L.T. 4. E 02 L.T. 2. E 02 L.T. 2. E 02 TH-228 L.T. 3. E 01 L.T. 2. E 01 L.T. 2. t 01 (a) Sample unavailable due to lack of vegetation.

L.T. means less than.

i l

I TABLE B-13 (Cont.)

BROAD LEAF VEGETATION :

i i IODINE-131 AND GAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSES (APEL RESULTS)

SAMPLE IDCATION: BLB-1 UNITS: pCi/Kg COLLECTION IAB NO. DATE Ru-103 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137

< 17 < 20 < 19 < 17 860171 01/30/86 < 10 < 9 860308 02/25/86 < 9 < 11

< 10 < 12 < 12 < 10 860473 03/25/86

< 7 < 9 < 8 < 7 860722 04/29/86 860980 05/27/86 20+/-12 175+/-16 < 16 27+/-12

< 20 < 23 < 22 < 20 861211 06/24/86

< 9 < 10 < 9 < 9 861493 07/24/86 < 21 < 19 < 17 4

861675 08/27/86 < 18

< 17 < 21 < 19 < 17 861885 09/30/86

< 19 < 23 < 22 < 19 862104 10/28/86 < 8 < 7 862315 11/27/86 < 7 < 11 1

< 15 < 25 < 16 < 14 l 862532 12/26/86 e

i i

TABLE B-13 (Cont.)

BROAD LEAF VEGETATION :

? IODINE-131 AND GAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSES (AP&L RESULTS)

BLQ-1 UNITS: pCi/Kg SAMPLE LOCATION:

COLLECTION DATE Ru-103 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 LAB NO.

< 7 < 8 < 8 < 7 860170 01/30/86 < 18 < 18 < 16 860309 02/25/86 < 16

< 18 < 23 < 20 < 18 860472 03/25/86

< 13 < 16 < 14 < 13 860723 04/29/86 < 14 24+/-11 860981 05/27/86 12+/- 8 243+/-16 < 15

< 15 < 19 < 17 l

861213 06/24/86

< 11 < 14 < 13 < 11 861494 07/24/86 < 16 < 14 < 12 861677 08/27/86 < 13

< 13 < 16 < 16 < 13 861887 09/30/86

< 12 < 16 < 14 < 12 862106 10/28/86 < 15 < 12 < 11 862314 11/28/86 < 11

< 19 < 30 < 18 < 18 862531 12/26/86 1

- - - . - . . _ . . _ ~ . - _ .

l t

4 l TABLE B-13 (Cont.)

] , BROAD LEAF VEGETATION :

i IODINE-131 AND GAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSES I (AP&L RESULTS) f UNITS: pCi/Kg j SAMPLE IDCATION: BLK-15 i

COLLECTICII IAB NO. DATE Ru-103 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 j 01/30/86 INSUFFICENT SAMPLE AVAIIAB12

, 02/25/86 INSUFFICENT SAMPLE AVAIIABIA 860474 03/26/86 < 16 < 19 < 18 < 17 O < 15 < 20 < 17 < 14 j 860721 04/29/86 '

i 861011 05/29/86 40+/-10 113+/-15 23+/-11 40+/- 9 861212 06/24/86 < 23 < 26 < 25 < 26 i < 15

861495 07/24/86 < 15 < 17 < 16 j 861676 08/27/86 < 14 < 17 < 15 < 15 j 861886 09/30/86 < 21 < 26 < 21 < 21 862105 10/28/86 < 20 < 25 < 21 < 19 862316 11/27/86 < 11 < 16 < 11 < 10

, 862533 12/26/86 < 11 < 17 < 12 < 10 '

6 1

2 l

i i t 1

1 i

TABLE B-14 l ,

FOOD / GARDEN CROPS :

' IODINE-131 AND GAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSES (AP&L RESULTS) ,

i FPP-1 UNITS: poi /Kg SAMPLE IDCATION:

I COLLECTION Ru-103 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 LAB NO. DATE

< 7 < 10 < 8 < 6 862047 10/17/86 C

=

i a

1

)

l l

I i

i 1

I I

1 i

d 1

h i

l 4

4 APPENDIX C I

SUMMARY

OF UNAVAIIABLE SAMPLES AND MISSED LOWER LIMITS OF DETECTION <

l 1

i 4

J l 3

i i

i n

1 i

119 l

TABLE C-1

SUMMARY

OF UNAVAILABLE SAMPLES AND MISSED LOWER LIMITS OF DETECTION DURING Tile PERIOD OF JANUARY 1 TO MARCH 31, 1986 EIrlAIIAT1081 or SAstLE UttAVAllMILITY DATE OIL MISSED LID AIIALYSIS LOCATIGH SAlet.E DIEDIA Cross seta, I-131 APC-1 01/27/86-02/03/86 Sampler malfunctions no sample collected.

1. Atmospheric Cross Seta, I-131 Arc-1 02/03/86-02/10/86 sampler malfunctioni no sample collected.

2. Atmospherte c-. January to March Iso samples available cows did not supply y 3. Milk I-I31, samma pag-l milk for human consumption.

1-131, Caamme NKE-4 January to March Iso samples available, goate not lactating.

4. Milk 1-131, Camma BLE-15 February Iso sample available due to lack of Broad Imat Vegetation 5.

vetetation.

l l

TABLE C- 2

SUMMARY

OF UNAVAILABLE SAMPLES AND MISSED LOWER LIMITS OF DETECTION DURING THE PERIOD OF APRIL 1 TO JUNE 30, 1986 EIPt.ANATION OF SA M LE UNAVAILABILITY DATE OR MISSED 1.LD ANALYSIS LOCATI(El SAMI.E MEDIA Cross Beta, I-131 APC-1 04/15/86-04/21/86 Sampler malfunction resulted in lou sample l

1. Atnospheric volume collecteds r..ults tavalid.

Cross Beta, 1-131 ApC-1 04/15/86-04/21/86 Sampler malfunction resulted in lou sample

2. Atmospheric volume collecteds results invalid.

y N

" Cross Seta, 1-131 APC-1 04/21/86-04/28/86 Sampler malfunctions no sample collected.

l 3. Atmospheric Cross Beta, I-131 APC-1 04/21/86-04/28/86 Sampler selfunctions no sample collected.

4. Atmospheric Cross Seta, I-13I APC-1 04/28/86-05/05/86 Sample lost in shipment.

5. Atmospheric Cross Beta, I-13I APC-1 04/28/86-05/05/86 Sample lost in shipment.

6. Atmospheric APP-1 04/28/86-05/05/86 Sample lost in ehtyeent.

7. Atmospheric Cross seta. I-131 04/28/86-05/05/86 Sample lost in shipment.

8. Atmospheric cross seta. I-131 APQ-1 APE-30 04/28/86-05/05/86 Sample lost in ehtyeent.

9. Atmospheric Cross Beta, 1-131 Cross Seta, 1-13I APC-1 06/16/86-06/23/86 Sampler malfunctions no sample collected.

10. Atmospheric 05/06/86 Sample toet in shipment.

11. Milk t-131 Canna setQ-5 1-131, Camma Pe[Q-50 05/05/86 Sample lost in shipment.

12. Milk No samples available we did not produce milk I-131 Cam MKQ-1 April to June

13. Milk for human consumption.

1-131, Casmaa PetE-4 April to June No smoples available, goate not lactating.

14. Milk i

TABLE C- 3 SU) DIARY OF UNAVAILABLE SAMPLES AND MISSED LOWER LIMITS OF DETECTION DURING Ti!E PERIOD OF JULY l TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1986 EKFLANATION OF SAM LE INEAVAILABILITY LOCATION DATE OR MISSED LLD SAM LE MEDIA AllALYSIS Cross Deta, 1-131 APC-1 08/11/86-06/18/06 Sampler malfunction, no sample collected.

1. Atmospherte DMC-2 09/01/86-09/15/86 Sampler malfunctions no composite sample

2. Drinking / Surface Water 1-I31 was collected. Crab sample was obtained on 9/15/86.

w N I DWE-5 09/15/86-09/29/86 Sampler malfunctions no composite sample

3. Drinking / Surface Water 1-131 was collected. Crab sample was obtained on 9/29/86.

MtQ-1 July to September No samples availables cows did not produce

6. Milk 1-131. Casssa milk for human consumption.

MKE-6 July to September No samples available, goats not lactating.

5. Milk I-131. Ca m k

e

- . .. ._ _ _ __ _ .= - ,_. .- - .

TABLE C-4

SUMMARY

OF UNAVAILABLE SAMPLES AND MISSED LOWER LIMITS OF DETECTION DURING THE PERIOD OF f

OCTOBER 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 1986 l

EXPLAMATION OF SA M LE UIIAVAILABILITY 14 CAT 10BI DATE Oft MISSED LLD SAM LE peEDIA ANALYSIS Cross Beta, 1-131 APC-1 09/29/86-10/06/86 Sampler malfunction, no sample collected.

1. Atmospheric Cross Beta, 1-131 APC-1 10/09/86-10/13/86 Four day sample due to sampler malfunction.

2. Atmospheric Results were lavalid and not used.

U w

1-131, Comma W Q-65 12/9/86 Sample not collected due to scheduling

3. Milk problems with supplier. Vegetation sample collected during month of missed milk sample, 1-131, Caane WQ-I October to December no samples available cows did not produce  ;

4. Milk milk for human consumption.

5. Milk 1-131, Ca m IstE-4 October to December no sample available, goats not lactating.

e

TABLE C-5

SUMMARY

OF UNAVAILABLE TLD MEASUREMENTS DURING THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 1986 4

1 1

LOCATION QUARTER EXPLANATION i D-5 First TLD Stolen.

G-2 First TLD Stolen Replaced 3/6/86.

j B-4 Second TLD Stolen.

a F-4 Second TLD Stolen.

N-1 Second TLD Stolen Replaced 5/1/86.

l 1 P-1 Second TLD Stolen, Replaced 5/1/86. ,

R-6 Second TLD Stolen Replaced 6/4/86.

H-6 Fourth Damaged Phosphors. '

l j N-1 Fourth -

TLD Stolen.

I i

F

.A l

\

l

' 124 4

i

_ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ , - _ _ . _ _ _ - . _ . _ _ . _ . ~_ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ .

-A m a. a

w. c a a _h . m a m _ m s.n_-. - .. w h

4 4

I i

a J

i APPENDIX D

SUMMARY

OF INTERLABORATORY COMPARISONS l

l r

e f

l 125 i

..m . . _ - _ _ _ _ . . . - - , . _ ._ . . - - _ _

TABLE D-1 I US EPA CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM RESULTS FOR 1986 l

l (AP&L RESULTS)

EPA PREP 'DATE EPA EPA AP&L NORM DEV DATE ISSUED RESULTS MEDIA NUCLIDE RESULTS RESULTS KNOWN 01/08/86 04/08/86 Water Gross 3 2.66 -0.11 (pCl/t) Gross 7 7.67 0.23 02/07/86 05/30/86 Water Cr-51 38 43.66 1.96 l l

(pC1/1) Co-60 18 19.33 0.46  ;

j Zn-65 40 44 1.38 l Ru-106 0 LT 20 -- i

! Cs-134 30 29.66 -0.11 1

l Cs-137 22 23 0.34 02/14/86 05/30/86 Water H-3 5227 4953 -0.91 j (pci/s) i 02/28/86 05/30/86 Milk I-131 9 8.67 -0.10 l l l

! (pci/1)

] 03/21/86 06/09/88 Water Gross 15 10 -1.73 (pC1/t) Gross 8 10.33 0.81 04/25/86 07/28/86 Air Part Gross 15 16 0.34 3

(pC1/m) Gross 47 52 1.73 1

1 Cs-137 10 9 -0.34 04/04/86 06/09/86 Water I-131 9.0 9.0 0

~

(pC1/2) . .

I 06/13/86 07/28/86 Water N-3 3125 2900 -1.08 j (pC1/1) l 1

l LT = Less Than

• • Greater Then a 2 Sigma

! *** Greater Then a 3 Sigma

}

126 l

TABLE D-1 (Cont.)

US EPA CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM RESULTS FOR 1986 (AP&L RESULTS)

DATE EPA EPA AP8t. NORM DEV EPA PREP ISSUED RESULTS MEDIA NUCllDE RESULTS RESULTS KNOWN OATE 04/20/86 08/11/86 Water Gross 17 12.33 -1.61 (pC1/s) Gross 35 33.66 -0.46 Co-60 10 10.66 0.23 Cs-134 5 5 0 Cs-137 5 5.67 0.23 05/23/86 06/30/86 Water Gross 8 5 -1.03 (pci/s) Gross 15 13.33 -0.58 06/06/86 08/11/86 Water Cr-51 0 LT 37 --

(pC1/t) Co-60 66 67 ,

0.34 Zn-65 86 89 1.03 Ru-106 50 51.67 0.58 1 Cs-134 49 48 -0.34 Cs-137 10 10 0 06/27/86 10/03/86 Milk I-131 41 46.7 1.63 (pci/s) Cs-137 31 36 1.73 K 1600 1633.3 0.72 08/08/86 niater I-131 45 45 0 (pC1/A)

Air Gross 22 22 0 09/12/86 12/11/86 Filter Gross 46 69.7 1.27 3

(pC1/m) ._

Cs-137 22 20 -0.69

• LT = Less Thaa

• • Greater N n 2 2 Sigma i *** Greater Than 2 3 51gua 127 i

t .

TABLE D-1 (Cont.)

US EPA CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM RESULTS FOR 1986

( AP&L RESULTS )

DATE EPA EPA AP&L NORM DEV EPA PREP DATE ISSUED RESULTS MEDIA NUCL10E RESULTS RESULT 5 KNOWN 07/18/86 10/03/86 Water Gross 6 6.33 0.11 (pC1/t) Gross 18 19.66 0.58 09/19/86 11/28/86 Water Gross 15 16 0.34 )

(pci/1) Gross 8 9.7 0.58 10/10/86 12/11/86 Water Cr-51 59 51.7 2.54 1 (pC1/1) Co-60 31 31.7 0.23 Zn-65 85 87 0.69 Ru-106(1) 74 84 3.46 ***'

Cs-134 28 26.7 , 0.46 Cs-137 44 44 0 l l

10/17/86 12/11/86 Water H-3 5973 5750 -0.66 (pC1/t) l 10/22/86 12/24/86 Water Gross 40 33.66 -2.19

(pC1/1) Gross 51 43 -2.77 *'

Ce-60 24 28 1.38 i Cs-134 12 11.33 -0.23 Cs-137 8 10.33 0.81 10/31/86 02/09/87 Milk Cs-137 39 41.7 0.92 (pC1/A) 1-131 49 54 2.02

• K (2) 1565 1440 3.44 **

11/21/86 01/12/87 Water Gross 20 17 '1.03 (pC1/a) Gross 20 25.33 1.84 l LT = Less Than ,

! ** Greater Than 2 2 511pa

• • • Greater Than a 3 S' gas 128

TABLE D-1 (Cont.)

US EPA CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM RESULTS FOR 1986 (AP&L RESULTS)

(1) Ru-los is quantitated by accumulation of relatively few counts in the photo peak compared to the background baseline. This results in a large relative counting error. Because the other gaseia emitting isotopes in this sample were quantified within the 13 sigma control limits no errors in sample preparation or counting efficiency are suspected. No further action is planned.

(2) Two of the three gasmia detectors utilized contain a background K-40 peak.

During calculation of total K in the sample the estimate of the K-40 background was higher than appropriate for this sample which resulted in low quantification for K. In the future, for samples requiring quantification of K-40 or total K only the detection without a K-40 background peak will be utilized.

O k

129

. _.m _ _ _ __ . . _ _ . . . . _ _ , . . . . _ __ . _ . - . . . _ .

. . . . . , ~ .

i I

l l 9

TABLE D-2 i.

EICHTH INTERNATIONAL INTERCOMPARISON OF ENVIRONM NTAL DOSIE TER RESULTS (1985)

LP6L'S RESULTS (uR) (b)

DELIVERED EXPOSURRS (mR) ALL PARTICIPANTS RESULTS (mR) (a)

Uncertainty % Error (e) ND (f)

Estimate Uncertainty Nean SD (c) 1 SD(c) N (d) Exposure Laboratory Exposures 7 20.7 169 15.0 3.0 12.8 -0.35 From Cesium-137 (g) 17,2 g,9 16.2 3.4

+ [] Field ExpCentes (g) 29.2 -1.27 o 21.3 169 21.0 3.0

^'

29.7 1.5 28.9 6.2 Site I

' , 4.5 44.7 167 7.0 1.0 32.7 -0.69 10.4 0.5 10.1 i Site 2 (a) Results of all participants in the Intercomparison Study.

(b) Result s based on using Panasonic UD-814 AQ TLDs. ,

/

(c) SD stands for Standard Deviation 4 % SD stands for Percent Standard ,; [ Deviation.

(d) N stands for Number of results.

(e) % Error is a measure of how much LP6L's results dif fered f rom the estimated delivered exposures *

% Error - (LP6L's Exposure - Delivered Exposure) X 100 Delivered Exposure ,jj results.

., is a measure of how many standard deviations LP6L results were from all pstticipants'

(f) MD stande for " Normalized Deviation". It ND = LP&L Exposure

• All Participants' Results Nean /

A!! Participants' SD

. (g) Results of all datimeter types for all participants' results, k',

i

1 G

APPENDIX E SYNOPSES OF ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 4._.

131 L- , . . . , . . _ . -..-_.,-.,~_--,.,.--..~.,__r._ .-. - . . _ _,

t i

E-1.0 ANALYSIS OF SAMPLES FOR GROSS BETA ACTIVITY E-1.1 Air Particulates i After a delay of three or more days, allowing for the 1

radon-222 and radon-220 daughter products ' to decay', the l particulate filters were counted in a gas-flow proportional l j counter. 1 l

J l E-1.2 Water i

1 A known volume of water (usually one litar for Teledyne Isotopes and 200 milliliters for AP&L) was evaporated to near dryness, transferred to a two inch diameter planchet, and then evaporated to dryness. The planchet was then counted (50 minutes for Teledyne Isotopes and 100 minutes for AP&L) . in an automatic alpha-beta counter.

i E-2.0 ANALYSIS OF WATER SAMPLES FOR TRITIUM A known volume of water (1 milliliter for Teledyne Isotopes and 5 milliliters for AP&L) was added to a liquid scintillation

solution (20 milliliters for Teledyne and 15 milliliters for

! AP&L) in a 25 milliliter vial. The sample was then counted (100 l minutes for Teledyne and 500 minutes for AP&L) in a liquid l scintillation counter.

f  !

E-3.0 ANALYSIS OF SAMPLES FOR IODINE-131 i

j E-3.1 Milk and Water j For samples sent to Teledyne Isotopes, two liters of a

sample were first equilibrated with stable iodide carrier.  !

3 A batch treatment with anion exchange resin was used to remove iodine from the sample. The iodine was then stripped

{

from the resin with sodium hypochlorite solution, reduced l with hydroxylamine hydrochloride, and then extracted into carbon tetrachloride as free iodine. It was then back-extracted as iodide into sodium bisulfite solution and i precipitated as palladium iodide. The precipitate was

! weighed for chemical yield and mounted on a nylon planchet

{ for low level beta counting. The chemical yield was

, corrected by measuring the stable iodide content of the milk j or the water with a specific ion electrode.

l For samples sent to AP&L, up to four liters of a sample were thoroughly mixed with a stable iodine carrier solution. The i

132 i

! I i l sample was then eluded through an anion exchange resin l column to remove iodine from the sample. The iodine was '

stripped from the resin and processed in the same manner as described above.

E-3.2 Broad Leaf Vecetation For samples sent to Teledyne Isotopes, a radiochemical j analysis was performed. Stable iodide carrier was first added to a measured weight of chopped sample. The sample was then leached with sodium hydroxide solution, evaporated j to dryness, and fused in a muffle furnace. The melt was i

dissolved in water, filtered, and treated with sodium

hypochlorite. The iodine was then reduced with hydroxyl-

~

amine hydrochloride and extracted into chloroform. It was then back-extracted as iodide into sodium bisulfite solution I and precipitated as palladium iodide. The precipitate was weighed for chemical yield and mounted on a nylon planchet for low level beta counting. The chemical yield was corrected for the natural, stable iodide content of the sample by use of a specific ion electrode on a separatie j aliquot (without carrier added) of the sample.

For samples sent to AP&L, the iodine analysis was performed using gamma spectroscopy. The time between sample receipt and analysis was minimized as well as the sample size and i count times adjusted in order to attain the required lower i limit of detection. Refer to Section E-4.2 for a descrip-tion of the gamma spectroscopy procedure.

I l E-4.0 GAMMA SPECTROSCOPY ANALYSIS E-4.1 Milk and Water For samples sent to Teledyne Isotopes, a one litar Marinelli j beaker was filled with a representative aliquot of the

! sample. The sample was then counted for 1000 minutes with a i shielded Ge(Li) detector coupled to a computer based data I acqu-isition system which performed pulse height analysis.

! For samples sent to AP&L, a 3.5 liter Marinelli beaker was j filled with a representative aliquot of the sample. The

! sample was then counted for a minimum of 420 minutes with a shielded Germanium detector coupled to a computer based data acquisition system that performed pulse height analysis.

i 133 i

d E-4.2 Vecetation. Food and Garden Crons, and Fish As much as possible (without drying) of a vegetation, food, or garden crop sample was loaded into a tared Marinelli beaker and weighed. The sample was then counted (1000 minutes for Teledyne Isotopes and a minimum of 420 minutes 1

for AP&L) with a shielded Ge(Li) detector coupled to a com-puter based data acquisition system which performed pulse height analysis.

As much as possible (up to the total sample) of the edible

! portion of a fish was loaded into a tared Marinelli beaker

, and weighed. The sample was then counted (1000 minutes for j Teledyne Isotopes and a minimum of 420 minutes for AP&L) with a shielded Ge(Li) detector coupled to a computer based data acquisition system which performed pulse height analysis.

l i,

t i E-4.3 Soils and Sediment Soils and sediments were dried at low temperatures, leds than 100 degrees Centigrade. The soil or sediment was i loaded into a tared Marinelli beaker and weighed. The sample was then counted (at least six hours for Teledyne l Isotopes and at least four hours for AP&L) with a shielded 4

Ge (Li) detector coupled to a computer based data acquisition system which performed pulse height analysis.

4 E-4.4 Charcoal Cartridaes (Air Iodine) i j For samples sent to Teledyne Isotopes, charcoal cartridges

! were counted up to five at a time, with one positioned on l the face of a Ge(Li) detector and up to four on the side of the Ge(Li) detector. Each Ge(Li) detector was calibrated for both positions. The detection limit for iodints-131 of each charcoal cartridge was determined (assuming no positive

[ iodine-131) uniquely from the volume of air which passed through it. In the event iodine-131 was observed in the initial counting of a set of charcoal cartridges, then each cartridge was counted separately, positioned on the face of i

the_ detector.

i j For samples sent to AP&L, charcoal cartridges were counted

! in a Marinelli beaker, with one cartridge positioned on the face of a Germanium detector and up to six cartridges on the side of the Germanium detector. If no iodine-131 was detected, the detection limit for the batch of cartridges

counted together was determined using the smallest sample

} volume of the individual cartridges within the batch. If j iodine-131 was observed in the screening count of a set of

. 134

1 I

i l

l cartridges, each cartridge was then counted separately, l l positioned on the face of the detector. A separate counting l

. geometry was established for each Germanium detector.

E-4.5 Air Particulates The weekly air particulate filters for a quarterly composite from each field station were aligned one in front of another and then counted (at least six hours for Teledyne Isotopes i

and a minimum of four hours for AP&L) with a shielded Ge(Li) detector coupled to a computer based data acquisition system which performed pulse height analysis.

E-4.6 Comouter Software

. A computer software program defined peaks by certain changes in the slope of the spectrum. The program also compared the

! energy of each peak with a library of peaks for isotope l identification and then performed the radioactivity calcula-tion using the appropriate fractional gamma ray abundance, half life, detector efficiency, and net counts in the peak region.

I I

i E-5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL DOSIMETRY j Thermoluminescent Dosimeters (TLDs) manufactured by Panasonic (model UD-814AQ) were used for environmental dosimetry. The i

Panasonic TLDs contained one lithium borate and three calcium sulfate phosphor elements. However, only the calcium sulfate phosphor elements were used. An annealed dosimeter was placed inside a plastic bag and mounted in an aluminum frame prior to

placement n the field. The dosimeters were exchanged every i quarter. '1he exposures of the collected dosimeters were read

using an automatic TLD reader manufactured by Panasonic (Model i UD-710).

i I

1 j 135 j

e APPENDIX F STATISTICAL ANALYSES l

136

F-1.0 CALCULATION OF MEAN AND STANDARD DEVIATION The mean and standard deviation for different groups of analyses

• were calculated using the following equations:

i n* x 1

(F-1) x = I i=1 n, 1

3

'i fSEs st

• 2

(,x) (3)2 0.5 (F-2) s =

s k (nx - 1) )

where:

x = mean of sample population, i a = standard deviation of sample population, nx = number of samples in sample population, and xi = value of the i'th sample.

F-2.0 COMPARING TWO SAMPLE POPULATION MEANS The means of two sample populations can be compared for a statistical difference using the standard "t" test. The use of the test requires the assumption that the data within the populations are normally distributed and that the true standard deviations of the mean are equal for both populations. The standard "t" test tests the hypothesis that the true means of both populations are equal. The "t" value can be calculated from the equation below (obtained from the CRC Standard Mathematical Tables, 26th Edition (1981)):

1 G - y) l (F-3) t=

I(a,-1)e,2 + (my- 1)s y2)**3 fi 1 f3

? -+-

l k a, + s y -2 ) ( n, nf y

137 I

J

! where:

t= calculated "t" value, x= mean of first data set, j  ?= mean of second data set, nx = number of variables in first data set, s x = standard deviation of first data set, ,

ny = number of variables in second data set, and '

l s y = standard deviation of second data set.

If the data from both sample populations are treated as cor- '

i related pairs, the difference between individual measurements can be examined using the statistical "t" test. In this case, if the

. true means and true standard deviations for the sample popula-

! tions are equal, the difference between the correlated data

, points should be normally distributed about a mean of zero. The

! "t" value can then be calculated from the following equation

! (obtained from the CRC Standard Mathematical Tables, 26th Edition j (1981)):

i (F-4) M

" (*

ed I

j where:

d= the average of the difference between the cor-related data points from the two sample popula-tions:

1 N

! 7= I (st-yg)/s i=1 I xi= the l'th data point from population x,

yi= the i'th data point from population y, N= the number of correlated pairs of data points, n= degrees of freedom, for equation F-4, n=N-1, and 1

- sd= the standard deviation of the difference between i the correlated data points.

The calculated "t" value in both cases is used to test the hypothesis that the true mean of the first population Nx) is equal to the true mean of the second population (ny) assuming 7 that the true standard deviations of both populations are equal j

(rx = (y). The calculated "t" value is compared to a tabular "t" value shch that:

138

}

_ _ . _ , - _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ - - . - - -._. _ ,-.___ ,_ . _ . . _ ..~...._ _ _._, _ _ .-. _ ~ - _ _ _ .

i

a. if t>ta,n then reject the hypothesis when Mx y ,

{ b. if t<-t ,nm then reject the hypothesis whenM xqy, 1

j c. if ltl>tw/2,n then reject the hypothesis whenM x=4y, I

where td/ n and t n are the tabular "t" values, with a pre-I- selectedehror (5 ercent in this case), confidence level (1-es)

x i or and(1-d/2),

n=N-1 and fordegrees of freedon n (n=nTabular F-4, respectively). +nyvalues2 for Equation of "t" were F-3 i obtained from the CRC Standard Mathematical Tables, 26th Edition

(1981).

F-3.O TLD MEASUREMENTS The TLD measurements made during 1986 were grouped into cate-4 gories based on distance from the plant. The means and standard i deviations obtained for each category are given in Table F-1.

] The mean dose from the stations located more than five miles away from the plant were compared to the mean dose from stations  :

located within two miles from the plant and to the mean dose from  !

stations located between two and five miles from the plant usirig

, the standard "t" test. The "t" values were calculated using Equation F-3 and are given in Table F-1. Comparing the calcula-

tad and tabular "t" values show that the mean dose for stations  ;

i within two miles from the plant is statistically lower than the mean dose from stations located greater than five miles from the plant. The mean dose for stations located between two and five miles from the plant is statistically the same as the mean dose l for stations located more than five miles from the plant. l Ii

)

] F-4.0 GROSS BETA ACTIVITY ON AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS The means and standard deviations for airborne gross beta results l- obtained during 1986 from the control and indicator stations are

! given in Table F-2. The mean from each indicator station was compared to the mean from the control station using the standard "t" test to determine if there was a statistical difference. The calculated (using Equation F-3) and tabular "t" values for each indicator / control station comparison are given in Table F-2.

j comparing _the calculated and tabular values indicate that there 2

is no statistical diffs tence between the means from each indica-l tor location and the mean from the control location.

l F-5.0 GROSS BETA ACTIVITY IN MONTHLY DRINKING WATER COMPOSITES l The means and standard deviations for gross beta activity I detected in the monthly drinking water composites obtained during 139

1986 from the control and indicator stations are given in Table F-3. The mean from each indicator station was compared to the

, mean from the control station using the standard "t" test ~ to determine if there was a statistical difference. The calculated l (using Equation F-3) and tabular "t" values for each indicator /-

j control station comparison are given in Table F-3. Comparing the i calculated and tabular values indicate that there is no statisti-l cal difference between indicator stations DWG-2 and DWE-5 and '

j control station DWP-7 means. l I i q

i J

1 4 6

'l t

I 1

t r

(

I I

I 140

n a

- h t

_ s d e r el e t i t w aMn o c a l 1

o. 5 Pl y n 5 4 8 A A l sae 1 2 N N l

_ nhh 4 a ot t c i i t em t ar o s

_ t ur S cf i

t a

t s

s i

5 t

- n t 2 a n l a dP l e p

. t e ah 4 5 5 8 9 e ct 1 2 4 0 h o 3 9 0 t L m o 1 2 m sr - o nf r o f i s t e s al e t i l SM i m

S 2 t

e E -

t t S 0 i .

F 3 d e

S D t T E a WD L F c

o t

• D EP l

t )

R T n a n U A sa ( o SW el i A t l P 3 3 2 5 3 t E P i 1 6 8 9 a M u M e. 2 6 9 t R s D F 2 lE 5 3 r

1 L - -

- T E 0 m o F C o f F f; r E O A f n L T a B N S e A O I m T S D I e .

R T ht A S t n P a M D tl ap O E C P h U t e _

L O h A R et C C t I

T S s

n ae c u S N o i r I O s df T I in n A T ra i s T A ah e S T pt sl S m t i s) oe t l m m.

ir e Cr o

a u s5

) t t aq l

p om t e u

e

. t l e R n r l m dn ac a v . a eea

.h t

q ed S utl p Vn) t Dt l = e

. s a a " d .

e 9

nt d d/

r s l

V~h ti "f

5e 2

as ae d r r

e "t 't s ro n

g 0. or 0m W/se na a(

b a

" oo nm l aC t E de r t dir u%(

a S h et f b5 a9 rt

( t a at s T oa _

f c lS e o u l el chi u l t m l s

- ai Cw5 an vo

- i dt

- ea _

- st U s

- a O *e-Ii  !'  !

l l 4 i' I ')I

! lfl ' '

0

- 3 7 5 1 A A N N

- - 5 E 2 2

. P A

~

1 ,

- 7 3 1 A A Q 5 N N

~ P A

2 2 Y 1 T N - 7 3 1 A A I P 5 N N V O P 2 2 I A T 5 1 C 8 A 9 T 1

A A T R E O T B F S

S S S R O E R T 1 2 G L - 8 5 8 9 8

_ - I C 4 9 8 F F F P 2 2 1 9 O A E E 0 1 L N T

- B O A A S l T I U R C A I P T M R O A C P

- L A

R I

C A 1 I - 7 4 4 A A T N C 4 M N S O P 2 2

. I A _

T .

- A T

S

- n

_ i o

t na ot iS

- t ar

. et o n uSt t a

_ o l a

._ i e al c t l Voi e e a 3 rd ve

- ) i i " t n l c an) l b

v = t nI a m e * " o Ve c

/ D Co d i mC1 d

r 3, i

n deg t "t

" n i

f l p

- Mp a r t n) ai0 o p a

. d e l r3 rC

- '0 1

n a

b m

ua-cpE a

l%(

t t

- ( t u l mF u5 o S N aoA b9 n CC( a s

- T n a

e

- M A

M

-. $N

, m.% .A - m. ._- .: 4 5 . . 4 __..--...-% - --_h,..e.A ,, , awe da-. A __u...._ _ ~J I

7

• 7 "

I I i .

g 4 1

i l  !

I l m i

• 1 ~ ~ ~ a o 1 - 4 A 2 3

• g d 4

C j *

),

C l "d .

U

! n

! a $

' E o g i

- - I8 ~.

a a

~

=

a 5 a -  ; g

- g -

4 M

l bU

! uE C< R b N i

l $

~

1 j

84 g OM j$)

i 1

) j

)

$ #13 1.

- 1:_ . .e- _

1 (c ,

.j3 $4 8

~

Aq 43 2 'O4 i

1re l i

1 a

] ag c. v 3.e=

-gv F

-1 a- -

I 143

}

i i

9 APPENDIX G DUPLICATE SAMPLING PROGRAM RESULTS I

l e

144

l l

G-1.0 DUPLICATE SAMPLING PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

. During 1986, Louisiana Power & Light changed the contract  !

laboratory that provided analytical services for the REMP. l Teledyne Isotopes, located in Westwood, NJ, was the analytical i laboratory used since the beginning of the REMP in 1983. At the end of the first quarter of 1986, analytical services were changed to those provided by the Technical Services Department of Arkansas Power & Light (AP&L) located in Little Rock, AR. It was  ;

necessary, prior to changing laboratories, to determine if any i statistical bias or analytical discrepancies existed between the results obtained from the laboratories. Therefore, a duplicate sampling and analysis program was established during the first quarter of 1986 in order to compare laboratories and evaluate their results.

The duplicate sampling program involved collecting duplicate water, milk, vegetation, and shoreline soil samples. The samples were collected by following the collection and sample preparation procedures recommended by each laboratory. Due to limitations in  ;

equipment availability, it was not possible or practical to ,

collect and analyze duplicate air samples. .

The results for the duplicate samples that were analyzed by both  !

laboratories are presented side by side in Tables G-1 through G-7. A brief discussion of the results comparison by sample type is contained in the following sections.

i G-2.0 RESULTS COMPARISON f G-2.1 Air Samnles As stated previously, duplicate air samples were not collected. Instead, the results obtained from Teledyne Isotopes during the time Waterford 3 SE8 was in operation (1985 through the first quarter of 1986) were compared to those obtained from AP&L during 1986 (excluding data from i the period influenced by the Chernobyl incident).

The average gross beta activity detected on the air partic-ulate filters from all of the sampling locations analysed by 1 Teledyne during 1985 and 1986 was 0.021 pCi/ cubic meter.

The -average gross beta activity on the air filters from all of the sampling locations analysed by AP&L since June 30, 1986 through the end of the year was 0.020 pci/ cubic meter.

From this comparison, it is apparent that there was good agreement between the results reported by the-laboratories.

During the periods not affected by the Chernobyl incident, the airborne levels of iodine-131 were all below the lower 145

! limits of detection for both laboratories. The lower limits '

} of detection attained by both laboratories were comparable

! to one another. -

i G-2.2 Water Samples During the first quarter of 1986, the results obtained from the radiochemical analysis of biweekly drinking / surface j water samples for iodine-131 were all below the lower limits of detection (see Table G-1) . The lower limits of detection attained by both laboratories were comparable. ,

[ The biweekly drinking / surface water samples were composited i on a monthly basis at the respective laboratory and analyzed

{ for gamma emitters by gamma spectroscopy. No gamma emitters i were detected by either laboratory (see Table G-2). The i lower limits of detection attained by both laboratories for j the respective man-made gamma emitters were comparable. '

l 1 The monthly composites were also analyzed for gross beta

! activity. Gross beta activity was detected in all of the 1 samples analyzed (see Table G-2) . The average gross beta

activity reported by Teledyne for stations DWG-2, DWE-5 and j DWP-7 were 6.1, 4.6, and 6.2 pCi/1, respectively. The gross

! beta results reported by AP&L for stations DWG-2, DWE-5, and DWP-7 were 10.3, 3.73, and 5.2 pCi/1.

The discrepancies in these gross beta measurements are most  !

l likely related to the different analytical techniques used t at the laboratories. Teledyne Isotopes' filters the monthly I

composite samples to remove suspended sediment prior to analysis. AP&L does not filter the samples. Therefore, one ,

might expect that the results observed in the AP&L sample to i

be more variable due to fluctuating concentrations of i suspended sediment throughout the year. Examining the I

standard deviations of the data observed for the duplicate samples supports this assumption. The standard deviations of the results reported by Teledyne for stations DWG-2, DWE-5, and DWP-7 were 0.9, 0.3, and 1.3 pCi/1, respec-

tively. The standard deviations of the results reported by j AP&L for stations DWG-2, DWE-5, and DWP-7 were 11.4, 1.1,

and 1.4 pCi/1. Historically, it has been observed that

{ stattion DWG-2 has typically more suspended sediment than the j other stations. Therefore, before AP&L's gross beta

! activity results can be correlated with those reported by

) Teledyne over the previous years, more data must be col-i lected.

l The biweekly samples were also composited on a quarterly

basis by the respective laboratories and analysed for i tritium. All of the analyses were below the lower limits of l detection (see Table G-3) . Typically, AP&L was capable of j

146

i l-

{ achieving a consistently lower limit of detection than Teledyne. The limit of detection achieved by AP&L was comparable to that of the contract laboratory used during the preoperational program. Based on the LLD's achieved by AP&L, one should expect positive results to be reported in

future analyses since the LLD is near the natural background levels of tritium detected during the preoperational i program.

I Duplicate groundwater samples were analysed by both labora-i tories for tritium and gamma emitters. All results were

] below the lower limits of detection (see Table G-4).

t

G-2.3 Shoreline Soil Samnles I Shoreline soil samples were collected and sent to both

! laboratories for gamma spectroscopy analysis. Samples j collected at station SHWJ-1 had detectable levels of j aan-made radionuclides (see Table G-5) . Teledyne detected

! cobalt-58 and cesium-137 at concentrations of 38 and 104

pCi/kg-dry. AP&L detected only cesium-137 at a concentra-i tion of 67 pCi/kg-dry. The discrepancy between the results is most probably related to the technique used to collect the samples. A true duplicate sample was not collected.

Instead, two separate samples were collected from the shoreline at two adjacent locations rather than collecting one larger sample, mixing it, and then dividing into two aliquots.

G-2.4 Milk Samples

Duplicate milk samples were collected and analyzed by a j radiochemical procedure for iodine-131 and by gamma spec-1 troscopy at each laboratory. All man-made gamma emitters j were below their respective lower limits of detection for

all of the samples analyzed -(see Table G-6) . These lower

! limits of detection were comparable for both laboratories.

i With respect to the iodine-131 analysis, all but one sample l were below the lower limits of detection. The positive measurement reported by AP&L and its associated two sipa counting error was 0.7 +/- 0.6 pCi/1. Since the counting i error was almost as large as the result, the positive i measurement was attributed to counting statistics. There-i fore, the results reported by the laboratories were consis-l tent with one another.

! G-2.5 Broad Leaf Veaetation samnles l

[ Duplicate broad leaf vegetation samples were analysed for iodine-133 by a radiochemical procedure at Teledyne and by j gamma spectroscopy at AP&L. All iodine-131 results were below the lower limits of detection (see Table G-7) . The J lower limit of detection for the radiochemical procedure was 1

147 i

I 1

a consistently lower than the LLD by gamma spectroscopy.

i However, AP&L adjusted counting times and sample size as

well as minimized the time between sample receipt and analysis to achieve a satisfactory lower limit of detec-tion.

Both laboratories also analyzed the samples for other man-made gamma emitters by gamma spectroscopy. All results were below the respective lower limits of detection (see Table G-7). The lower limits of detection achieved by both ,

laboratories were comparable.

! G-

3.0 CONCLUSION

S Based on the results obtained from the duplicate sampling r program, with the exception of gross beta analysis on water {

samples, no major bias or analytical discrepancies were ob- '

served. The discrepancy between gross beta results reported for the drinking / surface water samples was apparently related to the different analytical techniques being used at each laboratory. , ,

1 Before the waterborne gross beta results received from AP&L can be correlated with those reported by Teledyne for prior years, l more data must be gathered. However, it is still possible to

] compara AP&L results obtained from the control and indicator i stations to one another.

i I

I f

a mm 148

-. - _ - _ . . . . _ _ _ . _ -_ _ . . _ - _ _ . _ . _ . . _ _ . .- . _ _ - . . - . _ . - _ _ . _ _ . ~.

l l

TABLE C-1 DUPLICATE SAMPLING PROGRAM RESULTS :

1-131 ANALTSIS ON DRINKINC/ SURFACE WATER SAMPLES e

STRTION COLLECTION (MTE TELEDYTE MRL START : STOP RESULTS HESILTS I-131 I-131 (pCi/1) (pCi/1) i f

l 136-2 12/23 : 01/06 <0.3 <0.3 I

01/06 : 01/20 <0.3 <0.3 01/20 : 02/04 <0.4 <0.2 i

02/04 : 02/17 <0.3 <0.4 02/17 : 03/03 <0.3 <0.3 E

• 03/03 : 03/17 <0.3 <0.4 03/17 : 03/31 <0.2 <0.3 03/31 : 04/15 <0.5 <0.3 DbE-5 12/23  : 01/06 <0.3 <0.3 01/06  : 01/20 <0.3 <0.3 01/20  : 02/04 <0.4 <0.2 02/04  : 02/17 <0.3 <0.4 l

02/17 : 03/03 <0.4 <0.3 03/03 : 03/17 <0.5 <0.3 03/17 : 03/31 <0.3 <0.4 03/31 : 04/15 <0.4 <0.4 IBF-7 12/23  : 01/06 <0.3 <0.3 01/06  : 01/20 <0.3 <0.3 01/20  : 02/04 <0.4 <0.3 02/04  : 02/17 <0.3 <0.4 02/17  : 03/03 <0.2 <0.3 03/03  : 03/17 <0.4 <0.3 C3/17 : 03/31 <0.3 <0.4 03/31 : 04/15 <0.5 <0.3

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ - - - - - - - - - _ _ - . _ _ - . , a

1 l

1 l

TABLE G-2 DUPLICATE SAMPLING PROCRAM RESULTS:

GROSS BETA AND CAltlA ISOTOPIC ANALYSES ON

' MONTHLT DRINKING / SURFACE WATER COMPOSITES GROSS SETA me-51 Co-SS Fe-59 Co-60 2n-65 2r/les-95 Cs-131 Cs-137 Se/Le-110 STATION LASSARTORY COLLECT 10el SRTE (pCi/1) (pci/1) (pci/1) (pci/1) (pci/1) t STOP (pCi/1) (pci/1) (pCi/1) (pCi/1) (pCi/1)

START l

l

<1 <5 <1 <5 <S <5 <5 <1 <10 ENAE-2 TELEDWNE 12/23 02/01 6.1+/-1.8

<9 <3 V <1 <1 <1 <10 02/01 03/03 5.2+/-1.8 <1 <1

<1 <1 (9 <1 W <5 <1 <1 <10 03/03 03/31 7.0+/-1.9

<5 (5 <9 <5 <!! <12 4 <5 <1 IBAG-2 fret 12/23 02/01 23.1*/-3.1 4 <3 <3 <6 82/01 03/03 2.5+/-2.4 <2 <3 4 <3 <6

<3 <3 4 <3 4 <7 <3 <3 <3 63/03 03/31 5.0+/-2.5 i

O I o <1 <1 49 <1 <S <5 <1 <1 <10 i INE-5 TELEWWIE 12/23 02/09 1.6*/-1.7

<1 W <1 <1 <3 <10 02/01 03/03 1.9+/-1.9 <1 <1 <9

<3 <1 <10 <1 <S <1 <1 <3 < 10 03/03 03/31 1.1*/-1.7

<3 <3 4 <3 4 4 <3 <3 <3 GBE-5 fret 12/23 3 02/tM 1.2*/-2.5

<1 <S <10 <1 <1 <9 02/01 03/03 1.5+/-2.5 <1 <1 (S

<2 <3 4 <3 <5 4 <3 <3 <1 S3/03 03/31 2.5*/-2.3 43 <3 <S <3 4 <1 <3 <3 <9 Ehr-7 TELEDWE 12/23 02/01 1.9+/-1.6 V <5 <1 <1 <10 i

82/01 03/03 7.5*/-1.7 <1 <1 <9 <3 l 41 <1 <9 <1 W <1 44 <1 <10 03/03 03/31 6.3*/-1.8

<1 <1 <S <1 <S <9 <5 <1 <1 Ehr-7 fret 12/23 3 02/01 4.7e/-2.6

<5 <12 <13 <6 <5 <11 02/04 03/03 6.S*/-2.6 <5 4 <12

<3 <3 <5 <2 <5 <6 <3 <3 <1 03/03 03/31 1.1*/-2.5 i

f

l J

}

TABLE C-3 DUPLICATE SAMPLING PROGRAM RESULTS TRITIUM ANALYSIS ON QUARTERLY DRINKING / SURFACE WATER COMPOSITES l

l STAT![Di LfEMERT(EtY rn i FCTIEDI (MTE H-3 STfutT : STEP (pCi/1) i

-j EndG-2 TELEDWE 12/23 : 03/31 <2000 DMG-2 fW%L 01/06 : 03/31 <250 C

~

(BE-5 TELEDWE 12/23 : 03/31 <2000 (BE-5 f54L 01/06 : 03/31 <250 z

IBF-7 TELEDWE 12/23 : 03/31 <2000 DW-7 f54L 01/06 : 03/31 <250 1

)

r k

4 I

h

} -

m. . . _. --. . ___ ___ _.._..________m_.._,

_ __m - __. ____.._._________.._.m . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ ___ _ _ ____ _..__ _ _ _ __ _ ____._ _ ____ _. . __ _ __-. . _ . . _ . . . _ _ - , ,

i TABLE C-4 9

DUPLICATE SAMPLING PROGRAM RESULTS:

TRITIUM AND CAIGUL ISOTOPIC ANALYSES ON GROUNDWATER SABELES Starless LagenetteY CaLLECTION SetE 10 - 3 h-54 Co ale Fe-59 Co-68 he-65 2r N 95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Se/t.e-11e Siserf : Sier (pCa/1) (pCs/1) (pci/1) (pCa/1) (pCi/1) (pCs/I) (pci/1) (pCi/1) (pci/I) (pci/1)

__=

<20e0 <5 <5 <30 <5 <30 <5 <5 <6 <7 GasJ-1 TELE 3 rte asen et/se Isen 04/29 <2988 44 44 <9 <3 <6 <4 <4 <4 <s areL 01/es <430 <3 <3 <6 <2 <6 <6 <3 <3 <5

- GesJ-1 Is/n y aun 09/29 4500 <5 <5 411 <5 <30 <13 <5 <5 <9

_ , - - r , c_, --,- -- __

l l

i l

1 40 S:

91

) >

7.1 " "

d$ 3 Qi a:

~5 by 9$$$

i l8 g g

83 0

sn( R g

v a As- g n  :

r h b geJ d Nw h U E E U Ull g_. g E SSSS '

UN b  ;

e E  !

g g d

j Y

h $$hk 8

153 u - _ _ ._ _ . _ - _ . . . . _ . . _ . , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ . _ _ _

TABLE C-6 DUPLICATE SAMPLINC PROGRAM RESULTS:

1-131 AND GA!GUL ISOTOPIC ANALYSES ON MILE SAMPLES STRTIED4 LfBWMTORY CM_LECTION DRTE 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba/La-140 STfu2T : STOP (pCi/1) (pCi/1) (pci/1) (pCi/1)

TELEDYtE MM  : 01/07 <0.1 <5 <4 <4 19 3 -5 MM  : 01/21 <0.2 <6 <6 <7 MM  : 02/04 <0.3 <6 <6 <5 MM  : 02/18 <O.1 <4 <4 <4 l

MM  : 03/04 <0.2 <5 <6 <7 l

MM  : 03/18 <0.2 <6 <6 <7 MM  : 04/08 <0.3 <8 <7 <7 MM  : 04/22 <0.5 <7 <6 <6 ftE-5 fML MM : 01/07 <0.3 <3 <3 <3

=[ N/R : 01/21 0.7+/-0.3 <3 <3 <3 M4  : 02/03 <0.3 <3 <3 <4 MM  : 02/18 <0.3 <3 <3 <3 MM  : 03/04 <0.4 <3 <3 <2 MM  : 03/18 <0.2 <6 <6 <5 l MM  : 04/08 <0.5 <3 <2 <2 MM  : 04/22 <0.2 <5 <5 <4 192-50 TF1FnYTE MM  : 01/06 <0.2 <5 <4 <4 MM  : 01/21 <0.2 <4 <4 <6 MM  : 02/03 <0.2 <8 <8 <7 MM  : 02/18 <0.1 <8 <7 <7 MM  : 03/04 <0.2 <8 <7 <9 MM  : 03/17 <0.2 <5 <6 <6 MM  : 04/07 <O.3 <5 <6 <7 M/R : 04/21 <0.5 <6 <6 <6 PEG-50 fML MM  : 01/06 <0.4 <5 <4 <4 MM  : 01/21 <0.4 <3 <3 <2 MM  : 02/03 <0.3 <4 <4 <5 MM  : 02/18 <0.3 <5 <4 <3

<5 <5 <4 l

MM  : 03/04 <0.4 MM  : 03/17 <0.2 . <4 <4 <3 MM  : 04/07 <0.5 <3 <3 <3 MM  : 04/21 <0.2 <3 <3 <2 1

TABLE C-7 DUPLICATE SAMPLING PROCRAM RESULTS:

I-131 AND CAP 9tA ISOTOPIC ANALYSES ON BROAD LEAF VECETATION SAMPLES S

STRTION LHBODRTORY CDLLECTION DATE 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 START : STOP (pCi/kg) (pCiAg) (pCi/kg)

BLR-1 TELEDYtE N/R  : 01/30 <4 <20 <10 N/A  : 02/25 <6 <10 <10 N/R  : 03/25 <9 <90 <90 N/R  : 04/29 <6 <10 <8 BLB-1 IW4L N/R  : 01/30 <20 <19 <17 N/R  : 02/25 <11 <10 <9 g N/R  : 03/25 <!2 <!2 <10 N/R  : 04/29 <9 <8 <7 l

BLD-1 TELEDYtE N/R  : 01/30 <5 <20 <20 N/R  : 02/25 <4 <10 <10 N/R  : 03/25 <8 <9 <9 M/R  : 04/29 <7 <10 <10 BLO-1 f5%L N/R  : 01/30 <8 <8 <7 N/A  : 02/25 <18 <18 <16 N/R  : 03/25 <23 <20 <18 M/R  : 04/29 <16 <14 <13 BLK-15 TELEDYtE N/R : 01/30 <5 <10 <20 N/A : 03/25 <7 <10 <10 N/R : 04/29 <6 <10 <10 IR.K-15 f54L N/R  : 01/30 ft) SIDH.E N/R  : 02/25 NO SiWH_E N/A  : 03/25 <19 <18 <17 N/R  : 04/29 <20 <17 <14

J n -. .__ , . - - . - . . ~ . , - - a -- a- .

a i

1 e

t 4

APPENDIX H RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RELATED TO THE CHERNOBYL INCIDENT

'I i

l l

156

7E f

H-

1.0 INTRODUCTION

During May and June of 1986, reactor produced isotopes were detected in REMP samples monitoring the airborne exposure pathway. An increase in airborne gross beta and iodine-131 activities were observed at both control and indicator locations following the April 26, 1986 explosion and subsequent fire at the Chernobyl reactor in the Soviet Union. Increased levels of airborne radioactivity throughout the United States were reported by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (Environ-mental Radiation Datt Report 46, EPA 520/5-87-004, September 1986). Increased levels of radioactivity (in precipitation) were first detected in the United States by the EPA monitoring network on May 4, 1986, at Portland, OR.

Due to the increased levels of airborne radioactivity, vegetation and milk samples also exhibited a brief increase in radioactivity concentrations during May and June of 1986. The intent of this appendix is to summarize these observations for future ref-erence. All of the 1986 REMP data that showed radioactivity levels influenced by the Chernobyl incident are summarized in Table H-1.

H-2.0 AIR SAMPLE RESULTS During the period following the Chernobyl incident, from May 5 through June 30, 1986, elevated levels of airborne radioactivity were detected in environmental samples obtained at both control and indicator locations.

The average weekly gross beta activity detected during this period for stations APC-1, APG-1, APP-1, APQ-1, and APE-30 were 0.068, tively.

0.075, 0.071, 0.071, and 0.077 pCi/ cubic meter, respec-The weekly measurements reported for samples from all locations ranged between 0.023 to 0.128 pCi/ cubic meter. The average weekly gross beta activity observed during this period for all indicator locations was 0.071 pCi/ cubic meter compared to an avenge of 0.077 pCi/ cubic meter for the control station.

The average weekly iodine-131 concentrations detected during this period for stations APC-1, APG-1, APP-1, APQ-1, and APE-30 were 0.050, 0.047, 0.035, 0.043, and 0.050 pCi/ cubic meter, respec-tively. The weekly measurements reported for all locations ranged between 0.008 to 0.090 pCi/ cubic meter. The average weekly iodine-131 activity for all indicator locations during this period was 0.043 pCi/ cubic meter compared to an average of 0.050 pCi/ cubic meter for the control station.

Detectable levels of man-made radionuclides were observed on the quarterly composite filters from both control and indicator locations for the second quarter of 1986. The average quarterly concentrations for all indicator locations of ruthenium-103, cesium-134, and cesium-137 were 0.005, 0.003, and 0.006 pCi/ cubic 157 i'

. e meter, respectively. The quarterly concentrations of ruthen-ium-103, casium-134, and cesium-137 observed at the control

, location were 0.005, 0.004, and 0.007 pCi/ cubic meter, respec-tively.

I-I H-3.0 MILK SAMPLE RESULTS Iodine-131 was detected in both control and indicator location samples collected after the Chernobyl incident. The average iodine-131 concentration in the sample collected at the indicator location was 8 pCi/l compared to" 1.4 pCi/l at the control location. Upon inquiry of the control dairy operator it was determined that the dairy hard at the control location received a significantly higher percentage of stored ; feed compared to the herd at the indicator location. As a result, the control location was moved to another hard whose feed more closely matched the indicator hard.

Gamma , $pectroscopy results indi.cated casium-137 was present in

~

one sample collected at the indicator location at a concentration of 4 pCi/1. ,

~

H-4.0 BROAD LEAF VEGETAdION SAMPLE RESULTS  %

Iodine-131 was detected in all broad leaf vegetation samples collected during May of 1986. Theraverage concentration for the two indicator location' samples was 209 pCi/kg-wat compared to 113 pCi/kg-vet at the control location. The difference between the values most likely resulted from a combination of counting statistics and local variations in the atmospheric deposition rate.

The samples were also analyzed by gamma spectroscopy forcother man-made gamma emitters. Ruthenium-103 and cesium-137 wore detected in the samples obtained from the indicator location at average concentrations of 32 and 26 pCi/kg-wat, . respectively.

Ruthenium-103, cesium-134, and cesium-137 were detected in the

sample obtained from the control location at concentrations of 40, 23, and 40 pCi/kg-wet, respectively.

e-b i

s 158 s

4

- - - . . - - . - _ . - , , , , e --m--, .-

I g

j 333333' 333'3333 333333i 333333i 333333i

~ . . ~

M1l-S

=

333333" i 333333i 333333i 333333i 333333i  !

r n n v 7

, 9919994 1912294

... .. ... . . . ... 199119.(

. . .. 1111994 2111114 r . . r . ,

s t

, s= =ss- es : se "Isa .

lU E

~

0b$b008bbbb008bbbb008bbb0008bbbb003 seu =nus -ezu zma azsn

. .a M y ,

W C d E N "'**""

5 g nemenn nemmen . nom.nn nemonn

• b $$$$$$8 $$$$$$8 $$$$$$8 b$$$$$$ bbbhbbs E

E N"2IWN--

2R22"R-- 2 22.22

.. 4252."

... R:~4.9R.

m do IIIIIlIIIlIIlIIIlIIlIIIIIIIIIIIIIII meg a ssR at***2R

- sss sst s R mestt R 2t~~ 4 t Sega s sssR 2R s

8 888 833 $888883 E888888 E3.8 838 SEs3885 0 g . . . . .

C III.888I IIIIIII ,$

. g k II8(I88 8II88II 8884888 s

eg ym ~

RRs;'k-g 3 sRs g t" IR I'aa g ssa k" d" m- ssss 8. sss38. ss I ~s@> $ It' s ~a ~s@"R@88s o s"ss . sI" R gl ss

.E. "

i ci e

i R

i coe BB8 WWW

- w-.

m lG "I $$$

rer V= nlq w its

W 159 i

l1lf1 \

2 1 9 7 2 1 1

• 3 D D -

1 L - L - /

- L/ L / / e s <+ < + +

0 C 4 4 7 4 2 2 1

1 1 3 DD D D D 1 LL L L L -

- tL L L L /

s << < < <

• C 3 2

2 9 0 3 1 1 0 DD D -

1 LL L - / -

- Lt L / * /

u << < e 2

R 0 1 0 2 4 A

T A

D 54 2 6 6 15 D 1 1 .

E 1 T 3 - - - - - -

) A 1 // / / / /

. L - +* * * *

• t E I 3 3 n R 55 4 5 o 7 4 1 23 1 1 2 1 C L 1

( Y B

1 O

- N H R E

E H L C R B T F E A B )) ) ) ) )

T O cc c ( c c( c (

S ( ( (

Y S R O _

A R O

M M -

U S

66 6 6 6 6 99 9 9 9 9

// / / / / -

SO 73 9 7 7 9 S -

ET 20 1 2 2 2 E -

T // / / / / L A 56 5 5 5 5 SP --

D 00 0 0 0 0 EM LA N:  : : :  : : : PS -

O M I SA A R A A AY -

T // / / / / SL -

CM MN N N N N R -

EO YE LR LT LF KR O ER I C EU -

HD -

RR OO NR 0 5 FF OE 5 5 1 1 1 IB - - - - - DDD TM O O 9 O K EEE AU K K L L L RRR TM M M B S S III S UUU QQQ EEE RRR TTT R _ OOO I F _ NNN D R)

Eg SSS E) )

MS K1 Lk III SSS T L/ /

EI Ii Di YYY LM MCp RC LLL PU Op AAA M( ( R( NNM A B ARR S ...

abc 5o 11 l l!

l I

l

+ P. O. BOX 60340 LOUISI&ANA POWER LIGHT/ 317BARONNESTREET NEW ORLEANS, LOUISlANA 70160 *

(504) 595-3100 U$0kbIvsN April 29, 1987 W3P87-1030 A4.05 QA U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555

Subject:

Waterford 3 SES Docket No. 50-382 License No. NPF-38 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Enclosed is the subject 1986 annual report on radiological environmental monitoring which covers the period of January 1 through December 31, 1986.

This report is submitted per Section 6.9.1.7 in the Waterford 3 Technical Specifications (NUREG-lll7) of Appendix A to Facility Operating License No.

NPF-38. ,

1 V uly yours,

/W b'/6 K.W. Cook Nuclear Safety and Regulatory Affairs Manager KWC:BGM:ssf l

Enclosure cc (w/ enclosure): R.D. Martin, NRC Region IV hTC Resident Inspectors Office cc (w/o e nclosure): J.A. Calvo, NRC-NRR J.H. Wilson, NRC-NRR E.L. Blake W.M. Stevenson "AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER" u