ML20064L137

1993 Annual Environ Operating Rept

ML20064L137
Person / Time
Site:	Waterford
Issue date:	12/31/1993
From:	Burski R ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
W3B4-94-2115, NUDOCS 9403240145
Download: ML20064L137 (2)

Text

[

t e

M Entergy Operations,Inc.

= ENTERGY p .

H F. Durski m

W3B4-94-2115 A4.ll PR March 15, 1994 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk '

Washington, D.C. 20555 l

Subject:

Waterford 3 SES Docket No. 50-382 License No. NPF-38 Annual Environmental Operating Report - 1993

Dear Gentlemen:

Attached is the Annual Environmental Operating Report for the subject facility. This report is submitted pursuant to section 5.4.1 of the Environmental Protection Plan (Appendix 8 to the Operating License).

Should you have any questions regarding this report, please contact Michael L. Layton at (504) 464-3454.

Yours very truly, 1

l .

4#

()}\

R.F. Burs ~ [ki Director, Nuclear Safety RF8/MLL/jsf Attachment ,

i cc: L.J. Callan - NRC Region IV l D.L. Wigginton - NRC - NRR l

N.S. Reynolds l R.B. McGehee I H.L. Knudson - EPA 0 0 (j l J.D. Givens - LA DEQ / , 1 Od0C26 NRC Resident Inspector's Office l l l

9403240145 931231

• PDR ADOCK 05000382 R PDR ,

1993 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT This report describes implementation of the Environmental Protection Plan (EPP) for the calendar year 1993, and provides the information required by the EPP.

A. Summaries and analyses of the results of the environmental protection activities re f red by EPP subsection 4.2:

This section of the EPP provides protection of the two cultural resources areas on the Waterford 3 site. There were no activities which affected either the Plantation Overseer's House site or the Plantation Quarter's site, both eligible for the National Register of Historic Places, during this reporting period.

B. EPP noncompliances and the corrective actions taken to remedy them:

There were no noncompliances with the requirements of the EPP during this reporting period.

C. A discussion of chanaes in station desian or operation. tests. or experiments made in accordance with the EPP subsection 3.1 which included a potentially sianificant unreviewed environmental auestion:

There were no changes in station design, operation, tests or experiments conducted that are reportable under this section during this reporting period.

D. Nonroutine reports submitted in accordance with subsection 5.4.2:

There were no nonroutine reports submitted in accordance with subsection 5.4.2 during this reporting period.

i l